sanorg-34006 and ximelagatran

Cancer increases the risk of thromboembolic events, especially in people receiving anticoagulation treatments.. To compare the efficacy and safety of low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs), direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for the long-term treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in people with cancer.. We conducted a literature search including a major electronic search of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2016, Issue 1), MEDLINE (Ovid), and Embase (Ovid); handsearching conference proceedings; checking references of included studies; use of the 'related citation' feature in PubMed and a search for ongoing studies in trial registries. As part of the living systematic review approach, we run searches continually, incorporating new evidence after it is identified. Last search date 14 May 2018.. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the benefits and harms of long-term treatment with LMWHs, DOACs or VKAs in people with cancer and symptomatic VTE.. We extracted data in duplicate on study characteristics and risk of bias. Outcomes included: all-cause mortality, recurrent VTE, major bleeding, minor bleeding, thrombocytopenia, and health-related quality of life (QoL). We assessed the certainty of the evidence at the outcome level following the GRADE approach (GRADE handbook).. Of 15,785 citations, including 7602 unique citations, 16 RCTs fulfilled the eligibility criteria. These trials enrolled 5167 people with cancer and VTE.Low molecular weight heparins versus vitamin K antagonistsEight studies enrolling 2327 participants compared LMWHs with VKAs. Meta-analysis of five studies probably did not rule out a beneficial or harmful effect of LMWHs compared to VKAs on mortality up to 12 months of follow-up (risk ratio (RR) 1.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.88 to 1.13; risk difference (RD) 0 fewer per 1000, 95% CI 45 fewer to 48 more; moderate-certainty evidence). Meta-analysis of four studies did not rule out a beneficial or harmful effect of LMWHs compared to VKAs on major bleeding (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.55 to 2.12; RD 4 more per 1000, 95% CI 19 fewer to 48 more, moderate-certainty evidence) or minor bleeding (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.27; RD 38 fewer per 1000, 95% CI 92 fewer to 47 more; low-certainty evidence), or thrombocytopenia (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.69). Meta-analysis of five studies showed that LMWHs probably reduced the recurrence of VTE compared to VKAs (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.77; RD 53 fewer per 1000, 95% CI 29 fewer to 72 fewer, moderate-certainty evidence).Direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonistsFive studies enrolling 982 participants compared DOACs with VKAs. Meta-analysis of four studies may not rule out a beneficial or harmful effect of DOACs compared to VKAs on mortality (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.21; RD 12 fewer per 1000, 95% CI 51 fewer to 37 more; low-certainty evidence), recurrent VTE (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.33 to 1.31; RD 14 fewer per 1000, 95% CI 27 fewer to 12 more; low-certainty evidence), major bleeding (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.38 to 1.57, RD 8 fewer per 1000, 95% CI 22 fewer to 20 more; low-certainty evidence), or minor bleeding (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.22; RD 21 fewer per 1000, 95% CI 54 fewer to 28 more; low-certainty evidence). One study reporting on DOAC versus VKA was published as abstract so is not included in the main analysis.Direct oral anticoagulants versus low molecular weight heparinsTwo studies enrolling 1455 participants compared DOAC with LMWH. The study by Raskob did not rule out a beneficial or harmful effect of DOACs compared to LMWH on mortality up to 12 months of follow-up (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.25; RD 27 more per 1000, 95% CI 30 fewer to 95 more; low-certainty evidence). The data also showed that DOACs may have shown a likely reduction in VTE recurrence up to 12 months. For the long-term treatment of VTE in people with cancer, evidence shows that LMWHs compared to VKAs probably produces an important reduction in VTE and DOACs compared to LMWH, may likely reduce VTE but may increase risk of major bleeding. Decisions for a person with cancer and VTE to start long-term LMWHs versus oral anticoagulation should balance benefits and harms and integrate the person's values and preferences for the important outcomes and alternative management strategies.Editorial note: this is a living systematic review (LSR). LSRs offer new approaches to review updating in which the review is continually updated, incorporating relevant new evidence as it becomes available. Please refer to the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for the current status of this review.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Azetidines; Benzimidazoles; Benzylamines; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Neoplasms; Oligosaccharides; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Venous Thromboembolism; Vitamin K

