raltegravir-potassium and efavirenz

Treatment of neurological, neurocognitive, and neuropsychiatric impairment in the setting of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection remains a complex problem, given several possible mechanisms of pathogenesis. The etiology must be determined based on clinical judgment and objective evidence, including cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) data from lumbar puncture and neuroimaging information from magnetic resonance imaging, when available and indicated. Other neuroinfectious etiologies must be ruled out, including central nervous system (CNS) opportunistic infections. HIV replication in the CNS (including CSF escape) should be evaluated for and excluded. If CSF HIV is detected, we recommend a treatment switch to antiretrovirals (ARVs) targeted to address any CSF HIV resistance mutations identified, or empiric treatment intensification using ARVs with high CNS penetration. If CSF HIV is not detected, treatment intensification with CCR5 inhibitors may be considered as an adjunct to reduce neuroinflammation. Finally, the current ARV regimen must be examined for possible neurotoxicity. Efavirenz has been well-recognized for its neuropsychiatric adverse effects and potential for causing sleep disturbances. Similar concerns have recently been raised with integrase inhibitors, especially dolutegravir and raltegravir, although further studies are needed to determine the risks for clinically relevant neuropsychiatric side effects from these medications, given their overall high potency and proven success in treating systemic HIV.

Topics: Alkynes; Anti-Retroviral Agents; Benzoxazines; Central Nervous System Infections; Cyclopropanes; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; HIV Infections; Humans; Oxazines; Piperazines; Pyridones; Raltegravir Potassium

The first-generation integrase inhibitors (INIs) raltegravir (RAL) and elvitegravir (EVG) have shown efficacy against HIV infection, but they have the limitations of once-more daily dosing and extensive cross-resistance. Dolutegravir (DTG, S/GSK1349572), a second-generation drug that overcomes such shortcomings, is under spotlight. The purpose of this study is to review the evidence for DTG use in clinical settings, including its efficacy and safety.. PubMed, EMbase, Ovid, Web of Science, Science Direct, and related websites were screened from establishment until July 2013, and scientific meeting proceedings were manually searched. Two reviewers independently screened 118 citations repeatedly to identify randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy and safety of DTG-based regimen with those of RAL- or elvitegravir-based regimens. Using the selected studies with comparable outcome measures and indications, we performed a meta-analysis based on modified intention-to-treat (mITT), on-treatment (OT), and as-treated (AT) virological outcome data. Independent data extraction and quality assessment were conducted.. Four unique studies were included with the use of DTG in antiretroviral therapy-naive patients. In therapy-naive patients, DTG combined with abacavir/lamivudine (ABC/3TC) or tenofovir/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) resulted in a significantly better virological outcome with a mITT relative risk (RR)of 1.07 (95 % confidence interval (95 % CI 1.03-1.12). Evidence further supported use of DTG had a better virological suppression in the 50 mg once daily group (mITT RR 1.07; 95 % CI 1.03-1.12) as well as in the sub-analysis in dolutegravir/efavirenz(DTG/EFV) and dolutegravir/raltegravir (DTG/RAL) groups (RR 1.09, 95 % CI 1.03-1.15; RR 1.06, 95 % CI 0.98-1.15, respectively). In the matter of safety of DTG-based regimen, the risk of any event was RR 0.98 (95 % CI 0.94-1.01), the risk of serious adverse events (AEs) was RR 0.84 (95 % CI 0.62-1.15), and the risk of drug-related serious AEs was RR 0.33 (95 % CI 0.13-0.79).. In general, DTG 50 mg given once daily combined with an active background drug is a better choice in terms of both efficacy and safety.

Topics: Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; Cyclopropanes; Deoxycytidine; Dideoxynucleosides; Drug Combinations; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lamivudine; Oxazines; Piperazines; Pyridones; Raltegravir Potassium; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Tenofovir; Treatment Outcome

The aim of this study was to compare an in-person, group-based behavioral weight loss intervention to technology-based interventions in adults with obesity.. Adults (. Findings provide initial information on the use of technology-based interventions that include wearable devices combined with brief monthly telephone calls for weight loss in adults with obesity.. A highly stable amino-coordinated metal-organic framework ZJU-198 has been synthesized and structurally characterized, exhibiting high CO. The use of statins in SLE reduced the serum lipid and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels, which suggests a role for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Statins did not affect the SLEDAI score, and therefore their use for modifying SLE disease activity levels is not presently supported.

Topics: Absorptiometry, Photon; Adult; Air Pollutants; Alkynes; Alleles; Animals; Anthracenes; Anthraquinones; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; Black or African American; Bone Density; Bone Density Conservation Agents; C-Reactive Protein; Calcium, Dietary; Capsid Proteins; Cardiomyopathy, Dilated; Cardiovascular Diseases; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Cholesterol; Collagen Type I; Cyclopropanes; Darunavir; Disease Models, Animal; Drug Therapy, Combination; Echocardiography; Emtricitabine; Epitopes; Female; Femur Neck; Gene Expression Profiling; Genetic Predisposition to Disease; Hepatitis, Viral, Animal; Hip Joint; HIV Infections; Humans; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Immunization; Inflammation Mediators; Lipoproteins, LDL; Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic; Male; Mice; Mice, Inbred BALB C; Nitrates; Osteocalcin; Oxidation-Reduction; Parathyroid Hormone; Parvovirus B19, Human; Peptides; Phenotype; Pilot Projects; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; Raltegravir Potassium; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sodium Chloride; Tenofovir; Transcriptome; Uterine Cervical Dysplasia; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms; Vaccines; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A; Vitamin D; Young Adult

Long-term use of antiretroviral therapy (ART) to treat HIV infection has been associated with dyslipidemia and metabolic and cardiovascular complications. Available options for patients at risk of cardiovascular disease include antiretroviral drugs with improved lipid profiles. Dolutegravir is one of a new generation of HIV integrase inhibitors recently incorporated into the US Department of Health and Human Services, German, Spanish, and Italian HIV treatment guidelines as a preferred first-line third agent in combination with dual nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) backbone therapies. To understand the lipid profile of dolutegravir in the context of combination ART, we analyzed the lipid outcomes at 48 weeks in ART-naive participants in four phase IIb-IIIb clinical trials.. Variables included in this analysis were total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (HDL-C), TC/HDL ratio, and triglycerides at baseline and week 48.. In a comparative analysis, dolutegravir demonstrated a broadly neutral effect on lipids versus efavirenz or ritonavir-boosted darunavir; in both comparisons, patients taking dolutegravir exhibited smaller increases in TC, LDL-C, and triglyceride levels. In comparison with raltegravir, dolutegravir exhibited a similar lipid profile, including small increases in TC, LDL-C, and triglyceride levels for both agents. In the pooled dolutegravir analysis, minimal increases in LDL-C and triglycerides were observed but mean values at 48 weeks remained below National Cholesterol Education Program target levels. HDL-C levels increased at 48 weeks, and the mean TC/HDL-C ratio was 0.6 at 48 weeks; these values are associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular disease.. Together, these data show that dolutegravir has a safer lipid profile in combination ART and provides an important treatment option for older patients who may have other risk factors for metabolic syndrome or cardiovascular disease.

Topics: Adult; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cyclopropanes; Darunavir; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; HIV Infections; Humans; Lipids; Male; Oxazines; Piperazines; Pyridones; Raltegravir Potassium; Ritonavir; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

To review the pharmacology, safety, and efficacy of dolutegravir, an integrase strand-transfer inhibitor (INSTI), and to discuss its role in the treatment of HIV-1-infected patients.. PubMed articles indexed through August 2013 were identified using the search terms S/GSK1349572, dolutegravir, and integrase inhibitor. Information was also identified from the package insert, cited publication references, professional meeting abstracts, and the ClinicalTrials.gov registry.. English language articleswere selected for evaluation, with preference given to safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetic studies conducted in HIV-1-infected patients.. Dolutegravir is a new INSTI approved for combination treatment in HIV-1-infected adults and adolescent children. Four phase 3 studies provide the basis for current labeling in antiretroviral-naïve and antiretroviral-experienced adults. Results from these studies demonstrate that dolutegravir is noninferior in efficacy to raltegravir in antiretroviral-naïve patients and superior in antiretroviral-experienced patients. Superiority to efavirenz and darunavir/ritonavir was also demonstrated in antiretroviral-naïve patients. Dolutegravir is well tolerated, exhibits low potential for drug-drug interactions, and has a long serum half-life, allowing it to be administered once-daily in patients without preexisting INSTI resistance. Twice-daily administration is recommended in patients with known or suspected resistance mutations to first-generation INSTIs. Mild elevations in serum creatinine occur following dolutegravir initiation from inhibition of renal organic cation transporter 2 but do not reflect changes in glomerular filtration.. Dolutegravir is the first second-generation INSTI and exhibits several advantages over current integrase inhibitors and other preferred antiretrovirals. Long-term efficacy and safety are needed to define dolutegravir's role in treatment.

Topics: Alkynes; Benzoxazines; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cyclopropanes; Drug Combinations; Drug Interactions; Half-Life; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; HIV Infections; HIV Integrase Inhibitors; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Oxazines; Piperazines; Pyridones; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir

To study gut microbiota before and 24 weeks after a single antiretroviral agent switch.. HIV-positive patients with efavirenz (EFV) or a protease inhibitor (PI)-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) were randomized to switch EFV or PI to raltegravir (RAL group, n = 19) or to continue unchanged ART (EFV/PI group, n = 22). Age and weight-matched HIV-negative participants (n = 10) were included for comparison.. Microbiota was analyzed using 16S rRNA sequencing. Serum intestinal fatty acid-binding protein (I-FABP) and serum lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP) were measured as gut permeability markers. Three-day food diaries were collected.. At week 24, microbiota diversity (Chao1 index) was higher in RAL than the EFV/PI group (P = 0.014), and RAL group did not differ from HIV-negative participants. In subgroup analysis switching from EFV (P = 0.043), but not from a PI to RAL increased Chao1. At week 24, RAL and EFV/PI group differed in the relative abundance of Prevotella 9 (higher in RAL, P = 0.01), Phascolarctobacterium and Bacteroides (lower in RAL, P = 0.01 and P = 0.03). Dietary intakes did not change during the study and do not explain microbiota differences. Also, I-FABP and LBP remained unchanged.. Here we demonstrate that a single ART agent switch caused microbiota alterations, most importantly, an increase in diversity with EFV to RAL switch. Previously, we reported weight gain, yet reduced inflammation in this cohort. The observed microbiota differences between RAL and EFV/PI groups may be associated with reduced inflammation and/or increase in weight. Further studies are needed to evaluate inflammatory and metabolic capacity of microbiota with ART switches.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; Gastrointestinal Microbiome; HIV Infections; Humans; Inflammation; Protease Inhibitors; Raltegravir Potassium; RNA, Ribosomal, 16S

We sought to compare virologic outcomes on antiretroviral therapy (ART) between people with HIV (PWH) also treated for tuberculosis in the different countries who participated to two randomized trials.. Pooled analysis of two randomized clinical trials.. In the phase II Reflate TB and phase III Reflate TB2 trials conducted in Brazil, Côte d'Ivoire, Mozambique and Vietnam, ART-naïve PWH treated for tuberculosis were randomized to receive raltegravir or efavirenz. We assessed country differences in baseline characteristic using Wilcoxon tests and chi-square, or Fisher's exact test. We used logistic regression to analyze determinants of virologic success, defined as week-48 plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/ml.. Of 550 participants (140 from Brazil, 170 from Côte d'Ivoire, 129 from Mozambique and 111 from Vietnam) with median baseline HIV-1 RNA of 5.4 log 10  copies/ml, 362 (65.8%) achieved virologic success at week 48. Virologic success rates were: 105/140 (75.0%) in Brazil, 99/170 (58.2%) in Côte d'Ivoire, 84/129 (65.1%) in Mozambique and 74/111 (66.7%) in Vietnam ( P  = 0.0233). Baseline HIV-1 RNA, but not the country, was independently associated with virologic success: baseline HIV-1 RNA ≥500 000 copies/ml (reference), HIV RNA <100 000 copies/ml odds ratio 3.12 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.94; 5.01] and HIV-1 RNA 100 000-499 999 copies/ml odds ratio: 1.80 (95% CI 1.19; 2.73). Overall, 177/277 (63.9%) patients treated with raltegravir and 185/273 (67.9%) patients treated with efavirenz had a plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/ml at week 48.. Virologic response to antiretroviral therapy in PWH with TB varied across countries but was mainly driven by levels of pretreatment HIV-1 RNA.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; HIV Infections; Humans; Raltegravir Potassium; RNA, Viral; Tuberculosis; Viral Load

