sirolimus and zotarolimus

Topics: Clinical Trials as Topic; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Humans; Prosthesis Design; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

Drug-eluting stents revolutionized the treatment of coronary artery disease with vastly improved outcomes compared with bare metal stents. As stent technology has evolved, a wide variety of antiproliferative drugs have been developed to prevent stent restenosis and stent thrombosis. The Resolute stent system (Medtronic, CA, USA) elutes zotarolimus from a multipolymer blend to prevent early and late stent-related complications. The Resolute stents have evolved from the initial Resolute stent, to the Resolute Integrity™ and most recently, the Resolute Onyx™. These stents have been studied across a wide range of patients and coronary syndromes. They compare similarly in performance to their contemporary second generation stents. We present a review of the major trials involving these zotarolimus-eluting stents.

Topics: Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prosthesis Design; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

Several previously published trials comparing Zotarolimus Eluting Stents (ZES) with Sirolimus Eluting Stents (SES), Paclitaxel Eluting Stents (PES) or Everolimus Eluting Stents (EES) at a follow up period of 1 year, were continually being followed up in order to assess the long-term outcomes. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to compare the long-term (2-5 years) adverse clinical outcomes which were associated with ZES versus SES, PES and EES following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI). Risk Ratios (RR) with 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs) were generated and the analysis was carried out by the RevMan 5.3 software. In this analysis with a total number of 17,606 participants, ZES and EES were associated with similar adverse outcomes including Stent Thrombosis (ST), myocardial infarction (MI), major adverse cardiac events and repeated revascularization. When ZES were compared with SES and PES during the long-term, MI and definite or probable ST were significantly lower with ZES, with RR: 1.35, 95% CI: 1.17-1.56; P = 0.0001 and RR: 1.91, 95% CI: 1.33-2.75; P = 0.0004 respectively whereas the other adverse outcomes were similarly manifested. Future research should be able to confirm this hypothesis.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Paclitaxel; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome

Patients with diabetes and coronary artery disease remain at high risk for adverse cardiovascular events after percutaneous coronary intervention. The efficacy and safety of the various drug-eluting stents (DES) in patients with diabetes is unclear.. Randomized controlled trials comparing first-generation DES [paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) and sirolimus-eluting stents (SES)] with everolimus-eluting stents (EES) and zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES) in diabetic patients were systematically searched. Efficacy [target vessel revascularization (TVR) and target lesion revascularization (TLR)] and safety [major adverse cardiac events (MACE), all-cause and cardiac mortality, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis] outcomes were evaluated.. Eighteen randomized controlled trials comprising of 8095 patients (17,000 patient-years of follow-up) were included. Compared to first-generation DES, EES significantly decreased MACE by 18% (relative risk [RR]: 0.82, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.70-0.96), myocardial infarction by 43% (RR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.39-0.84) and stent thrombosis by 46% (RR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.35-0.82) in patients with diabetes. Moreover EES showed a trend towards reduction in rates of TLR and TVR (p=0.05). ZES was associated with 89% increased risk for TLR (RR: 1.89, 95% CI: 1.10-3.22) compared to first-generation DES. Furthermore, meta-regression analysis showed a greater magnitude of benefit of EES over first-generation DES for MACE (p=0.037) and stent thrombosis (p=0.036) in diabetic patients requiring Insulin.. In patients with diabetes and coronary artery disease undergoing stenting, EES is the most efficacious and safe DES. The outcomes data for ZES in diabetes patients were limited and further trials are needed.

Topics: Coronary Artery Disease; Diabetes Mellitus; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

Two thousand fifteen has been a winning year for Drug Eluting Stents (DES). Increase in the number of patients with cardiovascular diseases treated by Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) has resulted to a high demand for second generation DES. This current analysis aimed to compare the different types of Stent Thrombosis (ST) associated with Zotarolimus Eluting Stents (ZES) versus Everolimus Eluting Stents (EES) at 1 year follow up.. Electronic databases were searched for studies comparing ZES with EES. Different types of ST reported at 1 year follow up were considered as the primary endpoints in this analysis. Odds Ratios (OR) with 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs) were used as the statistical parameters and the pooled analyses were carried out by the RevMan 5 · 3 software.. A total number of 10,512 patients were included in this analysis. No significant difference in any definite ST, acute definite ST, subacute definite ST, and late definite ST were observed between ZES and EES, at 1 year follow up with OR: 1.70, 95% CI: 0.92 - 3.16; P = 0.09, OR: 3.44, 95% CI: 0.82 - 14.43; P = 0.09, OR: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.43 - 2.95; P = 0.80 and OR: 2.39, 95% CI: 0.83 - 6.85; P = 0.11 respectively. Moreover, any definite or probable ST and definite/probable/possible ST were also not significantly different with OR: 1.39, 95% CI: 0.89 - 2.17; P = 0.15 and OR: 1.19, 95% CI: 0.84 - 1.70; P = 0.33 respectively. In addition, any probable ST, acute probable ST, late probable ST and possible ST were also not significantly different at 1 year follow up with OR: 1.11, 95% CI: 0.60 - 2.05; P = 0.75, OR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.12 - 2.40; P = 0.41, OR: 1.67, 95% CI: 0.35 - 7.86; P = 0.52 and OR: 1.08, 95% CI: 0.64 - 1.82; P = 0.78 respectively.. At 1 year follow up, ZES were not associated with significantly lower or higher definite and probable ST compared to EES. In addition, no significant difference was observed in acute, subacute and late definite or probable ST. However, further trials are recommended to assess the effects of these second-generation DES during the long-term.

Topics: Cardiovascular Agents; Chi-Square Distribution; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Thrombosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Humans; Odds Ratio; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prosthesis Design; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

The increasing use of drug eluting stents in interventional cardiology calls for assessment of their efficacy and safety, both among drug-eluting and bare-metal stents, in the context of rational decision making.. We searched for papers that compared any of the sirolimus-eluting stent, paclitaxel-eluting stent, drug- eluting stent, biodegradable stent, everolimus-eluting stent, zotarolimus-resolute eluting stent, biolimus- eluting stent, bare-metal stent and zotarolimus-eluting stent. The search was contacted through Medline, the Cochrane database, Embase, TCTMD, ClinicalTrials.gov, Clinical Trial Results, CardioSource, abstracts and presentations from major cardiovascular meetings. We also searched for further articles cited by selected papers. Furthermore, important conferences and relevant proceedings and abstracts, such as the American Heart Association, American College of Cardiology, Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics, Society of Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention, European Society of Cardiology, and Euro-PCR, were also searched. Inclusion criteria were: randomised controlled trials (RCTs), size of study (≥100 patients), duration more than 6 months and definition of reported endpoints (target vessel revascularization, thrombosis, myocardial infarction and cardiac death). Analysis of the data was performed for short-term (less than a year) and long-term outcomes (more than a year). A mixed treatment comparison approach was utilised for the data analysis.. Based on the rankings of each treatment, a distinct difference between the 2nd and 1st generation stents was identified. We can conclude that everolimus, zotarolimus-resolute and biolimus eluting stents carry the highest probabilities of being superior for all endpoints.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic; Death; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Metals; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Paclitaxel; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sirolimus; Stents; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome

Compared with the zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES), the everolimus-eluting stent (EES) has reduced the risk of stent restenosis and thrombosis as found in a number of randomized-controlled trials (RCTs). However, the benefits have been variable.. We evaluate the long-term effect of EES and ZES on the risk of stent thrombosis and target lesion revascularization in patients receiving PCI. We identified RCTs by a systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Database.. Five RCTs (9853 patients) were included. Overall, EES significantly reduced the risk of target lesion revascularization [odds ratio (OR), 0.77; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.62-0.95; P=0.01] compared with ZES therapy. However, there was no difference in the risk of target vessel revascularization (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.78-1.10; P=0.38) and definite/probable stent thrombosis (OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.56-1.25; P=0.37) between the two groups. Furthermore, the risk of mortality (OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.84-1.27; P=0.73), myocardial infarction (OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.74-1.23; P=0.70), and major adverse cardiac event (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.84-1.10; P=0.53) was similar between the two groups.. The new-generation Resolute-ZES and EES have a similar long-term safety and efficacy profile.

Topics: Cardiovascular Agents; Chi-Square Distribution; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Thrombosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Odds Ratio; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prosthesis Design; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Although new-generation drug-eluting stents represent the standard of care among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, there remains debate about differences in efficacy and the risk of stent thrombosis between the Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (R-ZES) and the everolimus-eluting stent (EES). The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the R-ZES compared with EES in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.. A systematic literature search of electronic resources was performed using specific search terms until September 2014. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed comparing clinical outcomes between patients treated with R-ZES and EES up to maximum available follow-up. The primary efficacy end point was target-vessel revascularization. The primary safety end point was definite or probable stent thrombosis. Secondary safety end points were cardiac death and target-vessel myocardial infarction. Five trials were identified, including a total of 9899 patients. Compared with EES, R-ZES had similar risks of target-vessel revascularization (risk ratio [RR], 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90-1.24; P=0.50), definite or probable stent thrombosis (RR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.86-1.85; P=0.24), cardiac death (RR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.79-1.30; P=0.91), and target-vessel myocardial infarction (RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.89-1.36; P=0.39). Moreover, R-ZES and EES had similar risks of late definite or probable very late stent thrombosis (RR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.53-2.11; P=0.87). No evidence of significant heterogeneity was observed across trials.. R-ZES and EES provide similar safety and efficacy among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Topics: Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Postoperative Complications; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sirolimus; Survival Analysis; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome

The purpose of this study was to investigate the differential clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for coronary bifurcation lesions with 1- or 2-stenting techniques using first- or second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES).. The 2-stenting technique has been regarded to have worse clinical outcomes than the 1-stenting technique after bifurcation PCI with first-generation DES. However, there has been a paucity of data comparing the 1- and 2-stenting techniques with the use of second-generation DES.. Patient-level pooled analysis was performed with 3,162 patients undergoing PCI using first- or second-generation DES for bifurcation lesions from the "Korean Bifurcation Pooled Cohorts" (COBIS [Coronary Bifurcation Stenting] II, EXCELLENT [Registry to Evaluate Efficacy of Xience/Promus Versus Cypher in Reducing Late Loss After Stenting], and RESOLUTE-Korea [Registry to Evaluate the Efficacy of Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent]). The 3-year clinical outcomes were compared between 1- and 2-stenting techniques, stratified by the type of DES.. With first-generation DES, rates of target lesion failure (TLF) or patient-oriented composite outcome (POCO) (a composite of all death, any myocardial infarction, any repeat revascularization, and cerebrovascular accidents) at 3 years were significantly higher after the 2-stenting than the 1-stenting technique (TLF 8.6% vs. 17.5%; p < 0.001; POCO 18.1% vs. 28.5%, p < 0.001). With second-generation DES, however, there was no difference between 1- and 2-stenting techniques (TLF 5.4% vs. 5.8%; p = 0.768; POCO 11.2% vs. 12.9%; p = 0.995). The differential effects of 2-stenting technique on the prognosis according to the type of DES were also corroborated with similar results by the inverse probability weighted model. The 2-stenting technique was a significant independent predictor of TLF in first-generation DES (hazard ratio: 2.046; 95% confidence interval: 1.114 to 3.759; p < 0.001), but not in second-generation DES (hazard ratio: 0.667; 95% confidence interval: 0.247 to 1.802; p = 0.425).. Patient-level pooled analysis of 3,162 patients in Korean Bifurcation Pooled Cohorts demonstrated that the 2-stenting technique showed comparable outcomes to 1-stenting technique with second-generation DES, which is different from the results of first-generation DES favoring the 1-stenting technique.

Topics: Aged; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Circulation; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Proportional Hazards Models; Prosthesis Design; Registries; Republic of Korea; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

The safety and efficacy of everolimus-eluting stent (EES) versus zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) are controversial both in randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of EES versus ZES.. Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane database and www.clinicaltrials.gov updated to Mar 2014 with safety [major adverse cardiac events (MACE)], all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), stent thrombosis (ST) and efficacy [target vessel revascularization (TVR), target lesion revascularization (TLR), target vessel failure (TVF), target lesion failure (TLF)] endpoints and follow-up of ≥12 months were identified.. Data from 11,778 patients in 8 RCTs and 34,850 patients in 26 observational studies were included. In RCT studies, no evidence indicating that EES was safer or more efficacious than ZES. In observational studies, EES associated with a significantly lower risk for MACE (RR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.46-0.69), ST (RR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.45-0.78), TVR (RR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.47-0.79), TLR (RR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.38-0.83) and TLF (RR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.50-0.93). The pooled data of RCTs and observational studies showed that compared to ZES, EES associated with a significant lower risk for MACE (RR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.54-0.78), ST (RR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.52-0.83), TVR (RR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.58-0.89), TLR (RR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.49-0.82) and TLF (RR: 078, 95% CI: 0.62-1.00).. In RCTs, EES and ZES showed comparable safety and efficacy, while in observational studies or pooled data, EES was safer and more efficacious than ZES.

Topics: Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Observational Studies as Topic; Prosthesis Design; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

To establish whether technological improvements in drug-eluting stent (DES) technology introduced in second-generation (G2) DES have contributed to improving patient-focused outcomes.. We performed a systematic review of randomised clinical trials (RCT) comparing first-generation (G1) and G2 DES with a>9-month clinical follow-up. The primary endpoint for efficacy was ischaemia-driven target lesion revascularisation (ID-TLR); safety endpoints were all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI) and stent thrombosis (ST). Sixteen RCTs involving 25,427 patients met eligibility criteria (17 comparisons). In these trials, paclitaxel (PES) and sirolimus (SES) were compared with everolimus (EES), zotarolimus (ZES) or biolimus A9 (BES) DES. G2 varied in metal alloy, strut thickness and type of drug-eluting matrix. Overall, G2 DES were associated with a 26% relative risk reduction (RRR) of MI (relative risk [RR]=0.74, 95% CI: 0.61-0.90, p=0.003) and ST (RR=0.70, 95% CI: 0.55-0.89, p=0.004), while no significant benefit was observed for ID-TLR and death. Use of 2G DES was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of ID-TLR (RR=0.66, 95% CI: 0.51-0.85, p=0.002), MI (RR=0.60, 95% CI: 0.49-0.72, p<0.001) and ST (RR=0.41, 95% CI: 0.26-0.65, p=0.001) when compared with PES. Strut thickness ≤91 µm in G2 DES was associated with a significantly lower risk of MI (RR=0.54, 95% CI: 0.51-0.86, p=0.002).. The introduction of thinner stent struts and other technological improvements made in G2 DES technology have translated into better patient outcomes. Overall, the net benefit of G2 DES over G1 DES is expressed in terms of ID-TLR and ST risk reduction but it could be masked by heterogeneities in the use of G1 comparators and the use of non-inferiority study designs in RCTs.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Humans; Paclitaxel; Patient Outcome Assessment; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prosthesis Design; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sirolimus

This study sought to investigate the relative safety and efficacy of bioabsorbable polymer (BP)-based biolimus-eluting stents (BES) versus durable-polymer (DP)-drug-eluting stents (DES) and bare-metal stents (BMS) by means of a network meta-analysis.. Studies have suggested that BP-BES might reduce the risk of stent thrombosis (ST) and late adverse outcomes compared with first-generation DES. However, the relative safety and efficacy of BP-BES versus newer-generation DES coated with more biocompatible DP have not been investigated in depth.. Randomized controlled trials comparing BP-BES versus currently U.S.-approved DES or BMS were searched through MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. Information on study design, inclusion and exclusion criteria, sample characteristics, and clinical outcomes was extracted.. Data from 89 trials including 85,490 patients were analyzed. At 1-year follow-up, BP-BES were associated with lower rates of cardiac death/myocardial infarction (MI), MI, and target vessel revascularization (TVR) than BMS and lower rates of TVR than fast-release zotarolimus-eluting stents. The BP-BES had similar rates of cardiac death/MI, MI, and TVR compared with other second-generation DP-DES but higher rates of 1-year ST than cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stents (CoCr-EES). The BP-BES were associated with improved late outcomes compared with BMS and paclitaxel-eluting stents, considering the latest follow-up data available, with nonsignificantly different outcomes compared with other DP-DES although higher rates of definite ST compared with CoCr-EES.. In this large-scale network meta-analysis, BP-BES were associated with superior clinical outcomes compared with BMS and first-generation DES and similar rates of cardiac death/MI, MI, and TVR compared with second-generation DP-DES but higher rates of definite ST than CoCr-EES.

Topics: Cardiovascular Agents; Chromium Alloys; Coated Materials, Biocompatible; Coronary Thrombosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Myocardial Revascularization; Paclitaxel; Polymers; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sirolimus; Stents

The aim of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of biodegradable-polymer (BP) drug-eluting stents (DES), bare metal stents (BMS), and durable-polymer DES in patients undergoing coronary revascularization, we performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis using a Bayesian framework.. Study stents included BMS, paclitaxel-eluting (PES), sirolimus-eluting (SES), endeavor zotarolimus-eluting (ZES-E), cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting (CoCr-EES), platinium-chromium everolimus-eluting (PtCr-EES), resolute zotarolimus-eluting (ZES-R), and BP biolimus-eluting stents (BP-BES). After a systematic electronic search, 113 trials with 90 584 patients were selected. The principal endpoint was definite or probable stent thrombosis (ST) defined according to the Academic Research Consortium within 1 year.. Biodegradable polymer-biolimus-eluting stents [OR, 0.56; 95% credible interval (CrI), 0.33-0.90], SES (OR, 0.53; 95% CrI, 0.38-0.73), CoCr-EES (OR, 0.34; 95% CrI, 0.23-0.52), and PtCr-EES (OR, 0.31; 95% CrI, 0.10-0.90) were all superior to BMS in terms of definite or probable ST within 1 year. Cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stents demonstrated the lowest risk of ST of all stents at all times after stent implantation. Biodegradable polymer-biolimus-eluting stents was associated with a higher risk of definite or probable ST than CoCr-EES (OR, 1.72; 95% CrI, 1.04-2.98). All DES reduced the need for repeat revascularization, and all but PES reduced the risk of myocardial infarction compared with BMS.. All DESs but PES and ZES-E were superior to BMS in terms of ST within 1 year. Cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stents was safer than any DES even including BP-BES. Our results suggest that not only the biodegradability of polymer, but the optimal combination of stent alloy, design, strut thickness, polymer, and drug all combined determine the safety of DES.

Topics: Absorbable Implants; Bayes Theorem; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Myocardial Revascularization; Paclitaxel; Prosthesis Failure; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sirolimus; Stents; Tubulin Modulators

Topics: Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Observational Studies as Topic; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Sirolimus

The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) following the use of new generation drug-eluting stents is unknown.. The association between DAPT interruption and the rates of stent thrombosis (ST) and cardiac death/target-vessel myocardial infarction (CD/TVMI) in patients receiving a Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (R-ZES) was analysed in 4896 patients from the pooled RESOLUTE clinical programme. Daily acetylsalicylate (ASA) and a thienopyridine for 6-12 months were prescribed. A DAPT interruption was defined as any interruption of ASA and/or a thienopyridine of >1 day; long interruptions were >14 days. Three groups were analysed: no interruption, interruption during the first month, and >1-12 months. There were 1069 (21.83%) patients with a DAPT interruption and 3827 patients with no interruption. Among the 166 patients in the 1-month interruption group, 6 definite/probable ST events occurred (3.61%; all long DAPT interruptions), and among the 903 patients in the >1-12 months (60% occurred between 6 and 12 months) interruption group, 1 ST event occurred (0.11%; 2-day DAPT interruption). Among patients with no DAPT interruption, 32 ST events occurred (0.84%). Rates of CD/TVMI were 6.84% in the 1-month long interruption group, 1.41% in the >1-12 months long interruption group, and 4.08% in patients on continuous DAPT.. In a pooled population of patients receiving an R-ZES, DAPT interruptions within 1 month are associated with a high risk of adverse outcomes. Dual antiplatelet therapy interruptions between 1 and 12 months were associated with low rates of ST and adverse cardiac outcomes. Randomized clinical trials are needed to determine whether early temporary or permanent interruption of DAPT is truly safe. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT00617084; NCT00726453; NCT00752128; NCT00927940.

Topics: Aspirin; Blood Vessel Prosthesis; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clopidogrel; Coronary Thrombosis; Death, Sudden, Cardiac; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Graft Occlusion, Vascular; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Failure; Sirolimus; Ticlopidine; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Withholding Treatment

The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation is still unclear. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized trials to assess the optimal duration of DAPT after DES implantation.. Articles were identified through a literature search of EMBASE, Pubmed, Europubmed, and the Cochrane Library until November 2013. Data were independently extracted by 2 reviewers. A random effect model was used to calculate the pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of the clinical outcomes concerned.. Three randomized controlled trials with zotarolimus- or everolimus-eluting stents and 6679 patients were included. There were no significant differences between short-term DAPT and standard-term DAPT in the comparison of incidences of cardiac death (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.53-1.35; P = 0.48), myocardial infarction (OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.83-1.75; P = 0.32), stent thrombosis (OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.50-3.39; P = 0.59), and target vessel revascularization (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.89-1.52; P = 0.26). Short-term DAPT did not increase the risk of all-cause death (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.59-1.26; P = 0.44), cerebrovascular accidents (OR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.421.81; P = 0.72), and major bleeding events (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.30-1.15; P = 0.12).. The results indicate that short-term DAPT do not increase the risk of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, target vessel revascularization, major bleeding, cerebrovascular accidents, and all-cause death at 12 months after implantation of DES compared with current standard-term DAPT. However, only 3 studies with second generation of DES are included in this meta-analysis. Further well-designed studies are still needed.

Topics: Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sirolimus; Time Factors

Drug eluting stents were an important addition to the interventional options available for patients with coronary artery disease, and they effectively reduced the risk of restenosis observed with bare metal stents. However, the drugs and polymers used in the composition of drug eluting stents were found to delay vascular healing and elicit inflammatory responses, which contributed to late and very late stent thrombosis events. Newer generation drug eluting stents have been engineered with polymers that are more biocompatible and have more favorable drug elution profiles. The Resolute(®) zotarolimus eluting stent (R-ZES) is a new-generation drug eluting stent. The Global RESOLUTE clinical program was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the R-ZES. The studies conducted under this program have established that the R-ZES safely and effectively treats coronary artery stenosis, with low rates of target lesion failure, target vessel revascularization, and stent thrombosis during extended follow-up.

Topics: Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Humans; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Product Surveillance, Postmarketing; Sirolimus

Over the past decades, there has been significant evolution in coronary stents used in percutaneous coronary intervention. The current novel drug-eluting stents available in the United States represent significant advancements compared to angioplasty, bare-metal stents, and the first generation of drug-eluting stents (DES). The Xience everolimus-eluting stents, Promus everolimus-eluting stents, and Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stents currently demonstrate the optimal balance of safety and efficacy. Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stents have shorter drug-elution courses, and recent evidence suggests that 3 months of dual antiplatelet therapy appears safe, making Endeavor preferred when early discontinuation of dual antiplatelet therapy is warranted. Despite these advances in stent design, the permanent polymer and metallic stent remain in the vessel wall and may precipitate sustained inflammation, persistent vasomotor dysfunction, and in-stent neo-atherosclerosis. Bioresorbable platforms with biodegradable polymers have been developed to overcome the aforementioned limitations, and the outcomes of ongoing clinical trials are eagerly anticipated to determine if these novel stents will further improve clinical outcomes.

Topics: Absorbable Implants; Animals; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prosthesis Design; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

The aim of this study was to describe the process to obtain Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for the expanded indication for treatment with the Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (R-ZES) (Medtronic, Inc., Santa Rosa, California) in patients with coronary artery disease and diabetes.. The R-ZES is the first drug-eluting stent specifically indicated in the United States for percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with diabetes.. We pooled patient-level data for 5,130 patients from the RESOLUTE Global Clinical Program. A performance goal prospectively determined in conjunction with the FDA was established as a rate of target vessel failure at 12 months of 14.5%. In addition to the FDA pre-specified cohort of less complex patients with diabetes (n = 878), we evaluated outcomes of the R-ZES in all 1,535 patients with diabetes compared with all 3,595 patients without diabetes at 2 years.. The 12-month rate of target vessel failure in the pre-specified diabetic cohort was 7.8% (upper 95% confidence interval: 9.51%), significantly lower than the performance goal of 14.5% (p < 0.001). After 2 years, the cumulative incidence of target lesion failure in patients with noninsulin-treated diabetes was comparable to that of patients without diabetes (8.0% vs. 7.1%). The higher risk insulin-treated population demonstrated a significantly higher target lesion failure rate (13.7%). In the whole population, including complex patients, rates of stent thrombosis were not significantly different between patients with and without diabetes (1.2% vs. 0.8%).. The R-ZES is safe and effective in patients with diabetes. Long-term clinical data of patients with noninsulin-treated diabetes are equivalent to patients without diabetes. Patients with insulin-treated diabetes remain a higher risk subset. (The Medtronic RESOLUTE Clinical Trial; NCT00248079; Randomized, Two-arm, Non-inferiority Study Comparing Endeavor-Resolute Stent With Abbot Xience-V Stent [RESOLUTE-AC]; NCT00617084; The Medtronic RESOLUTE US Clinical Trial (R-US); NCT00726453; RESOLUTE International Registry: Evaluation of the Resolute Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent System in a 'Real-World' Patient Population [R-Int]; NCT00752128; RESOLUTE Japan-The Clinical Evaluation of the MDT-4107 Drug-Eluting Coronary Stent [RJ]; NCT00927940).

Topics: Aged; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Thrombosis; Device Approval; Diabetes Mellitus; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Japan; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration

Compared to bare metal stent angioplasty, first-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) have markedly reduced the incidence of in-stent restenosis. However, given the increased concerns over late and very late stent thrombosis, newer-generation DES were developed. To date, these DES have virtually replaced the use of first-generation DES worldwide. In this review article, we carefully consider the pre-clinical and clinical trials that have been performed with currently available, european conformity-marked and Food and Drug Administration-approved new-generation Resolute(®) and Xience V(®) DES.

Topics: Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Graft Occlusion, Vascular; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

Second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) are purported to have a lower risk of stent thrombosis than first-generation DES. However, few studies have examined the frequency of late stent thrombosis (LST) and very LST (VLST) in patients with second-generation DES, and the safety of discontinuation of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) remains controversial.. We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrials.gov to identify all reported cases of definite LST and VLST in patients with second-generation DES. Inclusion was restricted to cases with zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES) and everolimus-eluting stents (EES) in which the time from percutaneous coronary intervention and time from discontinuation of DAPT to LST/VLST was reported.. A total of 26 cases (15 ZES and 11 EES) in 11 publications were included. We identified 17 cases of LST and 9 cases of VLST. The median time from percutaneous coronary intervention to LST/VLST in ZES patients was 121 days (interquartile range [IQR], 89-292) and in EES patients was 364 days (IQR, 269-504). For the 5 patients who discontinued taking acetylsalicylic acid and clopidogrel simultaneously, the median time to event was 20 days (IQR, 10-60). For the 7 patients who discontinued taking clopidogrel but continued taking acetylsalicylic acid, the median time to event was 190 days (IQR, 135-303).. With only a few reported cases of LST/VLST in the literature, available data suggest that thrombotic events might be rare with second-generation DES. Moreover, LST/VLST appears to occur later after DAPT discontinuation in patients with second-generation DES than in those with first-generation DES.

Topics: Aspirin; Cardiotonic Agents; Clopidogrel; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prosthesis Design; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Ticlopidine; Time Factors

To investigate the safety and efficacy of durable polymer drug eluting stents (DES) and biodegradable polymer biolimus eluting stents (biolimus-ES).. Network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.. Medline, Google Scholar, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) database search for randomised controlled trials comparing at least two of durable polymer sirolimus eluting stents (sirolimus-ES) and paclitaxel eluting stents (paclitaxel-ES), newer durable polymer everolimus eluting stents (everolimus-ES), Endeavor and Resolute zotarolimus eluting stents (zotarolimus-ES), and biodegradable polymer biolimus-ES.. Safety (death, myocardial infarction, definite or probable stent thrombosis) and efficacy (target lesion and target vessel revascularisation) assessed at up to one year and beyond.. 60 randomised controlled trials were compared involving 63,242 patients with stable coronary artery disease or acute coronary syndrome treated with a DES. At one year, there were no differences in mortality among devices. Resolute and Endeavor zotarolimus-ES, everolimus-ES, and sirolimus-ES, but not biodegradable polymer biolimus-ES, were associated with significantly reduced odds of myocardial infarction (by 29-34%) compared with paclitaxel-ES. Compared with everolimus-ES, biodegradable polymer biolimus-ES were associated with significantly increased odds of myocardial infarction (by 29%), while Endeavor zotarolimus-ES and paclitaxel-ES were associated with significantly increased odds of stent thrombosis. All investigated DES were similar with regards to efficacy endpoints, except for Endeavor zotarolimus-ES and paclitaxel-ES, which were associated with significantly increased the odds of target lesion and target vessel revascularisations compared with other devices. Direction of results beyond one year did not diverge from the findings for up to one year follow-up. Bayesian probability curves showed a gradient in the magnitude of effect, with everolimus-ES and Resolute zotarolimus-ES offering the highest safety profiles.. The newer durable polymer everolimus-ES and Resolute zotarolimus-ES and the biodegradable polymer biolimus-ES maintain the efficacy of sirolimus-ES; however, for safety endpoints, differences become apparent, with everolimus-ES and Resolute zotarolimus-ES emerging as the safest stents to date.

Topics: Absorbable Implants; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Male; Myocardial Infarction; Polymers; Postoperative Complications; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome

To compare the efficacy and safety of biodegradable polymer drug eluting stents with those of bare metal stents and durable polymer drug eluting stents.. Mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis of 258,544 patient years of follow-up from randomized trials.. PubMed, Embase, and Central were searched for randomized trials comparing any of the Food and Drug Administration approved durable polymer drug eluting stents (sirolimus eluting, paclitaxel eluting, cobalt chromium everolimus eluting, platinum chromium everolimus eluting, zotarolimus eluting-Endeavor, and zotarolimus eluting-Resolute) or biodegradable polymer drug eluting stents, with each other or against bare metal stents.. Long term efficacy (target vessel revascularization, target lesion revascularization) and safety (death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis). Landmark analysis at more than one year was evaluated to assess the potential late benefit of biodegradable polymer drug eluting stents.. From 126 randomized trials and 258,544 patient years of follow-up, for long term efficacy (target vessel revascularization), biodegradable polymer drug eluting stents were superior to paclitaxel eluting stents (rate ratio 0.66, 95% credibility interval 0.57 to 0.78) and zotarolimus eluting stent-Endeavor (0.69, 0.56 to 0.84) but not to newer generation durable polymer drug eluting stents (for example: 1.03, 0.89 to 1.21 versus cobalt chromium everolimus eluting stents). Similarly, biodegradable polymer drug eluting stents were superior to paclitaxel eluting stents (rate ratio 0.61, 0.37 to 0.89) but inferior to cobalt chromium everolimus eluting stents (2.04, 1.27 to 3.35) for long term safety (definite stent thrombosis). In the landmark analysis after one year, biodegradable polymer drug eluting stents were superior to sirolimus eluting stents for definite stent thrombosis (rate ratio 0.29, 0.10 to 0.82) but were associated with increased mortality compared with cobalt chromium everolimus eluting stents (1.52, 1.02 to 2.22). Overall, among all stent types, the newer generation durable polymer drug eluting stents (zotarolimus eluting stent-Resolute, cobalt chromium everolimus eluting stents, and platinum chromium everolimus eluting stents) were the most efficacious (lowest target vessel revascularization rate) stents, and cobalt chromium everolimus eluting stents were the safest with significant reductions in definite stent thrombosis (rate ratio 0.35, 0.21 to 0.53), myocardial infarction (0.65, 0.55 to 0.75), and death (0.72, 0.58 to 0.90) compared with bare metal stents.. Biodegradable polymer drug eluting stents are superior to first generation durable polymer drug eluting stents but not to newer generation durable polymer stents in reducing target vessel revascularization. Newer generation durable polymer stents, and especially cobalt chromium everolimus eluting stents, have the best combination of efficacy and safety. The utility of biodegradable polymer stents in the context of excellent clinical outcomes with newer generation durable polymer stents needs to be proven.

Topics: Anti-Infective Agents; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Myocardial Infarction; Paclitaxel; Polymers; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sirolimus; Stents; Treatment Outcome

Whether ZES can further improve angiographic and clinical outcomes compared to SES still remains uncertain.. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES) compared with sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI).. Major electronic information sources were explored for randomized controlled trials comparing ZES with SES among patients undergoing PCI during at least 9 months follow-up. The primary efficacy outcomes were target lesion revascularization (TLR), target vessel revascularization (TVR), and major adverse cardiac events (MACE); safety outcomes were stent thrombosis (ST), myocardial infarction (MI), and cardiac death.. Seven comparative studies were identified (a total of 5983 patients). When compared with ZES at 12-month follow-up, SES significantly reduced risk of MACE (relative risk [RR]: 0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.61 to 0.89, p=0.002), and TLR (RR:0.39; 95% CI: 0.29 to 0.52; p<0.00001), without significant differences in terms of TVR (RR:0.68, 95% CI: 0.38 to 1.20; p=0.18), ST (RR:0.71; 95% CI: 0.39 to 1.31; p=0.28), cardiac death (RR:0.83; 95% CI: 0.49-1.42, p=0.50) or MI (RR:1.08; 95%CI: 0.80 to 1.45; p=0.62).. At 12-month follow-up, SES are superior to ZES in reducing the incidences of TLR and MACE in patients undergoing PCI, without significant differences in terms of TVR, ST, cardiac death, and MI.

Topics: Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

As the first nationwide Korean prospective multicenter data collection registry, the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry (KAMIR) launched in November 2005. Through a number of innovative approaches, KAMIR suggested new horizons about acute myocardial infarction (AMI) which contains unique features of Asian patients from baseline characteristics to treatment strategy. Obesity paradox was existed in Korean AMI patients, whereas no gender differences among them. KAMIR score suggested new risk stratifying method with increased convenience and an enhanced accuracy for the prediction of adverse outcomes. Standard loading dose of clopidogrel was enough for Asian AMI patients. Triple antiplatelet therapy with aspirin, clopidogrel and cilostazol could improve clinical outcomes than dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel. Statin improved clinical outcomes even in AMI patients with very low LDL-C levels. The rate of percutaneous coronary intervention was higher and door-to-balloon time was shorter than the previous reports. Zotarolimus eluting stents as the 2nd generation drug-eluting stent (DES) was not superior to the 1st generation DES, in contrast to the western AMI studies. KAMIR made a cornerstone in the study of Korean AMI and expected to be new standards of care for AMI with the renewal of KAMIR design to overcome its pitfalls.

Topics: Acute Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Registries; Republic of Korea; Risk Factors; Severity of Illness Index; Sirolimus

Topics: Drug-Eluting Stents; Humans; Paclitaxel; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cohort Studies; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Stenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Paclitaxel; Prognosis; Prosthesis Failure; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Severity of Illness Index; Sex Factors; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

To evaluate efficacy and safety of two zotarolimus-eluting stent generations versus other limus-eluting stents (LES), and to compare Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stents (R-ZES) with Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stents (E-ZES).. The performance of zotarolimus-eluting stents versus other LES, and the possible improvements of R-ZES versus E-ZES still remain to be defined.. We undertook a meta-analysis of trials in which patients were randomly assigned to percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) with R-ZES versus LES, or with E-ZES versus LES, as well as an indirect comparison of R-ZES versus E-ZES, with LES as common comparator. The primary efficacy endpoint was ischaemia-driven target vessel revascularisation (ID-TVR); the primary safety endpoints were myocardial infarction (MI), cardiac death and cumulative definite/probable stent thrombosis (ST).. Overall, 13'709 patients were assigned to PCI with R-ZES versus LES (n=7185) or with E-ZES versus LES (n=6524). The risk of ID-TVR (OR (95% CI)=1.06 (0.90 to 1.25), p=0.47), MI (1.00 (0.81 to 1.25), p=0.97), cardiac death (0.99 (0.69 to 1.42), p=0.96) and ST (1.18 (0.68 to 2.03), p=0.56) did not differ between R-ZES and LES. Patients receiving E-ZES were more likely to undergo ID-TVR as compared with those receiving LES (1.95 (1.40 to 2.73), p<0.0001). The risk of MI (0.91 (0.54 to 1.54), p=0.73), cardiac death (1.02 (0.54 to 1.91), p=0.96) and ST (1.10 (0.50 to 2.44), p=0.81) was similar between E-ZES and LES. At indirect comparison, PCI with R-ZES versus E-ZES reduced the risk of ID-TVR (0.54 (0.37 to 0.78), p=0.001), without increasing MI (1.09 (0.62 to 1.93), p=0.74), cardiac death (0.97 (0.46 to 2.00), p=0.93) and ST (1.07 (0.40 to 2.80), p=0.88).. The antirestenotic efficacy of Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stents is superior to Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stents and similar to other limus-eluting stents. Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stents increase the risk of reinterventions as compared with other limus-eluting stents. First and second-generation zotarolimus-eluting stents have similar thrombogenicity compared with other limus-eluting stents.

Topics: Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prosthesis Design; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

Exaggerated neointimal hyperplasia is considered as the primary mechanism for increased restenosis in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) treated with bare-metal stent. However, the vessel response in DM and non-DM treated with different drug-eluting stents (DES) has not been systematically evaluated.. We investigated 3D intravascular ultrasound (postprocedure and 6 to 9 months) in 971 patients (267 with DM and 704 without DM) treated with sirolimus- (n=104), paclitaxel- (n=303), zotarolimus- (n=391), or everolimus- (n=173) eluting stents. Volumetric data were standardized by length as volume index (VI). At postprocedure, lumen VI at the stented segment was significantly smaller in DM than in non-DM, whereas vessel VI was similar between the 2 groups. At follow-up, neointimal obstruction and maximum cross-sectional narrowing (neointimal area/stent area) were not significantly different between the 2 groups with no interaction for the DES type. Consequently, lumen VI was smaller in DM than in non-DM at follow-up. In the reference segments, residual plaque burden at postprocedure was significantly greater in DM than in non-DM, although change in lumen VI was similar between the 2 groups. The arterial responses at the reference segments also showed no interaction for the DES type.. DM and non-DM lesions showed similar vessel response in both in-stent and reference segments regardless of the DES type. In the DES era, the follow-up lumen in DM patients seems to be determined primarily by the smaller lumen at postprocedure rather than exaggerated neointima within the stent or plaque proliferation at the reference segments.

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cardiovascular Agents; Chi-Square Distribution; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Vessels; Diabetes Mellitus; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Hyperplasia; Linear Models; Male; Middle Aged; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Multivariate Analysis; Neointima; Paclitaxel; Predictive Value of Tests; Prosthesis Design; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography, Interventional

The zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) is a new drug-eluting stent that delivers zotarolimus, a synthetic analogue of sirolimus, through a biocompatible phosphorylcholine polymer coating. ZES has shown promising results compared with bare-metal stents, but its safety and efficacy against sirolimus-eluting (SES) and paclitaxel-eluting (PES) stents is yet to be established.. We aimed to summarize current evidence from randomized trials comparing ZES with SES and PES.. We searched the Medline, Embase and CENTRAL databases for randomized studies comparing ZES with SES and PES for percutaneous coronary intervention. Relevant clinical and angiographic outcomes were extracted and combined using random and fixed-effect models for heterogeneous and homogenous outcomes, respectively.. Seven randomized trials met the inclusion criteria: ZES group, n=3787; SES group, n=2606; PES group, n=1966. Compared with SES, ZES was associated with significantly higher odds of clinically driven target vessel revascularization (odds ratio [OR] 2.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.78-3.14) and target lesion revascularization (OR 2.46, 95% CI 1.36-4.46). Compared with SES, ZES had higher in-stent restenosis (OR 6.13, 95% CI 3.96-9.50), late lumen loss 'in-stent' (mean difference [MD] 0.39 mm, 95% CI 0.34-0.44) and late lumen loss 'in-segment' (MD 0.18 mm, 95% CI 0.15-0.21). ZES was associated with higher in-stent late lumen loss than PES (MD 0.18 mm, 95% CI 0.07-0.28). There were no differences in mortality, reinfarction or stent thrombosis with ZES compared with SES and PES.. ZES is not superior to PES and is inferior to SES in terms of angiographic outcomes and clinically driven revascularization.

Topics: Coated Materials, Biocompatible; Confidence Intervals; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Equipment Failure; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Paclitaxel; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Phosphorylcholine; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Sirolimus; Stents

To relate late lumen loss (LLL) after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation to angiographic (BAR) and target vessel revascularization (TVR) in randomized clinical trials of DES.. We reviewed all clinical trials comparing different DES and having protocol-driven angiographic follow-up. We combined the data in a meta-regression analysis correlating LLL with BAR or TVR, with and without adjustment for diabetes mellitus, lesion length or reference vessel diameter. There were 15,846 patients in 29 trials (9 DES platforms) and 8697 had angiographic follow-up at a mean of 8 months. The mean age was 63 y, 28% were women and 33% had diabetes mellitus. Mean weighted in-segment LLL was 0.232mm (0.228-0.235mm), significantly higher in paclitaxel- and zotarolimus-eluting stents than in sirolimus-, everolimus- or biolimus-eluting stents. LLL was monotonically related to BAR (BAR=0.30×LLL+0.02, R(2)=0.53, P<0.0001) and TVR (TVR=0.20×LLL+0.02, R(2)=0.46, P<0.0001). Two thirds of patients with BAR had TVR. LLL remained significantly associated with BAR and TVR after multivariable adjustment. Reference vessel diameter and diabetes mellitus were inversely related to BAR.. LLL is a strong, monotonically related predictor of BAR and TVR. There is no evidence of threshold phenomenon in these relationships.

Topics: Aged; Angiography; Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Paclitaxel; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Regression Analysis; Sirolimus

Types and characteristics of current-available drug-eluting stents(DES) are introduced in this review. Currently, DESs with agents of "limus family" are mainly used because of their efficacy and safety. Two representative performances, angiographic late loss and incidence of late acquired incomplete stent apposition, are compared between these DESs. Furthermore, patient-to-patient variation in amount of neointimal hyperplasia, which is chiefly associated with clinical outcomes, tends to be larger for the DES with larger average angiographic late loss. Thrombotic complications are unexpectedly more frequent in the DES with larger late loss within first one year according to the randomized clinical trials, however, persistent influences to vascular wall become dominant factors stent thrombosis at very late phases.

Topics: Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Antineoplastic Agents; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Paclitaxel; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sirolimus; Thrombosis

The introduction of drug-eluting stents (DES) has improved the efficacy of percutaneous coronary intervention by addressing the issue of neointimal proliferation, a pathology contributing to restenosis. First-generation stents eluting sirolimus or paclitaxel were joined by second-generation stents, such as the everolimus- and the zotarolimus-eluting stents, promising increased safety and efficacy. As a result, there is a plethora of drug-eluting stents available, with differences in the stent platform, the polymer coating and the eluted drug, which translate into differences in biological markers of efficacy, such as late loss. However, it remains controversial whether these discrepancies have an impact on clinical markers of safety and efficacy, or if the improved efficacy of DES is a class effect. This article reviews the differences between DES by looking into the biological differences and into trials and registries of DES.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Paclitaxel; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Registries; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Coronary Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Sirolimus

Given statistically significant and clinically meaningful reductions in angiographic restenosis and repeat revascularization, treatment with drug-eluting stents (DESs) has become established as a standard of care in percutaneous coronary revascularization. However, despite their superior efficacy compared with conventional bare metal stents, experiences with first-generation DESs from both clinical trials and real-world practice have raised attention to the late safety risk of stent thrombosis that may be related to biologic incompatibility, delayed vessel healing and/or impaired endothelial function. To address the outstanding needs related to DES safety and deliverability while maintaining efficacy, the Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent (Medtronic CardioVascular, CA, USA) is distinguished by favorable safety and efficacy demonstrated in clinical trials and usual practice. The purpose of this article is to describe the mechanical and pharmacologic features of the Endeavor stent, provide an overview of comparative trial results of the Endeavor stent with bare metal stents and alternative DESs, and detail recent and developing trials specific to the Endeavor stent that provide further insight to stent biocompatibility and safety.

Topics: Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug-Eluting Stents; Heart; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Sirolimus

Restenosis following interventions in the coronary or peripheral arteries develops over weeks to months. In coronary arteries the restenosis rate has been markedly reduced since the advent of drug-eluting stents. Non-stent-based methods for local drug delivery enable restenosis inhibition without the need for stent implantation, does not permanently change the structure of the vessel, are repeatable, and seems to be applicable where drug-eluting stents provide insufficient protection. Preclinical data indicate that short exposure of the vessel wall to a lipophilic inhibitor of cell proliferation is sufficient for preventing restenosis. Initial evidence to this effect emerged from an investigation of paclitaxel embedded in a matrix that enhances the solubility and release of the agent from the balloon coating as well as its transfer to the vessel wall. Further corroborating data from preclinical and clinical studies demonstrating a reduction in late lumen loss and lower restenosis rates led to the market introduction of a variety of paclitaxel-coated angioplasty balloons. The effectiveness of restenosis inhibition is not determined by the active agent alone. Other factors that are crucial for the effectiveness and safety of drug-coated angioplasty balloons are the formulation containing the agent and the coating technique. In this review we first outline the development of paclitaxel-coated balloons to then provide an overview of the preclinical results obtained with different paclitaxel-coated balloons and finally compare these with the outcome in patients. The article concludes with a short outlook on initial results with a zotarolimus-coated angioplasty balloon.

Topics: Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Coronary Restenosis; Drug Delivery Systems; Drug-Eluting Stents; Humans; Paclitaxel; Sirolimus

Small vessel (<3 mm) coronary artery disease is common and has been identified as independent predictor of restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention. It remains controversial whether bare-metal stent (BMS) implantation in small vessels has an advantage over balloon angioplasty in terms of angiographic and clinical outcomes. Introduction of drug-eluting stent (DES) has resulted in significant reduction in restenosis and the need for repeat revascularization. Several DESs have been introduced resulting in varying reduction in outcomes as compared with BMS. However, their impact on outcomes in small vessels is not clearly known. It is expected that DES could substantially reduce restenosis in smaller vessels. Large, randomized studies are warranted to assess the impact of different DESs on outcomes in patients with small coronary arteries.

Topics: Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Humans; Paclitaxel; Sirolimus; Stents; Treatment Outcome

Zotarolimus is an anti-proliferative drug used exclusively in the design of coronary drug eluting stent.. To review pathophysiological and clinical data regarding the use of zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) for the treatment of coronary artery disease.. Mechanism of action of zotarolimus is reviewed and design of different type of ZES described. Clinical results of the trials by the use of different ZES are discussed.. First and second generations of ZES demonstrated to be safe but less effective in preventing restenosis as the competitive sirolimus eluting stent and paclitaxel eluting stent. Third generation of ZES that show new pharmacokinetic release of the drug may improve clinical results in continuing trials.. Zotarolimus incorporated on stent platform represents a useful tool in treating patients with coronary artery disease. Release kinetic of the drug may play a major role in in-stent neointimal suppression during follow-up.

Topics: Animals; Clinical Trials as Topic; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Forecasting; Humans; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

Drug-eluting stents (DES) with antiproliferative drugs attached via polymers on the stent surface have reduced in-stent restenosis and repeat revascularization compared with bare metal stent (BMS) across nearly all lesion and patient subsets. However, the small number of patients with in-stent restenosis after DES treatment still exists. Furthermore, concerns about long-term safety of DES are raised, particularly regarding the higher-than-expected late-event thrombosis. There is no doubt that the DES will continue to play a pivotal role in the treatment of coronary artery disease, yet future designs need to incorporate features that reduce thrombosis and promote endothelialization along with maintaining the efficacy. This review focuses on novel generation of DES, discussing new programs, including new antiproliferative agents, novel polymeric and non polymeric stents.

Topics: Absorbable Implants; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Thrombosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Equipment Design; Everolimus; Evidence-Based Medicine; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Polymers; Prosthesis Design; Sirolimus; Tacrolimus

Drug-eluting stents (DES) have been shown to be safe and significantly reduce clinical events and angiographic restenosis in the percutaneous treatment of coronary artery disease. Currently, three DES have been approved in Europe and Northern America: the sirolimus-eluting stent (SES), the paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) and the zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES). Everolimus, an analog of sirolimus, is an immunosuppressive and antiproliferative agent. In three studies, the SPIRIT I, FUTURE I and II, the everolimus-eluting stent has proven to be safe, well-tolerated and has shown very favorable clinical and angiographic results. Compared with earlier-generation DES, the XIENCE V everolimus-eluting coronary stent system (Advanced Cardiovascular Systems Inc., an Abbott Vascular Company, CA, USA) may provide enhanced deliverability, radiopacity with thinner strut filaments and, owing to a durable polymer, sustained drug elution and vascular compatibility.

Topics: Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Drug Delivery Systems; Everolimus; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Paclitaxel; Sirolimus; Stents; Technology Assessment, Biomedical

Controversy exists about the clinical significance of in-stent late loss (ISLL) after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. We sought to clarify whether ISLL after DES implantation is related to a potential clinical impact.. We included in a meta-regression analysis 21 trials (8641 patients) that randomly compared DES with bare-metal stents (BMS). We evaluated the relationship between angiographic behaviour of DES and the clinical impact of using DES instead of BMS in each trial using meta-regression techniques, weighting by the number of patients included in each trial. Mean ISLL in patients allocated to DES and DeltaISLL (difference in ISLL in patients allocated to BMS and DES) were used as angiographic parameters of efficacy of DES. The number of patients needed to be treated (NNT) to prevent one target lesion revascularization (TLR) was used to quantify the clinical impact of using DES instead of BMS. There was a significant relationship between mean ISLL in patients allocated to DES and the clinical benefit of using DES instead of BMS, as measured with the NNT for TLR: NNT for TLR = 6.2 + 18.4 [ISLL-DES] (R = 0.62; P = 0.007). Therefore, a 0.1 mm increase in mean ISLL-DES was associated with a 1.8 increase in NNT for TLR. There was also a significant association between the degree of inhibition of neointimal hyperplasia of DES in comparison with BMS with the NNT for TLR: NNT for TLR = 17.1-11.8 [DeltaISLL] (R = 0.61; P = 0.008). Therefore, a 0.1 mm reduction in ISLL by using DES instead of BMS was associated with a 1.2 decrease in mean NNT for TLR.. There is a strong and significant association between the degree of inhibition of neointimal formation with the use of DES and the clinical impact of using DES instead of BMS.

Topics: Coronary Restenosis; Delayed-Action Preparations; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Paclitaxel; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sirolimus; Stents; Tacrolimus; Tubulin Modulators

Comparative preclinical histologic studies remain the most effective method for assessing the healing characteristics of vascular stents. The 2 most commonly used animal models to assess vascular responses to stent implantation are the porcine coronary artery and the rabbit iliac artery. Neither model alone is comparable to the human response to the implantation of a drug-eluting stent (DES). In the rabbit model at 28 days, the pathologies of the zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES), the paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES), the sirolimus-eluting stent (SES), and a bare metal stent (BMS) were assessed. There was less inflammation with the ZES than with the SES or PES, and there were uncovered struts with the SES and PES but not with the ZES and BMS. In the pig model at 30, 90, and 180 days, the pathologies of the ZES, SES, and BMS were assessed. At 30 days, the thickness of neointima and the grade of inflammation were less with the SES than with the ZES and BMS, but at 90 and 180 days, the measures increased for the SES and were greater than those with the ZES and BMS, whereas the measures for the ZES and BMS did not change over time. In the rabbit model, the endothelialization of overlapping the SES, PES, and ZES was assessed. There was significantly greater endothelialization in the area above stent struts in the overlapping segment for the ZES than for the SES (p = 0.028). The level of endothelialization for the PES was less than that for the ZES, but the difference was not significant. Because arterial healing is multifactorial, it is extremely important that the next generation of DESs undergo preclinical testing in pig and rabbit models to examine endothelialization, inflammation, release kinetics, and neointimal reduction to establish the safety of these devices in humans.

Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Coronary Vessels; Disease Models, Animal; Drug-Eluting Stents; Humans; Iliac Artery; Paclitaxel; Rabbits; Sirolimus; Swine; Time Factors; Tunica Intima

Early studies of a cobalt-based alloy stent coated with the novel antiproliferative agent zotarolimus and a phosphorylcholine polymer have demonstrated significant reductions in angiographic restenosis and target vessel revascularization compared with bare metal stents. However, the generalizability of the angiographic outcomes and clinical benefit of zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZESs) to a more real-world patient population is undetermined. Clinical and angiographic outcomes in 1,317 patients treated with the ZES in the first 4 trials of the Endeavor ZES (Medtronic Vascular, Santa Rosa, CA) clinical trials program were pooled for systematic analysis. Protocol-specified follow-up angiography was performed at 8 or 12 months for a subset of 750 of these patients, and clinical follow-up was performed at 9 months after the index procedures in all patients. Diabetes mellitus was present in 22.5% of patients, the mean reference vessel diameter was 2.73 mm, and the mean lesion length was 14.59 mm. At 8 months (12 months for ENDEAVOR I), mean +/- SD in-stent late luminal loss was 0.61 +/- 0.49 mm. In-stent late luminal loss was greatest in larger caliber (>2.9 mm) vessels (0.65 +/- 0.49 mm) and longer (>16.3 mm) lesions (0.70 +/- 0.52 mm) but did not statistically vary according to diabetic status. At 9 months, overall rates of target lesion revascularization (TLR) and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were 4.9% and 7.7%, respectively. The rate of TLR at 12 months was not significantly different relative to diabetes and lesion length >16.3 mm (7.2% and 7.7%, respectively), although TLR was significantly more common when reference vessel diameter was <2.5 mm (8.5%; p = 0.013). At 24 months, overall rates of TLR and MACE were 6.5% and 9.9%, respectively. The overall 24-month rate of stent thrombosis was 0.3%, with no events occurring >14 days after the procedure. Despite varied clinical and angiographic characteristics, treatment with the ZES is associated with consistently low rates of TLR and overall major adverse events, including stent thrombosis. Although these findings indicate the efficacy and safety of the ZES over the time course of the first 4 ENDEAVOR clinical trials, additional ongoing study with more open patient inclusion criteria (including long lesions, small vessels, bifurcations, etc) will be important for discerning whether comparable clinical outcomes can be extended to lesion subsets of higher complexity.

Topics: Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Sirolimus; Survival Rate

Drug-eluting stents have revolutionized the field of interventional cardiology and have provided a significant innovation for preventing coronary artery restenosis. Polymer coatings that deliver anti-proliferative drugs to the vessel wall are key components of these revolutionary medical devices. This article focuses on the development of stents which elute the potent anti-proliferative agent, zotarolimus, from a synthetic phosphorylcholine-based polymer known for its biocompatible profile. Zotarolimus is the first drug developed specifically for local delivery from stents for the prevention of restenosis and has been tested extensively to support this indication. Clinical experience with the PC polymer is also extensive, since more than 120,000 patients have been implanted to date with stents containing this non-thrombogenic coating. This review provides background on pre-clinical studies with zotarolimus, on the development of the biocompatible PC polymer and on the clinical trials conducted using two stent platforms which deliver this drug to patients with coronary artery disease.

Topics: Coronary Restenosis; Drug Delivery Systems; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sirolimus; Stents

Despite considerable benefits associated with current drug-eluting stents (DES), continued attention to the safety, efficacy, and deliverability of first-generation DES has led to the development of new antiproliferative agents with alternative stent platforms and different drug carrier systems. Zotarolimus is a recently developed pharmacologic agent with both antiproliferative and anti-inflammatory properties. The Endeavor drug-eluting stent (Medtronic Vascular, Santa Rosa, CA) represents the combination of zotarolimus, a low-profile cobalt alloy stent platform, and a biocompatible phosphorylcholine drug carrier system. At present, four clinical trials examining the safety and efficacy of the Endeavor stent have been performed. Although these studies have enrolled patients with similar clinical and angiographic characteristics, they have differed in trial design and study population size and have been performed across a broad geographic and physician distribution. Despite these differences, the results of these trials demonstrate consistently low rates of angiographic restenosis and repeat revascularization in addition to a favorable safety profile, with no occurrences of late stent thrombosis through 1 year of follow-up. This review describes the pharmacology and design on the Endeavor stent, summarizes results from recent clinical trials evaluating the Endeavor stent, and provides an overview of ongoing and future directions for clinical investigation.

Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Coated Materials, Biocompatible; Combined Modality Therapy; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Stenosis; Humans; Phosphorylcholine; Prosthesis Design; Sirolimus; Stents

Drug-eluting stents (DESs) have revolutionized interventional cardiology over the past few years to the extent that balloon angioplasty and bare stents did in the 1980s and 1990s. The first DESs became commercially available in Europe in 2002 and in the US in 2003, and it is estimated that up to 80% of patients who undergo stent implantation in the US now receive a DES. Two devices, Cypher sirolimus-eluting stents (Cordis Corporation, Miami Lakes, FL) and Taxus paclitaxel-eluting stents (Boston Scientific Corporation, Natick, MN), are currently licensed for sale in both regions. Multiple new devices using different drugs, carriers and stents are currently undergoing clinical trials to establish their efficacy and obtain approval for commercialization. While the remarkable reduction of restenosis has accounted for the success of DESs, concerns remain regarding long-term follow-up; published 3-year follow-up results are available for fewer than 200 patients overall. Reports of late stent thrombosis have emerged, particularly in relation to discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy. In patients treated with DESs, long-term administration of at least one antiplatelet agent must be continued following completion of the mandatory dual antiplatelet regimen. In this review, we summarize the findings available for DESs so far, discuss emerging safety and efficacy data, and look at the future directions for these devices.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic; Clinical Trials as Topic; Coronary Restenosis; Endothelium, Vascular; Everolimus; Immunosuppressive Agents; Paclitaxel; Sirolimus; Stents

ABT-578 is a new synthetic analog of rapamycin, designed to inhibit smooth muscle cell proliferation-a key contributor to restenosis-by blocking the function of the mTOR cell cycle regulatory protein. Given these pharmacodynamics, ABT-578 was considered beneficial for intracoronary delivery to arrest the process responsible for neointimal hyperplasia after angioplasty and stenting. Consequently, the ABT-578-eluting ENDEAVOR stent system has been created, representing a potential new alternative for treating patients with coronary heart disease. In order to evaluate safety, feasibility and efficacy of this stent design, the ENDEAVOR clinical program has been started, including three randomized clinical trials. ENDEAVOR I is the first-in-man trial including 100 patients with native de novo coronary lesions. The 4-month follow-up data, recently presented, demonstrated safety and feasibility of this new drug-eluting stent (DES) concept with a 4-month MACE (major adverse cardiac events) rate of 2.0%. In order to evaluate this stent system in a larger patient population as well as more complex lesion subsets, the multicenter study ENDEAVOR II has been started including a total of 1,200 patients. The enrollment of this study was completed in January 2004. The aim of the US multicenter study ENDEAVOR III is a head-to-head comparison of the ENDEAVOR ABT-578-eluting stent system with the already approved sirolimus-eluting Cypher stent in 369 patients. If the results of both pivotal studies ENDEAVOR II and III confirm the efficacy of the ENDEAVOR stent design observed so far, the ENDEAVOR stent will be established as a new and promising contender in the field of DES.

Topics: Administration, Topical; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Coated Materials, Biocompatible; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Stenosis; Feasibility Studies; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Paclitaxel; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sirolimus; Stents; Treatment Outcome

Conventional drug-eluting stents achieve good safety and performance outcomes, but the stents permanently cage the vessel, leading to a non-plateauing rate of clinical events. The DynamX Bioadaptor is designed to reduce these long-term events through unique design features that permit restoring vessel function and physiology through the disengagement of uncaging elements after the resorption of a biodegradable polymer over six months. Promising initial results have been obtained in the DynamX mechanistic study, with excellent safety and effectiveness, positive arterial remodeling, improved vasomotion, compliance, and cyclic pulsatility. We now aim to confirm these findings randomizing the DynamX Bioadaptor against the Resolute Onyx stent.. This multi-center, international, randomized single-blinded study is conducted in 34 sites across Europe, Japan, and New Zealand and is divided into the European/New Zealand cohort and the Japanese cohort (which includes an imaging subset). It is designed to randomly assign 444 patients (222 per region) in a 1:1 ratio to either the DynamX Bioadaptor or the Resolute Onyx stent. Furthermore, a pharmacokinetic substudy is conducted in 9 patients enrolled in Japan to assess the pharmacokinetics of sirolimus after implantation of the DynamX Bioadaptor. Study follow-up is scheduled at one, six, and 12 months, and annually thereafter for five years; imaging follow-up includes angiographic, intravascular ultrasound, and optical coherence tomography assessments at 12 months in a subset of patients. The primary endpoint is 12-month target lesion failure.. This trial will provide valuable insights into the safety and efficacy of this novel bioadaptor when compared to a contemporary drug-eluting stent.. The DynamX Sirolimus-Eluting Bioadaptor has unique design features aiming to reduce long-term events after percutaneous coronary intervention by permitting the restoration of vessel function through the freeing of uncaging elements. Promising initial results have been obtained in the DynamX mechanistic study. This trial aims to confirm these findings in a randomized setting. The European/ New Zealand and Japanese cohorts were designed to randomly assign 444 subjects in a 1:1 ratio to either the DynamX Bioadaptor or the Resolute Onyx stent. Furthermore, a pharmacokinetic substudy is conducted in 9 patients enrolled in Japan to assess the pharmacokinetics of sirolimus.

Topics: Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prosthesis Design; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

Limited information is available on the comparative efficacy and safety of different stent platforms in patients at high bleeding risk undergoing an abbreviated dual antiplatelet therapy duration after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The aim of this study was to compare the safety and effectiveness of the biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stent with the durable-polymer zotarolimus-eluting stent in patients at high bleeding risk receiving 1 month of dual antiplatelet therapy after PCI.. The Bioflow-DAPT Study is an international, randomized, open-label trial conducted at 52 interventional cardiology hospitals in 18 countries from February 24, 2020, through September 20, 2021. Patients with a clinical indication to PCI because of acute or chronic coronary syndrome who fulfilled 1 or more criteria for high bleeding risk were eligible for enrollment. Patients were randomized to receive either biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stents or durable-polymer, slow-release zotarolimus-eluting stents after successful lesion preparation, followed by 1 month of dual antiplatelet therapy and thereafter single antiplatelet therapy. The primary outcome was the composite of death from cardiac causes, myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis at 1 year, and was powered for noninferiority, with an absolute margin of 4.1% at 1-sided 5% alpha.. A total of 1948 patients at high bleeding risk were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stents (969 patients) or durable-polymer zotarolimus-eluting stents (979 patients). At 1 year, the primary outcome was observed in 33 of 969 patients (3.6%) in the biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stent group and in 32 of 979 patients (3.4%) in the durable-polymer zotarolimus-eluting stent group (risk difference, 0.2 percentage points; upper boundary of the 1-sided 95% CI, 1.8; upper boundary of the 1-sided 97.5% CI, 2.1;. Among patients at high risk for bleeding who received 1 month of dual antiplatelet therapy after PCI, the use of biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stents was noninferior to the use of durable-polymer zotarolimus-eluting stents with regard to the composite of death from cardiac causes, myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis.. URL: https://www.. gov; Unique identifier: NCT04137510.

Topics: Absorbable Implants; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Polymers; Sirolimus; Stents; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome

Patients with diabetes mellitus are at high risk of adverse events after percutaneous revascularization, with no differences in outcomes between most contemporary drug-eluting stents. The Cre8 EVO stent releases a formulation of sirolimus with an amphiphilic carrier from laser-dug wells, and has shown clinical benefits in diabetes. We aimed to compare Cre8 EVO stents to Resolute Onyx stents (a contemporary polymer-based zotarolimus-eluting stent) in patients with diabetes.. We did an investigator-initiated, randomized, controlled, assessor-blinded trial at 23 sites in Spain. Eligible patients had diabetes and required percutaneous coronary intervention. A total of 1175 patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive Cre8 EVO or Resolute Onyx stents. The primary endpoint was target-lesion failure, defined as a composite of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, and clinically indicated target-lesion revascularization at 1-year follow-up. The trial had a non-inferiority design with a 4% margin for the primary endpoint. A superiority analysis was planned if non-inferiority was confirmed. There were 106 primary events, 42 (7.2%) in the Cre8 EVO group and 64 (10.9%) in the Resolute Onyx group [hazard ratio (HR): 0.65, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.44-0.96; Pnon-inferiority < 0.001; Psuperiority = 0.030]. Among the secondary endpoints, Cre8 EVO stents had significantly lower rate than Resolute Onyx stents of target-vessel failure (7.5% vs. 11.1%, HR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.46-0.99; P = 0.042). Probable or definite stent thrombosis and all-cause death were not significantly different between groups.. In patients with diabetes, Cre8 EVO stents were non-inferior to Resolute Onyx stents with regard to target-lesion failure composite outcome. An exploratory analysis for superiority at 1 year suggests that the Cre8 EVO stents might be superior to Resolute Onyx stents with regard to the same outcome.. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03321032.

Topics: Coronary Artery Disease; Diabetes Mellitus; Drug-Eluting Stents; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prosthesis Design; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

Treatment of a coronary bifurcation lesion is often required in routine clinical practice, but data on the performance of very thin-strut biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents are scarce.. Comparison of biodegradable polymer and durable polymer drug-eluting stents in an all comers population (BIO-RESORT) is a prospective, multicenter randomized clinical trial that included 3514 all-comer patients, who were randomized to very thin-strut biodegradable polymer-coated sirolimus- or everolimus-eluting stents, versus thin-strut durable polymer-coated zotarolimus-eluting stents. The approach of bifurcation stenting was left at the operator's discretion, and provisional stenting was generally preferred. This prespecified analysis assessed 3-year clinical outcome of all patients in whom treatment involved at least one bifurcation with a side-branch diameter ≥1.5 mm.. Of all BIO-RESORT trial participants, 1236 patients were treated in bifurcation lesions and analyzed. Single- and two-stent techniques were used in 85.8% and 14.2%, respectively. 'True' bifurcation lesions (main vessel and side-branch obstructed) were treated in 31.1%. Three-year follow-up was available in 1200/1236 (97.1%) patients. The main endpoint target vessel failure (composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization) occurred in sirolimus-eluting stents in 42/412 (10.3%) and in zotarolimus-eluting stents in 49/409 (12.1%) patients (P-logrank = 0.40). In everolimus-eluting stents, target vessel failure occurred in 40/415 (9.8%) patients (vs. zotarolimus-eluting stents: P-logrank = 0.26). There was no between-stent difference in individual components of target vessel failure. Findings were consistent in patients with single-vessel treatment and patients treated with a single-stent technique.. Three years after stenting all-comers with bifurcation lesions, clinical outcome was similar with the sirolimus-eluting and everolimus-eluting stents versus the zotarolimus-eluting stent.

Topics: Biodegradable Plastics; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Equipment Failure Analysis; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Long Term Adverse Effects; Male; Middle Aged; Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prosthesis Failure; Sirolimus

Very long-term outcomes according to diabetic status of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with new-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) are scant. Both, the durable polymer zotarolimus-eluting stent (DP-ZES), the first DES to gain FDA-approval for specific use in patients with diabetes mellitus, and the polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent (PF-SES), with a unique design that enables effective drug release without the need of a polymer offer the potential to enhance clinical long-term outcomes especially in patients with diabetes mellitus.. We investigate 10-year clinical outcomes of the prespecified subgroups of patients with and without diabetes mellitus, randomly assigned to treatment with PF-SES versus DP-ZES in the ISAR-TEST 5 trial. The primary endpoint of interest was major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as the composite of all-cause death, any myocardial infarction or any revascularization. Further endpoints of interest were cardiac death, myocardial infarction related to the target vessel and target lesion revascularization as well as the individual components of the primary composite endpoint and the incidence of definite or probable stent thrombosis at 10 years.. This analysis includes a total of 3002 patients randomly assigned to PF-SES (n = 2002) or DP-ZES (n = 1000). Prevalence of diabetes mellitus was high and comparable, 575 Patients (28.7%) in PF-SES group and 295 patients (29.5%) in DP-ZES group (P = 0.66). At 10 years 53.5% of patients with diabetes mellitus and 68.5% of patients without diabetes mellitus were alive. Regarding major adverse cardiac events, PF-SES as compared to DP-ZES showed comparable event rates in patients with diabetes mellitus (74.8% vs. 79.6%; hazard ratio 0.86; 95% CI 0.73-1.02; P = 0.08) and in patients without diabetes (PF-SES 62.5% vs. DP-ZES 62.2%; hazard ratio 0.99; 95% CI 0.88-1.11; P = 0.88).. At 10 years, both new-generation DES show comparable clinical outcome irrespective of diabetic status or polymer strategy. Event rates after PCI in patients with diabetes mellitus are considerable higher than in patients without diabetes mellitus and continue to accrue over time.. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00598533, Registered 10 January 2008, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00598533?term=NCT00598533 Kaplan-Meier estimates of endpoints of interest for patients with vs. without diabetes mellitus treated with PF-SES vs. DP-ZES. Bar graphs: Kaplan-Meier estimates as percentages. PF-SES: polymer-free sirolimus-eluting stent; DP-ZES: durable polymer zotarolimus-eluting stent; DM: diabetes mellitus. Comparison of event rates of individual endpoints in patients with and without diabetes mellitus treated with PF-SES vs. DP-ZES all without statistically significant differences. Comparison of event rates of individual endpoints in overall patients with vs. without diabetes mellitus significantly different (P ≤ 0.01 for all comparisons).

Topics: Aged; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Diabetes Mellitus; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Polymers; Probucol; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

We compared 10-year clinical outcomes in diabetes and nondiabetes patients treated with Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting (ZES) or Cypher sirolimus-eluting coronary stents (SES). A total of 1,162 patients were randomized to ZES (169 with diabetes) and 1,170 patients were randomized to SES (168 with diabetes). Patients were further stratified by diabetes status at the time of inclusion. A subgroup of patients with diabetes (n = 88) underwent angiographic re-evaluation 10 months after stent implantation. End points included a combined end point of death or myocardial infarction, and the individual end points of death, myocardial infarction, and revascularization. In patients with diabetes, we found no difference in the combined end point (odds ratio [OR] 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53 to 1.24), death (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.25), or in MI (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.91). However, diabetics with ZES more frequently underwent coronary revascularization compared with SES patients (OR 1.93, 95% CI 1.05 to 3.66). In patients without diabetes, ZES and SES had similar 10-year rates of all end points (death: OR 1.13, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.39; MI: OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.05; revascularization: OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.09). Landmark analysis from 5 to 10 years showed no difference in outcomes between SES and ZES in either subgroup. In conclusion, at 10 years, SES and ZES performed similarly in patients with and without diabetes. Although coronary revascularization was more prevalent in diabetes patients with ZES, this may, in part, have been related to the angiographic follow-up that was offered to a subgroup of diabetes patients.

Topics: Cause of Death; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Denmark; Diabetes Mellitus; Drug-Eluting Stents; Follow-Up Studies; Forecasting; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Incidence; Postoperative Complications; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Sirolimus; Survival Rate

We compared long-term clinical outcomes between patients treated with Orsiro sirolimus-eluting stent (O-SES) and those treated with durable biocompatible polymer Resolute Integrity zotarolimus-eluting stent (R-ZES).. The ORIENT trial was a randomized controlled noninferiority trial to compare angiographic outcomes between O-SES and R-ZES. We performed a post hoc analysis of 3-year clinical outcomes and included 372 patients who were prospectively enrolled and randomly assigned to O-SES (n = 250) and R-ZES (n = 122) groups in a 2:1 ratio. The primary endpoint was target lesion failure defined as a composite of cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization. At 3 years, target lesion failure occurred in 4.7% and 7.8% of O-SES and R-ZES groups, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.58; 95% confidence intervals, 0.24-1.41; p = .232 by log-rank test). Secondary endpoints including cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization showed no significant differences between the groups. Stent thrombosis occurred in two patients in R-ZES group (0.0% vs. 1.6%, p = .040).. This study confirms long-term safety and efficacy of the two stents. We found a trend for lower target lesion failure with O-SES compared to R-ZES, although statistically insignificant.

Topics: Absorbable Implants; Aged; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Thrombosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Polymers; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Republic of Korea; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Polymer-free drug-coated stents provide superior clinical outcomes to bare-metal stents in patients at high bleeding risk who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and are treated with 1 month of dual antiplatelet therapy. Data on the use of polymer-based drug-eluting stents, as compared with polymer-free drug-coated stents, in such patients are limited.. In an international, randomized, single-blind trial, we compared polymer-based zotarolimus-eluting stents with polymer-free umirolimus-coated stents in patients at high bleeding risk. After PCI, patients were treated with 1 month of dual antiplatelet therapy, followed by single antiplatelet therapy. The primary outcome was a safety composite of death from cardiac causes, myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis at 1 year. The principal secondary outcome was target-lesion failure, an effectiveness composite of death from cardiac causes, target-vessel myocardial infarction, or clinically indicated target-lesion revascularization. Both outcomes were powered for noninferiority.. A total of 1996 patients at high bleeding risk were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive zotarolimus-eluting stents (1003 patients) or polymer-free drug-coated stents (993 patients). At 1 year, the primary outcome was observed in 169 of 988 patients (17.1%) in the zotarolimus-eluting stent group and in 164 of 969 (16.9%) in the polymer-free drug-coated stent group (risk difference, 0.2 percentage points; upper boundary of the one-sided 97.5% confidence interval [CI], 3.5; noninferiority margin, 4.1; P = 0.01 for noninferiority). The principal secondary outcome was observed in 174 patients (17.6%) in the zotarolimus-eluting stent group and in 169 (17.4%) in the polymer-free drug-coated stent group (risk difference, 0.2 percentage points; upper boundary of the one-sided 97.5% CI, 3.5; noninferiority margin, 4.4; P = 0.007 for noninferiority).. Among patients at high bleeding risk who received 1 month of dual antiplatelet therapy after PCI, use of polymer-based zotarolimus-eluting stents was noninferior to use of polymer-free drug-coated stents with regard to safety and effectiveness composite outcomes. (Funded by Medtronic; ONYX ONE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03344653.).

Topics: Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Thrombosis; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Eluting Stents; Heart Diseases; Hemorrhage; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Polymers; Prosthesis Design; Single-Blind Method; Sirolimus

Topics: Coated Materials, Biocompatible; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Restenosis; Diabetes Mellitus; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Polymers; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Single-Blind Method; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

There is limited data comparing the Xience everolimus-eluting stent (EES) and the Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) with the BioMatrix biolimus-eluting stent (BES).. This open-label, randomized, noninferiority trial enrolled all-comer patients to be randomly treated with either BES, EES, or ZES in a 1:1:1 ratio in 15 centers across South Korea. The primary end point was a device-oriented composite outcome consisting of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, and clinically indicated target lesion revascularization at 24 months. The BES was compared with the EES and the ZES by intention-to-treat analyses with a noninferiority margin of 3.8%, respectively.. Because of slow recruitment and low event rates, this trial was prematurely terminated after enrollment of 1935 (75%) of the intended 2580 patients. Of the 1911 patients randomized to either EES (n=638), BES (n=634), or ZES (n =639), the rate of device-oriented composite outcome was 3.6%, 2.2%, and 3.9%, respectively, at 24 months (BES versus EES: absolute risk difference -1.4% [upper limit of 1-sided 95% CI: -3.2%];. The BES was noninferior to either the EES or the ZES in all-comer patients for device-oriented composite outcome at the 24-month follow-up. However, caution is advised regarding interpretation of these results due to the premature termination of this study. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01397175.

Topics: Aged; Cardiovascular Agents; Drug-Eluting Stents; Early Termination of Clinical Trials; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Ischemia; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prosthesis Design; Recurrence; Republic of Korea; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

The objective was to assess the 2-year clinical performance of three drug-eluting stents in all-comer patients with severely calcified coronary lesions.. Severe lesion calcification increases cardiovascular event risk after coronary stenting, but there is a lack of data on the clinical outcome of all-comers with severely calcified lesions who were treated with more recently introduced drug-eluting stents.. The BIO-RESORT trial (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01674803) randomly assigned 3,514 all-comer patients to biodegradable polymer Synergy everolimus-eluting stents (EES) or Orsiro sirolimus-eluting stents (SES), versus durable polymer Resolute Integrity zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES). In a post hoc analysis, we assessed 783 patients (22.3%) with at least one severely calcified target lesion.. At 2-year follow-up (available in 99% of patients), the main composite endpoint target vessel failure occurred in 19/252 (7.6%) of the EES and in 33/265 (12.6%) of the ZES-treated patients (p = .07). Target vessel failure occurred in 24/266 (9.1%) of the SES-treated patients (vs. ZES: p = .21). There was a difference in target vessel revascularization, which was required in EES in 6/252 (2.4%) patients and in ZES in 20/265 (7.7%) patients (p = .01); the target vessel revascularization rate in SES was 9/266 (3.4%, vs. ZES: p = .04). Multivariate analysis showed that implantation of EES, but not SES, was independently associated with lower target vessel revascularization rates than in ZES.. In BIO-RESORT participants with severely calcified target lesions, treatment with EES was associated with a lower 2-year target vessel revascularization rate than treatment with ZES.

Topics: Aged; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Netherlands; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prosthesis Design; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Severity of Illness Index; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Vascular Calcification

Treatment of bifurcation lesions is technically challenging and has been associated with an increased risk of adverse events. We sought to evaluate the clinical and angiographic outcomes of patients who underwent bifurcation lesion provisional treatment in the BioNIR Ridaforolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in Coronary Stenosis trial. A prospective, multicenter, 1:1 randomized trial was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ridaforolimus-eluting stents (RES) versus zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES). Enrollment of bifurcation lesions treated with a provisional 1-stent technique was allowed. Bifurcation lesions were analyzed by an angiographic core laboratory. Outcomes were analyzed according to the presence of a bifurcation lesion treatment. Study population included 686 (35.8%) patients with and 1,228 (64.2%) patients without bifurcation lesion treatment. Procedural success was high and similar between groups. In 2 years, there was no difference in the rate of target lesion failure between the bifurcation and nonbifurcation groups (7.6% vs 7.3%, respectively, p = 0.81) regardless of the presence of side branch stenosis ≥50%. In 159 patients with angiographic follow-up, there was no difference in the rate of binary restenosis between groups (9.0% vs 9.2%, p = 0.96). Rates of target lesion failure at 1-year were similar with ZES and RES, and consistent in patients with and without bifurcation lesions (p

Topics: Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Stenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prospective Studies; Sirolimus

The aim of this study was to assess 2-year safety and efficacy of the current-generation thin composite-wire-strut durable-polymer Resolute Onyx zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES), compared with the ultrathin-strut biodegradable-polymer Orsiro sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) in all-comers and a pre-specified small-vessel subgroup analysis.. The Resolute Onyx ZES is widely used in clinical practice, but no follow-up data beyond 1 year have been published. The randomized BIONYX (Bioresorbable Polymer-Coated Orsiro Versus Durable Polymer-Coated Resolute Onyx Stents) trial (NCT02508714) established the noninferiority of ZES versus SES regarding target vessel failure (TVF) rates.. A total of 2,488 all-comer patients were treated at 7 coronary intervention centers in Belgium, Israel, and the Netherlands. The main endpoint, TVF, was a composite of safety (cardiac death or target vessel-related myocardial infarction) and efficacy (clinically indicated target vessel revascularization). Two-year follow-up data were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods.. Two-year follow-up data were available for 2,460 of 2,488 patients (98.9%). TVF occurred in 93 of 1,243 patients (7.6%) assigned to ZES versus 87 of 1,245 patients (7.1%) assigned to SES (log-rank p = 0.66). There was no significant between-stent difference in individual components of this endpoint. The incidence of definite-or-probable stent thrombosis was low for both treatment arms (0.4% vs. 1.1%; log-rank p = 0.057). In patients stented in small vessels, there was no between-stent difference (TVF 8.2% vs. 8.7% [log-rank p = 0.75], target lesion revascularization 4.0% vs. 4.4% [log-rank p = 0.77]).. At 2-year follow-up, the novel thin composite-wire-strut durable-polymer Resolute Onyx ZES showed in all-comers similar safety and efficacy compared with the ultrathin cobalt-chromium-strut biodegradable-polymer Orsiro SES. The analysis of patients who were treated in small vessels also suggested no advantage for either stent.

Topics: Aged; Belgium; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Thrombosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Israel; Male; Middle Aged; Netherlands; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Outcome data after extended long-term follow-up of patients with coronary artery disease treated with drug-eluting stents (DES) in randomized clinical trials are scant.. Performance differences among devices may be expected to emerge over time depending on whether stenting is done with polymer-free or durable polymer DES. This study assessed the 10-year outcomes of patients enrolled in the ISAR-TEST-5 (Test Efficacy of Sirolimus- and Probucol-Eluting Versus Zotarolimus-Eluting Stents) trial.. A total of 3,002 patients were randomized to treatment with either polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stents (n = 2,002) or durable polymer zotarolimus-eluting stents (n = 1,000). The primary endpoint was the composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization (a device-oriented composite endpoint [DOCE]). Additional endpoints of interest were the patient-oriented composite endpoint (POCE), including all-cause death, any myocardial infarction, or any revascularization; individual components of the composite endpoints; and definite or probable stent thrombosis.. The median age of the patients at randomization was 67.8 years. At 10 years, 63.9% of patients were alive. The rates of DOCE and POCE were high in both groups with no difference in the incidence between polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stents and durable polymer zotarolimus-eluting stents (DOCE: 43.8% vs. 43.0%, respectively; hazard ratio: 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.89 to 1.14; p = 0.90; POCE: 66.2% vs. 67.7%, respectively; hazard ratio: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.86 to 1.04; p = 0.22). The rates of the individual components of the composite endpoints were comparable in both groups. The incidence of definite/probable stent thrombosis over 10 years was low and comparable in both groups (1.6% vs. 1.9%; hazard ratio: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.46 to 1.54; p = 0.58).. At 10 years, there were no measurable differences in outcomes between patients treated with polymer-free versus durable polymer DES. The incidence of stent thrombosis was low and comparable in both groups. High overall adverse clinical event rates were observed during extended follow-up. (Test Efficacy of Sirolimus- and Probucol-Eluting Versus Zotarolimus-Eluting Stents [ISAR-TEST-5]; NCT00598533).

Topics: Absorbable Implants; Aged; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Forecasting; Humans; Male; Polymers; Prosthesis Design; Retrospective Studies; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

Patients aged ≥80 years are often treated with new-generation drug-eluting stents (DES), but data from randomized studies are scarce owing to underrepresentation in most trials. We assessed 1-year clinical outcome of octogenarians treated with new-generation DES versus younger patients.. We pooled patient-level data of 9,204 participants in the TWENTE, DUTCH PEERS, BIO-RESORT, and BIONYX (TWENTE I-IV) randomized trials. The main clinical end point was target vessel failure (TVF), a composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction (MI), or clinically indicated target vessel revascularization.. The 671 octogenarian trial participants had significantly more comorbidities. TVF was higher in octogenarians than in 8,533 patients <80 years (7.3% vs 5.3%, hazard ratio [HR]: 1.36, 95% CI: 1.0-1.83, P = .04). The cardiac death rate was higher in octogenarians (3.9% vs 0.8%, P < .001). There was no significant between-group difference in target vessel MI (2.3% vs 2.3%, P = .88) and repeat target vessel revascularization (1.9% vs 2.8%, P = .16). In multivariate analyses, age ≥ 80 years showed no independent association with TVF (adjusted HR: 1.04, 95% CI: 0.76-1.42), whereas the risk of cardiac death remained higher in octogenarians (adjusted HR: 3.38, 95% CI: 2.07-5.52, P < .001). In 6,002 trial participants, in whom data on major bleeding were recorded, octogenarians (n = 459) showed a higher major bleeding risk (5.9% vs 1.9%; HR: 3.08, 95% CI: 2.01-4.74, P < .001).. Octogenarian participants in 4 large-scale randomized DES trials had more comorbidities and a higher incidence of the main end point TVF. Cardiac mortality was higher in octogenarians, whereas there was no increase in MI or target vessel revascularization rates. Treatment of octogenarian patients with new-generation DES appears to be safe and effective.

Topics: Aged, 80 and over; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Postoperative Complications; Reoperation; Risk Adjustment; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

To evaluate the safety and efficacy outcomes after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) with second-generation Resolute™ zotarolimus-eluting stent (R-ZES) in patients enrolled in the DAPT-STEMI Trial (NCT01459627).. R-ZES is one of the most used drug eluting stents worldwide. To date, the safety and efficacy data of this stent in setting of STEMI is limited.. The Resolute-STEMI is a prespecified prospective register that reports the safety and efficacy of R-ZES in setting of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) at 6 months for the following endpoints: a composite endpoint of all-cause mortality, any myocardial infarction (MI), any (unscheduled) revascularization, stroke and TIMI major bleeding, as well as target lesion failure and stent thrombosis (ST).. From a total of 1,100 STEMI patients enrolled in the trial, 998 received a R-ZES. At 6 months the PE occurred in 42 (4.2%) patients. All-cause death, MI, revascularization, stroke and TIMI major bleeding was respectively 8 (0.8%), 9 (0.8%), 34 (3.4%), 2 (0.2%), and 4 (0.4%). The rate of target lesion revascularizations involving the culprit lesion was 1.1%. Target lesion failure was 1.5%. The rate of definite ST was 0.5%. The rate of both definite or probable ST was 0.7%.. The present analysis is the largest to date reporting short-term and mid-term clinical outcomes with the R-ZES stent in setting of STEMI. At 30 days and 6-months R-ZES has an outstanding safety and efficacy even in this high-risk category of patients.

Topics: Aged; Cardiovascular Agents; Cause of Death; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Thrombosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Recurrence; Registries; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

The aim of this study was to assess the 3-year safety and efficacy of treating all-comer patients with 3 contemporary drug-eluting stents (DES).. The BIO-RESORT (Comparison of Biodegradable Polymer and Durable Polymer Drug-Eluting Stents in an All Comers Population) (TWENTE III) randomized trial (NCT01674803) found similar 1-year safety and efficacy for the 2 biodegradable-polymer DES (i.e., ultrathin-strut cobalt-chromium Orsiro sirolimus-eluting stent [SES] and very-thin-strut platinum-chromium Synergy everolimus-eluting stent) compared with the durable-polymer thin-strut cobalt-chromium Resolute Integrity zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES). Two-year follow-up suggested that the SES might reduce repeat revascularizations beyond 1 year compared with the ZES.. A total of 3,514 all-comer patients were treated at 4 centers for coronary intervention. The main clinical endpoint, target vessel failure, was a composite of safety (cardiac death or target vessel-related myocardial infarction) and efficacy (target vessel revascularization). Secondary endpoints included the individual components of target vessel failure and stent thrombosis.. Three-year follow-up data were available for 3,393 of 3,514 patients (96.6%). Target vessel failure occurred in 8.5% with SES and 10.0% with ZES (p. Despite substantial differences in stent backbone and polymer coating, all 3 DES showed favorable 3-year safety and efficacy in all comers, without significant between-stent differences. Further follow-up is required to definitely answer the question of whether one stent might improve clinical outcomes at a later stage.

Topics: Absorbable Implants; Aged; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Thrombosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Netherlands; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Polymers; Prosthesis Design; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Advanced age is directly related to worse outcomes following ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and higher complication rates from antithrombotic therapies and primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Often excluded from clinical trials, seniors presenting with STEMI remain an understudied population despite contributing to 140,000 hospital admissions annually. The SAFE-STEMI for Seniors study is a prospective, multicenter, unblinded, randomized clinical trial designed to examine the efficacy and safety of instantaneous wave-free ratio-guided complete revascularization in multivessel disease, while also investigating other components of STEMI care for patients ≥60 years including the efficacy and safety of zotarolimus-eluting stents for primary PCI and transradial PCI with the Glidesheath Slender and TR band. The SAFE-STEMI trial represents North America's first and only prospective randomized investigational device exemption study to use a Coordinated Registry Network infrastructure with collaborative partnering across industry manufacturers, promoting both efficiency and reduced cost of evidence development for regulatory decisions related to both diagnostic and therapeutic technologies in a single study design. The study has been powered to evaluate 2 independent co-primary end points in a population of older patients with STEMI: (1) third-generation drug-eluting stents for primary PCI and (2) instantaneous wave-free ratio-guided complete revascularization versus infarct-related artery-only revascularization.

Topics: Aged; Drug-Eluting Stents; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Middle Aged; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prospective Studies; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sirolimus; ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction; Treatment Outcome

The impact of coronary artery disease (CAD) extension/complexity on outcomes and on the comparative benefits/risks of zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) versus bare-metal stents (BMS) remains unclear in patients at high risk of bleeding or thrombosis or at low restenosis risk.. We performed a post-hoc analysis of the ZEUS trial. The impact of coronary anatomic complexity measured by the SYNTAX score on the differences in outcomes following ZES and BMS was assessed at 1 year.. The mean SYNTAX score was 16.3 ± 13.1 with a median of 12 (IQR: 7 to 22). We stratified patients according to SYNTAX tertiles (0-8: n = 563; >8-19 n = 532; >19: n = 511), and observed that the higher the score, the correspondingly higher was the rate of the primary endpoint of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and other ischemic events, but not bleeding after adjustment. The superior efficacy of ZES versus BMS for MACE was consistent across SYNTAX tertiles (tertile 1: HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.44-1.13; tertile 2: HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.46-1.09; tertile 3: HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.61-1.10) without significant heterogeneity (p for trend = 0.55). This between-groups difference mainly reflected a reduction in MI and TVR without effect on mortality. There was no significant interaction between the SYNTAX score and allocated stent type with respect to ischemic and bleeding endpoints.. The SYNTAX score was predictor of major adverse cardiovascular events but not bleeding and ZES provided superior efficacy and safety than BMS across the whole spectrum of CAD complexity. SYNTAX score may be routinely used for the assessment of the ischemic risk (but not bleeding) after PCI and should not guide the decision-making for DES versus BMS in patients undergoing PCI.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Internationality; Male; Myocardial Ischemia; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Risk Factors; Single-Blind Method; Sirolimus; Stents; Treatment Outcome

Outcomes for stent-based coronary intervention of lesions with long diseased segments remain relatively unfavorable. This study sought to compare the efficacy of Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stents (R-ZES) and Xience everolimus-eluting stents (EES) for very long coronary lesions.. This randomized, multicenter, prospective trial compared the use of R-ZES with EES for very long (≥50 mm) native coronary lesions. The primary end point was in-segment late luminal loss at 12-month angiographic follow-up. A total of 400 patients were needed to assess the primary end point. However, owing to very slow enrollment of patients, this trial was early terminated (302 patients were enrolled), and thus, this report provides descriptive information on primary and secondary end points. The R-ZES and EES groups had similar baseline characteristics. Lesion length was 49.6±10.2 and 50.6±13.3 mm in the R-ZES and EES groups, respectively (P=0.47). The number of stents used at the target lesion was 2.1±0.3 and 2.2±0.5, respectively. Twelve-month angiographic follow-up was performed in 50% of eligible patients. In-segment late luminal loss did not significantly differ between the R-ZES and EES groups (0.17±0.57 vs. 0.09±0.43 mm, P=0.32). In-segment binary restenosis rates were 8.1 and 5.3% in the R-ZES and EES groups, respectively (P=0.49). There were no significant between-group differences in the rate of adverse events (death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, target lesion revascularization, and composite outcomes).. For patients with very long native coronary artery disease, R-ZES and EES implantation showed comparable angiographic and clinical outcomes through 1 year of follow-up.