This study was designed to compare efficacy and safety among novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs), which have not been directly compared in randomized control trials to date.. We performed network meta-analyses of randomized control trials in preventing thromboembolic events and major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation. PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for published studies and various registries of clinical trials for unpublished studies were searched for 2002-2013. All phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of NOACs (apixaban, edoxaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban), idraparinux, and ximelagatran were reviewed.. A systematic literature search identified nine phase III RCTs for primary analyses. The efficacy of each NOAC was similar with respect to our primary composite endpoint following adjustment for open label designs [odds ratios (ORs) versus vitamin K antagonists: apixaban 0.79; dabigatran 150mg 0.77; edoxaban 60mg 0.87; rivaroxaban 0.86] except for dabigatran 110mg and edoxaban 30mg. Apixaban and edoxaban 30mg and 60mg had significantly fewer major bleeding events than dabigatran 150mg, ricvaroxaban, and vitamin K antagonists. All NOACs were similar in reducing secondary endpoints with the exception of dabigatran 110mg and 150mg which were associated with a significantly greater incidence of myocardial infarction compared to apixaban, edoxaban 60mg, and rivaroxaban.. Our indirect comparison with adjustment for study design suggests that the efficacy of the examined NOACs is similar across drugs, but that some differences in safety and risk of myocardial infarction exist, and that open label study designs appear to overestimate safety and treatment efficacy. Differences in study design should be taken into account in the interpretation of results from RCTs of NOACs.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Azetidines; Benzylamines; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Odds Ratio; Oligosaccharides; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K

Cancer increases the risk of thromboembolic events in patients including those receiving anticoagulation treatments.. To compare the efficacy and safety of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and oral anticoagulants for the long-term treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with cancer.. We conducted a comprehensive search for studies of anticoagulation in cancer patients including 1. a February 2013 electronic search of: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL Issue 12, 2012), MEDLINE, and EMBASE; 2. a handsearch of conference proceedings; 3. checking of references of included studies; 4. use of the 'related citation' feature in PubMed; and 5. a search of clinicaltrials.gov for ongoing studies.. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing long-term treatment with LMWH versus oral anticoagulants (vitamin K antagonist (VKA) or ximelagatran) in patients with cancer and symptomatic objectively confirmed VTE.. Using a standardized data form, we extracted data on methodological quality, participants, interventions and outcomes of interest: survival, recurrent VTE, major bleeding, minor bleeding, thrombocytopenia, and postphlebitic syndrome. We assessed the quality of evidence at the outcome level following the GRADE approach.. Of 9559 identified citations, 10 RCTs (11 reports) were eligible and reported data for 1981 patients with cancer. We excluded 14 studies in which patients with cancer constituted study subgroups, but did not report outcome data for them. Meta-analysis of seven RCTs comparing LMWH with VKA found no statistically significant survival benefit (hazard ratio (HR) 0.96; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81 to 1.14) but a statistically significant reduction in VTE (HR 0.47; 95% CI 0.32 to 0.71). The remaining findings did not exclude a beneficial or harmful effect of LMWH compared with VKA for the outcomes of major bleeding (RR 1.07; 95% CI 0.52 to 2.19), minor bleeding (RR 0.89; 95% CI 0.51 to 1.55), or thrombocytopenia (RR 0.98; 95% CI 0.57 to 1.66). We judged the quality of evidence as low for mortality, major bleeding, and minor bleeding, and as moderate for recurrent VTE.One RCT comparing dabigatran with VKA did not exclude beneficial or harmful effects of one agent over the other. One RCT comparing six months' extension of anticoagulation with 18 months of ximelagatran 24 mg twice daily versus no extended ximelagatran did not exclude beneficial or harmful effects for the outcomes of reduction in VTE, mortality, and minor bleeding. One RCT comparing once-weekly subcutaneous injection of idraparinux for three or six months versus standard treatment (parenteral anticoagulation followed by warfarin or acenocoumarol) suggested a reduction in recurrent VTE (HR 0.39; 95% CI 0.14 to 1.11) at six months, but did not exclude beneficial or harmful effects for the outcomes of mortality (HR 0.99; 95% CI 0.66 to 1.48) and major bleeding (RR 1.04; 95% CI 0.39 to 2.83).. For the long-term treatment of VTE in patients with cancer, LMWH compared with VKA reduces venous thromboembolic events but not mortality. The decision for a patient with cancer and VTE to start long-term LMWH versus oral anticoagulation should balance the benefits and harms and integrate the patient's values and preferences for the important outcomes and alternative management strategies.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Azetidines; Benzimidazoles; Benzylamines; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Neoplasms; Oligosaccharides; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Venous Thromboembolism; Vitamin K