Topics: Alkynes; Benzoxazines; Coinfection; Cyclopropanes; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C; HIV Infections; HLA-DR Antigens; Humans; Lipopolysaccharide Receptors; Neopterin; Raltegravir Potassium; Vietnam

To assess in ART-naïve pregnant women randomized to efavirenz- versus raltegravir-based ART (IMPAACT P1081) whether pretreatment drug resistance (PDR) with minority frequency variants (<20% of individual's viral quasispecies) affects antiretroviral treatment (ART)-suppression at term.. A case-control study design compared PDR minority variants in cases with virologic non-suppression (plasma HIV RNA >200 copies/mL) at delivery to randomly selected ART-suppressed controls.. HIV pol genotypes were derived from pretreatment plasma specimens by Illumina sequencing. Resistance mutations were assessed using the HIV Stanford Database, and the proportion of cases versus controls with PDR to their ART regimens was compared.. PDR was observed in 7 participants (11.3%; 95% CI 4.7, 21.9) and did not differ between 21 cases and 41 controls (4.8% vs 14.6%, p = 0.4061). PDR detected only as minority variants was less common (3.2%; 95% CI 0.2, 11.7) and also did not differ between groups (0% vs. 4.9%; p = 0.5447). Cases' median plasma HIV RNA at delivery was 347c/mL, with most (n = 19/22) showing progressive diminution of viral load but not ≤200c/mL. Among cases with viral rebound (n = 3/22), none had PDR detected. Virologic non-suppression at term was associated with higher plasma HIV RNA at study entry (p<0.0001), a shorter duration of ART prior to delivery (p<0.0001), and randomization to efavirenz- (versus raltegravir-) based ART (p = 0.0085).. We observed a moderate frequency of PDR that did not significantly contribute to virologic non-suppression at term. Rather, higher pretreatment plasma HIV RNA, randomization to efavirenz-based ART, and shorter duration of ART were associated with non-suppression. These findings support early prenatal care engagement of pregnant women and initiation of integrase inhibitor-based ART due to its association with more rapid suppression of plasma RNA levels. Furthermore, because minority variants appeared infrequent in ART-naïve pregnant women and inconsequential to ART-suppression, testing for minority variants may be unwarranted.

Topics: Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Anti-Retroviral Agents; Benzoxazines; Case-Control Studies; Cyclopropanes; Drug Resistance, Viral; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Integrase Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Pregnancy; Pregnant Women; Raltegravir Potassium; RNA; Viral Load

Pregnant women using antiretrovirals (ARVs) may have persistent vaginal viral shedding, which could be associated with sexual and perinatal HIV transmission. However, there are scant data on vaginal viral load (VVL) in pregnant women with undetectable plasma viral load (PVL).. This study was a post hoc analysis of an open-label randomized trial to evaluate the virologic response of 2 ART regimens. The participants were ART-naive women living with HIV initiating ART regimens between 20 and 36 weeks of pregnancy recruited at 19 clinical sites in 6 countries. Participants were randomized to receive 400 mg of raltegravir 2 times a day or 600 mg of efavirenz 4 times a day in addition to 150 mg of lamivudine and 300 mg of zidovudine 2 times a day. VVL and PVL tests were performed at every study visit. The primary outcome measures were HIV-1 PVL and VVL at maternal study week 4 and rates of perinatal HIV transmission.. A total of 408 were enrolled, of whom 323 had VVL samples 4 weeks after enrollment and were included in this analysis. Among women with undetectable/nonquantifiable PVL during ART, the overall rate of quantifiable VVL at week 4 was 2.54% (7/275). Of the 275 with nonquantifiable PVL, 99.1% (115/116) and 96.2% (153/159) had nonquantifiable VVL in the efavirenz and raltegravir arms, respectively. None of the 7 women with quantifiable VVL at the week 4 study visit transmitted HIV to their infants.. Detectable VVL in pregnant women with undetectable/nonquantifiable PVL while receiving ART was rare and not associated with perinatal HIV transmission.

Topics: Adult; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Benzoxazines; Cyclopropanes; Drug Resistance, Viral; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Infant; Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical; Lamivudine; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious; Pregnant Women; Raltegravir Potassium; Vigna; Viral Load; Virus Shedding; Zidovudine

Although antiretroviral regimens containing integrase inhibitors rapidly suppress HIV viral load in non-pregnant adults, few published data from randomised controlled trials have compared the safety and efficacy of any integrase inhibitor to efavirenz when initiated during pregnancy. We compared safety and efficacy of antiretroviral therapy with either raltegravir or efavirenz in late pregnancy.. An open-label, randomised controlled trial was done at 19 hospitals and clinics in Argentina, Brazil, South Africa, Tanzania, Thailand, and the USA. Antiretroviral-naive pregnant women (20-<37 weeks gestation) living with HIV were assigned to antiretroviral regimens containing either raltegravir (400 mg twice daily) or efavirenz (600 mg each night) plus lamivudine 150 mg and zidovudine 300 mg twice daily (or approved alternative backbone regimen), using a web-based, permuted-block randomisation stratified by gestational age and backbone regimen. The primary efficacy outcome was plasma HIV viral load below 200 copies per mL at (or near) delivery. The primary efficacy analysis included all women with a viral load measurement at (or near) delivery who had viral load of at least 200 copies per mL before treatment and no genotypic resistance to any study drugs; secondary analyses eliminated these exclusion criteria. The primary safety analyses included all women who received study drug, and their infants. This trial is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov, number NCT01618305.. From Sep 5, 2013, to Dec 11, 2018, 408 women were enrolled (206 raltegravir, 202 efavirenz) and 394 delivered on-study (200 raltegravir, 194 efavirenz); 307 were included in the primary efficacy analysis (153 raltegravir, 154 efavirenz). 144 (94%) women in the raltegravir group and 129 (84%) in the efavirenz group met the primary efficacy outcome (absolute difference 10%, 95% CI 3-18; p=0·0015); the difference primarily occurred among women enrolling later in pregnancy (interaction p=0·040). Frequencies of severe or life-threatening adverse events were similar among mothers (30% in each group; 61 raltegravir, 59 efavirenz) and infants (25% in each group; 50 raltegravir, 48 efavirenz), with no treatment-related deaths.. Our findings support major guidelines. The integrase inhibitor dolutegravir is currently a preferred regimen for the prevention of perinatal HIV transmission with raltegravir recommended as a preferred or alternative integrase inhibitor for pregnant women living with HIV.. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

Topics: Adult; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; Cyclopropanes; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Integrase Inhibitors; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical; Lamivudine; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious; Raltegravir Potassium; Viral Load; Young Adult; Zidovudine

Antiretroviral drugs with a lower potential to induce hepatic steatosis in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection need to be identified. We compared the effect of switching efavirenz (EFV) to raltegravir (RAL) on hepatic steatosis among HIV-infected patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) receiving EFV plus 2 nucleoside analogues.. HIV-infected patients on EFV plus tenofovir/emtricitabine or abacavir/lamivudine with NAFLD were randomized 1:1 to switch from EFV to RAL (400 mg twice daily), maintaining nucleoside analogues unchanged, or to continue with EFV plus 2 nucleoside analogues. At baseline, eligible patients should show controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) values ≥238 dB/m. Changes in hepatic steatosis at 48 weeks of follow-up over baseline levels were measured by CAP.. Overall, 39 patients were included, and 19 of them were randomized to switch to RAL. At week 48, median CAP for the RAL group was 250 (Q1-Q3, 221-277) dB/m and 286 (Q1-Q3, 269-314) dB/m for the EFV group (P = .035). The median decrease in CAP values was -20 (Q1-Q3, -67 to 15) dB/m for the RAL arm and 30 (Q1-Q3, -17 to 49) dB/m for the EFV group (P = .011). CAP values <238 dB/m at week 48 were observed in 9 (47%) patients on RAL and 3 (15%) individuals on EFV (P = .029).. After 48 weeks, HIV-infected individuals switching EFV to RAL showed decreases in the degree of hepatic steatosis, as measured by CAP, compared with those continuing with EFV. In addition, the proportion of patients without significant hepatic steatosis after 48 weeks was greater for those who switched to RAL.. NCT01900015.

Topics: Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Cyclopropanes; Dideoxynucleosides; Drug Substitution; Drug Therapy, Combination; Elasticity Imaging Techniques; Emtricitabine; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Lamivudine; Male; Middle Aged; Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease; Raltegravir Potassium; Tenofovir; Triglycerides; Waist-Hip Ratio

Plasma, duodenal, and rectal tissue antiretroviral therapy (ART) drug concentrations, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) RNA and HIV DNA copy numbers, and recovery of mucosal immunity were measured before and 9 months after initiation of 3 different ART regimens in 26 subjects. Plasma and tissue HIV RNA correlated at baseline and when 9-month declines were compared, suggesting that these compartments are tightly associated. Antiretroviral tissue:blood penetration ratios were above the 50% inhibitory concentration values in almost 100% of cases. There were no correlations between drug concentrations and HIV DNA/RNA. Importantly, no evidence was found for residual viral replication or deficient tissue drug penetration to account for delayed gastrointestinal-associated lymphoid tissue immune recovery.