Topics: Aged; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Risk Factors; Single-Blind Method; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

Polymer-free amphilimus-eluting stents (PF-AES) represent a novel elution technology in the current era of drug-eluting stents. The clinical safety and efficacy of PF-AES as compared with latest-generation permanent-polymer zotarolimus-eluting stents (PP-ZES) have not yet been investigated in a large randomized trial.. In this physician-initiated, prospective, multicenter, randomized, noninferiority trial, an all-comers population requiring percutaneous coronary intervention was enrolled across 3 European sites. Randomization (1:1 ratio) to PP-ZES or PF-AES was performed after stratification for troponin status and diabetes mellitus. In both treatment arms, troponin-positive patients were planned for 12-month dual antiplatelet therapy, whereas troponin-negative patients were planned for 1-month dual antiplatelet therapy. Outcome assessors were blinded to the allocated treatment. The device-oriented primary end point of target-lesion failure was defined as cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, or target-lesion revascularization at 12-months as analyzed by modified intention-to-treat (80% power, and a 3.5% noninferiority margin).. In total, 1502 patients were randomized and 1491 treated with the assigned stent and available for follow-up. The primary end point occurred in 42 (5.6%) of the 744 patients receiving PP-ZES versus 46 (6.2%) of the 747 patients receiving PF-AES. PF-AES were clinically noninferior to PP-ZES (risk difference, 0.5%; upper limit 1-sided 95% confidence interval, 2.6%; P. PF-AES were noninferior to PP-ZES regarding target-lesion failure at 12 months. Findings regarding the secondary end point and prespecified subgroups were generally consistent with that of the primary end point.. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT02328898.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Angina, Stable; Angina, Unstable; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Thrombosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Europe; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Polymers; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Stenting small-vessel lesions has an increased adverse cardiovascular event risk. Very thin-strut or ultrathin-strut drug-eluting stents might reduce this risk, but data are scarce.. To assess the outcome of all-comer patients with small coronary vessel lesions treated with 3 dissimilar types of drug-eluting stents.. This is a prespecified substudy of the Comparison of Biodegradable Polymer and Durable Polymer Drug-eluting Stents in an All Comers Population (BIO-RESORT) trial, an investigator-initiated, randomized, patient-blinded comparative clinical drug-eluting stent trial. Patients treated with ultrathin-strut sirolimus-eluting stents, very thin-strut everolimus-eluting stents, or previous-generation thin-strut zotarolimus-eluting stents were enrolled from December 2012 to August 2015. This multicenter trial was conducted in 4 Dutch centers for cardiac intervention. Of all 3514 all-comer BIO-RESORT participants, 1506 patients with treatment in at least 1 small-vessel lesion (reference vessel <2.5 mm) were included. Data were analyzed between September 2018 and February 2019.. Target lesion failure at 3-year follow-up, a composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization, analyzed by Kaplan-Meier methods.. In 1452 of 1506 participants (96.4%) (1057 men [70.2%]; 449 women [29.8%]; mean [SD] age, 64.3 [10.4] years), follow-up was available. Target lesion failure occurred in 36 of 525 patients (7.0%) treated with sirolimus-eluting stents, 46 of 496 (9.5%) with everolimus-eluting stents, and 48 of 485 (10.0%) with zotarolimus-eluting stents (sirolimus-eluting vs zotarolimus-eluting hazard ratio [HR], 0.68; 95% CI, 0.44-1.05; P = .08; everolimus-eluting vs zotarolimus-eluting HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.62-1.39; P = .72). There was a difference in target lesion revascularizations between sirolimus-eluting and zotarolimus-eluting stents (2.1% vs 5.3%; HR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.20-0.81; P = .009) that emerged after the first year of follow-up (1.0% vs 3.7%; P = .006); multivariate analysis showed that sirolimus-eluting stent implantation was independently associated with a lower target lesion revascularization rate at 3-year follow-up (adjusted HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.20-0.85; P = .02). In the everolimus-eluting stents, the revascularization rate was 4.0% (vs zotarolimus-eluting, HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.41-1.34; P = .31). There was no significant between-stent difference in cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis.. Patients stented in small coronary vessels experienced fewer repeated revascularizations if treated with ultrathin-strut sirolimus-eluting stents vs previous generation thin strut zotarolimus-eluting stents. Further research is required to evaluate the potential effect of particularly thin stent struts.. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01674803.

Topics: Absorbable Implants; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prosthesis Design; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

There are limited data on the long-term outcome of platinum chromium-based everolimus-eluting stents (PtCr-EES) vs. cobalt chromium-based zotarolimus-eluting stents (CoCr-ZES).Methods and Results:A total of 3,755 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were randomized 2:1 to PtCr-EES or CoCr-ZES, and 96.0% of patients completed the 3-year clinical follow-up. The primary outcome was target lesion failure (TLF), defined as a composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction (MI), and clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR). At 3 years, TLF occurred in 5.3% and in 5.4% of the PtCr-EES and CoCr-ZES groups, respectively (hazard ratio 0.978; 95% confidence interval 0.730-1.310, P=0.919). There were no significant differences in the individual components of TLF. Routine angiographic follow-up was performed in 38.9% of the total patients. In a landmark analysis of the subgroup that had follow-up angiography, the clinically-driven TLR rate of CoCr-ZES was significantly higher than PtCr-EES group during the angiography follow-up period (P=0.009). Overall definite and probable stent thrombosis rates were very low in both groups (0.5% vs. 0.6%, P=0.677).. PtCr-EES and CoCr-ZES had similar and excellent long-term outcomes in both efficacy and safety after PCI in an all-comer population.

Topics: Aged; Chromium; Chromium Alloys; Coronary Angiography; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platinum; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Failure; Sirolimus

Polymer-free drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation in combination with 1-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has shown superior safety and efficacy outcomes compared with bare-metal stents among patients with high-bleeding risk (HBR) treated with 1-month DAPT. The safety and efficacy of the newer-generation durable-polymer DES Resolute Onyx compared with polymer-free DES among HBR patients treated with 1-month DAPT is unknown.. The Onyx ONE global randomized trial is an international, prospective, randomized, blinded, controlled study enrolling HBR patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. The trial will randomize up to 2,000 patients in a 1:1 fashion to receive either the durable-polymer Resolute Onyx DES or the polymer-free Biosensors BioFreedom DES. After index procedure, patients in both arms will be treated with 1 month of DAPT (aspirin and oral P2Y12 inhibitor), followed by single antiplatelet therapy thereafter. The primary end point is the composite end point of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis at 1-year follow-up. The powered secondary end point is target lesion failure (defined as the composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or clinically driven target lesion revascularization) at 1 year. Patient follow-up is planned for 1, 2, and 6 months and 1 and 2 years after the procedure.. The Onyx ONE global randomized trial is the first study to directly compare the safety and efficacy of a durable polymer DES (Resolute Onyx) with a polymer-free DES (BioFreedom) in HBR patients treated with 1 month of DAPT.

Topics: Aspirin; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Eluting Stents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Research Design; Risk; Single-Blind Method; Sirolimus; Stents; Thrombosis

Amphilimus sirolimus-eluting stents (A-SES) represent a novel elution technology in the current era of drug-eluting stents with promising results in patients with diabetes mellitus. At present no large trial has been designed to evaluate clinical outcomes of A-SES as compared to new-generation drug-eluting stents in unselected patients. Accordingly, we designed this trial to evaluate clinical noninferiority of A-SES as compared with zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES) in a real-world, all-comers setting.. ReCre8 is a prospective multicenter randomized clinical trial evaluating the clinical outcomes of A-SES as compared with ZES in all-comers requiring percutaneous coronary intervention. Patients are randomized 1:1 to receive either A-SES or ZES. On-site block-randomization is stratified by diabetes mellitus, and troponin status to perform prespecified subanalyses. Patients receive 1-month of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) when troponin-negative, or 12-months of DAPT when troponin-positive. The primary endpoint is target-lesion failure at 1-year follow-up. A total of 1,532 patients will be enrolled to demonstrate clinical noninferiority of A-SES with at least 80% power, a noninferiority margin of 3.5% and a type-I-error of 0.05.. ReCre8 (NCT02328898) is the first randomized multicenter trial with a head-to-head comparison of A-SES as compared with ZES to investigate the clinical safety and efficacy of these new-generation DES in a real-world, all-comers population.

Topics: Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Equivalence Trials as Topic; Humans; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

A second iteration of a sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) that has a biodegradable PLGA polymer coating with an electrografting base layer on a thin-strut (80 µm) cobalt-chromium platform (BuMA Supreme; SINOMED, Tianjin, China) has been developed. This first-in-man trial aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of the novel device.. This randomised, multicentre, single-blinded, non-inferiority trial compared the BuMA Supreme SES versus a contemporary durable polymer zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) in terms of angiographic in-stent late lumen loss (LLL) at nine-month follow-up as the primary endpoint. A total of 170 patients were randomly allocated to treatment with either SES (n=83) or ZES (n=87). At nine-month angiographic follow-up, in-stent LLL was 0.29±0.33 mm in the SES group and 0.14±0.37 mm in the ZES group (pnon-inferiority=0.45). The in-stent percent diameter stenosis and the binary restenosis rate of the two treatment arms were similar (19.2±12.0% vs. 16.1±12.6%, p=0.09, and 3.3% vs. 4.4%, p=1.00, respectively). At 12-month clinical follow-up, there was no difference between treatment arms with regard to the device-oriented composite clinical endpoint (4.9% vs. 5.7%; p=0.72).. The PIONEER trial did not meet its primary endpoint in terms of in-stent LLL at nine-month follow-up. However, this result did not translate into any increase in restenosis rate or impairment in 12-month clinical outcomes.

Topics: Absorbable Implants; Aged; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prosthesis Design; Sirolimus

To assess the safety and efficacy of the novel Resolute (R-) Onyx drug-eluting stent (DES).. The R-Onyx DES consists of a composite wire with an outer shell of cobalt chromium alloy and a platinum-iridium inner core to enhance radiopacity, with thinner, swaged struts and modified stent geometry compared with the predicate Resolute DES, resulting in a slightly lower total drug load in most sizes.. This was a prospective, single-arm non-inferiority trial compared with a historical control. Patients with stable angina/ischemia and up to 2 de novo target lesions ≤35 mm long with reference vessel diameter (RVD) of 2.25-4.2 mm were enrolled. The primary endpoint was late lumen loss at 8-month follow-up. Propensity-score adjusted outcomes from the single-arm RESOLUTE-US trial served as the control.. Seventy-five patients (85 lesions) were enrolled. Mean patient age was 66 ± 9 years, 73% were male, and 32% had diabetes. Mean lesion length was 14.28 ± 6.68 mm, mean RVD was 2.57 ± 0.48 mm, and 86% of lesions were class B2/C. In-stent late lumen loss at 8 months was 0.24 ± 0.39 mm with R-Onyx DES compared with 0.36 ± 0.52 mm with Resolute DES (P < 0.001 for noninferiority, P = 0.029 for superiority). At 8 months, clinically driven target lesion revascularization occurred in 3 patients (4.0%) and target lesion failure occurred in 5 patients (6.7%).. In-stent late lumen loss is non-inferior, and appears to be superior, with the thin-strut novel composite wire R-Onyx DES compared with Resolute DES. Continued evolution of stent design can improve angiographic outcomes in complex lesions, even in the current era of next-generation DES.

Topics: Aged; Angina, Stable; Cardiovascular Agents; Chromium Alloys; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Iridium; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platinum; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography, Interventional; United States

Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) based on three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography (3D-QCA) is a novel method to assess physiological functionality after treatment with stents. The current study aimed to evaluate the difference in physiological functionality nine months after implantation of a bioresorbable polymer-based sirolimus-eluting stent with an electrografting base layer (BuMA Supreme: B-SES) versus a durable polymer-based zotarolimus-eluting stent (Resolute: R-ZES).. The current post hoc analysis was performed in the PIONEER randomised trial (1:1 randomisation to B-SES [83 patients/95 lesions] and R-ZES [87 patients/101 lesions]). QFR was measured in stented vessels in both arms at preprocedural, post-procedural and nine-month angiography without pharmacologically induced hyperaemia (contrast QFR). At nine months, both the values of QFR distal to the stent (B-SES: 0.89±0.10 vs. R-ZES: 0.89±0.11, p=0.97) and the number of vessels with QFR ≤0.8 were not significantly different between the two groups (11.0% vs. 12.8%, p=0.72), while the in-stent binary restenosis rate was also comparable (3.7% vs. 3.5%, p=1.00). QFR gradient across the device (∆QFR) at nine months was also similar between the groups (B-SES: 0.03±0.04 vs. R-ZES: 0.03±0.07, p=0.95).. Quantitative flow assessment nine months after stenting did not differ between B-SES and R-ZES, despite a significant difference in in-stent late lumen loss.

Topics: Coronary Angiography; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Polymers; Prosthesis Design; Sirolimus; Stents; Treatment Outcome

There are few randomised studies concerning the optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for patients who receive a second-generation drug-eluting stent (DES). This trial aimed to investigate the safety of six-month compared with 12-month DAPT maintenance after second-generation DES implantation.. A prospective, randomised, multicentre trial was performed at 10 medical centres. The 1,368 patients included in the study received a biolimus-eluting stent (BES) or a zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES). The primary outcome measured was the composite of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), or ischaemia-driven target lesion revascularisation at the 12-month follow-up. The secondary outcome was the percentage of uncovered struts at six months in 60 patients (30 ZES, 30 BES) using optical coherence tomography (OCT) assessment. Each patient was randomly assigned to six-month (n=684) or 12-month DAPT (n=684). Major adverse cardiac events at 12 months occurred in eight patients (1.2%) in the six-month DAPT group and in four patients (0.6%) in the 12-month DAPT group (risk difference 0.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.4-1.6%; p=0.24). The upper 95% CI limit was lower than the pre-specified limit of 4% non-inferiority (p for non-inferiority <0.05). The percentage of uncovered struts was 3.16±4.30% at six months in 60 stents of 60 patients.. After second-generation DES implantation, six-month DAPT was not inferior to 12-month DAPT in terms of MACE occurrence over the 12-month follow-up period. OCT examination revealed favourable stent strut coverage at six months after stent implantation.

Topics: Aged; Aspirin; Cardiovascular Agents; Clopidogrel; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Predictive Value of Tests; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Republic of Korea; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Treatment Outcome

The study sought to evaluate for the first time the 5-year outcomes after treating an all-comers population with newer-generation cobalt chromium-based Resolute Integrity zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES) (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, California) versus platinum chromium-based PROMUS Element everolimus eluting stents (EES) (Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts).. The DUTCH PEERS (TWENTE II) (DUrable polymer-based sTent CHallenge of Promus ElemEnt versus ReSolute integrity: TWENTE II) trial is a randomized, multicenter, single-blinded, investigator-initiated all-comers trial that found at its main analysis similar 1-year safety and efficacy for both drug-eluting stents. It is the first randomized trial ever to investigate the Resolute Integrity ZES and the first trial to compare both devices.. In total, 1,811 patients were 1:1 randomized to ZES versus EES. We performed a pre-specified assessment of the 5-year clinical outcomes in terms of safety and efficacy. The main endpoint target vessel failure (TVF) is a composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization. Secondary endpoints included the individual components of TVF, and stent thrombosis. The study was independently monitored, and adverse clinical events were independently adjudicated.. Five-year clinical follow-up data was available in 1,798 (99.3%) patients. The ZES and EES groups showed favorable outcomes, with similar 5-year incidence of TVF (13.2% vs. 14.2%; p. At 5-year follow-up, the Resolute Integrity ZES and PROMUS Element EES showed similar and sustained results in terms of safety and efficacy for treating a broad population of all-comers.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Thrombosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Netherlands; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prosthesis Design; Risk Factors; Single-Blind Method; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the BioNIR stent compared with the Resolute Integrity stent for the treatment of coronary artery disease.. This first-in-human, multicentre, single-blind randomised non-inferiority trial was performed in Europe and Israel. Patients with stable coronary artery disease or acute coronary syndromes were randomly assigned to treatment with BioNIR or Resolute Integrity stents in a 2:1 fashion. The primary endpoint was angiographic in-stent late lumen loss (LLL) at six months. Three hundred and two patients were randomised, of whom 261 (86.0%) underwent six-month angiographic follow-up. The BioNIR stent was non-inferior to the Resolute Integrity stent for the primary endpoint of in-stent LLL at six months (0.04±0.30 mm vs. 0.03±0.31 mm, respectively, pnoninferiority<0.0001). At 12-month follow-up, target lesion failure occurred in 3.4% in the BioNIR group and 5.9% in the Resolute Integrity group (p=0.22). Rates of MACE were similar between the BioNIR and Resolute Integrity groups (4.3% vs. 5.9%, respectively, p=0.45).. The BioNIR stent was non-inferior to the Resolute Integrity stent for the primary endpoint of angiographic in-stent LLL at six months. Clinical outcomes at one year were comparable between the two groups.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prospective Studies; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

The aim was to compare in a noninferiority trial the efficacy and safety of 2 contemporary drug-eluting stents (DESs): a novel, durable polymer-coated stent versus an established bioabsorbable polymer-coated stent.. The BIONYX trial (ClinicalTrials.gov-no.NCT02508714) is an investigator-initiated, prospective, randomized, patient- and assessor-blinded, international, multicenter study in all-comer patients with all types of clinical syndromes and lesions who require percutaneous coronary interventions with DES. Patients at 7 study sites in the Netherlands, Belgium, and Israel were randomly assigned (1:1, stratified for gender and diabetes mellitus) to treatment with the novel, zotarolimus-eluting, durable polymer-coated Resolute Onyx stent that has a radiopaque, thin-strut, CoreWire stent platform versus the sirolimus-eluting, bioresorbable polymer-coated Orsiro stent (reference device) that has a very thin-strut, cobalt-chromium stent backbone. The primary end point is the 1-year incidence of the composite clinical end point target vessel failure consisting of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, or clinically indicated target vessel revascularization. A power calculation, assuming a target vessel failure rate of 6.0% (noninferiority margin 2.5%), revealed that 2,470 study patients would give the study 80% power (α level 5%), allowing for up to 3% loss to follow-up. The first patient was enrolled on October 7, 2015; on December 23, 2016, the last patient entered the study.. BIONYX is a large-scale, prospective, randomized, international, multicenter trial comparing a novel DES with durable coating versus a reference DES with biodegradable coating in all-comers. The study is the first randomized assessment of the Resolute Onyx stent, which is an often-used DES outside the United States.

Topics: Absorbable Implants; Aged; Belgium; Coated Materials, Biocompatible; Coronary Stenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Internationality; Israel; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Netherlands; Patient Safety; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Polymers; Prospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Single-Blind Method; Sirolimus; Statistics, Nonparametric; Survival Rate; Treatment Outcome

Durable polymers used in drug-eluting stents are considered a potential cause of hypersensitivity inflammatory response adversely affecting stent healing. Using a sequential follow-up with optical coherence tomography, we compared the differences in healing profiles of 2 drug-eluting stents with a biodegradable or durable polymer.. Sixty patients with multivessel disease were prospectively enrolled to receive both study stents, which were randomly assigned to 2 individual vessels, a Resolute Integrity zotarolimus-eluting stent with a durable BioLinx polymer and a BioMatrix NeoFlex Biolimus A9-eluting stent with a biodegradable polylactic acid polymer. Optical coherence tomography was performed at baseline, then in 5 randomly assigned monthly groups at 2 to 6 months, and at 9 months in all patients. The primary end point was the difference in optical coherence tomography strut coverage at 9 months. Key secondary end points included angiographic late lumen loss and composite major adverse cardiac events (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization, and definite or probable stent thrombosis) at 9 months. Resolute Integrity zotarolimus-eluting stent showed significantly better strut coverage than BioMatrix NeoFlex Biolimus A9-eluting stent at 2 to 6 months (. Despite having a durable polymer, Resolute Integrity zotarolimus-eluting stent exhibited better strut coverage than BioMatrix NeoFlex Biolimus A9-eluting stent having a biodegradable polymer; both showed similar antiproliferative efficacy. This novel, longitudinal, sequential optical coherence tomography protocol using each patient as own control could achieve conclusive results in small sample size.. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01742507.

Topics: Absorbable Implants; Aged; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Hong Kong; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neointima; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Predictive Value of Tests; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Treatment Outcome

To show that limiting dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) to six months in patients with event-free ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) results in a non-inferior clinical outcome versus DAPT for 12 months.. Prospective, randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority trial.. Patients with STEMI treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and second generation zotarolimus-eluting stent.. Patients with STEMI aged 18 to 85 that underwent a primary PCI with the implantation of second generation drug-eluting stents were enrolled in the trial. Patients that were event-free at six months after primary PCI were randomised at this time point.. Patients that were taking DAPT and were event-free at six months were randomised 1:1 to single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) (ie, aspirin only) or to DAPT for an additional six months. All patients that were randomised were then followed for another 18 months (ie, 24 months after the primary PCI).. The primary endpoint was a composite of all cause mortality, any myocardial infarction, any revascularisation, stroke, and thrombolysis in myocardial infarction major bleeding at 18 months after randomisation.. A total of 1100 patients were enrolled in the trial between 19 December 2011 and 30 June 2015. 870 were randomised: 432 to SAPT versus 438 to DAPT. The primary endpoint occurred in 4.8% of patients receiving SAPT versus 6.6% of patients receiving DAPT (hazard ratio 0.73, 95% confidence interval 0.41 to 1.27, P=0.26). Non-inferiority was met (P=0.004 for non-inferiority), as the upper 95% confidence interval of 1.27 was smaller than the prespecified non-inferiority margin of 1.66.. DAPT to six months was non-inferior to DAPT for 12 months in patients with event-free STEMI at six months after primary PCI with second generation drug-eluting stents.. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01459627.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Combined Modality Therapy; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Sirolimus; ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Polymer coatings of drug-eluting stents (DES) may induce allergic reactions and inflammation, resulting in late-acquired stent malapposition (LASM) with the risk of stent thrombosis. This study evaluated, if biodegradable polymer (BP) reduces the incidence of LASM compared to permanent polymer (PP) after treatment with newer generation DES.. Fifty patients with 59 lesions were randomized (2:1) to elective treatment with second generation PP-DES (n = 32, 39 stents), either Everolimus-eluting or Zotarolimus-eluting stents, or with BP-DES (Biolimus-eluting stents [BES]; n = 18, 20 stents) and underwent optical coherence tomography directly after implantation and after 1 year. After implantation acute stent malappositions (ASM) were documented in 30 stents (51%) distributed to 22 stents treated with PP-DES (56%) and 8 with BP-DES (40%; n.s.). After 1 year, late stent malappositions (LSM) were detected in 14 stents (24 %); ASM persisted (APSM) in 9 stents after one year (7 PP-DES-18%, 2 BES-10%), whereas ASM resolved in 21 stents. In addition, LASM was documented in nine stents including five stents without and four stents with additional APSM. All LASM were located in PP-DES (n = 9; 23%), none in BP-DES (P = 0.022). Compared to the reference lumen area, in-stent lumen area of stents without LASM was smaller due to neointimal hyperplasia (P = 0.021), whereas in-stent lumen area at maximum LASM of stents with LASM was larger due to positive remodeling (P = 0.002).. In conclusion the use of BP-DES reduced the occurrence of LASM due to positive remodeling compared to second generation PP-DES.

Topics: Absorbable Implants; Aged; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Neointima; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Polymers; Postoperative Complications; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Prosthesis Failure; Sirolimus; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Treatment Outcome

The aim of this study was to evaluate the angiographic efficacy and clinical outcomes of the Restore paclitaxel-coated balloon in a randomized trial designed to enable its approval with an indication for small-vessel disease (SVD).. Higher rates of restenosis and stent thrombosis limit the effectiveness of drug-eluting stent (DES) treatment of SVD. Whether a drug-coated balloon (DCB)-only strategy is effective in de novo SVD is not yet established.. In the noninferiority RESTORE SVD China trial, eligible patients with reference vessel diameter ≥2.25 and ≤2.75 mm were randomized to the Restore DCB or the RESOLUTE Integrity DES in a 1:1 ratio stratified by diabetes and number of lesions treated. Patients with RVD ≥2.00 and <2.25 mm were enrolled in a nested very small vessel registry. Angiographic and clinical follow-up were planned at 9 months and 1 year, respectively, in all patients. The study was powered for the primary endpoint of 9-month in-segment percentage diameter stenosis.. Between August 2016 and June 2017, a total of 230 subjects at 12 sites were randomized to the DCB group (n = 116) or DES group (n = 114); 32 patients were treated with the DCB in the very small vessel cohort. Nine-month in-segment percentage diameter stenosis was 29.6 ± 2.0% with the DCB versus 24.1 ± 2.0% with the DES; the 1-sided 97.5% upper confidence limit of the difference was 10.9%, achieving noninferiority of the DCB compared with the DES (p for noninferiority < 0.001). The DCB and DES had comparable 1-year rates of target lesion failure (4.4% vs. 2.6%, p = 0.72).. In this multicenter randomized trial, the Restore DCB was noninferior to the RESOLUTE DES for 9-month in-segment percentage diameter stenosis. (Assess the Efficacy and Safety of RESTORE Paclitaxel Eluting Balloon Versus RESOLUTE Zotarolimus Eluting Stent for the Treatment of Small Coronary Vessel Disease; NCT02946307).

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cardiac Catheters; Cardiovascular Agents; China; Coated Materials, Biocompatible; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Stenosis; Coronary Thrombosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prosthesis Design; Registries; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

The authors sought to investigate the impact of diabetes mellitus (DM) on outcomes following contemporary drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation in the BIONICS (BioNIR Ridaforolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in Coronary Stenosis) trial.. Patients with DM are at increased risk for adverse events following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).. A prospective, multicenter, 1:1 randomized trial was conducted to evaluate in a noninferiority design the safety and efficacy of ridaforolimus-eluting stents versus zotarolimus-eluting stents among 1,919 patients undergoing PCI. Randomization was stratified to the presence of medically treated DM, and a pre-specified analysis compared outcomes according to the presence or absence of DM up to 2 years.. The overall prevalence of DM was 29.1% (559 of 1,919). DM patients had higher body mass index, greater prevalence of hyperlipidemia and hypertension, and smaller reference vessel diameter. One-year target lesion failure (cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization) was significantly higher among diabetic patients (7.8% vs. 4.2%; p = 0.002), mainly due to higher target lesion revascularization (4.5% vs. 2.0%; p = 0.002). Rates of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and stent thrombosis did not statistically vary. Among 158 patients undergoing 13-month angiographic follow-up, restenosis rates were 3 times higher in diabetic patients compared with nondiabetic patients (15.2% vs. 4.7%; p = 0.01). Clinical and angiographic outcomes were similar between ridaforolimus-eluting stent- and zotarolimus-eluting stent-treated patients.. Despite advances in interventional therapies, and the implementation of new-generation DES, diabetic patients still have worse angiographic and clinical outcomes compared with nondiabetic patients undergoing PCI.

Topics: Aged; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Stenosis; Coronary Thrombosis; Diabetes Mellitus; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prevalence; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Risk Factors; Single-Blind Method; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Limited data is available on the long-term outcome of patients with increased cardiovascular event risk, treated with newer-generation durable polymer drug-eluting stents (DES).. We therefore assessed 3-year follow-up data of high-risk versus low- to intermediate-risk patients of the randomized DUTCH PEERS trial (NCT01331707). In both risk groups we also compared patients treated with Resolute Integrity versus Promus Element DES. Patients were categorized as "high-risk" if they met ≥1 of the following criteria: (1) diabetes (17.9%); (2) previous myocardial infarction (21.9%); (3) previous coronary revascularization (25.8%); (4) chronic renal failure (3.5%); (5) left ventricular ejection fraction ≤30% (1.5%); and (6) age ≥75 years (17.3%).. At the 3-year follow-up, the incidence of the composite endpoint target vessel failure (TVF) (13.2 vs. 7.5%; logrank p < 0.001) and 2 of its components - cardiac death (4.7 vs. 1.5%; logrank p < 0.001) and target vessel revascularization (7.3 vs. 4.7%; logrank p = 0.03) - was higher in high-risk (n = 957) versus low- to intermediate-risk patients (n = 854). Among high-risk patients, treatment with Resolute Integrity (n = 481) and Promus Element stents (n = 476) was similarly safe and efficacious (TVF: 13.3 vs. 13.1%; logrank p = 0.95; definite-or-probable stent thrombosis: 1.7 vs. 1.7%; logrank p = 1.00).. The newer-generation Resolute Integrity and Promus Element stents showed similar results in terms of safety and efficacy for treating high-risk patients, who had significantly higher event rates than patients with low-to-intermediate risk.

Topics: Aged; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Proportional Hazards Models; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Risk Factors; Single-Blind Method; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome

The combined use of a drug-eluting balloon (DEB) and a bare metal stent (BMS) for the treatment of de novo non-small vessel coronary artery diseases (CAD) remains to be evaluated. We investigated the efficacy of a sequential treatment using a DEB together with a BMS implantation in comparison to a zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES). This study was a prospective, randomized, open-label study. We designed it to demonstrate the non-inferiority of a sequential treatment using a DEB first followed by a BMS (DEB + BMS) compared with the use of a ZES. The primary endpoint was in-segment late loss (LL) at 9 months measured by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA). A total of 180 patients were enrolled in the study. The 9-month follow-up angiography was performed in 72 patients with DEB + BMS and 74 patients with ZES. When comparing the DEB + BMS results with the ZES ones, LL was 0.50 ± 0.46 mm in DEB + BMS patients vs. 0.21 ± 0.44 mm in ZES patients (P < 0.001). The mean difference of the LL was 0.31 mm, which was larger than the prespecified non-inferiority margin of 0.19 mm, and the 2-sided 95% confidence interval was 0.15-0.48. The clinical outcomes were not significantly different. In conclusion, the DEB + BMS strategy is inferior to the ZES one in terms of the LL result at 9 months. The DEB strategy for de novo coronary artery lesions needs to be improved for it to become an alternative treatment option.

Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Diabetes Complications; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Metals; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Sirolimus

The aim of this study was to explore the safety and efficacy of a dedicated drug-eluting stent for the treatment of coronary lesions with very small reference vessel diameter (RVD).. Smaller RVD is associated with increased risk for restenosis and target lesion failure (TLF) after stent implantation.. This was a prospective, single-arm, multicenter trial of the Resolute Onyx 2.0-mm zotarolimus-eluting stent. The primary endpoint was 12-month TLF, which was compared with a pre-specified performance goal. Subjects with stable or unstable angina or ischemia, target lesions ≤27 mm in length, and RVD ≥2.0 and <2.25 mm were eligible for enrollment. A subset of subjects underwent follow-up angiography at 13 months post-procedure.. A total of 101 subjects with 104 lesions were enrolled. The mean age was 67.3 ± 9.6 years, 47% of subjects had diabetes, the mean lesion length was 12.6 ± 6.3 mm, and the mean RVD was 1.91 ± 0.26 mm. The rate of TLF at 12 months was 5.0%, fulfilling the pre-specified performance goal of 19% (p < 0.001). The rates of target lesion revascularization and target vessel myocardial infarction were 2.0% and 3.0%, respectively. There were no episodes of stent thrombosis. In-stent late lumen loss was 0.26 ± 0.48 mm, and the rate of binary restenosis was 12.0%.. In this first report of a drug-eluting stent with a dedicated size to treat lesions with RVD <2.25 mm, the Resolute Onyx 2.0-mm zotarolimus-eluting stent was associated with a low rate of TLF and late lumen loss, without a signal for stent thrombosis. This novel-sized drug-eluting stent appears to be a feasible option for the treatment of coronary lesions in extremely small vessels. (Medtronic Resolute Onyx 2.0 mm Clinical Study; NCT02412501).

Topics: Aged; Angina, Stable; Angina, Unstable; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United States

It is not clear if anti-restonotic effect of cilostazol is consistent for different types of drug-eluting stents (DES).The purpose of this study was to compare the anti-proliferative effect of cilostazol between DAT and TAT with consideration of confounding influences of DES type.Nine hundred and fifteen patients were randomized to either dual antiplatelet therapy (DAT; aspirin and clopidogrel) or triple antiplatelet therapy (TAT; aspirin, clopidogrel, and cilostazol) in the previous CILON-T trial. After excluding 70 patients who received both or neither stents, we analyzed 845 patients who received exclusively PES or ZES, and compared in-stent late loss at 6 months between both antiplatelet regimens (DAT versus TAT).Baseline angiographic and clinical characteristics were similar between the DAT (656 lesions in 425 patients) and the TAT group (600 lesions in 420 patients). The 6-month follow-up angiography was completed in 745 patients (88.2%). Quantitative coronary angiography showed that TAT significantly reduced in-stent late loss (DAT 0.62 ± 0.62 mm versus TAT 0.54 ± 0.49 mm, P = 0.015). Stent type, diabetes or lesion length did not interact with difference of late loss. However, reduction of late loss by cilostazol did not lead to a significant reduction in the rate of target lesion revascularization (TLR) (DAT 7.8% versus TAT 6.9%, P = 0.69) due to a nonlinear relationship found between late loss and TLR.The TAT group showed less in-stent late loss as compared to the DAT group. This was consistently observed regardless of DES type, lesion length, or diabetic status. However, reduction of late loss by cilostazol did not lead to a significant reduction in TLR.

Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Cilostazol; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Restenosis; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Paclitaxel; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Sirolimus; Tetrazoles

Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation are at increased risk of late adverse events, partly explained by an exaggerated inflammatory reaction to durable-polymer stent coatings.. We sought to investigate whether implantation of polymer-free DES would reduce this risk.. In the ISAR-TEST 5 (the Intracoronary Stenting and Angiographic Results: Test Efficacy of Sirolimus- and Probucol- and Zotarolimus-Eluting Stents) trial, patients were randomly allocated to receive a polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent or a new generation durable-polymer zotarolimus-eluting stent. We analyzed late clinical outcomes in the subgroup of patients presenting with STEMI. The primary endpoint was the combined incidence of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction or target lesion revascularization at 5 years.. 311 patients with STEMI were randomized to receive sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stents (n = 215) or zotarolimus-eluting stents (n = 96). At 5 years, there was no difference in the incidence of the primary endpoint in patients treated with sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stents versus zotarolimus-eluting stents (18.3% versus 20.1% respectively, hazard ratio = 0.87, 95% CI, 0.50-1.51; P = 0.62). Rates of the individual components of the primary endpoint were also comparable in both groups. The incidence of definite/probable stent thrombosis was 1.4% versus 1.0% respectively (hazard ratio = 1.35, 95% CI, 0.14-12.94, P = 0.80).. Long-term outcomes of patients with STEMI treated with polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stents versus durable-polymer zotarolimus-eluting stents were similar. Stent thrombosis rates were low and comparable in both treatment groups, with no events beyond 12 months.. Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier NCT 00598533) © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Topics: Aged; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Thrombosis; Disease-Free Survival; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Polymers; Probucol; Proportional Hazards Models; Prosthesis Design; Recurrence; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation has not been established yet. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the optimal duration of DAPT after the DES implantation.. From three randomized controlled trials investigating DAPT duration after coronary stent implantation, we evaluated the clinical outcomes of short-term (6 months or less) DAPT compared with prolonged DAPT (12 months or more) in 1661 DES-treated pairs matched by propensity scores. At follow-up of 1 year, net adverse clinical event (NACE) was defined as cardiac death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, definite/probable stent thrombosis, or thrombolysis in myocardial infarction major bleeding.. Short-term DAPT as compared with prolonged DAPT was not associated with 1-year NACEs after DES implantation [hazard ratio (HR) 1.068, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.787-1.450, p = 0.671]. Predictors for NACEs were old age (>75 years), hypertension, diabetes mellitus, renal dysfunction (serum creatinine ≥2.0 mg/dL), and multi-vessel disease. The DAPT strategy differentially contributed to the occurrence of NACEs according to the risk burden (p for interaction <0.001). In patients with low risk for NACEs, bleeding events were less in short-term DAPT than in prolonged DAPT (HR 0.332, 95 % CI 0.130-0.849, p = 0.021) (p for interaction = 0.098). Meanwhile, short-term DAPT was associated with more ischemic events that included cardiac death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, or definite/probable stent thrombosis (HR 2.164, 95 % CI 1.340-3.494, p = 0.002) (p for interaction <0.001) in patients with high risk for NACEs.. One-year clinical outcomes of DAPT after DES implantation depended on the burden of cardiovascular risk.

Topics: Aged; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Death, Sudden, Cardiac; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Republic of Korea; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Ticlopidine; Time Factors

This study sought to assess the safety and effectiveness of the drug-filled stent (DFS) (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, California) in the treatment of patients with coronary artery disease.. Polymer-free drug-eluting stents have the potential to improve clinical outcomes and facilitate shorter durations of dual antiplatelet therapy. The polymer-free DFS is made from a trilayered continuous wire with an outer cobalt chromium layer, a middle tantalum layer, and an inner lumen coated with sirolimus. Small laser-drilled holes on the abluminal stent surface control drug elution.. The RevElution trial enrolled 100 patients with de novo coronary lesions 2.25 to 3.50 mm in diameter and length ≤27 mm in 2 cohorts of 50 patients for angiographic, intravascular ultrasound, and clinical assessment at 9 or 24 months, with optical coherence tomography performed in a subset of 30 patients at each time period. The primary endpoint was angiographic in-stent late lumen loss at 9 months compared with Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (Medtronic) historical control data.. Fifty patients with 56 lesions were treated with DFS in the 9-month cohort. In-stent late lumen loss was 0.26 ± 0.28 mm for DFS and 0.36 ± 0.52 mm for Resolute (p. At 9 months, the polymer-free DFS was safe and effective with high rates of early strut coverage and noninferior late lumen loss compared to Resolute. (Medtronic RevElution Trial [RevElution]; NCT02480348).

Topics: Australia; Chromium Alloys; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Thrombosis; Coronary Vessels; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Latin America; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Predictive Value of Tests; Prosthesis Design; Risk Factors; Singapore; Sirolimus; Tantalum; Time Factors; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography, Interventional

We performed a randomised controlled open-label non-inferiority trial to compare angiographic outcomes between the ultra-thin strut, biodegradable hybrid polymer Orsiro sirolimus-eluting stent (O-SES) and the durable biocompatible polymer Resolute Integrity zotarolimus-eluting stent (R-ZES).. A total of 372 patients planned to undergo percutaneous coronary revascularisation were randomly assigned 2:1 to treatment with O-SES or R-ZES (250 and 122 patients, respectively). O-SES was non-inferior to R-ZES for the primary endpoint, in-stent late lumen loss at nine months (median 0.06 mm [interquartile range, -0.09 to 0.24 mm] versus 0.12 mm [-0.07 to 0.32 mm]; p for non-inferiority <0.001; p for superiority=0.205). Percent diameter stenosis was significantly lower in the O-SES group than in the R-ZES group (15.0 [10.0 to 20.0] versus 20.0 [13.3 to 26.0]; p=0.002). Target lesion failure occurred in 2.4% and 3.3% of the O-SES and R-ZES groups, respectively (p=0.621). Subgroup analyses showed consistently similar outcomes between the two groups in terms of the primary endpoint, except for the diabetic subgroup.. O-SES was non-inferior to R-ZES in terms of in-stent late loss at nine months. Angiographic restenosis and clinical adverse events were low in both groups. This study confirms the good safety and efficacy profiles of both contemporary coronary stents.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Polymers; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

The authors sought to compare the safety and efficacy of the biocompatible durable-polymer zotarolimus-eluting stent with the biodegradable-polymer biolimus-eluting stent in unselected coronary patients.. Biodegradable-polymer biolimus-eluting stents are superior to first-generation durable-polymer drug-eluting stents in long-term randomized all-comer trials. Long-term data comparing them to second-generation durable-polymer drug-eluting stents are lacking.. The study was a randomized, multicenter, all-comer, noninferiority trial in patients with chronic stable coronary artery disease or acute coronary syndromes and at least 1 coronary artery lesion requiring treatment with a drug-eluting stent. Endpoints included major adverse cardiac events (MACE), a composite of safety (cardiac death and myocardial infarction not clearly attributable to a non-target lesion) and efficacy (target lesion revascularization); the individual endpoints of MACE; all-cause mortality; any myocardial infarction; target vessel revascularization; and definite or probable stent thrombosis at 36 months.. From March 2011 to August 2012, 2,999 patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either the zotarolimus-eluting (1,502 patients) or the biolimus-eluting (1,497 patients) stent. At 3-year follow-up, MACE occurred in 128 (8.6%) patients assigned to the durable-polymer zotarolimus-eluting stent and in 144 (9.6%) assigned to the biodegradable-polymer biolimus-eluting stent (p = 0.36). Occurrence of cardiac death (2.7% vs. 3.4%), myocardial infarction not clearly attributable to a non-target lesion (2.7% vs. 2.5%), and target lesion revascularization (5.4% vs. 5.5%) did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. Definite very late stent thrombosis occurred in 6 (0.4%) patients assigned to the durable-polymer zotarolimus-eluting stent and in 10 (0.7%) assigned to the biodegradable-polymer biolimus-eluting stent (p = 0.33).. At 3-year follow-up, the durable-polymer zotarolimus-eluting stent and the biodegradable-polymer biolimus-eluting stent were similar in clinical outcome, with no significant difference in safety and efficacy outcomes, including stent thrombosis.

Topics: Absorbable Implants; Aged; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Thrombosis; Denmark; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Polymers; Proportional Hazards Models; Prosthesis Design; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Long-term follow-up after a clinical trial of 2 often-used, newer-generation drug-eluting stents (DESs) in a broad patient population is of interest. Comprehensive long-term outcome of eligible nonenrolled patients has never been reported.. To assess 5-year safety and efficacy of 2 newer-generation DESs in randomized participants with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes or stable angina and to evaluate long-term outcomes of nonenrolled eligible patients treated with the same DESs.. The TWENTE (Real-World Endeavor Resolute vs Xience V Drug-Eluting Stent Study in Twente) trial is an investigator-initiated, patient-blinded, randomized, comparative DES trial that enrolled patients from June 18, 2008, to August 26, 2010. Most patients had non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes and complex lesions. Of all 1709 eligible patients, 1391 (81.4%) were treated in the TWENTE trial with zotarolimus-eluting (ZES, n = 697) or everolimus-eluting (EES, n = 694) cobalt-chromium stents. The remaining 318 eligible patients (18.6%) were not enrolled but underwent nonrandomized treatment with the same DESs. Data were analyzed from August 26, 2015, to October 11, 2016. Event rates (percentages) were derived from log-rank analysis and may differ from straightforward calculation (nominator/denominator). The 5-year follow-up of the TWENTE participants was prespecified in the trial protocol; that of the nonenrolled participants was ad hoc.. Target vessel failure (TVF), a composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization.. Of 1709 eligible participants, 1233 (72.1%) were men, 476 (27.9%) were women, and mean (SD) age was 64.6 (10.6) years. Among the 1370 of 1391 TWENTE trial participants (98.5% follow-up), TVF was similar between those in the ZES (16.1%) and EES (18.1%) groups (P = .36). Stent thrombosis rates were low: definite (7 of 697 [1.0%] vs 4 of 694 [0.6%]; P = .37) and occurred after more than 1 year in 3 (0.4%) with ZES vs 4 (0.6%) with EES (P = .69). The 318 nonenrolled eligible patients (308 patients [96.9%] of whom were followed up) were older and had more advanced disease than trial participants. Their TVF rate was higher than that of trial participants (71 of 318 [23.3%] vs 233 of 1391 [17.1%]; P = .02), which partly reflects a difference in cardiac mortality (23 of 318 [7.7%] vs 60 of 1391 [4.5%]; P = .03). Similar 5-year rates were found for myocardial infarction (91 of 1391 [6.7%] vs 22 of 318 [7.2%]; P = .80) and target vessel revascularization (129 of 1391 [9.7%] vs 34 of 318 [11.4%]; P = .36) between trial participants and nonenrolled eligible patients. In all eligible patients (ie, trial participants plus nonenrolled eligible patients), the TVF rate was only slightly higher than in trial participants only (18.3% vs 17.1%).. Long-term outcome data from nonenrolled eligible patients support the validity of the TWENTE trial findings and present, with the trial, a strong case for the long-term safety and efficacy of the newer-generation DESs used.. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01066650.

Topics: Coronary Angiography; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Patient Selection; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Postoperative Complications; Prosthesis Design; Sirolimus; Survival Rate; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United States

To evaluate the effects of sex and anthropometry on clinical outcomes in patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).. From three randomized trials (REal Safety and Efficacy of 3-month dual antiplatelet Therapy following Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent implantation, Impact of intraVascular UltraSound guidance on outcomes of Xience Prime stents in Long lesions, Chronic Total Occlusion InterVention with drUg-eluting Stents), we compared 333 pairs of men and women matched by propensity scores, all of whom underwent intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided PCI for complex lesions.. For 12 months, the incidence of adverse cardiac events, defined as the composite of cardiac death, target lesion-related myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization, was not different between women and men (2.4% vs. 2.4%, p=0.939). Using multivariable Cox's regression analysis, post-intervention minimum lumen area [MLA; hazard ratio (HR)=0.620, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.423-0.909, p=0.014] by IVUS was a predictor of adverse cardiac events. Height on anthropometry and lesions with chronic total occlusion were significantly related to post-intervention MLA. However, female sex was not independently associated with post-intervention MLA. In an age and sex-adjusted model, patients in the low tertile of height exhibited a greater risk for adverse cardiac events than those in the high tertile of height (HR=6.391, 95% CI=1.160-35.206, p=0.033).. Sex does not affect clinical outcomes after PCI for complex lesions. PCI outcomes, however, may be adversely affected by height.

Topics: Aged; Anthropometry; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Propensity Score; Proportional Hazards Models; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography, Interventional

Previous studies have suggested a benefit of cilostazol in addition to standard dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), reducing in-stent late luminal loss and restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with bare-metal and drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. However, there is a paucity of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) assessment of neointimal tissue hyperplasia (NIH) after triple-antiplatelet therapy (TAPT), especially in diabetic patients treated with DES.. This prospective, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in diabetic patients randomized (1:1) to receive either standard DAPT (aspirin and clopidogrel) vs TAPT with cilostazol for a minimum of 12 months after PCI with Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent (E-ZES). The primary endpoint was the 9-month comparison of percentage of NIH in both groups. Additionally, we compared in-stent late lumen loss, binary restenosis, major adverse cardiac event (MACE; cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and restenosis) rates, and the incidence of vascular/bleeding complications.. In total, 133 diabetic patients were enrolled (cilostazol cohort = 65 patients) with 56.4% male and mean age of 60.8 years. Overall, the two cohorts were comparable in terms of baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics, except for the reference vessel diameter, which was smaller among patients randomized to cilostazol (2.48 ± 0.46 mm vs 2.69 ± 0.48 mm; P=.01). At 9 months, there was a non-significant trend toward less percentage of NIH obstruction in the TAPT cohort (33.2 ± 8.29% vs 35.1 ± 8.45%; P=.07). However, this finding did not impact angiographic late-lumen loss (0.60 ± 0.46 mm cilostazol group vs 0.64 ± 0.48 mm control group; P=.30) and binary restenosis (9.8% vs 6.8%; P=.99). MACE rate also did not significantly differ between the cohorts (13.8% cilostazol group vs 8.8% control group; P=.81). Of note, the addition of a third antiplatelet agent did not increase vascular and bleeding complications.. In diabetic patients treated with E-ZES, TAPT with cilostazol did not add any significant benefit in terms of NIH suppression or MACE reduction.

Topics: Aspirin; Cilostazol; Clopidogrel; Comorbidity; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Diabetes Mellitus; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neointima; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Sirolimus; Tetrazoles; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

Incomplete neointimal coverage and malapposed struts after stenting are associated with increased risk of stent thrombosis. We aimed to evaluate neointimal coverage early after Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (R-ZES) implantation using optical coherence tomography (OCT). A total of 20 patients with de novo native coronary lesions with R-ZES were enrolled. Among these patients, 20 stented lesions in 19 patients were evaluated at 1, 2, and 3 months after R-ZES implantation. The strut apposition and neointimal coverage were evaluated by OCT. Neointimal hyperplasia (NIH) thickness and percentage of covered struts and the proportion of incompletely apposed struts were measured at 1-mm intervals. The mean percentages of covered stent struts were over 85 % within 3 months (88.4 ± 6.3 % at 1 month, 95.5 ± 5.5 % at 2 months, 93.6 ± 3.5 % at 3 months). The percentages of incompletely apposed struts were not significantly different among the groups (4.4 ± 4.2 % at 1 month, 1.9 ± 1.9 % at 2 months, 3.1 ± 2.2 % at 3 months, p = 0.51). Mean NIH thickness (38.9 ± 8.1 μm at 1 month, 70.6 ± 18.8 μm at 2 months, 54.1 ± 5.9 at 3 months, p = 0.0016) was thickest in the 2 months group. Most of all OCT findings within 2 months demonstrated neointimal coverage with low signal intensity. The neointimal coverage of ZES-R was over 85 % within 3 months. These data may support shorter requirement of dual antiplatelet therapy duration with R-ZES.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Stenosis; Coronary Thrombosis; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Neointima; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Predictive Value of Tests; Prospective Studies; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Treatment Outcome

To assess the "real world" clinical outcome of patients with bifurcated lesions undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with implantation of second and third generations of zotarolimus-eluting stent.. Nine Italian centres participated in a prospective multicentre clinical project evaluating the outcome of patients receiving zotarolimus-eluting Resolute stent and Resolute Integrity stents. Patients with bifurcated lesions entered this evaluation. Clinical characteristics and angiographic and procedural details were prospectively recorded. Clinical outcome was prospectively assessed to evaluate the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE). A total of 577 patients were enrolled. The target lesion was distal left main in 11.1% and left anterior descending artery in 52.8%, and 30.3% of lesions were Medina 1,1,1. At a mean follow-up time of 27.0 ± 13.5 months, the survival free from MACE was 91.8%. Survival free from MACE was similar in patients grouped according to different bifurcated lesion complexity. On the contrary, patients receiving a single stent had better survival free from MACE as compared with those with double stent (P = 0.005). At multivariable analysis, double stenting (but not bifurcated lesion complexity) was found to be a significant predictor of MACE (hazard ratio, 2.52; 95% confidence interval, 1.28-4.94; P = 0.007). Of note, patients receiving the second stent as a bail-out had worse survival free from MACE compared with those who received it as a planned technique (P = 0.045).. The treatment of patients with bifurcated lesions with second and third generation zotarolimus-eluting stents is associated with good long-term clinical outcomes. Clinical outcome seems to be independent of lesion complexity, but may be influenced by the stenting technique (single or double stenting as well as elective or bail-out double stenting). © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Topics: Aged; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in bifurcated lesions with second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) was associated with increased myocardial infarction (MI) rates. Flexible stent designs that accommodate well to vessel tapering may be of benefit in challenging anatomies such as bifurcated target lesions, but so far data are scarce.. We analyzed the 2-year follow-up data of the DUTCH PEERS (TWENTE II) trial, which randomized 1811 all-comer patients to PCI with newer generation resolute integrity zotarolimus-eluting (Medtronic) or promus element everolimus-eluting stents (Boston Scientific). In bifurcated lesions, provisional stenting was generally performed. Target vessel failure is a composite endpoint, consisting of cardiac death, target vessel MI, or target vessel revascularization.. Patients with at least one bifurcated lesion (n = 465, 25.7 %) versus patients with non-bifurcated target lesions only (n = 1346, 74.3 %) showed similar rates of clinical endpoints including target vessel failure (9.2 versus 7.9 %, p = 0.36) and definite stent thrombosis (0.4 versus 1.0 %, p = 0.38). Target vessel MI was more common in patients with bifurcated lesions (3.4 versus 1.6 %, p = 0.02); but after multivariate analysis with propensity score adjustment, bifurcation treatment was found not to be an independent predictor of target vessel MI (HR 1.40, 95 % CI 0.71-2.76; p = 0.34). Among patients with bifurcated lesions, DES type and side-branch size did not affect outcome, but periprocedural MI occurred more often after two-stent approaches (9.0 versus 2.1 %; p = 0.002).. All-comer patients treated for bifurcated and non-bifurcated target lesions showed similar and low rates of clinical endpoints, suggesting that the DES used are efficacious and safe for treating bifurcated target lesions.

Topics: Aged; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Thrombosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Netherlands; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Proportional Hazards Models; Prosthesis Design; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Newer-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) have been shown to be superior to first-generation DES. Current-generation DES have zotarolimus, everolimus or biolimus as antiproliferative drugs. Novolimus, a metabolite of sirolimus, has been specifically developed to provide efficacy similar to currently available agents at a lower dose and thus requires a lower polymer load. We report the final five-year outcomes of the EXCELLA II trial comparing a zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) with a novolimus-eluting stent (NES).. EXCELLA II is a prospective, multicentre, single-blind, non-inferiority clinical trial. Patients (n=210) with a maximum of two de novo lesions in two different epicardial vessels were randomised (2:1) to treatment with either NES (n=139) or ZES (n=71). At five-year follow-up, patients in the NES group had a significantly lower incidence of the patient-oriented (HR 0.53, 95% CI: 0.32-0.87, p=0.013) and device-oriented (HR 0.38, 95% CI: 0.17-0.83, p=0.011) composite endpoints. There was no difference in cardiac death and definite/probable stent thrombosis between the two groups; however, there was a trend towards reduction in myocardial infarction and repeat revascularisation in the NES group at five-year follow-up.. At five-year follow-up, the incidence of device- and patient-oriented events was significantly lower in the NES group. Further studies, adequately powered for clinical outcomes, are warranted.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Coronary Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Macrolides; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prospective Studies; Sirolimus

To compare the incidence and predictors of target lesion revascularisation (TLR) and non-TLR after percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents (DES).. We pooled patient-level data on 6,137 patients (Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent: 5,016, XIENCE everolimus-eluting stent: 1,121) in the RESOLUTE Global Program. At three years, clinically driven TLR, unplanned non-TLR, and no revascularisation occurred in 186, 618, and 5,333 patients, respectively. On multivariate analysis, predictors of both TLR and non-TLR were pre-procedure diameter stenosis (%) (odds ratio [OR] 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.01-1.02], and OR 0.99 [0.99-1.00]), diabetes (OR 1.46 [1.07-1.99], and OR 1.37 [1.15-1.64]), and prior PCI (OR 1.42 [1.01-2.00], and OR 1.41 [1.18-1.68]). Baseline characteristics associated with TLR only were prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery (OR 2.85 [1.91-4.27]), in-stent restenosis (OR 2.35 [1.43-3.83]), age (OR 0.98 per year [0.97-1.00]), hypertension (OR 1.64 [1.10-2.44]), and pre-procedure reference vessel diameter (OR 0.74 per mm [0.55-0.99]). Baseline characteristics associated with non-TLR only were lesion location (left anterior descending vs. all others) (OR 0.70 [0.59-0.83]), and hyperlipidaemia (OR 1.42 [1.15-1.75]).. The cumulative incidence of non-TLR at three years in patients treated with current-generation DES was almost three times higher than TLR.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

This study evaluated coronary endothelial function after the implantation of sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs), everolimus-eluting stents (EESs), and zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES) by a different methodology, and also analyzed whether optical coherence tomography (OCT) findings represent endothelial healing after stenting.. It is unclear whether OCT assessment of stent strut coverage represents endothelial healing after drug-eluting stent implantation.. Thirty patients with a left anterior descending artery lesion were randomized 1:1:1 to receive an SES, EES, or ZES. The vascular response was evaluated 6 months after stenting by three methods: the functional response by acetylcholine infusion, the morphological response by OCT, and the biological response by measuring vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) levels.. The proportion of uncovered struts by OCT at 6 months was significantly higher in both SES and EES than in ZES. However, the vasomotor response was impaired and the VEGF level of the coronary sinus was significantly lower in SES than in EES and ZES. There were no relationships between the OCT findings and vasomotor response to acetylcholine and VEGF levels in all cohorts.. The vascular response at 6 months was more preserved in ZES and EES than in SES. Our results suggest that the morphological assessment with OCT may not always be used as a surrogate for functional and biological healing response after stenting. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Topics: Acetylcholine; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Biomarkers; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Stenosis; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Endothelium, Vascular; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Treatment Outcome; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A; Vasodilation; Vasodilator Agents; Wound Healing

In percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) patients new-generation drug-eluting stent (DES) has reduced adverse events in comparison to early-generation DES. The aim of the current study was to investigate the long-term clinical efficacy and safety of new-generation DES versus early-generation DES for PCI of unprotected left main coronary artery (uLMCA) disease.. The patient-level data from the ISAR-LEFT MAIN and ISAR-LEFT MAIN 2 randomized trials were pooled. The clinical outcomes of PCI patients assigned to new-generation DES (everolimus- or zotarolimus-eluting stent) versus early-generation DES (paclitaxel- or sirolimus-eluting stent) were studied. The primary endpoint was the composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI), target lesion revascularization and stroke (MACCE, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event).. In total, 1257 patients were available. At 3 years, the risk of MACCE was comparable between patients assigned to new-generation DES or early-generation DES (28.2 versus 27.5 %, hazard ratio-HR 1.03, 95 % confidence intervals-CI 0.83-1.26; P = 0.86). Definite/probable stent thrombosis was low and comparable between new-generation DES and early-generation DES (0.8 versus 1.6 %, HR 0.52, 95 % CI 0.18-1.57; P = 0.25); in patients treated with new-generation DES no cases occurred beyond 30 days. Diabetes increased the risk of MACCE in patients treated with new-generation DES but not with early-generation DES (P interaction = 0.004).. At 3-year follow-up, a PCI with new-generation DES for uLMCA disease shows comparable efficacy to early-generation DES. Rates of stent thrombosis were low in both groups. Diabetes significantly impacts the risk of MACCE at 3 years in patients treated with new-generation DES for uLMCA disease. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT00133237; NCT00598637.

Topics: Aged; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Germany; Humans; Italy; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prosthesis Design; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Stroke; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

The objective of this study is to assess 3-year clinical outcome of patients with true bifurcation lesions (TBLs) versus non-true bifurcation lesions (non-TBLs) following treatment with second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES). TBLs are characterized by the obstruction of both main vessel and side-branch. Limited data are available on long-term clinical outcome following TBL treatment with newer-generation DES. We performed an explorative sub-study of the randomized TWENTE trial among 287 patients who had bifurcated target lesions with side-branches ≥2.0 mm. Patients were categorized into TBL (Medina classes: 1.1.1; 1.0.1; 0.1.1) versus non-TBL to compare long-term clinical outcome. A total of 116 (40.4 %) patients had TBL, while 171 (59.6 %) had non-TBL only. Target-lesion revascularization rates were similar (3.5 vs. 3.5 %; p = 1.0), and definite-or-probable stent thrombosis rates were low (both <1.0 %). The target-vessel myocardial infarction (MI) rate was 11.3 versus 5.3 % (p = 0.06), mostly driven by (periprocedural) MI ≤48 h from PCI. All-cause mortality and cardiac death rates were 8.7 versus 3.5 % (p = 0.06) and 3.5 versus 1.2 % (p = 0.22), respectively. The 3-year major adverse cardiac event rate for patients with TBL versus non-TBL was 20.0 versus 11.7 % (p = 0.05). At 1-, 2-, and 3-year follow-up, 6.5, 13.0, and 11.0 % of patients reported chest pain at less than or equal moderate physical effort, respectively, without any between-group difference. Patients treated with second-generation DES for TBL had somewhat higher adverse event rates than patients with non-TBL, but dissimilarities did not reach statistical significance. Up to 3-year follow-up, the vast majority of patients of both groups remained free from chest pain.

Topics: Aged; Angina Pectoris; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Thrombosis; Disease-Free Survival; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prosthesis Design; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

We sought to investigate the impact of the self-apposing, sirolimus-eluting STENTYS stent on midterm and long-term stent apposition and strut coverage compared with a zotarolimus-eluting balloon-expandable stent in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI).. In the APPOSITION IV trial, 152 STEMI patients were randomised (3:2) to the self-apposing, sirolimus-eluting STENTYS stent or a commercially available zotarolimus-eluting balloon-expandable stent at 12 sites in five countries with angiographic follow-up and optical coherence tomography at four or nine months. At four months, a lower percentage of malapposed stent struts was observed in the STENTYS group (N=21; Nstruts=501) compared with controls (N=26; Nstruts=326; 0.07% vs. 1.16%; p=0.002) with significantly more covered struts, using a 20 µm cut-off (94.32% vs. 89.09%; p=0.003). At nine months, the primary endpoint (percentage malapposed stent struts) was similar in both groups (STENTYS, N=40; Nstruts=566; control, N=21; Nstruts=292), showing complete apposition (p=0.55) and near total (>96%) coverage (p=0.58).. In STEMI patients undergoing PPCI, the self-apposing, sirolimus-eluting STENTYS stent was equivalent to a conventional drug-eluting balloon-expandable stent with respect to late stent strut apposition and coverage at nine months. However, stent strut apposition and coverage at four months were significantly better in the STENTYS group.

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Coronary Angiography; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

This study sought to investigate the ischemic and bleeding outcomes of patients fulfilling high bleeding risk (HBR) criteria who were randomized to zotarolimus-eluting Endeavor Sprint stent (E-ZES) or bare-metal stent (BMS) implantation followed by an abbreviated dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) duration for stable or unstable coronary artery disease.. DES instead of BMS use remains controversial in HBR patients, in whom long-term DAPT poses safety concerns.. The ZEUS (Zotarolimus-Eluting Endeavor Sprint Stent in Uncertain DES Candidates) is a multinational, randomized single-blinded trial that randomized among others, in a stratified manner, 828 patients fulfilling pre-defined clinical or biochemical HBR criteria-including advanced age, indication to oral anticoagulants or other pro-hemorrhagic medications, history of bleeding and known anemia-to receive E-ZES or BMS followed by a protocol-mandated 30-day DAPT regimen. The primary endpoint of the study was the 12-month major adverse cardiovascular event rate, consisting of death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization.. Compared with patients without, those with 1 or more HBR criteria had worse outcomes, owing to higher ischemic and bleeding risks. Among HBR patients, major adverse cardiovascular events occurred in 22.6% of the E-ZES and 29% of the BMS patients (hazard ratio: 0.75; 95% confidence interval: 0.57 to 0.98; p = 0.033), driven by lower myocardial infarction (3.5% vs. 10.4%; p < 0.001) and target vessel revascularization (5.9% vs. 11.4%; p = 0.005) rates in the E-ZES arm. The composite of definite or probable stent thrombosis was significantly reduced in E-ZES recipients, whereas bleeding events did not differ between stent groups.. Among HBR patients with stable or unstable coronary artery disease, E-ZES implantation provides superior efficacy and safety as compared with conventional BMS. (Zotarolimus-Eluting Endeavor Sprint Stent in Uncertain DES Candidates [ZEUS]; NCT01385319).

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Metals; Myocardial Infarction; Patient Selection; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prosthesis Design; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Single-Blind Method; Sirolimus; Stents; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

The aim of this study was to evaluate the late clinical performance of a polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent compared with a new-generation durable polymer-based zotarolimus-eluting stent.. It was previously shown that polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stents were noninferior to zotarolimus-eluting stents at 12 months. However, long-term follow-up of these devices is critical to evaluate late comparative efficacy.. In a clinical trial with minimal exclusion criteria, 3,002 patients were randomly assigned to treatment with polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stents versus zotarolimus-eluting stents. The primary endpoint was the combined incidence of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization.. At 5 years, there was no difference in the incidence of the primary endpoint between sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stents and zotarolimus-eluting stents (23.8% vs. 24.2%, respectively; hazard ratio: 0.98; 95% confidence interval: 0.84 to 1.15; p = 0.80). The rates of the individual components of the primary endpoint were also comparable in both groups. The incidence of definite or probable stent thrombosis was low in both groups (1.3% vs. 1.6%, respectively; hazard ratio: 0.86; 95% confidence interval: 0.46 to 1.62; p = 0.64). The rates of any death, myocardial infarction, and revascularization were similar in both groups. Results were consistent across pre-specified subgroups of age, sex, diabetes, and vessel size.. Long-term outcomes of patients treated with polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stents compared with a new-generation durable polymer-based zotarolimus-eluting stent were similar. Rates of stent thrombosis were low and comparable in both treatment groups, with few events beyond 12 months. (Efficacy Study of Rapamycin- vs. Zotarolimus-Eluting Stents to Reduce Coronary Restenosis [ISAR-TEST-5]; NCT00598533).

Topics: Aged; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Thrombosis; Disease-Free Survival; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Germany; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Polymers; Probucol; Proportional Hazards Models; Prosthesis Design; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

The outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention with newer generation permanent polymer-coated drug-eluting stents (DES) in patients with severely calcified lesions is greatly unknown. We assessed the impact of severe lesion calcification on clinical outcome in patients with stable angina who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with newer generation DES.. TWENTE and DUTCH PEERS randomized trials enrolled 1423 patients with stable angina, who were categorized into patients with versus without severe target lesion calcification. A patient-level pooled analysis assessed clinical outcome, including target vessel failure (TVF), a composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization (TVR).. Patients with severe calcification (n = 342) were older (66.6 ± 9.1 vs 64.2 ± 9.8 years, P < .001) and had more diabetes (25.7% vs 20.4%, P = .04) than other patients (n = 1081). Patients with calcified lesions had higher rates of TVF (16.4% vs 9.8%, pLogrank = .001), cardiac death (4.4% vs 1.5%, P = .03), target vessel myocardial infarction (7.6% vs 3.4%, P = .001), and definite stent thrombosis (1.8% vs 0.4%, P = .02). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that severe calcification was an independent risk factor of 2-year TVF (HR 1.42, 95% CI: 1.02-1.99, pLogrank = .04); landmark analysis showed that this was based on a difference during the first year (periprocedural: 5.8% vs. 3.1%, pLogrank = .02; first year: 7.5% vs. 3.8%, pLogrank = .007; second year: 4.1% vs. 3.3%, pLogrank = .54).. In patients with stable angina, severe target lesion calcification is associated with an increased risk of adverse cardiovascular events following treatment with newer generation permanent polymer-coated DES. This increase in risk is restricted to the first year of follow-up, which is an encouraging finding.

Topics: Aged; Angina, Stable; Coated Materials, Biocompatible; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Polymers; Severity of Illness Index; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome; Vascular Calcification

Treatment of lesions in small vessels was associated with worse clinical outcome, and various definitions of "small vessels" have been used. Data with novel drug-eluting stents are scarce.. To compare the outcome of patients with vs without small-vessel treatment, we assessed 2-year follow-up data of the DUTCH PEERS randomized trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01331707), in which 1,811 all-comers were treated with contemporary zotarolimus-eluting (Resolute Integrity) or everolimus-eluting (Promus Element) stents. Primary end point was target lesion failure (TLF), a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization.. The rates of TLF (9.5% vs 5.4%; P log rank = .001) and 2 individual components thereof-target vessel myocardial infarction (3.1% vs 1.3%; P log rank = .006) and target lesion revascularization (4.8% vs 2.8%; P log rank = .02)-were higher among 798 (44.1%) patients treated in at least one small vessel (<2.50 mm by quantitative coronary angiography). Multivariate analysis with propensity score adjustment demonstrated that treatment of small-vessel lesions independently predicted TLF at 2-year follow-up (hazard ratio 1.60, 95% CI 1.09-2.34). Patients with the smallest target vessel being <2.25 mm had TLF rates similar to patients with smallest target vessels of 2.25 to <2.50 mm; however, patients treated in vessels no smaller than 2.50 to <3.00 mm and patients treated in vessels ≥3.00 mm had lower TLF rates (9.3%, 9.8%, 5.0%, and 5.8%, respectively; P log rank = .009).. Patients treated with novel drug-eluting stents in small-vessel lesions had higher adverse event rates than did patients who had no small-vessel treatment. Our data suggest that with current stents, a vessel diameter <2.50 mm is a suitable threshold to identify small target vessels.

Topics: Aged; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Organ Size; Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Sirolimus

The prevalence of factors that are associated with an increased risk of stent thrombosis (ST), including smoking, diabetes mellitus, and small stent size, is different in women and men who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention. Thus, gender may potentially modify the relation between stent type and the incidence of ST during long-term follow-up. We explored the data of Patient Related Outcomes With Endeavor Versus Cypher stenting Trial (PROTECT) to evaluate this hypothesis. PROTECT randomized 2,061 women and 6,648 men who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention for various indications to Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stenting (E-ZES) or Cypher sirolimus-eluting stenting (C-SES). Dual antiplatelet therapy was prescribed for at least 3 months. Data on study end points were collected until 5 years after randomization, including ST, death, and cardiovascular events. We analyzed end points and treatment effect (E-ZES vs C-SES) in relation to gender. Women were on average 4.7 years older (65.8 vs 61.1), had a higher prevalence of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, were less often smokers, and had a shorter total stent length than men. At discharge and throughout follow-up, a slightly lower fraction of women were using dual antiplatelet therapy. During 5-year follow-up, definite or probable ST was observed in 36 women (1.8%) and 152 men (2.4%; log-rank p = 0.15). E-ZES reduced the incidence of ST compared with C-SES in women (hazard ratio 0.58) and men (hazard ratio 0.61), with no evidence of heterogeneity (p = 0.89). In conclusion, in PROTECT, women and men had similar cumulative incidence of ST at 5 years after stent placement. The favorable effect of the study stent E-ZES over C-SES was not modified by gender.

Topics: Aged; Antibiotics, Antineoplastic; Coronary Artery Disease; Diabetes Mellitus; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Graft Occlusion, Vascular; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Proportional Hazards Models; Sex Factors; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome

Limited data are available on the long-term effects of contemporary drug-eluting stents versus contemporary bare-metal stents on rates of death, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, and stent thrombosis and on quality of life.. We randomly assigned 9013 patients who had stable or unstable coronary artery disease to undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with the implantation of either contemporary drug-eluting stents or bare-metal stents. In the group receiving drug-eluting stents, 96% of the patients received either everolimus- or zotarolimus-eluting stents. The primary outcome was a composite of death from any cause and nonfatal spontaneous myocardial infarction after a median of 5 years of follow-up. Secondary outcomes included repeat revascularization, stent thrombosis, and quality of life.. At 6 years, the rates of the primary outcome were 16.6% in the group receiving drug-eluting stents and 17.1% in the group receiving bare-metal stents (hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88 to 1.09; P=0.66). There were no significant between-group differences in the components of the primary outcome. The 6-year rates of any repeat revascularization were 16.5% in the group receiving drug-eluting stents and 19.8% in the group receiving bare-metal stents (hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.69 to 0.85; P<0.001); the rates of definite stent thrombosis were 0.8% and 1.2%, respectively (P=0.0498). Quality-of-life measures did not differ significantly between the two groups.. In patients undergoing PCI, there were no significant differences between those receiving drug-eluting stents and those receiving bare-metal stents in the composite outcome of death from any cause and nonfatal spontaneous myocardial infarction. Rates of repeat revascularization were lower in the group receiving drug-eluting stents. (Funded by the Norwegian Research Council and others; NORSTENT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00811772 .).

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Myocardial Revascularization; Retreatment; Sirolimus; Stents

Improved outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention remain an unmet clinical need. We assessed the long-term efficacy and safety of novel polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent in diabetic patients enrolled in intracoronary stenting and angiographic results: test efficacy of sirolimus- and probucol-eluting versus zotarolimus-eluting stents 5 trial.. In a pre-specified subgroup analysis, outcomes of diabetic patients treated with a sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent or a second-generation zotarolimus-eluting stent were compared. The primary endpoint was a device-oriented composite outcome comprising cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction (MI), or target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 5-year follow-up. Event-free survival was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were estimated from univariate Cox proportional hazards models.. A total of 870 patients with diabetes mellitus were treated with either a sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent (n = 575) or a second-generation zotarolimus-eluting stent (n = 295). At 5 years, the rate of device-oriented composite endpoint was comparable between the sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent and the second-generation zotarolimus-eluting stent (32.9 versus 33.4 %, HR 0.88, 95 % CI 0.76-1.26). No significant differences were observed between the sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent and the second-generation zotarolimus-eluting stent groups in the incidence of cardiac death (15.6 versus 16.7 % HR 0.92, 95 % CI 0.63-1.32), target-vessel MI (4.6 versus 6.6 %, HR 0.73, 95 % CI 0.40-1.34), and TLR (18.6 versus 18.8 %, HR 1.00, 95 % CI, 0.72-1.41). The rate of definite or probable stent thrombosis was low and similar in both groups (2.5 versus 2.6 %, HR 1.02, 95 % CI, 0.41-2.52).. In patients with diabetes the long-term efficacy and safety of a polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent were comparable to a second-generation durable polymer zotarolimus-eluting stent. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00598533. Registered 10 January 2008.

Topics: Aged; Cardiovascular Agents; Cardiovascular Diseases; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Thrombosis; Diabetic Angiopathies; Disease-Free Survival; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Probucol; Proportional Hazards Models; Prosthesis Design; Retreatment; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

In acute myocardial infarction (MI), novel highly deliverable drug-eluting stents (DES) may be particularly valuable as their flexible stent designs might reduce device-induced traumas to culprit lesions. The aim of the study was to assess the safety and efficacy of percutaneous coronary interventions with 2 novel durable polymer-coated DES in patients with acute MI.. The prospective, randomized DUTCH PEERS (TWENTE II) multicenter trial compares Resolute Integrity and Promus Element stents in 1811 all-comer patients, of whom 817 (45.1%) were treated for ST-segment elevation MI or non-ST-segment elevation MI and the 2-year outcome is available in 99.9%. The primary clinical endpoint is target vessel failure (TVF), a composite of cardiac death, target vessel related MI, or target vessel revascularization.. Of all 817 patients treated for acute MI, 421 (51.5%) were treated with Resolute Integrity and 396 (48.5%) with Promus Element stents. At the 2-year follow-up, the rates of TVF (7.4% vs 6.1%; P = .45), target lesion revascularization (3.1% vs 2.8%; P = .79), and definite stent thrombosis (1.0% vs 0.5%; P = .69) were low for both stent groups. Consistent with these findings in all patients with acute MI, outcomes for the 2 DES were favorable and similar in both, with 370 patients with ST-segment elevation MI (TVF, 5.1% vs 4.9%; P = .81) and 447 patients with non-ST-segment elevation MI (TVF, 9.0% vs 7.5%; P = .56).. Resolute Integrity and Promus Element stents were both safe and efficacious in treating patients with acute MI. The present 2-year follow-up data underline the safety of using these devices in this particular clinical setting.

Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Cardiovascular Diseases; Coronary Angiography; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Graft Occlusion, Vascular; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Revascularization; Netherlands; Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Sirolimus; ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction; Thrombosis

In patients with coronary artery disease, treated with durable polymer-coated drug-eluting stents, the life-long presence of the polymer might delay arterial healing. Novel very thin strut biodegradable polymer stents, which leave only a bare metal stent after polymer resorption, might improve long-term outcome. We investigated in allcomers the safety and efficacy of three stents eluting either everolimus, sirolimus, or zotarolimus, often clinically used but never compared, of which the biodegradable polymer everolimus-eluting stent was never before assessed in allcomers.. The large-scale, investigator-initiated, multicentre, assessor and patient blinded, three-arm, randomised, BIO-RESORT non-inferiority trial was done at four clinical sites in the Netherlands. All-comer patients were aged 18 years or older, capable of providing informed consent, and required a percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent implantation according to clinical guidelines or the operators' judgment. Exclusion criteria were: participation in another randomised drug or device study before reaching the primary endpoint of that study; planned surgery necessitating interruption of dual antiplatelet therapy within the first 6 months; known intolerance to components of the investigational product or medication required; uncertainty about the adherence to follow-up procedures or an assumed life expectancy of less than 1 year; or known pregnancy. Web-based computer-generated allocation sequences randomly assigned patients (1:1:1) to treatment with very thin strut biodegradable polymer everolimus-eluting or sirolimus-eluting stents (which differ substantially in type, amount, distribution, and resorption speed of their respective coating), or thin strut durable polymer zotarolimus-eluting stents. The primary endpoint was a composite of safety (cardiac death or target vessel-related myocardial infarction) and efficacy (target vessel revascularisation) at 12 months of follow up with a very thin strut biodegradable polymer of either everolimus-eluting or sirolimus-eluting stents, compared with durable polymer zotarolimus-eluting stents, analysed by intention to treat (non-inferiority margin 3·5%). This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01674803.. From Dec 21, 2012, to Aug 24, 2015, 3514 patients were enrolled and analysed, of whom 2449 (70%) had acute coronary syndromes, which included 1073 (31%) ST-elevation myocardial infarctions. 12 month follow-up of 3490 (99%) patients (three lost to follow-up; 21 withdrawals) was available. The primary endpoint was met by 55 (5%) of 1172 patients assigned to everolimus-eluting stents, 55 (5%) of 1169 assigned to sirolimus-eluting stents and 63 (5%) of 1173 assigned to zotarolimus-eluting stents. Non-inferiority of the everolimus-eluting stents and sirolimus-eluting stents compared with zotarolimus-eluting stents was confirmed (both -0·7% absolute risk difference, 95% CI -2·4 to 1·1; upper limit of one sided 95% CI 0·8%, p. At 12 month follow-up, both very thin strut drug-eluting stents with dissimilar biodegradable polymer coatings (eluting either everolimus or sirolimus) were non-inferior to the durable polymer stent (eluting zotarolimus) in treating allcomers with a high proportion of patients with acute coronary syndromes. The absence of a loss of 1 year safety and efficacy with the use of these two biodegradable polymer-coated stents is a prerequisite before assessing their potential longer-term benefits.. Biotronik, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic.

Topics: Absorbable Implants; Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Coronary Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Netherlands; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Polymers; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

We examined long-term outcomes after implantation of the Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (R-ZES) in ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients.. We compared long-term outcomes of STEMI patients undergoing primary angioplasty <12 hours from symptom onset who were randomised to the R-ZES (n=122) or the everolimus-eluting stent (EES, n=158) in the RESOLUTE All Comers Trial after propensity score adjustment. The five-year cumulative incidence of target lesion failure (TLF) was 7.6% versus 10.4% among patients treated with R-ZES versus EES, respectively, (adjusted p=0.304), and comprised clinically driven target lesion revascularisation (TLR, 2.5% versus 2.0%, adjusted p=0.766) and cardiac death/target vessel MI (5.1% versus 9.1%, adjusted p=0.123). The five-year cumulative incidence of stent thrombosis was 0.8% for R-ZES patients versus 1.3% for EES patients (adjusted p=0.868). In the RESOLUTE Global Clinical Trial Program, excluding RESOLUTE All Comers, the three-year cumulative incidence of TLF with R-ZES was 9.8% and comprised 7.0% clinically driven TLR and 4.5% cardiac death/target vessel MI.. Patients with STEMI who received R-ZES had excellent long-term clinical outcomes which were similar to those of patients who received EES.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Sirolimus; ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction; Time; Treatment Outcome

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is a fundamental treatment that optimizes clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention, especially in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Although current international guidelines recommend DAPT for at least 12 months after implantation of a drug-eluting stent in patients with ACS, these recommendations are not based on randomized controlled trials dedicated to ACS population.. The SMART-DATE trial is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, and open-label study to demonstrate the noninferiority of 6-month DAPT compared with 12 months or longer DAPT in patients with ACS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. A total of 2,700 patients will undergo prospective, random assignment to either of the DAPT duration groups. To minimize the bias from different stent devices, the type of stents will be randomly assigned (everolimus-eluting stents, zotarolimus-eluting stents, or biolimus A9-eluting stents). The primary end point is a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and cerebrovascular events at 18 months after the index procedure. The major secondary end points are definite/probable stent thrombosis defined by the Academic Research Consortium and bleeding defined by Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 2-5.. The SMART-DATE randomized trial is the first study exploring the safety of 6-month DAPT compared with conventional 12-month or longer DAPT dedicated to patients with ACS after second-generation drug-eluting stent implantation.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adult; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Drug Monitoring; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Republic of Korea; Sirolimus; Ticlopidine; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

To assess the differences in clinical outcome between complex patients treated with Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES) versus Xience V everolimus-eluting stents (EES).. Nowadays, many complex patients with coronary disease are treated with percutaneous coronary interventions, using drug-eluting stents (DES).. We analyzed 2-year outcome data of 1,033 complex patients of the TWENTE trial, treated with second-generation Resolute ZES or Xience V EES. Complex patients had at least one of the following characteristics: renal insufficiency (creatinine ≥ 140 µmol/l); ejection fraction < 30%; acute myocardial infarction (MI) within previous 72 hrs; >1 lesion/vessel; >2 vessels treated; lesion length > 27 mm; bifurcation; saphenous vein graft lesion; arterial bypass graft lesion; in-stent restenosis; unprotected left main lesion; lesion with thrombus; or lesion with total occlusion. Target vessel failure (TVF), the primary composite endpoint of the trial, was defined as cardiac death, target vessel-related MI, or target vessel revascularization.. Among the 1,033 complex patients, 529 (51%) were treated with Resolute ZES and 504 (49%) with Xience V EES. Patient- and procedure-related characteristics were similar between DES groups. After 2-year follow-up, outcome was also similar between DES groups. TVF occurred in 12.1% of patients treated with Resolute ZES and 12.3% of patients treated with Xience V EES. In addition, DES groups did not differ significantly in cardiac death, MI, or target vessel revascularization-the individual components of TVF.. Complex patients treated with Resolute ZES and Xience V EES showed similar safety and efficacy during 2-year follow-up. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Topics: Aged; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Netherlands; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prosthesis Design; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

To compare the efficacy and safety of the MiStent absorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (APSES) with a zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES).. The trial was a 2:1 randomisation at 26 sites of 184 patients implanted with an APSES (n=123) versus a ZES (n=61). Following stent implantation, all patients underwent quantitative coronary angiography at baseline and at nine months of follow-up, while a select subgroup also underwent optical coherence tomography (OCT). The primary efficacy hypothesis was superiority of in-stent late lumen loss (LLL) of APSES compared to ZES. At nine months, the primary endpoint was met, with a mean in-stent LLL of 0.27±0.46 mm in 103 APSES patients versus 0.58±0.41 mm in 52 ZES patients (p<0.001). The proportion of uncovered stent struts by OCT at nine months was very low in both groups. The mean neointimal thickness of covered struts (p=0.002) and percent net volume obstruction (p≤0.003) were significantly lower in the APSES than in the ZES group. Major adverse cardiac event and stent thrombosis rates were low and comparable between groups.. The DESSOLVE II trial demonstrated superiority in the primary efficacy endpoint of nine-month mean LLL for APSES compared to ZES. Strut coverage by OCT was high with both stents and the clinical safety endpoints including stent thrombosis were equally low in both groups. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01294748.

Topics: Absorbable Implants; Aged; Antibiotics, Antineoplastic; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Stenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neointima; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Polymers; Single-Blind Method; Sirolimus; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Treatment Outcome

We conducted a pooled post hoc analysis (RESOLUTE All Comers and RESOLUTE International) of patients who had the Resolute® zotarolimus-eluting stent (R-ZES) implanted in revascularised total occlusions (TO) compared with patients treated with R-ZES for non-occluded lesions.. Patients were divided into three groups: chronic TO (CTO; n=256), non-chronic TO (n=292), and no occlusion (n=2,941). Clinical and safety outcomes assessed through two years included target lesion failure (TLF: cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and clinically driven target lesion revascularisation) and Academic Research Consortium definite or probable stent thrombosis. The rate of TLF at two years was not significantly different among patients in the CTO (9.1%), TO (9.8%), and no occlusion (10.4%) groups (log-rank p=0.800); neither were the components of TLF. Definite or probable stent thrombosis occurred more frequently in the TO group (2.8% vs. 1.2% in the CTO and 1.1% in the group with no occlusion, p=0.027). There were 10 late and six very late stent thrombosis events.. Apart from a higher rate of stent thrombosis in patients with TO, patients with totally occluded coronary arteries who receive revascularisation with an R-ZES have clinical outcomes comparable to those who receive a similar stent in non-occluded lesions.

Topics: Aged; Cardiovascular Agents; Chronic Disease; Coronary Occlusion; Coronary Thrombosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Registries; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

We studied coronary vasomotion in patients treated with the Mistent(®) absorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (APSES) and in patients implanted with the Endeavor(®) zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES).. First generation (1st-gen) drug-eluting stents (DES) induce persistent vasomotor dysfunction in the treated coronary artery. It is unknown whether and to what extent the implantation of an absorbable polymer DES impairs coronary vasomotion.. This sub-study of the DESSOLVE II trial included 19 APSES Mistent(®) and 10 ZES Endeavor(®) patients. Incremental atrial pacing and quantitative coronary angiography were used to assess vasomotion proximal and distal to the stent and in a reference segment at 9 months after implantation. Percent changes in vessel diameter with pacing versus baseline were calculated and compared. Vasomotor response of the APSES group was also compared with changes observed in a historical group of 17 patients implanted with a 1st-gen sirolimus-eluting stent (SES).. Normal vasomotion (vasodilatation) was preserved and of comparable magnitude in the APSES and in the ZES group both proximally (P = 0.34) and distally (P = 0.38) to the stent. This finding was not observed in the 1st-gen SES group showing marked pacing-induced vasoconstriction at both stent edges (P < 0.05 vs. APSES). The results were practically unchanged after excluding patients with absolute changes in vessel diameter <3% between baseline and maximal pacing.. The implantation of an absorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent is associated with preserved coronary vasomotion, comparable to that observed after implantation of the Endeavor(®) ZES, and distinct from 1st-gen SES which induce coronary vasomotor dysfunction.

Topics: Absorbable Implants; Aged; Cardiac Pacing, Artificial; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Europe; Female; Historically Controlled Study; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; New Zealand; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Polymers; Prospective Studies; Single-Blind Method; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Vasoconstriction; Vasodilation

Sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) have been shown to be superior to Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES) and comparable to Resolute ZES at eight-month angiography in patients treated for total coronary occlusions (TCO). This study investigated clinical outcome at three-year follow-up.. The PRISON III trial investigated the efficacy and safety of SES against ZES (Endeavor and Resolute) in two study phases. In the first phase, 51 patients were randomised to receive SES and 46 to Endeavor ZES. In the second phase, 103 and 104 patients were randomised to SES or Resolute ZES, respectively. Between one and three years there were only a few additional clinical events in all groups. As a result, the rates of target lesion revascularisation 12.2% vs. 19.6%, p=0.49, target vessel failure 14.3% vs. 19.6%, p=0.68, and definite or probable stent thrombosis 4.1% vs. 2.2% were comparable between SES and Endeavor ZES at three years. In the second study phase, the rates of target lesion revascularisation 10% vs. 5.9%, p=0.42, target vessel failure 10% vs. 7.9%, p=0.79 and definite or probable stent thrombosis 1.0% vs. 0% were similar between SES and Resolute ZES.. The present study demonstrated a low incidence of clinical events between one- and three-year follow-up with either SES compared to Endeavor ZES or SES versus Resolute ZES in patients treated for total coronary occlusions.

Topics: Aged; Antibiotics, Antineoplastic; Cardiovascular Diseases; Coronary Occlusion; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Myocardial Revascularization; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Reoperation; Sirolimus; Thrombosis

To assess three-year clinical outcome following randomised use of the second-generation Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) and the XIENCE V everolimus-eluting stent (EES). For Resolute ZES and randomised use, outcome data ≥3 years are relatively scarce.. The TWENTE trial examined 1,391 patients with stable angina or non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes, of whom 21.6% were diabetics, 70.1% had complex B2 or C lesions and 77.4% had "off-label" indications for DES use. Three-year follow-up data were obtained in 1,381 patients (99.3%; 10 withdrawals). Adverse clinical events were independently adjudicated. The primary endpoint target vessel failure (TVF), a composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction and clinically indicated target vessel revascularisation, was 12.1% for Resolute ZES and 13.4% for XIENCE V EES (p=0.50). Cardiac death rates were 1.9% vs. 3.5% (p=0.06); the other individual components of TVF also showed no significant between-group differences. The rates of definite-or-probable stent thrombosis (1.4% vs. 1.6%, p=0.82) and very late stent thrombosis (0.6% vs. 0.4%, p=1.0) did not differ between the groups.. Three-year follow-up data of patients included in the randomised TWENTE trial demonstrated similar and sustained safety and efficacy of Resolute ZES and XIENCE V EES.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Angina, Stable; Antineoplastic Agents; Cardiovascular Diseases; Coronary Stenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Myocardial Revascularization; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Reoperation; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome

To compare long-term outcome of patients treated for chronic total occlusion (CTO) lesions versus patients treated for non-CTO lesions only.. Percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) for CTO lesions generally have a higher adverse event risk than PCI for non-CTO lesions. However, long-term outcome data from prospective studies with second-generation drug-eluting stent (DES) use in CTO lesions is scarce.. We analyzed in this substudy of the TWENTE trial the data of 674 patients, who had stable angina and were electively treated with second-generation DES (Resolute zotarolimus-eluting or Xience V everolimus-eluting stents). Main outcome parameter was target lesion failure (TLF), a composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction (MI), or target lesion revascularization (TLR).. Patients with CTO lesions (n = 59, 8.8%) were more often treated for lesions in small vessels (94.9% vs. 63.1%, P < 0.001), long lesions (52.5% vs. 17.7%, P < 0.001) and multiple vessels (42.4% vs. 22.4%, P < 0.001), and were less often males (62.7% vs. 74.6%, P < 0.05) than patients with non-CTO lesions (n = 615, 91.2%). J-CTO scores ≥2 were present in 56% of CTO lesions. Despite significant differences in characteristics of patients, lesions, and interventional procedures, the TLF rate at 3-year follow-up was similar for both groups (13.6% vs. 12.9%, P = 0.89). In addition, a patient-oriented composite endpoint (any death, MI or revascularization) did not differ between groups (18.6% vs. 18.8%, P = 0.97).. Patients treated with second-generation DES for CTO lesions showed at 3-year follow-up an incidence of adverse clinical events that was low and similar to patients with non-CTO lesions only.

Topics: Aged; Cardiovascular Agents; Chronic Disease; Coronary Occlusion; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Netherlands; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prosthesis Design; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

The aim of this study was to evaluate the extent of neointimal response after the implantation of a second-generation drug-eluting stent, zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES-ER, Endeavor Resolute) or everolimus-eluting stent (EES, Xience V), using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) in diabetic patients.. In all, 154 diabetic patients with de-novo coronary lesions were randomized to be implanted with a ZES-ER or EES, and the angiographic follow-up at 9 months combined with a complete IVUS study was available for 96 patients with 101 lesions.. Baseline demographic and lesion parameters were similar in both groups at index percutaneous coronary intervention. On follow-up angiography, in-stent late lumen loss and minimal lumen diameter were not different between the two groups. On IVUS study, neointimal hyperplasia volume [median (interquartile range): ZES-ER vs. EES; 2.25 mm (0.57-6.25) vs. 1.59 mm (0.45-8.37), P=0.615] and in-stent percentage of volume obstruction [median (interquartile range): ZES-ER vs. EES; 1.16% (0.33-3.61) vs. 0.77% (0.29-4.01), P=0.615] showed similar results between the two groups.. In diabetic patients, the second-generation drug-eluting stents, ZES-ER and EES, were comparable in inhibiting neointimal proliferation.

Topics: Aged; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Vessels; Diabetic Angiopathies; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neointima; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Pilot Projects; Predictive Value of Tests; Prosthesis Design; Republic of Korea; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography, Interventional

The clinical benefits of optical coherence tomography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention are unclear. Therefore, in this study we sought to evaluate the impact of optical coherence tomography guidance on stent strut coverage following drug-eluting stent implantation.. A total of 101 patients in 105 lesions were randomly assigned to receive percutaneous coronary intervention under either optical coherence tomography guidance (n = 51 lesions of 50 patients) or angiography guidance (n = 54 lesions of 51 patients), and underwent a follow-up optical coherence tomography examination 6 months after zotarolimus-eluting stent implantation. The primary and secondary end points were the percentage of uncovered and malapposed struts, respectively, on 6-month follow-up optical coherence tomography.. The percentage of uncovered struts was significantly lower in the optical coherence tomography-guided arm (1.60% [1.84]%, [median, 1.06%] vs 4.51% [5.43]% [median, 2.38%]; P = .0004) at 6-month follow-up. The incidence of stents with ≥ 5.9% uncovered struts was also significantly lower in the optical coherence tomography-guided arm (2 patients [3.9%] vs 14 patients [25.9%]; P = .002). In addition, the percentage of malapposed struts was significantly lower in the optical coherence tomography-guided arm (0.19% [0.51]% [median, 0.0%] vs 0.98% [2.53]% [median, 0.0%]; P = .027).. Optical coherence tomography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention significantly reduced the incidence of uncovered stent struts at 6 months compared to angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention. These findings suggest that optical coherence tomography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention has a beneficial effect on drug-eluting stent strut coverage.

Topics: Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Sirolimus; Surgery, Computer-Assisted; Time Factors; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Treatment Outcome

Only limited data from large randomized clinical trials have been published on the long-term performance of second-generation drug-eluting stents in bifurcation lesions.. We investigated in patients in the randomized TWENTE trial the long-term safety and efficacy of treating bifurcation lesions with 2 widely applied second-generation drug-eluting stents, the zotarolimus-eluting Resolute stent (Medtronic Inc, Santa Rosa, CA) and the everolimus-eluting Xience V stent (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA). Three-year follow-up was available in 99.3%. Patients were categorized into treatment for ≥1 bifurcation lesion versus treatment for nonbifurcation lesions only.. Among the 1,391 patients of the TWENTE trial, 362 (26%) were treated for bifurcation lesions. At 3-year follow-up, target-vessel failure did not differ between patients treated for bifurcation versus nonbifurcation lesions (13.1% vs 12.6%; P = .84), whereas the periprocedural myocardial infarction rate was higher in patients with bifurcation lesions (6.9% vs 3.1%; P < .01). Of the 362 patients with bifurcation lesion treatment, 179 (49.4%) were treated with Resolute and 183 (50.6%) with Xience V. There was no significant difference in target-vessel failure between the Resolute and Xience V groups with bifurcation treatment (13.6% vs 12.6%; P = .78), and their incidence of definite-or-probable stent thrombosis was low and similar (1.1% vs 0.5%, respectively; P = .62).. Despite a significant difference in periprocedural myocardial infarction, 3-year clinical outcome after implantation of second-generation stents was favorable and similar for patients with and without bifurcation lesions. In addition, we observed no difference in long-term clinical outcome after bifurcation lesion treatment with Resolute and Xience V stents.

