pulmicort and fluticasone-furoate

Pharmacological asthma management focuses on the use of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)-containing therapies, which reduce airway inflammation and provide bronchoprotection, improving symptom control and reducing exacerbation risk. ICS underuse due to poor adherence is common, leading to poor clinical outcomes including increased risk of mortality. This article reviews efficacy versus systemic activity profiles for various adherence patterns and dosing regimens of fluticasone furoate (FF)-containing and budesonide (BUD)-containing asthma therapies in clinical trials and real-world studies.. We performed a structured literature review (1 January 2000-3 March 2022) and mathematical modelling analysis of FF-containing and BUD-containing regular daily dosing in patients with mild-to-severe asthma, as-needed BUD/formoterol (FOR) in mild asthma, and BUD/FOR maintenance and reliever therapy (MART) dosing in moderate-to-severe asthma, to assess efficacy (bronchoprotection) and systemic activity (cortisol suppression) profiles of dosing patterns of ICS use in multiple adherence scenarios.. A total of 22 manuscripts were included in full-text review and 18 in the model simulations. Focusing on FF-containing or BUD-containing treatments at comparable adherence rates, regular daily FF or FF/vilanterol (VI) dosing provided more prolonged bronchoprotection and fewer systemic effects than daily BUD, daily BUD/FOR, or BUD/FOR MART dosing, especially in low adherence scenarios. In model simulations and the real-world setting, FF/VI generally provided longer bronchoprotection, lower systemic activity, and greater clinical benefits over BUD/FOR as well as consistently higher adherence.. In this literature review and modelling analysis, FF/VI was found to show clinical advantages on asthma control over BUD/FOR. These findings have implications for helping clinicians select the most suitable inhaled therapy for their patients with asthma.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Asthma; Budesonide; Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination; Drug Combinations; Fluticasone; Humans

There is a considerable amount of evidence that supports the possibility of an increased risk of pneumonia associated with prolonged use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, as yet, no statistically significant increase in pneumonia-related 30-day mortality in patients on ICS has been demonstrated. The lack of objective pneumonia definitions and radiological confirmations have been a major source of bias, because of the similarities in clinical presentation between pneumonia and acute exacerbations of COPD. One of the newer fluticasone furoate studies overcomes these limitations and also provides an assessment of a range of doses, suggesting that the therapeutic window is quite narrow and that conventional dosing has probably been too high, although the absolute risk may be different compared to other drugs. Newer studies were not able to rule out budesonide as responsible for pneumonia, as previous evidence suggested, and there is still need for evidence from head-to-head comparisons in order to better assess possible intra-class differences. Although the exact mechanisms by which ICS increase the risk of pneumonia are not fully understood, the immunosuppressive effects of ICS on the respiratory epithelium and the disruption of the lung microbiome are most likely to be implicated. Given that COPD represents such a complex and heterogeneous disease, attempts are being made to identify clinical phenotypes with clear therapeutic implications, in order to optimize the pharmacological treatment of COPD and avoid the indiscriminate use of ICS. If deemed necessary, gradual withdrawal of ICS appears to be well tolerated. Vaccination against pneumococcus and influenza should be emphasized in patients with COPD receiving ICS. Physicians should keep in mind that signs and symptoms of pneumonia in COPD patients may be initially indistinguishable from those of an exacerbation, and that patients with COPD appear to be at increased risk of developing pneumonia as a complication of ICS therapy.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Androstadienes; Bronchodilator Agents; Budesonide; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Pneumonia; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

Randomized data comparing triple therapy with dual inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/long-acting β. We compared the effects of once-daily triple therapy on lung function and health-related quality of life with twice-daily ICS/LABA therapy in patients with COPD.. The FULFIL (Lung Function and Quality of Life Assessment in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease with Closed Triple Therapy) trial was a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy study comparing 24 weeks of once-daily triple therapy (fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol 100 μg/62.5 μg/25 μg; ELLIPTA inhaler) with twice-daily ICS/LABA therapy (budesonide/formoterol 400 μg/12 μg; Turbuhaler). A patient subgroup remained on blinded treatment for up to 52 weeks. Co-primary endpoints were change from baseline in trough FEV. These results support the benefits of single-inhaler triple therapy compared with ICS/LABA therapy in patients with advanced COPD. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02345161).

