piperidines and niraparib

The standard of care for newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer is surgical cytoreduction plus platinum-based chemotherapy; however, recurrent disease frequently occurs after treatment. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors as first-line maintenance therapy have been demonstrated to significantly reduce the risk of disease progression or death in patients with advanced ovarian cancer who have a complete or partial response to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Niraparib is the only PARP inhibitor that offers a significant progression-free survival benefit compared with placebo in this patient population regardless of the homologous recombination status. However, predictive factors for treatment responses and approaches to dose optimization remain to be investigated. In this study, two Chinese patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer exhibited long-term responses to niraparib treatment, and hematological toxicity was successfully managed by dose adjustment. The literature on clinical trials and real-world experience on the efficacy, tolerability, and dose individualization of niraparib treatment in Western and Chinese patients was also reviewed. Future research is warranted to identify the characteristics of 'long responders' to niraparib treatment.

Topics: Asian People; Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines

PARP inhibitors are effective in different types of tumors such as ovarian, breast, prostate and pancreatic cancer. Many studies are in progress and may lead to prescription evolution. PARP inhibitors prescription is almost reserved to patients with a constitutional BRCA mutation or a somatic BRCA alteration or a tumor with a deficiency in homologous recombination. Nowadays, the diagnosis of homologous recombination deficit, HRD, is possible with the prescription of a myChoice CDx (Myriad) test. PARP inhibitors are studied in association with chemotherapy and targeted therapies but also with radiotherapy and with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Access to PARP inhibitors is challenged with the emergence of resistance mechanism. Various trials are now studying the possibility of reversing these resistance mechanisms.

Topics: Breast Neoplasms; DNA Damage; DNA Repair-Deficiency Disorders; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Female; Genes, BRCA1; Genes, BRCA2; Homologous Recombination; Humans; Indazoles; Indoles; Male; Ovarian Neoplasms; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Prostatic Neoplasms; Recombinational DNA Repair

New molecular therapeutic approaches have emerged in recent years for advanced gynaecological cancers, including targeted therapies such as poly-ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi). These have demonstrated efficacy in high-grade serous ovarian cancers in patients carrying a mutation in the BRCA gene, which predisposes them to breast and ovarian cancers. Clinical and pre-clinical data suggest that the activity of PARPi inhibitors may not be limited to BRCA mutated tumours and may involve the homologous recombination pathway. These data raise the question of the potential efficacy of PARPi in advanced endometrial and cervical cancers where treatment options are currently limited. At present, there are few data available on the activity of PARPi in endometrial and cervical cancers, but some results seem promising. In this review, we present a synthesis of the available studies concerning PARPi in endometrial and cervical cancer.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Cell Line, Tumor; Cisplatin; Clinical Trials as Topic; DNA Damage; DNA Repair-Deficiency Disorders; Endometrial Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Indoles; Ovarian Neoplasms; Papillomavirus Infections; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms

Patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), treated with niraparib maintenance, present with haematological and gastrointestinal toxicities. Limited data exist on niraparib safety assessment.. To evaluate niraparib safety profile, as maintenance therapy, in women with platinum-sensitive EOC.. PubMed and Cochrane searches were carried out up to April 2021 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating niraparib versus placebo in EOC patients with a response to platinum-based chemotherapy. Regarding the meta-analysis, for dichotomous data, the pooled risk ratio (RR) was calculated.. A total of 1539 patients from three RCTs revealed that niraparib-treated patients are associated with a significantly higher risk of any grade of nausea (RR, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.86 to 2.48), fatigue (RR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.52,. Niraparib is considered an effective and well-tolerated choice, with an improved safety profile, for the maintenance treatment of EOC patients.

Topics: Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines

Poly (adenosine diphosphate)-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors for tumors with homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), including pathogenic mutations in. JGOG2052 is a single-arm, open-label, multi-center, phase 2 clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of niraparib monotherapy for a recurrent or persistent rare fraction of gynecologic malignancies with. Japan Primary Registries Network (JPRN) Identifier: jRCT2031210264.

Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Female; Genital Neoplasms, Female; Homologous Recombination; Humans; Indazoles; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines

We reviewed clinical data for niraparib monotherapy in

Topics: Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Quality of Life

Niraparib (Zejula™) is a PARP inhibitor which is approved for maintenance therapy in adults with advanced ovarian cancer in complete or partial response to platinum-based chemotherapy. In a placebo-controlled phase III trial in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer, niraparib significantly extended progression free survival in two predefined populations, namely a patient population with altered homologous-recombination DNA repair pathways [i.e. homologous-recombination deficiency positive (HRd)] and the overall trial population. A prespecified exploratory subgroup analysis indicated that niraparib was also efficacious in patients who were homologous recombination deficiency negative or homologous recombination proficient (HRp). Niraparib has a manageable tolerability profile with myelosuppression as the main safety concern. Haematological reactions were managed with monitoring and dose reduction or interruption. A weight- and platelet count-based individualised dosage regimen introduced during the trial (and subsequently approved) appeared to improve haematological tolerability. Niraparib is a useful option for first-line maintenance therapy for advanced ovarian cancer in adults who responded to platinum-based chemotherapy, regardless of homologous-recombination deficiency status and is a promising option for HRp patients, for whom maintenance treatment options are limited.. In 2021, ovarian cancer is predicted to be responsible for ≈ 43,770 deaths in Europe and the USA combined. Niraparib (Zejula™) is a once-daily oral treatment for first-line maintenance therapy in adults with advanced ovarian cancer that is responsive to chemotherapy. Although other agents of the same drug class (e.g. olaparib) are only approved for use against tumours with compromised DNA repair mechanisms, niraparib is approved without this restriction. Niraparib reduced the risk of disease progression or death in patients with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer, irrespective of whether the patients had compromised or functional DNA repair mechanisms. Abnormal blood counts are the main safety concern with niraparib, though adverse drug reactions may be managed through monitoring and interrupting or decreasing the dosage. Starting treatment at a personalised lower dosage may also reduce the likelihood of adverse drug reactions. Niraparib is a useful option for first-line maintenance therapy for advanced ovarian cancer, regardless of the patient's DNA repair mechanisms, and is a promising option for patients with functional DNA repair mechanisms, a group for which maintenance treatment options are limited.

Topics: Adult; Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines

In early stages, standard treatment is adjuvant chemotherapy, consisting of platinum-based combination for 6 cycles, especially in serous and endometrioid high grade carcinomas. In advanced stages, indication of neoadjuvant chemotherapy must be discussed on a case-by-case basis in multidisciplinary meetings (MDM). Bevacizumab can also be considered in the neoadjuvant setting in some circumstances, always after discussion in MDM. Carboplatin plus paclitaxel every 21 days, with or without bevacizumab remains the standard of care for first-line chemotherapy. Inhibitors of poly-(ADP-riboses) polymerases (PARPi) have been approved and are reimbursed as maintenance monotherapy in tumors carrying BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation after complete or partial response to chemotherapy. Two recent studies demonstrated the efficacy of PARPi on progression free survival, one for niraparib single-agent in patients with high-grade ovarian carcinoma regardless of BRCA status, the other one for the combination of bevacizumab and olaparib in patients with high grade carcinoma, with positive test for homologous recombination DNA repair deficiency (regardless of BRCA status). These two new modalities of maintenance therapy are now available in compassionate use programs or post compassionate use programs. Depending on pending decisions upon reimbursement, these indications might be somewhat modified.

Topics: Algorithms; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Carboplatin; Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Genes, BRCA1; Genes, BRCA2; Humans; Indazoles; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Neoplasm Grading; Neoplasm Staging; Ovarian Neoplasms; Paclitaxel; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors

The present study aimed to assess the prevalence of symptoms of anxiety and depression among health professionals in the three most affected regions in Cameroon.. The study was a descriptive cross-sectional type. Participants were health care professionals working in the three chosen regions of Cameroon. The non_probability convinient sample technique and that of the snowball were valued via a web questionnaire. The non-exhaustive sample size was 292. The diagnosis of anxiety and depression was made by the HAD (Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale).. Les auteurs rapportent que le secteur médical est classé à un plus grand risque de contracter le COVID-19 et de le propager potentiellement à d’autres. Le nombre sans cesse croissant de cas confirmés et suspects, la pression dans les soins, l’épuisement des équipements de protection individuelle et le manque de médicaments spécifiques peuvent contribuer à un vécu anxio-dépressif significatif. La présente étude s’est donnée pour ambition d’évaluer la prévalence des symptômes de l’anxiété et de la dépression chez les professionnels de santé dans les trois Régions les plus concernées au Cameroun.. Le choix des trois Régions du Cameroun se justifie non seulement par le fait qu’elles totalisent 95,8 % des cas de coronavirus au pays depuis le début de la pandémie, mais aussi parce qu’elles disposent de plus de la moitié des personnels de santé (56 %). Il s’agit d’une étude transversale, descriptive et analytique. Les participants sont des professionnels de la santé en service dans les Régions du Centre, Littoral et de l’Ouest du Cameroun. La méthode d’échantillonnage non probabiliste de convenance couplée à celle de boule de neige via un web questionnaire a été adoptée. La collecte des données a duré du 5 au 19 avril 2020, intervalle de temps après lequel on n’avait plus eu de répondants. À la fin de cette période, la taille de l’échantillon non exhaustive était de 292 professionnels. Le diagnostic de l’état anxio-dépressive était posé via l’échelle de HAD (Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale). Dans le HAD, chaque réponse cotée évalue de manière semi-quantitative l’intensité du symptôme au cours de la semaine écoulée. Un score total est obtenu ainsi que des scores aux deux sous-échelles : le score maximal est de 42 pour l’échelle globale et de 21 pour chacune des sous-échelles. Le coefficient alpha de Cronbach est de 0,70 pour la dépression et de 0,74 pour l’anxiété. Certains auteurs après plusieurs travaux ont proposé qu’une note inférieure ou égale à 7 indique une absence d’anxiété ou de dépression ; celle comprise entre 8 et 10 suggère une anxiété ou une dépression faible à bénigne ; entre 11 et 14, pour une anxiété ou une dépression modérée ; enfin, une note comprise entre 15 et 21 est révélatrice d’une anxiété sévère. Le logiciel Excel 2013 et Epi Info version 7.2.2.6 ont été utilisés pour les traitements statistiques. Les liens entre les variables ont été considérées significatifs pour une valeur de. L’amélioration des conditions de travail et notamment la fourniture d’équipement de protection, la mise en place des cellules spéciales d’écoute pour le personnel de santé pourraient être proposées.. Taken together with satisfactory selectivity index (SI) values, the acetone and methanol extracts of. During a mean follow-up period of 25.6 ± 13.9 months, 38 (18.4%) VAs and 78 (37.7%) end-stage events occurred. Big ET-1 was positively correlated with NYHA class (. In primary prevention ICD indication patients, plasma big ET-1 levels can predict VAs and end-stage events and may facilitate ICD-implantation risk stratification.. Beyond age, cognitive impairment was associated with prior MI/stroke, higher hsCRP, statin use, less education, lower eGFR, BMI and LVEF.. These data demonstrate that even a short period of detraining is harmful for elderly women who regularly participate in a program of strength training, since it impairs physical performance, insulin sensitivity and cholesterol metabolism.. Exposure to PM. Respiratory sinus arrhythmia is reduced after PVI in patients with paroxysmal AF. Our findings suggest that this is related to a decrease in cardiac vagal tone. Whether and how this affects the clinical outcome including exercise capacity need to be determined.. BDNF and leptin were not associated with weight. We found that miR-214-5p exerted a protective role in I/R injured cardiac cells by direct targeting FASLG. The results indicated that the MGO injection reduced all CCl. The hepatoprotective effects of MGO might be due to histopathological suppression and inflammation inhibition in the liver.. OVEO showed moderate antifungal activity, whereas its main components carvacrol and thymol have great application potential as natural fungicides or lead compounds for commercial fungicides in preventing and controlling plant diseases caused by. PF trajectories were mainly related to income, pregestational BMI, birth weight, hospitalisation due to respiratory diseases in childhood, participant's BMI, report of wheezing, medical diagnosis and family history of asthma, gestational exposure to tobacco and current smoking status in adolescence and young adult age.. In chronic pain patients on opioids, administration of certain benzodiazepine sedatives induced a mild respiratory depression but paradoxically reduced sleep apnoea risk and severity by increasing the respiratory arousal threshold.. Quantitative measurements of sensory disturbances using the PainVision. The serum level of 20S-proteasome may be a useful marker for disease activity in AAV.. The electrophysiological data and MD simulations collectively suggest a crucial role of the interactions between the HA helix and S4-S5 linker in the apparent Ca. Invited for the cover of this issue are Vanesa Fernández-Moreira, Nils Metzler-Nolte, M. Concepción Gimeno and co-workers at Universidad de Zaragoza and Ruhr-Universität Bochum. The image depicts the reported bimetallic bioconjugates as planes directing the gold fragment towards the target (lysosomes). Read the full text of the article at 10.1002/chem.202002067.. The optimal CRT pacing configuration changes during dobutamine infusion while LV and RV activation timing does not. Further studies investigating the usefulness of automated dynamic changes to CRT pacing configuration according to physiologic condition may be warranted.

Topics: 3' Untranslated Regions; 5'-Nucleotidase; A549 Cells; Accidental Falls; Acetylcholinesterase; Acrylic Resins; Actinobacillus; Acute Disease; Acute Kidney Injury; Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing; Adenosine; Adenosine Triphosphate; Administration, Inhalation; Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Advance Care Planning; Africa, Northern; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Air Pollutants; Air Pollution; Air Pollution, Indoor; Albendazole; Aluminum Oxide; Anastomosis, Surgical; Ancylostoma; Ancylostomiasis; Androstadienes; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Angiotensin II; Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Anti-Infective Agents; Antibodies, Bispecific; Antibodies, Viral; Anticoagulants; Antihypertensive Agents; Antinematodal Agents; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Antioxidants; Antiporters; Antiviral Agents; Apoptosis; Aptamers, Nucleotide; Aromatase Inhibitors; Asian People; Astrocytes; Atrial Fibrillation; Auditory Threshold; Aurora Kinase B; Australia; Autophagy; Autophagy-Related Protein 5; Autotrophic Processes; Bacillus cereus; Bacillus thuringiensis; Bacterial Proteins; Beclin-1; Belgium; Benzene; Benzene Derivatives; Benzhydryl Compounds; beta Catenin; beta-Arrestin 2; Biliary Tract Diseases; Biofilms; Biofuels; Biomarkers; Biomarkers, Tumor; Biomass; Biomechanical Phenomena; Bioreactors; Biosensing Techniques; Biosynthetic Pathways; Bismuth; Blood Platelets; Bone and Bones; Bone Regeneration; Bortezomib; Botulinum Toxins, Type A; Brain; Brain Injuries; Brain Ischemia; Brain Neoplasms; Breast Neoplasms; Breath Tests; Bronchodilator Agents; Calcium Phosphates; Cannabis; Carbon Dioxide; Carbon Isotopes; Carcinogenesis; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy; Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices; Cardiomyopathies; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cariostatic Agents; Case Managers; Case-Control Studies; Catalysis; Cation Transport Proteins; CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes; Cecropia Plant; Cell Adhesion; Cell Count; Cell Differentiation; Cell Division; Cell Line; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Membrane; Cell Movement; Cell Proliferation; Cell Self Renewal; Cell Survival; Cells, Cultured; Cellular Reprogramming; Cellulose; Charcoal; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Chemical Phenomena; Chemokines; Chemoradiotherapy; Chemoreceptor Cells; Child; Child Abuse; Child, Preschool; China; Chlorogenic Acid; Chloroquine; Chromatography, Gas; Chronic Disease; Clinical Competence; Coated Materials, Biocompatible; Cochlea; Cohort Studies; Color; Comorbidity; Computer Simulation; Computer-Aided Design; Contraception; Contraceptive Agents, Female; Contrast Media; COP-Coated Vesicles; Coronavirus Infections; Cost of Illness; Coturnix; COVID-19; Creatinine; Cross-Over Studies; Cross-Sectional Studies; Culex; Curriculum; Cyclic N-Oxides; Cytokines; Cytoplasm; Cytotoxicity, Immunologic; Cytotoxins; Databases, Factual; Deep Learning; Delivery, Obstetric; Denitrification; Dental Caries; Denture, Complete; Dexamethasone; Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus; Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dielectric Spectroscopy; Diet, High-Fat; Dietary Fiber; Disease Models, Animal; Disease Progression; DNA; DNA Copy Number Variations; DNA, Mitochondrial; Dog Diseases; Dogs; Dopaminergic Neurons; Double-Blind Method; Down-Regulation; Doxorubicin; Drug Carriers; Drug Design; Drug Interactions; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Drugs, Chinese Herbal; Dry Powder Inhalers; Dust; E2F1 Transcription Factor; Ecosystem; Education, Nursing; Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate; Electric Impedance; Electricity; Electrocardiography; Electrochemical Techniques; Electrochemistry; Electrodes; Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel; Endoplasmic Reticulum; Endothelial Cells; Environmental Monitoring; Enzyme Inhibitors; Epithelial Cells; Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition; Esophageal Neoplasms; Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma; Estrogen Receptor Modulators; Europe; Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem; Exosomes; Feasibility Studies; Female; Ferricyanides; Ferrocyanides; Fibrinogen; Finite Element Analysis; Fistula; Fluorescent Dyes; Fluorides, Topical; Fluorodeoxyglucose F18; Fluticasone; Follow-Up Studies; Food Contamination; Food Microbiology; Foods, Specialized; Forensic Medicine; Frail Elderly; France; Free Radicals; Fresh Water; Fungi; Fungicides, Industrial; Galactosamine; Gastrointestinal Neoplasms; Gene Expression Profiling; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; Gene Frequency; Genetic Predisposition to Disease; Genotype; Gingival Hemorrhage; Glioblastoma; Glioma; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Glomerulosclerosis, Focal Segmental; Glucose; Glucose Transport Proteins, Facilitative; Glucosides; Glutamine; Glycolysis; Gold; GPI-Linked Proteins; Gram-Negative Bacteria; Gram-Positive Bacteria; Graphite; Haplotypes; HCT116 Cells; Healthy Volunteers; Hearing Loss; Heart Failure; Hedgehog Proteins; HEK293 Cells; HeLa Cells; Hemodynamics; Hemorrhage; Hepatocytes; Hippo Signaling Pathway; Histone Deacetylases; Homeostasis; Hospital Mortality; Hospitalization; Humans; Hydantoins; Hydrazines; Hydrogen Peroxide; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration; Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions; Hydroxylamines; Hypoglycemic Agents; Immunity, Innate; Immunoglobulin G; Immunohistochemistry; Immunologic Factors; Immunomodulation; Immunophenotyping; Immunotherapy; Incidence; Indazoles; Indonesia; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Infarction, Middle Cerebral Artery; Inflammation; Injections, Intramuscular; Insecticides; Insulin-Like Growth Factor I; Insurance, Health; Intention to Treat Analysis; Interleukin-1 Receptor-Associated Kinases; Interleukin-6; Intrauterine Devices; Intrauterine Devices, Copper; Iron; Ischemia; Jordan; Keratinocytes; Kidney; Kidney Diseases; Kir5.1 Channel; Klebsiella Infections; Klebsiella pneumoniae; Lab-On-A-Chip Devices; Laparoscopy; Lasers; Lasers, Semiconductor; Lenalidomide; Leptin; Lethal Dose 50; Levonorgestrel; Limit of Detection; Lipid Metabolism; Lipid Metabolism Disorders; Lipogenesis; Lipopolysaccharides; Liquid Biopsy; Liver; Liver Abscess, Pyogenic; Liver Cirrhosis; Liver Diseases; Liver Neoplasms; Longevity; Lung Neoplasms; Luteolin; Lymph Nodes; Lymphocyte Activation; Macaca fascicularis; Macrophages; Mad2 Proteins; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Mammary Glands, Human; Manganese; Manganese Compounds; MAP Kinase Signaling System; Materials Testing; Maternal Health Services; MCF-7 Cells; Medicaid; Medicine, Chinese Traditional; Melanoma; Membrane Proteins; Mental Health; Mercury; Metal Nanoparticles; Metals, Heavy; Metformin; Methionine Adenosyltransferase; Mice; Mice, Inbred BALB C; Mice, Inbred C3H; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Mice, Inbred CBA; Mice, Knockout; Mice, Nude; Microalgae; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Microglia; MicroRNAs; Microscopy, Atomic Force; Microscopy, Electron, Scanning; Middle Aged; Mitochondria; Mitochondrial Proteins; Mitral Valve; Mitral Valve Insufficiency; Models, Anatomic; Molecular Structure; Molybdenum; Monocarboxylic Acid Transporters; Moths; MPTP Poisoning; Multigene Family; Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Multiple Myeloma; Muscle, Skeletal; Mutagens; Mutation; Myeloid Cells; Nanocomposites; Nanofibers; Nanomedicine; Nanoparticles; Nanowires; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Neomycin; Neoplasm Grading; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Neoplasms; Neoplastic Stem Cells; Neostriatum; Neovascularization, Pathologic; Netherlands; Neuromuscular Agents; Neurons; NF-E2-Related Factor 2; NF-kappa B; Nickel; Nitrogen Oxides; Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease; Nucleosides; Nucleotidyltransferases; Nutritional Status; Obesity, Morbid; Ofloxacin; Oils, Volatile; Oligopeptides; Oncogene Protein v-akt; Optical Imaging; Organic Cation Transport Proteins; Organophosphonates; Osteoarthritis; Osteoarthritis, Hip; Osteoarthritis, Knee; Osteoblasts; Osteogenesis; Oxidation-Reduction; Oxidative Stress; Oxides; Oxygen Isotopes; Pancreas; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Pandemics; Particle Size; Particulate Matter; Patient Acceptance of Health Care; Patient Compliance; PC-3 Cells; Peptide Fragments; Peptides; Periodontal Attachment Loss; Periodontal Index; Periodontal Pocket; Periodontitis; Peroxides; Peru; Pest Control, Biological; Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase; Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases; Phylogeny; Pilot Projects; Piperidines; Plant Bark; Plant Extracts; Plant Leaves; Plasmids; Platelet Function Tests; Pneumonia, Viral; Podocytes; Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase-1; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Polyethylene Terephthalates; Polymers; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; Porosity; Portugal; Positron-Emission Tomography; Postoperative Complications; Postural Balance; Potassium Channels, Inwardly Rectifying; Povidone; Powders; Precancerous Conditions; Precision Medicine; Predictive Value of Tests; Pregnancy; Prenatal Care; Prognosis; Promoter Regions, Genetic; Prospective Studies; Prostatectomy; Prostatic Neoplasms; Proteasome Inhibitors; Protective Agents; Protein Binding; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases; Protein Transport; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt; Psychiatric Nursing; PTEN Phosphohydrolase; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyrimethamine; Radiopharmaceuticals; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Rats, Wistar; Reactive Oxygen Species; Receptor, ErbB-2; Receptor, IGF Type 1; Receptors, Estrogen; Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled; Recombinational DNA Repair; Recovery of Function; Regional Blood Flow; Renal Dialysis; Renin; Renin-Angiotensin System; Reperfusion Injury; Reproducibility of Results; Republic of Korea; Respiratory Distress Syndrome; Retrospective Studies; Rhodamines; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; RNA, Long Noncoding; RNA, Messenger; Running; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins; Salinity; Salmeterol Xinafoate; Sarcoma; Seasons; Shoulder Injuries; Signal Transduction; Silicon Dioxide; Silver; Sirtuin 1; Sirtuins; Skull Fractures; Social Determinants of Health; Sodium; Sodium Fluoride; Sodium Potassium Chloride Symporter Inhibitors; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Soil; Soil Pollutants; Spain; Spectrophotometry; Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared; Staphylococcal Protein A; Staphylococcus aureus; Stem Cells; Stereoisomerism; Stomach Neoplasms; Streptomyces; Strontium; Structure-Activity Relationship; Students, Nursing; Substance-Related Disorders; Succinic Acid; Sulfur; Surface Properties; Survival Rate; Survivin; Symporters; T-Lymphocytes; Temozolomide; Tensile Strength; Thiazoles; Thiobacillus; Thiohydantoins; Thiourea; Thrombectomy; Time Factors; Titanium; Tobacco Mosaic Virus; Tobacco Use Disorder; Toll-Like Receptor 4; Toluene; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases; Toxicity Tests, Acute; Toxicity Tests, Subacute; Transcriptional Activation; Treatment Outcome; Troponin I; Tumor Cells, Cultured; Tumor Escape; Tumor Hypoxia; Tumor Microenvironment; Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha; Tyrosine; Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases; Ubiquitination; Ultrasonic Waves; United Kingdom; United States; United States Department of Veterans Affairs; Up-Regulation; Urea; Uric Acid; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms; Urinary Bladder, Neurogenic; Urine; Urodynamics; User-Computer Interface; Vemurafenib; Verbenaceae; Veterans; Veterans Health; Viral Load; Virtual Reality; Vitiligo; Water Pollutants, Chemical; Wildfires; Wnt Signaling Pathway; Wound Healing; X-Ray Diffraction; Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays; Xylenes; Young Adult; Zinc; Zinc Oxide; Zinc Sulfate; Zoonoses