Topics: Aged; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Revascularization; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prosthesis Design; Risk Factors; Sirolimus

We compared 5-year clinical outcomes in diabetic and nondiabetic patients treated with Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZESs; Endeavor Sprint, Medtronic, Santa Rosa, California) or Cypher sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs; Cordis, Johnson & Johnson, Warren, New Jersey) coronary implantation. We randomized 2,332 patients to either ZESs (n = 1,162, n = 169 diabetic patients) or SESs (n = 1,170, n = 168 diabetic patients) stratified according to presence or absence of diabetes mellitus. End points included major adverse cardiac event (MACE), a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization (TVR), and definite stent thrombosis. Among diabetic patients, MACE occurred more frequently in patients treated with ZESs than SESs (48 [28.4%] vs 31 [18.5%]; odds ratio [OR] 1.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05 to 2.93, p = 0.032) because of a higher rate of TVR (32 [18.9%] vs 14 [8.3%]; OR 2.57, 95% CI 1.32 to 5.02, p = 0.006). Among nondiabetic patients, ZES and SES had similar MACE rates at 5-year follow-up but SES was associated with a significantly higher risk of definite stent thrombosis (10 [1.0%] vs 23 [2.3%]; OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.91, p = 0.028). Moreover, during the last 4 years, ZES had fewer MACE, TVR, and stent thrombosis events among nondiabetic patients. In conclusion, SES remains superior to ZES in patients with diabetes throughout the 5-year follow-up, however, among nondiabetic patients, SES demonstrated a highly dynamic performance with favorable initial results followed by a late catch-up that included an overall higher risk of stent thrombosis.

Topics: Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation; Case-Control Studies; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Graft Occlusion, Vascular; Humans; Male; Myocardial Infarction; Prosthesis Failure; Reoperation; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome

Patients at high bleeding risk would benefit from a shorter dual antiplatelet therapy after PCI. Compared to first-generation devices, the design of newer generation drug-eluting stents may facilitate more rapid anatomical and functional healing of stented vessel based on thinner stent platforms, biodegradable/biocompatible polymers and rapid drug elution.. Forty-four non-diabetic patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and culprit lesion in the LAD were randomized to receive either biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (BP-SES) or durable polymer zotarolimus-eluting stent (DP-ZES). Neointimal strut coverage was examined using optical coherence tomography, and vasodilator response on invasive thermodilution-derived coronary flow reserve (CFR) at 3-month follow-up. The primary endpoints were percent uncovered struts and CFR. A total of 425 cross-sections (4,897 struts) were analyzed in the BP-SES group, and 425 cross-sections (5,467 struts) in the DP-ZES group. The percent uncovered struts was lower in the BP-SES group compared with the DP-ZES group, both at strut level (3.9% vs. 8.9%, respectively, P<0.001), and stent level (3.9 ± 3.2% vs. 8.9 ± 6.9%, respectively, P=0.019). No significant difference was found between the 2 groups regarding CFR (3.0 ± 1.3 vs. 3.2 ± 1.0, respectively, P>0.05).. In non-diabetic patients with ACS, BP-SES provided slightly better stent strut coverage at 3 months compared with DP-ZES, but neither stent was fully covered. No difference in vasodilator response was seen.

Topics: Absorbable Implants; Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Biodegradable Plastics; Double-Blind Method; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neointima; Prospective Studies; Sirolimus; Vasodilation

Stents with a passive coating of titanium-nitride-oxide (TiNO) have been compared with Endeavor® zotarolimus-eluting stents (E-ZES) with regard to the primary endpoint of in-stent late lumen loss at six to eight months. The objective of the present analysis was to compare the long-term outcomes of TiNO stents with E-ZES up to five years of clinical follow-up.. A total of 302 patients had been randomly allocated to treatment with TiNO or E-ZES. Up to five years of follow-up, major adverse cardiac events (MACE), the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or clinically indicated target vessel revascularisation (TLR), were observed in 27.6% of patients treated with TiNO stents and 25.3% of patients treated with E-ZES (RR 1.13, 95% CI: 0.72-1.75, p=0.60), with the majority of events related to clinically indicated TVR (TiNO 21.7% versus E-ZES 20.7%, RR 1.10, 95% CI: 0.67-1.81). There were no differences with respect to individual events including cardiac death, myocardial infarction or stent thrombosis between the two treatment arms up to five years of follow-up. A majority of patients remained free from angina throughout the entire study duration (TiNO 77.3% versus E-ZES 76.1%, p=0.92).. Final five-year outcomes of the TIDE trial comparing TiNO stents with E-ZES revealed increased rates of MACE driven primarily by clinically indicated TVR. The TIDE trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00492908.

Topics: Aged; Antibiotics, Antineoplastic; Cardiovascular Diseases; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Stenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Myocardial Revascularization; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Proportional Hazards Models; Reoperation; Sirolimus; Titanium; Treatment Outcome

New-generation drug-eluting coronary stents have reduced the risk of coronary events, especially in patients with complex disease or lesions. To what extent different stent platforms, polymers, and antiproliferative drugs affect outcomes, however, is unclear. We investigated the safety and efficacy of a third-generation stent by comparing a highly biocompatible durable-polymer-coated zotarolimus-eluting stent with a biodegradable-polymer-coated biolimus-eluting stent.. This open-label, randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority trial was done at three sites across western Denmark. All patients who presented with stable coronary artery disease or acute coronary syndromes and at least one coronary artery lesion (more than 50% stenosis) from March, 2011, to August, 2012, were assessed for eligibility. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either the durable-polymer zotarolimus-eluting stent or the biodegradable-polymer biolimus-eluting stent. The primary endpoint was a composite of safety (cardiac death and myocardial infarction not clearly attributable to a non-target lesion) and efficacy (target-lesion revascularisation) at 12 months, analysed by intention to treat. The trial was powered to assess non-inferiority of durable-polymer zotarolimus-eluting stent compared with the biodegradable-polymer biolimus-eluting stent with a predetermined non-inferiority margin of 0·025. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01956448.. Of 7103 screened, 1502 patients with 1883 lesions were assigned to receive the durable-polymer zotarolimus-eluting stent and 1497 patients with 1791 lesions to receive the biodegradable-polymer biolimus-eluting stent. 79 (5·3%) and 75 (5·0%) patients, respectively, met the primary endpoint (absolute risk difference 0·0025, upper limit of one-sided 95% CI 0·016%; p=0·004). The individual components of the primary endpoint did not differ significantly between stent types at 12 months.. The durable-polymer-coated zotarolimus-eluting stent was non-inferior to the biodegradable-polymer-coated biolimus-eluting stent in unselected patients.. Medtronic Cardiovascular and Biosensors Interventional Technologies.

Topics: Absorbable Implants; Aged; Coated Materials, Biocompatible; Denmark; Drug-Eluting Stents; Equipment Design; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Intention to Treat Analysis; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Ischemia; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Polymers; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

The use of drug-eluting stents (DES) in patients at high risk of bleeding or thrombosis has not been prospectively studied; limited data are available in patients who have a low restenosis risk.. This study sought to compare a hydrophilic polymer-based, second-generation zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) with a unique drug fast-release profile versus bare-metal stents (BMS) under similar durations of dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT).. We randomly assigned 1,606 patients with stable or unstable symptoms, and who on the basis of thrombotic bleeding or restenosis risk criteria, qualified as uncertain candidates for DES, to receive ZES or BMS. DAPT duration was on the basis of patient characteristics, rather than stent characteristics, and allowed for a personalized 1-month dual antiplatelet regimen. The primary endpoint was the risk of 1-year major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), which included death, myocardial infarction (MI), or target vessel revascularization (TVR).. Median DAPT duration was 32 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 30 to 180 days) and did not differ between the groups. In the ZES group, 140 patients (17.5%) reached the primary endpoint, compared with 178 patients (22.1%) in the BMS group (hazard ratio: 0.76; 95% confidence interval: 0.61 to 0.95; p = 0.011) as a result of lower MI (2.9% vs. 8.1%; p < 0.001) and TVR rates (5.9% vs.10.7%; p = 0.001) in the ZES group. Definite or probable stent thrombosis was also significantly reduced in ZES recipients (2.0% vs. 4.1%; p = 0.019).. Compared with BMS, DES implantation using a stent with a biocompatible polymer and fast drug-eluting characteristics, combined with an abbreviated, tailored DAPT regimen, resulted in a lower risk of 1-year MACE in uncertain candidates for DES implantation. (Zotarolimus-eluting Endeavor Sprint Stent in Uncertain DES Candidates [ZEUS] Study; NCT01385319).

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aspirin; Biocompatible Materials; Clopidogrel; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Postoperative Complications; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

Studies have indicated varying mortality risks with timing of stent thrombosis (ST), but few have been adequately powered with prospective late follow-up. PROTECT randomized 8,709 subjects to either Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting or Cypher sirolimus-eluting stents. PROTECT Continued Access enrolled 1,018 patients treated with Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stents. Subjects completed at least 4 and 3 years of follow-up, respectively. ARC-defined definite and probable ST events were stratified by time from index procedure: early (≤30 days), late (>30 and ≤360 days), and very late (>360 days). Rates of death and myocardial infarction were analyzed by ST timing. Median follow-up was 4.1 years. There were 184 ST events (1.9%): 61 early, 27 late, and 96 very late. Patient and procedural characteristics were similar between timing groups. There was no difference in dual-antiplatelet therapy use at discharge (97%) or 1 year (84%). Cardiac death in patients with ST at 4 years occurred in 32.1% compared with 2.5% in patients without ST (p <0.001). Combined rates of cardiac death and myocardial infarction did not differ according to ST timing, yet early ST was more commonly associated with cardiac death at 4 years than later ST (50.8% for early vs 18.5% for late vs 24.0% for very late; p <0.001). The relation between ST timing and outcomes did not differ between stent types. In conclusion, in prospective data, cardiac death was more common after early ST than later ST. Although ST remains infrequent, continued efforts to determine how to reduce ST, particularly within the first 30 days, are warranted. (The PROTECT trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00476957.).

Topics: Aged; Cause of Death; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Thrombosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Graft Occlusion, Vascular; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Risk Factors; Sirolimus

This study assessed clinical events and patient-reported chest pain 2 years after treatment of all-comers with Resolute Integrity zotarolimus-eluting stents (Medtronic Vascular, Santa Rosa, California) and Promus Element everolimus-eluting stents (Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts).. For both drug-eluting stents (DES), no all-comer outcome data from >12 months of follow-up have been published. Although there is increasing interest in patient-reported chest pain following stenting, data with novel DES are scarce.. The DUTCH PEERS multicenter trial (TWENTE II) (DUrable Polymer-Based STent CHallenge of Promus ElemEnt Versus ReSolute Integrity) Randomized Trial [TWENTE II]) randomized 1,811 all-comer patients to treatment with 1 type of DES. Monitoring and event adjudication were performed by independent contract research organizations.. The 2-year follow-up of 1,810 patients (99.9%) was available. The primary composite endpoint target vessel failure occurred in 8.6% and 7.8% of patients treated with zotarolimus- and everolimus-eluting stents, respectively (p = 0.55). Rates of components of target vessel failure were: cardiac death (2.4% vs. 1.9%, p = 0.42); target vessel-related myocardial infarction (2.4% vs. 1.8%, p = 0.33); clinically-indicated target vessel revascularization (4.6% vs. 4.9%, p = 0.83). At 1- and 2-year follow-up, >80% of patients were free from chest pain (no between-stent difference). In addition, >87% of patients were either free from chest pain or experienced pain only at maximal physical exertion, but not during normal daily activities. Patients with chest pain after 12 months at no more than moderate physical effort had a higher risk of target vessel revascularization during the following year (hazard ratio: 1.89 [95% confidence interval: 1.05 to 3.39], p = 0.03).. During the second year of follow-up, the incidence of adverse clinical endpoints remained similar and low for both DES. The vast majority of patients were free from chest pain.

Topics: Aged; Angina Pectoris; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Polymers; Proportional Hazards Models; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Risk Factors; Single-Blind Method; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Newer-generation drug-eluting stents that release zotarolimus or everolimus have been shown to be superior to the first-generation drug-eluting stents. However, data comparing long-term safety and efficacy of zotarolimus- (ZES) and everolimus-eluting stents (EES) are limited. RESOLUTE all-comers (Randomized Comparison of a Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent With an Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) trial compared these 2 stents and has shown that ZES was noninferior to EES at 12-month for the primary end point of target lesion failure. We report the secondary clinical outcomes at the final 5-year follow-up of this trial.. RESOLUTE all-comer clinical study is a prospective, multicentre, randomized, 2-arm, open-label, noninferiority trial with minimal exclusion criteria. Patients (n=2292) were randomly assigned to treatment with either ZES (n=1140) or EES (n=1152). Patient-oriented composite end point (combination of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and any revascularizations), device-oriented composite end point (combination of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and clinically indicated target lesion revascularization), and major adverse cardiac events (combination of all-cause death, all myocardial infarction, emergent coronary bypass surgery, or clinically indicated target lesion revascularization) were analyzed at 5-year follow-up. The 2 groups were well-matched at baseline. Five-year follow-up data were available for 98% patients. There were no differences in patient-oriented composite end point (ZES 35.3% versus EES 32.0%, P=0.11), device-oriented composite end point (ZES 17.0% versus EES 16.2%, P=0.61), major adverse cardiac events (ZES 21.9% versus EES 21.6%, P=0.88), and definite/probable stent thrombosis (ZES 2.8% versus EES 1.8%, P=0.12).. At 5-year follow-up, ZES and EES had similar efficacy and safety in a population of patients who had minimal exclusion criteria.. URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00617084.

Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

There have been no randomized studies comparing intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided versus conventional angiography-guided chronic total occlusion (CTO) intervention using new-generation drug-eluting stent Therefore, we conducted a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial designed to test the hypothesis that IVUS-guided CTO intervention is superior to angiography-guided intervention.. After successful guidewire crossing, 402 patients with CTOs were randomized to the IVUS-guided group (n=201) or the angiography-guided group (n=201) and secondarily randomized to Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stents or Nobori biolimus-eluting stents. The primary and secondary end points were cardiac death and a major adverse cardiac event defined as the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or target-vessel revascularization, respectively. After 12-month follow-up, the rate of cardiac death was not significantly different between the IVUS-guided group (0%) and the angiography-guided group (1.0%; P by log-rank test=0.16). However, major adverse cardiac event rates were significantly lower in the IVUS-guided group than that in the angiography-guided group (2.6% versus 7.1%; P=0.035; hazard ratio, 0.35; 95% confidence interval, 0.13-0.97). Occurrence of the composite of cardiac death or myocardial infarction was significantly lower in the IVUS-guided group (0%) than in the angiography-guided group (2.0%; P=0.045). The rates of target-vessel revascularization were not significantly different between the 2 groups. In the comparison between Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent and Nobori biolimus-eluting stent, major adverse cardiac event rates were not significantly different (4.0% versus 5.7%; P=0.45).. Although IVUS-guided CTO intervention did not significantly reduce cardiac mortality, this randomized study demonstrated that IVUS-guided CTO intervention might improve 12-month major adverse cardiac event rate after new-generation drug-eluting stent implantation when compared with conventional angiography-guided CTO intervention.. URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01563952.

Topics: Aged; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Occlusion; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prospective Studies; Random Allocation; Sirolimus; Ultrasonography, Interventional

Although trials comparing antiplatelet strategies after percutaneous coronary intervention report average risks of bleeding and ischemia in a population, there is limited information to guide choices based on individual patient risks, particularly beyond 1 year after treatment. Patient-level data from Patient Related Outcomes With Endeavor vs Cypher Stenting Trial (PROTECT), a broadly inclusive trial enrolling 8,709 subjects treated with drug-eluting stents (sirolimus vs zotarolimus-eluting stent), and PROTECT US, a single-arm study including 1,018 subjects treated with a zotarolimus-eluting stent, were combined. The risk of ischemic events, cardiovascular death/non-periprocedural myocardial infarction (MI)/definite or probable stent thrombosis, and bleeding events, Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Arteries moderate or severe bleed, were predicted using logistic regression. At median follow-up of 4.1 years, major bleeding occurred in 260 subjects (2.8%) and ischemic events in 595 (6.3%). Multivariate predictors of bleeding were older age, smoking, diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, and chronic kidney disease (all p <0.05). Ischemic events shared all the same predictors with bleeding events and gender, body mass index, previous MI, previous coronary artery bypass graft surgery, ST-segment elevation MI on presentation, stent length, and sirolimus-eluting stent use (all p <0.05). Within individual subjects, bleeding and ischemic risks were strongly correlated; 97% of subjects had a greater risk of ischemic events than bleeding. In conclusion, individual patient risks of ischemia and bleeding are related to many common risk factors, yet the predicted risks of ischemic events are greater than those of major bleeding in the large majority of patients in long-term follow-up.

Topics: Aged; Blood Transfusion; Coronary Artery Disease; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug-Eluting Stents; Europe; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Postoperative Hemorrhage; Prognosis; Retrospective Studies; Sirolimus; Survival Rate; Time Factors

Third-generation, permanent-polymer-based drug-eluting stents with novel, flexible designs might be more easily delivered than previous generations of stents in complex coronary lesions, but might be less longitudinally stable. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy in all-comer patients of two third-generation stents that are often used clinically, but that have not yet been compared, and one of which has not previously been assessed in a randomised trial.. In this investigator-initiated, single-blind, multicentre, randomised, two-arm, non-inferiority trial, patients aged 18 years and older who required a percutaneous coronary intervention with implantation of a drug-eluting stent were recruited from four study sites in the Netherlands. We randomly assigned patients by independently managed computer-generated allocation sequences in a 1:1 ratio to receive either cobalt-chromium-based zotarolimus-eluting stents (Resolute Integrity, Medtronic, Santa Rosa, CA, USA) or platinum-chromium-based everolimus-eluting stents (Promus Element, Boston Scientific, Natick, MA, USA). Patients and analysts were masked to the allocated stent, but treating clinicians were not. The primary endpoint of target-vessel failure was a composite of safety (cardiac death or target-vessel-related myocardial infarction) and efficacy (target-vessel revascularisation) at 12 months, analysed by intention to treat (with a non-inferiority margin of 3·6%). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01331707.. Between Nov 25, 2010, and May 24, 2012, 1811 eligible all-comer patients, with 2371 target lesions, were enrolled in the study. 370 (20%) patients presented with ST-elevation myocardial infarction and 447 (25%) with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. 906 patients were assigned to receive zotarolimus-eluting stents and 905 to receive everolimus-eluting stents. Ease of stent delivery was shown by very low numbers of patients requiring treatment other than their assigned study treatment (six [1%] in the zotarolimus-eluting stent group vs five [1%] in the everolimus-eluting stent group; p=0·22). 12-month follow-up results were available for 1810 patients (one patient in the zotarolimus-eluting stent group withdrew consent). The primary endpoint was met by 55 (6%) of 905 patients in the zotarolimus-eluting stent group and 47 (5%) of 905 in the everolimus-eluting stent group. The zotarolimus-eluting stent was non-inferior to the everolimus-eluting stent (absolute risk difference 0·88%, 95% CI -1·24% to 3·01%; upper limit of one-sided 95% CI 2·69%; non-inferiority p=0·006). We noted no significant between-group differences in individual components of the primary endpoint. Definite stent thrombosis occurred in three (0·3%) patients in the zotarolimus-eluting stent group and six (0·7%) patients in the everolimus-eluting stent group (p=0·34). Longitudinal stent deformation was seen only in the everolimus-eluting stent group (nine [1·0%] of 905 vs 0 of 906, p=0·002; nine of 1591 [0·6%] everolimus-eluting stents implanted became deformed), but was not associated with any adverse events.. Both stents were similarly efficacious and safe, and provided excellent clinical outcomes, especially in view of the large number of patients who presented with acute myocardial infarctions.. Boston Scientific, Medtronic.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Coronary Occlusion; Death, Sudden, Cardiac; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Single-Blind Method; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

This study sought to assess device-specific outcomes after implantation of bare-metal stents (BMS), zotarolimus-eluting Endeavor Sprint stents (ZES-S), paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES), or everolimus-eluting stents (EES) (Medtronic Cardiovascular, Santa Rosa, California) in all-comer patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.. Few studies have directly compared second-generation drug-eluting stents with each other or with BMS.. We randomized 2,013 patients to BMS, ZES-S, PES, or EES implantation. At 30 days, each stent group received up to 6 or 24 months of clopidogrel therapy. The key efficacy endpoint was the 2-year major adverse cardiac event (MACE) including any death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization, whereas the cumulative rate of definite or probable stent thrombosis (ST) was the key safety endpoint.. Clinical follow-up at 2 years was complete for 99.7% of patients. The MACE rate was lowest in EES (19.2%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 16.0 to 22.8), highest in BMS (32.1%; 95% CI: 28.1 to 36.3), and intermediate in PES (26.2%; 95% CI: 22.5 to 30.2) and ZES-S (27.8%; 95% CI: 24.1 to 31.9) groups (chi-square test = 18.9, p = 0.00029). The 2-year incidence of ST in the EES group (1%; 95% CI: 0.4 to 2.2) was similar to that in the ZES-S group (1.4%; 95% CI: 0.7 to 2.8), whereas it was lower compared with the PES (4.6%, 95% CI: 3.1 to 6.8) and BMS (3.6%; 95% CI: 2.4 to 5.6) groups (chi-square = 16.9; p = 0.0001).. Our study shows that cumulative MACE rate, encompassing both safety and efficacy endpoints, was lowest for EES, highest for BMS, and intermediate for PES and ZES-S groups. EES outperformed BMS also with respect to the safety endpoints with regard to definite or probable and definite, probable, or possible ST. (PROlonging Dual antiplatelet treatment after Grading stent-induced Intimal hyperplasia studY [PRODIGY]; NCT00611286).

Topics: Aged, 80 and over; Chi-Square Distribution; Clopidogrel; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Thrombosis; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Hyperplasia; Italy; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Metals; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Neointima; Paclitaxel; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prosthesis Design; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Stents; Ticlopidine; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

In patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), there is an increasing therapeutic need among interventional cardiologists to conduct dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) whose duration is shorter than current guideline-recommended 6-12 months after the implantation of drug-eluting stents. However, no clinical grounds sufficient to rationalize the need are available.. To define the optimal duration of DAPT and to examine the safety and efficacy of the Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent (E-ZES) in real-world Japanese patients with CAD.. The present prospective, nonrandomized, multicenter, controlled study is uniquely designed to examine the analysis set to be formulated after integrating two different databases consisting of the following two study arms: the 3-month DAPT arm, in which 1,210 patients were consecutively enrolled at 106 medical institutions; and the 12-month DAPT arm, in which 1,210 patients will be consecutively extracted from the Endeavor Japan post-marketing surveillance at 60 medical institutions. The primary endpoint is "net adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events-death, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, and major bleeding)" at 12 months after implantation. The secondary endpoints are as follows: major adverse cardiac events at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after implantation; target vessel revascularization and target lesion revascularization at 9 and 12 months after implantation; and stent thrombosis, DAPT compliance, and bleeding events at 12 months after implantation. Noninferiority in the E-ZES's profiles between the study arms will be investigated.. The present study will provide insight into the optimal duration of DAPT after the E-ZES implantation in individual, real-world patients with CAD.

Topics: Aged; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Eluting Stents; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Incidence; Japan; Male; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

The aim of this study was to compare 5-year cost-effectiveness and clinical outcomes of patients with oral rapamycin (OR) plus bare-metal stent versus the drug-eluting stent (DES) strategy. During 2006 to 2007, a total of 200 patients were randomized to OR (n = 100) and DES (n = 100). Primary end point was to compare costs of initial procedure and cost-effectiveness of both revascularization strategies. Safety was evaluated by the composite of death, myocardial infarction, and cerebrovascular accident. Efficacy was assessed by target vessel and target lesion revascularizations. The 2 groups had similar baseline demographic, clinical, and angiographic characteristics. In the DES group, paclitaxel-, zotarolimus-, and sirolimus-eluting stents were used. Five-year clinical follow-up was accomplished in 99% patients. The DES group had significantly higher procedural (p <0.001), discharge to first-year (p = 0.02), and 1- to 5-year costs (p <0.001) compared with the OR group. At 5 years, the composite end point of death, myocardial infarction, and cerebrovascular accident (12% in the OR group vs 25% in the DES group, p = 0.01) was significantly less in the OR group. Target vessel revascularization (14.5% in the OR group vs 21% in the DES group, p = 0.16) and target lesion revascularization (10% in the OR group vs 17.6% in the DES group, p = 0.05) were not significantly different. In conclusion, a strategy of OR plus bare-metal stent was cost saving than a first-generation DES.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Coronary Artery Disease; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Paclitaxel; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Sirolimus; Stents; Treatment Outcome

The aim of the study was to investigate 4-year outcomes and predictors of repeat revascularization in patients treated with the Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (R-ZES) (Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota) and XIENCE V everolimus-eluting stent (EES) (Abbott Vascular, Abbott Park, Illinois) in the RESOLUTE (A Randomized Comparison of a Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent With an Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) All-Comers trial.. Data on long-term outcomes of new-generation drug-eluting stents are limited, and predictors of repeat revascularization due to restenosis and/or progression of disease are largely unknown.. Patients were randomly assigned to treatment with the R-ZES (n = 1,140) or the EES (n = 1,152). We assessed pre-specified safety and efficacy outcomes at 4 years including target lesion failure and stent thrombosis. Predictors of revascularization at 4 years were identified by Cox regression analysis.. At 4 years, the rates of target lesion failure (15.2% vs. 14.6%, p = 0.68), cardiac death (5.4% vs. 4.7%, p = 0.44), and target vessel myocardial infarction (5.3% vs. 5.4%, p = 1.00), clinically-indicated target lesion revascularization (TLR) (7.0% vs. 6.5%, p = 0.62), and definite/probable stent thrombosis (2.3% vs. 1.6%, p = 0.23) were similar with the R-ZES and EES. Independent predictors of TLR were age, insulin-treated diabetes, SYNTAX (Synergy between PCI with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) score, treatment of saphenous vein grafts, ostial lesions, and in-stent restenosis. Independent predictors of any revascularization were age, diabetes, previous percutaneous coronary intervention, absence of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, smaller reference vessel diameter, SYNTAX score, and treatment of left anterior descending, right coronary artery, saphenous vein grafts, ostial lesions, or in-stent restenosis.. R-ZES and EES demonstrated similar safety and efficacy throughout 4 years. TLR represented less than one-half of all repeat revascularization procedures. Patient- and lesion-related factors predicting the risk of TLR and any revascularization showed considerable overlap. (A Randomized Comparison of a Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent With an Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [RESOLUTE-AC]; NCT00617084).

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prognosis; Prosthesis Design; Reoperation; Sirolimus; Time Factors

Unexpected requests for non-cardiac surgery requiring discontinuation of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) frequently occur in daily clinical practice. The objectives of this study were to evaluate prevalence, timing and clinical outcomes of such unexpected requests for non-cardiac surgery or other invasive procedures during the first year after drug-eluting stents (DESs) implantation.. We prospectively investigated the prevalence, timing and clinical outcomes of unexpected requests for non-cardiac surgery or other procedures during the first year after DESs implantation in 2117 patients.. The prevalence of requested non-cardiac surgery or invasive procedures was 14.6% in 310 requests and 12.3% in 261 patients. Among 310 requests, those were proposed in 11.3%<1 month, 30.0% between 1 and 3 months, 36.8% between 4 and 6 months and 21.9% between 7 and 12 months post-DES implantation. The rates of actual discontinuation of DAPT and non-cardiac surgery or procedure finally performed were 35.8% (111 of 310 requests) and 53.2% (165 of 310 requests), respectively. On multivariate regression analysis, the most significant determinants for actual discontinuation of DAPT were Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent implantation with 3-month DAPT (OR=5.54, 95% CI 2.95-10.44, p<0.001) and timing of request (OR=2.84, 95% CI 1.97-4.11, p<0.001). There were no patients with any death, myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis related with actual discontinuation of DAPT.. Those unexpected requests with premature discontinuation of DAPT were relatively common and continuously proposed during the first year following DES implantation. No death, myocardial infarction or stent thrombosis occurred in patients with actual discontinuation of DAPT.

Topics: Aged; Attitude to Health; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Health Behavior; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Regression Analysis; Sirolimus; Surgical Procedures, Operative; Treatment Outcome; Treatment Refusal

To investigate the putative modifying effect of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) use on the incidence of stent thrombosis at 3 years in patients randomized to Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent (E-ZES) or Cypher sirolimus-eluting stent (C-SES).. Of 8709 patients in PROTECT, 4357 were randomized to E-ZES and 4352 to C-SES. Aspirin was to be given indefinitely, and clopidogrel/ticlopidine for ≥ 3 months or up to 12 months after implantation. Main outcome measures were definite or probable stent thrombosis at 3 years. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was applied, with stent type, DAPT, and their interaction as the main outcome determinants. Dual antiplatelet therapy adherence remained the same in the E-ZES and C-SES groups (79.6% at 1 year, 32.8% at 2 years, and 21.6% at 3 years). We observed a statistically significant (P = 0.0052) heterogeneity in treatment effect of stent type in relation to DAPT. In the absence of DAPT, stent thrombosis was lower with E-ZES vs. C-SES (adjusted hazard ratio 0.38, 95% confidence interval 0.19, 0.75; P = 0.0056). In the presence of DAPT, no difference was found (1.18; 0.79, 1.77; P = 0.43).. A strong interaction was observed between drug-eluting stent type and DAPT use, most likely prompted by the vascular healing response induced by the implanted DES system. These results suggest that the incidence of stent thrombosis in DES trials should not be evaluated independently of DAPT use, and the optimal duration of DAPT will likely depend upon stent type (Clinicaltrials.gov number NCT00476957).

Topics: Aspirin; Blood Vessel Prosthesis; Clopidogrel; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Thrombosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Graft Occlusion, Vascular; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Failure; Sirolimus; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

In head-to-head comparisons of coronary drug-eluting stents, the primary endpoint is traditionally assessed after 9-12 months. However, the optimum timepoint for this assessment remains unclear. In this study, we assessed clinical outcomes at up to 5 years' follow-up in patients who received two different types of drug-eluting stents.. We undertook this multicentre, open-label, randomised superiority trial at five percutaneous coronary intervention centres in Denmark. We randomly allocated 2332 eligible adult patients (≥18 years of age) with an indication for drug-eluting stent implantation to the zotarolimus-eluting Endeavor Sprint stent (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, CA, USA) or the sirolimus-eluting Cypher Select Plus stent (Cordis, Johnson & Johnson, Warren, NJ, USA). Randomisation of participants was achieved by computer-generated block randomisation and a telephone allocation service. The primary endpoint of the SORT OUT III study was a composite of major adverse cardiac events-cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularisation-at 9 months' follow-up. In this study, endpoints included the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events and definite stent thrombosis at follow-up times of up to 5 years. Analysis was by intention to treat. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00660478.. We randomly allocated 1162 patients to receive the zotarolimus-eluting stent and 1170 to the sirolimus-eluting stent. At 5-year follow-up, rates of major adverse cardiac events were similar in patients treated with both types of stents (zotarolimus-eluting stents 197/1162 [17.0%] vs sirolimus-eluting stents 182/1170 [15.6%]; odds ratio [OR] 1.10, 95% CI 0.88-1.37; p=0.40). This finding was indicative of the directly contrasting results for rates of major adverse cardiac events at 1-year follow up (zotarolimus 93/1162 [8.0%] vs sirolimus 46/1170 [3.9%]; OR 2.13, 95% CI 1.48-3.07; p<0.0001) compared with those at follow-up between 1 and 5 years (104 [9.0%] vs 136 [11.6%]; OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.59-1.02; p=0.071). At 1-year follow-up, definite stent thrombosis was more frequent after implantation of the zotarolimus-eluting stent (13/1162 [1.1%]) than the sirolimus-eluting stent (4/1170 [0.3%]; OR 3.34, 95% CI 1.08-10.3; p=0.036), whereas the opposite finding was recorded for between 1 and 5 years' follow-up (zotarolimus-eluting stent 1/1162 [0.1%] vs sirolimus-eluting stent 21/1170 [1.8%], OR 0.05, 95% CI 0.01-0.36; p=0.003). 26 of 88 (30%) target lesion revascularisations in the zotarolimus-eluting stent group occurred between 1 and 5 years' follow-up, whereas 54 of 70 (77%) of those in the sirolimus-eluting stent group occurred during this follow-up period.. The superiority of sirolimus-eluting stents compared with zotarolimus-eluting stents at 1-year follow-up was lost after 5 years. The traditional 1-year primary endpoint assessment therefore might be insufficient to predict 5-year clinical outcomes in patients treated with coronary drug-eluting stent implantation.. Cordis and Medtronic.

Topics: Aged; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Thrombosis; Cytostatic Agents; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Research Design; Single-Blind Method; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Drug eluting stents for the treatment of small vessel coronary artery disease have traditionally yielded inferior clinical outcomes compared to the use of DES in large vessels. The benefit of the second-generation Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (R-ZES) in small vessels was examined.. Two-year clinical outcomes from five combined R-ZES studies were compared between patients with small (reference vessel diameter [RVD] ≤2.5 mm; n = 1,956) and large (RVD >2.5 mm; n = 3174) vessels.. Despite a higher incidence of comorbidities in the small vessel group, there was no significant difference in target lesion failure (TLF) (10.1% vs. 8.7%; P = 0.54) at 2 years. When the subgroup of patients with diabetes was examined (n = 1,553) there was no significant difference in 2-year TLF in small compared to large vessels (11.2% vs. 11.1%; P = 0.17). Similarly, within the small vessel cohort, no significant difference was seen regarding TLF at 2 years between people with and without diabetes (11.2% vs 9.6%; P = 0.28).. When used for the treatment of small vessels, the R-ZES appears to provide acceptable clinical results at 2 years when compared to its performance in large vessels.

Topics: Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Registries; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

This study sought to test whether the newly developed platinum chromium (PtCr)-based everolimus-eluting stent (EES) is noninferior to the cobalt chromium (CoCr)-based zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) in all-comers receiving percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).. PtCr provides improved radial strength, conformability, and visibility compared with the CoCr alloy, but PtCr-based stents have not been tested in a wide range of patients receiving PCI. Also, recent case series have raised the issue of longitudinal stent deformation (LSD) with newer drug-eluting stents.. We randomly assigned 3,755 all-comers receiving PCI to PtCr-EES or CoCr-ZES. The primary outcome was target lesion failure (TLF) at 1-year post-PCI, defined as the composite of cardiac death, nonfatal target vessel-related myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization. Post-hoc angiographic analysis was performed to qualitatively and quantitatively analyze LSD.. At 1 year, TLF occurred in 2.9% and 2.9% of the population in the PtCr-EES and CoCr-ZES groups, respectively (superiority p = 0.98, noninferiority p = 0.0247). There were no significant differences in the individual components of TLF as well as the patient-oriented clinical outcome. Of 5,010 stents analyzed, LSD occurred in 0.2% and 0% in the PtCr-EES and CoCr-ZES groups, respectively (p = 0.104). There was no significant difference in post-deployment stent length ratio between the 2 stents (p = 0.352).. At 1 year, PtCr-EES was noninferior to CoCr-ZES in all-comers receiving PCI. Although LSD was observed only in PtCr-EES, both the stent length ratio and the frequency of LSD were not significantly different between the 2 stent types, and PtCr-EES was not associated with adverse clinical outcomes. (Harmonizing Optimal Strategy for Treatment of Coronary Artery Stenosis-SAfety & EffectiveneSS of Drug-ElUting Stents & Anti-platelet REgimen [HOST-ASSURE]; NCT01267734).

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Chromium Alloys; Chromium Compounds; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Stenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platinum Compounds; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Republic of Korea; Single-Blind Method; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

To our knowledge, no randomised study has compared rates of uncovered stent struts in everolimus (EES) vs. new-generation zotarolimus-eluting (ZES-R) stents in acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The aim of our study was to evaluate the completeness of neointimal coverage with optical coherence tomography (OCT) in ACS patients treated with drug-eluting stents (DES) comparing EES versus new-generation ZES-R.. All eligible ACS patients admitted to four Italian centres with a clinical indication for culprit lesion intervention were randomised 1:1 to EES or ZES-R. The primary study endpoint was the percentage of uncovered stent struts evaluated by optical coherence tomography (OCT) at six months. Secondary endpoints were the percentage of malapposed stent struts, percent neointimal hyperplasia cross-sectional area (CSA) and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at six months. A total of 60 patients were randomised to EES (n=29) or ZES-R (n=31). No differences were observed in baseline characteristics between the two groups. Overall, 31.7% presented with STEMI, of which 68.4% were anterior. The other patients comprised 41.7% NSTEMI and 26.7% troponin-negative ACS. A mean of 1.3±0.6 lesions were treated per patient, with a mean of 1.3±0.5 stents per lesion. At 30 days there was one sudden death. Six-month OCT analysis was performed in 25 lesions in the EES group and in 24 lesions in the ZES-R group. There was no difference in the primary endpoint of uncovered stent struts between groups (EES 6.42% [3.27, 9.57] vs. ZES-R 7.07% [3.22, 10.92]; p=0.80). Furthermore, there were no differences between groups in the percentage of malapposed stent struts, either with (EES 1.19% [0.34, 2.04] vs. ZES-R 0.85% [0.40, 1.30]; p=0.49) or without coverage (EES 1.06% [0.12, 2.01] vs. ZES-R 0.24% [0.05, 0.44]; p=0.09). Percent neointima CSA was similar in both groups (EES 37.0% [18.6, 55.3] vs. ZES-R 26.6% [18.4, 34.8]; p=0.31). At six-month clinical follow-up, no additional patients died or suffered MI. There were four MACE in the EES group and one in the ZES-R group.. In our study, in patients presenting with ACS, both EES and ZES-R had low percentages of malapposed and uncovered stent struts at six-month OCT analysis.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Stenosis; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Neointima; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Single-Blind Method; Sirolimus; Tomography, Optical Coherence

To compare the long-term clinical safety between two drug-eluting stents with different healing characteristics in the Patient Related Outcomes with Endeavour (E-ZES) vs. Cypher (C-SES) Stenting Trial (PROTECT). At 3 years, there was no difference in the primary outcome of definite or probable stent thrombosis or in the other main secondary clinical outcomes consisting of the composite of death or myocardial infarction (MI). Prespecified 4-year clinical follow-up was analysed.. Patient Related OuTcomes with Endeavour vs. Cypher Stenting Trial was a prospective, open-label randomized-controlled superiority trial powered to look at differences in long-term clinical safety, including stent thrombosis. Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) was prescribed for ≥ 3 months and up to 12 months based on current guidelines. Patient Related OuTcomes with Endeavour vs. Cypher Stenting Trial enrolled 8791 patients undergoing elective or emergency PCI to E-ZES or C-SES. There was no difference in DAPT usage between the two groups up to 4 years. At 4-year follow-up, the primary outcome occurred in 1.6% of E-ZES vs. 2.6% of C-SES patients [HR 0.63 (95% CI 0.46-0.85), P = 0.003]. The composite of all-cause death or large MI occurred in 6.7% of E-ZES vs. 8.0% of C-SES-treated patients [HR 0.84 (95% CI 0.71-0.98), P = 0.024].. Drug-eluting coronary stents with different healing characteristics demonstrated different late safety profiles: after 4 years, compared with C-SES, E-ZES reduced the risk of stent thrombosis and the risk of the composite endpoints of death or MI. Appropriately powered large-scale trials with long-term follow-up are critical to determine clinical safety and efficacy of permanently implanted coronary stents. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00476957.

Topics: Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Thrombosis; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Graft Occlusion, Vascular; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prosthesis Failure; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

Long-term outcomes are imperative to confirm safety of drug-eluting stents. There have been 2 randomized controlled trials comparing everolimus-eluting stents (EESs) and Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES-Rs). To date, long-term clinical outcomes of these stents were limited to only 1 report, which has recently reported 4-year comparisons of these stents. Therefore, more evidence is needed regarding long-term clinical outcomes of the second-generation stents. This study compared the long-term clinical outcomes of EES with ZES-R in "all-comer" cohorts up to 3-year follow-up. The EXCELLENT and RESOLUTE-Korea registries prospectively enrolled 3,056 patients treated with EES and 1,998 with ZES-R, respectively, without exclusions. Stent-related composite outcomes (target lesion failure) and patient-related composite events up to 3-year follow-up were compared in crude and propensity score-matched analyses. Of 5,054 patients, 3,830 patients (75.8%) had off-label indication (2,217 treated with EES and 1,613 treated with ZES-R). The stent-related outcome (189 [6.2%] vs 127 [6.4%], p = 0.812) and the patient-related outcome (420 [13.7%] vs 250 [12.5%], p = 0.581) did not differ between EES and ZES-R, respectively, at 3 years, which was corroborated by similar results from the propensity score-matched cohort (hazard ratio [HR] 0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70 to 1.20, p = 0.523 and 0.85, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.02, p = 0.081, for stent- and patient-related outcomes, respectively). The rate of definite or probable stent thrombosis up to 3 years (22 [0.7%] vs 10 [0.5%], p = 0.370) was also similar. The rate of very late definite or probable stent thrombosis was very low and comparable between the 2 stents (3 [0.1%] vs 1 [0.1%], p = 0.657). In multivariate analysis, chronic renal failure (adjusted HR 3.615, 95% CI 2.440 to 5.354, p <0.001) and off-label indication (adjusted HR 1.782, 95% CI 1.169 to 2.718, p = 0.007) were the strongest predictors of target lesion failure at 3 years. In conclusion, both stents showed comparable safety and efficacy at 3-year follow-up in this robust real-world registry with unrestricted use of EES and ZES-R. Overall incidences of target lesion failure and definite stent thrombosis, including very late stent thrombosis, were low, even in the patients with off-label indications, suggesting excellent long-term safety and sustained efficacy of both types of second-generation drug-eluting stents.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Electrocardiography; Everolimus; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Registries; Republic of Korea; Sirolimus; Survival Rate; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Drug-eluting stents (DES) were first used on-label - in simple patients with low clinical risk and easily accessible lesions. Currently, DES are increasingly used off-label - in complex patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) with historically higher event risk. Therefore, our aim was to investigate whether patients with off-label indications for DES use had similar outcomes compared to patients who were treated for on-label indications only. We analysed two-year follow-up data of 1,387 TWENTE trial patients, treated with second-generation everolimus-eluting XIENCE V or zotarolimus-eluting Resolute stents, and compared off-label vs. on-label DES use with regard to the following clinical endpoints: cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), periprocedural MI (≤48 hrs), and target vessel revascularisation (TVR). Patients with off-label DES use (n=1,033; 74.5%) had more diabetes (22.9% vs. 17.5%; p=0.032), previous MI (35.9% vs. 22.3%; p<0.001), type B2/C lesions (84.7% vs. 62.7%; p<0.001), and acute coronary syndromes (57.8% vs. 33.3%; p<0.001). Nevertheless, cardiac death and TVR rates were similar to those of patients with on-label DES use (p>0.8). Following off-label DES use, there was a higher incidence of PMI (5.0% vs. 1.4%; p=0.003), of which only 1.1% reached creatine kinase levels >5x the upper limit of normal (ULN). Despite differences in risk profile, patients with off-label DES use did not differ from patients with on-label DES use in clinical endpoints other than periprocedural MI. These largely positive findings underline the favourable safety profile of second-generation DES.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Calcinosis; Creatine Kinase; Diabetes Mellitus; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Off-Label Use; Patient Outcome Assessment; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Severity of Illness Index; Sirolimus

To investigate the outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in bifurcation versus non-bifurcation lesions using the next-generation Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (R-ZES).. We analyzed 3-year pooled data from the RESOLUTE All-Comers trial and the RESOLUTE International registry. The R-ZES was used in 2772 non-bifurcation lesion patients and 703 bifurcation lesion patients, of which 482 were treated with a simple-stent technique (1 stent used to treat the bifurcation lesion) and 221 with a complex bifurcation technique (2 or more stents used). The primary endpoint was 3-year target lesion failure (TLF, defined as the composite of death from cardiac causes, target vessel myocardial infarction, or clinically-indicated target lesion revascularization [TLR]), and was 13.3% in bifurcation vs 11.3% in non-bifurcation lesion patients (adjusted P=.06). Landmark analysis revealed that this difference was driven by differences in the first 30 days between bifurcation vs non-bifurcation lesions (TLF, 6.6% vs 2.7%, respectively; adjusted P<.001), which included significant differences in each component of TLF and in-stent thrombosis. Between 31 days and 3 years, TLF, its components, and stent thrombosis did not differ significantly between bifurcation lesions and non-bifurcation lesions (TLF, 7.7% vs 9.0%, respectively; adjusted P=.50).. The 3-year risk of TLF following PCI with R-ZES in bifurcation lesions was not significantly different from non-bifurcation lesions. However, there was an increased risk associated with bifurcation lesions during the first 30 days; beyond 30 days, bifurcation lesions and non-bifurcation lesions yielded similar 3-year outcomes.

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cause of Death; Coronary Stenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Myocardial Revascularization; Prospective Studies; Recurrence; Registries; Retrospective Studies; Sirolimus

This study sought to compare clinical outcomes and angiographic findings using the Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (R-ZES) (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, California) versus the Taxus Liberte paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) (Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts) in an all-comer Chinese population.. Concerns regarding restenosis risk led to new-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) designed for use in patients with complex clinical or lesion characteristics. In-stent late lumen loss (LLL) is a measure of restenosis risk.. Patients with an indication for treatment with a DES were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to placement of at least 1 R-ZES or PES with minimal exclusions. The primary endpoint was angiographic in-stent LLL at 9 months post-procedure. Clinical endpoints at 12 months are compared between the 2 stents.. A total of 198 patients received a R-ZES, and 202 patients received a PES. Most patients were male; 25.8% and 29.2% of R-ZES and PES patients, respectively, had diabetes. Over 70% of lesions in both cohorts were American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association lesion classification Type B2 and C (B2/C). In-stent LLL was 0.16 ± 0.38 mm for R-ZES and 0.33 ± 0.52 mm for PES at 9 months (p < 0.001; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.26 to -0.08). The rates of clinically driven target lesion revascularization were 1.5% for R-ZES and 7.0% for PES (p = 0.011). The rate of target lesion failure was 5.6% for R-ZES and 11% for PES (p = 0.068).. In an all-comers Chinese population, 9-month in-stent LLL was significantly less with R-ZES compared with PES, which was reflected in lower revascularization rates at 12 months for the R-ZES patients. Results are consistent with previous clinical trials of the R-ZES in all-comer populations. (Resolute Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent Versus the Taxus Liberte Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in China [R-China RCT]; NCT01334268).

Topics: Aged; Cardiovascular Agents; China; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Paclitaxel; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

This study sought to report the final 5-year outcomes of the ENDEAVOR IV (A Randomized, Controlled Trial of the Medtronic Endeavor Drug [ABT-578] Eluting Coronary Stent System Versus the Taxus Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent System in De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions) trial comparing the Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent (E-ZES) (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, California) with the Taxus paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) (Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts) in patients with single de novo coronary lesions.. Primary results of the ENDEAVOR IV trial demonstrated similar clinical outcomes with E-ZES and PES. Concerns with regard to late adverse clinical events with drug-eluting stents highlight the need for long-term follow-up with these devices.. Late outcomes after the use of E-ZES and PES were examined in the multicenter randomized ENDEAVOR IV trial in cumulative and landmark analyses. Assessed outcomes were related to device efficacy and patient safety.. At 5 years, clinical data were available for 722 (93.4%) E-ZES patients and 718 (92.6%) PES patients. Overall rates of target lesion revascularization (7.7% vs. 8.6%, p = 0.70) and target vessel failure were similar (17.2% vs. 21.1%, p = 0.061) with E-ZES compared with PES. The incidence of cardiac death or myocardial infarction (MI) was lower with E-ZES (6.4% vs. 9.1%, p = 0.048), primarily driven by a lower rate of target vessel MI with E-ZES (2.6% vs. 6.0%, p = 0.002). Although overall definite/probable stent thrombosis rates were similar between stents (1.3% vs. 2%, p = 0.42), rates of very late stent thrombosis (0.4% vs. 1.8%, p = 0.012) and late MI events (1.3% vs. 3.5%, p = 0.008) were significantly lower with E-ZES compared with PES.. These data demonstrate the durable efficacy and safety of E-ZES compared with PES for the treatment of de novo coronary lesions. Significant improvements in late safety outcomes were observed with E-ZES but should be considered hypothesis-generating, given the limited statistical power of the trial. (The ENDEAVOR IV Clinical Trial: A Trial of a Coronary Stent System in Coronary Artery Lesions; NCT00217269).

Topics: Aged; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Thrombosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Paclitaxel; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Proportional Hazards Models; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Risk Factors; Single-Blind Method; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United States

The ZOMAXX I trial tested the noninferiority of a zotarolimus-eluting coronary stent (ZoMaxx(™) ) when compared with a paclitaxel-eluting coronary stent (Taxus(™) Express(2™) ) in a randomized trial of percutaneous intervention for de novo coronary artery stenosis. Angiographic analysis at the primary endpoint of 9 months has been reported previously. The purpose of this follow-on analysis was to describe the clinical results of the ZoMaxx and Taxus cohorts of the ZOMAXX I trial after 5 years.. In the ZOMAXX I trial, 199 patients received a ZoMaxx stent and 197 patients received a Taxus stent at 29 investigative sites in Europe, Australia, and New Zealand. The two groups were generally well matched with respect to both clinical and lesional characteristics, including the incidence of diabetes (ZoMaxx 22% vs. Taxus 26%; P = 0.29), reference vessel diameter (ZoMaxx 2.79 ± 0.43 mm vs. Taxus 2.81 ± 0.46 mm; P = 0.65), and lesion length (ZoMaxx 14.9 ± 5.7 mm vs. Taxus 14.6 ± 5.5; P = 0.61). Through 5 years of follow-up, a total of 21 patients had died, six patients had withdrawn, nine had been lost to follow-up, and 13 missed their 5-year visit, leaving a total of 347 patients for analysis (169 ZoMaxx and 178 Taxus). At the 5-year time point, there were no significant differences in any clinical metric including ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR; ZoMaxx 10.6% vs. Taxus 7.1%; P = 0.29), Q-wave myocardial infarction (ZoMaxx 1.5% vs. Taxus 1.0%; P = 0.99), definite/probable stent thrombosis (ZoMaxx 1.5% vs. Taxus 3.0%; P = 0.34), and cardiac death (ZoMaxx 3.0% vs. Taxus 1.0%; P = 0.28).. After 5 years, the differences in clinical outcome between patients treated with ZoMaxx vs. Taxus stents did not reach statistical significance. However, the nominally higher rate of ischemia-driven TLR (10.6 vs. 7.1%) and the previously reported higher rate of restenosis after 9 months suggest that the ZoMaxx stent afforded less neointimal inhibition when compared with Taxus. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Topics: Aged; Australia; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Stenosis; Coronary Thrombosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Europe; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Neointima; New Zealand; Paclitaxel; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prosthesis Design; Risk Factors; Severity of Illness Index; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

The aim of this study was to evaluate late safety and efficacy outcomes among patients enrolled in clinical trials comparing Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stents (E-ZES) (Medtronic, Inc., Santa Rosa, California) with first-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) and bare-metal stents (BMS).. Despite demonstration of higher angiographic luminal loss and restenosis with E-ZES compared with alternative DES, whether differences in these early angiographic measures translate into more disparate late clinical events is uncertain.. Among 3,616 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularization in 5 registration trials, late safety and efficacy events were compared between E-ZES (n = 2,132) versus sirolimus- or paclitaxel-eluting stents (n = 888) or BMS (n = 596).. Compared with a parallel cohort of patients treated with first-generation DES and BMS, 5-year rates of cardiac death/myocardial infarction (MI) (5.8% vs. 8.8% DES, p = 0.003; vs. 8.4% BMS, p = 0.02) and major adverse cardiac events (16.1% vs. 20.6% DES, p = 0.009; vs. 24.6% BMS, p < 0.001) were significantly lower with E-ZES. The E-ZES was associated with significantly lower target lesion revascularization (TLR) compared with BMS (7.4% vs. 16.3%, p < 0.001) but similar to comparator DES (7.4% vs. 8.1%, p = 0.63). Despite higher TLR in the first year with E-ZES compared with DES, between 1- and 5-year follow-up, rates of cardiac death/MI, TLR, and definite/probable stent thrombosis were significantly lower with E-ZES.. Over 5 years, significant differences in cardiac death/MI and composite endpoints favored treatment with E-ZES over comparator BMS and DES. Rates of clinical restenosis and safety events, including stent thrombosis beyond the first year of revascularization, remain stable with E-ZES, leading to significant differences compared with first-generation DES.

Topics: Aged; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Stenosis; Coronary Thrombosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Metals; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Paclitaxel; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Predictive Value of Tests; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Stents; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of the implantation of Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES) (Medtronic Inc., Santa Rosa, California) and Xience V everolimus-eluting stents (EES) (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, California) following strict discontinuation of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after 12 months.. Only limited long-term follow-up data are available from head-to-head comparisons of second-generation drug-eluting stents.. The randomized TWENTE (The Real-World Endeavor Resolute Versus Xience V Drug-Eluting Stent Study in Twente) trial is an investigator-initiated study performed in a population with many complex patients and lesions and only limited exclusion criteria. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to ZES (n = 697) or EES (n = 694).. Two-year follow-up information was available on all patients. The rate of continuation of DAPT beyond 12 months was very low (5.4%). The primary endpoint of target vessel failure, a composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization, did not differ between ZES and EES (10.8% vs. 11.6, p = 0.65), despite fewer target lesion revascularizations in patients with EES (2.6% vs. 4.9%, p = 0.03). The patient-oriented composite endpoint was similar (16.4% vs. 17.1%, p = 0.75). Two-year rates of definite or probable stent thrombosis were 1.2% and 1.4%, respectively (p = 0.63). Very late definite or probable stent thrombosis occurred only in 2 patients in each study arm (0.3% vs. 0.3%, p = 1.00).. After 2 years of follow-up and stringent discontinuation of DAPT beyond 12 months, Resolute ZES and Xience V EES showed similar results in terms of safety and efficacy for treating patients with a majority of complex lesions and off-label indications for drug-eluting stents. (The Real-World Endeavor Resolute Versus Xience V Drug-Eluting Stent Study in Twente [TWENTE]; NCT01066650).

Topics: Aged; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Outcome data are limited in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI) or other acute coronary syndromes (ACSs) who receive a drug-eluting stent (DES). Data suggest that first generation DES is associated with an increased risk of stent thrombosis when used in STEMI. Whether this observation persists with newer generation DES is unknown. The study objective was to analyze the two-year safety and effectiveness of Resolute™ zotarolimus-eluting stents (R-ZESs) implanted for STEMI, ACS without ST segment elevation (non-STEACS), and stable angina (SA).. Data from the Resolute program (Resolute All Comers and Resolute International) were pooled and patients with R-ZES implantation were categorized by indication: STEMI (n=335), non-STEACS (n=1416), and SA (n=1260).. Mean age was 59.8±11.3 years (STEMI), 63.8±11.6 (non-STEACS), and 64.9±10.1 (SA). Fewer STEMI patients had diabetes (19.1% vs. 28.5% vs. 29.2%; P<0.001), prior MI (11.3% vs. 27.2% vs. 29.4%; P<0.001), or previous revascularization (11.3% vs. 27.9% vs. 37.6%; P<0.001). Two-year definite/probable stent thrombosis occurred in 2.4% (STEMI), 1.2% (non-STEACS) and 1.1% (SA) of patients with late/very late stent thrombosis (days 31-720) rates of 0.6% (STEMI and non-STEACS) and 0.4% (SA) (P=NS). The two-year mortality rate was 2.1% (STEMI), 4.8% (non-STEACS) and 3.7% (SA) (P=NS). Death or target vessel re-infarction occurred in 3.9% (STEMI), 8.7% (non-STEACS) and 7.3% (SA) (P=0.012).. R-ZES in STEMI and in other clinical presentations is effective and safe. Long term outcomes are favorable with an extremely rare incidence of late and very late stent thrombosis following R-ZES implantation across indications.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Angina, Stable; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) offers tomographic images of the coronary artery, helping physicians to refine drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation in angiographically complex lesions. However, controversy exists regarding whether the routine use of IVUS in short-length lesions leads to improved clinical outcomes after DES implantation. Therefore, we evaluated the usefulness of IVUS in predicting major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization, at 1 year after DES implantation in short-length lesions. The present study was a subanalysis of the REal Safety and Efficacy of a 3-month dual antiplatelet Therapy following Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent implantation (RESET) study with different clinical outcome parameters. The study population consisted of 662 patients with IVUS guidance and 912 patients with angiography guidance who underwent DES implantation (stent length ≤24 mm). In the IVUS-guided group, adjuvant postdilation was more frequently performed (43.0% vs 34.6%, p <0.001), and the postintervention minimal lumen diameters were greater (2.88 ± 0.44 mm vs 2.72 ± 0.43 mm, p <0.001). MACE occurred in 15 IVUS-guided (2.3%) and 19 angiographically guided (2.1%) patients (p = 0.872). In a subset of patients with diabetes mellitus (n = 292), the MACE rate was 3.4% (n = 4) and 1.7% (n = 3) in the IVUS- and angiographically guided patients, respectively (p = 0.384). The MACE rate in the IVUS- and angiographically guided patients with acute coronary syndrome (n = 601) was 1.1% (n = 3) and 2.7% (n = 9), respectively (p = 0.194). The clinical benefits of IVUS-guided DES implantation compared with angiographically guided DES implantation in short-length lesions could not be confirmed even in patients with clinically high-risk presentations (acute coronary syndrome and diabetes mellitus). In conclusion, routine IVUS guidance does not provide clinical benefits when performing short-length DES implantation.

Topics: Aged; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prognosis; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography, Interventional

Everolimus-eluting stents (EES) have shown favorable clinical outcomes. However, there have been no studies evaluating early vascular response after EES implantation. We designed a prospective study to compare the neointimal response between zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES) and EES at 3 and 12 months using serial optical coherence tomography examinations.. Sixty patients who underwent 3-month and 12-month follow-up optical coherence tomography (36 EES, 24 ZES) were included. Neointimal coverage and malapposition were evaluated using a strut-based analysis at both 3 and 12 months. Neointimal hyperplasia area and thrombus were assessed. ZES showed a higher incidence of covered struts (81.5 vs. 77.1%, P<0.0001) and lower incidence of malapposed struts (1.4 vs. 2.3%, P=0.001) than EES at 3 months. However, at 12 months, EES showed a slightly higher incidence of covered struts (96.4 vs. 93.6%, P<0.0001) and a lower incidence of malapposed struts (0.9 vs. 1.1%, P=0.03) than ZES. Neointimal hyperplasia area was greater in the ZES group than in the EES group at both 3 and 12 months (0.77 vs. 0.49 mm, P=0.03 and 1.50 vs. 0.97 mm, P=0.01, respectively). No significant difference in the incidence of thrombus was observed at both 3 and 12 months.. ZES showed rapid neointimal healing compared with EES at 3 months. However, at 12 months, EES had a slightly better vascular healing profile than ZES.

Topics: Aged; Cardiovascular Agents; Chi-Square Distribution; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Hyperplasia; Male; Middle Aged; Neointima; Observer Variation; Odds Ratio; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Predictive Value of Tests; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Reproducibility of Results; Republic of Korea; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Treatment Outcome; Wound Healing

To assess long-term outcomes of Endeavor Zotarolimus-eluting stent (E-ZES) implantation in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM).. Patients with DM and coronary artery disease have lower restenosis with drug-eluting stent (DES) compared with bare-metal stents. Recent data suggest that the E-ZES is inferior to other DES in this population.. Patient-level data for 601 patients with DM from the ENDEAVOR III and ENDEAVOR IV trials were pooled, of which 337 were treated with E-ZES and 264 were treated with other DES. The primary outcome was target vessel failure (TVF) in the course of 5 years. Outcomes are reported as rates using Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival method and differences between E-ZES and other stent types (sirolimus-eluting stent or paclitaxel-eluting stent) were compared using the log-rank statistic. The independent effect of stent type on TVF was assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression.. Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. Five-year TVF KM rate estimate was numerically lower for E-ZES, but the difference did not reach statistical significance (20.2 vs. 26.9%, P = 0.065). The 5-year KM rate estimates of major adverse cardiac events (17.7 vs. 26.6%, P = 0.012), death (7.6 vs. 15.0%, P = 0.004), and myocardial infarction (1.3 vs. 5.1%, P = 0.011) were also lower for E-ZES versus other DES.. Patients with DM implanted with E-ZES have favorable long-term outcomes compared to first-generation DES. Long-term performance of DES should be assessed routinely and may differ from initial performance.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Diabetic Angiopathies; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Paclitaxel; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Proportional Hazards Models; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

We investigated clinical outcomes after treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions with second generation drug eluting stents (DES).. Post hoc analysis of a randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority trial.. Multicentre study.. All comers study with minimal exclusion criteria.. Patients were treated with either zotarolimus or everolimus eluting stents. The patient population was divided according to treatment of bifurcation or non-bifurcation lesions and clinical outcomes were compared between groups.. Clinical outcomes within 2-year follow-up.. A total of 2265 patients were included in the present analysis. Two-year follow-up data were available in 2223 patients: 1838 patients in the non-bifurcation group and 385 patients in the bifurcation group. At 2-year follow-up the bifurcation and the non-bifurcation lesion groups showed no significant differences in terms of cardiac death (2.3 vs 2.1, p=0.273), target lesion failure (9.7% vs 13.8%, p=0.255), major adverse cardiac events (11.5% vs 15.1%, p=0.305), target lesion revascularisation (4.7% vs 6.0%, p=0.569), and definite or probable stent thrombosis (1.6% vs 1.8%, p=0.419).. The use of second generation DES for the treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions was associated with similar long term mortality and clinical outcomes compared with non-bifurcation lesions.

Topics: Aged; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Stenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Proportional Hazards Models; Prospective Studies; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

Histologic experimental studies have reported incomplete neointimal healing in overlapping with respect to nonoverlapping segments in drug-eluting stents (DESs), but these observations have not been confirmed in human coronary arteries hitherto. On the contrary, angiographic and optical coherence tomography studies suggest that DES overlap elicits rather an exaggerated than an incomplete neointimal reaction.. Optical coherence tomography studies from 2 randomized trials including sirolimus-eluting, biolimus-eluting, everolimus-eluting, and zotarolimus-eluting stents were analyzed at 9- to 13-month follow-up. Coverage in overlapping segments was compared versus the corresponding nonoverlapping segments of the same stents, using statistical pooled analysis.. Forty-two overlaps were found in 31 patients: 11 in sirolimus-eluting stents, 3 in biolimus-eluting stents, 17 in everolimus-eluting stents, and 11 in zotarolimus-eluting stents. The risk ratio of incomplete coverage was 2.35 (95% CI 1.86-2.98) in overlapping versus nonoverlapping segments. Thickness of coverage in overlaps was only 85% (95% CI 81%-90%) of the thickness in nonoverlaps. Significant heterogeneity of the effect was observed, especially pronounced in the comparison of thickness of coverage (I(2) = 90.31).. The effect of overlapping DES on neointimal inhibition is markedly heterogeneous: on average, DES overlap is associated with more incomplete and thinner coverage, but in some cases, the overlap elicits an exaggerated neointimal reaction, thicker than in the corresponding nonoverlapping segments. These results might help to understand why overlapping DES is associated with worse clinical outcomes, both in terms of thrombotic phenomena and in terms of restenosis and revascularization.

Topics: Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Stenosis; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Feasibility Studies; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Hyperplasia; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Neointima; Prosthesis Design; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Treatment Outcome

The second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) have shown superiority in many studies relating to safety and efficacy when compared with the first-generation DES. However, it is unclear whether there are differences in efficacy and safety among the second-generation DES after long-term follow-up.. This multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-labeled trial will directly compare the efficacy and safety among the patients treated with either everolimus-eluting stent (EES), zotarolimus-eluting stent with biolinx polymer (ZES-R), or biolimus-eluting stent (BES) with minimal exclusion criteria. The primary end point is a patient-oriented composite consisted of cardiac death, myocardial infarction not clearly attributable to a nontarget vessel and clinically indicated target lesion revascularization at 24-month clinical follow-up post-index procedure. With the hypothesis that "BES is non-inferior to EES" or "BES is non-inferior to ZES-R" in primary end point, approximately 2,600 patients will be assigned to one of the types of stents using a web-based randomization system.. The CHOICE trial will directly compare the efficacy and safety of EES, ZES-R, and BES in everyday clinical practice for long-term follow-up.

Topics: Adult; Algorithms; Coronary Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Male; Myocardial Infarction; Prosthesis Design; Sirolimus

This study sought to compare the safety and efficacy of the zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) and the everolimus-eluting stent (EES) for treatment of unprotected left main coronary artery (uLMCA) disease.. The second-generation ZES and EES have reduced the risk of restenosis in large patient cohorts. However, their comparative performance in uLMCA lesions is not known.. In this study, patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for uLMCA lesions were randomly assigned to receive either a ZES (n = 324) or an EES (n = 326). The primary endpoint was the combined incidence of death, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization at 1 year. Secondary endpoints were definite or probable stent thrombosis at 1 year and angiographic restenosis based on analysis of the left main coronary artery area at follow-up angiography.. At 1 year, the cumulative incidence of the primary endpoint was 17.5% in the ZES group and 14.3% in the EES group (relative risk: 1.26; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.85 to 1.85; p = 0.25). Three patients in the ZES group (0.9%) and 2 patients in the EES group (0.6%) experienced definite or probable stent thrombosis (p > 0.99). All-cause mortality at 1 year was equal in the 2 groups (5.6%; relative risk: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.52 to 1.93; p = 0.98). Angiographic restenosis occurred in 21.5% of patients in the ZES group and 16.8% in the EES group (relative risk: 1.28; 95% CI: 0.86 to 1.92; p = 0.24).. Within the statistical limitations of the present study, treatment of uLMCA lesions with a ZES or an EES provided comparable clinical and angiographic outcomes at 1-year follow-up.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Sirolimus

We evaluated the safety and effectiveness of the Resolute™ zotarolimus-eluting stent (R-ZES) in real-world clinical practice through 3 years.. A randomized comparison of the R-ZES and the XIENCE V™ everolimus-eluting stent showed no difference in any outcomes through 3-year follow-up in high-volume academic centers. RESOLUTE International is a confirmatory trial designed to evaluate the R-ZES in real-world clinical practice.. RESOLUTE International is a single arm, observational trial that enrolled 2,349 patients from 88 centers with only a few inclusion and exclusion criteria. The primary end-point was the composite of cardiac death and target vessel myocardial infarction (TV-MI) at 1 year. Secondary end-points include target lesion failure (TLF), target vessel revascularization (TVR), and their components, and stent thrombosis (ST).. At 3 years 97.2% of patients completed clinical follow-up. The mean age was 63.4 ± 11.2 years, 77.8% were male, and 30.4% had diabetes. The average number of stents per patient was 1.6 ± 1.0; and mean stent length was 30.9 ± 20.5 mm. Dual antiplatelet therapy was used in 91.1% of patients at 1 year, 43.0% at 2 years, and 34.6% at 3 years. Cardiac death and TV-MI occurred in 161 patients (7.0%). There were 6 (0.3%) very late ST events for a total ST rate of 1.1% through 3 years. The rates of clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR), TVR, and TLF were 5.7%, 7.4%, and 11.4%, respectively.. The safety and effectiveness of the R-ZES through 3 years in this real-world all-comer study was consistent with previously reported all-comer trials.

Topics: Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Prospective Studies; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

Clinical outcomes of new-generation drug-eluting stents (DES), Everolimus-eluting stent (EES) or Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (R-ZES), have been reported. However, angiographic follow-up data of new-generation DES are limited, especially in Asians. We investigated the angiographic and clinical outcomes of EES and R-ZES in a real-world setting of Korean patients.. Angiographic and clinical outcomes of 679 patients (866 lesions) who had been treated with EES or R-ZES from Jun 2008 to May 2010 were evaluated. The primary analysis was to compare in-segment late loss at 9 months and the secondary analyses were to compare the clinical outcomes.. In-segment late loss at 9-month follow-up angiography was 0.23 ± 0.52 mm for EES and 0.29 ± 0.64 mm for R-ZES (p = 0.248). In addition, the rate of binary restenosis did not show between-group differences (5.8% vs. 6.8% for EES and R-ZES, respectively, p = 0.716). During a median follow-up of 33 months, there were no significant differences in Kaplan-Meier estimates of target lesion failure (TLF) (7.5% vs. 7.9% for EES and R-ZES, respectively, p = 0.578) and patient-oriented composite outcomes (POCO including all-cause death, any myocardial infarction, and any revascularization, 22.8% vs. 20.1%, p = 0.888). The adjusted hazard ratios for TLF and POCO were 0.875 (95% CI 0.427 - 1.793; p = 0.715) and 1.029 (95% CI 0.642 - 1.650; p = 0.904), respectively, for EES over R-ZES in the propensity score matched group analysis.. In Korean patients undergoing new-generation DES implantation for coronary artery disease, EES and R-ZES showed similar angiographic outcomes at 9 months and comparable clinical outcomes during 2.8 years of median follow-up.

Topics: Aged; Cohort Studies; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Registries; Republic of Korea; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

Angiographic and clinical outcomes remain relatively unfavorable for diabetic patients even after the use of drug-eluting stent. This prospective, multicenter, randomized study compared the relative efficacy and safety of resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (R-ZES) and sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation in diabetic patients with coronary artery disease. The primary end point was noninferiority of angiographic in-segment late loss at 9 months. Clinical events were also monitored for at least 12 months. Patient recruitment was prematurely stopped after enrollment of 256 patients (127 in R-ZES group and 129 in SES) because of discontinuing production of SES. The R-ZES was noninferior to the SES for 9-month in-segment late loss (0.34 ± 0.30 vs 0.39 ± 0.43 mm; difference -0.048; 95% confidence interval -0.157 to 0.061; upper 1-sided 95% confidence interval 0.044; p <0.001 for noninferiority). In addition, in-stent late loss (0.22 ± 0.29 vs 0.21 ± 0.40 mm, p = 0.849) and the rates of in-segment (1.2% vs 6.7%, p = 0.119) and in-stent (1.2% vs 3.3%, p = 0.621) binary restenoses were similar between the 2 groups. At 12 months, there were no statistical differences between the 2 groups in the incidence of any clinical outcomes (death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization, ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization, and composite outcomes). In conclusion, despite having reduced power because of early study termination, our study suggests that the R-ZES has noninferior angiographic outcomes at 9 months to the SES in diabetic patients with coronary artery disease.

Topics: Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Diabetes Mellitus; Drug-Eluting Stents; Electrocardiography; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

The use of drug-eluting stent (DES) instead of bare-metal stent (BMS) in patients at high stent thrombosis or bleeding risk as well as in those at low restenosis risk (ie, uncertain DES candidates) remains a matter of debate. Zotarolimus-Eluting Endeavor Sprint stent (E-ZES) (Santa Rosa, CA) is a hydrophilic polymer-based second-generation device with unique drug fast-release profile, which may allow for a shorter dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) duration without safety concerns.. The primary objective is to assess whether E-ZES implantation followed by a shorter than currently recommended course of DAPT will decrease the incidence of 12-month major adverse cardiovascular events as compared with BMS in undefined DES recipients. Actual duration of DAPT regimen will be dictated by patients' characteristics and not by stent type and, as such, can be as short as 30 days after intervention in both stent groups.. The ZEUS study is an open-label randomized clinical trial conducted at 20 clinical sites in Italy, Switzerland, Portugal, and Hungary. With 1,600 individuals, this study will have 85% power to detect a 33% difference in the primary end point consisting of the composite of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization.. The ZEUS trial aims to assess whether the use of E-ZES, followed by a DAPT duration regimen based on patients' characteristics and not by stent type, is superior to conventional BMS implantation in undefined DES recipients who qualify for the presence of high thrombosis, bleeding, or low restenosis risk criteria.

Topics: Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Hungary; Italy; Male; Metals; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Portugal; Research Design; Risk Assessment; Sirolimus; Switzerland; Thrombosis; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Uncertainty

The current recommendation is for at least 12 months of dual antiplatelet therapy after implantation of a drug-eluting stent. However, the optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy with specific types of drug-eluting stents remains unknown.. To assess the clinical noninferiority of 3 months (short-term) vs 12 months (long-term) of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with zotarolimus-eluting stents.. The OPTIMIZE trial was an open-label, active-controlled, 1:1 randomized noninferiority study including 3119 patients in 33 sites in Brazil between April 2010 and March 2012. Clinical follow-up was performed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Eligible patients were those with stable coronary artery disease or history of low-risk acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing PCI with zotarolimus-eluting stents.. After PCI with zotarolimus-eluting stents, patients were prescribed aspirin (100-200 mg daily) and clopidogrel (75 mg daily) for 3 months (n = 1563) or 12 months (n = 1556), unless contraindicated because of occurrence of an end point.. The primary end point was net adverse clinical and cerebral events (NACCE; a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction [MI], stroke, or major bleeding); the expected event rate at 1 year was 9%, with a noninferiority margin of 2.7%. Secondary end points were major adverse cardiac events (MACE; a composite of all-cause death, MI, emergent coronary artery bypass graft surgery, or target lesion revascularization) and Academic Research Consortium definite or probable stent thrombosis.. NACCE occurred in 93 patients receiving short-term and 90 patients receiving long-term therapy (6.0% vs 5.8%, respectively; risk difference, 0.17 [95% CI, -1.52 to 1.86]; P = .002 for noninferiority). Kaplan-Meier estimates demonstrated MACE rates at 1 year of 8.3% (128) in the short-term group and 7.4% (114) in the long-term group (HR, 1.12 [95% CI, 0.87-1.45]). Between 91 and 360 days, no statistically significant association was observed for NACCE (39 [2.6%] vs 38 [2.6%] for the short- and long-term groups, respectively; HR, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.66-1.60]), MACE (78 [5.3%] vs 64 [4.3%]; HR, 1.22 [95% CI, 0.88-1.70]), or stent thrombosis (4 [0.3%] vs 1 [0.1%]; HR, 3.97 [95% CI, 0.44-35.49]).. In patients with stable coronary artery disease or low-risk ACS treated with zotarolimus-eluting stents, 3 months of dual antiplatelet therapy was noninferior to 12 months for NACCE, without significantly increasing the risk of stent thrombosis.. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01113372.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Risk; Sirolimus; Stroke; Thrombosis; Ticlopidine

The Orsiro Hybrid sirolimus-eluting stent is a newly developed third-generation drug-eluting stent, featuring a unique dual-polymer mix. An active bioabsorbable polymer delivers the anti-proliferative drug, sirolimus, via controlled release, while a passive biocompatible polymeric coating shields the metallic strut from surrounding tissue, preventing interaction. To date, the Orsiro Hybrid sirolimus-eluting stent has excelled in terms of late lumen loss at 9 months in a first-in-man single-arm trial. However, the efficacy and safety data for Orsiro Hybrid sirolimus-eluting stents in a broader population of all-comers are limited. The present study offers an angiographic and clinical comparison of the Orsiro Hybrid sirolimus-eluting stent and the Resolute Integrity zotarolimus-eluting stent in the treatment of patients with coronary artery disease.. The ORIENT trial is a multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-arm study designed to demonstrate the non-inferiority of the Orsiro Hybrid sirolimus-eluting stent relative to the Resolute Integrity zotarolimus-eluting stent. A total of 375 patients with a spectrum of coronary artery disease will undergo prospective, random assignment to a Orsiro Hybrid sirolimus-eluting stent or Resolute Integrity zotarolimus-eluting stent (2:1 ratio), for a primary endpoint of in-stent late lumen loss at 9 months by quantitative coronary angiography. Secondary 12-month clinical endpoints are death, target lesion revascularization, target vessel revascularization, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis and target lesion failure (a composite of cardiac death, target lesion revascularization and target vessel-related myocardial infarction).. The ORIENT trial is the first study to date comparing the Orsiro Hybrid sirolimus-eluting stent with the Resolute Integrity zotarolimus-eluting stent for efficacy and safety in a population of all-comers with coronary artery disease.. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01826552.

Topics: Cardiovascular Agents; Clinical Protocols; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Thrombosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Republic of Korea; Research Design; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

To evaluate long-term patterns of luminal changes after implantation of different types of drug-eluting stents (DES), we analyzed the serial angiographic outcomes of patients implanted with zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES), sirolimus-eluting stents (SES), or paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES).. Little is known regarding long-term luminal changes after DES implantation.. As a subgroup analysis of the ZEST trial, we performed complete angiographic evaluation immediately after the procedure and at 9 months and 2 years in 111 patients with 165 lesions (36 patients with ZES, 40 with SES, and 35 with PES).. Baseline clinical, angiographic, and procedural characteristics were similar among the three groups. Quantitative angiographic analysis revealed significant decreases in minimal luminal diameter 9 months after stent implantation in the ZES (from 2.71 ± 0.49 to 2.21 ± 0.42 mm, P < 0.001), SES (from 2.79 ± 0.49 to 2.58 ± 0.57 mm, P < 0.001), and PES (from 2.66 ± 0.45 to 2.19 ± 0.52 mm, P < 0.001) groups. However, significant late improvements with different degree in luminal diameter were observed between 9 months and 2 years in the ZES (from 2.21 ± 0.42 to 2.39 ± 0.58 mm, P = 0.001), SES (from 2.58 ± 0.57 to 2.66 ± 0.60 mm, P = 0.039), and PES (from 2.19 ± 0.52 to 2.43 ± 0.52 mm, P < 0.001) groups.. Serial angiographic follow-up study revealed a biphasic luminal response after DES implantation, characterized by an early progression phase for the first 9 months and a late regression phase from 9 months to 2 years.

Topics: Aged; Cardiovascular Agents; Chi-Square Distribution; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Linear Models; Male; Middle Aged; Neointima; Paclitaxel; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Predictive Value of Tests; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Republic of Korea; Single-Blind Method; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

To evaluate the differential treatment effects of zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES), sirolimus-eluting stents (SES), and paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) according to diabetic status.. Diabetic patients have a higher risk of ischemic complications after stenting than nondiabetic patients.. Using data from the ZEST randomized trial, comparing ZES with SES and PES, we evaluated relative outcomes among stents in diabetic and nondiabetic patients. The primary outcome was a major adverse cardiac event (MACE), defined as a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization.. Of the 2,645 patients enrolled in the ZEST trial, 760 (29%) had diabetes mellitus. Baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics were similar in the three stent groups, regardless of diabetic status. In diabetic patients, ZES showed similar rates of MACE as compared to PES (13.8% vs. 15.3%, P = 0.58), but higher rates of MACE than SES (13.8% vs. 7.7%, P = 0.05). In nondiabetic patients, ZES showed similar rates of MACE as compared to SES (10.3% vs. 10.8%, P = 0.72), whereas significantly lower rates of MACE compared to PES (10.3% vs. 15.3%, P = 0.01). In comparing the ZES and SES groups, there was a substantial interaction between diabetic status and stent types on MACE occurrence (Interaction P = 0.07). However, in comparison of ZES and PES, there were no significant interactions between diabetes and stent type on MACE (Interaction P = 0.25).. In diabetic patients, SES showed the lowest rate of MACE compared with ZES and PES. But, in nondiabetic patients, SES and ZES showed significantly lower rates of MACE than PES. ZES shows a diabetes-related interaction on MACE compared with SES, but not with PES.

Topics: Aged; Cardiovascular Agents; Chi-Square Distribution; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Thrombosis; Diabetes Mellitus; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Paclitaxel; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Proportional Hazards Models; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Republic of Korea; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

There have been no optical coherence tomographic (OCT) data directly comparing the pattern of strut coverage between the 2 second-generation drug-eluting stents in the early period. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate early strut coverage using optical coherence tomography 3 months after Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES-R) or everolimus-eluting stent (EES) implantation in de novo coronary artery lesions. A total of 40 patients who were suitable for the OCT procedure and consented to the study protocol were randomized 1:1 to receive either ZES-R or EES. Among these patients, 35 stented lesions (18 ZES-R, 17 EES) in 34 patients were evaluated by optical coherence tomography immediately and 3 months after stent implantation. Neointimal hyperplasia thickness, percentage of uncovered struts, and the proportion of malapposed struts were measured at 1-mm intervals. An uncovered strut was defined as having a neointimal hyperplasia thickness of 0 μm. At the 3-month OCT evaluation, mean neointimal hyperplasia thickness (ZES-R vs EES 74 ± 41 vs 75 ± 35 μm, p = 0.89) and mean percentage of uncovered struts (ZES-R vs EES 6.2 ± 6.9 vs 4.7 ± 5.1%, p = 0.62) were not significantly different between the groups. The percentage of malapposed struts was also similar between the groups (0.7 ± 2.2% for ZES-R and 0.7 ± 1.7% for EES, p = 0.64). Thrombi were documented in 3 stents (1 [5.6%] in a ZES-R vs 2 [11.8%] in EES, p = 0.60). In conclusion, early stent strut coverage on the basis of serial OCT evaluation was comparable between ZES-R and EES 3 months after stent implantation.

Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Stenosis; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Neointima; Prospective Studies; Sirolimus; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography, Interventional

Out-stent plaque characteristics and eosinophilic inflammatory response, which correlates with positive remodeling after first-generation drug-eluting stent implantation, may be associated with late restenosis and very late stent thrombosis. The differences of out-stent plaque characteristics were compared between paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) and zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES), using integrated backscatter-intravascular ultrasound (IB-IVUS).. Of 78 patients enrolled, 25 receiving PES and 25 receiving ZES had adequate IVUS assessment. Volumetric IVUS analysis was performed after stenting and at 8-month follow-up. Out-stent plaque change in the stented segment was compared on IB-IVUS. The relationship between systemic inflammatory response and out-stent plaque change was evaluated. In PES, vessel volume significantly increased (365-389 mm(3), P<0.0001), whereas it did not change in ZES (315-314 mm(3), P=0.81). In culprit lesions at baseline in PES, fibrous plaque tended to increase (3.1-3.6mm(2), P=0.051) and lipid plaque significantly increased (4.3-5.1mm(2), P=0.02), whereas in ZES the fibrous plaque significantly increased (2.9-4.0mm(2), P<0.0001) but lipid plaque significantly decreased (5.1-3.6mm(2), P<0.0001). Systemic eosinophil increase was significantly correlated with positive remodeling and out-stent lipid plaque increase.. Chronic out-stent plaque change in ZES consisted of less positive remodeling and more favorable effects on out-stent plaque characteristics than PES. Systemic eosinophil change might be a marker of out-stent lipid plaque change.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Eosinophils; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Paclitaxel; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome; Tubulin Modulators; Ultrasonography, Interventional; Vasculitis; Ventricular Remodeling

The Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (R-ZES) utilizes the same metallic platform and anti-restenotic drug as the Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent (E-ZES) but is coated with a more biocompatible polymer with enhanced drug-release kinetics. The aim of this study was to compare the long-term clinical outcomes of 2 zotarolimus-eluting stent generations.. In two randomized trials with broad inclusion criteria (ISAR-TEST 2 and ISAR-TEST 5), 1,000 patients were treated with R-ZES and 339 patients treated with E-ZES. In both trials follow-up angiography was scheduled at 6 to 8 months. The efficacy endpoint of interest was target lesion revascularization and the safety endpoints were the combined incidence of cardiac death or myocardial infarction related to target vessel as well as the incidence of definite stent thrombosis at 2-year follow-up.. The incidence of target lesion revascularization at 2 years was 12.0% in the R-ZES group and 16.0% in the E-ZES (HR 0.72 [95% CI: 0.52-1.00], P = .052). The incidence of cardiac death or myocardial infarction was 5.5% vs. 4.8% (HR 1.15, [95% CI: 0.66-2.02], P = .62) and of definite stent thrombosis was 0.4% vs. 0.6% (HR 0.68, [95% CI: 0.12-3.72], P = .66), respectively. All measures of angiographic restenosis were in favor of the R-ZES; in-stent late lumen loss was 0.29 ± 0.56 with the R-ZES versus 0.58 ± 0.55 with the E-ZES (P < .0001).. Comparison of the 2 Food and Drug Administration-approved zotarolimus-eluting stents suggested that the R-ZES as compared to the E-ZES displayed overall superior antirestenotic efficacy. Both devices were associated with a similar low risk of adverse safety events through 2 years.

Topics: Aged; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Death; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Myocardial Infarction; Prosthesis Design; Risk Assessment; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome

The purpose of this pre-specified analysis of the PROlonging Dual antiplatelet treatment after Grading stent-induced Intimal hyperplasia studY (PRODIGY) was to assess device-specific outcomes relative to different duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after Everolimus- (EES), Paclitaxel (PES), Zotarolimus- (ZES-S) eluting, or bare metal stents (BMS).. We randomized 2013 patients to BMS, ZES-S, PES, or EES implantation. At 30 days, each stent group underwent up to 6 or 24 months clopidogrel therapy. The primary endpoint, which was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or cerebrovascular accident, did not differ in patients receiving BMS [HR: 0.89 (95% CI: 0.54-1.45)], PES [HR: 0.74 (95% CI: 0.43-1.25)], or EES [HR: 0.63 (95% CI: 0.33-1.21)] implantation across DAPT groups, whereas it was significantly higher in ZES-S patients undergoing long when compared with short-term DAPT therapy (HR: 2.85, P = 0.0018), with positive interaction testing (P-value = 0.004). At the 6-month landmark analysis, heterogeneity across stent types persisted for the primary study endpoint and other secondary clinical outcomes, whereas patients receiving PES showed a significantly higher rate of definite, probable and definite, probable, possible stent thrombosis in the short DAPT regimen. No association in absolute or relative terms was noted between stent potency in inhibiting intimal hyperplasia and greater vulnerability to shorter DAPT therapy.. Our study suggests that optimal duration of DAPT may be stent-specific and it does not support a clear association between stent potency and vulnerability to shorter DAPT therapy. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00611286. http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00611286?term=prodigy&rank=2.

Topics: Aged; Clopidogrel; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Vessels; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Graft Occlusion, Vascular; Humans; Hyperplasia; Male; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Sirolimus; Stents; Stroke; Ticlopidine; Tunica Intima

Women are underrepresented in clinical research, and few data are available from randomized head-to-head comparisons of second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) in female patients. Aim of this study was to assess safety and efficacy of two second-generation DES in women. In TWENTE-a prospective, randomized, comparative DES trial-"real-world" patients were stratified for gender before randomization for Resolute or Xience V stents.. Target vessel failure (TVF; cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, and clinically indicated target vessel revascularization) after 1 year was the predefined endpoint.. Among 1,391 patients, 382 (27.5%) women were randomized to Resolute (n = 192) and Xience V (n = 190). Baseline and procedural characteristics were similar for females in both study arms, except for smaller vessel and stent diameters in Resolute-treated lesions. After 1 year, TVF (8.9 vs. 8.4%; adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 0.95, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.41-2.20, P = 0.91) and a patient-oriented composite endpoint (13.0 vs. 12.1%, P = 0.79) did not differ significantly between women in both arms. Women were older than men (P < 0.01) and had more often diabetes mellitus (26.4 vs. 19.8%, P = 0.01) and hypertension (63.6 vs. 52.5%, P < 0.01), but there was no significant gender difference in TVF (adjusted OR: 1.18, 95% CI: 0.73-1.92, P = 0.50).. This gender-stratified TWENTE trial analysis resulted in no significant difference in safety and efficacy outcomes between Resolute- and Xience V-treated females.

Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Cardiovascular Agents; Chi-Square Distribution; Comorbidity; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Netherlands; Odds Ratio; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Risk Factors; Sex Factors; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

The purpose of this prospective, randomized, single-blind controlled clinical trial was to compare the effectiveness of a zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZoMaxx™) with a paclitaxel-eluting coronary stent (Taxus™ Express(2)™) in patients with angina pectoris and a single native coronary artery lesion between 10-28 mm in length and 2.5-3.75mm in diameter.. Patients were enrolled at 75 international institutions between June 2005 and November 2006.. 1099 (1672 originally planned) patients received 557 ZoMaxx and 542 Taxus stents: cohorts were well-matched for diabetes (27% vs. 27%), reference vessel diameter (2.73 ± 0.46mm vs. 2.74 ± 0.45mm) and lesion length (14.8 ± 6.7mm vs. 14.3 ± 6.4mm). Nine month clinical and angiographic follow-up was available in 1052/1099 (96%) and 649/836 (78%) patients, respectively. The safety profiles for the two stents (myocardial infarction (MI), cardiac death and/or target vessel revascularization (TVR)) were similar (ZoMaxx 8.7% vs. Taxus 6.9%, p=NS). The primary endpoint of 9-month TVR occurred more frequently after treatment with ZoMaxx (6.8%) as compared with Taxus (4.2%), therefore the primary clinical endpoint was not met. However, the 9-month in-segment late lumen loss for ZoMaxx (0.29 ± 0.47mm) and Taxus (0.22 ± 0.41mm, p=NS) were similar, thus satisfying the primary angiographic endpoint. Secondary endpoints of the rates of in-segment and in-stent binary restenosis were also similar (5.9% vs. 5.8%, 7.8% vs. 7.9%, respectively).. At 9months, the ZoMaxx stent failed to achieve the primary endpoint of non-inferiority in TVR to the Taxus stent, but safety endpoints were equal between the two stent systems.

Topics: Angina Pectoris; Cohort Studies; Coronary Stenosis; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Humans; Paclitaxel; Prospective Studies; Radiography; Single-Blind Method; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

Limited data are available regarding the direct comparison of angiographic and clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DESs) for chronic total occlusion (CTO).. A prospective, randomized, multicenter trial was conducted to evaluate the non-inferiority of a zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES; Endeavor Sprint®, n=80) to a sirolimus-eluting stent (SES; Cypher®, n=80) in patients with CTO lesion with a reference vessel diameter ≥ 2.5mm. The primary endpoint was in-segment binary restenosis rate at 9-month angiographic follow-up. Key secondary endpoints included target vessel failure (TVF; including cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization) and Academic Research Consortium-defined definite/probable stent thrombosis (ST) within 12 months. The ZES was non-inferior to the SES with respect to the primary endpoint, which occurred in 14.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.0-22.2) and in 13.7% (95%CI: 5.8-21.6) of patients, respectively (non-inferiority margin, 15.0%; P for non-inferiority <0.001). There were no significant between-group differences in the rate of TVF (10.0% vs. 17.5%; P=0.168) nor in the rate of ST (0.0% vs. 1.3%; P=0.316) during the 12-month clinical follow-up.. The effectiveness and safety of ZES are similar to those of SES and therefore it is a good treatment option in patients undergoing PCI for CTO with DESs.

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cardiovascular Agents; Chronic Disease; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Occlusion; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Republic of Korea; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography, Interventional

The aim of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES) (Medtronic Cardiovascular, Santa Rosa, California) with Xience V everolimus-eluting stents (EES) (Abbott Vascular Devices, Santa Clara, California) at 1-year follow-up.. Only 1 randomized trial previously compared these stents.. This investigator-initiated, patient-blinded, randomized noninferiority study had limited exclusion criteria (acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions not eligible). Patients (n = 1,391; 81.4% of eligible population) were randomly assigned to ZES (n = 697) or EES (n = 694). Liberal use of stent post-dilation was encouraged. Cardiac biomarkers were systematically assessed. The primary endpoint was target vessel failure (TVF), a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction not clearly attributable to non-target vessels, and clinically indicated target-vessel revascularization. An external independent research organization performed clinical event adjudication (100% follow-up data available). Analysis was by intention-to-treat.. Acute coronary syndromes were present in 52% and "off-label" feature in 77% of patients. Of the lesions, 70% were type B2/C; the post-dilation rate was very high (82%). In ZES and EES, TVF occurred in 8.2% and 8.1%, respectively (absolute risk-difference 0.1%; 95% confidence interval: -2.8% to 3.0%, p(noninferiority) = 0.001). There was no significant between-group difference in TVF components. The definite-or-probable stent thrombosis rates were relatively low and similar for ZES and EES (0.9% and 1.2%, respectively, p = 0.59). Definite stent thrombosis rates were also low (0.58% and 0%, respectively, p = 0.12). In EES, probable stent thrombosis beyond day 8 was observed only in patients not adhering to dual antiplatelet therapy.. Resolute ZES were noninferior to Xience V EES in treating "real-world" patients with a vast majority of complex lesions and "off-label" indications for drug-eluting stents, which were implanted with liberal use of post-dilation. (The Real-World Endeavor Resolute Versus XIENCE V Drug-Eluting SteNt Study: Head-to-head Comparison of Clinical Outcome After Implantation of Second Generation Drug-eluting Stents in a Real World Scenario; NCT01066650).

