temocapril-hydrochloride and cadralazine

To assess whether electrocardiographic variables are useful to detect the regression of left ventricular (LV) mass after long-term antihypertensive treatment, we related electrocardiographic voltages to echocardiographic variables before and after treatment with an ACE inhibitor, temocapril (TEM), or direct vasodilator, cadralazine (CAD). Twenty-one patients with essential hypertension were treated with either TEM (n = 11) or CAD (n = 10) for one year. LV mass index (LVMI) by echocardiography and Sokolow-Lyon voltage (SV1 + RV5), Cornell voltage (RaVL + SV3) and RV5 + RV6 by standard 12-lead electrocardiographic voltages were determined before and after treatment. Both drugs decreased blood pressure to the same extent. Both Sokolow-Lyon voltage and RV5 + RV6 tended to decrease in the ACE group (40.0 +/- 9.4 to 37.2 +/- 9.4 mm and 44.7 +/- 13.5 to 41.7 +/- 11.7 mm, respectively, N.S.), but not in the CAD group (38.4 +/- 6.8 to 39.7 +/- 7.7 mm and 42.9 +/- 10.4 to 46.8 +/- 11.2 mm, respectively, N.S.). LVMI decreased in the ACE group (-24 +/- 22 g/m2), whereas it increased in the CAD group (37 +/- 27 g/m2, p < 0.01). Change in LVMI was correlated with the changes in RV5 + RV6 and Sokolow-Lyon voltage (r = 0.73, p < 0.01 and r = 0.70, p < 0.01, respectively), but not with that in Cornell voltage. These results indicated that the changes in voltage criteria of RV5 + RV6 and Sokolow-Lyon are useful to assess the change in LVM after antihypertensive treatment in patients with essential hypertension although voltage variables in electrocardiogram were not sensitive to detect changes in LVMI.

Topics: Aged; Antihypertensive Agents; Echocardiography; Electrocardiography; Female; Humans; Hypertension; Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridazines; Thiazepines; Vasodilator Agents

This study compared the effects of 1 year of monotherapy with a calcium-channel antagonist (nilvadipine; NIL), an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor (temocapril; TEM), or a new vasodilator (cadralazine; CAD) on left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy in essential hypertension. Furthermore, to elucidate the mechanism responsible for regression of LV hypertrophy after treatment, LV mass index (LVMI) by echocardiography, plasma renin activity (PRA), aldosterone (PAC), norepinephrine, and atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) concentration were measured before and after treatment. Thirty-six patients were randomly assigned to the NIL, TEM, or CAD groups. Blood pressure (BP) before treatment was 174 +/- 10/104 +/- 7, 173 +/- 18/103 +/- 8, and 171 +/- 16/103 +/- 7 mm Hg (mean +/- SD) in NIL, TEM, and CAD groups, respectively. BP was lower after treatment with each of the three test drugs than after the placebo period, and there were no differences in BP reduction among three groups. LVMI, in NIL and TEM, was reduced from 129 +/- 48 to 115 +/- 39 g/m2 and from 117 +/- 39 to 88 +/- 20 g/m2 (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively), whereas, in the CAD group, it was increased (110 +/- 30 to 138 +/- 27 g/m2; p < 0.01). In the CAD group, PAC decreased and ANP increased significantly. The change in LVMI correlated with that in BP for TEM and with that in ANP in all patients. These data indicated that LV volume overload as well as LV pressure overload may contribute to LV hypertrophy and that monotherapy with CAD is not desirable from the point of view of LV mass reduction in essential hypertension.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aldosterone; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Atrial Natriuretic Factor; Calcium Channel Blockers; Echocardiography; Female; Hemodynamics; Humans; Hypertension; Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular; Male; Middle Aged; Nifedipine; Norepinephrine; Pyridazines; Renin; Thiazepines; Vasodilator Agents