sitagliptin-phosphate and alogliptin

Observational studies and meta-analyses of randomized trials on dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4i) reported discordant results on the risk of malignancies with this class of drugs. Aim of the present meta-analysis is the assessment of the effect of DPP4i treatment on the incidence of different types of cancer, collecting all available evidence from randomized controlled trials.. An extensive MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane database search for sitagliptin or vildagliptin or omarigliptin or saxagliptin or alogliptin or trelagliptin or anagliptin or linagliptin or gemigliptin or evogliptin or teneligliptin was performed up to September 30th, 2019. All trials performed on type 2 diabetes, with duration ≥ 24 weeks, and comparing of DPP4i with placebo or active drugs were collected. The study has been registered on PROSPERO (#153344). Mantel-Haenszel odds ratio (MH-OR) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was calculated for all outcomes.. A total of 157 eligible trials were identified. DPP-4i were not associated with an increased risk of overall cancer (MH-OR 0.93 [0.86, 1.00]; p = 0.07), with no significant differences across individual molecules of the class. When compared with placebo/none, a lower risk of cancer with DPP-4i was observed in placebo-controlled trials (MH-OR 0.90 [0.82, 0.99], p = 0.030), whereas no significant differences have been detected with any other comparators. DPP-4i was associated with a significant reduction in colorectal cancer (MH-OR 0.70 [0.53, 0.94], p = 0.020).. Available data do not support the hypothesis of an association of DPP4i treatment with malignancies, with a possible beneficial effect for colon-rectal cancer.

Topics: Adamantane; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Humans; Incidence; Neoplasms; Piperidines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Uracil; Vildagliptin

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors are oral antidiabetic drugs that safely reduce the blood glucose level over the long term. In Japan, DPP-4 inhibitors have become the oral antidiabetic drugs most frequently prescribed for patients with type 2 diabetes. However, the results of several cardiovascular outcomes studies have suggested that some DPP-4 inhibitors may increase the risk of hospitalization for heart failure. In patients with diabetes, heart failure is the most frequent cardiovascular condition, and it has a negative impact on the quality of life as well as being a potentially fatal complication. Therefore, it is important to determine whether an increased risk of heart failure is associated with certain DPP-4 inhibitors or is a class effect of these drugs. This review explores the mechanism by which DPP-4 inhibitors may increase the risk of heart failure and possible differences among these drugs. The available research suggests that DPP-4 inhibitors cause sympathetic activation as a class effect and this may increase the risk of heart failure. Unlike other DPP-4 inhibitors, sitagliptin and alogliptin are mainly excreted in the urine and suppress renal sodium-hydrogen exchanger 3 activity. These two drugs did not increase the risk of hospitalization for heart failure in large-scale cardiovascular outcomes studies.

Topics: Adult; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Female; Heart Failure; Hospitalization; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Quality of Life; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Uracil

This article reviews evidence supporting sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor combination therapy for management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).. We conducted a nonsystematic review of the literature focusing on single-pill or fixed-dose combinations of SGLT2 inhibitors and DPP-4 inhibitors available in the United States.. SGLT2 inhibitors and DPP-4 inhibitors have complementary mechanisms of action that address several of the underlying pathophysiologic abnormalities present in T2DM without overlapping toxicities. The combination of these 2 agents has several advantages including a low risk of hypoglycemia, the potential for weight loss, the ability to coformulate into a pill with once-daily administration, and the possibility to use with other classes of glucose-lowering agents. Cardiovascular outcomes trials reported to date support the safety of the DPP-4 class and suggest possible cardioprotective effects for SGLT2 inhibitors - at least based on the first reported study that used empagliflozin. Recent clinical evidence shows that SGLT2 inhibitor/DPP-4 inhibitor therapy is an effective combination for T2DM treatment, providing glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) reductions of 1.1 to 1.5%, and weight reductions of approximately 2 kg when added to metformin, which is its primary place in therapy.. The combination of an SGLT2 inhibitor/DPP-4 inhibitor is a safe and effective treatment choice for patients with T2DM who are unable to obtain adequate glycemic control with metformin therapy, cannot use metformin, or have a higher baseline HbA1c.. BP = blood pressure; CI = confidence interval; CVOT = cardiovascular outcomes; DKA = diabetic ketoacidosis; DPP-4 = dipeptidyl peptidase-4; EXAMINE = EXamination of cArdiovascular outcoMes with alogliptiN versus standard of carE in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and acute coronary syndrome; FDA = Food and Drug Administration; HbA1c = glycated hemoglobin; HR = hazard ratio; MACE = major adverse cardiovascular events; SAVOR-TIMI 53 = Saxagliptin Assessment of Vascular Outcomes Recorded in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus; SBP = systolic blood pressure; SGLT2 = sodium glucose cotransporter 2; TECOS = Trial to Evaluate Cardiovascular Outcomes after Treatment with Sitagliptin; T2DM = type 2 diabetes mellitus; XR = extended release.

Topics: Adamantane; Benzhydryl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Canagliflozin; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glucosides; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Linagliptin; Metformin; Piperidines; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Treatment Outcome; Uracil

Data on the possible relationship of gliptin treatment with the incidence of acute pancreatitis have been controversial. The aim of the current study was to combine data on the incidence of acute pancreatitis from three large randomized controlled trials.. Three trials designed to test cardiovascular safety and efficacy of add-on treatment with a gliptin were included in the analysis, as follows: SAVOR-TIMI 53 (saxagliptin), EXAMINE (alogliptin), and TECOS (sitagliptin). The trials included 18,238 gliptin-treated patients and 18,157 placebo-treated patients. Data were combined using a random-effects model meta-analysis.. The incidence of acute pancreatitis was significantly increased in the gliptin-treated patients when compared with the control groups (odds ratio 1.79 [95% CI 1.13-2.82], P = 0.013). The difference in the absolute risk was small (0.13%).. Treatment with gliptins significantly increased the risk for acute pancreatitis in a combined analysis of three large controlled randomized trials.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adamantane; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Humans; Incidence; Pancreatitis; Piperidines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Uracil

Regulatory requirements mandate that new drugs for treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), such as dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, are evaluated to show that they do not increase cardiovascular (CV) risk.. A systematic review was undertaken to evaluate the association between DPP-4 inhibitor and GLP-1 receptor agonist use and major adverse cardiac events (MACE). The National Institutes of Health Medline database was searched for pooled analyses, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of DPP-4 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists that included CV endpoints.. Thirty-six articles met the inclusion criteria encompassing 11 pooled analyses, 17 meta-analyses, and eight RCTs (including secondary analyses). Over the short term (up to 4 years), patients with T2DM exposed to a DPP-4 inhibitor or GLP-1 receptor agonist were not at increased risk for MACE (or its component endpoints) compared with those who received comparator agents. Two meta-analyses showed a significant reduction in the incidence of MACE associated with DPP-4 inhibitor therapy as a drug class, but this beneficial effect was not observed in other meta-analyses that included large RCT CV outcome studies. In four RCTs that evaluated alogliptin, saxagliptin, sitagliptin, or lixisenatide, there was no overall increased risk for MACE relative to placebo in T2DM patients at high risk for CV events or with established CV disease, although there was an increased rate of hospitalization for heart failure associated with saxagliptin. A fifth RCT showed that liraglutide reduced MACE risk by 13% versus placebo.. Overall, incretin therapy does not appear to increase risk for MACE in the short term.

Topics: Adamantane; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Peptides; Piperidines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Uracil

The incretin-based therapies, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogs, are important new classes of therapy for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). These agents prolong the action of the incretin hormones, GLP-1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), by inhibiting their breakdown. The incretin hormones improve glycemic control in T2DM by increasing insulin secretion and suppressing glucagon levels. The cardiovascular (CV) effects of the incretin-based therapies have been of substantial interest since 2008, when the US Food and Drug Administration began to require that all new therapies for diabetes undergo rigorous assessment of CV safety through large-scale CV outcome trials. This article reviews the most recent CV outcome trials of the DPP-4 inhibitors (SAVOR-TIMI 53, EXAMINE, and TECOS) as evidence that the incretin-based therapies have acceptable CV safety profiles for patients with T2DM. The studies differ with regard to patient population, trial duration, and heart failure outcomes but show similar findings for CV death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and stroke, as well as hospitalization for unstable angina.