Although several new antithrombotic agents have been developed for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF), many patients will continue to be treated with warfarin worldwide. We performed a meta-analysis of safety and efficacy outcomes in patients with AF treated with warfarin for stroke prevention in large contemporary randomized controlled trials (RCTs).. We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases for relevant studies; RCTs comparing warfarin with an alternative thromboprophylaxis strategy with at least 400 patients in the warfarin arm and reporting stroke as an efficacy outcome were included.. Eight RCTs with 55,789 patient-years of warfarin therapy follow-up were included. Overall time spent in the therapeutic range was 55% to 68%. The annual incidence of stroke or systemic embolism in patients with AF taking warfarin was estimated to be 1.66% (95% CI, 1.41%-1.91%). Major bleeding rates varied from 1.40% to 3.40% per year across the studies. The risk of stroke per year was significantly higher in elderly patients (2.27%), female patients (2.12%), patients with a history of stroke (2.64%), and patients reporting no previous exposure to vitamin K antagonists (1.96%). There was a significant increase in the annual incidence of stroke with progressively increasing CHADS(2) (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age, diabetes, and prior stroke) scores.. Current use of warfarin as a stroke prevention agent in patients with AF is associated with a low rate of residual stroke or systemic embolism estimated to be 1.66% per year. Compared with a previous meta-analysis, there has been significant improvement in the proportion of time spent in therapeutic anticoagulation, with a resultant decline in observed stroke rates.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Azetidines; Benzylamines; Brain Ischemia; Clopidogrel; Female; Humans; Incidence; Male; Oligosaccharides; Primary Prevention; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome; United States; Warfarin

Heparin, low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and warfarin are well-established anticoagulants still in widespread use despite their well known drawbacks. Heparin requires continuous monitoring, has serious side-effects such as haemorrhage, thrombosis and osteoporosis, and lacks an oral route of administration. LMWH is a safer, more convenient anticoagulant to use but it cannot be given orally, does not have an antidote and may be difficult to administer in patients with renal failure. Warfarin has a narrow therapeutic window, interacts with other drugs and foods and requires monitoring like heparin. The limitations of all three of these established anticoagulants have prompted the search for better more convenient agents. The major examples of these newer anticoagulants are the direct and indirect factor Xa inhibitors and the direct thrombin inhibitors. These new agents tend to have more predictable pharmacokinetic properties, superior efficacy and safety and some can be administered orally. In this review, we summarise the advantages and disadvantages of three established anticoagulants (heparin, LMWH and warfarin) and the most promising new anticoagulants (fondaparinux, idraparinux, rivaroxaban, apixaban, dabigatran and ximelagatran) by discussing their pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics. We also discuss recent patents in the field of anticoagulation, which aim to improve the safety and effectiveness of antithrombotic agents currently in use or offer alternative ways for anticoagulation.

Topics: Animals; Anticoagulants; Azetidines; Benzimidazoles; Benzylamines; Dabigatran; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fondaparinux; Heparin; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Morpholines; Oligosaccharides; Polysaccharides; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Thrombin; Warfarin

As the population ages, the burden of thromboembolic disease increases. The development of new anticoagulants that overcome the shortcomings of the vitamin K antagonists represents an important advance.Clinical evaluation of new anticoagulants typically begins in short-term indications, such as prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery, followed by investigation in chronic conditions, such as stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation. Factors for consideration in clinical trials include methodological issues (blinded versus open-label; active-control statistical designs; patient selection, etc.). Despite its subsequent withdrawal, clinical trials of ximelagatran demonstrated the efficacy of fixed doses of an oral, direct thrombin inhibitor for prevention of thromboembolism. Direct and indirect inhibition of activated Factor X is another target for new anticoagulants. Evidence-based data from trials such as these will pave the way for new anticoagulants, with the goal of bringing optimum prophylactic therapy to those requiring anticoagulation.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Azetidines; Benzimidazoles; Benzylamines; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dabigatran; Drugs, Investigational; Humans; Oligosaccharides; Pyridines; Thromboembolism; United States

