piperidines and sibutramine

All major guidelines on antihypertensive therapy recommend weight loss; anti-obesity drugs may be able to help in this respect.. To assess the long-term effects of pharmacologically induced reduction in body weight in adults with essential hypertension on all-cause mortality, cardiovascular morbidity, and adverse events (including total serious adverse events, withdrawal due to adverse events, and total non-serious adverse events).. To assess the long-term effects of pharmacologically induced reduction in body weight in adults with essential hypertension on change from baseline in systolic blood pressure, change from baseline in diastolic blood pressure, and body weight reduction.. We obtained studies using computerised searches of the Cochrane Hypertension Group Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, the clinical trials registry ClinicalTrials.gov, and from handsearches in reference lists and systematic reviews (status as of 13 April 2015).. Randomised controlled trials in hypertensive adults of at least 24 weeks' duration that compared long-term pharmacologic interventions for weight loss with placebo. . Two review authors independently selected studies, assessed risk of bias, and extracted data. Where appropriate and in the absence of significant heterogeneity between studies (P > 0.1), we pooled studies using fixed-effect meta-analysis. When heterogeneity was present, we used the random-effects method and investigated the cause of heterogeneity.. After updating the literature search, which was extended to include four new weight-reducing drugs, we identified one additional study of phentermine/topiramate, bringing the total number of studies to nine that compare orlistat, sibutramine, or phentermine/topiramate to placebo and thus fulfil our inclusion criteria. We identified no relevant studies investigating rimonabant, liraglutide, lorcaserin, or naltrexone/bupropion. No study included mortality and cardiovascular morbidity as predefined outcomes. Incidence of gastrointestinal side effects was consistently higher in those participants treated with orlistat versus those treated with placebo. The most frequent side effects were dry mouth, constipation, and headache with sibutramine, and dry mouth and paresthaesia with phentermine/topiramate. In participants assigned to orlistat, sibutramine, or phentermine/topiramate body weight was reduced more effectively than in participants in the usual-care/placebo groups. Orlistat reduced systolic blood pressure as compared to placebo by -2.5 mm Hg (mean difference (MD); 95% confidence interval (CI): -4.0 to -0.9 mm Hg) and diastolic blood pressure by -1.9 mm Hg (MD; 95% CI: -3.0 to -0.9 mm Hg). Sibutramine increased diastolic blood pressure compared to placebo by +3.2 mm Hg (MD; 95% CI: +1.4 to +4.9 mm Hg). The one trial that investigated phentermine/topiramate suggested it lowered blood pressure.. In people with elevated blood pressure, orlistat and sibutramine reduced body weight to a similar degree, while phentermine/topiramate reduced body weight to a greater extent. In the same trials, orlistat and phentermine/topiramate reduced blood pressure, while sibutramine increased it. We could include no trials investigating rimonabant, liraglutide, lorcaserin, or naltrexone/bupropion in people with elevated blood pressure. Long-term trials assessing the effect of orlistat, liraglutide, lorcaserin, phentermine/topiramate, or naltrexone/bupropion on mortality and morbidity are unavailable and needed. Rimonabant and sibutramine have been withdrawn from the market, after long-term trials on mortality and morbidity have confirmed concerns about the potential severe side effects of these two drugs. The European Medicines Agency refused marketing authorisation for phentermine/topiramate due to safety concerns, while the application for European marketing authorisation for lorcaserin was withdrawn by the manufacturer after the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use judged the overall benefit/risk balance to be negative.

Topics: Adult; Anti-Obesity Agents; Appetite Depressants; Blood Pressure; Cyclobutanes; Diet, Reducing; Female; Fructose; Humans; Hypertension; Lactones; Male; Middle Aged; Orlistat; Phentermine; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rimonabant; Safety-Based Drug Withdrawals; Time; Topiramate; Weight Loss

All major guidelines for antihypertensive therapy recommend weight loss; anti-obesity drugs might be a helpful option.. To assess the long-term effects of pharmacologically induced reduction in body weight with orlistat, sibutramine or rimonabant on:- all cause mortality - cardiovascular morbidity - adverse events. - changes in systolic and/or diastolic blood pressure - body weight reduction even though sibutramine and rimonabant have been withdrawn from the market.. Studies were obtained from computerised searches of Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL and from hand searches in reference lists and systematic reviews (status as of 17(th) August, 2012).. Randomized controlled trials in adult hypertensive patients with a study duration of at least 24 weeks comparing pharmacologic interventions (orlistat, sibutramine, rimonabant) for weight loss with placebo.. Two authors independently assessed risk of bias and extracted data. Studies were pooled using fixed-effect meta-analysis in the absence of significant heterogeneity between studies (p>0.1). Otherwise, we used the random effects method and investigated the cause of heterogeneity.. After the updated literature search, the number of studies remained the same, with eight studies comparing orlistat or sibutramine to placebo fulfilling our inclusion criteria. No relevant studies investigating rimonabant for weight loss were identified. No study included mortality and cardiovascular morbidity as a pre-defined outcome. Incidence of gastrointestinal side effects was consistently higher in orlistat treated vs. placebo treated patients. Most frequent side effects with sibutramine were dry mouth, constipation and headache. Patients assigned to weight loss diets, orlistat or sibutramine reduced their body weight more effectively than patients in the usual care/placebo groups. Blood pressure reduction in patients treated with orlistat was for systolic blood pressure (SBP): weighted mean difference (WMD): -2.5 mm Hg; 95% CI, -4.0 to -0.9 mm Hg and for diastolic blood pressure (DBP): WMD -1.9 mm Hg; 95% CI, -3.0 to -0.9 mm Hg. Meta-analysis showed DBP increase under therapy with sibutramine: WMD +3.2 mm Hg; 95%CI +1.4 to +4.9 mm Hg.. In patients with elevated blood pressure, orlistat and sibutramine reduced body weight to a similar degree. In the same trials, orlistat reduced blood pressure and sibutramine increased blood pressure. No trials investigating rimonabant in people with elevated blood pressure could be included. Long-term trials assessing the effect of orlistat, sibutramine and rimonabant on mortality and morbidity are lacking. Rimonabant and sibutramine have been withdrawn from the market for the time being.

Topics: Adult; Anti-Obesity Agents; Blood Pressure; Cyclobutanes; Diet, Reducing; Female; Humans; Hypertension; Lactones; Male; Middle Aged; Orlistat; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rimonabant; Safety-Based Drug Withdrawals; Time; Weight Loss

Obesity is a chronic disease, and it requires chronic therapy. Hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes and cardiovascular diseases are leading causes of mortality in the modern world. All of them are strongly linked to obesity. While treating obesity, those conditions are also managed. Obese patients should always be treated through lifestyle interventions, though the results of such interventions are modest. Pharmacotherapy is a second step in the treatment of obesity, approved only when weight loss targets were not reached through lifestyle intervention. During the history of antiobesity drugs, many of them were withdrawn because of their side effects. Various guidelines recommend prescribing drug therapy for obesity through consideration of the potential benefits and limitations. Orlistat deactivates intestinal lipase and inhibits intestinal fat lipolysis. It is actually the only drug on the European market approved for the treatment of obesity. Orlistat therapy reduces weight to a modest extent, but it reduces the incidence of diabetes beyond the result achieved with lifestyle changes. Recently, some effective antiobesity drugs like sibutramine and rimonabant have been removed from the market due to their side effects. The new combination of topimarate and fentermine is approved in the US but not in Europe. The cost effectiveness of long-term pharmacotherapy of obesity is still an unresolved question.

Topics: Anti-Obesity Agents; Appetite; Combined Modality Therapy; Comorbidity; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Cyclobutanes; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diet, Diabetic; Drug Combinations; Exercise Therapy; Fructose; Gastrointestinal Hormones; Humans; Incretins; Insulin; Insulin Secretion; Intestines; Lactones; Leptin; Life Style; Models, Biological; Neuropeptides; Obesity; Orlistat; Phentermine; Phytotherapy; Piperidines; Plant Preparations; Pyrazoles; Rimonabant; Topiramate

The study aims to compare anti-obesity interventions in a single evidence synthesis framework. Electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials of orlistat, rimonabant or sibutramine reporting weight or body mass index (BMI) change from baseline at 3, 6 or 12 months. A mixed treatment comparison was used to combine direct and indirect trial evidence. Ninety-four studies involving 24,808 individuals were included; 83 trials included data on weight change and 41 on BMI change. All results are in comparison with placebo. The active drugs were all effective at reducing weight and BMI. At 3 months, orlistat reduced weight by -2.65 kg (95% credibility interval -4.00 kg, -1.31 kg). For sibutramine, 15 mg gave a greater reduction than 10 mg at 12 months, -6.35 kg versus -5.42 kg, respectively. Rimonabant reduced weight by -11.23 kg at 3 months and -4.55 kg at 12 months. Lifestyle advice alone also reduced weight at 6 and 12 months, but was less effective than the pharmacological interventions. In conclusion, modest weight reductions were seen for all pharmacological interventions. Those interventions which have now been withdrawn from use (sibutramine and rimonabant) seem to be the most effective, implying that there may be a place in clinical practice for similar drugs if side effects could be avoided.