Topics: Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Electrocardiography; Everolimus; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Prosthesis Design; Retrospective Studies; Single-Blind Method; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Data on clinical outcomes among patients treated with the zotarolimus-eluting Endeavor™ stent versus the sirolimus-eluting Cypher™ stent favor the sirolimus-eluting stent. However, a separate comparison of clinical outcome among patients treated for multiple lesions with these stents is lacking. We performed this comparison within the SORT OUT III trial data set.. Among 2332 patients randomized in SORT OUT III, 695 were treated for multiple lesions with zotarolimus-eluting (n = 350) or sirolimus-eluting (n = 345) stents and followed for 18 months. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE); composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization (TVR); was the primary endpoint.. Zotarolimus-eluting compared to sirolimus-eluting stent treatment was associated with increased MACE rate (13.2% vs. 2.6%; hazard ratio 5.29 with 95% confidence interval: 2.59-10.8). All secondary endpoints; all cause death, cardiac death, myocardial infarction, TVR, target lesion revascularization, in-stent restenosis, and definite stent thrombosis; were observed more frequently among zotarolimus-eluting stent treated patients. For all endpoints, hazard ratios were 1.6 to 4.6 times higher than in the overall results of the SORT OUT III trial.. We observed better clinical outcomes among patients treated for multiple lesions with the sirolimus-eluting stent compared to those treated with the zotarolimus-eluting stent.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome

The optimal duration of dual-antiplatelet therapy and the risk-benefit ratio for long-term dual-antiplatelet therapy after coronary stenting remain poorly defined. We evaluated the impact of up to 6 versus 24 months of dual-antiplatelet therapy in a broad all-comers patient population receiving a balanced proportion of Food and Drug Administration-approved drug-eluting or bare-metal stents.. We randomly assigned 2013 patients to receive bare-metal, zotarolimus-eluting, paclitaxel-eluting, or everolimus-eluting stent implantation. At 30 days, patients in each stent group were randomly allocated to receive up to 6 or 24 months of clopidogrel therapy in addition to aspirin. The primary end point was a composite of death of any cause, myocardial infarction, or cerebrovascular accident. The cumulative risk of the primary outcome at 2 years was 10.1% with 24-month dual-antiplatelet therapy compared with 10.0% with 6-month dual-antiplatelet therapy (hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% confidence interval, 0.74-1.29; P=0.91). The individual risks of death, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, or stent thrombosis did not differ between the study groups; however, there was a consistently greater risk of hemorrhage in the 24-month clopidogrel group according to all prespecified bleeding definitions, including the recently proposed Bleeding Academic Research Consortium classification.. A regimen of 24 months of clopidogrel therapy in patients who had received a balanced mixture of drug-eluting or bare-metal stents was not significantly more effective than a 6-month clopidogrel regimen in reducing the composite of death due to any cause, myocardial infarction, or cerebrovascular accident.. URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00611286.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aspirin; Cause of Death; Clopidogrel; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Vessels; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Paclitaxel; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Risk; Sirolimus; Stroke; Thrombosis; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

Second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) have raised the bar of clinical performance. These stents are mostly made from cobalt chromium alloy. A newer generation DES has been developed from platinum chromium alloy, but clinical data regarding the efficacy and safety of the platinum chromium-based everolimus-eluting stent (PtCr-EES) is limited, with no comparison data against the cobalt chromium-based zotarolimus-eluting stent (CoCr-ZES). In addition, an antiplatelet regimen is an integral component of medical therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). A 1-week duration of doubling the dose of clopidogrel (double-dose antiplatelet therapy (DDAT)) was shown to improve outcome at 1 month compared with conventional dose in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing PCI. However in Asia, including Korea, the addition of cilostazol (triplet antiplatelet therapy (TAT)) is used more commonly than doubling the dose of clopidogrel in high-risk patients.. In the 'Harmonizing Optimal Strategy for Treatment of coronary artery stenosis - sAfety & effectiveneSS of drug-elUting stents & antiplatelet REgimen' (HOST-ASSURE) trial, approximately 3,750 patients are being prospectively and randomly assigned in a 2 × 2 factorial design according to the type of stent (PtCr-EES vs CoCr-ZES) and antiplatelet regimen (TAT vs DDAT). The first primary endpoint is target lesion failure at 1 year for the stent comparison, and the second primary endpoint is net clinical outcome at 1 month for comparison of antiplatelet therapy regimen.. The HOST-ASSURE trial is the largest study yet performed to directly compare the efficacy and safety of the PtCr-EES versus CoCr-ZES in an 'all-comers' population. In addition, this study will also compare the clinical outcome of TAT versus DDAT for 1-month post PCI.. ClincalTrials.gov number NCT01267734.

Topics: Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Chromium; Chromium Alloys; Coronary Stenosis; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platinum; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Republic of Korea; Research Design; Single-Blind Method; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Drug-eluting stents (DES) are increasingly used for the treatment of coronary artery disease. An optimized DES performance is desirable to successfully treat various challenging coronary lesions in a broad population of patients. In response to this demand, third-generation DES with an improved deliverability were developed. Promus Element (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA) and Resolute Integrity (Medtronic Vascular, Santa Rosa, CA) are 2 novel third-generation DES for which limited clinical data are available. Accordingly, we designed the current multicenter study to investigate in an all-comers population whether the clinical outcome is similar after stenting with Promus Element versus Resolute Integrity.. DUTCH PEERS is a multicenter, prospective, single-blinded, randomized trial in a Dutch all-comers population. Patients with all clinical syndromes who require percutaneous coronary interventions with DES implantation are eligible. In these patients, the type of DES implanted will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio between Resolute Integrity versus Promus Element. The trial is powered based on a noninferiority hypothesis. For each stent arm, 894 patients will be enrolled, resulting in a total study population of 1,788 patients. The primary end point is the incidence of target vessel failure at 1-year follow-up.. DUTCH PEERS is the first randomized multicenter trial with a head-to-head comparison of Promus Element and Resolute Integrity to investigate the safety and efficacy of these third-generation DES.

Topics: Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Netherlands; Research Design; Sirolimus; Stents

Data on strut surface coverage of second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) are limited. We investigated stent strut coverage of resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES-R) or everolimus-eluting stent (EES) at 9 months after implantation using optical coherence tomography (OCT).. ComparisOn of neointimal coVerage betwEen zotaRolimus-eluting stent and everolimus-eluting stent using Optical Coherence Tomography (COVER OCT) is a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial comparing ZES-R to EES using OCT at 9 months after stent implantation. The primary end point was the rate of stent strut coverage at 9 months.. A total of 51 patients were randomized to receive either ZES-R (ZES-R group) or EES (EES group), and 47 stents (24 ZES-R and 23 EES) in 44 of 51 patients were evaluated by OCT both immediately after stent implantation and at 9 months. The neointimal thickness was not significantly different between the 2 groups at 9 months (ZES-R vs EES: 139 ± 58 vs 124 ± 42 μm, P = .31). The mean percentages of uncovered stent struts were 3.3% for ZES-R versus 3.4% for EES at 9 months (P = .51). The proportions of malapposed struts immediately after stent implantation (P = .89) and at 9-month follow-up (P = .34) were 0.8% and 0.7% for ZES-R versus 1.0% and 0.1% for EES, respectively. Thrombi were documented in 1 stent (1 [4.2%] in ZES-R vs 0 [0%] in EES).. According to the sequential OCT evaluation, ZES-R and EES showed comparable neointimal thickness and the rate of uncovered stent strut at 9 months after stent implantation.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Coronary Angiography; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Sirolimus; Tomography, Optical Coherence

The TWENTE trial recently enrolled more than 80% of all eligible patients, who were randomised to zotarolimus-eluting Resolute or everolimus-eluting XIENCE V stents. In the present study, we investigated whether eligible, non-enrolled patients differed from the randomised TWENTE trial population in baseline characteristics and one-year outcome.. Characteristics of 1,709 eligible patients were analysed. Independent external adjudication of clinical events was likewise performed for non-enrolled (n=318) and randomised patients (n=1,391). Non-enrolled and randomised patients did not differ in gender distribution, diabetes mellitus, and clinical presentation, but differed significantly in age and cardiovascular history. Nevertheless, clinical outcome after one year did not differ in the primary composite endpoint target-vessel failure (TVF; 9.8% vs. 8.1%; p=0.34), and its components cardiac death (1.6% vs. 1.2%; p=0.61), target vessel-related myocardial infarction (4.7% vs. 4.6%; p=0.92), and target-vessel revascularisation (3.8% vs. 3.0%; p=0.48). Previous bypass surgery predicted TVF in non-enrolled patients (p=0.001); removal of these patients resulted in identical TVF rates for non-enrolled and randomised patients (7.3% vs. 7.3%; p=0.99).. Despite some differences in baseline characteristics, non-enrolled and randomised patients did not differ in one-year outcome, which was favourable for both populations and may be related to the drug-eluting stents used.

Topics: Aged; Cardiovascular Agents; Chi-Square Distribution; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Eligibility Determination; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Myocardial Infarction; Netherlands; Odds Ratio; Patient Selection; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

To compare clinical outcomes among patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with zotarolimus-eluting and sirolimus-eluting stents in the SORT OUT III trial.. Currently, only limited data allow direct comparison of clinical outcomes among patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with a second-generation drug-eluting stent (DES) eluting zotarolimus vs. a first-generation DES eluting sirolimus.. Patients with acute coronary syndrome (n=1052) were randomized to treatment with zotarolimus-eluting (n=506) or sirolimus-eluting (n=546) stents and followed for 18 months. The primary composite endpoint, major adverse cardiac events (MACE), was defined as a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction or target vessel revascularization.. Zotarolimus-eluting stent treatment compared to sirolimus-eluting stent treatment was associated with increased rates of MACE (8·7% vs. 5·0%; hazard ratio (HR), 1·78; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1·10-2·88; P=0·02) and TVR (6·8% vs. 3·9%; HR, 1·77; 95% CI, 1·03-3·04; P=0·04), while all-cause death, cardiac death, myocardial infarction and definite stent thrombosis did not differ significantly. In the same trial, stable angina pectoris patients (n=1206) were randomized to zotarolimus-eluting (n=614) and sirolimus-eluting (n=592) stents with similar results.. With and without acute coronary syndromes, patients treated with the sirolimus-eluting stent had better clinical outcomes than those treated with the zotarolimus-eluting stent.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Angina, Stable; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Myocardial Revascularization; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

This study sought to examine the 3-year clinical outcomes in patients treated with the Endeavor (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, California) zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) or the Cypher (Cordis, Johnson & Johnson, Warren, New Jersey) sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) in routine clinical practice.. The long-term clinical outcome in patients treated with ZES in comparison with SES is unclear.. The authors randomized 2,332 patients to ZES (n = 1,162) or SES (n = 1,170) implantation. Endpoints included major adverse cardiac events (MACE), a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization; the individual endpoints of MACE; and definite stent thrombosis.. At 3-year follow-up, the MACE rate was higher in patients treated with ZES than in patients treated with SES (148 [12.9%] vs. 116 [10.1%]; hazard ratio [HR]: 1.33, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04 to 1.69; p = 0.022). Target vessel revascularization was more frequent in the ZES group compared with the SES group (103 [9.1%] vs. 76 [6.7%]; HR: 1.40, 95% CI: 1.04 to 1.89; p = 0.025), whereas the occurrence of myocardial infarction (3.8% vs. 3.3%) and cardiac death (2.8% vs. 2.8%) did not differ significantly. Although the rate of definite stent thrombosis was similar at 3-year follow-up (1.1% vs. 1.4%), very late (12 to 36 months) definite stent thrombosis occurred in 0 (0%) patients in the ZES group versus 12 (1.1%) patients in the SES group (p = 0.0005).. Although the 3-year MACE rate is higher in patients treated with ZES versus SES, our data highlight a late safety problem concerning definite stent thrombosis with the use of SES. This finding underscores the importance of long-term follow-up in head-to-head comparisons of drug-eluting stents. (Randomized Clinical Comparison of the Endeavor and the Cypher Coronary Stents in Non-selected Angina Pectoris Patients [SORT OUT III]; NCT00660478).

Topics: Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

We sought to compare the long-term safety of two devices with different antiproliferative properties: the Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent (E-ZES; Medtronic, Inc) and the Cypher sirolimus-eluting stent (C-SES; Cordis, Johnson & Johnson) in a broad group of patients and lesions.. Between May 21, 2007 and Dec 22, 2008, we recruited 8791 patients from 36 recruiting countries to participate in this open-label, multicentre, randomised, superiority trial. Eligible patients were those aged 18 years or older undergoing elective, unplanned, or emergency procedures in native coronary arteries. Patients were randomly assigned to either receive E-ZES and C-SES (ratio 1:1). Randomisation was stratified per centre with varying block sizes of four, six, or eight patients, and concealed with a central telephone-based or web-based allocation service. The primary outcome was definite or probable stent thrombosis at 3 years and was analysed by intention to treat. Patients and investigators were aware of treatment assignment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00476957.. PROTECT randomised 8791 patients, of whom 8709 provided consent to participate and were eligible: 4357 were allocated to the E-ZES group and 4352 patients to the C-SES group. At 3 years, rates of definite or probable stent thrombosis did not differ between groups (1·4% for E-ZES [predicted: 1·5%] vs 1·8% [predicted: 2·5%] for C-SES; hazard ratio [HR] 0·81, 95% CI 0·58-1·14, p=0·22). Dual antiplatelet therapy was used in 8402 (96%) patients at discharge, 7456 (88%) at 1 year, 3041 (37%) at 2 years, and 2364 (30%) at 3 years.. No evidence of superiority of E-ZES compared with C-SES in definite or probable stent thrombosis rates was noted at 3 years. Time analysis suggests a difference in definite or probable stent thrombosis between groups is emerging over time, and a longer follow-up is therefore needed given the clinical relevance of stent thrombosis.. Medtronic, Inc.

Topics: Aged; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Sirolimus; Thrombosis

The goal of this study was to evaluate shorter duration (3 months) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation.. There have been few published reports of prospective randomized clinical studies comparing the safety and efficacy of shorter duration DAPT after DES implantation.. We randomly assigned 2,117 patients with coronary artery stenosis into 2 groups according to DAPT duration and stent type: 3-month DAPT following Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent (E-ZES) implantation (E-ZES+3-month DAPT, n=1,059) versus 12-month DAPT following the other DES implantation (standard therapy, n=1,058). We hypothesized that the E-ZES+3-month DAPT would be noninferior to the standard therapy for the primary composite endpoint (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, target\\vessel revascularization, or bleeding) at 1 year.. The primary endpoint occurred in 40 (4.7%) patients assigned to E-ZES+3-month DAPT compared with 41 (4.7%) patients assigned to the standard therapy (difference: 0.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -2.5 to 2.5; p=0.84; p<0.001 for noninferiority). The composite rates of any death, myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis were 0.8% and 1.3%, respectively (difference: -0.5%; 95% CI: -1.5 to 0.5; p=0.48). The rates of stent thrombosis were 0.2% and 0.3%, respectively (difference: -0.1%; 95% CI: -0.5 to 0.3; p=0.65) without its further occurrence after cessation of clopidogrel in the E-ZES+3-month DAPT group. The rates of target vessel revascularization were 3.9% and 3.7%, respectively (difference: 0.2%; 95% CI: -2.3 to 2.6; p=0.70).. E-ZES+3-month DAPT was noninferior to the standard therapy with respect to the occurrence of the primary endpoint. (REal Safety and Efficacy of a 3-month dual antiplatelet Therapy following E-ZES implantation [RESET]; NCT01145079).

Topics: Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Stenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Prospective Studies; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Withholding Treatment

The zotarolimus-eluting stent has shown larger in-stent late lumen loss compared to sirolimus-eluting stents in previous studies. However, this has not been thoroughly evaluated in ST elevation myocardial infarction.. This was a prospective, randomized, controlled trial evaluating angiographic outcomes in patients presenting with ST elevation myocardial infarction, treated with zotarolimus-eluting stents or sirolimus-eluting stents. From March 2007 to February 2009, 122 patients were randomized to zotarolimus-eluting stents or sirolimus-eluting stents in a 1:1 fashion. The primary endpoint was 9-month in-stent late lumen loss confirmed by coronary angiography, and secondary endpoints were percent diameter stenosis, binary restenosis rate, major adverse cardiac events (a composite of cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization), and late-acquired incomplete stent apposition.. Angiographic in-stent late lumen loss was significantly higher in the zotarolimus-eluting stent group compared to the sirolimus-eluting stent group ((0.49 ± 0.65) mm vs. (0.10 ± 0.46) mm, P = 0.001). Percent diameter stenosis at 9-month follow-up was also larger in the zotarolimus-eluting stent group ((30.0 ± 17.9)% vs. (17.6 ± 14.0)%, P < 0.001). In-segment analysis showed similar findings. There were no significant differences in binary restenosis rate, major adverse cardiac events, and late-acquired incomplete stent apposition.. Compared to sirolimus-eluting stents, the zotarolimus-eluting stent is associated with significantly higher in-stent late lumen loss at 9-month angiographic follow-up in the treatment of ST elevation myocardial infarction. Although there was no significant difference in 1-year clinical outcomes, the clinical implication of increased late lumen loss should be further studied.

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

Procedural and clinical outcomes still remain unfavorable for patients with long coronary lesions who undergo stent-based coronary interventions. Therefore, we compared the relative efficacy and safety of resolute zotarolimus-eluting stents (R-ZES) and sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) for patients with de novo long coronary lesions.. This randomized, multicenter, prospective trial, called the Percutaneous Treatment of LONG Native Coronary Lesions With Drug-Eluting Stent-IV (LONG-DES IV) trial, compared long R-ZES and SES in 500 patients with long (≥25 mm) native coronary lesions. The primary end point of the trial was in-segment late luminal loss at 9-month angiographic follow-up. The baseline characteristics were not different between R-ZES and SES groups, including lesion lengths (32.4±13.5 mm versus 31.0±13.5 mm, P=0.27). At 9-month angiographic follow-up, the R-ZES was noninferior to the SES with respect to in-segment late luminal loss, the primary study end point (0.14±0.38 mm versus 0.12±0.43 mm, P for noninferiority=0.03, P for superiority=0.68). In addition, in-stent late luminal loss (0.26±0.36 mm versus 0.24±0.42 mm, P=0.78) and the rates of in-segment (5.2% versus 7.2%, P=0.44) and in-stent (4.0% versus 6.0%, P=0.41) binary restenosis were not significantly different between the 2 groups. There were no significant between-group differences in the rate of adverse clinical events (death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, target-lesion revascularization, and composite outcomes).. For patients with de novo long coronary artery disease, R-ZES implantation showed noninferior angiographic outcomes as compared with SES implantation.. URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01186094.

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cardiovascular Agents; Chi-Square Distribution; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Thrombosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Republic of Korea; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

This study sought to evaluate the safety and feasibility of zotarolimus-eluting stent implantation in focal atherosclerotic lesions of the internal pudendal arteries among men with erectile dysfunction (ED) and a suboptimal response to phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors.. ED, a common condition, is often mediated by atherosclerosis. Current treatment options are limited.. Male subjects with atherosclerotic ED and a suboptimal response to phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors were enrolled in this prospective, multicenter, single-armed safety and feasibility trial. A novel combination of clinical, duplex ultrasound, and invasive angiographic factors were used to determine eligibility for stent therapy. The primary safety endpoint was any major adverse event 30 days after the procedure. The primary feasibility end point was improvement in the International Index of Erectile Function (Erectile Dysfunction Domain) score ≥ 4 points in ≥ 50% of subjects at 3 months. We report 6-month follow-up results, including duplex ultrasound and angiography.. Forty-five lesions were treated with stents in 30 subjects. Procedural success was 100% with no major adverse events through follow-up. The primary feasibility endpoint at 6 months was achieved by 59.3% of intention-to-treat subjects (95% confidence interval: 38.8% to 77.6%) and 69.6% of per-protocol subjects (95% confidence interval: 47.1% to 86.8%). Duplex ultrasound peak systolic velocity of the cavernosal arteries increased from baseline by 14.4 ± 10.7 cm/s at 30 days and 22.5 ± 23.7 cm/s at 6 months. Angiographic binary restenosis (≥ 50% lumen diameter stenosis) was reported in 11 (34.4%) of 32 lesions.. Among patients with ED and limited response with pharmacologic therapy, percutaneous stent revascularization of the internal pudendal artery is feasible and is associated with clinically meaningful improvement in both subjective and objective measures of erectile function.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Angiography; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug-Eluting Stents; Erectile Dysfunction; Feasibility Studies; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Penile Erection; Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography, Doppler, Duplex

Current recommendations for antithrombotic therapy after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation include prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and clopidogrel ≥12 months. However, the impact of such a regimen for all patients receiving any DES system remains unclear based on scientific evidence available to date. Also, several other shortcomings have been identified with prolonged DAPT, including bleeding complications, compliance, and cost. The second-generation Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent (E-ZES) has demonstrated efficacy and safety, despite short duration DAPT (3 months) in the majority of studies. Still, the safety and clinical impact of short-term DAPT with E-ZES in the real world is yet to be determined.. The OPTIMIZE trial is a large, prospective, multicenter, randomized (1:1) non-inferiority clinical evaluation of short-term (3 months) vs long-term (12-months) DAPT in patients undergoing E-ZES implantation in daily clinical practice. Overall, 3,120 patients were enrolled at 33 clinical sites in Brazil. The primary composite endpoint is death (any cause), myocardial infarction, cerebral vascular accident, and major bleeding at 12-month clinical follow-up post-index procedure.. The OPTIMIZE clinical trial will determine the clinical implications of DAPT duration with the second generation E-ZES in real-world patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Topics: Adult; Aspirin; Brazil; Clopidogrel; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Eluting Stents; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Postoperative Period; Prospective Studies; Research Design; Sirolimus; Ticlopidine; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

This was designed to assess the outcomes of side branch (SB) stenosis after implantation of three drug-eluting stents (DES). From 2,645 patients in the ZEST (Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent with Sirolimus-Eluting and PacliTaxel-Eluting Stent for Coronary Lesions) Trial, 788 patients had 923 bifurcation lesions with SB ≥ 1.5 mm were included. SB was treated in 150 lesions, including 35 (3.8%) receiving SB stenting. Of untreated SB with baseline stenosis < 50%, the incidences of periprocedural SB compromise was similar in the zotarolimus (15.8%), sirolimus (17.2%), and paclitaxel (16.6%) stent groups (P = 0.92). At follow-up angiography, delayed SB compromise occurred in 13.9%, 3.2%, and 9.4% (P = 0.010) of these groups. When classified into four groups (< 50%, 50%-70%, 70%-99%, and 100%), 9.0% of untreated SB were worsened, whereas improvement and stationary were observed in 9.6% and 81.4%. In a multivariable logistic regression model, main branch (MB) stenosis at follow-up (%) was the only independent predictor of SB stenosis worsening (odds ratio, 1.03; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.04; P < 0.001). After MB stenting in bifurcation lesions, a minority of SB appears to worsen. DES with strong anti-restenotic efficacy may help maintain SB patency.

Topics: Acute Disease; Aged; Blood Vessels; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Stenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Myocardial Revascularization; Odds Ratio; Paclitaxel; Predictive Value of Tests; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome

To determine which drug-eluting stents are more effective in acute myocardial infarction (MI) patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD).. This study included a total of 3,566 acute MI survivors with CKD from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry who were treated with stenting and followed up for 12 months: 1,845 patients who received sirolimus-eluting stents (SES), 1,356 who received paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES), and 365 who received zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES). CKD was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate < 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) calculated by the modification of diet in renal disease method.. At the 12-month follow-up, patients receiving ZES demonstrated a higher incidence (14.8%) of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) compared to those receiving SES (10.1%) and PES (12%, p = 0.019). The ZES patients also had a higher incidence (3.9%) of target lesion revascularization (TLR) compared to those receiving SES (1.5%) and PES (2.4%, p = 0.011). After adjusting for confounding factors, ZES was associated with a higher incidence of MACE and TLR than SES (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.623; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.442 to 0.879; p = 0.007; adjusted HR, 0.350; 95% CI, 0.165 to 0.743; p = 0.006, respectively), and with a higher rate of TLR than PES (adjusted HR, 0.471; 95% CI, 0.223 to 0.997; p = 0.049).. Our findings suggest that ZES is less effective than SES and PES in terms of 12-month TLR, and has a higher incidence of MACE due to a higher TLR rate compared with SES, in acute MI patients with CKD.

Topics: Aged; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Paclitaxel; Prospective Studies; Registries; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Republic of Korea; Sirolimus

To expand the paucity of data on the efficacy of various drug-eluting stents in diabetic patients.. Type 2 diabetic patients treated in our institution from October 2005 to January 2007 presenting with of de novo lesions in native coronary arteries were randomly assigned to sirolimus-eluting stents (Cypher group; n=76); paclitaxel-eluting stents (Taxus group; n=75); and everolimus-eluting stents (Endeavor group; n=75). Poor metabolic control (HbA1c >7% and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol >100 mg/dL) and microvascular complications (retinopathy and/or nephropathy) were assessed. The primary end point was the 3-year composite of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including death of any cause, myocardial infarction, and clinically driven target vessel revascularization. MACE-free survival was 86.8% in the Cypher group, 82.5% in the Taxus group, and 64.4% in the Endeavor group (P=0.006 by log-rank test). The post hoc comparisons showed no significant difference between Cypher versus Taxus groups (adjusted P=1.0) but a higher MACE rate in the Endeavor group versus both the Cypher group (adjusted P=0.012) and the Taxus group (adjusted P=0.075). Independent predictors of 3-year MACE at Cox analysis were treatment by Endeavor versus Cypher stent (2.35 [95% confidence interval, 1.07 to 5.41]; P=0.030), multivessel disease (hazard ratio, 1.78 [95% confidence interval, 1.06 to 2.66]; P=0.031), diabetic retinopathy (hazard ratio, 1.60; [95% confidence interval, 1.03 to 2.76]; P=0.038), and poor metabolic control (hazard ratio, 1.60; [95% confidence interval, 1.02 to 2.52]; P=0.048).. The present pilot study suggests that in diabetic patients, the Endeavor stent is associated with a higher 3-year MACE rate when compared with Cypher and Taxus stents.

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Coronary Angiography; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Angiopathies; Diabetic Retinopathy; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Paclitaxel; Pilot Projects; Sirolimus

As a substudy of the large, randomized ZEST (Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent with Sirolimus-Eluting and PacliTaxel-Eluting Stent for Coronary Lesions) trial comparing first- and second-generation drug-eluting stents, we evaluated intimal hyperplasia (IH) and vascular changes using volumetric intravascular ultrasound analysis.. Complete angiographic and volumetric intravascular ultrasound data immediately after stenting and at 9-month follow-up were available in 162 patients with 183 lesions: 61 sirolimus-eluting stents (SES), 64 paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES), and 58 zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES). External elastic membrane, stent, lumen, and peristent plaque volumes (external elastic membrane minus stent) were normalized by stent length. Percent IH volumes were calculated as [IH volume/stent volume]×100, %. Reduction of minimal luminal area) was greater in PES than SES (-1.4±1.5 mm(2) versus -0.7±0.9 mm(2), P=0.003), whereas minimal luminal area change in ZES was not significantly different from SES (-1.2±1.0 mm(2) versus -0.7±0.9 mm(2), P=0.055). Percent IH volume was less in SES compared with PES (9.8±6.0% versus 17.5±11.2%, P=0.002) or with ZES (9.8±6.0% versus 18.2±7.6%, P=0.005). Comparing ZES versus PES, there were no significant differences in %IH volume (17.5±11.2% versus 18.2±7.6%, P=0.779) or changes in normalized lumen volume (-1.2±1.3 mm(2) versus -1.1±0.8 mm(2), P=0.452). Late stent malapposition was identified in 8 (13%) SES and 2 (3%) PES but in no ZES (P=0.050). Angiographic restenosis was detected in 6 lesions (3 PES and 3 ZES).. The degree of neointimal growth in ZES was similar to that in PES but less than that in SES. ZES had no late stent malappositions.. URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00418067.

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Hyperplasia; Male; Middle Aged; Paclitaxel; Sirolimus; Tunica Intima; Ultrasonography, Interventional

In the RESOLUTE All Comers trial, the Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent was non-inferior to the Xience V everolimus-eluting stent for the primary stent-related endpoint of target lesion failure (cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and ischaemia-driven target lesion revascularisation) at 1 year. However, data for long-term safety and efficacy from randomised studies of new generation drug-eluting coronary stents in patients treated in routine clinical practice are scarce. We report the prespecified 2-year clinical outcomes from the RESOLUTE All Comers trial.. In 2008, patients with at least one coronary lesion 2.25-4.0 mm in diameter, with greater than 50% stenosis, were randomly assigned to a Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent or a Xience V everolimus-eluting stent at 17 centres in Europe and Israel. Randomisation was by an interactive voice response system stratified by centre. Study investigators were not masked to treatment allocation; but those who did data management and analysis, and patients were masked. There were no restrictions as to the number of vessels or lesions treated, or the number of stents implanted. We assessed prespecified safety and efficacy outcomes at 2 years with specific focus on patient-related composite (all death, all myocardial infarction, all revascularisation) and stent-related composite outcomes. Analyses were by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00617084.. 1140 patients were assigned to the zotarolimus-eluting stent and 1152 to the everolimus-eluting stent; 1121 and 1128 patients, respectively, completed 2-year follow-up. The patient-related outcome (231 [20.6%] zotarolimus vs 231 [20.5%] everolimus; difference 0.1%, 95% CI-3.2 to 3.5; p=0.958) and stent-related outcome (126 [11.2%] vs 121 [10.7%]; difference 0.5%, -2.1 to 3.1; p=0.736) did not differ between groups, although rates of the stent-related outcome were substantially lower than were those for the patient-related outcome. Three patients in each group (0.3%) had very late (after 1 year) stent thrombosis.. Similar safety and efficacy outcomes were sustained between two new generation drug-eluting stents at 2-year follow-up. The greater number of patient-related than stent-related events in patients with complex clinical and lesion characteristics emphasises that during long-term follow-up, the optimisation of secondary prevention is at least as important as the selection of which new generation drug-eluting stent to implant in a specific lesion.. Medtronic (USA).

Topics: Adult; Aged; Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Death, Sudden, Cardiac; Drug-Eluting Stents; Europe; Everolimus; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Israel; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Myocardial Revascularization; Prospective Studies; Secondary Prevention; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

The RESOLUTE US (R-US) trial is a prospective, observational study designed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of the Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (R-ZES) in a U.S. population.. The R-ZES releases zotarolimus over a 6-month period in order to achieve optimal clinical effectiveness and safety.. The R-US trial recruited patients with de novo native coronary lesions suitable for 1- or 2-vessel treatment with stents from 2.25 to 4.0 mm in diameter. In the main analysis cohort (2.5- to 3.5-mm stents and single-lesion treatment), the primary endpoint was 12-month target lesion failure (TLF) defined as the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), and clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR), compared with data from Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent (E-ZES) trials, adjusting for baseline covariates through propensity scores.. Overall, 1,402 patients were enrolled with a mean reference vessel diameter of 2.59 ± 0.47 mm and diabetes prevalence of 34.4%. In the main analysis cohort, TLF was 3.7% at 12 months compared with historical E-ZES results (TLF = 6.5%). The R-ZES met the 3.3% margin of noninferiority (rate difference = -2.8%, upper 1-sided 95% confidence interval: -1.3%, p < 0.001). The overall TLF rate was 4.7%, and rates of cardiac death, MI, and TLR were 0.7%, 1.4%, and 2.8%, respectively. The 12-month rate of stent thrombosis was 0.1%.. The R-ZES achieved a very low rate of clinical restenosis while maintaining low rates of important clinical safety events such as death, MI, and stent thrombosis at 1-year follow-up. (The Medtronic RESOLUTE US Clinical Trial [R-US]; NCT00726453).

Topics: Aged; Cohort Studies; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Vessels; Diabetes Mellitus; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prevalence; Prospective Studies; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome; United States

This study assessed the ability of the SYNTAX score (SXscore) to stratify risk in patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using zotarolimus-eluting or everolimus-eluting stents.. The SXscore can identify patients treated with PCI who are at highest risk of adverse events.. The SXscore was calculated prospectively in 2,033 of the 2,292 patients enrolled in the RESOLUTE All Comers study (RESOLUTE III All Comers Trial: A Randomized Comparison of a Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent With an Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention). Clinical outcomes in terms of a patient-oriented composite endpoint (POCE) of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), and repeat revascularization; the individual components of POCE; target lesion failure (TLF) (a composite of cardiac death, target-vessel MI, and clinically driven target lesion revascularization); and stent thrombosis were subsequently stratified according to SXscore tertiles: SXscore(LOW) ≤ 9 (n = 698), 9 17 (n = 659).. At 12-month follow-up, rates of POCE, MI, repeat revascularization, TLF, and the composite of death/MI were all significantly higher in patients in the highest SXscore tercile. Rates of stent thrombosis were all highest in the SXscore(HIGH) tertile (p > 0.05). After multivariate adjustment, the SXscore was identified as an independent predictor of POCE, MI, repeat revascularization, and TLF (p < 0.05 for all). At 12-month follow-up, the SXscore, ACEF score, and Clinical SXscore had C-statistics of 0.57, 0.78, and 0.67, respectively, for mortality and of 0.62, 0.56, 0.63, respectively, for POCE. No significant between-stent differences were observed for TLF or POCE in any of the SXscore tertiles.. The SYNTAX score is able to stratify risk amongst an all-comers population treated with PCI with second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES); however, improvements can be made with the inclusion of clinical variables. (RESOLUTE III All Comers Trial: A Randomized Comparison of a Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent With an Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; NCT00617084).

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Europe; Everolimus; Female; Health Status Indicators; Humans; Israel; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Linear Models; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Predictive Value of Tests; Proportional Hazards Models; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Survival Rate; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Available drug-eluting stents (DES) have achieved great success in reducing restenosis rates. Recently, investigators have demonstrated that the durable polymer carrier plays a significant role in DES-related hypersensitive reaction and delays vessel healing. TIVOLI stent is a novel sirolimus-eluting coronary stent with biodegradable coating containing sirolimus and polylactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) polymer. The present study sought to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the TIVOLI biodegradable-polymer-based sirolimus-eluting stent in treating patients with coronary artery disease.. A prospective, multicenter clinical trial comparing TIVOLI biodegradable coated sirolimus-eluting stent with ENDEAVOR zotarolimus-eluting stent was conducted in 324 patients (TIVOLI group: 168 patients; ENDEAVOR group: 156 patients) at 12 centers in China to demonstrate the non-inferiority of in-stent late loss with TIVOLI stent compared to ENDEAVOR stent in subjects with a maximum of two de novo native coronary artery lesions (lesion length ≤ 40 mm, reference vessel diameter 2.25-4.00 mm). The primary end point was angiographic in-stent late loss at 8-month. The secondary end points were clinical outcomes at 2 years, including major adverse cardiac events (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or target-lesion revascularization) and stent thrombosis.. Angiographic late lumen loss at 8 months in the TIVOLI group was superior to the ENDEAVOR group (in-stent (0.25 ± 0.33) mm vs. (0.57 ± 0.55) mm, diff (95%CI) -0.23 (-0.32, -0.14), P < 0.0001; in-segment (0.25 ± 0.33) mm vs. (0.42 ± 0.55) mm, diff (95%CI) -0.13 (-0.23, -0.02), P = 0.0083). The rate of in-stent binary restenosis at 8 months was reduced from 8.6% in the ENDEAVOR group to 2.9% in the TIVOLI group (P = 0.0229). Compared to ENDEAVOR stent, TIVOLI stent resulted in a significant reduction in target-lesion revascularization (4.2% vs. 9.6%, P = 0.0495) at 2 years. The two-year major adverse cardiac events (MACE) rate was lower for the TIVOLI group, but not significantly different (6.6% vs. 10.9%, P = 0.1630).. TIVOLI was superior to ENDEAVOR stent with respect to late lumen loss at 8 months, and it yielded both lower rates of angiographic binary restenosis at 8 months and target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 2 years. The MACE rate at 2 years was comparable in both groups.

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Polymers; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

Drug-eluting stents (DES) are commonly used to treat obstructive coronary disease and avoid restenosis. Newer DES have been developed to improve effectiveness and safety. We describe a clinical trial to evaluate a DES with a novel polymer that may improve the antirestenosis effectiveness while maintaining the safety standards of currently Food and Drug Administration-approved DES.. The RESOLUTE US Trial is a multicenter, nonrandomized trial prospectively designed to compare the Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (R-ZES) to the Food and Drug Administration-approved Endeavor ZES using patient-level historical control data, adjusting for baseline covariates through propensity score. The stents differ primarily in the polymer, which, in the R-ZES, is designed to elute zotarolimus over a longer period. The study will enroll up to 1,574 patients with ischemic heart disease due to de novo native coronary lesions suitable for 1- or 2-vessel treatment with stents from 2.25 to 4.0 mm in diameter. The primary end point is target lesion failure at 12 months postprocedure, defined as the composite of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction (MI), and clinically driven target lesion revascularization by percutaneous or surgical methods. Secondary end points include device, lesion and procedural success, death, MI, cardiac death and MI, composites of these clinical events, and stent thrombosis at each follow-up assessment up to 5 years postprocedure.. The RESOLUTE US Trial (ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT00726453) is a prospective, multicenter, observational study with a patient-level historical control designed to assess the safety and efficacy of the R-ZES for the treatment of de novo lesions in native coronary arteries.

Topics: Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

Polymer formulation may affect the efficacy of drug-eluting stents. Resolute, Endeavor, and ZoMaxx are zotarolimus-eluting stents with different stent platforms and different polymer coatings and have been tested in clinical trials. The aim of this analysis was to compare the efficacy of zotarolimus-eluting stents with different polymers.. Data were obtained from the first-in man trial or first randomized trials of each stent, The Clinical RESpOnse EvaLUation of the MedTronic Endeavor CR ABT-578 Eluting Coronary Stent System in De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions (RESOLUTE), Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of the Medtronic AVE ABT-578 Eluting Driver Coronary Stent in De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions (ENDEAVOR II), and ZoMaxx I trials. Follow-up intravascular ultrasound analyses (8 to 9 months of follow-up) were possible in 353 patients (Resolute: 88, Endeavor: 98, ZoMaxx: 82, Driver: 85). Volume index (volume/stent length) was obtained for vessel, stent, lumen, peristent plaque, and neointima. Cross-sectional narrowing was defined as neointimal area divided by stent area (%). Neointima-free frame ratio was calculated as the number of frames without intravascular ultrasound-detectable neointima divided by the total number of frames within the stent. At baseline, vessel, lumen, and peristent plaque volume index were not significantly different among the 4 stent groups. At follow-up, percent neointimal obstruction was significantly lower in Resolute compared with Endeavor, ZoMaxx, and Driver (Resolute: 3.7±4.0, Endeavor: 17.5±10.1, ZoMaxx: 14.6±8.1, Driver: 29.4±17.2%; P<0.001). Greater maximum cross-sectional narrowing and higher neointima-free frame ratio, suggesting less neointimal coverage, were observed in Resolute compared with other stent groups. Multiple regression analysis confirmed that the biodurable polymer used in Resolute independently correlated with neointimal suppression among 3 zotarolimus-eluting stents.. The different polymer formulations significantly affect the relative amount of neointima for zotarolimus-eluting stents.. URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00248079.

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cell Proliferation; Coronary Angiography; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neointima; Polymers; Regression Analysis; Sirolimus; Ultrasonography, Interventional

This study sought to compare late safety and efficacy outcomes following percutaneous coronary revascularization with zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES) and sirolimus-eluting stents (SES).. Despite higher late lumen loss and binary restenosis with ZES compared with SES, it is uncertain whether differences in early angiographic measures translate into more disparate late clinical events.. Clinical outcomes were prospectively evaluated through 5 years in the ENDEAVOR III (A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Medtronic Endeavor Drug [ABT-578] Eluting Coronary Stent System Versus the Cypher Sirolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent System in De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions) that randomized 436 patients of relatively low anatomic and clinical risk to treatment with ZES (n = 323) or SES (n = 113) and evaluated a primary endpoint of 8-month angiographic late lumen loss.. At 5 years (completeness of follow-up: 95.2%), pre-specified endpoints of all-cause mortality (5.2% vs. 13.0%, p = 0.02), myocardial infarction (1.0% vs. 4.6%, p = 0.03), and the composite event rates of cardiac death/myocardial infarction (1.3% vs. 6.5%, p = 0.009) and major adverse cardiac events (14.0% vs. 22.2%, p = 0.05) were significantly lower among patients treated with ZES. Rates of target lesion (8.1% ZES vs. 6.5% SES, p = 0.68) and target vessel revascularization were similar between treatment groups. Stent thrombosis was infrequent and similar in both groups (0.7% ZES vs. 0.9% SES, p = 1.0). Between 9 months and 5 years, progression of major adverse cardiac events was significantly more common with SES than with ZES (16.7% vs. 7.8%, p = 0.015).. Despite initially higher angiographic late lumen loss, rates of clinical restenosis beyond the protocol-specified angiographic follow-up period remain stable with ZES compared with the rates for SES, resulting in similar late-term efficacy. Over 5 years, significant differences in death, myocardial infarction, and composite endpoints favored treatment with ZES. (The Medtronic Endeavor III Drug Eluting Coronary Stent System Clinical Trial [ENDEAVOR III]; NCT00217256).

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of patient and lesion complexity on outcomes with newer-generation zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES) and everolimus-eluting stents (EES).. Clinical and angiographic outcomes of newer-generation stents have not been described among complex patients.. Patients enrolled in the RESOLUTE All Comers trial (A Randomized Comparison of a Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent With an Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) were stratified into "complex" and "simple.". Of 2,292 patients, 1,520 (66.3%) were complex and treated with ZES (n = 764) or EES (n = 756). Event rates were higher among complex patients, and results did not differ between ZES and EES, regardless of complexity. At 1 year, target lesion failure was 8.9% in ZES- and 9.7% in EES-treated complex patients (p = 0.66) and 6.8% in ZES- and 5.7% in EES-treated simple patients (p = 0.55). Rates of cardiac death (1.3% vs. 2.2%, p = 0.24), target-vessel myocardial infarction (4.3% vs. 4.4%, p = 0.90), and clinically indicated target lesion revascularization (4.4% vs. 4.0%, p = 0.80) were similar for both stent types among complex patients. Definite or probable stent thrombosis occurred in 20 (1.3%) complex patients with no difference between ZES (1.7%) and EES (0.9%, p = 0.26). Angiographic follow-up showed similar results for ZES and EES in terms of in-stent percentage diameter stenosis (22.2 ± 15.4% vs. 21.4 ± 15.8%, p = 0.67) and in-segment binary restenosis (6.6% vs. 8.0%, p = 0.82) in the complex group.. In this all-comers randomized trial, major adverse cardiovascular events were more frequent among complex than simple patients. The newer-generation ZES and EES proved to be safe and effective, regardless of complexity, with similar clinical and angiographic outcomes for both stent types through 1 year. (RESOLUTE-III All Comers Trial: A Randomized Comparison of a Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent With an Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; NCT00617084).

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Stenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Myocardial Ischemia; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

To compare the tissue coverage of a hydrophilic polymer-coated zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) vs. a fluoropolymer-coated everolimus-eluting stent (EES) at 13 months, using optical coherence tomography (OCT) in an 'all-comers' population of patients, in order to clarify the mechanism of eventual differences in the biocompatibility and thrombogenicity of the devices.. Patients randomized to angiographic follow-up in the RESOLUTE All Comers trial (NCT00617084) at pre-specified OCT sites underwent OCT follow-up at 13 months. Tissue coverage and apposition were assessed strut by strut, and the results in both treatment groups were compared using multilevel logistic or linear regression, as appropriate, with clustering at three different levels: patient, lesion, and stent. Fifty-eight patients (30 ZES and 28 EES), 72 lesions, 107 stents, and 23 197 struts were analysed. Eight hundred and eighty-seven and 654 uncovered struts (7.4 and 5.8%, P= 0.378), and 216 and 161 malapposed struts (1.8 and 1.4%, P= 0.569) were found in the ZES and EES groups, respectively. The mean thickness of coverage was 116 ± 99 µm in ZES and 142 ± 113 µm in EES (P= 0.466). No differences in per cent neointimal volume obstruction (12.5 ± 7.9 vs. 15.0 ± 10.7%) or other areas-volumetric parameters were found between ZES and EES, respectively.. No significant differences in tissue coverage, malapposition, or lumen/stent areas and volumes were detected by OCT between the hydrophilic polymer-coated ZES and the fluoropolymer-coated EES at 13-month follow-up.

Topics: Aged; Coronary Stenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Polymers; Prospective Studies; Sirolimus; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Treatment Outcome; Tubulin Modulators

This study sought to compare the efficacy of passive stent coating with titanium-nitride-oxide (TiNO) with drug-eluting stents releasing zotarolimus (ZES) (Endeavor, Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota).. Stent coating with TiNO has been shown to reduce restenosis compared with bare-metal stents in experimental and clinical studies.. In an assessor-blind noninferiority study, 302 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention were randomized to treatment with TiNO or ZES. The primary endpoint was in-stent late loss at 6 to 8 months, and analysis was by intention to treat.. Both groups were well balanced with respect to baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics. The TiNO group failed to reach the pre-specified noninferiority margin for the primary endpoint (in-stent late loss: 0.64 ± 0.61 mm vs. 0.47 ± 0.48 mm, difference: 0.16, upper 1-sided 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.26; p(noninferiority) = 0.54), and subsequent superiority testing was in favor of ZES (p(superiority) = 0.02). In-segment binary restenosis was lower with ZES (11.1%) than with TiNO (20.5%; p(superiority) = 0.04). A stratified analysis of the primary endpoint found particularly pronounced differences between stents among diabetic versus nondiabetic patients (0.90 ± 0.69 mm vs. 0.39 ± 0.38 mm; p(interaction) = 0.04). Clinical outcomes showed a similar rate of death (0.7% vs. 0.7%; p = 1.00), myocardial infarction (5.3% vs. 6.7%; p = 0.60), and major adverse cardiac events (21.1% vs. 18.0%, hazard ratio: 1.19, 95% CI: 0.71 to 2.00; p = 0.50) at 1 year. There were no differences in rates of definite or probable stent thrombosis (0.7% vs. 0%; p = 0.51) at 1 year.. Compared with TiNO, ZES was superior with regard to late loss and binary restenosis. The concept of passive stent coating with TiNO remains inferior to drug-eluting stent technology in reducing restenosis. ([TIDE] Randomized Trial Comparing Titan Stent With Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent: NCT00492908).

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Clopidogrel; Confidence Intervals; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Reperfusion; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Statistics as Topic; Statistics, Nonparametric; Switzerland; Ticlopidine; Titanium

Telmisartan is a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ activator with potent anti-inflammatory and antiatherogenic effects. The authors compared the effects of telmisartan and valsartan on neointima volume, atherosclerosis progression and brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) after stenting in hypertensive type 2 diabetes.. This was a prospective, randomised, 8-month follow-up study that included patients with significant coronary stenosis who received telmisartan (n=36) or valsartan (n=37).. University hospital.. Neointima volume and atherosclerosis progression 10 mm proximal and distal to the stented segment were analysed using repeat intravascular ultrasonography. baPWV and inflammatory markers such as interleukin 6, tumour necrosis factor α, C-reactive protein and adiponectin were compared.. Neointima volume at 8 months was significantly lower in the telmisartan group than the valsartan group (1.9±1.0 vs 2.6±1.4 mm(3)/1 mm, p=0.007, respectively). Total plaque volumes 10 mm proximal (7.1±1.5 vs 7.8±1.6 mm(3)/1 mm, p=0.032, respectively) and distal (3.5±1.4 vs 4.1±1.3 mm(3)/1 mm, p=0.028, respectively) to the stent were significantly lower in the telmisartan group than the valsartan group at 8 months. The decrease from baseline in baPWV was significantly greater in the telmisartan group than the valsartan group (-52±104 vs 30±113 cm/s, p=0.002, respectively). The increase from baseline in adiponectin levels and the decreases from baseline in interleukin 6 and tumour necrosis factor α levels were significantly greater in the telmisartan group at 8 months. Retinol-binding protein-4, homeostasis model of assessment index, hemoglobin A(1c) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels decreased significantly in both groups without differences in changes from baseline between the two groups.. Telmisartan reduced neointima volume; atherosclerosis progression 10 mm proximal and distal to the stented segment and baPWV independent of blood pressure, glucose and lipid control in hypertensive type 2 diabetes. Clinical trial no NCT00599885 (clinicaltrials.gov.).

Topics: Adiponectin; Aged; Ankle Brachial Index; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Benzimidazoles; Benzoates; C-Reactive Protein; Coronary Stenosis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Disease Progression; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Hypertension; Interleukin-6; Male; Middle Aged; Neointima; Prospective Studies; Single-Blind Method; Sirolimus; Telmisartan; Tetrazoles; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha; Ultrasonography, Interventional; Valine; Valsartan

Patients with diabetes mellitus have increased risk of in-stent restenosis after coronary stent implantation due to neointimal hyperplasia (NIH). The aim of this study was to use quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and volumetric intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) to evaluate the effects of the sirolimus-eluting Cypher® stent (SES) and the zotarolimus-eluting Endeavor® stent (ZES) on angiographic late lumen loss and intima hyperplasia in diabetic patients.. In the DiabeDES III trial, 127 patients were randomised to SES or ZES stent implantation. Angiographic 10-month follow-up data were available in 105 patients, including 48 SES and 57 ZES treated patients. Angiographic endpoints were in-stent late lumen loss and minimal lumen diameter. IVUS endpoints included NIH volume and in-stent percent volume obstruction. Baseline clinical characteristics and lesion parameters were similar in the two groups. At 10-month follow-up, angiographic in-stent late lumen loss (0.14±0.37 mm vs. 0.74±0.45 mm, p<0.001) was reduced and minimum lumen diameter was higher (2.36±0.53 mm vs. 1.96±0.65, p<0.001) in the SES group as compared to the ZES group. As compared to the ZES group, NIH volume was significantly reduced in the SES group (median [interquartile range]: 0.0 mm3 [0.0 to 1.2] vs. 16.5 mm3 [6.2 to 31.1], p<0.001). In-stent% volume obstruction was significantly reduced in SES as compared to ZES (median [interquartile range]: 0.0% [0.0-0.7] vs. 13.0% [6.7-20.8], p<0.001).. In diabetic patients, the SES reduced angiographic late lumen loss and inhibited NIH more effectively than ZES.

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Laser-Assisted; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Diabetes Complications; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Hyperplasia; Male; Middle Aged; Neointima; Risk Factors; Single-Blind Method; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography, Interventional

The purpose of the present study was to compare the efficacy and safety of paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES), sirolimus-eluting stent (SES), and zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) with metabolic syndrome (MS).. Using data from Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry (KAMIR; November 2005-December 2007), a total of 1,768 MS patients with STEMI who underwent primary PCI were enrolled: The PES group was 634, SES group, 906, and ZES group, 228. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac event (all-cause death, re-myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization) during 12 months follow-up. At 12 months, the cumulative incidence of primary endpoint in the PES, SES, and ZES groups was 10.9%, 9.1%, and 11.0%, respectively (P=0.086). Incidence of death, recurrent myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization did not differ among the 3 groups. There were 7 episodes of acute (0.3% in PES group, 0.4% in SES group, and 0.4% in ZES group, respectively, P=0.773) and 18 episodes of cumulative stent thrombosis including late stent thrombosis (0.9% in PES group, 1.0% in SES group, and 1.3% in ZES group, respectively, P=0.448).. Implantation of SES, PES, and ZES in MS patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI provided comparable clinical outcomes in patients enrolled in KAMIR.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic; Asian People; Disease-Free Survival; Drug-Eluting Stents; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Metabolic Syndrome; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Paclitaxel; Republic of Korea; Sirolimus; Survival Rate

Durable polymer coatings have been implicated in mid- and long-term adverse events after drug-eluting stent implantation. A polymer-free dual-drug sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent and a new generation permanent polymer zotarolimus-eluting stent are recently developed technologies demonstrating encouraging results.. In a clinical trial with minimal exclusion criteria, we randomly assigned 3002 patients to treatment with sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stents versus zotarolimus-eluting stents. The trial was designed to demonstrate noninferiority of the sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stents. The primary end point was the combined incidence of cardiac death, target-vessel-related myocardial infarction, or target-lesion revascularization at 1-year follow-up. Follow-up angiography was scheduled at 6 to 8 months. The sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent was noninferior to the zotarolimus-eluting stent in terms of occurrence of the primary end point (13.1% versus 13.5%, respectively, P(noninferiority)=0.006; hazard ratio=0.97, 95% confidence interval, 0.78 to 1.19; P(superiority)=0.74). The incidence of definite/probable stent thrombosis was low in both groups (1.1% versus 1.2%, respectively; hazard ratio=0.91 [95% confidence interval, 0.45 to 1.84], P=0.80). With regard to angiographic efficacy, there were no differences between the sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent and the zotarolimus-eluting stent in terms of either in-segment binary angiographic restenosis (13.3% versus 13.4% respectively; P=0.95) or in-stent late luminal loss (0.31±0.58 mm versus 0.29±0.56 mm, respectively; P=0.46).. In this large-scale study powered for clinical end points, a polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent was noninferior to a new generation durable polymer-based zotarolimus-eluting stent out to 12 months.. http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier NCT 00598533.

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Anticholesteremic Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Polymers; Probucol; Prosthesis Design; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

We assessed the in vivo vascular response to a new generation of zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES) with prolonged drug release (Resolute ZES-SR, Medtronic Vascular, Santa Rosa, California) compared with ZES with faster kinetics (Endeavor ZES-FR, Medtronic Vascular) by optical coherence tomography.. Local drug release kinetics has been implicated with antirestenosis efficacy of drug-eluting stents. However, the impact of different release kinetics on vascular response of diseased human coronary arteries remains to be investigated.. The study population consisted of 43 patients with long lesions in native coronary vessels treated with multiple overlapping ZES. Twenty-one patients treated with ZES-SR were compared with 22 patients treated with ZES-FR from the ODESSA (Optical coherence tomography for DES SAfety) study. The primary endpoint was in-stent neointimal hyperplasia as assessed by optical coherence tomography at 6-month follow-up. Coprimary endpoints were the percentage of uncovered and malapposed struts.. Strut-level median neointimal thickness was 0.11 mm (interquartile range [IQR]: 0.07 to 0.15 mm) in ZES-SR and 0.31 mm (IQR: 0.27 to 0.42 mm) in ZES-FR, respectively (p < 0.001). The 6-month rate of uncovered struts per patient was 7.38% (IQR: 3.06% to 12.72%) in ZES-SR and 0.00% (IQR: 0.00% to 0.00%) in ZES-FR (p < 0.001); rate of malapposed and uncovered struts was 1.47% (IQR: 0.32% to 4.23%) in ZES-SR and 0.00% (IQR: 0.00% to 0.00%) in ZES-FR (p < 0.001).. This study demonstrated the impact of different release kinetics on human in vivo vascular response to ZES implantation. The new generation of ZES-SR compared with ZES-FR had better suppression of the neointimal response but higher proportion of uncovered and malapposed struts at 6-month optical coherence tomography follow-up. (Optical Coherence Tomography in Long Lesions [LongOCT]; NCT01133925).

Topics: Aged; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Stenosis; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prognosis; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Sirolimus; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography, Interventional

Inconsistent results in outcomes have been observed between the genders after drug-eluting stent implantation. The aim of this study was to investigate gender differences in neointimal proliferation for the Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) and the Driver bare-metal stent (BMS). A total of 476 (n = 391 ZES, n = 85 BMS) patients whose volumetric intravascular ultrasound analyses were available at 8-month follow-up were studied. At 8 months, neointimal obstruction and maximum cross-sectional narrowing (CSN) were significantly lower in women than in men receiving ZES (neointimal obstruction 15.5 ± 9.5% vs 18.2 ± 10.9%, p = 0.025; maximum CSN 30.3 ± 13.2% vs 34.8 ± 15.0%, p = 0.007). Conversely, these parameters tended to be higher in women than in men receiving BMS (neointimal obstruction 36.3 ± 15.9% vs 27.5 ± 17.2%, p = 0.053; maximum CSN 54.3 ± 18.6% vs 45.6 ± 18.3%, p = 0.080). There was a significant interaction between stent type and gender regarding neointimal obstruction (p = 0.001) and maximum CSN (p = 0.003). Multivariate linear regression analysis revealed that female gender was independently associated with lower neointimal obstruction (p = 0.027) and maximum CSN (p = 0.004) for ZES but not for BMS. Compared to BMS, ZES were independently associated with a reduced risk for binary restenosis in both genders (odds ratio for women 0.003, p = 0.001; odds ratio for men 0.191, p <0.001), but the magnitude of this risk reduction with ZES was significantly greater in women than men (p = 0.015). In conclusion, female gender is independently associated with decreased neointimal hyperplasia in patients treated with ZES. The magnitude of risk reduction for binary restenosis with ZES is significantly greater in women than in men.

Topics: Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; California; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Hyperplasia; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Neointima; Prognosis; Prosthesis Design; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Sex Distribution; Sex Factors; Sirolimus

Diabetes is associated with an increased risk of major adverse cardiac events after percutaneous coronary intervention. We compared clinical outcomes in patients with and without diabetes mellitus treated with the second-generation Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) or the first-generation Cypher Select+ sirolimus-eluting stent (SES). We randomized 2,332 patients to treatment with ZESs (n = 1,162, n = 169 diabetics) or SESs (n = 1,170, n = 168 diabetics) and followed them for 18 months. Randomization was stratified by presence/absence of diabetes. The primary end point was major adverse cardiac events defined as a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization. Secondary end points included these individual end points plus all-cause mortality and target lesion revascularization. In diabetic patients, use of ZES compared to SES was associated with an increased risk of major adverse cardiac events (18.3% vs 4.8%, hazard ratio 4.05, 95% confidence interval 1.86 to 8.82), myocardial infarction (4.7% vs 0.6%, hazard ratio 8.09, 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 64.7), target vessel revascularization (14.2% vs 3.0%, hazard ratio 4.99, 95% confidence interval 1.90 to 13.1), and target lesion revascularization (12.4% vs 1.2%, hazard ratio 11.0, 95% confidence interval 2.59 to 47.1). In patients without diabetes differences in absolute risk decrease were smaller but similarly favored SES. In conclusion, implantation of ZESs compared to SESs is associated with a considerable increased risk of adverse events in patients with diabetes at 18-month follow-up.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Coronary Artery Disease; Diabetes Mellitus; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Retreatment; Risk Assessment; Sirolimus

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES), sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) and paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).. This study was a prospective, single-blind, multicentre, randomised trial. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 12 months post-procedure, defined as cardiac death, recurrent myocardial infarction (MI), or ischaemia-driven target lesion revascularisation (TLR). An angiographic substudy was performed at nine months among 348 patients. From October 2006 to April 2008, 611 patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI were randomly assigned to treatment with ZES (n=205), SES (n=204), or PES (n=202). The cumulative incidence of MACE was 5.9% in the ZES group, 3.4% in the SES group and 5.7% in the PES group at 12-month follow-up (p=0.457). There was a trend towards a lower rate of ischaemia-driven TLR at 12- (p=0.092) and 18-month (p=0.080) follow-up in the SES group compared to the ZES and PES groups. No difference was observed in rates of cardiac death, recurrent MI and combined death and/or recurrent MI among three groups at 12- and 18-month follow-up. The rate of stent thrombosis was similar among the three groups (2.0% in each group, p=1.000).. As compared with SES and PES, the use of ZES in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI, showed similar rates of MACE, cardiac death and recurrent MI at 12 and 18 months. There was a trend towards a higher rate of TLR with ZES or PES compared to SES.

Topics: Aged; Angiography; Angioplasty; Antineoplastic Agents; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Paclitaxel; Prospective Studies; Republic of Korea; Single-Blind Method; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Coronary Stenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Paclitaxel; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

Vessel angulation and large changes in vessel geometry after stent implantation have been associated with an increased risk of target lesion failure (TLF) using bare-metal stents. Second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES)offer superior conformability and inhibition of neointima. The aim of the study is to investigate the relationship between pre and post-implant vessel geometry and the occurrence of TLF at 1 year after treatment with second-generation DES; and to compare the conformability of Resolute and Xience stents.. The RESOLUTE All-Comers trial randomized 2292 patients (3366 lesions) to Resolute zotarolimus-DES (Medtronic CardioVascular) or Xience everolimus-DES (Abbott Vascular). At 1 year, 176 lesions (121 patients)presented with TLF; a composite of cardiac death, acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and target lesion revascularization (TLR). Lesions with TLF were matched with 176 lesions (168 patients) without TLF adjusting for clinical and procedural characteristics. The number of bends, vessel curvature and angulation were assessed with quantitative coronary angiography pre and post-implantation. The absolute difference post minus pre-implantation was used as a surrogate of stent conformability.. At pre-implantation, lesions without and with TLF had similar numbers of bends/lesion (1.81 vs 1.74; P = .35), vessel curvature (0.295 cm(-1) vs 0.363 cm(-1); P = .13) and vessel angulation (46.3° vs 43.5°; P = .80), respectively. Lesions without and with TLR also had similar numbers of bends/lesion (1.39 vs 1.39; P = .83), vessel curvature (0.368 cm(-1) vs 0.325 cm(-1); P = .33) and angulation (40.2° vs 37.2°; P = .19). Lesions without and with in-hospital AMI also presented with similar number of bends/lesion (1.69 vs 1.81; P = .48), vessel curvature (0.349 cm(-1) vs 0.345 cm(-1); P = .91) and vessel angulation (43.53° vs 48.45°; P = .38). The absolute difference post- - pre-implantation was similar in lesions without and with TLF, TLR and In-hospital AMI. The absolute difference post- - pre-implantation was similar with both Resolute and Xience in vessel curvature (-0.046 cm(-1) vs -0.047 cm(-1); P = .66) and was smaller in number of bends/lesion (-0.08 vs -0.16; P = .13) and in vessel angulation (-6.0° vs -10.1°; P = .03) with the Resolute.. Bended, curved, and angulated lesions and changes in the number of bends/lesion, vessel curvature, and angulation from pre to post-implantation have no relation with TLF and TLR at 1 year and have no relation with In-hospital AMI using second-generation of DES. Resolute appears to be more conformable than Xience.

Topics: Aged; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Prosthesis Implantation; Sirolimus; Treatment Failure

The ENDEAVOR IV (Randomized Comparison of Zotarolimus-Eluting and Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease) trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of the zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) compared with the paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES).. First-generation drug-eluting stents have reduced angiographic and clinical restenosis, but long-term safety remains controversial. A second-generation drug-eluting stent, which delivers zotarolimus, a potent antiproliferative agent, via a biocompatible phosphorylcholine polymer on a cobalt alloy thin-strut stent has shown promising experimental and early clinical results.. This is a prospective, randomized (1:1), single-blind, controlled trial comparing outcomes of patients with single de novo coronary lesions treated with ZES or PES. The primary end point was noninferiority of 9-month target vessel failure defined as cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization.. Among a total of 1,548 patients assigned to ZES (n = 773) or PES (n = 775), at 9 months, ZES was noninferior to PES with rates of target vessel failure 6.6% versus 7.1%, respectively (p(noninferiority) < or = 0.001). There were fewer periprocedural myocardial infarctions with ZES (0.5% vs. 2.2%; p = 0.007), whereas at 12 months, there were no significant differences between groups in rates of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, or stent thrombosis. Although incidence of 8-month binary angiographic in-segment restenosis was higher in patients treated with ZES versus PES (15.3% vs. 10.4%; p = 0.284), rates of 12-month target lesion revascularization were similar (4.5% vs. 3.2%; p = 0.228), especially in patients without planned angiographic follow-up (3.6% vs. 3.2%; p = 0.756).. These findings demonstrate that ZES has similar clinical safety and efficacy compared with PES in simple and medium complexity single de novo coronary lesions. (ENDEAVOR IV Clinical Trial; NCT00217269).

Topics: Aged; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Paclitaxel; Single-Blind Method; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

In low-risk patients, the zotarolimus-eluting stent has been shown to reduce rates of restenosis without increasing the risk of stent thrombosis. We compared the efficacy and safety of the zotarolimus-eluting stent versus the sirolimus-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease who were receiving routine clinical care with no direct follow-up.. We did a single-blind, all-comer superiority trial in adult patients with chronic stable coronary artery disease or acute coronary syndromes, and at least one target lesion. Patients were treated at one of five percutaneous coronary intervention centres between January, 2006, and August, 2007. Computer-generated block randomisation and a telephone allocation service were used to randomly assign patients to receive the zotarolimus-eluting or the sirolimus-eluting stent. Data for follow-up were obtained from national Danish administrative and health-care registries. The primary endpoint was a composite of major adverse cardiac events within 9 months: cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularisation. Intention-to-treat analyses were done at 9-month and 18-month follow-up. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00660478.. 1162 patients (1619 lesions) were assigned to receive the zotarolimus-eluting stent, and 1170 patients (1611 lesions) to receive the sirolimus-eluting stent. 67 patients (72 lesions) had stent failure, and six patients were lost to follow-up. All randomly assigned patients were included in analyses at 9-month follow-up; 2200 patients (94%) had completed 18-month follow-up by the time of our assessment. At 9 months, the primary endpoint had occurred in a higher proportion of patients treated with the zotarolimus-eluting stent than in those treated with the sirolimus-eluting stent (72 [6%] vs 34 [3%]; HR 2.15, 95% CI 1.43-3.23; p=0.0002). At 18-month follow-up, this difference was sustained (113 [10%] vs 53 [5%]; 2.19, 1.58-3.04; p<0.0001). For patients receiving the zotarolimus-eluting stent and those receiving the sirolimus-eluting stent, all cause-mortality was similar at 9-month follow-up (25 [2%] vs 18 [2%]; 1.40, 0.76-2.56; p=0.28), but was significantly different at 18-month follow-up (51 [4%] vs 32 [3%]; 1.61, 1.03-2.50; p=0.035).. The sirolimus-eluting stent is superior to the zotarolimus-eluting stent for patients receiving routine clinical care.. Cordis and Medtronic.

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Coronary Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Retreatment; Single-Blind Method; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome

We designed a randomized trial exploiting optical coherence tomography (OCT) to assess coverage and apposition of overlapping bare-metal stents (BMS) and drug-eluting stents (DES) in human coronary arteries.. Overlapping DES impair healing in animals. Optical coherence tomography allows accurate in vivo assessment of stent strut coverage and apposition.. Seventy-seven patients with long coronary stenoses were randomized to overlapping sirolimus-eluting stents (SES), paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES), zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES), or BMS. The primary goal of the study was to determine the rate of uncovered/malapposed struts in overlap versus nonoverlap segments, according to stent type, at 6-month follow-up with OCT.. A total of 53,047 struts were analyzed. The rate of uncovered/malapposed struts was 1.5 +/- 3.4% and 0.6 +/- 2.7% in overlap versus nonoverlap BMS (p = NS), respectively, and 4.3 +/- 11% and 3.6 +/- 8% in overlap versus nonoverlap DES (p = NS), respectively. There were no differences in the rates of uncovered/malapposed struts between overlapping BMS and DES, likely due to low frequency of uncovered/malapposed struts in ZES (0.1 +/- 0.4%), which offset the higher rates observed in SES (6.7 +/- 9.6%) and PES (6.7 +/- 16.5%, p < 0.05). Overlap segments showed greater neointimal volume obstruction versus nonoverlap segments in all DES (p < 0.05 for all DES types). Strut-level neointimal thickness at overlap and nonoverlap segments were lowest in SES (0.16 +/- 0.1 mm and 0.12 +/- 0.1 mm, respectively) compared with PES (0.27 +/- 0.1 mm and 0.20 +/- 0.1 mm, respectively), ZES (0.40 +/- 0.16 mm and 0.33 +/- 0.13 mm, respectively), and BMS (0.55 +/- 0.31 mm and 0.53 +/- 0.25 mm, respectively, p < 0.05).. As assessed by OCT the impact of DES on vascular healing was similar at overlapping and nonoverlapping sites. However, strut malapposition, coverage pattern, and neointimal hyperplasia differ significantly according to DES type. (Optical Coherence Tomography for Drug Eluting Stent Safety [ODESSA]; NCT00693030).

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Stenosis; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Feasibility Studies; Female; Humans; Hyperplasia; Male; Metals; Middle Aged; Paclitaxel; Predictive Value of Tests; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Sirolimus; Stents; Time Factors; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography, Interventional

This was a single centre registry study on clinical efficacy and safety of drug-eluting stent (DES) in diabetic patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for complex coronary lesions.. A total of 288 diabetic patients who underwent elective PCI between September 2003 and June 2006 in our centre were enrolled and followed-up for 18 months. Among them, 79 (27.4%) patients received sirolimus-eluting stent (SES), 138 (47.9%) paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) and 71 (24.7%) zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES). The endpoints were major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and stent thrombosis rates.. Baseline demographics were comparable among the 3 DES groups (median age was 60 years; 69% men). Complex lesions (defined as ACC/AHA type C stenosis) accounted for 55.6% of the total lesions: SES (50.6%), PES (65.2%) and ZES (43.7%), P = 0.005. At 18 months follow-up, the composite endpoint of MACE was found in 12.7% in SES group, 8.7% in the PES group, 12.7% in ZES group and (P = 0.55). Stent thrombosis (ST) occurred in 1 patient (1.3%) in the SES group, 2 patients (1.4%) in PES group and 1 patient (1.4%) in ZES group, respectively (P = 1.00).. The use of DES for elective PCI in diabetic patients was associated with favourable intermediate-term clinical outcomes with no significant differences in efficacy among the 3 groups. Stent thrombosis had low event occurrence rate.

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Stenosis; Diabetes Complications; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Paclitaxel; Sirolimus; Survival Analysis; Treatment Outcome

New-generation coronary stents that release zotarolimus or everolimus have been shown to reduce the risk of restenosis. However, it is unclear whether there are differences in efficacy and safety between the two types of stents on the basis of prospectively adjudicated end points endorsed by the Food and Drug Administration.. In this multicenter, noninferiority trial with minimal exclusion criteria, we randomly assigned 2292 patients to undergo treatment with coronary stents releasing either zotarolimus or everolimus. Twenty percent of patients were randomly selected for repeat angiography at 13 months. The primary end point was target-lesion failure, defined as a composite of death from cardiac causes, any myocardial infarction (not clearly attributable to a nontarget vessel), or clinically indicated target-lesion revascularization within 12 months. The secondary angiographic end point was the extent of in-stent stenosis at 13 months.. At least one off-label criterion for stent placement was present in 66% of patients. The zotarolimus-eluting stent was noninferior to the everolimus-eluting stent with respect to the primary end point, which occurred in 8.2% and 8.3% of patients, respectively (P<0.001 for noninferiority). There were no significant between-group differences in the rate of death from cardiac causes, any myocardial infarction, or revascularization. The rate of stent thrombosis was 2.3% in the zotarolimus-stent group and 1.5% in the everolimus-stent group (P=0.17). The zotarolimus-eluting stent was also noninferior regarding the degree (+/-SD) of in-stent stenosis (21.65+/-14.42% for zotarolimus vs. 19.76+/-14.64% for everolimus, P=0.04 for noninferiority). In-stent late lumen loss was 0.27+/-0.43 mm in the zotarolimus-stent group versus 0.19+/-0.40 mm in the everolimus-stent group (P=0.08). There were no significant between-group differences in the rate of adverse events.. At 13 months, the new-generation zotarolimus-eluting stent was found to be noninferior to the everolimus-eluting stent in a population of patients who had minimal exclusion criteria. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00617084.)

Topics: Aged; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Intention to Treat Analysis; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Prosthesis Design; Retreatment; Sirolimus; Treatment Failure

Novolimus, a macrocyclic lactone with anti-proliferative properties, has a similar efficacy to currently available agents; however it requires a lower dose, and less polymer, and is therefore conceivably safer.. The EXCELLA II study was a prospective, multicentre, single-blind, non-inferiority clinical trial which randomised 210 patients with a maximum of two de novo coronary artery lesions in two different epicardial vessels in a ratio of 2:1 to treatment with either the Elixir DESyne Novolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System (NES n=139, Elixir Medical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) or the Endeavor zotarolimus eluting stent (ZES n=71, Medtronic, Santa Rosa, CA, USA). The primary endpoint was in-stent mean late lumen loss (LLL) at 9-months follow-up. In-stent percent volume obstruction (%VO) was measured in a?sub-group of 65 patients having 9-month intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) follow-up. Clinical secondary endpoints included a device orientated composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (MI), and clinically indicated target lesion revascularisation (CI-TLR) assessed at 9-months follow-up. At 9-months, the in-stent LLL was 0.11+/-0.32 mm in the NES arm, as compared to 0.63+/-0.42 mm in the ZES (p<0.0001 non-inferiority, p<0.0001 superiority). In-stent%VO was 4.5+/-5.1% and 20.9+/-11.3% for NES and ZES, respectively (p<0.001). There was no significant difference between stent groups in the device orientated composite endpoint (NES 2.9% vs. ZES 5.6%, -2.8% [-8.8%, 3.3%], p=0.45) or its individual components of cardiac death, target vessel MI and CI-TLR.. This non-inferiority randomised study not only met its primary endpoint, but also demonstrated superiority of NES compared to the ZES in terms of in-stent LLL.

Topics: Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Macrolides; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Single-Blind Method; Sirolimus; Time Factors

Using optical coherence tomography, we assessed the proportion of uncovered struts at 6-month follow-up in zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES), specifically Endeavor (Medtronic CardioVascular, Santa Rosa, California) stents, and identical bare-metal stents (BMS) implanted in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).. Sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents implanted in STEMI have been associated with delayed healing and incomplete strut coverage. ZES are associated with a more complete and uniform strut coverage in stable patients, but whether this holds true also after STEMI is unknown.. Forty-four patients with STEMI who underwent primary PCI were randomized to ZES or BMS (3:1 randomization). Angiographic, intravascular ultrasound, and optical coherence tomography follow-up was conducted at 6 months and clinical follow-up at 1 year. All images were analyzed by an independent core laboratory that was blind to stent assignments.. There were no differences between ZES and BMS in percentage of uncovered struts (median: 0.00% [interquartile range (IQR): 0.00% to 1.78%] vs. 1.98% [IQR: 0.21% to 7.33%], p = 0.13), maximum length of uncovered segments (0.00 [IQR: 0.00 to 1.19] mm vs. 1.38 [IQR: 0.65 to 3.30] mm, p = 0.10), percentage of malapposed struts (0.00% [IQR: 0.00% to 0.23%] vs. 0.15% [IQR: 0.00% to 5.81%], p = 0.16), and maximum length of malapposed segments (0.00 [IQR: 0.00 to 0.67] mm vs. 0.33 [IQR: 0.00 to 2.55] mm, p = 0.20). Neointimal response was similar between ZES and BMS (332 [IQR: 240 to 429] microm vs. 186 [IQR: 136 to 348] microm, p = 0.99) and evenly distributed. No late acquired malapposition was observed in both groups. There were no deaths, myocardial infarction, or stent thromboses at 1 year.. This optical coherence tomography study found no difference in strut coverage and similar vessel response to ZES, when compared with identical BMS, implanted during primary percutaneous coronary intervention in STEMI patients. (Six-Month Coverage and Vessel Wall Response of the Zotarolimus Drug-Eluting Stent Implanted in AMI Assessed by Optical Coherence Tomography [OCTAMI]; NCT00704561).

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Metals; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Predictive Value of Tests; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Sirolimus; Stents; Time Factors; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography, Interventional

The Resolute stent is a newly developed system with a bio-histocompatible polymer that allows programmed drug delivery up to 180 days. The aim of this intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) analysis was to evaluate the short- (4 months) and mid-term (9 months) efficacy using the Resolute stent.. Data were derived from the RESOLUTE trial, a prospective, multicenter, non-randomized, single-arm study to treat de novo native coronary artery lesions. This trial included 2 cohorts with different follow-up periods, and all enrollment patients in this trial received IVUS study. Follow-up IVUS was available in 24 patients (4-month group) and 88 patients (9-month group). Neointimal obstruction (%) was defined as neointimal volume divided by stent volume. Cross-sectional narrowing (CSN, %) was defined as neointimal area divided by stent area. No significant differences in vessel, lumen and stent volume at post-procedure were observed within stented segments between the 4- and 9-month follow-up groups. Although neointimal volume and % neointimal obstruction showed no significant difference between the 2 groups (% neointimal obstruction: 2.2 ± 2.5 vs 3.7 ± 4.0%, P=0.09), maximum CSN was significantly larger in the 9-month group. There were 7 cases of late incomplete stent apposition.. These IVUS results showed minimum growth of neointimal proliferation by the Resolute stent throughout the stented segment up to 9 months follow up. 

Topics: Aged; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neointima; Polymers; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Ultrasonography, Interventional

A potentially adverse vascular response to overlapping drug eluting stents (DES) has been suggested in current research.. To evaluate the impact of baseline disease severity at the site of stent overlap.. This is a substudy of ODESSA, a prospective, randomised controlled trial designed to evaluate healing of overlapping stents. 71/77 patients with a total of 86 overlapping stents were studied: 25 sirolimus, 24 paclitaxel, 26 zotarolimus-eluting stents; and 11 bare metal stents (BMS). Patients were categorised into high-grade stenosis (HGS, ≥ 70% diameter stenosis) and low-grade stenosis (LGS, <70%) at the site of stent overlap. Angiography and intravascular ultrasound were performed after stent deployment and repeated at 6 months, together with additional optical coherence tomography. Images were analysed by an independent core laboratory. End points were binary restenosis, percentage neointimal hyperplasia (%NIH), mean lumen and stent areas and degree of strut coverage/apposition at overlapping stents at 6 months. Stent overlaps occurred in 49 HGS and 37 LGS. Restenosis was found in 5/6 HGS versus 0/5 LGS treated with overlapping BMS (p=0.01) and 4/43 HGS versus 0/32 LGS treated with overlapping DES. There was a trend towards higher %NIH at BMS overlap in HGS versus LGS (p=0.07). DES overlaps had lower lumen and stent areas and similar %NIH in HGS versus LGS. Any uncovered or malapposed struts occurred more often in overlapping DES at LGS than at HGS (59.4% vs 32.6%, p=0.03).. Overlapping DES in normal-appearing coronary segments showed a higher incidence of uncovered or malapposed struts, while restenosis occurred exclusively in overlapping stents at HGS. These findings should be considered when deploying overlapping stents.

Topics: Aged; Coronary Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Paclitaxel; Prospective Studies; Radiography; Sirolimus; Stents; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Treatment Outcome; Tubulin Modulators; Ultrasonography, Interventional

The aim of this study was to evaluate the relative efficacy and safety of zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES) in comparison with the established and widely used sirolimus- (SES) and paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) in routine clinical practice.. Whether ZES might provide similar clinical and angiographic outcomes in a broad spectrum of patients compared with SES or PES is undetermined.. We performed a single-blind, multicenter, prospectively randomized trial to compare ZES with SES and PES in 2,645 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. The primary end point was a composite of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (death, myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization) at 12 months. A noninferiority comparison (ZES vs. SES) and a superiority comparison (ZES vs. PES) were performed for the primary end point.. Baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics were similar in the 3 groups. At 12 months, the ZES group showed noninferior rates of MACE compared with the SES group (10.2% vs. 8.3%, p for noninferiority = 0.01, p for superiority = 0.17) and significantly fewer MACE than the PES group (10.2% vs. 14.1%, p for superiority = 0.01). The incidence of death or myocardial infarction was similar among the groups (ZES vs. SES vs. PES, 5.8% vs. 6.9% vs. 7.6%, respectively, p = 0.31). The incidence of stent thrombosis was significantly lower in the SES group (ZES vs. SES vs. PES, 0.7% vs. 0% vs. 0.8%, respectively, p = 0.02).. In this large-scale, practical randomized trial, the use of ZES resulted in similar rates of MACE compared with SES and in fewer MACE compared with PES at 12 months. (Comparison of the Efficacy and the Safety of Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Sirolimus-Eluting Stent and PacliTaxel-Eluting Stent for Coronary Lesions; NCT00418067).

Topics: Aged; Cardiovascular Diseases; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Reperfusion; Paclitaxel; Prospective Studies; Single-Blind Method; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

The increased frequency of very late (>1 year) stent thrombosis (VLST) has raised concerns with regard to the safety of sirolimus-eluting stents and paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES).. Experimental and preliminary clinical findings with the zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) have suggested a favorable safety profile.. The ENDEAVOR IV (Randomized Comparison of Zotarolimus- and Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease) trial is a single-blind randomized ZES versus PES clinical trial in 1,548 patients with de novo native coronary lesions; the primary end point-9-month target vessel failure-was previously reported, annual clinical follow-up is planned for 5 years, and this report describes the 3-year outcomes.. The ZES compared with PES reduced target vessel failure (12.3% vs. 15.9%, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.58 to 1.00, p = 0.049), myocardial infarctions (MI) (2.1% vs. 4.9%, HR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.25 to 0.80, p = 0.005), and cardiac death plus MI (3.6% vs. 7.1%, HR: 0.52, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.82, p = 0.004). Although the overall 3-year rate of Academic Research Consortium definite/probable stent thrombosis did not differ significantly (1.1% vs. 1.7%, HR: 0.67, 95% CI 0.28 to 1.64, p = 0.380), VLST (between 1 and 3 years) was significantly reduced in ZES patients (1 event vs. 11 events; 0.1% vs. 1.6%, HR: 0.09, 95% CI: 0.01 to 0.71, p = 0.004). Ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization at 3 years was similar with ZES versus PES (6.5% vs. 6.1%, HR: 1.10, 95% CI: 0.73 to 1.65, p = 0.662).. Three-year follow-up results from the ENDEAVOR IV trial indicate similar antirestenosis efficacy but improved clinical safety associated with ZES compared with PES, due to significantly fewer peri-procedural and remote MIs associated with fewer VLST events. (A Randomized, Controlled Trial of the Medtronic Endeavor Drug [ABT-578] Eluting Coronary Stent System Versus the Taxus Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent System in De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions; NCT00217269).

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Stenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Paclitaxel; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Proportional Hazards Models; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Single-Blind Method; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United States

To investigate the mechanistic basis underlying antirestenosis and the antiatherogenic effect of pioglitazone in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were undergoing zotarolimus-eluting stent implantation.. Recent studies highlight the beneficial effect of pioglitazone in attenuating neointimal growth after stent implantation. Patients with coronary artery diseases were randomly assigned to pioglitazone (n=47) or placebo (n=47) after stent implantation. Pioglitazone significantly reduced neointimal hyperplasia within the stented lesion and attenuated total plaque burden in the in-segment regions of the stent, as assessed by intravascular ultrasonography at the 8-month follow-up. These changes were preceded by reduced circulating natural killer (NK) cells, diminished interleukin 6 and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 levels, and downregulation of chemokine receptor 2 at 2 days after stent implantation; and an elevated interleukin 10 level at 10 days after implantation. Furthermore, the proliferation and migration of vascular smooth muscle cells were inhibited in the presence of pioglitazone-treated patient serum, demonstrating that the antiproliferative effects of pioglitazone occurred concurrently with its antiinflammatory action.. Our data present early cellular and immunologic changes by pioglitazone that might have been associated with antirestenotic and antiatherogenic effects in diabetic patients. Inhibiting proinflammatory responses while promoting antiinflammatory circuits, together with an antiproliferative action, may, in part, account for the antirestenotic effect of pioglitazone by altering vascular remodeling processes in the early phase.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Cardiovascular Agents; Cell Movement; Cell Proliferation; Cells, Cultured; Chemokine CCL2; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Vessels; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperplasia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Inflammation Mediators; Insulin; Interleukin-6; Killer Cells, Natural; Lipids; Male; Middle Aged; Myocytes, Smooth Muscle; Pioglitazone; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Receptors, CCR2; Republic of Korea; Single-Blind Method; Sirolimus; Thiazolidinediones; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Tunica Intima; Ultrasonography, Interventional

We prospectively compared coronary endothelial dysfunction in patients with zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) versus sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation at 6-month follow-up.. A ZES has been associated with uniform and rapid healing of the endothelium.. Fifty patients were randomly treated with intravascular ultrasound-guided stenting with a single stent to the mid-segment of the left anterior descending artery (20 ZES, 20 SES, and 10 bare-metal stents), and endothelial function was estimated before and after intervention at 6-month follow-up by incremental acetylcholine (Ach) (10, 20, 50, and 100 microg/min) and nitrate (200 microg/min) infusions into the left coronary ostium. The vascular response was quantitatively measured in the 5-mm segments proximal and distal to the stent.. In the drug-eluting stent groups, more intense vasoconstriction to incremental doses of Ach was observed at 6-month follow-up compared with the responses before stenting. Endothelial function associated with the ZES was more preserved at 6-month follow-up compared with the SES. Vasoconstriction to Ach was more prominent in the distal segments than the proximal segments in both the ZES and SES groups. Endothelium-independent vasodilation to nitrate did not differ significantly among the study groups.. Vasoconstriction in response to Ach in the peri-stent region was less pronounced in the ZES group than the SES group at 6-month follow-up, which suggests that endothelial function associated with ZES can be more preserved than the SES.

Topics: Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Endothelium, Vascular; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; ROC Curve; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Vasoconstriction

To evaluate the vascular response at 9 months after zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES; Endeavor) implantation using optical coherence tomography (OCT). These findings were compared with those after implantation of a sirolimus-eluting stent (SES; Cypher Select).. Cross-sectional observational study with prospective OCT registry.. Nine months after ZES or SES implantation.. A total of 68 patients (32 ZES and 36 SES) underwent OCT at 9 months after stent implantation. The neointima hyperplasia (NIH) thickness inside each strut and percentage of NIH area at every 1 mm cross section were measured.. The degree of neointimal coverage and the prevalence of malapposition at 9 months after ZES and SES implantation using OCT.. The mean (SD) NIH thickness (251.2 (110.0) mum vs 85.5 (53.3) mum, p<0.001) and percentage of NIH area (27.9 (9.1)% vs 11.2 (7.1)%, p<0.001) were significantly greater in ZES than in SES. The prevalence of uncovered strut as well as malapposed strut was significantly lower in ZES than in SES (0.3% vs 12.3%, p<0.001 and 0.08% vs 2.6%, p<0.001). Thrombus was not observed in ZES (0.0% in ZES vs 27.8% in SES, p = 0.001).. Neointimal coverage in ZES was almost complete and malapposition was very rare at 9-months' follow-up.

Topics: Coronary Stenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Observer Variation; Sirolimus; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Treatment Outcome; Tunica Intima

The aim of this study was to compare the vessel response between zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES) and paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) using intravascular ultrasound.. The ENDEAVOR IV (Randomized Comparison of Zotarolimus- and Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease) trial was a randomized controlled study of zotarolimus-eluting, phosphorylcholine-coated, cobalt-alloy stents for the treatment of de novo coronary lesions compared with using PES for the same treatment.. Data were obtained from patients with serial (baseline and 8-months follow-up) intravascular ultrasound analysis available (n = 198). Volumetric analysis was performed for vessel, lumen, plaque, stent, and neointima. Cross-sectional narrowing (given as percentage) was defined as neointimal area divided by stent area. Neointima-free frame ratio was calculated as the number of frames without intravascular ultrasound-detectable neointima divided by the total number of frames within the stent. Subsegment analysis was performed at every matched 1-mm subsegment throughout the stent.. At follow-up, the ZES group showed significantly greater percentage of neointimal obstruction (16.6 +/- 12.0% vs. 9.9 +/- 8.9%, p < 0.01) and maximum cross-sectional narrowing (31.8 +/- 16.1% vs. 25.2 +/- 14.9%, p < 0.01) with smaller minimum lumen area than the PES group did. However, the incidence of maximum cross-sectional narrowing >50% was similar in the 2 groups. Neointima-free frame ratio was significantly lower in the ZES group. In overall analysis, whereas the PES group showed positive remodeling during follow-up (13.7 +/- 4.2 mm(3)/mm to 14.3 +/- 4.3 mm(3)/mm), the ZES group showed no significant difference (12.7 +/- 3.6 mm(3)/mm to 12.9 +/- 3.5 mm(3)/mm). In subsegment analysis, significant focal positive vessel remodeling was observed in 5% of ZES and 25% of PES cases (p < 0.05).. There were different global and focal vessel responses for ZES and PES. Both drug-eluting stents showed a similar incidence of lesions with severe narrowing despite ZES having a moderate increase in neointimal hyperplasia compared with neointimal hyperplasia in PES. There was a relatively lower neointima-free frame ratio in ZES, suggesting a greater extent of neointimal coverage. (The ENDEAVOR IV Clinical Trial: A Trial of a Coronary Stent System in Coronary Artery Lesions; NCT00217269).

Topics: Aged; Alloys; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cardiovascular Agents; Coated Materials, Biocompatible; Cobalt; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Hyperplasia; Male; Middle Aged; Paclitaxel; Phosphorylcholine; Prosthesis Design; Single-Blind Method; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Tunica Intima; Ultrasonography, Interventional; United States

The aim of this study was to examine outcomes related to the use of the Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) (Medtronic CardioVascular, Santa Rosa, California) compared with the TAXUS paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) (Boston Scientific Corp., Natick, Massachusetts) in the 477 patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) enrolled in the randomized ENDEAVOR IV (Randomized Comparison of Zotarolimus- and Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease) trial.. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in diabetic patients is associated with increased rates of restenosis-related end points compared with PCI in nondiabetic patients. Although ZES has been associated with similar clinical efficacy compared with PES in the overall trial population of the ENDEAVOR IV trial, whether these results are maintained in the higher-risk restenosis subgroup of patients with DM has not been determined.. Clinical and angiographic outcomes were compared according to randomized treatment assignment to either ZES or PES.. Baseline characteristics were similar among ZES (n = 241) and PES (n = 236) diabetic patients, with slightly longer lesion lengths in PES-treated patients (12.9 mm vs. 14.0 mm, p = 0.041). Among the 86 DM patients assigned to routine angiographic follow-up (18% of the overall DM cohort), in-stent percent diameter stenosis at 8 months was greater among ZES-treated patients (32.9 vs. 21.1, p = 0.023), with a trend toward higher in-stent late loss. One-year clinical outcomes were similar among DM patients treated with either ZES or PES (target vessel failure: 8.6% vs. 10.8%, p = 0.53; target lesion revascularization: 6.9% vs. 5.8%, p = 0.70; target vessel revascularization: 8.6% vs. 9.4%, p = 0.87). There were no significant interactions between DM status and stent type with respect to the outcomes measured, and the relative efficacy/safety of ZES and PES were similar among insulin- and noninsulin-requiring subgroups.. One-year clinical outcomes were similar among DM patients treated with ZES and PES in the ENDEAVOR IV trial. These findings parallel the overall trial results, which demonstrated similar efficacy and safety of ZES and PES for single de novo coronary lesions.

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Stenosis; Diabetic Angiopathies; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Paclitaxel; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Severity of Illness Index; Single-Blind Method; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United States

The RESOLUTE trial examined the safety and efficacy of a next-generation zotarolimus-eluting coronary stent, Resolute (Medtronic CardioVascular Inc., Santa Rosa, California).. Revascularization benefits associated with current drug-eluting stents are often diminished in the presence of complex coronary lesions and in certain patient cohorts. Resolute uses a new proprietary polymer coating that extends the duration of drug delivery to match the longer healing duration often experienced in more complex cases.. The RESOLUTE trial was a prospective, nonrandomized, multicenter study of the Resolute stent in 139 patients with de novo coronary lesions with reference vessel diameters > or =2.5 and < or =3.5 mm and lesion length > or =14 and < or =27 mm. The primary end point was 9-month in-stent late lumen loss by quantitative coronary angiography. Secondary end points included major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 30 days, 6, 9, and 12 months; acute device, lesion, and procedure success; and 9-month target vessel failure (TVF), target lesion revascularization (TLR), stent thrombosis, neointimal hyperplastic (NIH) volume, and percent NIH volume obstruction.. The 9-month in-stent late lumen loss was 0.22 +/- 0.27 mm. Cumulative MACE were 4.3%, 4.3%, 7.2%, and 8.7% at 30 days, 6, 9, and 12 months, respectively. Acute lesion, procedure, and device success rates were 100.0%, 95.7%, and 99.3%, respectively. At 9 months, TLR was 0.0%, TVF was 6.5%, stent thrombosis was 0.0%, NIH volume was 6.55 +/- 7.83 mm(3), and percent NIH volume obstruction was 3.73 +/- 4.05%.. In this feasibility study, the Resolute stent demonstrated low in-stent late lumen loss, minimal neointimal hyperplastic ingrowth, low TLR, no stent thrombosis, and acceptable TVF and MACE. (The RESOLUTE Clinical Trial; NCT00248079).

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Australia; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Stenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Feasibility Studies; Female; Humans; Hyperplasia; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; New Zealand; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography, Interventional; United States

To evaluate the 5-year clinical outcomes of patients treated with the Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) in the ENDEAVOR I first-in-human study.. ENDEAVOR I was a prospective, nonrandomized, multicenter study of the Endeavor ZES in 100 consecutive patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease (CAD) due to de novo, stenotic lesions in native coronary arteries.. Patients with single or multivessel CAD were eligible to participate, but only one lesion per patient was treated. The lesion had to have > or = 50% stenosis, be < or = 15 mm in length, and located in a vessel with a reference diameter of 3.0-3.5 mm. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE), target lesion revascularization (TLR), target vessel failure (TVF), and stent thrombosis were evaluated 5 years after stent implantation.. The cumulative incidence of MACE was 2.0% at 1 year, 3.0% at 2 years, 6.1% at 3 years, 7.2% at 4 years, and 7.2% at 5 years. At 5 years, there were seven patients who had eight events; four noncardiac (cancer) deaths, three cases of TLR, of which one presented as a non-Q-wave MI because of a stent thrombosis at 10 days after the index procedure. There were no late or very late stent thromboses by any definition. TVF at 5 years was 5.2%.. Use of the Endeavor ZES to treat symptomatic CAD due to de novo lesions in native coronary arteries resulted in sustained clinical benefits to 5 years, with low rates of MACE, TLR, TVF, and stent thrombosis.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Australia; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Stenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Massachusetts; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; New Zealand; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Severity of Illness Index; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Drug-eluting stents (DESs) are increasingly used for treatment of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), but there are few comparisons of outcomes of various types of DES. We compared the efficacy and safety of zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZESs), sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs), and paclitaxel-eluting stents (PESs) in primary intervention for STEMI. This multicenter, prospectively randomized ZEST-AMI trial included 328 patients at 12 medical centers who were randomly assigned to ZES (n = 108), SES (n = 110), or PES (n = 110) deployment. The primary end point was major adverse cardiac events (death, MI, and ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization) at 12 months. Secondary end points included the individual components of the primary end point, late loss, angiographic restenosis, and stent thrombosis. Baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics were well matched. In-segment late loss (0.28 +/- 0.42 vs 0.46 +/- 0.48 vs 0.47 +/- 0.50 mm, respectively, p = 0.029) and restenosis rate (2.7% vs 15.9% vs 12.3%, respectively, p = 0.027) at 8 months were lowest in the SES group compared to the ZES and PES groups. At 12 months, cumulative incidence rates of primary end points in the ZES, SES, and PES groups were 11.3%, 8.2%, and 8.2%, respectively (p = 0.834). There were 2 acute (in the SES group) and 5 subacute (2 in the SES group and 3 in the PES group) stent thromboses. Incidence of death, recurrent MI, or ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization did not differ among the 3 groups. In conclusion, despite the difference in restenosis rate, the efficacy and safety of the 3 different DESs showed similar, acceptable results in the treatment of STEMI.

