tiotropium-bromide and aclidinium-bromide

Relevant publications related to medicinal and toxic aerosols are discussed in this review. Treatment of COPD includes a combination of long-acting bronchodilators and long-acting muscarinic antagonists. A combination of aclidinium bromide and formoterol fumarate was approved in the United States. The combination was superior to its components alone, as well as tiotropium and a salmeterol-fluticasone combination. Increased risk of an asthma exacerbation was reported in children exposed to electronic nicotine delivery systems. A smart inhaler capable of recording inspiratory flow was approved in the United States. The use of as-needed budesonide-formoterol was reported to be superior to scheduled budesonide and as-needed terbutaline for the treatment of adults with mild-to-moderate asthma. A survey among teens with asthma and their caregivers revealed a disagreement in the number of inhaled controller medications the teen was taking. Treatment with inhaled hypertonic saline resulted in a decreased lung clearance index in infants and preschool children with cystic fibrosis. Surgical masks were well tolerated and significantly decreased the burden of aerosolized bacteria generated by coughing in adults with cystic fibrosis. Inhaled liposomal amikacin in addition to guideline-based therapy was reported to be superior to guideline-based therapy alone in achieving negative sputum cultures in adult subjects with

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adolescent; Adult; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Asthma; Bronchodilator Agents; Budesonide; Child; Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems; Formoterol Fumarate; Humans; Nebulizers and Vaporizers; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Tiotropium Bromide; Tropanes

Maintenance bronchodilator therapy with long-acting β-agonists (LABAs) and long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) is the cornerstone treatment for patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) of LABA/LAMA are recommended for the majority of symptomatic COPD patients by global guidelines; regional guidelines such as the Japanese and Korean guidelines also provide similar recommendations for the use of LABA/LAMA FDCs. This review comprehensively describes the latest clinical evidence from key studies on the efficacy and safety of four approved LABA/LAMA fixed-dose combinations: indacaterol/glycopyrronium, vilanterol/umeclidinium, formoterol/aclidinium, and olodaterol/tiotropium. Additionally, in this review we describe the rationale behind the use of LABA/LAMA FDC therapy, key findings from the preclinical and clinical trial evaluation of respective LABA and LAMA monocomponents, and the efficacy and safety of LABA/LAMA FDCs. Special emphasis is placed on the clinical evidence for the monocomponents and LABA/LAMA FDCs from the Asian population. This detailed overview of the efficacy and safety of LABA/LAMA FDCs in global and Asian COPD patients is envisaged to provide a better understanding of the benefits of these therapies and to inform healthcare providers and patients on their appropriate use.Funding: Novartis Pharma K.K.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Asian People; Benzoxazines; Benzyl Alcohols; Bronchodilator Agents; Chlorobenzenes; Drug Combinations; Formoterol Fumarate; Glycopyrrolate; Humans; Indans; Muscarinic Antagonists; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinolones; Quinuclidines; Tiotropium Bromide; Treatment Outcome; Tropanes

Recent updates to the GOLD guidelines emphasize the use of combination LABA and LAMA bronchodilators for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with persistent dyspnea despite monotherapy or frequent exacerbations despite LAMA monotherapy. There are several commercially available LABA/LAMA fixed dose combination inhalers, which are likely to become the principle therapy for many patients with COPD.. In the last 4 years, there have been a number of large clinical trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of combined LAMA and LABA bronchodilators. LAMA/LABA fixed dose combination therapies have consistently demonstrated clinically significant improvements to airway obstruction, dyspnea, and quality of life whenever compared with placebo, and more modest improvements compared with bronchodilator monotherapies and combined bronchodilator/inhaled corticosteroid therapy.. New guidelines emphasize combination bronchodilators as a mainstay of therapy for many patients with symptomatic COPD and there are several new combination bronchodilator therapies available to patients. It is important for physicians and patients to understand the range and degree of expected clinical effects and the safety profiles of these new medications.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Benzoxazines; Benzyl Alcohols; Bronchodilator Agents; Chlorobenzenes; Delayed-Action Preparations; Drug Combinations; Formoterol Fumarate; Glycopyrrolate; Humans; Indans; Muscarinic Antagonists; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinolones; Quinuclidines; Tiotropium Bromide; Tropanes

The objective of this study was to estimate the relative efficacy and safety of fixed-dose combination aclidinium/formoterol 400/12 μg twice daily compared to tiotropium 18 μg once daily in adult patients with moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).. A systematic literature review performed in March 2014, using a predefined search strategy in MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library, identified 17 randomized placebo-controlled trials, (tiotropium n = 15; aclidinium/formoterol n = 2). Outcomes of interest were: bronchodilation (peak and trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)), COPD symptoms [Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI) focal score and % of responders (>1 unit improvement)] and Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) [St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score and % responders (>4 unit improvement)], % of patients with ≥1 exacerbations, adverse events (AE), serious adverse events (SAE), hospitalization and mortality, all at 24 weeks. In the absence of head-to-head trials between aclidinium/formoterol and tiotropium, a Bayesian indirect treatment comparison (ITC) was used with placebo as common control.. Regarding bronchodilation, aclidinium/formoterol was found to be more efficacious than tiotropium at peak FEV1, with mean difference in change from baseline (DCFB) 143 mL [95% credible interval (CrI): 112, 174] and at trough FEV1 [DCFB 26 mL (95% CrI -2, 55)]. Aclidinium/formoterol is expected to be more efficacious than tiotropium in improving dyspnea symptoms measured by TDI [DCFB 0.54 points (95% CrI 0.09, 0.99); odds ratio (OR) of responders 1.51 (95% CrI 1.11, 2.06)]. SGRQ results are comparable for aclidinium/formoterol versus tiotropium [DCFB -0.52 (95% CrI -2.21, 1.17); OR of responders 1.16 (95% CrI 0.47, 2.87)]. The ITC results suggest similar safety profiles regarding AEs, SAEs and hospitalization.. Based on the ITC, aclidinium/formoterol is expected to be more efficacious than tiotropium in terms of lung function and symptom control while providing comparable HRQoL results and safety profile.. AstraZeneca.