Topics: Adamantane; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cardiovascular System; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Piperidines; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Uracil

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the greatest burden of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in terms of morbility, mortality and costs for individuals and societies. Therefore, its prevention is a major goal in diabetes care. Optimal treatment of hyperglycemia is certainly instrumental to CVD prevention. Optimal treatment means both establishing the most appropriate glycemic target for the given individual and selecting the medication(s) with the most favourable benefit/safety ratio. CVD safety, if not a clear CVD benefit, is certainly required for all antidiabetic agents. Dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors are among the classes of antidiabetic agents most recently made available for diabetes care. A major question to be addressed is the effect of these compounds on CVD. Expectations were high for their mechanism of action, which targets also post-prandial glucose and minimize hypoglycemia risk, thereby providing a sort of global glucose control, and for some potentially beneficial extra-glycemic effects. This article reviews the existing literature on this issue.. Data published so far document that DPP-4 inhibitors have a wide spectrum of glycemic and extra-glycemic effects potentially reducing the risk of CVD as well as favourable effects on intermediate or surrogate CVD endpoints. These data heralded a better CVD outcome. Accordingly, pooling CVD safety data from phase 3 and 4 studies conducted with DPP-4 inhibitors suggested that their use might translate into a better CVD outcome. Data from three CVD outcome RCTs with alogliptin, saxagliptin and sitagliptin documented no harm but did not show any benefit on major CVD events. A modest but significant increased risk of hospitalization for heart failure was observed with saxagliptin and with alogliptin (only in subjects with no history of heart failure before randomization) but not with sitagliptin. A study currently in progress with linagliptin will provide further insights in the issue of CVD safety and benefit.. It should be considered that most alternative oral antidiabetic agents generally do not possess a better CVD risk profile than DPP-4 inhibitors and that some of them, indeed, should be used with caution because of potentially adverse effects on heart and vasculature. Overall, the selection of antidiabetic agent(s) with the most favourable CVD profile is mandatory but still challenging in diabetes care.

Topics: Cardiovascular Diseases; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase IV as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Endpoint Determination; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Linagliptin; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Observational Studies as Topic; Piperidines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Uracil

Several randomized, controlled clinical trials were initiated some years ago in order to evaluate the cardiovascular safety of the new antidiabetic drugs in patients with type 2 diabetes due to requirements from regulatory bodies. Four trials with incretin-based drugs (saxagliptin, alogliptin, sitagliptin and lixisenatide) have been completed so far. Based on the primary outcome endpoints of these trials no cardiovascular risks were found with incretins in patients with type 2 diabetes. As for saxagliptin, the hospitalization for heart failure was investigated as a secondary endpoint, and an increased risk was observed in the respective trial; however, this observation was widely debated later in the literature. Together with ongoing trials of other novel antihyperglycemic agents, these data will provide more robust evidence about the cardiovascular safety of incretin-based antidiabetic treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Topics: Adamantane; Cardiovascular System; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Evidence-Based Medicine; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Peptides; Piperidines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Time Factors; Uracil

Owing to the close association of cardiovascular (CV) disease with type 2 diabetes and the uncertainty surrounding the CV safety of antidiabetes agents, in 2008 the Food and Drug Administration issued guidance for the demonstration of CV safety for new antidiabetes drugs. Recently the results from CV outcomes trials of three dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors and a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist have been reported. The Saxagliptin Assessment of Vascular Outcomes Recorded in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus (SAVOR) trial, the Examination of Cardiovascular Outcomes with Alogliptin versus Standard of Care in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Acute Coronary Syndrome (EXAMINE) trial, and the Trial Evaluating Cardiovascular Outcomes with Sitagliptin (TECOS) assessed the safety of saxagliptin, alogliptin, and sitagliptin, respectively, in patients with type 2 diabetes with CV disease or at high risk for CV disease. The Evaluation of Lixisenatide in Acute Coronary Syndrome (ELIXA) assessed the safety of lixisenatide in patients with type 2 diabetes and a recent acute coronary syndrome event. The results show that these agents neither increased nor deceased major adverse CV events (CV death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and nonfatal stroke) compared with placebo. However, the resources needed to conduct these studies may detract from the ability to understand the potential long-term benefit and risk in the majority of patients that are candidates for use of these medications.

Topics: Adamantane; Cardiovascular System; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Humans; Piperidines; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Treatment Outcome; Uracil

The treatment of diabetes mellitus type 2 is effective, but still is not optimal. DPP4 inhibitors (gliptins) are a new group of peroral antidiabetic drugs. The third clinical mortality study with gliptins in patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 was finished in 2015. The studies are known under acronym TECOS, SAVOR and EXAMINE and the tested drugs are sitagliptin, saxagliptin and alogliptin. The studies included about 37,000 patients. The studies confirmed the cardiovascular safety of the DPP4 inhibitors, but the question about increased heart failure remains open. The effectiveness of lowering glycaemia (glycated haemoglobin) was confirmed and also the pancreatic safety is confirmed.

Topics: Adamantane; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Glycated Hemoglobin; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Piperidines; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Uracil

Effective, evidence-based management of type 2 diabetes (T2D) requires the integration of the best available evidence with clinical experience and patient preferences.. Studies published from 2000 to 2012 evaluating glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) or dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4 inhibitors) were identified using PubMed. The author contextualized the study findings with his clinical experience.. Incretin-based therapy targets multiple dysfunctional organs in T2D. Injectable GLP-1RAs provide substantial glycemic control and weight reduction; while oral DPP-4 inhibitors provide moderate glycemic control and weight neutrality. Both classes are effective, well tolerated, and associated with a low incidence of hypoglycemia when used alone or in combination with other antidiabetes agents. GLP-1RAs are associated with transient nausea and, like DPP-4 inhibitors, rare pancreatitis.. Data indicate and clinical experience confirms that incretins are well tolerated in appropriate patients and provide sustained glycemic control and weight loss or weight neutrality throughout T2D progression.

Topics: Adamantane; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Exenatide; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Linagliptin; Liraglutide; Peptides; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazines; Quinazolines; Receptors, Glucagon; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Treatment Outcome; Triazoles; Uracil; Venoms; Weight Loss

Dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors are a class of anti-hyperglycemic agents with proven efficacy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).. This review considers the pharmacokinetic profile, adverse effects and drug interactions of DPP-4 inhibitors. DPP-4 inhibitors have certain differences in their structure, metabolism, route of elimination and selectivity for DPP-4 over structurally related enzymes, such as DPP-8/DPP-9. They have a low potential for drug interactions, with the exception of saxagliptin that is largely metabolized by cytochrome CYP3A4/A5. Reports of pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer have raised concerns regarding the safety of DPP-4 inhibitors and are under investigation. Post-marketing surveillance has revealed less common adverse effects, especially a number of skin- and immune-related adverse effects. These issues are covered in the present review.. DPP-4 inhibitors are useful and efficient drugs. DPP-4 inhibitors have similar mechanism of action and similar efficacy. However, DPP-4 inhibitors have certain differences in their pharmacokinetic properties that may be associated with different clinical effects and adverse event profiles. Although clinical trials indicated a favorable safety profile, post-marketing reports revealed certain safety aspects that need further investigation. Certainly, more research is needed to clarify if the differences among DPP-4 inhibitors could lead to a different clinical and safety profile.

Topics: Adamantane; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Drug Interactions; Humans; Linagliptin; Nitriles; Piperidines; Piperidones; Purines; Pyrazines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Pyrrolidines; Quinazolines; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Thiazolidines; Triazoles; Uracil; Vildagliptin

Although recent reports suggest an association between saxagliptin and an increased risk of admissions for heart failure, it is not clear whether dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP-IV) inhibition contributes to heart failure in high-risk patients. The purpose of this research is to understand heart failure risk among high-risk patients with type 2 diabetes.. This is a systematic review of data published in full papers and abstract form using the terms DPP-IV inhibitors and heart failure published since October 2013. Data from insurance and hospital databases were combined with those from multiple published trials, including the Saxagliptin Assessment of Vascular Outcomes Recorded in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 53 (SAVOR-TIMI 53) trial; Examination of Cardiovascular Outcomes With Alogliptin Versus Standard of Care (EXAMINE), and Vildagliptin in Ventricular Dysfunction Diabetes (VIVIDD) trial as well as pooled analyses of linagliptin and saxagliptin placebo-controlled trials to examine heart failure among patients represented in those datasets.. A meta-analysis of the 9 datasets showed an increase in heart failure with dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitors of 15% (P = 0.017). There was no statistical heterogeneity, nor was there a statistical difference between cohort studies and randomized, controlled trials (P = 0.3), even though cohort studies alone were not significant (relative risk: 1.1; P = 0.32). Removing SAVOR-TIMI 53 data produced an insignificant increase in heart failure of 12% (P = 0.09) in the rest of the studies. In the randomized, controlled trials, the increased risk was 24% (P = 0.002). There was no statistical difference between those studies with and without baseline cardiovascular disease (P = 0.58), although the cardiovascular disease studies were borderline significant (P = 0.06). There was no publication bias.. There are data from studies using sitagliptin, saxagliptin, and alogliptin showing that these agents may increase the risk of hospitalization for heart failure. More data are required for a definitive conclusion.