Topics: Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Aspirin; Cardiovascular Agents; Clopidogrel; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Thrombosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Myocardial Revascularization; Paclitaxel; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Recurrence; Sirolimus; Ticlopidine

Drug-eluting stents (DES) reduce restenosis rates compared to bare-metal stents. Most trials using DES enrolled selected patient and lesion subtypes, and primary endpoint focused on angiographic metrics or relatively short-term outcomes. When DES are used in broader types of lesions and patients, important differences may emerge in long-term outcomes between stent types, particularly the incidence of late stent thrombosis. PROTECT is a randomized, open-label trial comparing the long-term safety of the zotarolimus-eluting stent and the sirolimus-eluting stent. The trial has enrolled 8,800 patients representative of those seen in routine clinical practice, undergoing elective, unplanned, or emergency procedures in native coronary arteries in 196 centers in 36 countries. Indications for the procedure and selection of target vessel and lesion characteristics were at the operator's discretion. Procedures could be staged, but no more than 4 target lesions could be treated per patient. Duration of dual antiplatelet therapy was prespecified to achieve similar lengths of treatment in both study arms. The shortest predefined duration was 3 months, as per the manufacturer's instructions. The primary outcome measure is the composite rate of definite and probable stent thrombosis at 3 years, centrally adjudicated using Academic Research Consortium definitions. The main secondary end points are 3-year all-cause mortality, cardiac death, large nonfatal myocardial infarction, and all myocardial infarctions. This large, international, randomized, controlled trial will provide important information on comparative rates of stent thrombosis between 2 different DES systems and safety as assessed by patient-relevant long-term clinical outcomes.

Topics: Drug-Eluting Stents; Humans; Incidence; Prosthesis Design; Research Design; Sirolimus; Thrombosis

The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical and economic outcomes for subjects receiving zotarolimus-eluting (ZES) (n = 323) versus sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) (n = 113) in the ENDEAVOR III (Randomized Controlled Trial of the Medtronic Endeavor Drug [ABT-578] Eluting Coronary Stent System Versus the Cypher Sirolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent System in De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions) clinical trial.. Although previous clinical trials have evaluated long-term clinical outcome for drug-eluting stents, none considered their economic implications.. We analyzed case report form information with quality-of-life adjustment and Medicare cost weights applied from secondary sources; compared differences in clinical outcomes, quality-adjusted survival, medical resource use, and medical costs; and evaluated cost-effectiveness through 3-year follow-up.. The use of ZES versus SES reduced the 3-year rates/100 subjects of death or myocardial infarction (3.9 vs. 10.8; difference, -6.9; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -13.0 to 0.8; p = 0.028), with no difference in target vessel revascularization rates (17.9 vs. 12.2; difference, 5.7; 95% CI: -3.7 to 15.1; p = 0.23) but greater use of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery (3.5 vs. 0.0; difference 3.5; 95% CI: 1.3 to 5.7; p = 0.002). After discounting at 3% per annum, total medical costs for ZES versus SES were similar ($23,353 vs. $21,657; difference, $1,696; 95% CI: -$1,089 to $4,482, p = 0.23), and the 3-year cost-effectiveness ratio was $57,002/quality-adjusted life year.. Despite a reduction in death or myocardial infarction and no difference in total revascularizations, medical costs were not decreased due to increased CABG repeat revascularization procedures for subjects receiving ZES versus SES. If future trials observe similar differences, improved safety with no difference in medical costs, the use of ZES versus SES will be a clinically and economically attractive treatment strategy. (The Medtronic Endeavor III Drug Eluting Coronary Stent System Clinical Trial [ENDEAVOR III]; NCT00217256).

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Artery Bypass; Coronary Artery Disease; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Health Care Costs; Humans; Male; Medicare; Middle Aged; Models, Economic; Myocardial Infarction; Prosthesis Design; Quality of Life; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Risk Assessment; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United States

The aim of this study was to assess, after 2 years of follow-up, the safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of a zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) compared with a paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) in patients with native coronary lesions.. Early drug-eluting stents were associated with a small but significant incidence of very late stent thrombosis (VLST), occurring >1 year after the index procedure. The ZES has shown encouraging results in clinical trials.. The ENDEAVOR IV trial (Randomized, Controlled Trial of the Medtronic Endeavor Drug [ABT-578] Eluting Coronary Stent System Versus the Taxus Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent System in De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions), a randomized (1:1), single-blind, controlled trial (n = 1,548) compared ZES versus PES in patients with single de novo coronary lesions. Two-year follow-up was obtained in 96.0% of ZES and 95.4% of PES patients. The primary end point was target vessel failure (TVF), and safety end points included Academic Research Consortium-defined stent thrombosis. Economic end points analyzed included quality-adjusted survival, medical costs, and relative cost-effectiveness of ZES and PES.. The TVF at 2 years was similar in ZES and PES patients (11.1% vs. 13.1%, p = 0.232). There were fewer myocardial infarctions (MIs) in ZES patients (p = 0.022), due to fewer periprocedural non-Q-wave MIs and fewer late MIs between 1 and 2 years. Late MIs were associated with increased VLST (PES: 6 vs. ZES: 1; p = 0.069). Target lesion revascularization was similar comparing ZES with PES (5.9% vs. 4.6%; p = 0.295), especially in patients without planned angiographic follow-up (5.2% vs. 4.9%; p = 0.896). The cost-effectiveness of ZES and PES was similar.. After 2 years of follow-up, ZES demonstrated efficacy and cost-effectiveness comparable to PES, with fewer MIs and a trend toward less VLST. (The ENDEAVOR IV Clinical Trial: A Trial of a Coronary Stent System in Coronary Artery Lesions; NCT00217269).

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cardiovascular Agents; Constriction, Pathologic; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Health Care Costs; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Models, Economic; Myocardial Infarction; Paclitaxel; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Quality of Life; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Risk Assessment; Single-Blind Method; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United States

The E-Five registry was designed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) (Medtronic CardioVascular, Santa Rosa, California) for the treatment of coronary artery stenosis across a wide range of patients treated in real-world clinical practice settings.. Early clinical trials with the Endeavor ZES have demonstrated low rates of target lesion revascularization with a favorable safety profile including low late stent thrombosis with up to 4 years of follow-up. A clinical registry was designed to complement controlled trial data by examining a large patient population, including high-risk patient subsets.. The E-Five registry is a prospective, nonrandomized, multicenter global registry conducted at 188 centers worldwide. Adult patients (n = 8,314) with coronary artery disease who underwent single-vessel or multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention were enrolled. The primary end point was the rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 12 months. A secondary analysis stratified patients by standard versus extended-use clinical and lesion characteristics.. Overall 12-month outcome rates were MACE 7.5%; cardiac death 1.7%; myocardial infarction (all) 1.6%; target lesion revascularization 4.5%; and stent thrombosis (Academic Research Consortium definite and probable) 1.1%. The 12-month MACE rates were 4.3% and 8.6% for standard- and extended-use patients, respectively (p < 0.001).. This large, international multicenter registry provides important information regarding the long-term safety and efficacy of the Endeavor ZES across standard and extended-use patients in the real-world setting. Rates of MACE and measures of safety including cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and stent thrombosis were low and consistent with pooled results of clinical trials. (E-Five Registry: A World-Wide Registry With The Endeavor Zotarolimus Eluting Coronary Stent [eFive Registry]; NCT00623441).

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Australia; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Stenosis; Europe; Female; Humans; Israel; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Registries; Risk Assessment; Sirolimus; South America; Thrombosis; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United States

We performed this study to investigate the vascular response in early period after zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) (Endeavor Sprint, Medtronic CardioVascular, Minneapolis, Minnesota) implantation.. The ZES has different characteristics, with biocompatible polymer and rapid drug-elution, compared with the first-generation drug-eluting stents (DES).. The ENDEAVOR OCT (Evaluation in 3 Months Duration of Neointimal Coverage after Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation by Optical Coherence Tomography) trial is a prospective, single-center study evaluating vascular healing patterns with optical coherence tomography (OCT) at 3 months after stent implantation. A total of 31 ZES in 30 patients underwent serial OCT at immediate post-intervention and 3 months. Neointimal growth and malapposition were analyzed at each stent strut of cross-sectional OCT images with 0.5-mm intervals.. The incidence of malapposition at post-intervention and 3 months was 6.0% and 0.2%, respectively. However, late acquired malapposition was not detected at 3 months. Of 31 stents, 27 stents (87.1%) were covered completely with neointima, but the remaining 4 stents had 2 (0.8%), 4 (0.9%), 4 (1.2%), and 6 (1.4%) uncovered struts. Overall mean percentage of covered stent struts was 99.9 +/- 0.4%. This finding was consistent among groups with acute coronary syndrome and stable angina pectoris (99.9 +/- 0.3% vs. 99.9 +/- 0.4%, p = 0.92). Intracoronary thrombus was documented in 1 stent (3.2%) among 31 stents.. Most of the stent struts were covered with neointima, and late acquired malapposition was not found at 3 months after ZES implantation. Therefore, the current study demonstrated that ZES might have a favorable in vivo vascular response at 3 months after stent implantation. (Evaluation of Zotarolimus Eluting Stent at 3 Months Using Optical Coherence Tomography [ENDEAVOR OCT]; NCT00815139).

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Predictive Value of Tests; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Time Factors; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Treatment Outcome; Tunica Intima; Ultrasonography, Interventional

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angioscopy; Coronary Stenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Sirolimus; Tunica Intima

A novel zotarolimus-eluting coronary stent system (ZoMaxx, Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, Illinois) was compared with a paclitaxel-eluting coronary stent (Taxus Express2) in a randomized trial of percutaneous intervention for de novo coronary artery stenosis. The primary end point was defined as noninferiority of in-segment late lumen loss after 9 months.. The ZoMaxx stent system elutes 10 microg/mm zotarolimus using a phosphorylcholine polymer loaded onto a novel stainless steel stent platform containing a 0.0007-inch inner layer of tantalum.. Twenty-nine investigative sites in Europe, Australia, and New Zealand enrolled 401 patients, 396 of whom received a study stent.. After 9 months, late lumen loss was significantly greater in the ZoMaxx group (in-stent 0.67 +/- 0.57 mm vs. 0.45 +/- 0.48 mm; p < 0.001; in-segment 0.43 +/- 0.60 mm vs. 0.25 +/- 0. 45 mm; p = 0.003), resulting in significantly higher rates of >50% angiographic restenosis (in-stent 12.9% vs. 5.7%; p = 0.03; in-segment 16.5% vs. 6.9%; p = 0.007). The upper bound of the 95% confidence interval on the difference in in-segment late lumen loss between the 2 treatment groups (0.27 mm) exceeded the 0.25 mm value pre-specified for noninferiority. There were no significant differences between ZoMaxx and Taxus-treated groups with respect to target lesion revascularization (8.0% vs. 4.1%; p = 0.14), major adverse cardiac events (12.6% vs. 9.6%; p = 0.43), or stent thrombosis (0.5% in both groups).. After 9 months, the ZoMaxx stent showed less neointimal inhibition than the Taxus stent, as shown by higher in-stent late loss and restenosis by qualitative coronary angiography.

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Australia; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Stenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Europe; Female; Humans; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; New Zealand; Paclitaxel; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Risk Assessment; Severity of Illness Index; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography, Interventional

The purpose of this study was to investigate the vascular response of zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) and sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) using serial intravascular ultrasound (IVUS).. Data were obtained from the Endeavor Drug-Eluting Coronary Stent System Versus the Center Siromlimus-Eluting Coronary Stent System in De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions (ENDEAVOR) III trial, a randomized study comparing ZES and SES for the treatment of de novo native coronary artery lesions. Serial (baseline and 8-month follow-up) IVUS was available in 258 patients (190 ZES, 68 SES).. At 8 months, ZES had greater percentage of neointimal volume index (ZES 1.1 +/- 0.8 mm3/mm vs SES 0.2 +/- 0.1 mm3/mm, P < .01), resulting in smaller lumen volume index (6.0 +/- 2.0 mm3/mm vs 7.0 +/- 2.1 mm3/mm, P < .05). Zotarolimus-eluting stents showed larger IVUS-detectable neointimal coverage over stent surface (50.2% vs 10.5%, P < .01) and greater mean neointimal thickness (0.19 +/- 0.07 mm vs 0.10 +/- 0.06 mm, P < .01). Zotarolimus-eluting stents had a significantly lower incidence of late-acquired incomplete stent apposition.. Zotarolimus-eluting stent is associated with a significantly greater amount of neointimal hyperplasia compared with SES. This amount of hyperplasia in ZES is distributed throughout the stent at 8-month follow-up.

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Stenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Probability; Reference Values; Risk Assessment; Sensitivity and Specificity; Single-Blind Method; Sirolimus; Survival Rate; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Tunica Intima; Ultrasonography, Interventional; Vascular Patency

Drug eluting stents (DES) have been shown to reduce restenosis compared with bare metal stents in bifurcated lesions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes of patients with bifurcated lesions treated by 3 different DES.. Consecutive patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease on one bifurcated lesion with SB>2.25 mm (on visual estimation) undergoing at the Department of Cardiology of the Catholic University of Rome, Italy were screened. Patients treated with Sirolimus-eluting stent (Cypher Select; SES Group), Tacrolimus-eluting stent (Taxus-Libertè; TA Group) and Zotarolimus-eluting stent (Endeavor Driver; ZOT Group) were enrolled in the study. Clinical and angiographic characteristics of all patients were prospectively recorded. Major adverse clinical events (MACE), including death, acute myocardial infarction (MI) or target lesion revascularization (TVR) by either percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary surgery were recorded during the follow-up. Incidence of definite or probable stent thrombosis was calculated according to the ARC criteria.. Two hundred and forty-one consecutive patients were enrolled (89 Group CY, 98 Group TA and 54 Group EN). Length of follow-up was 235+/-60 days. Baseline clinical and angiographic characteristic were similar across the groups. The adopted technique for stent implantation was provisional stenting (73.4%), T-stenting technique (7%), crush (7%) and V-stenting (2.6%). The rate of patients finally treated with two stents was similar among groups. The cumulative rate of MACE (9% SES, 12% TA, 11% ZOT: P=0.7) and of TVR (2% SES, 9% TA, 7% ZOT) was similar among groups. No definite stent thrombosis was observed during follow-up, while 1 probable stent thrombosis was observed in TA group.. The clinical outcome of bifurcated lesions using DES and mainly a technique of single stent implantation is good. In the present observational study, clinical adverse events did not differ in patients with bifurcated lesions treated by Cypher, Taxus or Endeavor stent implantation.

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Vessels; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Proportional Hazards Models; Prospective Studies; Risk Factors; Rome; Sirolimus; Tacrolimus; Treatment Outcome

The use of the Endeavor stent might reduce restenosis and stent thrombosis at 9 months.. Patients (n =1,197) treated for single coronary artery stenosis were enrolled in a prospective, randomized, double-blind study and randomly assigned to receive the Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting phosphorylcholine polymer-coated stent (n= 598) or the same bare metal stent but without the drug or the polymer coating (n=599).. The 2 groups were well matched in baseline characteristics. Diabetes was present in 20.1% of patients; the mean reference vessel diameter was 2.75 mm; and the mean lesion length was 14.2 mm. The primary end point of target vessel failure at 9 months was reduced from 15.1% with the bare metal stent to 7.9% with the Endeavor (P=0.0001), and the rate of major adverse cardiac events was reduced from 14.4% with the bare metal stent to 7.3% with the Endeavor (P=0.0001). Target lesion revascularization was 4.6% with Endeavor compared with 11.8% with the bare metal stent (P=0.0001). The rate of stent thrombosis was 0.5% with the Endeavor, which was not significantly different from 1.2% with the bare metal stent. In 531 patients submitted to angiographic follow-up, late loss was reduced from 1.03+/-0.58 to 0.61+/-0.46 (P<0.001) in stent and from 0.72+/-0.61 to 0.36+/-0.46 (P<0.001) in segment. The rate of in-segment restenosis was reduced from 35% to 13.2% with Endeavor (P<0.0001). There was no excessive edge stenosis, aneurysm formation, or late acquired malposition by intravascular ultrasound imaging. Differences in clinical outcome were maintained at 12 and 24 months (P<0.0001).. Compared with bare metal stents, the Endeavor stent is safe and reduces the rates of clinical and angiographic restenosis at 9, 12, and 24 months.

Topics: Aged; Australia; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Stenosis; Double-Blind Method; Drug Delivery Systems; Equipment Design; Europe; Female; Humans; Israel; Male; Middle Aged; New Zealand; Pacific Islands; Phosphorylcholine; Prospective Studies; Sirolimus; Stents; Treatment Outcome

The ZoMaxx Coronary Stent System elutes the antiproliferative agent zotarolimus via a biocompatible phosphorylcholine polymer loaded onto a novel, thin, stainless steel stent platform containing an 0.0007-inch inner layer of tantalum that enhances fluoroscopic radiopacity. The objective of this single-arm prospective clinical trial was to assess the safety and performance of the ZoMaxx stent for the treatment of coronary artery stenosis. Forty consecutive patients with ischemic coronary occlusive disease due to single de novo obstructive lesions of native coronary arteries were treated with 3 x 18 mm ZoMaxx stents at the Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologie in Saõ Paulo, Brazil, between April and July 2005. Independent core laboratories analyzed quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound results immediately after stent implantation, and after 4 months. The lesion, procedure, and device-deployment success rates were all 100% (40 of 40). There were no major adverse cardiac events during the study. Follow-up quantitative coronary angiography at 4 months revealed in-stent and in-segment late lumen losses of 0.20 +/- 0.35 and 0.17 +/- 0.35 mm, respectively. Follow-up intravascular ultrasound at 4 months revealed 6.5 +/- 6.2% neointimal volume obstruction. There were no instances of late acquired stent incomplete apposition or stent thrombosis. In conclusion, the ZoMaxx Coronary Stent can be safely implanted for the treatment of de novo coronary artery stenosis. The inhibition of neointima formation as measured by follow-up angiography and IVUS after 4 months suggests therapeutic potential for the reduction of restenosis.

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Circulation; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Stenosis; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Phosphorylcholine; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Research Design; Sirolimus; Stents; Treatment Outcome; Tunica Intima; Ultrasonography, Interventional

To describe a novel modification of the T-stenting technique and to report the bench test as well as the first clinical results obtained.. The best technique to treat bifurcated coronary lesions has not been defined.. This novel modification of the T-stenting technique is based, after stenting of the main vessel (MV) and kissing balloon, on the intentional minimal protrusion of the side-branch (SB) stent within the MV. Final kissing balloon is performed using the balloon kept uninflated into the MV before SB stenting. The technique was tested in vitro and applied in two independent series of patients undergoing elective drug-eluting stent implantation on one bifurcated lesion. Bifurcated lesions were classified according to the Medina classification. Patients' outcome up to 9 month was prospectively assessed.. The bench test showed perfect coverage of the bifurcation with minimal stent's struts overlap at the proximal part of SB ostium and a small, single layer stent struts, neo-carina not affecting the MV patency. Seventy-three complex patients (67% of Medina 1,1,1 lesions; 44% of unprotected distal left main lesions) were treated with sirolimus-, paclitaxel-, or zotarolimus-eluting stents using the TAP technique. Procedural success was achieved in all cases and the clinical outcome up to 9 month was characterized by a low rate of clinically-driven target vessel revascularization (6.8%).. The TAP-stenting is a modification of the T-stenting technique which allows full coverage of bifurcated lesions and facilitates final kissing balloon. The first clinical experience suggests that this technique may be practical, thus calling for further evaluations of the technique.

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Disease; Female; Humans; Italy; Korea; Male; Middle Aged; Paclitaxel; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Radiography, Interventional; Severity of Illness Index; Sirolimus; Stents; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography, Interventional; Vascular Patency

Despite the effectiveness of sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents in reducing intimal hyperplasia (IH) and the need for repeat revascularization, concerns about their long-term safety have motivated the search for new drug-eluting stents (DES). Recently developed, the ZoMaxx stent combines a sirolimus-analogous agent (zotarolimus), featuring a phosphorycoline polymer and stainless steel and tantalum platform. We sought to assess the efficacy of this new DES in reducing IH.. A total of 40 patients were treated with the ZoMaxx stent and compared to 50 patients treated with its non-drug-eluting equivalent, the TriMaxx stent. Only single de novo lesions in native coronary vessels greater than or equal to 3.0 mm were enrolled. Serial quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) images were obtained at baseline and 6- month follow up. All patients were clinically followed for 1 year. This analysis aimed to compare the percent of IH between the 2 stents. Secondarily, we assessed in-segment late loss, binary restenosis and major adverse cardiac events.. Baseline patient and lesion characteristics were comparable between the 2 groups. At follow up, zotarolimus efficiently suppressed neointimal hyperplasia formation with a marked reduction in the percentage of stent obstruction by IVUS (4.6 +/- 3.6% vs. 31.2 +/- 16%; p < 0.0001). Almost 90% of the segments stented with ZoMaxx did not exhibit more than 10% of obstruction. After 1 year, 12 patients treated with the TriMaxx and 2 patients treated with the ZoMaxx presented in-segment binary restenosis (p = 0.03).. In this initial experience, ZoMaxx proved to be clinically safe and superior to its non-drug-coated equivalent in reducing in-stent IH formation and restenosis.

Topics: Coated Materials, Biocompatible; Coronary Angiography; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Imaging, Three-Dimensional; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Ischemia; Myocardial Revascularization; Pilot Projects; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Implantation; Sirolimus; Stents; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography, Interventional

Primary intracoronary drug-eluting stent placement after the successful crossing of total coronary occlusions decreases restenosis rate at long-term follow-up compared with bare-metal stent implantation. The PRISON II trial was the first randomized study to show the safety and efficacy of sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with totally occluded native coronary arteries. The sirolimus-eluting stent is superior to the bare-metal stent in treating patients with total coronary occlusions, with significant reduction in angiographic binary in-stent and in-segment restenosis resulting in significantly reduced need for target lesion and target vessel revascularization. Whether sirolimus-eluting stents are superior to other drug-eluting stents in total coronary occlusions is unknown. In this prospective, randomized trial, sirolimus-eluting stent implantation will be compared with zotarolimus-eluting stent implantation for the treatment of total coronary occlusions. A total of 300 patients will be followed for up to 5 years with angiographic follow-up at 8 months. Quantitative coronary analysis will be performed by an independent core laboratory. The primary end point will be in-segment late luminal loss at 8 months angiographic follow-up.

Topics: Coronary Disease; Drug Delivery Systems; Humans; Prospective Studies; Single-Blind Method; Sirolimus; Stents

Zotarolimus-eluting phosphorylcholine-coated cobalt-chromium alloy Driver stents (ZES) demonstrated significant reductions in target lesion revascularization rate with few apparent adverse events compared with bare metal stents (BMS; uncoated Driver stents) in a prospective, multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled trial in de novo coronary lesions. The aim of this study was to examine detailed vascular responses to ZES compared with BMS using serial intravascular ultrasound analysis. A total of 343 patients (ZES n = 178, BMS n = 165) were enrolled in this formal, prespecified intravascular ultrasound substudy of the Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of the Medtronic AVE Zotarolimus-Eluting Driver Coronary Stent in de Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions (ENDEAVOR II), a prospective, multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled trial to compare ZES and BMS in de novo native coronary artery lesions. Quantitative and qualitative intravascular ultrasound analyses were performed postprocedurally and at 8-month follow-up in stented and reference segments. ZES showed significantly less neointima, with a larger lumen than BMS at 8 months (percentage neointimal volume 17.6 +/- 10.1% vs 29.4 +/- 17.2%, p <0.0001; maximum percentage neointimal area 32.9 +/- 13.0% vs 47.6 +/- 18.6%, p <0.0001; minimum luminal area 4.9 +/- 1.6 vs 4.0 +/- 1.7 mm(2), p <0.0001) and no unfavorable edge effect. In the 18-mm single stents, ZES showed evenly inhibited neointima compared with BMS. Neither persistent stent-edge dissection nor late-acquired incomplete stent apposition was observed in either group. In conclusion, ZES showed evenly inhibited neointima with no apparent adverse vascular response in stented and reference segments at 8 months compared with BMS.

Topics: Chromium Alloys; Coated Materials, Biocompatible; Cohort Studies; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Double-Blind Method; Endosonography; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Phosphorylcholine; Prospective Studies; Sirolimus; Stents; Tunica Intima

The Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES; Medtronic Vascular, Santa Rosa, CA) has been found to provide event-free clinical outcomes to 2 years for the treatment of symptomatic CAD by suppressing neointimal proliferation of the target lesion. The clinical outcomes of patients treated with the Endeavor ZES were evaluated at 4 years after implantation. One hundred consecutive patients with symptomatic ischemic heart disease due to de novo stenotic lesions of native coronary arteries were treated with the Endeavor ZES at 8 centers according to a standardized procedure. At 4 years, 3 patients were lost to follow-up analysis. The incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE; defined as death, myocardial infarction, emergent cardiac surgery, or repeat revascularization of the target lesion) was 2% at 4 months, 2% at 1 year, 3% at 2 years, 6.1% at 3 years, and 7.2% at 4 years. The difference in these rates was due to 4 deaths caused by cancer (metastatic melanoma, metastatic adenocarcinoma, small-cell cancer of the bladder, and lung carcinoma). From 2-4 years, there was an additional reported case of target lesion revascularization (TLR). A single case of stent thrombosis occurred at 10 days after the index procedure but no cases occurred thereafter. The treatment of patients with symptomatic CAD due to de novo lesions in native coronary arteries with the Endeavor ZES has sustained clinical benefits to 4 years, with very low rates of MACE and TLR.

Topics: Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Coronary Artery Bypass; Coronary Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

The clinical and angiographic factors that predict clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) in patients treated with the zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) are not known. Accordingly, the differences between ZES-treated patients who required TLR and ZES-treated patients who did not require TLR were examined in 1,306 patients enrolled in 4 pivotal trials of the Endeavor ZES (Medtronic Vascular, Santa Rosa, CA) for the treatment of symptomatic native coronary artery disease. TLR was performed in 64 patients (4.9%) by 9 months, with most cases (89.1%) occurring after 30 days. ZES-treated patients who required TLR had a greater incidence of 2- or 3-vessel disease (p <0.01), more stents implanted (p = 0.05), and lower device (p = 0.04) and procedure (p <0.01) success rates than ZES-treated patients who did not require TLR. The stents implanted in ZES-treated patients who later required TLR were also longer (p = 0.02) and smaller in diameter (p <0.01). Most angiographic outcomes at 8 months (12 months for ZES-treated patients in ENDEAVOR I) were worse for ZES-treated patients who later required TLR. At 9 months, 10.9% of the ZES-treated patients who required TLR had had myocardial infarctions, compared with 2.2% who did not require TLR (p = 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified older age (odds ratio [OR], 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00-1.06), male sex (OR, 1.79; 95% CI, 0.88-3.65), and longer lesion length (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.99-1.07) as risk factors for TLR after ZES implantation (with a C statistic of 0.61, suggesting a modest discriminatory value). These data provide insight into the clinical and angiographic factors that predict TLR at 9 months in ZES-treated patients, making possible the focused surveillance of selected ZES-treated patients who might be at greater risk of TLR.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Drug Delivery Systems; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Myocardial Revascularization; Registries; Sirolimus

The results of 2 randomized controlled trials of the Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES; Medtronic Vascular, Santa Rosa, CA) were recently reported: ENDEAVOR II, in which the Endeavor stent was compared with the Driver bare metal stent (BMS; Medtronic Vascular), and ENDEAVOR III, in which the Endeavor stent was compared with the first-generation Cypher sirolimus-eluting stent (SES; Cordis Corporation, Miami Lakes, FL). To examine in detail the vascular responses to the Endeavor stent, serial intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) analyses were performed in subsets of patients in the 2 trials at baseline and 8-month follow-up. The investigators report results for various IVUS parameters and compare those with published results for the first-generation SES and paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES). The ZES demonstrated significantly improved effectiveness and equivalent safety compared with the BMS in ENDEAVOR II. Although the ZES seems to be slightly less effective at inhibiting intimal hyperplasia than the SES and PES, early results are indicative of an acceptable safety profile. This finding may be due in part to the relatively complete and uniform neointimal coverage associated with the ZES.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Coronary Disease; Double-Blind Method; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Hyperplasia; Male; Middle Aged; Sirolimus; Tunica Intima; Ultrasonography

The E-Five is a prospective, nonrandomized, multicenter global registry of patients receiving the Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES; Medtronic Vascular, Santa Rosa, CA) for the treatment of coronary artery stenosis. All consecutive procedures were included in the registry, without any specific anatomic or clinical exclusion criteria. Since October 2005, 8,318 patients have been enrolled in the E-Five Registry at 188 hospitals in Europe, South America, Australia, New Zealand, and Asia, and 10,343 lesions have been treated. The primary end point is the rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 1 year. Of the lesions treated, 60.3% were American College of Cardiology (ACC) and American Heart Association (AHA) type B2 or C lesions, and 16.5% were bifurcation stenoses. The average lesion length was 18.50 +/- 10.60 mm, and 50.6% of the lesions were > or =16 mm long. Clinical data have been analyzed for 1,989 of the patients (23.9%) receiving the Endeavor ZES in this registry, with 30-day clinical outcomes available for 1,985 of these 1,989 patients (99.8%). The acute procedure success rate in these patients was 98.6%, comparable with procedure success rates observed in previous Endeavor ZES clinical trials. The 30-day rate of MACE in these patients was just 1.7%, comparable with 30-day rates of MACE observed in previous ENDEAVOR clinical trials. In an early analysis of a subgroup of patients enrolled in the E-Five Registry, the Endeavor ZES demonstrated encouraging acute and 30-day outcomes in a real-world population of patients who underwent single-vessel or multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention.

Topics: Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Coronary Artery Bypass; Coronary Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Registries; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

The use of the Endeavor stent might reduce restenosis and stent thrombosis at 9 months.. Patients (n = 1197) treated for single coronary artery stenosis were enrolled in a prospective, randomized, double-blind study and randomly assigned to receive the Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting phosphorylcholine polymer-coated stent (n = 598) or the same bare metal stent but without the drug or the polymer coating (n = 599). The 2 groups were well matched in baseline characteristics. Diabetes was present in 20.1% of patients; the mean reference vessel diameter was 2.75 mm; and the mean lesion length was 14.2 mm. The primary end point of target vessel failure at 9 months was reduced from 15.1% with the bare metal stent to 7.9% with the Endeavor (P = 0.0001), and the rate of major adverse cardiac events was reduced from 14.4% with the bare metal stent to 7.3% with the Endeavor (P = 0.0001). Target lesion revascularization was 4.6% with Endeavor compared with 11.8% with the bare metal stent (P = 0.0001). The rate of stent thrombosis was 0.5% with the Endeavor, which was not significantly different from 1.2% with the bare metal stent. In 531 patients submitted to angiographic follow-up, late loss was reduced from 1.03 +/- 0.58 to 0.61 +/- 0.46 (P < 0.001) in stent and from 0.72 +/- 0.61 to 0.36 +/- 0.46 (P < 0.001) in segment. The rate of in-segment restenosis was reduced from 35.0% to 13.2% with Endeavor (P < 0.0001). There was no excessive edge stenosis, aneurysm formation, or late acquired malapposition by intravascular ultrasound imaging. Differences in clinical outcome were maintained at 12 and 24 months (P < 0.0001).. Compared with bare metal stents, the Endeavor stent is safe and reduces the rates of clinical and angiographic restenosis at 9, 12, and 24 months.

Topics: Aged; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Capsules; Cardiac Catheterization; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Disease; Double-Blind Method; Equipment Design; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Sirolimus; Stents

This trial examined the relative clinical efficacy, angiographic outcomes, and safety of zotarolimus-eluting coronary stents (ZES) with a phosphorylcholine polymer versus sirolimus-eluting stents (SES).. Whether a cobalt-based alloy stent coated with the novel antiproliferative agent, zotarolimus, and a phosphorylcholine polymer may provide similar angiographic and clinical benefit compared with SES is undetermined.. A prospective, multicenter, 3:1 randomized trial was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ZES (n = 323) relative to SES (n = 113) in 436 patients undergoing elective percutaneous revascularization of de novo native coronary lesions with reference vessel diameters between 2.5 mm and 3.5 mm and lesion length > or =14 mm and < or =27 mm. The primary end point was 8-month angiographic in-segment late lumen loss.. Angiographic in-segment late lumen loss was significantly higher among patients treated with ZES compared with SES (0.34 +/- 0.44 mm vs. 0.13 +/- 0.32 mm, respectively; p < 0.001). In-hospital major adverse cardiac events were significantly lower among patients treated with ZES (0.6% vs. 3.5%, p = 0.04). In-segment binary angiographic restenosis was also higher in the ZES cohort (11.7% vs. 4.3%, p = 0.04). Total (clinically and non-clinically driven) target lesion revascularization rates at 9 months were 9.8% and 3.5% for the ZES and SES groups, respectively (p = 0.04). However, neither clinically driven target lesion revascularization (6.3% zotarolimus vs. 3.5% sirolimus, p = 0.34) nor target vessel failure (12.0% zotarolimus vs. 11.5% sirolimus, p = 1.0) differed significantly.. Compared with SES, treatment with a phosphorylcholine polymer-based ZES is associated with significantly higher late lumen loss and binary restenosis at 8-month angiographic follow-up. (The Endeavor III CR; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT00265668?order=1?).

Topics: Aged; Coronary Stenosis; Drug Delivery Systems; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Sirolimus; Stents; Treatment Outcome

ABT-578, a sirolimus analog, is being developed for administration from drug-eluting stents to prevent postimplantation neointimal hyperplasia. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of multiple doses of ABT-578. Healthy subjects randomly received placebo or ABT-578 (200, 400, or 800 microg) as daily intravenous infusions for 14 days. ABT-578 blood pharmacokinetics and urine excretion on days 1 and 14 were determined. The effect of ABT-578 on mitogen-stimulated lymphocyte proliferation was assessed. ABT-578 pharmacokinetics was described by a 3-compartment open model. The mean CL, V(ss), and t(1/2) ranges were 4.0 to 4.6 L/h, 92.5 to 118.0 L, and 24.7 to 31.0 hours, respectively. ABT-578 pharmacokinetics was dose and time invariant. Approximately 0.1% of ABT-578 was excreted in the urine. ABT-578 was well tolerated, and no systemic changes were observed in the mitogen-stimulated lymphocyte proliferation. ABT-578 was shown to be safe over a wide range of systemic exposures.

Topics: Adult; Area Under Curve; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Female; Half-Life; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Metabolic Clearance Rate; Middle Aged; Sirolimus

Topics: Atherectomy, Coronary; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prosthesis Design; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prosthesis Design; Registries; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

A polymer-free biolimus-eluting stent (PF-BES) and a zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) recently showed similar clinical profiles and appear to be competing options in specific clinical settings of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Whether they perform similarly also in complex procedural settings as coronary bifurcation lesions remains unaddressed.. All consecutive patients undergoing coronary bifurcation PCI with PF-BES or the new iteration of the ZES from three large multicenter real-world registries were included. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), target lesion revascularization (TLR) and stent thrombosis (ST). Multiple analyses to adjust for baseline differences were carried out including propensity-score matching, propensity-score stratification and inverse-probability-weighting. Outcomes are reported according to Cox proportional hazard models censored at 400-day follow-up.. 1169 patients treated with PF-BES (n = 440) or ZES (n = 729) on the main branch of a coronary bifurcation lesion were included (mean age 69 ± 11 years, 75.4% male, 53.8% acute coronary syndrome at presentation, 26.6% left main bifurcation, median dual antiplatelet therapy duration 12 [range 12-12] months). MACE, all-cause death, TLR and ST tended towards non-statistically higher rates with the PF-BES as compared to the ZES. Higher MI and target vessel revascularization occurrence was observed with PF-BES.. In this large contemporary cohort of patients undergoing coronary bifurcation PCI, the occurrence of MACE was non-statistically different with the use of PF-BES and ZES devices. However, differences favoring the ZES device that may entail clinical relevance were observed. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings and explore whether they remain valid when a short dual antiplatelet therapy is adopted.

Topics: Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Infant; Male; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Polymers; Prosthesis Design; Sirolimus; Stents; Treatment Outcome

To compare stent recoil (SR) of the thin-strut durable-polymer Zotarolimus-eluting stent (dp-ZES) and the ultrathin-strut bioabsorbable-polymer Sirolimus-eluting stent (bp-SES) in chronic total occlusions (CTOs) and to investigate the predictors of high SR in CTOs.. Newer ultrathin drug eluting stent might be associated with lower radial force and higher elastic recoil due to the thinner strut design, possibly impacting on the rate of in-stent restenosis and thrombosis.. Between January 2017 and November 2019, consecutive patients with CTOs undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention were evaluated. Only patients treated with dp-ZES or bp-SES were included and stratified accordingly. Quantitative coronary angiography analysis was used to assess absolute SR, relative SR, absolute focal SR, relative focal SR, high absolute, and high relative focal SR.. A total of 128 lesions (67 treated with dp-ZES and 61 with bp-SES) in 123 patients were analyzed. Between bp-SES and dp-ZES no differences were found in absolute SR (p = .188), relative SR (p = .138), absolute focal SR (p = .069), and relative focal SR (p = .064). High absolute and high relative focal SR occurred more frequently in bp-SES than in dp-ZES (p = .004 and p = .015). Bp-SES was a predictor of high absolute focal SR (Odds ratio [OR] 3.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.50-7.22, p = .003]. High-pressure postdilation and bp-SES were predictors of high relative focal SR (OR 2.22, 95% CI 1.01-4.86, p = .047; OR 2.74, 95% CI 1.24-6.02, p = .012, respectively).. Both stents showed an overall low SR. However, ultra-thin strut bp-SES was a predictor of high absolute and high relative focal SR.

Topics: Absorbable Implants; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Polymers; Prosthesis Design; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

Reports of long-term outcomes of patients treated with drug-eluting stents in total coronary occlusions are limited. We analysed clinical outcomes of patients treated with the zotarolimus-eluting Resolute stent (R-ZES) implanted in coronary total occlusions versus non-occluded lesions.. Patients treated with R-ZES and included in four trials (RESOLUTE All Comers, RESOLUTE International, RESOLUTE China RCT, and RESOLUTE China Registry) were pooled and divided into three groups - patients with chronic total occlusions (CTO), patients with total occlusions that had occurred recently (rec-TO), and patients without total occlusions (non-TO). Clinical outcomes at five years were analysed. Of 5,487 patients treated with R-ZES in these trials, 8.0% had CTOs, 8.5% rec-TOs and 83.5% non-TOs. Patients had a mean age of 62.8 years, approximately 25% were female and 30% were diabetics. TLF was similar in the three groups at five years (TLF was 13.2%, 12.5% and 13.3% in the CTO, rec-TO and non-TO groups, respectively, p=0.96). Stent thrombosis tended to occur more frequently for rec-TO compared to CTO and non-TO patients (2.6% vs 1.2% and 1.3%, respectively, p=0.11).. In this large population of patients who had R-ZES implanted, five-year clinical outcomes were similar whether or not the stents were implanted in total occlusions.

Topics: Cardiovascular Agents; China; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Occlusion; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prosthesis Design; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

We sought to evaluate clinical outcomes in patients treated with the drug-eluting stent ihtDEStiny BD.. The ihtDEStiny BD stent is a metallic sirolimus eluting stent with a biodegradable polymer with both drug and polymer coating the abluminal surface of the stent and balloon.. In this study, the clinical outcomes of a multicenter prospective registry of patients treated with this stent (DEStiny group) were analyzed and compared with those of a control group of patients treated with durable polymer everolimus or zotarolimus eluting stents (CONTROL group) paired by propensity score matching. Primary outcome was the target vessel failure (TVF) at 12 months defined as a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (TV-MI) and target vessel revascularization (TVR).. A total of 350 patients were included in the DESTtiny group. The control group consisted initially of 1368 patients, but after matching (1:1) 350 patients were selected as CONTROL group. The baseline clinical, angiographic and procedural characteristics were quite comparable in both groups. At 12 months follow up the TVF was 6.6% in DEStiny group and 6.3% in CONTROL group (p = 0.8). No differences were observed for any of the individual components of the primary endpoint: cardiac death 1.1% vs. 1.4%, TV-MI 3.4% vs. 3.7% and TVR 2.6% vs. 2.3% respectively.. The use of ihtDEStiny stent in real practice is associated with a clinical performance at 12 months follow up that appears to be non-inferior to the most widely used and largely evidence supported durable polymer drug eluting stents. A longer follow up is warranted.

Topics: Absorbable Implants; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Polymers; Propensity Score; Prosthesis Design; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

Patients with diabetes have more extensive coronary disease, resulting in higher risks of adverse clinical events following stenting. In all-comer patients, contemporary DES have shown excellent safety and efficacy, but data on diabetic patients are scarce. Separately for the BIO-RESORT and BIONYX trials, we assessed the 2-year clinical outcomes of diabetic patients, treated with various contemporary drug-eluting stents (DES).. We performed two prespecified secondary analyses of two randomized DES trials, which both stratified for diabetes. The main endpoint was target vessel failure (TVF), a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization. Follow-up was finished before the COVID-19 pandemic.. In BIO-RESORT, 624/3514 (17.8%) had diabetes: 211 received Orsiro sirolimus-eluting stents (SES), 203 Synergy everolimus-eluting stents (EES), and 210 Resolute Integrity zotarolimus-eluting stents (RI-ZES). TVF did not differ between SES (10.2%) and EES (10.0%) versus RI-ZES (12.7%) (SES vs. RI-ZES HR:0.78, 95%-CI [0.44-1.40]; p = 0.40, EES vs. RI-ZES HR:0.79, 95%-CI [0.44-1.40]; p = 0.42). In BIONYX, 510/2488 (20.5%) patients had diabetes: 250 received SES and 260 Resolute Onyx zotarolimus-eluting stents (RO-ZES). There was no difference in TVF between SES (10.7%) versus RO-ZES (12.2%) (HR:0.88, 95%-CI [0.52-1.48]; p = 0.63).. There was no difference in 2-year clinical outcome among patients with diabetes, who were treated with SES, or EES, versus RI-ZES. In addition there was no difference in clinical outcome in diabetic patients, who were treated with SES versus RO-ZES. These findings may be considered as a signal of safety and efficacy of the studied DES in patients with diabetes.

Topics: Biodegradable Plastics; Diabetes Mellitus; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Humans; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Prosthesis Design; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Research Design; Sirolimus

[Figure: see text].

Topics: Absorbable Implants; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Polymers; Sirolimus; Stents; Treatment Outcome

Zotarolimus is a semi-synthetic derivative of rapamycin and a novel immunosuppressive agent used to prevent graft rejection. The pharmacological pathway of zotarolimus restricts the kinase activity of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), which potentially leads to reductions in cell division, cell growth, cell proliferation, and inflammation. These pathways have a critical influence on tumorigenesis. This study aims to examine the anti-tumor effect of zotarolimus or zotarolimus combined with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) on A549 human lung adenocarcinoma cell line implanted in BALB/c nude mice by estimating tumor growth, apoptosis expression, inflammation, and metastasis. We established A549 xenografts in nude mice, following which we randomly divided the mice into four groups: control, 5-FU (100 mg/kg/week), zotarolimus (2 mg/kg/day), and zotarolimus combined with 5-FU. Compared the results with those for control mice, we found that mice treated with zotarolimus or zotarolimus combined with 5-FU retarded tumor growth; increased tumor apoptosis through the enhanced expression of cleaved caspase 3 and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) phosphorylation; decreased inflammation cytokines levels (e.g., IL-1β, TNF-α, and IL-6); reduced inflammation-related factors such as cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) protein and nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) mRNA; enhanced anti-inflammation-related factors including IL-10 and inhibitor of NF-κB kinase α (IκBα) mRNA; and inhibited metastasis-related factors such as transforming growth factor β (TGF-β), CD44, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Notably, mice treated with zotarolimus combined with 5-FU had significantly retarded tumor growth, reduced tumor size, and increased tumor inhibition compared with the groups of mice treated with 5-FU or zotarolimus alone. The in vivo study confirmed that zotarolimus or zotarolimus combined with 5-FU could retard lung adenocarcinoma growth and inhibit tumorigenesis. Zotarolimus and 5-FU were found to have an obvious synergistic tumor-inhibiting effect on lung adenocarcinoma. Therefore, both zotarolimus alone and zotarolimus combined with 5-FU may be potential anti-tumor agents for treatment of human lung adenocarcinoma.

Topics: A549 Cells; Animals; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Apoptosis; Cytokines; ErbB Receptors; Fluorouracil; Humans; Hyaluronan Receptors; Inflammation; Male; Mice, Inbred BALB C; NF-kappa B; Sirolimus; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A; Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays

Zotarolimus is a semi-synthetic derivative of rapamycin and an inhibitor of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling. Currently, zotarolimus is used to prolong the survival time of organ grafts, but it is also a novel immunosuppressive agent with potent anti-proliferative activity. Here, we examine the anti-tumor effect of zotarolimus, alone and in combination with 5-fluorouracil, on HCT-116 colorectal adenocarcinoma cells implanted in BALB/c nude mice. Compared with the control mice, mice treated with zotarolimus or zotarolimus combined with 5-FU showed retarded tumor growth; increased tumor apoptosis through the enhanced expression of cleaved caspase 3 and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) phosphorylation; reduced inflammation-related factors such as IL-1β, TNF-α, and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) protein; and inhibited metastasis-related factors such as CD44, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), transforming growth factor β (TGF-β), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Notably, mice treated with a combination of zotarolimus and 5-FU showed significantly retarded tumor growth, reduced tumor size, and increased tumor inhibition compared with mice treated with 5-FU or zotarolimus alone, indicating a strong synergistic effect. This in vivo study confirms that zotarolimus or zotarolimus combined with 5-FU can be used to retard colorectal adenocarcinoma growth and inhibit tumorigenesis. Our results suggest that zotarolimus may increase the chemo-sensitization of tumor cells. Therefore, zotarolimus alone and zotarolimus combined with 5-FU may be potential anti-tumor agents in the treatment of human colon adenocarcinoma. Future research on zotarolimus may lead to the development of new therapeutic strategies.

Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Apoptosis; Cell Proliferation; Colorectal Neoplasms; Fluorouracil; Humans; Male; Mice; Mice, Inbred BALB C; Mice, Nude; Sirolimus; Tumor Cells, Cultured; Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays

Limited research has detailed the outcomes of chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with independent core laboratory and event adjudication. This study examined procedural, clinical, and patient-reported health status outcomes among patients undergoing CTO PCI with specific focus on outcomes for those treated with zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES).. Among 500 consecutive patients undergoing attempted CTO PCI, procedural and in-hospital clinical outcomes were examined in addition to the 1-year composite endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization (major adverse cardiac events, MACE). In a pre-specified cohort of 250 patients, health status measures were ascertained at baseline and 1 year. A powered secondary endpoint was 1-year MACE among patients treated with ZES compared with a performance goal.. Demographic, lesion, and procedural characteristics for the overall population included prior bypass surgery, 29.8%; diabetes, 35.2%; occlusion length >20 mm, 71.3%; J-CTO score, 2.5 ± 1.1; and primary retrograde strategy, 30.8%. Overall guidewire crossing was 90.9%; clinical success following guidewire crossing, 94.3%; and 1-year MACE rate, 12.1%. One-year health status significantly improved from baseline with successful CTO-PCI (angina frequency, 72.7 ± 26.5 at baseline to 96.0 ± 10.8, p < .0001). Compared with a performance goal derived from prior CTO DES trials (1-year hierarchal MACE, 25.2%), treatment with ZES was associated with significantly lower MACE (18.2%, one-sided upper CI, 23.6%, p = .017).. Favorable procedural success, health status improvements and late-term clinical outcomes inform the relative risks and benefits of CTO PCI when performed in a clinically indicated, complex patient population representative of those treated in clinical practice.

Topics: Aged; Cardiovascular Agents; Chronic Disease; Coronary Occlusion; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Health Status; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Recovery of Function; Registries; Retrospective Studies; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

This study sought to determine clinical outcomes between treatment groups over long-term follow-up.. The safety and efficacy of a ridaforolimus-eluting stent (RES) was evaluated in the BIONICS (BioNIR Ridaforolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent System in Coronary Stenosis) and NIREUS (BioNIR Ridaforolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System [BioNIR] European Angiography Study) trials, demonstrating noninferiority of RES in comparison with a zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) regarding 1-year target lesion failure (TLF) and 6-month angiographic late lumen loss, respectively.. Patient-level data from the BIONICS (N = 1,919) and NIREUS (N = 302) randomized trials were pooled, and outcomes in patients implanted with RES and ZES compared. Broad inclusion criteria allowed enrollment of patients with acute coronary syndromes and complex lesions. The primary endpoint was the 2-year rate of TLF or clinically driven target lesion revascularization.. A total of 2,221 patients (age 63.2 ± 10.3 years; 79.7% men) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with RES (n = 1,159) or ZES (n = 1,062) were included. Clinical and angiographic characteristics were similar between groups. At 2 years, the primary endpoint of TLF was similar among patients implanted with RES and ZES (7.0% vs. 7.2%; p = 0.94). Rates of target lesion revascularization (4.8% RES vs. 4.1% ZES; p = 0.41) and target vessel-related myocardial infarction (3.1% RES vs. 3.8% ZES; p = 0.52) did not differ between groups. The overall rate of stent thrombosis was also similar (0.5% RES vs. 0.9% ZES; p = 0.39).. In a pooled analysis of 2 randomized trials, 2-year clinical outcomes were similar between patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with RES and ZES. These results support the long-term safety and efficacy of RES for the treatment of a broad population of patients with coronary artery disease.

Topics: Aged; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Thrombosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prosthesis Design; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Bionics; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

Patients with Williams syndrome often present with abnormalities of the vascular wall of the aorta and/or the pulmonary artery. Surgery may result in restenosis of the affected vessel. Herein, we report a case of an infant with multiple recurrences of aortic coarctation successfully treated with Zotarolimus drug-eluting stent.

Topics: Aortic Coarctation; Computed Tomography Angiography; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Recurrence; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome; Williams Syndrome

Diabetes mellitus (DM) plays an important role in restenosis and late in-stent thrombosis (ST). The current study using optical coherence tomography (OCT) aims to compare target lesion neointima in patients with or without diabetes after zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) treatment.. OCT images of 90,212 struts and quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) in 62 patients (32 with DM and 30 without DM) with 69 de novo coronary lesions (34 DM and 35 non-DM) both after ZES implantation and 12 ± 1 month angiographic follow-up were recorded. Patient characteristics, lesion characteristics, clinical outcomes, and OCT findings including neointimal thickness, coverage, malapposition, and intimal morphology were analyzed.. Baseline patient characteristics and lesion characteristics data were similar between the two groups. Higher neointimal thickness (0.14 ± 0.09 mm vs. 0.09 ± 0.04 mm, p = 0.021), more neovascularization (3.03 ± 6.24 vs. 0.52 ± 1.87, p = 0.017) and higher incidence of layered signal pattern (12.19 ± 19.91% vs. 4.28 ± 9.02%, p = 0.049) were observed in diabetic lesions comparing with non-diabetic lesions. No differences were found in malapposition, uncovered percentage, and thrombus between the two groups (all p > 0.05). Occurrence of clinical adverse events was also similar during the follow-up period (p > 0.05).. Although more neointimal proliferation and more neovascularization were found in diabetic coronary lesions when compared with non-diabetic lesions, treatment with ZES showed similar stent malapposition rate at 1-year follow-up. The data indicated that ZES treatment could possibly be effective in treating diabetic coronary lesions.. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT01747356.

Topics: Aged; Case-Control Studies; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Vessels; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Angiopathies; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Severity of Illness Index; Sirolimus; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Treatment Outcome

In this study, we sought to compare the efficacy and safety of the Xience Prime/Xience V/Promus EES and Biomatrix/Biomatrix Flex/Nobori BES with resolute integrity/resolute ZES using the grand drug-eluting stent (Grand-DES) registry.. Currently, new-generation drug-eluting stents (DESs) are used as the standard of care in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. No study has simultaneously compared everolimus-eluting stent (EES), biolimus-eluting stent (BES), and zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES).. Stent-related composite outcomes (target lesion failure) and patient-related composite outcomes were compared in crude and propensity score-matched analysis.. Of the 17,286 patients in the Grand-DES group, 5,137, 2,970, and 4,990 patients in the EES, BES, and ZES groups completed a three-year follow-up. In the propensity score-matched cohort, the stent-related outcome (EES vs. BES vs. ZES; 5.9% vs. 6.7% vs. 7.1%,. In this robust real-world registry with unrestricted use of EES, BES, and ZES, the three stent groups showed comparable safety and efficacy at the 3-year follow-up.

Topics: Drug-Eluting Stents; Equipment Safety; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Propensity Score; Registries; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

There is a scarcity of comparative studies between Endeavor Resolute®-zotarolimus-eluting stent (R-ZES) and Resolute Integrity®-ZES (I-ZES) during long-term follow-up periods. Although the stent alloy and the polymer of these two ZESs are similar, the platform and the design of these two stents are different. This study was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of these two different ZESs in the all-comer Korean patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) during a 3-year follow-up period.. This study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. In this single-center, retrospective, and all-comer patients' cohort study, a total of 889 patients who underwent PCI with R-ZES (n=394) or I-ZES (n=495) were enrolled. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) defined as all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), any repeat revascularization including target lesion revascularization (TLR), target vessel revascularization (TVR), and non-TVR, and the secondary endpoint was stent thrombosis (ST) at 3 years.. To adjust for any potential confounders, the propensity score-adjusted multivariable analysis was performed using the logistic regression model (C-statistics=0.689). The cumulative incidence rates of MACEs [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 1.341; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.615-2.922; p=0.461], all-cause death, nonfatal MI, any repeat revascularization, and ST (aHR, 2.090; 95% CI, 0.163-26.77; p=0.571) were similar between the two groups during the 3-year follow-up period.. R-ZES and I-ZES demonstrated comparable efficacy and safety after PCI during a 3-year follow-up period. However, these results can perhaps be more precisely defined by other large and long-term follow-up studies in the future. (Anatol J Cardiol 2020; 23: 268-76).

Topics: Asian People; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Republic of Korea; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Sirolimus

Topics: Drug-Eluting Stents; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

The Resolute zotarolimus eluting stent (ZES) is a next-generation durable polymer, thin-struts drug eluting stent. Although several randomized and observational studies have proven its safety and efficacy, long-term follow-up data are still limited. This prospective, multicenter, single arm study, showed favorable 5-year outcomes in patients undergoing Resolute ZES implantation, with considerably low rate of repeated revascularization and stent thrombosis. Data on long-term performance of next-generation drug eluting stents are of paramount importance to adequately inform decision-making in contemporary clinical practice.

Topics: Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prospective Studies; Sirolimus; Stents; Technology; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Endeavor®-zotarolimus-eluting stent (E-ZES) was the first ZES to be developed, and Resolute integrity®-ZES (I-ZES) has been developed more recently. Comparative studies on long-term usage of these two ZESs have been rare.. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of E-ZES and I-ZES during a long-term follow-up of patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).. A total of 767 patients who underwent PCI with E-ZES or I-ZES were eligible for this study. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), defined as the composite of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), and any repeat revascularization. The secondary endpoint was stent thrombosis (ST).. After propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis, two PSM groups (193 pairs, n = 386, C-statistic = 0.824) were generated. During the 3-year follow-up period, the cumulative incidence of MACEs (hazard ratio [HR], 0.837; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.464-1.508; p = 0.553) and ST (HR, 0.398; 95% CI, 0.077-2.052; p = 0.271) was similar for the E-ZES and I-ZES groups. Additionally, the cumulative incidences of all-cause death, cardiac death, non-fatal MI, and any repeat revascularization were not significantly different between the two groups.. Although I-ZES utilizes a more advanced stent platform, stent design, and polymer system than E-ZES, both the ZESs showed comparable efficacy and safety during the 3-year follow-up period in this single-center, all-comers registry. However, further large-scaled, randomized, well-controlled trials with long-term follow-up are needed to verify these results.

Topics: Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prosthesis Design; Retrospective Studies; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Hyperglycemia is an important risk factor for poor clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The relative superiority of the long-term clinical outcomes of durable-polymer (DP) -based and biodegradable-polymer (BP) -based newer-generation drug-eluting stents (DESs) after successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with AMI and prediabetes is not well established. We compared the clinical outcomes in such patients between DP-based and BP-based newer-generation DESs.A total of 4,377 patients with AMI and prediabetes were divided into the following two groups: the DP-DES group (n = 3,775; zotarolimus-eluting stents [ZES; n = 1,546] and everolimus-eluting stents [EES; n = 2,229]) and the BP-DES group (n = 602; biolimus-eluting stents [BES]). The primary endpoint was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), defined as all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction (re-MI), or any repeat revascularization. The secondary endpoint was the occurrence of stent thrombosis (ST).The 2-year adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of MACEs for ZES versus EES, ZES versus BES, EES versus BES, and ZES/EES versus BES (aHR: 1.125; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.834-1.518; P = 0.440) were similar. The cumulative incidence of ST was also comparable between the DP-DES and BP-DES groups (aHR: 1.407; 95% CI, 0.476-4.158; P = 0.537). Moreover, the 2-year aHRs of all-cause death, CD, re-MI, target lesion revascularization (TLR), target vessel revascularization (TVR), and non-TVR were similar.Patients with AMI and prediabetes who received DP-DES or BP-DES during PCI showed comparable safety and efficacy during the 2-year follow-up period.

Topics: Absorbable Implants; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prediabetic State; Sirolimus

Despite treatment guidance endorsing shortened dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) duration in high bleeding risk (HBR) patients after drug-eluting stents, limited evidence exists to support these recommendations. The present study was designed to examine the safety and effectiveness of 1-month DAPT duration following percutaneous coronary intervention with zotarolimus-eluting stents in HBR patients.. Onyx ONE Clear was a prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized study evaluating the safety and effectiveness of 1-month DAPT followed by single antiplatelet therapy in HBR patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with Resolute Onyx drug-eluting stents. The primary analysis of cardiac death or myocardial infarction between 1 month and 1 year was performed in the prespecified one-month clear population of patients pooled from the Onyx ONE US/Japan study and Onyx ONE randomized controlled trial. One-month clear was defined as DAPT adherence and without major adverse events during the first month following percutaneous coronary intervention.. Among patients enrolled in Onyx ONE US/Japan (n=752) and Onyx ONE randomized controlled trial (n=1018), 1506 patients fulfilled one-month clear criteria. Mean HBR characteristics per patient was 1.6 with 44.7% having multiple risks. By 2 months and 1 year, respectively, 96.9% and 89.3% of patients were taking single antiplatelet therapy. Between 1 month and 1 year, the rate of the primary end point was 7.0%. The 1-sided upper 97.5% CI was 8.4%, less than the performance goal of 9.7% (. Among HBR patients who were event free before DAPT discontinuation at 1 month, favorable safety and effectiveness through 1 year support treatment with Resolute Onyx drug-eluting stents as part of an individualized strategy for shortened DAPT duration following percutaneous coronary intervention. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier NCT03647475.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug-Eluting Stents; Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United States

Current generation durable polymer DES have sustained efficacy and safety out to 5 years. The Orsiro DES has both a bioresorbable polymer and ultra thin struts and has the potential to improve the safety of DES. In this all comers trial, 3 year outcomes with Orsiro DES were similar to the durable polymer zotarolimus eluting stent.

Topics: Drug-Eluting Stents; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Polymers; Prosthesis Design; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

To assess the long-term safety and efficacy of the Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (R-ZES).. The R-ZES has been associated with low rates of adverse events over short-intermediate term follow-up. However, reliable assessment of the safety and efficacy of any implanted device requires long-term evaluation.. The RESOLUTE US trial was a prospective, observational study conducted at 116 U.S. sites and enrolled patients with de novo coronary lesions. Patients were followed clinically for 5 years with independent event adjudication and data monitoring.. A total of 1,402 patients (1,573 lesions) were enrolled; 34% had diabetes mellitus and 75% had ACC type B2/C lesions. The 5-year rate of target lesion failure (TLF) was 12.3%, target lesion revascularization was 6.5%, target vessel myocardial infarction was 3.2%, and cardiac death was 4.1%. Dual antiplatelet therapy usage was 94% at 1 year and 47% at 5 years, with a 0.1% and 0.5% respective incidence of definite or probable stent thrombosis. The 5-year rate of TLF was 16.9% among patients with diabetes mellitus and 14.7% in patients with at least one small (≤2.5 mm) vessel treated. Covariates independently associated with 5-year TLF in multivariable analysis included diabetes mellitus (odds ratio [OR] 1.89, p < .001), prior coronary artery bypass grafting (OR 2.28, p < .001), prior myocardial infarction (OR 1.85, p = .002), and smaller reference vessel diameter (OR 1.75, p = .004).. Results from the fully adjudicated and monitored RESOLUTE US trial demonstrate long-term 5-year safety and efficacy of the R-ZES stent among a relatively low-risk population of patients, including a 0.5% rate of stent thrombosis at 5 years.

Topics: Aged; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Thrombosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prospective Studies; Recurrence; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United States

Topics: Absorbable Implants; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Polymers; Sirolimus; Stents; Treatment Outcome

There are limited long-term outcome data comparing BioLinx polymer (B)-zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES) with phosphorylcholine polymer (P)-ZES. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of B-ZES with P-ZES in patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) during a 3-year follow-up period.One thousand two hundred fifty four patients who underwent PCI with P-ZES (Endeavor [ZES-E] or Endeavor sprint [ZES-S], n = 356) or B-ZES (Endeavor resolute [ZES-R] or Resolute Integrity [ZES-I], n = 889) were enrolled. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE); the composite of total death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), target lesion revascularization (TLR), target vessel revascularization (TVR), non-target vessel revascularization (Non-TVR), and the secondary endpoint was stent thrombosis (ST).After PSM, 2 propensity-matched (PSM) groups (275 pairs, n = 550, C-statistic = 0.730) were generated. During the 3-year follow-up period, the cumulative incidence of MACE (hazard ratio [HR], 1.525; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.920-2.526; P = .101) and ST (HR, 1.248; 95% CI, 0.335-4.4649; P = .741) were similar between P-ZES and B-ZES after PSM. However, TLR rate was significantly higher in ZES-S than ZES-I (11.3% vs 3.8%, log rank P = .029) and TVR rate was higher in ZES-S than ZES-R (14.1% vs 4.8%, log rank P = .025).In this single-center, all-comer registry, despite different polymers, P-ZES, and B-ZES showed comparable safety and efficacy during a 3-year follow-up period after PCI.

Topics: Aged; Cardiovascular Diseases; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Phosphorylcholine; Polymers; Propensity Score; Prosthesis Design; Reoperation; Sirolimus

Topics: Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Coronary Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome

The second-generation everolimus and zotarolimus drug eluting stents (DES) have shown superiority for repeat revascularisation and safety to the first-generation devices for stable patients. However, the benefit of those devices in the setting of ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has remained questionable due to concern regarding stent thrombosis (ST) seen with the first-generation devices. We review the outcomes of patients with STEMI treated in our centre at a time when the second-generation DES became the standard of care.. All patients who presented to our institution with STEMI and underwent emergency percutaneous intervention (PCI) in 2012 with second-generation DES were identified. Case notes and electronic records were reviewed. Patients undergoing staged PCI to non-culprit lesions were excluded. Patients who died during the primary cardiac event with cardiogenic shock were also excluded.. A total of 399 patients (mean age 65+/-12, 274 (76%) male) were identified. Thirty-five patients (8.7%) died during hospitalisation with cardiogenic shock and were excluded from the subsequent analysis. A further 35 patients died during follow-up. Patients received a mean of 1.15 DES. Median follow-up time was 4.7 years. Median door to reperfusion time was 90 minutes. The all-cause mortality rate for STEMI survivors was 9.6%. Cardiac mortality rate was 3.6%. Thirty-one patients (8.5%) re-presented with symptoms leading to repeat coronary angiography. In-stent restenosis (ISR) was observed only in eight patients (2.2%). The significant factors associated with re-presentation were smoking and medication non-compliance.. Early mortality rates following emergency PCI for STEMI remain high despite low reperfusion times. The five-year follow-up data would suggest that STEMI survivors have good outcomes with the second-generation DES.

Topics: Aged; Cause of Death; Coronary Angiography; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; New Zealand; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Sirolimus; ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome

There are few studies which compare the efficacy and safety of the Resolute Onyx zotarolimus-eluting stent (O-ZES) and everolimus-eluting stent (EES) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Therefore, the present study aimed to compare clinical outcomes of O-ZES and EES in patients with AMI undergoing successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).. From January 2016 to December 2016, the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry (KAMIR) enrolled 3,364 consecutive patients. Among them, O-ZES was used in 402 patients and EES was used in 1,084 patients. The primary endpoint was target lesion failure (TLF), as defined by composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (TV-MI), and ischemic driven-target lesion revascularization (ID-TLR) at 6 month clinical follow-up.. At 6 months, the incidence of TLF was not significantly different between O-ZES and EES group (4.0% vs. 3.9%, adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.17, 95% confidential interval [CI] 0.58-2.35, p = 0.665). O-ZES also showed similar results of cardiac death (3.7% vs. 3.4%, adjusted HR 1.25, 95% CI 0.59-2.63, p = 0.560), TV-MI (0.2% vs. 0.6%, adjusted HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.07-4.85, p = 0.600), ID-TLR (0.0% vs. 0.3%, p = 0.524), and definite or probable stent thrombosis (0.2% vs. 0.3%, adjusted HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.06-6.41, p = 0.696) when compared with EES.. The present study shows that implantation of O-ZES or EES provided similar clinical outcomes with similar risk at 6-month of TLF and definite/probable ST in patients with AMI undergoing successful PCI.

Topics: Aged; Cardiovascular Agents; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prosthesis Design; Registries; Republic of Korea; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

The RESOLUTE-DIABETES CHINA study was specifically designed to investigate the safety and efficacy of Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES; Medtronic, Santa Rosa, CA, USA) in the treatment of diabetic coronary lesions in the Chinese population.. In all, 945 patients with de novo native coronary lesions and type 2 diabetes mellitus were recruited at 32 cardiac centers across the Chinese mainland and were implanted with Resolute ZES. The primary endpoint was target vessel failure (TVF); secondary endpoints were clinical outcomes, namely all-cause death, stroke, bleeding, target lesion revascularization (TLR), target vessel revascularization (TVR), non-TVR, and stent thrombosis (ST). The follow-up period for all endpoints was 12 months after the procedure.. In all, 933 patients (98.73%) had clinical follow-up at 12 months. The rate of TVF was 11.60%, whereas the rate of occurrence of secondary endpoints was 5.47%, with four patients (0.43%) having subacute or late ST. There were no significant differences in TVF rates comparing patients with different HbA1c levels or receiving different glucose control treatments (all P > 0.05). Patients with multivessel lesions had higher TVF rates (95% confidence intervals) than those with single-vessel lesions (16.76% [12.10%-22.97%) vs 9.72% [7.79%-12.11%], respectively; P = 0.006). There were no significant differences in TVF rates in patients with or without small vessels, bifurcated lesions, or chronic total occlusions (all P > 0.05). [Correction added on 17 January 2019, after first online publication: in the second sentence of Results section, "TLF" was changed to "TVF".].. Resolute ZES may perform well in the Chinese diabetic population, especially in those with poor glucose control, complex lesions, and certain unfavorable clinical features. Further studies are needed to determine why ZES perform well in this population.

Topics: Coronary Artery Disease; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Safety; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

There are limited data comparing the clinical outcomes among new-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients with dyslipidemia after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We thought to investigate 2-year clinical outcomes among durable-polymer (DP)-coated stents [zotarolimus eluting (ZES) and everolimus eluting (EES)] and biodegradable-polymer (BP)-coated biolimus-eluting stent (BES) in dyslipidemic AMI patients after PCI. Finally, a total 2403 enrolled patients were divided into ZES (n = 953), EES (n = 1145) or BES (n = 305) group. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE) defined as total death (TD), cardiac death (CD), myocardial infarction (MI), target lesion revascularization (TLR), target vessel revascularization (TVR) and non-TVR. The secondary endpoint was the incidence of definite or probable stent thrombosis (ST). The 2-year adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of MACE for ZES vs. EES [HR, 1.066; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.752-1.511; p = 0.720], ZES vs. BES (HR 0.933; 95% CI 0.565-1.541; p = 0.786), EES vs. BES (HR 1.876; 95% CI 0.535-1.436; p = 0.600) and ZES/EES vs. BES (HR 0.929; 95% CI 0.591-1.462; p = 0.751) was similar. The cumulative incidences of ST were comparable (ZES vs. EES vs. BES = 1.1% vs. 0.9% vs. 1.1%, p = 0.675) and adjusted HR was not different. In addition, the 2-year adjusted HR of TD, CD, MI, TLR, TVR, and non-TVR was similar. The AMI patients with dyslipidemia receiving ZES, EES, or BES after PCI showed comparable safety and efficacy during 2-year follow-up periods. Therefore, DP-DES or BP-DES is equally acceptable in dyslipidemic AMI patients during PCI.

Topics: Absorbable Implants; Drug-Eluting Stents; Dyslipidemias; Everolimus; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Polymers; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Humans; Metals; Sirolimus; Stents

Polymer-free amphilimus-eluting stents (PF-AES) represent a novel elution-technology in coronary stenting. We aimed to assess 1-year clinical outcomes of PF-AES as compared to latest-generation permanent polymer zotarolimus-eluting stents (PP-ZES) in a real-world all-comers setting.. A prospective registry of patients treated with either PF-AES or PP-ZES between 2014 and 2016 was conducted. The primary outcome was defined as major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), and the secondary outcome was defined as target-lesion failure (TLF) at 1 year. To account for measured confounders, a propensity-score adjusted Cox proportional-hazard model was built to evaluate clinical outcomes.. Our study suggests that implantation of PF-AES was safe and effective in real-world patients, with low-rates of MACCE and TLF at 1 year. Our data needs to be confirmed by a large trial to evaluate the clinical outcomes of this novel polymer-free, eluting-technology used in PF-AES.

Topics: Aged; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Propensity Score; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Registries; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Long and diffuse coronary lesions (LDCLs) are routinely subjected to percutaneous management, but long‑term clinical outcomes and complication predictors with the use of contemporary stents and techniques remain undetermined.. The aim of the study was to address long‑term effects of percutaneous management of LDCLs, using contemporary devices and optimization techniques.. Long and diffuse coronary lesion was defined as a lesion requiring an implantation of 30 mm or longer total stent(s) length (TSL) into one coronary artery (bailouts excluded). There were 290 LDCL interventions with the use of newer generation drug‑eluting stents (DESs; cobalt chromium everolimus- or zotarolimus-eluting stents) performed between January 2013 and January 2016.. The mean (SD) TSL was 55.5 (16.8) mm. The use of intravascular ultrasound / optical coherence tomography was 17.1%, rotablation, 6.9%, and noncompliant balloon, 88.9%. The median (range) follow‑up duration was 831 (390-1373) days. All‑cause mortality and cardiac death rates were 11.7% and 6.9%, respectively. The myocardial infarction (MI) rate was 6.6%, including target‑vessel MI in 4.1%. The rate of clinically‑driven repeat revascularization was 13.8%, and of definite or probable LDCL stent thrombosis, 7.2%. Overall patient‑oriented adverse event rate (any death, MI, or repeat revascularization) was 25.5%, and device‑oriented rate (cardiac death, target vessel‑MI, or target lesion restenosis), 13.4%. Adverse outcome predictors were chronic kidney disease, acute coronary syndrome as an indication for the procedure, chronic heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, multivessel disease, and coexisting peripheral artery disease, but not lesion‑related factors, such as bifurcation, calcification, chronic total occlusion, or TSL.. Adverse outcomes following contemporary LDCL management using newer generation DESs in routine clinical practice are associated with clinical patient characteristics rather than lesion characteristics or TSL. We identified high‑risk patient cohorts that may benefit from enhanced surveillance.

Topics: Aged; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

Normalized optical density (NOD) measured by optical coherence tomography represents neointimal maturity after coronary stent implantation and is correlated with morphologic information provided by both light and electron microscopy. We aimed to test the hypothesis that even second generation drug-eluting stents (DESs) are problematic in terms of neointimal maturity. We implanted bare-metal stents (BMS: n = 14), everolimus-eluting stents (EESs: n = 15) or zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZESs: n = 12) at 41 sites in 32 patients with stable coronary artery disease. OCT was performed at up to 12 months of follow-up, and the average optical density of neointima covering struts was evaluated. NOD was calculated as the optical density of stent-strut covering tissue divided by the optical density of the struts. We also measured circulating CD34+ /CD133+ /CD45low cells, and serum levels of stromal cell-derived factor (SDF)-1, interleukin (IL)-8 and matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9 at baseline and follow-up. NOD was lower in the EES (0.70 ± 0.06) group than in the BMS (0.76 ± 0.07, P < 0.05) and ZES (0.76 ± 0.06, P < 0.05) groups. The mean neointimal area (R = 0.33, P < 0.05) and mean neointimal thickness (R = 0.37, P < 0.05) were correlated with NOD. Although NOD was not correlated with percent changes in circulating endothelial progenitor cells, and the levels of SDF-1 and IL-8, it was negatively correlated with the change in MMP-9 level (R = - 0.51, P < 0.01). Neointimal maturity might be lower at EES sites than BMS or ZES sites. This might lead to impaired neointimal tissue growth and matrix degradation. These results suggest a specific pathophysiology after DES implantation.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cardiovascular Agents; Chemokine CXCL12; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Endothelial Progenitor Cells; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Interleukin-8; Male; Matrix Metalloproteinase 9; Middle Aged; Neointima; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Predictive Value of Tests; Prosthesis Design; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Treatment Outcome; Vascular Remodeling

Objective To evaluate the 1-year clinical outcomes of patients who received the Resolute Onyx™ stent. Methods This was a single-centre, retrospective registry analysis that reviewed the clinical data from all patients who were implanted with a Resolute Onyx™ stent between March 2015 and February 2016. Clinical follow-up was performed at 1 year post-implantation. Results A total of 252 patients received a Resolute Onyx™ stent and two patients were lost to follow-up. The mean age of the cohort was 66.9 years and 113 (45.2%) had diabetes mellitus. Thirty-eight patients (15.2%) had left main disease and 73 (29.2%) had three-vessel disease. A total of 175 patients (70.0%) had small vessel disease (<2.75 mm) and 210 (84.0%) had long lesions (>20 mm). The 1-year target lesion failure was 4.4% (11 of 250), cardiovascular death occurred in eight patients (3.2%), ischaemia-driven target lesion revascularization was undertaken in five patients (2.0%) and stent thrombosis occurred in one patient (0.4%). Conclusion The Resolute Onyx™ stent showed a favourable 1-year clinical performance in a real-world population.

Topics: Aged; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Thrombosis; Diabetes Mellitus; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Registries; Retrospective Studies; Sirolimus; Survival Analysis; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Drug-eluting stents (DES) have evolved to using bioresorbable polymers as a method of drug delivery. The impact of bioresorbable polymer on long-term neointimal formation, inflammation, and healing has not been fully characterised. This study aimed to evaluate the biological effect of polymer resorption on vascular healing and inflammation.. A comparative DES study was performed in the familial hypercholesterolaemic swine model of coronary stenosis. Permanent polymer DES (zotarolimus-eluting [ZES] or everolimus-eluting [EES]) were compared to bioresorbable polymer everolimus-eluting stents (BP-EES) and BMS. Post implantation in 29 swine, stents were explanted and analysed up to 180 days. Area stenosis was reduced in all DES compared to BMS at 30 days. At 180 days, BP-EES had significantly lower area stenosis than EES or ZES. Severe inflammatory activity persisted in permanent polymer DES at 180 days compared to BP-EES or BMS. Qualitative para-strut inflammation areas (graded as none to severe) were elevated but similar in all groups at 30 days, peaked at 90 days in DES compared to BMS (p<0.05) and, at 180 days, were similar between BMS and BP-EES but were significantly greater in DES.. BP-EES resulted in a lower net long-term reduction in neointimal formation and inflammation compared to permanent polymer DES in an animal model. Further study of the long-term neointima formation deserves study in human clinical trials.

Topics: Absorbable Implants; Animals; Coronary Stenosis; Disease Models, Animal; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Inflammation; Neointima; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Polymers; Sirolimus; Swine; Wound Healing

To assess clinical outcomes of Amphilimus Sirolimus-Eluting Stents (A-SES) as compared to Zotarolimus-Eluting Stents (ZES) in complex real-world diabetic patients.. Patients with diabetes mellitus represent one of the most challenging scenarios with high rates of restenosis and stent thrombosis in the current era of drug-eluting stents. Hence, we assessed the safety of A-SES versus ZES in complex diabetic patients.. In this observational study, we analyzed all consecutive patients with diabetes mellitus referred to our center from November 2012 to November 2014. The primary outcome was target-lesion failure at 1-year follow-up.. A total of 165 consecutive diabetic patients underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with A-SES or ZES for stable coronary artery disease in our tertiary center. Using the Kaplan Meier method the cumulative incidence of target-lesion failure was 6.7% (5.9% A-SES versus 7.5% ZES, p=0.19) at 1-year follow-up. Event-free survival at 1year follow-up was similar (89.4% A-SES vs. 83.3% ZES, p=0.29). Interestingly, we did not find any cases of definite-, and only one case of probable stent thrombosis in this high risk cohort.. In this real-world registry, A-SES and ZES seems to be associated with promising 1-year clinical safety outcomes following PCI in a contemporary cohort of high-risk diabetic patients. Our results should be considered hypothesis generating, as the clinical safety of A-SES has to be confirmed in a large trial.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Thrombosis; Diabetes Mellitus; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Netherlands; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Progression-Free Survival; Prosthesis Design; Registries; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Time Factors

The use of short-duration dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) remains controversial. To investigate efficacy and safety of short-duration DAPT, we performed a detailed comparison of intra-stent conditions by optical coherence tomography (OCT) after second-generation drug-eluting stent implantation with short-term and standard DAPT.. Eighty-two consecutive patients with stable angina pectoris who received Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stents (R-ZESs; Medtronic Cardiovascular, Santa Rosa, CA, USA) were enrolled. Patients were assigned to 3-month (3M group: 41 patients) and standard (standard group: 41 patients) DAPT. In the 3M group, clopidogrel was discontinued 3 months after stent implantation. In the standard group, DAPT was maintained until follow-up OCT. At 9 months, neointimal proliferation was significantly larger in the 3M group, but there were no significant between-group differences in the proportion of uncovered and malapposed strut. The prevalence of abnormal intra-stent tissue (AIT) at 9 months was equivalent between groups. A multiple regression analysis revealed malapposition at 9 months as the strongest independent predictor of AIT at 9 months, and the prevalence of AIT was not associated with DAPT duration. Over 2 years, cardiac events were equal between groups; however, major bleeding was higher tendency in the standard group than in the 3M group.. This OCT study indicated that reducing DAPT's duration may provide acceptable arterial healing in patients with implanted R-ZESs.

Topics: Aged; Angina Pectoris; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Coronary Stenosis; Coronary Vessels; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Humans; Japan; Male; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Tomography, Optical Coherence

Topics: Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Sirolimus; Stents

Delayed healing and endothelial dysfunction may occur with drug-eluting stents (DES), promoting accelerated infiltration of lipids in the neointima and development of neoatherosclerosis (NA). Pathology data suggest durable polymer (DP) of DES to play a major role in this process. Whether biodegradable polymer (BP) may address these issues is uncertain. We compared in vivo vessel healing and NA of current generation BP- or DP-DES using serial optical coherence tomography (OCT) assessments.. Ninety patients with multivessel coronary artery disease were randomized 1:1 to BP everolimus-eluting stents (EES, Synergy) or DP zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES, Resolute Integrity). Co-primary endpoints were the maximum length of uncovered struts at 3 months (powered for non-inferiority) and the percentage of patients presenting with frames of NA at 18 months (powered for superiority) as measured by OCT. The maximum length of uncovered struts at 3 months was 10 ± 8 mm in the BP-EES group and 11 ± 7 mm in the DP-ZES group (mean difference -1 mm; upper 97.5% confidence interval +2 mm; P = 0.05 for non-inferiority; P = 0.45 for superiority). The percentage of patients presenting with frames of NA at 18 months was low and similar between BP-EES and DP-ZES groups (11.6% vs. 15.9%; P = 0.56). There was no stent thrombosis in both groups at 24 months.. BP-EES and DP-ZES showed a similar healing response at 3 months and a low incidence of NA at 18 months. Biocompatible polymers, regardless of whether they are durable or biodegradable, may favourably impact the long-term vascular response to current-generation DES.

Topics: Absorbable Implants; Aged; Atherosclerosis; Biocompatible Materials; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Neointima; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Wound Healing

The aim of this study was to investigate whether the underlying plaque type affects the neointimal coverage after drug-eluting stent implantation.. A total of 1793 struts in 22 zotarolimus-eluting stents were assessed using optical coherence tomography imaging within 3 months of implantation. Neointimal coverage was evaluated within 5 mm from each stent edge on cross-sectional optical coherence tomography images at every 1-mm interval. The percentage of struts covered by neointima was compared among the normal segment group, the fibrous plaque group, and the lipid plaque group on the basis of the underlying plaque type.. The percentage of covered strut was significantly lower in the normal segment group than in the fibrous plaque group (35.9±30.2 vs. 57.1±31.0%, P<0.05) and the lipid plaque group (vs. 64.7±23.5%, P<0.01). The neointima was significantly thinner in the normal segment group than in the lipid plaque group (19.0±22.3 vs. 32.0±18.8 μm, P<0.01). The percentage of struts on the normal segment was significantly higher in cross-sections with a ratio of uncovered to total struts per section more than 0.3 than in cross-sections with a ratio up to 0.3 (32.4±31.7 vs. 19.5±33.8%, P<0.01).. Struts on the normal segment were less covered and had thinner neointima than struts on the lipid plaque at the stent edge within 3 months after zotarolimus-eluting stent implantation. Caution should be exercised when implanting longer drug-eluting stents to achieve uniform strut coverage in the early phase.

Topics: Aged; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Fibrosis; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neointima; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Plaque, Atherosclerotic; Prosthesis Design; Retrospective Studies; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Drug-Eluting Stents; Sirolimus

Data concerning the effect of current smoking on solely new-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) are limited. We investigated the impact of current smoking on 2-year clinical outcomes between durable-polymer (DP)-coated DES (zotarolimus-eluting [ZES] and everolimus eluting [EES]) and biodegradable-polymer (BP)-coated biolimus-eluting stent (BES) in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients after successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).. Finally, a total of 8357 AMI patients with current smoking underwent successful PCI with new-generation DES (ZES, EES, and BES) were enrolled and divided into three groups as ZES (n = 3199), EES (n = 3987), and BES group (n = 1171). The primary endpoint was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) defined as all-cause death (cardiac death [CD] or non-cardiac death), recurrent AMI (re-MI), any revascularization (target lesion revascularization [TLR], target vessel revascularization [TVR], and non-TVR). The secondary endpoint was the incidence of definite or probable stent thrombosis (ST).. The 2-year adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of MACE for ZES vs. EES (1.055; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.843-1.321; p = 0.638), ZES vs. BES (HR, 0.885; 95% CI, 0.626-1.251; p = 0.488), EES vs. BES (HR, 0.889; 95% CI, 0.633-1.250; p = 0.499), and ZES/EES vs. BES (HR, 0.891; 95% CI, 0.648-1.126; p = 0.480) were similar. The occurrence of ST after adjustment were also comparable. In addition, the 2-year adjusted HR for all-cause death, CD, re-MI, TLR, TVR, and non-TVR were not different.. In this study, DP-DES and BP-DES showed comparable safety and efficacy during 2-year follow-up periods. Therefore, DP-DES or BP-DES are equally acceptable in AMI patients with current smoking undergoing PCI.

Topics: Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Polymers; Sirolimus; Smoking; Thrombosis

The aim of this study is to evaluate differences in stent endothelial coverage among the second generation of drug-eluting stents. Incomplete stent coverage is one of the major causes of late stent thrombosis. Rabbits fed a normal diet received an everolimus (Xience Prime; EES) and a zotarolimus-eluting stent (Resolute Integrity; R-ZES) in each iliac artery, followed by sacrifice at 14 and 28 days after stent implantation. In addition, a group of atherosclerotic rabbits similarly received EES and R-ZES, and were sacrificed at 28 days. The extent of stent endothelial coverage was assessed by scanning electron microscopy. To evaluate endothelial coverage after bifurcation stenting, rabbits received EES and R-ZES placed with culotte stenting at the iliac bifurcation, followed by sacrifice at 14 and 28 days. In rabbits fed a normal diet, the percent uncovered strut area 14 days after stent implantation was significantly higher in R-ZES than in EES (10.1% (IQR 9.8-15.5) vs. 3.0% (IQR 1.5-9.7), p = 0.03), whereas it was not significantly different at 28-days (3.9% (IQR 0.8-10.3) vs. 1.0% (IQR 0.0-2.8), p = 0.2). In rabbits with induced atheroma, R-ZES also showed less endothelial coverage 28 days after stent implantation (5.3% (IQR 2.2-9.9) vs. 1.1% (IQR 0-6.2), p = 0.03). In the culotte stenting model, the percent uncovered strut area of the proximal overlapped segment was significantly higher in R-ZES at 14 days (15.8% (IQR 14.3-17.7) vs. 8.8% (IQR 8.3-9.8), p = 0.03) and 28 days (9.9% (IQR 4.1-13.9) vs. 2.5% (IQR 1.6-6.7), p = 0.04) after stent implantation. The carina area also showed a better coverage in EES compared with R-ZES. EES showed a better stent endothelial coverage compared with R-ZES after stent implantation in the early phase in normals, in arteries with lipid rich plaque, and in bifurcation stented sites.

Topics: Angiography; Animals; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation; Drug-Eluting Stents; Endothelium, Vascular; Everolimus; Female; Iliac Artery; Immunosuppressive Agents; Microscopy, Electron, Scanning; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Rabbits; Sirolimus

Whether arterial repair following implantation of drug-eluting stents (DES) of the second generation differs among stent types remains unknown. We examined 41 DES placed in 28 patients (age 72 ± 7 years, male 89%) presenting with stable angina pectoris due to de novo lesions in native coronary arteries. Coronary angioscopy was performed 4 ± 1 months after stent implantation. Patients were divided into two groups based on the DES types: 22 cobalt-chrome everolimus-eluting stents (CoCr-EES) in 13 patients and 19 slow-release zotarolimus-eluting stents (R-ZES) in 15 patients. Neointimal coverage (NIC) was graded as: grade 0, stent struts exposed; grade 1, struts bulging into the lumen, although covered; grade 2, struts embedded in the neointima, but translucent; grade 3, struts fully embedded and invisible. NIC was defined as heterogeneous when the NIC grade variation was ≥1. Presence of thrombus was also investigated. Distribution of dominant NIC grade (CoCr-EES: grade 0, 9%; grade 1, 77%; grade 2, 9%; grade 3, 5%; R-ZES: grade 0, 16%; grade 1: 47%; grade 2, 37%; grade 3, 0%, P = 0.38) and heterogeneity of NIC (P = 0.43) were similar between CoCr-EES and R-ZES groups. Existence of thrombus was not significantly different in CoCr-EES and R-ZES (18 versus 42%, P = 0.17). Arterial repair occurred without significant differences between CoCr-EES and R-ZES 4 months after implantation.

Topics: Aged; Angina, Stable; Angioscopy; Chromium Alloys; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Disease; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Sirolimus; Wound Healing

To evaluate long-term outcomes in patients undergoing either paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) or endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stents (E-ZES) placement and to assess comparative effectiveness of PES vs. E-ZES in different "off-label" and "high-risk" patient subgroups.. PES and E-ZES are frequently used in percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs). However, the long-term comparative effectiveness of PES vs. E-ZES in real practice is unknown.. We created a longitudinal database by linking the New York State (NYS) cardiac registries, the NYS hospital discharge file, the National Death Index, and the U.S. Census file for patients undergoing either PES or E-ZES placement from July 2008 through December 2009. All-cause mortality, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), target lesion PCI (TLPCI), and target vessel coronary artery bypass graft (TVCABG) surgery were compared for 9,264 propensity score matched patients for a 5-year follow-up period using the Kaplan-Meier method with further adjustment using Cox proportional hazards regression.. We did not detect significant differences between E-ZES and PES (reference) in 5-year mortality (adjusted hazard ratio : 1.02, 95% confidence interval : 0.91-1.14), AMI (AHR: 1.05, 95% CI: 0.90-1.22), TLPCI (AHR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.86-1.13), and TVCABG (AHR, 1.07, 95% CI: 0.84-1.36). For six "off-label" and two "high-risk" subpopulations, we had similar findings for the two stent groups.. NYS observational data suggest that 5-year outcomes are comparable in patients receiving either PES or E-ZES placement, mirroring the findings of recent clinical trials. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cardiovascular Agents; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Coronary Artery Disease; Databases, Factual; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; New York; Paclitaxel; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prosthesis Design; Registries; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stents (E-ZES) and everolimus-eluting stents (EES) as second-generation stents were approved for use in percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) in 2008. We aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of E-ZES vs. EES using New York State (NYS) cardiac registries and to compare long-term effectiveness of E-ZES vs. EES in six "off-label" and two "high-risk" subgroups.. We created a longitudinal database by linking the NYS cardiac registries, the statewide hospital discharge data, the National Death Index, and the U.S. Census file (2010) for patients receiving either E-ZES or EES from July 2008 through December 2010. We examined outcome measures of all-cause mortality, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), target lesion PCI (TLPCI), and target vessel coronary artery bypass graft (TVCABG) surgery for 13,663 propensity score matched pairs in the 6-year follow-up period. We applied Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards regression for further adjustment of propensity-matched pairs.. Compared with patients receiving EES, patients receiving E-ZES had a significantly higher rate of 6-year all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio (AHR): 1.10, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.04-1.17, P=0.003), AMI (AHR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.02-1.23, P=0.01), TLPCI (AHR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.18-1.39, P<0.001), and TVCABG (AHR: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.26-1.71, P<0.001). EES had better or similar long-term outcomes than E-ZES for the subgroups that were examined.. At 6years, patients receiving EES generally had better or comparable mortality, AMI, TLPCI, and TVCABG outcomes compared with patients receiving E-ZES.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Middle Aged; New York; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Registries; Sirolimus; Survival Rate; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

The aim of this study was to evaluate the capacity of the SYNTAX Score-II (SS-II) to predict long-term mortality in patients undergoing left main percutaneous coronary intervention (LM-PCI) treated with second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES).Data from 487 consecutive patients with de novo left main coronary artery disease undergoing PCI were retrospectively studied. The patients were divided into tertiles according to the SS-II: low SS-II tertile (SS-II ≤ 22), intermediate SS-II tertile (SS-II of 23 to 30), and high SS-II tertile (SS-II ≥ 30). The survival curves were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were performed to evaluate the possible associations between the SS-II and the rates of long-term mortality. The predictive ability of the SS-II for mortality was assessed and compared with the SYNTAX score (SS) alone by an area under the receiver operator curve (AUC).The overall SS-II was 27.3 ± 9.1. At a mean follow-up of 5.1 years, the long-term mortality was 6.0%. The rates of mortality were 2.4%, 3.4%, and 11.6%, respectively (P < 0.0001) in the low, intermediate, and high SS-II tertiles. The cardiac mortality rates were 1.8%, 1.4%, and 8.1%, respectively (P = 0.002) among patients in the 3 groups. By multivariate analysis, SS-II was an independent predictor of the long-term mortality (hazard ratio: 1.56, 95% confidence interval: 1.05 to 2.32; P = 0.03). The AUC demonstrated a substantially higher predictive accuracy of the SS-II for mortality compared with the SS alone (AUC was 0.689 and 0.596, respectively).In patients with LM-PCI treated with a second-generation DES, the SS-II is an independent predictor of long-term mortality and demonstrates a superior predictability compared with the SS alone.