Over the past years, several studies have demonstrated that defects in DNA damage response and repair (DDR) genes are present in a significant proportion of patients with prostate cancer. These alterations, particularly mutations in BRCA2, are known to be associated with an increased risk of developing prostate cancer and more aggressive forms of the disease. There is growing evidence that certain DDR gene aberrations confer sensitivity to poly-(ADP ribose) polymerase inhibitors and/or platinum chemotherapy, while other defects might identify cases that are more likely to benefit from immune checkpoint inhibition. The potential prognostic impact and relevance for treatment selection together with the decreasing costs and broader accessibility to next-generation sequencing have already resulted in the increased frequency of genetic profiling of prostate tumours. Remarkably, almost half of all DDR genetic defects can occur in the germline, and prostate cancer patients identified as mutation carriers, as well as their families, will require appropriate genetic counselling. In this review, we summarise the current knowledge regarding the biology and clinical implications of DDR defects in prostate cancer, and outline how this evidence is prompting a change in the treatment landscape of the disease.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated Proteins; Clinical Trials as Topic; DNA Damage; DNA Repair; Genes, BRCA1; Genes, BRCA2; Germ-Line Mutation; High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing; Humans; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Indazoles; Indoles; Male; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Piperidines; Platinum Compounds; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Precision Medicine; Prognosis; Prostatic Neoplasms

Treatment of metastatic prostate cancer has evolved significantly over the past decade. Palliative therapy has, historically, consisted of androgen deprivation, chemotherapy and different radiation therapy approaches. More recently, breakthrough therapy with the use of poly-ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors has led to significant improvement in the outcome of patients with metastatic prostate cancer who harbor certain genetic mutations. This concise review focuses on the 3 PARP inhibitors that have shown activity in metastatic prostate cancer.

Topics: Animals; BRCA1 Protein; BRCA2 Protein; Genetic Predisposition to Disease; Humans; Indazoles; Indoles; Male; Mutation; Neoplasm Metastasis; Phenotype; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Prostatic Neoplasms; PTEN Phosphohydrolase; Treatment Outcome

We aimed to evaluate the risk of PARP inhibitors (PARPis) causing pneumonitis in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and in the real-world practice.. First, a systematic review based on meta-analysis was conducted. RCTs with available data reporting pneumonitis events for PARPis were eligible for analysis. Second, we conducted a disproportionality analysis based on data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database to characterize the main features of PARPi-related pneumonitis.. PARPis increased the risk of pneumonitis that can result in serious outcomes and tend to occur early. Early recognition and management of PARPi-pneumonitis is of vital importance in clinical practice. The mechanisms and risk factors should be studied further to improve clinical understanding and innovative treatment strategies for these diseases.

Topics: Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems; Humans; Incidence; Indazoles; Neoplasms; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Piperidines; Pneumonia; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Time Factors

We aimed to evaluate comparative safety and tolerability of the approved PARP inhibitors in people with cancer.. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials comparing an approved PARP inhibitor (fluzoparib, olaparib, rucaparib, niraparib, or talazoparib) with placebo or chemotherapy in cancer patients. Outcomes of interest included: serious adverse event (SAE), discontinuation due to adverse event (AE), interruption of treatment due to AE, dose reduction due to AE, and specific grade 1-5 AEs.. Ten trials including 3763 participants and six treatments (olaparib, rucaparib, niraparib, talazoparib, placebo, and protocol-specified single agent chemotherapy) were identified. SAE and discontinuation of treatment did not differ significantly among the four approved PARP inhibitors. Regarding interruption of treatment and dose reduction due to AE, statistically significant differences and statistically non-significant trend were observed. Talazoparib is associated with a higher risk of interruption of treatment and dose reduction (excluding rucaparib) due to AE as compared with the other drugs. Niraparib showed a trend of lower risk of AE related dose reduction as compared with the other drugs. Furthermore, there were significant differences in specific grade 1-5 AE among the four drugs.. The safety profile of the four approved PARP inhibitors is comparable in terms of SAE and AE-related discontinuation of treatment. Statistically significant differences in the AEs spectrum and AEs related dose interruption and dose reduction demonstrated the prompt identification of AE and dose personalization seem mandatory to obtain maximal benefit from PARP inhibitors.

Topics: Humans; Indazoles; Indoles; Neoplasms; Network Meta-Analysis; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

The standard treatment for advanced ovarian cancer is cytoreductive surgery followed by cytotoxic chemotherapy. However, it has high risk of recurrence and poor prognosis. Poly(ADPribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors selectively target DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in tumor cells that cannot be repaired and induce the synthetic lethality of BRCA1/2 mutation cancers. PARP inhibitors are clinically used to treat recurrent ovarian cancer and show significant efficacy in ovarian cancer patients with homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathway defects. PARP inhibitors also have significant clinical benefits in patients without HR defects. With the increasingly extensive clinical application of PARP inhibitors, the possibility of acquiring drug resistance is high. Therefore, clinical strategies should be adopted to manage drug resistance of PARP inhibitors. This study aims to summarize the indications and toxicity of PARP inhibitors, the mechanism of action, targeted treatment of drug resistance, and potential methods to manage drug-resistant diseases. We used the term "ovarian cancer" and the names of each PARP inhibitor as keywords to search articles published in the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) on Pubmed, along with the keywords "clinicaltrials.gov" and "google.com/patents" as well as "uspto.gov." The FDA has approved olaparib, niraparib, and rucaparib for the treatment of recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Talazoparib and veliparib are currently in early trials and show promising clinical results. The mechanism underlying resistance to PARP inhibitors and the clinical strategies to overcome them remain unclear. Understanding the mechanism of resistance to PARP inhibitors and their relationship with platinum resistance may help with the development of antiresistance therapies and optimization of the sequence of drug application in the future clinical treatment of ovarian cancer.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Benzimidazoles; BRCA1 Protein; BRCA2 Protein; Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; DNA Repair; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Indoles; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ovarian Neoplasms; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerases

To summarize the data supporting the use of maintenance therapy in ovarian cancer treatment.. Since December 2016, the United States Food and Drug Administration has approved four drugs for six different ovarian cancer maintenance indications based on the results of clinical trials demonstrating efficacy and tolerability. These include antiangiogenesis and poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) inhibitors (PARP inhibitors). Four drugs are approved for use in maintenance therapy for recurrent ovarian cancer, including bevacizumab (GOG-0213 and OCEANS), niraparib (NOVA), olaparib (Study 19 and SOLO2) and rucaparib (ARIEL3). Two drugs are approved for use in maintenance therapy in newly diagnosed ovarian cancer, including bevacizumab (GOG-0218) and olaparib (SOLO1). New data were reported at the European Society for Medical Oncology Congress in October 2019 that may lead to the approval of additional strategies in front-line maintenance, including the use of niraparib (PRIMA), veliparib (VELIA) and bevacizumab + olaparib (PAOLA).. The landscape of maintenance treatment options for ovarian cancer has been rapidly expanding and continues to evolve as new data emerge. Currently approved strategies include antiangiogenesis and PARP inhibitor treatments.

Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Bevacizumab; Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Indoles; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

To review the efficacy and safety of niraparib for the treatment of recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer (OC, FTC, and PPC).. A literature search via MEDLINE through PubMed from August 2013 to January 2020 was performed using the key terms. Completed and ongoing trials were identified through a review of the website trial registry https://www.clinicaltrials.gov.. In a phase III, double-blind clinical trial, progression-free survival improved in patients treated with niraparib compared with placebo as maintenance treatment for patients with platinum-sensitive, recurrent OC: 21 versus 5.5 months in the germline breast cancer susceptibility gene (. Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have gained a place in the therapeutic management of OC, FTC, and PPC because of their ability to suppress growth of homologous recombination deficiency-positive tumors, including those with. PARP inhibitors can be used as a single agent for maintenance therapy for platinum-sensitive recurrent disease in patients with partial or complete response following 2 or more rounds of platinum-based therapy.

Topics: Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Fallopian Tube Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ovarian Neoplasms; Peritoneal Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Progression-Free Survival

The use of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors in the front-line management of advanced ovarian cancer has recently emerged as an exciting strategy with the potential to improve outcomes for patients with advanced ovarian cancer. In this article, we review the results of four recently published Phase III randomised controlled trials evaluating the use of PARP inhibitors in the primary treatment of ovarian cancer (SOLO1, PRIMA, PAOLA-1, and VELIA). Collectively, the studies suggest that PARP maintenance in the upfront setting is most beneficial among patients with BRCA-associated ovarian cancers (hazard ratios range from 0.31 to 0.44), followed by patients with tumours that harbour homologous recombination deficiencies (hazard ratios range from 0.33 to 0.57). All three studies that included an all-comer population were able to demonstrate benefit of PARP inhibitors, regardless of biomarker status. The FDA has approved olaparib for front-line maintenance therapy among patients with BRCA-associated ovarian cancers, and niraparib for all patients, regardless of biomarker status. In determining which patients should be offered front-line maintenance PARP inhibitors, and which agent to use, there are multiple factors to consider, including FDA indication, dosing preference, toxicity, risks versus benefits for each patient population, and cost. There are ongoing studies further exploring the front-line use of PARP inhibitors, including the potential downstream effects of PARP-inhibitor resistance in the recurrent setting, combining PARP-inhibitors with other anti-angiogenic drugs, immunotherapeutic agents, and inhibitors of pathways implicated in PARP inhibitor resistance.

Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; BRCA1 Protein; BRCA2 Protein; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Approval; Drug Costs; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Mutation; Ovarian Neoplasms; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerases; Progression-Free Survival; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recombinational DNA Repair; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration

Breast and ovarian cancer are common malignancies among older adults, causing significant morbidity and mortality. Although most cases of breast and ovarian cancer are sporadic, a significant proportion is caused by mutations in cancer susceptibility genes, most often breast cancer susceptibility genes (BRCA) 1 and 2. Furthermore, some breast and ovarian tumors are phenotypically similar to those with BRCA mutations, a phenomenon known as "BRCAness". BRCA mutations and "BRCAness" lead to defects in DNA repair, which may be a target for therapeutic agents such as Poly ADP-Ribose Polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. PARP inhibitors are novel medications which lead to double-strand breaks resulting in cell death due to synthetic lethality, and which have been shown to be effective in patients with advanced breast and ovarian cancers with or without BRCA mutations. Three different PARP inhibitors (olaparib, niraparib, and rucaparib) have been approved for the treatment of ovarian cancer and one (olaparib) for breast cancer harboring BRCA mutations. Here, we review the currently available evidence regarding the use of PARP inhibitors for the treatment of patients with breast and ovarian cancer, with a particular focus on the inclusion of older adults in clinical trials of these therapies. Additionally, we provide an overview of currently ongoing studies of PARP inhibitors in breast and ovarian cancer, and include recommendations for increasing the evidence-base for using these medications among older patients.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Breast Neoplasms; DNA Repair; Female; Genes, BRCA1; Genes, BRCA2; Humans; Indazoles; Indoles; Ovarian Neoplasms; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Synthetic Lethal Mutations

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have provided great clinical benefits to ovarian cancer patients. To date, three PARP inhibitors, namely, olaparib, rucaparib and niraparib have been approved for the treatment of ovarian cancer in the United States. Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) and platinum sensitivity are prospective biomarkers for predicting the response to PARP inhibitors in ovarian cancers. Preclinical data have focused on identifying the gene aberrations that might generate HRD and induce sensitivity to PARP inhibitors in vitro in cancer cell lines or in vivo in patient-derived xenografts. Clinical trials have focused on genomic scar analysis to identify biomarkers for predicting the response to PARP inhibitors. Additionally, researchers have aimed to investigate mechanisms of resistance to PARP inhibitors and strategies to overcome this resistance. Combining PARP inhibitors with HR pathway inhibitors to extend the utility of PARP inhibitors to BRCA-proficient tumours is increasingly foreseeable. Identifying the population of patients with the greatest potential benefit from PARP inhibitor therapy and the circumstances under which patients are no longer suited for PARP inhibitor therapy are important. Further studies are required in order to propose better strategies for overcoming resistance to PARP inhibitor therapy in ovarian cancers.

Topics: Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Indoles; Ovarian Neoplasms; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerases

Genomic instability is a hallmark of cancer, and often is the result of altered DNA repair capacities in tumour cells. DNA damage repair defects are common in different cancer types; these alterations can also induce tumour-specific vulnerabilities that can be exploited therapeutically. In 2009, a first-in-man clinical trial of the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor olaparib clinically validated the synthetic lethal interaction between inhibition of PARP1, a key sensor of DNA damage, and BRCA1/BRCA2 deficiency. In this review, we summarize a decade of PARP inhibitor clinical development, a work that has resulted in the registration of several PARP inhibitors in breast (olaparib and talazoparib) and ovarian cancer (olaparib, niraparib and rucaparib, either alone or following platinum chemotherapy as maintenance therapy). Over the past 10 years, our knowledge on the mechanism of action of PARP inhibitor as well as how tumours become resistant has been extended, and we summarise this work here. We also discuss opportunities for expanding the precision medicine approach with PARP inhibitors, identifying a wider population who could benefit from this drug class. This includes developing and validating better predictive biomarkers for patient stratification, mainly based on homologous recombination defects beyond BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations, identifying DNA repair deficient tumours in other cancer types such as prostate or pancreatic cancer, or by designing combination therapies with PARP inhibitors.

Topics: BRCA1 Protein; BRCA2 Protein; Breast Neoplasms; Female; Genomic Instability; Humans; Indazoles; Indoles; Ovarian Neoplasms; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Piperidines; Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase-1; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors

Niraparib is an oral poly(ADP ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor that is currently approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) as well as recently approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for the maintenance treatment of women with recurrent ovarian cancer who are in complete or partial response to platinum-based chemotherapy. The mechanisms of action of niraparib include inhibition of PARP enzymatic activity as well as increased formation of PARP-DNA complexes through "trapping" the PARP enzyme on damaged DNA. Phase I and III studies have demonstrated activity and benefit of niraparib in both BRCA mutated (BRCAm) and BRCA wild-type (BRCAwt) cancers. Phase I testing of niraparib established the maximally tolerated dose of 300mg by mouth (PO) daily, and the phase 3 ENGOT-OV16/NOVA study demonstrated the benefit of niraparib maintenance therapy compared to placebo after completion of and response to platinum-based chemotherapy in both BRCAm and BRCAwt ovarian cancer patient populations. Toxicities seen with niraparib include hematologic, gastrointestinal, fatigue, and cardiovascular. Hematologic toxicities include thrombocytopenia, anemia, neutropenia and leukopenia; upfront dose modification to 200mg niraparib for patients with baseline weight of ≤77kg and/or baseline platelets of ≤150,000K/uL should be considered to avoid significant hematologic toxicity, especially thrombocytopenia, based on recent analyses of the ENGOT-OV16/NOVA study. Cardiovascular toxicities include hypertension, tachycardia, as well as palpitations, and patients should be monitored for hypertension. PARP inhibitors have been associated with low risks of acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), and the overall risk of AML and MDS is 0.9% of all patients treated with niraparib. Niraparib testing is ongoing in newly diagnosed ovarian cancer patients as maintenance therapy following completion of platinum-based chemotherapy, in BRCAwt cancers as treatment, as well as in combinations with other biologic drugs such as immunotherapy and anti-angiogenic agents.

Topics: Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Clinical Trials as Topic; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors

Ovarian cancer is a disease with a propensity to recur despite dramatic responses to initial treatment, which typically consists of a combination of cytoreductive surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy. A maintenance therapy, which may prevent or delay relapse while not negatively impacting quality of life, is critical to improving outcomes. Areas covered: This review discusses the pharmacologic properties, clinical efficacy, and safety profile of niraparib, a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor indicated for the maintenance treatment of patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer who are in a complete or partial response to platinum-based chemotherapy. Expert opinion: Following presentation of ENGOT-OV16/NOVA at the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) 2016 Congress, niraparib became the first PARP inhibitor to receive full approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the maintenance treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer, regardless of a patient's germline or somatic mutational status. This approval has had a sweeping impact on treatment strategies, moving the indication for a PARP inhibitor earlier in the treatment course and greatly expanding the population of patients who may benefit from this class of drugs. Active clinical trials suggest that new indications and novel treatment combinations are eagerly sought.

Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Fallopian Tube Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial; Ovarian Neoplasms; Peritoneal Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Quality of Life

The single agent activity of PARP inhibitors (PARPi) in germline BRCA mutated (gBRCAm) breast and ovarian cancer suggests untapped potential for this new class of drug in breast cancer. The US Food and Drug Administration has approved three PARPi (olaparib, rucaparib, and niraparib) so far to treat certain ovarian cancers, including those with gBRCAm and olaparib for treatment of gBRCAm breast cancers. Several PARPi are now under clinical development for breast cancer in the various treatment settings. Recently, two phase III trials of olaparib (OlympiaD) and talazoparib (EMBRACA) demonstrated 3-month progression-free survival improvement with PARPi compared to physician's choice single agent chemotherapy in metastatic gBRCAm breast cancer. To date, PARPi seems less efficacious in metastatic breast cancer patients than those with BRCA mutated platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer, perhaps reflecting the biologic heterogeneity and low somatic BRCA mutation rate in breast cancer. The use of PARPi is gradually evolving, including combination strategies with chemotherapy, targeted agents, radiotherapy, or immunotherapy in women with and without gBRCAm. The role of predictive biomarkers, including molecular signatures and homologous recombination repair deficiency scores based on loss of heterozygosity and other structural genomic aberrations, will be crucial to identify a subgroup of patients who may have benefit from PARPi. An improved understanding of the mechanisms underlying PARPi clinical resistance will also be important to enable the development of new approaches to increase efficacy. This is a field rich in opportunity, and the coming years should see a better understanding of which breast cancer patients we should treat with PARPi and where these agents should come in over the course of treatment.

