stilbenes and idoxifene

This article provides an overview of the historical development, current research, clinical benefits, and potential future applications of the selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), tamoxifen and raloxifene. The understanding of the mechanism of action of SERMs led not only to the development of tamoxifen, the first widely used antiestrogen for breast cancer treatment, but also to its application as a chemopreventive agent. The SERM principle of antiestrogenic actions in the breast but estrogenlike actions in bone is reviewed in clinical practice through analysis of the current applications and the potential for expanding the role of SERMs. The current view of the molecular mechanism of SERM action is summarized to identify potential target sites for future research. The clinical success of tamoxifen and raloxifene for the prevention and treatment of breast cancer and osteoporosis, respectively, has encouraged the development of a range of new agents that target breast cancer, osteoporosis, coronary heart disease, and endometrial safety.

Topics: Anticarcinogenic Agents; Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic; Breast Neoplasms; Cinnamates; Drug Design; Forecasting; Humans; Molecular Biology; Piperidines; Pyrrolidines; Raloxifene Hydrochloride; Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators; Stilbenes; Tamoxifen; Tetrahydronaphthalenes; Thiophenes; Toremifene; Treatment Outcome

EM-652 exerts pure antiestrogenic activity in the mammary gland and endometrium, while tamoxifen, the antiestrogen most widely used for the treatment of breast cancer, exerts mixed antiestrogenic-estrogenic activity in these tissues. Our objective was to compare the agonistic and antagonistic effects of EM-652 with tamoxifen and 5 other antiestrogens on the growth of ZR-75-1 human breast xenografts in ovariectomized nude mice. During the 23 weeks of treatment at a daily oral dose of 50 microg, EM-652 was the only compound that decreased tumor size relative to pretreatment values, whereas the 6 other antiestrogens only decreased to various extents the progression rate stimulated by estrone. Under estrone stimulation, all groups of animals had more than 60% of their tumors in the progression category except for the EM-652-treated group, where only 7% of the tumors progressed. In the absence of estrone stimulation, progression was seen in 60%, 33%, 21% and 12% of tumors in the tamoxifen-, idoxifene-, toremifene- and raloxifene-treated groups, respectively, while only 4% of tumors progressed in the EM-652-treated group. The agonistic and antagonistic actions of each antiestrogen were also measured on endometrial epithelial cell thickness. Our present findings indicate that EM-652, in addition to being the most potent antiestrogen on human breast tumor growth, has no agonistic effect in breast and endometrial tissues. Since previous data have shown benefits of EM-652 on bone density and lipid profile, this compound could be an ideal candidate for chemoprevention of breast and uterine cancers, while protecting against osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease.

Topics: Animals; Breast Neoplasms; Cell Division; Cell Size; Cinnamates; Endometrium; Epithelial Cells; Estrogen Antagonists; Estrone; Female; Humans; Kinetics; Mice; Mice, Nude; Neoplasm Transplantation; Ovariectomy; Piperidines; Raloxifene Hydrochloride; Stilbenes; Tamoxifen; Toremifene; Tumor Cells, Cultured

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Cinnamates; Estrogen Antagonists; Female; Genital Neoplasms, Female; Humans; Norpregnenes; Piperidines; Raloxifene Hydrochloride; Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators; Stilbenes; Tamoxifen; Thiophenes; Toremifene

The triphenylethylene antiestrogens, idoxifene (Idox) and toremifene (Tor), are structurally related analogues of tamoxifen (Tam) and were developed to improve the therapeutic index for advanced breast cancer patients. However, the issue of cross-resistance with Tam for these new agents is critical for clinical testing because the majority of breast cancer patients have already received or failed adjuvant Tam. The goal of this study was to determine the effectiveness of Idox as an antitumor agent in three models of Tam-stimulated breast cancer in athymic mice and compare the results with the actions of Tor and ICI 182,780 in a Tam-stimulated MCF-7 tumor model. We first compared the activities of Tam and Idox in the 17beta-estradiol (E2)-stimulated MCF-7 tumor line MT2:E2. Tam and Idox reduced E2-stimulated growth by 65-70% (week 9: P = 0.0009 for Tam, P = 0.0005 for Idox versus E2 alone). However, Tam (1.5 mg daily) and Idox (1.0 mg daily) both produced T47D breast tumors in athymic mice during 23 weeks of treatment (12 tumors/22 sites and 15 tumors/18 sites, respectively). Tam and Idox stimulated tumor growth equally in two different Tam-stimulated MCF-7 models and in a T47D model. Tor was completely cross-resistant with Tam in the MCF-7 tumor model, which implied that neither Idox nor Tor would be effective as a second-line endocrine therapy after Tam failure and may offer no therapeutic advantages over Tam as adjuvant therapies. In contrast, ICI 182,780, a pure antiestrogen currently being tested as a treatment for breast cancer after Tam failure, had no growth-stimulatory effect on the MCF-7 Tam-stimulated breast tumor line. This agent may provide an advantage as an adjuvant therapy and increase the time to treatment failure.

Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Breast Neoplasms; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Estradiol; Estrogen Antagonists; Estrogen Receptor Modulators; Female; Fulvestrant; Humans; Mammary Neoplasms, Experimental; Mice; Mice, Inbred BALB C; Mice, Nude; Neoplasm Transplantation; Stilbenes; Tamoxifen; Time Factors; Toremifene; Tumor Cells, Cultured

Antiestrogens such as tamoxifen are one of the most effective methods of treating estrogen receptor (ERalpha) positive breast cancers; however, the effectiveness of this therapy is limited by the almost universal development of resistance to the drug. If antiestrogens are recognized differently by the cell as it has been suggested, then in disease conditions where tamoxifen fails to function effectively, a mechanistically different antiestrogen might yield successful results. Although many antiestrogens have been developed, a direct comparison of their mechanisms of action is lacking, thus limiting their utility. Therefore, to determine if there are mechanistic differences among available antiestrogens, we have carried out a comprehensive analysis of the molecular mechanisms of action of 4-hydroxy-tamoxifen (40HT), idoxifene, raloxifene, GW7604, and ICI 182,780. Using a novel set of peptides that recognize different surfaces on ERalpha, we have found that following binding to ERalpha, each ligand induces a distinct ERalpha-ligand conformation. Furthermore, transcriptional assays indicate that each ERalpha-ligand complex is recognized distinctly by the transcription machinery, and consequently, antiestrogens vary in their ability to inhibit estradiol- and 40HT-mediated activities. Relative binding assays have shown that the affinity of these ligands for ERalpha is not always representative of their inhibitory activity. Using this assay, we have also shown that the pharmacology of each antiestrogen is influenced differently by hormone binding proteins. Furthermore, GW7604, like ICI 182,780, but unlike the other antiestrogens evaluated, decreases the stability of the receptor. Overall, our results indicate that there are clear mechanistic distinctions among each of the antiestrogens studied. However, GW7604 and ICI 182,780 differ more significantly from tamoxifen than idoxifene and raloxifene. These data, which reveal differences among antiestrogens, should assist in the selection of compounds for the clinical regulation of ERalpha function.

Topics: Blood Proteins; Breast Neoplasms; Cell Division; Cinnamates; Drug Stability; Estradiol; Estrogen Antagonists; Estrogen Receptor alpha; Fulvestrant; Gene Expression; Humans; Protein Binding; Protein Conformation; Raloxifene Hydrochloride; Receptors, Estrogen; Stilbenes; Tamoxifen; Transcription, Genetic; Tumor Cells, Cultured