Indirect systemic and direct oral factor Xa and direct oral factor IIa inhibitors with improved pharmacologic profiles compared with heparins and vitamin K antagonists are currently in clinical development. This overview focuses on the indirect antithrombin dependent pentasaccharide derivatives of idraparinux and on the most advanced oral direct inhibitors to factor Xa (rivaroxaban and apixaban) and IIa (dabigatran). Specifically, the results of dose-finding studies for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after elective orthopedic surgery, the results of dose-finding studies for treatment of acute venous thromboembolism including prolonged prophylaxis of recurrent events, and the designs of ongoing clinical trials are reviewed.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Azetidines; Benzimidazoles; Benzylamines; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Glycine; Humans; Infusions, Parenteral; Morpholines; Oligosaccharides; Piperazines; Prothrombin; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Thrombin; Thrombosis; Venous Thromboembolism

Shortcomings of the existing anticoagulants, vitamin K antagonists and heparins, have led to the development of newer anticoagulant therapies. In particular, Vitamin K antagonists' slow onset of action, numerous drug interactions, narrow therapeutic window and need for frequent monitoring make it the most obvious target for replacement. Targeting specific coagulation enzymes or steps in the coagulation pathway, new anticoagulants have been or are under evaluation in clinical trials for a number of clinical indications, namely the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism, the prevention of ischemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation, and in acute coronary syndromes. Following a brief review of pharmacological aspects, this article will summarize the results of Phase III clinical trials evaluating the novel anticoagulants fondaparinux, ximelagatran and idraparinux. At present, most attention is directed at developing an oral anticoagulant to replace vitamin K antagonists for prevention of systemic thromboembolism. A number of newer agents are in both early and advanced stages of investigation.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Azetidines; Benzylamines; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Fondaparinux; Humans; Oligosaccharides; Polysaccharides; Thromboembolism; Thrombosis; Venous Thrombosis

Venous thromboembolic disease (VTE) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Unfractioned heparin, low-molecular weight heparins and vitamin K antagonists, currently used in the prophylaxis and treatment of VTE, are effective and relatively safe. Otherwise, they have some important limitations (narrow therapeutic window, highly variable dose-response relationship; limitation by the need of parenteral administration for heparins and the risk of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia) which provide opportunities for new antithrombotic drugs. These drugs include: inhibitors of factors IXa and factor VIIa/tissue factor complex, agents that enhance the protein C anticoagulant pathway, direct and antithrombin-dependent Xa inhibitors, direct and indirect thrombin inhibitors. Fondaparinux and idraparinux, two new indirect parenteral factor Xa inhibitors, have been studied in well conducted trials, showing interesting results both in the prevention and in the treatment of VTE. Ximelagatran, the first orally available thrombin inhibitor, represents a promising new anticoagulant drug for the prophylaxis of VTE after major orthopedic surgery and for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Azetidines; Benzylamines; Fibrinolytic Agents; Fondaparinux; Humans; Oligosaccharides; Polysaccharides; Thromboembolism

