sq-29548 and sulprostone

The present study examined the hypothesis that prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) through activation of prostaglandin E (EP) receptor contributes to endothelium-dependent contractions.. Western blotting revealed that the protein expression of EP1 receptor was significantly down-regulated in the aorta of the spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR), but there was no significant difference in the expression of EP2, EP4, and total EP3 receptors between preparations of Wistar Kyoto rats (WKY) and SHR. Isometric tension studies showed that low concentrations of PGE2 caused endothelium-dependent relaxations in WKY but not in aortas of the SHR. High concentrations of PGE2 evoked contractions predominately through the activation of thromboxane-prostanoid (TP) receptors in the WKY, but involves the dual activation EP and TP receptors in the SHR. SQ29,548, BAYu3405 and Terutroban (TP receptor antagonists), and AH6809 (non-selective EP receptor antagonist) abolished, while SC19220 (preferential EP1 receptor antagonist) did not inhibit endothelium-dependent contractions. Both SC19220 and AH6809 significantly inhibited contractions to U46619 (TP receptor agonist).. The present study demonstrates that the contraction caused by PGE2 in the SHR aorta is dependent on the activation of EP1 and TP receptors, but that endothelium-dependent contractions do not require the former. Thus, PGE2 is unlikely to be an endothelium-derived contracting factor in this artery. The ability of AH6809 to inhibit endothelium-dependent contractions can be attributed to its partial antagonism at TP receptors. Nevertheless, the impairment of PGE2-mediated relaxation may contribute to endothelial dysfunction in the aorta of the SHR.

Topics: 15-Hydroxy-11 alpha,9 alpha-(epoxymethano)prosta-5,13-dienoic Acid; Animals; Aorta, Thoracic; Blotting, Western; Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic; Carbazoles; Dibenz(b,f)(1,4)oxazepine-10(11H)-carboxylic acid, 8-chloro-, 2-acetylhydrazide; Dinoprostone; Disease Models, Animal; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Endothelium, Vascular; Fatty Acids, Unsaturated; Hydrazines; Hypertension; Immunohistochemistry; Naphthalenes; Phenylephrine; Potassium Chloride; Propionates; Prostaglandin Antagonists; Rats; Rats, Inbred SHR; Rats, Inbred WKY; Receptors, Prostaglandin E; Receptors, Prostaglandin E, EP1 Subtype; Receptors, Thromboxane; Sulfonamides; Vasoconstriction; Vasoconstrictor Agents; Vasodilation; Xanthones

Evidence indicates that prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)) preferentially affects preglomerular renal vessels. However, whether this is limited to small-caliber arterioles or whether larger vessels farther upstream also respond to PGE(2) is currently unclear. In the present study, we first investigated the effects of PGE(2) along the preglomerular vascular tree and subsequently focused on proximal interlobular arteries (ILAs). Proximal ILAs in hydronephrotic rat kidneys as well as isolated vessels from normal kidneys constricted in response to PGE(2), both under basal conditions and after the induction of vascular tone. By contrast, smaller vessels, i.e., distal ILAs and afferent arterioles, exhibited PGE(2)-induced vasodilation. Endothelium removal and pretreatment of single, isolated proximal ILAs with an EP1 receptor blocker (SC51322, 1 micromol/l) or a thromboxane A(2) receptor blocker (SQ29548, 1 micromol/l) did not prevent vasoconstriction to PGE(2). Furthermore, in the presence of SC51322, responses of these vessels to PGE(2) and the EP1/EP3 agonist sulprostone were superimposable, indicating that PGE(2)-induced vasoconstriction is mediated by EP3 receptors on smooth muscle cells. Immunohistochemical staining of proximal ILAs confirmed the presence of EP3 receptor protein on these cells and the endothelium. Adding PGE(2) to normal isolated kidneys induced a biphasic flow response, i.e., an initial flow increase at PGE(2) concentrations

Topics: Angiotensin II; Animals; Arteries; Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic; Dinoprostone; Endothelium, Vascular; Fatty Acids, Unsaturated; Hydrazines; Hydronephrosis; In Vitro Techniques; Kidney Cortex; Male; Muscle, Smooth, Vascular; Norepinephrine; Perfusion; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Receptors, Prostaglandin E; Receptors, Prostaglandin E, EP1 Subtype; Receptors, Prostaglandin E, EP3 Subtype; Receptors, Thromboxane A2, Prostaglandin H2; Renal Circulation; Vasoconstriction; Vasoconstrictor Agents

1. Since the role of prostanoid receptors in intestinal peristalsis is largely unknown, the peristaltic motor effects of some prostaglandin (DP, EP, IP), thromboxane (TP) and leukotriene (LT) receptor agonists and antagonists were investigated. 2. Propulsive peristalsis in fluid-perfused segments from the guinea-pig small intestine was triggered by a rise of the intraluminal pressure and recorded via the intraluminal pressure changes associated with the peristaltic waves. Alterations of distension sensitivity were deduced from alterations of the peristaltic pressure threshold and modifications of peristaltic performance were reflected by modifications of the amplitude, maximal acceleration and residual baseline pressure of the peristaltic waves. 3. Four categories of peristaltic motor effects became apparent: a decrease in distension sensitivity and peristaltic performance as induced by the EP1/EP3 receptor agonist sulprostone and the TP receptor agonist U-46619 (1-1000 nM); a decrease in distension sensitivity without a major change in peristaltic performance as induced by PGD(2) (3-300 nM) and LTD(4) (10-100 nM); a decrease in peristaltic performance without a major change in distension sensitivity as induced by PGE(1), PGE(2) (1-1000 nM) and the EP1/IP receptor agonist iloprost (1-100 nM); and a decrease in peristaltic performance associated with an increase in distension sensitivity as induced by the EP2 receptor agonist butaprost (1-1000 nM). The DP receptor agonist BW-245 C (1-1000 nM) was without effect. 4. The peristaltic motor action of sulprostone remained unchanged by the EP1 receptor antagonist SC-51089 (1 micro M) and the DP/EP1/EP2 receptor antagonist AH-6809 (30 micro M), whereas that of U-46619 and LTD(4) was prevented by the TP receptor antagonist SQ-29548 (10 micro M) and the cysteinyl-leukotriene(1) (cysLT(1)) receptor antagonist tomelukast (10 micro M), respectively. 5. These observations and their pharmacological analysis indicate that activation of EP2, EP3, IP, TP and cysLT(1) receptors, but not DP receptors, modulate intestinal peristalsis in a receptor-selective manner, whereas activation of EP1 seems to be without influence on propulsive peristalsis. In a wider perspective it appears as if the effect of prostanoid receptor agonists to induce diarrhoea is due to their prosecretory but not peristaltic motor action.

Topics: 15-Hydroxy-11 alpha,9 alpha-(epoxymethano)prosta-5,13-dienoic Acid; Alprostadil; Animals; Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic; Dinoprostone; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Fatty Acids, Unsaturated; Female; Guinea Pigs; Hydantoins; Hydrazines; Iloprost; In Vitro Techniques; Intestine, Small; Leukotriene Antagonists; Leukotriene D4; Male; Oxazepines; Peristalsis; Prostaglandin D2; Prostaglandins A; Receptors, Leukotriene; Receptors, Prostaglandin; Xanthenes; Xanthones; Yohimbine