Topics: BRCA1 Protein; BRCA2 Protein; Breast Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Indoles; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerases; Progression-Free Survival

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) accounts for approximately 15-20% of all breast cancers and is characterized by a lack of immunohistochemical expression of estrogen receptors (ER), progesterone receptors (PR) and HER2. TNBC is associated with poor long-term outcomes compared with other breast cancer subtypes. Many of these tumors are also basal-like cancers which are characterized by an aggressive biological behavior with a distant recurrence peak observed early at 3 years following diagnosis. Furthermore, metastatic TNBC bears a dismal prognosis with an average survival of 12 months. Although the prevalence of genetic alterations among women with TNBC differs significantly by ethnicity, race and age, BRCA mutations (including both germline mutations and somatic genetic aberrations) are found in up to 20-25% of unselected patients and especially in those of the basal-like immunophenotype. Therefore, defects in the DNA repair pathway could represent a promising therapeutic target for this subgroup of TNBC patients. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors exploit this deficiency through synthetic lethality and have emerged as promising anticancer therapies, especially in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers. Several PARP inhibitors are currently being evaluated in the adjuvant, neo-adjuvant, and metastatic setting for the treatment of breast cancer patients with a deficient homologous recombination pathway. In this article, we review the major molecular characteristics of TNBC, the mechanisms of homologous recombination, and the role of PARP inhibition as an emerging therapeutic strategy.

Topics: Benzamides; Female; Genes, BRCA1; Genes, BRCA2; Homologous Recombination; Humans; Indazoles; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) remains a leading cause of cancer death in women. Approximately 10-15% of patients with EOC harbor a genetic predisposition due to mutations in BRCA1/2 genes. In the recurrent setting, prolonging time to platinum-resistance may improve progression-free survival. In BRCA1/2 mutated ovarian cancer, the use of a polyadenosine diphosphate-ribose polymerase inhibitors has been studied in the maintenance and recurrent setting. In the pivotal Phase III NOVA trial, maintenance therapy post platinum response with niraparib significantly improved outcomes in all subgroups, leading to the first polyadenosine diphosphate-ribose polymerase inhibitors approval by the US FDA in this setting. In this review, we will focus on the role of niraparib in the treatment of EOC.

Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Female; Genes, BRCA1; Genes, BRCA2; Humans; Indazoles; Mutation; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors

Niraparib, an orally available selective inhibitor of poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP), is the first PARP inhibitor approved for use in patients with ovarian cancer who do not harbor a germ-line or somatic mutation in the breast cancer gene (BRCA). Overall, niraparib is well tolerated and its toxicities, primarily hematologic, are manageable especially with recently released initial dose modification guidelines based on weight and baseline platelet count. The role of niraparib as maintenance following frontline platinum-based chemotherapy as well as in the treatment of recurrent high-grade serous ovarian cancer is an active area of investigation. Areas covered: This review focuses on niraparib, its pharmacology, clinical efficacy, and adverse effects as evidenced by prospective clinical trials, and licensed indications. Expert commentary: Niraparib introduced the use of PARP inhibitors regardless of biomarker status. Recent studies highlight the critical need for more accurate biomarkers to identify patients most likely to benefit from treatment with PARP inhibitors. In the next 5 years, we anticipate further expansion of and elucidation regarding the optimal indication for use of niraparib in the treatment of ovarian cancer.

Topics: Biomarkers, Tumor; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Practice Guidelines as Topic

Topics: Female; Humans; Indazoles; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors

Use of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors has greatly increased over the past 5 years. With several new Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals, three PARP inhibitors have entered into standard of care treatment for epithelial ovarian cancer (including ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer). Olaparib and rucaparib currently have indications for treatment of recurrent BRCA mutant ovarian cancer. Olaparib, rucaparib, and niraparib all have indications for maintenance therapy in recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer after response to platinum-based therapy. In our practice, we use both olaparib and rucaparib in the recurrent setting, and all three PARP inhibitors in the maintenance setting. Choice of which PARP inhibitor to use in either setting is largely based upon baseline laboratory values, number of prior therapies, and presence of a BRCA mutation and/or homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). As (HRD) and other biomarker assessments continue to improve, we anticipate being able to better identify which patients might most benefit from PARP inhibitor therapy in the future. The clinically available PARP inhibitors are currently undergoing extensive investigations in clinical trials. Other newer agents such as talazoparib, veliparib, 2X-121, and CEP-9722 are in earlier stages of development. As more FDA-approved indications for PARP inhibitor therapy in ovarian cancer become available, we anticipate the decision of which PARP inhibitor to use will become increasingly complex.

Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzimidazoles; BRCA1 Protein; BRCA2 Protein; Carbazoles; Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Indoles; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ovarian Neoplasms; Ovary; Phthalazines; Phthalimides; Piperazines; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerases(PARP) synthesize the ADP-ribose polymers onto proteins and play a role in DNA repair. PARP inhibitors block the repair of single-strand breaks, which in turn gives rise to double-strand breaks during DNA replication. Thus, PARP inhibitors elicit synthetic lethality in cancer with BRCA1/2 loss-of-function mutations that hamper homologous recombination repair of double-strand breaks. Olaparib, the first-in-class PARP inhibitor, was approved for treatment of BRCA-mutated ovarian cancer in Europe and the United States in 2014. Other PARP inhibitors under clinical trials include rucaparib, niraparib, veliparib, and the "PARP-trapping" BMN-673. BRCA1/2 sequencing is an FDA-approved companion diagnostics, which predicts the cancer vulnerability to PARP inhibition. Together, synthetic lethal PARP inhibition is a novel promising strategy for cancer intervention even in cases without prominent driver oncogenes.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Benzimidazoles; BRCA1 Protein; BRCA2 Protein; DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded; DNA Replication; DNA, Single-Stranded; Enzyme Inhibitors; Humans; Indazoles; Indoles; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Mutation; Neoplasms; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerases; Recombinational DNA Repair

Clinical investigation of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors for ovarian cancer treatment has rapidly evolved from observations of single-agent in vitro activity of these agents in BRCA-deficient cancer cells in 2005 to the initiation of multiple phase III studies in 2013. With clinical trial design and treatment of ovarian cancer increasingly based on histological and molecular characteristics, PARP inhibitors are on the horizon of becoming the first biologic agents to be used to treat ovarian cancer based upon pre-selection characteristics of the patient's cancer. PARP inhibitors are most active in ovarian cancers that have defects or aberrations in DNA repair; use of these agents has been of particular interest in high grade serous cancers (HGSC), where studies have shown that ~50% of HGSC have abnormalities of DNA repair through BRCA germline and somatic mutation, post-translational changes of BRCA, and abnormalities of other DNA repair molecules. In addition, as aberrant DNA pathways in other histological subtypes of ovarian cancer are identified, and through the combination of PARP inhibitors with other biologic agents, the pool of eligible patients who may benefit from PARP inhibitors will likely expand. Pending review by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the outcome of confirmatory phase III studies, PARP inhibitors could become the first FDA-approved biologic agent for ovarian cancer and also the first new FDA-approval in ovarian cancer since carboplatin and gemcitabine were approved for platinum sensitive ovarian cancer in 2006. This review discusses the PARP inhibitors that are currently in testing for ovarian cancer treatment and the future of this class of anti-cancer agents.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Benzimidazoles; DNA Repair; Female; Genes, BRCA1; Genes, BRCA2; Humans; Indazoles; Indoles; Ovarian Neoplasms; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors may synergize with programmed cell death receptor-1 (PD-1) inhibitors to enhance adaptive and innate antitumor immune responses. In the phase 2 JASPER study (NCT04475939), the PARP inhibitor niraparib was evaluated in combination with the PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab in patients with metastatic and/or locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).. Patients whose tumors had programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion scores (TPS) ≥50% (cohort 1) or 1%-49% (cohort 2) received first-line niraparib (200 mg once daily) plus pembrolizumab (200 mg every 3 weeks). The primary end point was investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR). Secondary end points included duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), safety, and pharmacokinetics.. Thirty-eight patients were enrolled in cohorts 1 and 2. In cohort 1, ORR (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 56.3% (9 of 16 patients; 29.9%-80.2%); 2 of 16 patients had complete responses and 7 of 16 had partial responses (PRs). In cohort 2, ORR was 20.0% (5.7%-43.7%) with 4 of 20 PRs. In cohorts 1 and 2, the median DoR was 19.7 months (95% CI, 4.2 months to not estimable [NE]) and 9.4 months (95% CI, 4.2 months to NE), the median PFS was 8.4 months (95% CI, 3.9-22.1 months) and 4.2 months (95% CI, 2.0-6.2 months), and the median OS was NE (95% CI, 6.0 months to NE) and 7.7 months (95% CI, 4.0-12.5 months), respectively. Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 88.2% and 85.7% of patients in cohorts 1 and 2, respectively. Safety was consistent with known profiles of single-agent niraparib and pembrolizumab.. Niraparib plus pembrolizumab showed clinical activity in patients with advanced and/or metastatic NSCLC.. The JASPER clinical trial studied a new combination treatment for advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Pembrolizumab, a drug approved for NSCLC, was given with niraparib. Previous research showed that these 2 drugs together might work better than either drug alone. This study found that more than half of patients with high levels of a tumor marker responded to the combination, and one-fifth of patients with lower levels of the marker responded. The types of side effects from the combination were similar to side effects from both drugs alone. These results support more research on this combination.

Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Humans; Indazoles; Lung Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors

Given the expanding clinical use of poly(adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis), there is a significant need for optimal strategies with which to treat patients whose cancer progresses while using a PARPi. However, the treatment consensus after PARPi has not been established. The aim of the Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group (KGOG) 3056/NIRVANA-R trial is to investigate the efficacy of niraparib in combination with bevacizumab as a maintenance therapy in platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer patients who were previously treated with a PARPi.. The KGOG 3056/NIRVANA-R is a multi-centre, investigator-initiated, single-arm, phase II trial of patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer recruited from seven KGOG sites. This study included patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer who received at least 2 previous courses of platinum-containing therapy and had been treated with a PARPi. Mucinous histology type was excluded. Patients who had responded to the last platinum regimen (either complete or partial response) were eligible to participate in this study. Forty-four patients will be recruited. All enrolled patients are treated with niraparib and bevacizumab for maintenance therapy until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of patient consent. The primary endpoint of the study is 6-month progression-free survival rate. Accrual is expected to be completed in 2022, followed by presentation of results in 2023.. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04734665.

Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Platinum; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Republic of Korea

Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancers are enriched for DNA repair gene defects (DRDs) that can be susceptible to synthetic lethality through inhibition of PARP proteins. We evaluated the anti-tumour activity and safety of the PARP inhibitor niraparib in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancers and DRDs who progressed on previous treatment with an androgen signalling inhibitor and a taxane.. In this multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study, patients aged at least 18 years with histologically confirmed metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mixed histology accepted, with the exception of the small cell pure phenotype) and DRDs (assessed in blood, tumour tissue, or saliva), with progression on a previous next-generation androgen signalling inhibitor and a taxane per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1 or Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 criteria and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, were eligible. Enrolled patients received niraparib 300 mg orally once daily until treatment discontinuation, death, or study termination. For the final study analysis, all patients who received at least one dose of study drug were included in the safety analysis population; patients with germline pathogenic or somatic biallelic pathogenic alterations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA cohort) or biallelic alterations in other prespecified DRDs (non-BRCA cohort) were included in the efficacy analysis population. The primary endpoint was objective response rate in patients with BRCA alterations and measurable disease (measurable BRCA cohort). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02854436.. Between Sept 28, 2016, and June 26, 2020, 289 patients were enrolled, of whom 182 (63%) had received three or more systemic therapies for prostate cancer. 223 (77%) of 289 patients were included in the overall efficacy analysis population, which included BRCA (n=142) and non-BRCA (n=81) cohorts. At final analysis, with a median follow-up of 10·0 months (IQR 6·6-13·3), the objective response rate in the measurable BRCA cohort (n=76) was 34·2% (95% CI 23·7-46·0). In the safety analysis population, the most common treatment-emergent adverse events of any grade were nausea (169 [58%] of 289), anaemia (156 [54%]), and vomiting (111 [38%]); the most common grade 3 or worse events were haematological (anaemia in 95 [33%] of 289; thrombocytopenia in 47 [16%]; and neutropenia in 28 [10%]). Of 134 (46%) of 289 patients with at least one serious treatment-emergent adverse event, the most common were also haematological (thrombocytopenia in 17 [6%] and anaemia in 13 [4%]). Two adverse events with fatal outcome (one patient with urosepsis in the BRCA cohort and one patient with sepsis in the non-BRCA cohort) were deemed possibly related to niraparib treatment.. Niraparib is tolerable and shows anti-tumour activity in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and DRDs, particularly in those with BRCA alterations.. Janssen Research & Development.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Androgen Antagonists; Androgens; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; DNA Repair; Humans; Indazoles; Male; Piperidines; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant; Thrombocytopenia

Doublet combination therapies targeting immune checkpoints have shown promising efficacy in patients with advanced solid tumors, but it is unknown if rational triplet combinations will be well tolerated and associated with improved antitumor activity. The objective of this trial was to determine the recommended phase 2 doses (RP2Ds) and to assess the safety and efficacy of the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor dostarlimab in combination with (1) the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor niraparib with or without vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor bevacizumab or (2) carboplatin-paclitaxel chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab, in patients with advanced cancer.. IOLite is a multicenter, open-label, multi-arm clinical trial. Patients with advanced solid tumors were enrolled. Patients received dostarlimab in combination with niraparib with or without bevacizumab or in combination with carboplatin-paclitaxel with or without bevacizumab until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal from the study. Prespecified endpoints in all parts were to evaluate the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), RP2Ds, pharmacokinetics (PKs), and preliminary efficacy for each combination.. A total of 55 patients were enrolled; patients received dostarlimab and: (1) niraparib in part A (n=22); (2) carboplatin-paclitaxel in part B (n=14); (3) niraparib plus bevacizumab in part C (n=13); (4) carboplatin-paclitaxel plus bevacizumab in part D (n=6). The RP2Ds of all combinations were determined. All combinations were safe and tolerable, with no new safety signals observed. DLTs were reported in 2, 1, 2, and 0 patients, in parts A-D, respectively. Preliminary antitumor activity was observed, with confirmed Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1 complete/partial responses reported in 4 of 22 patients (18.2%), 6 of 14 patients (42.9%), 4 of 13 patients (30.8%), and 3 of 6 (50.0%) patients, in parts A-D, respectively. Disease control rates were 40.9%, 57.1%, 84.6%, and 83.3%, in parts A-D, respectively. Dostarlimab PK was unaffected by any combinations tested. Coadministration of bevacizumab showed no impact on niraparib PKs. The overall mean PD-1 receptor occupancy was 99.0%.. Dostarlimab was well tolerated in both doublet and triplet regimens tested, with promising antitumor activity observed with all combinations. We observed higher disease control rates in the triplet regimens than in doublet regimens.. NCT03307785.

Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Carboplatin; Humans; Indazoles; Neoplasms; Paclitaxel; Piperidines; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

To evaluate the association between surgical timing and postoperative residual disease status on the efficacy of niraparib first-line maintenance therapy in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer at high risk of recurrence.. Post hoc analysis of the phase 3 PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 (NCT02655016) study of niraparib in patients with newly diagnosed primary advanced ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer with a complete/partial response to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Progression-free survival (PFS) was assessed by surgical status (primary debulking surgery [PDS] vs neoadjuvant chemotherapy/interval debulking surgery [NACT/IDS]) and postoperative residual disease status (no visible residual disease [NVRD] vs visible residual disease [VRD]) in the intent-to-treat population.. In PRIMA (N = 733), 236 (32.2%) patients underwent PDS, and 481 (65.6%) received NACT/IDS before enrollment. Median PFS (niraparib vs placebo) and hazard ratios (95% CI) for progression were similar in PDS (13.7 vs 8.2 months; HR, 0.67 [0.47-0.96]) and NACT/IDS (14.2 vs 8.2 months; HR, 0.57 [0.44-0.73]) subgroups. In patients who received NACT/IDS and had NVRD (n = 304), the hazard ratio (95% CI) for progression was 0.65 (0.46-0.91). In patients with VRD following PDS (n = 183) or NACT/IDS (n = 149), the hazard ratios (95% CI) for progression were 0.58 (0.39-0.86) and 0.41 (0.27-0.62), respectively. PFS was not evaluable for patients with PDS and NVRD because of sample size (n = 37).. In this post hoc analysis, niraparib efficacy was similar across PDS and NACT/IDS subgroups. Patients who had NACT/IDS and VRD had the highest reduction in the risk of progression with niraparib maintenance.

Topics: Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Neoplasm Staging; Neoplasm, Residual; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines

To assess safety and efficacy of niraparib + bevacizumab as a first-line maintenance therapy for patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer.. This multicenter, phase II, single-arm, open-label study enrolled adult patients with stage IIIB to IV ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer (NCT03326193). Patients were required to have an attempt at debulking surgery and have a complete response, partial response, or no evidence of disease following first-line, platinum-based chemotherapy with ≥3 cycles of bevacizumab. The primary endpoint was the progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 18 months. Secondary endpoints included PFS, overall survival, and safety.. Among the 105 evaluable patients, the PFS rate at 18 months was 62% (95% CI 52-71%) in the overall population and 76% (95% CI 61-87) in the homologous recombination deficient (HRd), 47% (95% CI 31-64%) in the HR proficient (HRp), and 56% (95% CI 31-79%) in the HR not determined (HRnd) subgroups (December 24, 2020, cutoff). After a median follow-up time of 28.7 months (IQR, 23.9-32.5 months), median PFS was 19.6 months (95% CI 16.5-25.1) in the overall population (N = 105) and 28.3 months (95% CI 19.9-NE), 14.2 months (95% CI 8.6-16.8), and 12.1 months (95% CI 8.0-NE) in the HRd, HRp, and HRnd subgroups, respectively (June 16, 2021, cutoff). The most common any-grade treatment-related adverse events (related to niraparib and/or bevacizumab) were thrombocytopenia (74/105), fatigue (60/105), and anemia (55/105; December 24, 2020, cutoff).. Niraparib + bevacizumab first-line maintenance therapy displayed promising PFS results. Safety was consistent with the known safety profiles of niraparib and bevacizumab as monotherapy.

Topics: Adult; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Platinum

Establishing alternatives to lifelong chemotherapy for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer has been proposed to address chemotherapy resistance and cumulative toxicity. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have shown efficacy in this setting, and concurrent immune checkpoint blockade could offer synergistic tumour control. The aim of this study was to test the safety and antitumour activity of maintenance with PARP inhibition combined with immune checkpoint blockade in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer who had a stable response to platinum-based chemotherapy.. We conducted an open-label, randomised, phase 1b/2 study of niraparib plus anti-PD-1 (nivolumab) or anti-CTLA-4 (ipilimumab) therapy for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer whose cancer had not progressed after at least 16 weeks of platinum-based therapy. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) via permuted block randomisation (block sizes 2 and 4) to niraparib 200 mg orally per day plus either nivolumab 240 mg intravenously every 2 weeks (later changed to 480 mg intravenously every 4 weeks based on manufacturer update) or ipilimumab 3 mg/kg intravenously every 4 weeks for four doses. The primary endpoints were safety and progression-free survival at 6 months. Treatment groups were not compared for activity, which was assessed in each group against a clinically meaningful progression-free survival at 6 months of 44% (null hypothesis). Superiority of a treatment regimen could be declared if 6-month progression-free survival was 60%, and inferiority if 6-month progression-free survival was 27%. All patients who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one post-treatment assessment of response according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1 were included in the efficacy population. The safety population consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03404960, and enrolment is completed and follow-up is ongoing.. 91 patients were enrolled between Feb 7, 2018, and Oct 5, 2021 and were randomly assigned to niraparib plus nivolumab (n=46) or niraparib plus ipilimumab (n=45). Of these patients, 84 were evaluable for the progression-free survival endpoint (niraparib plus nivolumab=44; niraparib plus ipilimumab=40). Median follow-up was 23·0 months (IQR 15·0-31·5). 6-month progression-free survival was 20·6% (95% CI 8·3-32·9; p=0·0002 vs the null hypothesis of 44%) in the niraparib plus nivolumab group; and 59·6% (44·3-74·9; p=0·045) in the niraparib plus ipilimumab group. Ten (22%) of 46 patients in the niraparib plus nivolumab group and 23 (50%) of 45 patients in the niraparib plus ipilimumab group had a grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse event. The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events in the niraparib plus nivolumab group were hypertension (in four [8%] patients), anaemia (two [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (two [4%]) whereas in the niraparib plus ipilimumab group these were fatigue (in six [14%]), anaemia (five [11%]), and hypertension (four [9%]). There were no treatment-related deaths.. The primary endpoint of 6-month progression-free survival was met in the niraparib plus ipilimumab maintenance group, whereas niraparib plus nivolumab yielded inferior progression-free survival. These findings highlight the potential for non-cytotoxic maintenance therapies in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.. Bristol Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, the Basser Center Young Leadership Council, The Konner Foundation, The Pearl and Philip Basser Innovation Research Award, the Anonymous Foundation, and the US National Institutes of Health.

Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Humans; Hypertension; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Indazoles; Ipilimumab; Nivolumab; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Piperidines; Platinum; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors

Platinum-resistant ovarian cancer patients have a poor prognosis and few treatment options are available. Preclinical and clinical data demonstrated that the combination of poly-ADP ribose polymerase inhibitors with immune checkpoint inhibitors could have a synergistic antitumor activity in this setting of patients.. The primary objective is to assess the efficacy of niraparib plus dostarlimab compared with chemotherapy in recurrent ovarian cancer patients not suitable for platinum treatment.. This trial will assess the hypothesis that niraparib plus dostarlimab therapy is effective to increase overall survival, progression-free survival, and time to first subsequent therapy respect to chemotherapy alone, with an acceptable toxicity profile.. This is a phase III, multicenter trial, where recurrent ovarian cancer patients not eligible for platinum re-treatment will be randomized 1:1 to receive niraparib plus dostarlimab vs physician's choice chemotherapy until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or withdrawal of patient consent. The study will be performed according to European Network for Gynaecological Oncological Trial groups (ENGOT) model B and patients will be recruited from 40 sites across MITO, CEEGOG, GINECO, HeCOG, MANGO, and NOGGO groups.. Eligible patients must have recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer not eligible for platinum retreatment. Patients who received previous treatment with poly-ADP ribose polymerase inhibitors and/or immune checkpoint inhibitors will be eligible. No more than two prior lines of treatment are allowed.. The primary endpoint is overall survival defined as the time from the randomization to the date of death by any cause.. 427 patients will be randomized.. June 2024 TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04679064.

Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Female; Humans; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Indazoles; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ovarian Neoplasms; Peritoneal Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors

The present study aimed to assess the prevalence of symptoms of anxiety and depression among health professionals in the three most affected regions in Cameroon.. The study was a descriptive cross-sectional type. Participants were health care professionals working in the three chosen regions of Cameroon. The non_probability convinient sample technique and that of the snowball were valued via a web questionnaire. The non-exhaustive sample size was 292. The diagnosis of anxiety and depression was made by the HAD (Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale).. Les auteurs rapportent que le secteur médical est classé à un plus grand risque de contracter le COVID-19 et de le propager potentiellement à d’autres. Le nombre sans cesse croissant de cas confirmés et suspects, la pression dans les soins, l’épuisement des équipements de protection individuelle et le manque de médicaments spécifiques peuvent contribuer à un vécu anxio-dépressif significatif. La présente étude s’est donnée pour ambition d’évaluer la prévalence des symptômes de l’anxiété et de la dépression chez les professionnels de santé dans les trois Régions les plus concernées au Cameroun.. Le choix des trois Régions du Cameroun se justifie non seulement par le fait qu’elles totalisent 95,8 % des cas de coronavirus au pays depuis le début de la pandémie, mais aussi parce qu’elles disposent de plus de la moitié des personnels de santé (56 %). Il s’agit d’une étude transversale, descriptive et analytique. Les participants sont des professionnels de la santé en service dans les Régions du Centre, Littoral et de l’Ouest du Cameroun. La méthode d’échantillonnage non probabiliste de convenance couplée à celle de boule de neige via un web questionnaire a été adoptée. La collecte des données a duré du 5 au 19 avril 2020, intervalle de temps après lequel on n’avait plus eu de répondants. À la fin de cette période, la taille de l’échantillon non exhaustive était de 292 professionnels. Le diagnostic de l’état anxio-dépressive était posé via l’échelle de HAD (Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale). Dans le HAD, chaque réponse cotée évalue de manière semi-quantitative l’intensité du symptôme au cours de la semaine écoulée. Un score total est obtenu ainsi que des scores aux deux sous-échelles : le score maximal est de 42 pour l’échelle globale et de 21 pour chacune des sous-échelles. Le coefficient alpha de Cronbach est de 0,70 pour la dépression et de 0,74 pour l’anxiété. Certains auteurs après plusieurs travaux ont proposé qu’une note inférieure ou égale à 7 indique une absence d’anxiété ou de dépression ; celle comprise entre 8 et 10 suggère une anxiété ou une dépression faible à bénigne ; entre 11 et 14, pour une anxiété ou une dépression modérée ; enfin, une note comprise entre 15 et 21 est révélatrice d’une anxiété sévère. Le logiciel Excel 2013 et Epi Info version 7.2.2.6 ont été utilisés pour les traitements statistiques. Les liens entre les variables ont été considérées significatifs pour une valeur de. L’amélioration des conditions de travail et notamment la fourniture d’équipement de protection, la mise en place des cellules spéciales d’écoute pour le personnel de santé pourraient être proposées.. Taken together with satisfactory selectivity index (SI) values, the acetone and methanol extracts of. During a mean follow-up period of 25.6 ± 13.9 months, 38 (18.4%) VAs and 78 (37.7%) end-stage events occurred. Big ET-1 was positively correlated with NYHA class (. In primary prevention ICD indication patients, plasma big ET-1 levels can predict VAs and end-stage events and may facilitate ICD-implantation risk stratification.. Beyond age, cognitive impairment was associated with prior MI/stroke, higher hsCRP, statin use, less education, lower eGFR, BMI and LVEF.. These data demonstrate that even a short period of detraining is harmful for elderly women who regularly participate in a program of strength training, since it impairs physical performance, insulin sensitivity and cholesterol metabolism.. Exposure to PM. Respiratory sinus arrhythmia is reduced after PVI in patients with paroxysmal AF. Our findings suggest that this is related to a decrease in cardiac vagal tone. Whether and how this affects the clinical outcome including exercise capacity need to be determined.. BDNF and leptin were not associated with weight. We found that miR-214-5p exerted a protective role in I/R injured cardiac cells by direct targeting FASLG. The results indicated that the MGO injection reduced all CCl. The hepatoprotective effects of MGO might be due to histopathological suppression and inflammation inhibition in the liver.. OVEO showed moderate antifungal activity, whereas its main components carvacrol and thymol have great application potential as natural fungicides or lead compounds for commercial fungicides in preventing and controlling plant diseases caused by. PF trajectories were mainly related to income, pregestational BMI, birth weight, hospitalisation due to respiratory diseases in childhood, participant's BMI, report of wheezing, medical diagnosis and family history of asthma, gestational exposure to tobacco and current smoking status in adolescence and young adult age.. In chronic pain patients on opioids, administration of certain benzodiazepine sedatives induced a mild respiratory depression but paradoxically reduced sleep apnoea risk and severity by increasing the respiratory arousal threshold.. Quantitative measurements of sensory disturbances using the PainVision. The serum level of 20S-proteasome may be a useful marker for disease activity in AAV.. The electrophysiological data and MD simulations collectively suggest a crucial role of the interactions between the HA helix and S4-S5 linker in the apparent Ca. Invited for the cover of this issue are Vanesa Fernández-Moreira, Nils Metzler-Nolte, M. Concepción Gimeno and co-workers at Universidad de Zaragoza and Ruhr-Universität Bochum. The image depicts the reported bimetallic bioconjugates as planes directing the gold fragment towards the target (lysosomes). Read the full text of the article at 10.1002/chem.202002067.. The optimal CRT pacing configuration changes during dobutamine infusion while LV and RV activation timing does not. Further studies investigating the usefulness of automated dynamic changes to CRT pacing configuration according to physiologic condition may be warranted.

Topics: 3' Untranslated Regions; 5'-Nucleotidase; A549 Cells; Accidental Falls; Acetylcholinesterase; Acrylic Resins; Actinobacillus; Acute Disease; Acute Kidney Injury; Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing; Adenosine; Adenosine Triphosphate; Administration, Inhalation; Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Advance Care Planning; Africa, Northern; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Air Pollutants; Air Pollution; Air Pollution, Indoor; Albendazole; Aluminum Oxide; Anastomosis, Surgical; Ancylostoma; Ancylostomiasis; Androstadienes; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Angiotensin II; Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Anti-Infective Agents; Antibodies, Bispecific; Antibodies, Viral; Anticoagulants; Antihypertensive Agents; Antinematodal Agents; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Antioxidants; Antiporters; Antiviral Agents; Apoptosis; Aptamers, Nucleotide; Aromatase Inhibitors; Asian People; Astrocytes; Atrial Fibrillation; Auditory Threshold; Aurora Kinase B; Australia; Autophagy; Autophagy-Related Protein 5; Autotrophic Processes; Bacillus cereus; Bacillus thuringiensis; Bacterial Proteins; Beclin-1; Belgium; Benzene; Benzene Derivatives; Benzhydryl Compounds; beta Catenin; beta-Arrestin 2; Biliary Tract Diseases; Biofilms; Biofuels; Biomarkers; Biomarkers, Tumor; Biomass; Biomechanical Phenomena; Bioreactors; Biosensing Techniques; Biosynthetic Pathways; Bismuth; Blood Platelets; Bone and Bones; Bone Regeneration; Bortezomib; Botulinum Toxins, Type A; Brain; Brain Injuries; Brain Ischemia; Brain Neoplasms; Breast Neoplasms; Breath Tests; Bronchodilator Agents; Calcium Phosphates; Cannabis; Carbon Dioxide; Carbon Isotopes; Carcinogenesis; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy; Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices; Cardiomyopathies; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cariostatic Agents; Case Managers; Case-Control Studies; Catalysis; Cation Transport Proteins; CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes; Cecropia Plant; Cell Adhesion; Cell Count; Cell Differentiation; Cell Division; Cell Line; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Membrane; Cell Movement; Cell Proliferation; Cell Self Renewal; Cell Survival; Cells, Cultured; Cellular Reprogramming; Cellulose; Charcoal; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Chemical Phenomena; Chemokines; Chemoradiotherapy; Chemoreceptor Cells; Child; Child Abuse; Child, Preschool; China; Chlorogenic Acid; Chloroquine; Chromatography, Gas; Chronic Disease; Clinical Competence; Coated Materials, Biocompatible; Cochlea; Cohort Studies; Color; Comorbidity; Computer Simulation; Computer-Aided Design; Contraception; Contraceptive Agents, Female; Contrast Media; COP-Coated Vesicles; Coronavirus Infections; Cost of Illness; Coturnix; COVID-19; Creatinine; Cross-Over Studies; Cross-Sectional Studies; Culex; Curriculum; Cyclic N-Oxides; Cytokines; Cytoplasm; Cytotoxicity, Immunologic; Cytotoxins; Databases, Factual; Deep Learning; Delivery, Obstetric; Denitrification; Dental Caries; Denture, Complete; Dexamethasone; Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus; Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dielectric Spectroscopy; Diet, High-Fat; Dietary Fiber; Disease Models, Animal; Disease Progression; DNA; DNA Copy Number Variations; DNA, Mitochondrial; Dog Diseases; Dogs; Dopaminergic Neurons; Double-Blind Method; Down-Regulation; Doxorubicin; Drug Carriers; Drug Design; Drug Interactions; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Drugs, Chinese Herbal; Dry Powder Inhalers; Dust; E2F1 Transcription Factor; Ecosystem; Education, Nursing; Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate; Electric Impedance; Electricity; Electrocardiography; Electrochemical Techniques; Electrochemistry; Electrodes; Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel; Endoplasmic Reticulum; Endothelial Cells; Environmental Monitoring; Enzyme Inhibitors; Epithelial Cells; Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition; Esophageal Neoplasms; Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma; Estrogen Receptor Modulators; Europe; Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem; Exosomes; Feasibility Studies; Female; Ferricyanides; Ferrocyanides; Fibrinogen; Finite Element Analysis; Fistula; Fluorescent Dyes; Fluorides, Topical; Fluorodeoxyglucose F18; Fluticasone; Follow-Up Studies; Food Contamination; Food Microbiology; Foods, Specialized; Forensic Medicine; Frail Elderly; France; Free Radicals; Fresh Water; Fungi; Fungicides, Industrial; Galactosamine; Gastrointestinal Neoplasms; Gene Expression Profiling; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; Gene Frequency; Genetic Predisposition to Disease; Genotype; Gingival Hemorrhage; Glioblastoma; Glioma; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Glomerulosclerosis, Focal Segmental; Glucose; Glucose Transport Proteins, Facilitative; Glucosides; Glutamine; Glycolysis; Gold; GPI-Linked Proteins; Gram-Negative Bacteria; Gram-Positive Bacteria; Graphite; Haplotypes; HCT116 Cells; Healthy Volunteers; Hearing Loss; Heart Failure; Hedgehog Proteins; HEK293 Cells; HeLa Cells; Hemodynamics; Hemorrhage; Hepatocytes; Hippo Signaling Pathway; Histone Deacetylases; Homeostasis; Hospital Mortality; Hospitalization; Humans; Hydantoins; Hydrazines; Hydrogen Peroxide; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration; Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions; Hydroxylamines; Hypoglycemic Agents; Immunity, Innate; Immunoglobulin G; Immunohistochemistry; Immunologic Factors; Immunomodulation; Immunophenotyping; Immunotherapy; Incidence; Indazoles; Indonesia; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Infarction, Middle Cerebral Artery; Inflammation; Injections, Intramuscular; Insecticides; Insulin-Like Growth Factor I; Insurance, Health; Intention to Treat Analysis; Interleukin-1 Receptor-Associated Kinases; Interleukin-6; Intrauterine Devices; Intrauterine Devices, Copper; Iron; Ischemia; Jordan; Keratinocytes; Kidney; Kidney Diseases; Kir5.1 Channel; Klebsiella Infections; Klebsiella pneumoniae; Lab-On-A-Chip Devices; Laparoscopy; Lasers; Lasers, Semiconductor; Lenalidomide; Leptin; Lethal Dose 50; Levonorgestrel; Limit of Detection; Lipid Metabolism; Lipid Metabolism Disorders; Lipogenesis; Lipopolysaccharides; Liquid Biopsy; Liver; Liver Abscess, Pyogenic; Liver Cirrhosis; Liver Diseases; Liver Neoplasms; Longevity; Lung Neoplasms; Luteolin; Lymph Nodes; Lymphocyte Activation; Macaca fascicularis; Macrophages; Mad2 Proteins; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Mammary Glands, Human; Manganese; Manganese Compounds; MAP Kinase Signaling System; Materials Testing; Maternal Health Services; MCF-7 Cells; Medicaid; Medicine, Chinese Traditional; Melanoma; Membrane Proteins; Mental Health; Mercury; Metal Nanoparticles; Metals, Heavy; Metformin; Methionine Adenosyltransferase; Mice; Mice, Inbred BALB C; Mice, Inbred C3H; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Mice, Inbred CBA; Mice, Knockout; Mice, Nude; Microalgae; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Microglia; MicroRNAs; Microscopy, Atomic Force; Microscopy, Electron, Scanning; Middle Aged; Mitochondria; Mitochondrial Proteins; Mitral Valve; Mitral Valve Insufficiency; Models, Anatomic; Molecular Structure; Molybdenum; Monocarboxylic Acid Transporters; Moths; MPTP Poisoning; Multigene Family; Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Multiple Myeloma; Muscle, Skeletal; Mutagens; Mutation; Myeloid Cells; Nanocomposites; Nanofibers; Nanomedicine; Nanoparticles; Nanowires; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Neomycin; Neoplasm Grading; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Neoplasms; Neoplastic Stem Cells; Neostriatum; Neovascularization, Pathologic; Netherlands; Neuromuscular Agents; Neurons; NF-E2-Related Factor 2; NF-kappa B; Nickel; Nitrogen Oxides; Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease; Nucleosides; Nucleotidyltransferases; Nutritional Status; Obesity, Morbid; Ofloxacin; Oils, Volatile; Oligopeptides; Oncogene Protein v-akt; Optical Imaging; Organic Cation Transport Proteins; Organophosphonates; Osteoarthritis; Osteoarthritis, Hip; Osteoarthritis, Knee; Osteoblasts; Osteogenesis; Oxidation-Reduction; Oxidative Stress; Oxides; Oxygen Isotopes; Pancreas; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Pandemics; Particle Size; Particulate Matter; Patient Acceptance of Health Care; Patient Compliance; PC-3 Cells; Peptide Fragments; Peptides; Periodontal Attachment Loss; Periodontal Index; Periodontal Pocket; Periodontitis; Peroxides; Peru; Pest Control, Biological; Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase; Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases; Phylogeny; Pilot Projects; Piperidines; Plant Bark; Plant Extracts; Plant Leaves; Plasmids; Platelet Function Tests; Pneumonia, Viral; Podocytes; Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase-1; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Polyethylene Terephthalates; Polymers; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; Porosity; Portugal; Positron-Emission Tomography; Postoperative Complications; Postural Balance; Potassium Channels, Inwardly Rectifying; Povidone; Powders; Precancerous Conditions; Precision Medicine; Predictive Value of Tests; Pregnancy; Prenatal Care; Prognosis; Promoter Regions, Genetic; Prospective Studies; Prostatectomy; Prostatic Neoplasms; Proteasome Inhibitors; Protective Agents; Protein Binding; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases; Protein Transport; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt; Psychiatric Nursing; PTEN Phosphohydrolase; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyrimethamine; Radiopharmaceuticals; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Rats, Wistar; Reactive Oxygen Species; Receptor, ErbB-2; Receptor, IGF Type 1; Receptors, Estrogen; Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled; Recombinational DNA Repair; Recovery of Function; Regional Blood Flow; Renal Dialysis; Renin; Renin-Angiotensin System; Reperfusion Injury; Reproducibility of Results; Republic of Korea; Respiratory Distress Syndrome; Retrospective Studies; Rhodamines; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; RNA, Long Noncoding; RNA, Messenger; Running; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins; Salinity; Salmeterol Xinafoate; Sarcoma; Seasons; Shoulder Injuries; Signal Transduction; Silicon Dioxide; Silver; Sirtuin 1; Sirtuins; Skull Fractures; Social Determinants of Health; Sodium; Sodium Fluoride; Sodium Potassium Chloride Symporter Inhibitors; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Soil; Soil Pollutants; Spain; Spectrophotometry; Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared; Staphylococcal Protein A; Staphylococcus aureus; Stem Cells; Stereoisomerism; Stomach Neoplasms; Streptomyces; Strontium; Structure-Activity Relationship; Students, Nursing; Substance-Related Disorders; Succinic Acid; Sulfur; Surface Properties; Survival Rate; Survivin; Symporters; T-Lymphocytes; Temozolomide; Tensile Strength; Thiazoles; Thiobacillus; Thiohydantoins; Thiourea; Thrombectomy; Time Factors; Titanium; Tobacco Mosaic Virus; Tobacco Use Disorder; Toll-Like Receptor 4; Toluene; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases; Toxicity Tests, Acute; Toxicity Tests, Subacute; Transcriptional Activation; Treatment Outcome; Troponin I; Tumor Cells, Cultured; Tumor Escape; Tumor Hypoxia; Tumor Microenvironment; Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha; Tyrosine; Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases; Ubiquitination; Ultrasonic Waves; United Kingdom; United States; United States Department of Veterans Affairs; Up-Regulation; Urea; Uric Acid; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms; Urinary Bladder, Neurogenic; Urine; Urodynamics; User-Computer Interface; Vemurafenib; Verbenaceae; Veterans; Veterans Health; Viral Load; Virtual Reality; Vitiligo; Water Pollutants, Chemical; Wildfires; Wnt Signaling Pathway; Wound Healing; X-Ray Diffraction; Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays; Xylenes; Young Adult; Zinc; Zinc Oxide; Zinc Sulfate; Zoonoses

Treatment with poly ADP ribose polymerase (PARP)1/2 inhibitors represents a novel opportunity to selectively kill a subset of cancer cell types by exploiting their deficiencies in DNA repair, thus leading to synthetic lethality. Treatment of homologous recombination deficient (HRD)-tumors with PARP inhibitors generates significant levels of DNA damage, which has the potential to further increasing tumor mutational burden, promoting neoantigen release, and upregulating both interferons and programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression, suggesting a potential complementary and synergistic role with immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer treatment. Here we present the design and rationale of a prospective, phase II, single-arm study aiming to investigate the safety and antitumor activity of the combination of niraparib and dostarlimab in patients with HRD-positive and PD-L1 ≥ 1% advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and/or malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). Considering the prevalence of pathogenetic germline mutations in DNA repair genes, reported to be around 5% to 10% in patients with MPM and NSCLC, a total of 700 to 1000 cases will be screened to identify 70 patients who are HRD-positive/PD-L1 ≥ 1% (N = 35 NSCLC; N = 35 MPM) to be included. Patients will receive the combination of niraparib orally once daily and dostarlimab intravenously. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints are objective response, duration of response, overall survival, and safety. The results of this study will provide evidence on the safety and antitumor activity of niraparib and dostarlimab combination in patients with advanced, HRD-positive and PD-L1 ≥ 1% NSCLC and/or MPM.

Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; B7-H1 Antigen; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; DNA Repair Enzymes; Germ-Line Mutation; Humans; Indazoles; Lung Neoplasms; Mesothelioma, Malignant; Mutation; Piperidines; Pleural Neoplasms; Prognosis; Prospective Studies

Platinum based chemotherapy is the treatment of choice for ovarian cancer patients with a platinum treatment free interval of >6 months. Niraparib is an oral poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor approved as maintenance therapy after a response to platinum rechallenge, regardless of BRCA status. Atezolizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1). A combination of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor and anti-PD-L1/programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) has shown synergy in preclinical models and promising clinical activity.. To determine whether the addition of atezolizumab to carboplatin based chemotherapy and to subsequent maintenance with niraparib improves progression free survival compared with placebo in patients with recurrent disease and a platinum treatment free interval of >6 months.. The Atezolizumab and NIraparib Treatment Association (ANITA) trial is a GEICO (Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Ovario) led phase III, randomized, double-blinded, multicenter European Network for Gynecological Oncological Trials (ENGOT) study. Patients will be randomized to arm A (control arm) consisting of platinum based chemotherapy (investigator's choice) plus a placebo of atezolizumab followed by maintenance niraparib plus a placebo of atezolizumab, or to arm B (experimental arm) consisting of platinum based chemotherapy (investigator's choice) plus atezolizumab followed by maintenance niraparib plus atezolizumab.. Inclusion criteria are women aged over 18 years, diagnosed with relapsed high grade serous, endometrioid, or undifferentiated ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal carcinoma. Patients are eligible if they received no more than two previous lines of chemotherapy, relapsed ≥6 months after the last platinum containing regimen, and have at least one measurable lesion according to the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors, version 1.1.. The primary endpoint for this study is progression free survival.. Approximately 414 patients will be recruited and randomized in a 1:1 ratio, with the aim of demonstrating a benefit in progression free survival for the experimental arm with a hazard ratio of O.7, using a two sided alpha of 0.05 and a power of 80%.. The trial was launched in the fourth quarter of 2018 and is estimated to close in the second quarter of 2021. Mature results for progression free survival are expected to be presented by 2023.. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03598270.

Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Double-Blind Method; Fallopian Tube Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Peritoneal Neoplasms; Piperidines; Platinum; Progression-Free Survival; Time Factors

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of niraparib in Japanese women with heavily pretreated ovarian cancer.. This Phase 2 open-label, single-arm study enrolled Japanese women with homologous recombination deficiency-positive relapsed, high-grade serous ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer who had completed 3-4 lines of therapy. The starting dose of niraparib was 300 mg administered once daily in continuous 28-day cycles until objective progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, consent withdrawal or discontinuation. The primary endpoint, objective response rate (ORR), was assessed by the investigator using RECIST version 1.1. Safety evaluations included the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), including serious TEAEs.. Twenty women were enrolled and the confirmed ORR in the full analysis set (FAS) was 35.0% (7/20), consisting of 1 complete response and 6 partial responses. Disease control rate in the FAS was 90.0%. The most frequently reported TEAEs (>50%) were anemia, nausea, and platelet count decreased. One patient (5.0%) had TEAEs leading to discontinuation of niraparib whereas reductions or interruptions were reported in 14 (70.0%) and 15 (75.0%) patients, respectively. The median dose intensity (202.9 mg daily) corresponded to a relative dose intensity of 67.6%.. Efficacy and safety of niraparib in heavily pretreated Japanese women was comparable to that seen in an equivalent population of non-Japanese women. No new safety signals were identified.. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03759600.

Topics: Female; Homologous Recombination; Humans; Indazoles; Japan; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors

This study evaluated maintenance treatment with niraparib, a potent inhibitor of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1/2, in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer.. Between 26 September 2017 and 2 February 2019, 265 patients were randomized to receive niraparib (n = 177) or placebo (n = 88); 249 patients received an ISD (300 mg, n = 14; 200 mg, n = 235) as per protocol. In the intention-to-treat population, median PFS was significantly longer for patients receiving niraparib versus placebo: 18.3 [95% confidence interval (CI), 10.9-not evaluable] versus 5.4 (95% CI, 3.7-5.7) months [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.32; 95% CI, 0.23-0.45; P < 0.0001], and a similar PFS benefit was observed in patients receiving an ISD, regardless of BRCA mutation status. Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 50.8% and 19.3% of patients who received niraparib and placebo, respectively; the most common events were neutrophil count decreased (20.3% versus 8.0%) and anemia (14.7% versus 2.3%).. Niraparib maintenance treatment reduced the risk of disease progression or death by 68% and prolonged PFS compared to placebo in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer. Individualized niraparib dosing is effective and safe and should be considered standard practice in this setting.

Topics: Adult; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; China; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors

The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the safety of niraparib 300 mg/day in Japanese patients with platinum-sensitive, relapsed ovarian cancer in a maintenance setting.. Phase 2, multicenter, open-label, single-arm study enrolled Japanese patients with platinum-sensitive, relapsed ovarian cancer who had received ≥2 platinum-based regimens. The primary endpoint (incidence of grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia-related events within 30 days after initial niraparib administration) was justified by the incidences of a global pivotal phase 3 study and its post-hoc safety analysis on thrombocytopenia, the major hematological adverse event of niraparib. The overall safety analysis examined other treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs).. Enrolled patients (n=19) had a median (min, max) body weight of 53.9 (40.8-79.1) kg; all but one patient weighed <77 kg. Most (94.7%) patients initially received niraparib 300 mg/day but this decreased in subsequent cycles (mean±standard deviation dose intensity, 191.6±65.7 mg/day). In total, 6/19 (31.6%) patients experienced grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia-related events within 30 days of initial niraparib administration. Other common TEAEs included nausea, and decreased platelet or neutrophil counts. No progression-free or overall survival events occurred; only 1 of 4 response-evaluable patients had a post-baseline tumor assessment (stable disease).. The incidence of grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia-related events in Japanese ovarian cancer patients was similar to that in the corresponding non-Japanese study. Overall, the safety profile was acceptable and consistent with the known safety profile and previous experience with niraparib.. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03759587.

Topics: Female; Humans; Indazoles; Japan; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines

Niraparib is the only poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose)-polymerase (PARP) inhibitor available as oral monotherapy for maintenance, regardless of BRCA mutational status.. This phase I, open-label, non-randomized, dose-escalation study was conducted in Japan using a 3 + 3 design. Adults (≥20 years) with metastatic or locally advanced solid tumours were enrolled. Niraparib 200 mg (cohort 1) or 300 mg (cohort 2) was administered once daily in 21-day cycles (no drug holiday between cycles) until progressive disease (PD) or unacceptable toxicity. The primary objective was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of niraparib in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumours. The number of patients with dose-limiting toxicities in cycle 1 and number with treatment-emergent adverse events were primary endpoints. Secondary endpoints were pharmacokinetics and tumour response.. There were three patients in cohort 1 and six patients in cohort 2. Only one patient, in cohort 2, developed a dose-limiting toxicity (grade 4 platelet count decreased). All patients in both cohorts developed treatment-emergent adverse events. The most common treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events were decreased appetite (n = 2) in cohort 1, and platelet count decreased as well as aspartate aminotransferase increased (both n = 5) in cohort 2. Mean Cmax and AUC0-24 of niraparib increased dose-proportionally after multiple doses (accumulation ratio of between 1.64 and 3.65); median tmax was 3-4 h. Two patients, both in cohort 2, had a partial response to treatment.. Niraparib (200 or 300 mg/day) was tolerable and had a favourable pharmacokinetic profile in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumours.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Cohort Studies; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors

To assess the safety and pharmacokinetics and determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of niraparib with apalutamide or abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AAP) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).. BEDIVERE was a multicenter, open-label, phase 1b study of niraparib 200 or 300 mg/day with apalutamide 240 mg or AAP (abiraterone acetate 1000 mg; prednisone 10 mg). Patients with mCRPC were previously treated with ≥ 2 lines of systemic therapy, including ≥ 1 androgen receptor-axis-targeted therapy for prostate cancer.. Thirty-three patients were enrolled (niraparib-apalutamide, 6; niraparib-AAP, 27). No dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were reported when combinations included niraparib 200 mg; five patients receiving niraparib 300 mg experienced DLTs [niraparib-apalutamide, 2/3 patients (66.7%); niraparib-AAP, 3/8 patients (37.5%)]. Although data are limited, niraparib exposures were lower when given with apalutamide compared with historical niraparib monotherapy exposures in patients with solid tumors. Because of the higher incidence of DLTs, the niraparib-apalutamide combination and niraparib 300 mg combination with AAP were not further evaluated. Niraparib 200 mg was selected as the RP2D with AAP. Of 19 patients receiving niraparib 200 mg with AAP, 12 (63.2%) had grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events, the most common being thrombocytopenia (26.3%) and hypertension (21.1%). Five patients (26.3%) had adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation.. These results support the choice of niraparib 200 mg as the RP2D with AAP. The niraparib-AAP combination was tolerable in patients with mCRPC, with no new safety signals. An ongoing phase 3 study is further assessing this combination in patients with mCRPC.. NCT02924766 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Androstenes; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Humans; Indazoles; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Prednisone; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant; Receptors, Androgen; Thiohydantoins

ZL-2306-005 is a randomized, double-blind, multicenter phase 3 study evaluating the efficacy and safety of niraparib, a poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, as first-line maintenance therapy in Chinese patients with platinum-responsive, extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC).. Patients with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) to standardized, platinum-based first-line chemotherapy were randomized 2:1 to receive niraparib or placebo (300 mg [baseline body weight ≥ 77 kg, platelet count ≥ 150,000/μL] or 200 mg) once daily until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) (blinded independent central review) and overall survival (sample size planned: 591 patients). Secondary end points included investigator-evaluated PFS and safety.. ZL-2306-005 was terminated early owing to ES-SCLC treatment landscape changes (data cutoff: March 20, 2020). During July 2018-February 2020, a total of 185 of 272 patients screened were randomized (niraparib: n = 125 [CR = 1, PR = 124]; placebo: n = 60 [CR = 1, PR = 59]). Median (95% confidence interval [CI]) PFS (blinded independent central review) was 1.54 months (1.41-2.69, niraparib) and 1.36 months (1.31-1.48, placebo); hazard ratio (HR) = 0.66 (95% CI: 0.46-0.95, p = 0.0242). Median overall survival was 9.92 months (9.33-13.54, niraparib) and 11.43 months (9.53-not estimable, placebo); HR = 1.03 (95% CI: 0.62-1.73, p = 0.9052). Median investigator-evaluated PFS was 1.48 months (1.41-2.56, niraparib) and 1.41 months (1.31-2.00, placebo); HR = 0.88 (95% CI: 0.61-1.26; p = 0.4653). Grade greater than or equal to 3 adverse events occurred in 34.4% (niraparib) and 25.0% (placebo) of patients.. ZL-2306-005 did not reach primary end points. Nevertheless, niraparib as maintenance therapy modestly improved PFS in patients with platinum-responsive ES-SCLC, with acceptable tolerability profile and no new safety signal.

Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Lung Neoplasms; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines

The purpose of this study is to characterize niraparib pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety in patients with normal hepatic function (NHF) versus moderate hepatic impairment (MHI).. These findings support adjusting the 300 mg niraparib starting dose to 200 mg QD in patients with MHI.. NCT03359850; registered December 2, 2017.

Topics: Aged; Area Under Curve; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Liver; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines

Pharmacokinetics characteristics of niraparib in Chinese patients were similar to those in white patients. Niraparib could be well tolerated by Chinese patients, and adverse events were manageable in this study. Population pharmacokinetics analysis indicated that baseline body weight had a modest impact on pharmacokinetics parameters of niraparib; however, it was not considered clinically important.. This randomized, open-label, single-arm, phase I study was designed to investigate the pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of niraparib in Chinese patients with epithelial ovarian cancer.. Eligible patients were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive 100, 200, or 300 mg of niraparib once daily. PK parameters were analyzed after single and multiple dose administrations.. The PK profile of niraparib in Chinese patients is consistent with that in white patients. Niraparib is safe and well tolerated in Chinese patients with ovarian cancer.

Topics: Female; Humans; Indazoles; Male; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors

Combined PARP and immune checkpoint inhibition has yielded encouraging results in ovarian cancer, but predictive biomarkers are lacking. We performed immunogenomic profiling and highly multiplexed single-cell imaging on tumor samples from patients enrolled in a Phase I/II trial of niraparib and pembrolizumab in ovarian cancer (NCT02657889). We identify two determinants of response; mutational signature 3 reflecting defective homologous recombination DNA repair, and positive immune score as a surrogate of interferon-primed exhausted CD8 + T-cells in the tumor microenvironment. Presence of one or both features associates with an improved outcome while concurrent absence yields no responses. Single-cell spatial analysis reveals prominent interactions of exhausted CD8 + T-cells and PD-L1 + macrophages and PD-L1 + tumor cells as mechanistic determinants of response. Furthermore, spatial analysis of two extreme responders shows differential clustering of exhausted CD8 + T-cells with PD-L1 + macrophages in the first, and exhausted CD8 + T-cells with cancer cells harboring genomic PD-L1 and PD-L2 amplification in the second.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; B7-H1 Antigen; CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes; DNA Mutational Analysis; Drug Monitoring; Female; Gene Amplification; Humans; Indazoles; Interferons; Macrophages; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ovarian Neoplasms; Ovary; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Programmed Cell Death 1 Ligand 2 Protein; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor; Recombinational DNA Repair; Single-Cell Analysis; Treatment Outcome; Tumor Microenvironment

In China, secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCR) has been widely used in ovarian cancer (OC) over the past two decades. Although Gynecologic Oncology Group-0213 trial did not show its overall survival benefit in first relapsed patients, the questions on patient selection and effect of subsequent targeting therapy are still open. The preliminary data from our pre-SOC1 phase II study showed that selected patients with second relapse who never received SCR at recurrence may still benefit from surgery. Moreover, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) maintenance now has been a standard care for platinum sensitive relapsed OC. To our knowledge, no published or ongoing trial is trying to answer the question if patient can benefit from a potentially complete resection combined with PARPi maintenance in OC patients with secondary recurrence.. SOC-3 is a multi-center, open, randomized, controlled, phase II trial of SCR followed by chemotherapy and niraparib maintenance vs chemotherapy and niraparib maintenance in patients with platinum-sensitive second relapsed OC who never received SCR at recurrence. To guarantee surgical quality, if the sites had no experience of participating in any OC-related surgical trials, the number of recurrent lesions evaluated by central-reviewed positron emission tomography-computed tomography image shouldn't be more than 3. Eligible patients are randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either SCR followed by 6 cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy and niraparib maintenance or 6 cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy and niraparib maintenance alone. Patients who undergo at least 4 cycles of chemotherapy and must be, in the opinion of the investigator, without disease progression, will be assigned niraparib maintenance. Major inclusion criteria are secondary relapsed OC with a platinum-free interval of no less than 6 months and a possibly complete resection. Major exclusion criteria are borderline tumors and non-epithelial ovarian malignancies, received debulking surgery at recurrence and impossible to complete resection. The sample size is 96 patients. Primary endpoint is 12-month non-progression rate.. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03983226.

Topics: Adolescent; China; Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography; Quality of Life

Niraparib is a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor approved for use in heavily pretreated patients and as maintenance treatment in patients with newly-diagnosed or recurrent ovarian cancer following a response to platinum-based chemotherapy. We present long-term safety data for niraparib from the ENGOT-OV16/NOVA trial.. This multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled phase III trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of niraparib for the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer. Patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive either once-daily niraparib 300 mg or placebo. Two independent cohorts were enrolled based on germline BRCA mutation status. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, reported previously. Long-term safety data were from the most recent data cutoff (September 2017).. Overall, 367 patients received niraparib 300 mg once daily. Dose reductions due to TEAEs were highest in month 1 (34%) and declined every month thereafter. Incidence of any-grade and grade ≥ 3 hematologic and symptomatic TEAEs was also highest in month 1 and subsequently declined. Incidence of grade ≥ 3 thrombocytopenia decreased from 28% (month 1) to 9% and 5% (months 2 and 3, respectively), with protocol-directed dose interruptions and/or reductions. Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) were reported in 2 and 6 niraparib-treated patients, respectively, and in 1 placebo patient each. Treatment discontinuations due to TEAEs were <5% in each month and time interval measured.. These data demonstrate the importance of appropriate dose reduction according to toxicity criteria and support the safe long-term use of niraparib for maintenance treatment in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer.. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01847274.

Topics: Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Progression-Free Survival

Platinum-based chemotherapy is the foundation of treatment for platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer, but has substantial toxicity. Bevacizumab and maintenance poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors both significantly improve efficacy versus standard therapy, primarily in terms of progression-free survival, and offer the potential for chemotherapy-free treatment. AVANOVA2 compared niraparib and bevacizumab versus niraparib alone as definitive treatment for platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer.. This open-label, randomised, phase 2, superiority trial in 15 university hospitals in Denmark, Sweden, Finland, Norway, and the USA enrolled women aged 18 years or older with measurable or evaluable high-grade serous or endometrioid platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer. Patients had to have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, and had to have previously received platinum-containing therapy for primary disease but ≤1 prior non-platinum-containing regimen for recurrent disease. Previous treatment with bevacizumab or first-line maintenance PARP inhibitors was permitted. Eligible patients were randomly assigned 1:1 (by random permuted blocks with block sizes of two and four, no masking), stratified by homologous recombination deficiency status and chemotherapy-free interval, to receive once-daily oral niraparib 300 mg alone or with intravenous bevacizumab 15 mg/kg once every 3 weeks until disease progression. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, assessed by the investigators in the intention-to-treat population after events in at least 62 patients. Safety was analysed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This ongoing trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02354131.. Between May 23, 2016, and March 6, 2017, 97 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned: 48 to niraparib plus bevacizumab and 49 to single-agent niraparib. Median follow-up was 16·9 months (IQR 15·4-20·9). Niraparib plus bevacizumab significantly improved progression-free survival compared with niraparib alone (median progression-free survival 11·9 months [95% CI 8·5-16·7] vs 5·5 months [3·8-6·3], respectively; adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0·35 [95% CI 0·21-0·57], p<0·0001). Grade 3 or worse adverse events occurred in 31 (65%) of 48 patients who received niraparib plus bevacizumab and 22 (45%) of 49 who received single-agent niraparib. The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events in both groups were anaemia (7 [15%] of 48 vs 9 [18%] of 49) and thrombocytopenia (5 [10%] vs 6 [12%]), and hypertension in the combination group (10 [21%] vs 0). Niraparib plus bevacizumab was associated with increased incidences of any-grade proteinuria (10 [21%] of 48 patients vs 0) and hypertension (27 [56%] of 48 vs 11 [22%] of 49) compared with niraparib alone. No treatment-related deaths occurred.. The efficacy observed with this chemotherapy-free combination of approved agents in women with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer warrants further evaluation. A randomised phase 3 trial investigating niraparib plus bevacizumab versus chemotherapy plus bevacizumab in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer is planned.. Nordic Society of Gynaecological Oncology and Tesaro.

Topics: Aged; Anemia, Aplastic; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Carcinoma, Endometrioid; Disease Progression; Female; Humans; Hypertension; Indazoles; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Grading; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Progression-Free Survival; Proteinuria; Thrombocytopenia

Niraparib, an inhibitor of poly(adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose) polymerase (PARP), has been associated with significantly increased progression-free survival among patients with recurrent ovarian cancer after platinum-based chemotherapy, regardless of the presence or absence of. In this randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer in a 2:1 ratio to receive niraparib or placebo once daily after a response to platinum-based chemotherapy. The primary end point was progression-free survival in patients who had tumors with homologous-recombination deficiency and in those in the overall population, as determined on hierarchical testing. A prespecified interim analysis for overall survival was conducted at the time of the primary analysis of progression-free survival.. Of the 733 patients who underwent randomization, 373 (50.9%) had tumors with homologous-recombination deficiency. Among the patients in this category, the median progression-free survival was significantly longer in the niraparib group than in the placebo group (21.9 months vs. 10.4 months; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31 to 0.59; P<0.001). In the overall population, the corresponding progression-free survival was 13.8 months and 8.2 months (hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.76; P<0.001). At the 24-month interim analysis, the rate of overall survival was 84% in the niraparib group and 77% in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.44 to 1.11). The most common adverse events of grade 3 or higher were anemia (in 31.0% of the patients), thrombocytopenia (in 28.7%), and neutropenia (in 12.8%). No treatment-related deaths occurred.. Among patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer who had a response to platinum-based chemotherapy, those who received niraparib had significantly longer progression-free survival than those who received placebo, regardless of the presence or absence of homologous-recombination deficiency. (Funded by GlaxoSmithKline; PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02655016.).