Topics: Anti-Obesity Agents; Body Mass Index; Cyclobutanes; Humans; Lactones; Life Style; Obesity; Orlistat; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Rimonabant; Treatment Outcome; Weight Loss

Obesity [defined as a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m(2)] represents a considerable public health problem and is associated with a significant range of comorbidities and an increased mortality risk. The primary aim of the management of obesity is to achieve weight reduction in the interests of health. For obese patients who cannot achieve or maintain a healthy weight by non-pharmacological means, drug therapy is recommended in combination with non-pharmacological interventions such as dietary modifications and exercise.. To evaluate the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of three pharmacological interventions in obese patients.. Clinical effectiveness data used in the meta-analysis were sourced from articles identified in a systematic review of the literature. Data used to inform transitions to obesity-related comorbidities were derived from the General Practice Research Database (GPRD). The results of the meta-analysis and GPRD analyses informed the economic model supplemented by data from the Health Survey for England and other UK-specific data sourced from the literature.. A systematic literature review was conducted of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of orlistat, sibutramine and rimonabant within their licensed indications for the treatment of obese patients. Electronic bibliographic databases including MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library databases and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) were searched in January 2009, and the reference lists of relevant articles were checked. Studies were included if they compared orlistat, sibutramine or rimonabant with lifestyle and/or exercise advice (standard care), placebo or metformin.. Overall, 94 studies involving 24,808 individuals were included in the clinical meta-analysis. Eighty-three trials included data on weight change, 41 included data on BMI change and 45 and 36 studies reported on 5% and 10% body weight loss, respectively. Overall, the results show that the active drug interventions are all effective at reducing weight and BMI compared with placebo. In the case of sibutramine, the higher dose (15 mg) resulted in a greater reduction than the lower dose (10 mg). Generally, the data quality of the trials included was low with poor reporting of standard errors and standard deviations. Results from the BMI risk models derived from the GPRD showed consistent increases in risk with increasing BMI. Adjustments for key confounders, such as age, sex and smoking status, were found to be statistically significant at the 5% level, in all risk models. Applying linear models to estimate BMI trajectories, for the diabetic cohort, an average increase in BMI of 0.040 per year for both men and women was observed. The non-diabetic cohort model showed an increase in BMI of 0.175 per year for women and 0.145 per year for men. The results of the cost-effectiveness analyses suggest that sibutramine 15 mg dominates the other three active interventions and the net benefit analyses show that sibutramine 15 mg is the most cost-effective alternative for thresholds > £2000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). However, both sibutramine and rimonabant have been withdrawn because of safety concerns relating to potential treatment-induced fatal adverse events. If the proportion of patients who experienced a fatal adverse event was > 1.8% (1.5%, 1.0%) for sibutramine 15 mg (sibutramine 10 mg, rimonabant) the treatment would not be considered cost-effective when using a threshold of £20,000 per QALY.. The clinical review did not include all possible lifestyle comparators, with the inclusion limited to only those trials included one of the active drug interventions. We also excluded all studies not reported in English. Although the clinical review included data from 94 studies, the quality of data was generally low, particularly in terms of the reporting of standard deviation. There was also inconsistency between the results of the mixed-treatment comparison (MTC) and the pair-wise analyses.. The MTC of anti-obesity treatments shows that all the active treatments are effective at reducing weight and BMI. The economic results show that, compared with placebo, the treatments are all cost-effective when using a threshold of £20,000 per QALY, and, within the limitations of the data available, sibutramine 15 mg dominates the other three interventions. This work has highlighted many areas of methodological research that could be explored, including assessing inconsistencies within a network to determine differences between the results of pair-wise and MTC analyses; the use of meta-regression methods to look for effect modifiers; exploring the effect of local publication bias; and the use of joint models to analyse the repeated measures of BMI and the time-to-event processes simultaneously.. The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.

Topics: Anti-Obesity Agents; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Cyclobutanes; Drug Costs; Exercise; Female; Humans; Lactones; Male; Middle Aged; Obesity; Orlistat; Piperidines; Primary Health Care; Pyrazoles; Rimonabant; Risk Reduction Behavior; Treatment Outcome

Currently, obesity presents one of the biggest health problems. Management strategies for weight reduction in obese individuals include changes in life style such as exercise and diet, behavioral therapy, and pharmacological treatment, and in certain cases surgical intervention. Diet and exercise are best for both prevention and treatment, but both require much discipline and are difficult to maintain. Drug treatment of obesity offer a possible adjunct, but it may only have modest results, limited by side effects; furthermore, the weight lowering effects last only as long as the drug is being taken and, unfortunately, as soon as the administration is stopped, the weight is regained. These strategies should be used in a combination for higher efficacy. Drugs used to induce weight loss have various effects: they increase satiety, reduce the absorption of nutrients or make metabolism faster; but their effect is usually moderate. In the past, several drugs were used in the pharmacological therapy of weight reduction including thyroid hormone, dinitrophenol, amphetamines and their analogues, e.g. fenfluramine, At present, only orlistat is available in the long term treatment (≥ 24 weeks) of obesity as sibutramine and rimonabant were withdrawn form the market. Several new anti-obesity drugs are being tested at present, and liraglutide, a GLP-1 analogue (incretin mimetic), is the most promising one.

Topics: Amides; Anti-Obesity Agents; Anticonvulsants; Antidepressive Agents; Basal Metabolism; Benzazepines; Benzoxazines; Body Mass Index; Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic; Ciliary Neurotrophic Factor; Clinical Trials as Topic; Combined Modality Therapy; Cyclobutanes; Dexfenfluramine; Fatty Acids; Female; Fenfluramine; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Human Growth Hormone; Humans; Intestinal Absorption; Lactones; Leptin; Life Style; Liraglutide; Male; Norepinephrine; Obesity; Obesity, Morbid; Orlistat; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Receptor, Melanocortin, Type 4; Rimonabant; Satiation; Serotonin; Sodium-Glucose Transport Proteins; Sucrose; Thyroid Hormones

Topics: Animals; Cyclobutanes; Diabetes Mellitus; Female; Humans; Incretins; Insulin; Lactones; Male; Metformin; Obesity; Orlistat; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Rimonabant; Sex Characteristics; Sulfonylurea Compounds

Topics: Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems; Appetite Depressants; Body Weight; Brain; Combined Modality Therapy; Cyclobutanes; Diet, Reducing; Drug Approval; Drug Combinations; Drug Recalls; Drugs, Investigational; Forecasting; Humans; Obesity; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rimonabant

Obesity is one of the greatest public health challenges of the twenty-first century. The World Health Organization (WHO) reports that in 2005 approximately 1.6 billion adults were overweight and at least 400 million adults were obese. The prevalence of obesity is still continuing to increase dramatically. Overweight and obese people carry a higher risk for a variety of cardiovascular diseases including hypertension, coronary heart disease, stroke and peripheral occlusive artery disease. Weight loss is considered to be the initial step which helps to prevent or to control the clinical consequences of obesity. In a great number of patients who are not able to reduce weight by means of non-pharmacological measures, drug therapy can assist in reaching the weight management targets. Drug treatment should only be considered as part of a systematic weight management program including dietary and lifestyle changes. This review summarizes current pharmacotherapeutic concepts for the treatment of obesity in adults focusing on efficacy and safety of anti-obesity drugs.

Topics: Adult; Anti-Obesity Agents; Appetite Depressants; Combined Modality Therapy; Cyclobutanes; Enzyme Inhibitors; Humans; Lactones; Lipase; Obesity; Orlistat; Piperidines; Prevalence; Pyrazoles; Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB1; Rimonabant; Risk Reduction Behavior; Treatment Outcome; Weight Loss

Obesity is considered a worldwide epidemic. Weight reduction by means of lifestyle changes is difficult to achieve, and pharmacotherapy is frequently needed. Although all currently approved anti-obesity agents have proven to be effective to achieve some degree of weight reduction and improve cardiometabolic risk factors, different compounds differ in their mechanism of action and safety profile. However, it is still difficult to achieve and maintain therapeutic objectives along time. The aim of the present article is to summarize the main characteristics of available anti-obesity agents and to explore novel agents that may provide significant clinical benefits in the future.