Topics: Bayes Theorem; Bronchodilator Agents; Drug Combinations; Dyspnea; Forced Expiratory Volume; Formoterol Fumarate; Hospitalization; Humans; Odds Ratio; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quality of Life; Severity of Illness Index; Tiotropium Bromide; Tropanes

Exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have important consequences for lung function, health status and mortality. Furthermore, they are associated with high economic costs, predominantly related to hospitalization. They are managed acutely with short-acting bronchodilators, systemic corticosteroids or antibiotics; however, a large proportion of COPD exacerbations are unreported and therefore untreated or self-managed. There is evidence to suggest that these unreported exacerbations also have important consequences for health status; therefore, reducing exacerbation risk is an important goal in the management of COPD. Current guidelines recommend long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) as first-line bronchodilator therapy in patients with stable COPD who have a high risk of exacerbation or increased symptoms. To date, three LAMAs, tiotropium bromide, aclidinium bromide and glycopyrronium bromide, have been approved as maintenance bronchodilator treatments for stable COPD. These all provide clinically significant improvements in lung function, reduce symptoms and improve health status compared with placebo in patients with COPD. This paper reviews evidence from randomized, controlled clinical trials demonstrating that tiotropium, aclidinium and glycopyrronium reduce exacerbation risk in patients with COPD. Reductions were seen irrespective of the exacerbation measure used, whether time to first event or annualized exacerbation rate. Furthermore, studies with aclidinium suggest LAMAs can reduce exacerbation risk irrespective of whether exacerbation events are assessed, using an event-based approach or a symptom-based method which includes unreported events. Together these results demonstrate that LAMAs have the potential to provide clinical benefit in the management of exacerbations in patients with stable COPD.

Topics: Clinical Trials as Topic; Delayed-Action Preparations; Glycopyrrolate; Humans; Muscarinic Antagonists; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Tiotropium Bromide; Tropanes

Randomized, controlled trials comparing long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) efficacy in COPD are limited. This network meta-analysis (NMA) assessed the relative efficacy of tiotropium 18 µg once-daily (OD) and newer agents (aclidinium 400 µg twice-daily, glycopyrronium 50 µg OD, and umeclidinium 62.5 µg OD).. A systematic literature review identified randomized, controlled trials of adult COPD patients receiving LAMAs. A NMA within a Bayesian framework examined change from baseline in trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), transitional dyspnea index focal score, St George's Respiratory Questionnaire score, and rescue medication use.. Twenty-four studies (n=21,311) compared LAMAs with placebo/each other. Aclidinium, glycopyrronium, tiotropium, and umeclidinium, respectively, demonstrated favorable results versus placebo, for change from baseline (95% credible interval) in 12-week trough FEV1 (primary endpoint: 101.40 mL [77.06-125.60]; 117.20 mL [104.50-129.90]; 114.10 mL [103.10-125.20]; 136.70 mL [104.20-169.20]); 24-week trough FEV1 (128.10 mL [84.10-172.00]; 135.80 mL [123.10-148.30]; 106.40 mL [95.45-117.30]; 115.00 mL [74.51-155.30]); 24-week St George's Respiratory Questionnaire score (-4.60 [-6.76 to -2.54]; -3.14 [-3.83 to -2.45]; -2.43 [-2.92 to -1.93]; -4.69 [-7.05 to -2.31]); 24-week transitional dyspnea index score (1.00 [0.41-1.59]; 1.01 [0.79-1.22]; 0.82 [0.62-1.02]; 1.00 [0.49-1.51]); and 24-week rescue medication use (data not available; -0.41 puffs/day [-0.62 to -0.20]; -0.52 puffs/day [-0.74 to -0.30]; -0.30 puffs/day [-0.81 to 0.21]). For 12-week trough FEV1, differences in change from baseline (95% credible interval) were -12.8 mL (-39.39 to 13.93), aclidinium versus tiotropium; 3.08 mL (-7.58 to 13.69), glycopyrronium versus tiotropium; 22.58 mL (-11.58 to 56.97), umeclidinium versus tiotropium; 15.90 mL (-11.60 to 43.15), glycopyrronium versus aclidinium; 35.40 mL (-5.06 to 76.07), umeclidinium versus aclidinium; and 19.50 mL (-15.30 to 54.38), umeclidinium versus glycopyrronium. Limitations included inhaler-related factors and safety; longer-term outcomes were not considered.. The new LAMAs studied had at least comparable efficacy to tiotropium, the established class standard. Choice should depend on physician's and patient's preference.

Topics: Aged; Bayes Theorem; Bronchodilator Agents; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Forced Expiratory Volume; Glycopyrrolate; Humans; Lung; Male; Middle Aged; Muscarinic Antagonists; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinuclidines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recovery of Function; Spirometry; Surveys and Questionnaires; Time Factors; Tiotropium Bromide; Treatment Outcome; Tropanes

