pulmicort and aluminum-sulfate

CCR4 is highly expressed on Th2 cells. These cells play an important role in acute inflammatory responses, including those involved in allergic rhinitis. We determined whether disrupting the CCR4 ligand interaction with CCR4 antagonist could alleviate allergic rhinitis in a mouse model.. BALB/c mice were sensitized with ovalbumin and alum by intraperitoneal injection and challenged with intranasally administered ovalbumin. Compound 22, which has been reported as a novel small-molecule antagonist of CCR4, was also administered intranasally. In addition, budesonide, an efficient glucocorticoid, was used as a positive control. The effects of compound 22 were quantified by multiple parameters of allergic responses in both nasal and pulmonary tissues.. Compound 22 significantly improved symptoms of allergic rhinitis and suppressed levels of total IgE of serum. It dramatically reduced the levels of IL-4 in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and also decreased the number of inflammatory cells in the fluid. The infiltration of inflammatory cells, especially eosinophils, was markedly reduced in the nasal and pulmonary tissues. The number of IL-4+ cells was also significantly reduced in these tissues. Moreover, the numbers of Foxp3+ cells and IL-17+ cells were reduced, though not to a statistically significant degree.. In our research, CCR4 antagonists such as compound 22 were proven for the first time to alleviate murine allergic rhinitis when administered nasally. CCR4 antagonists may have therapeutic potential for the treatment of allergic rhinitis.

Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Alum Compounds; Animals; Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid; Budesonide; Chemotaxis; Disease Models, Animal; Female; Glucocorticoids; HEK293 Cells; Humans; Immunization; Immunoglobulin E; Immunologic Factors; Interleukin-4; Mice; Mice, Inbred BALB C; Neutrophils; Ovalbumin; Receptors, CCR4; Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial; Th2 Cells

Eosinophils play a major role in the development and severity of asthma. Robust and rapid preclinical animal models are desirable to profile novel therapeutics inhibiting the influx of eosinophils into the airways. To develop a rapid, airway eosinophil recruitment model in the rat, Brown-Norway (BN) rats were immunised with ovalbumin (OVA)/alum on day 0, 1 and 2 and challenged with OVA aerosol on day 5 and 6. On day 7 bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) was analysed for eosinophil numbers, eosinophil peroxidase (EPO) activity and cytokines. Lung sections were also examined. The immunised animals showed a strong selective influx of eosinophils into the airways correlating with enhanced EPO activity, Interleukin (IL-4), IL-5 and monocytes chemo attractant protein levels in the BALF in comparison to sham-sensitised rats. In addition the immunised rats developed goblet cell metaplasia in the lung and showed OVA specific IgG1 and IgE levels in the serum but no airway hyperreactivity after metacholine challenge. Airway inflammation was suppressed by applying the steroids Budesonide (intra tracheally) and Prednisolone (per orally), Roflumilast a phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor, and the H1 receptor antagonists Epinastine and Ketotifen. Montelukast, a Leukotriene receptor antagonist and Chromoglycate, a mast cell stabiliser, had no effect in this model. In summary, in this novel preclinical rat model therapeutics expected to inhibit the development of airway eosinophilia can rapidly be tested.

Topics: Alum Compounds; Aminopyridines; Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Asthma; Benzamides; Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid; Budesonide; Cyclopropanes; Dibenzazepines; Disease Models, Animal; Eosinophils; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Imidazoles; Ketotifen; Lung; Mice; Mice, Inbred BALB C; Ovalbumin; Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors; Prednisolone; Rats; Rats, Inbred BN

We examined the effects of glucocorticosteroids (GCS) on antigen-induced bronchial anaphylactic reactions (BAR) in SD rats immunized with ovalbumin (OA) and alum. The animals were treated with vehicle, budesonide (BUD), dexamethasone (DEX), or hydrocortisone (HC) at various times before intravenous (i.v.) antigen challenge. The drugs were administered either intraperitoneally (i.p.) or intratracheally (i.t.); the BAR was elicited by a low or by a high challenge dose of antigen. A BAR elicited by a low challenge dose of antigen was reduced in a dose-dependent way by all GCS after i.p. administration; at 1 mg/kg, BUD and DEX significantly reduced BAR and at 50 mg/kg all three of the examined compounds inhibited the BAR by 50% or more. For BUD, maximum effect was recorded when it was given 12 h before test. There was only a slight variation in the inhibitory effects of the GCS with immunization conditions of test animals. I.t. instillation of the drugs did not markedly increase their inhibitory capacity as compared to i.p. administration. BAR elicited by a high antigen dose was at best marginally affected by the GCS when given either i.p. or i.t. Thus, antigen-induced airway reactivity in rats can be reduced by GCS treatment provided that this is performed sufficiently long before the test and that the challenge dose of antigen is not too high.

Topics: Acetophenones; Administration, Topical; Alum Compounds; Aluminum; Anaphylaxis; Animals; Antigens; Bronchial Diseases; Budesonide; Cromolyn Sodium; Dexamethasone; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Interactions; Glucocorticoids; Immunization; Injections, Intraperitoneal; Injections, Intravenous; Male; Ovalbumin; Pregnenediones; Quinacrine; Rats; Rats, Inbred Strains; Respiration; Sulfates; Time Factors