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Combined Modality Therapy; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Middle Aged; Nausea; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Progression-Free Survival; Quality of Life; Survival Analysis

To analyze the safety and efficacy of niraparib in patients aged ≥70 years with recurrent ovarian cancer in the ENGOT-OV16/NOVA trial.. The trial enrolled 2 independent cohorts with histologically diagnosed recurrent ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer who responded to platinum rechallenge, on the basis of germline breast cancer susceptibility gene mutation (gBRCAmut) status. Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive niraparib (300 mg) or placebo once daily until disease progression. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review. Adverse events (AEs) of special interest were based on the known safety profile of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors.. Patients aged ≥70 years in the gBRCAmut cohort receiving niraparib (n = 14) had not yet reached a median PFS compared with a median PFS of 3.7 months for the same age group in the placebo arm (hazard ratio [HR], 0.09 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.01 to 0.73]). Non-gBRCAmut patients aged ≥70 years receiving niraparib (n = 47) had a median PFS of 11.3 months compared with 3.8 months in the placebo arm (HR, 0.35 [95% CI, 0.18 to 0.71]). Median duration of follow-up in the niraparib arm was 17.3 months in patients ≥70 years and 17.2 months in patients <70 years. Frequency, severity of AEs, and dose reductions in the niraparib arm were similar in patients aged <70 and ≥ 70 years population. The most common grade ≥ 3 AEs in patients ≥70 years were hematologic: thrombocytopenia event (34.4%), anemia event (13.1%), and neutropenia event (16.4%).. For patients ≥70 years of age receiving niraparib as maintenance treatment in the ENGOT-OV16/NOVA trial, PFS benefits and incidence of any grade or serious treatment-emergent AEs were comparable to results in the younger population. Use of niraparib should be considered in this population.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ovarian Neoplasms; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors

Anticancer drugs may cause cardiovascular toxicities, including QT interval prolongation. Niraparib, a potent and selective once-daily oral poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, is approved as a maintenance therapy in platinum-sensitive recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer (EOC). Here, we present the effects of niraparib on cardiac repolarization, and the correlation between changes in baseline QT interval corrected by Fridericia's formula (ΔQTcF) and niraparib plasma concentrations.. Patients with EOC from the NOVA study (subset of n = 15), the food effect NOVA substudy (n = 17), and a QTc substudy (n = 26) underwent intensive electrocardiographic (ECG) monitoring that included triplicate ECG testing on Day 1 at baseline (predose) and at 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8 h postdose concurrent with time-matched blood sampling for determination of niraparib plasma concentrations. All patients received once-daily 300-mg niraparib until disease progression or toxicity.. Across the 3 substudies, the upper limit of the two-sided 90% confidence interval (CI) of ΔQTcF was ≤ 10 ms at every postdose timepoint, with a maximum upper limit of 4.3 ms, which indicates no clinically meaningful effect on QTc prolongation. No statistically significant relationship between ΔQTcF and niraparib plasma concentration was observed (estimated slope: 0.0049; 95% CI: - 0.0020, 0.0117; P = 0.164). There were no clinically relevant changes in other ECG parameters that could be attributable to niraparib.. Niraparib administration at the recommended daily dose of 300 mg for EOC is not associated with clinically relevant alteration of ECGs, including QTc prolongation.

Topics: Aged; Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Cardiotoxicity; Double-Blind Method; Electrocardiography; Fallopian Tube Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Long QT Syndrome; Middle Aged; Peritoneal Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors

Late-line treatment options for patients with ovarian cancer are few, with the proportion of patients achieving an overall response typically less than 10%, and median overall survival after third-line therapy of 5-9 months. In this study (QUADRA), we investigated the activity of niraparib monotherapy as the fourth or later line of therapy.. QUADRA was a multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study that evaluated the safety and activity of niraparib in adult patients (≥18 years) with relapsed, high-grade serous (grade 2 or 3) epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer who had been treated with three or more previous chemotherapy regimens. The study was done in the USA and Canada, and 56 sites screened patients (50 sites treated at least one patient). Patients received oral niraparib 300 mg once daily continuously, beginning on day 1 and every cycle (28 days) thereafter until disease progression. The primary objective was the proportion of patients achieving an investigator-assessed confirmed overall response in patients with homologous recombination deficiency (HRD)-positive tumours (including patients with BRCA and without BRCA mutations) sensitive to their last platinum-based therapy who had received three or four previous anticancer therapy regimens (primary efficacy population). Efficacy analyses were additionally done in all dosed patients with measurable disease at baseline.. Between April 1, 2015 and Nov 1, 2017, we screened 729 patients for eligibility and enrolled 463 patients, who were initiated on niraparib therapy. At the time of database lock (April 11, 2018), enrolment had closed and the study was ongoing, with 21 patients still on treatment. Patients had received a median of four (IQR 3-5) previous lines of therapy, and the median follow-up for overall survival was 12·2 months (IQR 3·7-22·1). 151 (33%) of 463 patients were resistant and 161 (35%) of 463 patients were refractory to the last administered platinum therapy. 13 (28%) of 47 patients in the primary efficacy population achieved an overall response according to RECIST (95% CI 15·6-42·6; one-sided p=0·00053). The most common drug-related grade 3 or worse treatment-emergent adverse events were anaemia (113 [24%] of 463 patients) and thrombocytopenia (95 [21%] of 463 patients). The most common treatment-emergent serious adverse events were small intestinal obstruction (34 [7%] of 463 patients), thrombocytopenia (34 [7%] of 463 patients), and vomiting (27 [6%] of 463 patients). One death due to gastric haemorrhage was considered treatment related.. We observed clinically relevant activity of niraparib among women with heavily pretreated ovarian cancer, especially in patients with HRD-positive platinum-sensitive disease, which includes not only patients with a BRCA mutation but also a population with BRCA wild-type disease. We identified no new safety signals. Our data support expansion of the treatment indication for poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors to include patients with HRD-positive ovarian cancer beyond those with BRCA mutations.. Tesaro.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; BRCA1 Protein; BRCA2 Protein; Canada; Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Fallopian Tube Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Middle Aged; Mutation; Ovarian Neoplasms; Peritoneal Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Progression-Free Survival; Time Factors; United States; Young Adult

In the ENGOT-OV16/NOVA trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01847274), maintenance therapy with niraparib, a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, prolonged progression-free survival in patients with platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer who had a response to their last platinum-based chemotherapy. The objective of the study was to assess the clinical benefit and patient-reported outcomes in patients who had a partial response (PR) and complete response (CR) to their last platinum-based therapy.. A total of 553 patients were enrolled in the trial. Of 203 patients with a germline. Progression-free survival was improved in patients treated with niraparib compared with placebo in both the g. Patients achieved clinical benefit from maintenance treatment with niraparib regardless of response to the last platinum-based therapy.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Organoplatinum Compounds; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Progression-Free Survival

Combining poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors with antiangiogenic agents appeared to enhance activity vs PARP inhibitors alone in a randomized phase II trial.. In AVANOVA (NCT02354131) part 1, patients with measurable/evaluable high-grade serous/endometrioid platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer received bevacizumab 15 mg/kg every 21 days with escalating doses of niraparib capsules (100, 200, or 300 mg daily) in a 3 + 3 dose-escalation design. Primary objectives were to evaluate safety and tolerability and to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D).. Three of 12 enrolled patients had germline BRCA2 mutations. In cycle 1, nine patients experienced grade 3 toxicities: five with hypertension, three with anemia, and one with thrombocytopenia. There was one dose-limiting toxicity (grade 4 thrombocytopenia with niraparib 300 mg), thus the RP2D was bevacizumab 15 mg/kg with niraparib 300 mg. The response rate was 50%; disease was stabilized in a further 42%. Median progression-free survival was 11.6 (95% confidence interval 8.4-20.1) months. Niraparib pharmacokinetics were consistent with historical single-agent data. Overlapping exposure was observed across the dose ranges tested on days 1 and 21.. There was one dose-limiting toxicity; other adverse events were typical PARP inhibitor and antiangiogenic class effects. Niraparib-bevacizumab showed promising activity; Part 2 (vs bevacizumab) was recently reported and phase III comparison with standard-of-care therapy is planned.

Topics: Adult; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Monitoring; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Middle Aged; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Progression-Free Survival

Niraparib (Zejula™) is a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the maintenance treatment of patients with recurrent platinum-sensitive epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer who are in a complete or partial response to platinum-based chemotherapy. The pivotal phase III clinical trial has shown improved progression-free survival in patients receiving niraparib compared with those receiving placebo.. Since niraparib is administered orally, it is of interest to investigate the oral bioavailability (F. Six patients received an oral therapeutic dose of 300 mg niraparib, followed by a 15-min intravenous infusion of 100 µg. The F

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Area Under Curve; Biological Availability; Breast Neoplasms; Carbon Radioisotopes; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Fallopian Tube Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Infusions, Intravenous; Middle Aged; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Progression-Free Survival; Radioactive Tracers; Tandem Mass Spectrometry

Niraparib is a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor approved in the USA and Europe for maintenance treatment of adult patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer who are in complete or partial response to platinum-based chemotherapy. In the pivotal ENGOT-OV16/NOVA trial, the dose reduction rate due to treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was 68.9%, and the discontinuation rate due to TEAE was 14.7%, including 3.3% due to thrombocytopenia. A retrospective analysis was carried out to identify clinical parameters that predict dose reductions.. All analyses were carried out on the safety population, comprising all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. Patients were analyzed according to the study drug consumed (i.e., as treated). A predictive modeling method (decision trees) was used to identify important variables for predicting the likelihood of developing grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia within 30 days after the first dose of niraparib and determine cut-off points for chosen variables.. Following dose modification, 200 mg was the most commonly administered dose in the ENGOT-OV16/NOVA trial. Baseline platelet count and baseline body weight were identified as risk factors for increased incidence of grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia. Patients with a baseline body weight <77 kg or a baseline platelet count <150 000/µl in effect received an average daily dose ∼200 mg (median = 207 mg) due to dose interruption and reduction. Progression-free survival in patients who were dose reduced to either 200 or 100 mg was consistent with that of patients who remained at the 300 mg starting dose.. The analysis presented suggests that patients with baseline body weight of <77 kg or baseline platelets of <150 000/µl may benefit from a starting dose of 200 mg/day.. NCT01847274.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Body Weight; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Humans; Incidence; Indazoles; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Platelet Count; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Progression-Free Survival; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Thrombocytopenia

Quality of life (QOL) has become an important complementary endpoint in cancer clinical studies alongside more traditional assessments (eg, tumour response, progression-free survival, overall survival). Niraparib maintenance treatment has been shown to significantly improve progression-free survival in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. We aimed to assess whether the benefits of extending progression-free survival are offset by treatment-associated toxic effects that affect QOL.. The ENGOT-OV16/NOVA trial was a multicentre, double-blind, phase 3, randomised controlled trial done in 107 study sites in the USA, Canada, Europe, and Israel. Patients with recurrent ovarian cancer who were in response to their last platinum-based chemotherapy were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive either niraparib (300 mg once daily) as a maintenance treatment or placebo. Randomisation was stratified based on time to progression after the penultimate platinum-based regimen, previous use of bevacizumab, and best response (complete or partial) to the last platinum-based regimen with permuted-block randomisation (six in each block) using an interactive web response system. The trial enrolled two independent cohorts on the basis of germline BRCA (gBRCA) mutation status (determined by BRACAnalysis Testing, Myriad Genetics, Salt Lake City, UT, USA). The primary endpoint of the trial was progression-free survival, and has already been reported. In this study, we assessed patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in the intention-to-treat population using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Ovarian Symptoms Index (FOSI) and European QOL five-dimension five-level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L). We collected PROs from trial entry every 8 weeks for the first 14 cycles and every 12 weeks thereafter. If a patient discontinued, we collected PROs at discontinuation and during a postprogression visit 8 weeks (plus or minus 2 weeks) later. We assessed the effect of haematological toxic effects on QOL with disutility analyses of the most common grade 3-4 adverse events (thrombocytopenia, anaemia, and neutropenia) using a mixed model with histology, region, previous treatment, age, planned treatment, and baseline score as covariates. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01847274.. Between Aug 28, 2013, and June 1, 2015, 553 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive niraparib (n=138 in the gBRCAmut cohort, n=234 in the non-gBRCAmut cohort) or placebo (n=65 in the gBRCAmut cohort, n=116 in the non-gBRCAmut cohort). The mean FOSI score at baseline was similar between the two groups (range between 25·0-25·6 in the two groups). Overall QOL scores remained stable during the treatment and preprogression period in the niraparib group; no significant differences were observed between the niraparib and placebo group, and preprogression EQ-5D-5L scores were similar between the two groups in both cohorts (0·838 [0·0097] in the niraparib group vs 0·834 [0·0173] in the placebo group in the gBRCAmut cohort; and 0·833 [0·0077] in the niraparib group vs 0·815 [0·0122] in the placebo group in the non-gBRCAmut cohort). The most common adverse events reported at screening (baseline) were lack of energy (425 [79%]; 97 [18%] reporting severe lack of energy), pain (236 [44%]), and nausea (118 [22%]). All symptoms, except nausea, either remained stable or improved over time in the niraparib group. The most common grade 3 or 4 toxicities observed in the niraparib group were haematological in nature: thrombocytopenia (124 [34%] of 367 patients), anaemia (93 [25%]), and neutropenia (72 [20%]); disutility analyses showed no significant QOL impairment associated with these toxic effects.. These PRO data suggest that women who receive niraparib as maintenance treatment for recurrent ovarian cancer after responding to platinum treatment are able to maintain QOL during their treatment when compared with placebo.. TESARO.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Piperidines; Progression-Free Survival; Quality of Life; Surveys and Questionnaires

Niraparib is an oral poly(adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose) polymerase (PARP) 1/2 inhibitor that has shown clinical activity in patients with ovarian cancer. We sought to evaluate the efficacy of niraparib versus placebo as maintenance treatment for patients with platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer.. In this randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial, patients were categorized according to the presence or absence of a germline BRCA mutation (gBRCA cohort and non-gBRCA cohort) and the type of non-gBRCA mutation and were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive niraparib (300 mg) or placebo once daily. The primary end point was progression-free survival.. Of 553 enrolled patients, 203 were in the gBRCA cohort (with 138 assigned to niraparib and 65 to placebo), and 350 patients were in the non-gBRCA cohort (with 234 assigned to niraparib and 116 to placebo). Patients in the niraparib group had a significantly longer median duration of progression-free survival than did those in the placebo group, including 21.0 vs. 5.5 months in the gBRCA cohort (hazard ratio, 0.27; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.17 to 0.41), as compared with 12.9 months vs. 3.8 months in the non-gBRCA cohort for patients who had tumors with homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) (hazard ratio, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.24 to 0.59) and 9.3 months vs. 3.9 months in the overall non-gBRCA cohort (hazard ratio, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.61; P<0.001 for all three comparisons). The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events that were reported in the niraparib group were thrombocytopenia (in 33.8%), anemia (in 25.3%), and neutropenia (in 19.6%), which were managed with dose modifications.. Among patients with platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer, the median duration of progression-free survival was significantly longer among those receiving niraparib than among those receiving placebo, regardless of the presence or absence of gBRCA mutations or HRD status, with moderate bone marrow toxicity. (Funded by Tesaro; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01847274 .).

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Bone Marrow; Disease-Free Survival; Double-Blind Method; Female; Genes, BRCA1; Germ-Line Mutation; Homologous Recombination; Humans; Indazoles; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Staging; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Platinum Compounds; Young Adult

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) is implicated in DNA repair and transcription regulation. Niraparib (MK4827) is an oral potent, selective PARP-1 and PARP-2 inhibitor that induces synthetic lethality in preclinical tumour models with loss of BRCA and PTEN function. We investigated the safety, tolerability, maximum tolerated dose, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles, and preliminary antitumour activity of niraparib.. In a phase 1 dose-escalation study, we enrolled patients with advanced solid tumours at one site in the UK and two sites in the USA. Eligible patients were aged at least 18 years; had a life expectancy of at least 12 weeks; had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or less; had assessable disease; were not suitable to receive any established treatments; had adequate organ function; and had discontinued any previous anticancer treatments at least 4 weeks previously. In part A, cohorts of three to six patients, enriched for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, received niraparib daily at ten escalating doses from 30 mg to 400 mg in a 21-day cycle to establish the maximum tolerated dose. Dose expansion at the maximum tolerated dose was pursued in 15 patients to confirm tolerability. In part B, we further investigated the maximum tolerated dose in patients with sporadic platinum-resistant high-grade serous ovarian cancer and sporadic prostate cancer. We obtained blood, circulating tumour cells, and optional paired tumour biopsies for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic assessments. Toxic effects were assessed by common toxicity criteria and tumour responses ascribed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Circulating tumour cells and archival tumour tissue in prostate patients were analysed for exploratory putative predictive biomarkers, such as loss of PTEN expression and ETS rearrangements. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00749502.. Between Sept 15, 2008, and Jan 14, 2011, we enrolled 100 patients: 60 in part A and 40 in part B. 300 mg/day was established as the maximum tolerated dose. Dose-limiting toxic effects reported in the first cycle were grade 3 fatigue (one patient given 30 mg/day), grade 3 pneumonitis (one given 60 mg/day), and grade 4 thrombocytopenia (two given 400 mg/day). Common treatment-related toxic effects were anaemia (48 patients [48%]), nausea (42 [42%]), fatigue (42 [42%]), thrombocytopenia (35 [35%]), anorexia (26 [26%]), neutropenia (24 [24%]), constipation (23 [23%]), and vomiting (20 [20%]), and were predominantly grade 1 or 2. Pharmacokinetics were dose proportional and the mean terminal elimination half-life was 36·4 h (range 32·8-46·0). Pharmacodynamic analyses confirmed PARP inhibition exceeded 50% at doses greater than 80 mg/day and antitumour activity was documented beyond doses of 60 mg/day. Eight (40% [95% CI 19-64]) of 20 BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers with ovarian cancer had RECIST partial responses, as did two (50% [7-93]) of four mutation carriers with breast cancer. Antitumour activity was also reported in sporadic high-grade serous ovarian cancer, non-small-cell lung cancer, and prostate cancer. We recorded no correlation between loss of PTEN expression or ETS rearrangements and measures of antitumour activity in patients with prostate cancer.. A recommended phase 2 dose of 300 mg/day niraparib is well tolerated. Niraparib should be further assessed in inherited and sporadic cancers with homologous recombination DNA repair defects and to target PARP-mediated transcription in cancer.. Merck Sharp and Dohme.

Topics: Adult; Aged; BRCA1 Protein; BRCA2 Protein; Cohort Studies; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Heterozygote; Humans; Indazoles; Male; Maximum Tolerated Dose; Middle Aged; Mutation; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Neoplasms; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Prognosis; Prostatic Neoplasms; Tissue Distribution

Topics: China; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines

Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Humans; Indazoles; Male; Piperidines; Prednisone; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant

Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Humans; Indazoles; Male; Piperidines; Prostatic Neoplasms

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors are a new maintenance therapy option for patients with ovarian cancer (OC).. To evaluate the efficacy and influencing factors of the novel PARP inhibitor niraparib for maintenance treatment of Chinese patients with advanced OC.. In this retrospective multicenter real-world study patients with advanced OC from 15 hospitals throughout China were enrolled. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) and the secondary endpoints included the time to treatment discontinuation and safety. Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression was used to identify possible risk factors for PFS, after which a prediction model was established to evaluate the likelihood of achieving an 18-month PFS. The relationship between the dose of niraparib and PFS was also evaluated.. The PFS rates of 199 patients at 6, 12, 18, 24, and 30 months were 87.4%, 75.9%, 63.6%, 56.1%, and 51.8%, respectively. LASSO regression model revealed that only age < 65 years (P = 0.011), BRCA mutations (P < 0.001), and R0 status after cytoreductive surgery (P = 0.01) were significant factors associated with prolonged PFS times. Based on the LASSO logistic regression analysis, a clinical prediction formula was developed: - 2.412 + 1.396Age. For Chinese OC patients, niraparib, particularly at a 200 mg individual starting dose, was an effective therapy with easily manageable safety.. Maintenance therapy with poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors is a new option for patients with ovarian cancer (OC) after they have received platinum-based chemotherapy to reduce the recurrence or relapse rates, but it remains unclear whether there are any changes in efficacy and safety when different starting doses of niraparib are administrated to Chinese patients, who typically have a bodyweight < 77 kg. We found that niraparib exhibited satisfactory efficacy with tolerable safety during maintenance therapy for advanced OC whether administered at 100 mg or 200 mg doses. We believe these regimens can serve as a valuable addition to the previous results of randomized controlled trials.

Topics: Aged; Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines

Resistance to platinum and PARP inhibitors represents a major barrier to the long-term survival of ovarian cancer patients. We aim to explore the potential role of chronic stress in drug resistance in ovarian cancer. Leveraging four ovarian cancer with chronic stress (OCCS) mouse models, we explore the therapeutic efficacy of platinum, Niraparib, and Docetaxel treatment in vivo, and compare the efficacy of these anti-tumor drugs in vitro using cell viability assays. Comparing the transcriptional characteristics in RNA-Seq of OCCS mice with public databases, we analyze the molecular mechanism of chronic stress promoting drug resistance in ovarian cancer. We find that chronic stress is positively correlated with platinum-resistant recurrence in ovarian cancer patients. Chronic stress can induce platinum and Niraparib resistance of ovarian cancer, but it does not affect the therapeutic efficacy of Docetaxel treatment in vivo. And the platinum-resistant cell lines are not sensitive to these anti-tumor drugs, which is different from the result in vivo. Then, we identify several gene networks and their constituent genes that are most significantly associated with chronic stress and drug resistance in ovarian cancer, including the glycolysis pathway and DNA damage. This study develops Niraparib and platinum-resistant in vivo models, reflecting the ability of OCCS mice to reproduce different aspects of human ovarian cancer molecular mechanism, and provides a new theoretical basis for overcoming the double drug resistance of ovarian cancer.