Topics: Animals; Anti-Obesity Agents; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cyclobutanes; Humans; Lactones; Obesity; Orlistat; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Rimonabant

Obesity is considered as a major health problem, as its prevalence continuously rises worldwide. One of the common health consequences of obesity is type 2 diabetes mellitus. Therefore, antiobesity management is a prerequisite in treating diabetic patients. Lifestyle modifications combined with pharmacological agents appear to be an effective approach. Sibutramine is a serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor, which acts centrally by promoting the feeling of satiety and decreasing caloric intake, thus resulting in weight loss. A potential association with cardiovascular side effects has been noted. Orlistat, a gastric and pancreatic lipase inhibitor, also achieves significant weight loss and improves glycaemic status, but it has gastrointestinal side effects. Rimonabant, the first endocannabinoid CB1 antagonist, is associated with weight reduction and it improves diabetic parameters; nevertheless, it is associated with psychiatric disorders; indeed, a recently conducted safety review led to the temporal suspension of its commercialization. The above-mentioned medications seem to be currently useful agents for treating obesity in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Other medications used for diabetes management, such as exenatide, liraglutide and pramlintide, have also shown body weight reduction. Ongoing research is needed to scrutinize the precise impact of these agents in the daily clinical practice of management of obesity in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anti-Obesity Agents; Appetite Depressants; Body Weight; Cyclobutanes; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Lactones; Male; Middle Aged; Obesity; Orlistat; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB1; Rimonabant; Treatment Outcome; Weight Loss; Young Adult

The objective of this article was to estimate the risk of discontinuation due to adverse events in trials of orlistat, sibutramine and rimonabant. Medline, EMBASE, the Cochrane controlled trials register and reference lists of identified articles were searched from 1990 to May 2008. All randomized placebo-controlled trials of 12-24 months of duration on adults using licensed doses were included. Studies/study arms were excluded if they evaluated weight maintenance after weight loss. Trials were identified, subjected to inclusion and exclusion criteria and reviewed. Data on participants, interventions and discontinuation were extracted and trials rated for quality based on established criteria. A random effects model was used to estimate pooled risk ratios, risk differences and number needed to harm (NNH). A total of 28 trials met the inclusion criteria (16 orlistat, 7 sibutramine and 5 rimonabant). The risk ratios for discontinuation due to adverse events were significantly elevated for rimonabant (2.00; 1.66-2.41) and orlistat (1.59; 1.21-2.08), but not sibutramine (0.98, 0.68-1.41). Compared with placebo, the risk difference was the largest for rimonabant (7%, 5-9%; NNH 14, 11-19), followed by orlistat (3%, 1-4%; NNH 39, 25-83), while no significant difference was seen for sibutramine (0.2%, -3 to 4%; NNH 500). The most common adverse events leading to withdrawal were gastrointestinal for orlistat (40%) and psychiatric for rimonabant (47%). Corresponding information was unavailable for sibutramine. In conclusion, available weight loss drugs differ markedly regarding risk of discontinuation due to adverse events, as well as in underlying causes of these events. Given the large number of patients eligible for treatment, the low NNH for rimonabant is a concern.

Topics: Anti-Obesity Agents; Appetite Depressants; Cyclobutanes; Humans; Lactones; Medication Adherence; Odds Ratio; Orlistat; Overweight; Patient Dropouts; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rimonabant

All major guidelines for antihypertensive therapy recommend weight loss; anti-obesity drugs might be a helpful option.. To assess the long-term effects of pharmacologically induced reduction in body weight with orlistat, sibutramine or rimonabant on:- all cause mortality - cardiovascular morbidity - adverse events. - changes in systolic and/or diastolic blood pressure - body weight reduction. Studies were obtained from computerised searches of Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL and from hand searches in reference lists and systematic reviews.. Randomized controlled trials in adult hypertensive patients with a study duration of at least 24 weeks comparing pharmacologic interventions (orlistat, sibutramine, rimonabant) for weight loss with placebo.. Two authors independently assessed risk of bias and extracted data. Studies were pooled using fixed-effect meta-analysis in the absence of significant heterogeneity between studies (p>0.1). Otherwise, we used the random effects method and investigated the cause of heterogeneity.. Eight studies comparing orlistat or sibutramine to placebo fulfilled our inclusion criteria. No relevant studies investigating rimonabant for weight loss were identified. No study included mortality and cardiovascular morbidity as a pre-defined outcome. Incidence of gastrointestinal side effects was consistently higher in orlistat treated vs. placebo treated patients. Most frequent side effects with sibutramine were dry mouth, constipation and headache. Patients assigned to weight loss diets, orlistat or sibutramine reduced their body weight more effectively than patients in the usual care/placebo groups. Blood pressure reduction in patients treated with orlistat was for systolic blood pressure (SBP): weighted mean difference (WMD): -2.5 mm Hg; 95% CI, -4.0 to -0.9 mm Hg and for diastolic blood pressure (DBP): WMD -1.9 mm Hg; 95% CI, -3.0 to -0.9 mm Hg. Meta-analysis showed DBP increase under therapy with sibutramine: WMD +3.2 mm Hg; 95%CI +1.4 to +4.9 mm Hg.. In patients with elevated blood pressure, orlistat and sibutramine reduced body weight to a similar degree. In the same trials, orlistat reduced blood pressure and sibutramine increased blood pressure. No trials investigating rimonabant in people with elevated blood pressure could be included. Long-term trials assessing the effect of orlistat, sibutramine and rimonabant on mortality and morbidity are needed.

Topics: Adult; Anti-Obesity Agents; Blood Pressure; Cyclobutanes; Female; Humans; Hypertension; Lactones; Male; Middle Aged; Orlistat; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rimonabant; Time; Weight Loss

Weight gain, during and after the menopause is common. Contributing factors include ethnicity, reduced physical activity, reduced lean mass, reduced resting metabolic rate and treatment with certain drugs, e.g. steroids, insulin, glitazones. Excess body weight increases the risk of medical conditions including type 2 diabetes, hypertension, osteoarthritis, certain cancers and is associated with increased mortality. This review examines pharmacological approaches to promote weight loss. Pharmacological therapy should be considered as an adjunct to diet and lifestyle changes. The licensed drugs orlistat, sibutramine and rimonabant are discussed. Obesity increases the risk of type 2 diabetes. Thus, the effects of metformin and exenatide are examined.

Topics: Anti-Obesity Agents; Bariatric Surgery; Cyclobutanes; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Exenatide; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Lactones; Menopause; Metformin; Obesity; Orlistat; Peptides; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Rimonabant; Risk Factors; Venoms

To review economic evaluations of weight loss drugs and compare reported incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs).. A literature search was conducted for cost-effectiveness (CEAs) and cost-utility analyses (CUAs) of sibutramine, orlistat and rimonabant.. Fourteen unique articles were identified (11 CUAs and 3 CEAs; 9 orlistat, 4 sibutramine and 1 rimonabant). All used diet and exercise as comparator, whereas none included indirect costs. Time horizons varied from treatment period only (1-4 years) to 80 years (median 7.5 years). Longer studies modeled effects on diabetes, micro- and macrovascular complications, coronary heart disease and death. Of the CUAs, the median ICER was 16,000 euro(2007)/QALY (quality-adjusted life-year; range 10,000-88,000), with the worst cost-effectiveness when recommended stop rules for non-responding patients were not applied. All studies but three were funded by the manufacturing company, and the median ICER was considerably higher for independent than for sponsored analyses (62,000 euro vs 15,000 euro/QALY). However, two of the three independent CUAs did not use recommended stop rules, as compared with one of eight manufacturer-sponsored analyses. The results were most sensitive to assumptions regarding weight loss sustainability and utility per kilogram lost. Side effects and dropout because of reasons other than lack of efficacy were generally not incorporated.. Published economic evaluations indicate that orlistat, sibutramine and rimonabant are within the range of what is generally regarded as cost-effective. Uncertainty remains about weight loss sustainability, utility gain associated with weight loss and extrapolations from transient weight loss to long-term health benefits. Modeling of head-to-head comparisons and attrition is needed, as are analyses conducted independently of manufacturing companies.

Topics: Anti-Obesity Agents; Appetite Depressants; Body Mass Index; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Cyclobutanes; Europe; Humans; Lactones; Obesity; Orlistat; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Rimonabant; Treatment Outcome; United States

It has been long known that the frequency of overweight and obese people is higher among depressed and bipolar patients than in the general population. The marked alteration of body weight (and appetite) is one of the most frequent of the 9 symptoms of major depressive episode, and these symptoms occur during recurrent episodes of depression with a remarkably high consequence. According to studies with representative adult population samples, in case of obesity (BMI over 30) unipolar or bipolar depression is significantly more frequently (20-45%) observable. Since in case of depressed patients appetite and body weight reduction is observable during the acute phase, the more frequent obesity in case of depressed patients is related (primarily) not only to depressive episodes, but rather to lifestyle factors, to diabetes mellitus also more frequently occurring in depressed patients, to comorbid bulimia, and probably to genetic-biological factors (as well as to pharmacotherapy in case of medicated patients). At the same time, according to certain studies, circadian symptoms of depression give rise to such metabolic processes in the body which eventually lead to obesity and insulin resistance. According to studies in unipolar and bipolar patients, 57-68% of patients is overweight or obese, and the rate of metabolic syndrome was found to be between 25-49% in bipolar patients. The rate of metabolic syndrome is further increased by pharmacotherapy. Low total and HDL cholesterol level increases the risk for depression and suicide and recent studies suggest that omega-3-fatty acids possess antidepressive efficacy. Certain lifestyle factors relevant to healthy metabolism (calorie reduction in food intake, regular exercise) may be protective factors related to depression as well. The depression- and possibly suicide-provoking effect of sibutramine and rimonabant used in the pharmacotherapy of obesity is one of the greatest recent challenges for professionals and patients alike.

