sitagliptin-phosphate and glimepiride

Combining antihyperglycemic agents in order to rapidly and safely achieve the best possible glycemic control is the standard of care today for the management of type 2 diabetes. Agents should ideally have mechanisms of actions that are complementary and that improve glycemic control without unacceptable gain in body weight or hypoglycemia. Areas covered: Ertugliflozin and metformin hydrochloride (ertugliflozin/metformin, SEGLUROMET) is a recently approved fixed-dose combination tablet containing the sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitor ertugliflozin and metformin. This review summarizes key characteristics of ertugliflozin and metformin, as well as the efficacy and safety results of co-administration of these agents in the ertugliflozin clinical development program. This information comes from the ertugliflozin/metformin prescribing information as well as published clinical trials obtained through a PubMed search. Expert commentary: SGLT-2 inhibitors are an important class of antihyperglycemic agents that are efficacious as monotherapy and in combination with other antihyperglycemic agents. Given their favorable effects on glycemia control as well as 'extra-glycemic' parameters such as body weight and blood pressure, they are ideal agents for appropriate patients with type 2 diabetes. The fixed-dose combination of ertugliflozin with metformin is an effective combination that is conveniently administered and may improve medication adherence and persistence.

Topics: Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Metformin; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Treatment Outcome

Liraglutide is a once-daily human glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D). It has been prospectively investigated in a series of multinational, randomised, controlled phase 3 trials (the Liraglutide Effect and Action in Diabetes programme), as well as in an additional direct head-to-head study with sitagliptin. These trials were designed to clarify the use and safety of liraglutide in clinical practice across the treatment continuum of T2D, and consequently involved a large number and diverse range of patients. These studies also included active comparisons against antidiabetic agents including metformin, rosiglitazone, glimepiride, insulin glargine, exenatide and sitagliptin, and therefore have helped to examine clinical differences and similarities between liraglutide and these commonly used agents.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Exenatide; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Liraglutide; Male; Metformin; Peptides; Pyrazines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rosiglitazone; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Thiazolidinediones; Treatment Outcome; Triazoles; Venoms

New drugs for type 2 diabetes that act on incretin metabolism have been shown to improve glycemic control, reduce body weight and have a low risk for hypoglycemia. Among these, liraglutide is the first glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) analogue approved for subcutaneous, once-daily administration. According to results from clinical trials, liraglutide is an attractive alternative for the early treatment of type 2 diabetes. The results of the LEAD (Liraglutide Effect and Action in Diabetes) study program demonstrated the efficacy and safety of liraglutide in terms of reduction of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels, significant loss of body weight that was maintained over the long term, better control of the lipid profile and systolic arterial pressure, reduction of the risk for hypoglycemia and reduction of cardiovascular risk. Moreover, the drug was demonstrated to be safe and can be co-administered with oral antidiabetic agents. The product's tolerability has been demonstrated, with nausea as the most common adverse event, which waned from the fourth week of treatment.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Liraglutide; Pyrazines; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Triazoles

In the last couple of years, a new class of antidiabetic drugs became available for the clinical practice. Due to the intensive research, several new drugs reached the market. Among the incretinmimetics both the GLP-1 (glucagon like peptide-1)-receptor agonist exenatide and the GLP-1-analogue liraglutide can be used for treatment. As for incretin enhancers (dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 [DPP-4]-inhibitors), sitagliptin, vildagliptin and saxagliptin are available in Hungary, linagliptin will be introduced to the market in the near future. In clinical practice, any incretin-based new drugs can be used for treating patients with type 2 diabetes, preferably in combination with metformin. The clinical experiences with these new drugs are reviewed focusing on both the benefits and the potential side-effects of the particular compounds.

Topics: Adamantane; Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Drug Approval; Drug Therapy, Combination; Exenatide; Gliclazide; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hungary; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Linagliptin; Liraglutide; Metformin; Nitriles; Peptides; Pioglitazone; Purines; Pyrazines; Pyrrolidines; Quinazolines; Receptors, Glucagon; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Thiazolidinediones; Triazoles; Venoms; Vildagliptin

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is the leading cause of kidney disease in the US. It is not known whether glucose-lowering medications differentially affect kidney function.. To evaluate kidney outcomes in the Glycemia Reduction Approaches in Diabetes: A Comparative Effectiveness (GRADE) trial comparing 4 classes of glucose-lowering medications added to metformin for glycemic management in individuals with T2D.. A randomized clinical trial was conducted at 36 sites across the US. Participants included adults with T2D for less than 10 years, a hemoglobin A1c level between 6.8% and 8.5%, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) greater than or equal to 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 who were receiving metformin treatment. A total of 5047 participants were enrolled between July 8, 2013, and August 11, 2017, and followed up for a mean of 5.0 years (range, 0-7.6 years). Data were analyzed from February 21, 2022, to March 27, 2023.. Addition of insulin glargine, glimepiride, liraglutide, or sitagliptin to metformin, with the medication combination continued until the HbA1c was greater than 7.5%; thereafter, insulin was added to maintain glycemic control.. Chronic eGFR slope (change in eGFR between year 1 and trial end) and a composite kidney disease progression outcome (albuminuria, dialysis, transplant, or death due to kidney disease). Secondary outcomes included incident eGFR less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, 40% decrease in eGFR to less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, doubling of urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) to 30 mg/g or greater, and progression of Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes stage. Analyses were intention-to-treat.. Of the 5047 participants, 3210 (63.6%) were men. Baseline characteristics were mean (SD) age 57.2 (10.0) years; HbA1c 7.5% (0.5%); diabetes duration, 4.2 (2.7) years; body mass index, 34.3 (6.8); blood pressure 128.3/77.3 (14.7/9.9) mm Hg; eGFR 94.9 (16.8) mL/min/1.73 m2; and median UACR, 6.4 (IQR 3.1-16.9) mg/g; 2933 (58.1%) were treated with renin-angiotensin-aldosterone inhibitors. Mean chronic eGFR slope was -2.03 (95% CI, -2.20 to -1.86) mL/min/1.73 m2 per year for patients receiving sitagliptin; glimepiride, -1.92 (95% CI, -2.08 to -1.75) mL/min/1.73 m2 per year; liraglutide, -2.08 (95% CI, -2.26 to -1.90) mL/min/1.73 m2 per year; and insulin glargine, -2.02 (95% CI, -2.19 to -1.84) mL/min/1.73 m2 per year (P = .61). Mean composite kidney disease progression occurred in 135 (10.6%) patients receiving sitagliptin; glimepiride, 155 (12.4%); liraglutide, 152 (12.0%); and insulin glargine, 150 (11.9%) (P = .56). Most of the composite outcome was attributable to albuminuria progression (98.4%). There were no significant differences by treatment assignment in secondary outcomes. There were no adverse kidney events attributable to medication assignment.. In this randomized clinical trial, among people with T2D and predominantly free of kidney disease at baseline, no significant differences in kidney outcomes were observed during 5 years of follow-up when a dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor, sulfonylurea, glucagonlike peptide 1 receptor agonist, or basal insulin was added to metformin for glycemic control.. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01794143.

Topics: Adult; Albuminuria; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Disease Progression; Female; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Glucose; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Kidney; Kidney Diseases; Liraglutide; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Sitagliptin Phosphate

Data are lacking on the comparative effectiveness of commonly used glucose-lowering medications, when added to metformin, with respect to microvascular and cardiovascular disease outcomes in persons with type 2 diabetes.. We assessed the comparative effectiveness of four commonly used glucose-lowering medications, added to metformin, in achieving and maintaining a glycated hemoglobin level of less than 7.0% in participants with type 2 diabetes. The randomly assigned therapies were insulin glargine U-100 (hereafter, glargine), glimepiride, liraglutide, and sitagliptin. Prespecified secondary outcomes with respect to microvascular and cardiovascular disease included hypertension and dyslipidemia, confirmed moderately or severely increased albuminuria or an estimated glomerular filtration rate of less than 60 ml per minute per 1.73 m. During a mean 5.0 years of follow-up in 5047 participants, there were no material differences among the interventions with respect to the development of hypertension or dyslipidemia or with respect to microvascular outcomes; the mean overall rate (i.e., events per 100 participant-years) of moderately increased albuminuria levels was 2.6, of severely increased albuminuria levels 1.1, of renal impairment 2.9, and of diabetic peripheral neuropathy 16.7. The treatment groups did not differ with respect to MACE (overall rate, 1.0), hospitalization for heart failure (0.4), death from cardiovascular causes (0.3), or all deaths (0.6). There were small differences with respect to rates of any cardiovascular disease, with 1.9, 1.9, 1.4, and 2.0 in the glargine, glimepiride, liraglutide, and sitagliptin groups, respectively. When one treatment was compared with the combined results of the other three treatments, the hazard ratios for any cardiovascular disease were 1.1 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.9 to 1.3) in the glargine group, 1.1 (95% CI, 0.9 to 1.4) in the glimepiride group, 0.7 (95% CI, 0.6 to 0.9) in the liraglutide group, and 1.2 (95% CI, 1.0 to 1.5) in the sitagliptin group.. In participants with type 2 diabetes, the incidences of microvascular complications and death were not materially different among the four treatment groups. The findings indicated possible differences among the groups in the incidence of any cardiovascular disease. (Funded by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases and others; GRADE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01794143.).

