stigmatellin and terbutryne

We report here the first example of a reaction center mutant from Rhodobacter sphaeroides, where a single mutation (M266His --> Leu) taking place in the primary quinone protein pocket confers selective resistance to triazine-type inhibitors (terbutryn, ametryn, and atrazine), which bind in the secondary quinone protein pocket, at about 13 A from the mutation site. The M266His --> Leu mutation involves one of the iron atom ligands. Interestingly, neither the secondary quinone nor the highly specific inhibitor stigmatellin binding affinities are affected by the mutation. It is noticeable that in the M266His --> Ala mutant a nativelike behavior in observed. We suggest that the long side chain of Leu in position M266 may lack space to accommodate in the Q(A) pocket therefore transferring its hindrance to the Q(B) pocket. This may occur via the structural feature formed by the Q(A)-M219His-Fe-L190His-inhibitor (or Q(B)) connection, pushing L189Leu and/or L229Ile in closer contact to the triazine molecules, therefore decreasing their bindings. This opens the possibility to finely tune, in reaction center proteins, the affinity for herbicides by designing mutations distant from their binding sites.

Topics: Atrazine; Benzoquinones; Binding, Competitive; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Histidine; Leucine; Methionine; Models, Chemical; Mutagenesis, Site-Directed; Photosystem II Protein Complex; Polyenes; Protein Binding; Rhodobacter sphaeroides; Triazines

The equilibrium and kinetic parameters for the binding of various inhibitors to the Q(B) pocket of the bacterial reaction center were investigated in chromatophores from Rhodobacter capsulatus and Rhodobacter sphaeroides. By monitoring the near-IR absorption changes specific to Q(A)(-) and Q(B)(-), we measured the fraction of inhibited centers in the dark and the kinetics and extent of inhibitor displacement after one flash due to the formation of the Q(A)Q(B)(-) state. The inhibitor release rate was much faster for triazines and o-phenanthroline (t(1/2) in the 50 ms to 1 s range) than for stigmatellin (t(1/2) approximately 20 s). For inhibitors with a rapid release rate, the fast phase of P(+) decay observed in the absence of secondary donor reflects the competition between P(+)Q(A)(-) recombination and inhibitor release: it is thus faster than the P(+)Q(A)(-) recombination, and its relative extent is smaller than the fraction of initially inhibited centers. At appropriate inhibitor concentrations, one can have almost total binding in the dark and almost total inhibitor displacement after one flash. Under such conditions, a pair of closely spaced flashes resets the two-electron gate in a single state (Q(A)Q(B)(-)), irrespective of the initial state. The apparent dissociation constant of terbutryn was significantly increased (by a factor of 4-7) in the presence of Q(A)(-), in agreement with the conclusion of Wraight and co-workers [Stein, R. R., et al. (1984) J. Cell. Biochem. 24, 243-259]. We suggest that this effect is essentially due to a tighter binding of ubiquinone in the Q(A)(-) state.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Benzoquinones; Betaproteobacteria; Binding, Competitive; Herbicides; Kinetics; Photolysis; Photosynthetic Reaction Center Complex Proteins; Polyenes; Quinones; Rhodobacter capsulatus; Rhodobacter sphaeroides; Rhodospirillum rubrum; Titrimetry; Triazines