Topics: Anti-Obesity Agents; Antidepressive Agents; Appetite Depressants; Appetite Regulation; Bipolar Disorder; Circadian Rhythm; Cyclobutanes; Depression; Depressive Disorder, Major; Dietary Carbohydrates; Energy Intake; Ghrelin; Humans; Hypothalamo-Hypophyseal System; Insulin Resistance; Leptin; Obesity; Piperidines; Pituitary-Adrenal System; Pyrazoles; Rimonabant; Seasonal Affective Disorder; Sleep Wake Disorders; Surveys and Questionnaires; Weight Gain; Weight Loss

Diet, exercise and behavioral therapy are the basics for every treatment of obesity. If lifestyle intervention does not result in a weight loss of 5% within 3 to 6 months, an additional pharmacotherapy can be considered. Treated patients should have a BMI >/=30 kg/m(2) or at least a BMI >/=27 kg/m(2) plus accompanying comorbidities, such as type 2 diabetes, dyslipidemia or hypertension. Current guidelines list orlistat, sibutramine and rimonabant as possible options for the pharmacotherapy of obesity. These compounds result in moderate weight reduction and improvement of cardiovascular risk profile. Especially the improvement of glucose metabolism can be considered as clinically relevant. Different side effects of the various compounds need to be considered before their use. Additional options for the pharmacotherapy of obesity are currently developed, their approval, however, is unlikely to happen within the next couple of years.

Topics: Anti-Obesity Agents; Appetite Depressants; Cyclobutanes; Humans; Lactones; Obesity; Orlistat; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Rimonabant; Treatment Outcome

The prevalence of obesity in the developed world is increasing. Approximately 23% of adult Canadians (5.5 million people) are obese. Obesity is associated with an increased risk of developing several comorbid diseases, ranging from cardiovascular diseases to cholelithiasis and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. The etiology of obesity is multifactorial, involving a complex interaction among genetics, hormones and the environment. The available evidence and recommendations for nonpharmacological management of obesity, including dietary therapy, physical activity and behavioural therapy, in addition to pharmacotherapy are discussed. A brief discussion on endoscopic and surgical procedures is undertaken. Several antiobesity treatment options are available and may be indicated in appropriate situations. Selecting obesity therapy may be guided by body mass index measurements, comorbid illnesses and patient preference.

Topics: Anti-Obesity Agents; Bariatric Surgery; Behavior Therapy; Caloric Restriction; Cyclobutanes; Dietary Carbohydrates; Dietary Fats; Exercise; Humans; Lactones; Obesity; Orlistat; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Rimonabant; Weight Loss

The relentless rise in the prevalence of obesity predicts an exponential increase in the incidence of obesity-related complications. Medical and surgical treatments are necessary to prevent and treat obese co-morbidities, thereby avoiding disability and premature death. Interventions for obesity should be evaluated not by weight loss alone but against the new incidence in obesity-related co-morbidities, their remission or improvement. In combination with lifestyle measures, currently available pharmacological therapies -- rimonabant, orlistat and sibutramine -- achieve 5-10% weight loss, although a return to baseline is the norm after cessation of medication. All these agents demonstrate approximately 0.5% reduction in HbA1c in diabetic subjects; orlistat also reduces the new incidence of type 2 diabetes. Modest improvement in lipid profiles and reduced calculated cardiovascular risk is observed, but data on improvement of other co-morbidities are sparse. In contrast, surgical procedures that restrict food ingestion and/or curtail the absorptive surface area of the gut consistently achieve substantial weight loss, typically 20-35%, effect resolution of co-morbid conditions and improve quality of life. Although mortality is low, complications and hospitalisation are not uncommon after bariatric surgery. Intriguingly, surgical patients experience a reduction in appetite and report changes in food preference. Accentuation of the normal gastrointestinal hormonal response to food intake and possible changes in vagal afferent signalling are proposed to induce satiety. Increased understanding of body weight homeostasis and appetite regulation has provided an impressive list of potential targets for drug development, with the promise that single or combination therapy may ultimately challenge the supremacy of bariatric surgery.

Topics: Adipose Tissue; Amyloid; Anticonvulsants; Antidepressive Agents; Anxiety; Appetite Regulation; Bariatric Surgery; Body Mass Index; Bupropion; Cholecystokinin; Ciliary Neurotrophic Factor; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cyclobutanes; Depression; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Fluoxetine; Fructose; Ghrelin; Humans; Intra-Abdominal Fat; Islet Amyloid Polypeptide; Isoxazoles; Lactones; Leptin; Metabolic Syndrome; Metformin; Obesity; Obesity, Morbid; Orlistat; Oxyntomodulin; Peptide YY; Piperidines; Polycystic Ovary Syndrome; Pyrazoles; Rimonabant; Sertraline; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive; Surgical Procedures, Operative; Topiramate; Zonisamide

The unabated rise in the prevalence of obesity is a challenge for global health care systems. Efforts to reverse this trend by dietary or behavioral counseling have not been successful, which has stimulated efforts to find a role for pharmacotherapy. Currently only a small number of antiobesity drugs are approved for long-term use and only a few compounds are in clinical development. Despite recent progress in the understanding of the regulation of energy balance, drug discovery has been less productive than expected. In the present review, the clinically available antiobesity agents are discussed. Examples of drug candidates that are currently in development are given and the possible future range of antiobesity agents is illustrated by the targets being addressed in drug discovery. Finally, the efficacy of antiobesity agents and their value in the treatment of obesity are assessed in comparison with other therapeutic approaches, such as surgery and changes in lifestyle.

Topics: Anti-Obesity Agents; Cyclobutanes; Disease Outbreaks; Drug Design; Drugs, Investigational; Humans; Lactones; Obesity; Orlistat; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Rimonabant

Antiobesity treatment is recommended for selected patients in whom lifestyle modification is unsuccessful. Two antiobesity drugs are currently licensed for long-term use. Orlistat, a gastrointestinal lipase inhibitor, reduces weight by around 3 kg on average and decreases progression to diabetes in high-risk patients; adverse gastrointestinal effects are common. Sibutramine, a monoamine-reuptake inhibitor, results in mean weight losses of 4-5 kg, but is associated with increases in blood pressure and pulse rate. Rimonabant, the first of the endocannabinoid receptor antagonists, reduces weight by 4-5 kg on average and improves waist circumference and concentrations of HDL cholesterol and triglyceride; however, an increased incidence of mood-related disorders has been reported. To date, all antiobesity drug trials have been limited by their high attrition rates and lack of long-term morbidity and mortality data. Other promising antiobesity drugs, including those acting within the central melanocortin pathway, are in development, but are years away from clinical use. In light of the lack of successful weight-loss treatments and the public-health implications of the obesity pandemic, the development of safe and effective drugs should be a priority. However, as new drugs are developed we suggest that the assessment processes should include both surrogate endpoints (ie, weight loss) and clinical outcomes (ie, major obesity-related morbidity and mortality). Only then can patients and their physicians be confident that the putative benefits of such drugs outweigh their risks and costs.

Topics: Anti-Obesity Agents; Blood Pressure; Cholesterol, HDL; Cyclobutanes; Half-Life; Humans; Lactones; Obesity; Orlistat; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rimonabant; Weight Loss

Treatment of obesity continues to rely upon the classical triad of nutritional advise, increase of physical activity and use of drugs. However, in recent years, there have appeared novelties in both therapeutic targets and new molecules. With regard to therapeutic targets of obesity, success does not consist of losing much weight but attaining a moderate yet maintained weight lose (5-10% of initial weight) at the expense of visceral fat. In other words, instead of weight, what is needed is a waist reduction, mainly to improve or prevent obesity-related metabolic and vascular complications. Regarding drugs, a new molecules is about to appear in the international pharmaceutical market: rimonabant. A selective blocker of the endocannabinoid receptor CB1, it has proven to be effective and safe in treating obesity and its comorbidities. Another known agent, orlistat, has proven to be effective in the prevention of the development of type 2 diabetes in obese patients with or without glucose intolerance.

Topics: Anti-Obesity Agents; Cyclobutanes; Humans; Lactones; Obesity; Orlistat; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Rimonabant

Three medications with approval for long-term use in the treatment of obesity are currently available in the United States. Sibutramine (U.S. Food and Drug Administration [FDA] approved in 1997), orlistat (FDA approved in 1999), and rimonabant (available in Europe and given FDA approvable status in 2006 and expected to be marketed in 2007) represent modern approaches to medications used adjunctively for weight management. As demonstrated in large clinical trials of 2 to 4 years' duration, these medications significantly increase weight loss compared with placebo; weight loss with these drugs reaches a nadir between 20 and 28 weeks; weight loss, averaged 8%-10%, with the placebo contributing 4%-6% of that. Weight maintenance is demonstrated as long as adherence to medication continues. All medications have side effects that need to be considered. For sibutramine, there is a rise in blood pressure and heart rate that may require discontinuation of the drug in a small percent of patients. For orlistat, steatorrhea produces the principal gastrointestinal side effects. Rimonabant appears to have a favorable safety and tolerability profile. Nausea and gastrointestinal symptoms are the chief tolerability issue, but they are usually self-limited. In addition there are several drugs and drug combinations in phase 2 or phase 2 trials that will be reported on in the coming years.

