sirolimus and cediranib

In the recent years, a number of targeted therapies have been approved for first-line treatment of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. A systematic review was conducted to assess the clinical efficacy, safety and effect of all first-line treatments evaluated to date on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). A systematic search of Embase, Cochrane and MEDLINE databases was performed to identify randomized controlled trials (1980-2015) evaluating any targeted therapy/immunotherapy against placebo or any other targeted intervention/immunotherapy in treatment-naive patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Conference proceedings from major cancer congresses (2007-2015) were handsearched. Sixteen randomized controlled trials were identified, mostly phase III. Overall, targeted therapies were associated with either improved [sunitinib, bevacizumab+interferon α (IFNα) and temsirolimus] or comparable (sorafenib) progression-free survival (PFS) versus IFNα monotherapy. Sunitinib demonstrated comparable PFS and overall survival to pazopanib, comparable PFS to sorafenib and shorter PFS compared with bevacizumab+IFNα (although no conclusions were made with regard to superiority/inferiority). Compared with sorafenib, tivozanib demonstrated a significantly longer PFS, and both tivozanib and axitinib demonstrated higher response rates. Nintedanib demonstrated comparable PFS and overall survival to sunitinib in a phase II trial. Temsirolimus, sunitinib and sorafenib treatment led to better HRQoL versus IFNα; pazopanib was associated with better HRQoL versus sunitinib. No direct meta-analyses or indirect treatment comparison analysis were undertaken because of noncomparability of the trials. In general, targeted therapies demonstrated favourable clinical efficacy and improved HRQoL compared with IFNα monotherapy. The newer therapies, tivozanib and axitinib (but not nintedanib), appeared to exhibit greater clinical benefit (response rate) than older tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Imidazoles; Indazoles; Indoles; Interferon-alpha; Kidney Neoplasms; Neoplasm Metastasis; Niacinamide; Phenylurea Compounds; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Quality of Life; Quinazolines; Quinolines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sirolimus; Sorafenib; Sulfonamides; Sunitinib

Several 'lines of therapy' that utilize cytotoxic agents and are driven by platinum-free intervals are the current standard of care for patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. For patients with platinum-resistant disease, single agent chemotherapy (pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, topotecan, gemcitabine or weekly paclitaxel) is the standard of care. For patients with platinum-sensitive disease, combination chemotherapy (carboplatin plus paclitaxel, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin or gemcitabine) is the standard of care. In addition, antiangiogenic therapy using bevacizumab is an established option. Future directions could include 'lines of therapy' with biologic agents driven by specific biologic targets. Data from antiangiogenic agents (trebananib, pazopanib and cediranib), antifolate drugs (farletuzumab and vintafolide), poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (olaparib and veliparib), mTOR inhibitors (everolimus and temsirolimus) and immune editing agents (nivolumab) have been summarized in this review.

Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzimidazoles; Carboplatin; Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Deoxycytidine; Doxorubicin; Everolimus; Female; Folic Acid; Gemcitabine; Humans; Indazoles; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial; Nivolumab; Ovarian Neoplasms; Paclitaxel; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Polyethylene Glycols; Pyrimidines; Quinazolines; Recombinant Fusion Proteins; Sirolimus; Sulfonamides; Topotecan; TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases; Vinca Alkaloids

Treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has undergone significant changes over the past 3 years after a long period of relative stagnation. A better understanding of the biology of the tumor led to the discovery of molecular targeted therapies resulting in significant improvement in outcome for this common malignancy.. A review of new drugs, both established and investigational, at present used in the treatment of RCC is provided in this article.. A comprehensive free-text search of all available published literature including but not limited to, Medline, Scopus, American Society of Clinical Oncology presentations, National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines and information available through other national and international scientific organizations was carried out during the preparation of this manuscript.. Targeted therapy in RCC is a prime example of successful translational research. Continuing clinical and preclinical research in drug development holds promise for further advances in this area.

Topics: Animals; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Agents; Axitinib; Benzenesulfonates; Bevacizumab; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Clinical Trials as Topic; Everolimus; Humans; Imidazoles; Indazoles; Indoles; Kidney Neoplasms; Niacinamide; Phenylurea Compounds; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Quinazolines; Sirolimus; Sorafenib; Sulfonamides; Sunitinib

Temsirolimus, a mTOR inhibitor, and AZD2171, a VEGFR inhibitor, have independently shown activity in patients with gynecological malignancies. Understanding the pivotal role of the PI3K/PTEN/AKT/mTOR pathway in regulating angiogenesis, a phase I study utilizing Temsirolimus and AZD2171 was initiated to study the safety of targeting the mTOR and VEGF pathway in patients with recurrent or refractory gynecological malignancies.. Patients with advanced gynecological cancers were enrolled in this phase 1 study with Temsirolimus and AZD2171. A traditional 3 + 3 design was followed. The primary objective was to determine the MTD of the combination. Secondary objectives included efficacy, progression free survival (PFS) and toxicity profile. An expansion phase was planned after the MTD was determined.. The study enrolled 11 patients over 16 months. All patients were enrolled in dose level 1. Due to toxicity, the trial was halted at dose level 1. No MTD was determined. The most common grade 3/4 toxicities included hypertension, thrombocytopenia, thromboembolic events, and hypertriglyceridemia. Five patients were evaluable for best overall clinical response. The best overall clinical response was stable disease. Two patients died without documented progression of disease. The median PFS was 7.2 months.. Despite a conservative dose escalation, the toxicity data demonstrated that the combination of AZD2171 and Temsirolimus was not tolerable. Increased awareness of novel toxicities, pharmacological interactions, coupled with strict patient selection and early mitigation of side effects may enhance phase I clinical trial development.

Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Female; Genital Neoplasms, Female; Humans; Quinazolines; Sirolimus; TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases

Cediranib (AZD2171) is a potent small molecule inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptors. Cediranib has demonstrated single agent activity in several adult cancers and is being studied in combination with standard cytotoxic agents in multiple disease settings.. Cediranib was tested in vivo against six childhood tumor xenograft models (four sarcomas, one glioblastoma, one neuroblastoma) alone or combined with cyclophosphamide (two models), vincristine (three models) or cisplatin (one model), each administered at its maximum tolerated dose, or rapamycin (six models).. The combination of cediranib with standard cytotoxic agents was superior to the cytotoxic agent used alone for a single xenograft (one of the three xenografts evaluated for the vincristine-cediranib combination). The cediranib-cyclophosphamide combination was inferior to single agent cyclophosphamide in time to event for both models studied and was significantly inferior for one of the models. Cediranib combined with rapamycin was superior to each of the agents used alone in two of the six models and was determined to be additive or supra-additive with rapamycin in four models, although the effects were not large.. Cediranib combined with cytotoxic chemotherapy agents demonstrated little or no benefit (and in one case was significantly inferior) compared to chemotherapy alone for the six pediatric cancer xenografts studied. By contrast, the combination of cediranib with rapamycin was additive or supra-additive in four of the six models in terms of prolongation of time to event, though tumor regressions were not observed for this combination.

Topics: Adolescent; Animals; Antibiotics, Antineoplastic; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Child; Child, Preschool; Female; Glioblastoma; Humans; Infant; Mice; Mice, Inbred BALB C; Mice, Nude; Mice, SCID; Neoplasm Transplantation; Neuroblastoma; Quinazolines; Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor; Sarcoma; Sirolimus; Transplantation, Heterologous; Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays