ritonavir and tipranavir

The development of tipranavir and darunavir, second generation non-peptidic HIV protease inhibitors, with marked improved resistance profiles, has opened a new perspective on the treatment of antiretroviral therapy (ART) experienced HIV patients with poor viral load control. The aim of this study was to determine the virologic response in ART experienced patients to tipranavir-ritonavir and darunavir-ritonavir based regimens.. A computer based literature search was conducted in the databases of HINARI (Health InterNetwork Access to Research Initiative), Medline and Cochrane library. Meta-analysis was performed by including randomized controlled studies that were conducted in ART experienced patients with plasma viral load above 1,000 copies HIV RNA/ml. The odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for viral loads of <50 copies and <400 copies HIV RNA/ml at the end of the intervention were determined by the random effects model. Meta-regression, sensitivity analysis and funnel plots were done. The number of HIV-1 patients who were on either a tipranavir-ritonavir or darunavir-ritonavir based regimen and achieved viral load less than 50 copies HIV RNA/ml was significantly higher (overall OR = 3.4; 95% CI, 2.61-4.52) than the number of HIV-1 patients who were on investigator selected boosted comparator HIV-1 protease inhibitors (CPIs-ritonavir). Similarly, the number of patients with viral load less than 400 copies HIV RNA/ml was significantly higher in either the tipranavir-ritonavir or darunavir-ritonavir based regimen treated group (overall OR = 3.0; 95% CI, 2.15-4.11). Meta-regression showed that the viral load reduction was independent of baseline viral load, baseline CD4 count and duration of tipranavir-ritonavir or darunavir-ritonavir based regimen.. Tipranavir and darunavir based regimens were more effective in patients who were ART experienced and had poor viral load control. Further studies are required to determine their consistent viral load suppression effect as the duration of treatment is more prolonged.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Darunavir; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Odds Ratio; Pyridines; Pyrones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

This review focuses on the use of tipranavir/ritonavir, darunavir/ritonavir and etravirine for the treatment of HIV infection that has become resistant to protease inhibitors and/or nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors.. Tipranavir/ritonavir and darunavir/ritonavir are boosted protease inhibitors highly active against HIV that has developed mutations that confer resistance to other protease inhibitors. For both drugs, there are scores to predict activity based on a combination of mutations. Best results are obtained when each drug is combined with one and preferably two other completely active antiretrovirals. The interaction profile and toxicity profile is better for darunavir/ritonavir, which in addition has shown positive outcomes in clinical trials of patients with early failure.Etravirine is a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor highly active against HIV that has developed mutations that confer resistance to nevirapine or efavirenz. Clinical trials results suggest that etravirine should be used with other active antiretrovirals. Best results for etravirine have been obtained in combination with darunavir/ritonavir in patients with extensive protease inhibitor and nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor resistance. The role of etravirine for the treatment of early failure of efavirenz-based or nevirapine-based regimens remains to be elucidated. Resistance to etravirine requires the accumulation of multiple reverse transcriptase mutations different from K103N, which has no impact on activity.. Tipranavir/ritonavir, darunavir/ritonavir and etravirine are very important additions to the therapeutic armamentarium against HIV that has become resistant to protease inhibitors and nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Darunavir; Drug Resistance, Viral; HIV; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Nitriles; Pyridazines; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

Tipranavir (Aptivus) is a selective nonpeptidic HIV-1 protease inhibitor (PI) that is used in the treatment of treatment-experienced adults with HIV-1 infection. Tipranavir is administered orally twice daily and must be given in combination with low-dose ritonavir, which is used to boost its bioavailability. The durable efficacy of tipranavir, in combination with low-dose ritonavir (tipranavir/ritonavir 500 mg/200 mg twice daily), has been demonstrated in well designed trials in treatment-experienced adults infected with multidrug-resistant strains of HIV-1. In treatment-experienced adults with HIV-1 infection receiving an optimized background regimen, viral suppression was greater and immunological responses were better with regimens containing tipranavir/ritonavir than with comparator ritonavir-boosted PI-containing regimens. The efficacy benefit appeared to be more marked in patients receiving two fully active drugs in the regimen, with the combination of tipranavir/ritonavir and enfuvirtide (for the first time) appearing to be the most successful. Although tipranavir is generally well tolerated, clinical hepatitis and hepatic decompensation, and intracranial haemorrhage have been associated with the drug. Tipranavir also has a complex drug-interaction profile. Thus, tipranavir, administered with ritonavir, is an effective treatment option for use in the combination therapy of adults with HIV-1 infection who have been previously treated with other antiretroviral drugs.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Interactions; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

Tipranavir (TPV), a protease inhibitor, has box warnings for intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and hepatotoxicity (including hepatic failure and death). A box warning is a labeling statement about serious adverse events leading to significant injury and/or death. A box warning is the most serious warning placed in the labeling of a prescription medication. As a result of the respective morbidity and mortality associated with ICH and hepatic failure, the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) Adverse Event Reporting System (AERS) was searched for reports of these adverse events in HIV-infected patients receiving a tipranavir/ritonavir (TPV/r)-based regimen. This search comprised part of the FDA's safety analysis for traditional approval. From July 2006 to March 2007, 10 cases of ICH were identified in AERS. From June 2005 to March 2007, 12 cases of liver-associated deaths were identified. One patient experienced liver failure and fatal ICH. Most patients with these events had additional risk factors. Among patients with liver-associated deaths, 3 had HIV-RNA less than 400 copies per milliliter at the time of hepatic failure. Among 10 patients who discontinued TPV/r when hepatic failure developed, median number of days post-TPV/r to death was 23 (range, 2-69 days). Review of AERS did not identify new safety concerns regarding ICH. Among most patients with liver-associated deaths, death appears to occur soon after hepatic failure develops. If considering TPV/r, careful assessment of risk/benefit is suggested for patients at risk for ICH and hepatic failure.

Topics: Adult; Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems; Aged; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Liver Failure; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration

Protease inhibitors (PIs) are potent competitive inhibitors of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) widely used in the treatment of the acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) and prescribed in combination with other antiretroviral drugs. So far ten PIs were approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of HIV infection. In this mini review, quality control methods of each PI are discussed on the basis of analytical techniques published in the literature. Special attention is given to summarize the LC methods described for the analysis of the selected PIs in both drug substances and products with the available literature till date.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; Carbamates; Chromatography, Liquid; Darunavir; Drug Contamination; Furans; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Indinavir; Lopinavir; Nelfinavir; Oligopeptides; Organophosphates; Pyridines; Pyrimidinones; Pyrones; Quality Control; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Sulfonamides

Tipranavir is a nonpeptidic protease inhibitor that has activity against human immunodeficiency virus strains resistant to multiple protease inhibitors. Tipranavir 500 mg is coadministered with ritonavir 200 mg. Tipranavir is metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A and, when combined with ritonavir in vitro, causes inhibition of CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, and CYP3A in addition to induction of glucuronidase and the drug transporter P-glycoprotein. As a result, drug-drug interactions between tipranavir-ritonavir and other coadministered drugs are a concern. In addition to interactions with other antiretrovirals, tipranavir-ritonavir interactions with antifungals, antimycobacterials, oral contraceptives, statins, and antidiarrheals have been specifically evaluated. For other drugs such as antiarrhythmics, antihistamines, ergot derivatives, selective serotonin receptor agonists (or triptans), gastrointestinal motility agents, erectile dysfunction agents, and calcium channel blockers, interactions can be predicted based on studies with other ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors and what is known about tipranavir-ritonavir CYP and P-glycoprotein utilization. The highly complex nature of drug interactions dictates that cautious prescribing should occur with narrow-therapeutic-index drugs that have not been specifically studied. Thus, the known interaction potential of tipranavir-ritonavir is reported, and in vitro and in vivo data are provided to assist clinicians in predicting interactions not yet studied. As more clinical interaction data are generated, better insight will be gained into the specific mechanisms of interactions with tipranavir-ritonavir.

Topics: ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1; Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

Tipranavir is a recently approved nonpeptidic protease inhibitor specifically developed for the management of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection in treatment-experienced patients with protease inhibitor-resistant infection. It is active against a wide range of drug-resistant laboratory- and patient-derived isolates. Tipranavir requires pharmacokinetic boosting by ritonavir (200 mg) to achieve therapeutic levels with twice-daily dosing and must be administered with food for optimal absorption. It is a potent protease inhibitor with a unique drug-resistance profile that offers advantages in the management of cases of multidrug-resistant HIV infection. Tipranavir (in combination with ritonavir) is both an inhibitor and inducer of cytochrome p450, with significant potential for drug-drug interactions, and therefore, it must be used cautiously when administered to patients who are receiving other drugs. Evolution of drug resistance after treatment failure with tipranavir is complex and is not yet fully understood. There is limited overlap in the resistance mutations that predict response to tipranavir and another new protease inhibitor, darunavir, which is active against drug-resistant isolates. Tipranavir is associated with elevations in alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase levels, as well as elevated cholesterol and triglyceride levels, and can cause the typical gastrointestinal adverse effects associated with all protease inhibitors.

Topics: Cholesterol; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Triglycerides

Tipranavir is a non-peptidic HIV-1 protease inhibitor. It binds strongly and selectively, has a favourable resistance profile, and is administered orally twice daily with a subtherapeutic dosage of ritonavir in a 'boosted' regimen (TPV/r) in order to increase its bioavailability. Analysis of clinical isolates from treatment-experienced patients identified the following tipranavir resistance-associated HIV protease mutations: L10V, I13V, K20M/R/V, L33F, E35G, M36I, K43T, M46L, I47V, I54A/M/V, Q58E, H69K, T74P, V82L/T, N83D, I84V. In two large, well designed phase III trials in protease inhibitor-experienced, HIV-infected patients, the RESIST (Randomised Evaluation of Strategic Intervention in multidrug reSistant patients with Tipranavir)-1 and -2 studies, oral TPV/r 500mg/200mg twice daily achieved a significantly better virological response after 24 weeks than standard ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors. This held true for the proportion of patients achieving a >or=1 log(10) decrease in plasma HIV-RNA levels (viral load) [42% and 41% vs 22% and 15%; both p < 0.0001; primary endpoint] and other virological parameters (the proportion of patients with undetectable viral load and total viral load reduction). In addition, a significantly larger increase in CD4+ cell count was achieved with TPV/r than comparator regimens in these trials. The most common adverse events in clinical trials of tipranavir were gastrointestinal. The incidence of treatment discontinuation because of adverse events in the RESIST trials was 8% (pooled data).

Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Drug Resistance, Viral; HIV Infections; HIV Protease; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Mutation; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Viral Load

Tipranavir is a newly approved protease inhibitor that belongs to the class of 4-hydroxy-5,6-dyhydro-2-pyrones. It exhibits potent in vitro activity against both human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 and HIV-2, including clinical isolates with multiple protease inhibitor-resistant mutations. Tipranavir requires coadministration with ritonavir to achieve clinically meaningful serum concentration. In randomized, phase III, open-label trials, it was found to be superior to the currently available boosted protease inhibitors in highly treatment-experienced patients with multiple protease inhibitor mutations. Thus, it provides a welcome new option for salvage antiretroviral therapy. The most common adverse effects associated with tipranavir are diarrhea, nausea and vomiting. Common laboratory abnormalities include elevations of total cholesterol, triglycerides and liver enzymes.

Topics: Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV-1; HIV-2; Humans; Molecular Structure; Protease Inhibitors; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

Although protease inhibitors (PIs) have dramatically improved outcomes in HIV-infected patients, half still fail treatment with PI-based combination therapy. Genetic pressure from incomplete viral suppression rapidly selects for HIV variants with protease gene mutations that confer reduced susceptibility to PI drugs. A number of specific amino acid substitutions have been associated with PI resistance. However, high-level resistance to individual PIs requires the accumulation of several primary and secondary mutations, developing along drug-specific, step-wise pathways. HIV variants resistant to saquinavir and ritonavir usually contain L90M and V82A substitutions, respectively. Indinavir resistance may be linked to substitutions at positions 46 or 82. Resistance to nelfinavir is primarily associated with D30N but may alternatively be found with L90M. Resistance during exposure to amprenavir can follow development of I50V, which also may confer resistance to lopinavir. Failure during treatment with atazanavir is closely linked to 150L. The overlapping of these pathways can lead to multiple-PI resistance, limiting therapeutic options in antiretroviral-experienced patients. Reduced susceptibility to more than one PI is most likely to be associated with amino acid substitutions at six positions: 10, 46, 54, 82, 84 and 90. Other mutations (D30N, G48V, I50V or I50L) are relatively specific for particular PIs and are less likely to produce cross resistance. Certain resistance mutations selected by exposure to one PI may actually increase susceptibility to others. Patients newly diagnosed with HIV infection are increasingly found to harbour virus that is resistant to the more commonly used drugs. Newer PIs may select for mutations that result in less cross resistance with older agents.

Topics: Amino Acid Substitution; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Drug Resistance, Viral; Genetic Variation; HIV; HIV Infections; HIV Protease; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Indinavir; Mutation; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Sulfonamides

This review deals with clinical applications of compounds that inhibit the action of the protease encoded within the genome of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). The HIV-protease is essential for viral maturation and represents an important therapeutic target in the fight against AIDS. Following a brief overview of the enzyme structure and function, the article focuses on a number of peptide and non-peptide based HIV-protease inhibitors that are in current clinical use. These drugs are discussed both with respect to their efficacy in treatment of AIDS, and to problems related to insurgence of viral resistance and side effects seen to date in patient populations.