Topics: Adamantane; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Heart Failure; Hospitalization; Humans; Nitriles; Piperidines; Pyrrolidines; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Uracil; Vildagliptin

As type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) progresses, most patients will require insulin replacement therapy. Whether oral antidiabetic drug (OAD) therapy should be retained when initiating insulin is still debated. While the rationale to keep metformin with insulin is strong (mostly as an insulin-sparing agent to limit weight gain), the evidence is less clear for other OADs. In particular, the question now comes up what the expected benefit could be of combining the newer agents, such as the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors with insulin. Additionally, when metformin is no longer a treatment option, as in the case of patients with severe renal impairment, insulin is often used as monotherapy, with little evidence of benefit in maintaining other OADs. In this specific situation, it is also of interest to evaluate the potential benefit of combined treatment with a DPP-4 inhibitor and insulin. Among the classic limitations of insulin therapy in patients with T2DM, hypoglycemia remains a major barrier to glycemic control, along with weight gain exacerbation. The oral DPP-4 inhibitors improve glycemic control by increasing the sensitivity of the islet cells to glucose, and thus are not associated with an increased risk for hypoglycemia and are weight neutral. In addition to the expected benefits associated with limiting insulin dose and regimen complexity, the specific advantages the DPP-4 inhibitor drug class on hypoglycemia and weight gain could justify combining DPP-4 inhibitors with insulin; additionally, a DPP-4 inhibitor may be of special value to decrease glycemic excursions that are not properly addressed by basal insulin therapy and metformin use, even after optimizing titration of the basal insulin. However, given the common original perception that treatment with DPP-4 inhibitors may be less beneficial with increasing disease progression because of the loss of β-cell function, the potential relevance of these agents in the setting of advanced T2DM treated with insulin was not necessarily anticipated. Promising data from studies on the use of these new agents in insulin-treated patients with T2DM have started to emerge. Our article provides a comprehensive overview of the currently available evidence from controlled randomized clinical trials and we discuss the potential role of DPP-4 inhibitors in the this setting. Further clinical experience will allow to fully assess the positioning of these agents in insulin-treated T2DM populations.

Topics: Adamantane; Body Weight; Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Disease Progression; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Linagliptin; Nitriles; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazines; Pyrrolidines; Quinazolines; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Triazoles; Uracil; Vildagliptin

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a common complication of diabetes mellitus and the most common cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). As the worldwide prevalence of diabetes continues to increase, the number of patients with CKD will also increase. Therefore, it is essential that physicians know how to safely and effectively manage diabetes in the setting of CKD. Adequate glycaemic control in patients with diabetes is important to prevent ESRD and other complications and to decrease mortality. However, many glucose-lowering agents need to be dose-adjusted or should not be used in the setting of stage 3 CKD or higher (defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <60 ml/min/1.73 m(2)), particularly in patients with stage 5 CKD (eGFR <15 ml/min/1.73 m(2)) and in those receiving dialysis. Insulin therapy is appropriate for patients undergoing dialysis; however, several orally administered glucose-lowering agents can also be used safely in these patients. In this Review, we provide an overview of the use of noninsulin glucose-lowering agents in the dialysis population.

Topics: Adamantane; Biguanides; Diabetic Nephropathies; Dipeptides; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Disease Progression; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Glycoside Hydrolase Inhibitors; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Linagliptin; Meglumine; Metformin; Nitriles; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazines; Pyrrolidines; Quinazolines; Renal Dialysis; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Thiazolidinediones; Treatment Outcome; Triazoles; Uracil; Vildagliptin

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibition is a well- characterized treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The objective of this model-based meta-analysis was to describe the time course of HbA1c response after dosing with alogliptin (ALOG), saxagliptin (SAXA), sitagliptin (SITA), or vildagliptin (VILD). Publicly available data involving late-stage or marketed DPP-4 inhibitors were leveraged for the analysis. Nonlinear mixed-effects modeling was performed to describe the relationship between DPP-4 inhibition and mean response over time. Plots of the relationship between metrics of DPP-4 inhibition (ie, weighted average inhibition [WAI], time above 80% inhibition, and trough inhibition) and response after 12 weeks of daily dosing were evaluated. The WAI was most closely related to outcome, although other metrics performed well. A model was constructed that included fixed effects for placebo and drug and random effects for intertrial variability and residual error. The relationship between WAI and outcome was nonlinear, with an increasing response up to 98% WAI. Response to DPP-4 inhibitors could be described with a single drug effect. The WAI appears to be a useful index of DPP-4 inhibition related to HbA1c. Biomarker to response relationships informed by model-based meta-analysis can be leveraged to support study designs including optimization of dose, duration of therapy, and patient population.

Topics: Adamantane; Biomarkers; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Models, Biological; Nitriles; Piperidines; Pyrazines; Pyrrolidines; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Treatment Outcome; Triazoles; Uracil; Vildagliptin

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors offer new options for the management of type 2 diabetes. Direct comparisons with active glucose-lowering comparators in drug-naive patients have demonstrated that DPP-4 inhibitors exert slightly less pronounced HbA(1c) reduction than metformin (with the advantage of better gastrointestinal tolerability) and similar glucose-lowering effects as with a thiazolidinedione (TZD; with the advantage of no weight gain). In metformin-treated patients, gliptins were associated with similar HbA(1c) reductions compared with a sulphonylurea (SU; with the advantage of no weight gain, considerably fewer hypoglycaemic episodes and no need for titration) and a TZD (with the advantage of no weight gain and better overall tolerability). DPP-4 inhibitors also exert clinically relevant glucose-lowering effects compared with a placebo in patients treated with SU or TZD (of potential interest when metformin is either not tolerated or contraindicated), and as oral triple therapy with a good tolerability profile when added to a metformin-SU or pioglitazone-SU combination. Several clinical trials also showed a consistent reduction in HbA(1c) when DPP-4 inhibitors were added to basal insulin therapy, with no increased risk of hypoglycaemia. Because of the complex pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes and the complementary actions of glucose-lowering agents, initial combination of a DPP-4 inhibitor with either metformin or a glitazone may be applied in drug-naive patients, resulting in greater efficacy and similar safety compared with either drug as monotherapy. However, DPP-4 inhibitors were less effective than GLP-1 receptor agonists for reducing HbA(1c) and body weight, but offer the advantage of being easier to use (oral instead of injected administration) and lower in cost. Only one head-to-head trial demonstrated the non-inferiority of saxagliptin vs sitagliptin. Clearly, more trials of direct comparisons between different incretin-based therapies are needed. Because of their pharmacokinetic characteristics, pharmacodynamic properties (glucose-dependent glucose-lowering effect) and good overall tolerability profile, DPP-4 inhibitors may have a key role to play in patients with renal impairment and in the elderly. The role of DPP-4 inhibitors in the therapeutic armamentarium of type 2 diabetes is rapidly evolving as their potential strengths and weaknesses become better defined mainly through controlled clinical trials.

Topics: Adamantane; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Linagliptin; Male; Metformin; Nitriles; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazines; Pyrrolidines; Quinazolines; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Triazoles; Uracil; Vildagliptin; Weight Gain

Dipeptidyl peptidase -4 inhibitors represent a novel way to augment the incretin system and one of the newest class of medications in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Their mechanism of action is to decrease the inactivation of glucagon-like peptide 1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide, both of which are involved in maintaining euglycemia subsequent to carbohydrate intake. Currently investigated agents include sitagliptin, vildagliptin, saxagliptin, linagliptin, and alogliptin. Each agent has been shown to provide significant improvements in glycemic control compared to placebo. They are effective when added to other oral diabetes agents and in the cases of sitagliptin, vildagliptin, and alogliptin in addition to insulin. These agents may not provide as significant improvement in glucose concentrations as some other medications including metformin, thiazolidinediones, or glucagon-like peptide 1 agonists. The lack of head to head clinical data comparing the various dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors does not allow for specific recommendations if one agent is more effective or safer than another within the class. Their side effect profile suggests they are very well tolerated and have few drug interactions. For patients with mildly elevated glucose concentrations, they are therapeutic options in both drug-naive patients as well as those not optimally controlled on other diabetes medications.