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Androstadienes; Benzyl Alcohols; Bronchodilator Agents; Budesonide; Chlorobenzenes; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Forced Expiratory Volume; Formoterol Fumarate; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Nebulizers and Vaporizers; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quality of Life; Quinuclidines

Burdensome symptoms of allergic rhinitis (AR) include nasal and ocular symptoms such as itching, tearing and redness. Intranasal corticosteroids are efficacious in the treatment of nasal symptoms of AR.. It was the aim of this study to determine the efficacy of the intranasal corticosteroid mometasone furoate nasal spray (MFNS) in relieving ocular symptoms associated with seasonal AR (SAR).. Ocular symptom data were analyzed for subjects >or=12 years of age, randomized to MFNS 200 mug q.d. (n = 176) or placebo (n = 177) in a placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial. Post hoc efficacy analysis assessed the mean change from baseline in subject-reported total ocular symptom scores (TOSS) averaged over the treatment period.. Mean baseline TOSS was 4.91 for the MFNS group and comparable (5.05) for the placebo group - combined average for individual symptoms such as itching, tearing and redness ranged from 0 (no symptoms) to 9 (all symptoms, severe). Mean change from baseline in TOSS averaged over days 1-15 was -1.42 for the MFNS group and -0.94 for the placebo group (p = 0.02), for an observed treatment difference of 0.49 (statistical data rounded to 2 decimal positions). Improvement in individual symptoms (eye itching, tearing and redness) contributed to this treatment effect; the greatest improvement occurred with tearing, which decreased -0.52 from the baseline score 1.59 in the MFNS group and -0.31 from 1.67 in those receiving placebo (p < 0.01), for an observed treatment difference of 0.21. Treatment with MFNS was safe and well tolerated.. MFNS is effective in reducing ocular symptoms of SAR, in addition to its established efficacy in reducing nasal symptoms of SAR.

Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Androstadienes; Anti-Allergic Agents; Budesonide; Child; Double-Blind Method; Eye Diseases; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Mometasone Furoate; Pregnadienediols; Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal

Many inhaled drugs are poorly water soluble, and the dissolution rate is often the rate-limiting step in the overall absorption process. To improve understanding of pulmonary drug dissolution, four poorly soluble inhalation compounds (AZD5423 (a developmental nonsteroidal glucocorticoid), budesonide, fluticasone furoate (FF), and fluticasone propionate (FP)) were administered as suspensions or dry powders to the well-established isolated perfused rat lung (IPL) model. Two particle size distributions (d50 = 1.2 μm and d50 = 2.8 μm) were investigated for AZD5423. The pulmonary absorption rates of the drugs from the suspensions and dry powders were compared with historical absorption data for solutions to improve understanding of the effects of dissolution on the overall pulmonary absorption process for poorly soluble inhaled drugs. A physiologically based biopharmaceutical in silico model was used to analyze the experimental IPL data and to estimate a dissolution parameter ( k

Topics: Acetamides; Administration, Inhalation; Androstadienes; Animals; Budesonide; Drug Liberation; Fluticasone; Indazoles; Lung; Male; Models, Biological; Particle Size; Powders; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Respiratory Tract Absorption; Solubility; Suspensions; Wettability

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is associated with a high healthcare resource and cost burden. Healthcare resource utilization was analyzed in patients with symptomatic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease at risk of exacerbations in the FULFIL study. Patients received either once-daily, single inhaler triple therapy (fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol) 100 µg/62.5 µg/25 µg or twice-daily dual inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting beta agonist therapy (budesonide/formoterol) 400 µg/12 µg.. FULFIL was a phase III, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter study. Unscheduled contacts with healthcare providers were recorded by patients in a daily electronic diary; the costs of healthcare resource utilization were calculated post hoc using UK reference costs.. Over 24 weeks, slightly fewer patients who received fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (169/911; 18.6%) required contacts with healthcare providers compared with budesonide/formoterol (180/899; 20.0%). Over 52 weeks in an extension population, fewer patients who received fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol required unscheduled contacts with healthcare providers compared with budesonide/formoterol (25.2% vs. 32.7%). Non-drug costs per treated patient per year were lower in the fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol group than the budesonide/formoterol group over 24 and 52 weeks (£653.80 vs. £763.32 and £749.22 vs. £988.03, respectively), with the total annualized cost over 24 weeks being slightly greater for fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol than budesonide/formoterol (£1,289.35 vs. £1,267.45).. This healthcare resource utilization evidence suggests that, in a clinical trial setting over a 24- or 52-week timeframe, non-drug costs associated with management of a single inhaler fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol are lower compared with twice-daily budesonide/formoterol.. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT02345161.. GSK.

Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Androstadienes; Bronchodilator Agents; Budesonide; Double-Blind Method; Female; Formoterol Fumarate; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Nebulizers and Vaporizers; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; United Kingdom

Intranasal corticosteroids (INS) are the first line treatment for allergic rhinitis (AR). To guide clinical decision-making, we created a therapeutic index (TIX) for INS reflecting efficacy and safety.. A Medline search (1966 to June 2009) was carried out to identify all placebo-controlled randomized trials, and observational reports for safety issues, with Dexamethasone, Budesonide (BUD), Fluticasone propionate (FP), Fluticasone furoate (FF), Flunisolide, Mometasone furoate (MF), Triamcinolone (TRIAM), and Beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) as treatment for AR. Data on three efficacy (nasal symptoms, ocular symptoms, global assessment) and three safety outcomes (epistaxis, growth, systemic ocular effects) were extracted. Meta analyses were performed for each INS and outcome and results were categorised into scores by quartiles. Scores of the three efficacy and safety outcomes were summed up to create summation scores for efficacy (ES) and side effects (AES), respectively with a maximum of 9 points. The TIX was then defined as the ratio of ES and AES.. Data of 84 studies were extracted. Based on availability of data, a TIX was calculated for 6 substances. BUD showed the highest efficacy score followed by MF and TRIAM. The lowest scores for side effects were achieved by MF and TRIAM followed by FP. These findings resulted in TIX scores of 7 and 5 for MF and TRIAM, respectively, indicating a high efficacy and low potential of adverse events. Medium scores were reached by BUD and FP and lower scores by BDP and FF.. Although safety and efficacy is proven for all available INS by multiple studies, the systematic aggregation and analysis of data allows for a differentiated summary on clinically important features.

Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Androstadienes; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Beclomethasone; Budesonide; Fluocinolone Acetonide; Fluticasone; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Mometasone Furoate; Pregnadienediols; Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial; Treatment Outcome; Triamcinolone

Currently available glucocorticoids are relatively short acting and may be less effective in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) where high levels of oxidative stress are seen. Here we show that a novel glucocorticoid, fluticasone furoate (FF), has a longer duration of action in several cell systems compared with fluticasone propionate (FP) and budesonide, and unlike FP, FF is resistant to oxidative stress. FF had similar or slightly higher potency to FP and was 2-9 fold more potent than budesonide, when assessed at 4h, in inhibiting inflammatory cytokine production in epithelial cell lines (BEAS2B, A549), primary bronchial epithelial cells and a monocytic cell line (U937). The potency of FF was sustained beyond 16 h with or without washout compared with FP or budesonide, such that it showed a greater duration of action in this range of cellular assays. The activated YFP-conjugated glucocorticoid receptor was detectable in nuclei of FF treated BEAS2B cells for at least for 30 h, and FF had a longer duration of action than FP in inhibiting activation of transcription factors such as NF-κB and AP-1. In addition, FF showed superior effects to FP in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from patients with COPD and also in U937 cells or primary bronchial epithelial cells under conditions of oxidative stress. The longer duration of action and oxidative stress insensitivity of FF compared with FP has potential clinical implications for the control of inflammation in respiratory diseases, such as COPD.

Topics: Active Transport, Cell Nucleus; Androstadienes; Asthma; Budesonide; Cell Line; Cell Nucleus; Fluticasone; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Leukocytes, Mononuclear; Oxidative Stress; p38 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases; Phosphorylation; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Receptors, Glucocorticoid; Respiratory System; Time Factors; Transcription Factor RelA