Topics: Animals; Anti-Obesity Agents; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Cyclobutanes; Humans; Lactones; Obesity; Orlistat; Overweight; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Rimonabant; Treatment Outcome

Modification of lifestyle is the main therapeutical approach in the treatment of obesity, but use to fail on long terms of time. Addition of anti-obesity drugs allows keeping the weight loss during years and improving obesity-related comorbidities.. This review is an actualisation on efficacy, safety and tolerability of the approved drugs on the long-term treatment of obesity (orlistat and sibutramine). New indications and effects of their use far beyond the weight loss are as well commented. Finally, potential benefits of the administration of CB1 antagonist rimonabant on the weight loss and cardiometabolic risk factors are analysed in detail.. A decade of experience on the use of orlistat and sibutramine has demonstrated their higher efficacy on the weight loss when compared to placebo either on adult or teenage population as well as safety and tolerability on long-term administration. Beneficial effects on the lipid profile, glycosilated haemoglobin on diabetic patients, blood pressure and levels of inflammatory cytokines, contribute to decrease the cardiovascular risk on obese patients. Phase III clinical trials using rimonabant show additional benefits to the expected weight loss, mainly reducing visceral fat and cardiometabolic risk factors.. Pharmacological treatment of obesity must be considered as a therapeutical tool that has to be used together with long-term lifestyle changes, contributing to the body weight reduction as well as to the improvement of the cardiometabolic risk related to obesity.

Topics: Anti-Obesity Agents; Cyclobutanes; Humans; Lactones; Life Style; Obesity; Orlistat; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Rimonabant; Safety; Treatment Outcome; Weight Loss

This review summarizes data on currently used antiobesity drugs and new compounds under clinical development. Three antiobesity drugs are currently accepted for long-term use. Sibutramine is a noradrenaline and serotonin reuptake inhibitor which reduces body weight by about 4-5 kg but increases heart rate and arterial blood pressure. Orlistat is a gastrointestinal lipase inhibitor which results in mean weight loss by about 3 kg and reduces the incidence of type 2 diabetes in patients with impaired glucose tolerance; however, adverse gastrointestinal effects have been observed. Rimonabant is an endocannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist which induces a 4-5 kg mean weight loss and improves glycemic and lipid profiles, but it induces anxiety and depressive disorders. Unfortunately, there are no data on the chronic administration of these drugs. Other drugs can induce weight loss, e.g. some antidepressants, antiseizure agents, and antidiabetic drugs. The moderate efficacy of currently used antiobesity drugs has led to an intense effort to identify new, safe antiobesity drugs with better therapeutic profiles. The new antiobesity drugs under clinical development include: 1) agents that affect neurotransmitters in the central nervous system, including noradrenaline and dopamine reuptake inhibitors (bupropion, radafaxine), selective 5HT2C receptor agonists (lorcaserin), and selective 5HT6 receptor antagonists, 2) agents that modulate the activity of neuropeptides influencing food intake, including leptin analogues, human ciliary neurotrophic factor (Axokine), neuropeptide Y antagonists, and melanine-concentrating hormone antagonists, 3) agents that affect the peripheral satiety signals and brain-gut axis, e.g. selective cholecystokinin receptor A agonists, PYY3-36, agents decreasing ghrelin activity, 4) thermogenic agents, e.g. selective beta3 receptor agonists and selective thyroid hormone receptor beta agonists, and 5) others, e.g. human growth hormone fragment (AOD9604) and gastrointestinal lipase inhibitor (cetilistat).

Topics: Anti-Obesity Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cyclobutanes; Humans; Lactones; Neurotransmitter Agents; Obesity; Orlistat; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Rimonabant; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-Obesity Agents; Appetite Depressants; Bariatric Surgery; Body Mass Index; Cyclobutanes; Diagnosis, Differential; Enzyme Inhibitors; Humans; Lactones; Male; Middle Aged; Obesity; Obesity, Morbid; Orlistat; Overweight; Piperidines; Prognosis; Pyrazoles; Rimonabant; Time Factors; Weight Loss

The obesity pandemic will likely have a significant impact on the global incidence of cardiovascular disease. Although the mechanisms linking obesity and cardiovascular disease are unclear, recent studies have implicated the adipocyte as a potentially important mediator of vascular complications. The adipocyte is no longer considered a passive storage depot for triglycerides and fatty acids, but rather an active metabolic organ capable of producing several factors, commonly referred to as adipokines, that may have effects on many physiological and pathophysiological processes. With increasing fat mass, several adipose-related factors are upregulated that may affect local and distant inflammatory processes, including atherothrombosis. Other factors, such as adiponectin, are downregulated with increasing fat mass. Although most adipokines are thought to promote vascular disease, several studies over the past few years indicate adiponectin is actually protective against both diabetes and vascular disease. There are now available pharmacologic agents capable of altering the adipocyte transcription profile. This review will focus on the potential impact of adipocyte-derived factors towards vascular disease and emerging therapeutic strategies that may alter these effects.

Topics: Adiponectin; Anti-Obesity Agents; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cyclobutanes; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hyperlipidemias; Hypertension; Lactones; Obesity; Orlistat; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Rimonabant; Risk Factors

Obesity is a chronic metabolic disorder that affects one third of American adults. Modest weight losses of just 5% to 10% of body weight, which are achievable with lifestyle modification and pharmacotherapy, can lead to remarkable improvements in many obesity-associated co-morbidities, including dyslipidemia, hypertension, and type 2 diabetes. In this review, the indications for pharmacotherapy and the goals of treatment are discussed, and current and future pharmacologic approaches to the treatment of obesity are examined. Current pharmacologic therapies for obesity are limited, but recent advances in our understanding of the complex and overlapping endocrine pathways that regulate body weight have led to new opportunities for antiobesity drug development. Important drug targets that are highlighted in this review include adipocyte-derived hormones, hypothalamic neuropeptides, and gastrointestinal hormones.

Topics: Amyloid; Anti-Obesity Agents; Appetite Depressants; Body Weight; Chronic Disease; Comorbidity; Cyclobutanes; Exenatide; Gastrointestinal Hormones; Humans; Islet Amyloid Polypeptide; Lactones; Leptin; Metformin; Obesity; Orlistat; Peptides; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rimonabant; Venoms

Acceptable adverse effects and a clinical relevant weight loss of 3 to 5 kilograms have been found in long-term randomized clinical trials for sibutramine (Reductil) and orlistat (Xenical); these drugs may be prescribed for treatment of obesity for a duration of one and four years, respectively. This also seems to be the case for rimonabant (Acomplia), which is expected to receive approval in 2005 or 2006. However, until data on morbidity and mortality are available from RCTs, there is no absolute indication for prescribing drugs for treatment of obesity.

Topics: Anti-Obesity Agents; Appetite Depressants; Cyclobutanes; Diethylpropion; Enzyme Inhibitors; Humans; Lactones; Obesity; Orlistat; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rimonabant; Time Factors; Weight Loss

Obesity is strongly associated with conditions such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus and osteoarthritis that have known adverse health outcomes. The rising prevalence of obesity threatens to overburden our health care system. As a result, the need for safe and effective treatment options is urgent. Unfortunately, pharmacologic treatment options have been disappointing either because of poor side effect profiles or limited long-term efficacy. Our goal is to review currently available pharmacologic treatments and the data supporting their use so that practicing physicians may better incorporate them into a comprehensive, long-term treatment strategy for their patients. We focus on orlistat and sibutramine as these are the two medicines approved by the FDA for long-term treatment of obesity. In addition, we review briefly agents approved for short-term use as well as agents such as zonisamide and topiramate which have shown some promise as weight loss agents in specific clinical circumstances. Finally, we highlight one medicine currently in phase III clinical trials, an endocannabinoid receptor antagonist. Given the overwhelming research focus on this disease, it is likely that the coming years will bring more treatment options, raising the chance that our patients will have meaningful and sustained weight loss.

Topics: Anti-Obesity Agents; Appetite Depressants; Cyclobutanes; Fructose; Humans; Isoxazoles; Lactones; Obesity; Orlistat; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Rimonabant; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors; Topiramate; Zonisamide

Currently, the substances orlistat and sibutramine are approved drugs for the pharmacotherapy of obesity. Used in combination with increased exercise and dietary measures, both are capable of significantly reducing weight. In the USA and Europe, official approval for the selective cannabinoid receptor antagonist, rimonabant has been applied for.

Topics: Anti-Obesity Agents; Appetite Depressants; Cannabinoid Receptor Antagonists; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cyclobutanes; Enzyme Inhibitors; Exercise; Humans; Lactones; Lipase; Obesity; Orlistat; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Rimonabant; Time Factors; Weight Loss

Obesity has reached global epidemic proportions because of an increasingly obesogenic environment. This review examines the association between obesity, and in particular visceral fat, as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease and mortality.. The World Health Organization defines obesity based on the body mass index. Recently the waist-to-hip ratio has been shown to be a significantly stronger predictor of cardiovascular events than body mass index. The metabolic syndrome and its evolving definition represent a cluster of metabolic risk factors which help predict cardiovascular disease and mortality. Although insulin resistance plays a central role in the pathophysiology of the metabolic syndrome, there is limited support for therapy with insulin sensitizers, thiazolidinediones, in patients with coronary artery disease. The current anti-obesity drugs, orlistat and sibutramine, have only a modest effect on weight loss. The blockade of the endocannabinoid system with rimonabant, however, may be a promising new strategy.. Obesity is associated with significant increase in cardiovascular risk. Lifestyle modification remains the cornerstone of management although anti-obesity medications may be indicated in high risk individuals with comorbid disease.