Atrial fibrillation, the most commonly encountered arrhythmia in clinical practice, is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Its incidence and prevalence are increasing, and it represents a growing clinical and economic burden. Recent research has highlighted new approaches to both pharmacological and non-pharmacological management. Pooled data from trials comparing antithrombotic treatment with placebo show that warfarin reduces the risk of stroke by 62% and that aspirin alone reduces the risk by 22%. Overall, in high-risk patients, warfarin was better than aspirin in preventing strokes, with a relative risk reduction of 36%, but the risk of major hemorrhage with warfarin was twice that with aspirin. Anticoagulation treatment needs to be tailored individually for patients on the basis of age, comorbidities, and contraindications. However, warfarin remains under-prescribed in clinical practice, for reasons related to patients (comorbidities) and physicians. The limitations of warfarin treatment have prompted the development of new anticoagulants with predictable pharmacokinetics that do not require as frequent monitoring. Ximelagatran, an oral direct thrombin inhibitor, was compared with warfarin in the SPORTIF program, which found both agents to be broadly effective in the prevention of embolic events, but observed abnormal liver function tests in 6% of patients on ximelagatran. Liver function monitoring during treatment is thus needed. Idraparinux, a factor Xa inhibitor administered by once weekly subcutaneous injections, is being evaluated in patients with atrial fibrillation. The ACTIVE trial is currently assessing the role of aspirin plus clopidogrel, compared with adjusted dose warfarin, in the prevention of vascular events in high-risk patients with atrial fibrillation. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor-blocking drugs interfere with atrial remodeling and show promise in atrial fibrillation, as suggested in the LIFE trial. Preliminary studies suggest that statins may reduce the risk of recurrence after electrical cardioversion. Finally, percutaneous methods for occlusion of the left atrial appendage are currently under investigation in patients at high risk of thromboembolism but with contraindications for chronic warfarin.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Age Factors; Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Azetidines; Benzylamines; Clopidogrel; Drug Therapy, Combination; Electric Countershock; Humans; Hypolipidemic Agents; Incidence; Injections, Subcutaneous; Middle Aged; Oligosaccharides; Placebos; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prevalence; Prodrugs; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recurrence; Risk Factors; Stroke; Ticlopidine; Warfarin

Modern approaches to prevention of venous thromboembolic complications in patients with chronic heart failure are analyzed in this review which contains results of large studies of low molecular weight heparins. In MEDENOX trial the use of enoxaparin in medical patients was associated with 63% reduction of risk of thrombosis. The authors own experience showed that 2 weeks of therapy with enoxaparin in patients with chronic stage IIB-III heart failure caused significant lowering of soluble fibrin-monomer complexes, fibrinogen, and index of turbo-dynamic potential. These changes evidenced for decreased intravascular blood coagulation. Thus enoxaparin can be effectively used for prevention of thrombosis and thromboembolism in patients with chronic heart failure. Novel antithrombotic agents fondaparinux, idraparinux, ximelagatran, recombinant thrombomodulin are perspective medications for prevention of venous thromboses and embolism in medical patients.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Azetidines; Benzylamines; Dalteparin; Double-Blind Method; Enoxaparin; Fibrinolytic Agents; Fondaparinux; Heart Failure; Humans; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Oligosaccharides; Placebos; Polysaccharides; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Thromboembolism; Thrombomodulin; Thrombosis; Time Factors; Venous Thrombosis

Antithrombotic drugs: heparins and oral vitamin K antimetabolites are connected with many side effects, which delimit their application in clinical practise. Continuous research has led to synthesis of new drugs which are safer and easier in use. Actually used antithrombotic drugs with their faults are discussed. Mechanism of action and data from trials relating to efficacy and safety of new drugs: fondaparinux, idraparinux and ximelagatran are presented.

Topics: Azetidines; Benzylamines; Fibrinolytic Agents; Fondaparinux; Humans; Oligosaccharides; Polysaccharides; Thrombosis

Anticoagulant therapy is effective at preventing the development of venous thromboembolism in high-risk patients, and reduces morbidity and mortality in individuals with established thromboembolic disease. Vitamin K antagonists and heparins are currently the most commonly used anticoagulant drugs, but they have practical limitations. Therefore, new antithrombotic agents with predictable dose-responses (thereby decreasing the need for monitoring without compromising efficacy or safety), ideally available in an oral formulation and with a rapidly reversible anticoagulant effect, are needed. New drugs fulfilling some of the above criteria have been developed and have proven to be effective agents for the treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism.

