tamoxifen-aziridine and afimoxifene

Estrogen-responsive genes are regulated by altering the balance of estrogen receptor (ER) interaction with transcription activators and inhibitors. Here we examined the role of ER ligand on ER interaction with the Chicken Ovalbumin Upstream Promoter Transcription Factor (COUP-TF) orphan nuclear receptor. COUP-TF binding to half-site estrogen response elements (EREs) was increased by the addition of estradiol (E2) -liganded ER (E2-ER), but not by ER liganded with the antiestrogens 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT-ER) or tamoxifen aziridine (TAz-ER). ER did not bind to single half-sites. Conversely, COUP-TF enhanced the ERE binding of purified E2-ER, but did not affect TAz-ER-ERE binding. In contrast, only antiestrogens enhanced direct interaction between ER and COUP-TF as assessed by GST pull-down assays. Identical results were obtained using either purified bovine or recombinant human ERalpha. Co-immunoprecipitation assays showed that ER and COUP-TF interact in extracts from MCF-7 and ERalpha-transfected MDA-MB-231 cells. Here we document that ER ligand impacts COUP-TF-ER interaction. COUP-TF interaction is mediated by the DNA binding and ligand-binding domains of ER. We suggest that changes in ER conformation induced by DNA binding reduce ER-COUP-TF interaction. Transient transfection of human MCF-7 breast cancer cells with a COUP-TFI expression vector repressed E2-induced luciferase reporter gene expression from single or multiple tandem copies of a consensus ERE. COUP-TFI stimulated 4-OHT-induced luciferase activity from a minimal ERE. Alone, COUP-TFI increased transcription from ERE half-sites or a single ERE in a sequence-dependent manner. These data provide evidence that the ERE sequence and its immediate flanking regions influence whether COUP-TF enhances, inhibits, or has no effect on ER ligand-induced ERE reporter gene expression and that COUP-TFI activates gene transcription from ERE half-sites. We suggest that COUP-TFI plays a role in mitigating estrogen-responsive gene expression.

Topics: Animals; Binding Sites; Breast Neoplasms; Cattle; Chickens; COUP Transcription Factor I; DNA-Binding Proteins; ERRalpha Estrogen-Related Receptor; Estradiol; Estrogen Antagonists; Estrogen Receptor alpha; Female; Gene Expression Regulation; Humans; Ligands; Luciferases; Nuclear Receptor Co-Repressor 2; Ovalbumin; Precipitin Tests; Proteins; Receptors, Cytoplasmic and Nuclear; Receptors, Estrogen; Recombinant Proteins; Repetitive Sequences, Nucleic Acid; Repressor Proteins; Response Elements; Tamoxifen; Transcription Factors; Transcription, Genetic; Transfection; Trefoil Factor-1; Tumor Cells, Cultured; Tumor Suppressor Proteins

Estradiol-liganded estrogen receptor (E2-ER) binds EREs with a stoichiometry of one E2-ER dimer per estrogen response element (ERE). In contrast, although 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT)-liganded ER (4-OHT-ER) binds EREs with high affinity, its saturation ERE binding capacity is consistently half that of E2-ER, giving an apparent stoichiometry of one 4-OHT-ER monomer per ERE. Here we show that one molecule of 4-OHT ligand dissociates from the ER dimer apparently during the process of binding to DNA. Under equilibrium conditions, the type I antiestrogen tamoxifen aziridine (TAz), covalently attached to ER (TAz-ER), binds a single ERE with high affinity (Kd = 0.27 nM), comparable to that of E2-ER and 4-OHT-ER. In contrast to 4-OHT-ER, the ERE binding stoichiometry of TAz-ER was identical to that of E2-ER: one dimeric receptor per ERE. By measuring [3H]ligand that was initially bound to ER, a significant loss of [3H]4-OHT from ER was detected after ERE binding, whereas all [3H]E2 or [3H]TAz remained ER-bound. These results confirm that one molecule of 4-OHT ligand dissociates from the ER dimer as a consequence of ERE binding. Binding of 4-OHT and TAz are likely to induce a conformation in ER dimers that alters their capacity for gene activation. Upon ER binding to DNA, this conformation reveals itself by allowing 4-OHT dissociation, and predictably would allow TAz dissociation were it not bound covalently.