Topics: Albuminuria; Blood Glucose; Cardiovascular Diseases; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Neuropathies; Drug Therapy, Combination; Dyslipidemias; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Glycated Hemoglobin; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypertension; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Liraglutide; Metformin; Microvessels; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Sulfonylurea Compounds

The comparative effectiveness of glucose-lowering medications for use with metformin to maintain target glycated hemoglobin levels in persons with type 2 diabetes is uncertain.. In this trial involving participants with type 2 diabetes of less than 10 years' duration who were receiving metformin and had glycated hemoglobin levels of 6.8 to 8.5%, we compared the effectiveness of four commonly used glucose-lowering medications. We randomly assigned participants to receive insulin glargine U-100 (hereafter, glargine), the sulfonylurea glimepiride, the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist liraglutide, or sitagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor. The primary metabolic outcome was a glycated hemoglobin level, measured quarterly, of 7.0% or higher that was subsequently confirmed, and the secondary metabolic outcome was a confirmed glycated hemoglobin level greater than 7.5%.. A total of 5047 participants (19.8% Black and 18.6% Hispanic or Latinx) who had received metformin for type 2 diabetes were followed for a mean of 5.0 years. The cumulative incidence of a glycated hemoglobin level of 7.0% or higher (the primary metabolic outcome) differed significantly among the four groups (P<0.001 for a global test of differences across groups); the rates with glargine (26.5 per 100 participant-years) and liraglutide (26.1) were similar and lower than those with glimepiride (30.4) and sitagliptin (38.1). The differences among the groups with respect to a glycated hemoglobin level greater than 7.5% (the secondary outcome) paralleled those of the primary outcome. There were no material differences with respect to the primary outcome across prespecified subgroups defined according to sex, age, or race or ethnic group; however, among participants with higher baseline glycated hemoglobin levels there appeared to be an even greater benefit with glargine, liraglutide, and glimepiride than with sitagliptin. Severe hypoglycemia was rare but significantly more frequent with glimepiride (in 2.2% of the participants) than with glargine (1.3%), liraglutide (1.0%), or sitagliptin (0.7%). Participants who received liraglutide reported more frequent gastrointestinal side effects and lost more weight than those in the other treatment groups.. All four medications, when added to metformin, decreased glycated hemoglobin levels. However, glargine and liraglutide were significantly, albeit modestly, more effective in achieving and maintaining target glycated hemoglobin levels. (Funded by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases and others; GRADE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01794143.).

Topics: Blood Glucose; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Liraglutide; Metformin; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Treatment Outcome

Diabetes mellitus is a chronic metabolic disease which has an adverse impact on the quality of patient's life, so patients often need to receive treatment for a long time. Selection of medications with high therapeutics effects and low cost is very important for patients to take medicine for a longer period of time. Sitagliptin is a drug which is widely used in clinics and can effectively control blood glucose level. This article explores the pharmacoeconomic value of Sitagliptin in the treatment of diabetes mellitus.. A total of 100 patients with diabetes mellitus treated were recruited in this study. The patients were randomly divided into 4 groups with 25 cases in each group. Patients in group A were treated with pioglitazone, group B with Sitagliptin, group C with metformin and group D with glimepiride. The cost of the drugs, the treatment results and adverse effects were compared.. Compared with group A, C and D, the cost-effectiveness ratio of group B was low (p<0.05), and the therapeutic effect was high (p<0.05). In addition, the incidence of adverse reactions in group B was lower than that in group A, C and D (p<0.05). There was no significant difference in the levels of FPG, 2hPG and HbAlc in patients among the four groups before treatment (p>0.05). After treatment, the levels of FPG, 2hPG and HbAlc in group B were significantly lower than those in groups A, C and D (p<0.05). Finally, there was no significant difference in waist circumference and BMI among the four groups before treatment (p>0.05). After treatment, the waist circumference and BMI in group B were lower than those in groups A, C and D (p<0.05).. The application of Sitagliptin in the treatment of diabetic patients can effectively enhance the therapeutic effect. The cost effectiveness is satisfactory, and the blood glucose level can be maintained at a stable state.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Diabetes Mellitus; Economics, Pharmaceutical; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Pioglitazone; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Sulfonylurea Compounds

Ertugliflozin, a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor for the treatment of adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus, is expected to be coadministered with sitagliptin, metformin, glimepiride, and/or simvastatin. Four separate open-label, randomized, single-dose, crossover studies were conducted in healthy adults to assess the potential pharmacokinetic interactions between ertugliflozin 15 mg and sitagliptin 100 mg (n = 12), metformin 1000 mg (n = 18), glimepiride 1 mg (n = 18), or simvastatin 40 mg (n = 18). Noncompartmental pharmacokinetic parameters derived from plasma concentration-time data were analyzed using mixed-effects models to assess interactions. Coadministration of sitagliptin, metformin, glimepiride, or simvastatin with ertugliflozin had no effect on area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 to infinity (AUC

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucuronosyltransferase; Healthy Volunteers; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Sulfonylurea Compounds; UDP-Glucuronosyltransferase 1A9; Young Adult

To assess the efficacy and safety of add-on therapy with the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor teneligliptin compared with sitagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) inadequately controlled with metformin and glimepiride.. This was a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority study of adult Korean subjects with T2DM (n = 201), with HbA1c ranging from 7.0% to 11.0%, on stable doses of metformin plus glimepiride. Subjects were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to receive either oral teneligliptin 20 mg or sitagliptin 100 mg for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in HbA1c.. At baseline, mean age was 60.56 ± 9.41 years, body mass index was 25.23 ± 2.85 kg/m. Teneligliptin was non-inferior to sitagliptin in the context of triple therapy for T2DM and is an important option in this setting.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Equivalence Trials as Topic; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Republic of Korea; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Thiazolidines; Treatment Failure

People with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) have preclinical cardiac and vascular dysfunction associated with low cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF). This is especially concerning because CRF is a powerful predictor of cardiovascular mortality, a primary issue in T2D management. Glucagon-like pepetide-1 (GLP-1) augments cardiovascular function and our previous data in rodents demonstrate that potentiating the GLP-1 signal with a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) inhibitor augments CRF. Lacking are pharmacological treatments which can target T2D-specific physiological barriers to exercise to potentially permit adaptations necessary to improve CRF and thereby health outcomes in people with T2D. We therefore hypothesized that administration of a DPP4-inhibitor (sitagliptin) would improve CRF in adults with T2D.. Thirty-eight participants (64 ± 1 years; mean ± SE) with T2D were randomized in a double-blinded study to receive 100 mg/day sitagliptin, 2 mg/day glimepiride, or placebo for 3 months after baseline measurements. Fasting glucose decreased with both glimepiride and sitagliptin compared with placebo (P = 0.002). CRF did not change in any group (Placebo: Pre: 15.4 ± 0.9 vs. Post: 16.1 ± 1.1 ml/kg/min vs. Glimepiride: 18.5 ± 1.0 vs. 17.7 ± 1.2 ml/kg/min vs. Sitagliptin: 19.1 ± 1.2 vs. 18.3 ± 1.1 ml/kg/min; P = 0.3). Sitagliptin improved measures of cardiac diastolic function, however, measures of vascular function did not change with any treatment.. Three months of sitagliptin improved diastolic cardiac function, however, CRF did not change. These data suggest that targeting the physiological contributors to CRF with sitagliptin alone is not an adequate strategy to improve CRF in people with T2D.. www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT01951339.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Cardiorespiratory Fitness; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diastole; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Double-Blind Method; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Muscle, Skeletal; Oxidative Phosphorylation; Oxygen Consumption; Placebos; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Sulfonylurea Compounds

Fasiglifam (TAK-875) is a G protein-coupled receptor 40 agonist that was being investigated for treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). A development program was terminated late in phase III clinical trials due to liver safety concerns.. The liver safety of fasiglifam was assessed from data based on six phase II and nine phase III double-blind studies and two open-label studies with emphasis on pooled data from 15 double-blind studies from both global and Japanese development programs. Taking into consideration different daily doses of fasiglifam administered in clinical studies, the primary comparisons were between all patients exposed to fasiglifam (any dose) versus placebo, and, where applicable, versus the two active comparators, sitagliptin or glimepiride. A Liver Safety Evaluation Committee consisting of hepatologists blinded to treatment assignments evaluated hepatic adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (SAEs) for causal relationship to study drug.. The analysis included data from 9139 patients with T2DM in 15 double-blind controlled studies who received either fasiglifam (n = 5359, fasiglifam group), fasiglifam and sitagliptin (n = 123), or a comparator agent (n = 3657, non-exposed group consisting of placebo and other antidiabetic agents). Exposure to treatment for more than 1 year ranged from 249 patients in the placebo arm, to 370 patients in the glimepiride arm and 617 patients in the fasiglifam 50 mg arm. The primary focus of the analysis was on the hepatic safety of fasiglifam. The overall safety profile based on treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs), SAEs, deaths, and withdrawal due to AEs was similar between fasiglifam and placebo (excluding liver test abnormalities). However, there was an increased incidence rate of serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevations > 3 × upper limit of normal (ULN), 5 × ULN, and 10 × ULN in fasiglifam-treated patients compared with those treated with placebo or active comparators. ALT elevations > 3 × ULN for fasiglifam were 2.7% compared with 0.8 and 0.5% for the active comparators and placebo. There did not appear to be a clear dose response in incidence of ALT elevations between patients receiving 25 or 50 mg daily. The cumulative incidence of elevations in serum ALT > 3 × ULN was higher in the first 6 months of treatment with fasiglifam compared with both placebo and the active comparators, but the rate of new ALT elevations appeared to be similar across all treatment groups thereafter. No demographic or baseline patient characteristics were identified to predict elevations exceeding ALT > 3 × ULN in fasiglifam-treated patients. The pattern of liver injury with fasiglifam was hepatocellular, and there were no reports of liver-related deaths, liver failure or life-threatening liver injury. Most fasiglifam-associated ALT elevations were asymptomatic and resolved promptly upon discontinuing treatment, but in two patients the recovery was prolonged. Importantly, three important serious liver injury cases were identified among fasiglifam-treated patients; one case was adjudicated to be a clear Hy's Law case and the two remaining cases were considered to closely approximate Hy's Law cases.. Although the incidence of overall AEs, SAEs, and deaths was similar between fasiglifam and placebo, a liver signal was identified based primarily on the difference in liver chemistry values in the fasiglifam group compared with the placebo and active comparator groups. Three serious liver injuries were attributed to fasiglifam treatment. Clinical development of fasiglifam was halted due to these liver safety concerns.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Alanine Transaminase; Benzofurans; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Liver; Male; Middle Aged; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Sulfones; Sulfonylurea Compounds

Diabetes therapies that provide durable glycaemic control for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are needed. We present efficacy results of albiglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, in people with T2DM over a 3-year period.. Five of the 8 HARMONY phase 3 trials, comparing albiglutide with other therapies or placebo across a spectrum of clinical care, lasted for a preplanned 3years. Participants with uncontrolled hyperglycaemia who met predetermined criteria could receive rescue medication. The ability to remain on study medication without needing additional rescue was an efficacy measure. Glycaemic measures and body weight were analysed in 2 populations: those who remained rescue-free and all participants.. Participants (n=3132) were randomised to albiglutide or comparator. A greater proportion of participants who received albiglutide remained rescue-free (55-71%) compared with placebo (35-51%; p<0.001 to p=0.002). The proportion of rescue-free participants with albiglutide did not differ from glimepiride or insulin glargine, was higher than with sitagliptin (p=0.013), and lower than with pioglitazone (p=0.045). At 3years, albiglutide was associated with clinically significant reductions in hyperglycaemia (eg, rescue-free participants: HbA1c -0.52% [SE0.11] to -0.98% [0.12]; -5.7mmol/mol [1.2] to -10.7mmol/mol [1.3] and all participants: HbA1c -0.29% [0.11] to-0.92% [0.13]; -3.2mmol/mol [1.2] to -10.1mmol/mol [1.4]). Albiglutide was also associated with modest reductions in body weight vs pioglitazone, glimepiride, and insulin glargine, which were associated with weight gain.. These 3-year efficacy data support long-term use of albiglutide in the management of people with T2DM. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00849056, NCT00849017, NCT00838903, NCT00838916, NCT00839527.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Male; Pioglitazone; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Thiazolidinediones; Treatment Outcome