Topics: Adult; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; Cyclohexanes; Cyclopropanes; DNA, Viral; Duodenum; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Lymphoid Tissue; Male; Maraviroc; Raltegravir Potassium; Rectum; RNA, Viral; Triazoles

A low CD4/CD8 ratio during treated HIV identifies individuals with heightened immunoactivation and excess mortality. Whether ART regimens elicit distinct CD4/CD8 ratio recovery remains unknown. We aimed to compare the efficacy of an integrase inhibitor versus a non-nucleoside to normalize the CD4/CD8 ratio.. We conducted a post hoc analysis of the STARTMRK study, a randomized, blinded, double-dummy Phase III trial of raltegravir versus efavirenz, and each in combination with tenofovir/emtricitabine, in treatment-naive HIV-infected adults. Blinding was maintained for the entire 5 year duration of the study. Kaplan-Meier methods for time-dependent variables were used to calculate the rates of CD4/CD8 normalization at different cut-offs and cumulative probabilities. Cox proportional hazard models were used to compare probabilities of CD4/CD8 normalization by treatment arm.. A total of 563 patients were analysed; 81% were males and the mean age (SD) was 37 (10) years. Raltegravir was associated with higher rates of CD4/CD8 ratio normalization at the >0.4 cut-off (median time to normalization = 56 versus 84 days; P = 0.048 by log-rank test). A Cox proportional hazard model stratified based on baseline CD4 counts showed an association between raltegravir and higher rates of CD4/CD8 ratio normalization (HR = 1.23; P = 0.02).. We herein show that normalization of the CD4/CD8 ratio above a clinically meaningful threshold may be dependent on the drug class used. Raltegravir showed faster CD4/CD8 ratio normalization compared with efavirenz, a finding with potential clinical implications. Whether other integrase inhibitors have a similar impact for this outcome remains to be explored.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; CD4-CD8 Ratio; Cyclopropanes; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Raltegravir Potassium; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Whether initiation of antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimens aimed at achieving greater concentrations within gut associated lymphoid tissue (GALT) impacts the level of mucosal immune reconstitution, inflammatory markers and the viral reservoir remains unknown. We included 12 HIV- controls and 32 ART-naïve HIV patients who were randomized to efavirenz, maraviroc or maraviroc+raltegravir, each with fixed-dose tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine. Rectal and duodenal biopsies were obtained at baseline and at 9 months of ART. We performed a comprehensive assay of T-cell subsets by flow cytometry, T-cell density in intestinal biopsies, plasma and tissue concentrations of antiretroviral drugs by high-performance liquid chromatography/mass spectroscopy, and plasma interleukin-6 (IL-6), lipoteichoic acid (LTA), soluble CD14 (sCD14) and zonulin-1 each measured by ELISA. Total cell-associated HIV DNA was measured in PBMC and rectal and duodenal mononuclear cells. Twenty-six HIV-infected patients completed the follow-up. In the duodenum, the quadruple regimen resulted in greater CD8+ T-cell density decline, greater normalization of mucosal CCR5+CD4+ T-cells and increase of the naïve/memory CD8+ T-cell ratio, and a greater decline of sCD14 levels and duodenal HIV DNA levels (P = 0.004 and P = 0.067, respectively), with no changes in HIV RNA in plasma or tissue. Maraviroc showed the highest drug distribution to the gut tissue, and duodenal concentrations correlated well with other T-cell markers in duodenum, i.e., the CD4/CD8 ratio, %CD4+ and %CD8+ HLA-DR+CD38+ T-cells. Maraviroc use elicited greater activation of the mucosal naïve CD8+ T-cell subset, ameliorated the distribution of the CD8+ T-cell maturational subsets and induced higher improvement of zonulin-1 levels. These data suggest that combined CCR5 and integrase inhibitor based combination therapy in ART treatment naïve patients might more effectively reconstitute duodenal immunity, decrease inflammatory markers and impact on HIV persistence by cell-dependent mechanisms, and show unique effects of MVC in duodenal immunity driven by higher drug tissue penetration and possibly by class-dependent effects.

Topics: Adult; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; CCR5 Receptor Antagonists; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Cyclohexanes; Cyclopropanes; Drug Combinations; Emtricitabine, Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Drug Combination; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay; Female; Flow Cytometry; HIV Infections; HIV Integrase Inhibitors; Humans; Immunity, Mucosal; Lymphocyte Activation; Male; Maraviroc; Pilot Projects; Raltegravir Potassium; T-Lymphocyte Subsets; Triazoles

Topics: Adult; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; Benzoxazines; Cyclopropanes; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Emtricitabine; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Raltegravir Potassium; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Surveys and Questionnaires; Tenofovir; Treatment Outcome

Raltegravir is a human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 integrase strand transfer inhibitor currently marketed at a dose of 400 mg twice daily (BID). Raltegravir for once daily regimen (QD) at a dose of 1200 mg (2 x 600 mg) is under development and offers a new treatment option for HIV-1 infected treatment-naive subjects. Since raltegravir is eliminated mainly by metabolism via an UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1 A1-mediated glucuronidation pathway, co-administration of UGT1A1 inducers may alter plasma levels of raltegravir. Efavirenz, an UGT1A1 inducer, was used to assess the impact of altered UGT activity on a 1200 mg QD dose of raltegravir. An open label, randomized, 2-period fixed-sequence Phase 1 study was performed in adult healthy male and female subjects (non-childbearing potential) ≥ 19 and ≤55 years of age, with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 18.5 and ≤32.0 kg/m

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; Cyclopropanes; Drug Interactions; Enzyme Induction; Female; Glucuronosyltransferase; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Raltegravir Potassium; Young Adult

The aim of this study was to compare an in-person, group-based behavioral weight loss intervention to technology-based interventions in adults with obesity.. Adults (. Findings provide initial information on the use of technology-based interventions that include wearable devices combined with brief monthly telephone calls for weight loss in adults with obesity.. A highly stable amino-coordinated metal-organic framework ZJU-198 has been synthesized and structurally characterized, exhibiting high CO. The use of statins in SLE reduced the serum lipid and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels, which suggests a role for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Statins did not affect the SLEDAI score, and therefore their use for modifying SLE disease activity levels is not presently supported.

Topics: Absorptiometry, Photon; Adult; Air Pollutants; Alkynes; Alleles; Animals; Anthracenes; Anthraquinones; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; Black or African American; Bone Density; Bone Density Conservation Agents; C-Reactive Protein; Calcium, Dietary; Capsid Proteins; Cardiomyopathy, Dilated; Cardiovascular Diseases; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Cholesterol; Collagen Type I; Cyclopropanes; Darunavir; Disease Models, Animal; Drug Therapy, Combination; Echocardiography; Emtricitabine; Epitopes; Female; Femur Neck; Gene Expression Profiling; Genetic Predisposition to Disease; Hepatitis, Viral, Animal; Hip Joint; HIV Infections; Humans; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Immunization; Inflammation Mediators; Lipoproteins, LDL; Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic; Male; Mice; Mice, Inbred BALB C; Nitrates; Osteocalcin; Oxidation-Reduction; Parathyroid Hormone; Parvovirus B19, Human; Peptides; Phenotype; Pilot Projects; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; Raltegravir Potassium; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sodium Chloride; Tenofovir; Transcriptome; Uterine Cervical Dysplasia; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms; Vaccines; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A; Vitamin D; Young Adult

Concurrent treatment of HIV and tuberculosis is complicated by drug interactions. We explored the safety and efficacy of raltegravir as an alternative to efavirenz for patients co-infected with HIV and tuberculosis.. We did a multicentre, phase 2, non-comparative, open-label, randomised trial at eight sites in Brazil and France. Using a computer-generated randomisation sequence, we randomly allocated antiretroviral-naive adult patients with HIV-1 and tuberculosis (aged ≥18 years with a plasma HIV RNA concentration of >1000 copies per mL) to receive raltegravir 400 mg twice a day, raltegravir 800 mg twice daily, or efavirenz 600 mg once daily plus tenofovir and lamivudine (1:1:1; stratified by country). Patients began study treatment after the start of tuberculosis treatment. The primary endpoint was virological suppression at 24 weeks (HIV RNA <50 copies per mL) in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug (modified intention-to-treat analysis). We recorded death, study drug discontinuation, and loss to follow-up as failures to achieve the primary endpoint. We assessed safety in all patients who received study drugs. This study is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00822315.. Between July 3, 2009, and June 6, 2011, we enrolled and randomly assigned treatment to 155 individuals; 153 (51 in each group) received at least one dose of the study drug and were included in the primary analysis. 133 patients (87%) completed follow-up at week 48. At week 24, virological suppression was achieved in 39 patients (76%, 95% CI 65-88) in the raltegravir 400 mg group, 40 patients (78%, 67-90) in the raltegravir 800 mg group, and 32 patients (63%, 49-76) in the efavirenz group. The adverse-event profile was much the same across the three groups. Three (6%) patients allocated to efavirenz and three (6%) patients allocated to raltegravir 800 mg twice daily discontinued the study drugs due to adverse events. Seven patients died during the study (one in the raltegravir 400 mg group, four in the raltegravir 800 mg group, and two in the efavirenz group): none of the deaths was deemed related to study treatment.. Raltegravir 400 mg twice daily might be an alternative to efavirenz for the treatment of patients co-infected with HIV and tuberculosis.. French National Agency for Research on AIDS and Viral Hepatitis (ANRS), Brazilian National STD/AIDS Program-Ministry of Health.

Topics: Adenine; Adult; AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Antitubercular Agents; Benzoxazines; Brazil; Coinfection; Cyclopropanes; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; France; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lamivudine; Male; Middle Aged; Organophosphonates; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium; RNA, Viral; Tenofovir; Treatment Outcome; Tuberculosis; Viral Load

STARTMRK, a phase III noninferiority trial of raltegravir-based versus efavirenz-based therapy in treatment-naive patients, remained blinded until its conclusion at 5 years. We now report the final study results.. Previously untreated patients without baseline resistance to efavirenz, tenofovir, or emtricitabine were eligible for a randomized study of tenofovir/emtricitabine plus either raltegravir or efavirenz. Yearly analyses were planned, with primary and secondary end points stipulated at weeks 48 and 96, respectively. The primary efficacy outcome was the percentage of patients with viral RNA (vRNA) levels <50 copies per milliliter counting noncompleters as failures (NC=F). Changes from baseline CD4 count were computed using an observed-failure approach to missing data. No formal hypotheses were formulated for testing at week 240.. Overall, 71 of 281 raltegravir recipients (25%) and 98 of 282 efavirenz recipients (35%) discontinued the study; discontinuations due to adverse events occurred in 14 (5%) and 28 (10%) patients in the respective groups. In the primary NC=F efficacy analysis at week 240, 198 of 279 (71.0%) raltegravir recipients and 171 of 279 (61.3%) efavirenz recipients had vRNA levels <50 copies per milliliter, yielding a treatment difference {Δ [95% confidence interval (CI)] = 9.5 (1.7 to 17.3)}. Generally comparable between-treatment differences were seen in both the protocol-stipulated sensitivity analyses and the prespecified subgroup analyses. The mean (95% CI) increments in baseline CD4 counts at week 240 were 374 and 312 cells per cubic millimeter in the raltegravir and efavirenz groups, respectively [Δ(95% CI) = 62 (22 to 102)]. Overall, significantly fewer raltegravir than efavirenz recipients experienced neuropsychiatric side effects (39.1% vs 64.2%, P < 0.001) or drug-related clinical adverse events (52.0% vs 80.1%, P < 0.001).. In this exploratory analysis of combination therapy with tenofovir/emtricitabine in treatment-naive patients at week 240, vRNA suppression rates and increases in baseline CD4 counts were significantly higher in raltegravir than efavirenz recipients. Over the entire study, fewer patients experienced neuropsychiatric and drug-related adverse events in the raltegravir group than in the efavirenz group. Based on better virologic and immunologic outcomes after 240 weeks, raltegravir/tenofovir/emtricitabine seemed to have superior efficacy compared with efavirenz/tenofovir/emtricitabine.

Topics: Adenine; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; Cyclopropanes; Deoxycytidine; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Efavirenz, Emtricitabine, Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Drug Combination; Emtricitabine; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Organophosphonates; Oxazines; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Tenofovir; Treatment Outcome

The goal of this study was to define viral kinetics after initiation of raltegravir (RAL)-based antiretroviral therapy (ART).. ART-naive patients received RAL, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, and emtricitabine for 72 weeks. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) RNA were measured by ultrasensitive and single-copy assays, and first (d1)-, second (d2)-, and, third (d3)-phase decay rates were estimated by mixed-effects models. Decay data were compared to historical estimates for efavirenz (EFV)- and ritonavir/lopinavir (LPV/r)-based regimens.. Bi- and tri-exponential models for ultrasensitive assay (n = 38) and single-copy assay (n = 8) data, respectively, provided the best fits over 8 and 72 weeks. The median d1 with ultrasensitive data was 0.563/day (interquartile range [IQR], 0.501-0.610/day), significantly slower than d1 for EFV-based regimens [P < .001]). The median duration of d1 was 15.1 days, transitioning to d2 at an HIV-1 RNA of 91 copies/mL, indicating a longer duration of d1 and a d2 transition at lower viremia levels than with EFV. Median patient-specific decay estimates with the single-copy assay were 0.607/day (IQR, 0.582-0.653) for d1, 0.070/day (IQR, 0.042-0.079) for d2, and 0.0016/day (IQR, 0.0005-0.0022) for d3; the median d1 duration was 16.1 days, transitioning to d2 at 69 copies/mL. d3 transition occurred at 110 days, at 2.6 copies/mL, similar to values for LPV/r-based regimens.. Models using single-copy assay data revealed 3 phases of decay with RAL-containing ART, with a longer duration of first-phase decay consistent with RAL-mediated blockade of productive infection from preintegration complexes.