Topics: Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome; Anti-HIV Agents; Binding Sites; Carbamates; Clinical Trials as Topic; Computer-Aided Design; Crystallography, X-Ray; Drug Design; Drug Resistance, Microbial; Drug Therapy, Combination; Furans; HIV Protease; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Indinavir; Nelfinavir; Oligopeptides; Pyridines; Pyrones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Sulfonamides

Topics: Carbamates; Drug Resistance; Furans; HIV Protease; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Indinavir; Nelfinavir; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Structure-Activity Relationship; Sulfonamides

Ritonavir-boosted tipranavir (TPV/r) was evaluated as initial therapy in treatment-naïve HIV-1-infected patients because of its potency, unique resistance profile, and high genetic barrier. Trial 1182.33, an open-label, randomized trial, compared two TPV/r dose combinations versus ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (LPV/r). Eligible adults, who had no prior antiretroviral therapy were randomized to twice daily (BID) 500/100 mg TPV/r, 500/200 mg TPV/r, or 400/100 mg LPV/r. Each treatment group also received Tenofovir 300 mg + Lamivudine 300 mg QD. The primary endpoint was a confirmed viral load (VL) <50 copies/mL at week 48 without prior antiretroviral regimen changes. Primary analyses examined CD4-adjusted response rates for non-inferiority, using a 15% non-inferiority margin. At week 48, VL<50 copies/mL was 68.4%, 69.9%, and 72.4% in TPV/r100, TPV/r200, and LPV/r groups, respectively, and TPV/r groups showed non-inferiority to LPV/r. Discontinuation due to adverse events was higher in TPV/r100 (10.3%) and TPV/r200 (15.3%) recipients versus LPV/r (3.2%) recipients. The frequency of grade ≥3 transaminase elevations was higher in the TPV/r200 group than the other groups, leading to closure of this group. However, upon continued treatment or following re-introduction after treatment interruption, transaminase elevations returned to grade ≤2 in >65% of patients receiving either TPV/r200 or TPV/r100. The trial was subsequently discontinued; primary objectives were achieved and continuing TPV/r100 was less tolerable than standard of care for initial highly active antiretroviral therapy. All treatment groups had similar 48-week treatment responses. TPV/r100 and TPV/r200 regimens resulted in sustained treatment responses, which were non-inferior to LPV/r at 48 weeks. When compared with the LPV/r regimen and examined in the light of more current regimens, these TPV/r regimens do not appear to be the best options for treatment-naïve patients based on their safety profiles.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Disease Progression; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Gastrointestinal Diseases; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lamivudine; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Proportional Hazards Models; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Tenofovir; Young Adult

To evaluate the long-term (up to week 292) safety, efficacy and tolerability of ritonavir-boosted tipranavir in HIV-1-infected pediatric patients. Long-term follow up of patients enrolled in the randomized, open-label pediatric trial (1182.14/PACTG1051).. HIV-1-infected pediatric patients (2-18 years) who participated in the PACTG 1051 trial were followed for ritonavir-boosted tipranavir-based regimen efficacy, safety and tolerability through week 292.. In patients <12 years of age, 51/62 (82%) were receiving drug at week 48 and 13/62 (21%) at week 288. Among adolescents (12-18 years of age), 35/53 (66%) were receiving drug at week 48 and 2/53 (4%) at week 288. Among patients 2 to <6 years of age, 18/25 (72%) had viral loads <400 copies/mL at week 48. By week 292, 9/25 (36%) of patients had viral loads <400 copies/mL. Among older patients, week 48 responder rates were 35% (13/37 of patients 6 to <12 years of age) and 32% (17/53 of patients 12 to 18 years of age). By week 292, 6/37 (16%) of those 6 to <12 years of age and 2/53 (4%) of those 12 to 18 years of age had viral loads <400 copies/mL. Overall safety and tolerability profiles were best for children who initiated treatment between 2 and <6 years of age. Drug-related adverse events (investigator defined) were similar across all age groups (55-65%).. Pediatric patients who begin treatment at the earlier ages, and who are stable on a ritonavir-boosted tipranavir-based regimen at week 48, generally continue to demonstrate good safety, tolerability and virologic efficacy profiles up to 292 weeks of treatment.

Topics: Adolescent; Anti-HIV Agents; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug Combinations; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Viral Load

Dolutegravir (DTG) is an unboosted, integrase inhibitor for the treatment of HIV infection. Two studies evaluated the effects of efavirenz (EFV) and tipranavir/ritonavir (TPV/r) on DTG pharmacokinetics (PK) in healthy subjects.. The first study was an open-label crossover where 12 subjects received DTG 50 mg every 24 hours (q24h) for 5 days, followed by DTG 50 mg and EFV 600 mg q24h for 14 days. The second study was an open-label crossover where 18 subjects received DTG 50 mg q24h for 5 days followed by TPV/r 500/200 mg every 12 hours (q12h) for 7 days and then DTG 50 mg q24h and TPV/r 500/200 mg q12h for a further 5 days. Safety assessments and serial PK samples were collected. Non-compartmental PK analysis and geometric mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals were generated.. The combination of DTG with EFV or TPV/r was generally well tolerated. Four subjects discontinued the TPV/r study due to increases in alanine aminotransferase that were considered related to TPV/r. Co-administration with EFV resulted in decreases of 57, 39 and 75% in DTG AUC(0-τ), Cmax and Cτ, respectively. Co-administration with TPV/r resulted in decreases of 59, 46 and 76% in DTG AUC(0-τ), Cmax and Cτ, respectively.. Given the reductions in exposure and PK/pharmacodynamic relationships in phase II/III trials, DTG should be given at an increased dose of 50 mg twice daily when co-administered with EFV or TPV/r, and alternative regimens without inducers should be considered in integrase inhibitor-resistant patients.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Area Under Curve; Benzoxazines; Cross-Over Studies; Cyclopropanes; Drug Combinations; Drug Interactions; Female; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; HIV Integrase Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Models, Biological; Oxazines; Piperazines; Pyridines; Pyridones; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Young Adult

This study assessed the single-dose pharmacokinetics of the herpes antiviral acyclovir (administered as the pro-drug valacyclovir) alone and in combination with twice-daily 200 mg ritonavir-boosted tipranavir (500 mg) at steady state.. The study was an open label, one-sequence cross-over pharmacokinetic study in HIV-negative adults. Plasma drug concentrations were measured by validated LC/MS/MS assays; pharmacokinetics (AUC, C(max)) were determined using noncompartmental methods. The geometric mean ratio and 90% confidence interval [GMR, 90% CI] were used to evaluate the drug interaction.. Twenty-six of 29 subjects completed the trial. With steady-state tipranavir/ritonavir, acyclovir C(max) decreased 4.9% [0.95, 0.88-1.02] and AUC increased 6.6% [1.07, 1.04-1.09]. The majority of subjects experienced at least one adverse event, most of which were mild gastrointestinal disorders. Three subjects discontinued tipranavir/ritonavir treatment as a result of drug-related increases in ALT/AST, including one subject who experienced mild upper abdominal pain. All subjects recovered without sequelae.. When administered as a single dose of valacyclovir with steady-state tipranavir/ritonavir, there were no clinically important changes in acyclovir pharmacokinetics. This result indicates that valacyclovir can be co-administered safely with no dose adjustments.

Topics: Acyclovir; Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiviral Agents; Area Under Curve; Chromatography, Liquid; Cross-Over Studies; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prodrugs; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Tandem Mass Spectrometry; Valacyclovir; Valine

This study evaluated the effects of single-dose administration and steady-state concentrations of tipranavir 500 mg and ritonavir 200 mg (TPV/r) combination on the pharmacokinetics of tadalafil 10 mg (TAD) in an open-label study. Seventeen healthy male volunteers received sequential dosing of the studied product: TAD (day 1) alone in a single dose for 7 days followed by TAD (day 8) in a single dose with TPV/r (500/200 mg twice daily, days 8-18). Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined in a noncompartmental analysis. The geometric mean ratio and 90% confidence interval were used to evaluate drug interactions. The effect of a single dose of TAD on the pharmacokinetics of TPV/r resulted in a small decrease in exposure after either first-dose or steady-state TPV/r (geometric mean ratios [90% confidence interval]: area under the concentration-time curve, 0.85 [0.74-0.97]). In contrast, coadministration of TAD exposure was increased significantly (2.33 [2.02-2.69]) when administered with the first dose of TPV/r but not when TPV/r steady state was reached (1.01 [0.83-1.21]). Antiretroviral activity may not be reduced, but the dose of TAD should be reduced at the start of TPV/r therapy and then a full dose can be resumed after steady state is reached.

Topics: Adult; Biological Availability; Carbolines; Cross-Over Studies; Drug Interactions; Half-Life; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Metabolic Clearance Rate; Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Tadalafil; Young Adult

Previous reports on the pharmacokinetic of tipranavir (TPV) and buprenorphine (BUP)/ naloxone found that coadministration resulted in an 80% reduction in the area under the curve AUC of the primary BUP metabolite, norBUP, without any pharmacodynamic consequences. This study was conducted to characterize how tipranivir/ritonavir effects the glucuronide metabolites of BUP and may explain the reduction in the norBUP.. HIV-seronegative subjects stabilized on at least 3 weeks of BUP/naloxone sequentially underwent baseline and steady-state pharmacokinetic evaluation of twice daily TPV 500?mg coadministered with ritonavir 200?mg (TPV/r).. Twelve subjects were enrolled and ten completed the study. The steady-state pharmacokinetics for BUP-3-glucuronide (BUP-3G) and norBUP-3-glucuronide (norBUP-3G) in the presence and absence of steady-state TPV/r were analyzed. The C(max) of BUP-3G was 8.78???5.23?ng/mL without TPV/r and increased to 12.7???11.7 after steady state of TPV/r was achieved. The AUC of BUP-3G was 31.1???19.4?(ng/mL)?(h) without TPV/r and increased to 58. 6???49.5 after steady state of TPV/r was achieved (p?=?.0966). In contrast, steady-state norBUP-3G AUC(0?24?h) (p?=?.0216) and C(max) (p?=?.0088) were significantly decreased in the presence of steady-state TPV/r.. This study further elucidates the effects of TPV/r on glucuronidation. The current evaluation of glucuronide metabolites of BUP and norBUP are suggestive of combined inhibition of Uridine diphosphate (UDP)-glucuronosyltransferase of the 1A family and cytochrome P450 3A4 that spares UGT2B7 leading to a shunting of BUP away from production of norBUP and toward BUP-3G as seen by a statistically significant increase in the AUC of BUP-3G.

Topics: Adult; Buprenorphine; Buprenorphine, Naloxone Drug Combination; Drug Interactions; Female; HIV Seronegativity; Humans; Inactivation, Metabolic; Male; Middle Aged; Naloxone; Narcotic Antagonists; Opioid-Related Disorders; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

The use of HIV protease inhibitors (PIs) as part of antiretroviral therapy in the treatment of HIV-1 infection may be associated with an increased risk of bleeding. This prospective, randomized, open-label trial in healthy volunteers compared the effects of tipranavir/ritonavir (TPV/r), darunavir/ ritonavir (DRV/r), and ritonavir (RTV) alone on platelet aggregation after a single dose and at steady-state concentrations. Subjects were selected on the basis of normal platelet aggregation and arachidonic acid (AA)-induced platelet aggregation inhibition after administration of a single 325-mg dose of aspirin. All 3 PI therapies were administered twice daily for 10 days. In some but not all subjects, TPV/r inhibited AA-induced platelet aggregation and prolonged PFA-100® closure time with collagen-epinephrine cartridge, which was of lesser magnitude and consistency compared with aspirin, but greater when compared to DRV/r and RTV. At least 2 subjects in each treatment arm showed complete inhibition of AA-induced platelet aggregation on treatment, and the magnitude of change in all platelet-function tests did not correlate with PI plasma concentrations. Effects of TPV/r on platelet aggregation were reversed 24 hours after the last TPV/r dose. None of the PI treatments tested were associated with increases in bleeding time, decreases in plasma coagulation factors, or increase in fibrinolysis. There was large inter-patient variability in antiplatelet effect for all PI treatments, ranging from no effect to complete inhibition of AA-induced platelet aggregation.