Topics: Animals; Cell Line, Tumor; Disease Models, Animal; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Female; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; Gene Regulatory Networks; Humans; Indazoles; Mice, Inbred BALB C; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Middle Aged; Models, Biological; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Platinum; Stress, Psychological

High-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) is the most common form of ovarian cancer diagnosed in patients worldwide. Patients with

Topics: Cell Line, Tumor; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Indoles; Mass Spectrometry; Mitochondria; Neoplasm Grading; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Proteomics; Signal Transduction

Topics: Erythema Multiforme; Humans; Indazoles; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma is associated with high morbidity and mortality rate for which radiotherapy is the main treatment modality. Niraparib, a Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 inhibitors (PARPi) was previously reported to confer radiosensitivity in different malignancies including non-small cell lung cancer. In this study, we assessed the in vivo ability of niraparib in conferring radiosensitivity to esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cells.. In this study, KYSE-30 and KYSE-150 cell lines were selected as in vivo esophageal squamous cell carcinoma models. The experimental groups were: niraparib tosylate alone, radiotherapy alone, control (no intervention), and combination therapy (radiotherapy + niraparib tosylate). Cell cytotoxicity assay, colony formation assay, flow cytometry, immunofluorescence, Western blotting, immunohistochemistry, lentivirus transfection analysis, and xenograft models were used for confirming radiosensitizing ability of niraparib and to investigate the possible cellular mechanism involved in radiosensitization.. The colony formation efficiency of the combination group was significantly much lower than that of the single radiation group (P < 0.01). Cell cytotoxicity assay demonstrated a significant reduction in proliferation of irradiated cells after treatment with niraparib tosylate compared to niraparib tosylate alone (P < 0.01). Cell apoptosis significantly increased in the combination group compared to either niraparib tosylate or radiotherapy alone (P < 0.01). Rate of tumor suppression rate was significantly high in the combined treatment group (P < 0.01) but, significantly decreased in nude mice. Western blot and lentivirus infection model suggested overexpression of FANCG genes to confer radiosensitivity.. These results suggest that the synergistic effect of niraparib tosylate and radiation may be related to the down-regulation of FANCG.

Topics: Animals; Apoptosis; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Cell Line, Tumor; Esophageal Neoplasms; Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma; Humans; Indazoles; Lung Neoplasms; Mice; Mice, Nude; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Radiation Tolerance; Radiation-Sensitizing Agents

Patients with prostate cancer whose tumors bear deleterious mutations in DNA-repair pathways often respond to PARP inhibitors. Studies were conducted to compare the activity of several PARP inhibitors in vitro and their tissue exposure and in vivo efficacy in mice bearing PC-3M-luc-C6 prostate tumors grown subcutaneously or in bone. Niraparib, olaparib, rucaparib, and talazoparib were compared in proliferation assays, using several prostate tumor cell lines and in a cell-free PARP-trapping assay. PC-3M-luc-C6 cells were approximately 12- to 20-fold more sensitive to PARP inhibition than other prostate tumor lines, suggesting that these cells bear a DNA damage repair defect. The tissue exposure and efficacy of these PARP inhibitors were evaluated in vivo in PC-3M-luc-C6 subcutaneous and bone metastasis tumor models. A steady-state pharmacokinetic study in PC-3M-luc-C6 tumor-bearing mice showed that all of the PARP inhibitors had favorable subcutaneous tumor exposure, but niraparib was differentiated by superior bone marrow exposure compared with the other drugs. In a PC-3M-luc-C6 subcutaneous tumor efficacy study, niraparib, olaparib, and talazoparib inhibited tumor growth and increased survival to a similar degree. In contrast, in the PC-3M-luc-C6 bone metastasis model, niraparib showed the most potent inhibition of bone tumor growth compared with the other therapies (67% vs. 40%-45% on day 17), and the best survival improvement over vehicle control [hazard ratio (HR), 0.28 vs. HR, 0.46-0.59] and over other therapies (HR, 1.68-2.16). These results show that niraparib has superior bone marrow exposure and greater inhibition of tumor growth in bone, compared with olaparib, rucaparib, and talazoparib.

Topics: Animals; Bone Neoplasms; Humans; Indazoles; Male; Mice; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerases; Prostate; Prostatic Neoplasms; Tissue Distribution

Topics: Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Indoles; Ovarian Neoplasms; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Piperidines; Platinum; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors

Topics: Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines

This single-arm pilot study (NCT03329937) evaluated neoadjuvant niraparib antitumor activity and safety in patients with localized HER2-negative, BRCA-mutated breast cancer. Twenty-one patients received niraparib 200 mg once daily in 28-day cycles. After 2 cycles, tumor response (≥30% reduction from baseline) by MRI was 90.5% and 40.0% (6 of 15) of patients who received only niraparib (2-6 cycles) had pathological complete response; no new safety signals were identified. High niraparib intratumoral concentration was observed.

Topics: Breast Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Pilot Projects; Piperidines

In the base case, olaparib was the more cost-effective treatment regimen. The ICERs for olaparib and niraparib compared to placebo were NT$1,804,785 and NT$2,340,265 per PFS-LY, respectively. Tornado analysis showed that PFS and the total resource use cost of niraparib regimen for patients without. Olaparib was estimated to be less cost and more effective compared to niraparib as maintenance therapy for patients with recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer.

Topics: Cost-Benefit Analysis; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ovarian Neoplasms; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Piperidines

Niraparib is effective against epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), but with adverse effects. In this study, we retrospectively investigated niraparib maintenance treatment feasibility in Korean patients newly diagnosed with EOC.. The medical records of 35 patients were reviewed. Data on the baseline clinical characteristics were collected, and adverse effects were described.. Sixteen patients underwent treatment suspension or dose reduction. There was no significant difference in adverse effects (A/E) due to the interval between adjuvant chemotherapy conclusion and niraparib initiation. The two groups had similar International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stages. The number of patients with a history of bevacizumab use was higher in the dose modification group than in the standard dose group.. Niraparib use must be considered in those previously treated with bevacizumab. There is a need for prospective research on lower dose (<200 mg) treatments in patients with risk factors.

Topics: Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Drug Tapering; Feasibility Studies; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Neoplasm Staging; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Republic of Korea; Retrospective Studies; Survival Analysis; Treatment Outcome

The objective of this study was to evaluate medical adherence for patients with ovarian cancer who initiated treatment with a PARP inhibitor therapy, and to identify factors associated with nonadherence.. We used the MarketScan Database to identify ovarian cancer patients who initiated PARP inhibitor therapy between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2017. The primary outcome was adherence defined as ≥ 80% proportion of days covered (PDC). A secondary outcome included adherence assessed using the medication possession ratio (MPR). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to assess relation between PDC and explanatory variables. Sensitivity analysis was performed to evaluate impact of dose-adjustments and toxicity-related delays on adherence.. Among 170,976 patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer, 151 patients met inclusion criteria. The median time from diagnosis to initiating therapy was 33 months. Overall, 40 (26.5%) were non-adherent based on a PDC less than 80%. Non-adherent patients were more likely to receive niraparib and have a longer duration of therapy (p < 0.05). We found no significant impact of age, comorbidities, insurance plan, or year of PARP inhibitor initiation on non-adherence. In a sensitivity analysis to assess different definition of adherence, non-adherence ranged from 11.3% to 41.1%. When accounting for possible dose-adjustments, 21.2% of patients were non-adherent.. This population based study of ovarian cancer patients found that a quarter of patients may be sub-optimally adherent to PARP inhibitor therapy. Future research should focus on identification of patients at risk for nonadherence and interventions to lower nonadherence among these patients.

Topics: Female; Humans; Indazoles; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Retrospective Studies

Topics: Adult; Aged; Budgets; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Middle Aged; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Progression-Free Survival; United States

DNA damage is a double-edged sword for cancer cells. On the one hand, DNA damage-induced genomic instability contributes to cancer development; on the other hand, accumulating damage compromises proliferation and survival of cancer cells. Understanding the key regulators of DNA damage repair machinery would benefit the development of cancer therapies that induce DNA damage and apoptosis. In this study, we found that isoprenylcysteine carboxylmethyltransferase (ICMT), a posttranslational modification enzyme, plays an important role in DNA damage repair. We found that ICMT suppression consistently reduces the activity of MAPK signaling, which compromises the expression of key proteins in the DNA damage repair machinery. The ensuing accumulation of DNA damage leads to cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in multiple breast cancer cells. Interestingly, these observations are more pronounced in cells grown under anchorage-independent conditions or grown in vivo. Consistent with the negative impact on DNA repair, ICMT inhibition transforms the cancer cells into a "BRCA-like" state, hence sensitizing cancer cells to the treatment of PARP inhibitor and other DNA damage-inducing agents.

Topics: Animals; Apoptosis; Benzamides; Breast Neoplasms; Cell Cycle Checkpoints; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Proliferation; DNA Damage; DNA Repair; Female; Genetic Vectors; HEK293 Cells; Humans; Indazoles; MAP Kinase Signaling System; Mice; Mice, SCID; Piperidines; Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase-1; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Protein Methyltransferases; Ribonucleosides; RNA, Small Interfering; Tumor Burden; Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays

Immune checkpoint blockades (ICBs) therapy showed limited efficacy in ovarian cancer management. Increasing evidence indicated that conventional and targeted therapies could affect tumor-associated immune responses and increase the effectiveness of immunotherapy. However, the effects of Niraparib, one of the poly (ADP) ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, on the immune response remains unclear. Delineating the crosstalk between cytotoxic anticancer agents and cancer-associated immunity may lead to more efficient combinatorial strategies.. Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in human ovarian cancer cells after PARP inhibitors treatment was examined by western blotting (WB) and flow cytometry. The expression of poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP1), PD-L1, and CD8 in human ovarian cancer tissues was detected by immunohistochemistry(IHC). The effect of Niraparib and PD-L1 blockade in ovarian cancer progression was investigated in vivo. The changes of immune cells and cytokines in vitro and in vivo were detected by flow cytometry and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Changes of cGAS/STING signal pathway after Niraparib treatment were determined by WB, ELISA.. Niraparib upregulated membrane PD-L1 and total PD-L1 expression in ovarian cancer cells and had a synergistic effect with PD-L1 blockade in vivo. In clinical patient samples, Niraparib augmented cytotoxic CD8. Niraparib could modulate the immune response via the activation of the cGAS/STING pathway, and combination with PD-L1 blockade could further enhance the effect. These results provide a sound theoretical basis for clinical treatment.

Topics: B7-H1 Antigen; Female; Humans; Immunity; Indazoles; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines

Head and neck cancers (HNSCC) are routinely treated with radiotherapy; however, normal tissue toxicity remains a concern. Therefore, it is important to validate treatment modalities combining molecularly targeted agents with radiotherapy to improve the therapeutic ratio. The aim of this study was to assess the ability of the PARP inhibitor niraparib (MK-4827) alone, or in combination with cell cycle checkpoint abrogating drugs targeting Chk1 (MK-8776) or Wee1 (MK-1775), to radiosensitize HNSCCs in the context of HPV status.. PARP1, PARP2, Chk1 or Wee1 shRNA constructs were analyzed from an in vivo shRNA screen of HNSCC xenografts comparing radiosensitization differences between HPV(+) and HPV(-) tumors. Radiosensitization by niraparib alone or in combination with MK-8776 or MK-1775 was assessed by clonogenic survival in HPV(-) and HPV(+) cells; and the role of p16 in determining response was explored. Relative expressions of DNA repair genes were compared by PCR array in HPV(+) and HPV(-) cells, and following siRNA-mediated knockdown of TRIP12 in HPV(-) cells.. In vivo shRNA screening showed a modest preferential radiosensitization by Wee1 and PARP2 in HPV(-) and Chk1 in HPV(+) tumor models. Niraparib alone enhanced the radiosensitivity of all HNSCC cell lines tested. However, HPV(-) cells were sensitized to a greater degree, as suggested by the shRNA screen. When combined with MK-8776 or MK-1775, radiosensitization was further enhanced in an HPV dependent manner with HPV(+) cells enhanced by MK-8776 and HPV(-) cells enhanced by MK-1775. A PCR array for DNA repair genes showed PARP and HR proteins BRCA1 and RAD51 were much lower in HPV(+) cells than in HPV(-). Similarly, directly knocking down p16-dependent TRIP12 decreased expression of these same genes. Overexpressing p16 decreased TRIP12 expression and increased radiosensitivity in HPV(-) HN5. However, while PARP inhibition led to significant radiosensitization in the control, it led to no further significant radiosensitization in p16 overexpressing cells. Forced p16 expression in HPV(-) HN5 increased accumulation in G1 and subG1 and limited progression to S phase, thus reducing effectiveness of PARP inhibition.. Niraparib effectively radiosensitizes HNSCCs with a greater benefit seen in HPV(-). HPV status also plays a role in response to MK-8776 or MK-1775 when combined with niraparib due to differences in DNA repair mechanisms. This study suggests that using cell cycle abrogators in combination with PARP inhibitors may be a beneficial treatment option in HNSCC, but also emphasizes the importance of HPV status when considering effective treatment strategies.

Topics: Cell Cycle Checkpoints; Cell Line, Tumor; DNA Damage; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Humans; Indazoles; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidinones; Radiation Tolerance

Despite the advancements in new therapies for colorectal cancer (CRC), chemotherapy still constitutes the mainstay of the medical treatment. For this reason, new strategies to increase the efficacy of chemotherapy are desirable. Poly-ADP-Ribose Polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) have shown to increase the activity of DNA damaging chemotherapeutics used in the treatment of CRC, however previous clinical trials failed to validate these results and pointed out dose-limiting toxicities that hamper the use of such combinations in unselected CRC patients. Nevertheless, in these studies little attention was paid to the mutational status of homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes.. We tested the combination of the PARPi niraparib with either 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin or irinotecan (SN38) in a panel of 12 molecularly annotated CRC cell lines, encompassing the 4 consensus molecular subtypes (CMSs). Synergism was calculated using the Chou-Talalay method for drug interaction. A correlation between synergism and genetic alterations in genes involved in homologous recombination (HR) repair was performed. We used clonogenic assays, mice xenograft models and patient-derived 3D spheroids to validate the results. The induction of DNA damage was studied by immunofluorescence.. We showed that human CRC cell lines, as well as patient-derived 3D spheroids, harboring pathogenic ATM mutations are significantly vulnerable to PARPi/chemotherapy combination at low doses, regardless of consensus molecular subtypes (CMS) and microsatellite status. The strongest synergism was shown for the combination of niraparib with irinotecan, and the presence of ATM mutations was associated to a delay in the resolution of double strand breaks (DSBs) through HRR and DNA damage persistence.. This work demonstrates that a numerically relevant subset of CRCs carrying heterozygous ATM mutations may benefit from the combination treatment with low doses of niraparib and irinotecan, suggesting a new potential approach in the treatment of ATM-mutated CRC, that deserves to be prospectively validated in clinical trials.

Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Cell Line, Tumor; Colorectal Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Irinotecan; Mice; Mice, Nude; Mutation; Piperidines

Poly-(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 and 2 (PARP1 and PARP2) are key enzymes in the DNA damage response. Four different inhibitors (PARPi) are currently in the clinic for treatment of ovarian and breast cancer. Recently, histone PARylation Factor 1 (HPF1) has been shown to play an essential role in the PARP1- and PARP2-dependent poly-(ADP-ribosylation) (PARylation) of histones, by forming a complex with both enzymes and altering their catalytic properties. Given the proximity of HPF1 to the inhibitor binding site both PARPs, we hypothesized that HPF1 may modulate the affinity of inhibitors toward PARP1 and/or PARP2. Here we demonstrate that HPF1 significantly increases the affinity for a PARP1 - DNA complex of some PARPi (i.e., olaparib), but not others (i.e., veliparib). This effect of HPF1 on the binding affinity of Olaparib also holds true for the more physiologically relevant PARP1 - nucleosome complex but does not extend to PARP2. Our results have important implications for the interpretation of PARP inhibition by current PARPi as well as for the design and analysis of the next generation of clinically relevant PARP inhibitors.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Benzamides; Benzimidazoles; Binding Sites; Carrier Proteins; Catalysis; Catalytic Domain; DNA Repair Enzymes; Humans; Indazoles; Indoles; Nuclear Proteins; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Piperidines; Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase-1; Protein Binding

Endometrial cancer (EC) is the second most common gynecologic malignancy in China, and the incidence and mortality rates have increased in recent years. Brain metastasis from EC is extremely rare, affecting only 0.3-1.16% of EC patients. The prognosis for patients with brain metastasis from EC is poor, with a median survival time of 3.5-6.5 months from the diagnosis of brain metastasis. Niraparib is a poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor that uses the concept of synthetic lethality in the presence of a mutation in the breast cancer susceptibility gene (BRCA). Niraparib is recommended as a maintenance treatment for ovarian cancer patients with platinum-sensitive relapse and has been shown to increase progression-free survival. Niraparib was found to enter the brain via the blood-brain barrier, which resulted in a higher concentration of the drug in the brain tissues and better tumor-suppressing effects. There was none report about the applications of PARP inhibitor for endometrial cancer with brain metastases. Here, we present the case of a 62-year-old woman whose Peripheral blood gene detection had shown BRCA1 mutation with brain metastases from high-grade serous carcinoma of the endometrium who was successfully treated with Niraparib and remained free of disease progression for 6 months.

Topics: Brain Neoplasms; China; Endometrial Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Middle Aged; Piperidines

Topics: Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Approval; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Ovarian Neoplasms; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors

Topics: Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Fallopian Tubes; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines

Poly-(ADP-Ribose)-Polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) were reported as radiosensitizers in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with wide-type epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), but the effects of radiation combined with PARPi were not investigated in EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Moreover, the underlying mechanisms were not well examined. This study aimed to study the efficacy of radiation combined with niraparib in EGFR-mutated NSCLC and explore their influence on the immune system.. Clone formation and apoptosis assay were conducted to explore the effects of niraparib and radiation. Immunofluorescence was conducted to detect the double-strand DNA breaks. Real-time PCR and immunoblotting were employed to evaluate the activation of STING/TBK1/TRF3 pathway and the expression levels of interferon β, CCL5 and CXCL10. Immunocompetent mice model bearing with subcutaneous Lewis lung cancer was established to confirm the results in vivo.. PARPi not only as a radiosensitizer inhibited EGFR-mutated NSCLC tumor growth, but also cooperated with radiation to promote anti-tumor immune responses.