Topics: Adenine; Adult; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; Cyclopropanes; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Organophosphonates; Pilot Projects; Prospective Studies; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium; Ritonavir; RNA Stability; RNA, Viral; Tenofovir; Viral Load

Abstract The influence of efavirenz, etravirine, raltegravir, and nevirapine administration on the pharmacokinetics of ritonavir-boosted darunavir was investigated using population pharmacokinetics analysis. The population was composed of 142 patients infected with HIV: darunavir plus nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI), 54 patients (group A); darunavir plus efavirenz±NRTI, 4 patients (group B); darunavir plus etravirine±NRTI, 5 patients (group C); darunavir plus nevirapine±NRTI, 21 patients (group D); darunavir plus raltegravir±NRTI, 38 patients (group E); and darunavir plus raltegravir and etravirine±NRTI, 20 patients (group F). A significant increase in darunavir clearance in combination with nevirapine (+66%) and efavirenz (+235%) was observed. A significant decrease (p<0.05) in trough plasma concentration was observed in groups B and D compared with the other groups. Our study indicates that the combination of ritonavir-boosted darunavir and etravirine or raltegravir has no significant influence on the pharmacokinetics of darunavir in contrast to the combination of ritonavir-boosted darunavir and nevirapine or efavirenz, which involves an increase in darunavir clearance and a decrease in the plasma concentration of darunavir.

Topics: Adult; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Benzoxazines; Cyclopropanes; Darunavir; Drug Synergism; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Nevirapine; Nitriles; Pyridazines; Pyrimidines; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

The aim was to examine the long-term safety and efficacy of raltegravir in patients with HIV-1 and hepatitis B virus (HBV) and/or hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection in three double-blind, randomized, controlled Phase III studies.. In STARTMRK, treatment-naïve patients received raltegravir 400 mg twice a day (bid) or efavirenz 600 mg at bedtime, both with tenofovir/emtricitabine. In BENCHMRK-1 and -2, highly treatment-experienced patients with multi-drug resistant virus and prior treatment failure received raltegravir 400 mg bid or placebo, both with optimized background therapy. Patients with chronic HBV and/or HCV coinfection were enrolled if baseline liver function tests were ≤5 times the upper limit of normal. HBV infection was defined as HBV surface antigen positivity for all studies; HCV infection was defined as HCV RNA positivity for STARTMRK and HCV antibody positivity for BENCHMRK.. Hepatitis coinfection was present in 6% (34 of 563) of treatment-naïve patients (4% HBV only, 2% HCV only and 0.2% HBV+HCV) and 16% (114 of 699) of treatment-experienced patients (6% HBV only, 9% HCV only and 1% HBV+HCV). The incidence of drug-related adverse events was similar in raltegravir recipients with and without hepatitis coinfection in both STARTMRK (50 vs. 47%) and BENCHMRK (34 vs. 38.5%). Grade 2-4 liver enzyme elevations were more frequent in coinfected vs. monoinfected patients, but were not different between the raltegravir and control groups. At week 96, the proportion of raltegravir recipients with HIV RNA <50 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL was similar between coinfected and monoinfected patients (93 vs. 90% in STARTMRK; 63 vs. 61% in BENCHMRK).. Raltegravir was generally well tolerated and efficacious up to 96 weeks in HIV-infected patients with HBV/HCV coinfection.

Topics: Adult; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Coinfection; Cyclopropanes; Double-Blind Method; Female; Hepatitis B; Hepatitis C; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium; Treatment Outcome

Efavirenz (EFV) causes neuropsychiatric side-effects and an unfavorable blood lipid profile. We investigated the effect of replacing EFV with raltegravir (RAL) on patient preference, daytime sleepiness, sleep quality, anxiety, and lipid levels.. Switch-ER was a randomized, double-blind, cross-over study. Patients who tolerated EFV, with less than 50 copies/ml HIV-RNA, were randomized into two groups: the RAL-first group started with RAL (400 mg twice daily) and EFV placebo, and the EFV-first group with EFV (600 mg once daily) and RAL placebo. After 2 weeks, both groups switched to the alternate regimen. The primary endpoint was patient preference for the first or the second regimen, assessed after 4 weeks.. Fifty seven participants were enrolled with a median CD4 cell count 600/μl, and duration of previous EFV therapy 3.4 years. Fifty three participants completed the study. When asked about treatment preference after 4 weeks, 22 preferred RAL and 12 preferred EFV, whereas 19 did not express a preference. A significant difference in anxiety and stress scores favoring RAL (P = 0.04 and 0.03, respectively) was observed. Median plasma cholesterol levels decreased by 0.4 mmol/l (16 mg/dl, P < 0.001), triglycerides by 0.2 mmol/l (18 mg/dl, P = 0.036), and low-density lipoprotein by 0.2 mmol/l (8 mg/dl, P = 0.004) after replacing EFV with RAL. After study completion, 51% of patients switched to RAL.. Half of patients previously on a stable EFV preferred to switch to RAL, after double-blind exposure to RAL for 2 weeks. Substitution of EFV by RAL significantly impacted on lipid levels, stress, and anxiety scores.

Topics: Adult; Alkynes; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Anxiety Disorders; Benzoxazines; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Cross-Over Studies; Cyclopropanes; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium; Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders; Surveys and Questionnaires; Treatment Outcome

We compared 3 years of antiretroviral therapy with raltegravir or efavirenz as part of a combination regimen in the ongoing STARTMRK study of treatment-naive patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).. Eligible patients with HIV-1 RNA (vRNA) levels >5000 copies/mL and without baseline resistance to efavirenz, tenofovir, or emtricitabine were randomized in a double-blind, noninferiority study to receive raltegravir or efavirenz, each combined with tenofovir/emtricitabine. Outcomes included viral suppression, adverse events, and changes from baseline metabolic parameters. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry scans were obtained on a convenience sample of patients at prespecified time points to assess changes in body fat composition.. At week 156 counting noncompleters as failures, 212 (75.4%) of 281 versus 192 (68.1%) of 282 had vRNA levels <50 copies/mL in the raltegravir and efavirenz groups, respectively [Δ (95% CI) = 7.3% (-0.2, 14.7), noninferiority P < .001]. Mean changes from baseline CD4 count were 332 and 295 cells/mm³ in the raltegravir and efavirenz arms, respectively [Δ (95% CI) = 37 (4, 69)]. Consistent virologic and immunologic efficacy was maintained across prespecified demographic and baseline prognostic subgroups for both treatment groups. Fewer drug-related clinical adverse events (49% vs 80%; P < .001) occurred in raltegravir than efavirenz recipients, with discontinuations due to adverse events in 5% and 7%, respectively. Elevations in fasting lipid levels (including LDL- and HDL-cholesterol) were consistently lower in the raltegravir than efavirenz group (P < .005). Fat gain was 19% in 25 raltegravir recipients and 31% in 32 efavirenz recipients at week 156.. When combined with tenofovir/emtricitabine in treatment-naive patients, raltegravir produced durable viral suppression and immune restoration that was at least equivalent to efavirenz through 156 weeks of therapy. Both regimens were well tolerated, but raltegravir was associated with fewer drug-related clinical adverse events and smaller elevations in lipid levels. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT00369941.

Topics: Absorptiometry, Photon; Adenine; Adolescent; Adult; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Cyclopropanes; Deoxycytidine; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Emtricitabine; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Organophosphonates; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium; RNA, Viral; Tenofovir; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

We analyzed the 96-week results in the overall population and in prespecified subgroups from the ongoing STARTMRK study of treatment-naive HIV-infected patients.. Eligible patients with HIV-1 RNA (vRNA) levels >5000 copies per milliliter and without baseline resistance to efavirenz, tenofovir, or emtricitabine were randomized in a double-blind noninferiority study to receive raltegravir or efavirenz, each combined with tenofovir/emtricitabine.. At week 96 counting noncompleters as failures, 81% versus 79% achieved vRNA levels <50 copies per milliliter in the raltegravir and efavirenz groups, respectively [Delta (95% confidence interval) = 2% (-4 to 9), noninferiority P < 0.001]. Mean change in baseline CD4 count was 240 and 225 cells per cubic millimeter in the raltegravir and efavirenz groups, respectively [Delta (95% confidence interval) = 15 (-13 to 42)]. Treatment effects were consistent across prespecified baseline demographic and prognostic subgroups. Fewer drug-related clinical adverse events (47% versus 78%; P < 0.001) occurred in raltegravir than efavirenz recipients. Both regimens had modest effects on serum lipids and glucose levels and on body fat composition.. When combined with tenofovir/emtricitabine in treatment-naive patients, raltegravir exhibited durable antiretroviral activity that was noninferior to the efficacy of efavirenz through 96 weeks of therapy. Subgroup analyses were generally consistent with the overall findings. Both regimens were well tolerated.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Benzoxazines; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Cyclopropanes; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium; RNA, Viral; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load; Young Adult

Use of raltegravir with optimum background therapy is effective and well tolerated in treatment-experienced patients with multidrug-resistant HIV-1 infection. We compared the safety and efficacy of raltegravir with efavirenz as part of combination antiretroviral therapy for treatment-naive patients.. Patients from 67 study centres on five continents were enrolled between Sept 14, 2006, and June 5, 2008. Eligible patients were infected with HIV-1, had viral RNA (vRNA) concentration of more than 5000 copies per mL, and no baseline resistance to efavirenz, tenofovir, or emtricitabine. Patients were randomly allocated by interactive voice response system in a 1:1 ratio (double-blind) to receive 400 mg oral raltegravir twice daily or 600 mg oral efavirenz once daily, in combination with tenofovir and emtricitabine. The primary efficacy endpoint was achievement of a vRNA concentration of less than 50 copies per mL at week 48. The primary analysis was per protocol. The margin of non-inferiority was 12%. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00369941.. 566 patients were enrolled and randomly allocated to treatment, of whom 281 received raltegravir, 282 received efavirenz, and three were never treated. At baseline, 297 (53%) patients had more than 100 000 vRNA copies per mL and 267 (47%) had CD4 counts of 200 cells per microL or less. The main analysis (with non-completion counted as failure) showed that 86.1% (n=241 patients) of the raltegravir group and 81.9% (n=230) of the efavirenz group achieved the primary endpoint (difference 4.2%, 95% CI -1.9 to 10.3). The time to achieve such viral suppression was shorter for patients on raltegravir than on efavirenz (log-rank test p<0.0001). Significantly fewer drug-related clinical adverse events occurred in patients on raltegravir (n=124 [44.1%]) than those on efavirenz (n=217 [77.0%]; difference -32.8%, 95% CI -40.2 to -25.0, p<0.0001). Serious drug-related clinical adverse events occurred in less than 2% of patients in each drug group.. Raltegravir-based combination treatment had rapid and potent antiretroviral activity, which was non-inferior to that of efavirenz at week 48. Raltegravir is a well tolerated alternative to efavirenz as part of a combination regimen against HIV-1 in treatment-naive patients.. Merck.

