piperidines and trefentanil

piperidines has been researched along with trefentanil* in 4 studies

Reviews

1 review(s) available for piperidines and trefentanil

ArticleYear
New opioid analgesics: an update.
    International anesthesiology clinics, 1997,Spring, Volume: 35, Issue:2

    Topics: Analgesics; Analgesics, Opioid; Anesthesia, Conduction; Anesthesia, General; Anesthetics, Intravenous; Fentanyl; Humans; Pain, Postoperative; Piperidines; Remifentanil; Tetrazoles; Tramadol

1997

Trials

2 trial(s) available for piperidines and trefentanil

ArticleYear
Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling in drug development: application to the investigational opioid trefentanil.
    Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 1994, Volume: 56, Issue:3

    We determined the possible benefits of a new opioid, trefentanil, relative to fentanyl and alfentanil using high-resolution pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling and computer simulations of clinical dosing scenarios.. First, we determined in nine volunteers the electroencephalographic (EEG) effects and the trefentanil infusion rate that gave maximal EEG changes in 3 to 10 minutes. Then, in a crossover fashion in five volunteers, we compared the pharmacokinetics and EEG pharmacodynamics of trefentanil with fentanyl and alfentanil. Finally, we used computer simulations to predict offset of opioid effects of trefentanil, fentanyl, and alfentanil when given in different dosing schemes.. The pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic profile of trefentanil was similar to alfentanil, except for a higher elimination clearance. Trefentanil versus alfentanil pharmacokinetic parameters were as follows: Elimination clearance, 0.444 +/- 0.073 versus 0.184 +/- 0.031 L/min; steady-state distribution volume, 37 +/- 7 versus 23 +/- 3 L; and elimination half-life, 127 +/- 24 versus 114 +/- 19 minutes. Trefentanil versus alfentanil pharmacodynamics were as follows: the equilibration half-time between EEG effect and arterial drug concentration, 1.2 +/- 0.5 versus 0.6 +/- 0.4 minutes; and the concentration resulting in 50% of maximal EEG effect, 429 +/- 313 versus 577 +/- 273 ng/ml. The pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic profile of fentanyl was significantly different from trefentanil and alfentanil. Simulation of effect compartment concentration decay curves after variable-length infusions predicted more rapid recovery from trefentanil than from alfentanil or fentanyl.. We suggest that high-resolution pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic studies and computer simulations of clinical dosing scenarios may have significant usefulness in appreciating differences between new and established drugs in early phase I studies.

    Topics: Adult; Alfentanil; Analgesics; Computer Simulation; Drugs, Investigational; Electroencephalography; Fentanyl; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Male; Piperidines; Reference Values; Tetrazoles

1994
A-3665, a new short-acting opioid: a comparison with alfentanil.
    Anesthesia and analgesia, 1993, Volume: 76, Issue:4

    A-3665 is a new short-acting synthetic opioid of the piperidine class. We conducted a double-blind, escalating dose comparison of A-3665 to alfentanil and placebo. Analgesic efficacy was assessed after the administration of A-3665 in increasing intravenous doses (0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, and 64 micrograms/kg) to nine groups of volunteers. At the lower doses (0.25, 0.5, 1, and 2 micrograms/kg), five volunteers were in each group; four received A-3665 and one received placebo in a double-blind manner. There were nine volunteers in each of the next three groups; four received A-3665 (4, 8, or 16 micrograms/kg), four received alfentanil (4, 8, or 16 micrograms/kg), and one received placebo. At the 32 micrograms/kg and 64 micrograms/kg dose levels, five subjects each were to be enrolled (four to receive A-3665 and one to receive placebo); however, the study was terminated after two subjects in the 64 micrograms/kg group had significant respiratory depression. Both drugs caused potent analgesia, compared with placebo, with peak effect occurring 3 min after injection. There was no significant difference in analgesic potency of A-3665 and alfentanil as measured by tolerance to tibial pressure at 3 min. At the dose of 16 micrograms/kg, both drugs significantly increased pain tolerance to tibial pressure compared with placebo at 3 min, but alfentanil continued to display significant analgesic effect versus placebo and versus A-3665 at 6, 11, and 15 min after injection. A-3665 caused significant respiratory depression at doses of 32 micrograms/kg and 64 micrograms/kg, but alfentanil did not induce significant respiratory depression at the doses tested.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Alfentanil; Analgesics; Carbon Dioxide; Cardiovascular System; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Histamine; Humans; Oxygen; Pain; Partial Pressure; Piperidines; Respiration; Tetrazoles

1993

Other Studies

1 other study(ies) available for piperidines and trefentanil

ArticleYear
Mu opiate active substances trefentanil and naloxonazine: tritiation at high specific activity.
    Applied radiation and isotopes : including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture, industry and medicine, 2005, Volume: 63, Issue:2

    Methods are presented to synthesize and characterize [propyl-(3)H] trefentanil 3 and [propenyl-(3)H] naloxonazine 6.

    Topics: Isotope Labeling; Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy; Naloxone; Piperidines; Radiopharmaceuticals; Receptors, Opioid, mu; Tetrazoles; Tritium

2005