Bronchodilators are the mainstay for symptom relief in the management of stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Aclidinium bromide is a new long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) that differs from tiotropium by its higher selectivity for M3 muscarinic receptors with a faster onset of action. However, the duration of action of aclidinium is shorter than for tiotropium. It has been approved as maintenance therapy for stable, moderate to severe COPD, but its efficacy and safety in the management of COPD is uncertain compared to other bronchodilators.. To assess the efficacy and safety of aclidinium bromide in stable COPD.. We identified randomised controlled trials (RCT) from the Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register of trials (CAGR), as well as www.clinicaltrials.gov, World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) website and Almirall Clinical Trials Registry and Results. We contacted Forest Laboratories for any unpublished trials and checked the reference lists of identified articles for additional information. The last search was performed on 7 April 2014 for CAGR and 11 April 2014 for other sources.. Parallel-group RCTs of aclidinium bromide compared with placebo, long-acting beta2-agonists (LABA) or LAMA in adults with stable COPD.. Two review authors independently selected studies, assessed the risk of bias, and extracted data. We sought missing data from the trial authors as well as manufacturers of aclidinium. We used odds ratios (OR) for dichotomous data and mean difference (MD) for continuous data, and reported both with their 95% confidence intervals (CI). We used standard methodological procedures expected by The Cochrane Collaboration. We applied the GRADE approach to summarise results and to assess the overall quality of evidence.. This review included 12 multicentre RCTs randomly assigning 9547 participants with stable COPD. All the studies were industry-sponsored and had similar inclusion criteria with relatively good methodological quality. All but one study included in the meta-analysis were double-blind and scored low risk of bias. The study duration ranged from four weeks to 52 weeks. Participants were more often males, mainly Caucasians, mean age ranging from 61.7 to 65.6 years, and with a smoking history of 10 or more pack years. They had moderate to severe symptoms at randomisation; the mean post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) was between 46% and 57.6% of the predicted normal value, and the mean St George's Respiratory Questionnaire score (SGRQ) ranged from 45.1 to 50.4 when reported.There was no difference between aclidinium and placebo in all-cause mortality (low quality) and number of patients with exacerbations requiring a short course of oral steroids or antibiotics, or both (moderate quality). Aclidinium improved quality of life by lowering the SGRQ total score with a mean difference of -2.34 (95% CI -3.18 to -1.51; I(2) = 48%, 7 trials, 4442 participants) when compared to placebo. More patients on aclidinium achieved a clinically meaningful improvement of at least four units decrease in SGRQ total score (OR 1.49; 95% CI 1.31 to 1.70; I(2) = 34%; number needed to treat (NNT) = 10, 95% CI 8 to 15, high quality evidence) over 12 to 52 weeks than on placebo. Aclidinium also resulted in a significantly greater improvement in pre-dose FEV1 than placebo with a mean difference of 0.09 L (95% CI 0.08 to 0.10; I(2) = 39%, 9 trials, 4963 participants). No trials assessed functional capacity. Aclidinium reduced the number of patients with exacerbations requiring hospitalisation by 4 to 20 fewer per 1000 over 4 to 52 weeks (OR 0.64; 95% CI 0.46 to 0.88; I(2) = 0%, 10 trials, 5624 people; NNT = 77, 95% CI 51 to 233, high quality evidence) compared to placebo. There was no difference in non-fatal serious adverse events (moderate quality evidence) between aclidinium and placebo.Compared to tiotropium, aclidinium did not demonstrate significant differences for exacerbations requiring oral steroids or antibiotics, or both, exacerbation-related hospitalisations and non-fatal serious adverse events (very low quality evidence). Inadequate data prevented the comparison of aclidinium to formoterol or other LABAs.. Aclidinium is associated with improved quality of life and reduced hospitalisations due to severe exacerbations in patients with moderate to severe stable COPD compared to placebo. Overall, aclidinium did not significantly reduce mortality, serious adverse events or exacerbations requiring oral steroids or antibiotics, or both.Currently, the available data are insufficient and of very low quality in comparisons of the efficacy of aclidinium versus tiotropium. The efficacy of aclidinium versus LABAs cannot be assessed due to inaccurate data. Thus additional trials are recommended to assess the efficacy and safety of aclidinium compared to other LAMAs or LABAs.

Topics: Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Aged; Bronchodilator Agents; Disease Progression; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Muscarinic Antagonists; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Scopolamine Derivatives; Tiotropium Bromide; Tropanes

Although there are some challenges with current therapies, the growing evidence that tiotropium bromide is important in the maintenance treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has led to enthusiastic investigation in search of novel muscarinic antagonists which share some of the beneficial characteristics of tiotropium and perhaps improve upon less desirable ones.. Aclidinium bromide is a new muscarinic antagonist that has been developed to relieve symptoms in patients with COPD. Preclinical data showed that it has an intriguing pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profile. Aclidinium bromide was initially assessed as a once-daily bronchodilator. Subsequently, it has been evaluated as a twice-daily agent to increase the size of the clinical effect. Pivotal Phase III trials have documented that aclidinium bromide 400 μg twice-daily shows clinically meaningful effects in lung function and other important supportive outcomes, such as health-related quality of life, dyspnea and night-time/early morning symptoms, and is safe.. Aclidinium bromide can to be used as an alternative to tiotropium or a long-acting β₂-agonist. It is likely that the device used to deliver aclidinium, Genuair inhaler, a novel, multidose and a breath-actuated dry powder inhaler (DPI), will be important for the possible success of this drug. However, additional Phase III trials to assess advantages over tiotropium bromide and long-acting β₂-agonists are required to allow the place of aclidinium bromide to be fully elucidated.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Animals; Bronchodilator Agents; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dry Powder Inhalers; Humans; Muscarinic Antagonists; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quality of Life; Scopolamine Derivatives; Tiotropium Bromide; Tropanes

Aclidinium bromide is a new long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) indicated for maintenance bronchodilator treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The efficacy of aclidinium was compared with tiotropium and glycopyrronium, using a network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in moderate-to-severe COPD patients.. A systematic review was performed to identify RCTs evaluating aclidinium 400 μg twice daily (BID), glycopyrronium 50 μg once daily (OD), tiotropium 18 μg OD, or tiotropium 5 μg OD in adults with moderate-to-severe COPD. The outcomes of interest were: trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1); St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score and proportion of patients achieving ≥4 unit change; Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI) focal score and proportion of patients achieving ≥1 point change. The results were synthesized by means of a Bayesian NMA.. Twenty-one studies (22,542 patients) were included: aclidinium 400 μg BID (three studies); tiotropium 5 μg OD (three studies); tiotropium 18 μg OD (13 studies); and glycopyrronium 50 μg OD (two studies). Regarding trough FEV1 at 24 weeks, aclidinium demonstrated comparable efficacy to tiotropium 5 μg (difference in change from baseline [CFB]), (0.02 L [95% credible interval CrI -0.05, 0.09]); tiotropium 18 μg (0.02 L [95% CrI -0.05, 0.08]); and glycopyrronium (0.00 L [95% CrI -0.07, 0.07]). Aclidinium resulted in higher improvement in SGRQ score at 24 weeks, compared to tiotropium 5 μg (difference in CFB, -2.44 [95% CrI -4.82, -0.05]); and comparable results to tiotropium 18 μg (-1.80 [95% CrI -4.52, 0.14]) and glycopyrronium (-1.52 [95% CrI -4.08, 1.03]). Improvements in TDI score were comparable for all treatments.. Maintenance treatment with aclidinium 400 μg BID is expected to produce similar improvements in lung function, health-related quality of life, and dyspnea compared to tiotropium 5 μg OD; tiotropium 18 μg OD; and glycopyrronium 50 μg OD.