Topics: Adult; Blood Coagulation; Blood Coagulation Factors; Darunavir; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fibrinolysis; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation; Prospective Studies; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

This phase 2, randomized, active-controlled, 48-week study assessed the noninferiority of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) integrase inhibitor elvitegravir to comparator ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (CPI/r) in treatment-experienced subjects.. Subjects had HIV RNA levels 1000 copies/mL and 1 protease resistance mutation. Subjects received nucleoside or nucleotide reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) with or without T-20 and either CPI/r or once-daily elvitegravir at a dose of 20 mg, 50 mg, or 125 mg (blinded to dose) with ritonavir. After week 8, the independent data monitoring committee stopped the elvitegravir 20 mg arm and allowed subjects in the elvitegravir 50 mg and 125 mg arms to add protease inhibitors. The primary end point was the time-weighted average change from baseline in HIV RNA level through week 24 (DAVG(24)).. A total of 278 subjects with a median of 11 protease and 3 thymidine analog mutations were randomized and treated. One-half of subjects received NRTIs without expected antiviral activity. Compared with the DAVG(24) for the CPI/r arm (-1.19 log(10) copies/mL), the elvitegravir 50 mg arm was noninferior (-1.44 log(10) copies/mL), and the elvitegravir 125 mg arm was superior (-1.66 log(10) copies/mL; P = .021). Efficacy was impacted by activity of background agents. There was no relationship between elvitegravir dosage and adverse events.. Elvitegravir was well-tolerated and produced rapid virologic suppression that was durable with active background therapy. Trial registration. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier number: NCT00298350.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Darunavir; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Integrase Inhibitors; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Pyrones; Quinolones; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

The effects of tipranavir/ritonavir (TPV/r) on hepatic and intestinal P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme activity were evaluated in 23 volunteers. The subjects received oral (p.o.) caffeine, warfarin + vitamin K, omeprazole, dextromethorphan, and midazolam and digoxin (p.o. and intravenous (i.v.)) at baseline, during the first three doses of TPV/r (500 mg/200 mg b.i.d.), and at steady state. Plasma area under the curve (AUC)(0-infinity) and urinary metabolite ratios were used for quantification of protein activities. A single dose of TPV/r had no effect on the activity of CYP1A2 and CYP2C9; it weakly inhibited CYP2C19 and P-gp; and it potently inhibited CYP2D6 and CYP3A. Multiple dosing produced weak induction of CYP1A2, moderate induction of CYP2C19, potent induction of intestinal P-gp, and potent inhibition of CYP2D6 and CYP3A, with no significant effects on CYP2C9 and hepatic P-gp. Several P450/transporter single-nucleotide polymorphisms correlated with the baseline phenotype but not with the extent of inhibition or induction. Although mixed induction and inhibition are present, this approach offers an understanding of drug interaction mechanisms and ultimately assists in optimizing the clinical use of TPV/r.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Area Under Curve; ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1; Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System; Drug Combinations; Drug Interactions; Enzyme Induction; Enzyme Inhibitors; Female; Genotype; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Intestinal Mucosa; Liver; Male; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Phenotype; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Young Adult

Despite being among the most potent protease inhibitors, the use of tipranavir (TPV) is hampered by a high pill burden and frequent side effects compared with other boosted protease inhibitors. A total of 10 patients receiving TPV/ritonavir (TPV/RTV) 500/200 for longer than 6 months were randomized to stay on the same dosing schedule or switch to TPV/RTV 500/100. Although all patients on TVP/RTV 500/200 remained stable for the next 12 weeks, 3 out of 5 patients who switched doses experienced benefits in terms of reducing aminotransferases and total cholesterol. Fasting triglycerides were also reduced in 2 of them. Plasma HIV-RNA remained undetectable in all patients, despite the observed decline in TPV trough concentrations.

Topics: Adult; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Monitoring; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

Three separate controlled, two-period studies with healthy volunteers assessed the pharmacokinetic interactions between tipranavir-ritonavir (TPV/r) in a 500/200-mg dose and 500 mg of clarithromycin (CLR), 100 mg of fluconazole (FCZ), or 150 mg of rifabutin (RFB). The CLR study was conducted with 24 subjects. The geometric mean ratios (GMR) and 90% confidence intervals (90% CI; given in parentheses) of the areas under the concentration-time curve (AUC), the maximum concentrations of the drugs in serum (C(max)), and the concentrations in serum at 12 h postdose (Cp12h) for multiple-dose TPV/r and multiple-dose CLR, indicating the effect of TPV/r on the CLR parameters, were 1.19 (1.04-1.37), 0.95 (0.83-1.09), and 1.68 (1.42-1.98), respectively. The formation of the metabolite 14-OH-CLR was decreased by 95% in the presence of TPV, and the TPV AUC increased 66% compared to that for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-negative historical controls. The FCZ study was conducted with 20 subjects. The GMR (and 90% CI) of the AUC, C(max), and Cp24h, indicating the effect of multiple-dose TPV/r on the multiple-dose FCZ parameters, were 0.92 (0.88-0.95), 0.94 (0.91-0.98), and 0.89 (0.85-0.92), respectively. The TPV AUC increased by 50% compared to that for HIV-negative historical controls. The RFB study was conducted with 24 subjects. The GMR (and 90% CI) of the AUC, C(max), and Cp12h for multiple-dose TPV/r and single-dose RFB, indicating the effect of TPV/r on the RFB parameters, were 2.90 (2.59-3.26), 1.70 (1.49-1.94), and 2.14 (1.90-2.41), respectively. The GMR (and 90% CI) of the AUC, C(max), and Cp12h of TPV/r and RFB with 25-O-desacetyl-RFB were 4.33 (3.86-4.86), 1.86 (1.63-2.12), and 2.76 (2.44-3.12), respectively. Coadministration of TPV with a single dose of RFB resulted in a 16% increase in the TPV Cp12h compared to that for TPV alone. In the general population, no dose adjustments are necessary for the combination of TPV/r and CLR or FCZ. Combining TPV/r with RFB should be done with caution, while toxicity and RFB drug levels should be monitored. Study medications were generally well-tolerated in these studies.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Clarithromycin; Drug Interactions; Female; Fluconazole; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Pyrones; Rifabutin; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

Gender-related differences in the efficacy and safety of ritonavir-boosted tipranavir [tipranavir/ritonavir (TPV/r) 500/200 mg twice daily (b.i.d.)] were evaluated in a subanalysis of the Randomized Evaluation of Strategic Intervention in Multidrug Resistant Patients with Tipranavir (RESIST) trials. Data from HIV-1-infected women (203; TPV/r = 117) and men (1280; TPV/r = 629) showed no significant gender-related differences in HIV RNA response rates (at 48 weeks) and safety (at 96 weeks) despite higher mean steady-state plasma TPV trough concentrations in women. Significantly greater increases in CD4 cell count (+81.2 vs. +48.6; P = 0.0012) were observed in women at week 48.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Drug Combinations; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Viral; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sex Factors; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

Raltegravir (RAL) is a novel and potent human immunodeficiency virus type 1 integrase inhibitor that is predominantly metabolized via glucuronidation. The protease inhibitor combination tipranavir (TPV) at 500 mg and ritonavir (RTV) at 200 mg (TPV-RTV) has inhibitory and inductive effects on metabolic enzymes, which includes the potential to induce glucuronosyltransferase. Because RAL may be coadministered with TPV-RTV, there is the potential for the induction of RAL metabolism. Consequently, we assessed the effect of TPV-RTV on the pharmacokinetics of RAL and the safety and tolerability of this combination. Eighteen healthy adults were enrolled in this open-label study. The participants received RAL at 400 mg twice daily for 4 days (period 1) and TPV-RTV twice daily for 7 days (period 2), followed immediately by 400 mg RAL with TPV-RTV twice daily for 4 days (period 3). Under steady-state conditions, the RAL concentration at 12 h (C(12)) was decreased when RAL was administered with TPV-RTV (geometric mean ratio [GMR], 0.45; 90% confidence interval [CI] 0.31, 0.66; P = 0.0021); however, the area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to 12 h (GMR, 0.76; 90% CI, 0.49, 1.19; P = 0.2997) and the maximum concentration in serum (GMR, 0.82; 90% CI, 0.46, 1.46; P = 0.5506) were not substantially affected. There were no serious adverse experiences or discontinuations due to study drug-related adverse experiences, and RAL coadministered with TPV-RTV was generally well tolerated. Although the RAL C(12) was decreased with TPV-RTV in this study, favorable efficacy data collected in phase III studies substantiate that TPV-RTV may be coadministered with RAL without dose adjustment.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Female; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Pyrones; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Young Adult

To identify pharmacokinetic (PK) drug-drug interactions between tipranavir-ritonavir (TPV/r) and rosuvastatin and atorvastatin, we conducted two prospective, open-label, single-arm, two-period studies. The geometric mean (GM) ratio was 1.37 (90% confidence interval [CI], 1.15 to 1.62) for the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) for rosuvastatin and 2.23 (90% CI, 1.83 to 2.72) for the maximum concentration of drug in serum (Cmax) for rosuvastatin with TPV/r at steady state versus alone. The GM ratio was 9.36 (90% CI, 8.02 to 10.94) for the AUC of atorvastatin and 8.61 (90% CI, 7.25 to 10.21) for the Cmax of atorvastatin with TPV/r at steady state versus alone. Tipranavir PK parameters were not affected by single-dose rosuvastatin or atorvastatin. Mild gastrointestinal intolerance, headache, and mild reversible liver enzyme elevations (grade 1 and 2) were the most commonly reported adverse drug reactions. Based on these interactions, we recommend low initial doses of rosuvastatin (5 mg) and atorvastatin (10 mg), with careful clinical monitoring of rosuvastatin- or atorvastatin-related adverse events when combined with TPV/r.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anti-HIV Agents; Atorvastatin; Drug Interactions; Female; Fluorobenzenes; Heptanoic Acids; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Pyrones; Pyrroles; Ritonavir; Rosuvastatin Calcium; Sulfonamides; Young Adult

HIV-infected patients with opioid dependence often require opioid replacement therapy. Pharmacokinetic interactions between HIV therapy and opioid dependence treatment medications can occur. HIV-seronegative subjects stabilized on at least 3 weeks of buprenorphine/naloxone (BUP/NLX) therapy sequentially underwent baseline and steady-state pharmacokinetic evaluation of open-label, twice daily tipranavir 500 mg co-administered with ritonavir 200 mg (TPV/r). Twelve subjects were enrolled and 10 completed the study. Prior to starting TPV/r, the geometric mean BUP AUC(0-24h) and C(max) were 43.9 ng h/mL and 5.61 ng/mL, respectively. After achieving steady-state with TPV/r (> or = 7 days), these values were similar at 43.7 ng h/mL and 4.84 ng/mL, respectively. Similar analyses for norBUP, the primary metabolite of BUP, demonstrated a reduction in geometric mean for AUC(0-24h) [68.7-14.7 ng h/mL; ratio=0.21 (90% CI 0.19-0.25)] and C(max) [4.75-0.94 ng/mL; ratio=0.20 (90% CI 0.17-0.23)]. The last measurable NLX concentration (C(last)) in the concentration-time profile, never measured in previous BUP/NLX interaction studies with antiretroviral medications, was decreased by 20%. Despite these pharmacokinetic effects on BUP metabolites and NLX, no clinical opioid withdrawal symptoms were noted. TPV steady-state AUC(0-12h) and C(max) decreased 19% and 25%, respectively, and C(min) was relatively unchanged when compared to historical control subjects receiving TPV/r alone. No dosage modification of BUP/NLX is required when co-administered with TPV/r. Though mechanistically unclear, it is likely that decreased plasma RTV levels while on BUP/NLX contributed substantially to the decrease in TPV levels. BUP/NLX and TPV/r should therefore be used cautiously to avoid decreased efficacy of TPV in patients taking these agents concomitantly.

Topics: Adult; Anti-Retroviral Agents; Buprenorphine; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Seronegativity; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Naloxone; Narcotic Antagonists; Opioid-Related Disorders; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

The risk and course of serum transaminase elevations (TEs) and clinical hepatic serious adverse event (SAE) development in ritonavir-boosted tipranavir (TPV/r) 500/200 mg BID recipients, who also received additional combination antiretroviral treatment agents in clinical trials (TPV/r-based cART), was determined.. Aggregated transaminase and hepatic SAE data through 96 weeks of TPV/r-based cART from five Phase IIb/III trials were analyzed. Patients were categorized by the presence or absence of underlying liver disease (+LD or -LD). Kaplan-Meier (K-M) probability estimates for time-to-first US National Institutes of Health, Division of AIDS (DAIDS) Grade 3/4 TE and clinical hepatic SAE were determined and clinical actions/outcomes evaluated. Risk factors for DAIDS Grade 3/4 TE were identified through multivariate Cox regression statistical modeling.. Grade 3/4 TEs occurred in 144/1299 (11.1%) patients; 123/144 (85%) of these were asymptomatic; 84% of these patients only temporarily interrupted treatment or continued, with transaminase levels returning to Grade < or = 2. At 96 weeks of study treatment, the incidence of Grade 3/4 TEs was higher among the +LD (16.8%) than among the -LD (10.1%) patients. K-M analysis revealed an incremental risk for developing DAIDS Grade 3/4 TEs; risk was greatest through 24 weeks (6.1%), and decreasing thereafter (>24-48 weeks: 3.4%, >48 weeks-72 weeks: 2.0%, >72-96 weeks: 2.2%), and higher in +LD than -LD patients at each 24-week interval. Treatment with TPV/r, co-infection with hepatitis B and/or C, DAIDS grade >1 TE and CD4+ > 200 cells/mm3 at baseline were found to be independent risk factors for development of DAIDS Grade 3/4 TE; the hazard ratios (HR) were 2.8, 2.0, 2.1 and 1.5, respectively. Four of the 144 (2.7%) patients with Grade 3/4 TEs developed hepatic SAEs; overall, 14/1299 (1.1%) patients had hepatic SAEs including six with hepatic failure (0.5%). The K-M risk of developing hepatic SAEs through 96 weeks was 1.4%; highest risk was observed during the first 24 weeks and decreased thereafter; the risk was similar between +LD and -LD patients for the first 24 weeks (0.6% and 0.5%, respectively) and was higher for +LD patients, thereafter.. Through 96 weeks of TPV/r-based cART, DAIDS Grade 3/4 TEs and hepatic SAEs occurred in approximately 11% and 1% of TPV/r patients, respectively; most (84%) had no significant clinical implications and were managed without permanent treatment discontinuation. Among the 14 patients with hepatic SAE, 6 experienced hepatic failure (0.5%); these patients had profound immunosuppression and the rate appears higher among hepatitis co-infected patients. The overall probability of experiencing a hepatic SAE in this patient cohort was 1.4% through 96 weeks of treatment. Independent risk factors for DAIDS Grade 3/4 TEs include TPV/r treatment, co-infection with hepatitis B and/or C, DAIDS grade >1 TE and CD4+ > 200 cells/mm3 at baseline.. US-NIH Trial registration number: NCT00144170.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-HIV Agents; Female; Hepatitis, Viral, Human; HIV Infections; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Liver; Liver Failure; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Proportional Hazards Models; Pyridines; Pyrones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Transaminases; Young Adult

To evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of ritonavir-boosted tipranavir (TPV/r) in HIV-1-infected pediatric patients.. Open-label randomized pediatric trial (1182.14/PACTG1051) comparing TPV/r at two doses including an optimized background regimen.. HIV-1-infected patients (2-18 years) with plasma viral load 1500 copies/ml or more were randomized to TPV/r 290/115 or 375/150 mg/m twice-daily oral solution and optimized background regimen. Week 48 efficacy, safety and tolerability results were evaluated.. Children (n = 115; 97% treatment experienced) were randomized to low or high dose therapy. Eighty-eight remained on-treatment through 48 weeks. Baseline characteristics were similar between dose groups. At study entry, half of the HIV-1 isolates were resistant to all protease inhibitors. At 48 weeks, 39.7% low-dose and 45.6% high-dose TPV/r recipients had viral load less than 400 copies/ml and 34.5 and 35.1%, respectively, achieved viral load less than 50 copies/ml. Vomiting, cough and diarrhea were the most frequent adverse events. Grade 3 alanine aminotransferase elevations were observed in 6.3% of patients. No grade 4 alanine aminotransferase or grade 3/4 aspartate aminotransferase elevations were reported.. TPV/r achieved a sustained virologic response, showed a good safety profile and was well tolerated at either dose. In pediatric patients with high baseline resistance profiles, high-dose TPV/r tended to demonstrate a better sustained response.