Topics: Adenine; Adult; Alkynes; Analysis of Variance; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; Cyclopropanes; Deoxycytidine; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Emtricitabine; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Organophosphonates; Prognosis; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium; RNA, Viral; Safety; Tenofovir; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of raltegravir vs efavirenz-based antiretroviral therapy after 96 weeks in treatment-naive patients with HIV-1 infection.. Multicenter, double-blind, randomized study of raltegravir (100, 200, 400, or 600 mg twice a day) vs efavirenz (600 mg every day), both with tenofovir/lamivudine (TDF/3TC), for 48 weeks, after which raltegravir arms were combined and all dosed at 400 mg twice a day. Eligible patients had HIV-1 RNA > or =5000 copies per milliliter and CD4 T cells > or =100 cells per microliter.. One hundred ninety-eight patients were randomized and treated; 160 received raltegravir and 38 received efavirenz. At week 96, 84% of patients in both groups achieved HIV-1 RNA <400 copies per milliliter; 83% in the raltegravir group and 84% in the efavirenz group achieved <50 copies per milliliter (noncompleter = failure). Both groups showed similar increases in CD4 T cells (221 vs 232 cells/uL, respectively). An additional 2 patients (1 in each group) met the protocol definition of virologic failure between weeks 48 and 96; no known resistance mutations were observed in the raltegravir recipient; the efavirenz recipient had nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor and nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor resistance mutations. Investigator reported drug-related clinical adverse events (AEs) were less frequent with raltegravir (51%) than efavirenz (74%). Drug-related AEs occurring in >10% of patients in either group were nausea in both groups and dizziness and headache in the efavirenz group. Laboratory AEs remained infrequent. Raltegravir had no adverse effect on total or low-density lipoprotein cholesterol or on triglycerides. Neuropsychiatric AEs remained less frequent with raltegravir (34%) than efavirenz (58%). There were no drug-related serious AEs in patients receiving raltegravir.. In antiretroviral therapy-naive patients, raltegravir with TDF/3TC had potent antiretroviral activity, which was similar to efavirenz/TDF/3TC and was sustained to week 96. Raltegravir was generally well tolerated; drug-related AEs were less frequent in patients treated with raltegravir compared with efavirenz.

Topics: Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; Cyclopropanes; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium

Topics: Adenine; Adult; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; Cyclopropanes; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Integrase Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lamivudine; Organophosphonates; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Tenofovir; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Raltegravir is a novel human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) integrase inhibitor with potent in vitro activity (95% inhibitory concentration of 31 nM in 50% human serum). This article reports the results of an open-label, sequential, three-period study of healthy subjects. Period 1 involved raltegravir at 400 mg twice daily for 4 days, period 2 involved tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) at 300 mg once daily for 7 days, and period 3 involved raltegravir at 400 mg twice daily plus TDF at 300 mg once daily for 4 days. Pharmacokinetic profiles were also determined in HIV-1-infected patients dosed with raltegravir monotherapy versus raltegravir in combination with TDF and lamivudine. There was no clinically significant effect of TDF on raltegravir. The raltegravir area under the concentration time curve from 0 to 12 h (AUC(0-12)) and peak plasma drug concentration (C(max)) were modestly increased in healthy subjects (geometric mean ratios [GMRs], 1.49 and 1.64, respectively). There was no substantial effect of TDF on raltegravir concentration at 12 h postdose (C(12)) in healthy subjects (GMR [TDF plus raltegravir-raltegravir alone], 1.03; 90% confidence interval [CI], 0.73 to 1.45), while a modest increase (GMR, 1.42; 90% CI, 0.89 to 2.28) was seen in HIV-1-infected patients. Raltegravir had no substantial effect on tenofovir pharmacokinetics: C(24), AUC, and C(max) GMRs were 0.87, 0.90, and 0.77, respectively. Coadministration of raltegravir and TDF does not change the pharmacokinetics of either drug to a clinically meaningful degree. Raltegravir and TDF may be coadministered without dose adjustments.

Topics: Adenine; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; Cyclopropanes; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Integrase Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lamivudine; Male; Middle Aged; Organophosphonates; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Tenofovir; Treatment Outcome

Raltegravir is a novel human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) integrase strand transfer inhibitor with potent in vitro activity against HIV-1 (95% inhibitory concentration = 31 nM in 50% human serum). The possible effects of ritonavir and efavirenz on raltegravir pharmacokinetics were separately examined. Two clinical studies of healthy subjects were conducted: for ritonavir plus raltegravir, period 1, 400 mg raltegravir; period 2, 100 mg ritonavir every 12 h for 16 days with 400 mg raltegravir on day 14; for efavirenz plus raltegravir, period 1, 400 mg raltegravir; period 2, 600 mg efavirenz once daily for 14 days with 400 mg raltegravir on day 12. In the presence of ritonavir, raltegravir pharmacokinetics were weakly affected: the plasma concentration at 12 h (C(12 h)) geometric mean ratio (GMR) (90% confidence interval [CI]) was 0.99 (0.70, 1.40), area under the concentration-time curve from zero to infinity (AUC(0-infinity)) was 0.84 (0.70, 1.01), and maximum concentration of drug in serum (C(max)) was 0.76 (0.55, 1.04). In the presence of efavirenz, raltegravir pharmacokinetics were moderately to weakly reduced: C(12 h) GMR (90% CI) was 0.79 (0.49, 1.28); AUC(0-infinity) was 0.64 (0.52, 0.80); and C(max) was 0.64 (0.41, 0.98). There were no substantial differences in the time to maximum concentration of drug in plasma or the half-life. Plasma concentrations of raltegravir were not substantially affected by ritonavir. Though plasma concentrations of raltegravir were moderately to weakly reduced by efavirenz, the degree of this reduction was not clinically meaningful. No dose adjustment is required for raltegravir with coadministration with ritonavir or efavirenz.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; Cyclopropanes; Double-Blind Method; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Integrase Inhibitors; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Raltegravir (MK-0518) belongs to the new class of HIV integrase inhibitors. To date, there have been no reports investigating the potential for differential effects on viral dynamics with integrase inhibitors relative to current antiretroviral drugs.. Patients in this phase II study (P004) were antiretroviral treatment naive. Part 1 of this study compared monotherapy with raltegravir (100 mg, 200 mg, 400 mg, or 600 mg twice daily) with placebo over 10 days. In part 2, patients were enrolled for 48 weeks of combination therapy, with randomization to one of the four dosages of raltegravir or to efavirenz, in addition to tenofovir and lamivudine. Mathematical models were used to investigate processes underlying viral dynamics.. From day 15 through to day 57, individuals in the raltegravir arm were significantly more likely to have HIV RNA < 50 copies/ml (P < or = 0.047). Plasma viral loads were 70% lower at initiation of second-phase decay for individuals taking raltegravir than for those taking efavirenz (P < 0.0001). This challenges the current hypothesis that second-phase virus originates from infected long-lived cells, as an integrase inhibitor should not impact on viral production from this cell population. Mathematical modeling supported two hypotheses as consistent with these observations: (i) that second-phase virus arises from cells newly infected by long-lived infected cells and (2) that it arises from activation of latently infected cells with full-length unintegrated HIV DNA.. These observations challenge the current understanding of HIV-1 turnover and compartmentalization. They also indicate the promise of this new integrase inhibitor raltegravir.

Topics: Adenine; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; Cyclopropanes; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV; HIV Infections; HIV Integrase Inhibitors; Humans; Lamivudine; Linear Models; Organic Chemicals; Organophosphonates; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium; RNA, Viral; Statistics, Nonparametric; Tenofovir; Time Factors; Viral Load; Virus Integration; Virus Latency; Virus Replication

Women with HIV(WWH) are more likely to discontinue/change antiretroviral therapy(ART) due to side effects including neuropsychiatric symptoms. Efavirenz and integrase strand transfer inhibitors(INSTIs) are particularly concerning. We focused on these ART agents and neuropsychiatric symptoms in previously developed subgroups of WWH that differed on key sociodemographic factors as well as longitudinal behavioral and clinical profiles. WWH from the Women's Interagency HIV Study were included if they had ART data available, completed the Perceived Stress Scale-10 and PTSD Checklist-Civilian. Questionnaires were completed biannually beginning in 2008 through 2016. To examine ART-symptom associations, constrained continuation ratio model via penalized maximum likelihood were fit within 5 subgroups of WWH. Data from 1882 WWH contributed a total of 4598 observations. 353 women were previously defined as primarily having well-controlled HIV with vascular comorbidities, 463 with legacy effects(CD4 nadir < 250cells/mL), 274 aged ≤ 45 with hepatitis, 453 between 35-55 years, and 339 with poorly-controlled HIV/substance users. INSTIs, but not efavirenz, were associated with symptoms among key subgroups of WWH. Among those with HIV legacy effects, dolutegravir and elvitegravir were associated with greater stress/anxiety and avoidance symptoms(P's < 0.01); dolutegravir was also associated with greater re-experiencing symptoms(P = 0.005). Elvitegravir related to greater re-experiencing and hyperarousal among women with well-controlled HIV with vascular comorbidities(P's < 0.022). Raltegravir was associated with less hyperarousal, but only among women aged ≤ 45 years(P = 0.001). The adverse neuropsychiatric effects of INSTIs do not appear to be consistent across all WWH. Key characteristics (e.g., age, hepatitis positivity) may need consideration to fully weight the risk-benefit ratio of dolutegravir and elvitegravir in WWH.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Integrase Inhibitors; Humans; Oxazines; Raltegravir Potassium

People living with HIV may present co-morbidities requiring the initiation and subsequently the discontinuation of medications with inducing properties. The time to reach maximal enzyme induction and to return to baseline enzyme levels has not been thoroughly characterized.. The aim of this study was to evaluate the onset and disappearance of dolutegravir [uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1A1 and cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 substrate] and raltegravir (UGT1A1 substrate) induction with strong and moderate inducers using physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling.. The predictive performance of the PBPK model to simulate dolutegravir and raltegravir pharmacokinetics and to reproduce the strength of induction was verified using clinical drug-drug interaction studies (steady-state induction) and switch studies (residual induction). The model was considered verified when the predictions were within 2-fold of the observed data. One hundred virtual individuals (50% female) were generated to simulate the unstudied scenarios. The results were used to calculate the fold-change in CYP3A4 and UGT1A1 enzyme levels upon initiation and discontinuation of strong (rifampicin) or moderate (efavirenz or rifabutin) inducers.. The time for reaching maximal induction and subsequent disappearance of CYP3A4 induction was 14 days for rifampicin and efavirenz but 7 days for rifabutin. The distinct timelines for the moderate inducers relate to their different half-lives and plasma concentrations. The induction and de-induction processes were more rapid for UGT1A1.. Our simulations support the common practice of maintaining the adjusted dosage of a drug for another 2 weeks after stopping an inducer. Furthermore, our simulations suggest that an inducer should be administered for at least 14 days before conducting interaction studies to reach maximal induction.

Topics: Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A; Drug Interactions; Female; Glucuronosyltransferase; Humans; Male; Raltegravir Potassium; Rifabutin; Rifampin

There are limited data comparing the efficacy and safety of raltegravir and dolutegravir to that of efavirenz in HIV-1/tuberculosis (TB) coinfected patients.. We conducted a 10-year retrospective study in 4 centers in France. We included all HIV-1/tuberculosis coinfected patients starting antiretroviral therapy with a rifampicin-based regimen, with a plasma HIV RNA level (VL) > 1000 copies/mL. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with virological success that is, with VL <50 copies/mL at W48 using an Intention-To-Treat analysis, using last-observation-carried-forward to impute missing data. We also assessed antiretroviral therapy safety, analyzing treatment discontinuation for adverse events.. Between 2010 and 2020, 117 patients were included. Thirty-nine (33.3%) were treated with raltegravir and 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), 19 (16.2%) with dolutegravir (and 2 NRTIs) and 59 (50.4%) with efavirenz (and 2 NRTIs). At W48, the primary endpoint was achieved in 24 patients (61.5%) in the raltegravir group, in 12 (63.2%) in the dolutegravir group, and in 41 (69.5%) in the efavirenz group using an Intention-To-Treat analysis ( P = 0.68). Emergence of drug resistance in patients with virological failure, defined as a VL >50 copies/mL, was observed in 3 patients with efavirenz and one patient with raltegravir. Rate of treatment discontinuation for drug-related adverse events was 10.3%, 10.6%, 16.9% for raltegravir, dolutegravir and efavirenz respectively ( P = 0.67).. In this retrospective cohort study, raltegravir and dolutegravir yielded similar efficacy and safety results to efavirenz for the treatment of HIV-1/TB coinfected patients.