Early initiation of combination therapy using antihyperglycemic agents is recommended for treating type 2 diabetes (T2D). The present multicenter double-blind randomized parallel-group study examined the efficacy and safety of a sitagliptin and metformin fixed-dose combination (Sita/Met) compared with glimepiride in T2D patients as initial treatment.. Type 2 diabetes patients (aged ≥18 years) were randomized to Sita/Met or glimepiride for 30 weeks after a wash-off run-in period. The primary endpoint was change from baseline (CFB) in HbA1c. Secondary endpoints included the proportion of patients achieving target goal (HbA1c < 7.0 % [53 mmol/mol]) and CFB in fasting plasma glucose (FPG). Safety assessments comprised weight gain from baseline and the incidence of adverse events (AEs).. In total, 292 patients were randomized to Sita/Met (n = 147) or glimepiride (n = 145). After 30 weeks, Sita/Met demonstrated superiority over glimepiride in reducing HbA1c (-1.49 % vs -0.71 %, respectively; between-group difference - 0.78 %; P < 0.001). A significantly higher proportion of patients achieved the target goal with Sita/Met (81.2 %) than with glimepiride (40.1 %; P < 0.001). Greater reduction in FPG occurred with Sita/Met than with glimepiride (least-squares mean difference - 23.5 mg/dL; P < 0.001). Both drugs were generally well tolerated. Hypoglycemia events and weight gain were significantly lower in patients with Sita/Met than with glimepiride (5.5 % vs 20.1 % and -0.83 vs +0.90 kg, respectively; both P < 0.001). No serious drug-related AEs or deaths were reported.. Compared with glimepiride, Sita/Met as an initial treatment led to significantly greater improvements in glycemic control and body weight changes, with a lower incidence of hypoglycemia, over 30 weeks.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diarrhea; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Dyspepsia; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Infections; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Nausea; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Treatment Outcome

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of gemigliptin vs sitagliptin or glimepiride as initial combination therapy with metformin on glycaemic variability and to assess the correlation between glycaemic variability reduction and the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibition in patients with type 2 diabetes. This multicentre, randomized, active-controlled, open-label exploratory study included 69 patients with HbA1c > 7.5%. Subjects were randomized to receive gemigliptin 50 mg (n = 24), sitagliptin 100 mg (n = 23) or glimepiride 2 mg (n = 22) for 12 weeks. After 12 weeks, the change in mean amplitude of glycaemic excursion (MAGE) compared with baseline was significantly lower in the DPP-4 inhibitor groups compared with that in patients who received glimepiride. Furthermore, the standard deviation (SD) of glucose was significantly lower in patients who received gemigliptin than that in patients who received sitagliptin or glimepiride. The DPP-4 inhibition was significantly correlated with changes in MAGE and SD of glucose. In conclusion, gemigliptin and sitagliptin were more effective than glimepiride in reducing glycaemic variability as initial combination therapy with metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes, and the DPP-4 inhibition was associated with a reduction in glycaemic variability.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Piperidones; Pyrimidines; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP-4i) is commonly used worldwide for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. In addition to its hypoglycemic activity, DPP-4i might have anti-inflammatory effects. In this study we examined the effects of DPP-4i on the serum levels of soluble CD163 (sCD163), a marker for activated macrophages, in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus. We compared these anti-inflammatory effects with those of α glucosidase inhibitor (αGI).. Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were stably maintained on ≤2mg/day glimepiride alone were recruited and randomly assigned to receive additional sitagliptin (n=37) or αGI (n=37). Levels of sCD163 were measured before the addition and after a 24-week treatment period.. Addition of sitagliptin significantly reduced the serum sCD163 (632 vs. 575ng/mL, p<0.05), while αGI did not display this effect (624 vs. 607ng/mL). The changes in levels of sCD163 were not related to changes in either HbA1c or body mass index (BMI).. Our results suggested that DPP-4i might exert anti-inflammatory effects in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus, which are independent of its effects on glycemia and BMI.

Topics: Aged; Antigens, CD; Antigens, Differentiation, Myelomonocytic; Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glycoside Hydrolase Inhibitors; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Japan; Macrophages; Male; Middle Aged; Receptors, Cell Surface; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Sulfonylurea Compounds

Despite the current guideline's recommendation of a timely stepwise intensification therapy, the "clinical inertia", termed as the delayed treatment intensification, commonly exists in the real world, which may be partly due to the relatively little substantial evidence and no clear consensus regarding the efficacy and safety of triple oral agents in patients inadequately controlled with dual therapy. In this clinical trial performed in 237 centers in China, 5,535 type 2 diabetic patients inadequately controlled by previous therapies were treated with a stable metformin/sitagliptin dual therapy for 20 weeks. The patients who did not reach the glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) goal were then further randomized into glimepiride, gliclazide, repaglinide, or acarbose group for an additional 24-week triple therapy. A mean HbA1c reduction of 0.85% was observed when sitagliptin was added to the patients inadequately controlled with metformin in 16 weeks. Further HbA1c reductions in the 24-week triple therapy stage were 0.65% in glimepiride group, 0.70% in gliclazide group, 0.61% in repaglinide group, and 0.45% in acarbose group. The non-inferiority criterion for primary hypotheses was met for gliclazide and repaglinide, but not for acarbose, compared with glimepiride, when added to metformin/sitagliptin dual therapy. The incidences of adverse events (AEs) were 29.2% in the dual therapy stage and 30.3% in the triple therapy stage. Metformin/sitagliptin as baseline therapy, with the addition of a third oral antihyperglycemic agent, including glimepiride, gliclazide, repaglinide, or acarbose, was effective, safe and well-tolerated for achieving an HbA1c <7.0% goal in type 2 diabetic patients inadequately controlled with previous therapies. The timely augmentation of up to three oral antihyperglycemic agents is valid and of important clinical benefit to prevent patients from exposure to unnecessarily prolonged hyperglycemia.

Topics: Acarbose; Adult; Blood Glucose; Carbamates; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Gliclazide; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Treatment Outcome

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sitagliptin administered to elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) for 1 year as compared with glimepiride. Patients aged ≥60 years with T2DM and inadequately controlled blood glucose were randomly assigned to sitagliptin 50 mg once daily or glimepiride 0.5 mg once daily for 52 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline to week 52. Secondary efficacy endpoints included self-monitored blood glucose and weight. Safety endpoints were adverse events including hypoglycaemia. Administration of sitagliptin or glimepiride to elderly patients with T2DM resulted in a significant decrease in HbA1c change from baseline. At 52 weeks, the least squares mean difference between the treatments was 0.11% (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.02 to 0.24; P = .087) (1.2 mmol/mol [-0.2 to 2.6]). The upper limit of the CI was below the predefined non-inferiority margin (0.3% [3.3 mmol/mol]), demonstrating non-inferiority of sitagliptin to glimepiride for the primary endpoint. Sitagliptin resulted in a significantly lower incidence rate of non-serious hypoglycaemia than glimepiride during the 52 weeks (4.7% vs 16.1%; P = .002); thus, sitagliptin is a useful therapeutic option for elderly patients with T2DM.

Topics: Activities of Daily Living; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aging; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Equivalence Trials as Topic; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incidence; Incretins; Japan; Middle Aged; Reproducibility of Results; Severity of Illness Index; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Weight Loss

Tofogliflozin is an oral hypoglycemic agent with a novel mechanism of action that reduces blood glucose levels by promoting glucose excretion in urine, achieved by selectively inhibiting sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2). We evaluated the effects of several selected anti-type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) drugs-glimepiride, metformin, sitagliptin, pioglitazone, miglitol, nateglinide, and voglibose-on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of tofogliflozin, and the effects of tofogliflozin on the pharmacokinetics of these anti-T2DM drugs in healthy male volunteers.. A single dose of either tofogliflozin alone, one of the anti-T2DM drugs alone, or co-administration of tofogliflozin and the anti-T2DM drug was administered to 108 healthy men. Cmax, AUCinf, and cumulative urine glucose excretion after co-administration of tofogliflozin and each of the anti-T2DM drugs was evaluated relative to the values of those parameters after administration of each drug alone.. None of the anti-T2DM drugs had any effect on tofogliflozin exposure. Tofogliflozin had no or little effect on the exposure of any anti-T2DM drug. No anti-T2DM drug had any major effect on the cumulative urine glucose excretion induced by tofogliflozin. There were no safety concerns evident after administration of any drug alone or in co-administration.. Neither the pharmacokinetics nor the pharmacodynamics of tofogliflozin was affected by any of the anti-T2DM drugs evaluated in this study, nor was the pharmacokinetics of any of the anti-T2DM drugs affected by tofogliflozin in healthy male volunteers.