Topics: Adolescent; Alanine Transaminase; Anti-HIV Agents; Biomarkers; Blood Coagulation Disorders; Child; Child, Preschool; Diarrhea; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Logistic Models; Male; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load; Vomiting

Elvitegravir (EVG) is in phase 3 development in combination with ritonavir (RTV)-boosted protease inhibitors in treatment-experienced, HIV-infected patients. Two studies evaluated pharmacokinetic (PK) interactions among EVG and RTV-boosted tipranavir (TPV/r) or darunavir (DRV/r).. Healthy volunteers received EVG/r alone (study 1: 200/100 mg once daily; study 2: 125/100 mg once daily), TPV/r (500/200 mg twice daily) or DRV/r (600/100 mg twice daily) alone, and EVG (200 or 125 mg as applicable) added to TPV/r (500/200 mg twice daily) or DRV/r (600/100 mg twice daily) in a randomized crossover design, with assessment of steady-state PK for EVG, TPV, DRV, and RTV. Safety was assessed by clinical monitoring. Studies were powered to conclude lack of an interaction if the 90% confidence interval for the geometric mean ratios of the AUCtau and Cmax for EVG, TPV, and DRV were within predefined no-effect boundaries. Trough concentrations were also assessed.. No subjects discontinued for adverse events during treatment with EVG/r alone. On coadministration, AUCtau and Cmax of EVG and TPV and EVG and DRV were within prespecified no-effect boundaries versus treatment alone; trough concentrations were also not substantially altered.. The PK of EVG and TPV or DRV were not altered after coadministration of EVG with TPV/r or DRV/r. EVG PK was similar with varied RTV doses of 100 mg once daily, 100 mg twice daily, or 200 mg twice daily. EVG can be added to TPV/r or DRV/r regimens without dose adjustment.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Darunavir; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Pyrones; Quinolones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

Thymidine-based nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors and some protease inhibitors of HIV are associated with lipoatrophy, relative central fat accumulation and insulin resistance. The latter associations have not been well evaluated prospectively in adults commencing antiretroviral therapy. We studied the effects of protease inhibitor-based antiretroviral regimens on body composition, insulin sensitivity and adipocytokine levels.. 48-week substudy of a randomized, open-label, three-arm trial.. Hospital and community HIV clinics.. 140 HIV-infected adults naive to antiretroviral therapy.. Tipranavir/ritonavir [500/200 mg twice a day (TPV/r200)] or [500/100 mg twice a day (TPV/r100)] or lopinavir/ritonavir [400/100 mg twice a day (LPV/r)], each with tenofovir + lamivudine.. Body composition [dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry for limb fat; L4, abdominal computed tomography for visceral adipose tissue (VAT)]; and fasting metabolic parameters. The primary analysis was change in limb fat mass in each TPV/r group vs. LPV/r.. Limb fat increased in all three groups: LPV/r (1.17 kg) versus TPV/r200 (0.83 kg; P = 0.16) and TPV/r100 (0.41 kg; P = 0.07). VAT decreased in all groups: LPV/r (-3 cm) vs. TPV/r200 (-9 cm; P = 0.04) and TPV/r100 (-6 cm; P = 0.40). No significant change in insulin sensitivity was observed, including by oral glucose tolerance testing. The increase in leptin levels was significantly correlated with the increase in limb fat mass (r = 0.67; P < 0.0001). Despite increased limb fat, adiponectin levels increased, but significantly more with TPV/r200 (+6010 ng/ml; P < 0.0001) or TPV/r100 (+4497 ng/ml; P = 0.002) when compared with LPV/r (+1360 ng/ml).. Unlike many other antiretroviral regimens, TPV/r or LPV/r with tenofovir-lamivudine increased subcutaneous fat without evidence for increasing visceral fat or insulin resistance over 48 weeks.

Topics: Adiponectin; Adult; Body Composition; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; HIV-Associated Lipodystrophy Syndrome; Humans; Insulin Resistance; Lopinavir; Male; Pyridines; Pyrimidinones; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

Given the limited treatment options for patients with high-level resistance, antiretroviral (ARV) regimens based on concomitant use of 2 ritonavir (RTV)-boosted protease inhibitors (PIs) were considered a therapeutic option.. Boehringer Ingelheim (BI) study 1182.51 examined the pharmacokinetic profile, safety, and efficacy of RTV-boosted tipranavir (TPV/r), alone and in combination with comparator PIs (CPIs) in 315 triple-class-experienced, HIV-infected patients.. Two weeks after single PI therapy, the addition of TPV/r reduced plasma trough levels 52%, 80%, and 56% for lopinavir (LPV), saquinavir (SQV), and amprenavir (APV) recipients, respectively. After 2 weeks, a TPV/r-only regimen reduced HIV viral load (VL) by a median of 1.06 log(10) copies/mL. VL reductions at 2 weeks between single-boosted CPIs were difficult to compare, because the numbers of patients maintaining their previous failing PI after randomization were different. At week 4, patients initiating treatment with TPV-containing regimens sustained VL reduction (median decrease of 1.27 log(10) copies/mL). Patients adding TPV to regimens at week 2 achieved median reductions from a baseline of 1.19 log(10), 0.96 log(10), and 1.12 log(10) copies/mL at week 4 in dual-boosted LPV, SQV, and APV groups, respectively. At 24 weeks, VL reductions (median: -0.24 to -0.47 log(10) copies/mL) were comparable between treatment groups.. The efficacy of a dual PI regimen depended on the presence of TPV, with additional recycled CPIs having limited activity, even in drug-resistant patient populations with plasma trough concentrations regarded as likely to be adequate in this study. No clear guidelines exist about ARV plasma trough concentrations in treatment-experienced patients, however.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Area Under Curve; Diarrhea; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fatigue; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Metabolic Clearance Rate; Middle Aged; Nausea; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

The efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of three doses of tipranavir/ritonavir (TPV/r) in highly treatment-experienced human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1-infected patients with protease inhibitor (PI)-resistant isolates were evaluated. A 24-week multicenter, double-blind, randomized, dose-finding trial was conducted. All patients were three-drug class experienced and had taken at least two PI-based regimens. All had at least one primary PI mutation and had plasma HIV-RNA > 1000 copies/ml. Patients remained on their background non-PI antiretroviral medications for the first 14 days. After this 14-day period of functional TPV/r monotherapy, the background antiretroviral medications were optimized based on treatment history and the screening genotype. A total of 216 patients were randomized. All groups [TPV/r 500 mg/100 mg (n = 73), 500 mg/200 mg (n = 72), and 750 mg/200 mg (n = 71) twice daily] achieved an approximate 1 log10 reduction in the median HIV-RNA at week 2. A significant reduction was sustained through 24 weeks in the TPV/r 500 mg/200 mg and 750 mg/200 mg groups. The 500 mg/200 mg dose achieved optimal median TPV trough concentrations and lower interpatient variability. The most frequently reported adverse events (AEs) were diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, fatigue, and headache. The TPV/r 750 mg/200 mg group had the highest rate of grade 3 or 4 laboratory abnormalities and study discontinuations due to AEs. All doses of TPV/r tested in this study were associated with HIV-1 viral load reductions through 24 weeks. The 500 mg/200 mg dose achieved the best efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetic profile in this highly treatment-experienced population and was selected for the pivotal phase 3 studies.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-HIV Agents; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

To compare the relative antiviral efficacy of TMC114 with low-dose ritonavir (TMC114/r) and tipranavir with low-dose ritonavir (TPV/r) vs. control protease inhibitor (CPI) in treatment-experienced patients, using data from the POWER 1/2 and RESIST 1/2 trials. These trials recruited antiretroviral-experienced patients with HIV RNA > 1000 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL and at least one primary PI mutation, and used optimized nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors with or without enfuvirtide, plus investigator-selected CPI in the control arms.. For the POWER trials, data from the 600/100 mg twice a day (bid) dose and CPI arms (n=201) were included, while all data from the RESIST trials (TPV/r 500/200 mg bid and CPI; n=1159) were included. The difference in week 24 efficacy (intent to treat) for the new PI vs. CPI was compared between the trials.. Overall baseline characteristics were well matched across the trials. At week 24, 72% of TMC114/r patients achieved a > or =1 log(10) copies/mL reduction in HIV RNA compared with 40% of TPV/r patients (for CPI patients, this percentage was 21 and 18%, respectively, in the POWER and RESIST trials). The treatment benefit of TMC114/r over CPI in the POWER trials was greater (outside the 95% confidence intervals) than the benefit of TPV/r over CPI in the RESIST trials, for the 24-week HIV RNA endpoints of 1 log(10) copies/mL reduction, <400 copies/mL and <50 copies/mL, and also for the mean rise in CD4 count. In sensitivity analysis, this difference in efficacy was strongest for those who did not also use enfuvirtide.. Given the caveats of this type of analysis (for example, possible differences in trial conduct, and undetected differences in baseline resistance profiles), the efficacy benefits of TMC114/r vs. CPI in the POWER trials appear to be greater than the benefits of TPV/r vs. CPI in the RESIST trials, for patients who did not also use enfuvirtide.

Topics: Adult; Darunavir; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sulfonamides

The pharmacokinetic and metabolite profiles of the antiretroviral agent tipranavir (TPV), administered with ritonavir (RTV), in nine healthy male volunteers were characterized. Subjects received 500-mg TPV capsules with 200-mg RTV capsules twice daily for 6 days. They then received a single oral dose of 551 mg of TPV containing 90 microCi of [(14)C]TPV with 200 mg of RTV on day 7, followed by twice-daily doses of unlabeled 500-mg TPV with 200 mg of RTV for up to 20 days. Blood, urine, and feces were collected for mass balance and metabolite profiling. Metabolite profiling and identification was performed using a flow scintillation analyzer in conjunction with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The median recovery of radioactivity was 87.1%, with 82.3% of the total recovered radioactivity excreted in the feces and less than 5% recovered from urine. Most radioactivity was excreted within 24 to 96 h after the dose of [(14)C]TPV. Radioactivity in blood was associated primarily with plasma rather than red blood cells. Unchanged TPV accounted for 98.4 to 99.7% of plasma radioactivity. Similarly, the most common form of radioactivity excreted in feces was unchanged TPV, accounting for a mean of 79.9% of fecal radioactivity. The most abundant metabolite in feces was a hydroxyl metabolite, H-1, which accounted for 4.9% of fecal radioactivity. TPV glucuronide metabolite H-3 was the most abundant of the drug-related components in urine, corresponding to 11% of urine radioactivity. In conclusion, after the coadministration of TPV and RTV, unchanged TPV represented the primary form of circulating and excreted TPV and the primary extraction route was via the feces.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anti-HIV Agents; Capsules; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Synergism; Feces; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

BI 1182.2, an open-label, randomized, multicenter, phase 2 study, evaluated efficacy and tolerability of the protease inhibitor (PI) tipranavir (TPV; 500 mg twice daily or 1000 mg twice daily) administered with ritonavir (100 mg twice daily) in combination with 1 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor and 1 nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor in multiple PI-experienced HIV-1-infected patients.. Forty-one patients were evaluated in 2 arms: low-dose (19 patients) or high-dose (22 patients) ritonavir-boosted tipranavir (TPV/r). Primary endpoints were change from baseline in HIV-1 RNA concentrations at weeks 16, 24, 48, and 80 and percentage of patients with plasma HIV-1 RNA levels lower than the limit of quantitation. Safety was evaluated by adverse events (AEs), grade 3/4 abnormalities, and serious AEs.. Of all patients, 59% were still receiving TPV/r (14 in low-dose arm and 10 in high-dose arm) at week 80. Patients in both arms had a median >2.0-log10 reduction in plasma viral load. Intent-to-treat analysis demonstrated that a similar proportion of patients in the high-dose and low-dose groups achieved plasma HIV-1 RNA levels <50 copies/mL at week 80 (43% vs. 32%; P = 0.527). The most frequently observed AEs were diarrhea, headache, and nausea.. TPV/r combined with other active antiretroviral agents can provide a durable treatment response for highly treatment-experienced patients.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Pyrones; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sulfonamides; Time Factors; Treatment Failure; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Adenine; Anti-HIV Agents; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Didanosine; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Organophosphonates; Pyridines; Pyrones; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sulfonamides; Tenofovir; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