Topics: Adamantane; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Drug Interactions; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Humans; Linagliptin; Male; Nitriles; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazines; Pyrrolidines; Quinazolines; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Treatment Outcome; Triazoles; Uracil; Vildagliptin

Aging is characterized by a progressive increase in the prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), which approaches 20% by age 70 years. Older patients with T2DM are a very heterogeneous group with multiple comorbidities, an increased risk of hypoglycemia, and a greater susceptibility to adverse effects of antihyperglycemic drugs, making treatment of T2DM in this population challenging. The risk of severe hypoglycemia likely represents the greatest barrier to T2DM care in the elderly. Although recent guidelines recommend more flexibility in treating this population with individualized targets, inadequate glycemic control is still closely linked to poor outcome in elderly patients. Incretins (glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide [GIP] and glucagon-like peptide-1 [GLP-1]) are hormones released post-meal from intestinal endocrine cells that stimulate insulin secretion and suppress postprandial glucagon secretion in a glucose-dependent manner. "Incretin therapies," comprising the injectable GLP-1 analogs and oral dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, are promising new therapies for use in older patients because of their consistent efficacy and low risk of hypoglycemia. However, data with these new agents are still scarce in this population, which has not been particularly well represented in clinical trials, highlighting the need for additional specific studies. The objective of this article is to provide an overview of the available data and potential role of these novel incretin therapies in managing T2DM in the elderly. With the exception of the DPP-4 inhibitor vildagliptin, there is no published trial to date dedicated to this population, although a few studies are currently ongoing. Therefore, available data from elderly subgroups of individual studies were also reviewed when available, as well as pooled analyses by age subgroups across clinical programs conducted with incretin therapies.

Topics: Adamantane; Age Factors; Aged; Aging; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Exenatide; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Linagliptin; Liraglutide; Male; Middle Aged; Nitriles; Peptides; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazines; Pyrrolidines; Quinazolines; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Treatment Outcome; Triazoles; Uracil; Venoms; Vildagliptin

Treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) traditionally has involved a progression of phases, from conventional lifestyle interventions and monotherapy, to combination therapy involving oral agents, to insulin initiation and its use either alone or with oral pharmacotherapy. Currently, the need for antidiabetic therapies with fewer adverse effects (eg, weight gain, reduced rates of hypoglycemia) is unmet. In addition, most treatments fail to adequately control postprandial hyperglycemia. Traditional options have generally been directed at the "insulin demand" aspect and have targeted insulin secretion or insulin resistance in peripheral tissues. Only recently have agents been available to address the "glucose supply" aspect that leads to fasting hyperglycemia in patients with T2DM. Incretin-based therapies, however, address both aspects. Two classes of incretin-directed therapies are available and work by either increasing endogenous levels of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) (ie, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors) or by mimicking the activity of endogenous GLP-1 (ie, GLP-1 agonists). These therapies treat the key metabolic abnormalities associated with T2DM but do so with reduced rates of hypoglycemia and do not promote weight gain as compared with conventional therapies.

Topics: Adamantane; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Disease Progression; Gastric Inhibitory Polypeptide; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Incretins; Piperidines; Pyrazines; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Triazoles; Uracil

Successful management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) requires attention to additional conditions often associated with hyperglycemia including overweight or obesity, dyslipidemia and hypertension, as each has some relationship with microvascular or macrovascular complications. Because control of cardiovascular risk factors is as important as glucose control in T2DM, these risk factors need to be addressed, and it is critical that antidiabetes medications do not exacerbate these risk factors. A patient-centered approach to treatment in which clinicians maximize patient involvement in the selection of antidiabetes therapy may lead to increased adherence and improved clinical outcomes. The incretin hormones, which include glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), are involved in glucoregulation and have become an important focus of T2DM research and treatment. Incretin-based therapies, such as the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and the dipeptidyl peptidase-IV inhibitors, have shown beneficial effects on hyperglycemia, weight, blood pressure and lipids with a low incidence of hypoglycemia.

Topics: Adamantane; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Exenatide; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Liraglutide; Nitriles; Obesity; Patient Compliance; Peptides; Piperidines; Precision Medicine; Primary Health Care; Pyrazines; Pyrrolidines; Risk Factors; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Triazoles; Uracil; Venoms; Vildagliptin

Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are generally treated with many pharmacological compounds and are exposed to a high risk of drug-drug interactions. Indeed, blood glucose control usually requires a combination of various glucose-lowering agents, and the recommended global approach to reduce overall cardiovascular risk generally implies administration of several protective compounds, including HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins), antihypertensive compounds and antiplatelet agents. New compounds have been developed to improve glucose-induced beta-cell secretion and glucose control, without inducing hypoglycaemia or weight gain, in patients with T2DM. Dipeptidylpeptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors are novel oral glucose-lowering agents, which may be used as monotherapy or in combination with other antidiabetic compounds, metformin, thiazolidinediones or even sulfonylureas. Sitagliptin, vildagliptin and saxagliptin are already on the market, either as single agents or in fixed-dose combined formulations with metformin. Other compounds, such as alogliptin and linagliptin, are in a late phase of development. This review summarizes the available data on drug-drug interactions reported in the literature for these five DDP-4 inhibitors: sitagliptin, vildagliptin, saxagliptin, alogliptin and linagliptin. Possible pharmacokinetic interferences have been investigated between each of these compounds and various pharmacological agents, which were selected because there are other glucose-lowering agents (metformin, glibenclamide [glyburide], pioglitazone/rosiglitazone) that may be prescribed in combination with DPP-4 inhibitors, other drugs that are currently used in patients with T2DM (statins, antihypertensive agents), compounds that are known to interfere with the cytochrome P450 (CYP) system (ketoconazole, diltiazem, rifampicin [rifampin]) or with P-glycoprotein transport (ciclosporin), or agents with a narrow therapeutic safety window (warfarin, digoxin). Generally speaking, almost no drug-drug interactions or only minor drug-drug interactions have been reported between DPP-4 inhibitors and any of these drugs. The gliptins do not significantly modify the pharmacokinetic profile and exposure of the other tested drugs, and the other drugs do not significantly alter the pharmacokinetic profile of the gliptins or exposure to these. The only exception concerns saxagliptin, which is metabolized to an active metabolite by CYP3A4/5. Therefore, exposure to saxagli

Topics: Adamantane; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Drug Interactions; Humans; Linagliptin; Nitriles; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazines; Pyrrolidines; Quinazolines; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Triazoles; Uracil; Vildagliptin

Attenuation of the prandial incretin effect, mediated by glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP), contributes to hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Since the launch of sitagliptin in 2006, a compelling body of evidence has accumulated showing that dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, which augment endogenous GLP-1 and GIP levels, represent an important advance in the management of T2DM. Currently, three DPP-4 inhibitors - sitagliptin, vildagliptin and saxagliptin - have been approved in various countries worldwide. Several other DPP-4 inhibitors, including linagliptin and alogliptin, are currently in clinical development. As understanding of, and experience with, the growing number of DPP-4 inhibitors broadens, increasing evidence suggests that the class may offer advantages over other antidiabetic drugs in particular patient populations. The expanding evidence base also suggests that certain differences between DPP-4 inhibitors may prove to be clinically significant. This therapeutic diversity should help clinicians tailor treatment to the individual patient, thereby increasing the proportion that safely attain target HbA(1c) levels, and reducing morbidity and mortality. This review offers an overview of DPP-4 inhibitors in T2DM and suggests some characteristics that may provide clinically relevant differentiators within this class.

Topics: Adamantane; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Energy Intake; Gastric Emptying; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Intestinal Mucosa; Linagliptin; Neurons; Nitriles; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazines; Pyrrolidines; Quinazolines; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Triazoles; Uracil; Vildagliptin

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is currently considered to be an epidemic disease. A safe and effective treatment has long been sought by scientists. Incretin mimetics and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) inhibitors represent a new class of agents that have recently been included as antidiabetic drugs. Although only a limited number of studies exist regarding the treatment of DM based on the incretin effect, DPP4 inhibitors have so far proved to be safe and effective, both when administered alone or in combination with other antidiabetic medication. This review focuses on incretin-effect physiology, as well as the DPP4 inhibitors, from sitagliptin to the new alogliptin-pioglitazone combination agent, given as monotherapy and in combination with other antidiabetic agents.