Topics: Appetite Depressants; Body Fat Distribution; Body Mass Index; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cyclobutanes; Humans; Inflammation; Insulin Resistance; Intra-Abdominal Fat; Lactones; Life Style; Lipid Metabolism; Metabolic Syndrome; Obesity; Orlistat; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Rimonabant; Thiazolidinediones; Waist-Hip Ratio

This review offers an overview of physiological agents, current therapeutics, as well as medications, which have been extensively used and those agents not currently available or non-classically considered anti-obesity drugs. As obesity - particularly that of central distribution - represents an important triggering factor for insulin resistance, its pharmacological treatment is relevant in the context of metabolic syndrome control. The authors present an extensive review on the criteria for anti-obesity management efficacy, on physiological mechanisms that regulate central and/or peripheral energy homeostasis (nutrients, monoamines, and peptides), on beta-phenethylamine pharmacological derivative agents (fenfluramine, dexfenfluramine, phentermine and sibutramine), tricyclic derivatives (mazindol), phenylpropanolamine derivatives (ephedrin, phenylpropanolamine), phenylpropanolamine oxytrifluorphenyl derivative (fluoxetine), a naftilamine derivative (sertraline) and a lipstatine derivative (orlistat). An analysis of all clinical trials - over ten-week long - is also presented for medications used in the management of obesity, as well as data about future medications, such as a the inverse cannabinoid agonist, rimonabant.

Topics: Amphetamines; Anti-Obesity Agents; Appetite Depressants; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cyclobutanes; Energy Metabolism; Homeostasis; Humans; Lactones; Mazindol; Obesity; Orlistat; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Rimonabant; Weight Loss

The global obesity epidemic is causing much concern among health professionals due to the major health risks associated with obesity. Excess weight, particularly abdominal obesity, elevates multiple cardiovascular and metabolic risk factors, including Type 2 diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidaemia and cardiovascular disease. Thus obesity management goals should encompass health improvement and cardiometabolic risk reduction as well as weight loss. While lifestyle and diet modification form the basis of all effective strategies for weight reduction, some individuals may need additional intervention. About one in four people with BMI >27 kg/m(2) (those who have weight-related morbidity and who have been unsuccessful losing weight in standard ways) may require adjunctive therapy such as pharmacotherapy, very low energy diets/meal replacements, or bariatric surgery. This review focuses on appropriate use of pharmacotherapy for obesity and cardiometabolic risk. Sibutramine and orlistat are currently available for use in Australia. Rimonabant has been approved for use in the European Union, and is being considered for regulatory approval in the USA and Australia. The efficacy and safety of these three agents are examined. In addition, several novel pharmacotherapy agents in development are discussed.

Topics: Anti-Obesity Agents; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cyclobutanes; Humans; Lactones; Obesity; Orlistat; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Rimonabant; Risk Factors; Safety; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Anti-Obesity Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cyclobutanes; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Lactones; Obesity; Orlistat; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Rimonabant; Weight Loss

Obesity has become a significant health problem in industrialised and developing countries, and despite all nutritional and behavioural approaches, its prevalence is still increasing. In recent years, the identification and characterisation of central and peripheral mechanisms involved in the regulation of energy balance has made remarkable progress and provided numerous targets for novel anti-obesity agents. However, only few anti-obesity drugs are on the market and not many compounds have entered clinical development. In the present review, the clinically available agents are discussed and their pharmacological profiles are compared. Some of the drugs that are currently in clinical development are mentioned as examples of the possible future range of anti-obesity agents. Selected topics in drug discovery are presented to illustrate novel targets and concepts for the pharmacotherapy of obesity.

Topics: Anti-Obesity Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cyclobutanes; Drug Design; Energy Metabolism; Homeostasis; Humans; Lactones; Life Style; Models, Biological; Obesity; Orlistat; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Rimonabant; Technology, Pharmaceutical

The primary goal of managing patients with metabolic syndrome is to decrease their cardiovascular risk by individualizing treatment strategies according to the patient's specific risk factors. Treatment options for patients with metabolic syndrome include lifestyle modification and drug therapy. Lifestyle modification can be summarized as dietary changes, exercise, and smoking cessation. Drug therapy indicated for cardiometabolic risk reduction includes antihypertensives, insulin sensitizers, and cholesterol-lowering agents. In addition, two drugs-sibutramine and rimonabant-have been evaluated and produced promising outcomes in the overall management of high-risk patients with metabolic syndrome.

Topics: Appetite Depressants; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cyclobutanes; Exercise; Humans; Metabolic Syndrome; Obesity; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB1; Rimonabant; Risk Factors; Weight Loss

Long-term success in obesity therapy is difficult to obtain, therefore drug therapy appears to be helpful. Until today, end-point studies for obesity drugs beyond the improvement of individual surrogate parameters are still missing. For all available drugs, medical treatment can be recommended only for a limited period of time due to the data of the studies and under consideration of side effects. Although a weight reduction leads to an improvement of cardiovascular risk factors and hence a reduction of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality should be expected, no study could prove it so far. Despite the positive influence on individual surrogate parameters, the use of the present available therapies appears underwhelming. In this overview the approved substances and perspectives of new therapeutic concepts are represented.

Topics: Anti-Obesity Agents; Anticonvulsants; Cyclobutanes; Fructose; Humans; Lactones; Obesity; Orlistat; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Rimonabant; Topiramate

The increase in obesity prevalence is problematic as this condition is associated with health complications such as diabetes and cardiovascular diseases, more particularly when the excess body fat is stored in the deep abdominal region. The mainstay of therapy consists of behavior modification related to obesity such as overeating and physical inactivity. When these lifestyle modifying attempts fail, the use of anti-obesity drugs is warranted. Drug treatment is often indicated but is somewhat limited by the minimal number of well tolerated drugs that have proven to have long-term efficacy in maintaining body weight loss. The currently available drugs, sibutramine and orlistat, appear modestly effective in promoting weight loss. Ongoing studies continue to evaluate other drug treatments that may result in body weight reduction through a number of different mechanisms. Thus, the aim of this review is to present an overview of the current drugs available (particularly sibutramine and orlistat) as well as potential future candidates, and the impact of these agents on obesity and cardiovascular physiology. Furthermore, the therapeutic paradox of sibutramine in preventing obesity will be discussed as well as the beneficial impact of physical exercise on cardiac economy.

Topics: Animals; Anti-Obesity Agents; Appetite Depressants; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cardiovascular Physiological Phenomena; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cyclobutanes; Humans; Lactones; Obesity; Orlistat; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Rimonabant; Risk Factors

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death of men and women in the United States. The accumulation of visceral adipose tissue, as opposed to subcutaneous fat, increases the risk of developing CVD and metabolic disease. Because visceral adipose tissue uniquely contributes to the pathophysiology of CVD and insulin resistance, waist circumference is now being considered as a more useful marker of potential health risks associated with overweight and obesity than body mass index. Weight loss, particularly a reduction in waist circumference, improves insulin sensitivity, lipid profile, and serum adipocytokines, thereby reducing the risk of developing chronic disease and CVD.

Topics: Anti-Obesity Agents; Coronary Disease; Cyclobutanes; Exercise; Feeding Behavior; Humans; Intra-Abdominal Fat; Lactones; Metabolic Syndrome; Obesity; Orlistat; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Rimonabant

The current obesity pandemic imposes a major global disease burden. Levels of non-communicable diseases such as type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease and some cancers will continue to rise unless an effective approach to treat obesity is found. Sustained weight loss of between 5-10% in the obese, by various means, confers marked health benefits. The currently available pharmacotherapies, orlistat and sibutramine, can induce weight loss of between 5-10% over 2 years or more. In trials, orlistat and sibutramine induced weight loss tends to be only between 2-4 kg greater than that produced by placebo control. However, this additional placebo subtracted weight loss produces marked additional improvements in diabetes and cardiovascular risk factors. Moreover, in the 4 year long XENDOS trial, the modest placebo subtracted weight loss produced by orlistat (2.8 kg) reduced the incidence of diabetes by over a third in those with normal glucose tolerance, and by nearly half in those with impaired glucose tolerance. Despite this, prescription sales of sibutramine in the US have apparently remained static and those of orlistat have fallen, with the drug now entering the global over-the-counter medication market. Recent data on potential anti-obesity drugs currently under going phase III trials, such as Rimonabant and Topiramate, demonstrate these drugs produce greater and more prolonged weight loss. Wider use of pharmacotherapy and enhanced efficacy for the next generation of anti-obesity drugs certainly promise to reduce obesity related illness if not halt the rise in obesity per se.

Topics: Anti-Obesity Agents; Appetite Depressants; Cyclobutanes; Energy Metabolism; Feeding Behavior; Fructose; Humans; Lactones; Obesity; Orlistat; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rimonabant; Topiramate

There has been substantial development of pharmacological treatments for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) recently. The greatest change is the approval of new delivery systems for methylphenidate (MPH) and amphetamine (AMP) that permit once a day dosing. There are also a number of new compounds under development for the disorder, including several non-stimulant agents. These compounds target the noradrenergic, histaminergic and dopaminergic systems. The recent developments in the pharmacological treatment of ADHD should increase therapeutic options and the percentage of individuals with the disorder who can be effectively treated.