Topics: 1-Deoxynojirimycin; Adult; Benzhydryl Compounds; Cyclohexanes; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Interactions; Glucose; Glucosides; Healthy Volunteers; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Inositol; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Nateglinide; Phenylalanine; Pioglitazone; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Thiazolidinediones; Urine; Young Adult

This post hoc analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of canagliflozin, a sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) from Latin America.. Analyses were performed in subgroups of patients from Latin America based on data from three individual, 26-week, placebo-controlled studies of canagliflozin (monotherapy [n = 116/584], add-on to metformin [n = 199/918], and add-on to metformin plus sulfonylurea [n = 76/469]) and three individual, 52-week, active-controlled studies of canagliflozin (add-on to metformin versus sitagliptin [n = 240/1101], add-on to metformin versus glimepiride [n = 155/1450], and add-on to metformin plus sulfonylurea versus sitagliptin [n = 156/755]).. Changes from baseline in HbA1c, body weight, and systolic blood pressure (BP) with canagliflozin 100 and 300 mg versus placebo or active comparator (i.e., sitagliptin or glimepiride) were evaluated in the overall study populations and Latin American subgroups. Safety was assessed based on adverse event (AE) reports.. Canagliflozin 100 and 300 mg provided reductions in HbA1c, body weight, and systolic BP across studies in patients from Latin America that were generally similar to those seen in the overall populations of patients with T2DM. The AE profile in patients from Latin America was equivalent to that in the overall populations; higher rates of genital mycotic infections and osmotic diuresis-related AEs were seen with canagliflozin versus comparators. Limitations of this study include the post hoc analysis of data and the small sample size of patients from Latin America.. Canagliflozin improved glycemic control, reduced body weight and systolic BP, and was generally well tolerated in patients with T2DM from Latin America.. NCT01081834; NCT01106677; NCT01106625; NCT00968812; NCT01137812.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Latin America; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Treatment Outcome

The DPP-4 inhibitors are incretin-related drugs that improve hyperglycemia in a glucose-dependent manner and have been reported to exert favorable effects on atherosclerosis. However, it has not been fully elucidated whether DPP-4 inhibitors are able to improve endothelial function in patients with type 2 diabetes. Therefore, we investigated the efficacy of sitagliptin, a DPP-4 inhibitor, on endothelial function and glycemic metabolism compared with that of the sulfonylurea glimepiride.. In this multicenter, prospective, randomized parallel-group comparison study, 103 outpatients with type 2 diabetes (aged 59.9 ± 9.9 years with HbA1c levels of 7.5 ± 0.4%) with dietary cure only and/or current metformin treatment were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive sitagliptin or glimepiride therapy once daily for 26 weeks. Flow-mediated dilation (FMD), a comprehensive panel of hemodynamic parameters (Task Force® Monitor), and serum metabolic markers were assessed before and after the treatment.. During the study period, no statistically significant change in %FMD was seen in both groups (sitagliptin, 5.6 to 5.6%; glimepiride, 5.6 to 6.0%). Secretory units of islets in transplantation, TNF-α, adiponectin and biological antioxidant potential significantly improved in the sitagliptin group, and superoxide dismutase also tended to improve in the sitagliptin group, while improvements in HbA1c levels were similar between groups. Cardiac index, blood pressure and most other metabolic parameters were not different.. Regardless of glycemic improvement, early sitagliptin therapy did not affect endothelial function but may provide favorable effects on beta-cell function and on inflammatory and oxidative stress in patients with type 2 diabetes without advanced atherosclerosis.. UMIN Clinical Trials Registry System UMIN 000004955.

Topics: Adiponectin; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antioxidants; Biomarkers; Blood Pressure; Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Endothelium; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Hemodynamics; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Superoxide Dismutase; Treatment Outcome; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha; Young Adult

Dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP)-4 inhibitors and sulfonylureas may have different effects on islet function. We designed a new two-step hyperglycemic clamp to further compare the effects of sitagliptin, saxagliptin, and glimepiride on β-cell function and the incretin effect.. The present study was a four-way cross-over open label randomized study. Twelve healthy male subjects were administered a single dose of sitagliptin (100 mg), saxagliptin (5 mg), glimepiride (2 mg) or blank control 2 h before undergoing a two-step hyperglycemic clamp (Step 1: only intravenous glucose was administered; Step 2: i.v. glucose loading was combined with oral glucose consumption). Two-phase insulin secretion, glucagon secretion, and incretin levels were measured during the clamp.. In Step 1, with i.v. glucose only, there were no differences between the effects of the three drugs on insulin secretion, except that saxagliptin increased second-phase insulin secretion more than glimepiride (P = 0.007). In Step 2, oral glucose consumption led to an approximate two fold increase in insulin secretion and both gliptins significantly increased first-phase insulin secretion compared with glimepiride (P = 0.003 for both). Saxagliptin further increased second-phase insulin secretion compared with glimepiride (P = 0.005) and sitagliptin (P < 0.001). Both gliptins significantly decreased glucagon secretion and increased active glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) compared with glimepiride, especially in Step 2.. The two-step hyperglycemic clamp appears to be a precise method to assess β-cell function by taking the effect of incretins into consideration. The oral glucose consumption adds to the i.v. glucose infusion, amplifying the differences in the effects of DPP-4 inhibitors and glimepiride on insulin secretion.

Topics: Adamantane; Adult; Blood Glucose; Cross-Over Studies; Dipeptides; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Follow-Up Studies; Glucose Clamp Technique; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin-Secreting Cells; Male; Prognosis; Pyrazines; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Triazoles

To assess the efficacy and safety of a range of doses of a systemic, partial, glucokinase activator, PF-04937319, as add-on therapy to metformin, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).. Patients were randomized to once-daily PF-04937319 doses of 10, 50, 100 mg, or matching placebo (Study B1621002); or PF-04937319 doses of 3, 20, 50, 100 mg, or matching placebo (Study B1621007). Titrated glimepiride (Study B1621002) or sitagliptin (Study B1621007) were included in a double-dummy manner. The primary measure was change from baseline in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) at week 12. Key secondary measures included other glycaemic variables and safety and tolerability.. In the 639 patients randomized, the minimally efficacious PF-04937319 dose was identified as 50 mg once daily. At the highest PF-04937319 dose tested (100 mg), on average, a clinically significant reduction in HbA1c [-4.94 or -5.11 mmol/mol (-0.45 or -0.47%), placebo-adjusted], which was similar to that achieved with sitagliptin [-4.69 mmol/mol (-0.43%)] but lower than that achieved with titrated glimepiride [-9.07 mmol/mol (-0.83%)], was observed. At this dose, the effect on fasting plasma glucose was not consistent between the two studies (Study B1621002 vs Study B1621007: placebo-adjusted mean change of -0.83 vs +0.50 mmol/l). PF-04937319 was well tolerated at doses up to 100 mg. Hypoglycaemia was reported in 2.5% of patients (on placebo), 5.1% of patients (on PF-04937319 100 mg), 1.8% of patients (on sitagliptin) and 34.4% of patients (on titrated glimepiride).. In patients on metformin monotherapy, the addition of a 100-mg dose of PF-04937319 improved glycaemic control and was well tolerated.

Topics: Aged; Benzofurans; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fasting; Female; Glucokinase; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Pyrimidines; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Sulfonylurea Compounds

To evaluate the effect of the DPP-4 inhibitor sitagliptin on intrahepatic lipid (IHL) content and body fat in overweight Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes.. A prospective, 24-week, single-center, open-label comparative study enrolled 20 Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes (male: 11, female: 9) with a BMI≥25 kg/m(2) or fatty liver. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive treatment with sitagliptin (25 mg titrated up to 50 mg: S) or glimepiride (0.5 mg titrated up to 1 mg: G). After starting each treatment, IHL and total fat mass were evaluated by (1)H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy ((1)H-MRS) and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), respectively at baseline and at 12 weeks and 24 weeks.. After 24 weeks, HbA1c levels showed a similar significant decrease in both groups from 7.2 (7.0, 7.5) to 6.6 (6.4, 6.8)%, (54 (53, 56) to 48(47, 49) mmol/mol) with S and 7.3(6.8, 7.4) to 6.6 (6.3, 6.7)%, (55 (51, 56) to 48 (46, 49) mmol/mol) with G, median (interquartile range), p<0.05 vs. baseline, with no significant differences between the two groups. The IHL and total body fat mass were decreased in S group from 24.5(18.9, 36.6) to 20.5 (14.6, 28.5)% (p=0.009) and 22.5 (20.6, 33.7) to 21.6 (19.7, 32.4)kg (p=0.028), respectively, but not in G group.. Our findings indicate that sitagliptin and glimepiride achieved similar glycemic control, but only sitagliptin reduced IHL and total body fat (UMIN: 000013356).

Topics: Absorptiometry, Photon; Adipose Tissue; Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Fatty Liver; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Japan; Lipid Metabolism; Liver; Male; Middle Aged; Overweight; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Ultrasonography

We investigated the possibilities of drug-drug interactions between luseogliflozin, a sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor, and oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) in healthy Japanese males.. We conducted six independent studies to investigate potential drug-drug interactions between 5 mg luseogliflozin and the following OADs usually used in Japan: 1 mg glimepiride, 250 mg metformin, 30 mg pioglitazone, 50 mg sitagliptin, 50 mg miglitol, or 0.6 mg voglibose (0.2 mg before each meal). Twelve subjects were enrolled in each study. The glimepiride, metformin, sitagliptin, and miglitol studies were randomized, open-label, single-dose, three-way crossover studies. The pioglitazone and voglibose studies were open-label studies, where a single dose of luseogliflozin was added to multiple doses of pioglitazone or voglibose. The endpoints were the area under the curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC0-24 h) or to infinity (AUCinf) and the maximum concentration (Cmax) of each drug administered alone or in combination.. The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the geometric mean ratio (GMR) for Cmax of luseogliflozin in the pioglitazone and miglitol studies were beyond the reference range for bioequivalence (0.80-1.25) (miglitol: 0.851 [0.761, 0.952]; pioglitazone: 1.16 [1.04, 1.30]). However, the 90% CIs for AUC0-24 h were within the reference range. The 90% CIs of the GMRs for Cmax and AUC0-24 h of pioglitazone were beyond the reference range (Cmax 0.884 [0.746, 1.05]; AUC0-24 h 0.896 [0.774, 1.04]), but the 90% CIs for the active metabolites of pioglitazone were within the reference range. For the other combinations tested, the 90% CIs and GMRs for luseogliflozin and the individual OADs were within the reference range.. No clinically meaningful interactions were observed between luseogliflozin and six commonly used OADs in Japan, although there were some changes in the pharmacokinetics of pioglitazone co-administered with luseogliflozin and for luseogliflozin co-administered with miglitol or pioglitazone.. Taisho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

Topics: 1-Deoxynojirimycin; Adult; Antihypertensive Agents; Area Under Curve; Cross-Over Studies; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Japan; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Pioglitazone; Pyrazines; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Sorbitol; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Thiazolidinediones; Triazoles

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of sitagliptin compared with glimepiride in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and inadequate glycemic control with diet and exercise alone.. This was a randomized, parallel-group, multinational, non-inferiority clinical trial with an active-controlled, double-blind treatment period in which patients ≥ 65 and ≤ 85 years of age with T2DM were screened at 85 sites. Patients were randomized to once-daily sitagliptin (100 or 50 mg, depending on renal function) or glimepiride (in titrated doses) for 30 weeks. The main outcome measures were change from baseline in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and body weight; and the incidence of symptomatic hypoglycemia.. The mean baseline HbA1c was 7.8% in both the sitagliptin group (n = 197) and the glimepiride group (n = 191). After 30 weeks, the least squares (LS) mean change in HbA1c baseline was -0.32% with sitagliptin and -0.51 % with glimepiride, for a between-group difference (95% CI) of 0.19% (0.03-0.34). This result met the pre-specified criterion for declaring non-inferiority, which required that the upper 95% confidence limit lie below 0.4%. The LS mean change in FPG from baseline was -14.5 mg/dL with sitagliptin and -21.2 mg/dL with glimepiride, for a between-group difference (95% CI) of 6.7 mg/dL (0.7-12.7). The percentages of patients with adverse events of symptomatic hypoglycemia were 0.8% in the sitagliptin group and 4.7% in the glimepiride group (between-treatment difference = -3.9%, p = 0.009). The LS mean change in body weight from baseline was 0.4 kg with sitagliptin and 1.1 kg with glimepiride, for a between-group difference of -0.7 kg (p = 0.011).. In elderly patients with T2DM and inadequate glycemic control with diet and exercise alone, sitagliptin provided non-inferior glycemic control after 30 weeks of treatment compared with glimepiride. Compared with glimepiride, sitagliptin had a lower risk of hypoglycemia. Sitagliptin was weight-neutral; while the between-group difference in change from baseline in body weight was statistically significant, the modest difference may not be clinically meaningful.. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01189890.

Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diet; Double-Blind Method; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Male; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Treatment Outcome

CD26/DPP-4 is highly expressed by T cells, especially CD4+ T cells (T helper cells; Th) and may regulate the differentiation, maturation, or proliferation of these cells. We investigated the effects of sitagliptin, a DPP-4 inhibitor, on the absolute number and percentage of various subsets of circulating CD4+ T cells in patients with type 2 diabetes.. We enrolled 30 consecutive patients (16 women and 14 men) with type 2 diabetes in a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint study. Eligible participants were randomly assigned at a 2:1 ratio to either a sitagliptin group (sitagliptin at 50mg/day) or an active control group (glimepiride at 1mg/day). Patients were followed for 12 weeks with monthly review. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were examined by flow cytometry for intracellular expression of cytokines (IFN-γ as a marker of Th1cells, IL-4 for Th2 cells, and IL-17 for Th17 cells) and for expression of CD4, CD25, and Foxp3 (regulatory T cells [Treg]).. Both groups showed similar improvement of glycemic control. The total number of CD4+ T cells was decreased by treatment with sitagliptin, while it did not change in the control group. The number and percentage of Th17 cells and Treg cells both decreased significantly in the sitagliptin group, but not in the control group. There was a significant positive correlation between changes in the percentage of Th17 cells and Treg cells after treatment with sitagliptin.. Treatment with sitagliptin for 12 weeks reduced the number of circulating CD4+ T cells, especially Th17 and Treg cells, in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Topics: Aged; CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Female; Flow Cytometry; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Interferon-gamma; Interleukin-17; Interleukin-4; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Sulfonylurea Compounds; T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory; Th17 Cells

We assessed the efficacy and safety of sitagliptin compared with α-glucosidase inhibitor (αGI) in 120 of Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) inadequately controlled on stable ≤2 mg/day glimepiride alone [mean hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) 7.7%] by the randomized, active-controlled, non-inferiority trial. Patients were randomly assigned to receive additional sitagliptin or αGI for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in HbA1c from baseline to week 12. After 12 weeks, sitagliptin reduced HbA1c by -0.44% (p < 0.001) relative to αGI. At 24 weeks, the reduction was almost identical between the groups (-0.091%, p = 0.47). Gastrointestinal disorders were more common with αGI than with sitagliptin, but only minor hypoglycaemia occurred in both groups at similar frequency. These data suggested that sitagliptin was not inferior to αGI for reduction of HbA1c in Japanese T2DM patients receiving glimepiride alone, and well tolerated with minimum risk of gastrointestinal symptoms and hypoglycaemia.

Topics: 1-Deoxynojirimycin; Aged; alpha-Glucosidases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Gastrointestinal Agents; Glycated Hemoglobin; Glycoside Hydrolase Inhibitors; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Inositol; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazines; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Triazoles

In a previous single-center, open-label randomized 3-month study of triple oral antidiabetes drug (OAD) therapy, we investigated factors affecting the glycemic control afforded by sitagliptin, high-dose metformin, and low-dose glimepiride. Patients were prospectively assigned to either Group 1 (50% reduction in metformin) or Group 2 (discontinuation of glimepiride) and compared. The results showed that the glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels of patients in Group 2 deteriorated more than those in Group 1, whereas HbA1c levels were maintained in some patients in both groups.. To determine the factors associated with maintenance of HbA1c under this triple OAD regimen, data from the prospective study were further analyzed.. In both Groups 1 and 2, the baseline HbA1c level was higher in patients with HbA1c ≥7.0% after 3 months of treatment than those with an HbA1c level of <7.0%. A generalized linear model revealed that high-dose metformin was associated with a deterioration of HbA1c levels in Group 2.. Together, the findings indicate that glimepiride and high-dose metformin are important for sustained glycemic control in triple OAD therapy with sitagliptin, metformin, and sulfonylurea.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Asian People; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Japan; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Pyrazines; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Treatment Outcome; Triazoles

To compare the efficacy and safety of weekly albiglutide with daily sitagliptin, daily glimepiride, and placebo.. Patients with type 2 diabetes receiving metformin were randomized to albiglutide (30 mg), sitagliptin (100 mg), glimepiride (2 mg), or placebo. Blinded dose titration for albiglutide (to 50 mg) and glimepiride (to 4 mg) was based on predefined hyperglycemia criteria. The primary end point was change in HbA1c from baseline at week 104. Secondary end points included fasting plasma glucose (FPG), weight, and time to hyperglycemic rescue.. Baseline characteristics were similar among the albiglutide (n = 302), glimepiride (n = 307), sitagliptin (n = 302), and placebo (n = 101) groups. Baseline HbA1c was 8.1% (65.0 mmol/mol); mean age was 54.5 years. The mean doses for albiglutide and glimepiride at week 104 were 40.5 and 3.1 mg, respectively. At week 104, albiglutide significantly reduced HbA1c compared with placebo (-0.9% [-9.8 mmol/mol]; P < 0.0001), sitagliptin (-0.4% [-4.4 mmol/mol]; P = 0.0001), and glimepiride (-0.3% [-3.3 mmol/mol]; P = 0.0033). Outcomes for FPG and HbA1c were similar. Weight change from baseline for each were as follows: albiglutide -1.21 kg (95% CI -1.68 to -0.74), placebo -1.00 kg (95% CI -1.81 to -0.20), sitagliptin -0.86 kg (95% CI -1.32 to -0.39), glimepiride 1.17 kg (95% CI 0.70-1.63). The difference between albiglutide and glimepiride was statistically significant (P < 0.0001). Hyperglycemic rescue rate at week 104 was 25.8% for albiglutide compared with 59.2% (P < 0.0001), 36.4% (P = 0.0118), and 32.7% (P = 0.1504) for placebo, sitagliptin, and glimepiride, respectively. Rates of serious adverse events in the albiglutide group were similar to comparison groups. Diarrhea (albiglutide 12.9%, other groups 8.6-10.9%) and nausea (albiglutide 10.3%, other groups 6.2-10.9%) were generally the most frequently reported gastrointestinal events.. Added to metformin, albiglutide was well tolerated; produced superior reductions in HbA1c and FPG at week 104 compared with placebo, sitagliptin, and glimepiride; and resulted in weight loss compared with glimepiride.

Topics: Aged; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Pyrazines; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Treatment Outcome; Triazoles

Agents that augment GLP-1 effects enhance glucose-dependent β-cell insulin production and secretion and thus are hoped to prevent progressive impairment in insulin secretion characteristic of type 2 diabetes (T2D). The purpose of this study was to evaluate GLP-1 effects on β-cell secretory capacity, an in vivo measure of functional β-cell mass, early in the course of T2D.. We conducted a randomized controlled trial in 40 subjects with early T2D who received the GLP-1 analog exenatide (n = 14), the dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor sitagliptin (n = 12), or the sulfonylurea glimepiride (n = 14) as an active comparator insulin secretagogue for 6 months. Acute insulin responses to arginine (AIRarg) were measured at baseline and after 6 months of treatment with 5 days of drug washout under fasting, 230 mg/dL (glucose potentiation of arginine-induced insulin release [AIRpot]), and 340 mg/dL (maximum arginine-induced insulin release [AIRmax]) hyperglycemic clamp conditions, in which AIRmax provides the β-cell secretory capacity.. The change in AIRpot was significantly greater with glimepiride versus exenatide treatment (P < 0.05), and a similar trend was notable for the change in AIRmax (P = 0.1). Within each group, the primary outcome measure, AIRmax, was unchanged after 6 months of treatment with exenatide or sitagliptin compared with baseline but was increased with glimepiride (P < 0.05). α-Cell glucagon secretion (AGRmin) was also increased with glimepiride treatment (P < 0.05), and the change in AGRmin trended higher with glimepiride than with exenatide (P = 0.06).. After 6 months of treatment, exenatide or sitagliptin had no significant effect on functional β-cell mass as measured by β-cell secretory capacity, whereas glimepiride appeared to enhance β- and α-cell secretion.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Exenatide; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glucagon-Secreting Cells; Glucose Tolerance Test; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin-Secreting Cells; Male; Middle Aged; Peptides; Prognosis; Pyrazines; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Triazoles; Venoms; Young Adult

This randomized, prospective study was conducted in 76 subjects to assess whether low-dose (0.5-2 mg/day) glimepiride, in combination therapy with sitagliptin, improves glycemic control in a dose-dependent manner in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes. Eligible subjects had been treated with glimepiride at doses of 3-6 mg/day for at least 3 months and had a HbA1c level of ≥6.9%. Subjects were randomly assigned to three treatment groups of reduced doses of glimepiride (0.5 mg/day, 1 mg/day, or 2 mg/day) in addition to sitagliptin for 24 weeks. The primary efficacy analysis evaluated the change in HbA1c from baseline to week 24. Secondary efficacy endpoints included the changes in fasting plasma glucose, insulin secretion capacity, and β-cell function. Safety endpoints included hypoglycemia and any adverse event. Despite dose reduction of glimepiride, combination therapy with sitagliptin induced significant improvements in HbA1c levels (-0.8%, p < 0.001). Insulin secretion parameters (CPI, SUIT) also increased significantly. There were no significant differences between groups in changes from baseline HbA1c, insulin secretion capacity, and β-cell function (proinsulin/insulin) at 24 weeks of combination therapy. Multivariate analysis showed that baseline HbA1c was the only predictor for efficacy of combination therapy with sitagliptin and low-dose glimeripide. No changes in body weight were noted and no symptomatic hypoglycemia was documented. These findings indicate that combination therapy with sitagliptin and low-dose glimepiride (0.5 mg/day) is both effective for glycemic control and safe in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with high-dose glimepiride.

