quinupristin-dalfopristin and telavancin

An overview of the mechanism of action, dosing, clinical indications, and toxicities of the glycopeptide vancomycin is provided. The emerging gram-positive bacterial resistance to antimicrobials and its mechanisms are reviewed. Strategies to control this emergence of resistance are expected to be proposed. Newer antimicrobial agents that have activity against vancomycin-resistant organisms are now available and play a critical role in the treatment of life-threatening infections.

Topics: Aminoglycosides; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Daptomycin; Glycopeptides; Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections; Humans; Lipoglycopeptides; Peptides, Cyclic; Teicoplanin; Vancomycin; Virginiamycin

Infection by Staphylococcus aureus in critically ill patients is usually associated with antimicrobial resistance and high mortality. A more effective antibiotic treatment is needed to replace older drugs that have limited efficacy. Novel substances active on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, which are already available on the market or are still in development, are discussed in this review, with emphasis on nosocomial infections.. A number of new antibiotics are on the market (linezolid, quinupristin-dalfopristin, daptomycin) and there is good evidence regarding their efficacy, especially in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. Linezolid is, to date, the best alternative in treating nosocomial pneumonia by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. It is cost-effective; resistance levels are still very low but there are some concerns regarding its adverse events. Quinupristin-dalfopristin shows good activity in vitro but its efficacy in patients with pneumonia by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus is modest. Daptomycin is not recommended for pulmonary infections because of its reduced penetration in the lung tissue. Under current phase III trials in patients with nosocomial infections are tigecycline, ceftobiprole, and three new glycopeptides, all with particular activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.. For the moment, there are limited and rather expensive therapeutic options for the infections by Staphylococcus aureus in the critically ill. No dramatic superiority of the new drugs in comparison to the standard therapies was observed in most of the clinical trials. Better results on the efficacy of the drugs under investigation are expected.

Topics: Acetamides; Aminoglycosides; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cephalosporins; Clinical Trials as Topic; Critical Illness; Daptomycin; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial; Glycopeptides; Humans; Linezolid; Lipoglycopeptides; Methicillin Resistance; Minocycline; Oxazolidinones; Staphylococcal Infections; Teicoplanin; Tigecycline; Virginiamycin

Multicenter surveillance of antimicrobial susceptibility was performed for 235 vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREfm) isolates from 18 Taiwanese hospitals. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of eravacycline, omadacycline, lipoglycopeptides, and other comparator antibiotics were determined using the broth microdilution method. Nearly all isolates of VREfm were not susceptible to teicoplanin, dalbavancin, and telavancin, with susceptibility rates of 0.5%, 1.7% and 0.5%, respectively. Tigecycline and eravacycline were active against 93.2% and 89.7% of the VREfm isolates, respectively. Moreover, the susceptibility rates of quinupristin/dalfopristin, tedizolid, and linezolid were 59.1%, 84.2%, and 77.4%, respectively. Additionally, 94% of the VREfm isolates were classified as susceptible to daptomycin, and the MICs of omadacycline required to inhibit VREfm growth by 50% and 90% were 0.12 and 0.5 mg/L, respectively. Susceptibility rates of VREfm isolates to synthetic tetracyclines and daptomycin were slightly lower and to oxazolidinone-class antibiotics were much lower in Taiwan than those in other parts of the world. Continuous monitoring of VREfm resistance to novel antibiotics, including synthetic tetracyclines, oxazolidinone-class antibiotics, and daptomycin, is needed in Taiwan.

Topics: Aminoglycosides; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacteremia; Daptomycin; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Enterococcus faecium; Epidemiological Monitoring; Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections; Humans; Linezolid; Lipoglycopeptides; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Oxazolidinones; Taiwan; Tetracyclines; Tetrazoles; Tigecycline; Vancomycin; Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci; Virginiamycin

Topics: Acetamides; Aminoglycosides; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Ceftaroline; Cephalosporins; Cross Infection; Daptomycin; Humans; Linezolid; Lipoglycopeptides; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Minocycline; Oxazolidinones; Pneumonia, Staphylococcal; Tigecycline; Vancomycin; Virginiamycin