Topics: Animals; Antidepressive Agents; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Benzhydryl Compounds; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cyclobutanes; Donepezil; Histamine Agonists; Humans; Indans; Modafinil; Nootropic Agents; Piperidines; Propylamines

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Advisory Committees; Aged; Anti-Obesity Agents; Bariatric Medicine; Body Mass Index; Child; Congresses as Topic; Cyclobutanes; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Approval; Drug Discovery; Female; History, 20th Century; History, 21st Century; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Obesity; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Piperidines; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pyrazoles; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Reference Standards; Rimonabant; Safety-Based Drug Withdrawals; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration

Acomplia was ordered over the internet resulting in the delivery of counterfeit Acomplia and imitation products. The tablets were analyzed for the presence of rimonabant. Using LC-DAD-MSn the presence of effective quantities of rimonabant was confirmed in samples A-D. Samples A and D also contained traces of the rimonabant analogue NIDA-41020. Furthermore, NIR spectroscopy on the tablets indicated the presence of an unapproved rimonabant polymorph in samples C and D which was confirmed by Raman spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction (XRD). In sample E a low dose of sibutramine was found as well traces of N-desmethylsibutramine and bis-N-desmethylsibutramine. Rimonabant was withdrawn from the market because of serious adverse events and lack of efficacy. The availability of poor quality products with rimonabant, impurities and unapproved polymorphs is worrying. Suspect weight-loss medicines should be screened for the presence of novel analogues.

Topics: Chemistry, Pharmaceutical; Chromatography, Liquid; Cyclobutanes; Drug Contamination; Fraud; Internet; Models, Chemical; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB1; Rimonabant; Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared; Spectrum Analysis, Raman; X-Ray Diffraction

In eight studies included in the present Cochrane review the effects of orlistat or sibutramine versus placebo on mortality, cardiovascular mortality and adverse events were investigated in obese people with hypertension. No studies with rimonabant fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The weight loss was larger in the groups treated with orlistat or sibutramine compared with placebo therapy. Orlistat reduced systolic and diastolic blood pressure more than placebo, while blood pressure increased during treatment with sibutramine. The studies were too small and of too short duration to allow an evaluation of the effect on cardiovascular mortality and morbidity.

Topics: Adult; Anti-Obesity Agents; Appetite Depressants; Blood Pressure; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cyclobutanes; Evidence-Based Medicine; Humans; Hypertension; Lactones; Obesity; Orlistat; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rimonabant; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Weight Loss

The aim of the present study was to investigate to what extent patients using prescription antiobesity drugs (orlistat, sibutramine and rimonabant) concomitantly or concurrently used psychotropic drugs and analgesics and the association between this drug use and the patients' gender and age. An additional aim was to investigate the sequence of drug therapy among users of both antiobesity drugs and antidepressants or antipsychotics, respectively.. Data were retrieved from the Norwegian Prescription Database (NorPD). All patients who had an antiobesity drug (ATC code A08A) dispensed from a Norwegian pharmacy between January 2004 and December 2007 were included in the study.. One in four patients using antiobesity drugs had at least on one occasion used a psychotropic drug concomitantly. The most commonly used psychotropic drugs were anxiolytics/hypnotics/sedatives (17.7%) and antidepressants (14.7%). Analgesics were used by 36.2%. A significantly higher percentage of women used anxiolytics/hypnotics/sedatives (18.8% vs. 14.0%, p < 0.0005), antidepressants (16.1% vs. 9.5%, p < 0.0005), antipsychotics (4.0% vs. 2.9%, p < 0.0005) and analgesics (37.8% vs. 30.5%, p < 0.0005) concomitantly with antiobesity drugs when compared to men. One out of ten patients using sibutramine had at least on one occasion used an interacting drug concomitantly.. Use of psychotropic drugs and analgesics among patients using antiobesity drugs is extensive, especially among women. Clinicians prescribing sibutramine should be more aware of drug interactions with other prescribed drugs. There is still insufficient information on psychiatric disorders among these patients.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Analgesics; Anti-Obesity Agents; Child; Cyclobutanes; Databases, Factual; Drug Interactions; Female; Humans; Lactones; Male; Middle Aged; Norway; Orlistat; Piperidines; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Psychotropic Drugs; Pyrazoles; Rimonabant; Sex Factors; Young Adult

In view of its potential advantages, drug polytherapy is currently attracting significant interest in the field of obesity research. In this context, concurrent manipulation of serotonergic and cannabinoid pathways in rodents has been found to reduce food and fluid intake in both an additive or synergistic manner. To further assess the value of this polytherapeutic approach, the current study examined the acute effects of low-dose combinations of the cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist/inverse agonist rimonabant (0.5 mg/kg) and the dual serotonin- and noradrenaline-reuptake inhibitor sibutramine (0.125 and 0.25 mg/kg) in male rats. Ethological analysis was used to generate comprehensive behavioural profiles, including the behavioural satiety sequence (BSS). Findings confirmed that, although neither drug given alone significantly altered food intake, feeding behaviour or weight gain, rimonabant per se tended to reduce consumption and time spent feeding while significantly increasing scratching and grooming responses. However, none of these effects of the CB1 receptor antagonist/inverse agonist was significantly altered by the presence of either dose of sibutramine. In striking contrast to recent reports of acute low-dose interactions (enhanced appetite suppression and reduced side-effects) between rimonabant and naloxone, present results would not appear to support the clinical potential of rimonabant/sibutramine polytherapy for obesity.

Topics: Animals; Appetite; Cyclobutanes; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Male; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Rats; Reaction Time; Rimonabant; Satiety Response; Weight Gain

Tesofensine, a novel triple monoamine reuptake inhibitor, produces a significant weight loss in humans. The present study aimed at characterizing the weight-reducing effects of tesofensine in a rat model of diet-induced obesity. Sibutramine and rimonabant were used as reference comparators. Compared to baseline, long-term treatment with tesofensine (28 days, 1.0 or 2.5mg/kg, p.o.) resulted in a significant, dose-dependent and sustained weight loss of 5.7 and 9.9%, respectively. Sibutramine (7.5mg/kg, p.o.) treatment caused a sustained weight loss of 7.6%, whereas the employed dose of rimonabant (10mg/kg, p.o.) only produced a transient weight reduction. While all compounds exhibited a significant inhibitory effect on food intake which gradually wore off, the hypophagic effect of tesofensine was longer lasting than sibutramine and rimonabant. In contrast to tesofensine, the body weight of pair-fed rats returned to baseline at the end of the study, which may indicate that tesofensine stimulated energy expenditure. The differential efficacy on weight reduction was also reflected in lowered body fat depots, as tesofensine and sibutramine most efficiently reduced abdominal and subcutaneous fat mass which was paralleled by reduced plasma lipid levels. In an oral glucose tolerance test, only tesofensine significantly suppressed the plasma insulin response below the level that could be obtained by paired feeding, indicating that tesofensine further improved glycemic control. In conclusion, the robust weight loss with long-term tesofensine treatment is likely due to a combined synergistic effect of appetite suppression and increased energy expenditure.

Topics: Adipose Tissue; Animals; Appetite; Biogenic Monoamines; Blood Glucose; Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic; Cyclobutanes; Diet; Eating; Glucose Tolerance Test; Lipids; Male; Neurotransmitter Uptake Inhibitors; Obesity; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Rats; Rimonabant; Time Factors; Weight Loss

The objective of the study was to evaluate whether sibutramine and rimonabant, drugs that decrease food intake in human and non-human animals, affect the discriminative stimulus effects associated with acute food deprivation ("hunger").. Rats were trained to discriminate between 22- and 2-h food deprivation in a two-lever choice procedure. After rats acquired the discrimination, subjects were food-restricted for 22 h and administered with sibutramine (0.32-10 mg/kg, p.o.) or rimonabant (0.32-10 mg/kg, s.c.) before a generalization test session.. Sibutramine (3.2 mg/kg) produced significant decreases in 22-h deprivation-appropriate responding, response rates (resulting in lever pressing rates similar to those following 2-h food deprivation), and food intake measured 1 h after the generalization test. A larger sibutramine dose eliminated responding and significantly reduced food intake. Rimonabant did not alter the discriminative stimulus effects of 22-h food deprivation, but rimonabant did significantly reduce both response rates and food intake.. Sibutramine appears to decrease food intake by reducing hunger sensations associated with food deprivation. In contrast, rimonabant does not alter the discrimination of acute food deprivation. The use of food-deprivation discrimination techniques may be useful in identifying the role of specific neuroactive compounds in eating stimulated by a sense of hunger and may aid in medication development for more effective treatments for obesity and other eating-related conditions.