Topics: Aged; Cohort Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Nephropathies; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Resistance; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Incretins; Insulin; Insulin Secretion; Insulin-Secreting Cells; Japan; Kidney; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazines; Severity of Illness Index; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Triazoles

After approval of sitagliptin and >750 mg of metformin in Japan, a triple oral antidiabetes drug (OAD) regimen including sulfonylurea, metformin, and sitagliptin was sometimes described. However, in the real world of clinical practice, the daily dose of sulfonylurea tended to be decreased according to the warning from the Japan Diabetes Society for avoiding hypoglycemia, instead of increasing the dose of metformin for maintaining hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels with this regimen. This study examined the impact of either a small dose of glimepiride or a high dose of metformin on HbA1c in triple OAD therapy with sitagliptin in a 3-month, single-center, open-label, randomized controlled study.. Fifty-six type 2 diabetes mellitus patients who had been treated with 50 mg of sitagliptin, ≥ 1,000 mg of metformin, and ≤ 1 mg of glimepiride with an HbA1c level of <7.4% during at least 3 months were enrolled in the study. The patients were randomly assigned to two treatment groups who either received a 50% reduced dose of metformin (n = 27) or discontinued glimepiride (n = 29), while sitagliptin administration continued in both groups. Twenty-six patients from the reduced metformin group and 27 patients from the discontinued glimepiride group completed the study.. Significantly greater changes were observed in HbA1c and glycated albumin levels in patients who discontinued glimepiride than in patients with a 50% reduced metformin dose, during the 2-3-month period than in the 1-3-month period.. Glimepiride is important for good glycemic control in triple OAD therapy with sitaglitpin and metformin. This regimen may be useful for those patients who do not achieve satisfactory glycemic control with dual combination therapy.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; C-Peptide; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Japan; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Pyrazines; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Treatment Outcome; Triazoles

The aim of this work was to compare treatment intensification strategies based on orally administered vs injectable incretin-based antihyperglycaemic agents in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus on metformin monotherapy.. In a 26 week, open-label study, 653 patients (baseline HbA1c = 8.2% [66 mmol/mol]) were randomised at 111 sites in 21 countries in a 1:1 ratio to a strategy using oral agents (starting with sitagliptin 100 mg/day) or a strategy using the injectable drug liraglutide starting at a dose of 0.6 mg/day, up-titrated to 1.2 mg/day after 1 week. The following patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus were recruited for the study: those aged 18-79 years, on a stable dose of metformin monotherapy ≥1,500 mg/day for ≥12 weeks, with an HbA1c ≥7.0% (53 mmol/mol) and ≤11.0% (97 mmol/mol) and a fasting fingerstick glucose (FFG) <15 mmol/l (<270 mg/dl) at the randomisation visit, deemed capable by the investigator of using a Victoza pen injection device (containing 6 mg/ml liraglutide; Novo Nordisk, Bagsværd, Denmark). Women taking part in the study agreed to remain abstinent or use an acceptable method of birth control during the study. Randomisation was performed via a computer-generated allocation schedule using an interactive voice response system. After 12 weeks, patients on sitagliptin with HbA1c  ≥ 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) and fasting glucose >6.1 mmol/l had their treatment intensified with glimepiride; patients on liraglutide with HbA1c  ≥ 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) had the dose up-titrated to 1.8 mg/day. The primary analysis assessed whether the strategy using oral drugs was non-inferior to that using an injectable drug regarding HbA1c change from baseline at week 26 using a per-protocol (PP) population and a non-inferiority margin of 0.4%.. In the PP population (522 patients included: oral strategy, n = 269; injectable strategy, n = 253) antihyperglycaemic therapy was intensified at week 12 in 50.2% and 28.5%, respectively. HbA1c decreased over 26 weeks in both treatment strategy groups, with a larger initial reduction at week 12 in the injectable strategy group. The LS mean change in HbA1c at week 26 was -1.3% (95% CI -1.4, -1.2) in the oral strategy group and -1.4% (95% CI -1.5, -1.3) in the injectable strategy group; the study met the non-inferiority criterion. Both treatment regimens were generally well tolerated; hypoglycaemia was reported more often with the oral strategy, while nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea and abdominal pain were reported more often with the injectable strategy.. An oral, incretin-based treatment strategy with sitagliptin and, if needed, glimepiride may be a good approach in many patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus for managing inadequate glycaemic control on metformin monotherapy, as compared with an injectable treatment strategy with liraglutide. The oral and injectable strategies had similar effects on HbA1c and had good overall tolerability. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01296412 Funding The study was sponsored by Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck and Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Liraglutide; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Pyrazines; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Treatment Outcome; Triazoles; Young Adult

The epidemic of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) threatens to become the major public health problem of this century. However, a comprehensive comparison of the long-term effects of medications to treat T2DM has not been conducted. GRADE, a pragmatic, unmasked clinical trial, aims to compare commonly used diabetes medications, when combined with metformin, on glycemia-lowering effectiveness and patient-centered outcomes.. GRADE was designed with support from a U34 planning grant from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK). The consensus protocol was approved by NIDDK and the GRADE Research Group. Eligibility criteria for the 5,000 metformin-treated subjects include <5 years' diabetes duration, ≥ 30 years of age at time of diagnosis, and baseline hemoglobin A1c (A1C) of 6.8-8.5% (51-69 mmol/mol). Medications representing four classes (sulfonylureas, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists, and insulin) will be randomly assigned and added to metformin (minimum-maximum 1,000-2,000 mg/day). The primary metabolic outcome is the time to primary failure defined as an A1C ≥ 7% (53 mmol/mol), subsequently confirmed, over an anticipated mean observation period of 4.8 years (range 4-7 years). Other long-term metabolic outcomes include the need for the addition of basal insulin after a confirmed A1C >7.5% (58 mmol/mol) and, ultimately, the need to implement an intensive basal/bolus insulin regimen. The four drugs will also be compared with respect to selected microvascular complications, cardiovascular disease risk factors, adverse effects, tolerability, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness.. GRADE will compare the long-term effectiveness of major glycemia-lowering medications and provide guidance to clinicians about the most appropriate medications to treat T2DM. GRADE begins recruitment at 37 centers in the U.S. in 2013.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Liraglutide; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Pyrazines; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Triazoles

To investigate the effect of ipragliflozin on the pharmacokinetics of sitagliptin, pioglitazone or glimepiride and vice versa in healthy subjects.. Three trials with an open-label, randomized, two-way crossover design were conducted in healthy subjects. Ipragliflozin 150 mg, sitagliptin 100 mg, pioglitazone 30 mg or glimepiride 1-2 mg were administered alone or in combination. Primary endpoints were the area under the curve from the time of dosing to infinity (AUC(inf)) and the maximum observed plasma concentration (C(max)) of each drug.. Multiple doses of ipragliflozin did not change the AUC(inf) and C(max) of a single dose of sitagliptin, pioglitazone or glimepiride. All geometric mean ratios and 90% CIs for AUC(inf) and C(max) , with and without ipragliflozin, were within the predefined range of 80-125% (AUC(inf) : sitagliptin 100.1 [96.9-103.5], pioglitazone 101.7 [96.6-107.0], glimepiride 105.1 [101.3-109.0], and C(max) : sitagliptin 92.4 [82.8-103.1], pioglitazone 98.6 [87.7-110.8], glimepiride 110.0 [101.9-118.8]). Similarly, multiple doses of sitagliptin, pioglitazone or glimepiride did not change the pharmacokinetics of a single dose of ipragliflozin (AUC(inf) : 95.0 [93.4-103.1], 100.0 [98.1-102.0], 99.1 [96.6-101.6]; and C(max) : 96.5 [90.4-103.1], 93.5 [86.3-101.2], 97.3 [89.2-106.2]). Ipragliflozin either alone or in combination with any of the three glucose-lowering drugs was well tolerated in healthy subjects.. Ipragliflozin did not affect the pharmacokinetics of sitagliptin, pioglitazone or glimepiride and vice versa, suggesting that no dose-adjustments are likely to be required when ipragliflozin is given in combination with other glucose-lowering drugs in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Area Under Curve; Body Mass Index; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucosides; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Pioglitazone; Pyrazines; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Thiazolidinediones; Thiophenes; Triazoles

Oral hypoglycemic agents (OHAs) are usually divided into postprandial and basal drugs. As their actions are probably more complex, it is important to ascertain which factors can modulate their effects.. Thirty-one type 2 diabetes patients treated with metformin (glycosylated hemoglobin [HbA1c] 6.5-9%; median, 7.3%) and enrolled in two randomized controlled studies were allocated to either rosiglitazone (Group 1, n = 8) or glimepiride (Group 2, n = 7) and to either vildagliptin or sitagliptin (Group 3 considered as a whole, n = 16). All patients were investigated using continuous glucose monitoring at baseline and after 8-12 weeks of add-on therapy. Areas under the 24-h glycemic profile curves (AUCs) were determined for assessing postprandial (AUCpp), basal (AUCb), and total (AUCtotal) hyperglycemia. After calculation of decrements in AUCs (∂AUCs) from baseline to end of treatment periods, the following contribution ratios of postprandial and basal decrements to the overall glucose decrement were determined: ∂AUCpp/∂AUCtotal and ∂AUCb/∂AUCtotal (%).. ∂AUCpp/∂AUCtotal and ∂AUCb/∂AUCtotal were negatively and positively, respectively, associated (R(2) = 0.195, P = 0.013) with baseline HbA1c. ∂AUCpp/∂AUCtotal was significantly higher (50.8 ± 4.8%) in patients with HbA1c <7.3% than in those with HbA1c ≥ 7.3% (27.0 ± 4.4%) (P = 0.001). After adjustment on baseline HbA1c, ∂AUCpp/∂AUCtotal was greater in Group 3 (44.0 ± 1.6%) than in Group 1 (32.1 ± 4%) and 2 (37.0 ± 3.1%) (P = 0.007).. Gliptins, glitazones and sulfonylureas concomitantly act on basal and postprandial glucose even though gliptins are more efficient on postprandial glucose. HbA1c appears as a reliable factor for predicting the respective decrements of these two parameters and thus for guiding the choice between the aforementioned drugs.