Topics: Adamantane; Animals; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Drug Therapy, Combination; Gastric Inhibitory Polypeptide; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Pioglitazone; Piperidines; Pyrazines; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Thiazolidinediones; Triazoles; Uracil

It has been reported that dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors improve hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels in diabetic patients and may also improve the serum lipids. However, few studies have examined relationship between the effects of the DPP-4 inhibitor and the pretreatment HbA1c levels in diabetic patients. Furthermore, it has been reported that prolonged treatment with DPP-4 inhibitors may make glycemic control difficult in some patients. In the present study, we investigated (1) the effect of the DPP-4 inhibitor alogliptin on HbA1c, blood glucose (BG), and serum lipid in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes, (2) the relationship between the HbA1c levels at baseline and the effects of alogliptin, and (3) the effects of switching of the DPP-4 inhibitor to alogliptin after 12 months' administration of sitagliptin on glycemic control and serum lipids. After 6-months' treatment with alogliptin, we found reductions of HbA1c, BG, and serum total cholesterol, and LDL cholesterol levels. Pretreatment level of HbA1c was well correlated with the degree of reduction of both HbA1c and BG levels after the treatment. Also, alogliptin kept levels of HbA1c and BG reduced by sitagliptin for 12 months, and relapsing of these levels and serum lipids were not observed. This study revealed that alogliptin improved HbA1c, BG, and serum lipid profiles in type 2 diabetic patients, and the effect of alogliptin on HbA1c and BG levels was correlated with HbA1c level at pretreatment. Furthermore, long-term treatment with alogliptin did not cause relapsing of glycemic control and serum lipids.

Topics: Asian People; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Lipids; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Uracil

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor is a new class of anti-diabetic drug which exerts its glucose-lowering action by suppressing the degradation of a gut incretin hormone glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1). To elucidate whether treatment with stronger DPP-4 inhibitor on top of angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker (ARB) provides greater renal protective effects, we performed a crossover study with two DPP-4 inhibitors, sitagliptin and alogliptin, in twelve type 2 diabetic patients with incipient nephropathy taking ARBs. This study consisted of three treatment periods: sitagliptin 50 mg/day for 4 weeks (first period), alogliptin 25 mg/day for 4 weeks (second period), and sitagliptin 50 mg/day for 4 weeks (third period). Significant changes in body mass index, blood pressure, serum lipids, serum creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and HbA1c were not observed among the three treatment periods. Reduced urinary levels of albumin and an oxidative stress marker 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG), increased urinary cAMP levels, and elevated plasma levels of stromal cell-derived factor-1α (SDF-1α) which is a physiological substrate of DPP-4 were observed after the switch from sitagliptin to a stronger DPP-4 inhibitor alogliptin. Given a large body of evidence indicating anti-oxidative action of cAMP and up-regulation of cellular cAMP production by SDF-1α, the present results suggest that more powerful DPP-4 inhibition on top of angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockade would offer additional protection against early-stage diabetic nephropathy beyond that attributed to glycemic control, via reduction of renal oxidative stress by SDF-1α-cAMP pathway activation.

Topics: 8-Hydroxy-2'-Deoxyguanosine; Aged; Albuminuria; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Chemokine CXCL12; Cross-Over Studies; Cyclic AMP; Deoxyguanosine; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Nephropathies; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Pyrazines; Receptor, Angiotensin, Type 1; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Triazoles; Up-Regulation; Uracil

Endothelial dysfunction is an independent predictor for cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Glucagon like peptide-1 (GLP-1) reportedly exerts vasodilatory actions, and inhibitors of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4), an enzyme-degrading GLP-1, are widely used to treat T2DM. We therefore hypothesized that DPP-4 inhibitors (DPP-4Is) improve endothelial function in T2DM patients and performed 2 prospective, randomized crossover trials to compare the DPP-4I sitagliptin and an α-glucosidase inhibitor, voglibose (in study 1) and the DPP-4Is sitagliptin and alogliptin (in study 2).. In study 1, 24 men with T2DM (46±5 years) were randomized to sitagliptin or voglibose for 6 weeks without washout periods. Surprisingly, sitagliptin significantly reduced flow-mediated vasodilatation (FMD; -51% compared with baseline, P<0.05) of the brachial artery despite improved diabetic status. In contrast, voglibose did not affect FMD. To confirm this result and determine whether it is a class effect, we conducted another trial (study 2) to compare sitagliptin and alogliptin in 42 T2DM patients (66±8 years) for 6 weeks with 4-week washout periods. Both DPP-4Is improved glycemic control but significantly attenuated FMD (7.2/4.3%, P<0.001, before/after sitagliptin; 7.0/4.8%, P<0.001, before/after alogliptin, respectively). Interestingly, FMD reduction was less evident in subjects who were on statins or whose LDL cholesterol levels were reduced by them, but this was not correlated with parameters including DPP-4 activity and GLP-1 levels or diabetic parameters.. Our 2 independent trials demonstrated that DPP-4 inhibition attenuated endothelial function as evaluated by FMD in T2DM patients. This unexpected unfavorable effect may be a class effect of DPP-4Is.. URL: http://center.umin.ac.jp, Unique Identifiers: UMIN000005682 (sitagliptin versus voglibose) and UMIN000005681 (sitagliptin versus alogliptin).

Topics: Adult; Aged; Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Cholesterol, LDL; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Endothelium, Vascular; Female; Humans; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Inositol; Japan; Linear Models; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Prospective Studies; Pyrazines; Regional Blood Flow; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Triazoles; Uracil; Vasodilation

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibition is a well- characterized treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The objective of this model-based meta-analysis was to describe the time course of HbA1c response after dosing with alogliptin (ALOG), saxagliptin (SAXA), sitagliptin (SITA), or vildagliptin (VILD). Publicly available data involving late-stage or marketed DPP-4 inhibitors were leveraged for the analysis. Nonlinear mixed-effects modeling was performed to describe the relationship between DPP-4 inhibition and mean response over time. Plots of the relationship between metrics of DPP-4 inhibition (ie, weighted average inhibition [WAI], time above 80% inhibition, and trough inhibition) and response after 12 weeks of daily dosing were evaluated. The WAI was most closely related to outcome, although other metrics performed well. A model was constructed that included fixed effects for placebo and drug and random effects for intertrial variability and residual error. The relationship between WAI and outcome was nonlinear, with an increasing response up to 98% WAI. Response to DPP-4 inhibitors could be described with a single drug effect. The WAI appears to be a useful index of DPP-4 inhibition related to HbA1c. Biomarker to response relationships informed by model-based meta-analysis can be leveraged to support study designs including optimization of dose, duration of therapy, and patient population.

Topics: Adamantane; Biomarkers; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Models, Biological; Nitriles; Piperidines; Pyrazines; Pyrrolidines; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Treatment Outcome; Triazoles; Uracil; Vildagliptin

The purpose of this study is to investigate the regulation of adipose tissue insulin resistance with DPP-4 inhibitors in treatment-naive subjects with T2DM and to examine its relation to other diabetic parameters.. A total of 147 subjects were treated with alogliptin 12.5-25 mg/day (n = 55), sitagliptin 25-50 mg/day (n = 49), or teneligliptin 10-20 mg/day (n = 43) monotherapy for 3 months. Changes in adipo-IR, a mathematical model used to evaluate adipose tissue insulin resistance, and various diabetic parameters were analyzed in this prospective, non-randomized observational study.. Among these three drugs, only alogliptin significantly reduced adipo-IR (-25.9%, p < 0.004) and some lipid parameters, such as LDL-C, T-C/HDL-C, log(TG)/HDL-C, non-HDL-C/HDL-C, and LDL-C/HDL-C. Subjects in the alogliptin group were divided into two groups with distinct changes in adipo-IR. Group A had a significant decrease in adipo-IR (-56.5%, p < 0.00001, n = 28), whereas group B had an insignificant increase (19.1%, p = 0.055, n = 27). Significant reductions in FBG or HbA1c were observed in groups A and B, respectively. Group A also showed significant reductions in HOMA-R, T-C/HDL-C, TG, log(TG)/HDL-C, non-HDL-C/HDL-C, LDL-C/HDL-C, and FFA, as well as increases in QUICKI or HDL-C. In contrast, group B showed significant reductions in QUICKI or LDL-C, and increases in HOMA-R, insulin, HOMA-B, C-peptide, or CPR-index.. In contrast to other tested DPP-4 inhibitors, alogliptin demonstrated the ability to down-regulate insulin resistance in adipose tissue, as well as certain atherogenic lipids. This study provides the initial evidence of a DPP-4 inhibitor's potential to regulate adipose tissue insulin resistance. Furthermore, adipo-IR is associated with non-LDL-C lipid parameters instead of glycemic control in those receiving alogliptin.