Topics: Base Sequence; Binding Sites; Binding, Competitive; DNA; Estradiol; Molecular Sequence Data; Promoter Regions, Genetic; Receptors, Estrogen; Tamoxifen; Time Factors; Titrimetry; Tritium

Quantitative DNase I footprinting assays were employed to simultaneously measure the amount of estrogen receptor (ER) bound to each site in constructs containing multiple estrogen response elements (EREs). These assays revealed identical, high affinity ER-ERE binding, Kd of approximately 0.25 nM, for estradiol-liganded ER (E2-ER), 4-hydroxytamoxifen liganded ER (4-OHT-ER), tamoxifen aziridine liganded ER (TAz-ER), and unliganded dimeric ER, for each ERE in constructs containing up to four tandem EREs. Increasing concentrations of ER resulted in the same pattern of occupancy for each ERE, whether or not the site was located near other EREs. Similarly, the presence or absence of E2, 4-OHT, or TAz ligand did not change ER-ERE interaction. Since activated ER-ERE binding affinity is identical, whether ER is liganded or unliganded, ligand cannot regulate ER-ERE binding affinity. These results support the hypothesis that ligand-dependent conformational changes primarily determine how ER interacts with components of the transcription initiation complex that mediate gene transactivation. In addition, footprint assays revealed that, following ER binding, an AT-rich site adjacent to the ERE becomes hypersensitive to DNase I digestion. This sequence may be easily or intrinsically bent, assisting in recruiting ER to ERE sites.

Topics: Animals; Base Sequence; Binding Sites; Cattle; Deoxyribonuclease I; DNA; DNA Footprinting; Estradiol; Kinetics; Ligands; Molecular Sequence Data; Receptors, Estrogen; Regulatory Sequences, Nucleic Acid; Tamoxifen

It is well known that MCF-7 cells, when incubated with hydroxytamoxifen (OH-Tam) loose their capacity to bind [3H]estradiol. By using Western blotting and [3H]tamoxifen aziridine labeling of KCl extracts from these cells we found that this loss in binding capacity was not associated with a disappearance of the estrogen receptor (ER) protein, an event known to occur after incubation with estradiol. Attempts to label under exchange conditions these ER molecules, which, on the basis of enzyme immunoassays appear to accumulate under OH-Tam treatment, were unsuccessful. Cell fractionation suggested that their origin is nuclear. Assessment of a few triphenylethylenic antiestrogens, as far as their inhibitory potency towards the in vitro MCF-7 cell growth is concerned, indicated a correlation between accumulation of these non-binding ER molecules and the antiestrogen antiproliferative action. However, we were unable to demonstrate absence of such an ER accumulation in two tamoxifen-resistant variants. Impaired folding of the ER protein or impaired phosphorylation of its hormone-binding domain are attractive hypotheses to account for these non-binding ER molecules. Whether these ER molecules have any physiological role, such as competition with the "normal" receptor molecules for the estrogen responsive elements on the DNA is unknown and deserves further study.