Topics: Adamantane; Adult; Aged; Analysis of Variance; Area Under Curve; Basal Metabolism; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Nitriles; Postprandial Period; Pyrazines; Pyrrolidines; Rosiglitazone; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Thiazolidinediones; Triazoles; Vildagliptin

To compare the efficacy and safety of sitagliptin and glimepiride in treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with metformin alone.. In an 18 week, randomized parallel group interventional trial, 50 subjects who were only on metformin as antidiabetic agent, with inadequate glycemic control, were randomized to either sitagliptin 50/100mg or glimepiride 1/2 mg per day. Dose of drugs was adjusted after 4 weeks if glycemic control was not reached.. At 18 weeks both groups (sitagliptin and glimepiride) produced significant (P < 0.001) reduction in HbA1C (-0.636% and -1.172% respectively), with 12% patients in sitagliptin group and 36% patients in glimepiride group achieving target HbA1C. Reduction was also significant (P < 0.001) in both groups in FPG (-15.49 mg and -29.84 mg respectively) and 2HPPG (-34.28 mg and -44.83 mg respectively). Sitagliptin group showed net decrease in bodyweight by 0.102 kg whereas glimepiride group showed net increase in body weight by 0.493 kg. Incidence of hypoglycemia was 4% in sitagliptin group and 8% in glimepiride group.. In this study addition of sitagliptin and glimepiride to metformin monotherapy, produced significant improvement in glycemic control. Benefits were more with glimepiride in comparison to sitagliptin. Sitagliptin was well tolerated, with lower risk of hypoglycemia than glimepiride, and produced weight loss as compared to weight gain with glimepiride.

Topics: Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Male; Metformin; Pyrazines; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Triazoles

Dapagliflozin increases urinary glucose excretion by selectively inhibiting renal sodium-glucose transporter 2, an insulin-independent mechanism of action that may be complementary to that of other oral antidiabetes drugs. The current studies assessed the potential for pharmacokinetic (PK) interaction between dapagliflozin and pioglitazone, metformin, glimepiride or sitagliptin in healthy subjects following single-dose administration.. In open-label, randomized, three-period, three-treatment crossover studies, 24 subjects received 50 mg dapagliflozin, 45 mg pioglitazone or the combination, while 18 subjects received 20 mg dapagliflozin, 1000 mg metformin or the combination. In an open-label, randomized, five-period, five-treatment, unbalanced crossover study, 18 subjects first received 20 mg dapagliflozin, 4 mg glimepiride or the combination, and afterward 100 mg sitagliptin or sitagliptin plus 20 mg dapagliflozin. Blood samples were taken over 72 h of each treatment period. Lack of PK interaction was defined as the ratio of geometric means and 90% confidence interval (CI) for combination:monotherapy being within the range of 0.80-1.25.. Co-administration of dapagliflozin with pioglitazone, metformin, glimepiride or sitagliptin had no effect on dapagliflozin maximum plasma concentration (C(max) ) or area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC). Similarly, dapagliflozin did not affect the C(max) or AUC for the co-administered drug, except for slight extensions of the 90% CI for the ratio of geometric means for glimepiride AUC (upper limit 1.29) and pioglitazone C(max) (lower limit 0.75). All monotherapies and combination therapies were well tolerated.. Dapagliflozin can be co-administered with pioglitazone, metformin, glimepiride or sitagliptin without dose adjustment of either drug.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Benzhydryl Compounds; Cross-Over Studies; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucosides; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Pioglitazone; Pyrazines; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Thiazolidinediones; Treatment Outcome; Triazoles; Young Adult

to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adding sitagliptin or glimepiride to the treatment regimen of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and inadequate glycaemic control on metformin monotherapy.. patients with type 2 diabetes and an HbA(1c) of 6.5-9.0% while on a stable dose of metformin (≥ 1500 mg/day) combined with diet and exercise for at least 12 weeks were randomized in a double-blind manner to receive either sitagliptin 100 mg daily (N = 516) or glimepiride (starting dose 1 mg/day and up-titrated, based upon patient's self-monitoring of blood glucose results, to a maximum dose of up to 6 mg/day) (N = 519) for 30 weeks. The primary analysis assessed whether sitagliptin is non-inferior to glimepiride in reducing HbA(1c) at week 30 (based on the criterion of having an upper bound of the 95% CI less than the prespecified non-inferiority bound of 0.4%).. the mean baseline HbA(1c) was 7.5% in both the sitagliptin group (n = 443) and the glimepiride group (n = 436). After 30 weeks, the least squares (LS) mean change in HbA(1c) from baseline was -0.47% with sitagliptin and -0.54% with glimepiride, with a between-group difference (95% CI) of 0.07% (-0.03, 0.16). This result met the prespecified criterion for declaring non-inferiority. The percentages of patients with an HbA(1c) < 7.0% at week 30 were 52 and 60% in the sitagliptin and glimepiride groups, respectively. The LS mean change in fasting plasma glucose from baseline (95% CI) was -0.8 mmol/l (-1.0, -0.6) with sitagliptin and -1.0 mmol/l (-1.2, -0.8) with glimepiride, for a between-group difference (95% CI) of 0.2 mmol/l (-0.1, 0.4). The percentages of patients for whom hypoglycaemia was reported were 7% in the sitagliptin group and 22% in the glimepiride group (percentage-point difference = -15, p < 0.001). Relative to baseline, sitagliptin was associated with a mean weight loss (-0.8 kg), whereas glimepiride was associated with a mean weight gain (1.2 kg), yielding a between-group difference of -2.0 kg (p < 0.001).. in patients with type 2 diabetes and inadequate glycaemic control on metformin monotherapy, the addition of sitagliptin or glimepiride led to similar improvement in glycaemic control after 30 weeks. Sitagliptin was generally well tolerated. Compared to treatment with glimepiride, treatment with sitagliptin was associated with a lower risk of hypoglycaemia and with weight loss versus weight gain (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00701090).

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Pyrazines; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Treatment Outcome; Triazoles

To assess the efficacy and safety of a 24-week treatment with sitagliptin, a highly selective once-daily oral dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor, in patients with type 2 diabetes who had inadequate glycaemic control [glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) >or=7.5% and or=4 mg/day) monotherapy and 229 were on glimepiride (>or=4 mg/day) plus metformin (>or=1,500 mg/day) combination therapy. Patients exceeding pre-specified glycaemic thresholds during the double-blind treatment period were provided open-label rescue therapy (pioglitazone) until study end. The primary efficacy analysis evaluated the change in HbA(1c) from baseline to Week 24. Secondary efficacy endpoints included fasting plasma glucose (FPG), 2-h post-meal glucose and lipid measurements.. Mean baseline HbA(1c) was 8.34% in the sitagliptin and placebo groups. After 24 weeks, sitagliptin reduced HbA(1c) by 0.74% (p < 0.001) relative to placebo. In the subset of patients on glimepiride plus metformin, sitagliptin reduced HbA(1c) by 0.89% relative to placebo, compared with a reduction of 0.57% in the subset of patients on glimepiride alone. The addition of sitagliptin reduced FPG by 20.1 mg/dl (p < 0.001) and increased homeostasis model assessment-beta, a marker of beta-cell function, by 12% (p < 0.05) relative to placebo. In patients who underwent a meal tolerance test (n = 134), sitagliptin decreased 2-h post-prandial glucose (PPG) by 36.1 mg/dl (p < 0.001) relative to placebo. The addition of sitagliptin was generally well tolerated, although there was a higher incidence of overall (60 vs. 47%) and drug-related adverse experiences (AEs) (15 vs. 7%) in the sitagliptin group than in the placebo group. This was largely because of a higher incidence of hypoglycaemia AEs (12 vs. 2%, respectively) in the sitagliptin group compared with the placebo group. Body weight modestly increased with sitagliptin relative to placebo (+0.8 vs. -0.4 kg; p < 0.001).. Sitagliptin 100 mg once daily significantly improved glycaemic control and beta-cell function in patients with type 2 diabetes who had inadequate glycaemic control with glimepiride or glimepiride plus metformin therapy. The addition of sitagliptin was generally well tolerated, with a modest increase in hypoglycaemia and body weight, consistent with glimepiride therapy and the observed degree of glycaemic improvement.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Pyrazines; Single-Blind Method; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Treatment Outcome; Triazoles

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glycemic Control; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Liraglutide; Metformin; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Treatment Outcome

GRADE Study Research Group; Nathan DM, Lachin JM, Balasubramanyam A, et al.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Liraglutide; Metformin; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Treatment Outcome

GRADE Study Research Group; Nathan DM, Lachin JM, Buse JB, et al.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Liraglutide; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Treatment Outcome

To emulate the GRADE (Glycemia Reduction Approaches in Diabetes: A Comparative Effectiveness Study) trial using real world data before its publication. GRADE directly compared second line glucose lowering drugs for their ability to lower glycated hemoglobin A. Observational study.. OptumLabs® Data Warehouse (OLDW), a nationwide claims database in the US, 25 January 2010 to 30 June 2019.. Adults with type 2 diabetes and HbA. The primary outcome was time to HbA. 8252 people were identified (19.7% of adults starting the study drugs in OLDW) who met eligibility criteria for the GRADE trial (glimepiride arm=4318, liraglutide arm=690, sitagliptin arm=2993, glargine arm=251). The glargine arm was excluded from analyses owing to small sample size. Median times to HbA. In this emulation of the GRADE trial, liraglutide was statistically significantly more effective at maintaining glycemic control than glimepiride or sitagliptin when added to metformin monotherapy. Generating timely evidence on medical treatments using real world data as a complement to prospective trials is of value.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Liraglutide; Metformin; Prospective Studies; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Retrospective Studies; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Treatment Outcome