Topics: Bayes Theorem; Bronchodilator Agents; Forced Expiratory Volume; Glycopyrrolate; Humans; Lung; Muscarinic Antagonists; Odds Ratio; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Recovery of Function; Scopolamine Derivatives; Severity of Illness Index; Tiotropium Bromide; Treatment Outcome; Tropanes

Long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) play a central role in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Previously, only one LAMA (tiotropium) was available for the treatment of COPD, necessitating the development of other therapeutic options due to the heterogeneity of COPD and patient responses to treatment. This article reviews the COPD management potential of aclidinium bromide, a LAMA administered twice daily (BID) by a multidose dry powder inhaler that is indicated for maintenance treatment of COPD. Aclidinium possesses kinetic selectivity for the M(3) versus M(2) receptor and is rapidly hydrolyzed in plasma to two major inactive metabolites, resulting in a low and transient systemic exposure and minimizing the potential for systemic side effects. A pharmacokinetic study with multiple doses of twice-daily aclidinium demonstrated the short half-life of aclidinium in plasma, suggesting that a steady state may be reached as early as the second day postdose. In a phase II study, twice-daily aclidinium 400 µg provided 24-hour bronchodilation, with significant improvements versus tiotropium during the second half of the day. In two phase III studies (ACCORD I and ATTAIN), both aclidinium 200 µg and 400 µg BID provided statistically significant improvements in trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) and other related lung function measurements. Improvements in peak FEV(1) on day 1 were comparable to those at study end, demonstrating that aclidinium provides maximal bronchodilation after the first dose that is maintained over time. Health status was significantly improved and dyspnea, nighttime and morning symptoms of COPD were likewise significantly reduced with aclidinium. Numerically greater improvements in efficacy were observed with the 400 µg dose compared with the lower dose, with similar safety profiles between the two doses and a low incidence of anticholinergic side effects. The approved therapeutic dose of aclidinium 400 µg BID is thus an effective new treatment option for patients with COPD.

Topics: Animals; Bronchodilator Agents; Delayed-Action Preparations; Dry Powder Inhalers; Humans; Muscarinic Antagonists; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Receptor, Muscarinic M3; Scopolamine Derivatives; Tiotropium Bromide; Tropanes

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is characterized by poorly reversible airflow obstruction. Long-acting bronchodilators improve lung function and relieve dyspnea. Aclidinium bromide is a novel long-acting antimuscarinic bronchodilator; Phase III clinical trials have demonstrated that administration of this drug twice per day improves lung function, dyspnea and health-related quality of life. Aclidinium bromide is delivered using the Genuair(®) device, which is an easy to use multidose dry powder inhaler. Aclidinium bromide is rapidly metabolized in the plasma, so there is low systemic exposure that minimizes the anticholinergic side effects. This new long-acting bronchodilator provides effective bronchodilation with minimal side effects.

Topics: Acetylcholine; Bronchodilator Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dry Powder Inhalers; Exercise Tolerance; Humans; Ipratropium; Muscarinic Antagonists; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Receptors, Muscarinic; Scopolamine Derivatives; Signal Transduction; Tiotropium Bromide; Tropanes

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is mainly treated pharmaceutically with bronchodilators. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical benefits of two-times-per-day aclidinium bromide (Acli-BID) compared with once-a-day tiotropium bromide hydrate (Tio-QD) in patients with COPD.. This study was a multicentre, open-label, randomised study.. Fourcentres in Kagawa prefecture, Japan.. Patients who were diagnosed to have COPD Grade 2-3 according to the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease 2015 criteria were enrolled.. Patients were randomly assigned to receive Acli-BID or Tio-QD at a 1:1 ratio, and followed for 8 weeks. Acli-BID was administered in the morning and night, and Tio-QD was administered in the night.. Primary outcome was forced expiratory volume in one second area under the curve (FEV. 44 patients were included in this study. FEV. Acli-BID as with Tio-QD could be one of the therapeutic options for patients with COPD to improve pulmonary function. Also, our results suggest that intervention with bronchodilators enhanced physical activity in patients with COPD.. UMIN 000020020.

Topics: Aged; Bronchodilator Agents; Exercise; Female; Forced Expiratory Volume; Humans; Japan; Linear Models; Male; Middle Aged; Muscarinic Antagonists; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Severity of Illness Index; Tiotropium Bromide; Treatment Outcome; Tropanes

A previous Phase IIIb study (NCT01462929) in patients with moderate to severe COPD demonstrated that 6 weeks of treatment with aclidinium led to improvements in 24-hour bronchodilation comparable to those with tiotropium, and improvement of symptoms versus placebo. This post hoc analysis was performed to assess the effect of treatment in the symptomatic patient group participating in the study.. Symptomatic patients (defined as those with Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms [E-RS™] in COPD baseline score ≥10 units) received aclidinium bromide 400 μg twice daily (BID), tiotropium 18 μg once daily (QD), or placebo, for 6 weeks. Lung function, COPD respiratory symptoms, and incidence of adverse events (AEs) were assessed.. In all, 277 symptomatic patients were included in this post hoc analysis. Aclidinium and tiotropium treatment improved forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV. In this post hoc analysis of symptomatic patients with moderate to severe COPD, aclidinium 400 μg BID provided additional improvements compared with tiotropium 18 μg QD in: 1) bronchodilation, particularly during the nighttime, 2) daily COPD symptoms (E-RS), 3) early-morning and nighttime symptoms, and 4) early-morning limitation of activity.

Topics: Activities of Daily Living; Aged; Bronchodilator Agents; Circadian Rhythm; Double-Blind Method; Female; Forced Expiratory Volume; Humans; Lung; Male; Middle Aged; Muscarinic Antagonists; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Recovery of Function; Severity of Illness Index; Time Factors; Tiotropium Bromide; Treatment Outcome; Tropanes