Topics: Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; Coinfection; Cyclopropanes; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Oxazines; Piperazines; Pyridones; Raltegravir Potassium; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Tuberculosis; Viral Load

Integrase inhibitors appear to increase body weight, but paradoxically some data indicate that raltegravir (RAL) may decrease liver fat. Our objective was to study the effects of switching from a protease inhibitor (PI) or efavirenz (EFV) to RAL on liver fat, body composition, and metabolic parameters among people living with HIV (PLWH) with high risk for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). We randomized overweight PLWH with signs of metabolic syndrome to switch a PI or EFV to RAL (

Topics: Adipose Tissue; Alkynes; Benzoxazines; Body Composition; Cyclopropanes; HIV Infections; Humans; Liver; Protease Inhibitors; Raltegravir Potassium

Topics: Alkynes; Benzoxazines; Coinfection; Cyclopropanes; HIV Infections; Humans; Raltegravir Potassium; Tuberculosis

Topics: Alkynes; Anti-Retroviral Agents; Benzoxazines; Cyclopropanes; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (U.S.); Pregnancy; Raltegravir Potassium; United States

We assessed changes in functional connectivity by fMRI (functional magnetic resonance imaging) and cognitive measures in otherwise neurologically asymptomatic people with HIV (PWH) switching combination antiretroviral therapy (cART). In a prospective study (baseline and follow-up after at least 4 months), virologically suppressed PWH switched non-nuclease reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI; tenofovir-DF/emtricitabine with efavirenz to rilpivirine) and integrase-strand-transfer inhibitors (INSTI; tenofovir-DF/emtricitabine with raltegravir to dolutegravir). PWH were assessed by resting-state fMRI and stop-signal reaction time (SSRT) task fMRI as well as with a cognitive battery (CogState™) at baseline and follow-up. Switching from efavirenz to rilpivirine (n = 10) was associated with increased functional connectivity in the dorsal attention network (DAN) and a reduction in SSRTs (p = 0.025) that positively correlated with the time previously on efavirenz (mean = 4.8 years, p = 0.02). Switching from raltegravir to dolutegravir (n = 12) was associated with increased connectivity in the left DAN and bilateral sensory-motor and associative visual networks. In the NNRTI study, significant improvements in the cognitive domains of executive function, working memory and speed of visual processing were observed, whereas no significant changes in cognitive function were observed in the INSTI study. Changes in fMRI are evident in PWH without perceived neuropsychiatric complaints switching cART. fMRI may be a useful tool in assisting to elucidate the underlying pathogenic mechanisms of cART-related neuropsychiatric effects.

Topics: Adult; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Asymptomatic Diseases; Benzoxazines; Cognitive Dysfunction; Connectome; Cyclopropanes; Drug Substitution; Emtricitabine; Executive Function; Female; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; HIV Infections; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Memory, Short-Term; Middle Aged; Neuropsychological Tests; Oxazines; Piperazines; Prospective Studies; Pyridones; Raltegravir Potassium; Rilpivirine; Tenofovir

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) viral load (VL) during pregnancy is a critical determinant of the risk of HIV mother-to-child transmission (MTCT). Prior studies suggest that VL suppression is influenced by antiretroviral regimen. In this study, using secondary real-life data from the Ministry of Health of Brazil, we compared VL suppression at 60-180 days after the first antiretroviral therapy (ART) prescription during pregnancy and time to undetectable VL among pregnant women under treatment with double nucleoside/nucleotide regimens combined with efavirenz, boosted lopinavir, boosted atazanavir, or raltegravir, with adjustment for potential confounders in multivariable models. A total of 18,997 pregnant women living with HIV were included in the study. Compared to regimens containing lopinavir, we found that atazanavir-, efavirenz-, and raltegravir-based regimens were superior in achieving both outcomes after adjustment for age, social vulnerability index, time under ART, baseline CD4+ cell count, and baseline HIV VL. Raltegravir-containing regimens had the highest adjusted odds/rates of VL suppression compared to patients with other regimens. Elimination of HIV MTCT is still a critical public health issue in many countries. Our findings suggest that raltegravir-based regimens were superior when compared to efavirenz-, lopinavir-, and atazanavir-based antiretroviral regimens in achieving suppression of HIV VL.

Topics: Adult; Alkynes; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Atazanavir Sulfate; Benzoxazines; Brazil; Cyclopropanes; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical; Middle Aged; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious; Raltegravir Potassium; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

HIV is produced in lymphoid tissues (LT) and stored on the follicular dendritic cell network in LT. When antiretroviral therapy is started, plasma viremia decays in 2 phases; the first within days of starting therapy and the second over weeks. Raltegravir (RAL), an integrase inhibitor, has been associated with only a single rapid phase of decay, and we speculated this may be due to higher intracellular concentration (IC) of RAL in LT. We have previously measured suboptimal ICs of antiretroviral therapy agents in LT, which were associated with slower decay of both vRNA+ cells and the follicular dendritic cell network pool.. Outpatient clinic at the Joint Clinical Research Center in Kampala, Uganda.. We compared the rate of decay in LT in people starting RAL with those starting efavirenz (EFV).. There was no difference in the rate of virus decay in LT. The ratio of the ICs of RAL and EFV in lymph node to the concentration of drug that inhibits 95% of virus in blood was 1 log lower in lymph node for EFV and >3 logs lower for RAL.. These data further highlight the challenges of drug delivery to LT in HIV infection and demonstrate that RAL is not superior to EFV as judged by direct measurements of the source of virus in LT.

Topics: Adult; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Cyclopropanes; Dendritic Cells, Follicular; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Integrase Inhibitors; Humans; In Situ Hybridization; Lymph Nodes; Lymphoid Tissue; Male; Raltegravir Potassium; Viral Load; Viremia; Young Adult

To explore the effectiveness of raltegravir-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) on treatment response among ART-naive patients seeking routine clinical care.. Cohort study of adults enrolled in HIV care in the United States.. We compared virologic suppression and CD4 cell count recovery over a 2.5 year period after initiation of an ART regimen containing raltegravir or efavirenz using observational data from a US clinical cohort, generalized to the US population of people with diagnosed HIV. We accounted for nonrandom treatment assignment, informative censoring, and nonrandom selection from the US target population using inverse probability weights.. Of the 2843 patients included in the study, 2476 initiated the efavirenz-containing regimen and 367 initiated the raltegravir-containing regimen. In the weighted intent-to-treat analysis, patients spent an average of 74 (95% confidence interval: 41, 106) additional days alive with a suppressed viral load on the raltegravir regimen than on the efavirenz regimen over the 2.5-year study period. CD4 cell count recovery was also superior under the raltegravir regimen.. Patients receiving raltegravir spent more time alive and suppressed than patients receiving efavirenz, but the probability of viral suppression by 2.5 years after treatment was similar between groups. Optimizing the amount of time spent in a state of viral suppression is important to improve survival among people living with HIV and to reduce onward transmission.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Benzoxazines; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Cohort Studies; Cyclopropanes; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Raltegravir Potassium; Survival Analysis; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United States; Viral Load; Young Adult

The long-term effectiveness of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) treatments containing integrase inhibitors is unknown.. We use observational data from the Centers for AIDS Research Network of Integrated Clinical Systems and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to estimate 4-year risk of AIDS and all-cause mortality among 415 patients starting a raltegravir regimen compared to 2646 starting an efavirenz regimen (both regimens include emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate). We account for confounding and selection bias as well as generalizability by standardization for measured variables, and present both observational intent-to-treat and per-protocol estimates.. At treatment initiation, 12% of patients were female, 36% black, 13% Hispanic; median age was 37 years, CD4 count 321 cells/µL, and viral load 4.5 log10 copies/mL. Two hundred thirty-five patients incurred an AIDS-defining illness or died, and 741 patients left follow-up. After accounting for measured differences, the 4-year risk was similar among those starting both regimens (ie, intent-to treat hazard ratio [HR], 0.96 [95% confidence interval {CI}, .63-1.45]; risk difference, -0.9 [95% CI, -4.5 to 2.7]), as well as among those remaining on regimens (ie, per-protocol HR, 0.95 [95% CI, .59-1.54]; risk difference, -0.5 [95% CI, -3.8 to 2.9]).. Raltegravir and efavirenz-based initial antiretroviral therapy have similar 4-year clinical effects. Vigilance regarding longer-term comparative effectiveness of HIV regimens using observational data is needed because large-scale experimental data are not forthcoming.

Topics: Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome; Adult; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Cohort Studies; Cyclopropanes; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Integrase Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Raltegravir Potassium; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; RNA, Viral; Tenofovir; United States; Viral Load; Young Adult

The use of antiretroviral (ARV) drugs with central nervous system (CNS) penetration effectiveness (CPE) may be useful in the treatment of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder (HAND) as well as targeting a CNS reservoir in strategies to achieve a functional cure for HIV. However, increased cognitive deficits are linked to at least one of these drugs (efavirenz). As mitochondrial dysfunction has been found with a number of ARVs, and as such can affect neuronal function, the objective of this study was to assess the effects of ARV with high CPE for toxicological profiles on presynaptic nerve terminal energy metabolism. This subcellular region is especially vulnerable in that a constant supply of ATP is required for the proper maintenance of neurotransmitter release and uptake supporting proper neuronal function. We evaluated the effects of acute treatment with ten different high CPE ARVs from five different drug classes on rat cortical and striatal nerve terminal bioenergetic function. While cortical nerve terminal bioenergetics were not altered, striatal nerve terminals exposed to efavirenz, nevirapine, abacavir, emtricitabine, zidovudine, darunavir, lopinavir, raltegravir, or maraviroc (but not indinavir) exhibit reduced mitochondrial spare respiratory capacity (SRC). Further examination of efavirenz and maraviroc revealed a concentration-dependent impairment of striatal nerve terminal maximal mitochondrial respiration and SRC as well as a reduction of intraterminal ATP levels. Depletion of ATP at the synapse may underlie its dysfunction and contribute to neuronal dysfunction in treated HIV infection.

Topics: Adenosine Triphosphate; Alkynes; Animals; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; Cerebral Cortex; Corpus Striatum; Cyclohexanes; Cyclopropanes; Darunavir; Dideoxynucleosides; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Emtricitabine; Lopinavir; Male; Maraviroc; Mitochondria; Neurons; Nevirapine; Oxidative Phosphorylation; Permeability; Presynaptic Terminals; Raltegravir Potassium; Rats; Rats, Long-Evans; Triazoles; Zidovudine

As treatment options coalesce around a smaller number of antiretroviral drugs (ARVs), data are emerging on the drug resistance mutations (DRMs) selected by the most widely used ARVs and on the impact of these DRMs on ARV susceptibility and virological response to first- and later-line treatment regimens. Recent studies have described the DRMs that emerge in patients receiving tenofovir prodrugs, the nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors efavirenz and rilpivirine, ritonavir-boosted lopinavir, and the integrase inhibitors raltegravir and elvitegravir. Several small studies have described DRMs that emerge in patients receiving dolutegravir.