Diabetes is one of the World's most concerning health problems and millions of patients are using anti-diabetic drugs (ADDs) in order to control blood glucose. The in vitro H295R steroidogenesis assay was implemented to investigate endocrine effects of three ADDs, metformin (MET), glimepiride (GLIM), sitagliptin (SIT) and the cholesterol-lowering drug simvastatin (SIM) individually and in three binary mixtures. Steroid hormones were analyzed using LC-MS/MS. Mixture effects were assessed by applying the Concentration Addition (CA) model. All tested drugs and binary mixtures interrupted the H295R steroidogenesis with different potency. The effects of MET:GLIM on the steroidogenesis were overall similar to the steroidogenic profile of GLIM, however effects were less pronounced. The binary mixture of MET:SIT showed overall minor effects on steroid production and only at very high concentrations. The SIM:SIT mixture showed inhibition downstream from cholesterol, which was attributed to the effects of SIM. The CA model partly predicted the effect of MET:SIT on some steroids but significantly overestimated the effects of MET:GLIM and SIM:SIT. Thus, the applicability of the CA model was limited and cocktail effects appeared to be intermediate responses of individual drugs, rather than additive. The complexity of dynamic pathways such as steroidogenesis appears to significantly reduce the use of the CA model. In conclusion, more dynamic models are needed to predict mixture effects in complex systems.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Cell Line; Chromatography, Liquid; Drug Interactions; Endocrine Disruptors; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Metformin; Simvastatin; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Steroids; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Tandem Mass Spectrometry

To investigate the ameliorating effect of sitagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, on blood glucose control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were previously untreated with or who have a poor responsive to existing antidiabetic drugs.. Sitagliptin (50 mg/day) was added on to the pre-existing therapy for type 2 diabetes and changes in the glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level after 3 months of treatment were compared with the baseline and performed exploratory analysis.. HbA1c levels were significantly decreased after 1 month of treatment compared to baseline, with a mean change in HbA1c level from baseline of -0.73% (range, -0.80 to -0.67) in the entire study population at 3 months. Patients who received a medium dose of glimepiride showed the least improvement in HbA1c levels. The percentage of patients who achieved an HbA1c level of <7.0% significantly increased after 1 month of treatment, reaching 53.1% at 3 months. The percentage of patients who achieved a fasting blood glucose level of <130 mg/dL significantly increased after 1 month of treatment, reaching 50.9% at 3 months.. Sitagliptin improved the HbA1c level and rate of achieving the target control levels in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were previously untreated with, or poorly responsive to, existing antidiabetic drugs. Thus, sitagliptin is expected to be useful in this patient group. However, the additional administration of sitagliptin in patients treated with medium-dose glimepiride only slightly improved blood glucose control when corrected for baseline HbA1c level.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Sulfonylurea Compounds

To evaluate long-run cost-effectiveness in a Swedish setting for liraglutide compared with sulphonylureas (glimepiride) or sitagliptin, all as add-on to metformin for patients with type 2 diabetes insufficiently controlled with metformin in monotherapy.. The IHE Cohort Model of Type 2 Diabetes was used to evaluate clinical and economic outcomes from a societal perspective. Model input data were obtained from two clinical trials, the Swedish National Diabetes Register and the literature. Cost data reflected year 2013 price level. The robustness of results was checked with one-way-sensitivity analysis and probability sensitivity analysis.. The cost per QALY gained for liraglutide (1.2 mg) compared to SU (glimepiride 4 mg), both as add-on to metformin, ranged from SEK 226,000 to SEK 255,000 in analyzed patient cohorts. The cost per QALY for liraglutide (1.2 mg) vs sitagliptin (100 mg) as second-line treatment was lower, ranging from SEK 149,000 to SEK 161,000. Costs of preventive treatment were driving costs, but there was also a cost offset from reduced costs of complications of ∼ 20%. Notable cost differences were found for nephropathy, stroke, and heart failure. The predicted life expectancy with liraglutide increased the cost of net consumption for liraglutide.. The analysis was an ex-ante analysis using model input data from clinical trials which may not reflect effectiveness in real-world clinical practice in broader patient populations. This limitation was explored in the sensitivity analysis. The lack of specific data on loss of production due to diabetes complications implied that these costs may be under-estimated.. Treatment strategies with liraglutide 1.2 mg improved the expected quality-of-life and increased costs when compared to SU and to sitagliptin for second-line add-on treatments. The cost per QALY for liraglutide was in the range considered medium by Swedish authorities.

Topics: Cost-Benefit Analysis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Health Services; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Life Expectancy; Liraglutide; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Models, Economic; Pyrazines; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Smoking; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Sweden; Triazoles

Sitagliptin, the first of a new class of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4)-inhibitory oral antihyperglycaemic drugs (OHDs), was introduced in Japan in December 2009. In April 2010 a safety alert was issued regarding the risk of serious hypoglycaemic events, and prescribers were recommended to reduce the dose of sulfonylurea (i.e. glimepiride, glibenclamide [glyburide] or gliclazide) in patients receiving a combination of sulfonylurea and sitagliptin.. A propensity score-matched cohort study was performed using Japanese pharmacy prescription receipt data for OHDs in order to confirm reported changes in OHD prescription behaviour for patients receiving sitagliptin before and after the safety alert.. Prescription data from about 6,500 medical institutions throughout Japan during December 2009 to 31 December 2010 were randomly collected from 300 pharmacies, covering 82,064 patients with 629,955 prescriptions for OHDs. Patients who had received a sulfonylurea and sitagliptin (1,788 patients/3,576 prescriptions) before the safety alert were designated as the DPP-4 group. Patients who had received a sulfonylurea but not sitagliptin (30,963 patients/61,926 prescriptions) before the alert were designated as the non-DPP-4 group. Propensity score matching was employed to match baseline characteristics, such as age, sex, type of OHD, metformin use, type of prescribers period for measuring baseline period and type of prescribers' institutions, for 1,783 patients from each group. In the matched cohort, logistic regression analysis was conducted to compare prescription trends before and after the alert. The primary outcome measure of this study was dose of glimepiride, glibenclamide or gliclazide prescribed for DPP-4 and non-DPP-4 patients.. In the propensity score-matched cohort, the proportion of glimepiride dose >2 mg of DPP-4 patients was reduced from 45.8 % in Period 1 (before the alert) to 37.5 % in Period 2 (after the alert) (odds ratio [OR] 0.71; 95 % CI 0.579-0.870), whereas in the case of non-DPP-4 patients the proportion was changed from 28.9 % to 29.5 % in the matched cohort (OR 1.03; 95 % CI 0.868-1.215). The mean prescribed glimepiride dose in DPP-4 patients was also reduced from 2.79 ± 1.81 mg in Period 1 (before the alert) to 2.38 ± 1.71 mg in Period 2 (after the alert) [p < 0.0001], whereas the corresponding change in the case of non-DPP-4 patients was from 2.01 ± 1.56 mg to 2.01 ± 1.54 mg (p = 0.94). The difference between the mean prescribed doses in the two groups was statistically significant in both periods. Similar trends of prescription pattern changes were seen for glibenclamide and gliclazide. The reduction of prescribed sulfonylurea dose in DPP-4 patients following the safety alert coincided with a decrease of adverse event reports.. Our results indicate that propensity score matching to control for baseline characteristics of individual patients and prescribers is a useful approach to avoid selection bias and confounding effects in evaluating the influence of an event on prescription behaviour. This case-matched study indicated that sulfonylurea prescription behaviour changed significantly after the sitagliptin safety alert. There was a significant reduction in sulfonylurea dose after the alert in DPP-4 patients, but not in non-DPP-4 patients. Our findings should be helpful for assessing and improving the effectiveness of other regulatory safety alerts.

Topics: Aged; Cohort Studies; Female; Gliclazide; Glyburide; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Japan; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Safety; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Propensity Score; Pyrazines; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Triazoles

Type 2 diabetic patients have a high incidence of cerebrovascular disease, elevated inflammation, and high risk of developing cognitive dysfunction following carotid endarterectomy (CEA). To elucidate the relationship between inflammation and the risk of cognitive dysfunction in type 2 diabetic patients, we aim to determine whether elevated levels of systemic inflammatory markers are associated with cognitive dysfunction 1 day after CEA.. One hundred fifteen type 2 diabetic CEA patients and 156 reference surgical patients were recruited with written informed consent in this single-center cohort study. All patients were evaluated with an extensive battery of neuropsychometric tests. Preoperative monocyte counts, HbA1c, C-reactive protein (CRP), intercellular adhesion molecule 1, and matrix metalloproteinase 9 activity levels were obtained.. In a multivariate logistic regression model constructed to identify predictors of cognitive dysfunction in type 2 diabetic CEA patients, each unit of monocyte counts (odds ratio [OR] 1.76 [95% CI 1.17-2.93]; P=0.005) and CRP (OR 1.17 [1.10-1.29]; P<0.001) was significantly associated with higher odds of developing cognitive dysfunction 1 day after CEA in type 2 diabetic patients.. Type 2 diabetic patients with elevated levels of preoperative systemic inflammatory markers exhibit more cognitive dysfunction 1 day after CEA. These observations have implications for the preoperative medical management of this high-risk group of surgical patients undergoing carotid revascularization with CEA.

Topics: Aged; Cognition Disorders; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Endarterectomy, Carotid; Glyburide; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Inflammation; Logistic Models; Metformin; Middle Aged; Pyrazines; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Triazoles

We retrospectively investigated the effect of adding dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor and tapering sulfonylurea on blood glucose fluctuation in Asian patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus under basal-supported oral therapy (BOT). We recruited twenty-two consecutive Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who had blood glucose fluctuation under the combination therapy of insulin glargine and glimepiride and had sitagliptin initiated with glimepiride tapared. Their hemoglobin A1c levels and mean blood glucose profiles of seven points in self-monitoring blood glucose (SMBG) were 7.4 ± 0.6% and 8.6 ± 2.0 mmol/L, respectively. Sitagliptin was initiated with the dose of 50 mg per day and titrated up to 100 mg per day when necessary. Glimepiride was withdrawn if possible. Blood glucose fluctuation was evaluated with SMBG by calculating M-value, its range (the difference of maximum and minimum blood glucose levels), and its coefficient of variation (CV). Two months after sitagliptin add-on, M-value was decreased from 19 ± 13 to 13 ± 8 (p = 0.04). Blood glucose range and CV were also improved from 9.6 ± 2.9 mmol/L to 7.9 ± 2.6 mmol/L (p = 0.01), and from 33 ± 8% to 29 ± 8% (p < 0.01), respectively. Hemoglobin A1c levels and mean blood glucose profiles were unchanged (p = 0.93 and 0.47). In conclusion, blood glucose fluctuation was significantly improved two months after adding sitagliptin and tapering glimepiride in type 2 diabetic Japanese patients who were treated by BOT with insulin glargine and glimepiride.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Asian People; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazines; Retrospective Studies; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Treatment Outcome; Triazoles