pyrimidinones and temoporfin

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a new approach to cancer treatment for a variety of malignant tumors. In this study, two clinical photosensitizers, Temoporfin (meta-tetra-hydroxyl-phenyl-chlorin; mTHPC) and merocyanine 540 (MC540), were selected to explore for their photocytotoxic and genotoxic effects on nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells (NPC/HK1 and CNE2). Results of tetrazolium reduction assay showed that 80% cell killing were achieved for both cell lines at 0.4 microg/ml mTHPC for 24 h incubation and then with 40 kJ/m2 light irradiation, whereas 40 microg/ml MC540 with 50 kJ/m2 light dosage was required to attain the same level of phototoxicity for NPC/HK1. On the contrary, NPC/CNE2 was quite resistant to MC540. Hence, mTHPC-mediated PDT exerted a more potent effect than MC540-mediated PDT, even though the molar extinction coefficient of the main absorption peak for MC540 is much higher than that of mTHPC. Dark cytotoxicity remained negligible for both sensitizers. Comet assay was used to evaluate the DNA strand break and potential genotoxic effect induced by mTHPC and MC540 on the NPC cells. No DNA strand break was detected in the absence of light, and under sublethal treatment (LD25) for either sensitizer-loaded cells. Confocal laser scanning microscopy showed that mTHPC and MC540 localized in the cytoplasm but not in the nucleus of the tumor cells, which provided evidence for undetectable DNA damage under dark and low photodynamic dose.

Topics: Aged; Analysis of Variance; Antineoplastic Agents; Comet Assay; DNA; DNA Damage; Humans; Male; Mesoporphyrins; Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms; Photosensitizing Agents; Pyrimidinones; Tumor Cells, Cultured

The photodynamic effects of temoporfin (meso-tetrahydroxyphenylchlorin, mTHPC) and merocyanine 540 (MC540) in murine myeloid leukemia M1 and WEHI 3B (JCS) cells were compared. The mTHPC was found to be more potent and selective. At a lethal dosage of 90% killing (LD90), only 1.3 microM of mTHPC and 4.2 kJ/m2 of light irradiation was required, which was a 20-fold lower drug concentration and 11-fold smaller light dose than that required when using MC540. Meanwhile, three times less, or 15%, of the coincubated erythrocytes were destroyed by mTHPC than by MC540. Confocal micrographs showed that both drugs accumulated diffusely inside the cytoplasm in a very similar fashion, but mTHPC induced a more extensive apoptosis in photosensitized JCS cells. For example, at LD90, mTHPC practically killed all JCS cells via apoptosis and cleaved the DNA to extremely small 150 base-pair fragments. In contrast, among the JCS cells killed by MC540, about 88% died via apoptosis and large DNA fragments were abundant. Relative to MC540, the ability of mTHPC to trigger large-scale and thorough apoptosis in leukemia cells may help explain its potency and selectivity.

Topics: Animals; Apoptosis; Cell Survival; Erythrocytes; Leukemia, Experimental; Leukemia, Myeloid; Light; Mesoporphyrins; Mice; Photochemotherapy; Photosensitizing Agents; Pyrimidinones; Tumor Cells, Cultured