Topics: China; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Predictive Value of Tests; Proportional Hazards Models; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; ROC Curve; Sirolimus; Survival Rate; Treatment Outcome

A 59-year-old man with critical claudication underwent left femoro-anterior bypass grafting, which was uneventful. The graft was tunneled medially across the knee, then anterior to the tibia. His symptoms recurred 1 year later and he was found to have critical stenosis of the vein graft just proximal to the anterior tibial arterial anastomosis. This was treated with scaffolded balloon angioplasty and implantation of a coronary, zotarolimus-eluting balloon-expandable stent, which was also uneventful. However, his claudication again recurred 1 year later. Diagnostic angiography revealed crush, deformation and restenosis of the balloon-expandable stent requiring surgical revision of the bypass graft.

Topics: Angioplasty, Balloon; Cardiovascular Agents; Computed Tomography Angiography; Critical Illness; Drug-Eluting Stents; Graft Occlusion, Vascular; Humans; Intermittent Claudication; Male; Middle Aged; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Prosthesis Design; Prosthesis Failure; Recurrence; Reoperation; Saphenous Vein; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography, Doppler, Duplex; Vascular Grafting; Vascular Patency

Women with acute myocardial infarction (MI) undergoing mechanical reperfusion remain at increased risk of adverse cardiac events and mortality compared with their male counterparts. Whether the benefits of new-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) are preserved in women with acute MI remains unclear.. To investigate the long-term safety and efficacy of new-generation DES vs early-generation DES in women with acute MI.. Collaborative, international, individual patient-level data of women enrolled in 26 randomized clinical trials of DES were analyzed between July and December 2016. Only women presenting with an acute coronary syndrome were included. Study population was categorized according to presentation with unstable angina (UA) vs acute MI. Acute MI included non-ST-segment elevation MI (NSTEMI) or ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI).. Randomization to early- (sirolimus- or paclitaxel-eluting stents) vs new-generation (everolimus-, zotarolimus-, or biolimus-eluting stents) DES.. Composite of death, MI or target lesion revascularization, and definite or probable stent thrombosis at 3-year follow-up.. Overall, the mean age of participants was 66.8 years. Of 11 577 women included in the pooled data set, 4373 (37.8%) had an acute coronary syndrome as clinical presentation. Of these 4373 women, 2176 (49.8%) presented with an acute MI. In women with acute MI, new-generation DES were associated with lower risk of death, MI or target lesion revascularization (14.9% vs 18.4%; absolute risk difference, -3.5%; number needed to treat [NNT], 29; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.61-0.99), and definite or probable stent thrombosis (1.4% vs 4.0%; absolute risk difference, -2.6%; NNT, 46; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.19-0.69) without evidence of interaction for both end points compared with women without acute MI (P for interaction = .59 and P for interaction = .31, respectively). A graded absolute benefit with use of new-generation DES was observed in the transition from UA, to NSTEMI, and to STEMI (for death, MI, or target lesion revascularization: UA, -0.5% [NNT, 222]; NSTEMI, -3.1% [NNT, 33]; STEMI, -4.0% [NNT, 25] and for definite or probable ST: UA, -0.4% [NNT, 278]; NSTEMI, -2.2% [NNT, 46]; STEMI, -4.0% [NNT, 25]).. New-generation DES are associated with consistent and durable benefits over 3 years in women presenting with acute MI. The magnitude of these benefits appeared to be greater per increase in severity of acute coronary syndrome.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Angina, Unstable; Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Middle Aged; Mortality; Myocardial Infarction; Myocardial Revascularization; Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction; Paclitaxel; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Proportional Hazards Models; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recurrence; Sirolimus; ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction; Treatment Outcome

The third generation drug eluting Orsiro stent had shown already promising results in non-complex lesions.. We evaluated angiographic and 24 month clinical results of the sirolimus eluting Orsiro stents (O-SES) after recanalization of coronary chronic total occlusions (CTO). Results were compared with the zotarolimus eluting Resolute Integrity (R-ZES).. In a prospective series 57 patients were treated with a R-ZES followed by 74 patients treated with a O-SES stent. Angiographic follow up after 9 months and clinical follow-up after 12 and 24 months was performed.. In-stent late lumen loss was 0.24±0.53 mm for the O-SES compared with 0.59±0.72 (P=0.01) for R-ZES. Rates for TLR were similar (O-SES 10.0% versus R-ZES 11.1%, P=0.84). There was no definite stent thrombosis.. The O-SES resulted in a significant lower late lumen loss but with similar clinical results up to 24 month compared to the R-ZES after treatment of CTO lesions.

Topics: Aged; Cardiovascular Agents; Chronic Disease; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Occlusion; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Predictive Value of Tests; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Sirolimus; Stents

There are limited data on the frequency of and factors associated with quantitative coronary angiography (QCA)-defined longitudinal stent deformation (LSD) in various contemporary drug-eluting stents platforms. This study sought to evaluate the predictors of LSD and its long-term clinical implication.. LSD is uncommon with contemporary drug-eluting stents, regardless of the type of stent platform. LSD is mainly associated with procedural factors, especially with additional downstream procedures which require the passage of devices through the stent. Careful manipulation of poststent imaging or procedural devices is required to prevent LSD. More data are needed to clarify the impact of LSD on clinical events.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cardiovascular Agents; Chromium Alloys; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Databases, Factual; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platinum; Prosthesis Design; Prosthesis Failure; Republic of Korea; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography, Interventional

Early cessation of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is related to stent thrombosis (ST). The use of second-generation everolimus- and zotarolimus-eluting stents is associated with low restenosis rates and short duration of clopidogrel usage. Non-cardiac surgery in recently stent-implanted patients is associated with major adverse cardiac events (MACEs). Chronic renal failure patients awaiting renal transplantation may also undergo coronary stent implantation prior to surgery. Here we aimed to investigate the safety of early (3 months) DAPT interruption in second-generation drug-eluting stent (DES)-implanted renal transplant recipients.. In total, 106 previously stent-implanted chronic renal failure patients who underwent renal transplantation were retrospectively enrolled. Three groups were formed according to stent type and the duration of DAPT: early-interruption (3 months from DES implantation), lateinterruption (3-12 months from DES implantation), and bare-metal stent (BMS; at least 1 month from BMS implantation) groups.. Comparison among BMS, DES-early and DES-late groups indicated no difference in ST, myocardial infarction, death, and MACEs. In addition, no difference was observed in ST (p=0.998), myocardial infarction (p=0.998), death (p=0.999), and MACEs (p=0.998) between DES-early and DES-late groups.. Early (3 months) interruption of antiplatelet treatment with second-generation stents before renal transplantation seems to be safe and does not lead to increase in the occurrence of ST and MACEs.

Topics: Clopidogrel; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Kidney Transplantation; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Preoperative Period; Retrospective Studies; Sirolimus; Thrombosis

To evaluate the long-term prognostic value of risk scores in the setting of drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation for uLMCA.. Data on the prognostic value of novel risk scores developed to select the most appropriate revascularization strategy in patients undergoing DES implantation for uLMCA disease are relatively limited.. The study represents a patient-level pooled analysis of the ISAR-LEFT-MAIN (607 patients randomized to paclitaxel-eluting or sirolimus-eluting stents) and the ISAR-LEFT-MAIN-2 (650 patients randomized to everolimus-eluting or zotarolimus-eluting stents) randomized trials. The Syntax Score (SxScore) as well the Syntax Score II (SS-II), the EuroSCORE and the Global Risk Classification (GRC) were calculated. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality.. At a mean follow-up of 3 years there were 160 deaths (12.7%). The death-incidence was significantly higher in the upper tertiles than in the intermediate or lower ones for all risk scores (log-rank test P < 0.01 for all comparisons). The discriminatory power of a multivariable model for prediction of 3-year mortality was significantly improved after the inclusion of EuroSCORE (adjusted area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve = 0.779, 95% confidence interval 0.747 to 0.810, P = 0.008), but not after the inclusion of SxScore, SS II, or GRC.. In patients undergoing DES implantation for uLMCA disease, all evaluated risk scores were able to stratify the mortality risk at long-term follow-up. EuroSCORE was the only risk score that significantly improved the discriminatory power of a multivariable model to predict long-term mortality. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Area Under Curve; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Decision Support Techniques; Discriminant Analysis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Paclitaxel; Patient Selection; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Predictive Value of Tests; Proportional Hazards Models; Prosthesis Design; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; ROC Curve; Severity of Illness Index; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

The aim of this study was to evaluate neointimal coverage in the very early phase after second-generation drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation using optical coherence tomography (OCT). Patients who underwent staged percutaneous coronary intervention within 30 days after DES implantation were enrolled. OCT was performed to observe DES previously implanted. The median time interval from implantation to OCT examination was 21.5 days. A total of 10,625 struts of 54 stents (52 everolimus-eluting stents and 2 zotarolimus-eluting stents) in 42 lesions were analyzed. Strut tissue coverage was observed in 71.1 ± 19.2 % of the struts, malapposed struts in 2.56 ± 3.37 %, strut tissue coverage at the side branch orifice in 10.6 ± 17.2 %, and struts with protrusion in 0.95 ± 3.46 %. Mean tissue thickness on the covered struts was 39.8 ± 14.2 µm. The percentage of stent coverage was significantly lower in the overlapping segments than in the non-overlapping segments (48.4 ± 17.5 % vs. 74.4 ± 20.2 %, P < 0.05). Most of the stent struts were covered by tissue within 30 days after second-generation DES implantation. However, the percentage of strut coverage was lower in the overlapping segments than in the non-overlapping segments, suggesting that very early interruption of dual antiplatelet therapy might result in increased risk of stent thrombosis, even in second-generation DES.

Topics: Aged; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Thrombosis; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Neointima; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Treatment Outcome

Endothelial shear stress (ESS) may play a key role in the pathobiology of stent restenosis (SR). Nevertheless, limited data are available about ESS and its relation to SR.. We enrolled 14 patients who underwent successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in this study. Three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of 14 coronary arteries before and after stent implantation was performed. Using computational fluid dynamics, mean ESS was calculated proximally, in tertiles within and distal to the stent, both before and after stent implantation.. Stent implantation resulted in a significant ESS decrease in the entire atherosclerotic lesion (1.83 vs. 1.26 Pa, p = 0.02). Regarding the five territories in which the entire lesion was divided, ESS decrease was marginally significant in the area of the second in-stent tertile, and in the area 5 mm distal to the stent, whereas ESS decrease was not significant in the area 5 mm proximal to the stent, and in the area of the first and third in-stent tertile. At 12 months, two patients had SR, but restenosis was not related to ESS decrease.. ESS decreases after stent implantation but not uniformly, with the major reduction being in the middle tertile of the stent, and distal to the stent. In-stent ESS decrease may create local hemodynamic conditions leading to in-stent and in-segment restenosis.

Topics: Algorithms; Computed Tomography Angiography; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Elastic Tissue; Endothelium, Vascular; Follow-Up Studies; Hemodynamics; Humans; Hydrodynamics; Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted; Imaging, Three-Dimensional; Patient-Specific Modeling; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Shear Strength; Sirolimus

Few studies have directly compared vascular responses to second-generation drug-eluting stents (DESs). We performed optical coherence tomography examinations in 56 consecutive patients with implanted single stent [19 cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stents (CoCr-EES), 22 platinum-chromium EES (PtCr-EES), and 15 resolute zotarolimus-eluting stents (R-ZES)] for de novo lesions, and who did not have restenosis at their 9-month follow-up. Neointimal thickness (NIT), stent apposition, and neointimal coverage were assessed in every strut. A neointimal unevenness score [(NUS), maximum NIT/average NIT in the same cross-section] was determined for every 1-mm cross-section (CS). A total of 8350 struts and 1159 CSs were analyzed. The CoCr- and PtCr-EES had significantly fewer malapposed struts compared to the R-ZES (CoCr-EES: 0.19 % vs. PtCr-EES: 0.19 % vs.. 0.61 %, p = 0.007). Furthermore, the PtCr-EES had a lower frequency of uncovered struts compared to the others (CoCr-EES: 2.0 % vs. PtCr-EES: 1.4 % vs.. 2.3 %, p = 0.047). The NUS correlated with the frequency of uncovered struts (p < 0.001, r = 0.54). The EESs demonstrated more homogenous neointimal growth, as shown in the NUS, compared to the R-ZES [CoCr-EES: 1.66 (1.38-1.97) vs. PtCr-EES: 1.67 (1.41-2.00) vs.. 1.94 (1.56-2.28), p < 0.001]. Our results demonstrate that unevenness neointimal growth may relate with strut coverage after second-generation DES implantation. The PtCr-EES had a high frequency of strut coverage with a homogeneous neointima, suggesting fewer risks for stent thrombosis.

Topics: Aged; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Male; Metals; Middle Aged; Neointima; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Predictive Value of Tests; Prosthesis Design; Retrospective Studies; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Treatment Outcome

Our aim was to investigate whether long-term (three-year) clinical outcomes after multivessel treatment with the Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (R-ZES) were similar to single-vessel treatment.. The RESOLUTE Global Clinical Trial Program enrolled 7,618 patients, of whom 1,562 underwent multivessel and 6,053 single-vessel treatment with the R-ZES. Patients in the multivessel group were more likely to have complex lesions (58% vs. 44%, p<0.001). Clinical outcomes were compared using a Cox regression model adjusted by propensity score to account for differences in baseline characteristics. Compared with single-vessel treatment, multivessel treatment was associated with more complex anatomy and longer mean total stent length (57.8±28.6 vs. 26.7±15.2 mm, p<0.001). At three years, the cumulative incidence of target lesion failure was similar in patients with multivessel and single-vessel treatment (11.0% vs. 9.1%, adjusted p=0.986), as was the incidence of cardiac death or target vessel myocardial infarction (6.7% vs. 5.7%, adjusted p=0.793), the incidence of clinically driven target lesion revascularisation (5.1% vs. 4.4%, adjusted p=0.904), and the incidence of Academic Research Consortium definite or probable stent thrombosis (1.2% vs. 0.9%, adjusted p=0.544).. Multivessel treatment with R-ZES provided good long-term clinical outcomes that were comparable to those achieved with single-vessel stenting, supporting the efficacy and safety of R-ZES in patients in this setting.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Clinical Trials as Topic; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

First-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) have reduced short-term stent failure as compared to bare-metal stents due to the inhibition of neointima hyperplasia, but instead increased the risk of very-late stent failure. Although better outcomes have been reported for second-generation DES than for first-generation DES, the difference in the angioscopic findings at 1-year follow-up has not been adequately elucidated among second-generation DES.. Consecutive 161 patients who received angioscopic examination at 1 year after implantation of second-generation DES, i.e. Nobori biolimus-eluting stents (Terumo, Tokyo, Japan) (N-BES, n=25), Xience everolimus-eluting stents (Abbot Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA; X-EES, n=95), or Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stents (Resolute Integrity; Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA; R-ZES, n=41), in de novo native coronary lesions were analyzed.. Maximum neointima coverage grade (N-BES, 0.9±0.3; X-EES, 1.2±0.4; R-ZES, 1.5±0.5; p<0.001) was the highest in R-ZES and lowest in N-BES. Heterogeneity score was higher in R-ZES than in N-BES (N-BES, 0.8±0.4; X-EES, 0.9±0.4; R-ZES, 1.1±0.5; p=0.007). Maximum yellow color grade and prevalence of thrombus were not different. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that only stent type was associated with maximum neointima coverage grade; stent type and total stent length were associated with heterogeneity score; and stenting for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and total stent length were associated with maximum yellow color grade.. Neointima coverage and heterogeneity were mainly determined by stent type even among second-generation DES, while yellow color was determined mainly by whether target lesion was of ACS.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angioscopy; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neointima; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome

The authors evaluated the 5-year cumulative incidence of cardiovascular events following Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (R-ZES) implantation.. Individual trials are often underpowered to show differences for low-frequency adverse events. The R-ZES was studied in 10 prospective clinical trials, designed with identical adverse event definitions, ascertainment, and adjudication.. The RESOLUTE Global Clinical Trial Program includes 7,618 patients treated with R-ZES: RESOLUTE first-in-human study (N = 139), RESOLUTE All Comers (N = 1,140), RESOLUTE International (N = 2,349), RESOLUTE US (N = 1,402), RESOLUTE US 38 mm (N = 114), RESOLUTE Japan (N = 100), RESOLUTE Japan Small Vessel Study (N = 65), RESOLUTE Asia (N = 311), RESOLUTE China Randomized Controlled Trial (N = 198), and RESOLUTE China Registry (N = 1,800). The 5-year cumulative incidence of events was calculated.. The 5-year cumulative incidence of cardiac events was 13.4% for target lesion failure and included 5.0% cardiac death, 4.4% target vessel myocardial infarction, and 6.3% clinically driven target lesion revascularization. Dual-antiplatelet therapy at 1, 3, and 5 years was 91%, 37%, and 32%, respectively. The 5-year cumulative incidence of definite or probable stent thrombosis was 1.2%, which comprised 0.7% at 1 year and an annualized rate of 0.1% thereafter. Five-year use of dual-antiplatelet therapy varied geographically from 63% in Japan to 11% in Europe.. In the largest group of R-ZES patients examined to date, the majority of stent-related events, including target vessel myocardial infarction and stent thrombosis, occurred within the first year of implantation with much lower risks of these events out to 5 years.

Topics: Aged; Asia; Australia; Cardiovascular Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Thrombosis; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Eluting Stents; Europe; Evidence-Based Medicine; Female; Humans; Incidence; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; North America; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prosthesis Design; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; South America; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sirolimus

To compare the 1-year outcomes of a durable polymer Zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) versus a biodegradable polymer Biolimus-eluting stent (BES) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.. A total of 2083 patients from 2 different registries, 1125 treated with BES in NOBORI registry and 858 received ZES in CONSTANT registry were included in this study. Clinical outcomes were compared with the use of propensity score matching (PSM). The primary endpoint was a composite of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) including cardiac death, myocardial infarction, clinically driven target lesion revascularization and stroke. Secondary end points were individual components of MACCEs as well as the incidence of stent thrombosis at 1-year follow-up.. After PSM, 699 matched pairs of patients (n=1398) showed no significant difference between BES and ZES in the risk of composite MACCEs at 1 year (2.6% vs. 1.7%; p=0.36). Cardiac death was not statistically different between groups (0.7% vs. 0.4%, p=0.73). Target lesion revascularization rate was also similar between BES and ZES (1.1% vs. 0.7%, p=0.579). Non-Q wave myocardial infarction, as well as target-vessel revascularization rate, was similar between the two groups (0.14% for BES and 0.72% for ZES). Both stent types were excellent with no cases of stent thrombosis and rate of Q wave myocardial infarction reported during the follow-up period.. In this cohort of patients treated with BES or ZES, the rate of MACCEs at 1 year was low and significantly not different between both groups.

Topics: Absorbable Implants; Aged; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Polymers; Propensity Score; Registries; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Although studies have demonstrated comparable efficacy and safety profiles of everolimus- and zotarolimus-eluting stents (EES and ZES, respectively) for a broad spectrum of coronary artery diseases, there is paucity of data concerning their safety and efficacy for coronary chronic total occlusions (CTOs). This study compared the clinical performance of EES and ZES following successful percutaneous coronary intervention for CTOs.. The cohort included 539 consecutive CTO patients who underwent successful PCI using EES (n=313) and ZES (n=226) between September 2006 and August 2014. The primary outcome was defined as the composite of death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization.. During a median follow-up of 3.3years, in both groups, the primary outcome occurred in 12.2% of patients. After multivariable adjustment, no significant difference was observed between the two groups in the risk of primary outcome [hazard ratio (HR) 1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.59-1.79, P=0.930 for ZES compared with EES]. Similarly, there were no significant differences in the risk of death (adjusted HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.43-2.15, P=925), death or myocardial infarction (adjusted HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.46-1.88, P=0.829), and target vessel failure (adjusted HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.51-1.82, P=0.902). The incidence of definite/probable stent thrombosis was relatively low [0% (ZES) vs. 1.0% (EES), P=0.19].. No significant differences were observed between EES and ZES in terms of clinical outcomes for coronary CTOs at 3.3years.

Topics: Aged; Cohort Studies; Coronary Occlusion; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

To evaluate the rate of clinical events and bleeding risk according to age in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with a new-generation drug-eluting stent (DES) enrolled in the RESOLUTE Global Clinical Program.. This study represents a pooled analysis of five trials included in the RESOLUTE program including 5,130 patients, of whom 1,675 (32.6%) were ≥70 years old (elderly patients).. After adjusting for confounders, age ≥70 years was a significant predictor of high mortality at 30 days (0.6 vs. 0.1%, P = 0.017) and 2 years (7.2 vs. 2%, P < 0.001). No differences were seen with respect to acute myocardial infarction (MI) or target lesion and vessel revascularization rates between young and elderly patients. Bleeding rates were higher in the elderly throughout follow-up. In the elderly, 7 of the 27 (26%) patients with bleeding episodes died, with a median time between bleeding episode to death of 21 days. In the younger population, 1 patient of 17 with a bleeding episode died (400 days later).. Elderly patients undergoing PCI with a new-generation DES have increased mortality and bleeding risk, with similar rates of acute MI and repeat revascularization. Bleeding risk was higher in the elderly and strongly related to death. Target lesion failure rates were not significantly different between the two age groups, suggesting that the Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (R-ZES) is effective for patients younger and older than 70 years of age. R-ZES may be recommended for elderly patients when PCI with a DES is identified as a suitable option.

Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Myocardial Infarction; Observational Studies as Topic; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prosthesis Design; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Coronary Occlusion; Coronary Vasospasm; Drug-Eluting Stents; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Middle Aged; Recurrence; Sirolimus; ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Very late stent thrombosis (VLST) is a serious complication after percutaneous coronary intervention. However, the best therapy for VLST with late-acquired incomplete stent apposition and incomplete neointimal coverage remains unknown. In these cases, neointimal coverage was nearly complete and no late-acquired malapposition was detected at 18 months after Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) implantation for the treatment of VLST with late-acquired incomplete stent apposition after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation. We presented that Endeavor ZES implantation may become an attractive therapeutic strategy for the treatment of VLST with late-acquired incomplete stent apposition and incomplete neointimal coverage.

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Thrombosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neointima; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prosthesis Design; Sirolimus; Thrombectomy; Time Factors; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography, Interventional

Overall stent performance should be characterized by geometric luminal gain acquisition, neointimal coverage of the stent struts, and stabilization of the underlying inflammatory neoatheroma. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES), everolimus-eluting stent (EES) and bare metal stent (BMS) using optical coherence tomography (OCT) and coronary angioscopy. For 36 stented coronary lesions (BMS, 12 lesions; ZES, 11 lesions; EES, 13 lesions) in 27 patients, we calculated neointimal area and uncovered stent strut rate based on OCT findings at 10 months after stent placement. The grades of neointimal coverage and yellow color, both of which were classified from 0 to 3, were also assessed by coronary angioscopy. The plaque area of the ZES lesions was larger than that of the EES lesions (P < 0.05) but smaller than that of the BMS lesions (P < 0.05). The OCT-based uncovered rate of the ZES lesions was less than that of the EES lesions (P < 0.01), but similar to that of the BMS lesions. The stent coverage grade by angioscopy was higher in the ZES lesions than in the EES lesions (P < 0.05), but similar to the BMS lesions. The yellow grade was less in the ZES lesions than in the EES lesions (P < 0.01), but similar to the BMS lesions. ZES might be better than BMS in terms of neointimal thickening, and better than EES in terms of neointimal coverage as well as prevention of neoatheroma formation. ZES may have superior performance compared with EES.

Topics: Aged; Angioscopy; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Neointima; Sirolimus; Tomography, Optical Coherence

Our objective was to clarify whether thrombogenic problems with stent struts are resolved at 3 months after 2nd-generation drug-eluting stent implantation. Twenty-one patients with stable angina pectoris having 28 (22 zotarolimus-eluting, 6 everolimus-eluting) stents with optical coherence tomography (OCT)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were evaluated. Stent strut coverage and malapposition were evaluated by OCT immediately after PCI and at 3-month follow-up. Acute strut malapposition was observed in 26 out of 28 analyzed stents (92.9 %). At 3-month follow-up, 7 (26.9 %) of those 26 stents with strut malapposition were completely resolved, and the mean percentages of uncovered struts and malapposed struts were 8.3 and 2.0 % when analyzed by each individual stent. When analyzing a total of 30,060 struts, 807 struts (2.7 %) demonstrated acute strut malapposition. Among these, 219 struts (27.1 %) demonstrated persistent strut malapposition. On the basis of receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis, a strut-to-vessel (S-V) distance ≤160 µm on post-stenting OCT images was the corresponding cutoff point for resolved malapposed struts (sensitivity 78.1 %, specificity 62.8 %, area under the curve 0.758). The S-V distance of persistent malapposed struts on post-stenting OCT images was longer than that of resolved malapposed struts (235 ± 112 vs. 176 ± 93 µm, p < 0.01). At 3 months after PCI, the prevalence rates of uncovered and malapposed struts were relatively low in 2nd-generation drug-eluting stent. Our results suggest that OCT-guide PCI with an S-V distance ≤160 µm may be recommended especially in patients with planed short-term DAPT.

Topics: Aged; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prosthesis Design; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Ticlopidine; Tomography, Optical Coherence

To compare the long-term clinical outcomes between Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (R-ZES) and paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) in patients with small coronary artery disease.. Patients with a small vessel diameter are independently associated with increased risk of adverse cardiac events after drug-eluting stent implantation.. A cohort of 265 patients treated with R-ZES (185 patients with 211 lesions) or PES (80 patients with 100 lesions) in small vessel (≤2.5 mm) lesions were retrospectively analyzed. The primary end point of the study was the composite of major adverse cardiac events. The secondary end points included target lesion revascularization (TLR), target vessel revascularization (TVR), and stent thrombosis at 3 years.. The baseline characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. In the R-ZES group, the mean stent diameter was smaller and the total stent length per lesion was longer. Major adverse cardiac events occurred in 8 (10%) patients who had received PES and in 7 (3.8%) patients who had received R-ZES (P = .07). The rates of 3-year TLR (2.2% vs 2.5%; P = 1.00) and TVR (5.4% vs 10.0%; P = .17) showed no statistically significant difference between the R-ZES and PES groups. The rate of stent thrombosis was 0.5% in the R-ZES group and 2.5% in the PES group (P = .21).. The rates of major adverse cardiac events and cardiac death were similar in the R-ZES-treated group compared with the PES-treated group.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Thrombosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Paclitaxel; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

The efficacy of second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) in treating in-stent restenosis (ISR) compared to first-generation DES and non-DES treatment methods in real-world cohorts has not yet been adequately addressed. This research intends to examine optimum treatment of in-stent restenosis, considering first-generation DES, second-generation DES and non-DES treatment methods in a real-world cohort.. Retrospective analysis was performed on 114 patients treated for native-vessel BMS or DES ISR. Thirty-two were treated with a first-generation DES (81% sirolimus, 19% paclitaxel), 32 with a second-generation DES (72% everolimus, 28% zotarolimus) and 28 with non-DES methods (32% bare-metal stent, 39% balloon angioplasty, 29% cutting balloon). The composite primary endpoint was total adverse cardiac events, recurrent stable angina, unstable angina, myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel revascularisation (TVR) and cardiac death at minimum clinical follow-up of six months.. Primary endpoint rates were significantly higher in the non-DES and second-generation DES treatment groups than in first-generation DES (42.9%, 25.9%, 6.2%; p=0.004). Rates of MI and TVR were significantly higher in the non-DES treatment group, compared to first and second-generation DES (MI: 17.9%, 0%, 5.6%; p=0.018; TLR: 21.4%, 3.1%, 7.4%; p=0.041).. First-generation DES may be superior to second-generation DES and non-DES in treating BMS or DES ISR with regard to overall adverse cardiac events.

Topics: Aged; Angina, Stable; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Graft Occlusion, Vascular; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Retrospective Studies; Sirolimus

Methods for intravascular assessment of the side-branch (SB) orifice after stenting are not readily available. The aim of this study was to assess the utility of an en-face projection processing for optical coherence tomography (OCT) images for SB evaluation.. Measurements of the SB orifice obtained using en-face OCT images were validated using a phantom model. Linear regression modeling was applied to estimated area measurements made on the en-face images. The SB orifice was then analyzed in 88 patients with bifurcation lesions treated with either Xience V (everolimus-eluting stent) or Resolute Integrity [zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES)]. The SB orifice area (A) and the area obstructed by struts (B) were calculated, and the %open area was evaluated as (A-B)/A*100.. Linear regression modeling demonstrated that the observed departures of the intercept and slope were not significantly different from 0 (-0.12 ± 0.22, P=0.59) and 1 (1.01 ± 0.06, R(2)=0.88, P=0.87), respectively. In cases without SB dilatation, the %open area was significantly larger in the everolimus-eluting stent group (n=25) than in the ZES group [n=32; 89.2% (83.7-91.3) vs. 84.3% (78.9-87.8), P=0.04]. A significant difference in %open area between cases with and those without SB dilatation was demonstrated in the ZES group [91.4% (86.1-94.0) vs. 84.3% (78.9-87.8), P=0.04].. The accuracy of SB orifice measurement on an en-face OCT image was validated using a phantom model. This novel approach enables quantitative evaluation of the differences in SB orifice area free from struts among different stent types and different treatment strategies in vivo.

Topics: Biocompatible Materials; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Stenosis; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Membranes, Artificial; Middle Aged; Phantoms, Imaging; Polyglactin 910; Prosthesis Design; Reproducibility of Results; Sirolimus; Tomography, Optical Coherence

This study aim was to investigate the morphometric parameters of late-acquired incomplete stent apposition (ISA) following use of Cypher sirolimus-eluting stent (SES; Cordis), Taxus paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES; Boston Scientific), and Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES; Medtronic).. Characteristics of late-acquired ISA between first-generation and second-generation drug-eluting stents (DESs) have not been systematically examined.. Late-acquired ISA was defined as separation of at least 1 stent strut from the vessel wall with evidence of blood speckle behind the strut, where poststent implantation intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) revealed complete apposition. A total of 30 late-acquired ISA cases (12 SES, 10 PES, 8 ZES) were included in this IVUS analysis. Corresponding cross-sections at post procedure were selected for comparison. Vessel, lumen, peristent tissue, and stent area were measured in the late-acquired ISA arc as referenced to stent center.. Late-acquired ISA area was 2.4 ± 1.5 mm² in SES, 2.2 ± 2.7 mm² in PES, and 0.9 ± 0.6 mm² in ZES (P=.02 for SES vs ZES). Vessel area increased from post procedure to follow-up in SES (4.6 ± 1.7 mm² to 7.0 ± 2.5 mm²; P<.01) and PES (3.6 ± 1.7 mm² to 5.7 ± 3.8 mm²; P=.06), but not in ZES. Vessel expansion was the main mechanism in SES and PES groups; however, tissue regression and stent recoil, as well as vessel expansion, also contributed to late-acquired ISA in ZES. Per-patient analyses demonstrated that vessel expansion was the predominant mechanism of late-acquired ISA in 83% of SES, 60% in PES, and 50% of ZES cases.. The magnitude and mechanism of late-acquired ISA appear to be different between first-generation and second-generation DESs, possibly due to varying vessel response to different stent component types.

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Long Term Adverse Effects; Male; Middle Aged; Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care; Paclitaxel; Sirolimus; Ultrasonography, Interventional; United States

Drug-eluting stents (DES) have reduced late loss and target lesion revascularization through the inhibition of neointimal hyperplasia, but instead increased the risk of very late stent failure due to incomplete neointimal coverage and neoatherosclerosis. Although newer DES are more effective and safer than the first-generation DES, the difference in the condition of the stented lesions between Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stents (R-ZES) and Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stents (E-ZES) on angioscopy has not been reported.. Consecutive patients who received R-ZES (n=46) or E-ZES (n=46) for de novo lesion of native coronary artery and had 1-year follow-up angioscopy were examined. Yellow color (grade 0-3), neointimal coverage (grade 0-2), heterogeneity score (maximum-minimum neointimal coverage grade) and thrombus (presence or absence) at stented lesion were evaluated. The maximum yellow color grade (1.2±0.9 vs. 0.7±1.0, P=0.005) was higher in R-ZES than in E-ZES. The maximum (1.9±0.3 vs. 1.5±0.5, P<0.001) and minimum (1.1±0.7 vs. 0.4±0.5, P<0.001) coverage grade was higher in E-ZES than in R-ZES. The heterogeneity score was higher in R-ZES than in E-ZES (1.0±0.5 vs. 0.7±0.7, P=0.007). Prevalence of thrombus was not different between the 2 stents (6.5% vs. 2.2%, P=0.4).. E-ZES had better neointimal coverage with less yellow plaque and lower heterogeneity score than R-ZES. The lesions with E-ZES appeared more stable than those with R-ZES. (Circ J 2016; 80: 650-656).

Topics: Aged; Angioscopy; Atherosclerosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neointima; Plaque, Atherosclerotic; Sirolimus

Polymer coatings on drug-eluting stents (DES) serve as a vehicle for delivery of antirestenotic drugs. Whether they influence outcomes for contemporary DES is unknown. The evolution of polymer coatings for zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES) provides a natural experiment that facilitates such analysis. The Resolute ZES (R-ZES) uses the same antirestenotic drug as the Endeavor ZES (E-ZES) but has a more biocompatible polymer with enhanced drug release kinetics. However, there are limited data on the real-world comparative efficacy of R-ZES and the preceding E-ZES. Thus, we analyzed 17,643 patients who received either E-ZES or R-ZES from 2008 to 2014 from the British Columbia Cardiac Registry. A total of 9,869 patients (56%) received E-ZES and 7,774 patients (44%) received R-ZES. Compared with E-ZES, R-ZES was associated with lower 2-year mortality (4.1% vs 6.4%, p <0.001) and 2-year target vessel revascularization (TVR; 6.8% vs 10.7%, p <0.001). R-ZES use was an independent predictor of lower mortality rate and TVR. This was confirmed in propensity-matched analyses for 2-year mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 0.59, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.71, p <0.001) and 2-year TVR (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.75 to 0.98, p = 0.032). Instrumental variable analyses demonstrated R-ZES to be associated with lower 2-year mortality (Δ = -2.2%, 95% CI -4.3% to -0.2%, p = 0.032) and 2-year TVR (Δ = -3.3% to 95% CI -6.1% to -0.7%, p = 0.015). Acknowledging the limitations of observational analyses, this study has shown that R-ZES was associated with lower long-term TVR and mortality. These data are reassuring for the newer R-ZES and demonstrate how polymer coatings may influence the clinical performance of DES with wider implications for future DES development and design.

Topics: British Columbia; Coated Materials, Biocompatible; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Polymers; Prognosis; Prosthesis Design; Retrospective Studies; Sirolimus; Survival Rate; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

New-generation coronary stents including zotarolimus- and everolimus-eluting stents (ZES and EES) have been shown to decrease the risk of restenosis. The purpose of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of ZES and EES over a 12-month clinical follow up, in routine clinical practice.. This is an observational study in which 1029 consecutive patients treated with ZES (n = 669) or EES (n = 360) were enrolled. The study endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), and target lesion or vessel revascularization at 12 months.. Follow up was completed among 94.9% of the patients. The overall MACE occurred in 4 (0.6%) and 7 (2.0%) patients in the ZES and EES group, respectively. The occurrence of other cardiac events including nonfatal MI and target vessel or lesion revascularization was 1 (0.2%) versus 1 (0.3%) and 7 (1.1%) versus 5 (1.4%), respectively, in the ZES and EES groups of patients. Despite a slightly lower rate of MACE and cardiac death in the ZES group, the difference between these two groups was not significant (n = 0.064 for overall MACE, p = 0.129 for cardiac mortality, n = 0.999 for nonfatal MI, n = 0.468 for target vessel and n = 0.999 for target lesion revascularization).. According to our results, it could be concluded that the difference in the rate of MACE between the ZES and EES groups was not statistically significant at 12-month follow up.

Topics: Aged; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Registries; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

To evaluate angiographic and clinical results of ZES compared with EES after recanalization of CTOs.. ZES and EES showed similar clinical results in non-CTO lesions. Whether ZES and EES are also comparable in true CTO lesions (TIMI 0 flow, duration of occlusion of more than 3 months) with a higher risk of restenosis has not been addressed so far.. 125 patients with successful CTO recanalization via antegrade or retrograde approach were included. EES were implanted in 68 patients and ZES in 57 patients. Dual antiplatelet therapy was prescribed for 12 months. Follow-up angiography was scheduled at 9 months and clinical follow-up at 12 months. The primary angiographic outcome measure was in-stent late lumen loss. Primary clinical outcome measures were target lesion revascularization rate (TLR) and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) as a composite of cardiac death, TLR and myocardial infarction not clearly attributable to a non-target vessel.. Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. Mean stent length was 72.8 ± 33.0mm with EES and 70.8 ± 31.5 mm with ZES (P = 0.72). In-stent late lumen loss was 0.50 ± 0.71 mm for EES compared with 0.59 ± 0.72 (P = 0.52) for ZES. There were similar rates for TLR (EES 10.3% versus ZES 10.5%, P = 0.97) and MACE (EES 10.3% versus ZES 12.3%). No definite or probable stent thrombosis occurred. Stent length but not type of stent was predictive for in-stent late loss and TLR.. ZES and EES showed similar angiographic and clinical outcomes for treatment of CTOs. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Topics: Aged; Cardiovascular Agents; Chronic Disease; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Occlusion; Coronary Restenosis; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Predictive Value of Tests; Prosthesis Design; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Our case reports the first migration of a stent already deployed at high pressure in the main vessel during a 2-stent strategy for a bifurcation lesion using T and protrusion technique. The Kissing balloon was not optimal and could have led to an insufficient strut/cell opening and then to LAD stent pulled back into the artery tree. This case report highlights the importance of an optimal Kissing Balloon in two stent bifurcation technique.

Topics: Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Device Removal; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Foreign-Body Migration; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

Both bare-metal stents (BMS; the first-generation coronary stent) and zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES; a second-generation drug-eluting stent [DES]) have been widely utilized to treat coronary heart disease. However, the long-term comparative effectiveness of BMS and ZES remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate long-term comparative effectiveness of BMS versus ZES.. We created a longitudinal database by linking the New York State (NYS) cardiac registries, statewide hospital discharge data, the National Death Index (NDI), and the U.S. Census file (2010) for patients receiving either BMS or ZES during the 2008-2009 period. We examined the rates of all-cause mortality, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), target-lesion PCI (TLPCI), and target-vessel coronary artery bypass graft (TVCABG) surgery for a follow-up period of 4.5 years. A total of 10,443 propensity score matched pairs were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression adjusting for patient risk factors.. We found that patients receiving ZES had a lower rate of 4.5-year mortality (adjusted hazard ratio AHR: 0.68, 95% confidence interval CI: 0.63-0.73), AMI (AHR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.80-0.98), and TVCABG (AHR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.71-0.99) but a similar rate of TLPCI (AHR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.93-1.12). For "off-label" and "high-risk" subgroups, ZES was associated with improved mortality and generally better or non-inferior AMI, TLPCI, and TVCABG outcomes relative to BMS.. Compared with BMS, ZES was associated with lower long-term mortality, AMI and TVCABG. (J Interven Cardiol 2016;29:265-274).

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Metals; Middle Aged; New York; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Propensity Score; Proportional Hazards Models; Registries; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

Comparative data on long-term safety and efficacy of bioresorbable-polymer-BES versus durable-polymer-EES/ZES in ACS setting have hitherto been lacking. We sought to assess the safety and efficacy of bioresorbable-polymer-biolimus-A9-eluting stents (BES) compared with thin-strut-durable-polymer-everolimus- and zotarolimus-eluting stents (EES/ZES) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing PCI.. Between 2007 and 2012, 1,547 patients were implanted with new-generation drug-eluting stents (DES). Out of these, 369 received BES and 1,178 EES/ZES. The primary endpoint was probable/definite stent thrombosis (ST) while the secondary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel revascularization (TVR) and definite ST up to 5 years. As stent assignment was not random, we performed a propensity score matching (PSM), with 1:3 ratio, to account for potential confounders. Primary analysis demonstrated no significant differences between both groups for the primary endpoint of ST (BES vs.. 1.6% vs. 1.9%; mean-event-time = 1,797 days vs. 1,795 days, respectively; P = 0.75) and composite safety endpoint (BES vs.. 12.5% vs. 12.9%; mean-event-time = 1,631 days vs. 1,620 days, respectively; P = 0.88). Results regarding the 5-year-ST- and safety endpoint remained non-significant after PSM (P = 0.85, P = 0.56; respectively). After stratification based on cardiovascular risk, no difference regarding ST and composite outcome measure has been documented between both stent groups in high-risk- and low-risk patients. The type of stent did neither predict ST (HR 1.11, 95%CI 0.45-2.74, P = 0.82) nor composite safety endpoint (HR 0.93, 95%CI 0.67-1.30, P = 0.69).. Long-term safety and efficacy of bioresorbable-polymer-BES and durable-polymer-EES/ZES appear comparable in patients with ACS. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Topics: Absorbable Implants; Acute Coronary Syndrome; Coronary Angiography; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Polymers; Prosthesis Design; Retrospective Studies; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

In-stent hyperplasia (ISH) may develop in regions of low endothelial shear stress (ESS), but the relationship between the magnitude of low ESS, the extent of ISH, and subsequent clinical events has not been investigated.. We assessed the association of poststent ESS with neointimal ISH and clinical outcomes in patients treated with percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). Three-dimensional coronary reconstruction was performed in 374 post-PCI patients at baseline and 6 to 10 months follow-up as part of the PREDICTION Study. Each vessel was divided into 1.5-mm-long segments, and we calculated the local ESS within each stented segment at baseline. At follow-up, we assessed ISH and the occurrence of a clinically indicated repeat PCI for in-stent restenosis. In 246 total stents (54 overlapping), 100 (40.7%) were bare-metal stents (BMS), 104 (42.3%) sirolimus-eluting stents, and 42 (17.1%) paclitaxel-eluting stents. In BMS, low ESS post-PCI at baseline was independently associated with ISH (β=1.47 mm(2) per 1-Pa decrease; 95% CI, 0.38-2.56; P<0.01). ISH was minimal in drug-eluting stents. During follow-up, repeat PCI in BMS was performed in 21 stents (8.5%). There was no significant association between post-PCI ESS and in-stent restenosis requiring PCI.. Low ESS after BMS implantation is associated with subsequent ISH. ISH is strongly inhibited by drug-eluting stents. Post-PCI ESS is not associated with in-stent restenosis requiring repeat PCI. ESS is an important determinant of ISH in BMS, but ISH of large magnitude to require PCI for in-stent restenosis is likely attributed to factors other than ESS within the stent.

Topics: Aged; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Early Diagnosis; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hemodynamics; Humans; Hyperplasia; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Neointima; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Sirolimus; Stents; Stress, Mechanical; Treatment Outcome

At present no proven standard treatment for drug-eluting stent (DES) restenosis is available, and the efficacy and safety of everolimus-eluting stent (EES) and zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) for DES restenosis are limited. The purpose of this prospective, randomized 9-month intracoronary ultrasound (IVUS) and 3-year clinical follow-up study was to compare the effects of EESs and ZESs on neointima volume and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) such as death, myocardial infarction (MI), target lesion revascularization (TLR) and stent thrombosis in DES restenosis patients.. Patients with first- and second-generation DES restenosis, both EES and ZES implantation were effective and safe in reducing neointima volume and late loss with a comparable rate of MACEs independent of cardiovascular risk factors.

Topics: Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

We assessed long-term outcomes in patients with extra-small (XS) (≤2.25 mm) and small vessels (SV) (>2.25-2.75 mm) treated with the Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (R-ZES).. Data from eight studies including patients with XS or SV were pooled for this analysis. Among 2,141 patients (837 XS, 1,304 SV), three-year cumulative major adverse cardiac events (15.4% vs. 11.5%; adj. HR [95% CI]: 1.3 [1.0, 1.7], p=0.12), target lesion failure (12.4% vs. 9.3%, adj. HR: 1.1 [0.8, 1.5], p=0.56), and target lesion revascularisation (TLR: 6.9% vs. 4.5%, adj. HR 1.4 [0.9, 2.1], p=0.17) were greater in the XS cohort but were not significantly different after propensity adjustment. Target vessel revascularisation occurred more frequently in XS patients in both unadjusted and adjusted analyses (11.2% vs. 7.6%, adj. HR: 1.5 [1.1, 2.1], p=0.02). Stent thrombosis was low in both cohorts (1.2% vs. 0.6%, p=0.09). In the XS cohort, insulin-dependent diabetics had over twofold higher rates of TLR than non-diabetics (13.6% vs. 6.0%, p=0.02).. Long-term lesion-specific results among patients with XS vessels treated with the R-ZES were not significantly different from those among patients with SV, but specific patients with XS vessels (e.g., insulin-dependent diabetics) may remain at high risk for TLR.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Thrombosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

Coronary pseudoaneurysm is a rare complication of percutaneous coronary intervention with a drug-eluting stent. Neither precise incidence of the complication has been known, nor there has been any established therapeutic approach for it. A 69-years-old male with effort angina underwent percutaneous coronary intervention to his left main coronary artery (LMCA). After pre-dilatation with a balloon, Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent (E-ZES) was successfully implanted into the lesion that extended from his LMCA to left anterior descending artery. At 6 months after stenting, coronary angiography (CAG) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) revealed coronary pseudoaneurysm at the stented segment. Follow-up CAG at 13 months after stenting showed the spontaneous and complete resolution of the pseudoaneurysm. Subsequent IVUS, optical coherence tomography, and coronary angioscopy visualized complete neointimal coverage of stent struts. This is the first case report of E-ZES-related pseudoaneurysm with relatively rapid resolution. Our patient suggests that E-ZES might incidentally contribute to this favorable outcome.

Topics: Aged; Aneurysm, False; Drug-Eluting Stents; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Sirolimus

This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of the RESOLUTE(TM)zotarolimus-eluting stent (R-ZES; Medtronic, Inc, Santa Rosa, CA, USA) in Japanese patients for the treatment of de novo native coronary lesions.. Both RESOLUTE Japan (R-Japan) and RESOLUTE Japan Small Vessel Study (R-Japan SVS) were prospective, multicenter, single-arm observational studies. R-Japan enrolled 100 patients (reference vessel diameter, 2.5-3.5 mm) and R-Japan SVS enrolled 65 patients (at least 1 lesion suitable for 2.25-mm stent) treated with R-ZES. In R-Japan, in-stent late lumen loss (LLL; the primary endpoint) at 8 months was 0.12 ± 0.22 mm and volume obstruction on intravascular ultrasound was 2.33 ± 3.51%. At 4 years, there were no cases of clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR); the target lesion failure (TLF; composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and clinically driven TLR) was 5.6% (5/90). In R-Japan SVS, in-stent LLL at 9 months was 0.27 ± 0.33 mm, TLF (primary endpoint) was 4.6% (3/65), without incidence of TLR. At 3 years, TLF was 7.9% (5/63) and clinically driven TLR, 3.2% (2/63).. R-Japan and R-Japan SVS demonstrate substantial suppression of neointimal hyperplasia, low LLL, and excellent and sustained long-term clinical outcome with R-ZES in Japanese patients.

Topics: Combined Modality Therapy; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Stenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Heart Diseases; Humans; Incidence; Japan; Myocardial Infarction; Myocardial Revascularization; Neointima; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Postoperative Complications; Prospective Studies; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography, Interventional

The angiographic features of restenosis contain prognostic information. However, restenosis patterns of the new generation drug-eluting stents (DES), everolimus-(EES) and resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) have not been described.A total of 210 consecutive patients with DES restenosis were enrolled from 2003 to 2012. We analyzed 217 restenotic lesions after DES implantation, and compared the morphologic characteristics of the 2nd generation DES restenosis to those of restenosis with 2 first generation DES, sirolimus-(SES) and paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES).Baseline characteristics were comparable between the different stent groups. The incidence of focal restenosis was significantly lower for PES than the other stents (49.5% versus 87.0%, 76.2%, and 82.1% for PES versus SES, EES, and ZES, respectively, P < 0.001). When considering the pattern of restenosis solely within the stent margins, a further clear distinction between PES and other stents was observed (40.0% versus 92.9%, 88.9%, and 81.2% in PES versus SES, EES, and ZES, respectively, P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in restenosis patterns among SES, EES, and ZES. In multivariate analysis, PES implantation, hypertension, and age were associated with non-focal type of restenosis after DES implantation. After the introduction of EES and ZES into routine clinical practice in 2008, focal restenosis significantly increased from 63.9% to 76.7% and diffuse restenosis significantly decreased from 26.4% to 11.0% (P = 0.045).Focal restenosis was the most common pattern of restenosis in the new generation DES and the incidence of diffuse restenosis significantly decreased with the introduction of the 2nd generation DES.

Topics: Aged; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Paclitaxel; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Postoperative Complications; Registries; Republic of Korea; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome; Vascular Patency

To date, it remains unknown whether different types of new-generation drug-eluting stents have a differential impact on long-term outcomes in diabetic patients.. In this historical cohort study (two Italian centers), we analyzed 400 diabetic patients with 553 coronary lesions treated with new-generation CoCr zotarolimus-eluting stents (R-ZES: 136 patients, 196 lesions) or everolimus-eluting stents (EES: 264 patients, 357 lesions) between October 2006 and August 2012. Primary endpoint was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) over a 2-year follow-up period. MACE was defined as all-cause mortality, any myocardial infarction (MI) and/or target lesion revascularization (TLR). Multivessel revascularization, intervention for restenotic lesion and use of intravascular ultrasound were significantly higher in the R-ZES group, whereas small stent (≤2.5 mm) deployment was significantly higher in the EES group. At 2-year follow-up, there was no significant difference in occurrence of MACE (R-ZES vs EES: 22.8% vs 18.9%, P = 0.39). Similarly, no significant differences were observed in the composite endpoint of all-cause mortality/MI (10.0% vs 10.3%, P = 0.86) or TLR (12.4% vs 7.4%, P = 0.11). Adjustment for confounders and baseline propensity-score matching did not alter the aforementioned associations.. After 2 years of follow up similar outcomes (MACE, all-cause mortality/MI, TLR) were observed in real-world diabetic patients, including those with complex lesions and patient characteristics, treated with R-ZES and EES.

Topics: Aged; Chromium Alloys; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Diabetes Mellitus; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Incidence; Japan; Male; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Postoperative Complications; Prosthesis Design; Retrospective Studies; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Aged; Cardiotonic Agents; Coronary Vessel Anomalies; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Imaging, Three-Dimensional; Sirolimus; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Vascular Diseases

Topics: Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Myocardial Ischemia; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Sirolimus

Topics: Drug Hypersensitivity; Drug-Eluting Stents; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Sirolimus; Tomography, Optical Coherence; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration

New-generation drug-eluting stents have demonstrated the mid-term efficacy and safety, but possible differences between stents may emerge in a long-term period. We compared long-term outcomes of patients with chronic stable angina and an isolated de-novo lesion in the proximal left anterior descending artery that underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with Endeavor-zotarolimus eluting stents (E-ZES) and everolimus eluting stents (EES).. We prospectively enrolled 600 patients. Of these, 180 underwent E-ZES and 420 underwent EES implantation. Clinical follow-up was performed up to 7 years (median follow-up 61 months). The evaluated clinical outcomes were Target Lesion Failure (TLF), a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction and Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR), the Patient-Related Outcome (PRO) and stent thrombosis. Differences between groups evaluated with the Kaplan-Meier method and possible independent predictors with Cox proportional hazard regression.. At 5 years, the cumulative probability for outcomes was: TLF: 13.8% versus 7.5%, p=0.025, cardiac death: 3.1% versus 2.5%, p=0.937, myocardial infarction: 1.2% versus 1.8%, p=0.829, TLR: 10% versus 3.3%, p=0.003, PRO: 19.6% versus 13.8%, p=0.528, ST: 2.5% versus 2.7%, p=0.965, for E-ZES and EES respectively. Differences between stents increased after 30 months. In multivariate analysis predictors of TLF adjusted for stent type were Diabetes mellitus and estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR).. Both stents provided a favorable safety profile, with EES demonstrating better effectiveness. There was a late emergence in difference of endpoints after 30 months. Diabetes mellitus and eGFR predicted TLF.

Topics: Aged; Angina, Stable; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Sirolimus

This study sought to assess the frequency and clinical impact of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) nonadherence.. There are limited data on the impact of DAPT nonadherence during the first year after a second-generation drug-eluting stent placement.. After successful Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent implantation, 2,265 patients were enrolled in a registry with limited exclusions and monitored during 12 months of prescribed DAPT. Predictors of any nonadherence (ANA) at 6 months were analyzed by multivariable analysis, and the association between ANA at 6 or 12 months with the endpoints of death, myocardial infarction, and stent thrombosis was assessed.. The study population included 30% female patients, 34% with diabetes and 36% with acute coronary syndromes. ANA occurred in 208 patients (9.6%) before 6 months and 378 patients (18.5%) before 1 year. Major bleeding (odds ratio [OR]: 12.83, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.55 to 21.80, p < 0.001) was the only predictor of ANA at 6 months. In time-dependent analyses, ANA before 6 months was associated with an increased risk of death or myocardial infarction (7.6% vs. 3.0%, p < 0.001) and a numerical increase in stent thrombosis (2.0% vs. 0.9%, p = 0.12). After adjustment for baseline differences, ANA within 6 months remained associated with death or MI (OR: 1.95, 95% CI: 1.02 to 3.75). ANA occurring after 6 months did not increase the risk of subsequent ischemic events.. DAPT ANA occurs frequently and is associated with increased risk for thrombotic complications if it occurs within the first 6 months. Major bleeding was a significant correlate of DAPT ANA within 6 months. (EDUCATE: The MEDTRONIC Endeavor Drug Eluting Stenting: Understanding Care, Antiplatelet Agents and Thrombotic Events; NCT01069003).

Topics: Aged; Aspirin; Cardiovascular Agents; Clopidogrel; Coronary Thrombosis; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Logistic Models; Male; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Myocardial Infarction; Odds Ratio; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Registries; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Ticlopidine; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Postoperative Complications; Sirolimus; Ticlopidine

To investigate the impact of lesion angle on the incidence and distribution of acute vessel wall injuries and incomplete stent apposition (ISA) following second-generation drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation using optical coherence tomography (OCT). Several ex vivo studies demonstrated that angled arterial walls are exposed to imbalanced mechanical stress from deployed stents.. We included 243 lesions treated with a single DES (148 everolimus-eluting stent and 95 zotarolimus-eluting stent). Angled lesions were defined as lesions with angle ≥45° on an angiogram (n = 58). The vessel wall injuries and ISA were evaluated by OCT. The results were compared with non-angled lesions (<45°, n = 185). The incidence of instent dissection, thrombus, and ISA was significantly higher in the angled group than in the non-angled group (84.5 vs. 63.2%, P < 0.01; 55.2 vs. 35.1%, P < 0.01; 75.9 vs. 44.9%, P < 0.001, respectively). In the angled group, the normalized tissue protrusion volume around the centre of angle (6.59 ± 6.81, mm(3) × 10(2)) was higher than in the distal sub-segment (2.21 ± 2.87, mm3 × 10(2), P < 0.001), in the proximal sub-segment (4.14 ± 5.34, mm3 × 10(2), P = 0.02), and in the non-angled group (3.30 ± 2.81, mm3 × 10(2), P < 0.001). The incidence of major adverse cardiac events within 12 months was similar between the groups.. Angled coronary lesions had a higher incidence rate of OCT-detected vessel wall injuries and ISA compared with non-angled lesions following second-generation DES implantation. Further studies are needed to understand the long-term clinical significance of these findings.

Topics: Adult; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Disease; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Incidence; Male; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Registries; Sirolimus; Stress, Mechanical; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Vascular System Injuries

Topics: Absorbable Implants; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Stenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Middle Aged; Neointima; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prosthesis Design; Prosthesis Failure; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Absorbable Implants; Angina Pectoris; Coronary Stenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Feasibility Studies; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Graft Occlusion, Vascular; Humans; Metals; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Recurrence; Sirolimus; Tissue Scaffolds; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Tubulin Modulators

Topics: Aged; Coronary Occlusion; Everolimus; Humans; Male; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prosthesis Design; Sirolimus; Tissue Scaffolds; Tomography, Optical Coherence

The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) remains controversial in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We sought to compare outcomes after the implantation of zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) between patients with ACS who received clopidogrel-based DAPT for >6months and those treated for ≤6months.. From a registry of patients treated with ZESs between October 2005 and January 2010, 1740 patients with ACS were selected for the present analysis. Landmark analyses were performed for ACS patients who were event-free at 6months follow-up (n=1674). The primary outcome was a major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event (MACCE), including all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel revascularization (TVR), stent thrombosis, or stroke. We also performed adjustments for the baseline characteristics of patients, using their propensity-score matching (n=469 pairs).. During a median follow-up of 22.5months, the rate of MACCE was 6.4% in patients with DAPT >6months (n=1140) and 4.7% in patients with DAPT ≤6months (n=534) (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.61-1.82; p=0.86). After propensity-score matching, DAPT >6months was not found to be associated with a lower incidence of MACCE compared with DAPT ≤6months (adjusted HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.44-1.45, p=0.46). The rates of all-cause death or MI, TVR, stent thrombosis, and stroke also did not differ significantly between two groups.. DAPT for >6months do not seem to be associated with improved clinical outcomes in patients with ACS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with ZES.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Cause of Death; Clopidogrel; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Republic of Korea; Sirolimus; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

Second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) have been used widely to treat DES in-stent restenosis (ISR), which remains a clinical challenge. Knowledge of the outcomes of repeated second-generation DES implantation for focal versus nonfocal-type ISR is still missing.. In the current study, 254 patients with DES-ISR were divided into focal or nonfocal groups according to their ISR angiographic types. All patients with ISR lesions included in the current study received second-generation DES. Treatment modalities for both groups were similar without any systematic bias toward either group. The primary endpoint of the study was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) over a 2-year follow-up period. MACEs were defined as cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization.. The nonfocal-type group showed significantly greater incidence of MACEs than the focal-type group (38.3 vs. 24.1%; P=0.03), in which the occurrence of target lesion revascularization was more pronounced (32.3 vs. 18.4%; P=0.02). However, this group showed a higher incidence of type B2/C lesions (69.5 vs. 41.4%; P<0.01), with longer lesion length, and received significantly more and longer reimplanted stents than the focal-type group. Cox regression analysis indicated that nonfocal-type ISR was an independent predictor of MACEs (odds ratio 2.134, 95% confidence interval 1.173-3.884; P=0.014) after adjusting for all significant variables.. In the current study, second-generation DES is more effective in the treatment of focal-type DES-ISR than nonfocal-type ISR in terms of the occurrence of MACEs. Nonfocal-type ISR is an independent predictor of MACEs after the treatment of DES-ISR with second-generation DES.

Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Cardiovascular Diseases; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Myocardial Revascularization; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Proportional Hazards Models; Retreatment; Retrospective Studies; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

Despite common use of second-generation drug-eluting stents in treating patients with coronary artery disease, there is lack of data comparing these stents exclusively in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), especially with metabolic syndrome (MetS), which is highly prevalent in AMI and potential to worsen clinical outcomes. The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of everolimus-eluting stent (EES) and Resolute-zotarolimus-eluting stent (R-ZES) in AMI patients with MetS, in terms of stent-related and patient-related outcomes.. A total of 3942 AMI patients in the KAMIR (Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry) were grouped according to the presence of MetS and stent type: EES (N=1582) and R-ZES (N=255) in MetS (1837). Target lesion failure (TLF) and patient-oriented composite events (POCE) at 1 year were evaluated.. In MetS patients, TLF (3.7% vs. 2.7%, p=0.592) and POCE (7.9% vs. 6.7%, p=0.764) were similar between EES and R-ZES. Also in Non-MetS patients, TLF (3.9% vs. 3.1%, p=0.307) and POCE (6.4% vs. 7.3%, p=0.866) were similar between 2 groups. TLF was similar between MetS and Non-MetS patients (3.6% vs. 3.8%), while POCEs (7.7% vs. 6.6%) were higher in MetS. Propensity-score matching analysis showed similar results between stent groups in MetS and Non-MetS. In multivariate analysis, left ventricular ejection fraction and symptom-to-door time were independent predictors of TLF and POCE in MetS patients with AMI.. In MetS patients with AMI, EES and R-ZES showed excellent performance and safety. However, patient-oriented composite events were relatively high, suggesting more efforts to improve them.

Topics: Coronary Angiography; Drug-Eluting Stents; Electrocardiography; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Male; Metabolic Syndrome; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Propensity Score; Registries; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Late and very late stent thrombosis after drug-eluting stent implantation is a major concern. The present study evaluated difference in the effects of sirolimus, paclitaxel and zotarolimus on endothelial cells.. Mouse endothelial cells were seeded in a 6-well plate. Cells were cultured with an antiproliferative drug at the expected concentrations for each well for 24 hours before making 3 scratch lines with a pipette tip. After a 4.5 hour incubation period, 3 reference scratch lines, vertically across the original scratch lines, were made in the same way. The experiment was repeated at least 6 times (6 plates). Measurements were performed at 9 crossings of each well. Wound healing ratio was calculated as 1-(distance of the first scratch/distance of the second scratch). % cell migration was calculated as (wound healing ratio at an expected drug concentration/wound healing ratio with no drug) × 100. Average % cell migration at 54 crossings of 6 plates was calculated.. Paclitaxel inhibited cell migration in a concentration-dependent manner. On the other hand, concentration-dependent inhibition was not observed for sirolimus or zotarolimus. Sirolimus showed a stronger inhibitory effect on migration of endothelial cells compared to zotarolimus.. The difference in the effect of antiproliferative drugs of drug-eluting stents on endothelial cells may be associated with relatively faster re-endothelialization of zotarolimus-eluting stent compared to the 1st generation DES.

Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Cell Movement; Cells, Cultured; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug-Eluting Stents; Endothelial Cells; Mice; Paclitaxel; Sirolimus

The most common causes of in-stent restenosis (ISR) are intimal hyperplasia and stent under expansion. The purpose of this study was to use intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) to compare the ISR mechanisms of bare metal stents (BMS), first-generation drug-eluting stents (DES), and second-generation DES. There were 298 ISR lesions including 52 BMS, 73 sirolimus-eluting stents, 52 paclitaxel-eluting stents, 16 zotarolimus-eluting stents, and 105 everolimus-eluting stent. Mean patient age was 66.6 ± 1.1 years, 74.2% were men, and 48.3% had diabetes mellitus. BMS restenosis presented later (70.0 ± 66.7 months) with more intimal hyperplasia compared with DES (BMS 58.6 ± 15.5%, first-generation DES 52.6 ± 20.9%, second-generation DES 48.2 ± 22.2%, p = 0.02). Although reference lumen areas were similar in BMS and first- and second-generation DES, restenotic DES were longer (BMS 21.8 ± 13.5 mm, first-generation DES 29.4 ± 16.1 mm, second-generation DES 32.1 ± 18.7 mm, p = 0.003), and stent areas were smaller (BMS 7.2 ± 2.4 mm(2), first-generation DES 6.1 ± 2.1 mm(2), second-generation DES 5.7 ± 2.0 mm(2), p <0.001). Stent fracture was seen only in DES (first-generation DES 7 [5.0%], second-generation DES 8 [7.4%], p = 0.13). In conclusion, restenotic first- and second-generation DES were characterized by less neointimal hyperplasia, smaller stent areas, longer stent lengths, and more stent fractures than restenotic BMS.

Topics: Aged; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Metals; Middle Aged; Neointima; Paclitaxel; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prosthesis Design; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Stents; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography, Interventional

Percutaneous intervention of a coronary graft is the treatment of choice when the graft fails. The objective is to report the long-term results of drug-eluting stents (DES) in mammary artery grafts (MAG). Patients who had been treated with DES for MAG in 27 centers were selected. The baseline and procedural clinical data were included prospectively, and the follow-up was performed with the patients, families, and medical records. Two hundred and sixty-eight patients were included: age 65.5 ± 10.1 years, diabetes 47.8%, ejection fraction 55.5 ± 14.9%.. stable angina 28.4%, unstable angina 38.1%, non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction 21.6%, ST-elevation myocardial infarction 5.3%, and heart failure 6.7%; 1.19 ± 0.59 stents/patient were implanted measuring 18.8 ± 8.8 mm in length and 2.68 ± 0.35 mm in diameter. Rapamycin was used in 78 cases (29.1%), paclitaxel in 77 (28.7%), everolimus in 70 (26.1%), zotarolimus in 34 (12.7%), and biolimus in 9 (3.4%). All cases were successful except for 1 in which the patient died 30 minutes after the procedure. There were no other inhospital events. After a follow-up of 41 months (Q25: 23.7 to Q75: 57.8), 24 patients (9%) died of heart-related causes and 20 (7.5%) of noncardiac causes. Repeat revascularization was necessary in 31 cases, and in 1 additional patient, there was total occlusion, which was not treated. These 32 patients represented 11.9% of the total. In conclusion, the implantation of DES in MAG shows very high procedural success and also low long-term event rates.

Topics: Aged; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Internal Mammary-Coronary Artery Anastomosis; Male; Middle Aged; Paclitaxel; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

This study compared safety and efficacy of first- and second-generation DES in an unrestricted, real-life population of diabetic patients undergoing PCI.. The study was a subanalysis of diabetic patients from the all-comer Katowice-Zabrze Registry of patients undergoing PCI with the implantation of either first- (Paclitaxel-, Sirolimus-eluting stents) or second-generation DES (Zotarolimus-, Everolimus-, Biolimus-eluting stents). Efficacy defined as major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE: death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, stroke) and safety defined as stent thrombosis (ST) were evaluated at 1 year.. From the total of 1916 patients, 717 were diabetics. Among them, 257 (36%) were treated with first-generation DES (230 [89%] Paclitaxel-eluting stents, 27 [11%] Sirolimus-eluting stents), 460 with second-generation DES (171 [37%] Zotarolimus-eluting stents, 243 [53%] Everolimus-eluting stents, 46 [10%] Biolimus-eluting stents). Rate of MACCE was equal in both groups (p=0.54). Second-generation DES had a better safety profile than first-generation DES (log-rank for cumulative ST at 1 year p<0.001). First-generation DES was a risk factor for ST (HR 5.75 [1.16-28.47], p=0.03) but not for MACCE (HR 0.89 [0.6-1.32], p=0.57).. In a real-life setting of diabetic patients undergoing PCI, second-generation DES had lower risk of ST and similar MACCE rate compared to first-generation DES.

Topics: Aged; Angiography; Coronary Stenosis; Diabetes Mellitus; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Myocardial Revascularization; Paclitaxel; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Poland; Proportional Hazards Models; Registries; Retrospective Studies; Sirolimus; Stents; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome

It has been shown that triple antiplatelet therapy with cilostazol results in better clinical outcomes than dual therapy in patients treated with a first-generation drug-eluting stent (DES); however, it is unclear whether triple antiplatelet therapy has a similar efficacy after the implantation of second-generation DES.In the COACT (Cath Olic medical center percutAneous Coronary in Tervention) registry, 1248 study subjects who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with an everolimus- or zotarolimus-eluting stent (Endeavor, Xience V, or Promus) were analyzed. The patients were divided into 2 groups after propensity score matching (n = 724; M = 422 [58.3%]; mean age = 66.1 ± 11.0 years): Group 1: patients treated with dual antiplatelet drugs (aspirin and clopidogrel; n = 362; M = 213 [58.8%]; mean age = 65.6 ± 11.7 years); Group 2: patients treated with triple antiplatelet drugs (aspirin, clopidogrel, and cilostazol; n = 362; M = 209 [57.7%]; mean age = 65.6 ± 11.7 years). The mean follow-up duration was 13 ± 10 months, and the cumulative incidence of major cardiovascular events (MACE) was 6.3% in Group 1 and 7.7% in Group 2. There were no significant differences in MACE (death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and stroke) between the 2 groups (OR, 1.210; 95% CI: 0.772-1.898; P = 0.406). Kaplan-Meier curves for MACE did not show any survival benefit for triple antiplatelet therapy, even in patients with acute coronary syndrome.In patients treated with a second-generation DES implantation, there is no added clinical benefit to using triple rather than dual antiplatelet therapy.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aspirin; Cilostazol; Clopidogrel; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Postoperative Care; Postoperative Complications; Registries; Sirolimus; Tetrazoles; Thrombosis; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

Percutaneous coronary intervention is the most commonly performed method of revascularizing obstructive coronary artery disease. The impact of stent strut design on clinical outcomes remains unclear. The Endeavour Resolute (ER-ZES) and the Resolute Integrity (RI-ZES) zotarolimus-eluting stents utilize identical polymers and anti-proliferative agents, differing only in their respective strut design. This study assessed the comparative safety and efficacy of these two stents in unrestricted contemporary real-world practice.. A total of 542 patients were identified, corresponding to 340 ER-ZES and 480 RI-ZES. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE) defined by a composite of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction and stroke. Secondary endpoints included post-procedural length of stay, in-stent restenosis, target lesion revascularization, target vessel revascularization, coronary artery bypass grafting and stent thrombosis.. MACE occurred in 3.2% of the ER-ZES cohort and 5.0% of the RI-ZES cohort (p= 0.43). Adjusted analysis utilizing propensity score-adjusted odds ratio for MACE, was 1.37 (95% CI 0.46-4.07, p=0.57). The mortality rate (0.9% ER-ZES vs. 1.9% RI-ZES, p=0.59), non-fatal MI (2.3% ER-ZES vs. 3.1% RI-ZES, p=0.75) and stroke (0.0% ER-ZES vs. 0.3% RI-ZES, p=0.85) were not different. Additionally, there was no difference in any of secondary outcomes.. The clinical performance and safety of both ER-ZES and RI-ZES were not statistically different, despite differences in stent strut design.

Topics: Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

The role of the second-generation zotarolimus-eluting stent RESOLUTE in small-vessel coronary artery disease is unclear. The aim of this study was examine the angiographic results of RESOLUTE in de novo coronary lesions of ≥50 % diameter stenosis in target vessels ≤2.5 mm. From August 2008 to April 2010, 142 symptomatic patients with 159 lesions who fitted the inclusion criteria were treated with RESOLUTE. The mean age of patients was 66 ± 10 years, with male predominance (66 %). Diabetes mellitus was found in 62 (43.7 %) patients, whereas multivessel disease was observed in 105 (73.9 %). The mean stent size and length used were 2.33 ± 0.13 and 22 ± 8 mm, respectively. Follow-up angiography was performed on 143 (89.9 %) lesions in 127 (89.4 %) patients at a mean of 10.3 ± 3.6 months. Angiographic restenosis was found in 9 (6.3 %) lesions; the late loss was 0.26 ± 0.34 mm. At 1-year follow-up there were four cardiovascular deaths, two nonfatal myocardial infarctions, and six repeated revascularizations. The resultant major adverse cardiac event rate was 8.5 %. The use of RESOLUTE to treat small-vessel disease is associated with good clinical and angiographic outcomes at 1 year.

Topics: Aged; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Stenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prosthesis Design; Retrospective Studies; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Few data exist with regard to the polymer integrity of drug-eluting stents (DES) in vivo. This study aims to investigate the integrity of the polymer layer of 4 polymer-coated DES in vivo. We assessed the morphology of the polymer layer of sirolimus-eluting stent (SES; Cypher Select™), paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES; Taxus Liberté™), zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES; Endeavour RX™) and everolimus-eluting stent (EES; Xience V™) by scanning electron microscopy after balloon expansion at nominal and high pressures in the coronary arteries of 3 pigs. Effects of kissing balloon procedure were also explored. The polymer layer of SES, PES and EES were damaged in less than 3 % of the surface area with high pressure procedures, whereas the damaged area reached 38.0 ± 2.6 % in ZES (P < 0.01). The polymer integrity differed greatly among DES after balloon inflation in vivo. This should be taken into account when placing DES in tortuous vessels, calcified, as well as bifurcation lesions because the polymer layer may be easily damaged in these lesions.

Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation; Coated Materials, Biocompatible; Coronary Restenosis; Disease Models, Animal; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Immunosuppressive Agents; Paclitaxel; Prosthesis Design; Sirolimus; Swine

Several studies have reported re-endothelialization and endothelial function after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation; however, the relationship between re-endothelialization and endothelial function after DES implantation has not been investigated yet.. A total of 14 patients underwent evaluation of re-endothelialization by optical coherence tomography (OCT) and endothelial function by incremental Ach infusion at 9 months after DES implantation (ZES: N = 7, PES: N = 7). The neointimal thickness (NIT) inside each strut, strut coverage, and malapposition at every 1 mm cross-section were evaluated by OCT and the endothelial function was estimated by measuring the coronary vaso-reactivity in response to acetylcholine (Ach) infusion into coronary arteries.. Zotarolims eluting stent (ZES), compared with paclitaxcel eluting stent (PES), showed more homogeneous neointimal coverage of stent struts and low rate of malapposition. Vasoconstriction in response to Ach in the peri-stent region was also less pronounced in ZES than PES. In particular, vasoconstriction was more often observed in cases with inhomogeneous neointimal coverage of stent struts in the PES group.. Our findings suggest that endothelial function seems to be better preserved with ZES than PES, and homogeneous neointimal coverage of stent struts seem to be associated with the preserved endothelial function.

Topics: Acetylcholine; Aged; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Endothelial Cells; Female; Humans; Infusions, Intra-Arterial; Male; Middle Aged; Neointima; Paclitaxel; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prosthesis Design; Re-Epithelialization; Retrospective Studies; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Treatment Outcome; Vasoconstriction; Vasoconstrictor Agents

Topics: Everolimus; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Sirolimus

There were limited data about comparison of zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES) and everolimus-eluting stents (EES) in patients with small coronary artery disease (CAD), especially in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The objective of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of ZES and EES in patients with AMI for small CAD.. A total 1565 AMI patients treated with Endeavor-ZES (n=651) (Medtronic CardioVascular, Santa Rosa, CA, USA) or Xience V/Promus-EES (n=914) (Abbott Vascular, Temecula, CA/Boston Scientific, Natick, MA, USA) for small CAD (stent diameter ≤ 2.75 mm) in KAMIR (Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry) were enrolled. After propensity score matching to adjust for baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics, we compared a total 1302 patients (651 ZES and 651 EES) about major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 1-year. Subgroup analysis about 1-year clinical outcomes was undertaken in patients who were discharged alive.. Baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics were similar between the two groups after propensity score matching. Total MACE did not differ between the two groups before (9.8% vs. 8.2%, p=0.265) and after (9.8% vs. 9.4%, p=0.778) propensity score matching. The EES group showed lower rate of 1-year cardiac death (5.4% vs. 3.3%, p=0.041), target lesion failure (TLF; 6.9% vs. 4.3%, p=0.022), and stent thrombosis (1.4% vs. 0.4%, p=0.042) compared with the ZES group. However, there were no differences in 1-year cardiac death, TLF, and stent thrombosis in propensity score matched populations. Other various 1-year clinical outcomes showed no difference between the two groups. Subgroup analysis in patients who were discharged alive showed similar outcomes between the two groups at 1-year follow-up.. In-this propensity score matched analysis, EES and ZES showed no significant difference in clinical outcomes at 1-year follow-up in patients with AMI for small CAD.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Propensity Score; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

The RESOLUTE China Registry is a prospective, multicenter, all-comers, observational study of patients in China implanted with the Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (R-ZES). R-ZES was commercially available before the enrollment began. All patients suitable for R-ZES implantation according to applicable guidelines were candidates for enrollment at 30 centers and were treated per standard hospital practice. Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) was prescribed for a minimum of 6 months per current European Society of Cardiology guidelines and the device instructions for use. There were 1,800 patients enrolled with a mean age of 61.3 ± 10.9 years, 76% of patients were men, and 61% had complex disease. DAPT use was 94% at 1 year. Target lesion failure (cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or clinically driven target lesion revascularization) at 1 year was 3.5% (95% confidence interval 2.7% to 4.5%). The rate of cardiac death was 0.6%, target vessel myocardial infarction 2.3%, and clinically driven target lesion revascularization 0.9%. The 1-year rate of definite or probable stent thrombosis was 0.5% (8 of 1,750); 0.4% (7 of 1,750) occurred early (0 to 30 days) and 1 event occurred late (1 to 12 months). One stent thrombosis occurred in a patient who had an interruption of DAPT within the first month; all other stent thromboses occurred while on DAPT. Outcomes did not differ significantly between monitored and unmonitored patients (difference in target lesion failure, p = 0.264). In conclusion, the RESOLUTE China Registry confirms the safety and effectiveness of R-ZES in a large real-world Chinese population.

Topics: Aged; Anti-Bacterial Agents; China; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Postoperative Complications; Prospective Studies; Registries; Sirolimus; Survival Rate; Treatment Outcome

Randomized trials and registries have shown that drug-eluting stents (DES) have an overall better performance than bare-metal stents in patients treated in the setting of both ST-segment and non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes, mainly by reducing restenosis. Whether or not the use of newer second-generation devices (vs. first-generation DES) differs in these high-risk patients remains to be determined.. In a single-centre prospective registry, 3266 patients underwent a percutaneous coronary intervention with at least one DES from January 2003 to December 2009. Of these, 1423 (43.6%) were treated in the setting of an acute coronary syndrome, using either first-generation-only DES [paclitaxel or sirolimus; n=923 (64.9%)] or second-generation-only [zotarolimus or everolimus; n=500 (35.1%)]. The occurrence of death from any cause, nonfatal myocardial infarction or target vessel failure (composite primary endpoint) was compared between these two groups; repeat revascularization of the index stented lesion and definite stent thrombosis [according to the academic research consortium (ARC) definition] were assessed as isolated secondary outcomes. At a median follow-up of 598 days (interquartile range 453-1206), the incidence of death was 10.7% (152), 136 patients (9.6%) had a new myocardial infarction and target vessel failure events occurred in 147 patients (10.3%). Disparity in the follow-up duration was accounted for by considering only the 1-year major adverse cardiac event rate (n=161; 11.3%). After adjustment for baseline characteristics using a Cox proportional hazard model, we could not find a significant difference in the incidence of the composite primary endpoint at 1-year between first-generation (10.8%) and second-generation DES (12.2%) [hazard ratio (HR): 1.1; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.82-1.57, P=0.463], nor in the occurrence of repeat target lesion revascularization (3.6 vs. 4.4%; HR 1.35; 95% CI 0.77-2.34; P=0.293). In a per patient analysis, at 1 year, ARC-definite ST was documented in 1.0% of patients treated with second-generation DES versus 2.8% in those treated with first-generation DES (corrected HR 0.36; 95% CI 0.14-0.94; P=0.037), owing mostly to a higher difference in late ST.. Our results suggest that both first-generation and second-generation DES seem to be similarly effective in patients undergoing a percutaneous coronary intervention in the setting of acute coronary syndromes. However, newer second-generation devices may offer potential advantages because of a significantly lower incidence of ARC-definite ST.

Topics: Aged; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Paclitaxel; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Portugal; Proportional Hazards Models; Registries; Sirolimus; Stents; Treatment Outcome

To analyze the effect of paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB) treatment on patients with drug-eluting stent (DES) restenosis.. In the Valentines I trial, treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis was effective and safe with the second-generation DIOR® PCB.. Valentines I prospectively enrolled 250 patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR); 76 patients (30.4%) had restenosis of a previous paclitaxel or limus DES. Patients underwent balloon angioplasty followed by PCB treatment. Clinical outcomes of patients with paclitaxel-eluting DES restenosis (n=34; 41 lesions) and limus-eluting (sirolimus, everolimus and zotarolimus) DES restenosis (n=42; 43 lesions) treated with DIOR® PCB were compared.. Baseline characteristics were similar. There were more diffuse lesions >20mm treated in paclitaxel- compared to limus-eluting DES restenosis (50% vs. 26.8%, p=0.032). Number of PCB used per patient (1.08±0.31 overall), mean PCB diameter (2.99±0.42mm overall), mean PCB length (24.4±11.9mm overall), and bailout stenting (2.4% vs. 4.7%) were similar (p=NS). At mean follow-up of 231±43days, major adverse cardiac events was 0% vs. 23.8% in paclitaxel- vs. limus-eluting DES restenosis (p=0.002), driven mainly by less target vessel revascularization (0% vs. 21.4%, p=0.004). Target lesion revascularization was 0% vs. 16.7% for paclitaxel- vs. limus-eluting DES restenosis (p=0.015).. In Valentines I, PCB use was more effective in patients with paclitaxel DES restenosis compared to limus DES restenosis, achieving better mid-term clinical outcomes. This suggests the efficacy of localized paclitaxel delivery to overcome paclitaxel resistance but not limus resistance due to different mechanisms of DES failure.

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Paclitaxel; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Registries; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Neointimal proliferation of bifurcation lesions after implantation of drug-eluting stents (DES) has not been well evaluated. Thus, we compared neointimal proliferation of bifurcation lesions among four DES using optical coherence tomography (OCT).. 8-month follow-up OCT was performed in 68 bifurcation lesions treated by 15 sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) and 17 paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) as first-generation DES, and by 17 zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES) and 19 everolimus-eluting stents (EES) as second-generation DES. Cross-sectional images of the bifurcation lesion using OCT were analyzed every 450 µm. All images were divided into three areas: inner wall of the bifurcation (IB), outer wall of the bifurcation (OB), and ostium of the side branch (SB). We compared the incidence of uncovered struts (IUS) among three areas and the averaged neointimal thickness (NIH) between IB and OB in each stent and also compared these OCT parameters among all DES.. There were no significant differences of IUS between IB and OB in second-generation DES, while in first-generation DES, IUS of IB and OB showed significant differences. The IUS of SES in both areas was significantly higher than in the other DES (all P < 0.001). PES had a significantly higher IUS in SB than the others (all P < 0.001). NIH of OB was significantly higher than that of IB in PES, ZES, and EES, but in SES the NIH was similar in the two areas.. OCT revealed different neointimal growth patterns among SES, PES, ZES, and EES in bifurcation lesions.

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Coronary Stenosis; Cross-Sectional Studies; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neointima; Paclitaxel; Prosthesis Failure; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Severity of Illness Index; Sirolimus; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography, Interventional

Restenosis after drug eluting stent (DES) implantation in the distal/bifurcation left main (DBLM) remains challenging to manage. The aim of this study was to assess the in-stent restenosis (ISR) after DES implantation in DLM and to evaluate current management strategy.. The medical records of patients referred for LM distal/bifurcation percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) from the same Cardiology Unit in the January 2007 to December 2012 period were reviewed for PCI technique, stent type, restenosis type, restenosis treatment and management (CABG, balloon angioplasty only, alternative DES implant, drug eluting balloon angioplasty).. Fourteen patients (5 females, mean age 75.1±8.3years) out of 89 (15.7%) having undergone a percutaneous coronary interventions on DBLM with DES, developed restenosis (everolimus stents in 10 patients, zotarolimus stents in 4 patients). Technique used at the first implant included stenting of the main branch in 4 patients, culottes stenting in 6 patients and T-stent in 4 patients. The mean time elapsed from the first angioplasty and ISR intervention was 7.6±3.6months. Restenosis treatments included: implantation of a different DES (in 3 patients), implantation of a bare-metal stent (in 2 patients), simple balloon angioplasty (in 4 patients), and drug-eluting balloon (5 patients). At 6-month angiographic control second restenosis rate was 14.2%. After a mean follow-up of 38.5±24.4months the target vessel revascularization was 14.3%: surgery was the final choice in two patients due to recurrent restenosis. Incidence of major adverse cardiac event was 28.5%.. The occurrence of restenosis after DBLM following DES implantation is not frequent but remains difficult to manage. In our small anecdotal series, all the different strategies including implantation of different DES, balloon angioplasty, bare-metal stent implantation and drug-eluting balloon angioplasty appeared equally effective in maintaining arterial patency.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Stenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Italy; Male; Middle Aged; Prosthesis Design; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography, Interventional; Vascular Patency

The aim of this study was to compare the 2-year clinical outcomes of overlapping second-generation everolimus-eluting stents (EES) with those of overlapping resolute zotarolimus-eluting stents (R-ZES) in the treatment of long coronary artery lesions.. This retrospective analysis included 256 patients treated with overlapping EES (n=121) and R-ZES (n=135) for long coronary artery lesions (total stent length per lesion ≥34 mm). Study endpoints included major adverse cardiac events (MACE) defined as the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target-vessel revascularization (TVR), as well as target-lesion revascularization and definite stent thrombosis separately at 2 years.. In the two groups, the mean age was older and the average number of disease vessel was higher in the R-ZES group. The mean lesion length and total stent length per lesion were longer in the R-ZES group. EES were more frequently implanted in the left anterior descending coronary artery. No significant differences in the estimated MACE (5.8% for EES vs. 8.1% for R-ZES; P=0.548) or TVR (3.4% for EES vs. 4.0% for R-ZES; P=0.806) rates were noted between the two groups at 2-year follow-up. The incidence of definite stent thrombosis was low and similar in both groups (0.83% for EES vs. 0% for R-ZES; P=0.473). No significant differences were noted with respect to MACE or TVR between the two groups following propensity score matching.. Stent overlap with second-generation EES or R-ZES was associated with low rates of MACE, TVR, and stent thrombosis at 2-year follow-up. Our results suggest that the use of overlapping EES or R-ZES in long coronary lesions is associated with good long-term clinical outcomes. These results need to be validated with randomized controlled trials.

Topics: Aged; Cardiovascular Agents; Chi-Square Distribution; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Thrombosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Propensity Score; Proportional Hazards Models; Prosthesis Design; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) images and histology images of metal stents (MSs) inserted in animal ureters were compared, and the reliability of an OCT-based automated method for the performance of quantitative evaluation of ureteral MSs was evaluated. A zotarolimus-eluting metal stent (ZES) and a bare metal stent (BMS) were inserted in each ureter of ten pigs and six rabbits. OCT was performed in unobstructed stented ureters. Histopathologic examination of the stented ureters embedded in glycol-methacrylate took place. Quadrants of OCT images were compared to their respective histologic images by employing two independent observers who delineated different layers in the quadrants of OCT images and correlated them to the respective histologic quadrants. Manual (integrated OCT device software) and automated measurements of the OCT images using an automated strut detection method were compared. The observers highly agreed on the delineation of urothelium from the lamina propria and the lamina propria from the muscle layer of the ureteral wall. The algorithm measurements were similar to the manual measurements, and the algorithm proved to be reliable in the evaluation of ureteral MSs. Significantly higher endothelial hyperplasia of the BMSs in comparison to the ZESs was also quantitatively demonstrated by the strut detection method. OCT proved to be a reliable method for the evaluation of ureteral MSs. OCT provided images of the stented ureteral lumen similar to light microscopy quality. Measurements of the stented ureter are reliably performed by the automated strut detection method.

Topics: Animals; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Metals; Rabbits; Reproducibility of Results; Sirolimus; Sus scrofa; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Ureter

Topics: Cytostatic Agents; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Sirolimus

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with poor outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The aim of the study was to compare zotarolimus- and everolimus-eluting stents used during primary PCI in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and CKD.. We selected 854 consecutive ST-elevation MI patients with CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) undergoing primary PCI who were followed up for 12 months. They were divided into two groups based on type of stents implanted: (1) zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) and (2) everolimus-eluting stent (EES). The study end point was the 12-month major adverse cardiac events (MACE) which included all-cause death, non-fatal MI, target lesion revascularization (TLR), and target vessel revascularization (TVR).. The average number of stents used per vessel was 1.4 ± 0.7. A total of 433 patients received ZES and 421 patients received EES. There was no significant difference in the incidence of 12-month MI, TLR, or TVR. All-cause death was found to be borderline significant between two groups (2.8% in ZES vs 0.9% in EES, p=0.05). The incidence of 12-month MACE in ZES and EES was 5.7% and 2.6% respectively, p=0.022. Stent thrombosis did not differ between groups (p=0.677). Kaplan-Meier analysis did not show significant difference for 12-month MACE-free survival between groups (log-rank p=0.158). It remained the same even after propensity adjustment for multiple confounders in Cox model (p=0.326).. Implantation of ZES or EES provided comparable clinical outcomes with similar risk of 12-month MACE and death in STEMI patients with CKD undergoing primary PCI.

Topics: Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Registries; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Retrospective Studies; Sirolimus

There are few studies comparing the long-term efficacy and safety of the zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) with sirolimus- (SES) and paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) in the unselected cohorts that were subject to real life clinical practice.. Total 2,769 patient who underwent successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with the three drug-eluting stents (DES) between April 2006 and July 2008 were analyzed retrospectively. A total of 1,152 patients were treated with SES, 810 with PES, and 807 with ZES. The primary analysis endpoint was cumulative rate of target-lesion failure (TLF) at 24 months, defined as the composite of cardiac death, target-vessel-related myocardial infarction (MI), and target-lesion revascularization (TLR).. At 24 months, the incidence of TLF was significantly lower in the SES group compared with the ZES (7.6% vs. 11.3%, HR = 0.66, CI = 0.49–0.88, P = 0.005) or the PES group (7.6% vs. 10.2%, HR = 0.74, CI = 0.55–0.99, P = 0.048), while similar between the PES and the ZES groups (HR = 0.89, CI = 0.66–1.20, P = 0.443). The difference was mostly driven by higher rate of TLR in the ZES and PES groups compared with the SES group, mostly within the first year post-PCI. However, the rate of hard endpoints (cardiac death or nonfatal MI) was similar among the three groups. These results were reproduced in the propensity score-matched cohort.. This observational study shows that the use of SES is superior to PES or ZES for the TLF in the overall and matched analysis.

Topics: Aged; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Paclitaxel; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Proportional Hazards Models; Prosthesis Design; Republic of Korea; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Atherosclerosis progression is thought to be one of the mechanisms of late stent failure. Atherosclerosis progression is detected as yellow plaque formation on angioscopy. Cypher sirolimus-eluting stent has been reported to accelerate atherosclerosis progression, but the influence of Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent (Endeavor-ZES) or Xience everolimus-eluting stent (Xience-EES) on atherosclerosis has not been clarified. Therefore, we examined the serial changes in extent of atherosclerosis after the implantation of Endeavor-ZES or Xience-EES.. Consecutive patients who received implantation of Endeavor-ZES (n=25) or Xience-EES (n=30) at de novo lesion of native coronary artery and who had successful angioscopy immediately after stent implantation (baseline) and at 1-year follow-up were included in the study. Change in the maximum yellow color grade (grade 0-3) of the stented segment from baseline to follow-up was examined and was compared between Endeavor-ZES and Xience-EES. The maximum yellow color grade decreased significantly from baseline to follow-up in Endeavor-ZES (1.6±1.1 vs. 0.4±0.8, P<0.001), but it did not change in Xience-EES (1.7±1.0 vs. 1.4±0.7, P=0.23). Although the maximum yellow color grade was not different between Endeavor-ZES and Xience-EES at baseline (P=0.72), it was significantly lower in Endeavor-ZES than in Xience-EES at follow-up (P<0.001).. Atherosclerosis evaluated by yellow color of the plaque was significantly reduced at 1 year after Endeavor-ZES implantation, but was not changed after Xience-EES implantation.

Topics: Aged; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Plaque, Atherosclerotic; Sirolimus

Topics: Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Vessels; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Male; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Sirolimus; Ultrasonography, Interventional

Topics: Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Plaque, Atherosclerotic; Sirolimus

To assess the late postinterventional response to iliac stenting in atheromatous rabbits using the Xience V everolimus-eluting stent (Xience V EES; Abbott Vascular) and the Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (Resolute ZES; Medtronic Vascular) with the MultiLink Vision bare metal stent (BMS; Abbott Vascular) as a reference.. Xience V EES and Resolute ZES were developed to overcome shortcomings of first-generation DES.. Functional and microscopic changes were assessed by organ bath experiments and histopathologic examination. Gene expression was investigated using RT-PCR.. After 91 days, re-endothelialization was nearly complete (BMS: 93 ± 3%; Resolute ZES: 92 ± 2%; Xience V EES: 94 ± 3%; P = 0.10). Neointima thickness was similar in Resolute ZES (0.17 ± 0.08 mm) and BMS (0.17 ± 0.09 mm), and reduced in Xience V EES (0.03 ± 0.01 mm; P < 0.0001). Xience V EES had less peri-strut inflammation compared with BMS (P = 0.001) and Resolute ZES (P = 0.0001), while arterial segments distal to Xience V EES were more sensitive to acetylcholine than those distal to BMS and Resolute ZES (P = 0.02). Lectin-like oxidized receptor-1 was overexpressed in stented arteries (P < 0.001), whereas thrombomodulin was downregulated in Resolute ZES (P = 0.01) and BMS (P = 0.02) compared to unstented arteries of rabbits on regular chow. No significant changes were seen for vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, nitric oxide synthase 3, or endothelin-1.. At 3-month follow-up, nearly complete re-endothelialization was achieved for all stent groups. Xience V EES induced greater suppression of neointimal growth and peri-strut inflammation, higher vasorelaxation to acetylcholine, and expression of thrombomodulin at the level of unstented controls.