Topics: Adipose Tissue; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Resistance; Lipids; Prospective Studies; Sitagliptin Phosphate

Dipeptidylpeptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, including linagliptin, alogliptin, saxagliptin, sitagliptin, and vildagliptin, are used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients in China. This study assessed the economic outcomes of different DPP-4 inhibitors in patients with T2DM inadequately controlled with metformin in the Chinese context.. In this study, the validated Chinese Outcomes Model for T2DM (COMT) was conducted to project economic outcomes from the perspective of Chinese healthcare service providers. Efficacy and safety, medical expenditure, and utility data were derived from the literature, which were assigned to model variables. The primary outputs of the model included the lifetime costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). One-way and probability sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess the potential uncertainties of parameters.. Of the five competing strategies, alogliptin 25 mg strategy yielded the most significant health outcome, which associated with improvements in discounted QALY of 0.007, 0.014, 0.011, and 0.022. These results suggested that alogliptin was a preferred treatment option compared with other DPP-4 inhibitors for Chinese patients whose T2DM are inadequately controlled on metformin monotherapy.

Topics: Adamantane; China; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Drug Resistance; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Linagliptin; Metformin; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Uracil; Vildagliptin

In a recent publication, Eleftheriou et al. proposed that inhibitors of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) are functional inhibitors of the main protease (M

Topics: Adamantane; Antiviral Agents; Coronavirus 3C Proteases; Dipeptides; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Drug Repositioning; Enzyme Assays; Heterocyclic Compounds; Linagliptin; Piperidines; SARS-CoV-2; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Uracil

Recent studies revealed the risk of bullous pemphigoid (BP) in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) taking dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors. To clarify the relationship between taking DPP-4 inhibitors and the risk of BP among patients with DM, we conducted a cohort study by using the National Health Insurance Research Database of Taiwan from 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2015. We identified 6340 patients with DM taking DPP-4 inhibitors and 25 360 DM patients who had not taken DPP-4 inhibitors during the 7-year follow-up period. Compared with the non-DPP-4 inhibitor group, patients taking DDP-4 inhibitors had a higher risk of BP (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 2.382; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.163-4.883; P = 0.017]. Among the DPP-4 inhibitors available in Taiwan, vildagliptin showed the highest risk of BP (aHR, 2.849; 95% CI, 1.893-4.215; P < 0.001), followed by saxagliptin (aHR, 2.657; 95% CI, 1.770-3.934; P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis revealed that the higher risk of BP was observed in patients older than 65 years (aHR, 2.403; 95% CI, 1.590-3.627; P < 0.001). This study revealed that treatment with DPP-4 inhibitors, especially vildagliptin, was significantly associated with an increased risk of BP among DM patients.

Topics: Adamantane; Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Case-Control Studies; Databases, Factual; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Incidence; Linagliptin; Male; Middle Aged; Pemphigoid, Bullous; Piperidines; Risk Factors; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Taiwan; Uracil; Vildagliptin; Young Adult

The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the effects on laboratory parameters among monotherapy with five DPP-4 inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM).. We identified cohorts of new sitagliptin users (n = 879), vildagliptin users (n = 253), teneligliptin users (n = 260), alogliptin users (n = 237), and linagliptin users (n = 180) in patients with type 2 DM. We used a multivariate regression model to evaluate and compare the effects of the drugs on laboratory parameters including HbA1c concentration and serum concentrations of creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate, high density lipoprotein, total cholesterol, triglyceride, aspartate aminotransferase, and alanine aminotransferase among the five DPP-4 inhibitors up to 12 months.. Our study showed a favorable effect on HbA1c concentration and a slightly unfavorable effect on serum creatinine concentration in users of the five DPP-4 inhibitors, a favorable effect on lipid metabolism in sitagliptin, vildagliptin, and alogliptin users, and a favorable effect on hepatic parameters in sitagliptin, alogliptin, and linagliptin users, in comparison of the baseline and exposure periods. However, there was no significant difference in mean change in the concentration of any laboratory parameter among the five groups of DPP-4 inhibitor users.. In this study, we showed the effect of five DPP-4 inhibitors on glycemic, renal, and lipid metabolism, and hepatic parameters. DPP-4 inhibitors are well-tolerated hypoglycemic drugs.

Topics: Aged; Alanine Transaminase; Aspartate Aminotransferases; Cholesterol; Creatinine; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Female; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Linagliptin; Lipid Metabolism; Lipoproteins, HDL; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Thiazolidines; Triglycerides; Uracil; Vildagliptin

Topics: Adamantane; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Autoantibodies; Autoantigens; Collagen Type XVII; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Epitopes; Female; Humans; Immunoglobulin A; Immunoglobulin E; Immunoglobulin G; Linagliptin; Male; Membrane Glycoproteins; Middle Aged; Nitriles; Non-Fibrillar Collagens; Pemphigoid, Bullous; Piperidines; Pyrrolidines; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Uracil; Vildagliptin

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists (liraglutide, exenatide, lixisenatide) have recently been used as anti-diabetes drugs. We examined relationships of the binding occupancy of GLP-1 receptors (Φ) and their clinical efficacy after administration of GLP-1 receptor agonists. Next, by focusing on changes of GLP-1 concentration after administration of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors (vildagliptin, alogliptin, sitagliptin, linagliptin), we analyzed the relationship between Φ and clinical efficacy. Furthermore, using Φ as a common parameter, we compared the clinical efficacy elicited by GLP-1 receptor agonists and DPP-4 inhibitors using a theoretical analysis method. The present results showed that GLP-1 receptor agonists produced their clinical effect at a relatively low level of Φ (1.1-10.7%) at a usual dose. Furthermore, it was suggested that the drugs might achieve their full effect at an extraordinarily low level of Φ. It was also revealed that the Φ value of DPP-4 inhibitors (0.83-1.3%) was at the lower end or lower than that of GLP-1 receptor agonists at a usual dose. Accordingly, the predicted value for hemoglobin A

Topics: Adamantane; Algorithms; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Monitoring; Exenatide; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Ligands; Liraglutide; Models, Molecular; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Nitriles; Peptides; Piperidines; Pyrrolidines; Reproducibility of Results; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Uracil; Venoms; Vildagliptin

In 2008, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued Draft Guidance on investigating cardiovascular risk with oral diabetic drugs, including dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i). In 2014, underpowered, post hoc analyses of clinical trials suggested an increased risk of heart failure with the use of these products. As such, we assessed disproportionate reporting of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) among reports for DPP-4i submitted to the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from 2006 to 2015.. We assessed the empirical Bayes geometric mean (EBGM) and its lower bound (EB05) of the relative reporting ratio for MACE among DPP-4i reports in the full FAERS database and in a subset of reports limited to cardiovascular and diabetic drugs. We then compared the EB05 in these 2 analyses and calculated the percent positive agreement for signals of disproportional reporting (SDRs) involving MACE.. Of 180.3 million adverse event reports, 13.4 million were for diabetic and cardiovascular drugs. In the cardiovascular subset, there was an SDR for heart failure with linagliptin (EB05 = 2782.47) and saxagliptin (EB05 = 2.40), myocardial infarction with alogliptin (EB05 = 290.11), and cerebral infarction with sitagliptin (EB05 = 2.80). Of the 14 MACE, 8 had a percent positive agreement ≥50% for an SDR in both analyses. Overall, the cardiovascular subset elicited 11 more SDRs for DPP-4i than the full dataset.. Postmarketing surveillance of DPP-4i through FAERS suggest increased reporting of MACE, supporting the current FDA warning of heart failure risk. This suggests the need for additional longitudinal, observational research into the association of DPP-4i and other MACE.

Topics: Adamantane; Administration, Oral; Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems; Aged; Bayes Theorem; Databases, Factual; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Linagliptin; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Sitagliptin Phosphate; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration; Uracil

Saxagliptin statistically significantly increased the risk of hospitalization for heart failure compared with placebo in the clinical trial of SAVOR-TIMI 53. Neither the reason why only saxagliptin among several dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors increased the risk, nor the clinical implication of the result has been explained.. To evaluate the risk of hospitalization for heart failure associated with DPP-4 inhibitors by using an alternative measure to the hazard ratio.. We used the difference in restricted mean survival time (RMST) between DPP-4 inhibitors and placebo to evaluate the risk of cardiovascular events, including hospitalization for heart failure associated with DPP-4 inhibitors. Three randomized clinical trials with cardiovascular events as a primary end point-EXAMINE (alogliptin), SAVOR-TIMI 53 (saxagliptin), and TECOS (sitagliptin)-were reevaluated by estimating the RMSTs for the DPP-4 inhibitors and placebo based on the reconstructed individual patient data for each time-to-event outcome from publicly available information.. The differences of RMSTs (DPP-4 inhibitors minus placebo) for hospitalization for heart failure were -4 days [-6, -2] in the SAVOR-TIMI 53 (720 days follow-up), -3 days [-9, 3] in the EXAMINE (900 days follow-up), and 1 day [-5, 7] in the TECOS (1440 days follow-up). There were no substantial differences in the risk of other cardiovascular outcomes between DPP-4 inhibitors and placebo.. There are no substantial clinically relevant differences in the risk of cardiovascular events, including hospitalization for heart failure, between 3 of the DPP-4 inhibitors and placebo.

