sincalide and senktide

sincalide has been researched along with senktide* in 2 studies

Other Studies

2 other study(ies) available for sincalide and senktide

ArticleYear
Evidence for the involvement of ATP, but not of VIP/PACAP or nitric oxide, in the excitatory effect of capsaicin in the small intestine.
    European journal of pharmacology, 2000, Mar-31, Volume: 392, Issue:3

    The contractile effect of capsaicin in the guinea-pig small intestine involves an activation of enteric cholinergic neurons. Our present data show that the P(2) purinoceptor antagonist pyridoxal-phosphate-6-azophenyl-2',4'-disulphonic acid (PPADS, 30 microM) significantly reduces the contractile response to capsaicin (2 microM) in the presence, but not in the absence, of the tachykinin receptor antagonists [O-Pro(9), (Spiro-gamma-lactam)Leu(10), Trp(11)]physalaemin (1-11) (GR 82334; 3 microM) and (S)-(N)-(1-(3-(1-benzoyl-3-(3, 4-dichlorophenyl)piperidin-3-yl)propyl)-4-phenylpiperidine-4-yl)-N -methylacetamide (SR 142804: 100 nM) (for blocking tachykinin NK1 and NK3 receptors, respectively). PPADS (30 microM) fails to influence submaximal cholinergic contractions evoked by cholecystokinin octapeptide (CCK-8; 2-3 nM) or senktide (1 nM), or the direct smooth muscle-contracting effect of histamine (100-200 nM). A higher concentration (300 microM) of PPADS is also without effect against the stimulatory action of cholecystokinin octapeptide. This means that PPADS can probably be safely used as a purinoceptor antagonist in intestinal preparations. The putative pituitary adenylate cyclase activating peptide (PACAP) receptor antagonist PACAP-(6-38) (3 microM) significantly reduces the contractile effect of PACAP-(1-38) (10 nM) and abolishes that of vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP; 10 nM). PACAP-(6-38) (3 microM) fails to influence the effect of capsaicin (2 microM) both in the absence and in the presence of tachykinin receptor antagonists. The nitric oxide (NO) synthase inhibitor N(G)-nitro-L-arginine (L-NOARG; 100 microM) also fails to inhibit the capsaicin-induced motor response. We conclude that an endogenous ligand of PPADS-sensitive P(2) purinoceptors (possibly ATP), but not a VIP/PACAP-like peptide or NO, is involved in the nontachykininergic activation of cholinergic neurons in the course of the capsaicin-induced contraction.

    Topics: Acetylcholine; Adenosine Triphosphate; Animals; Capsaicin; Enzyme Inhibitors; Guinea Pigs; Ileum; In Vitro Techniques; Intestine, Small; Muscle Contraction; Muscle, Smooth; Neurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonists; Neuropeptides; Nitric Oxide; Nitric Oxide Synthase; Nitroarginine; Peptide Fragments; Physalaemin; Piperidines; Pituitary Adenylate Cyclase-Activating Polypeptide; Pyridoxal Phosphate; Receptors, Neurokinin-3; Sincalide; Substance P; Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide

2000
Differences in circular muscle contraction and peristaltic motor inhibition caused by tachykinin NK1 receptor agonists in the guinea-pig small intestine.
    Neurogastroenterology and motility, 2000, Volume: 12, Issue:2

    The tachykinin NK1 receptor agonist substance P methyl ester (SPOME) impedes intestinal peristalsis by releasing nitric oxide (NO) from inhibitory motor neurones. Since NK1 receptor agonists differ in their receptor interaction, we set out to compare a range of NK1 receptor agonists including SPOME, septide and GR-73 632 in their effects on propulsive peristalsis and circular muscle activity in the guinea-pig isolated small intestine. SPOME (100-300 nM) inhibited peristalsis by a rise of the pressure threshold at which peristaltic waves were triggered, whereas septide and GR-73 632 (30-300 nM) interrupted peristalsis by causing circular muscle spasms. Separate experiments showed that all three NK1 receptor agonists caused contraction of the circular muscle, which was enhanced by the NO synthase inhibitor NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (300 mM) and the P2X purinoceptor antagonist suramin (300 mM). In contrast, tetrodotoxin (300 nM) augmented the contractile effect of septide and GR-73 632 but not that of SPOME. It is concluded that the motor response to NK1 receptor agonists involves release of NO and adenosine triphosphate from inhibitory motor neurones. However, the NK1 receptor agonists differ in the mechanism by which they cause inhibitory transmitter release, which corresponds to differences in their antiperistaltic action.

    Topics: Adenosine Triphosphate; Animals; Enzyme Inhibitors; Female; Guinea Pigs; Intestine, Small; Male; Motor Neurons; Muscle Contraction; Muscle, Smooth; Neurokinin A; NG-Nitroarginine Methyl Ester; Nitric Oxide; Nitric Oxide Synthase; Peptide Fragments; Peristalsis; Piperidines; Purinergic P2 Receptor Antagonists; Pyrrolidonecarboxylic Acid; Quinuclidines; Receptors, Neurokinin-1; Receptors, Neurokinin-2; Receptors, Neurokinin-3; Sincalide; Spasm; Substance P; Suramin; Tetrodotoxin

2000