seglitide and lanreotide

The role of somatostatin and its mechanism of action in the retina remains an important target for investigation. Biochemical and pharmacological studies were engaged to characterize the somatostatin receptors in the rabbit retina, and their coupling to G-proteins. The ability of selective ligands to inhibit [125I]Tyr11-somatostatin-14 binding to rabbit retinal membranes was examined. The sst2 analogues SMS201-995, MK678, and BIM23014, displayed IC50 values of 0.28 +/- 0.12, 0.04 +/- 0.01 and 1.57 +/- 0.39 nm, respectively. The sst1 analogue CH275 moderately displaced the [125I]Tyr11-somatostatin-14 binding, while selective analogues for sst3, sst4 and sst5 had minimal effect. Immunoblotting and/or immunohistochemistry studies revealed the presence of the pertussis toxin sensitive Gi1/2, and Go proteins, as well as Gs. Somatostatin-14 and MK678 stimulated GTPase activity in a concentration-dependent manner with EC50 values of 42.8 +/- 16.8 and 70.0 +/- 16.5 nm, respectively, thus supporting the functional coupling between the receptor and the G-proteins. CH275 stimulated the GTPase activity moderately, in agreement with its binding profile. The antisera raised against Goalpha and Gi1/2alpha inhibited the somatostatin-induced high-affinity GTPase activity, but only anti-Goalpha inhibited the MK678 stimulation of the enzyme. These results suggest that somatostatin mediates its actions in the rabbit retina by interacting mainly with sst2 receptors that couple to Goalpha.

Topics: Animals; Binding, Competitive; Blotting, Western; Cell Membrane; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Enzyme Activation; GTP Phosphohydrolases; GTP-Binding Protein alpha Subunit, Gi2; GTP-Binding Protein alpha Subunits, Gi-Go; Heterotrimeric GTP-Binding Proteins; Immune Sera; Ligands; Male; Peptides, Cyclic; Proto-Oncogene Proteins; Rabbits; Radioligand Assay; Receptors, Somatostatin; Retina; Somatostatin

Human somatostatin (somatotropin release inhibiting factor = SRIF) receptor subtypes sst2 and sst5 were stably expressed in Chinese hamster lung fibroblast (CCL39) cells. [125I][Tyr3]octreotide labelled with high affinity and in a saturable manner both sst2 (pKd = 9.89+/-0.02, Bmax = 210+/-10 fmol/mg, n = 3) and sst5 sites (pKd = 9.64+/-0.04, Bmax = 920+/-170 fmol/mg, n = 3). The pharmacological profile of sst2 sites established in CCL39 cells using SRIF and various peptide analogues was very similar to that described previously in CHO cells and in human cortex: SRIF14 = SRIF28 > or = seglitide > BIM 23014 = RC 160 > octreotide > CGP 23996 > or = L362,855 > BIM 23052 > L361,301 = cortistatin14 > BIM 23030 > BIM 23056 > cycloantagonist SA. However, peptides classically perceived as sst2 receptor selective (e.g., seglitide, octreotide, vapreotide) showed also high affinity for human sst5 receptors labelled with [125I][Tyr3]octreotide: SRIF28 > seglitide > SRIF14 > L361,301 = octreotide > cortistatin14 = BIM 23014 = BIM 23052 > L362,855 = RC160 > CGP 23996 > BIM 23056 > cycloantagonist SA > BIM 23030. Further radioligand binding studies were performed with [Leu8,D-Trp22,125I-Tyr25]SRIF28 ([125I]LTT-SRIF28) and [125I]CGP 23996. At sst2 receptors, Bmax values determined with [125I][Tyr3]octreotide, [125I]LTT-SRIF28 and [125I]CGP 23996 were in the same range (180-370 fmol/mg). 5'-Guanylyl-imidodiphosphate (GppNHp) displaced all three radioligands to the same extent (85%) and the pharmacological profiles were superimposable. By contrast, at sst5 receptors Bmax values were very different: [125I][Tyr3]octreotide (920 fmol/mg), [125I]CGP 23996 (3530 fmol/mg) and [125I]LTT-SRIF28 (6950 fmol/mg). GppNHp affected [125I][Tyr3]octreotide more than [125I]CGP 23996 binding, whereas [125I]LTT-SRIF28 was much less affected. In addition, the affinity values determined in competition experiments at sst5 receptors, varied markedly; whereas SRIF14, cortistatin14 and SRIF28 showed 2-, 4- and 8-fold differences in affinity at sst5 receptors labelled with [125I][Tyr3]octreotide and [125I]LTT-SRIF28 compounds such as RC160, L363,301, L362,855, octreotide or CGP 23996 showed between 42- and 123-fold lower affinity when sst5 sites were labelled with [125I]LTT-SRIF28. The present data suggest caution to be used when comparing affinity profiles determined in binding studies using different radioligands. In addition, the present results suggest that effects produced by octreotide and re

Topics: Animals; Binding, Competitive; Cell Line; Cricetinae; Cricetulus; Humans; Iodine Radioisotopes; Octreotide; Peptides, Cyclic; Radioligand Assay; Receptors, Somatostatin; Somatostatin; Structure-Activity Relationship; Transfection

There is considerable controversy about the classification and nomenclature of somatostatin receptors. To date, five distinct receptor genes have been cloned and named chronologically according to their respective publication dates, but two were unfortunately given the same appellation (SSTR4). Consensually, a nomenclature for the recombinant receptors has been agreed according to IUPHAR guidelines (sst1, sst2, sst3, sst4, and sst5). However, a more informative classification is to be preferred for the future, employing all classification criteria in an integrated scheme. It is already apparent that the five recombinant receptors fall into two classes or groups, on the basis of not only structure but also pharmacological characteristics. One class (already referred to by some as SRIF1) appears to comprise sst2, sst3 and sst5 receptor subtypes. The other class (SRIF2) appears to comprise the other two recombinant receptor subtypes (sst1 and sst4). This promising approach is discussed but it is acknowledged that much more data from endogenous receptors in whole tissues are needed before further recommendations on somatostatin receptor nomenclature can be made.

Topics: Amino Acid Sequence; Molecular Sequence Data; Octreotide; Peptides, Cyclic; Receptors, Somatostatin; Recombinant Proteins; Somatostatin; Terminology as Topic