ta-8995 and evacetrapib

Although biomarkers are used as surrogate measures for drug targeting and approval and are generally based on plausible biological hypotheses, some are found to not correlate well with clinical outcomes. Over-reliance on inadequately validated biomarkers in drug development can lead to harm to trial subjects and patients and to research waste. To shed greater light on the process and ethics of biomarker-based drug development, we conducted a systematic portfolio analysis of cholesterol ester transfer protein inhibitors, a drug class designed to improve lipid profiles and prevent cardiovascular events. Despite years of development, no cholesterol ester transfer protein inhibitor has yet been approved for clinical use.. We searched PubMed and Clinicaltrials.gov for clinical studies of 5 known cholesterol ester transfer protein inhibitors: anacetrapib, dalcetrapib, evacetrapib, TA-8995, and torcetrapib. Published reports and registration records were extracted for patient demographic characteristics and study authors' recommendations of clinical usage or further testing. We used Accumulating Evidence and Research Organization graphing to depict the portfolio of research activities and a Poisson model to examine trends. We identified 100 studies for analysis that involved 96 944 human subjects. The data from only 41 201 (42%) of the human subjects had been presented in a published report. For the 3 discontinued cholesterol ester transfer protein inhibitors, we found a pattern of consistently positive results on lipid-modification end points followed by negative results using clinical end points.. Inefficiencies and harms can arise if a biomarker hypothesis continues to drive trials despite successive failures. Regulators, research funding bodies, and public policy makers may need to play a greater role in evaluating and coordinating biomarker-driven research programs.

Topics: Amides; Anticholesteremic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Biomarkers, Pharmacological; Cholesterol Ester Transfer Proteins; Drug Approval; Drug Discovery; Dyslipidemias; Endpoint Determination; Esters; Humans; Lipids; Oxazolidinones; Predictive Value of Tests; Quinolines; Reproducibility of Results; Sulfhydryl Compounds; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitors substantially increase the concentration of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), which may have a possible beneficial effect for cardiovascular disease risk reduction.. Current data regarding the effects of CETP inhibitors on cardiovascular disease risk and possible mechanisms for their effects and safety are presented in this review. Expert commentary: The first CETP inhibitor, torcetrapib, was discontinued because of increased off-target adverse effects (increased serum aldosterone and blood pressure levels). The development program of dalcetrapib and evacetrapib, which were not associated with increased blood pressure, was terminated due to futility (insufficient efficacy) concerning cardiovascular outcomes. Although the failure of torcetrapib has been attributed to specific off-target effects, there are some common characteristics between CETP inhibitors pointing to the possibility that certain adverse effects may be class-specific. The newer CETP inhibitors anacetrapib and TA-8995 have promising effects on lipid profile and metabolism (increase of HDL-C and reduction of both low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and lipoprotein (a) levels), but their cardiovascular effects and safety profile have not yet been confirmed in large outcome trials.

Topics: Amides; Anticholesteremic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Cholesterol Ester Transfer Proteins; Cholesterol, HDL; Cholesterol, LDL; Esters; Humans; Lipids; Lipoprotein(a); Lipoproteins, HDL; Oxazolidinones; Quinolines; Sulfhydryl Compounds