Topics: Adamantane; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Heart Failure; Hospitalization; Humans; Piperidines; Proportional Hazards Models; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Uracil

To predict the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) profiles of imigliptin, a novel DPP-4 inhibitor, in first-in-human (FIH) study based on the data from preclinical species.. Imigliptin was intravenously and orally administered to rats, dogs, and monkeys to assess their PK/PD properties. DPP-4 activity was the PD biomarker. PK/PD profiles of sitagliptin and alogliptin in rats and humans were obtained and digitized from literatures. PK/PD profiles of all dose levels for each drug in each species were analyzed using modeling approach. Human CL, Vss and PK profiles of imigliptin were then predicted using Allometric Scaling (AS), in vitro in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE), and the steady-state plasma drug concentration - mean residence time (Css-MRT) methods. In vitro EC50 corrected by fu and in vivo EC50 in rats corrected by interspecies difference of sitagliptin and alogliptin were utilized separately to predict imigliptin human EC50. The prediction by integrating all above methods was evaluated by comparing observed and simulated PK/PD profiles in healthy subjects.. Full PK/PD profiles in animal were summarized for imigliptin, sitagliptin and alogliptin. Imigliptin CL, Vss, and Fa were predicted to be 19.1L/h, 247L, and 0.81 in humans, respectively. Predicted imigliptin AUCs, AUECs, and Emax in humans were within 0.8-1.2 times of observed values whereas other predicted PK/PD parameters were within 0.5-1.5 times of observed values.. By integrating available preclinical and clinical data, FIH PK/PD profiles of imigliptin could be accurately predicted.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Area Under Curve; Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Dogs; Female; Haplorhini; Humans; Imidazoles; Male; Piperidines; Pyridines; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Uracil

Trelagliptin (SYR-472), a novel dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, shows sustained efficacy by once-weekly dosing in type 2 diabetes patients. In this study, we characterized in vitro properties of trelagliptin, which exhibited approximately 4- and 12-fold more potent inhibition against human dipeptidyl peptidase-4 than alogliptin and sitagliptin, respectively, and >10,000-fold selectivity over related proteases including dipeptidyl peptidase-8 and dipeptidyl peptidase-9. Kinetic analysis revealed reversible, competitive and slow-binding inhibition of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 by trelagliptin (t1/2 for dissociation ≈ 30 minutes). X-ray diffraction data indicated a non-covalent interaction between dipeptidyl peptidase and trelagliptin. Taken together, potent dipeptidyl peptidase inhibition may partially contribute to sustained efficacy of trelagliptin.

Topics: Animals; Crystallography, X-Ray; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Dogs; Humans; Male; Piperidines; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Substrate Specificity; Time Factors; Uracil

Topics: Adamantane; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Piperidines; Risk Factors; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Uracil

The majority of people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) will develop chronic kidney disease in their lifetime. Because most dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP)-4 inhibitors require dose adjustment in patients with T2DM and renal impairment, we aimed to understand how these treatments are prescribed in UK clinical practice, and to determine whether recommended dose adjustments are being made at initial prescription.. This retrospective, descriptive cohort study analyzed data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD). Patients of interest were those with T2DM and renal impairment initiated on a DPP-4 inhibitor between 2014 and 2015. Patients under 40 years of age and with type 1 diabetes were excluded. Descriptive statistics were calculated for baseline demographic and clinical characteristics, and the study protocol was approved by the Independent Scientific Advisory Committee for Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency database research.. A total of 3425 patients diagnosed with T2DM and renal impairment and initiated on a DPP-4 inhibitor were identified. The percentages of patients prescribed the high dose of saxagliptin, alogliptin,sitagliptin, and vildagliptin were 48%, 43%, 41%, and 27%, respectively, which is not recommended given their renal dysfunction. These are conservative estimates, as they do not include patients with severe renal impairment on sitagliptin and alogliptin, whose doses should be further reduced. No patients were prescribed an inappropriately high dose of linagliptin, as there is no requirement for dose adjustment in patients with renal impairment.. In this study, a considerable number of patients with T2DM and renal impairment were prescribed an inappropriately high dose of saxagliptin, alogliptin, sitagliptin, or vildagliptin for their level of renal impairment at treatment initiation. This prescribing could have been due to the complexity of different dosing requirements, or a lack of awareness of the need for dose adjustment of most DPP-4 inhibitors in patients with renal impairment. Linagliptin may be used in patients with moderate or severe renal impairment without dose adjustment.

Topics: Adamantane; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Female; General Practice; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Linagliptin; Male; Middle Aged; Nitriles; Piperidines; Pyrrolidines; Retrospective Studies; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Uracil; Vildagliptin

Topics: Adamantane; Benzhydryl Compounds; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glucosides; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Liraglutide; Peptides; Piperidines; Risk; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Uracil

Dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP-4) enzyme is responsible for the degradation of incretins that stimulates insulin secretion and hence inhibition of DPP-4 becomes an established approach for the treatment of type 2 diabetics. We studied the interaction between DPP-4 and its inhibitor drugs (sitagliptin 1, linagliptin 2, alogliptin 3, and teneligliptin 4) quantitatively by using fragment molecular orbital calculations at the RI-MP2/cc-pVDZ level to analyze the inhibitory activities of the drugs. Apart from having common interactions with key residues, inhibitors encompassing the DPP-4 active site extensively interact widely with the hydrophobic pocket by their hydrophobic inhibitor moieties. The cumulative hydrophobic interaction becomes stronger for these inhibitors and hence linagliptin and teneligliptin have larger interaction energies, and consequently higher inhibitory activities, than their alogliptin and sitagliptin counterparts. Though effective interaction for both 2 and 3 is at [Formula: see text] subsite, 2 has a stronger binding to this subsite interacting with Trp629 and Tyr547 than 3 does. The presence of triazolopiperazine and piperazine moiety in 1 and 4, respectively, provides the interaction to the S2 extensive subsite; however, the latter's superior inhibitory activity is not only due to a relatively tighter binding to the S2 extensive subsite, but also due to the interactions to the S1 subsite. The calculated hydrophobic interfragment interaction energies correlate well with the experimental binding affinities (KD) and inhibitory activities (IC50) of the DPP-4 inhibitors.

Topics: Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Humans; Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions; Hypoglycemic Agents; Linagliptin; Molecular Docking Simulation; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Thiazolidines; Uracil

All dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors display similar glycemic efficacies, although they differ greatly in their chemical structures and pharmacological properties. This may be due to the inclusions of non- or poor-responders in the analysis, thereby masking the real effects of these drugs. The aim of this study was to identify any differences in diabetic parameters only in good responders treated with sitagliptin and alogliptin.. Treatment naïve subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus were assigned to either sitagliptin 25-50 mg/day (n = 69) or alogliptin 12.5-25 mg/day monotherapy (n = 62) for 3 months. Only those who showed good response selected by a novel parameter called A1c index were further analysed (n = 24 for sitagliptin and n = 21 for alogliptin).. At baseline, FBG and BMI were significantly higher and CPR-index was significantly lower in alogliptin good responders. At 3 months, while similar reductions of HbA1c were observed in these two groups, decreases of fasting blood glucose (FBG) were significantly higher in alogliptin good responders. Homeostasis model assessment (HOMA)-R significantly decreased only in alogliptin good responders, while HOMA-B similarly and significantly increased in these two groups. BMI significantly increased only in sitagliptin good responders. Significant negative correlations were observed between A1c index and changes (Δ) of HOMA-B in both groups. By contrast, significant positive and negative correlations were observed between ΔFBG and ΔHOMA-R, and between ΔFBG and ΔHOMA-B, respectively, only in alogliptin good responders.. These results implicate that the effects on diabetic parameters and the glucose-lowering mechanisms of these two drugs might be different in those who have good response with these drugs. Accordingly, the choice of these drugs may be dependent on the characteristics of the patients.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Uracil

The purpose of this exercise was to explore the utility of allometric scaling approach for the prediction of intravenous and oral pharmacokinetics of six dipeptidy peptidase-IV (DPP-IV) inhibitors viz. ABT-279, ABT-341, alogliptin, carmegliptin, sitagliptin and vildagliptin.. The availability of intravenous and oral pharmacokinetic data in animals enabled the allometry scaling of 6 DPP-IV inhibitors. The relationship between the main pharmacokinetic parameters [viz. volume of distribution (Vd) and clearance (CL)] and body weight was studied across three or four mammalian species, using double logarithmic plots to predict the human pharmacokinetic parameters of CL and Vd using simple allometry.. A simply allometry relationship: Y = aWb was found to be adequate for the prediction of intravenous and oral human clearance/volume of distribution for DPP-IV inhibitors. The allometric equations for alogliptin, carmegliptin, sitagliptin, vildagliptin, ABT-279 and ABT-341 were 1.867W0.780, 1.170W0.756, 2.020W0.529, 1.959 W0.847, 0.672 W1.016, 1.077W 0.649, respectively, to predict intravenous clearance (CL) and the corresponding equations to predict intravenous volume of distribution (Vd) were: 3.313W0.987, 6.096W0.992, 7.140W0.805, 2.742W0.941, 1.299W0.695 and 5.370W0.803. With the exception of a few discordant values the exponent rule appeared to hold for CL (0.75) and Vd (1.0) for the predictions of various DPP-IV inhibitors. Regardless of the routes, the predicted values were within 2-3 fold of observed values and intravenous allometry was better than oral allometry.. Simple allometry retrospectively predicted with reasonable accuracy the human reported values of gliptins and could be used as a prospective tool for this class of drugs.

Topics: Adamantane; Administration, Intravenous; Administration, Oral; Animals; Biphenyl Compounds; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Dogs; Haplorhini; Humans; Nitriles; Piperidines; Prospective Studies; Pyridines; Pyrrolidines; Quinolizines; Rats; Retrospective Studies; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Triazoles; Uracil; Vildagliptin

In recent years, various dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP-4) inhibitors have been released as therapeutic drugs for type 2 diabetes in many countries. In spite of their diverse chemical structures, no comparative studies of their binding modes in the active site of DPP-4 have been disclosed. We determined the co-crystal structure of vildagliptin with DPP-4 by X-ray crystallography and compared the binding modes of six launched inhibitors in DPP-4. The inhibitors were categorized into three classes on the basis of their binding subsites: (i) vildagliptin and saxagliptin (Class 1) form interactions with the core S1 and S2 subsites and a covalent bond with Ser630 in the catalytic triad; (ii) alogliptin and linagliptin (Class 2) form interactions with the S1' and/or S2' subsites in addition to the S1 and S2 subsites; and (iii) sitagliptin and teneligliptin (Class 3) form interactions with the S1, S2 and S2 extensive subsites. The present study revealed that the additional interactions with the S1', S2' or S2 extensive subsite may increase DPP-4 inhibition beyond the level afforded by the fundamental interactions with the S1 and S2 subsites and are more effective than forming a covalent bond with Ser630.

Topics: Adamantane; Catalytic Domain; Crystallography, X-Ray; Dipeptides; Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Humans; Multiprotein Complexes; Nitriles; Oligopeptides; Piperidines; Protein Binding; Protein Interaction Mapping; Pyrazines; Pyrazoles; Pyrrolidines; Serine; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Structure-Activity Relationship; Thiazolidines; Triazoles; Uracil; Vildagliptin; X-Ray Diffraction

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors and other incretin-related drugs have attracted attention as antidiabetic agents, but they are expensive. The Japanese government has adopted a policy of reducing healthcare costs, and medical institutions must provide medical care while considering economic efficiency. This study was a comparative survey of the usage, treatment effectiveness, and cost of DPP-4 inhibitors. The subjects were patients prescribed DPP-4 inhibitors (sitagliptin, vildagliptin, and alogliptin) at Gifu Municipal Hospital between February 2010 and August 2011. HbA1c: Japan Diabetes Society values (%) and concomitant antidiabetic agents were surveyed for 12 weeks after the start of DPP-4 inhibitors. A cost-effectiveness analysis showed that the cost required for a 0.1% decrease in HbA1c for 12 weeks was the lowest with vildagliptin (2,478 yen; decrease in HbA1c: 0.75% +/- 0.85%). In a cost analysis with a virtual cohort of 1000 patients, the number of patients who achieved the treatment target (HbA1c 6.5%) was estimated with respect to a virtual cohort created based on the HbA1c level (7.59 +/- 1.13%) at baseline of 307 patients, in cases assuming the use of each DPP-4 inhibitor. In addition, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was obtained with sitagliptin 50 mg as the reference. The number of patients achieving the treatment target was the highest with vildagliptin 100 mg (413 of 1000 patients), and the estimated ICER of 28,359 yen was the lowest. Robustness was also confirmed with a sensitivity analysis. These results suggest that vildagliptin provides a superior cost-benefit.

Topics: Adamantane; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cohort Studies; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Costs and Cost Analysis; Diabetes Mellitus; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Nitriles; Piperidines; Pyrazines; Pyrrolidines; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Triazoles; Uracil; Vildagliptin

Topics: Adamantane; Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Exenatide; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Linagliptin; Liraglutide; Nitriles; Peptides; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazines; Pyrrolidines; Quinazolines; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Triazoles; Uracil; Venoms; Vildagliptin

We examined the impact of FDA's 2008 guidelines for addressing cardiovascular risks of new therapies for type 2 diabetes on clinical trials. We focused on the new class of incretin-modulating drugs, exenatide, sitagliptin, saxagliptin and liraglutide, which were approved in 2005-2010. We contrasted these findings with those from 2 different groups: 1. diabetes drugs approved in the same timeframe but with a non-incretin mechanism of action (colesevelam HCl and bromocriptine mesylate) and 2. diabetes drugs with NDAs delayed and not yet approved within the same time frame (vildagliptin, alogliptin, insulin inhalation powder, and exenatide long acting release). The new guidelines have had an important impact on clinical development. Review time has increased over 2-fold. The increase is seen even if a drug with the same mechanism of action has been already approved. Whereas exenatide (approved in 2005) required 10 months of regulatory review, the approval of liraglutide in 2010 required more than twice as long (21 months). In contrast, the marketing authorization of liraglutide in the EU required 14 months. Additionally, the manufacturer of vildagliptin announced in June 2008, 30 months after the NDA was filed, that a re-submission to meet FDA's demands was not planned. The drug however received marketing authorization in the EU in 2007. The number of randomized patients and patient-years in NDAs increased more than 2.5 and 4 fold, respectively since the guidelines. The significant cost increases and negative publicity because of rare adverse reactions will adversely affect future clinical research in type 2 diabetes and not address its burgeoning health care impact.

Topics: Adamantane; Allylamine; Cardiovascular Diseases; Colesevelam Hydrochloride; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Exenatide; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Insulin; Investigational New Drug Application; Liraglutide; Nitriles; Peptides; Piperidines; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pyrazines; Pyrrolidines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Time Factors; Triazoles; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration; Uracil; Venoms; Vildagliptin

Uremic cardiomyopathy contributes substantially to mortality in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) may improve cardiac function, but is mainly degraded by dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4).. In a rat model of chronic renal failure, 5/6-nephrectomized [5/6N] rats were treated orally with DPP-4 inhibitors (linagliptin, sitagliptin, alogliptin) or placebo once daily for 4 days from 8 weeks after surgery, to identify the most appropriate treatment for cardiac dysfunction associated with CKD. Linagliptin showed no significant change in blood level AUC(0-∞) in 5/6N rats, but sitagliptin and alogliptin had significantly higher AUC(0-∞) values; 41% and 28% (p = 0.0001 and p = 0.0324), respectively. No correlation of markers of renal tubular and glomerular function with AUC was observed for linagliptin, which required no dose adjustment in uremic rats. Linagliptin 7 µmol/kg caused a 2-fold increase in GLP-1 (AUC 201.0 ng/l*h) in 5/6N rats compared with sham-treated rats (AUC 108.6 ng/l*h) (p = 0.01). The mRNA levels of heart tissue fibrosis markers were all significantly increased in 5/6N vs control rats and reduced/normalized by linagliptin.. DPP-4 inhibition increases plasma GLP-1 levels, particularly in uremia, and reduces expression of cardiac mRNA levels of matrix proteins and B-type natriuretic peptides (BNP). Linagliptin may offer a unique approach for treating uremic cardiomyopathy in CKD patients, with no need for dose-adjustment.

Topics: Animals; Area Under Curve; Cardiomyopathies; Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Disease Models, Animal; Gene Expression Regulation; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Heart; Humans; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Linagliptin; Myocardium; Natriuretic Peptide, Brain; Nephrectomy; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazines; Quinazolines; Rats; Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Triazoles; Uracil; Uremia