silicon and 2-methacryloyloxyethyl-phosphorylcholine

silicon has been researched along with 2-methacryloyloxyethyl-phosphorylcholine* in 2 studies

Other Studies

2 other study(ies) available for silicon and 2-methacryloyloxyethyl-phosphorylcholine

ArticleYear
In situ surface modification on dental composite resin using 2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine polymer for controlling plaque formation.
    Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications, 2019, Volume: 104

    Composite resins (CRs) are widely used as dental restorative materials for caries treatment. They cause problems of secondary caries since Streptococcus mutans stays in the dental plaque, which the surface exists and produces acidic compounds during metabolism. The dental plaque depositions are induced by the protein adsorption on the surface. Therefore, suppression of protein adsorption on the surface of the CRs is important for inhibiting the formation of plaque and secondary caries. In this study we developed a surface treatment to provide an antibiofouling nature to the CRs by chemical reaction with 2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine (MPC) polymers in the oral cavity during dental treatment. To carry out the photochemical reaction on the remaining polymerizable groups of CRs, we synthesized the MPC polymer with a polymerizable group in the side chain. The MPC polymer could bind on the surfaces of the CRs chemically under dental treatment procedures. The treated surface showed significant resistance to oral protein adsorption and bacterial adhesion even when the surface was brushed with a toothbrush. Thus, we concluded that the photochemical reaction of the MPC polymer with the CRs in the oral cavity was good for making an antibiofouling surface and preventing secondary caries.

    Topics: Acrylic Resins; Biofouling; Composite Resins; Dental Plaque; Methacrylates; Mucins; Phosphorus; Phosphorylcholine; Photoelectron Spectroscopy; Polymers; Polyurethanes; Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy; Silicon; Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared; Streptococcus mutans; Surface Properties

2019
Methacrylate polymer layers bearing poly(ethylene oxide) and phosphorylcholine side chains as non-fouling surfaces: in vitro interactions with plasma proteins and platelets.
    Acta biomaterialia, 2011, Volume: 7, Issue:10

    Two methacrylate monomers, oligo(ethylene glycol) methyl ether methacrylate (OEGMA; MW=300 g mol(-1), poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) side chains of average length n=4.5) and 2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine (MPC; MW=295 g mol(-1)), were grafted from silicon wafer surfaces via surface-initiated atom transfer radical polymerization. The grafted surfaces were used as model PEG and phosphorylcholine surface systems to allow comparison of the effectiveness of these two motifs in the prevention of plasma protein adsorption and platelet adhesion. It was found that at high graft density fibrinogen adsorption from plasma on the poly(MPC) and poly(OEGMA) surfaces for a given graft chain length was comparable and extremely low. At low graft density, poly(OEGMA) was slightly more effective than poly(MPC) in resisting fibrinogen adsorption from plasma. Flowing whole blood experiments showed that at low graft density the poly(OEGMA) surfaces were more resistant to fibrinogen adsorption and platelet adhesion than the poly(MPC) surfaces. At high graft density, both the poly(MPC) and poly(OEGMA) surfaces were highly resistant to fibrinogen and platelets. Immunoblots of proteins eluted from the surfaces after contact with human plasma were probed with antibodies against a range of proteins, including the contact phase clotting factors, fibrinogen, albumin, complement C3, IgG, vitronectin and apolipoprotein A-I. The blot responses were weak on the poly(MPC) and poly(OEGMA) surfaces at low graft density and zero at high graft density, again indicating strongly protein resistant properties for these surfaces. Since the side chains of the poly(OEGMA) are about 50% greater in size than those of poly(MPC), the difference in protein resistance between the poly(MPC) and poly(OEGMA) surfaces at low graft density may be due to the difference in surface coverage of the two graft types.

    Topics: Adsorption; Adult; Biofouling; Blood Platelets; Blood Proteins; Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel; Fibrinogen; Hemorheology; Humans; Immunoblotting; Methacrylates; Microscopy, Electron, Scanning; Phosphorylcholine; Platelet Adhesiveness; Polyethylene Glycols; Silicon; Surface Properties

2011