Topics: Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV Seropositivity; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

Improved treatment options are needed for patients infected with multidrug-resistant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). The nonpeptidic protease inhibitor tipranavir has demonstrated antiviral activity against many protease inhibitor-resistant HIV-1 isolates. The Randomized Evaluation of Strategic Intervention in multi-drug reSistant patients with Tipranavir (RESIST-1) trial is an ongoing, open-label study comparing the efficacy and safety of ritonavir-boosted tipranavir (TPV/r) with an investigator-selected ritonavir-boosted comparator protease inhibitor (CPI/r) in treatment-experienced, HIV-1-infected patients.. Six hundred twenty antiretroviral-experienced patients were treated at 125 sites in North America and Australia. Before randomization, all patients underwent genotypic resistance testing, which investigators used to select a CPI/r and an optimized background regimen. Patients were randomized to receive TPV/r or CPI/r and were stratified on the basis of preselected protease inhibitor and enfuvirtide use. Treatment response was defined as a confirmed reduction in the HIV-1 load of > or = 1 log10 less than the baseline level without treatment change at week 24.. Mean baseline HIV-1 loads and CD4+ cell counts were 4.74 log10 copies/mL and 164 cells/mm3, respectively. At week 24, a total of 41.5% of patients in the TPV/r arm and 22.3% in the CPI/r arm had a > or = 1-log10 reduction in the HIV-1 load (intent-to-treat population; P<.0001). Mean increases in the CD4+ cell count of 54 and 24 cells/mm3 occurred in the TPV/r and CPI/r groups, respectively. Adverse events were slightly more common in the TPV/r group and included diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting. Elevations in alanine and aspartate aminotransferase levels and in cholesterol/triglyceride levels were more frequent in the TPV/r group.. TPV/r demonstrated superior antiviral activity, compared with investigator-selected, ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors, at week 24 in treatment-experienced patients with multidrug-resistant HIV-1 infection.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Viral Load

Tipranavir, a novel protease inhibitor, has demonstrated antiviral activity against protease inhibitor-resistant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) isolates. The Randomized Evaluation of Strategic Intervention in multi-drug reSistant patients with Tipranavir (RESIST-2) trial is an ongoing, open-label, phase III trial comparing ritonavir-boosted tipranavir (TPV/r) plus an optimized background regimen with an individually optimized, ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor in treatment-experienced, HIV-1-infected patients.. Patients at 171 sites in Europe and Latin America who had received > or = 2 previous protease inhibitor regimens, had triple-antiretroviral class experience, had an HIV-1 RNA level > or = 1000 copies/mL, and had genotypically demonstrated primary protease inhibitor resistance were eligible. After genotypic resistance tests were performed, a protease inhibitor and optimized background regimen were selected before randomization. Patients were randomized to receive either TPV/r or comparator protease inhibitor-ritonavir (CPI/r) and were stratified on the basis of preselected protease inhibitor and enfuvirtide use. Treatment response was defined as a confirmed HIV-1 load reduction > or = 1 log10 less than the baseline value without a treatment change at week 24.. A total of 863 patients were randomized and treated. At baseline, the mean HIV-1 load was 4.73 log10 copies/mL, and the mean CD4+ cell count was 218 cells/mm3. The preplanned 24-week efficacy analyses of 539 patients demonstrated treatment response rates of 41% in the TPV/r arm and 14.9% in the CPI/r arm (intent-to-treat analysis; P<.0001). The mean CD4+ cell count increased by 51 cells/mm3 in the TPV/r arm and by 18 cells/mm3 in the CPI/r arm. The most common adverse events were mild-to-moderate diarrhea, nausea, and headache. Grade 3 or greater elevations in serum transaminase, cholesterol, and triglyceride levels were more frequent in the TPV/r arm.. TPV/r had superior antiviral activity and increased immunologic benefits, compared with CPI/r, at week 24 among treatment-experienced patients infected with multidrug-resistant HIV-1.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

Loperamide (LOP) is a peripherally acting opioid receptor agonist used for the management of chronic diarrhea through the reduction of gut motility. The lack of central opioid effects is partly due to the efflux activity of the multidrug resistance transporter P-glycoprotein (P-gp) at the blood-brain barrier. The protease inhibitors are substrates for P-gp and have the potential to cause increased LOP levels in the brain. Because protease inhibitors, including tipranavir (TPV), are often associated with diarrhea, they are commonly used in combination with LOP. The level of respiratory depression, the level of pupil constriction, the pharmacokinetics, and the safety of LOP alone compared with those of LOP-ritonavir (RTV), LOP-TPV, and LOP-TPV-RTV were evaluated in a randomized, open-label, parallel-group study with 24 healthy human immunodeficiency virus type 1-negative adults. Respiratory depression was assessed by determination of the ventilatory response to carbon dioxide. Tipranavir-containing regimens (LOP-TPV and LOP-TPV-RTV) caused decreases in the area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity for LOP (51% and 63% decreases, respectively) and its metabolite (72% and 77% decreases, respectively), whereas RTV caused increases in the levels of exposure of LOP (121% increase) and its metabolite (44% increase). In vitro and in vivo data suggest that TPV is a substrate for and an inducer of P-gp activity. The respiratory response to LOP in combination with TPV and/or RTV was not different from that to LOP alone. There was no evidence that LOP had opioid effects in the central nervous system, as measured indirectly by CO2 response curves and pupillary response in the presence of TPV and/or RTV.

Topics: Adult; Caco-2 Cells; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Interactions; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Loperamide; Neurotoxicity Syndromes; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

Tipranavir (TPV), a novel nonpeptidic protease inhibitor (NPPI), was administered to treatment-naive HIV-1-infected patients over 14 days in a randomized, multicenter, open-label, parallel-group trial to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a self-emulsifying drug delivery system (SEDDS) formulation, in combination with ritonavir (RTV). Of the 31 patients enrolled, 10 were randomized to receive TPV 1200 mg twice daily (TPV 1200), 10 patients received TPV 300 mg + RTV 200 mg twice daily (TPV/r 300/200), and 11 patients received TPV 1200 mg + RTV 200 mg twice daily (TPV/r 1200/200). The median baseline viral load and CD4 cell count were 4.96 log10 copies/mL and 244 cells/mm, respectively. After 14 days, the median decrease in viral load was -0.77 log10 in the TPV 1200 group, -1.43 log10 in the TPV/r 300/200 group, and -1.64 log10 in the TPV/r 1200/200 group. TPV exposure was increased by 24- and 70-fold in the TPV/r 300/200 and 1200/200 groups, respectively, compared with TPV 1200 alone. There were no significant differences across treatment arms with regard to drug-related adverse events. TPV/r appeared to be safe, effective, and well tolerated during 14 days of treatment.

Topics: CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sulfonamides

The rapidly enlarging COVID-19 pandemic caused by the novel SARS-corona virus-2 is a global public health emergency of an unprecedented level. Unfortunately no treatment therapy or vaccine is yet available to counter the SARS-CoV-2 infection, which substantiates the need to expand research efforts in this direction. The indispensable function of the main protease in virus replication makes this enzyme a promising target for inhibitors screening and drug discovery to treat novel coronavirus infection. The recently concluded α-ketoamide ligand-bound X-ray crystal structure of SARS-CoV-2 M. For the study, we have targeted the SARS-CoV-2 M. The phylogenetic analysis of the SARS-CoV-2 genome reveals that the virus is closely related to the Bat-SL-CoV and does not exhibit any divergence at the genomic level. Molecular docking studies revealed that among the 77 drugs, screened top ten drugs shows good binding affinities, whereas the top three drugs: Lopinavir-Ritonavir, Tipranavir, and Raltegravir were undergone for molecular dynamics simulation studies for their conformational stability in the active site of the SARS-CoV-2 M. In the present study among the library of FDA approved antiviral drugs, the top three inhibitors Lopinavir-Ritonavir, Tipranavir, and Raltegravir show the best molecular interaction with the main protease of SARS-CoV-2. However, the in-vitro efficacy of the drug molecules screened in this study further needs to be corroborated by carrying out a biochemical and structural investigation.

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Betacoronavirus; Coronavirus 3C Proteases; Coronavirus Infections; COVID-19; Cysteine Endopeptidases; Drug Combinations; Drug Repositioning; Humans; Lopinavir; Molecular Conformation; Molecular Docking Simulation; Molecular Dynamics Simulation; Pandemics; Phylogeny; Pneumonia, Viral; Protease Inhibitors; Pyridines; Pyrones; Raltegravir Potassium; Ritonavir; SARS-CoV-2; Sulfonamides; Viral Nonstructural Proteins

In highly antiretroviral-experienced patients with a multidrug-resistant human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, recommended regimens should preferentially contain 3 active components, including a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (PI/r). Tipranavir/r (TPV/r), a non-peptidic PI, has been specifically developed for patients resistant to the usual antiretroviral classes including PIs. This paper discusses the role of TPV/r in patients experiencing multiple PI resistance.. Virological, immunological, and safety outcomes were collected between 2003 and 2007 at 7 clinical units. Virus resistance assessment was based on 3 different genotypic tests. The 207 patients evaluated had previously received nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) and PIs.. The main drugs co-administered with TPV/r were 1 or 2 NRTIs associated, in half of the patients, with enfuvirtide. After 12 weeks, viral load was <50 copies/ml in 38% of the patients (44% with enfuvirtide), while median CD4 counts had increased from 150 to 250 cells/mm³. Genotypic testing suggested that most of the patients had viruses susceptible to TPV. Lipid and transaminase levels were slightly modified, and less than 10% of treatment discontinuations were due to gastrointestinal events.. A regimen including TPV/r associated with at least 1 active component is a valuable option in highly ARV-experienced patients with multi-resistance to the usual ARV classes including PIs.

Topics: Adult; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Cohort Studies; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; France; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Viral Load

We compared tipranavir and darunavir concentrations measured at steady state in 20 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients enrolled in the EASIER-ANRS 138 clinical trial who switched from enfuvirtide to raltegravir while maintaining the same background regimen. The geometric mean ratios of the observed predose concentration (C(trough)), maximum concentration of drug observed in plasma (C(max)), and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) before (day 0) and after (week 24) the switch were 0.49, 0.76, and 0.67 and 0.82, 0.68, and 0.64 for tipranavir and darunavir, respectively. The virologic consequences of these drug interactions have yet to be determined.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Darunavir; Enfuvirtide; Female; HIV Envelope Protein gp41; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Peptide Fragments; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

Malaria and HIV infection are both very common in many developing countries. With the increasing availability of therapy for HIV infection, it was of interest to determine whether antiretroviral drugs exert antimalarial effects. We therefore tested the in vitro activity of 19 antiretroviral drugs against the W2 and 3D7 strains of Plasmodium falciparum at concentrations up to 50 μM. None of 5 tested nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors demonstrated activity. Two nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, efavirenz (mean 50% inhibitory concentration [IC(50)] of 22 to 30 μM against the two strains) and etravirine (3.1 to 3.4 μM), were active; nevirapine was not active. Also active were the fusion inhibitor enfuvirtide (6.2 to 7.9 μM) and the entry inhibitor maraviroc (15 to 21 μM). Raltegravir was not active. However, for all active drugs mentioned above, the IC(50)s were considerably greater than the concentrations achieved with standard dosing. The effects most likely to be clinically relevant were with HIV protease inhibitors. Of the tested compounds, activity was seen with lopinavir (2.7 to 2.9 μM), atazanavir (3.3 to 13.0 μM), saquinavir (5.0 to 12.1 μM), nelfinavir (6.5 to 12.1 μM), ritonavir (9.5 to 10.9 μM), tipranavir (15.5 to 22.3 μM), and amprenavir (28.1 to 40.8) but not darunavir. Lopinavir was active at levels well below those achieved with standard dosing of coformulated lopinavir-ritonavir. Lopinavir also demonstrated modest synergy with the antimalarial lumefantrine (mean fractional inhibitory concentration index of 0.66 for W2 and 0.53 for 3D7). Prior data showed that lopinavir-ritonavir also extends the pharmacokinetic exposure of lumefantrine. Thus, when used to treat HIV infection, lopinavir-ritonavir may have clinically relevant antimalarial activity and also enhance the activity of antimalarials.

Topics: Alkynes; Animals; Anti-Retroviral Agents; Antimalarials; Benzoxazines; Carbamates; Cyclopropanes; Darunavir; Furans; Lopinavir; Nelfinavir; Nevirapine; Plasmodium falciparum; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Sulfonamides

The stage-specific antimalarial activities of a panel of antiretroviral protease inhibitors (PIs), including two nonpeptidic PIs (tipranavir and darunavir), were tested in vitro against Plasmodium falciparum. While darunavir demonstrated limited antimalarial activity (effective concentration [EC(50)], >50 microM), tipranavir was active at clinically relevant concentrations (EC(50), 12 to 21 microM). Saquinavir, lopinavir, and tipranavir preferentially inhibited the growth of mature asexual-stage parasites (24 h postinvasion). While all of the PIs tested inhibited gametocytogenesis, tipranavir was the only one to exhibit gametocytocidal activity.