Topics: Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; Cyclopropanes; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Mutation; Oxazines; Piperazines; Pyridones; Quinolones; Raltegravir Potassium; Rilpivirine; Tenofovir

The three direct-acting antiviral agent (3D) regimen is a novel combination of direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) that has proven effective for the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Given the potential for coadministration in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection, possible drug interactions with antiretroviral drugs must be carefully considered. Four phase 1, multiple-dose pharmacokinetic studies were conducted in healthy volunteers (n = 66). The 3D regimen of 150/100 mg daily paritaprevir/ritonavir, 25 mg daily ombitasvir, and 400 mg twice-daily dasabuvir was administered alone or in combination with 200 mg daily of emtricitabine and 300 mg daily of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (tenofovir DF), 25 mg daily of rilpivirine, or 400 mg of raltegravir twice daily. A 2-DAA regimen of 150/100 mg daily paritaprevir/ritonavir and 400 mg of dasabuvir twice daily was also studied in combination with efavirenz/emtricitabine/tenofovir DF at 600/200/300 mg daily, respectively (Atripla; Bristol-Myers Squibb). Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined from plasma drug concentrations. No clinically significant drug interactions were observed (≤32% change in exposure) between the 3D regimen and that of emtricitabine plus tenofovir DF. Raltegravir exposure was increased up to 134% when the drug was coadministered with the 3D regimen. Although coadministration with rilpivirine was well tolerated in healthy volunteers, observed elevations in rilpivirine exposures may increase the potential for adverse drug reactions. Concomitant use of the 2-DAA regimen and efavirenz/emtricitabine/tenofovir DF was discontinued owing to poor tolerability and adverse events. No dose adjustment is required during coadministration of raltegravir, tenofovir DF, or emtricitabine with the 3D regimen. Rilpivirine is not recommended and efavirenz is contraindicated for coadministration with the 3D regimen.

Topics: Alkynes; Anti-Retroviral Agents; Antiviral Agents; Benzoxazines; Cyclopropanes; Drug Interactions; Emtricitabine; Hepacivirus; HIV-1; Humans; Raltegravir Potassium; Rilpivirine; Tenofovir

Although different factors have been implicated in the CD4/CD8 T-cell ratio recovery in HIV-infected patients who receive effective antiretroviral therapy (ART), limited information exists on the influence of the regimen composition. A longitudinal study carried out in a prospective, single-center cohort of HIV-infected patients. ART regimens including non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI), protease inhibitors (PI), or integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTI) from patients who achieved long-term (≥6-month duration) virological suppression (HIV-RNA < 400 copies/mL) from January 1998 to June 2014 were analyzed. The impact of ART composition on the changes of the CD4/CD8 T-cell ratio was modeled using a mixed linear approach with adjustment for possible confounders. A total of 1068 ART regimens from 570 patients were analyzed. Mean (SD) age of the patients was 42.15 (10.68) years and 276 (48.42%) had hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection. Five hundred fifty-eight (52.25%) regimens were PI-based, 439 (40.10%) NNRTI-based, and 71 (6.65%) INSTI-based; 487 (45.60%) were initial regimens, 476 (44.57%) simplification, and 105 (9.83%) salvage regimens. Median (IQR) number of regimens was 1 (1-2) per patient, of 29 (14-58) months duration, and 4 (3-7) CD4/CD8 measurements per regimen. The median baseline CD4/CD8 ratio was 0.42, 0.50, and 0.54, respectively, with the PI-, NNRTI-, and INSTI-based regimens (P = 0.0073). Overall median (IQR) increase of CD4/CD8 ratio was 0.0245 (-0.0352-0.0690) per year, and a CD4/CD8 ratio ≥1 was achieved in 19.35% of the cases with PI-based, 25.97% with NNRTI-based, and 22.54% with INSTI-based regimens (P = 0.1406). In the adjusted model, the mean CD4/CD8 T-cell ratio increase was higher with NNRTI-based regimens compared for PI-based (estimated coefficient for PI [95% CI], -0.0912 [-0.1604 to -0.0219], P = 0.009). Also, a higher CD4/CD8 baseline ratio was associated with higher CD4/CD8 increase in the adjusted model (P = 0.001); by contrast, higher age (P = 0.020) and simplification of ART regimen (P = 0.003) had a negative impact on the CD4/CD8 ratio. Antiretroviral regimen composition has a differential impact on the CD4/CD8 T-cell ratio; NNRTI-based regimens are associated with enhanced CD4/CD8 T-cell ratio recovery compared to PI-based antiretroviral regimens.

Topics: Adult; Age Factors; Alkynes; Atazanavir Sulfate; Benzoxazines; CD4-CD8 Ratio; Coinfection; Cyclopropanes; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Hepatitis C; HIV Infections; HIV Integrase Inhibitors; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Interferon Type I; Male; Middle Aged; Oligopeptides; Raltegravir Potassium; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ribavirin; Ritonavir

To understand the persistence of latently HIV-1 infected cells in virally suppressed infected patients, a number of in vitro models of HIV latency have been developed. In an attempt to mimic the in vivo situation as closely as possible, several models use primary cells and replication-competent viruses in combination with antiretroviral compounds to prevent ongoing replication. Latency is subsequently measured by HIV RNA and/or protein production after cellular activation. To discriminate between pre- and post-integration latency, integrase inhibitors are routinely used, preventing novel integrations upon cellular activation. Here, we show that this choice of antiretrovirals may still cause a bias of pre-integration latency in these models, as unintegrated HIV DNA can form and directly contribute to the levels of HIV RNA and protein production. We further show that the addition of reverse transcriptase inhibitors effectively suppresses the levels of episomal HIV DNA (as measured by 2-LTR circles) and decreases the levels of HIV transcription. Consequently, we show that latency levels described in models that only use integrase inhibitors may be overestimated. The inclusion of additional control conditions, such as 2-LTR quantification and the addition of reverse transcriptase inhibitors, is crucial to fully elucidate the actual levels of post-integration latency.

Topics: Alkynes; Benzoxazines; CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes; Cyclopropanes; DNA, Viral; Genes, Reporter; Green Fluorescent Proteins; HIV Infections; HIV Integrase Inhibitors; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lymphocyte Activation; Models, Biological; Nevirapine; Primary Cell Culture; Raltegravir Potassium; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Viral Proteins; Virus Integration; Virus Latency; Virus Replication

The objective of the study was to assess plasma concentrations of efavirenz, darunavir/ritonavir and raltegravir in patients with human immunodeficiency virus-hepatitis C virus (HIV-HCV)-coinfection without liver cirrhosis.. In this observational, open-label study, adult HIV-infected outpatients treated with tenofovir/emtricitabine plus efavirenz (600 mg daily), darunavir/ritonavir (800/100 mg daily) or raltegravir (400 mg twice daily) for at least 4 weeks were asked to participate. Subjects with liver cirrhosis were excluded. The trough concentration (C trough) of darunavir/ritonavir and raltegravir and the mid-dose concentration (C12h) of efavirenz were assessed at steady state by a validated high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-tandem mass spectrometry method.. A total of 96 HIV-positive patients were enrolled into the study. Thirty-four patients were treated with efavirenz, 33 with darunavir/ritonavir and 29 with raltegravir. The geometric mean plasma C trough [coefficient of variation (%)] of darunavir was comparable between HIV+/HCV+ and HIV+/HCV- subjects: 2644 ng/ml (155%) and 2491 ng/ml (139%), respectively (geometric mean ratio (GMR) = 0.81; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.79-1.56; p = 0.69). These values were comparable for raltegravir: 108 ng/ml (149%) in the HIV+/HCV+ group and 96 ng/ml (161%) in the HIV+/HCV- group (GMR = 0.84; 95% CI = 0.61-1.44; p = 0.72). On the contrary, the geometric mean plasma C12h of efavirenz was significantly higher among the 15 HIV+/HCV+ patients (1915 ng/ml, 159%) than among the 19 HIV+/HCV- patients (1505 ng/ml, 167%; GMR = 1.41; 95% CI = 1.19-1.71; p = 0.009).. The mean plasma concentration of efavirenz was significantly higher in HCV-positive than in HCV-negative patients without liver cirrhosis, while the mean plasma levels of darunavir/ritonavir and raltegravir were comparable in both groups.

Topics: Adult; Alkynes; Analysis of Variance; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; Coinfection; Cyclopropanes; Darunavir; Female; Hepatitis C; HIV Infections; Humans; Liver Function Tests; Male; Middle Aged; Raltegravir Potassium; Ritonavir

Nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase (RT) inhibitors (NNRTI) and integrase (IN) strand transfer inhibitors (INSTI) are key components of antiretroviral regimens. To explore potential interactions between NNRTI and INSTI resistance mutations, we investigated the combined effects of these mutations on drug susceptibility and fitness of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). In the absence of drug, single-mutant viruses were less fit than the wild type; viruses carrying multiple mutations were less fit than single-mutant viruses. These findings were explained in part by the observation that mutant viruses carrying NNRTI plus INSTI resistance mutations had reduced amounts of virion-associated RT and/or IN protein. In the presence of efavirenz (EFV), a virus carrying RT-K103N together with IN-G140S and IN-Q148H (here termed IN-G140S/Q148H) mutations was fitter than a virus with a RT-K103N mutation alone. Similarly, in the presence of EFV, the RT-E138K plus IN-G140S/Q148H mutant virus was fitter than one with the RT-E138K mutation alone. No effect of INSTI resistance mutations on the fitness of RT-Y181C mutant viruses was observed. Conversely, RT-E138K and -Y181C mutations improved the fitness of the IN-G140S/Q148H mutant virus in the presence of raltegravir (RAL); the RT-K103N mutation had no effect. The NNRTI resistance mutations had no effect on RAL susceptibility. Likewise, the IN-G140S/Q148H mutations had no effect on EFV or RPV susceptibility. However, both the RT-K103N plus IN-G140S/Q148H and the RT-E138K plus IN-G140S/Q148H mutant viruses had significantly greater fold increases in 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) of EFV than viruses carrying a single NNRTI mutation. Likewise, the RT-E138K plus IN-G140S/Q148H mutant virus had significantly greater fold increases in RAL IC50 than that of the IN-G140S/Q148H mutant virus. These results suggest that interactions between RT and IN mutations are important for NNRTI and INSTI resistance and viral fitness.. Nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and integrase inhibitors are used to treat infection with HIV-1. Mutations that confer resistance to these drugs reduce the ability of HIV-1 to reproduce (that is, they decrease viral fitness). It is known that reverse transcriptase and integrase interact and that some mutations can disrupt their interaction, which is necessary for proper functioning of these two enzymes. To determine whether resistance mutations in these enzymes interact, we investigated their effects on drug sensitivity and viral fitness. Although individual drug resistance mutations usually reduced viral fitness, certain combinations of mutations increased fitness. When present in certain combinations, some integrase inhibitor resistance mutations increased resistance to nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and vice versa. Because these drugs are sometimes used together in the treatment of HIV-1 infection, these interactions could make viruses more resistant to both drugs, further limiting their clinical benefit.

Topics: Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; Cyclopropanes; Drug Resistance, Viral; HEK293 Cells; HIV Infections; HIV Integrase; HIV Integrase Inhibitors; HIV Reverse Transcriptase; HIV-1; Humans; Inhibitory Concentration 50; Mutation; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Virion; Virus Replication

Growing evidence associates the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor efavirenz with several adverse events. Newer antiretrovirals, such as the integrase inhibitor raltegravir, the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor rilpivirine and the protease inhibitor darunavir, claim to have a better toxicological profile than efavirenz while producing similar levels of efficacy and virological suppression. The objective of this study was to determine the in vitro toxicological profile of these three new antiretrovirals by evaluating their effects on the mitochondrial and cellular parameters altered by efavirenz in hepatocytes and neurons.. Hep3B cells and primary rat neurons were treated with clinically relevant concentrations of efavirenz, darunavir, rilpivirine or raltegravir. Parameters of mitochondrial function, cytotoxicity and oxidative and endoplasmic reticulum stress were assessed using standard cell biology techniques.. None of the new compounds altered the mitochondrial function of hepatic cells or neurons, while efavirenz decreased mitochondrial membrane potential and enhanced superoxide production in both cell types, effects that are known to significantly compromise the functioning of mitochondria, cell viability and, ultimately, cell number. Of the four drugs assayed, efavirenz was the only one to alter the protein expression of LC3-II, an indicator of autophagy, and CHOP, a marker of endoplasmic reticulum stress and the unfolded protein response.. Darunavir, rilpivirine and raltegravir do not induce toxic effects on Hep3B cells and primary rat neurons, which suggests a safer hepatic and neurological profile than that of efavirenz.

