pyrophosphate and goethite

pyrophosphate has been researched along with goethite* in 2 studies

Other Studies

2 other study(ies) available for pyrophosphate and goethite

ArticleYear
Selective adsorption of various phosphorus species coexistence in water-soluble ammonium polyphosphate on goethite: Experimental investigation and molecular dynamics simulation.
    Chemosphere, 2022, Volume: 307, Issue:Pt 2

    The geochemical processes of polyphosphates (poly-Ps) are important for phosphorus (P) management and environmental protection. Water-soluble ammonium polyphosphate (APP) containing various P species has been increasingly used as an alternative P-fertilizer. The various P species coexistence and the chelation of poly-Ps with mental would trigger the P's competitive adsorption and affect the APP's adsorption intensity on goethite, compared to single orthophosphate (P

    Topics: Adsorption; Ammonium Compounds; Diphosphates; Fertilizers; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration; Iron Compounds; Minerals; Molecular Dynamics Simulation; Phosphates; Phosphorus; Polyphosphates; Water

2022
Evidence for non-electrostatic interactions between a pyrophosphate-functionalized uranyl peroxide nanocluster and iron (hydr)oxide minerals.
    Environmental science. Processes & impacts, 2019, Jul-17, Volume: 21, Issue:7

    The terminal oxygen atoms of the pyrophosphate groups in the uranyl peroxide nanocluster U24Pp12 ([(UO2)24(O2)24(P2O7)12]48-) are not fully satisfied by bond valence considerations and can become protonated. This functionality could allow for specific interactions with mineral surfaces, as opposed to the electrostatically-driven interactions observed between non-functionalized uranyl peroxide nanoclusters and mineral surfaces. The sorption of U24Pp12 to goethite and hematite was studied using batch sorption experiments as a function of U24Pp12 concentration, mineral concentration, and pH. A suite of spectroscopic techniques, scanning electron microscopy, and electrophoretic mobility measurements were used to examine the minerals before and after reaction with U24Pp12, leading to a proposed conceptual model for U24Pp12 interactions with goethite. The governing rate laws were determined and compared to those previously determined for a non-functionalized uranyl peroxide nanocluster. The rate of uranyl peroxide nanocluster sorption depends on the charge density and functionalized component of the uranyl peroxide cage. Electrophoretic mobility and attenuated total reflectance Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy analyses show that an inner-sphere complex forms between the U24Pp12 cluster and the goethite surface through the terminal pyrophosphate groups, leading to a proposed conceptual model in which U24Pp12 interacts with the triply-coordinated reactive sites on the (110) plane of goethite. These results demonstrate that the behavior of U24Pp12 at the iron (hydr)oxide-water interface is unique relative to interactions of the uranyl ion and non-functionalized uranyl peroxide nanoclusters.

    Topics: Adsorption; Diphosphates; Ferric Compounds; Iron Compounds; Minerals; Models, Theoretical; Nanostructures; Static Electricity; Uranium Compounds

2019