Long-acting muscarinic antagonists confer improvements in spirometry when used in addition to inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting beta-agonists (ICS/LABA) in COPD. The dual objectives of this proof of concept study were to evaluate trough effects of tiotropium (TIO) or aclidinium (ACL) when used as triple therapy and to assess if impulse oscillometry (IOS) might be more sensitive than spirometry in detecting subtle differences in bronchodilator response.. Patients with moderate to severe COPD already taking ICS/LABA were randomized to receive add-on therapy in cross-over fashion with either TIO 18 µg od or ACL 322 µg bid for 2-3 weeks each. Measurements of IOS, spirometry, 6-min walk test, St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) and Baseline/Transition Dyspnoea Index (TDI) were made at baseline and after chronic dosing at trough (12 h for ACL and 24 h for TIO), in addition to domiciliary diurnal spirometry.. 13 patients were completed: mean age 69 years, FEV1 52 % predicted, FEV1/FVC 0.48, and R5 202 % predicted. There were no differences in any visit-based trough IOS or spirometry outcomes comparing TIO versus ACL. Resonant frequency but not total airway resistance at 5 Hz (R5) significantly improved from baseline with both treatments while peripheral airway resistance (R5-R20) significantly improved with ACL. Visit-based FEV1, and forced and relaxed vital capacity were also significantly improved from baseline with both treatments. There were no significant differences in diurnal FEV1 and FEV6 profiles between treatments. 6-min walk distance and post-walk fatigue significantly improved from baseline with ACL, while post-walk dyspnea improved with TIO. SGRQ symptom score significantly improved to a similar degree with both treatments. TDI significantly improved with ACL versus TIO by 1.54 units.. We observed comparable bronchodilator efficacy at trough with TIO and ACL when used as triple therapy in COPD, while IOS was no more sensitive than spirometry.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Airway Resistance; Bronchoconstriction; Bronchodilator Agents; Cross-Over Studies; Drug Therapy, Combination; Exercise Test; Exercise Tolerance; Female; Forced Expiratory Volume; Humans; Lung; Male; Middle Aged; Muscarinic Antagonists; Oscillometry; Predictive Value of Tests; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Recovery of Function; Scotland; Spirometry; Time Factors; Tiotropium Bromide; Treatment Outcome; Tropanes; Vital Capacity

Preclinical studies suggested that aclidinium and glycopyrronium might have a faster onset of action than tiotropium. In this study we assessed the onset of action of aclidinium and glycopyrronium versus tiotropium, all administered at the approved clinical doses, in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and in human isolated bronchi by using different concentrations. Sixteen COPD patients inhaled single doses of aclidinium 400µg, glycopyrronium 50μg and tiotropium 18µg and FEV1 was measured to assess their onset of action. In human isolated bronchi the time to evoke half maximal relaxation of transmural stimulation was tested from 10nM to 1µM for each drug. Nine, eight and twelve patients did not achieve 15% increase of FEV1 after inhalation of aclidinium, glycopyrronium and tiotropium, respectively. Aclidinium (15.6±7.5min) and glycopyrronium (17.9±10.4min) enhanced 15% FEV1 more rapidly than tiotropium (42.5±19.4min), with no significant difference (P>0.05). In isolated airways, glycopyrronium elicited a dose-dependent onset of action (10nM: 8.2±1.3min, 100nM: 7.1±2.1min, 1μM: 3.4±0.4min) that was faster compared to that induced by aclidinium (1μM: 6.4±0.5min) and tiotropium (1μM: 8.4±1.1min) (P<0.05), that halved the contractile tone only at the highest concentration. Bronchodilation induced by aclidinium and glycopyrronium was faster than that induced by tiotropium, but since our analysis was restricted to the acute effect of these LAMAs and the inhaled doses were not isoeffective, the real differences in their impact on the onset of bronchodilation will be definitely determined after a long-term challenge of these treatments at isoeffective doses in COPD patients.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Bronchi; Bronchoconstriction; Bronchodilator Agents; Cross-Over Studies; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Female; Forced Expiratory Volume; Glycopyrrolate; Humans; In Vitro Techniques; Male; Middle Aged; Muscarinic Antagonists; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Time Factors; Tiotropium Bromide; Treatment Outcome; Tropanes

This randomized, double-blind, Phase IIIb study evaluated the 24-hour bronchodilatory efficacy of aclidinium bromide versus placebo and tiotropium in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).. Patients received aclidinium 400 μg twice daily (morning and evening), tiotropium 18 μg once daily (morning), or placebo for 6 weeks. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in forced expiratory volume in 1 second area under the curve for the 24-hour period post-morning dose (FEV1 AUC0-24) at week 6. Secondary and additional endpoints included FEV1 AUC12-24, COPD symptoms (EXAcerbations of chronic pulmonary disease Tool-Respiratory Symptoms [E-RS] total score and additional symptoms questionnaire), and safety.. Overall, 414 patients were randomized and treated (FEV1 1.63 L [55.8% predicted]). Compared with placebo, FEV1 AUC0-24 and FEV1 AUC12-24 were significantly increased from baseline with aclidinium (∆ = 150 mL and 160 mL, respectively; p < 0.0001) and tiotropium (∆ = 140 mL and 123 mL, respectively; p < 0.0001) at week 6. Significant improvements in E-RS total scores over 6 weeks were numerically greater with aclidinium (p < 0.0001) than tiotropium (p < 0.05) versus placebo. Only aclidinium significantly reduced the severity of early-morning cough, wheeze, shortness of breath, and phlegm, and of nighttime symptoms versus placebo (p < 0.05). Adverse-event (AE) incidence (28%) was similar between treatments. Few anticholinergic AEs (<1.5%) or serious AEs (<3%) occurred in any group.. Aclidinium provided significant 24-hour bronchodilation versus placebo from day 1 with comparable efficacy to tiotropium after 6 weeks. Improvements in COPD symptoms were consistently numerically greater with aclidinium versus tiotropium. Aclidinium was generally well tolerated.

Topics: Aged; Area Under Curve; Bronchodilator Agents; Circadian Rhythm; Cough; Disease Progression; Double-Blind Method; Dry Powder Inhalers; Dyspnea; Female; Forced Expiratory Volume; Headache; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Muscarinic Antagonists; Patient Preference; Pharyngitis; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Respiratory Sounds; Scopolamine Derivatives; Surveys and Questionnaires; Time Factors; Tiotropium Bromide; Tropanes; Xerostomia