This study updates the activity of telavancin against Gram-positive pathogens collected from USA hospitals (2007-2009). Telavancin (MIC(50/90), 0.12/0.25 μg/mL) was active against coagulase-negative staphylococci and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (100% susceptible), for which only daptomycin (MIC(50/90), 0.25/0.5 μg/mL; 99% susceptible) and quinupristin/dalfopristin (MIC(50/90), ≤ 0.25-0.5/0.5 μg/mL; 99% susceptible) exhibited similar activity. Telavancin (MIC(50/90), 0.25/0.5 μg/mL) inhibited 96.5% of Enterococcus faecalis at the Food and Drug Administration breakpoint (MIC, ≤ 1 μg/mL), where ampicillin (99.9% susceptible), daptomycin (99.9% susceptible), and linezolid (100% susceptible) also demonstrated high-level coverage. Telavancin inhibited, respectively, 100.0% and 91.7% of VanB-phenotype E. faecalis and E. faecium at ≤ 1 μg/mL, whereas it was less active against VanA strains. Telavancin was uniformly active against Streptococcus pneumoniae and resistant subsets, and demonstrated good potency (MIC(90), 0.06-0.12 μg/mL) against other streptococci, regardless of resistance to other drugs. This assessment reveals potent activity of telavancin against Gram-positive isolates collected from USA hospitals with no evidence of emergence of resistance.

Topics: Aminoglycosides; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cross Infection; Daptomycin; Gram-Positive Bacteria; Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections; Hospitals; Humans; Lipoglycopeptides; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; United States; Virginiamycin

The activity of telavancin and comparators was assessed against a contemporary (2007 and 2008) global collection of 10,000 isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. Telavancin was very active against methicillin-susceptible and -resistant S. aureus (MSSA and MRSA, respectively; MIC(50/90) for both, 0.12/0.25 microg/ml; 100.0% susceptible). This agent was 2-, 4-, and 8-fold more potent than daptomycin (MIC(90), 0.5 microg/ml), vancomycin or quinupristin-dalfopristin (MIC(90), 1 microg/ml), and linezolid (MIC(90), 2 microg/ml) against MRSA, respectively. These data show a potent activity of telavancin tested against a current global collection of S. aureus.

Topics: Acetamides; Aminoglycosides; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Daptomycin; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Humans; In Vitro Techniques; Linezolid; Lipoglycopeptides; Methicillin Resistance; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Oxazolidinones; Staphylococcal Infections; Staphylococcus aureus; Vancomycin; Virginiamycin

This study used CLSI broth microdilution to test the activity of telavancin and comparator antimicrobial agents against 67 methicillin (meticillin)-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates. Twenty-six vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (VISA) strains were among the isolates tested; all strains were susceptible to telavancin at < or = 1 microg/ml, whereas 12/26 (46%) of these isolates were nonsusceptible to daptomycin at the same concentration. All strains were susceptible to quinupristin-dalfopristin, while resistance was found to all other drugs tested. Telavancin demonstrated potent activity against all vancomycin-susceptible isolates as well as against heterogeneously VISA and VISA resistance phenotypes. In multistep resistance selection studies, telavancin yielded one stable mutant after 43 days in one MRSA strain out of the 10 MRSA strains tested with the MIC rising eightfold from 0.25 microg/ml (parent) to 2 microg/ml. MICs for this clone did not increase further when passages were continued for the maximum 50 days. In contrast, daptomycin selected stable resistant clones (MIC increase of >4x) after 14 to 35 days in 4 of 10 MRSA strains with MICs increasing from 1 to 2 microg/ml (parents) to 4 to 8 microg/ml (resistant clones). Sequencing analysis of daptomycin resistance determinants revealed point mutations in the mprF genes of all four stable daptomycin-resistant clones. Teicoplanin gave rise to resistant clones after 14 to 21 days in 2 of 10 MRSA strains with MICs rising from 1 to 2 microg/ml (parents) to 4 to 16 microg/ml (stable resistant clones). Linezolid selected stable resistant clones after 22 to 48 days in 2 of 10 MRSA strains with MICs rising from 2 to 4 microg/ml (parents) to 32 microg/ml (resistant clones). Vancomycin yielded no resistant clones in 10 MRSA strains tested; however, MICs increased two- to fourfold from 1 to 8 microg/ml to 2 to 16 microg/ml after 50 days. No cross-resistance was found with any clone/antimicrobial combination. The two enterococci developed resistance to daptomycin, and one developed resistance to linezolid. Single-step mutation frequencies for telavancin (<4.0 x 10(-11) to <2.9 x 10(-10) at 2x MIC) were lower than the spontaneous mutation frequencies obtained with the comparators.

Topics: Aminoglycosides; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacterial Proteins; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial; Enterococcus; Lipoglycopeptides; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Point Mutation; Staphylococcus; Vancomycin; Virginiamycin