Topics: Animals; Anticoagulants; Azetidines; Benzylamines; Blood Coagulation; Factor VII; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fondaparinux; Helminth Proteins; Humans; Oligosaccharides; Polysaccharides; Recombinant Proteins; Thrombin; Thromboembolism; Thrombomodulin; Thromboplastin; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thrombosis

Classic anticoagulant drugs, such as heparin and warfarin, are very effective. However, although in use for more than 50 years, they do have some clinical drawbacks. Heparin, now better termed unfractionated heparin, can only be used intravenously and its laboratory control is complicated. Warfarin is orally administered, but its therapeutic window is very narrow and patients need repeated laboratory tests. Moreover, both drugs are non-specific, as they inhibit the coagulation cascade at several steps. Pharmaceutic research has developed new drugs, some of which are already on the market, such as fondaparinux, a pentasaccharide that can interact with antithrombin, thus inhibiting factor Xa. This pentasaccharide is part of the parent heparin molecule and can be chemically synthesized, with the advantage of avoiding extractive compounds. Fondaparinux has a half-life compatible with once-a-day administration; modification of its structure (idraparinux) has led to more stable binding with antithrombin and to an increase in its half-life to allow once-a-week administration. Alternatives to oral anticoagulants have been developed following the study of some compounds like hirudin, which directly binds thrombin and blocks its catalytic site. One of these molecules, ximelagatran, is in advanced clinical development. Ximelagatran is converted into its active form, melagatran, in the circulation, and thrombin activity can be blocked by oral administration twice daily. There is no need for laboratory control and phase II and phase III studies are encouraging. The next few years should bring great changes to the treatment of patients with thromboembolic disorders.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Azetidines; Benzylamines; Blood Coagulation Disorders; Fondaparinux; Half-Life; Humans; Oligosaccharides; Polysaccharides

Treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) usually starts with concomitant administration of heparin or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) and a vitamin K antagonist. The parenteral anticoagulant, which is given for at least 5 days, is stopped once the vitamin K antagonist produces a therapeutic level of anticoagulation. Although the introduction of LMWH has simplified the initial treatment of VTE, problems remain. LMWH must be given by daily subcutaneous (SC) injection and vitamin K antagonists require routine coagulation monitoring, which is inconvenient for patients and physicians. Recently, 3 new anticoagulants have been introduced in an attempt to overcome these limitations. These include fondaparinux and idraparinux, synthetic analogs of the pentasaccharide sequence that mediates the interaction of heparin and LMWH with antithrombin, and ximelagatran, an orally active inhibitor of thrombin. These agents produce a predictable anticoagulant response; thus, routine coagulation monitoring is unnecessary. Because they do not bind to platelets or platelet factor 4, fondaparinux and idraparinux do not cause heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Unlike vitamin K antagonists, ximelagatran has a rapid onset of action, thereby obviating the need for concomitant administration of a parenteral anticoagulant when starting treatment. The lack of an antidote for these new agents is a drawback, particularly for idraparinux, which has a long half-life.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Azetidines; Benzylamines; Clinical Trials as Topic; Fondaparinux; Humans; Oligosaccharides; Polysaccharides; Pulmonary Embolism; Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis

Several antithrombotic agents in development have the potential to greatly simplify the management of patients with AF or at risk for DVT/PE. Ximelagatran has already completed several phase 3 clinical studies in both of these high-risk, high-cost clinical settings and is poised to become the first practical alternative to warfarin. Although the exact therapeutic roles of ximelagatran and other novel antithrombotics further back in the pipeline remain to be determined, the impact of these nonwarfarin alternatives on the current labor-intensive system of anticoagulation clinics seems certain. Most important, the introduction of safer and equally effective oral anticoagulants that do not require monitoring may increase the percentage of high-risk patients who actually receive preventive therapy. If the institutional energy and resources previously spent on anticoagulation clinics, thrombotic disease management, and quality benchmarking can now be redirected to the delivery of the new generation of easier-to-administer and safer antithrombotic agents, the potential to increase rates of preventive therapy initiation and adherence in managed care populations may be within reach. Given the proven clinical value of anticoagulation, this potential increase in the rate of prophylaxis suggests the possibility that, even in the face of a rapidly aging US population, we are nonetheless entering into a period of reduced morbidity, mortality, and costs from stroke and DVT/PE.

Topics: Atrial Fibrillation; Azetidines; Benzimidazoles; Benzylamines; Clopidogrel; Fibrinolytic Agents; Fondaparinux; Humans; Oligosaccharides; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Polysaccharides; Prodrugs; Pyridines; Stroke; Ticlopidine

Warfarin therapy achieving an International Normalized Ratio between 2 and 3 has been shown to be effective in preventing stroke. However, warfarin administration is problematic because of its variable dose, interaction with numerous foods and drugs, narrow therapeutic range, need for chronic anticoagulation monitoring, and long onset and offset of action, which all contribute to the significant underuse of warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation at risk for stroke despite clear indication for its use. This has led to new approaches. Studies with idraparinux (AMADEUS), a factor 10a inhibitor, and with aspirin and clopidogrel (ACTIVE), both platelet inhibitors, are on-going. Studies with ximelagatran (Stroke Prevention by Oral Thrombin Inhibition in Atrial Fibrillation [SPORTIF] trials III and V), an oral direct thrombin inhibitor, have been completed. They compared ximelagatran with warfarin in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation at risk for stroke. The studies demonstrated that ximelagatran is not inferior to warfarin. Moreover, ximelagatran has rapid onset and offset of action, fixed oral dosing without the need for anticoagulation monitoring, low potential for food and drug interactions, and a therapeutic margin wider than that of warfarin. We anticipate further studies to demonstrate definitively that the small percentage of patients (0.5%) with elevation of both alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and bilirubin levels can be managed safely, thereby making ximelagatran a promising option for preventing thromboembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation at risk for stroke.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Azetidines; Benzylamines; Clopidogrel; Humans; Oligosaccharides; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Stroke; Ticlopidine; Warfarin

Therapy for venous thromboembolism (VTE) currently involves a minimum of 3 months of anticoagulation. After cessation of therapy, however, recurrent venous thrombosis occurs at rates of 6 to 9% per year. Clinical trials have demonstrated the benefits of extending anticoagulation beyond 3 months for the prevention of recurrent VTE events. Despite this, many eligible patients do not receive the required thromboprophylaxis and the incidence of recurrent VTE remains too high for a preventable condition. A reason for failure to use prophylaxis is the fear of bleeding complications with current oral anticoagulants such as warfarin. Warfarin has an unpredictable pharmacokinetic profile and a variable dose-response relationship that requires frequent coagulation monitoring and dose adjustments to maintain a target intensity that is both safe and effective. Alternative strategies for long-term prophylaxis, which may potentially provide more consistent anticoagulant responses and reduce coagulation monitoring requirements, include the use of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), treatment with warfarin at a lower intensity, and the introduction of novel anticoagulants. The long-term use of LMWH has been found to be a particularly favorable treatment option for cancer patients in whom it is difficult to control the intensity of anticoagulation. In clinical trials, LMWH significantly reduced the risk of recurrent VTE without increasing bleeding risk. The parenteral administration of the LMWHs, however, is a drawback for long-term use in the outpatient setting. A clinical trial assessing the efficacy and safety of long-term low-intensity warfarin treatment found this therapy to be better than placebo, but another study showed that conventional intensity warfarin was significantly more efficacious than low-intensity warfarin. New therapies in development that may offer improved safety-efficacy profiles are the synthetic pentasaccharides fondaparinux and idraparinux and the oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran. Parenterally administered fondaparinux has been shown to be as effective as LMWH for the acute treatment (5 to 7 days) of symptomatic deep vein thrombosis. Idraparinux, with once-weekly parenteral dosing, is currently being assessed in phase III clinical trials for the long-term secondary prevention of VTE. Ximelagatran is the first oral agent in the new class direct thrombin inhibitors. With a fast onset of action and oral administration, ximelagatran is a

Topics: Anticoagulants; Azetidines; Benzylamines; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Fondaparinux; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Myocardial Ischemia; Oligosaccharides; Polysaccharides; Recurrence; Thrombin; Time Factors; Venous Thrombosis; Warfarin

Topics: Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Anticoagulants; Azetidines; Benzylamines; Dalteparin; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Fondaparinux; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Oligosaccharides; Placebos; Polysaccharides; Prodrugs; Pulmonary Embolism; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Thromboembolism; Thrombomodulin; Time Factors; Warfarin

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Azetidines; Benzylamines; Blood Coagulation Factors; Clinical Trials as Topic; Endothelium, Vascular; Fibrinolytic Agents; Fondaparinux; Hemostasis; Humans; Neoplasms; Neovascularization, Pathologic; Oligosaccharides; Polysaccharides; Stilbenes; Thrombosis