The efficacy and safety of aclidinium bromide bid, a novel, long-acting, muscarinic antagonist, was assessed in patients with moderate to severe COPD.. In this phase IIa randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, crossover trial, patients with moderate to severe COPD received aclidinium 400 μg bid, tiotropium 8 μg once daily, and placebo for 15 days, with a 9- to 15-day washout between treatment periods. Treatments were administered through the Genuair or HandiHaler dry powder inhalers. The primary end point was mean change from baseline in FEV(1) AUC(0-12/12h) (area under the curve where the numbers represent the time period for which data were collected divided by the number of hours over which the data are averaged [eg, 0-12 h postdose divided by 12 h]) on day 15. Secondary end points were changes from baseline in FEV(1) AUC(12-24/12h), FEV(1) AUC(0-24/24h), morning predose FEV(1), peak FEV(1), and COPD symptom scores.. Thirty patients with COPD were randomized, and 27 completed the study. Mean change from baseline in FEV(1) AUC(0-12/12h) at day 15 was significantly greater for aclidinium and tiotropium over placebo (P < .0001). Mean changes from baseline in FEV(1) AUC(12-24/12h), FEV(1) AUC(0-24/24h), morning predose FEV(1), and peak FEV(1) at day 15 were significantly greater for aclidinium and tiotropium over placebo (P < .0001 for all except P < .001 for FEV(1) AUC(12-24/12h) tiotropium vs placebo). Improvements were significantly greater with aclidinium vs tiotropium on day 1 for all of the normalized AUC values of FEV(1) as well as on day 15 for FEV(1) AUC(12-24/12h) (P < .05 for all). COPD symptoms were significantly improved from baseline with aclidinium vs placebo (P < .05) but not with tiotropium.. In patients with COPD, aclidinium 400 μg bid compared with placebo provided clinically meaningful improvements in 24-h bronchodilation that generally were comparable to tiotropium 18 μg daily but with significant differences in favor of aclidinium observed in the average nighttime period. Larger studies with longer treatment duration are ongoing to confirm the efficacy of aclidinium 400 μg bid on bronchodilation and COPD symptoms.. ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT00868231; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Aged; Bronchodilator Agents; Cross-Over Studies; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Forced Expiratory Volume; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Muscarinic Antagonists; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Scopolamine Derivatives; Severity of Illness Index; Tiotropium Bromide; Treatment Outcome; Tropanes

ABSTRACT Aclidinium bromide is a novel, long-acting, inhaled muscarinic antagonist in development for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The aim of this study was to assess the rate of onset of bronchodilation with aclidinium compared with placebo and tiotropium. This was a double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter, crossover study in COPD patients with a post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) ≥30% and <60% predicted. On study days, patients received single doses of aclidinium 200 μg, tiotropium 18 μg, or placebo. Serial spirometry was conducted from 10 minutes to 3 hours post-dose. The primary variable was the percentage of patients with an increase in FEV(1) of ≥10% above baseline at 30 minutes post-dose. Other assessments included change from baseline in FEV(1) and dyspnea over 3 hours post-dose. A total of 115 patients entered the study. Significantly more patients had an increase in FEV(1) of ≥10% above baseline at 30 minutes with aclidinium and tiotropium versus placebo (49.5% and 51.8% versus 13.8%; p < 0.0001). At 30 minutes, the relative increase from baseline in FEV(1) was significantly higher for aclidinium and tiotropium versus placebo (12% and 11% versus 3%; p < 0.0001). Aclidinium and tiotropium also significantly increased FEV(1) (p < 0.01) and improved the perception of dyspnea compared with placebo at all measured time points from 10 minutes to 3 hours post-dose. In conclusion, aclidinium provided effective bronchodilation, similar to that seen with tiotropium, with significant improvements compared with placebo observed from 10 minutes post-dose.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Bronchodilator Agents; Cross-Over Studies; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Forced Expiratory Volume; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Scopolamine Derivatives; Time Factors; Tiotropium Bromide; Treatment Outcome; Tropanes

Aclidinium bromide is an inhaled long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA). Although the initial potential increased cardiovascular and mortality risk among users of tiotropium has been ruled out by several observational studies, and clinical trials, there are still concerns related to the use of newer LAMA medications. The current study aimed to evaluate the risk of death among users of aclidinium and other LAMAs.. We conducted a cohort and nested case-control study among patients with COPD aged 40 years or older to compare the risk of all-cause mortality among users of aclidinium and other COPD medications with the risk among users of long-acting β2 agonists (LABA), in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) in the United Kingdom (2012-2017).. Mortality rates per 1,000 person-years were 32.9 for aclidinium, 43.8 for tiotropium, 38.0 for other LAMA, 47.1 for LABA/ICS, and 38.1 for LABA. The RR of death compared with current use of LABA was 0.54 (confidence interval [95% CI], 0.40-0.72) for aclidinium, 0.96 (95% CI, 0.76-1.21) for tiotropium, 0.76 (95% CI, 0.58-0.99) for other LAMA, and 1.08 (95% CI, 0.90-1.31) for LABA/ICS. Decreased risk for death observed among users of aclidinium was driven by overall current single use (RR = 0.41; 95% CI, 0.22-0.79), which corresponded to 26% of the aclidinium users (<15 cases) and not by multiple use (RR = 1.02; 95% CI, 0.71-1.48).. Use of aclidinium, tiotropium, other LAMA, or LABA/ICS was not associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality as compared with the use of LABAs.

Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Adult; Aged; Case-Control Studies; Cholinergic Antagonists; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Mortality; Muscarinic Antagonists; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Risk Factors; Tiotropium Bromide; Tropanes; United Kingdom

To describe and compare demographic and clinical profile of patients newly initiated on aclidinium (ACL) or tiotropium (TIO) and identify factors associated with newly initiated ACL in real-life clinical practice during 2013 in Catalonia.. We performed a population-based, retrospective, observational study with data obtained from the Information System for Research Development in Primary Care, a population database that contains information of 5.8 million inhabitants (more than 80% of the Catalan population). Patients over 40 years old, with a recorded diagnosis of COPD and newly initiated treatment with either ACL or TIO during the study period (January to December 2013), were selected. A descriptive analysis of demographic and clinical characteristics was performed, and treatment adherence was also assessed for both cohorts.. A total of 8,863 individuals were identified, 4,293 initiated with ACL and 4,570 with TIO. They had a mean age of 69.4 years (standard deviation: 11.3), a median COPD duration of 3 years (interquartile range: 0-8), and 71% were males. Patients treated with ACL were older, with more respiratory comorbidities, a longer time since COPD diagnosis, worse forced expiratory volume in 1 second (% predicted), and with a higher rate of exacerbations during the previous year compared with TIO. It was found that 41.3% of patients with ACL and 62.3% of patients with TIO had no previous COPD treatment. Inhaled corticosteroid and long-acting β2-agonist were the most frequent concomitant medications (32.9% and 32.6%, respectively). Approximately 75% of patients were persistent with ACL or TIO at 3 months from the beginning of treatment, and more than 50% of patients remained persistent at 9 months.. Patients initiated with ACL had more severe COPD and were taking more concomitant respiratory medications than patients initiated with TIO. ACL was more frequently initiated as part of triple therapy, while TIO was more frequently initiated as monotherapy.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Bronchodilator Agents; Databases, Factual; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Lung; Male; Middle Aged; Muscarinic Antagonists; Primary Health Care; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Retrospective Studies; Severity of Illness Index; Spain; Time Factors; Tiotropium Bromide; Treatment Outcome; Tropanes