Topics: Animals; Antimalarials; Darunavir; Erythrocytes; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Life Cycle Stages; Parasitic Sensitivity Tests; Plasmodium falciparum; Pyridines; Pyrones; Sulfonamides

HIV infected patients often take at least three anti-HIV drugs together in Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy (HAART) and/or Ritonavir-Boosted Protease Inhibitor Therapy (PI/r) to suppress the viral replications. The potential drug-drug interactions affect efficacy of anti-HIV treatment and major source of such interaction is competition for the drug metabolizing enzyme, cytochrome P450 (CYP). CYP3A4 isoform is the enzyme responsible for metabolism of currently available HIV-1 protease drugs. Hence administration of these drugs in HARRT or PI/r leads to increased toxicity and reduced efficacy in HIV treatment. We used computational molecular docking method to predict such interactions by which to compare experimentally measured metabolism of each HIV-1 protease drug. AutoDock 4.0 was used to carry out molecular docking of 10 HIV-protease drugs into CYP3A4 to explore sites of reaction and interaction energies (i.e., binding affinity) of the complexes. Arg105, Arg106, Ser119, Arg212, Ala370, Arg372, and Glu374 are identified as major drug binding residues, and consistent with previous data of site-directed mutagenesis, crystallography structure, modeling, and docking studies. In addition, our docking results suggested that phenylalanine clusters and heme are also participated in the binding to mediate drug oxidative metabolism. We have shown that HIV-1 protease drugs such as tipranavir, nelfinavir, lopinavir, and atazanavir differ in their binding modes on each other for metabolic clearance in CYP3A4, whereas ritonavir, amprenavir, indinavir, saquinavir, fosamprenavir, and darunavir share the same binding mode.

Topics: Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Computational Biology; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A; Darunavir; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Indinavir; Lopinavir; Nelfinavir; Pyridines; Pyrimidinones; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

Tipranavir (TPV) is the first nonpeptidic protease inhibitor used for the treatment of drug-resistant HIV infection. Clinically, TPV is coadministered with ritonavir (RTV) to boost blood concentrations and increase therapeutic efficacy. The mechanism of metabolism-mediated drug interactions associated with RTV-boosted TPV is not fully understood. In the current study, TPV metabolism was investigated in mice using a metabolomic approach. TPV and its metabolites were found in the feces of mice but not in the urine. Principal component analysis of the feces metabolome uncovered eight TPV metabolites, including three monohydroxylated, three desaturated, one dealkylated, and one dihydroxylated. In vitro study using human liver microsomes recapitulated five TPV metabolites, all of which were suppressed by RTV. CYP3A4 was identified as the primary enzyme contributing to the formation of four TPV metabolites (metabolites II, IV, V, and VI), including an unusual dealkylated product arising from carbon-carbon bond cleavage. Multiple cytochromes P450 (2C19, 2D6, and 3A4) contributed to the formation of a monohydroxylated metabolite (metabolite III). In vivo, RTV cotreatment significantly inhibited eight TPV metabolic pathways. In summary, metabolomic analysis revealed two known and six novel TPV metabolites in mice, all of which were suppressed by RTV. The current study provides solid evidence that the RTV-mediated boosting of TPV is due to the modulation of P450-dependent metabolism.

Topics: Animal Structures; Animals; Anti-HIV Agents; Aryl Hydrocarbon Hydroxylases; Biocatalysis; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C8; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2D6; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2D6 Inhibitors; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A Inhibitors; Dealkylation; Drug Interactions; Feces; Humans; Hydroxylation; Metabolomics; Mice; Mice, Inbred Strains; Microsomes, Liver; Molecular Structure; Oxidation-Reduction; Principal Component Analysis; Pyridines; Pyrones; Recombinant Proteins; Ritonavir; Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization; Sulfonamides; Tissue Distribution

Ritonavir-related adverse events have been reported in patients taking tipranavir/ritonavir at the licensed dosage of 500/200 mg twice daily (bid). The aim of this open-label, prospective, single-arm pilot study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a ritonavir dose reduction to 100 mg bid guided by the tipranavir virtual inhibitory quotient (vIQ) in HIV-infected patients receiving tipranavir/ritonavir 500/200 mg bid whose viral load was <50 copies/ml and whose tipranavir vIQ was >60. Viral load, blood chemistry, and tipranavir and ritonavir trough concentrations (C(trough)) in plasma were determined at baseline and up to 48 weeks. If the tipranavir vIQ fell to <40, the ritonavir dose was increased to 200 mg bid. The primary endpoint was the percentage of treatment failure after 48 weeks. Eleven patients were enrolled. At baseline, the median (IQR) CD4+ T-cell count and vIQ were 380 (231-520) cells/mm(3) and 233.4 (73.8-584.8), respectively. Ten patients (90.9%) maintained a viral load <50 copies/ml at week 48. Geometric mean (95% confidence interval) tipranavir C(trough) decreased from 24.7 (12.9-47.5) mg/l at baseline to 13.6 (7.1-26.2) mg/l at week 48 (p = 0.194), but the ritonavir dose had to be raised in only one patient. Median triglycerides and ALT concentrations decreased from 177.2 (132.9-292.4) mg/dl and 59 (23-128) IU/l at baseline to 158.0 (131.0-186.0) mg/dl and 28 (20-71) IU/l at week 48 (p = 0.047, p = 0.041), respectively. As a conclusion, ritonavir-dose reduction to 100 mg bid as a treatment-simplification strategy guided by the tipranavir vIQ in patients receiving salvage therapy with tipranavir/ritonavir 500/200 mg bid seems to be safe enough to be tested in adequately powered clinical trials.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Blood Chemical Analysis; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Plasma; Prospective Studies; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Salvage Therapy; Sulfonamides; Viral Load

The purpose of this study was to develop a tipranavir-weighted mutation score that provides guidance to treating physicians on the relative effect of specific protease mutations on tipranavir activity.. Weights were developed using data from RESIST tipranavir-treated patients based on regressions of virological response at weeks 8 and 24, accounting for baseline CD4(+) T-cell count and background regimen activity. The resulting weighted score and cutoffs were validated using a set of cohort patients external to the tipranavir development programme. Response rates were tabulated for the new weighted score and compared with other tipranavir mutation scores used in clinical practice.. The final weights were 74P, 82L/T, 83D and 47V (+4), 58E and 84V (+3), 36I, 43T and 54A/M/V (+2), 10V, 33F and 46L (+1), 24I and 76V (-2), 50L/V (-4), and 54L (-6). Tipranavir-weighted score susceptibility categories were susceptible ≤3, partially susceptible >3 but ≤10, and resistant ≥11. Week 48 response rates for RESIST patients were 34.6%, 15.9% and 5.9%, respectively. Using the external cohort data (n=150), the weighted score was highly associated with week 8 viral load reduction (P=0.0027). Only one other score achieved statistical significance.. The tipranavir-weighted score developed and externally validated here, in three datasets representing a broad population of treatment-experienced patients, can be used to make clinical decisions about whether to consider tipranavir in a treatment-experienced patient who has limited treatment options.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Body Weight; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Female; Genotype; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Mutation; Pyridines; Pyrones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Regression Analysis; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Viral Load

The importance of the active site region aspartyl residues 25 and 29 of the mature HIV-1 protease (PR) for the binding of five clinical and three experimental protease inhibitors [symmetric cyclic urea inhibitor DMP323, nonhydrolyzable substrate analog (RPB) and the generic aspartic protease inhibitor acetyl-pepstatin (Ac-PEP)] was assessed by differential scanning calorimetry. DeltaT(m) values, defined as the difference in T(m) for a given protein in the presence and absence of inhibitor, for PR with DRV, ATV, SQV, RTV, APV, DMP323, RPB, and Ac-PEP are 22.4, 20.8, 19.3, 15.6, 14.3, 14.7, 8.7, and 6.5 degrees C, respectively. Binding of APV and Ac-PEP is most sensitive to the D25N mutation, as shown by DeltaT(m) ratios [DeltaT(m)(PR)/DeltaT(m)(PR(D25N))] of 35.8 and 16.3, respectively, whereas binding of DMP323 and RPB (DeltaT(m) ratios of 1-2) is least affected. Binding of the substrate-like inhibitors RPB and Ac-PEP is nearly abolished (DeltaT(m)(PR)/DeltaT(m)(PR(D29N)) > or = 44) by the D29N mutation, whereas this mutation only moderately affects binding of the smaller inhibitors (DeltaT(m) ratios of 1.4-2.2). Of the nine FDA-approved clinical HIV-1 protease inhibitors screened, APV, RTV, and DRV competitively inhibit porcine pepsin with K(i) values of 0.3, 0.6, and 2.14 microM, respectively. DSC results were consistent with this relatively weak binding of APV (DeltaT(m) 2.7 degrees C) compared with the tight binding of Ac-PEP (DeltaT(m) > or = 17 degrees C). Comparison of superimposed structures of the PR/APV complex with those of PR/Ac-PEP and pepsin/pepstatin A complexes suggests a role for Asp215, Asp32, and Ser219 in pepsin, equivalent to Asp25, Asp25', and Asp29 in PR in the binding and stabilization of the pepsin/APV complex.

Topics: Atazanavir Sulfate; Binding Sites; Binding, Competitive; Calorimetry, Differential Scanning; Carbamates; Crystallography, X-Ray; Darunavir; Furans; HIV Protease; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Indinavir; Kinetics; Lopinavir; Models, Molecular; Molecular Structure; Mutation; Nelfinavir; Oligopeptides; Pepsin A; Protein Binding; Protein Structure, Tertiary; Pyridines; Pyrimidinones; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Sulfonamides

The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence and risk factors of severe liver events among HIV-infected patients treated with drug combinations including tipranavir boosted with ritonavir (TPV/r).. One hundred and fifty patients were selected because they started a regimen that included TPV/r (500/200 mg twice a day) and had clinical visits at least every 3 months. Patients who discontinued TPV/r before their first visit were included.. Twelve (8%) individuals developed grade>or=3 transaminase elevation (G>or=3TE). Nine (6%) patients discontinued TPV/r due to liver events. Six (8.6%) of 70 hepatitis C virus (HCV) co-infected patients and 6 (7.5%) of 80 subjects without HCV co-infection developed G>or=3TE (P=1). Liver fibrosis was evaluable in 48 (63%) of 76 individuals with hepatitis B virus and/or HCV infection. Four (13%) of 30 subjects with moderate-to-severe fibrosis and none of 18 with mild fibrosis showed G>or=3TE (P=0.3). None of nine patients with cirrhosis showed G>or=3TE.. Liver tolerability of TPV/r was generally good in a cohort of patients with a high proportion of HCV co-infection, including subjects with advanced fibrosis. The presence of HCV co-infection was not associated with an increased risk of severe transaminase elevations.

Topics: Adult; Anti-Retroviral Agents; Female; Hepatitis C, Chronic; HIV Infections; Humans; Liver Cirrhosis; Liver Function Tests; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Transaminases

Most HPLC-UV methods for therapeutic drug monitoring of anti-HIV drugs have long run times, which reduce their applicability for high-throughput analysis. We developed an ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC)-diode array detection method for the simultaneous quantification of the HIV-protease inhibitors (PIs) amprenavir, atazanavir, indinavir, lopinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir, saquinavir, and tipranavir (TPV), and the nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) efavirenz and nevirapine.. Solid-phase extraction of 1 mL plasma was performed with Waters HLB cartridges. After 3 wash steps, we eluted the drugs with methanol, evaporated the alcohol, and reconstituted the residue with 50 microL methanol. We injected a 4-microL volume into the UPLC system (Waters ACQUITY UPLC BEH C8 column maintained at 60 degrees C) and used a linear gradient of 50 mmol/L ammonium acetate and 50 mmol/L formic acid in water versus acetonitrile to achieve chromatographic separation of the drugs and internal standard (A-86093). Three wavelengths (215, 240, and 260 nm) were monitored.. All drugs were eluted within 15 min. Calibration curves with concentrations of 0.025-10 mg/L (1.875-75 mg/L for TPV) showed coefficients of determination (r(2)) between 0.993 and 0.999. The lower limits of quantification were well below the trough concentrations reported in the literature. Inter- and intraassay CVs and the deviations between the nominal and measured concentrations were <15%. The method was validated by successful participation in an international interlaboratory QC program.. This method allows fast and simultaneous quantification of all commercially available PIs and NNRTIs for therapeutic drug monitoring.