Topics: Animals; Appetite Depressants; Cyclobutanes; Discrimination Learning; Discrimination, Psychological; Eating; Food Deprivation; Male; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Rimonabant; Time Factors

The present study was undertaken to develop an animal model exploiting food cue-induced increased motivation to obtain food under operant self-administration conditions. To demonstrate the predictive validity of the model, rimonabant, fluoxetine, sibutramine and topiramate, administered 1 hour before the experiment, were tested. For 5 days, female Wistar rats were trained to self-administer standard 45 mg food pellets in one daily session (30 minutes) under FR1 (fixed ratio 1) schedule of reinforcement. Rats were then trained to an FR3 schedule and finally divided into two groups. The first group (control) was subjected to a standard 30 minutes FR3 food self-administration session. The second group was exposed to five presentations of levers and light for 10 seconds each (every 3 minutes in 15 minutes total). At the completion of this pre-session phase, a normal 30-minute session (as in the control group) started. Results showed that pre-exposure to environmental stimuli associated to food deliveries increased response for food when the session started. Corticosterone and adrenocorticotropic hormone plasma levels, measured after the 15-minute pre-exposure, were also significantly increased. No changes were observed for the other measured hormones (growth hormone, prolactin, thyroid-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, insulin, amylin, gastric inhibitor polypeptide, ghrelin, leptin, peptide YY and pancreatic polypeptide). Rimonabant, sibutramine and fluoxetine significantly reduced food intake in both animals pre-exposed and in those not pre-exposed to food-associated cues. Topiramate selectively reduced feeding only in pre-exposed rats. The present study describes the development of a new animal model to investigate cue-induced increased motivation to obtain food. This model shows face and predictive validity, thus, supporting its usefulness in the investigation of new potential treatments of binge-related eating disorders. In addition, the present findings confirm that topiramate may represent an important pharmacotherapeutic approach to binge-related eating.

Topics: Adrenocorticotropic Hormone; Animals; Anti-Obesity Agents; Appetite Depressants; Cannabinoids; Conditioning, Operant; Corticosterone; Cues; Cyclobutanes; Environment; Feeding Behavior; Female; Fluoxetine; Fructose; Humans; Hypothalamo-Hypophyseal System; Motivation; Piperidines; Pituitary-Adrenal System; Pyrazoles; Rats; Reproducibility of Results; Rimonabant; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors; Topiramate

Obesity is reaching epidemic proportions worldwide and it is correlated with various comorbidities, among which the most relevant are diabetes mellitus, arterial hypertension, and cardiovascular diseases. Obesity management is a modern challenge because of the rapid evolution of unfavorable lifestyles and unfortunately there are no effective treatments applicable to the large majority of obese/overweight people. The current medical attitude is to treat the complications of obesity (e.g. dyslipidemia, hypertension, diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases). However, the potential of treating obesity is enormous, bearing in mind that a volitional weight loss of 10 kg is associated with important risk factor improvement: blood pressure -10 mmHg, total cholesterol -10%, LDL cholesterol -15%, triglycerides -30%, fasting glucose -50%, HDL cholesterol +8%. Drug treatment for obesity is an evolving branch of pharmacology, burdened by severe side effects and consequences of the early drugs, withdrawn from the market, and challenged by the lack of long-term data on the effect of medications on obesity-related morbidity and mortality, first of all cardiovascular diseases. In Europe three antiobesity drugs are currently licensed: sibutramine, orlistat, and rimonabant; important trials with clinical endpoints are ongoing for sibutramine and rimonabant. While waiting for their results, it is convenient to evaluate these drugs for their effects on body weight and cardiometabolic risk factors. Sibutramine is a centrally acting serotonin/noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor that mainly increases satiety. At the level of brown adipose tissue, sibutramine can also facilitate energy expenditure by increasing thermogenesis. The long-term studies (five) documented a mean differential weight reduction of 4.45 kg for sibutramine vs placebo. Considering the principal studies, attrition rate was 43%. This drug not only reduces body weight and waist circumference, but it decreases triglycerides and uric acid as well and it increases HDL cholesterol; in diabetics it improves glycated hemoglobin. Sibutramine has conflicting effects on blood pressure: in some studies there was a minimal decrease, in some others a modest increase. In all the studies this drug increased pulse rate. Sibutramine is not recommended in patients with uncontrolled hypertension, or in case of history of cardio- and cerebrovascular disease. Orlistat is a pancreatic lipase inhibitor that reduces fat absorption by parti

Topics: Anti-Obesity Agents; Appetite Depressants; Body Mass Index; Bradykinin; Cannabinoid Receptor Antagonists; Cannabinoids; Cyclobutanes; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Economics, Pharmaceutical; Humans; Lactones; Lipase; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Obesity; Orlistat; Piperidines; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pyrazoles; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rimonabant; Risk Factors; Time Factors; Weight Loss

Overweight and obesity are major factors contributing to the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) and cardiovascular disease (CVD). In addition to the many physical and metabolic consequences of obesity, there are also mental health consequences, in particular, the risk for depression. Depression can lead to poor self-care, poor treatment compliance, and possible increased morbidity and mortality from such illnesses as type 2 DM and CVD. Lifestyle modification for the treatment of overweight and obesity is rarely successful over the long term, and use of surgery is limited by eligibility criteria; therefore, researchers and clinicians continue to explore pharmacotherapy, with intense efforts being directed toward the development of agents that, optimally, will reduce weight and simultaneously reduce or eliminate modifiable cardiovascular and metabolic risk factors. Among the promising new agents are the CB(1) receptor antagonists. These agents target receptors of the endocannabinoid system, a neuromodulatory system recently found to influence energy balance, eating behavior, and metabolic homeostasis via central and peripheral mechanisms. In animal and clinical studies, antagonism of CB(1) receptors has resulted in meaningful weight loss and improvement of lipid and glycemic profiles. Thus, these agents may provide a rational and effective approach for the management of not only overweight and obesity but also their metabolic and cardiovascular sequelae.

Topics: Amides; Anti-Obesity Agents; Cannabinoid Receptor Modulators; Cyclobutanes; Depression; Endocannabinoids; Humans; Lactones; Life Style; Metabolic Syndrome; Obesity; Orlistat; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Rimonabant; Risk

Topics: Acetylcholine; Administration, Oral; Analysis of Variance; Animals; Appetite Depressants; Cyclobutanes; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Male; Microdialysis; Nucleus Accumbens; Piperidines; Prefrontal Cortex; Pyrazoles; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Rimonabant

Topics: Anti-Obesity Agents; Appetite Depressants; Cyclobutanes; Depression; Drug Therapy, Combination; Evidence-Based Medicine; Humans; Lactones; Obesity, Morbid; Orlistat; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rimonabant; Suicide; Weight Loss

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Appetite Depressants; Body Mass Index; Cardiovascular Diseases; Child; Cyclobutanes; Female; Humans; Life Style; Male; Middle Aged; Obesity; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rimonabant; Risk Factors; Surveys and Questionnaires; Weight Loss

Topics: Anti-Obesity Agents; Appetite Depressants; Cannabinoids; Cyclobutanes; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Lactones; Male; Middle Aged; Obesity; Orlistat; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Rimonabant

Topics: Anti-Obesity Agents; Appetite Depressants; Cannabinoid Receptor Antagonists; Cyclobutanes; Dyslipidemias; Humans; Obesity; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Rimonabant; Weight Loss

The selective CB(1) receptor antagonist, SR 141716, has been demonstrated to reduce food consumption in a range of animal species.. To assess the effect of chronic administration of SR 141716 on body weight and ingestive behaviour of lean and obese (fa/fa) Zucker rats.. Lean and obese Zucker rats were orally dosed with SR 141716 (3, 10, 30 mg/kg PO), sibutramine (5 mg/kg PO) or vehicle for one week. Pair-fed controls provided insight as to whether the effect of SR 141716 on body weight was attributable to drug-induced hypophagia. Subsequently, the effect of chronic oral administration of SR 141716 (1, 3, 10 mg/kg) was assessed for 28 days. At the end of this period, all animals were given vehicle for 14 days. The incidence of wet-dog shakes, yawning, scratching, and grooming behaviours, was assessed after acute administration and at weekly intervals thereafter for 4 weeks.. SR 141716 dose-dependently decreased food intake and body weight gain in both lean and obese animals. The inhibition of food intake and body weight gain was greater in obese Zuckers than in lean Zucker controls. Changes in the body weights of pair-fed controls closely paralleled those of their drug-treated counterparts. Chronic 28-day treatment led to a maintained reduction of body weight gain. Withdrawal of SR 141716 on day 28 resulted in rebound hyperphagia and a significant weight gain. On acute administration, SR 141716 dose-dependently induced motor behaviours that showed tolerance upon repeated administration.. These data indicate that chronic oral treatment with SR 141716 significantly reduces the food intake and body weight gain of obese and lean Zucker rats, an effect that is greater in obese animals and reversible upon drug withdrawal.

Topics: Animals; Appetite Depressants; Cannabinoids; Cyclobutanes; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Eating; Energy Metabolism; Male; Motor Activity; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Rats; Rats, Zucker; Receptors, Cannabinoid; Receptors, Drug; Rimonabant; Time Factors; Weight Gain

Topics: Animals; Anti-Obesity Agents; Ciliary Neurotrophic Factor; Cyclobutanes; Drug Evaluation; Drugs, Investigational; Humans; Lactones; Obesity; Orlistat; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Recombinant Proteins; Rimonabant; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration