s-16924 and 4-iodo-2-5-dimethoxyphenylisopropylamine

s-16924 has been researched along with 4-iodo-2-5-dimethoxyphenylisopropylamine* in 1 studies

Other Studies

1 other study(ies) available for s-16924 and 4-iodo-2-5-dimethoxyphenylisopropylamine

Article	Year
S 16924 ((R)-2-[1-[2-(2,3-dihydro-benzo[1,4] dioxin-5-yloxy)-ethyl]-pyrrolidin-3yl]-1-(4-fluoro-phenyl)-ethanone), a novel, potential antipsychotic with marked serotonin (5-HT)1A agonist properties: II. Functional profile in comparison to clozapine and ha The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, 1998, Volume: 286, Issue:3 S 16924 antagonized locomotion provoked by dizocilpine and cocaine, reduced conditioned avoidance responses and blocked climbing elicited by apomorphine, models predictive of control of the positive symptoms of schizophrenia: its median inhibitory dose (ID)50 was 0.96 mg/kg, s.c. vs. 1.91 for clozapine and 0.05 for haloperidol. Rotation elicited in unilateral, substantia nigra-lesioned rats by the D1 agonist, SKF 38393, and by the D2 agonist, quinpirole, was blocked equipotently by S 16924 (0.8 and 1. 7) and clozapine (0.6 and 2.0), whereas haloperidol preferentially blocked quinpirole (0.02) vs. SKF 38393 (1.8). S 16924 more potently inhibited the head-twitches elicited by 1-(2, 5-dimethoxy-4-iodophenyl)-2-aminopropane (DOI) and the locomotion provoked by phencyclidine than it inhibited the locomotion elicited by amphetamine (ID50s = 0.15 and 0.02 vs. 2.4). Clozapine showed a similar preference (0.04 and 0.07 vs. 8.6), but not haloperidol (0. 07 and 0.08 vs. 0.04). The discriminative stimulus (DS) properties of DOI were also blocked by S 16924 (ID50 = 0.17) and clozapine (0. 05) but not by haloperidol (>0.16). S 16924 fully (100%) generalized [effective dose (ED)50 = 0.7] to a clozapine DS and clozapine (0.23) fully generalized to a S 16924 DS whereas haloperidol (>/=0.08) only partially generalized (/=80.0) or clozapine (>/=80.0). Further, S 16924 (ID50 = 3.2) and clozapine (5.5) inhibited induction of catalepsy by haloperidol. This action of S 16924 was abolished by the 5-HT1A receptor antagonist, WAY 100,635 (0.16), which less markedly attenuated the anticataleptic action of clozapine. Further, although gnawing elicited by methylphenidate was inhibited by S 16924 (ID50 = 8.4), clozapine (19.6) and haloperidol (0.04), only the action of S 16924 was blocked by WAY 100,635 (0.16). Halop Topics: Amphetamines; Animals; Antipsychotic Agents; Attention; Clozapine; Cognition; Discrimination Learning; Electroencephalography; Haloperidol; Humans; Male; Mice; Mice, Inbred ICR; Motor Activity; Prolactin; Pyrrolidines; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Receptors, Serotonin; Receptors, Serotonin, 5-HT1; Serotonin Receptor Agonists	1998

Article

Year

S 16924 ((R)-2-[1-[2-(2,3-dihydro-benzo[1,4] dioxin-5-yloxy)-ethyl]-pyrrolidin-3yl]-1-(4-fluoro-phenyl)-ethanone), a novel, potential antipsychotic with marked serotonin (5-HT)1A agonist properties: II. Functional profile in comparison to clozapine and ha

The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, 1998, Volume: 286, Issue:3

S 16924 antagonized locomotion provoked by dizocilpine and cocaine, reduced conditioned avoidance responses and blocked climbing elicited by apomorphine, models predictive of control of the positive symptoms of schizophrenia: its median inhibitory dose (ID)50 was 0.96 mg/kg, s.c. vs. 1.91 for clozapine and 0.05 for haloperidol. Rotation elicited in unilateral, substantia nigra-lesioned rats by the D1 agonist, SKF 38393, and by the D2 agonist, quinpirole, was blocked equipotently by S 16924 (0.8 and 1. 7) and clozapine (0.6 and 2.0), whereas haloperidol preferentially blocked quinpirole (0.02) vs. SKF 38393 (1.8). S 16924 more potently inhibited the head-twitches elicited by 1-(2, 5-dimethoxy-4-iodophenyl)-2-aminopropane (DOI) and the locomotion provoked by phencyclidine than it inhibited the locomotion elicited by amphetamine (ID50s = 0.15 and 0.02 vs. 2.4). Clozapine showed a similar preference (0.04 and 0.07 vs. 8.6), but not haloperidol (0. 07 and 0.08 vs. 0.04). The discriminative stimulus (DS) properties of DOI were also blocked by S 16924 (ID50 = 0.17) and clozapine (0. 05) but not by haloperidol (>0.16). S 16924 fully (100%) generalized [effective dose (ED)50 = 0.7] to a clozapine DS and clozapine (0.23) fully generalized to a S 16924 DS whereas haloperidol (>/=0.08) only partially generalized (/=80.0) or clozapine (>/=80.0). Further, S 16924 (ID50 = 3.2) and clozapine (5.5) inhibited induction of catalepsy by haloperidol. This action of S 16924 was abolished by the 5-HT1A receptor antagonist, WAY 100,635 (0.16), which less markedly attenuated the anticataleptic action of clozapine. Further, although gnawing elicited by methylphenidate was inhibited by S 16924 (ID50 = 8.4), clozapine (19.6) and haloperidol (0.04), only the action of S 16924 was blocked by WAY 100,635 (0.16). Halop

Topics: Amphetamines; Animals; Antipsychotic Agents; Attention; Clozapine; Cognition; Discrimination Learning; Electroencephalography; Haloperidol; Humans; Male; Mice; Mice, Inbred ICR; Motor Activity; Prolactin; Pyrrolidines; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Receptors, Serotonin; Receptors, Serotonin, 5-HT1; Serotonin Receptor Agonists

1998