Topics: Acetylcholine; Angioplasty, Balloon; Animals; Atherosclerosis; Disease Models, Animal; Down-Regulation; Drug-Eluting Stents; Endothelium, Vascular; Everolimus; Iliac Artery; Inflammation; Neointima; Rabbits; Scavenger Receptors, Class E; Sirolimus; Thrombomodulin; Vasodilator Agents

This study sought to compare everolimus-eluting stents (EES) versus Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES) in terms of patient- or stent-related clinical outcomes in an "all-comer" group of patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention.. DM significantly increases the risk of adverse events after percutaneous coronary intervention. The efficacy and safety of second-generation drug-eluting stents, in particular EES versus ZES, in patients with DM have not been extensively evaluated.. Patients with DM (1,855 of 5,054 patients, 36.7%) from 2 prospective registries (the EXCELLENT [Efficacy of Xience/Promus Versus Cypher in Reducing Late Loss After Stenting] registry and RESOLUTE-Korea [Registry to Evaluate the Efficacy of Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent]) who were treated with EES (n = 1,149) or ZES (n = 706) were compared. Stent-related outcome was target lesion failure (TLF), and patient-oriented composite events were a composite of all-cause mortality, any myocardial infarction, and any revascularization.. Despite a higher risk patient profile in the ZES group, both TLF (43 of 1,149 [3.7%] vs. 25 of 706 [3.5%], p = 0.899) and patient-oriented composite events (104 of 1,149 [9.1%] vs. 72 of 706 [10.2%], p = 0.416) were similar between the EES and ZES in patients with DM at 1 year. In those without DM, EES and ZES also showed comparable incidence of TLF (39 of 1,882 [2.1%] vs. 33 of 1,292 [2.6%], p = 0.370) and patient-oriented composite events (119 of 1,882 [6.3%] vs. 81 of 1,292 [6.3%], p = 0.951), which were all significantly lower than in the DM patients. These results were corroborated by similar findings from the propensity score-matched cohort. Upon multivariate analysis, chronic renal failure was the most powerful predictor of TLF in DM patients (hazard ratio: 4.39, 95% confidence interval: 1.91 to 10.09, p < 0.001).. After unrestricted use of second-generation drug-eluting stents in all-comers receiving percutaneous coronary intervention, both EES and ZES showed comparable clinical outcomes in the patients with DM up to 1 year of follow-up. DM compared with non-DM patients showed significantly worse patient- and stent-related outcomes. Nonetheless, overall incidences of TLF were low, even in the patients with DM, suggesting excellent safety and efficacy of both types of second-generation drug-eluting stents in this high-risk subgroup of patients.

Topics: Aged; Cardiovascular Agents; Chi-Square Distribution; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Angiopathies; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Myocardial Infarction; Patient Selection; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Propensity Score; Proportional Hazards Models; Prosthesis Design; Registries; Republic of Korea; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Absorbable Implants; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Stenosis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Angiopathies; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Male; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Sirolimus

Second-generation drug eluting stent (DES) implantation gradually replaced the first-generation DES in clinical practice. Whether the new DESs in use differ from one another, in terms of clinical outcomes, is still not known. We explored potential differences among DESs.. We followed 9584 consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention at our institution (2004-2012; mean follow-up, 2.8 years). Patients treated with bare-metal stent (BMS; n = 5599; 58.4%) were compared to 3985 DES counterparts (41.5%). The sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) served as the prototype for comparison to other DES types, using propensity matching. The primary outcome was a composite endpoint of total mortality, myocardial infarction, and clinically driven target vessel revascularization or coronary artery bypass graft. At 3 years, the composite endpoint was significantly lower in the DES vs. BMS group (17.9% vs. 25.3%; P<.001). Comparisons between SES and each of the five other stent types yielded no significant differences for the primary composite endpoint: SES vs. paclitaxel-eluting stent (n = 350 pairs; 18.1% vs. 17.7%; P=.70); vs. zotarolimus-eluting stent (n = 474 pairs; 21.8% vs. 23.2%; P=.35); vs. Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (n = 434 pairs; 16.9% vs. 11.7%; P=.70); vs. everolimus-eluting stent (n = 824 pairs; 14.2% vs. 14.1%; P=.60); and vs. biolimus-eluting stent (n = 117 pairs 13.7% vs. 13.4%; P=.60).. Cardiac prognosis did not differ between sirolimus and other DES types. The use of DES was associated with better clinical outcomes compared to BMS.

Topics: Aged; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Thrombosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Long Term Adverse Effects; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Postoperative Complications; Prognosis; Prosthesis Design; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Humans; Male; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Sirolimus

Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Prosthesis Design; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

Pentraxin-3 (PTX3) is an inflammatory marker thought to be more specific to cardiovascular inflammation than C-reactive protein (CRP). Our aim was to assess the prognostic value of PTX3 in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) after drug eluting stent (DES) implantation. Plasma PTX3 levels were measured before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and at 24 h post-PCI in 596 consecutive patients with stable CAD. Patients were followed up for a median of 3 years (range 1-5) for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). We found that the post-PCI plasma PTX3 levels were significantly higher at 24 h after PCI than pre-PCI, patients with MACEs had higher post-PCI PTX3 levels compared with MACEs-free patients, patients with higher post-PCI PTX3 levels (median > 4.384 ng/mL) had a higher risk for MACEs than those with PTX3 < 4.384 ng/mL, and post-PCI PTX3, cTnI, multiple stents, and age but not high-sensitivity CRP (hsCRP) were independently associated with the prevalence of MACEs after DES implantation. The present study shows that post-PCI PTX3 may be a more reliable inflammatory predictor of long-term MACEs in patients with stable CAD undergoing DES implantation than CRP. Measurement of post-PCI PTX3 levels could provide a rationale for risk stratification of patients with stable CAD after DES implantation.

Topics: Aged; C-Reactive Protein; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Inflammation; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Paclitaxel; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prognosis; Serum Amyloid P-Component; Sirolimus

The impact of underexpansion and minimal stent area (MSA) criteria in the second generation drug-eluting stents (DES) has not been addressed yet.. Using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), we assessed the optimal cut-off values of post-stenting MSA to prevent in-stent restenosis (ISR). Poststenting IVUS data and 9-month follow-up angiography were available in 912 patients with 990 lesions: 541 sirolimus-eluting stents (SES), 220 zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES) and 229 everolimus-eluting stents (EES).. For the prediction of angiographic ISR, the MSA of each DES was measured. The poststenting MSA was 6.4 ± 1.8 mm(2) in SES, 6.2 ± 2.1 mm(2) in ZES and 6.2 ± 2.1 mm(2) in EES. At the 9-months follow-up, the incidence of angiographic ISR was similar between SES (3.3%) vs. ZES (4.5%) vs. EES. (4.4%), (P = 0.53). Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified the post-stenting MSA as the only independent predictor of angiographic ISR in ZES (Odds ratio 0.722, 95% confidence interval 0.581-0.897, P = 0.001) and in EES (Odds ratio 0.595, 95% confidence interval 0.392-0.904, P = 0.015). The best MSA cut-off value was 5.5 mm(2) for the prediction of SES restenosis (sensitivity 72.2% and specificity 66.3%). For ZES, the optimal MSA predicting ISR was 5.3 mm(2) (sensitivity 56.7% and specificity 61.8%). For EES, the MSA <5.4 mm(2) predicted ISR (sensitivity 60.0% and specificity 60.0%).. As a preventable mechanism of ISR, smaller stent area predicted angiographic restenosis of the second generation DES as well as the first generation. The optimal cut-off values of post-stenting MSA for preventing restenosis were similar between ZES vs. EES vs. SES.

Topics: Aged; Cardiovascular Agents; Chi-Square Distribution; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Vessels; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Linear Models; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Odds Ratio; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Predictive Value of Tests; Prosthesis Design; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography, Interventional

Arterial repair in the early phase following implantation of a zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) remains unknown.. Following implantation of 49 Endeavor ZES in 33 patients, follow-up angioscopy was performed in 13 patients (26 ZES) in the early phase (EP; 123±24 days) and in 20 patients (23 ZES) in the middle phase (MP; 247±17 days). Neointimal coverage (NIC) was graded as follows: grade 0, stent struts exposed; grade 1, struts bulging into the lumen, although covered; grade 2, struts were embedded by the neointima but were seen translucently; grade 3, struts fully embedded and invisible. NIC was defined as heterogeneous for NIC grade variation≥1. The presence of thrombus and yellow plaque was also investigated. Although NIC heterogeneity tended to be more frequent in EP than in MP (50% vs. 22%, P=0.070), and yellow plaque significantly more frequent (58% vs. 13%, P=0.0025), the majority of stents were dominant NIC grade 3 at both follow-up periods (73% in EP vs. 78% in MP, P=0.75). There was no significant difference in thrombus (23% in EP vs. 4% in MP, P=0.10) between the follow-ups.. Sufficient arterial repair may have occurred by 4 months after ZES implantation. 

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angioscopy; Cardiovascular Agents; Chi-Square Distribution; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Thrombosis; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neointima; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Predictive Value of Tests; Prosthesis Design; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Paclitaxel; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Sirolimus

The optimal drug-eluting stent (DES) in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients remains unclear. We sought to compare the long-term performance of everolimus-eluting stents (EES) and Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stents (E-ZES) in STEMI.. The current analysis of a prospective registry included consecutive patients treated with EES or E-ZES for STEMI. Adjustment for measured confounders was done using Cox regression. In total, 931 patients met the inclusion criteria (412 EES and 519 E-ZES). Baseline characteristics were balanced, apart from a lower rate of renal insufficiency in EES. Median follow-up duration was 2.4 years (IQR 1.6-3.1). Mortality outcomes were similar. Up to three-year follow-up, the composite endpoint of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction and target lesion revascularisation (TLR) was lower in EES; 9.7% vs. 13.7% in E-ZES (HR 0.64, 95% CI: 0.42-0.99), primarily driven by reduced TLR rates; 3.4% in EES vs. 7.3% in E-ZES (HR 0.46, 95% CI: 0.23-0.92). Definite stent thrombosis rates were low and similar between groups (1.1% in EES vs. 1.9% in E-ZES, p=0.190).. Use of EES led to lower rates of the composite endpoint, driven by reduced TLR. This suggests that EES are more efficacious than Endeavor ZES in STEMI. Definite ST rates were low, and the strategy of second-generation DES implantation and the administration of upfront GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors appear to be safe in STEMI.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Drug-Eluting Stents; Electrocardiography; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Glycoprotein GPIIb-IIIa Complex; Proportional Hazards Models; Registries; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

This study was carried out to determine the effect of the use of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for more than 12 months on long-term clinical outcomes in patients who had undergone a percutaneous coronary intervention with the first and second generations of drug-eluting stents (DES).. The potential benefits of the use of DAPT beyond a 12-month period in patients receiving DES have not been established clearly. Moreover, it is also unclear whether the optimal duration of DAPT is similar for all DES types.. A total of 2141 patients with coronary artery disease treated exclusively with Cypher sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) or Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES) were considered for retrospective analysis. The primary endpoint [a composite of all-cause mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), and stroke] was compared between the 12-month DAPT and the >12-month DAPT group.. A total of 1870 event-free patients on DAPT at 12 months were identified. The average follow-up was 28.2±7.4 months. The primary outcomes were similar between the two groups (4.1% 12-month DAPT vs. 1.9% >12-month DAPT; P=0.090). Incidences of death, MI, stroke, and target vessel revascularization did not differ significantly between the two groups. Subgroup analysis showed that in the patients with hypertension, >12-month DAPT significantly reduced the occurrence of death/MI/stroke compared with that in the 12-month DAPT group (P=0.04). In patients implanted with SES, the primary outcome was significantly lower with the >12-month DAPT group (5.2% 12-month DAPT vs. 1.6% >12-month DAPT; P=0.016), whereas in patients with ZES, the primary outcome was comparable between the two groups (2.3% 12-month DAPT vs. 2.0% >12-month DAPT; P=0.99).. In our study, for all patients, >12-month DAPT in patients who had received DES was not significantly more effective than 12-month DAPT in reducing the rate of death/MI/stroke. Our findings, that patients who received SES benefit from >12-month DAPT whereas extended use of DAPT was not significantly more effective in those implanted with ZES, implied that the optimal duration of DAPT was different depending on different types of DES.

Topics: Aged; Aspirin; Cardiovascular Agents; Chi-Square Distribution; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Proportional Hazards Models; Prosthesis Design; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Stroke; Ticlopidine; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

The aim of the present study was to assess the intravascular ultrasound predictors for angiographic edge restenosis after newer generation drug-eluting stent implantation. A total of 820 patients (987 lesions) who underwent newer generation drug-eluting stent placement (236 Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stents, 246 Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stents, and 505 everolimus-eluting stents) with 9 months of angiographic surveillance were enrolled. The post-stenting angiographic and intravascular ultrasound images of 1,668 reference segments (681 proximal and 987 distal) were analyzed. Overall, 37% of angiographically normal proximal reference segments and 21% of angiographically normal distal reference segments had plaque burden >50%. In the overall cohort of 1,668 reference segments, 47 (2.8%) had 9-month angiographic edge restenosis (diameter stenosis >50%). Edge restenosis was predicted by a post-stenting reference segment plaque burden >54.5% (sensitivity 81%, specificity 80%) and a reference segment minimum lumen area of 5.7 mm(2) (sensitivity 72%, specificity 59%). The edge restenosis rate was 2.1% in the Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stents, 2.4% in the Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stents, and 3.4% in the everolimus-eluting stents lesions (p = 0.311). The predictive cutoff of the reference plaque burden was 56.3% for Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stents, 57.3% for Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stents, and 54.2% for everolimus-eluting stents. The criteria for residual plaque burden were similar between proximal and distal reference segments (56.4% vs 51.9%, respectively), but the minimum lumen area criteria were quite different (<7.1 mm(2) for proximal vs <4.8 mm(2) for distal reference segments). In conclusion, after newer drug-eluting stent implantation, edge restenosis was predicted by post-stenting reference segment plaque burden >55%.

Topics: Coronary Angiography; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Prosthesis Failure; Reproducibility of Results; Republic of Korea; Retrospective Studies; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Ultrasonography, Interventional

This study sought to examine the effect of oral metformin (Mf) therapy on endothelialization in the setting of drug-eluting stents (DES).. Mf is a commonly used therapy in diabetic patients receiving DES. Mf and locally eluted mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors used in DES have convergent molecular signaling; however, the impact of this drug interaction on stent endothelialization is unknown.. We examined human endothelial aortic cells (HAECs) and a rabbit model of stenting to determine points on molecular convergence between these 2 agents and their impact on stent endothelialization.. Western blotting of HAECs treated with Mf and the mTOR inhibitor sirolimus and 14-day rabbit iliacs treated with the combination of zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES) and oral Mf demonstrated greater inhibition of S6 kinase (S6K), a downstream effector of mTOR complex 1, than either treatment alone. HAEC proliferation was significantly inhibited by Mf or sirolimus treatments alone and further reduced when they were combined. Knockdown of S6K via short interfering RNA in HAECs impaired cell proliferation via a cyclin D1-dependent mechanism, whereas its overexpression rescued the antiproliferative effects of both agents. Last, endothelialization and endothelial cell proliferation at 14 days were assessed in rabbits receiving ZES or bare-metal stents and Mf or placebo by scanning electron microscopy and bromodeoxyuridine/CD31 labeling, respectively. Both endpoints were inhibited by ZES treatment alone and were further reduced by the combination of Mf and ZES.. Significant convergence of signaling occurs between Mf and locally delivered mTOR inhibitors at S6K. This further impairs endothelial recovery/proliferation via an S6K-dependent mechanism. Patients receiving Mf in combination with stents that elute mTOR inhibitors are potentially at increased risk of delayed endothelial healing and stent thrombosis.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Aorta; Apoptosis; Cell Proliferation; Cells, Cultured; Drug Interactions; Drug-Eluting Stents; Endothelial Cells; Endothelium, Vascular; Humans; Iliac Artery; Metformin; Microscopy, Electron, Scanning; Rabbits; Ribosomal Protein S6 Kinases; Sirolimus

We propose a modified simultaneous kissing stenting technique (MSKS) based on systematic implantation of a protective stent in the proximal main vessel (PMV) proximally to the bifurcation before simultaneous kissing stenting (SKS).. SKS has been proposed in large-size coronary vessel bifurcation lesions (BLs) when the PMV can accommodate two stents. SKS implies, however, low-pressure simultaneous final balloon inflations to avoid retrograde PMV dissection or rupture and therefore may not ensure optimal final stent apposition.. From January 2005 to May 2008, a total of 97 patients with 100 BLs (true bifurcation in 92%) who underwent MSKS were enrolled in a prospective registry. Drug-eluting stents were used for distal main vessel and side branch. Drug-eluting or large-size bare-metal stents were used as proximal protective stents.. Immediate procedural success rate was 100%. Global restenosis rate was 10% (5% in the main vessel and 8% in the side branch) at follow-up angiogram performed at 7 months in all patients (100%). No patient had early or late stent thrombosis. Two cases of non-fatal very late stent thrombosis occurred at 46 and 64 months. Over a mean 4.5-year follow-up period, target lesion revascularization rate was 11%, with only 3% driven by clinical ischemia.. Protective stent systematic implantation in the PMV represents a newly modified SKS technique that allows safe finalization of the procedure by high-pressure kissing balloon final inflation, ensuring optimal stent apposition with high immediate procedural success and low rates of long-term events.

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cohort Studies; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Stenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Incidence; Male; Metals; Middle Aged; Paclitaxel; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Sirolimus; Stents; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Aged; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cohort Studies; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Biodistribution of drug and drug candidates offers critical information regarding drug disposition in target and nontarget tissues. Concentrations of therapeutic agents in target tissue provide the foundation for efficacy, while concentrations in nontarget tissue pose potential safety risks. Analysis of tissue samples can sometimes provide important information during the development of a drug candidate, especially at early stages when radio labeled drug material is not readily available.. Determining the appropriate approach to allow for accurate, precise and reproducible drug concentration measurements from tissue samples requires addressing issues not present in routinely analyzed biological matrices, that is, plasma. We present here the issues encountered and techniques applied during the development, validation and application of a method for the determination of zotarolimus in a variety of tissues.. When well controlled, analysis of tissue samples can be performed in a manner similar to liquid biological matrices.

Topics: Animals; Chromatography, Liquid; Immunosuppressive Agents; Sirolimus; Swine; Tandem Mass Spectrometry; Validation Studies as Topic

Drug-coated balloons are increasingly used for peripheral vascular disease, and, yet, mechanisms of tissue uptake and retention remain poorly characterized. Most systems to date have used paclitaxel, touting its propensity to associate with various excipients that can optimize its transfer and retention. We examined zotarolimus pharmacokinetics.. Animal studies, bench-top experiments, and computational modeling were integrated to quantify arterial distribution after zotarolimus-coated balloon use. Drug diffusivity and binding parameters for use in computational modeling were estimated from the kinetics of zotarolimus uptake into excised porcine femoral artery specimens immersed in radiolabeled drug solutions. Like paclitaxel, zotarolimus exhibited high partitioning into the arterial wall. Exposure of intimal tissue to drug revealed differential distribution patterns, with zotarolimus concentration decreasing with transmural depth as opposed to the multiple peaks displayed by paclitaxel. Drug release kinetics was measured by inflating zotarolimus-coated balloons in whole blood. In vivo drug uptake in swine arteries increased with inflation time but not with balloon size. Simulations coupling transmural diffusion and reversible binding to tissue proteins predicted arterial distribution that correlated with in vivo uptake. Diffusion governed drug distribution soon after balloon expansion, but binding determined drug retention.. A large bolus of zotarolimus releases during balloon inflation, some of which pervades the tissue, and a fraction of the remaining drug adheres to the tissue-lumen interface. As a result, the duration of delivery modulates tissue uptake where diffusion and reversible binding to tissue proteins determine drug transport and retention, respectively.

Topics: Angioplasty, Balloon; Animals; Drug Delivery Systems; Female; Femoral Artery; Male; Organ Culture Techniques; Paclitaxel; Sirolimus; Swine; Tissue Distribution

Saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) are prone to an aggressive atherosclerotic process, and the efficacy of drug-eluting stents (DES) in treating this is still debated. In recent years, second-generation DES have been increasingly used in SVG intervention. The main objective of this study was to compare midterm clinical outcomes between first- and second-generation DES in SVGs because data regarding the use of second-generation DES in SVG are lacking. Patients treated with first-generation DES (127 patients with 143 lesions) and those treated with second-generation DES (84 patients with 100 lesions) were included in the study. Major adverse cardiac events, defined as the composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization, as well as target vessel revascularization and target lesion revascularization separately, were evaluated at 30-day, 12-month, and 18-month follow-up. Baseline characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. Older grafts were treated with second-generation DES (11.6 ± 5.3 vs 14.3 ± 6.0 years, p = 0.001). Stent length was longer in the first-generation group (34.1 ± 25.1 vs 30.5 ± 19.4 mm, p = 0.006), and maximum balloon diameter was smaller in the second-generation group (3.42 ± 0.42 vs 3.30 ± 0.41 mm, p = 0.003). Embolic protection device use was higher in the second-generation DES group (55.2% vs 72.0%, p = 0.012). At 18-month follow-up, rates of major adverse cardiac events, target vessel revascularization, and target lesion revascularization for the first- and second-generation groups were 24.4% versus 20.2% (p = 0.479), 18.1% versus 14.2% (p = 0.465), and 15.0% versus 10.7% (p = 0.373), respectively. In conclusion, second-generation DES are at least comparable with first-generation DES with regard to clinical outcomes at midterm follow-up.

Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Cause of Death; Coronary Artery Bypass; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Paclitaxel; Postoperative Complications; Prosthesis Design; Reoperation; Sirolimus; Veins

Topics: Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Stenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Metals; Paclitaxel; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Sirolimus; Stents

Topics: Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Artery Disease; Diabetes Mellitus; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Paclitaxel; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Sirolimus

To explore the 2-year clinical outcomes in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) disease treated with overall new drug-eluting stent (DES) options.. Recent available data have shown the feasibility and the safety of new DESs, mainly evaluating the everolimus-eluting stents in the setting of ULMCA disease.. Patients with ULMCA disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with everolimus-, zotarolimus-, and biolimus A9-eluting stents were prospectively evaluated. The study objective was the composite of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), consisting of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), and target vessel revascularization (TVR) at 2-year clinical follow-up.. A total of 154 patients were analyzed. The mean EuroSCORE and SYNTAX scores were 4.7 ± 2.6 and 27.5 ± 8.3, respectively. Distal location was present in 126 patients (81.8%) and 96 lesions (76.3%) were true Medina bifurcations. The 2-stent technique was used in 73 cases (57.9%). Everolimus-, zotarolimus-, and biolimus A9-eluting stents were implanted in 68 patients (44.2%), 46 patients (29.9%), and 40 patients (25.9%), respectively. At a median clinical follow-up of 551.5 days (interquartile range, 360.8-1045.5 days), MACEs occurred in 29 patients (18.8%). Ten patients (6.5%) died, and 2 deaths (1.3%) were adjudicated as cardiac. No patient had myocardial infarction or definite stent thrombosis (ST). One probable and 1 possible ST were adjudicated. TVR was required in 19 patients (12.3%) and target lesion revascularization was required in only 7 patients (4.5%).. In our experience, despite the presence of complex distal left main lesions, new DESs in ULMCA disease appear to be promising in terms of safety and efficacy at 2-year clinical follow-up.

Topics: Aged; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prospective Studies; Registries; Retrospective Studies; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome

The presence of uncovered struts overlying side branch is considered to be a potential risk of stent thrombosis. The accuracy in detection of neointimal strut coverage at branch point by optical coherence tomography (OCT) has not been validated in comparison with histology.. A total of 5 stents (3 drug-eluting stents and 2 bare-metal stents) were implanted in the bifurcation segment of normal coronary arteries in 4 domestic swine (weight, 25-40 kg). The animals underwent follow-up OCT at 30 days after stent implantation and were then sacrificed for histologic evaluation. The neointimal coverage of the non-apposed struts over the side branch was assessed by light microscopy. Every millimeter of the stent was specified by the OCT frame rate, and comparisons between OCT and pathologic findings were performed through precise histological-OCT frame matching.. OCT images at the side branch corresponded well with histological cross-sections. The tissues covering struts as assessed by OCT contained smooth muscle cells with proteoglycan-collagen matrix, but platelets are attached above the neointima in one of them on histologic examination, suggesting that most of the struts were well healed, with normal neointimal coverage.. This study demonstrated the accuracy of OCT for the detection of neointimal coverage of non-apposed struts over the side branch.

Topics: Animals; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Incidence; Metals; Models, Animal; Muscle, Smooth, Vascular; Neointima; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Stents; Sus scrofa; Tomography, Optical Coherence

The impact of gender on outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with second-generation drug-eluting stents is not known in Asian patients. The authors studied outcomes after PCI with zotarolimus-eluting stent in unselected consecutive series of Asian patients according to gender.. Outcomes among patients treated with zotarolimus-eluting stents from multicenter registry were evaluated by gender. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac events, composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction and target lesion revascularization at 1 year.. Of 2,840 patients, 855 (30.1%) were women. Comparatively, women were older; more frequently had diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia; less frequently women were current smokers, had previous myocardial infarctions and previous PCIs; were more likely to have culprit lesions in left anterior descending coronary artery; and underwent more multilesion PCIs. After adjustment for baseline differences, women were still at lower risk of major adverse cardiac events (38 [4.4%] versus 137 [6.9%], adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.30-0.89, P = 0.018), mainly driven by target lesion revascularization (24 [2.8%] versus 106 [5.3%], adjusted HR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.24-0.70, P = 0.001) at 1 year, although rates of cardiac death, myocardial infarction and stent thrombosis were similar between genders. These results were consistent after propensity score-matched population analysis (for major adverse cardiac events, adjusted HR: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.18-0.69, P = 0.012; for target lesion revascularization, adjusted HR: 0.32, 95% CI: 0.15-0.69, P = 0.004) and were also constant among various high-risk subgroups.. Despite greater baseline clinical and angiographic risk, the use of the zotarolimus-eluting stent is associated with favorable outcomes among Asian women treated with PCI.

Topics: Aged; Asian People; Cardiovascular Diseases; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Registries; Reproducibility of Results; Republic of Korea; Risk Factors; Sex Factors; Sirolimus; Survival Rate

Long-term clinical outcomes were evaluated in long coronary artery stenosis treated with different types of drug-eluting stents.. Long-term follow-up data to compare clinical outcomes between Resolute™ zotarolimus-eluting stent (R-ZES) versus sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation for long coronary artery stenosis is insufficient.. A total of 254 patients (307 lesions) treated with R-ZES and 265 patients (303 lesions) treated with SES for long coronary lesions (total stent length ≥ 30 mm) were enrolled, and long-term (3 years) clinical outcomes were compared between the 2 groups. Efficacy (target lesion revascularization [TLR]) and safety (the composite occurrence of cardiovascular death, target lesion-related myocardial infarction, or target lesion-related definite stent thrombosis) were assessed.. The 2 groups had similar baseline characteristics except for the duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (23.4 ± 11.2 months in R-ZES-treated patients vs. 27.4 ± 13.9 months in SES-treated patients, P<0.001). Total stent length was similar in R-ZES-treated patients (45.0 ± 19.0 mm) and SES-treated patients (45.4 ± 18.6 mm) (P=0.464). The cumulative TLR rate was 4.6% in R-ZES-treated patients versus 4.6% in SES-treated patients (P=0.911). For safety parameters, R-ZES-treated patients showed a significantly lower rate of the composite occurrence of cardiovascular death, target lesion-related myocardial infarction, or target lesion-related definite stent thrombosis than SES-treated patients (0.4% vs. 2.4%, P=0.042). Particularly, the occurrence of target lesion-related definite stent thrombosis was significantly lower in R-ZES-treated patients than in SES-treated patients (0.0% vs. 2.0%, P=0.028).. R-ZES stents showed superior long-term safety than SES for treating long coronary lesions, while maintaining a similar clinical efficacy.

Topics: Aged; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Stenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Prosthesis Design; Prosthesis Implantation; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

To obtain imaging evidence by 2-week optical coherence tomography (OCT) on the completion of neointimal coverage (NIC; the percentage of stent strut coverage and thickness of the formed neointima) completion after implantation of the Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent (E-ZES).. Despite the fact that NIC is a cardinal process in the pathomechanism of late stent thrombosis, little imaging information is available on morphological changes thereof on a short-time interval basis.. 27 Japanese patients with stable angina pectoris and de novo native coronary artery lesions were enrolled, and 27 lesions (30 implantations) were examined. OCT was performed at weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 after E-ZES implantation. NIC was examined using cross-sectional OCT images obtained at the 1.0-mm intervals.. In total, 621 cross-sectional OCT images, which depicted 7,747 stent struts, were analyzed. The mean percentages of stent strut coverage at weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 after E-ZES implantation were 12.3, 70.4, 67.9, 86.0, and 99.2%, respectively; a marked increase was found between weeks 2 and 4. The mean thicknesses of the formed neointima were 40.2, 52.1, 48.1, 86.5, and 146.2 μm at respective weeks, with the high-signal and thick neointima (146 µm) at week 10. An intracoronary thrombus was detected in only one stent at week 4.. The full circumferential coverage of the vessel wall by the high-signal neointima was found at as early as week 10 after E-ZES implantation, imparting a surrogate index for vascular healing by NIC.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Thrombosis; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Japan; Male; Neointima; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Predictive Value of Tests; Prospective Studies; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Treatment Outcome; Wound Healing

Metformin impairs endothelialization of drug eluting stents (DES) due to convergent signaling at the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway. We assessed whether metformin will continue to adversely affect stent endothelialization despite design improvements in newer generation DES.. Rabbit iliac artery stenting with newer generation DES was performed followed by 14 days of either normal chow diet or one with metformin (100 mg/kg/day) added. Scanning electron microscopy was used to assess stent endothelialization after sacrifice.. In the metformin-treated group there was significantly less endothelialization compared to the placebo-treated group. Paclitaxel-eluting stents in placebo-treated group had the greatest degree of endothelialization with significantly less in its metformin-treated counterpart and all-limus eluting stent groups.. Metformin inhibited stent endothelialization in newer generation DES despite improvements in stent design. By impairing stent endothelialization, metformin may increase the risk for thrombotic complications after newer generation DES placement.

Topics: Angioplasty, Balloon; Animals; Disease Models, Animal; Drug-Eluting Stents; Endothelium, Vascular; Everolimus; Hypoglycemic Agents; Iliac Artery; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Metformin; Paclitaxel; Rabbits; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Tubulin Modulators

This study was designed to evaluate the pharmacokinetic and vascular healing of a second-generation everolimus-eluting stent (EES) and slow-release zotarolimus-eluting stent (R-ZES).. Second-generation DESs have alleviated the safety concerns of late stent thrombosis by addressing issues of polymer biocompatibility and stent design, and optimizing drug loads and release kinetics. No preclinical comparison study exists between these stents.. Rabbit iliac artery stent implantation was performed using Xience Prime EES and Resolute R-ZES. Histomorphometric evaluation was performed at 28 and 60 days after implantation in an induced atheroma model. Endothelial coverage and maturation were assessed by scanning electron microscopy and immuno-labeling at 14 and 28 days following deployment. For pharmacokinetic studies, arterial tissue and stents were retrieved at 3, 14, 28, and 90 days, and blood samples were obtained during the first 24 hours.. Vascular remodeling (percent stenosis, neointimal thickness) was similar in arteries implanted with either stent group. At 28 days, inflammation was significantly less in the EES group as compared to the R-ZES group (inflammation score: 1.59 ± 0.52 vs 2.22 ± 0.69, respectively; P=.044), with no differences observed at 60 days. Endothelial coverage was similar between both groups; however, endothelial maturation above stent struts was significantly higher in the EES group vs R-ZES group at 28 days (33 ± 20% vs 22 ± 21%, respectively; P=.040). Arterial drug level concentrations were also shown to be significantly less in the EES group vs the R-ZES group (P<.0001).. Overall, EES and R-ZES displayed similar remodeling properties with lower arterial drug levels observed in the EES group vs the R-ZES group, which may have led to more rapid endothelial maturation.

Topics: Animals; Disease Models, Animal; Drug-Eluting Stents; Endothelium, Vascular; Everolimus; Femoral Artery; Iliac Artery; Male; Microscopy, Confocal; Microscopy, Electron, Scanning; Plaque, Atherosclerotic; Rabbits; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

This study was designed to prospectively evaluate the safety and efficacy of the 38-mm Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (R-ZES). Drug-eluting stents with long lengths are needed to ensure coverage of long lesions in some patients. Patients recruited from the RESOLUTE US and RESOLUTE Asia studies were implanted with at least one 38-mm R-ZES. Up to 2 lesions (in separate vessels) could be implanted with length ≤35 mm and a reference vessel diameter of 3.0 to 4.2 mm. The primary end point was 1-year target lesion failure, defined as cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or clinically driven target lesion revascularization. The 1-year target lesion failure rate using 1 vessel per patient was compared with a performance goal (19%) derived from historical data. There were 223 patients enrolled (n = 269 lesions). The mean age was 60.9 ± 10.9 years, 79% were men, and 38% had diabetes. Target lesion failure rate using a single-vessel analysis was 4.5%, and the upper limit of the 1-sided 95% confidence interval (7.5%) was less than the performance goal of 19%. A secondary analysis using all lesions resulted in a target lesion failure rate of 5.4% (upper limit of 1-sided 95% confidence interval, 8.6%). Baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes were similar between patients with and without diabetes. The rate of probable or definite stent thrombosis was 0.9%. In conclusion, the 38-mm length of the R-ZES was found to be safe and effective with a low rate of target lesion failure and stent thrombosis and no differences in outcomes between patients with and without diabetes.

Topics: Coronary Angiography; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

This study sought to assess the clinical safety and effectiveness of the Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (R-ZES) in patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR) from 2 large trials.. ISR treatment is associated with higher rates of subsequent cardiac events compared with treatment of de novo lesions. Although drug-eluting stents (DES) are an option, second-generation DES are largely untested in the treatment of ISR.. A total of 3,489 patients were pooled from the RAC (RESOLUTE All Comers) trial and the RESOLUTE International (RINT) registry. Two-year clinical endpoints included clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR), target lesion failure (TLF), cardiac death (CD), target vessel myocardial infarction (TVMI), combined CD or TVMI (CD/TVMI), and Academic Research Consortium definite and probable stent thrombosis (ST).. Overall, 281 patients (8.1%) received an R-ZES for ISR. Two-year TLR and TLF rates were significantly higher in ISR patients than in non-ISR patients (TLR: 12.7% vs. 4.3%, p = 0.003; TLF: 17.4% vs. 9.4%, p = 0.007); however, the CD/TVMI rate was not (6.9% vs. 6.1%, p = 0.711). Seven ISR patients had ST. Two-year outcomes by ISR stent type were similar: bare-metal stent (BMS)-ISR TLR was 12.5% and TLF was 17.2%; DES-ISR TLR was 13.0% and TLF was 18.8%. CD/TVMI was 7.3% and 7.2% for BMS-ISR and DES-ISR, respectively.. Using R-ZES to treat ISR appears equally safe in BMS-ISR and DES-ISR, with CD/TVMI rates comparable to 2-year outcomes in other clinical trials. Although revascularization rates are still higher in ISR lesions, the R-ZES offers an effective alternative for treatment of BMS-ISR and DES-ISR. (Randomized, Two-Arm, Non-inferiority Study Comparing Endeavor-Resolute Stent With Abbot Xience-V Stent [RESOLUTE-AC]; NCT00617084; and RESOLUTE International Registry: Evaluation of the Resolute Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent System in a 'Real-World' Patient Population [RINT]; NCT00752128).

Topics: Aged; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Thrombosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Myocardial Infarction; Odds Ratio; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Propensity Score; Prosthesis Design; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Registries; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Drug-Eluting Stents; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Paclitaxel; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

To compare the long-term clinical outcomes of everolimus-eluting (EES) and Resolute zotarolimus-eluting (R-ZES) stents in the treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions.. Recent studies have suggested that the R-ZES is comparable to the EES in the treatment of de novo coronary artery disease. Available data on how these compare in the treatment of bifurcation lesions are limited.. We retrospectively analyzed consecutive de novo bifurcation lesions, including left main stem lesions, treated with either EES or R-ZES between October 2006 and October 2011. Study endpoints examined included major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), defined as the composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), including periprocedural MI, and target vessel revascularization (TVR). Target lesion revascularization (TLR) per patient and per bifurcation as well as stent thrombosis (ST) were also analyzed.. We identified 235 bifurcation lesions treated with either EES (157 lesions in 154 patients) or R-ZES (78 lesions in 73 patients). Baseline clinical and procedural characteristics were broadly similar between the two groups. No significant differences in MACE (14.6% vs 11.5%; P=.99) or TVR (8.0% vs 7.3%; P=.45) rates were noted between the two groups at 2-year follow-up. The incidence of ST was low and similar in both groups (0% vs 1.4%).. EES and R-ZES are associated with acceptable and comparable long-term clinical outcomes when used in the treatment of bifurcation lesions. Further evaluation into the role of currently available drug-eluting stents in bifurcation percutaneous coronary intervention is required.

Topics: Aged; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Retrospective Studies; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

We report the case of a 69-year-old male whose left circumflex coronary artery was perforated immediately after implantation of an Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent (E-ZES). Despite successful hemostasis by long balloon inflation, a coronary pseudoaneurysm remained at the E-ZES-implanted segment. Coronary angiography performed one year after the coronary perforation showed the pseudoaneurysm had disappeared. Simultaneous optical coherence tomography and coronary angioscopy revealed that stent struts of the E-ZES were fully covered with thick neointima. This is the first case report of a relatively rapid healing process for an E-ZES-related coronary pseudoaneurysm.

Topics: Aged; Aneurysm, False; Angioscopy; Antibiotics, Antineoplastic; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Humans; Male; Sirolimus; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Wound Healing

We aimed to evaluate the mid-term outcomes of resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (R-ZES) implantation for in-stent restenosis (ISR).. There has been a paucity of data regarding the effects of new-generation drug-eluting stent to treat ISR.. From 2009 to 2010, a total of 98 patients with 98 ISR lesions were prospectively enrolled after R-ZES implantation for the treatment of ISR. Among 98 patients, 73 patients underwent follow-up angiography at 9 months. Serial intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) at both postprocedure and 9 months was evaluated in 55 patients. The overlapped segment of R-ZES was defined as the portion of R-ZES superimposed on previous stent.. Late loss and binary restenosis rate were 0.3 ± 0.5 mm and 5.5% at 9 months. On IVUS, the percentage of neointimal volume and maximum percentage of neointimal area were 3.9 ± 6.3% and 17.3 ± 15.5%, respectively. There was no significant change of vessel volume index between postprocedure and 9 months (16.9 ± 4.7 mm³ /mm vs. 17.1 ± 4.6 mm³ /mm, P = 0.251). Late-acquired incomplete stent apposition was observed in 5 (5/55, 9.1%) cases. Compared with nonoverlapped segments of R-ZES, the overlapped did not show larger neointimal volume index (0.3 ± 0.5 mm³ /mm vs. 0.2 ± 0.3 mm³ /mm, P = 0.187) on 9-month IVUS. During follow-up (median, 353 days), repeat target-lesion revascularization was performed in four cases, but there were no death or stent thrombosis.. This study suggested that R-ZES implantation for the treatment of ISR was effective up to 9 months and showed favorable vascular responses on serial IVUS assessment.

Topics: Coronary Angiography; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography, Interventional

The purpose of this study was to compare the two year efficacy and safety of zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES) and first-generation DES, sirolimus- (SES) and paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES), in an all-comer registry receiving primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).. A total of 711 consecutive STEMI patients (ZES: 135, SES: 427, and PES: 149), who underwent primary PCI between January 2005 and June 2008 were enrolled from three centers. In our study, the efficacy analysis endpoint was target vessel failure (cardiac death, target vessel related myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization) at 2 years. The safety analysis endpoint was a composite of all cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and stent thrombosis within 2 years.. At 2 years, the rates of target vessel failure in the ZES, SES, and PES groups were 14.8%, 12.9%, and 19.5%, respectively (p=0.141). The rates of composite safety endpoints at 2 years were not different among the three groups (ZES 8.1% vs. SES 13.1% vs. PES 16.8%, p=0.102). However, when comparing the two groups, ZES was safer than PES (adjusted HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.24-0.98, p=0.046). There was also a non-significant trend in favor of ZES in the rate of stent thrombosis (ZES 1.5% vs. SES 2.3% vs. PES 4.7%, p=0.186).. In the treatment of STEMI patients, ZES showed similar and acceptable efficacy compared to first-generation DES (SES and PES) up to 2 years. In addition, ZES seems to be more favorable than PES in terms of safety.

Topics: Aged; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Paclitaxel; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Registries; Retrospective Studies; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

Drug-eluting stents (DES) have significantly improved the rate of target vessel revascularization in comparison with bare metal stents. DES fracture was not reported in multicenter randomized clinical trials, but several case reports of DES fracture have been published, mostly with sirolimus-eluting stents. DES fracture is associated with stent restenosis and thrombosis. We report a zotarolimus-eluting stent fracture in an aortocoronary saphenous vein graft (SVG) bypass. The patient presented with chest pain and a non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. He underwent cardiac catheterization that showed a complete fracture of a zotarolimus-eluting stent in the ostium of a sequential SVG to the diagonal and obtuse coronary arteries. His management included coronary angioplasty and retrieval of the proximal fractured segment. We discuss the potential causes for this stent fracture and suggest caution when using a DES in an ostial location of a SVG bypass, especially in a highly mobile vessel.

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Bypass; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Stenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Myocardial Infarction; Prosthesis Failure; Retreatment; Risk Assessment; Saphenous Vein; Severity of Illness Index; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

Impact of plaque composition on late stent malapposition (LSM) after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation has not been evaluated.. We evaluated the relation between plaque components at poststenting peristent area (between external elastic membrane and stent areas) and LSM after DES implantation in 266 patients (314 native lesions; paclitaxel-eluting stent in 205 lesions, sirolimus-eluting stent in 66 lesions, zotarolimus-eluting stent in 32 lesions and everolimus-eluting stent in 11 lesions) in whom virtual-histology intravascular ultrasound was performed at index (poststenting) and follow-up (mean: 11.7 ± 4.8 months).. LSM occurred in 24 patients with 30 lesions (9.6%) and there were no significant differences in the incidences of LSM among 4 DES groups [21/205 (10.2%) in paclitaxel-eluting stent, 6/66 (9.1%) in sirolimus-eluting stent, 2/32 (6.3%) in zotarolimus-eluting stent and 1/11 (9.1%) in everolimus-eluting stent, p=0.5)]. Patients with LSM were presented with more acute myocardial infarction (50% vs. 28%, p=0.026) and were more diabetics (50% vs. 30%, p=0.030) compared with those without LSM. Lesions with LSM had more poststenting peristent %necrotic core (NC) volume compared with those without LSM (25.8 ± 11.1% vs. 21.0 ± 5.7%, p<0.001). Independent predictors of LSM were poststenting peristent %NC volume [odds ratio (OR); 1.216, 95% CI; 1.053-1.405, p=0.008], acute myocardial infarction (OR; 2.897, 95% CI; 1.675-4.118, p=0.029), and diabetes mellitus (OR; 2.413, 95% CI; 1.543-3.996, p=0.038).. Poststenting peristent NC component especially in patients with acute myocardial infarction and in those with diabetes mellitus is associated with the development of LSM after DES implantation.

Topics: Aged; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Plaque, Atherosclerotic; Retrospective Studies; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography, Interventional

Polymer-coating represents a key component of drug-eluting stent (DES) technology and its possible impact on vessel-wall healing is a matter of debate. The clinical impact of different polymer-coating may be assessed by comparing the outcome of patients treated by DES having the same stent platform and drug, and differing in the polymer. Thus, we compared the clinical outcome of patients treated by Endeavor Zotarolimus-eluting stent (E-ZES) and Resolute Zotarolimus-eluting stent (R-ZES) as they differ in the polymer-coating only.. At our Institution, E-ZES was available during a first period and then it was substituted by the R-ZES during a second period. Clinical, angiographic, and procedural data were prospectively collected. Clinical follow-up was prospectively obtained up to 1-year. Primary endpoint was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 12-month.. A total of 467 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention were enrolled: 233 patients treated with E-ZES and 234 with R-ZES. Patients treated by R-ZES had similar clinical characteristics and worse angiographic characteristics compared with those treated by E-ZES. At 12-month follow-up, MACE rate was significantly lower in the R-ZES group compared with E-ZES group (4.2% vs. 14.6%; P < 0.01). This difference was due to nonsignificantly lower rates of death and myocardial infarction and to significant lower rate of target-lesion-revascularization (R-ZES 3.4% vs. E-ZES 10.3%, P < 0.01).. The results of this study suggest that the clinical outcome of patients treated by DES differing for the polymer coating only may be different. Polymer coating is a pivotal, probably underrated, component of DES technology which may influence the clinical performance of DES.

Topics: Aged; Cardiovascular Agents; Coated Materials, Biocompatible; Coronary Angiography; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Polymers; Proportional Hazards Models; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Rome; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

To compare 2-year outcomes (mortality, mortality/myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel PCI (TVPCI), and target lesion PCI (TLPCI)) for patients receiving EES and ZES.. The utilization of drug-eluting coronary stents (DES) among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) has increased dramatically in the last decade. Everolimus-eluting stents (EES) and ENDEAVOR zotarolimus eluting stents (ZES) constitute the latest generation of approved DES in the United States, but little is known about their relative effectiveness.. New York patients undergoing EES and ZES revascularization without any other type of stent between 7/08 and 12/08 were propensity matched at the hospital level using multiple patient, operator, and hospital characteristics, and matched patients were followed through the end of 2010 to obtain comparative 2-year outcomes.. A total of 3286 patients were propensity-matched. Patients receiving EES had a significantly lower TVPCI rate (9.0% vs. 11.9%, AHR = 1.31, 95% CI (1.04, 1.65)) and a significantly lower TLPCI rate (6.0% vs. 8.3%, AHR = 1.35, 95% CI (1.02, 1.79)). There was no significant difference between EES and ZES for mortality or MI/mortality.. There were no significant differences in the hard endpoints of death or MI between patients who received EES versus those who received ZES (ENDEAVOR). Patients with EES experienced lower repeat revascularization rates than patients with ZES at 24 months.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; New York; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Propensity Score; Proportional Hazards Models; Prosthesis Design; Registries; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

To evaluate differences in strut coverage, inflammation and endothelialization between two second-generation polymer-based drug-eluting stents (DES) in an atherosclerotic rabbit double-injury iliac artery model at 28 days follow-up.. Rabbits with induced atheroma received bilateral iliac artery stents: everolimus-eluting stent (Xience V EES; Abbott Vascular), zotarolimus-eluting stent (Resolute ZES; Medtronic CardioVascular), or bare-metal stent (BMS; MultiLink Vision; Abbott Vascular). After 28 days, total neointimal coverage examined by scanning electron microscopy was >98% for all three stent types. Neointimal thickness above stent struts was decreased by 50% in Xience V EES (0.06 ± 0.01 mm; P = 0.00001) compared with BMS (0.15 ± 0.03 mm) and Resolute ZES (0.12 ± 0.04 mm). Luminal area was largest for Xience V EES (3.79 ± 0.33 mm(2) ; P = 0.0003 for Xience V EES vs. BMS), followed by Resolute ZES (3.46 ± 0.45 mm(2) ; P = 0.083 for Resolute ZES vs. BMS) and BMS (3.07 ± 0.53 mm(2) ). Percentage area stenosis was smallest for Xience V EES (17.23 ± 3.64%; P = 0.00001), while BMS (30.25 ± 7.48%) and Resolute ZES (30.79 ± 7.15%) did not differ. Endothelial monolayer regrowth was significantly lower in Resolute ZES (65 ± 13%) versus BMS (79 ± 11%; P = 0.004). There was no difference between Xience V EES (74 ± 10%) and BMS. Xience V EES was further associated with a lower number of inflammatory cells surrounding the stent struts (7 ± 2 per strut) in comparison to Resolute ZES (15 ± 6; P = 0.0001) and BMS (17 ± 9; P = 0.0005).. In this atherosclerotic rabbit model, Xience V EES suppressed neointimal thickening better, with normal endothelial regrowth as compared with BMS, and less strut-induced inflammation.

Topics: Angioplasty, Balloon; Animals; Atherosclerosis; Cardiovascular Agents; Cell Proliferation; Disease Models, Animal; Drug-Eluting Stents; Endothelial Cells; Everolimus; Iliac Artery; Inflammation; Male; Neointima; Prosthesis Design; Rabbits; Radiography; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Vascular System Injuries

This study sought to compare the safety and efficacy of the Xience V/Promus everolimus-eluting stent (EES) (Abbott Vascular, Temecula, California) with the Endeavor Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES-R) (Medtronic Cardiovascular, Santa Rosa, California) in "all-comer" cohorts.. Only 2 randomized controlled trials have compared these stents.. The EXCELLENT (Efficacy of Xience/Promus Versus Cypher to Reduce Late Loss After Stenting) and RESOLUTE-Korea registries prospectively enrolled 3,056 patients treated with the EES and 1,998 patients treated with the ZES-R, respectively, without exclusions. Stent-related composite outcomes (target lesion failure [TLF]) and patient-related composite outcomes were compared in crude and propensity score-matched analyses.. Of 5,054 patients, 3,830 (75.8%) had off-label indication (2,217 treated with EES and 1,613 treated with ZES-R). The stent-related outcome (82 [2.7%] vs. 58 [2.9%], p = 0.662) and the patient-related outcome (225 [7.4%] vs. 153 [7.7%], p = 0.702) did not differ between EES and ZES-R, respectively, at 1 year, which was corroborated by similar results from the propensity score-matched cohort. The rate of definite or probable stent thrombosis (18 [0.6%] vs. 7 [0.4%], p = 0.306) also was similar. In multivariate analysis, off-label indication was the strongest predictor of TLF (adjusted hazard ratio: 2.882; 95% confidence interval: 1.226 to 6.779; p = 0.015).. In this robust real-world registry with unrestricted use of EES and ZES-R, both stents showed comparable safety and efficacy at 1-year follow-up. Overall incidences of TLF and definite stent thrombosis were low, even in the patients with off-label indication, suggesting excellent safety and efficacy of both types of second-generation drug-eluting stents.

Topics: Aged; Cohort Studies; Coronary Thrombosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Korea; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Registries; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Alveolitis, Extrinsic Allergic; Biopsy; Drug Hypersensitivity; Drug-Eluting Stents; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Sirolimus; Steroids; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Treatment Outcome

A 73-year-old woman was admitted to our hospital with anterior acute myocardial infarction due to subacute thrombosis after coronary stenting with a zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES), which is a newly developed drug-eluting stent that has been widely used since May 2009 in Japan. Five days before, she underwent implantation with a ZES in the left anterior descending artery due to stable angina pectoris. After stenting, the intravascular ultrasonography showed no malapposition from the proximal to the distal edge of the stent. She received aspirin 100 mg/day and clopidogrel 75 mg/day from 2 weeks before the stent was implanted. When we investigated the single nucleotide polymorphisms of CYP2C19 in this patient, both CYP2C19*2 and CYP2C19*3 were detected, and she was classified as a poor metabolizer. This report is the first to describe subacute stent thrombosis following the implantation of a newly developed ZES in a Japanese patient, which may be related to clopidogrel resistance.

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Anterior Wall Myocardial Infarction; Aryl Hydrocarbon Hydroxylases; Aspirin; Cardiovascular Agents; Clopidogrel; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19; Drug Resistance; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Genotype; Humans; Phenotype; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; Prosthesis Design; Sirolimus; Thrombectomy; Thrombosis; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography, Interventional

There have been little data regarding major determinants for the uncovered stent struts after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation on optical coherence tomography (OCT). We investigated the major determinants of incomplete neointimal coverage of DES struts on OCT after implantation in a large cohort of patients. A total of 261 patients with 279 lesions who were treated with various DESs were selected from the OCT registry database. The lesions were divided into two groups based on the ratio of uncovered struts to total struts in all OCT cross-sections; an uncovered group (highest quartile with % uncovered struts ≥5.4%, n = 70), and covered group (the remaining lower quartiles with % uncovered struts <5.4%, n = 209). The uncovered group was more likely to have complex lesions, smaller reference vessel and stent diameter, and longer stent, more use of sirolimus-eluting stents, and less use of zotarolimus-eluting stents compared with the covered group. Of these variables, the most significant determinant of uncovered stent struts was DES type (odds ratio [OR] = 2.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.94-3.89, P < 0.001). The use of sirolimus-eluting stents (OR = 2.44, 95% CI, 1.15-5.47, P = 0.023) and zotarolimus-eluting stents (OR = 0.02, 95% CI = 0.01-0.25, P = 0.002) were the only significant risk and protective factors for uncovered stent struts, respectively. This study demonstrated that DES type might be associated with the most important determinants of uncovered struts compared to any other clinical or angiographic factor.

Topics: Aged; Analysis of Variance; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Thrombosis; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Odds Ratio; Paclitaxel; Predictive Value of Tests; Prosthesis Design; Registries; Republic of Korea; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Treatment Outcome

Previous optical coherence tomography (OCT) studies in patients with drug-eluting stents (DESs)-related very late stent thrombosis (VLST) were scarce. Therefore, we investigated OCT findings of VLST after implantation of DESs. Using OCT, we analyzed the status of stent struts and neointimal characteristics in 18 patients who developed VLST after DES implantation. These results were compared to those in 57 patients with neointimal hyperplasia causing >40% diameter stenosis. Lipid-laden neointima was defined as a region with marked signal attenuation and a diffuse border. Four (22.2%) of 18 patients with VLST had ruptured and lipid-laden neointima inside DESs without uncovered or malapposed stent struts. In the remaining 14 patients who developed VLST without neointimal rupture, uncovered and malapposed struts were observed in nine and seven patients, respectively, and lipid-laden neointima in four patients. Lipid-laden neointima was more frequently observed in four patients with neointimal rupture than in 14 patients without neointimal rupture (100% vs. 28.6%, respectively, P = 0.023). Of 57 patients with neointimal hyperplasia, eight (14.0%) had lipid-laden neointima. Time to OCT study after DES implantation was significantly longer in the eight patients with lipid-laden neointima than in 49 patients without lipid-laden neointima (45.5 ± 17.7 months vs. 11.7 ± 7.2 months, respectively, P < 0.001). Lipid-laden neointima was detected in some patients with neointimal hyperplasia > 1 year after DES implantation. In addition to uncovered or malapposed struts, rupture of lipid-laden neointima inside DESs was identified in some patients with DES-related VLST.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cardiovascular Agents; Chi-Square Distribution; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Thrombosis; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Hyperplasia; Lipid Metabolism; Male; Middle Aged; Neointima; Paclitaxel; Predictive Value of Tests; Prosthesis Design; Republic of Korea; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Treatment Outcome

To assess clinical performance of the second-generation Endeavor Resolute(®) drug-eluting stents (DES) in an unrestricted high-risk cohort of patients.. New-generation DESs aim to further increase its clinical safety and efficacy by means of more biocompatible components limiting inflammatory response, assuring strut coverage and preserving endothelial vascular function.. Between January 2008 and April 2009 820 unselected consecutive high-risk patients (1,352 lesions) treated with the Endeavor Resolute(®) stent were enrolled in an independent multicenter registry. Primary end-points of this registry were immediate procedural outcome, incidence of target lesion failure (TLF, defined as composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization) and rate of ARC stent thrombosis at 12-months follow-up.. High-risk patient/lesion profile included acute coronary syndrome diagnosis in 57% of patients, diabetes mellitus in 23% and ACC/AHA type B2/C lesion in 74%. Endeavor Resolute(®) stent was used in an off-label indication in 52% of cases with stent/patient ratio of 1.93 and average stented segment of 39.8±26.6 mm. Immediate procedural success was accomplished in 96.0% of cases and at median 12-month follow-up TLF rate was 7.1% with 4.0% of clinically driven repeat revascularizations and 1.1% of definite/probable stent thrombosis incidence. At multivariable analysis, nor off-label Endeavor Resolute(®) stent use or multiple stent implantations were associated to an increased risk of adverse events.. Extensive use of the new Endeavor Resolute(®) stent was associated with favorable procedural and 12-month outcomes despite the treatment of unselected complex clinical and anatomical presentation. Endeavor Resolute(®) stent showed excellent safety and efficacy profile also in off-label indications.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cardiovascular Agents; Chi-Square Distribution; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Hospital Mortality; Humans; Italy; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Myocardial Infarction; Product Labeling; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Registries; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

To report the safety and efficacy of zotarolimus eluting stents for treatment of unprotected left main coronary artery disease.. Percutaneous stent insertion is an increasingly popular alternative to bypass surgery for the management of left main (LM) coronary artery disease. While data support the use of sirolimus- and paclitaxel-coated stents in the LM coronary artery, there are no published series reporting results with Endeavor (zotarolimus) stents, particularly in the context of unprotected left main (ULM) lesions.. We retrospectively identified 40 consecutive patients who had ULM disease treated with Endeavor stents (ZES) and who had follow-up angiography. The primary endpoint was the prevalence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including cardiac/unexplained death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), and in-stent restenosis (ISR)/target lesion revascularization (TLR).. Angiographic and procedural success was achieved in all cases. Follow-up angiography occurred on average 5.6 ± 0.9 months after the index procedure. There were three incidences of ISR requiring TLR and another patient who had a NSTEMI in the follow-up period. At late follow-up (12.4 ± 1.8 months) three patients underwent CABG (one for RCA stenosis) and four patients died without knowledge of the status of the ULM stent (two cardiovascular and two deaths related to cancer progression).. In conclusion, our experience with Endeavor stents for the treatment of ULM disease demonstrates excellent angiographic and clinical outcomes, with a 7.5% ISR/TLR rate and a 15% MACE rate, respectively, at an average clinical follow-up of 12.4 months.

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cardiovascular Agents; Cause of Death; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Ontario; Prosthesis Design; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography, Interventional

Women have a worse outcome than men after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, in the drug-eluting stent (DES) era, limited data are available about the impact of gender-related differences on clinical outcome. Furthermore, many series have also included patients previously treated by coronary-artery bypass grafts or PCI, which may bias the evaluation of DES-related clinical events at follow up. We aimed to assess the impact of gender on clinical outcomes in a consecutive series of patients at first manifestation of coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing PCI with mTOR-inhibitor DES.. A total of 138 consecutive patients (age 64 ± 13 years, female gender 29%) undergoing successful mTOR-inhibitor DES implantation [sirolimus-eluting stent (SES); zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES); and everolimus-eluting stent (EES)] for the treatment of stable chronic angina or an acute coronary syndrome, as their first clinical manifestation of CAD, were prospectively enrolled between February 2008 and May 2009. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as a combination of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), and clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TVR) at 12-month follow up, constituted the endpoint of the study. Fifty-one (37%) patients received SES; 46 (33%) patients received ZES; and 41 (30%) patients received EES. At follow up, 21 (15%) patients experienced a MACE. Three (2%) patients had cardiac death, five (4%) had MI, while 13 (9%) patients underwent clinically driven TVR. MACE occurred more frequently in females than males [10 (25%) vs. 11 (11%), p = 0.05]. At Cox regression analysis, the only independent predictors of MACE were female gender and implantation of more than one stent [hazard ratio (HR) 3.70, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.46-9.36, p = 0.006; HR 1.26, 95% CI 0.99-2.74, p = 0.01, respectively].. In conclusion, our finding suggests that women may have a worse outcome as compared with men after mTOR-inhibitor DES implantation.

Topics: Aged; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Italy; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Ischemia; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Sex Factors; Sirolimus; Survival Rate; TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases

The Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES-R) has a thinner stent strut with biocompatible polymer than first generation drug-eluting stents. However, minimal optical coherence tomography (OCT) data exists about vascular responses after ZES-R implantation. This study investigated OCT findings in ZES-R implantation and compared them to those in sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation. A total of 123 lesions (43 ZES-R and 80 SES) in 111 patients were evaluated with OCT at 9 months after stent implantation. Strut apposition, neointimal hyperplasia (NIH) thickness, and stent coverage on each stent strut were evaluated. Mean NIH thickness was significantly greater in ZES-R-treated lesions than in SES-treated lesions (166 ± 73 μm vs. 96 ± 63 μm, respectively, P < 0.001). The percentage of uncovered strut was significantly lower in ZES-R-treated lesions than in SES-treated lesions (4.4 ± 4.8% vs. 10.3 ± 13.2%, respectively, P = 0.05). The percentage of malapposed struts was also significantly lower in ZES-R-treated than in SES-treated lesions (0.1 ± 0.4% vs. 1.5 ± 4.2%, respectively, P = 0.002). Intracoronary thrombus was less frequently detected in ZES-R-treated lesions (4.7% vs. 30.0%, respectively, P = 0.001). ZES-R showed a lower incidence of uncovered or malapposed stent struts and intracoronary thrombus than SES at 9-month follow-up OCT examination. Compared with SES, ZES-R may elicit more favorable vascular responses at the expense of an increased neointimal proliferation.

Topics: Aged; Cardiovascular Agents; Chi-Square Distribution; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Thrombosis; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Linear Models; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Neointima; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Predictive Value of Tests; Prosthesis Design; Registries; Retrospective Studies; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Neointima; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Sirolimus; Tomography, Optical Coherence

Bleeding events are common after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and have been shown to increase mortality in studies of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and anti-thrombotic therapy. Despite this evidence, bleeding has not been included as a traditional major endpoint in clinical trials of low-risk populations enrolled in PCI clinical trials. Thus, the impact of specific bleeding definitions has not been evaluated fully among these patients.. Using patient-level pooled data from sirolimus and zotarolimus drug-eluting stent clinical trials, we identified bleeding events using three common definitions of bleeding, ACUITY, TIMI, and GUSTO, and assessed the impact on mortality and MI at 12 months after PCI. The GUSTO, ACUITY, and TIMI classifications identified bleeding rates of 2.3%, 1.9%, and 2.1%, respectively. The GUSTO criteria classified all 118 suspected bleeding events. There were 22 (18.6%) and 8 (6.8%) suspected bleeding events that did not meet ACUITY and TIMI criteria, respectively. The combined endpoint of all-cause death or myocardial infarction (MI) at 12 months was significantly higher for patients with a bleeding event compared with those who did not bleed [hazard ratio 1.95 (95% CI 1.06-3.60)].. There is a substantial variability in the utility and inclusiveness of three widely used bleeding definitions in identifying clinically significant bleeding events in clinical trials of low risk patients undergoing PCI with DES. Patients with bleeding after elective PCI have an increased one-year risk of death or MI compared to those patients who do not bleed.

Topics: Aged; Cardiovascular Agents; Chi-Square Distribution; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug-Eluting Stents; Endpoint Determination; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Proportional Hazards Models; Prosthesis Design; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Terminology as Topic; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

The differences in the vascular response to stent implantation or in the incidence of late acquired stent malapposition among different types of drug-eluting stents are not well known in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI).. The pattern of vascular remodeling and degree of neointimal proliferation were different depending on the different types of drug-eluting stents.. This study used intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) to investigate vascular remodeling in patients treated with implantation of sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs) vs zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZESs) following acute MI. The study population consisted of 100 patients with acute MI who were treated either with SES (n = 41) or ZES (n = 59) and underwent both poststenting and 9-month follow-up IVUS examination. Serial vascular changes surrounding stented segments were compared between SES- and ZES-treated lesions.. Percentage of neointimal volume obstruction at follow-up was significantly smaller in SES-treated compared to ZES-treated lesions (2.8 ± 7.1% vs 18.1 ± 15.7%, respectively; P < 0.001). However, positive vascular remodeling, which was defined as greater than 10% increase in external elastic membrane volume index (31.7% vs 10.2%, respectively, P = 0.007), and late acquired stent malapposition (12.0% vs 0%, respectively, P = 0.006 ) occurred more frequently in SES-treated than in ZES-treated lesions.. The pattern of vascular remodeling, including positive remodeling, late acquired stent malapposition, and degree of neointimal proliferation might be different depending on the different types of drug-eluting stents in patients with acute MI.

Topics: Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Myocardial Infarction; Neointima; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography, Interventional

Non stent based delivery of antiproliferative agents using drug coated balloon catheters may offer additional flexibility and efficacy in a broad range of applications. The lipophilic antiproliferative drug zotarolimus makes it a potential candidate for balloon delivery. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a prototype zotarolimus coated balloon (ZCB) catheter in comparison to a zotarolimus eluting stent (ZES) in the porcine coronary overstretch model.. Eighty-four stents (diameters 3.0 and 3.5 mm; length 15 mm) were implanted in LAD and Cx of 42 domestic pigs: control (TriMaxx, Abbott, polymer coated stent without drug, implanted with uncoated PCI catheter, n = 56); ZES (ZoMaxx, Abbott, stent coated with zotarolimus in polymer, implanted with uncoated PCI catheter, n = 14); ZCB (TriMaxx, Abbott, polymer coated stent without drug, implanted with zotarolimus coated PCI catheter, n = 14). Drug content of the vessel wall (n = 9) was measured about 10-30 min post intervention with ZCB in additional pigs.. Immediately after ZCB treatment 101 ± 31 μg of zotarolimus was detected in the coronary arteries. After 28 days ZES led to a reduction of neointimal area from 4.32 ± 1.45 to 3.32 ± 1.11 mm2 (P = 0.019 vs. control). The effect of neointimal inhibition was more pronounced with the novel ZCB (2.79 ± 1.43 mm², P = 0.001 vs. control). Inflammation score was significantly reduced in vessels treated with the ZCB (0.75 ± 0.86 compared to control (1.45 ± 0.94, P = 0.013) and ZES (1.65 ± 0.90, P = 0.012).. Zotarolimus coated balloons and stents were found to effectively reduce neointimal proliferation in the porcine coronary model. Inflammation scores were significantly reduced after treatment with the coated balloon. Zotarolimus balloon coating might be a novel option in preventing and treating restenosis.

Topics: Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Animals; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Vessels; Disease Models, Animal; Drug-Eluting Stents; Hyperplasia; Neointima; Sirolimus; Swine

To provide clinical outcome data from everyday practice for the new generation Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (R-ZES).. Patients were eligible if placement of ≥1 R-ZES was intended. There were no restrictions on clinical indication, number of treated vessels, and lesion characteristics. The primary endpoint was the adjudicated cumulative 1-year incidence of cardiac death and target vessel myocardial infarction. Twenty-five per cent of the patients were randomly selected for monitoring. We recruited 2,349 patients with 3,147 lesions (1.6±1.0 stents per patient); 46.0% of patients had acute coronary syndrome, 30.5% were diabetic, and ≥1 complex criterion for stent placement was present in 67.5% of patients. One-year follow-up was complete in 97.9% of patients. The 1-year incidence of the primary endpoint was 4.3% (95% CI: 3.5% to 5.2%) and for ARC definite and probable stent thrombosis, 0.9% (0.5% to 1.3%). Clinically driven target lesion revascularisation and target lesion failure were 3.4% (2.7% to 4.3%) and 7.0% (6.0% to 8.2%), respectively. These findings were consistent across all lesion and patient subsets analysed. There were no significant differences in outcomes between monitored and unmonitored patients.. In everyday practice, the R-ZES performed similarly well as in the RESOLUTE All Comers randomised trial.

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Argentina; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Endpoint Determination; Europe; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Incidence; India; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Prospective Studies; Registries; Sirolimus; South Africa; Survival Rate; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Humans; Sirolimus; Terminology as Topic

Renal impairment (RI) is a predictor of poor outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease, but its influence in the setting of percutaneous coronary intervention and zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) implantation has not been described. This study evaluated the impact of RI on clinical outcomes in patients participating in the E-Five Registry.. E-Five was a prospective, multicenter, global registry of 8,314 patients; 2,116 patients were followed to 2 years.. Patients (excluding those who had undergone renal transplantation) were grouped according to renal function (normal function/mild RI, serum creatinine <110 μmol/L; moderate RI, 110-200 μmol/L; severe RI, >200 μmol/L) and their outcomes evaluated retrospectively. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE; i.e., death, myocardial infarction, emergency cardiac bypass surgery, or target lesion revascularization) and stent thrombosis events at 1 and 2 years were compared between groups.. The 1-year MACE rate in patients with mild RI was 6.8%, compared with 8.9 and 18.1% in patients with moderate and severe RI (P = 0.002 across groups). At 2 years, death occurred in 16% of those with severe RI, compared with 2.0 and 4.7% in those with mild and moderate RI (P = 0.002). There was no significant difference in the rates of target lesion revascularization or target vessel failure.. Greater severity of RI at intervention is associated with greater mortality and MACE but unchanged revascularization rates after ZES implantation.

Topics: Aged; Asia; Biomarkers; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Artery Bypass; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Thrombosis; Creatinine; Drug-Eluting Stents; Europe; Female; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Kidney; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Registries; Renal Insufficiency; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Severity of Illness Index; Sirolimus; South America; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

In this study we compared the outcomes of the everolimus-eluting stent (EES) versus the zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) in patients treated at a tertiary medical center, with up to one year of follow-up.. Unselected consecutive patients were retrospectively recruited following stenting with the ZES (n = 197) or EES (n = 190). The first 100 consecutive patients in each cohort underwent syntax scoring. The primary endpoint of the study was target vessel failure, defined as the combined endpoint of cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization. Secondary endpoints included target lesion revascularization, target lesion failure, acute stent thrombosis, total death, cardiac death, and non-fatal myocardial infarction.. The two groups were similar, including for Syntax scores (19.6 ± 12.8 versus 20.6 ± 13.6), number of stents per patient (2.9 ± 1.9 versus 2.9 ± 2.1), and cardiovascular risk factors. By one year, the primary outcome occurred in 20.8% EES versus 26.7% ZES (P = 0.19) patients. The secondary endpoints were as follows: target lesion revascularization (8.9% versus 20.6%, P = 0.003), target vessel revascularization (18.9% versus 25.6%, P = 0.142), definite and probable stent thrombosis (0% versus 2.5%), non-fatal myocardial infarction (2.7% versus 3.6%), and mortality (3.2% versus 5.1%) for the EES versus the ZES, respectively.. EES had similar target vessel failure to ZES, but superior target lesion revascularization and target lesion failure at one year of follow-up in an unselected cohort of patients.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cardiovascular Agents; Chi-Square Distribution; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Stenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Iowa; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Retrospective Studies; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Both paclitaxel and zotarolimus are currently employed in vascular interventional therapies, such as drug-eluting stents, and are under investigation for use in other novel drug-device combination products. Paclitaxel is a microtubule-stabilizing compound with potent antiproliferative properties and antimigration effects, whereas zotarolimus is a potent mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor with antiproliferative and antiinflammatory properties. This study was intended to compare paclitaxel and zotarolimus for intravascular applications in which drug exposure time may be reduced, such as in drug-coated balloons. These applications are generally aimed at reducing neointimal hyperplasia by limiting smooth muscle cell (SMC) proliferation and inflammatory cell recruitment, while minimally interfering with vessel reendothelialization after balloon denudation. In the cellular models described in this study, transient exposure of zotarolimus resulted in the sustained inhibition of SMC proliferation and reduced endothelial cell (EC) proinflammatory cytokine expression, while not affecting EC migration and viability. Transient exposure of paclitaxel inhibited SMC proliferation, EC migration, and overall cell viability, with no effect on expression of the proinflammatory biomarkers studied.

Topics: Apoptosis; Biomarkers; Cardiovascular Agents; Cell Death; Cell Movement; Cell Proliferation; Cell Survival; Cells, Cultured; Coronary Vessels; Cytokines; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Endothelial Cells; Humans; Inflammation Mediators; Muscle, Smooth, Vascular; Myocytes, Smooth Muscle; Necrosis; Paclitaxel; Sirolimus; Time Factors

Drug-eluting stents (DES) have been in clinical use for nearly a decade; however, the relative short- and long-term efficacy and safety of DES compared with bare-metal stents (BMS) and among the DES types are less well defined.. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched for randomized clinical trials, until March 2012, that compared any of the Food and Drug Administration-approved durable stent and polymer DES (sirolimus-eluting stent [SES], paclitaxel-eluting stent [PES], everolimus-eluting stent [EES], zotarolimus-eluting stent [ZES], and ZES-Resolute [ZES-R]) with each other or against BMS for de novo coronary lesions, enrolling at least 100 patients and with follow-up of at least 6 months. Short-term (≤ 1 year) and long-term efficacy (target-vessel revascularization, target-lesion revascularization) and safety (death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis) outcomes were evaluated and trial-level data pooled by both mixed-treatment comparison and direct comparison analyses. From 76 randomized clinical trials with 117 762 patient-years of follow-up, compared with BMS, each DES reduced long-term target-vessel revascularization (39%-61%), but the magnitude varied by DES type (EES~SES~ZES-R>PES~ZES>BMS), with a >42% probability that EES had the lowest target-vessel revascularization rate. There was no increase in the risk of any long-term safety outcomes, including stent thrombosis, with any DES (versus BMS). In addition, there was reduction in myocardial infarction (all DES except PES versus BMS) and stent thrombosis (with EES versus BMS: Rate ratio, 0.51; 95% credibility interval, 0.35-0.73). The safest DES appeared to be EES (>86% probability), with reduction in myocardial infarction and stent thrombosis compared with BMS. Short-term outcomes were similar to long-term outcomes, with SES, ZES-R, and everolimus-eluting stent being the most efficacious and EES being the safest stent.. DES are highly efficacious at reducing the risk of target-vessel revascularization without an increase in any safety outcomes, including stent thrombosis. However, among the DES types, there were considerable differences, such that EES, SES, and ZES-R were the most efficacious and EES was the safest stent.

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Metals; Middle Aged; Paclitaxel; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Registries; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Time; Treatment Outcome; Tubulin Modulators

Topics: Absorbable Implants; Anticoagulants; Coronary Thrombosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Humans; Sirolimus

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of unrestricted Endeavor Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) use. Furthermore, we sought to evaluate clinical outcomes associated with on- and off-label use of Resolute ZES.. The current study was a prospective, single-center registry. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as the composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target-vessel revascularization (TVR). Secondary endpoints were death, MI, TVR, and stent thrombosis (ST).. A total of 370 patients were prospectively enrolled. Off-label Resolute ZES use was performed in 311 patients (84%). At a mean follow-up of 17.3 ± 6 months, MACE occurred in 31 patients (8.5%), death in 15 (4.1%), MI in 10 (2.7%), and TVR in 19 (5.2%). Definite, probable, and possible ST occurred in 9 patients (2.5%). Off-label Resolute ZES implantation, as compared to on-label use, was not associated with an increased risk of MACE (9.4% vs 3.4%; P=.13), death (4.9% vs 0%; P=.14), MI (3.3% vs 0%; P=.38), and TVR (5.5% vs 3.4%; P=.75). On multivariable analysis, previous revascularization (P=.008), but not off-label Resolute ZES implantation (P=.07), was associated with MACE.. In daily clinical practice, Resolute ZES was mostly implanted in patients with off-label indications and associated with a relatively low rate of MACE and TVR.

Topics: Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cohort Studies; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Logistic Models; Male; Multivariate Analysis; Off-Label Use; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Failure; Registries; Risk Assessment; Sirolimus; Statistics, Nonparametric; Survival Rate; Treatment Outcome

Gender-related differences in long-term outcomes of patients receiving the Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) (Medtronic) have not been well defined. In this study, we evaluate the differences between men (M) and women (W) for 2-year target vessel failure (TVF) in an unselected consecutive series of patients treated with the ZES at our institution.. Data on 197 consecutive patients (133 M, 64 W) stented with the ZES were retrospectively analyzed. The primary endpoint of the study was to compare gender-related outcomes in TVF, defined as the combined endpoint of cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization (TVR). Secondary endpoints included TLR, TVR, acute stent thrombosis (ST) as defined by the academic research consortium (ARC), and cardiac death. The cine angiograms of the first consecutive 122 patients (79 M, 43 W) were independently reviewed by a cardiologist blinded to clinical outcome and SYNTAX scoring was performed. Follow-up was achieved using medical records and/or phone calls and was censored at 730 days. Descriptive analysis was performed on all variables. Univariate analysis compared the M and W cohorts. Logistic regression analysis modeling for predictors of TVF was performed and survival analysis between the 2 groups was plotted.. The 2 groups were well matched for demographic, clinical, angiographic, and procedural variables. Angiographic complexity was also statistically similar between the 2 groups as judged by SYNTAX scoring (15.8 ± 10.9 M vs 13.5 ± 8.3 W; P=.197). At 2-year follow-up, TVF was 22.6% and 32.8% (P=.684) with no statistical difference between TLR (18.1% M vs 12.8% W), TVR (21.8% M vs 32.8% W), cardiac death (2.3% M vs 6.3% W), and definite and probable stent thrombosis (2.26% M vs 3.13% W). Logistic regression analyses modeling for age, gender, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, non-left main (LM) bifurcation lesions, ostial lesions, trifurcating LM, and pre-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) lesion severity showed that a higher NYHA class (odds ratio [OR], 2.68; P=.005), ostial lesions (OR, 5.68; P<.001), bifurcating non-LM lesions (OR, 2.74; P=.015), and trifurcating LM lesions (OR, 28.24; P<.001) predicted a higher TVF. Female gender (P=.086) and age (P=.09) were not independent predictors of TVF.. In this cohort of patients receiving ZES, men and women had similar outcomes at 2-year follow-up consistent with recent reports in the current era of PCI. Complex coronary anatomy (ostial, non-LM bifurcations, and LM trifurcations) and advanced heart failure were stronger predictors of higher TVF than gender and age.

Topics: Academic Medical Centers; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Analysis of Variance; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cohort Studies; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Stenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Electrocardiography; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Prosthesis Failure; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Severity of Illness Index; Sex Factors; Sirolimus; Survival Rate; Treatment Outcome

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a balloon-mounted drug-eluting stent (DES) for recurrent carotid in-stent stenosis (ISS).. As part of our targeted carotid artery stenting (TARGET-CAS) protocol, neurological and ultrasound evaluations have been performed at 3, 6, and 12 months and then annually since 2001 in all carotid stent patients. For angiographically-confirmed >70% ISS, balloon angioplasty was performed as a first-line treatment. Recurrent ISS was treated with a 4.0-mm zotarolimus-eluting coronary stent (ZES) that was postdilated according to intravascular ultrasound imaging. Among the 1350 neuroprotected CAS procedures performed between January 2001 and March 2011, there were 7 (0.52%) patients (5 men; ages 51-72 years), all neurologically asymptomatic, with >70% recurrent ISS that occurred at 5 to 11 months after the initial balloon angioplasty treatment for ISS.. ZES implantation under distal embolic protection was technically successful and uncomplicated. Angiographic stenosis was reduced from 84.6%±7.5% to 10.7%±3.6% (p<0.01). In 5 patients with ZES implanted fully within the self-expanding carotid stent, duplex ultrasound follow-up (mean 17 months, range 6-36) revealed no evidence of restenosis or stent fracture/deformation. In the 2 other patients, the ZES had been implanted for distal edge ISS such that the ZES protruded beyond the original carotid stent. This protruding segment of the ZES demonstrated deformation/kinking in both; in one, this led to symptomatic stent occlusion.. The use of coronary ZES in the treatment of recurrent carotid ISS is feasible and appears effective provided the ZES is placed entirely within the original stent. Placement of a coronary ZES outside the carotid stent scaffold should be avoided.

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon; Cardiovascular Agents; Carotid Stenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Embolic Protection Devices; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Poland; Prosthesis Design; Recurrence; Severity of Illness Index; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography, Doppler, Duplex; Ultrasonography, Interventional

Topics: Angioplasty, Balloon; Cardiovascular Agents; Carotid Stenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Sirolimus

While, theoretically, a drug-eluting stent (DES) with a biodegradable polymer should reduce the incidence of late in-stent thrombosis, this has not been experimentally tested.. This study compared long-term manifestations of the Excel DES, with a biodegradable polymer, to the Endeavor DES, with a biocompatible polymer, in the same individuals.. Forty-eight patients underwent simultaneous implantation of 1 or more Endeavor stents and 1 or more Excel stents, during the same procedure, and were evaluated with coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) at least 1 year postprocedure. Within-patient comparisons were made between the Excel- and Endeavor-stented segments for efficacy and safety.. A total of 131 stents (69 Endeavor stents and 62 Excel stents) were implanted in 98 lesions among 48 patients. Baseline characteristics of the lesions in the two stented segments groups were comparable. Average follow-up duration was 14.3 ± 2.5 months. In-stent late luminal loss and luminal stenosis were higher in Endeavor-stented segments than in Excel-stented segments (P<.01). The binary restenosis rate was slightly higher in Endeavor-stented segments (4.3% vs. 1.6%; P=.379). In-stent thrombosis, late incomplete stent apposition, and uncovered stent struts were higher in Excel-stented segments than in Endeavor-stented segments (P<.01). There was 1 case of an in-stent coronary aneurysm with an Excel-stented segment. Four segments, in 4 cases (2 in each stent group), required target lesion revascularization.. This study suggested that, compared to DESs with a biocompatible polymer, DESs with biodegradable polymer do not appear to present an advantage for long-term safety.

Topics: Aged; Antibiotics, Antineoplastic; Biocompatible Materials; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Polymers; Postoperative Complications; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography, Interventional

Vascular stent coverage by endothelial cells, derived from endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) is considered a surrogate for healing. However, the effects of antiproliferative drugs used in current drug-eluting stents (DES) on EPC proliferative and antithrombotic function remains poorly defined.. Herein, we studied and compared the in vitro and in vivo effects of four antiproliferative drugs - paclitaxel, sirolimus, everolimus, and zotarolimus on several EPC properties including colony forming units (CFU), cell proliferation, apoptosis, antithrombotic and prothrombotic gene expression and nitric oxide (NO) as well as prostacyclin (PGI(2)) release. We also examined EPC migration and adhesion under flow conditions. We find that whereas all antiproliferative agents inhibited EPC proliferation and caused cell apoptosis, only paclitaxel and sirolimus reduced CFU formation. Paclitaxel treatment also resulted in the greatest down-regulation of antithrombotic gene expression and up-regulation of prothrombotic gene expression. NO release, migration, and adhesion of EPC under shear stress were inhibited by all antiproliferative drugs, most notably by paclitaxel and sirolimus.. These results indicate that antiproliferative drugs on DES, particularly paclitaxel, impair the proliferative and antithrombotic functions of EPC, and thereby could contribute to incomplete vascular healing and increase the risk of stent thrombosis.

Topics: Animals; Apoptosis; Cell Adhesion; Cell Movement; Cell Proliferation; Cells, Cultured; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Endothelial Cells; Endothelium, Vascular; Epoprostenol; Everolimus; Humans; Male; Nitric Oxide; Paclitaxel; Rats; Sirolimus; Stem Cells; Stents

This study sought to compare everolimus-eluting stents (EES) with zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).. There is a paucity of data to exclusively evaluate the safety and efficacy of second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) in the setting of AMI.. The present study enrolled 3,309 AMI patients treated with ZES (n = 1,608) or EES (n = 1,701) in a large-scale, prospective, multicenter registry-KAMIR (Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry). Propensity score matching was applied to adjust for differences in baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics, producing a total of 2,646 patients (1,343 receiving ZES, and 1,343 receiving EES). Target lesion failure (TLF) was defined as the composite of cardiac death, recurrent nonfatal myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization. Major clinical outcomes at 1 year were compared between the 2 propensity score-matched groups.. After propensity score matching, baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. Clinical outcomes of the propensity score-matched patients showed that, despite similar incidences of recurrent nonfatal myocardial infarction and in-hospital and 1-year mortality, patients in the EES group had significantly lower rates of TLF (6.5% vs. 8.7%, p = 0.029) and probable or definite stent thrombosis (0.3% vs. 1.6%, p < 0.001), compared with those in the ZES group. Furthermore, there was a numerically lower rate of target lesion revascularization (1.2% vs. 2.2%, p = 0.051) in the EES group than in the ZES group.. In this propensity-matched comparison, EES seems to be superior to ZES in reducing TLF and stent thrombosis in patients with AMI.

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cardiovascular Agents; Chi-Square Distribution; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Thrombosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Hospital Mortality; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Propensity Score; Proportional Hazards Models; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Recurrence; Registries; Republic of Korea; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Stenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Medication Adherence; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Sirolimus; Ticlopidine; Withholding Treatment

We evaluated the effectiveness and safety of a zotarolimus-eluting (ZES) versus a sirolimus-eluting (SES) coronary stent in a large cohort of patients treated with one of these stents in Western Denmark.. A total of 6,122 patients treated with ZES (n=2,282) or SES (n=3,840) were followed for up to 27 months. We ascertained clinical outcomes based on national medical databases.. Incidence of target lesion revascularization (no. per 100 person-years) was 5.3 in the ZES group compared to 1.9 in the SES group (adjusted hazard ratio (HR)=2.19, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 1.39-3.47; p=0.001). All-cause mortality was also higher in the ZES group (ZES: 6.3; SES: 3.3; adjusted HR=1.34, 95% CI: 1.05-1.72; p=0.02), while stent thrombosis (ZES: 1.2; SES: 0.5; adjusted HR=1.98, 95% CI: 0.75-5.23; p=0.14) did not differ significantly.. In agreement with previously published randomised data, this observational study indicated that the ZES was associated with an increased risk of death and TLR in a large cohort of consecutive patients.

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cohort Studies; Denmark; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Registries; Sirolimus

We compared safety and efficacy outcomes of 3 limus-based drug-eluting stents in the 'all-comers' PROENCY (PROmus/ENdeavor/CYpher) registry.. Limited data are available on head-to-head comparisons of the everolimus-eluting stent (EES) with the zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) or the sirolimus- eluting stent (SES) in the treatment of patients with coronary artery disease.. PROENCY was a prospective, open-label, multicenter, observational study including consecutive patients undergoing planned treatment with EES, ZES, or SES. Seventeen centers were designated to place an EES or SES, 14 other centers were designated to place EES or ZES. The primary endpoint was the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization (TVR) at 12 months. Unadjusted and propensity-adjusted outcomes were compared between groups.. A total of 1921 patients were enrolled in the study from February to December 2008, of which 1704 patients received only study stents and were analyzed. At 12 months, the unadjusted major adverse event rate was significantly lower in the EES group versus the ZES group (3.1% vs 8.7%; P=.001) and the SES group (5.2% vs 9.6%; P=.01). This was mainly driven by lower TVR rates [2.6% with EES vs 8.2% with ZES [P<.001] and 4.1% with EES vs 7.0% with SES [P=.05]. Stent thrombosis rates were low and comparable. Adjusted analyses confirmed the unadjusted results.. There were no differences in safety outcomes of EES, ZES, and SES at 12 months in PROENCY. However, differences in efficacy were observed between the 3 "limus"-based stents in a real-world patient population.

Topics: Aged; Coronary Artery Disease; Death, Sudden, Cardiac; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Follow-Up Studies; France; Germany; Humans; Incidence; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prospective Studies; Registries; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome

We aimed to assess the influence of different sirolimus analogues released from a uniform stent platform on re-endothelialisation and vascular healing responses.. Bare metal stents (BMS) were coated with a fluoropolymer containing everolimus (EES), sirolimus (SES) or zotarolimus (ZES) to generate drug-eluting stents (DES) with identical stent backbones, drug loads and release kinetics. DES constructs and control BMS were implanted into the iliac arteries of rabbits and were analysed at 14 days by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and confocal microscopy for en face evaluation of endothelialisation (n=6 for each stent), or at 28 days to determine histomorphometric characteristics (n=11 for each stent). SEM analysis revealed low degrees of strut re-endothelialisation within the DES without differences among groups, while the BMS control showed almost complete endothelialisation. Percent stenosis was significantly reduced in all DES compared to BMS. Strut-based fibrin analysis revealed significantly greater deposition in the DES compared to BMS, with EES showing maximum fibrin deposition among the DES groups.. Sirolimus and its derivatives have similar effects on endothelial regrowth and neointimal thickening. The observation of greatest fibrin deposition in the experimental EES group indicates that everolimus may affect vascular healing differently.

Topics: Angioplasty, Balloon; Animals; Biomarkers; Cardiovascular Agents; Drug-Eluting Stents; Endothelial Cells; Everolimus; Fibrin; Iliac Artery; Immunohistochemistry; Male; Metals; Microscopy, Confocal; Microscopy, Electron, Scanning; Models, Animal; Neointima; Platelet Endothelial Cell Adhesion Molecule-1; Prosthesis Design; Rabbits; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Wound Healing

Serial changes in strut coverage of drug-eluting stents (DESs), which are placed across side-branch vessels, remain unclear.. The changes in strut coverage of DESs crossing side-branch vessels (size ≥2.0 mm) were serially evaluated by optical coherence tomography (OCT) in 30 patients at 9 months and 2 years after the index DES implantation. DESs were paclitaxel-eluting stents (PESs), sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs), and zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZESs), each in 10 patients. Measured neointimal hyperplasia (NIH) thickness of 0 μm on OCT was defined as an uncovered strut.. The percentage of uncovered side-branch struts significantly decreased from 55.7 ± 39.9% to 36.6 ± 32.0% (P<.0001) on serial follow-up: PES, 93.4 ± 10.5% to 67.6 ± 24.2%, P=.018; SES, 47.5 ± 34.4% to 29.6 ± 24.1%, P=.036; and ZES, 26.2 ± 34.8% to 12.4 ± 19.0%, P=.028. Among covered side-branch struts, the overall percentage of struts with NIH thickness more than 30 μm significantly increased from 36.3 ± 37.4% to 51.0 ± 36.0% (P<.0001). However, compared to other DES types, a significant increase in relatively thin NIH (0 to 30 μm) was observed in PESs (1.6 ± 3.4% to 17.4 ± 16.0%; P=.018).. Serial follow-up OCT examination showed a significant decrease in the percentage of uncovered side-branch struts, and the coverage pattern differed with DES type.

Topics: Aged; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Neointima; Paclitaxel; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Retrospective Studies; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Tomography, Optical Coherence

The study evaluated serial quantitative and qualitative changes in vascular responses to drug-eluting stents (DES) using optical coherence tomography (OCT).. Serial changes in stent strut coverage and neointima characteristics in DES-treated lesions have not been sufficiently investigated using OCT.. Serial OCT was performed in 72 patients with 76 DES-treated lesions at 9 months and 2 years after DES implantation (sirolimus-eluting stent, n = 23; paclitaxel-eluting stent, n = 20; zotarolimus-eluting stent, n = 25; everolimus-eluting stent, n = 8). Serial changes in quantitative parameters (neointimal thickness, stent strut coverage, and apposition at each strut) and qualitative characteristics of the neointima were evaluated.. Mean neointimal thickness significantly increased from 164 μm to 214 μm between 9 months and 2 years (p < 0.001), and the percentage of uncovered stent struts significantly decreased (from 4.4% to 2.3%, p < 0.001). Completely covered lesions were more frequently observed at 2 years (44.7% vs. 59.2%, p = 0.07). However, the percentage of malapposed struts (0.6% vs. 0.9%, p = 0.24) and incidence of intracoronary thrombi (10.5% vs. 9.2%, p > 0.99) were similar. On qualitative evaluation of neointimal morphology, lipid-laden neointima (27.6% vs. 14.5%, p = 0.009) and thin-cap neoatheroma (13.2% vs. 3.9%, p = 0.07) were more frequently detected at 2-year follow-up compared with 9 months. In matched cross-sectional evaluation, the change of neointimal morphology from homogeneous to heterogeneous or lipid-laden pattern was observed in 23 (30.3%) of 76 lesions. There was a significant increase in percent neointimal hyperplasia cross-sectional area in those lesions.. This OCT study suggested that neointimal coverage improved from 9 months to 2 years without significant changes in the incidence of malapposed struts and intracoronary thrombus. Additionally, in-stent neoatherosclerosis including transformation to lipid-laden neointima might progress during extended follow-up periods after DES implantation.

Topics: Aged; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Thrombosis; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neointima; Paclitaxel; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Predictive Value of Tests; Registries; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Kidney; Male; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Renal Insufficiency; Sirolimus

The aim of this study was to compare safety and efficacy of 4 homogenous overlapping drug-eluting stents (DES) in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients. We selected 1,349 consecutive patients (62.1 ± 14.9 yr, 69.4% male) who received homogenous overlapping DESs in diffuse de novo coronary lesions from Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry from April 2006 through September 2010. They were divided into 4 groups based on type of DES implanted - Paclitaxel (PES), Sirolimus (SES), Zotarolimus (ZES) and Everolimus (EES)-eluting stents. Primary endpoint was 12-month MACE. We also studied EES versus other DESs (PES + SES + ZES). Mean stent length was 26.2 ± 7.5 mm and mean stent diameter was 3.1 ± 0.4 mm. Average number of stents used per vessel was 2.2 ± 0.5. Incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in PES, SES, ZES, and EES groups were 9.5%, 9.2%, 7.5%, and 3.8%, respectively (P = 0.013). In EES group, overall MACE and repeat revascularization were lowest, and no incidence of stent thrombosis was observed. Non-fatal MI was highest in PES, almost similar in SES and EES with no incidence in ZES group (P = 0.044). Cox proportional hazard analysis revealed no differences in the incidence of primary endpoint (P = 0.409). This study shows no significant differences in 12-month MACE among 4 groups.

Topics: Acute Disease; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic; Coronary Angiography; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Myocardial Revascularization; Paclitaxel; Proportional Hazards Models; Registries; Republic of Korea; Sirolimus; Survival Analysis

Topics: Drug-Eluting Stents; Erectile Dysfunction; Humans; Male; Penile Erection; Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors; Sirolimus

Stent fracture (SF) has been found in peripheral and coronary vasculatures, and in the latter mostly after implantation of sirolimus- or paclitaxel-eluting stents. We report a patient with a fractured stent associated with restenosis after zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) implantation which was confirmed by fluoroscopy, intravascular ultrasound and computerized tomography. To our knowledge, this is the first published report of SF after ZES implantation.