Topics: Blotting, Western; Breast Neoplasms; Cell Line; Centrifugation, Density Gradient; Estradiol; Estrogen Antagonists; Female; Humans; Molecular Weight; Receptors, Estrogen; Receptors, Progesterone; Structure-Activity Relationship; Tamoxifen; Tumor Cells, Cultured

Estrogen receptor activation has been examined in murine uteri by characterizing binding to ATP-Sepharose. Determinations were performed under conditions in which specific binding to estrogen receptors was demonstrated by both agonist and antagonist without participation by nonreceptor antiestrogen-binding components. Cell-free activation of estrogen receptors in cytosol was more effectively promoted by [3H]estradiol estradiol than by [3H]4-hydroxytamoxifen or [3H]tamoxifen aziridine. However, when in situ activation was examined after intact uteri were exposed to [3H]estradiol or [3H]4-hydroxytamoxifen, virtually all extracted nuclear receptors demonstrated activated binding to ATP-Sepharose within 20 min of hormone exposure. Profiles of nuclear receptor activation were remarkably similar after exposure to either agonist or antagonist. Estrogen receptors in cytosol prepared after exposing intact uteri to 3H-labeled ligands were characterized by much less ability to bind to ATP-Sepharose than nuclear receptors. After uteri were exposed to [3H]estradiol, the activated receptor fraction in the cytosol progressively increased in contrast to preparations obtained after uteri were exposed to [3H]4-hydroxytamoxifen, which demonstrated a constant level of activation. Thus, even when activation has occurred within the intact uterus, agonists and antagonists may be characterized by different apparent levels of receptor activation in the cytosol fraction. These differences in the cytosol, however, are considerably overshadowed by the extensive activation occurring within the nuclear fraction, which we have observed to be similar with agonist and antagonist. Since estrogen receptors appear to act within chromatin, and cytosol receptors may be produced by receptor redistribution during preparation, we interpret these observations to indicate that in situ receptor activation is very similar after exposure to either agonist or antagonist. Consequently, antagonism does not appear to be associated with antiestrogens that impede receptor activation within intact murine uteri.

Topics: Animals; Cell Nucleus; Cytosol; Diethylstilbestrol; Estradiol; Female; Kinetics; Mice; Receptors, Estrogen; Tamoxifen; Uterus

We have selected and cloned a stable variant of the MCF-7 human breast cancer cell line (LY 2) that is resistant to LY 117018 (LY), a potent antiestrogen that inhibits cell growth at concentrations as low as 10(-10) M. The cell line was selected by increasing the concentration of LY in the growth medium in a stepwise manner from 10(-8) to 10(-6) M as the cells become resistant. LY2 has been cloned in soft agar and carried for over 50 passages with no change in resistance. Other antiestrogens, such as tamoxifen and 40-hydroxytamoxifen no longer inhibit cell proliferation of LY 2. The cell line is still responsive to estrogen in a cell proliferation assay, but contains somewhat less estrogen receptors than MCF-7. The cytosolic estrogen receptor sediments to a 4S position on high salt sucrose density gradient centrifugation and is completely shifted to a denser gradient region when the receptor is incubated with a monoclonal antiestrophilin. The nuclear estrogen receptor when covalently labeled with [3H]tamoxifen aziridine has the same mol wt (62,000) in both MCF-7 and LY2 cells, when determined by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. In a competitive binding assay, LY 117018 competes for [3H]estradiol binding to its cytosol receptor with the same Ki in both MCF-7 and LY2 cells. When the induction of estrogen-specific proteins was examined, no detectable progesterone receptor could be detected in either estrogen-induced or control LY2 cells, in contrast to MCF-7 cells. However, both 52,000- and 160,000-dalton proteins were estrogen inducible in the medium of LY2 and MCF-7 cells, as measured by labeling with [35S]methionine. The phenotypic stability of the antiestrogen resistance in LY2 cells coupled with the cross-resistance the antiestrogens of widely different structures make this cell line an ideal model system for the study of hormone resistance in human breast cancer. In addition, while the mechanism of resistance is currently not elucidated, the selective loss of estrogen-inducible functions in this cell line may provide powerful clues for future study.

Topics: Binding, Competitive; Breast Neoplasms; Cell Division; Cell Line; Drug Resistance; Estradiol; Female; Humans; Molecular Weight; Phenotype; Pyrrolidines; Receptors, Estrogen; Receptors, Progesterone; Tamoxifen; Thiophenes