Topics: Alkynes; Atazanavir Sulfate; Benzoxazines; Carbamates; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Cyclopropanes; Furans; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Indinavir; Lopinavir; Nelfinavir; Nevirapine; Oligopeptides; Pyridines; Pyrimidinones; Pyrones; Reproducibility of Results; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Sensitivity and Specificity; Solid Phase Extraction; Sulfonamides

Topics: Child; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV Reverse Transcriptase; HIV Wasting Syndrome; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Mutation; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Viral Load

For intensively pretreated pediatric patients with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection, the treatment options available are limited. We report the case of a highly treatment-experienced 12-year-old boy with multidrug-resistant HIV-1, who was successfully treated with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) including ritonavir-boosted tipranavir oral solution, a novel non-peptic protease inhibitor, and enfuvirtide.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Child; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Enfuvirtide; HIV Envelope Protein gp41; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Peptide Fragments; Pyridines; Pyrones; Remission Induction; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

A reversal of key HIV protease mutations against tipranavir has been observed in a patient undergoing a late salvage antiretroviral therapy. Our patient initially introduced tipranavir/ritonavir in absence of an optimized background and novel drug classes, and nevertheless he experienced a virological-immunological benefit. Our report is a contribution to the present debate around the role of each single HIV protease mutation, and the validation of mutational "scores" (like the so-called tipranavir weighted score), to be applied to last-generation protease inhibitor compounds initially targeted on patients with limited, residual therapeutic options.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Drug Resistance, Viral; HIV; HIV Infections; HIV Protease; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Mutation, Missense; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Salvage Therapy; Sulfonamides

Tipranavir, a non-peptidic protease inhibitor which shows in vitro efficacy against some HIV-1-resistant strains, can be used in salvage therapies for multi-experienced HIV patients due to its peculiar resistance profile including 21 mutations at 16 protease positions according to International AIDS Society (IAS). Other genotypic scores, however, which attribute a different weight to single amino-acid substitutions, have been recently proposed. To validate the clinical utility of four different genotypic scores for selecting tipranavir responders, the baseline resistance pattern of 176 HIV heavily experienced patients was correlated with virological success (HIV-RNA<50 copies/ml) after 24 weeks of a new treatment based on tipranavir/ritonavir. Virological suppression after 24 weeks was reached by 42.5% of patients. With univariate analysis, genotypic scores were all associated with outcome but showed a low accuracy with ROC analysis, with the weighted score (WS) by Scherer et al. demonstrating the best performance with an AUC of 68%. Only 52% of patients classified as susceptible (WS< or =3) responded to the new therapy. The following variables were significantly associated (p<0.05) to failure with multivariate analysis: WS, log peak of HIV-RNA, IAS mutations: L33F, I54AMV, Q58E, and non-IAS mutation: N37DES. On the contrary, the use of T20 in T20-naïve patients and the V82AFSI and F53LY non-IAS mutations were associated with virological success. The study suggests that even if the "weighted" scores are able to interpret correctly the antiretroviral resistance profile of multi-experienced patients, it is difficult to individuate a cut-off which can be easily applied to this population for discriminating responders.

Topics: Adult; Amino Acid Substitution; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Drug Resistance, Viral; Female; Genotype; HIV Infections; HIV Protease; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Mutation, Missense; Pyridines; Pyrones; Research Design; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

Previously it has been shown that tipranavir-ritonavir (TPV/r) does not affect efavirenz (EFV) plasma concentrations. This study investigates the effect of steady-state EFV on steady-state TPV/r pharmacokinetics. This was a single-center, open-label, multiple-dose study of healthy adult female and male volunteers. TPV/r 500/200 mg twice a day (BID) was given with food for 24 days. After dosing with TPV/r for 10 days, EFV 600 mg once a day was added to the regimen. Intensive pharmacokinetic (PK) sampling was done on days 10 and 24. Validated bioanalytical high-pressure liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry methods were used to determine plasma tipranavir (TPV), ritonavir (RTV), and EFV concentrations. Thirty-four subjects were entered into the study, and 16 subjects completed it. The geometric mean ratios (90% confidence intervals) for TPV and RTV area under the curves, C(max)s, and C(min)s comparing TPV/r alone and in combination with EFV were 0.97 (0.87 to 1.09), 0.92 (0.81 to 1.03), and 1.19 (0.93 to 1.54) for TPV and 1.03 (0.78 to 1.38), 0.92 (0.65 to 1.30), and 1.04 (0.72 to 1.48) for RTV. Frequently observed adverse events were diarrhea, headache, dizziness, abnormal dreams, and rash. EFV had no effect on the steady-state PK of TPV or RTV, with the exception of a 19% increase in the TPV C(min), which is not clinically relevant. TPV/r can be safely coadministered with EFV and without the need for a dose adjustment.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; Cyclopropanes; Drug Interactions; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

Tipranavir (TPV) is a recently approved nonpeptidic protease inhibitor (PI) of HIV-1 and has been indicated for those infected with PIs-resistant HIV-1. However, in clinical practice, whether the HIV-1 from the patients with virological failure to the regimens containing first-line PIs remains susceptible to TPV/r may be questionable.. To assess the resistance levels to TPV of HIV-1 from patients with treatment failure to first-line PIs, patients who experienced virological failure were tested for genotypic resistance of HIV-1 since August 2006 in National Taiwan University Hospital. Patients were enrolled for this analysis if their failed regimens contained > 12 weeks of atazanavir or lopinavir/ritonavir (defined as ATV group and LPV/r group, respectively), but were excluded if they experienced both or other PIs. The levels of genotypic resistance to TPV/r were determined by TPV mutation score.. Till May 2008, 21 subjects in ATV group and 20 subjects in LPV/r group were enrolled. The TPV mutation scores in subjects in LPV/r group were significantly higher than these in ATV group (median, 3 vs 1, P = 0.007). 95.2% subjects in ATV group and only 45% subjects in LPV/r group had an estimated maximal virological response to TPV/r (P < 0.001). The resistance levels to TPV/r correlated with the duration of exposure to first-line PIs, whether in ATV or LPV/r group.. Cross-resistance from first-line PIs may impede the effectiveness of TPV/r-containing salvage therapy. TPV/r should be used cautiously for patients with virological failure to LPV/r especially long duration of exposure.

Topics: Adult; Atazanavir Sulfate; DNA Mutational Analysis; Drug Resistance, Viral; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Oligopeptides; Pyridines; Pyrimidinones; Pyrones; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sulfonamides; Treatment Failure; Young Adult

The expected effectiveness of protease inhibitors was assessed according to the Agence Nationale de Recherches sur le SIDA (ANRS), Rega and Stanford 2007 resistance algorithms in 93 and 87 antiretroviral therapy-naive patients, respectively, infected with B and non-B subtype viruses. Either B or non-B subtypes were considered fully susceptible to protease inhibitors, except to tipranavir/ritonavir, for which the 2007 ANRS algorithm scored non-B subtypes as naturally resistant when this algorithm was extended to these subtypes.

Topics: Algorithms; Anti-HIV Agents; Drug Resistance, Viral; France; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

To identify mutations associated with the virological response (VR) to a tipranavir-ritonavir (TPV/r)-based regimen, 143 patients previously treated with protease inhibitor (PI) were studied. VR was defined by a decrease of at least 1 log(10) in, or undetectable, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) RNA at month 3. The effect of each mutation in the protease, considering all variants at a residue as a single variable, on the VR to TPV/r was investigated. Mutations at six residues were associated with a lower VR (E35D/G/K/N, M36I/L/V, Q58E, Q61D/E/G/H/N/R, H69I/K/N/Q/R/Y, and L89I/M/R/T/V), and one mutation was associated with a higher VR (F53L/W/Y). The genotypic score M36I/L/V-53L/W/Y + Q58E + H69I/K/N/Q/R/Y + L89I/M/R/T/V was selected as providing a strong association with VR. For the seven patients with a genotypic score of -1 (viruses with only mutation at codon 53), the percentage of responders was 100% and the percentages were 79%, 56%, 33%, 21%, and 0% for those with scores of 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. The percentage of patients showing a response to TPV/r was lower for patients infected with non-clade B viruses (n = 16, all non-B subtypes considered together) than for those infected with clade B viruses (n = 127) (25% and 59%, respectively; P = 0.015). Most mutations associated with VR to TPV/r had not previously been associated with PI resistance. This is consistent with phenotypic analysis showing that TPV has a unique resistance profile. Mutations at five positions (35, 36, 61, 69, and 89) were observed significantly more frequently in patients infected with a non-B subtype than in those infected with the B subtype, probably explaining the lower VR observed in these patients.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Genotype; HIV Infections; HIV Protease; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Mutation; Pyridines; Pyrones; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

We reported that several HIV protease inhibitors (HIV-PIs) interfere with the endoproteolytic processing of two farnesylated proteins, yeast a-factor and mammalian prelamin A. We proposed that these drugs interfere with prelamin A processing by blocking ZMPSTE24, an integral membrane zinc metalloproteinase known to play a critical role in its processing. However, because all of the drug inhibition studies were performed with cultured fibroblasts or crude membrane fractions rather than on purified enzyme preparations, no definitive conclusions could be drawn. Here, we purified Ste24p, the yeast ortholog of ZMPSTE24, and showed that its enzymatic activity was blocked by three HIV-PIs (lopinavir, ritonavir, and tipranavir). A newer HIV-PI, darunavir, had little effect on Ste24p activity. None of the HIV-PIs had dramatic effects on the enzymatic activity of purified Ste14p, the prenylprotein methyltransferase. These studies strongly support our hypothesis that HIV-PIs block prelamin A processing by directly affecting the enzymatic activity of ZMPSTE24, and in this way they may contribute to lipodystrophy in individuals undergoing HIV-PI treatment.

Topics: Catalysis; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lamin Type A; Lopinavir; Membrane Proteins; Metalloendopeptidases; Nuclear Proteins; Protein Methyltransferases; Protein Precursors; Pyridines; Pyrimidinones; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins; Sulfonamides

The new non-peptidic protease inhibitor tipranavir is used boosted with ritonavir in a 500/200 mg bid scheme. Multiple drug interactions are described for both drugs because of their different action in CYP450 3A4 and p-glycoprotein. In this retrospective analysis of 22 patients during therapy with tipranavir/ritonavir (TPV) 500 mg/200 mg bid, we found significantly decreased TPV-trough levels in combination with tenofovir (15.32+/-5.22 microg/ml) in comparison to TPV trough levels without tenofovir (20.21+/-14.87 microg/ml). Therapeutic drug monitoring of TPV is recommended.

Topics: Adenine; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Benzoxazines; Cyclopropanes; Drug Interactions; Drug Monitoring; Enfuvirtide; HIV Envelope Protein gp41; HIV Infections; Humans; Organophosphonates; Peptide Fragments; Pyridines; Pyrones; Retrospective Studies; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Tenofovir

The virological response (VR) to a tipranavir-ritonavir (TPV-RTV)-based regimen had been shown to be associated with a number of mutations in the protease gene, the use of enfuvirtide (T20), and the TPV phenotypic inhibitory quotient (IQ). The role of the TPV genotypic IQ (gIQ) has not yet been fully investigated. The aim of our study was to evaluate the relationship between the TPV gIQ and the VR at 48 weeks to TPV-based salvage regimens. Patients placed on regimens containing two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors plus TPV-RTV 500/200 mg twice a day with or without T20 were prospectively studied. Regular follow-up was performed over the study period. VR, considered a viral load (VL) decrease of >or=1 log unit and/or the achievement of <50 copies/ml with no VL rebound of >0.5 log unit compared to the maximal VL decrease at week 48, was assessed. Thirty-eight patients who had received multiple drugs were included. At week 48 the VL decrease was -1.48 (interquartile range [IQR], -2.88 to -0.48), 15 patients (39.5%) had VLs of <50 copies/ml, and the CD4+ cell count increase was 37 cells/mm3 (IQR, -30 to +175). Twenty subjects (52.6%) achieved VRs. The TPV gIQ and optimized background score (OBS) were independently associated with higher VL decreases. The TPV gIQ and OBS were also independent predictors of a VR at week 48. TPV gIQ and OBS cutoff values of 14,500 and 2, respectively, were associated with a higher rate of VR. The TPV gIQ was shown to be able to predict the VR at 48 weeks to TPV-containing salvage regimens better than the TPV trough concentration or TPV-associated mutations alone. A possible TPV gIQ cutoff value of 14,500 for reaching a VR at week 48 was suggested. Further studies are needed in order to evaluate the calculation of TPV gIQ as a new tool for the optimization of TPV-based salvage therapy.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Genotype; HIV Infections; HIV Protease; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Middle Aged; Predictive Value of Tests; Pyridines; Pyrones; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Salvage Therapy; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Drug Therapy, Combination; Hemophilia A; Hemorrhage; HIV Infections; Humans; Pyridines; Pyrones; Risk; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

Tipranavir is one of the latest approved HIV protease inhibitors. This non-peptidic molecule is an strong inducer of cytochrome P450 and has to be co-administered with low doses ritonavir as pharmacokinetic booster to achieve effective antiviral activity in vivo. As expected, significant drug interactions may occur in patients treated with tipranavir/ritonavir, including diminished exposure to some antiretroviral agents. Although a few interactions can be managed with adequate drug dosing others preclude to use these medications in combination.

Topics: Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Enzyme Induction; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

An accurate, sensitive and simple reverse-phase (RP) high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) assay has been developed and validated for the simultaneous quantitative determination of tipranavir with nine other antiretroviral drugs in plasma. A liquid-liquid extraction of the drugs in tert-butylmethylether (TBME) from 200 microL of plasma is followed by a reversed phase gradient HPLC assay with UV detection at 210 nm. The standard curve for the drug was linear in the range of 80-80,000 ng/mL for tipranavir; 10-10,000 ng/mL for nevirapine, indinavir, efavirenz, and saquinavir; and 25-10,000 ng/mL for amprenavir, atazanavir, ritonavir, lopinavir, and nelfinavir. The regression coefficient (r(2)) was greater than 0.998 for all analytes. This method has been fully validated and shown to be specific, accurate and precise. Due to an excellent extraction procedure giving good recovery and a clean baseline, this method is simple, rapid, accurate and provides excellent resolution and peak shape for all analytes. Thus this method is very suitable for therapeutic drug monitoring.