Topics: Alkynes; Animals; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; Cell Line, Tumor; Cells, Cultured; Cyclopropanes; Darunavir; Drug Resistance, Viral; Hepatocytes; Humans; Mitochondria; Neurons; Nitriles; Pyrimidines; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium; Rats; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Rilpivirine; Sulfonamides

Liver enzyme elevations (LEE) were investigated in 2717 episodes of initiation of antiretroviral therapy since January 2010 in 1982 HIV patients. Serum hepatitis C virus (HCV)-RNA was positive in 24%. Any grade of LEE was recognized in 9% of episodes, being 6% in HCV-negative and 17% in HCV-positive patients (P < 0.001). Grades 3-4 LEE only occurred in 0.4% of patients. Overall, LEE were more frequent with ritonavir-boosted darunavir and atazanavir than with raltegravir and etravirine.

Topics: Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; Benzoxazines; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Coinfection; Cyclopropanes; Darunavir; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hepatitis C; HIV Infections; Humans; Liver; Male; Nevirapine; Oligopeptides; Pyridines; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Alkynes; Benzoxazines; Child; Cyclopropanes; Double-Blind Method; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Integrase Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Long-Term Care; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Viral Load; Virus Replication

Shift in research and development strategy from developing follow-on or 'me-too' drugs to differentiated medical products with potentially better efficacy than the standard of care (e.g., first-in-class, best-in-class, and bio-betters) highlights the scientific and commercial interests in establishing superiority even when a non-inferiority design, adequately powered for a pre-specified non-inferiority margin, is appropriate for various reasons. In this paper, we propose a group sequential design to test superiority at interim analyses in a non-inferiority trial. We will test superiority at the interim analyses using conventional group sequential methods, and we may stop the study because of better efficacy. If the study fails to establish superior efficacy at the interim and final analyses, we will test the primary non-inferiority hypothesis at the final analysis at the nominal level without alpha adjustment. Whereas superiority/non-inferiority testing no longer has the hierarchical structure in which the rejection region for testing superiority is a subset of that for testing non-inferiority, the impact of repeated superiority tests on the false positive rate and statistical power for the primary non-inferiority test at the final analysis is essentially ignorable. For the commonly used O'Brien-Fleming type alpha-spending function, we show that the impact is extremely small based upon Brownian motion boundary-crossing properties. Numerical evaluation further supports the conclusion for other alpha-spending functions with a substantial amount of alpha being spent on the interim superiority tests. We use a clinical trial example to illustrate the proposed design.

Topics: Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antiviral Agents; Benzoxazines; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Cyclopropanes; Data Interpretation, Statistical; HIV-1; Humans; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Respiratory Syncytial Viruses; Standard of Care; Therapeutic Equivalency

HIV entry inhibitors, such as maraviroc (MVC), prevent cell-free viruses from entering the cells. In clinical trials, patients who were treated with MVC often displayed viral loads that were above the limit of conventional viral load detection compared to efavirenz-based regimens. We hypothesize that viruses blocked by entry inhibitors may be redistributed to plasma, where they artificially increase viral load measurements compared to those with the use of antiretroviral drugs (ARVs) that act intracellularly. We infected PM-1 cells with CCR5-tropic HIV-1 BaL or CXCR4-tropic HIV-1 NL4-3 in the presence of inhibitory concentrations of efavirenz, raltegravir, enfuvirtide, maraviroc, and AMD3100, the latter three being entry inhibitors. Supernatant viral load, reverse transcriptase enzyme activity, and intracellular nucleic acid levels were measured at times up to 24 h postinfection. Infectivity of redistributed dual-tropic HIV-1 was assessed using TZM-bl cells. Extracellular viral load analysis revealed that entry inhibitor-treated cells had higher levels of virus in the supernatant than the cells treated with other ARVs at 8 h postinfection. By 24 h, the supernatant viral load was still higher for entry inhibitors than other ARVs. We observed a correlation between viral load and the step of entry inhibition. Dual-tropic virus infectivity was undiminished utilizing the CCR5 coreceptor following redistribution by CXCR4 entry inhibition. This in vitro model indicates that entry inhibitors exhibit a redistribution effect unseen with intracellular ARV drugs. Based on these results, the effectiveness of some entry inhibitors may be underestimated if plasma viral load is used as a sole indicator of clinical success.

Topics: Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; Benzylamines; Cell Line; Cyclams; Cyclohexanes; Cyclopropanes; DNA, Viral; Drug Resistance, Viral; Enfuvirtide; Heterocyclic Compounds; HIV Envelope Protein gp41; HIV Fusion Inhibitors; HIV Reverse Transcriptase; HIV-1; Humans; Maraviroc; Peptide Fragments; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium; Receptors, CCR5; Receptors, CXCR4; RNA, Viral; Triazoles; Viral Load; Virus Internalization

The goal of post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) for HIV is to prevent the establishment of a persistent infection following exposure to the virus. Integrase inhibitors have several potential advantages in PEP regimens, including the capacity to inhibit integration of HIV genomes that have already proceeded through reverse transcription, thereby becoming refractory to reverse transcriptase inhibitors. We sought to determine if integrase inhibitors extend the window of time during which PEP intervention might be successful.. Primary costimulated CD4(+) T-cells or macrophages were infected with a luciferase-bearing HIV reporter virus, permitting sensitive detection of viral gene expression under different drug treatment conditions. Relevant antiretroviral agents were added at various pre- or post-infection time points.. We showed that raltegravir effectively blocks HIV infection, even when cells are challenged with a large amount of virus. We also demonstrated that during infection of both primary costimulated CD4(+) T-cells and primary macrophages, raltegravir can inhibit infection when added at later post-infection time points than the reverse transcriptase inhibitor efavirenz.. This longer post-infection efficacy window, coupled with favourable pharmacokinetic properties and low toxicity, suggest that raltegravir may prove useful in HIV PEP.

Topics: Alkynes; Benzoxazines; CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes; Cyclopropanes; Gene Expression Regulation, Viral; Genes, Reporter; Genes, Viral; HIV; HIV Infections; HIV Integrase Inhibitors; Humans; Luciferases; Macrophages; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Post-Exposure Prophylaxis; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium; Time Factors

Topics: Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; Cyclopropanes; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; Humans; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium; Treatment Outcome

The objective of this investigation was to develop a thermosensitive vaginal gel containing raltegravir+efavirenz loaded PLGA nanoparticles (RAL+EFV-NPs) for pre-exposure prophylaxis of HIV. RAL+EFV-NPs were fabricated using a modified emulsion-solvent evaporation method and characterized for size and zeta potential. The average size and surface charge of RAL+EFV-NP were 81.8±6.4 nm and -23.18±7.18 mV respectively. The average encapsulation efficiency of raltegravir and efavirenz was 55.5% and 98.2% respectively. Thermosensitive vaginal gel containing RAL+EFV-NPs was successfully prepared using a combination of Pluronic F127 (20% w/v) and Pluronic F68 (1% w/v). Incorporation RAL+EFV-NPs in the gel did not result in nanoparticle aggregation and RAL+EFV-NPs containing gel showed thermogelation at 32.5°C. The RAL+EFV-NPs were evaluated for inhibition of HIV-1(NL4-3) using TZM-bl indicator cells. The EC(90) of RAL+EFV-NPs was lower than raltegravir+efavirenz (RAL+EFV) solution but did not reach significance. Compared to control HeLa cells without any treatment, RAL+EFV-NPs or blank gel were not cytotoxic for 14 days in vitro. The intracellular levels of efavirenz in RAL+EFV-NPs treated HeLa cells were above the EC(90) for 14 days whereas raltegravir intracellular concentrations were eliminated within 6 days. Transwell experiments of NPs-in-gel demonstrated rapid transfer of fluorescent nanoparticles from the gel and uptake in HeLa cells within 30 min. These data demonstrate the potential of antiretroviral NP-embedded vagina gels for long-term vaginal pre-exposure prophylaxis of heterosexual HIV-1 transmission.

Topics: Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Cyclopropanes; Drug Carriers; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical; Gels; HeLa Cells; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lactic Acid; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Nanoparticles; Phagocytosis; Poloxamer; Polyglycolic Acid; Polylactic Acid-Polyglycolic Acid Copolymer; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium; Temperature; Time Factors

The authors report a case of an HIV type-1-infected patient concomitantly using highly active antiretroviral therapy and acenocoumarol anticoagulant for secondary prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism. This is the first report of a possible drug interaction between efavirenz and atazanavir/ritonavir with acenocoumarol and also of the uncomplicated concurrent use of raltegravir with acenocoumarol.

Topics: Acenocoumarol; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Anticoagulants; Atazanavir Sulfate; Benzoxazines; Cyclopropanes; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Oligopeptides; Pyridines; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Venous Thrombosis

Topics: Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; Cyclopropanes; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Long-Term Care; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

CD4(+) T cells and macrophages are the primary target cells for HIV in vivo, and antiretroviral drugs can vary in their ability to inhibit the infection of these different cell types. Resistance pathways to the HIV integrase inhibitor raltegravir have previously been investigated in T cells. Primary raltegravir resistance mutations, most often at integrase amino acid position 148 or 155, afford some resistance to the drug. The acquisition of pathway-specific secondary mutations then provides higher-level resistance to viruses infecting T cells. We show here that during macrophage infection, the presence of a single primary raltegravir resistance mutation (Q148H, Q148R, N155H, or N155S) is sufficient to provide resistance to raltegravir comparable to that seen in viruses expressing both primary and secondary mutations in costimulated CD4(+) T cells. These data implicate macrophages as a potential in vivo reservoir that may facilitate the development of resistance to raltegravir. Notably, the newer integrase inhibitor MK-2048 effectively suppressed the infection of all raltegravir-resistant viruses in both T cells and macrophages, indicating that more recently developed integrase inhibitors are capable of inhibiting infection in both major HIV cellular reservoirs, even in patients harboring raltegravir-resistant viruses.

Topics: Alkynes; Benzoxazines; CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes; Cells, Cultured; Cyclopropanes; Drug Resistance, Viral; HIV Infections; HIV Integrase; HIV Integrase Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Macrophages; Mutation; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium; Zidovudine

Topics: Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Benzoxazines; Child; Cyclopropanes; HIV Infections; Humans; Liver Failure, Acute; Liver Transplantation; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium

Topics: Adult; Alkynes; Benzoxazines; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Cyclopropanes; Female; HIV Integrase Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Viral Load

Topics: Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; Cyclopropanes; Drug Approval; Drug Evaluation; HIV Infections; Humans; Life Expectancy; Patient Selection; Prognosis; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium

Topics: Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Cyclopropanes; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Integrase Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

Topics: Alkynes; Benzoxazines; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Cyclopropanes; HIV Infections; HIV Integrase Inhibitors; Humans; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Viral Load

Topics: Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; CCR5 Receptor Antagonists; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Cyclohexanes; Cyclopropanes; HIV Infections; HIV Integrase Inhibitors; Humans; Lipodystrophy; Maraviroc; Organic Chemicals; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium; Triazoles; Viral Load

Topics: Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; Benzoxazines; Carbamates; Cyclopropanes; Furans; HIV Infections; Humans; Oligopeptides; Organic Chemicals; Organophosphates; Oxazines; Patient Compliance; Pyridines; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Viral Load