Combining in vitro mouth-throat deposition measurements, cascade impactor data and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations, four different inhalers were compared which are indicated for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) treatment.. The Respimat inhaler, the Breezhaler, the Genuair, and the Ellipta were coupled to the idealized Alberta throat model. The modeled dose to the lung (mDTL) was collected downstream of the Alberta throat model using either a filter or a next generation impactor (NGI). Idealized breathing patterns from COPD patient groups - moderate and very severe COPD - were applied. Theoretical lung deposition patterns were assessed by an individual path model.. For the Respimat the mDTL was found to be 59% (SD 5%) for the moderate COPD breathing pattern and 67% (SD 5%) for very severe COPD breathing pattern. The percentages refer to nominal dose (ND) in vitro. This is in the range of 44%-63% in vivo in COPD patients who display large individual variability. Breezhaler showed a mDTL of 43% (SD 2%) for moderate disease simulation and 51% (SD 2%) for very severe simulation. The corresponding results for Genuair are mDTL of 32% (SD 2%) for moderate and 42% (SD 1%) for very severe disease. Ellipta vilanterol particles showed a mDTL of 49% (SD 3%) for moderate and 55% (SD 2%) for very severe disease simulation, and Ellipta fluticasone particles showed a mDTL of 33% (SD 3%) and 41% (SD 2%), respectively for the two breathing patterns. Based on the throat output and average flows of the different inhalers, CFD simulations were performed. Laminar and turbulent steady flow calculations indicated that deposition occurs mainly in the small airways. In summary, Respimat showed the lowest amount of particles depositing in the mouth-throat model and the highest amount reaching all regions of the simulation lung model.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Androstadienes; Benzyl Alcohols; Bronchodilator Agents; Chlorobenzenes; Computer Simulation; Drug Combinations; Dry Powder Inhalers; Equipment Design; Glycopyrrolate; Humans; Hydrodynamics; Lung; Metered Dose Inhalers; Models, Anatomic; Muscarinic Antagonists; Pharynx; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Respiration; Severity of Illness Index; Tiotropium Bromide; Tropanes

Comparisons of the use of aclidinium bromide and tiotropium bromide for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease often concentrate on key end points (exacerbations) at the expense of other benefits and risks. Multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) can help overcome this by using stakeholder preferences to combine multiple end points into an overall value estimate.. To evaluate the use of aclidinium bromide twice daily via Pressair™ (AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Wilmington, DE) and of tiotropium once daily via HandiHaler. Literature reviews and clinician engagement were used to identify value criteria. Performance of criteria was estimated from a clinical trial and clinician opinion. Scores and swing weights came from six clinicians who, during a 2-day workshop, reflected their patients' preferences. Scenario and sensitivity analyses were used to explore uncertainty in model designs and inputs.. Fourteen criteria, covering clinical effectiveness, safety, and convenience of the treatments of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, were identified. Exacerbations and device preloading were identified as the most important to patients; the least important was rescue medication use. Tiotropium's higher overall clinical effectiveness score was offset by aclidinium's better performance on safety and convenience outcomes. The MCDA generated a -42 (worst performance) to 100 (best performance) scale. The net impact of benefits over risks of aclidinium (38.5) exceeded that of tiotropium (13.2), and patients preferred aclidinium 79.7% of the time.. When considering clinical benefits and risks, aclidinium and tiotropium generate similar value to patients, but when convenience criteria are considered, aclidinium may be preferred. Further work is required to replicate these results, including eliciting preferences directly from patients.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Bronchodilator Agents; Forced Expiratory Volume; Humans; Nebulizers and Vaporizers; Patient Preference; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Severity of Illness Index; Tiotropium Bromide; Tropanes; United States

Long-acting muscarinic receptor antagonists (LAMAs) have been reported to attenuate cough in preclinical and clinical studies. The present study was performed on rabbits to compare aclidinium and tiotropium efficacy in the downregulation of the cough reflex. This reflex was evoked by citric acid inhalation in unanesthetized animals and by both citric acid inhalation and mechanical stimulation of the tracheobronchial tree in anesthetized animals 90 min following the inhalation of each drug (nebulizer output always at 1 mL/min). Aclidinium 4 mg/mL and tiotropium 200 μg/mL inhaled in 1 min proved to have similar protective effect on methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction in anesthetized animals. The total dosage employed for aclidinium and tiotropium was 4 mg and 200 μg, respectively. In awake animals, similar reductions in the cough number were observed following 10-min inhalation of each drug with a slight, not significant tendency to higher antitussive effects for aclidinium. In anesthetized animals, 1-min inhalation of each drug caused similar depressant effects on cough responses induced by both mechanical and chemical stimulation. A complete suppression of cough responses to mechanical stimuli was seen in some preparations. The results strongly suggest that the LAMA-induced downregulation of cough may be mediated not only by transient receptor potential vanilloid type 1 channels, as already reported, but also by acid-sensing ion channels and mechanoreceptors. The route of administration along with the more rapid hydrolysis of aclidinium into inactive metabolites minimize potential systemic side effects and give to this drug a very favorable safety profile.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Anesthesia; Animals; Antitussive Agents; Bronchoconstriction; Bronchodilator Agents; Cough; Delayed-Action Preparations; Disease Models, Animal; Male; Methacholine Chloride; Muscarinic Antagonists; Rabbits; Tiotropium Bromide; Tropanes; Wakefulness

