simethicone and magnesium-citrate

Colonoscopy is the gold standard for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer (CRC). Before a colonoscopy, an adequate bowel preparation (BP) is required. Currently, more novel regimens with different effects have been proposed and used successively. This network meta-analysis aims to compare the cleaning effects and patients' tolerability of several BP regimens.. We performed a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials including sixteen kinds of BP regimens. We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science databases. The outcomes of this study were bowel cleansing effect and tolerance.. We included a total of 40 articles with 13,064 patients. For the primary outcomes, polyethylene glycol (PEG) + ascorbic acid (Asc) + simethicone (Sim) (OR, 14.27, 95%CrI, 2.68-127.87) regimen is ranked first in Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). PEG + Sim (OR, 2.0, 95%CrI 0.64-6.4) regimen is ranked first in Ottawa Bowel Preparation Scale (OBPS), but without significant differences. For the secondary outcomes, PEG + Sodium Picosulfate/Magnesium Citrate (SP/MC) (OR, 4.88e + 11, 95%CrI, 39.56-1.82e + 35) regimen is the best in cecal intubation rate(CIR). PEG + Sim (OR,1.5, 95%CrI, 1.0-2.2) regimen is ranked first in adenoma detection rate(ADR). Senna (OR, 3.23, 95%CrI, 1.04-9.97) and SP/MC (OR, 249.91, 95%CrI, 78.49-958.19) regimens are ranked first in abdominal pain and willingness to repeat, respectively. There is no significant difference in cecal intubation time (CIT), polyp detection rate (PDR), nausea, vomiting, and abdominal bloat.. PEG + Asc + Sim regimen is more effective at cleaning the bowel. PEG + SP/MC will be helpful to increase CIR. For ADR, PEG + Sim regimen will be more helpful. In addition, PEG + Asc + Sim is the least likely to cause abdominal bloat, while Senna regimen is more likely to cause abdominal pain. Patients prefer to re-use the SP/MC regimen for bowel preparation.

Topics: Adult; Cathartics; Cecum; Colonoscopy; Humans; Network Meta-Analysis; Polyethylene Glycols; Sennosides; Simethicone

Bowel preparation for capsule endoscopy (CE) has not been standardized.. This study aimed to compare CE images between patients prepared by simethicone and those prepared by magnesium citrate.. Retrospective analysis of case series of our hospital from 2004 to 2007.. Single center.. CE images of 75 patients receiving bowel preparation either by 200 mg of simethicone (n=39) or by 34 g of magnesium citrate (n=36) were retrospectively investigated. Grades of fluid transparency and mucosal invisibility by air bubbles and food residue were compared between the 2 preparations. Capsule transit time, frequency of positive findings, and interobserver variations between 2 observers were also investigated.. Image quality and diagnostic yield of CE.. Fluid transparency in the first and the third time segments of the small intestine was better in patients prepared by magnesium citrate than in those prepared by simethicone (P= .001 and P= .03, respectively). On the other hand, mucosal invisibility was not different in any part of the small intestine between the 2 groups. Neither gastric transit time nor small-bowel transit time was different between the 2 groups. The diagnostic yield of CE correlated significantly with fluid transparency (P= .04), but it did not correlate with mucosal invisibility.. Single-center retrospective study.. Magnesium citrate seems to be a recommended preparation for CE compared with simethicone. The fluid transparency, rather than the mucosal invisibility, may be a factor associated with the diagnostic yield of CE.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Capsule Endoscopy; Citric Acid; Cohort Studies; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Image Enhancement; Intestinal Diseases; Intestine, Small; Male; Middle Aged; Organometallic Compounds; Patient Compliance; Premedication; Retrospective Studies; Sensitivity and Specificity; Simethicone; Therapeutic Irrigation; Young Adult