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Humans; Male; Prosthesis Failure; Radiography; Sirolimus; Ultrasonography

Drug-eluting stents (DES) have revolutionized the treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions. Among different DES types, sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) showed better outcomes than paclitaxel-eluting stents. Because novel sirolimus analogues have been implemented in DES, a prospective observational comparison was undertaken to compare major mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor-eluting stents in the treatment of bifurcation lesions according to the provisional T-stenting and small protrusion (TAP) technique. Overall, 187 patients (165 men, 65 ± 10 years) were enrolled in the study: 80 patients received a SES, whereas zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES) were implanted in 53 patients and everolimus-eluting stents (EvES) in 62 patients. Primary end-point of the study was the 12-month incidence of target bifurcation failure (TBF) defined as occurrence of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), and target vessel revascularization (TVR) or angiographic documentation of > 50% restenosis on the main vessel or TIMI flow < 3 on the side branch. Groups were homogeneous according to main clinical and angiographic characteristics. Overall, 17 (9.1%) patients had TBF: 4 (2.1%) patients had nonfatal non-ST-segment elevation MI, 9 (4.8%) patients underwent TVR, and 6 (3.2%) patients had an angiographic restenosis. The rate of TBF was statistically different among the three groups (7.9% in SES group, 18% in ZES group, and 3.3% in EvES group, P = 0.024). Previous MI was associated with a worse outcome (P = 0.025), whereas final kissing balloon was associated with a better outcome (P = 0.045). In conclusion, in this prospective registry, significant differences between DES were found in the outcome of patients treated for coronary bifurcation lesions according to provisional TAP technique. Thus, prospective randomized trials in this field are needed.

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cardiovascular Agents; Chi-Square Distribution; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Stenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Italy; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Proportional Hazards Models; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Registries; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Time Factors; TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases; Treatment Outcome

To present data from the cohort of patients in the all-comers Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) registry (E-Five) who underwent 2-year follow-up.. The Endeavor ZES has been shown to be safe and efficacious for treatment of single, de novo lesions in patients with stable coronary artery disease. E-Five evaluated the ZES in over 8,000 real-world patients, at 188 sites followed to 1 year. A subset of sites continued follow-up through 2 years to evaluate late-term safety and effectiveness of the ZES in this population with diverse clinical and lesion characteristics.. E-Five, a prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized global registry, collected 2-year outcomes for 2,116 patients from 26 centers. Sites were selected for participation based on patient accrual rates and the ability to continue follow-up activities for an additional year. Complete data was available for 2,054 patients. To observe whether or not a sustained benefit was achieved, data for all patients from the selected sites were included in the analysis.. The outcomes in the 2-year cohort tracked with the results of randomized controlled trials using the Endeavor ZES. One year results were MACE 7.5%, TLR 4.5%, and ARC definite/probable stent thrombosis 0.6%. Outcomes at 2 years for MACE, TLR, and ARC definite/probable stent thrombosis were 8.5, 5.1, and 0.7%, respectively.. Long-term efficacy and safety outcomes were maintained between 1 and 2 years for the 2-year patient cohort, with only a small number of additional MACE, TLR, and very late stent thrombosis events.

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Asia; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Eluting Stents; Europe; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Latin America; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Registries; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Pulmonary vein (PV) stenosis (PVS) is a complication of radiofrequency PV isolation (PVI). Reported restenosis rates after balloon dilatation and bare-metal stent implantation are high. Drug-eluting stent implantation (DES) has not been reported in the setting of PVS.. Patients suspected of having PVS after PVI based on clinical symptoms and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) follow-up (FU) were referred for PV DES. One or more branches of the affected PV as documented by angiography were stented (paclitaxel or zotarolimus DES). Follow-up consisted of repeat PV angiography and TEE. Over a period of 2 years, five patients were treated with a total of eight DES. A paclitaxel DES was used in seven of eight implants. Mean FU was 12 ± 14 months during which all patients remained asymptomatic. Transesophageal echocardiography Doppler maximal flow velocity (V(max)) of the affected PVs rose from 58 ± 6 cm/s pre-PVI to 207 ± 20 cm/s pre-DES (+358%, P < 0.0001). After DES, V(max) decreased acutely with 86 ± 15 cm/s (-58%, P < 0.01). During FU, V(max) remained stable in three patients and increased moderately in one. Angiography at 3 months confirmed absence of restenosis in the first three patients and moderate (40%) restenosis in one patient. In one patient, an increase of V(max) back to pre-DES values correlated with a 65% peri-stent stenosis, treated with a redo DES. In total, after seven primary DES only one (asymptomatic) proximal margin restenosis required re-stenting.. Initial experience with DES for PV stenosis suggests an excellent stent patency rate. Transesophageal echocardiography Doppler measurements provide a viable way of monitoring stent patency.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Atrial Fibrillation; Catheter Ablation; Constriction, Pathologic; Drug-Eluting Stents; Echocardiography, Transesophageal; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Paclitaxel; Pulmonary Veins; Retrospective Studies; Secondary Prevention; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome; Vascular Diseases

Zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES) have a higher rate of neointimal coverage than the first-generation drug-eluting stents on optical coherence tomography (OCT).. To determine whether neointimal coverage of stent struts detected by OCT can be used as a surrogate for endothelial function after ZES implantation.. Cross-sectional observational study.. Three months after ZES implantation.. OCT was performed in 20 patients with a ZES at 3 months after stent implantation to evaluate strut coverage. Endothelium-dependent coronary vasomotion was estimated by infusing incremental doses of acetylcholine into the coronary ostium. The vascular response was measured in the 10 mm segments proximal and distal to the stent.. Of 20 ZES, 15 (75%) were covered completely with neointima, but the remaining 5 ZES had exposed struts. The high-dose acetylcholine infusion produced significant vasoconstriction in the proximal (-9.8±10.1%) and the distal stent segment (-29.7±22.7%). However, the degree of vasoconstriction to acetylcholine varied between individuals (from -0.6% to -77%). Although no relationship was observed between coronary vasomotor response (percentage change in diameter after acetylcholine administration) and average neointimal thickness, the number of cross-sections with uncovered struts showed an inverse correlation with coronary vasomotor response in proximal and distal stent segments (r=-0.57, p=0.007 and r=-0.83, p<0.001, respectively).. The existence of exposed struts was associated with abnormal vasoconstriction to acetylcholine at 3 months after ZES implantation. The findings suggest that complete neointimal coverage of stent struts assessed by OCT could be used as a surrogate for vasomotion impairment at 3 months after ZES implantation.

Topics: Acetylcholine; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angina Pectoris; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Endothelium, Vascular; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Neointima; Prospective Studies; Sirolimus; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Vasoconstrictor Agents; Vasodilator Agents; Vasomotor System; Wound Healing

Our purpose was to investigate the clinical outcomes of Zotarolimus- and Paclitaxel-eluting stents in Turkish patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). In general, the outcome of drug-eluting stent (DES) placement has a proven efficacy in randomized trials. However, the difference in efficacy between the Zotarolimus and Paclitaxel-eluting stents in unselected Turkish patients is controversial. Therefore, we investigated the clinical outcomes of these two drug-eluting stents in the real-world.. We created a registry and prospectively analyzed data on a consecutive series of all patients who presented to our institution with symptomatic coronary artery disease between February 2005 and March 2007 and who were treated with the zotarolimus- or the paclitaxel-eluting stent. The follow-up period was approximately two years. The primary end-point was major cardiac events, and the secondary end-point was definite stent thrombosis. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects, and the study protocol was approved by the local ethical committee.. In total, 217 patients were treated with either the zotarolimus-eluting stent (n = 116) or the paclitaxel-eluting stent (n = 101). The lesions in the 2 arms of the study were treated similarly by conventional technique. At 24-month follow-up the paclitaxel-eluting stent group showed significantly higher non-Q wave myocardial infarction (2.6% vs 5.9%, p: 0.02), Q wave myocardial infarction (1.7% vs 5.9%, p: 0.049), coronary artery binding graft surgery (2.6% vs 6.9%, p: 0.002), and late stent thrombosis (1.7% vs 3.9%, p: 0.046).. Zotarolimus-eluting stents demonstrated better clinical outcomes than Paclitaxel-eluting stents in a daily routine practice of coronary intervention in an unselected Turkish population.

Topics: Aged; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Middle Aged; Paclitaxel; Patient Selection; Postoperative Complications; Prospective Studies; Random Allocation; Registries; Retrospective Studies; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Turkey

As data on the use of the latest-generation drugeluting stents (DES) in bifurcation interventions are lacking, we realized a multicenter registry to assess the procedural and clinical results obtained in patients with unselected bifurcated lesions treated with the novel zotarolimus-eluting Resolute stent (ZRS).. Three Italian centers participated in the study. Consecutive patients with significant stenosis of bifurcated lesions undergoing DES implantation were treated with ZRS. The recommended technique was the "provisional TAP approach" [main-vessel (MV) stent implantation eventually followed by kissing balloon and sidebranch (SB) stenting according to TAP technique]. Clinical characteristics, procedural details and clinical follow-up data were prospectively recorded. Procedural success was defined as post-percutaneous coronary intervention visual stenosis > 20% on MV and TIMI 3 flow on both MV and SB. Primary endpoint was major adverse coronary events (cardiac death, myocardial infarction and target vessel revascularization) at 9-month follow up. A total of 180 patients were enrolled. The target lesion was located in the distal left main in 16% and in the left anterior descending artery in 52%. All but 3 cases were treated according to the provisional TAP approach (kissing balloon rate, 69%; overall SB stenting rate, 10.6%). Procedural success was obtained in 98.3% (3 failures due to final SB TIMI flow < 3). At 9-month follow up, the survival free from MACE was 97.8% (1 cardiac death and 3 repeat revascularizations).. The use of the latest-generation ZRS in unselected bifurcated lesions treated by a provisional approach is associated with excellent procedural results and with promising clinical outcomes.

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Stenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Incidence; Italy; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Registries; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Survival Rate; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Coronary Stenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Humans; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Coronary Angiography; Coronary Restenosis; Death, Sudden, Cardiac; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Myocardial Infarction; Myocardial Revascularization; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Secondary Prevention; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

Differences between geographic regions in patient characteristics and outcomes, particularly for acute coronary syndromes, have been demonstrated in clinical trials. Clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary interventions with the Zotarolimus-eluting stent in a real-world population were assessed over time.. The influence of geographic location on clinical outcomes with the Zotarolimus-eluting stent was assessed in 3 regions: Asia Pacific, Europe, and Latin America.. A total of 8,314 patients (6,572 Europe, 1,522 Asia Pacific, and 220 Latin America) were followed for 1 year; 2,116 of these (1,613, 316, and 187, respectively) were followed for 2 years. Patient and lesion characteristics, dual antiplatelet therapy, and clinical outcomes were compared between Latin America and the other regions.. Patients in Latin America had the highest proportions of risk factors and prior myocardial infarction. Dual antiplatelet therapy usage rapidly declined in Latin America, from 44.9% at 6 months to 22.5% at 1 year and 7.8% at 2 years (Europe: 87.4%, 61.5%, 19.7%; Asia Pacific: 82.4%, 67.0%, 45.7%). There were no significant differences between Latin America and Europe or Asia Pacific for any outcome at either time point. The incidence of Academic Research Consortium definite and probable stent thrombosis was low (<1.2%) among all patients at 1 year and 2 years.. Clinical outcomes were comparable between patients in Latin America and Europe, and Latin America and Asia Pacific, despite less favorable clinical subsets in Latin America, a higher risk profile, and markedly lower use of dual antiplatelet therapy over time.

Topics: Asia; Cell Proliferation; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Epidemiologic Methods; Europe; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Latin America; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Postoperative Care; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Coronary Angiography; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Endothelium, Vascular; Humans; Myocardial Revascularization; Paclitaxel; Sirolimus

Optical coherence tomography is a high-resolution imaging technology that allows in vivo assessment of neointimal hyperplasia and strut coverage after coronary stenting.. Assessment of spatial distribution of healing, 6 months after zotarolimus-eluting stent implantation.. Forty-two zotarolimus-eluting stents were monitored by optical coherence tomography 6 months after implantation. Mean neointimal strut coverage thickness and percentage of neointimal hyperplasia were measured every millimetre. Non-covered strut ratios were assessed on each slice. In addition, the spatial distribution of neointimal hyperplasia and strut coverage were analysed longitudinally on five stent segments and axially on each slice.. There were no clinical events at 6 months under dual antiplatelet therapy. The optical coherence tomography analysis showed a mean neointimal hyperplasia thickness of 333±147μm and neointimal hyperplasia obstruction of 36.1±12.3%. The percentage of covered struts at 6 months was very high (98.9%). Only 6/745 slices analysed (0.8%) had non-covered strut ratios exceeding 30%. There was no significant heterogeneity in either longitudinal or axial neointimal hyperplasia distribution. No thrombi were observed.. This optical coherence tomography study found relatively constant neointimal hyperplasia thickness, regardless of the zotarolimus-eluting stent length or diameter. This spatially homogeneous neointimal hyperplasia was associated with near-total coverage of all struts, 6 months after implantation.

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Vessels; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; France; Humans; Hyperplasia; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Treatment Outcome; Tunica Intima

The aim of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetics of the four limus-eluting stents used in Japanese patients.. There are presently no reports comparing human pharmacokinetics among drug-eluting stents (DESs).. We retrospectively analyzed data from pharmacokinetic studies of patients implanted with an 18-mm DES: Cypher stent (sirolimus, n = 10), Endeavor stent (zotarolimus, n = 7), Xience V stent (everolimus, n = 6), and Nobori stent (biolimus A9, n = 10), in multicenter trials of Japan. Total drug doses of the Cypher stent, Endeavor stent, Xience V stent, and Nobori stent were 150, 180, 88, and 293 μg, respectively. Drug concentrations were measured in serial whole blood samples after implantation and the pharmacokinetics were analyzed.. Mean peak drug levels were 0.86 ng mL(-1) for Cypher, 1.80 ng mL(-1) for Endeavor, 0.50 ng mL(-1) for Xience V, and 0.09 ng mL(-1) for Nobori. After adjustment for the loaded dose, mean peak drug levels of the Cypher and Xience V stents were similar (0.0057 ng mL(-1) μg(-1) each) while the Endeavor (0.0100 ng mL(-1) μg(-1)) was higher, and the Nobori (0.0003 ng mL(-1) μg(-1)) was lower, compared with the Cypher and Xience V stents. The other pharmacokinetic parameters of four DESs differed according to characteristics of the coated drug. The systemic exposure of biolimus A9 was much lower than that of the other DESs studied.. In Japanese patients, systemic exposure was low, regardless of the type of limus drug eluted from the stents; but specific pharmacokinetic activities were varied according to the drug characteristics, concentration, and DES design.

Topics: Aged; Analysis of Variance; Asian People; Cardiovascular Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Japan; Linear Models; Male; Middle Aged; Models, Biological; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Prosthesis Design; Retrospective Studies; Sirolimus

Topics: Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Prosthesis Design; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

To establish a method for the content determination of zotarolimus on the drug eluting stents.. HPLC analysis was carried out with Zorbax Eclipse C8 column (4.6 x 75 mm 3.5 microm)and MPA acetate buffer solution: acetonitrile (51:49), MPB acetate buffer solution: acetonitrile (5:95) as the mobile phase. The detection wavelength was 278 nm.. There was a good linear relationship between the concentration of zotarolimus and the areas in the range of 5 microg/ml-75 microg/ml (r = 0.99986). The average recovery was 101.58% with RSD 0.68% (n = 6).. The method is simple, accurate and reproducible. It can be used as the quality test for zotarolimus on the drug eluting stents.

Topics: Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Drug-Eluting Stents; Sirolimus

Topics: Coronary Artery Disease; Diabetes Complications; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Neointima; Radiography; Sirolimus; Ultrasonography

Topics: Coronary Stenosis; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Sirolimus; Tomography, Optical Coherence

To compare zotarolimus-eluting stent (Endeavor Sprint®; ZES-S) and the everolimus-eluting stent (Xience V®; EES) in the treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions.. Both these stents have demonstrated good outcomes in the treatment of coronary lesions. However, the outcomes with respect to treatment of bifurcation lesions have yet to be conclusively demonstrated.. In this single centered, nonrandomized, open label study, we treated, between August 2006 and December 2008, 110 bifurcations with ZES-S and, in a second stage of the study, 129 bifurcations with EES. The primary end point was to compare the rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (death, myocardial infarction, and new target lesion revascularization) in-hospital and at 12 months of follow-up. Provisional T stenting was the strategy used in the majority of cases. Angiographic follow-up was performed only in patients who presented signs or symptoms suggestive of angina or ischemia.. There were no significant differences in in-hospital MACE between the groups (ZES-S: 8.1%; EES: 6.2%; P = 0.5). At 12 months, the ZES-S group had significantly more MACE than the EES group (23.1% vs. 4.5%; P < 0.001) and an elevated index of new revascularization of the bifurcation (17.5% vs. 3.2%; P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in mortality (four patients in ZES-S vs. one in EES; P = 0.14).. The treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions using everolimus-eluting stents results in better outcomes at 12 months of follow-up than zotarolimus-eluting stents.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cardiovascular Agents; Chi-Square Distribution; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Prosthesis Design; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Spain; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is superior to thrombolysis in STEMI (ST segment elevation myocardial infarction) patients. Data on late stent thrombosis (ST) have raised concerns regarding the use of drug-eluting stents during PPCI. We report the first 3-year clinical evaluation of the zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) in patients undergoing PPCI for STEMI, a single-center, prospective cohort study of consecutive patients admitted with STEMI. All underwent PPCI within 12 hours of symptoms; each received one or more ZES in one or more target lesions. All patients received aspirin 300 mg, clopidogrel 600 mg, abciximab, and unfractionated heparin. A total of 102 STEMI patients (76 male, mean 62 years) received 162 ZES (mean 1.6 stents/patient). Median call-to-balloon time was 123 (102-152) minutes. Thirty-day combined major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) rate was 3.9% (n = 4). Subacute ST occurred in 2 patients (1.96%). Combined MACE rates at 12 months and 3 years were 7.8% (n = 8) and 13.7% (n = 14). Late ST occurred in 1 patient (1%) with no occurrence of very late ST. This is the first 3-year report of the use of the ZES in an unselected, consecutive PPCI population. Overall 3-year incidence of MACE and target lesion revascularization (5.9%) was low, and was comparable to that seen with sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents in randomized controlled trials. At 3 years there was no occurrence of very late ST.

Topics: Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Confidence Intervals; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Heparin; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Sirolimus; Ticlopidine; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United Kingdom

Drug-eluting stents proved to minimize neointimal hyperplasia in coronary vessels. Hyperplastic reaction is the most common unwelcome event related to the use of metal mesh stents in the ureter. We evaluated the effect of zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) Endeavor Resolute in the porcine and rabbit ureter.. A ZES and a bare metal stent (BMS) were inserted in each ureter of 10 pigs and 6 rabbits. The insertion was performed by the retrograde approach. CT was used for the evaluation of porcine ureters while intraoperative intravenous urography (IVU) was used for rabbit ureters. The follow-up included CT or IVU every week for the following 4 weeks for pigs and 8 weeks for rabbits. Renal scintigraphies were performed before stent insertion and during the third week in all animals. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) has been used for the evaluation of the luminal and intraluminal condition of the ureters with stents. Histopathologic examination of the these ureters embedded in glycol-methacrylate was performed.. Hyperplastic reaction was present in both stent types. BMSs in seven porcine ureters were completely obstructed while porcine ureters with ZES stents had hyperplastic tissue that did not result in obstruction. Two rabbit ureters with BMS stents were occluded while no ZES was associated with ureteral obstruction. The function of the seven porcine renal units and the two rabbit units with obstructed ureters with stents was compromised. The OCT revealed increased hyperplastic reaction in the ureters with BMS stents in comparison with those with ZESs. Although, hyperplastic reaction was present in all cases, pathologic examination revealed significantly more hyperplastic reaction in BMSs.. ZESs in the pig and rabbit ureter were not related to hyperplastic reaction resulting in stent occlusion. These stents were related to significantly lower hyperplastic reaction in comparison with BMSs while inflammation rates were similar for both stent types.

Topics: Animals; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Hyperplasia; Inflammation; Kidney; Metals; Prosthesis Implantation; Rabbits; Radionuclide Imaging; Sirolimus; Sus scrofa; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Ureter; Urography; Urothelium

Drug-coated balloons are rapidly emerging as a therapeutic alternative for the interventional treatment of peripheral vascular disease. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that an angioplasty balloon coated with the mTOR inhibitor zotarolimus (ZCB) would inhibit neointimal hyperplasia in a novel injury-based superficial femoral artery model in the familial hypercholesterolemic swine.. A total of 44 familial hypercholesterolemic swine were included (12 designated to study tissue pharmacokinetics and 32 to study safety and efficacy). Fogarty balloon denudation was performed in all superficial femoral artery segments, followed by balloon angioplasty. In the pharmacokinetic study, a total of 24 ZCBs (300 μg/cm(2)) were used. Zotarolimus was detected in arterial tissue at 5 minutes (162 ng/mg of tissue), 24 hours (5.9 ng/mg of tissue), and 28 days (0.007 ng/mg of tissue) after ZCB inflation. In the safety and efficacy study, superficial femoral artery segments were randomized to either high-dose (600 μg/cm(2), n=16), low-dose (300 μg/cm(2), n=16), or paired uncoated balloons (high-dose ZCB control, n=16; low-dose ZCB control, n=16). At 28 days, the percentage of angiographic stenosis was similar among all tested groups. Histological analysis demonstrated a reduction in neointimal formation in both ZCB groups compared with controls (high-dose ZCB 44% reduction, P=0.007; low-dose ZCB 22% reduction, P=0.08). There was no evidence of delayed arterial healing or vascular toxicity in any of the ZCB groups.. The single delivery of zotarolimus via coated balloon is feasible, and therapeutic levels are maintained up to 28 days. The ZCB technology appears to be effective in the reduction of neointimal proliferation in the superficial femoral artery of the familial hypercholesterolemic swine.

Topics: Angioplasty, Balloon; Animals; Catheterization; Clinical Protocols; Femoral Artery; Humans; Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II; Infusion Pumps, Implantable; Models, Animal; Neointima; Postoperative Complications; Radiography; Sirolimus; Swine; TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases

We sought to evaluate differences in late safety outcomes relative to dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) duration in patients treated with zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES).. Despite treatment recommendations for at least 12 months of DAPT following drug-eluting stent revascularization, device-specific outcomes relative to DAPT duration are absent.. Among 2,032 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularization with ZES in 5 trials, late safety events were compared relative to DAPT duration for patients with ≥ 6 months DAPT adherence and survival free of major ischemic and bleeding events.. A total of 1,414 event-free patients on DAPT at 6 months were identified. Patient group comparisons relative to DAPT included: 6 months versus ≥ 12 months, and 6 months versus ≥ 24 months. Through 3 years, risk-adjusted ischemic event rates did not significantly differ between groups: 6 versus ≥ 12 months: death (2.7% vs. 2.2%), myocardial infarction (MI, 0.3% vs. 1.1%), and definite/probable stent thrombosis (ST, 0.3% vs. 0%); 6 versus ≥ 24 months: death (1.6% vs. 1.6%), MI (0.4% vs. 1.2%), and definite/probable ST (0.1% vs. 0.2%). Composite events also did not statistically vary between DAPT durations. In multivariable analysis, 6-month versus longer DAPT duration was not associated with increased likelihood of thrombotic events at 3-year follow-up. Major bleeding was negligible across groups.. Among patients treated with ZES, late-term events of death, MI, stroke, and ST do not significantly differ between patients taking 6 months DAPT compared with continuation beyond 1 year. These findings merit further study to identify the appropriate duration of DAPT according to specific drug-eluting stents.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic; Aspirin; Belgium; Confidence Intervals; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; France; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Odds Ratio; Paclitaxel; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Risk Assessment; Sirolimus; Thienopyridines; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United States

Topics: Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Sirolimus; Thienopyridines

Early clinical trials with the Endeavor zotarolimus eluting stent (ZES) in western populations demonstrated low rates of target lesion revascularization with a favorable safety profile including low late stent thrombosis with up to 5 years of follow-up. The aim of this clinical registry study was to evaluate real world clinical performance of the ZES coronary system in Chinese patients.. The China Endeavor Registry is a prospective, multicenter registry assessing the safety of the ZES system in a real world patient population. It was conducted at 46 centers in China in routine treatment of patients with coronary artery stenosis, including patients with clinical characteristics or lesion types that are often excluded from randomized controlled trials. The registry included 2210 adult patients who underwent single-vessel or multi-vessel percutaneous coronary intervention. The primary end point was the rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 12 months.. The 12-month rate of MACE for all patients in the registry was 3.03%. Cardiac death or myocardial infarction rate was 1.28% and target lesion revascularization rate was 1.66%, non-target lesion target vessel revascularization (TVR) was 0.52%, TVR was 2.18%, and target vessel failure was 3.22%. There was only one case of emergent cardiac bypass surgery. The 12-month overall incidence of all Academic Research Consortium (ARC)-defined stent thrombosis was 0.43%.. Mid-term results from the real-world China Endeavor Registry suggest that Endeavor ZES was safe and effective in Chinese patients.

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Asian People; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Sirolimus

Topics: Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Male; Sirolimus

Drug-eluting stents (DES) may be associated with an increased risk for stent thrombosis when compared with bare-metal stents. In endothelial cells, rapamycin induces tissue factor (TF) by inhibiting the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR). However, the effect of mTOR inhibition on TF activity and thrombus formation in vivo has not yet been studied. Moreover, it is unclear whether second-generation DES substances everolimus and zotarolimus have an effect on endothelial TF expression.. In a mouse carotid artery photochemical injury model, rapamycin (182 +/- 27.5 microg/L) decreased time to thrombotic occlusion by 40%, increased TF activity, and abrogated p70S6K phosphorylation when compared with controls. In vitro, rapamycin, everolimus, and zotarolimus (each 10(-7) mol/l) enhanced TNF-alpha-induced TF expression by 2.2-, 1.7-, and 2.4-fold, respectively, which was paralleled by an increase in TF surface activity. Similar to rapamycin, everolimus and zotarolimus abrogated TNF-alpha-induced p70S6K phosphorylation under these conditions.. Rapamycin increases TF activity and promotes arterial thrombosis in vivo at concentrations relevant in patients undergoing DES implantation; this effect may increase the thrombogenicity of DES. Since everolimus and zotarolimus augment endothelial TF expression and activity in vitro in a similar manner as rapamycin, these findings may also be relevant for second generation DES.

Topics: Animals; Blotting, Western; Carotid Artery Diseases; Carotid Artery, Common; Cells, Cultured; Drug-Eluting Stents; Endothelial Cells; Endothelium, Vascular; Everolimus; Mice; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Sirolimus; Thromboplastin; Thrombosis; Tubulin Modulators

The Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting coronary stent has been shown to reduce the restenosis rate compared to bare metal stents and has impacted other clinical measures such as mortality, acute myocardial infarctions (AMI) and target vessel revascularisation (TVR).. Using pooled efficacy data from the Endeavor clinical trial programme, a model was developed to compare the cost effectiveness of the Endeavor drug eluting stent (DES) with the Driver bare meal stent (BMS) over a four year time period. Endeavor was more costly but had an improved clinical outcome compared to Driver BMS over four years with a 4% reduction in deaths, 33% reduction in AMI and a 45% reduction in TVR. Late stent thrombosis was the only event showing an increased incidence for Endeavor of 0.2% compared to 0% for Driver. The incremental cost effectiveness ratio was pound3,757/quality adjusted life years (QALY).. Although much controversy has surrounded the appropriate way to assess the cost effectiveness of DES technology, a comprehensive analysis is presented and this suggests that by using extended clinical trial data out to four years, the Endeavor DES in particular, but DES technologies in general, are cost-effective approaches to percutaneous coronary intervention.

Topics: Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cardiovascular Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Coronary Artery Disease; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Costs; Drug-Eluting Stents; Health Care Costs; Humans; Markov Chains; Metals; Models, Economic; Myocardial Infarction; National Health Programs; Prosthesis Design; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Sirolimus; Stents; Thrombosis; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United Kingdom

Zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZESs) demonstrated greater in-segment late luminal loss and in-segment binary restenosis rates compared to sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs) in several studies. However, no data are available in direct comparison between the clinical outcomes of the 2 stents in unselected patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI). The aim of the present study was to compare the clinical outcomes of ZESs and SESs in real-world patients with STEMI. A total of 873 patients with STEMI (306 patients in the ZES group and 567 patients in the SES group) were enrolled in a nationwide prospective Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry (KAMIR) from January 2007 to January 2008. The primary end points were major adverse cardiac events, a composite of all causes of death, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization during a 12-month clinical follow-up. During 1 year of follow-up, the primary end points occurred in 140 patients (16.0%). The use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors and the occurrence of multivessel disease were more common in the SES group. The SES group had a significantly lower incidence of major adverse cardiac events (hazard ratio [HR] 1.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07 to 2.16, p = 0.02), target lesion revascularization (HR 2.16, 95% CI 1.01 to 4.59, p = 0.046), and target vessel revascularization (HR 2.24, 95% CI 1.18 to 4.24, p = 0.013). However, no significant differences were found in death or myocardial infarction (HR 1.37, 95% CI 0.91 to 2.05, p = 0.129). In conclusion, SESs provided superior angiographic outcomes, translating into better clinical outcomes and negating any change in STEMI patient safety profiles compared to ZESs.

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Electrocardiography; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Sirolimus; Thrombosis

Topics: Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sirolimus; Thrombosis

The zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) has been documented as significantly reducing restenosis and target lesion revascularization (TLR) requirement compared to bare metal stents (BMS).. In this single-centered, prospective study we sought to evaluate the short- and medium-term outcomes of ZES placement in bifurcated coronary artery lesions. Between August 2006 and December 2007, 107 consecutive patients (110 bifurcations) were recruited to have ZES placement in the lesion. The provisional T stenting (PTS) technique was used in 96.3%. Angiographic success was 100% in main vessel (MV) cases and 97.2% in that of side branch (SB).. With a mean follow-up of 12.4 +/- 1.77 (mean +/- SD) months there were four deaths, three from cardiac cause (2.85%). There were 18 patients (19 bifurcations) requiring TLR (17.59%) for clinical reasons. The only predictor of TLR was the use diameter of ZES

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cardiac Catheterization; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Equipment Design; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Inpatients; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

The aim of this study is to identify the extent of initial malapposition using optical coherence tomography (OCT) in ST-elevation myocardial infarctions (STEMI) treated with different types of drug-eluting stents (DES).. Twenty four STEMI patients that underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were enrolled. The OCT and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) were performed within 72 hours after the primary PCI. Distances between the endo-luminal surface of the strut reflection and the vessel wall and the extent of malapposition were measured and analyzed.. Sirolimus-eluting stents (SES), paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) and zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES) were deployed in 7 patients (29%), 7 patients (29%) and 10 patients (42%). In total, 4951 struts in 620 mm single-stent segments were analyzed (1463 struts in SES, 1522 in PES, and 1966 in ZES). In strut analysis by OCT, the incidence of malapposition was 17 % (860/4951) and in stent analysis by IVUS, malapposition rate was 21% (5/24). The malapposition rate of strut level using OCT in 5 patients who had malapposition in IVUS was significantly higher than the 19 of those who had not (32 +/- 5% vs. 12 +/- 6%, p = 0.001). In addition, the frequency of malapposition was also significantly different (28% in SES, 11% in PES, 10% in ZES, p = 0.001). The use of SES was an independent predictor of malapposed struts.. The incidence of malapposition using OCT was quite prevalent in STEMI after primary PCI with DES implantation and SES has especially higher rates of malapposition compared to other DESs.

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Paclitaxel; Sirolimus; Tomography, Optical Coherence

To retrospectively evaluate the 12-month effectiveness of the Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) in diabetic versus non-diabetic patients enrolled in the E-Five Registry.. The E-Five Registry is a prospective, multicentre registry of 8314 patients presenting with symptomatic coronary artery disease treated with the Endeavor (ZES). Patients were treated at 188 centres located in 37 countries across Europe, Latin America and Asia Pacific.. There were 2721 (32.7%) patients with diabetes (DM) and among these patients 682 were insulin-treated (ITDM) and 2039 were non-insulin-treated diabetic patients (NITDM). Interventions All enrolled patients received an Endeavor ZES and were followed for 12 months.. The primary outcome measure was major adverse cardiac event (MACE) at 12 months. Secondary endpoints included target lesion revascularisation (TLR), target vessel revascularisation (TVR), target vessel failure (TVF) and stent thrombosis.. Compared with non-DM patients, DM patients had higher rates of MACE (9.7% vs 6.4%, p<0.001), TLR (5.3% vs 4.0%, p=0.028) and Academic Research Consortium (ARC) definite and probable stent thrombosis (1.5% vs 0.9%, p=0.041). Compared with non-DM patients, ITDM patients had higher rates of MACE (12.6% vs 6.4%, p<0.001). ITDM patients had higher rates of death (6.7% vs 1.7%, p<0.001), cardiac death (4.5% vs 1.2%, p<0.001) and TLR (6.5% vs 4.0%, p=0.011) than non-DM patients.. The Endeavor ZES performed well in DM patients; however, DM patients experienced higher rates of adverse clinical events compared with non-DM patients. TRIAL REG NO:. http://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NTC00623441.

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Diabetes Mellitus; Drug-Eluting Stents; Epidemiologic Methods; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Registries; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome

We sought to compare the incidence of myonecrosis after elective implantation of bare metal stents with that of drug-eluting stents. The data of stable patients who were treated with stenting in a single native coronary artery were analyzed retrospectively. The stents used were bare metal in 119, sirolimus-eluting (Cypher Select Plus) in 119 patients, paclitaxel-eluting (Taxus Liberté) in 120, zotarolimus-eluting (Endeavor Sprint) in 122, and everolimus-eluting (Xience V) in 72. Endpoints included post-procedural myonecrosis (any elevation of creatine kinase-MB), myocardial infarction (creatine kinase-MB>3 times the upper limit of normal), and large myocardial infarction (creatine kinase-MB>5 times the upper limit of normal). The incidences of myonecrosis (16.7%-18.9%), myocardial infarction (3.3%-8.4%), and large myocardial infarction (1.7%-5.6%) were not significantly different among stent types. At the 30-day follow-up, there were 2 deaths in patients who had Taxus Liberté stents, one death each in those with Xience V and bare metal stents, and no cases of stroke or target vessel revascularization. In this study, bare metal stents and the 4 drug-eluting stents were associated with similar low incidences of myonecrosis, myocardial infarction, and large myocardial infarction.

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Biomarkers; Cardiovascular Agents; Creatine Kinase, MB Form; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Incidence; Male; Metals; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Myocardium; Necrosis; Paclitaxel; Prosthesis Design; Retrospective Studies; Singapore; Sirolimus; Stents; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Up-Regulation

The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the clinical and angiographic outcomes of 3 drug-eluting stents (DES) in patients with large vessel diameter and single coronary artery lesions.. The efficacy of 3 DESs may be similar.. A total of 411 consecutive patients who visited 3 university hospitals from June 2004 to December 2007 and had a single coronary lesion which was treated with the use of a DES that was 3.5 mm in diameter were enrolled in this study. Patients were divided into 3 stent groups: Paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES, n = 105), Sirolimus-eluting stent (SES, n = 259), and Zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES, n = 47). The study end point was a composite of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) including cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), and ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization (TVR) for 12 months.. Baseline characteristics were not different. Late loss was higher in the ZES group than the other stents (0.5 +/- 0.4 mm in SES vs 0.3 +/- 0.5 mm in PES, 0.7 +/- 0.5 mm in ZES, P = 0.001). The total MACE-free survival rate was not significantly different between the SES group and the PES group (98.8% in SES vs 97.1% in PES, P = 0.252) or the PES group and the ZES group (97.1% in PES vs 93.6% in ZES, P = 0.301). However, the SES group showed a significantly better MACE-free survival rate compared with the ZES group (98.8% in SES vs 93.6% in ZES, P = 0.018).. Clinical and angiographic outcomes of DES in a large vessel diameter and single coronary artery is excellent and SES appears to show better angiographic and clinical outcomes than ZES.

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cardiovascular Agents; Chi-Square Distribution; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Disease-Free Survival; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Hospital Mortality; Hospitals, University; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Paclitaxel; Prosthesis Design; Republic of Korea; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Severity of Illness Index; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

We examined angiographic and late-term clinical outcomes according to sex in recent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) trials involving zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES).. Differences in outcome between men and women undergoing PCI have been inconsistently described with bare metal and first-generation drug-eluting stents.. Clinical and angiographic outcomes among ZES-treated patients were evaluated by sex using propensity score modeling in a patient-level systematic overview of six trials and were also compared to patients receiving bare metal stents (BMS).. Among 2,132 patients, 608 were female (28.5%). Compared to men, women were older and more frequently had diabetes, hypertension, and a smaller reference vessel diameter (P < 0.05 for all). For both sexes, the relative reductions in 8-month angiographic binary restenosis and late lumen loss were statistically significant and of similar extent with ZES compared to BMS. By 2 years, treatment with ZES resulted in significantly lower target vessel revascularization (TVR) and target vessel failure (TVF; 10.0% vs. 21.5%, P = 0.0003) among women that paralleled risk reductions for men. However, among ZES-treated patients, 2-year rates of TVR (8.2% vs. 10.4%, P = 0.005) and TVF (9.9% vs. 12.8%, P = 0.004) were significantly lower among women, although rates of death and myocardial infarction were similar.. Despite greater baseline clinical and angiographic risk than men, women undergoing PCI with ZES compared to BMS experienced significant reductions in angiographic restenosis and repeat revascularization yet similar safety. Among all patients treated with ZES, late-term safety and efficacy outcomes are similar, if not lower, among women compared to men.

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cardiovascular Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Stenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Predictive Value of Tests; Propensity Score; Prosthesis Design; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Sex Factors; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

The ZoMaxx I and II trials were randomized controlled studies of the zotarolimus-eluting, phosphorylcholine-coated, TriMaxx stent for the treatment of de novo coronary lesions. The aim of this study was to compare the vessel response between zotarolimus- (ZES) and paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS).. Data were obtained from the ZoMaxx I and II trials, in which a standard IVUS parameter was available in 263 cases (baseline and 9-months follow up). Neointima-free frame ratio was calculated as the number of frames without IVUS-detectable neointima divided by the total number of frames within the stent. While an increase in vessel and plaque was observed in PES from baseline to follow up, there was no significant change in ZES. At follow up, % neointimal obstruction was significantly higher (15.4 ± 8.8% vs 11.3 ± 9.7%), and minimum lumen area at follow up was significantly smaller in ZES compared to PES. However, the incidence of IVUS-defined restenosis (maximum cross-sectional narrowing >60%) was similar in the 2 groups (3.2% vs 6.7%). Neointima-free frame ratio was significantly lower in ZES. There were 5 cases of late incomplete stent apposition in PES and none in ZES.. These IVUS results demonstrate a similar incidence of severe narrowing between these 2 DES. There was a moderate increase in neointimal hyperplasia that was associated with a greater extent of neointimal coverage in ZES compared with PES.

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cardiovascular Agents; Chi-Square Distribution; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Hyperplasia; Male; Middle Aged; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Paclitaxel; Prosthesis Design; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Tunica Intima; Ultrasonography, Interventional

The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy remains controversial.. Between December 2006 and March 2008, 823 patients were enrolled in a prospective multicenter registry for 3-month dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin 100-200mg+clopidogrel 75 mg daily) followed by aspirin mono-therapy after zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES). Major exclusion criteria were: cardiogenic shock, stent thrombosis (ST)-segment elevation myocardial infarction (MI) within 48h, previous drug-eluting stent implantation, severe left ventricular dysfunction, bifurcation lesions requiring 2-stenting, left main and graft lesions. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiac death, MI, or ST at 1 year. The median duration of dual antiplatelet therapy was 95 days (interquartile range 90-101). At 1 year, 3 patients (0.4%) had cardiac deaths, 3 patients (0.4%) had MI, and 4 patients (0.5%) had definite or probable ST, leading to the primary outcome in 5 patients (0.6%). Death, MI, or any revascularization occurred in 68 patients (8.3%). Among patients who were event-free at 3 months (n=812), clopidogrel was discontinued at 3 months in 661 patients and was continued for longer than 3 months in 151 patients. Discontinuation of clopidogrel at 3 months did not increase the primary outcome (HR 0.90; 95%CI, 0.09-9.02), death, MI, or any revascularization (HR 0.89; 95%CI, 0.48-1.67) after adjustment for the propensity score.. Three-month dual antiplatelet therapy seems to be feasible after ZES implantation in relatively low-risk patients.

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Aspirin; Cardiovascular Agents; Chi-Square Distribution; Clopidogrel; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Stenosis; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Eluting Stents; Feasibility Studies; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Propensity Score; Proportional Hazards Models; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Registries; Republic of Korea; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Ticlopidine; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

The absolute benefit of drug-eluting stents (DES) in low-risk patients and lesions is not well established.. The long term clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention in a single coronary artery disease may not be affected by the type of stent.. This study assessed and compared 2-year clinical outcomes of 304 consecutive patients (147 BMS patients and 157 DES patients) treated with a single coronary stent (4.0 mm) for single de novo large coronary artery disease in 3 referral cardiac centers. The primary outcome was a composite of major adverse cardiac events at 2 years after the index procedure.. The reference vessel diameter was similar in both groups (3.92 ± 0.29 mm in BMS vs 3.95 ± 0.24 mm in DES, P = 0.50). Late loss was larger in the BMS group (1.04 ± 0.83 mm vs 0.73 ± 0.91 mm in DES, P = 0.03). The incidence of major adverse cardiac events at the 2-year clinical follow-up was very low, 24 of 304 patients (7.9%), regardless of stent type deployed (7.5% in BMS vs 8.3% in DES, P = 0.83). The rate of target vessel revascularization was also similar in both groups (4.8% in BMS vs 5.7% in DES, P = 0.80).. Two-year clinical outcomes after PCI with a single large coronary stent (4.0 mm) were excellent. The clinical outcomes were not affected by the type of stent used.

Topics: Coronary Angiography; Coronary Stenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Paclitaxel; Postoperative Period; Prosthesis Design; Retrospective Studies; Severity of Illness Index; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Tubulin Modulators

We report here the final 5-year follow-up results from the ENDEAVOR II trial, which was the first randomised trial evaluating the Endeavor(tm) zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) compared with a bare metal stent (BMS) in patients with single, de novo coronary artery lesions.. Eligible patients were randomised 1:1 to receive ZES or BMS and were followed by telephone or clinic visit up to five years. We evaluated TVF and its components (target vessel revascularisation [TVR], Q-wave or non Q-wave myocardial infarction, or cardiac death attributed to the target vessel) at five years. Additionally, we report rates of MACE, TLR, and stent thrombosis (protocol- and ARC-defined) through five years. ENDEAVOR II enrolled 1,197 patients (598 ZES, 599 BMS). At five years of follow-up, the rates of TVF (15.4% vs 24.4%), TVR (10.7% vs 20.1%), MACE (15.4% vs 24.6%), and TLR (7.5% vs 16.3%) remained significantly lower in ZES patients compared with BMS patients. ARC definite and probable very late (>1 year) stent thrombosis remained low (0.2% ZES and 0.3% BMS) through five years.. After five years of follow-up, ZES demonstrated significantly improved clinical outcomes with sustained safety compared with BMS in patients with obstructive coronary artery disease.

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cardiovascular Agents; Cell Proliferation; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Occlusion; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Humans; Male; Microvessels; Middle Aged; Prosthesis Design; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Stenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Predictive Value of Tests; Prosthesis Design; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Sex Factors; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

The introduction of the drug-eluting stent (DES) has revolutionized the field of interventional cardiology during the past decade. Initial pivotal randomized clinical trials showed a large reduction in restenosis rates and the need for repeat intervention with DES compared with bare-metal stents. The three main components of a DES are 1) the stent platform, 2) a coating facilitating elution of the drug (mostly a polymer), and 3) a antiproliferative/anti-inflammatory drug. Currently, two classes of drugs are widely used in DES, Taxanes, including its best-known member Paclitaxel, and Rapamycins, which include Sirolimus and its analogues such as Everolimus, Zotarolimus and Biolimus A9. The first DES to receive United States Food and Drug Administration approval was the Sirolimus-eluting stent. Recently, two other stent types eluting a Sirolimus-analogue were approved; the Zotarolimus-eluting stent and the Everolimus-eluting stent. Biolimus A9-eluting stents, using biodegradable polymers, are currently approved and marketed outside of the United States. This review article focusses on the clinical studies that have been performed with DES eluting Sirolimus or its analogues.

Topics: Constriction, Pathologic; Everolimus; Humans; Sirolimus; Stents

This study sought to evaluate the long-term safety of the zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) using a pooled analysis of pivotal trials.. Drug-eluting stents, compared with bare-metal stents (BMS), have reduced restenosis; however, individual trials of these stents have not had sufficient power to ascertain long-term safety.. We combined patient level data from 6 prospective randomized single-arm multicenter trials involving 2,132 patients treated with ZES and 596 patients treated with a BMS control. The median follow-up was 4.1 years, with 5-year follow-up completed in 1,256 patients (97% of those eligible). The recommended minimum duration of dual antiplatelet therapy in these studies was 3 to 6 months regardless of stent type. An independent events committee adjudicated all events. The 2 treatment groups were compared after adjustment for between trial variation and for individual patient clinical and angiographic characteristics by propensity score.. The cumulative incidence of adverse events at 5 years for ZES and BMS were: death: 5.9% versus 7.6% (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.81, p = 0.34), cardiac death: 2.4 versus 3.7% (0.83, p = 0.57), myocardial infarction: 3.4 versus 4.8% (0.77, p = 0.37), target lesion revascularization: 7.0% vs. 16.5% (0.42, p < 0.001), stent thrombosis (definite or probable): 0.8 versus 1.7% (0.50, p = 0.21). After adjustment for variation in study and patient characteristics, there were no significant differences in stent thrombosis or the clinical safety event rates at 5 years between ZES and BMS.. Over 5 years, there was no increased risk of death, myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis, and there was a benefit of prevention of repeat revascularization procedures in ZES compared with BMS.

Topics: Confidence Intervals; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Proportional Hazards Models; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sirolimus; Statistics, Nonparametric; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United States

Despite the undeniable contribution of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) to assess drug-eluting stent (DES) effectiveness, the way these image modalities correlate to each other and to target-lesion revascularization (TLR) after PCI, is yet to be established. Thus we sought to evaluate whether there is an acceptable correlation between QCA and IVUS after DES implantation. We analyzed 204 pts treated with DES: Zotarolimus- (126), Sirolimus- (57), and Biolimus (31) with baseline and follow-up QCA and IVUS. The correlation between QCA lumen loss (LL) and intimal hyperplasia (IH) volume obstruction by IVUS was assessed by multiple regression analysis. Two QCA parameters (in-segment diameter stenosis and in-segment LL) and one IVUS variable (in-stent volume of IH) were evaluated as quantitative surrogates of 6 month TLR. The receiver operating characteristic method with c-statistics was used to assess the ability of each surrogate endpoint to predict TLR. QCA LL correlated positively with IVUS IH volume of obstruction (r = 0.69; CI95% 0.61-0.75: P < 0.0001), independent of DES type. The 2 QCA parameters were superior to the IVUS parameter as surrogates for TLR. Of note, QCA LL (c = 0.99) correlated best with TLR, even better than percent DS. In the DES era there is a good correlation between QCA measured LL and IVUS IH volume and therefore can be used as a surrogate of DES efficacy.

Topics: Coronary Angiography; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Regression Analysis; ROC Curve; Sirolimus; Ultrasonography, Interventional

To evaluate the long-term follow-up of drug-eluting stents (DES) in the treatment of unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA).. One hundred and forty-eight patients (mean age 71 +/- 10 years) with ULMCA stenoses underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with DES. Mean ejection fraction (EF) was 63 +/- 13% and distal ULMCA was involved in 63.5% of cases. In-hospital outcome showed one intra-procedural death, no stent thrombosis and 2% non Q-wave myocardial infarction (MI). Clinical follow-up was available in all patients (874 +/- 382 days): 10.1% of them had died, 8.8% had target lesion revascularisation (TLR) and 4.1% experienced MI. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) occurred in 20.3%. Mortality predictors were EF < or = 55% (OR 3.6, 95%-C.I. 1.3-10.1, p = 0.016) and EuroSCORE > or = 6 (OR 3.9, 95%-CI 1.1-14.1, p = 0.037). TLR predictors were distal lesion (OR 8.5, 95%-CI 1.1-15, p = 0.041) and age < 64 years (OR 3.1, 95%-CI 1-9, p = 0.042). MACE predictor was EF < or = 55% (OR 2.4, 95%-CI 1.1-5.2, p = 0.027).. ULMCA stenting with DES is safe, with favourable in-hospital outcome. Long-term results are acceptable with a mortality rate of 10%, a TLR rate of 9%, and a MACE rate of 20%. Low EF and high EuroSCORE predict mortality, while younger age and distal lesions predict TLR. Low EF also predicts MACE.

Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cardiovascular Agents; Cardiovascular Diseases; Coronary Stenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Follow-Up Studies; Hospital Mortality; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Middle Aged; Odds Ratio; Paclitaxel; Proportional Hazards Models; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Stroke Volume; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Predictive Value of Tests; Sirolimus; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Treatment Outcome

Our aim was to evaluate restenosis rate of drug-eluting stents (DES) in patients with and without diabetes mellitus (DM) in a real-world setting.. DES seem less effective in patients with DM.. The SCAAR (Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry) includes all patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in Sweden. From April 1, 2004, to April 20, 2008, all restenoses detected at a subsequent angiography and all DES types implanted at more than 500 occasions were assessed using Cox regression.. Four DES types qualified for inclusion. In total, 35,478 DES were implanted at 22,962 procedures in 19,004 patients and 1,807 restenoses were reported over a mean 29 months follow-up. In the entire population, the restenosis rate per stent was 3.5% after 1 year and 4.9% after 2 years. The adjusted risk of restenosis was higher in patients with DM compared with that in patients without DM (relative risk [RR]: 1.23, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.10 to 1.37). In patients with DM, restenosis was twice as frequent with the zotarolimus-eluting Endeavor stent (Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota) compared with that in the other DES types. The Endeavor stent and the sirolimus-eluting Cypher stent (Cordis, Johnson & Johnson, Miami, Florida) had higher restenosis rates in patients with DM compared with those in patients without DM (RR: 1.77, 95% CI: 1.29 to 2.43 and RR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.04 to 1.51). Restenosis rate with the paclitaxel-eluting Taxus Express and Liberté (Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts) stents was unrelated to DM. Mortality did not differ between different DES.. Restenosis rate with DES was higher in patients with DM compared with that in patients without DM. There seem to be important differences between different brands of DES.

Topics: Aged; Case-Control Studies; Confidence Intervals; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Databases as Topic; Diabetes Complications; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Paclitaxel; Proportional Hazards Models; Registries; Risk; Sirolimus; Sweden; Tubulin Modulators

Identification and characterization of unknown zotarolimus impurities on zotarolimus-coated drug-eluting stents is an important aspect of product development since the presence of impurities can have a significant impact on quality and safety of the drug product. Four zotarolimus degradation products have been characterized by LC/UV/PDA, LC/MS, LC/MS/MS and NMR techniques in this work. Zotarolimus drug substance and zotarolimus-coated stents were subjected to degradation under heat, humidity, acid or base conditions. The HPLC separation was achieved on a Zorbax Eclipse XDB-C8 column using gradient elution and UV detection at 278 nm. All four impurities generated through the degradation were initially analyzed by LC/MS and/or LC/MS/MS for structural information. Then the isolation of these degradants was carried out by semi-preparative HPLC method followed by freeze-drying of the collected fractions. Finally the degradants were studied by 1H and 13C NMR spectrometry. Based on LC/MS, 1H NMR and 13C NMR data, the structures of these impurities were proposed and characterized as zotarolimus ring-opened isomer (1), zotarolimus hydrolysis product, 16-O-desmethyl ring-opened isomer (2) and zotarolimus lower fragment (3). Degradants 1, 2 and 3 have been observed on degraded zotarolimus-coated stent products.

Topics: Chemistry, Pharmaceutical; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Drug Stability; Drug-Eluting Stents; Hot Temperature; Humidity; Hydrolysis; Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy; Models, Chemical; Molecular Conformation; Oxygen; Pyrans; Sirolimus; Spectrophotometry, Ultraviolet

Drug-eluting stents (DES) have become routine therapy in clinical practice because restenosis is significantly reduced in patients treated with these devices. New generations of DES bearing newer antiproliferative drugs have been developed. Sirolimus was the first antiproliferative drug eluted by a DES (SES) while zotarolimus represents a sirolimus-derived, newer antiproliferative drug borne by a different kind of DES (ZES). This report describes two cases of different vascular response to concurrent side by side implantation of SES and ZES in the same vessel and highlights significant early restenosis of ZES as compared with SES.

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prosthesis Design; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

The aim of this study was to investigate the angiographic and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) findings of the Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) in patients from a "real-world" clinical practice.. From January to March 2006, 100 patients undergoing routine or emergency percutaneous intervention were prospectively enrolled at one institution. Overall, 39% of the patients were diabetics and 80.8% of lesions were type B2/C. A total of 140 lesions were successfully treated with 174 ZES, and procedural success was 98%. Mean vessel diameter was 2.69 mm and mean lesion length was 16.0 mm; at 6-month angiographic follow-up (completed in 96%), in-stent late lumen loss was 0.66 mm, and in-segment restenosis was 8.2%. Angiographic restenosis was increased among diabetics (15.5 vs. 2.6%, p=0.009), and diabetes was the only significant predictor of angiographic restenosis (OR=15.27 [95%CI 2.45-95.04], p=0.003). By IVUS (performed in 88% at 6-month), % volume obstruction was 14.4+/-13.4%, and there was no late acquired incomplete stent apposition (ISA). At 1-year, overall MACE rate was 6%, including 5 TLRs (4% of patients), with no occurrence of stent thrombosis.. In this prospective "real-world" experience, the ZES demonstrated favourable angiographic and IVUS results in complex patients, with overall in-stent late lumen loss of 0.66 mm, and absence of late acquired ISA. At 1-year, there were no safety concerns including absence of death and stent thrombosis.

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Registries; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography, Interventional

There is limited information regarding the angiographic and clinical outcomes among the different drug-eluting stents (DESs) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).. A total 355 consecutive AMI patients who underwent PCI with a sirolimus- (SES, n=116) or paclitaxel- (PES, n=153) or zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES, n=86) were enrolled. The 6-month angiographic and 1-year clinical outcomes were compared among the 3 groups. At 6 months, there was a trend toward a higher incidence of binary restenosis in the PES group (SES: 8.6%, PES: 19.8%, ZES: 8.3%, P=0.052). Percentage of restenosis was higher in the PES group compared with SES, but was similar to ZES (SES: 18.75 +/-18.16%, PES: 29.32 +/-24.16%, ZES: 23.91 +/-17.03%, P=0.006). Late loss was lower in the SES group compared with PES and ZES (SES: 0.44 +/-0.52, PES: 0.83 +/-0.87, ZES: 0.75 +/-0.63, P<0.001). However, clinical outcomes, including mortality, MI, repeat PCI and major adverse cardiac events, were not different among the 3 groups.. The angiographic benefit of SES did not translate into a clinical benefit for up to 1 year in AMI patients.

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Odds Ratio; Paclitaxel; Prosthesis Design; Registries; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Severity of Illness Index; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Stenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Humans; Hyperplasia; Myocardial Infarction; Prosthesis Design; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cardiovascular Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Coronary Stenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Humans; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Myocardial Infarction; Patient Selection; Prosthesis Design; Risk Assessment; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

To characterize in-stent restenosis after the implantation of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES), paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES), tacrolimus-eluting stents (TES), and zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES), 25 patients treated with drug-eluting stents (DES; 9 PES, 10 SES, 4 TES, and 2 ZES) and 19 with bare-metal stents (BMS) underwent directional coronary atherectomy for in-stent restenosis 4 to 36 months after implantation. Restenosis after DES implantation was more frequently focal and associated with smaller specimens compared to that after BMS implantation. Light and confocal microscopy were used. Histologic features were similar in DES and BMS. In-stent restenotic lesions were composed mainly of neointima containing proteoglycan-rich smooth muscle cells and fibrolipidic regions. Small inflammatory infiltrates were observed, mostly in patients with unstable angina; CD18- and/or CD3(+) cells were detected in patients with BMS and DES. Different smooth muscle cell phenotypes were observed: synthetic was more frequent with BMS and PES, intermediate with ZES, contractile or intermediate with SES, and contractile with TES. The mean proliferation index was low and comparable among stent types; cyclins B1 and D1 were expressed in all DES. In conclusion, intra-DES and intra-BMS restenotic tissue was composed mainly of smooth muscle cells with different phenotypes, proliferating at a low rate. The different smooth muscle cell phenotypes within the stent types might suggest different mechanisms of restenosis.

Topics: Aged; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Muscle, Smooth, Vascular; Paclitaxel; Sirolimus; Tacrolimus; Treatment Outcome

Myocardial infarction (MI) after drug-eluting stent placement has been associated with an unfavorable late prognosis. Although the etiology of periprocedural MI is multifactorial, sidebranch occlusion may be an important contributing factor. We sought to identify the incidence of sidebranch occlusion during zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) and paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) placement and to relate sidebranch occlusion to the occurrence of periprocedural MI.. Angiograms were reviewed from patients randomly assigned to treatment with a ZES (597 patients; 943 sidebranches) or a PES (619 patients; 977 sidebranches). Sidebranch occlusion was defined as Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction flow grade 0 or 1. Sidebranch occlusion was correlated with frequency of MI, as assessed by the creatine phosphokinase MB isoenzyme. Sidebranch occlusion occurred less often after the first stent deployment in patients treated with ZES (2.2%) than in patients treated with PES (4.0%; P=0.032). A similar reduction in the frequency of sidebranch occlusion at any point during the procedure was found in patients treated with ZES (2.9% versus 4.8% in PES patients; P=0.042). Multivariable predictors of sidebranch occlusion included baseline sidebranch stenosis, complex lesion morphology, smaller baseline minimal lumen diameters, and the use of a PES. Of the 20 patients with MI within 30 days of the procedure, 30% had evidence of sidebranch occlusion during the stent procedure.. Patients treated with ZES were less likely to develop sidebranch occlusion during stent placement than patients treated with PES. Less frequent sidebranch occlusion with ZES may have contributed to the lower frequency rates of periprocedural MI in this study.

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Biomarkers; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Occlusion; Creatine Kinase, MB Form; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Myocardial Infarction; Myocardium; Necrosis; Paclitaxel; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Drug-eluting stents were developed and approved for the reduction of in-stent restenosis. However, restenosis still occurs, and stent fracture is suggested as a cause of restenosis after implantation. Although sirolimus-eluting stents are considered to carry a high risk of fracture, the risk is also present with other drug-eluting stents. Herein, we report the case of a 78-year-old woman who received a zotarolimus-eluting stent for a bifurcation lesion of the left anterior descending coronary artery. Ten months later, she underwent coronary angiography due to angina. The angiogram revealed in-stent restenosis, with a grade IV stent fracture. After percutaneous coronary angioplasty, the patient's clinical symptoms improved.

Topics: Aged; Angina Pectoris; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Prosthesis Failure; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Aged; Coated Materials, Biocompatible; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Stenosis; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Prosthesis Failure; Sirolimus; Stents; Time Factors

The purpose of this study was to assess trends in endothelial coverage and recovery among leading polymer-based drug-eluting stents (DES).. Autopsy studies of human U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved DES implanted coronary arteries suggest that complications of late stent thrombosis are associated with incomplete endothelial coverage of struts.. Rabbits received sirolimus-eluting stents (SES), paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES), zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES), and everolimus-eluting stents (EES) for 14 or 28 days along with MULTI-LINK (ML) Vision control stents. Endothelial coverage above and between struts was measured by morphometric analysis of images acquired through en face scanning electron microscopy. Dual fluorescent immunolabeling was performed for platelet-endothelial cell adhesion molecule (PECAM)-1 and thrombomodulin (TM), factors involved in cell-to-cell contact and thrombogenicity, respectively. In a separate analysis, the endothelial mitogen, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), was also assessed.. Varying rates of endothelialization among comparator DES were most notable at 14 days, where coverage above struts remained poor in SES, PES, and ZES (or=70%), whereas no significant differences were observed at 28 days. Select DES with poor endothelialization showed a further reduced expression of PECAM-1. All DES showed an absence or weak expression of the antithrombotic cofactor TM. Incomplete endothelialization in select DES was further associated with increased VEGF secretion and messenger ribonucleic acid levels at 14 days, providing evidence of a transitional healing surface.. The present study marks the first comparator analysis of endothelial coverage in leading polymeric DES, supporting disparities in arterial healing based on endothelial regrowth and recovery, favoring newer designs over the current generation of FDA-approved stents.

Topics: Animals; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Endothelium, Vascular; Everolimus; Microscopy, Electron, Scanning; Models, Animal; Paclitaxel; Platelet Endothelial Cell Adhesion Molecule-1; Polymerase Chain Reaction; Polymers; Rabbits; RNA, Messenger; Sirolimus; Thrombomodulin; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

Drug-eluting stents (DES) have been demonstrated to dramatically reduce the rate of in-stent restenosis (ISR). However, some studies found an increased rate of late incomplete stent apposition (ISA) and late stent thrombosis (ST) in DES compared to traditional bare-metal stents (BMS). Endeavor stent, a new cobalt-alloy DES coated with phosphorylcholine and zotarolimus, has been reported to have a very favorable safety profile with few documented late-acquired ISA and late ST. In the present report, we described an interesting case with coexistent ISR, late ISA and mural thrombus in an Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent 8 months after primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Heart Diseases; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Myocardial Infarction; Prosthesis Failure; Reoperation; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Ultrasonography, Interventional

Treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR) is a challenging clinical problem. Recent studies have verified the safety and efficacy of first-generation DES for the treatment of ISR. The safety and effectiveness of new-generation drug-eluting stents (nDES) for ISR has not been previously investigated. The aim of the present study was to prospectively evaluate the clinical outcomes after treatment with nDES implantation in patients with bare metal stent (BMS) ISR.. Consecutive patients with ISR after BMS implantation were included. Primary end-point was a major adverse cardiac event (MACE), defined as death, myocardial infarction (MI), or target vessel revascularization (TVR). The incidence of stent thrombosis was also evaluated.. A total of 46 consecutive patients were enrolled for the treatment of ISR, 23 patients from ZES and 23 from EES group. There were two (8.7%) cases of TVR in ZES cohort due to proliferative ISR at 6 and 7 months after DES implantation, and none in EES. One (4.3%) patient underwent percutaneous coronary intervention and the other (4.3%) was treated surgically. Neither acute nor subacute thrombosis was observed during the 13.3+/-6.3 months follow-up period. In all other patients, stress test was negative for ischemia at 6 months.. In this prospective study, we showed that direct nDES implantation is highly effective for ISR and seems to be a promising management for the treatment of ISR.

Topics: Aged; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Exercise Test; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Ischemia; Male; Middle Aged; Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care; Prospective Studies; Sirolimus; Stents; Treatment Outcome

To investigate the clinical outcomes in patients with ST segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with drug eluting stents (DES) versus a matched control group of patients with STEMI treated with bare metal stents (BMS).. This registry included 122 patients with STEMI undergoing primary coronary angioplasty with DES implantation at our institution. The control group consisted of 506 patients implanted with BMS, who were matched for age, infarct location, and diabetic status. The incidences of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) including target vessel/lesion revascularization (TVR/TLR) and stent thrombosis were assessed up to 12 months.. Twelve months follow up showed a non-significant trend towards reduced deaths (3.3% versus 7.1%, P=0.1), significantly reduced recurrent MI (0.0% versus 6.1%, P=0.02), TVR (5.7% versus 15.2%, P=0.006) and TLR (2.5% versus 14.0%, P=0.004) events in the DES group as compared to BMS group. The composite incidences of MACE at 12 months follow-up was lower in the DES group (11.5%) as compared to the BMS group (21.3%, P=0.01).. According to our experiences, the use of DES in STEMI is safe and effective as compared to BMS. DES was effective in reducing the incidence of restenosis outcomes and overall adverse cardiac events up to 12 months.

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Paclitaxel; Registries; Retrospective Studies; Sirolimus; Stents

Drug-eluting stent (DES) therapy reduces restenosis in patients with diabetes when compared with bare metal stent implantation. There are significant differences between commercially available DES platforms both in terms of design characteristics and clinical outcomes. Randomized active-comparator inter-DES trials powered for clinical endpoints are unlikely to be performed in patients with diabetes, however, direct comparison randomized trials utilizing surrogate endpoints support a superior anti-restenotic efficacy with sirolimus- versus paclitaxel-eluting stents. Thrombotic stent occlusion may be higher in patients with diabetes compared with nondiabetic patients, though there is no clear signal of a safety differential between the two platforms. Insufficient data on comparative performance in diabetics exist in relation to the approved zotarolimus-eluting and everolimus-eluting stent platforms. If all other factors are equal, then there seems to be no reason why the diabetic patient should not receive treatment with the sirolimus-eluting stent, which appears to have superior antirestenotic efficacy in this patient group.

Topics: Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Stenosis; Diabetes Complications; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Evidence-Based Medicine; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Metals; Paclitaxel; Patient Selection; Prosthesis Design; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Registries; Risk Assessment; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome

Implantation of a paclitaxel- or sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) may be associated with endothelial dysfunction. In the present study, we compared coronary endothelial function after zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) implantation to that after SES implantation. Patients who had one stent implantation for a single lesion in the left anterior descending artery were enrolled. After 6 to 9 months, coronary endothelial function was assessed in patients who showed no angiographic restenosis. Endothelium-dependent vasomotion was determined after intracoronary infusion of acetylcholine. Also, endothelium-independent vasomotion was assessed after nitrate infusion. A total of 23 patients (11 in the ZES group, 12 in the SES group) were included. In distal and far distal segments, the SES group showed significant vasoconstriction by acetylcholine. However, no significant vasomotion was observed in the ZES group (SES versus ZES: -36.1% versus -3.3% for distal; P = 0.003, -34.7% versus -3.4% for far distal; P = 0.003). Endothelium-independent vasodilatation by nitrates was preserved in all subjects. SES implantation may induce significant impairment of the endothelium-dependent vasomotor function in the distal portion of the treated vessel, while ZES implantation may not. Our results suggest that the change in coronary endothelial function after stent implantation could be different according to the type of DES.

Topics: Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Endothelium, Vascular; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Sirolimus; Vasomotor System

Zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZESs) have been shown to be safe and effective in randomised trials. We sought to report the clinical outcomes after implantation of ZES in real-world clinical practice.. ZES have been approved for clinical use in Singapore since April 2005. Until December 31, 2007, a total of 219 patients had undergone implantation of ZES. After excluding 11 foreign patients with whom contact was lost, 208 patients (246 lesions, 305 stents) formed the study cohort. A high-proportion of diabetic patients (n=90, 43.3%) was included. Recommended dual antiplatelet therapy was at least 3 months (n=147) for patients treated before or 12 months (n=61) after January 2007. As of January 2008, the median follow-up duration was 19 months (range: 1 to 33 months). There were 10 (4.8%) deaths, including 7 (3.4%) cardiac deaths. Myocardial infarction occurred in 11 (5.3%) patients. The numbers of patients requiring target vessel revascularisation and target lesion revascularisation were 10 (4.8%) and 5 (2.4%) respectively. Using the ARC definition, there were two cases of definite stent thrombosis on days 7 and 17, and one case of probable stent thrombosis on day 15.. In this real-world clinical experience, ZES was associated with a low incidence of adverse cardiac events at a medium follow-up of one and half years.

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Thrombosis; Death, Sudden, Cardiac; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Incidence; Inpatients; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Retrospective Studies; Sirolimus

Topics: Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Stenosis; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Humans; Paclitaxel; Prosthesis Design; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Research Design; Risk Assessment; Severity of Illness Index; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

There is evidence that endothelial coverage of drug-eluting stents might be delayed or absent, a risk factor for late thrombotic events. We studied the effects of different drug-polymer-device iterations on endothelium-dependent coronary vasomotion. Systemic markers of endothelial inflammation were correlated with coronary vasomotor changes.. Patients with paclitaxel-eluting stents (n=11), sirolimus-eluting stents (n=21), biolimus A9-eluting stents (n=28), zotarolimus-eluting stents (n=10), and bare-metal stents (n=13) were studied 10, 9, 9, 9, and 12 months after implantation, respectively. Endothelium-dependent coronary vasomotion was tested proximally and distally to the stent and at a reference vessel segment during atrial pacing at increasing heart rates by quantitative coronary angiography. Indexes of platelet-monocyte binding and other biomarkers were studied in a subgroup of 19 patients. The baseline characteristics and hemodynamics of the patients in the different stent groups were comparable. Significant differences were observed across the 5 stent groups, concerning the vasomotion of segments proximal (P=0.006) and distal (P=0.003) to the stent. Normal vasomotion (vasodilatation) was maintained in the biolimus A9-eluting stent, zotarolimus-eluting stent, and bare-metal stent groups, whereas vasoconstriction was observed in the sirolimus-eluting stent and paclitaxel-eluting stent groups. Platelet-monocyte binding in whole blood showed a significant inverse correlation with vasomotion in reference but not in segments adjacent to the stent (r=-0.57; P=0.01).. Paclitaxel-eluting stents and sirolimus-eluting stents seem to cause endothelial dysfunction of the implanted vessel, whereas biolimus A9-eluting stents and zotarolimus-eluting stents behave more closely to bare-metal stents, with preserved endothelial vasomotor response. Coronary vasoconstriction was not associated with detectable systemic endothelial activation.

Topics: Blood Platelets; Cardiovascular Agents; Cell Aggregation; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Endothelium, Vascular; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Monocytes; P-Selectin; Paclitaxel; Sirolimus; Vasoconstriction; Vasodilation

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Automation; Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation; Chest Wall Oscillation; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Stenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Risk Assessment; Severity of Illness Index; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography, Doppler

Drug-eluting stents have proven superior to bare metal stents with lower restenosis rates. Local delivery of drugs from these stents is achieved in most cases with the help of biostable polymer coatings. However, since the polymer coating remains in the body well after all the drug is released, patients can potentially develop hypersensitivity to these polymers--leading to complications such as late-stent thrombosis. It is therefore important that the polymers are designed to be biocompatible and well tolerated by the body. The polymer coatings are also expected to be robust and provide good control over elution of the desired drug. This paper describes the development of a unique, proprietary polymer blend system, specially designed to meet these requirements. Mutually compatible, free-radical-initiated elastomeric polymers were designed to provide a robust coating and offer a steady, sustained release of the highly hydrophobic drug zotarolimus over an extended period. The polymer blend system is also well tolerated by the hydrophilic environment in vivo, as demonstrated through porcine studies.

Topics: Animals; Biocompatible Materials; Drug Delivery Systems; Drug-Eluting Stents; Materials Testing; Polymers; Sirolimus; Spectrum Analysis, Raman; Swine; Transition Temperature

Topics: Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug-Eluting Stents; Heart Diseases; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration

Topics: Adult; Anticoagulants; Coronary Angiography; Drug Delivery Systems; Echocardiography; Female; Humans; Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic; Metals; Myocardial Infarction; Patient Compliance; Sirolimus; Stents

During stent development, accurate monitoring of the drug concentration in animal tissues can provide critical information on how the drug is released into the circulation and the surrounding tissues. To establish the relationship between the drug concentration and the distance from the stent to the target tissue, a comprehensive strategy was developed for sample collection, sample homogenization and sample storage as well as sample analysis. This strategy was developed with the analytical chemists and animal surgical specialists working together as a team. The optimized sampling process was designed to yield a representative sample, appropriately located and of an appropriate size. The sampling process was also designed to eliminate the potential for carryover and cross-contamination. During sample processing, the analyte solution was spiked into blank tissues using a sharp needle and a gas-tight syringe to prepare tissue quality control samples. These tissue quality controls were then used to evaluate the stability of the drug in solid tissue and homogenate, the homogenization carryover, the cross-contamination and the recovery of the drug during method validation and to monitor the overall process of drug analysis of the swine tissues. This thorough strategy has been applied to the accurate determination of zotarolimus in swine tissues for regulated toxicology studies. The entire process was controlled, including precise tissue sampling, compound-based tissue homogenization, method validation, and the application of the method to regulated toxicokinetics studies. The results demonstrate that analytical chemistry concepts can be successfully integrated into toxicokinetics studies in order to collect precise samples and obtain meaningful results. The strategy can be applied to similar toxicokinetics studies of locally administrated drugs in tissues.

Topics: Animals; Chromatography, Liquid; Immunosuppressive Agents; Quality Control; Reproducibility of Results; Sensitivity and Specificity; Sirolimus; Stents; Swine; Tandem Mass Spectrometry

Topics: Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Stenosis; Drug Delivery Systems; France; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sirolimus; Stents; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Coronary Restenosis; Everolimus; Humans; Paclitaxel; Patient Selection; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prosthesis Design; Risk Assessment; Sirolimus; Stents; Thrombosis

Sirolimus (rapamycin) is an immunosuppressant used in preventing allograft rejection and in drug-eluting stents to prevent restenosis after angioplasty. Zotarolimus, an analogue of sirolimus, was designed to have a shorter in vivo half-life. Zotarolimus was found to be mechanistically similar to sirolimus in having high-affinity binding to the immunophilin FKBP12 and comparable potency for inhibiting in vitro proliferation of both human and rat T cells. Rat pharmacokinetic studies with intravenous dosing demonstrated terminal elimination half-lives of 9.4 hours and 14.0 hours for zotarolimus and sirolimus, respectively. Given orally, T1/2 values were 7.9 hours and 33.4 hours, respectively. Consistent with its shorter duration, zotarolimus showed a corresponding and statistically significant 4-fold reduction in potency for systemic immunosuppression in 3 rat disease models. Pharmacokinetic studies in cynomolgus monkey underpredicted the half-life difference between zotarolimus and sirolimus apparent from recent clinical data. In vitro inhibition of human coronary artery smooth muscle cell proliferation by zotarolimus was comparable to sirolimus. Drug-eluting stents for local delivery of zotarolimus to the vessel wall of coronary arteries are in clinical development. The pharmacological profile of zotarolimus suggests it may be advantageous for preventing restenosis with a reduced potential for causing systemic immunosuppression or other side effects.

Topics: Animals; Animals, Newborn; Binding, Competitive; Cell Proliferation; Coronary Vessels; Disease Models, Animal; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Hypersensitivity; Encephalomyelitis, Autoimmune, Experimental; Graft Rejection; Half-Life; Heart Transplantation; Humans; Hypersensitivity, Delayed; Immunosuppressive Agents; Inhibitory Concentration 50; Lymphocyte Culture Test, Mixed; Male; Myocytes, Smooth Muscle; Rats; Rats, Inbred BN; Rats, Inbred Lew; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Sirolimus; T-Lymphocytes; Tacrolimus Binding Protein 1A

Vascular response at edges of drug-eluting stents is still not well established, particularly in diabetic patients who are prone to aggressive atherosclerosis progression. Recently, Biolimus and Zotarolimus have demonstrated potent antiproliferative effects.. To compare the vascular responses at edges of sirolimus analogous-eluting stents in patients with and without diabetes, using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS).. 306 edges were analyzed in 153 patients treated with drug-eluting stents and divided in: diabetics (122 edges) and nondiabetics (166 edges). IVUS was performed postintervention and at 6-month follow-up and included 5 mm distal and proximal to the stented segment. Vessel, lumen, and plaque volumes were calculated. Volume variation (follow-up minus basal) was also calculated. Edge restenosis was defined as obstruction >50%.. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. In both groups the entire lesion length was covered (stent length/lesion length ratio was 1.5 for both groups). There were no differences in edge volumes and restenosis rate between the groups. Among diabetics, there was no significant volume variation. However, in nondiabetic patients there was significant increase in vessel volume in proximal (from 67.1 +/- 22 mm(3) to 72.2 +/- 25 mm(3): P = 0.02) and distal (from 54.4 +/- 22 mm(3) to 59.8 +/- 22 mm(3): P = 0.001) edges.. Nondiabetic patients showed a significant positive vascular remodeling in proximal and distal edges of sirolimus analogous-eluting stent. This vascular mechanism was not observed in diabetic patients. Although different vascular responses were observed, restenosis rates were equivalent between the 2 groups at 6-month follow-up.

Topics: Aged; Cardiovascular Agents; Case-Control Studies; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Stenosis; Diabetic Angiopathies; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prosthesis Design; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography, Interventional

Sirolimus, an effective immunosuppressive agent, is used for drug eluting stents. During stent development, an analytical method for the determination of sirolimus in tissue needs to be established. Normally, tissue samples are homogenized and then analyzed against the calibration standards prepared in a tissue homogenate. This approach provides insufficient control of the homogenization process. In this paper, tissue quality control samples were introduced for the optimization of the homogenization process during method development, but also allowance for the performance evaluation of the entire analytical process. In addition, a new approach using rabbit blood as a homogenization medium was developed to stabilize sirolimus in rabbit tissue homogenates. Calibration standards and quality controls were prepared by spiking different sirolimus working solutions into rabbit blood. Homogenization quality control samples were prepared by injecting other sirolimus working solutions into empty test tubes and pre-cut arteries within pre-defined masses. A high-throughput homogenization procedure was optimized based on the specific chemical properties of sirolimus. The linear dynamic range was between 49.9 pg/mL and 31.9 ng/mL to accommodate the expected artery homogenate concentrations. Additionally, quality controls in rabbit blood were also used in the extraction to support the calibration standards. The accuracy and precision of the quality controls in rabbit blood reflect the extraction performance and the accuracy and precision of the homogenization tissue quality controls reflect the overall performance of the method. The mean bias was between -4.5 and 0.2% for all levels of quality controls in the blood and between 4.8 and 14.9% for all levels of the homogenization tissue quality controls. The CVs of all concentration levels were < or =5.3% for the quality controls in blood and < or =9.2% for the homogenization tissue quality controls. The method was successfully applied to determine the concentration of sirolimus in the rabbit arteries.

Topics: Animals; Arteries; Chemical Fractionation; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Coronary Restenosis; Drug Monitoring; Drug Stability; Drug-Eluting Stents; Quality Control; Rabbits; Reference Standards; Reproducibility of Results; Sensitivity and Specificity; Sirolimus; Specimen Handling; Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization; Tandem Mass Spectrometry; Tissue Distribution

The combination of drugs with devices, where locally delivered drugs elute from the device, has demonstrated distinct advantages over therapies involving systemic or local drugs and devices administered separately. Drug-eluting stents are most notable. Ink jet technology offers unique advantages for the coating of very small medical devices with drugs and drug-coating combinations, especially in cases where the active pharmaceutical agent is very expensive to produce and wastage is to be minimized. For medical devices such as drug-containing stents, the advantages of ink-jet technology result from the controllable and reproducible nature of the droplets in the jet stream and the ability to direct the stream to exact locations on the device surfaces. Programmed target deliveries of 100 microg drug, a typical dose for a small stent, into cuvettes gave a standard deviation (SD) of dose of 0.6 microg. Jetting on coated, uncut stent tubes exhibited 100% capture efficiency with a 1.8 microg SD for a 137 microg dose. In preliminary studies, continuous jetting on stents can yield efficiencies up to 91% and coefficients of variation as low as 2%. These results indicate that ink-jet technology may provide significant improvement in drug loading efficiency over conventional coating methods.

Topics: Animals; Blood Vessel Prosthesis; Coated Materials, Biocompatible; Computer Peripherals; Drug Implants; Equipment Design; Equipment Failure Analysis; Fenofibrate; Graft Occlusion, Vascular; Humans; Hypolipidemic Agents; Immunosuppressive Agents; Printing; Sirolimus; Stents

ABT-578, an active pharmaceutical ingredient (API), is a semi-synthetic tetrazole derivative of the fermented polyene macrolide rapamycin. Reverse phase (RP)-HPLC-UV-MS and normal phase (NP)-HPLC-UV-MS methods employing an LC/MSD trap with electrospray ionization (ESI) have been developed to track and map all significant impurities from the synthetic process. Trace-level tracking of key impurities occurring at various process points was achieved using complimentary methodologies, including a stability indicating reverse phase HPLC method capable of separating at least 25 starting materials and process-related impurities from the API (YMC-Pack Phenyl column, UV-MS, 210 nm) and a targeted reverse phase HPLC method capable of separating very polar compounds from crude reaction mixtures (Phenomenex Synergi Polar RP column, UV, 265 nm). In addition, a normal phase HPLC method condition with post-column modifier infusion is described for the separation of epimeric impurities, and analysis of aqueous-sensitive reactive species (YMC-Pack SIL column, UV-MS, 278 nm). Process control strategies were established with these combinations of analytical technologies for impurities analyses to enable a rich understanding of the ABT-578 process.

Topics: Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Drug Contamination; Molecular Structure; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Reproducibility of Results; Sirolimus; Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization; Spectrophotometry, Ultraviolet; Stereoisomerism

Topics: Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Stenosis; Diabetic Angiopathies; Drug-Eluting Stents; Humans; Prosthesis Design; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography, Interventional

C-reactive protein (CRP) is an inflammatory marker that predicts cardiac events in patients with coronary syndromes. However, data on the relationship between the CRP level and in-stent restenosis are contradictory. The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between the basal CRP level and the neointimal hyperplasia volume measured by intracoronary ultrasound 4 months after implantation of a zotarolimus-eluting stent.. The study included 40 consecutive patients who underwent zotarolimus-eluting stent implantation. Patients were divided into quartiles according to their preprocedural CRP level. Intracoronary ultrasound was performed after stent implantation and at 4 months, and the neointimal hyperplasia volume was determined using Simpson's rule. Correlation and linear regression analyses were used to evaluate the relationships between variables. Multivariate analysis was used to identify variables that were independently related to neointimal hyperplasia volume.. The patients' mean age was 58 (8) years, 55% were male, and 40% had diabetes mellitus. There was no difference in baseline characteristics between the quartiles. The hyperplasia volumes were 4.8 (4.2) microl and 15.8 (10.0) microl in the first and fourth quartiles, respectively (P< .001). There was a significant positive correlation between the CRP level and neointimal hyperplasia volume (r = 0.64, P=.0001). The CRP level, the postimplantation lumen volume, and the final deployment pressure were all independent predictors of neointimal hyperplasia.. In this study, an independent correlation was observed between the CRP level before zotarolimus-eluting stent implantation and the neointimal hyperplasia volume at 4-month follow-up.

Topics: C-Reactive Protein; Coronary Vessels; Drug Delivery Systems; Female; Humans; Hyperplasia; Imaging, Three-Dimensional; Male; Middle Aged; Sirolimus; Stents; Tunica Intima; Ultrasonography, Interventional

To compare the efficacy of drug eluting stents (DES) compared with bypass surgery (CABG) with left internal mammary artery (LIMA) in patients with single vessel disease suffering from chronic stable angina.. There are a limited number of studies investigating this group of patients.. We included 257 consecutive patients with isolated lesion in the proximal segment of left anterior descending artery (LAD). All patients suffered from chronic stable angina or from stress-induced ischemia. Of 257 patients, 147 underwent DES implantation and 110 CABG with LIMA. All patients were followed-up clinically for major adverse cardiac events.. The baseline demographic and angiographic characteristics were similar between the two groups. In the DES group we used sirolimus-, paclitaxel-, and ABT-578-eluting stents. The mean duration of hospitalization after CABG was 7.86 +/- 3.84 days vs. 1.02 +/- 0.19 days after PCI (P < 0.01). The incidence of MACE was 2.72% in the DES and 2.72% in the surgical group during a mean follow-up period of 18.71 +/- 6.27 months for PCI and 18.70 +/- 7.31 months for CABG (P = 0.99). There was one cardiac related death in the DES group and two in the surgical group (P = 0.58). There were three reinterventions in the DES group versus none in the surgical group (P = 0.26). Recurrence of angina was observed in 4.08% of pts in the DES group versus 6.36% in the CABG group (P = 0.57).. The present study demonstrated that patients suffering from chronic stable angina with isolated lesion in the proximal segment of LAD have excellent long-term outcome in both surgical and DES treatment.

Topics: Angina Pectoris; Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation; Chronic Disease; Coated Materials, Biocompatible; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Bypass; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Graft Occlusion, Vascular; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Paclitaxel; Sirolimus; Stents; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

The addition of drug elution to coronary stents plays an integral role in coronary restenosis prevention. The present study was undertaken to determine the mechanism of action and the in vitro and in vivo efficacy of zotarolimus, a new chemical entity designed specifically for elution from phosphorylcholine (PC)-coated stents, for the reduction of neointimal hyperplasia in porcine coronary arteries.. In vitro studies of Zotarolimus bound to FKBP-12 potently inhibited smooth muscle cells (SMCs) and endothelial cell (EC) proliferation. Twenty PC-only and 20 stents eluting zotarolimus 10 microg/mm were implanted in the coronary arteries of 20 domestic juvenile swine. After 28 days, zotarolimus stents exhibited less area stenosis (22.4+/-8.6 vs. 35.7+/-13%, P = 0.01), less neointimal area (1.69+/-0.55 vs. 2.78+/-1.07 mm(2), P = 0.01), less neointimal thickness (0.25+/-0.07 vs. 0.38+/-0.13 mm, P = 0.01), and greater lumen area (6.07+/-1.39 vs. 5.02+/-1.3 mm2, P = 0.01). All arteries in both the polymer-only and polymer/drug stent showed near-complete healing and minimal toxicity. Zotarolimus did not affect the extrastent segments nor alter the overall artery size (external elastic lamina cross-sectional area 9.18+/-1.19 vs. 9.06+/-1.28 mm2, P = 0.7).. Zotarolimus binds to FKBP-12 and in vitro inhibits SMC and EC proliferation. Zotarolimus applied to PC-coated stents reduces neointima in the swine coronary model after 28 days. These results suggest potentially promising human clinical application for coronary stenting with this polymer/drug combination.

Topics: Animals; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Vessels; Drug Implants; Hyperplasia; Immunosuppressive Agents; Sirolimus; Stents; Swine; Tunica Intima

Drug-eluting stents have attracted significant attention in the medical community and pharmaceutical industry due to their proven success in significantly reducing restenosis. Abbott Laboratories is developing a drug-eluting stent coated with zotarolimus and swine was recently used as an animal model for the pre-clinical study of stent implantation. In this article, we present a detailed experimental design and results for the validation and sample analysis of zotarolimus drug concentration in stented swine artery samples. Introduction of tissue quality control (QC) samples allows evaluation of the entire analytical process as well as the stability of the drug in both original tissue and homogenized tissue samples. In addition, a novel approach using 100% swine blood as the homogenization solution was developed for the consistency of the liquid-liquid extraction recovery and stability of the zotarolimus in tissue homogenates. Standards were prepared by spiking zotarolimus working solution in swine blood and tissue QC samples were used along with the artery samples during the sample analysis. The linear dynamic range of blood standard samples is from 0.61 to 333.20 ng/mL to accommodate the predicted artery homogenate concentrations. Overall tissue QC %CV during the method validation was from 4.4% to 8.6%. The overall %bias of tissue QC samples during the method validation was from -7.3% to 16.6%. The method was successfully applied for the analysis of swine artery samples. A similar approach for method validation and sample analysis has been successfully applied for the analysis of swine myocardium, kidney and liver tissue samples.

Topics: Animals; Arteries; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Drug Delivery Systems; Drug Stability; Immunosuppressive Agents; Sirolimus; Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization; Stents; Swine; Tandem Mass Spectrometry

Stent-based delivery of the antiproliferative and immunosuppressive macrocyclic lactone sirolimus reduces neointimal formation and restenosis by cytostatic inhibition of vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation. The objective of this study was to determine the feasibility and efficacy of stent-based delivery of ABT-578, a structurally unique macrocyclic lactone. Stainless steel balloon-expandable stents were coated with thin layer of phosphorylcholine (PC) or PC with ABT-578 (10 microg/mm). Fifteen juvenile domestic pigs underwent placement of oversized bare metal (n = 15), PC (n = 8), and PC with ABT-578 (n = 9) stents in the coronary arteries. At 28 days, histology demonstrated similar mean injury scores for the control, PC-, and ABT-578-coated stents. The mean neointimal area (mm2) was significantly reduced for ABT-578 (1.70 +/- 0.47) as compared with PC (2.82 +/- 1.24) and control (2.89 +/- 1.91) stents (P < or = 0.05). The 40% reduction in neointimal area resulted in significantly less mean percent diameter stenosis for ABT-578 (19.4% +/- 4.0%) as compared with PC (30.3 +/- 12.1 %) and control (29.4% +/- 15.5%) stents (P < or = 0.03). Twelve of the 45 bare metal stent cross-sections (26.7%) exhibited a giant cell reaction, while none of the sections from the ABT-578-eluting stents had a giant cell reaction (P = 0.004). Stent-based delivery of ABT-578 via a PC surface coating inhibits neointimal formation at 28 days in the porcine coronary model. Further study is necessary to determine the dose-response and long-term effects ABT-578-eluting stents in the porcine coronary model.

Topics: Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Animals; Coated Materials, Biocompatible; Coronary Vessels; Disease Models, Animal; Feasibility Studies; Graft Occlusion, Vascular; Immunosuppressive Agents; Phosphorylcholine; Sirolimus; Stents; Swine; Treatment Outcome; Tunica Intima

We report here a specific, automated LC/LC-MS/MS assay for the quantification of ABT-578 in human and rabbit blood and rabbit tissues for drug-eluting stent development. After protein precipitation, samples were injected into the HPLC system and extracted online using a high flow of 5 mL/min. The extracts were then backflushed onto the analytic column. The [M+Na] of ABT-578 (m/z 988.6-->369.4) and its internal standard sirolimus (m/z 936.5-->409.3) were monitored. Extraction and analysis took 4 minutes. The assay was validated following the US Food & Drug Administration guidelines. Linearity was 0.025-25 ng/mL for most matrices. In human blood, interday accuracies were 81.8% (at 0.025 ng/mL), 91.0% (1 ng/mL), and 99.5% (50 ng/mL), and interday precisions were 10.7% (0.025 ng/mL), 3.0% (1 ng/mL), and 1.8% (50 ng/mL).

Topics: Animals; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Growth Inhibitors; Humans; Molecular Structure; Rabbits; Reproducibility of Results; Sirolimus; Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization; Technology, Pharmaceutical; Tissue Distribution

We report here a quantitative method for the analysis of ABT-578 in human whole blood samples. Sample preparation was achieved by a semi-automated 96-well format liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) method. Aluminum/polypropylene heat seal foil was used to enclose each well of the 96-well plate for the liquid-liquid extraction. A liquid chromatography combined with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method with pre-column regeneration was developed for the analysis of sample extracts. Selective reaction monitoring (SRM) of the mass transitions m/z 983-935 and m/z 931-883 was employed for the detection of ABT-578 and internal standard, respectively. The ammonium adduct ions [M + NH(4)](+) generated from electrospray ionization were monitored as the precursor ions. The assay was validated for a linear dynamic range of 0.20-200.75ng/ml. The correlation coefficient (r) was between 0.9959 and 0.9971. The intra-assay CV (%) was between 1.9 and 13.5% and the inter-assay CV (%) was between 4.7 and 11.3%. The inter-assay mean accuracy was between 86.4 and 102.5% of the theoretical concentrations.

Topics: Chromatography, Liquid; Humans; Reference Standards; Reproducibility of Results; Sensitivity and Specificity; Sirolimus; Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization

Quantitative determination of drug concentrations in tissue samples can provide critical information for drug metabolism, kinetics, and toxicity evaluations. For analysis of tissue samples using liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometric (LC/MS/MS) detection, homogenization is a critical step in achieving good assay performance. Assay performance can be closely evaluated by spiking the drug directly into tissue samples prior to homogenization. It is especially important to include this assay evaluation for the analysis of artery tissue samples because artery tissue is very elastic, making it quite a challenge to develop an effective procedure for homogenization. An LC/MS/MS assay in 96-well format using liquid-liquid extraction was developed for analyzing ABT-578 in rabbit artery samples. Tissue quality control samples were prepared by spiking ABT-578 stock solutions directly into the tissue before homogenization. The usage of the tissue control samples gives a thorough evaluation of the sample preparation process that includes both homogenization and sample extraction. A 20% blood in saline solution was used as a homogenization solution. Calibration standards were made by spiking ABT-578 into rabbit whole blood. Blood quality control samples were also prepared by spiking ABT-578 into rabbit whole blood. These blood QC samples were used to confirm the validity of the calibration curve. A lower limit of quantitation of 0.050 ng/mL was achieved. The linear dynamic range of blood standards was from 0.050-30.3 ng/mL with the correlation coefficient (r) ranging from 0.9969-0.9996. Overall %CV was between 1.3 and 7.0%, and analytical recovery was between 98.2 and 105.8% for blood QC samples. The %CVs for tissue QC samples were between 6.7 and 13.0%, and analytical recovery after correction was between 93.5 and 114.3%.

Topics: Algorithms; Animals; Arteries; Calibration; Chemical Fractionation; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; In Vitro Techniques; Mass Spectrometry; Rabbits; Reference Standards; Reproducibility of Results; Robotics; Sensitivity and Specificity; Sirolimus; Specimen Handling; United States