This study characterised the in vitro and in vivo profiles of two novel long-acting muscarinic antagonists, aclidinium bromide and glycopyrronium bromide, using tiotropium bromide and ipratropium bromide as comparators. All four antagonists had high affinity for the five muscarinic receptor sub-types (M1-M5); aclidinium had comparable affinity to tiotropium but higher affinity than glycopyrronium and ipratropium for all receptors. Glycopyrronium dissociated faster from recombinant M3 receptors than aclidinium and tiotropium but more slowly than ipratropium; all four compounds dissociated more rapidly from M2 receptors than from M3 receptors. In vitro, aclidinium, glycopyrronium and tiotropium had a long duration of action at native M3 receptors (>8 h versus 42 min for ipratropium). In vivo, all compounds were equi-potent at reversing acetylcholine-induced bronchoconstriction. Aclidinium, glycopyrronium and ipratropium had a faster onset of bronchodilator action than tiotropium. Aclidinium had a longer duration of action than glycopyronnium (time to 50% recovery of effect [t½ offset] = 29 h and 13 h, respectively); these compare with a t½ offset of 64 h and 8 h for tiotropium and ipratropium, respectively. Aclidinium was less potent than glycopyrronium and tiotropium at inhibiting salivation in conscious rats (dose required to produce half-maximal effect [ED50] = 38, 0.74 and 0.88 μg/kg, respectively) and was more rapidly hydrolysed in rat, guinea pig and human plasma compared with glycopyrronium or tiotropium. These results indicate that while aclidinium and glycopyrronium are both potent antagonists at muscarinic receptors with similar kinetic selectivity for M3 receptors versus M2, aclidinium has a longer dissociation half-life at M3 receptors and a longer duration of bronchodilator action in vivo than glycopyrronium. The rapid plasma hydrolysis of aclidinium, coupled to its kinetic selectivity, may confer a reduced propensity for systemic anticholinergic side effects with aclidinium versus glycopyrronium and tiotropium.

Topics: Acetylcholine; Animals; Bronchoconstriction; Bronchodilator Agents; Glycopyrrolate; Guinea Pigs; Half-Life; Humans; Hydrolysis; Ipratropium; Male; Muscarinic Antagonists; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Scopolamine Derivatives; Species Specificity; Time Factors; Tiotropium Bromide; Tropanes

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Drug Chronotherapy; Germany; Humans; Muscarinic Antagonists; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Scopolamine Derivatives; Tiotropium Bromide; Tropanes

Aclidinium bromide is a novel, long-acting, inhaled muscarinic antagonist currently in registration phase for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Since urinary difficulty and retention have been reported for anticholinergic agents such as tiotropium and ipratropium, it is important to examine the preclinical urinary and renal safety profile of aclidinium.. The effect of aclidinium on urine and electrolyte excretion, renal function and voiding cystometry was analysed in conscious water-loaded Wistar rats (10-1000 μg/kg, s.c.), anaesthetised Beagle dogs (1000 μg/kg, i.v.) and anaesthetised guinea pigs (3-100μg/kg, intratracheally), respectively. Aclidinium plasma levels were determined in an independent study. Active comparators were tiotropium (all studies) and ipratropium (cystometry only).. Aclidinium 1000 μg/kg had no effect on urine excretion in rats, in contrast to tiotropium 100 μg/kg which significantly decreased this parameter (p<0.05). Aclidinium 1000 μg/kg also had no effect on renal function in Beagle dogs. In guinea pigs, aclidinium 3-100 μg/kg had no effect on urinary bladder function, whereas tiotropium and ipratropium 100 μg/kg decreased the peak micturition pressure (p<0.05), increased the volume of urine retained in the bladder (p<0.01) and showed a trend to decrease the volume of urine excreted.. Aclidinium had no significant effect on urinary and renal function in the animal models studied. These results, together with the rapid plasma clearance of aclidinium reported previously, suggest a lower propensity to induce urinary retention in humans than tiotropium and ipratropium.

Topics: Animals; Dogs; Female; Guinea Pigs; Kidney; Kidney Function Tests; Male; Muscarinic Antagonists; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Scopolamine Derivatives; Time Factors; Tiotropium Bromide; Tropanes

The objective of this work was to discover a novel, long-acting muscarinic M(3) antagonist for the inhaled treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), with a potentially improved risk-benefit profile compared with current antimuscarinic agents. A series of novel quaternary ammonium derivatives of (3R)-quinuclidinol esters were synthesized and evaluated. On the basis of its overall profile, (3R)-3-{[hydroxy(di-2-thienyl)acetyl]oxy}-1-(3-phenoxypropyl)-1-azoniabicyclo[2.2.2]octane bromide (aclidinium bromide) emerged as a candidate for once-daily maintenance treatment of COPD. This compound is a potent muscarinic antagonist, with long duration of action in vivo, and was found to have a rapid hydrolysis in human plasma, minimizing the potential to induce class-related systemic side effects. Aclidinium bromide is currently in phase III development for maintenance treatment of patients with COPD.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Animals; Bronchial Spasm; CHO Cells; Cricetinae; Cricetulus; Drug Stability; Esters; Guinea Pigs; Humans; Male; Mice; Muscarinic Antagonists; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quaternary Ammonium Compounds; Quinuclidines; Radioligand Assay; Receptor, Muscarinic M3; Stereoisomerism; Structure-Activity Relationship; Tropanes

Aclidinium bromide is a novel potent, long-acting inhaled muscarinic antagonist in development for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Aclidinium showed subnanomolar affinity for the five human muscarinic receptors (M(1)-M(5)). [(3)H]Aclidinium dissociated slightly faster from M(2) and M(3) receptors than [(3)H]tiotropium but much more slowly than [(3)H]ipratropium. Its association rate for the M(3) receptor was similar to [(3)H]ipratropium and 2.6 times faster than [(3)H]tiotropium. Residence half-life of [(3)H]aclidinium at the M(2) receptor was shorter than at the M(3) receptor, demonstrating kinetic selectivity for the M(3) receptor. In isolated guinea pig trachea, aclidinium showed comparable potency to ipratropium and tiotropium, faster onset of action than tiotropium, and duration of action similar to tiotropium and significantly longer than ipratropium. Nebulized aclidinium inhibited bronchoconstriction induced by acetylcholine in guinea pigs in a concentration-dependent manner with an onset of action faster than tiotropium. Duration of action of aclidinium (t(1/2) = 29 h) was much longer than ipratropium (8 h) but shorter than tiotropium (64 h). In dogs, aclidinium induced a smaller and more transient increase in heart rate than tiotropium at comparable supratherapeutic doses. Therefore, under these conditions, aclidinium showed a greater therapeutic index than tiotropium (4.2 versus 1.6). These results indicate that aclidinium is a potent muscarinic antagonist with a fast onset of action, a long duration of effect, and a favorable cardiovascular safety profile.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Anesthesia; Animals; Bronchi; Bronchoconstriction; Carbachol; CHO Cells; Cricetinae; Cricetulus; Dogs; Guinea Pigs; Heart Rate; Humans; Ipratropium; Male; Muscarinic Agonists; Muscarinic Antagonists; Receptors, Muscarinic; Scopolamine Derivatives; Stimulation, Chemical; Tiotropium Bromide; Trachea; Tropanes