Topics: Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; Benzoxazines; Carbamates; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Cyclopropanes; Drug Stability; Furans; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Indinavir; Lopinavir; Molecular Structure; Nelfinavir; Nevirapine; Oligopeptides; Oxazines; Pyridines; Pyrimidinones; Pyrones; Reproducibility of Results; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Sensitivity and Specificity; Spectrophotometry, Ultraviolet; Sulfonamides; Time Factors

Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Hypertriglyceridemia; Male; Pancreatitis; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

Tipranavir (TPV) is a novel non-peptidic protease inhibitor (PI). It binds strongly and selectively to the HIV-1 protease, is orally administered twice daily, boosted with low doses of ritonavir, and shows a favourable resistance profile. In the two registrational trials, named RESIST 1 and 2, TPV/ritonavir 500/200 mg b.i.d., along with an optimised antiretroviral backbone, provided better virologic responses than controls receiving standard of care ritonavir-boosted PI-based regimens. A total of 21 mutations at 16 protease codons have been shown to impact on TPV susceptibility and response rates. The TPV mutation score includes L10V, I13V, K20M/R/V, L33F, E35G, M36I, K43T, M46L, I47V, I54A/M/V, Q58E, H69K, T74P, V82L/T, N83D and I84V. Viruses containing eight or more of these mutations are generally resistant to the drug. TPV use is associated with an excess of grade 3/4 liver enzyme elevations compared with other ritonavir-boosted PIs, and the potential for drug-drug interactions is relevant and must be considered when prescribing TPV.

Topics: Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Interactions; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; HIV-2; Humans; Mutation; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Adenine; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lamivudine; Middle Aged; Organophosphonates; Porphyria Cutanea Tarda; Pyridines; Pyrones; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Tenofovir

In RESIST, enfuvirtide co-administered with ritonavir-boosted tipranavir was associated with higher plasma tipranavir concentrations, which seldom rose above those associated with an increased risk of grade 3/4 transaminase elevations. Transaminase elevation rates (6.5%) and clinical hepatic event rates (5.9 events/100 person exposure years) were lower in the tipranavir/ritonavir with enfuvirtide group than in the tipranavir/ritonavir without enfuvirtide group. Observed increases in plasma tipranavir concentrations thus had no apparent effect on the risk of hepatotoxicity.

Topics: Alanine Transaminase; Anti-HIV Agents; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Drug Therapy, Combination; Enfuvirtide; HIV Envelope Protein gp41; HIV Fusion Inhibitors; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Liver Diseases; Lopinavir; Peptide Fragments; Pyridines; Pyrimidinones; Pyrones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

In this study, tipranavir (TPV) biotransformation and disposition when co-administered with ritonavir (RTV) were characterized in Sprague-Dawley rats. Rats were administered a single intravenous (5 mg kg(-1)) or oral (10 mg kg(-1)) dose of [(14)C]TPV with co-administration of RTV (10 mg kg(-1)). Blood, urine, faeces and bile samples were collected at specified time-points over a period of 168 h. Absorption of TPV-related radioactivity ranged from 53.2-59.6%. Faecal excretion was on average 86.7% and 82.4% (intravenous) and 75.0% and 82.0% (oral) of dosed radioactivity in males and females, respectively. Urinary excretion was on average 4.06% and 6.73% (intravenous) and 9.71% and 8.28% (oral) of dosed radioactivity in males and females, respectively. In bile-duct-cannulated rats, 39.8% of the dose was recovered in bile. After oral administration, unchanged TPV accounted for the majority of the radioactivity in plasma (85.7-96.3%), faeces (71.8-80.1%) and urine (33.3-62.3%). The most abundant metabolite in faeces was an oxidation metabolite R-2 (5.9-7.4% of faecal radioactivity, 4.4-6.1% of dose). In urine, no single metabolite was found to be significant, and comprised <1% of dose. TPV when co-administered with RTV to rats was mainly excreted in feces via bile and the parent compound was the major component in plasma and faeces.

Topics: Absorption; Administration, Oral; Animals; Anti-HIV Agents; Bile; Biotransformation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Interactions; Female; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Injections, Intravenous; Male; Oxidation-Reduction; Pyridines; Pyrones; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Ritonavir; Sex Factors; Sulfonamides; Tissue Distribution

Topics: Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Cross-Over Studies; Darunavir; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

Week 48 HIV-RNA treatment response to the protease inhibitor tipranavir co-administered with ritonavir was compared with that of lopinavir co-administered with ritonavir in patients whose baseline isolates had varying lopinavir genotypic mutation scores. With increasing lopinavir mutation scores, the proportion of patients achieving a week 48 treatment response was increased in the tipranavir/ritonavir compared with the lopinavir/ritonavir arm. Tipranavir/ritonavir therapy improves treatment response rates compared with lopinavir/ritonavir in patients whose viruses have reduced susceptibility to lopinavir/ritonavir.

Topics: Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Resistance, Viral; HIV Infections; HIV Protease; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Mutation; Pyridines; Pyrimidinones; Pyrones; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Anticonvulsants; Contraindications; Drug Interactions; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Phenobarbital; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

Topics: Drug Approval; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

Topics: Adult; Contraindications; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; Humans; Patient Education as Topic; Patient Selection; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

Topics: Adult; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Salvage Therapy; Sulfonamides; Viral Load

Treatment options for HIV-1 infected individuals who have received extensive previous antiretroviral therapy are limited. We compared efficacy and safety of the novel non-peptidic protease inhibitor tipranavir co-administered with ritonavir plus an optimised background regimen with that of an investigator-selected ritonavir-boosted comparator protease inhibitor (CPI-ritonavir) in such patients.. We did a combined analysis of 48-week data from two ongoing, randomised, open-label, multinational, phase III, RESIST studies. HIV-1-infected adults with 3 months or longer previous triple antiretroviral class experience, two or more previous protease inhibitor regimens, HIV-1 RNA 1000 copies per mL or greater, and genotypically demonstrated primary resistance to protease inhibitor, were eligible. Primary endpoints were proportion of treatment responders (with reduction in viral load of 1 log(10) copies per mL or greater below baseline without treatment change) at 48 weeks and time to treatment failure through 48 weeks (intention-to-treat analysis). The RESIST studies are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT00054717 (RESIST-1) and NCT00144170 (RESIST-2).. 3324 patients were screened; 746 received tipranavir-ritonavir and 737 CPI-ritonavir. 486 (65.1%) patients on tipranavir-ritonavir and 192 (26.1%) on CPI-ritonavir remained on assigned treatment until week 48. At week 48, more patients achieved and maintained treatment response in the tipranavir-ritonavir group than in the CPI-ritonavir group (251 [33.6%] vs 113 [15.3%]; p<0.0001). Median time to treatment failure was significantly longer in the tipranavir-ritonavir group than in the CPI-ritonavir group (113 days vs 0 days; p<0.0001). Gastrointestinal system disorders and raised transaminase, cholesterol, and triglycerides were more frequent in the tipranavir-ritonavir group than in the CPI-ritonavir group.. Compared with CPI-ritonavir, tipranavir-ritonavir with an optimised background regimen provides better virological and immunological responses over 48 weeks in patients who have received extensive previous antiretroviral treatment.

Topics: Adult; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Enfuvirtide; Female; HIV Envelope Protein gp41; HIV Fusion Inhibitors; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Logistic Models; Male; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Peptide Fragments; Pyridines; Pyrones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Time Factors; Treatment Failure; Viral Load

Topics: HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

To compare baseline susceptibility to protease inhibitors among HIV-1 isolates of subtypes C, F, G and CRF02_AG, and to identify polymorphisms that determine the differences in susceptibility.. A total of 42 samples of drug-naive patients infected with subtypes G (n=19), CRF02_AG (n = 10), F (n = 6) and C (n = 7) were phenotyped and genotyped with the Antivirogram and the ViroSeq 2.0 genotyping system, respectively. A Bayesian network approach was used for a preliminary analysis of the collected data and the dependencies indicated by the network were statistically confirmed.. CRF02_AG samples were found to be more susceptible to nelfinavir and ritonavir than other subtypes. Hypersusceptibility to these drugs was associated with the 70R polymorphism. 37D/S/T was associated with reduced susceptibility to indinavir and 89M with reduced susceptibility to lopinavir. Susceptibility to tipranavir was the lowest among the subtype F samples and the highest for subtype G samples, with samples carrying 57R being more susceptible than samples carrying 57K.. Our study suggests that there are baseline susceptibility differences between subtypes and these differences are due to naturally occurring polymorphisms in these subtypes. The predictive value for phenotype of these polymorphisms was even valid in subtypes where these polymorphisms are less prevalent. Taking into account such polymorphisms should improve current algorithms for interpretation of genotyping results in a subtype-independent way.

Topics: Algorithms; Bayes Theorem; Drug Resistance, Viral; Genotype; HIV Infections; HIV Protease; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Indinavir; Models, Genetic; Nelfinavir; Phenotype; Polymorphism, Genetic; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

Fifty-five patients placed on tipranavir/ritonavir 500/200 mg twice a day (27 with enfuvirtide and 28 without) underwent tipranavir and ritonavir plasma concentration measurements by high-pressure liquid chromatography. Markedly higher tipranavir and ritonavir trough concentrations were observed in enfuvirtide recipients. The modelling of sparse plasma samples using a first order absorption and elimination monocompartmental model without time lag predicted higher tipranavir elimination half-life and volume of distribution in enfuvirtide takers. This unexpected drug-drug interaction warrants further investigation.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Cohort Studies; Drug Interactions; Enfuvirtide; Female; Half-Life; HIV Envelope Protein gp41; HIV Fusion Inhibitors; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Peptide Fragments; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

Topics: Animals; Anti-HIV Agents; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glucose Clamp Technique; Insulin Resistance; Male; Pyridines; Pyrones; Rats; Rats, Inbred WF; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

Topics: AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections; Antifungal Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid; Bronchoscopy; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Nelfinavir; Pneumocystis carinii; Pneumocystis Infections; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Sulfonamides

Topics: Drug Labeling; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration

Topics: Drug Resistance, Multiple, Viral; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Mutation; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

Topics: CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Pyridines; Pyrones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Viral Load

Topics: Administration, Oral; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Approval; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Pyridines; Pyrones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Synergism; Gastrointestinal Diseases; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

In our study we examined the anti-human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (anti-HIV-1) activity of a novel HIV-1 protease inhibitor, PNU-140690 (tipranavir), against patient-derived isolates resistant to multiple other protease inhibitors (PIs). The aim of our experiments was to investigate the genotypes and the in vitro phenotypes of drug resistance of PNU-140690. We carried out drug susceptibility tests with peripheral blood mononuclear cells and a fixed amount of infectious virus (1,000 50% tissue culture infective doses) to determine the 50% inhibitory concentration (IC(50)) and IC(90), PCR assays for the detection of drug resistance mutations in RNA in plasma, and direct sequencing of PCR products. Phenotypic resistance to PIs was invariably related to genotypic mutations. The substitutions among the amino acid residues of the protease included L10I, K20R, L24I, M36I, N37D, G48V, I54V, L63P, I64V, A71V, V77I, V82A, I84V, and L90M. Isolates from all of the patients had developed a maximal degree of resistance to indinavir, ritonavir, and nelfinavir (IC(50)s, >0.1 microM). We also compared these mutations with the amino acid changes previously described in association with in vivo tipranavir administration. The mutations included the following: I15V, E35D, N37D, R41K, D60E, and A71T. Infections with IIIB, 14aPre, and N70 were inhibited by an average drug IC(90) of 0.18 +/- 0.02 microM in multiple experiments. The average mean +/- standard error of mean IC(90) for the entire group of multidrug-resistant isolates derived from the mean values for two culture wells with p24 antigen supernatant appeared to be 0.619 +/- 0.055 microM (range, 0.31 to 0.86 microM). Tipranavir retained a sustained antiviral activity against PI-MDR clinical isolates and might be useful in combination regimens with other antiretroviral agents for patients who have already failed other PI-containing therapies.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Drug Resistance, Multiple; Gene Frequency; Genotype; HIV-1; Humans; Indinavir; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Molecular Sequence Data; Mutation; Phenotype; Protease Inhibitors; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Sulfonamides

PNU-140690 (sulfonamide-containing 5,6-dihydro-4-hydroxy-2-pyrone) is a potent, nonpeptidic inhibitor of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) protease currently under clinical evaluation. PNU-140690 and ritonavir were studied in two-drug combinations against the replication of HIV-1 clinical isolates in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. A ritonavir-sensitive (301-1x) and -resistant (301-6x) isolate pair derived from an individual before and after monotherapy with ritonavir were used. These isolates showed no significant difference in sensitivity to PNU-140690, but isolate 301-6x was more than 50-fold less sensitive to ritonavir than isolate 301-1x. Mathematical analysis showed that the combination of various concentrations of PNU-140690 with ritonavir yielded additive to moderately synergistic antiviral effects against the ritonavir-sensitive isolate and stronger synergy against the ritonavir-resistant isolate. The mechanism of synergy was not investigated, but the results suggested that both the virological and the observed in vitro pharmacological effects may have contributed to the observed synergy. Importantly, no significant antagonism was observed with the drug combinations studied. These data suggest that PNU-140690 may be useful in combination regimens with a structurally unrelated protease inhibitor such as ritonavir.

Topics: Cells, Cultured; Drug Combinations; Drug Resistance, Microbial; Drug Synergism; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Virus Replication