Topics: Animals; Carcinoma, Lewis Lung; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes; Cell Line, Tumor; Chemokine CCL5; Chemokine CXCL10; Chemoradiotherapy; DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded; Female; Fluorescent Antibody Technique; Genes, erbB-1; Humans; Immune System; Immunocompetence; Indazoles; Interferon Regulatory Factor-3; Interferon-beta; Lung Neoplasms; Lymphocytes, Tumor-Infiltrating; Membrane Proteins; Mice; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Mutation; Nuclear Proteins; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases; Radiation Tolerance; Radiation-Sensitizing Agents; Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction; TATA Box Binding Protein-Like Proteins; Tumor Stem Cell Assay

In this study, we explored the regulatory effects of nitrogen permease regulator 2-like (NPRL2) on niraparib sensitivity, a PARP inhibitor (PARPi) in castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) program were retrospectively examined. Gene-set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was conducted between high and low NRPL2 expression prostate adenocarcinoma (PRAD) cases in TCGA. CCK-8 assay, Western blot analysis of apoptotic proteins, and flow cytometric analysis of apoptosis were applied to test niraparib sensitivity. Immunofluorescent (IF) staining and co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP) were conducted to explore the proteins interacting with NPRL2. Results showed that the upregulation of a canonical protein-coding transcript of NPRL2 (ENST00000232501.7) is associated with an unfavorable prognosis. Bioinformatic analysis predicts a physical interaction between NPRL2 and UBE2M, which is validated by a following Co-IP assay. This interaction increases NPRL2 stability by reducing polyubiquitination and proteasomal degradation. Depletion of NPRL2 or UBE2M significantly increases the niraparib sensitivity of CRPC cells and enhances niraparib-induced tumor growth inhibition in vivo. NPRL2 cooperatively enhances UBE2M-mediated neddylation and facilitates the degradation of multiple substrates of Cullin-RING E3 ubiquitin ligases (CRLs). In conclusion, this study identified a novel NPRL2-UBE2M complex in modulating neddylation and niraparib sensitivity of CRPC cells. Therefore, targeting NPRL2 might be considered as an adjuvant strategy for PARPi therapy.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Atlases as Topic; bcl-2-Associated X Protein; Caspase 3; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Movement; Cell Proliferation; Databases, Genetic; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; Humans; Indazoles; Male; Mice; Mice, Inbred BALB C; Mice, Nude; NEDD8 Protein; Piperidines; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant; Protein Processing, Post-Translational; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2; RNA, Small Interfering; Signal Transduction; Survival Analysis; Tumor Suppressor Proteins; Ubiquitin-Conjugating Enzymes; Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 inhibitors (PARPi) are used to treat recurrent ovarian cancer (OC) patients due to greater survival benefits and minimal side effects, especially in those patients with complete or partial response to platinum-based chemotherapy. However, acquired resistance of platinum-based chemotherapy leads to the limited efficacy of PARPi monotherapy in most patients. Twist is recognized as a possible oncogene and contributes to acquired cisplatin resistance in OC cells. In this study, we show how Twist knockdown cisplatin-resistant (CisR) OC cells blocked DNA damage response (DDR) to sensitize these cells to a concurrent treatment of cisplatin as a platinum-based chemotherapy agent and niraparib as a PARPi on in vitro two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) cell culture. To investigate the lethality of PARPi and cisplatin on Twist knockdown CisR OC cells, two CisR cell lines (OV90 and SKOV3) were established using step-wise dose escalation method. In addition, in vitro 3D spheroidal cell model was generated using modified hanging drop and hydrogel scaffolds techniques on poly-2-hydroxylethly methacrylate (poly-HEMA) coated plates. Twist expression was strongly correlated with the expression of DDR proteins, PARP1 and XRCC1 and overexpression of both proteins was associated with cisplatin resistance in OC cells. Moreover, combination of cisplatin (Cis) and niraparib (Nira) produced lethality on Twist-knockdown CisR OC cells, according to combination index (CI). We found that Cis alone, Nira alone, or a combination of Cis+Nira therapy increased cell death by suppressing DDR proteins in 2D monolayer cell culture. Notably, the combination of Nira and Cis was considerably effective against 3D-cultures of Twist knockdown CisR OC cells in which Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress is upregulated, leading to initiation of mitochondrial-mediated cell death. In addition, immunohistochemically, Cis alone, Nira alone or Cis+Nira showed lower ki-67 (cell proliferative marker) expression and higher cleaved caspase-3 (apoptotic marker) immuno-reactivity. Hence, lethality of PARPi with the combination of Cis on Twist knockdown CisR OC cells may provide an effective way to expand the therapeutic potential to overcome platinum-based chemotherapy resistance and PARPi cross resistance in OC.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Apoptosis; Cell Line, Tumor; Cisplatin; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Mitochondria; Nuclear Proteins; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Signal Transduction; Synthetic Lethal Mutations; Twist-Related Protein 1

Niraparib, a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor, is approved for first/second-line maintenance treatment of ovarian cancer patients with complete or partial response to platinum-based chemotherapy, and multi-line monotherapy in BRCAmt patients or platinum-sensitive recurrence patients with homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). We present real-world experience from a single center of China.. Patients treated with niraparib in Jiangsu Cancer Hospital between June 2019 to July 2020 were recruited. The initial dose was given according to individualization. Response and adverse events (AEs) were analyzed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1. and National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0, respectively. HRD testing (AmoyDx®) was detected in most patients. Treatment was given until unequivocal progression or intolerable toxicity.. Twenty-two patients all received niraparib at a bolus of 200 mg/d. Fifty percent of patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer are HRD-positive. Six patients underwent first-line maintenance therapy. Sixteen patients received exploratory therapy. Ultimately image evaluation revealed that two patients achieved partial response (PR) and one patient achieved stable disease (SD), yielding objective response rate (ORR) of 33.3% (95%CI = 0.060-0.759) and disease control rate (DCR) of 50% (95%CI = 0.140-0.861) in the exploratory multi-line monotherapy group. The most common AEs were nausea, thrombocytopenia, and anemia. Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia were managed by dose reduction and interruption. Leg swelling was observed as a new adverse event.. It is feasible that patients receiving a bolus of 200 mg/d in patients from Chinese population can acquire promising efficacy and tolerance. This is the first real-world data about niraparib in ovarian cancer patients with available HRD status from China.

Topics: Adult; Aged; China; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Middle Aged; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors

(1) Background: Niraparib and Talazoparib are poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) 1/2 inhibitors. It is assumed that combining PARP inhibitors with radiotherapy could be beneficial for cancer treatment. In this study, melanoma cells were treated with Niraparib and Talazoparib in combination with ionizing radiation (IR). (2) Methods: The effects of Talazoparib and Niraparib in combination with IR on cell death, clonogenicity and cell cycle arrest were studied in healthy primary fibroblasts and primary melanoma cells. (3) Results: The melanoma cells had a higher PARP1 and PARP2 content than the healthy fibroblasts, and further increased their PARP2 content after the combination therapy. PARP inhibitors both sensitized fibroblasts and melanoma cells to IR. A clear supra-additive effect of KI+IR treatment was detected in two melanoma cell lines analyzing the surviving fraction. The cell death rate increased in the healthy fibroblasts, but to a larger extent in melanoma cells after combined treatment. Finally, a lower percentage of cells in the radiosensitive G2/M phase is present in the healthy fibroblasts compared to the melanoma cells. (4) Conclusions: Both PARP inhibitors sensitize melanoma cells to IR. Healthy tissue seems to be less affected than melanoma cells. However, the great heterogeneity of the results suggests prior testing of the tumor cells in order to personalize the treatment.

Topics: Cell Cycle; Cell Line, Tumor; Fibroblasts; Humans; Indazoles; Melanoma; Phthalazines; Piperidines; Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase-1; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerases; Radiation Tolerance

To investigate the activity of niraparib in patients with germline-mutated. BRAVO was a randomized, open-label phase III trial. Eligible patients had g. After the pre-planned interim analysis, recruitment was halted on the basis of futility, noting a high degree of discordance between local and central PFS assessment in the PC arm that resulted in informative censoring. At the final analysis (median follow-up, 19.9 months), median centrally assessed PFS was 4.1 months in the niraparib arm (. Informative censoring in the control arm prevented accurate assessment of the trial hypothesis, although there was clear evidence of niraparib's activity in this patient population.

Topics: BCG Vaccine; BRCA1 Protein; BRCA2 Protein; Breast Neoplasms; Female; Germ Cells; Germ-Line Mutation; Humans; Indazoles; Nitriles; Piperidines

DNA repair inhibitors are one of the latest additions to cancer chemotherapy. In general, chemotherapy produces DNA damage but tumoral cells may become resistant if enzymes involved in DNA repair are overexpressed and are able to reverse DNA damage. One of the most successful drugs based on modulating DNA repair are the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1) inhibitors. Several PARP1 inhibitors have been recently developed and approved for clinical treatments. We envisaged that PARP inhibition could be potentiated by simultaneously modulating the expression of PARP 1 and the enzyme activity, by a two-pronged strategy. A noncanonical G-quadruplex-forming sequence within the PARP1 promoter has been recently identified. In this study, we explored the potential binding of clinically approved PARP1 inhibitors to the G-quadruplex structure found at the gene promoter region. The results obtained by NMR, CD, and fluorescence titration confirmed by molecular modeling demonstrated that two out the four PARP1 inhibitors studied are capable of forming defined complexes with the PARP1 G-quadruplex. These results open the possibility of exploring the development of better G-quadruplex binders that, in turn, may also inhibit the enzyme.

Topics: Benzimidazoles; DNA; G-Quadruplexes; Humans; Indazoles; Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy; Models, Molecular; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Piperidines; Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase-1; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Promoter Regions, Genetic

Poly(adenosine diphosphate ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors exhibit promising activity against ovarian cancers, but their efficacy can be limited by acquired drug resistance. This study explores the role of autophagy in regulating the sensitivity of ovarian cancer cells to PARP inhibitors.. Induction of autophagy was detected by punctate LC3 fluorescence staining, LC3I to LC3II conversion on Western blot analysis, and electron microscopy. Enhanced growth inhibition and apoptosis were observed when PARP inhibitors were used with hydroxychloroquine, chloroquine (CQ), or LYS05 to block the hydrolysis of proteins and lipids in autophagosomes or with small interfering RNA against ATG5 or ATG7 to prevent the formation of autophagosomes. The preclinical efficacy of the combination of CQ and olaparib was evaluated with a patient-derived xenograft (PDX) and the OVCAR8 human ovarian cancer cell line.. Four PARP inhibitors (olaparib, niraparib, rucaparib, and talazoparib) induced autophagy in a panel of ovarian cancer cells. Inhibition of autophagy with CQ enhanced the sensitivity of ovarian cancer cells to PARP inhibitors. In vivo, olaparib and CQ produced additive growth inhibition in OVCAR8 xenografts and a PDX. Olaparib inhibited PARP activity, and this led to increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) and an accumulation of γ-H2AX. Inhibition of autophagy also increased ROS and γ-H2AX and enhanced the effect of olaparib on both entities. Treatment with olaparib increased phosphorylation of ATM and PTEN while decreasing the phosphorylation of AKT and mTOR and inducing autophagy.. PARP inhibitor-induced autophagy provides an adaptive mechanism of resistance to PARP inhibitors in cancer cells with wild-type BRCA, and a combination of PARP inhibitors with CQ or other autophagy inhibitors could improve outcomes for patients with ovarian cancer.

Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Apoptosis; Autophagy; Cell Line, Tumor; Chloroquine; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Drug Synergism; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Mice, Nude; Mice, SCID; Ovarian Neoplasms; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerases; Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays

Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Mutation; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Recombinational DNA Repair

Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Humans; Indazoles; Mutation; Piperidines; Recombinational DNA Repair; Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms

Topics: Benzimidazoles; Clinical Trials as Topic; Female; Genes, BRCA1; Genes, BRCA2; Humans; Indazoles; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Ovarian Neoplasms; Phenotype; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors

Polypharmacology plays an important role in defining response and adverse effects of drugs. For some mechanisms, experimentally mapping polypharmacology is commonplace, although this is typically done within the same protein class. Four PARP inhibitors have been approved by the FDA as cancer therapeutics, yet a precise mechanistic rationale to guide clinicians on which to choose for a particular patient is lacking. The four drugs have largely similar PARP family inhibition profiles, but several differences at the molecular and clinical level have been reported that remain poorly understood. Here, we report the first comprehensive characterization of the off-target kinase landscape of four FDA-approved PARP drugs. We demonstrate that all four PARP inhibitors have a unique polypharmacological profile across the kinome. Niraparib and rucaparib inhibit DYRK1s, CDK16 and PIM3 at clinically achievable, submicromolar concentrations. These kinases represent the most potently inhibited off-targets of PARP inhibitors identified to date and should be investigated further to clarify their potential implications for efficacy and safety in the clinic. Moreover, broad kinome profiling is recommended for the development of PARP inhibitors as PARP-kinase polypharmacology could potentially be exploited to modulate efficacy and side-effect profiles.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Binding Sites; Cyclin-Dependent Kinases; Dyrk Kinases; HEK293 Cells; Humans; Indazoles; Indoles; Isoenzymes; Molecular Docking Simulation; Neoplasms; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Piperidines; Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase-1; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Polypharmacology; Protein Binding; Protein Interaction Domains and Motifs; Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases; Protein Structure, Secondary; Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Proto-Oncogene Proteins; Substrate Specificity

Olaparib was approved on December 19, 2014 by the US FDA as 4th-line therapy (and beyond) for patients with germline BRCA1/2 mutations; rucaparib was approved on December 19, 2016 as 3rd-line therapy (and beyond) for germline or somatic BRCA1/2-mutated recurrent disease. On October 23, 2019, niraparib was approved for treatment of women with damaging mutations in BRCA1/2 or other homologous recombination repair genes who had been treated with three or more prior regimens. We compared the cost-effectiveness of PARPi(s) with intravenous regimens for platinum-resistant disease.. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and toxicity data from regulatory trials were incorporated in a model which transitioned patients through response, hematologic complications, non-hematologic complications, progression, and death. Using TreeAge Pro 2017, each PARPi(s) was compared separately to non‑platinum-based and bevacizumab-containing regimens. Costs of IV drugs, managing toxicities, infusions, and supportive care were estimated using 2017 Medicare data. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated and PFS was reported in quality adjusted life months for platinum-resistant populations.. Non‑platinum-based intravenous chemotherapy was most cost effective ($6,412/PFS-month) compared with bevacizumab-containing regimens ($12,187/PFS-month), niraparib ($18,970/PFS-month), olaparib ($16,327/PFS-month), and rucaparib ($16,637/PFS-month). ICERs for PARPi(s) were 3-3.5× times greater than intravenous non‑platinum-based regimens.. High costs of orally administered PARPi(s) were not mitigated or balanced by costs of infusion and managing toxicities of intravenous regimens typically associated with lower response and shorter median PFS. Balancing modest clinical benefit with costs of novel therapies remains problematic and could widen disparities among those with limited access to care.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Costs; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Indoles; Infusions, Intravenous; Markov Chains; Models, Statistical; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ovarian Neoplasms; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Quality of Life; United States

Topics: Female; Humans; Indazoles; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors

Cancer patients are disproportionately affected by generalized anxiety and major depression. For many, current treatments for these conditions are ineffective. In this case report, we present a serendipitous case of anxiety and depression improvement following administration of the poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor niraparib.. A 61-year old woman with a 20-year history of mild depression developed recurrent ovarian carcinoma and was placed on niraparib for maintenance chemotherapy. With the original onset of ovarian cancer, she experienced an episode of major depression that was resolved with sertraline. After recurrence of ovarian cancer, she experienced a recurrence of major depression and a new onset of generalized anxiety that failed to completely respond to multiple medications. After beginning niraparib therapy the patient noticed a rapid resolution of the symptoms of her anxiety and depression, an effect that was limited to 10-14 days. Due to bone marrow suppression, the patient was taken off and restarted on niraparib several times. Each discontinuation of niraparib resulted in return of her depression and anxiety, while each recontinuation of niraparib resulted in an improvement in her mood and anxiety.. This case demonstrates rapid and temporary improvement of anxiety and depression following niraparib administration. There is ample preclinical data that PARP signaling may play a role in psychiatric illness. A small amount of indirect data from clinical trials also shows that niraparib may have psychiatric benefits. Further research on PARP inhibition and its potential psychoactive effects is sorely needed.

Topics: Anxiety; Depression; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors

Combining photon or proton radiotherapy with targeted therapy shows promise for head and neck cancer (HNSCC). The poly (adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose) polymerase-1/2 inhibitor niraparib targets DNA damage repair (DDR). We evaluated the effects of niraparib in combination with photons or protons, and its effects on the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of protons, in human HNSCC cell lines.. Radiosensitivity was assessed and RBE was calculated with clonogenic survival assays; unrepaired DNA double-strand breaks were evaluated using immunocytochemical analysis of 53BP1 foci.. Niraparib reduced colony formation in two of the four cell lines tested (P < .05), enhanced radiosensitivity in all four cell lines, delayed DDR (P < .05), and increased proton vs photon RBE.. Niraparib enhanced the sensitivity of four HNSCC cell lines to both photons and protons and increased the RBE of protons, possibly by inhibiting DDR. Niraparib may enhance the effectiveness of both photon and proton radiotherapy for patients with HNSCC.

Topics: Cell Line, Tumor; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Humans; Indazoles; Photons; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Protons; Radiation-Sensitizing Agents

Cellular survival is dependent on the efficient replication and transmission of genomic information. DNA damage can be introduced into the genome by several different methods, one being the act of DNA replication. Replication is a potent source of DNA damage and genomic instability, especially through the formation of DNA double strand breaks (DSBs). DNA polymerase alpha is responsible for replication initiation. One subunit of the DNA polymerase alpha replication machinery is POLA2. Given the connection between replication and genomic instability, we decided to examine the role of POLA2 in DSB repair, as little is known about this topic. We found that loss of POLA2 leads to an increase in spontaneous DSB formation. Loss of POLA2 also slows DSB repair kinetics after treatment with etoposide and inhibits both of the major double strand break repair pathways: non-homologous end-joining and homologous recombination. In addition, loss of POLA2 leads to increased sensitivity to ionizing radiation and PARP1 inhibition. Lastly, POLA2 expression is elevated in glioblastoma multiforme tumors and correlates with poor overall patient survival. These data demonstrate a role for POLA2 in DSB repair and resistance to genotoxic stress.

Topics: Brain Neoplasms; Cell Line, Tumor; DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded; DNA Damage; DNA Polymerase I; DNA Repair; Etoposide; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; Glioma; Humans; Indazoles; Piperidines; Radiation, Ionizing; Survival Analysis; Up-Regulation

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Kidney Diseases; Middle Aged; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Risk Factors

Niraparib maintenance after frontline chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer extends progression free survival. The objective of this study was to determine the cost effectiveness of niraparib maintenance therapy in patients with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer.. Decision analysis models compared the cost of observation versus niraparib maintenance following chemotherapy for five groups: all newly diagnosed ovarian cancer patients (overall), those with homologous recombination deficiency, those harboring. For the overall group, the cost of observation was US$5.8 billion versus $20.5 billion for niraparib maintenance, with an incremental cost effectiveness ratio of $72 829. For the homologous recombination deficiency group, the observation cost was $3.0 billion versus $14.8 billion for niraparib maintenance (incremental cost effectiveness ratio $56 329). Incremental cost effectiveness ratios for the. For patients with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer, maintenance therapy with niraparib was cost effective. Cost effectiveness was improved when analyzing those patients with homologous recombination deficiency and

Topics: Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Decision Support Techniques; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Progression-Free Survival; Quality-Adjusted Life Years

PARP inhibitors niraparib and talazoparib are FDA approved for special cases of breast cancer. PARP is an interesting repair protein which is frequently affected in cancer cells. We studied the combined action of talazoparib or niraparib with ionizing radiation in melanoma cells and healthy fibroblasts.. Homologous recombination (HR) status in six different melanoma cell lines and healthy fibroblasts was assessed. Cell cultures were treated with PARP inhibitors talazoparib or niraparib and ionizing radiation (IR). Apoptosis, necrosis and cell cycle distribution was analyzed via flow cytometry. Cell migration was studied by scratch assays.. Studied melanoma cell cultures are HR deficient. Studied healthy fibroblasts are HR proficient. Talazoparib and niraparib have congruent effects within the same cell cultures. In all cell cultures, combined treatment increases cell death and G2/M arrest compared to IR. Combined treatment in melanoma cells distinctly increases G2/M arrest. Healthy fibroblasts are less affected by G2/M arrest. Treatment predominantly decelerates or does not modify migration. In two cell cultures migration is enhanced under the inhibitors.. Although the two PARP inhibitors talazoparib and niraparib appear to be suitable for a combination treatment with ionizing radiation in our in vitro studies, a combination treatment cannot generally be recommended. There are clear interindividual differences in the effect of the inhibitors on different melanoma cells. Therefore, the effect on the cancer cells should be studied prior to a combination therapy. Since melanoma cells increase more strongly than fibroblasts in G2/M arrest, the fractional application of combined treatment should be further investigated.

Topics: Apoptosis; Cell Survival; Chemoradiotherapy; Drug Interactions; Fibroblasts; G2 Phase Cell Cycle Checkpoints; Homologous Recombination; Humans; Indazoles; Melanoma; Phthalazines; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Primary Cell Culture; Skin; Skin Neoplasms; Tumor Cells, Cultured

This study aims to describe the real-world experience, including the clinical and financial burden, associated with PARP inhibitors in a large community oncology practice.. Retrospective chart review identified patients prescribed olaparib, niraparib or rucaparib for maintenance therapy or treatment of recurrent ovarian, primary peritoneal or fallopian tube cancer across twelve gynecologic oncologists between December 2016 and November 2018. Demographic, financial and clinical data were extracted. One PARP cycle was defined as a single 28-day period. For patients treated with more than one PARPi, each course was described separately.. A total of 47 patients and 506 PARP cycles were identified (122 olaparib, 24%; 89 rucaparib, 18%; 294 niraparib, 58%). Incidence of grade ≥ 3 adverse events were similar to previously reported. Toxicity resulted in dose interruption, reduction and discontinuation in 69%, 63% and 29% respectively. Dose interruptions were most frequent for niraparib but resulted in fewer discontinuations (p-value 0.01). Mean duration of use was 7.46 cycles (olaparib 10.52, rucaparib 4.68, niraparib 7.34). Average cost of PARPi therapy was $8018 per cycle. A total of 711 phone calls were documented (call rate 1.4 calls/cycle) with the highest call volume required for care coordination, lab results and toxicity management.. Although the toxicity profile was similar to randomized clinical trials, this real-world experience demonstrated more dose modifications and discontinuations for toxicity management than previously reported. Furthermore, the clinical and financial burden of PARP inhibitors may be significant and future studies should assess the impact on patient outcomes.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Community Health Centers; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Costs; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Gynecology; Humans; Indazoles; Indoles; Medical Oncology; Medication Therapy Management; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ovarian Neoplasms; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Retrospective Studies; Workload

Homologous recombination deficiency is a critical biologic feature of ovarian cancer. This weakness in DNA damage repair relies on functional poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase. Niraparib is a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, orally available and initially approved for maintenance therapy in women with ovarian cancer by the US FDA in 2017 and by the EMA in 2017 for the same indication. Ovarian cancer represents the most lethal of gynecologic malignancies. The efficacy of niraparib has changed the landscape of ovarian cancer treatment, but overall survival data is still to come. This review summarizes the data regarding niraparib mechanism of action, toxicities, single agent efficacy and novel combinations in ovarian cancer.

Topics: Fallopian Tube Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Ovarian Neoplasms; Peritoneal Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Prognosis; Treatment Outcome

DNA breaks recruit and activate PARP1/2, which deposit poly-ADP-ribose (PAR) to recruit XRCC1-Ligase3 and other repair factors to promote DNA repair. Clinical PARP inhibitors (PARPi) extend the lifetime of damage-induced PARP1/2 foci, referred to as 'trapping'. To understand the molecular nature of 'trapping' in cells, we employed quantitative live-cell imaging and fluorescence recovery after photo-bleaching. Unexpectedly, we found that PARP1 exchanges rapidly at DNA damage sites even in the presence of clinical PARPi, suggesting the persistent foci are not caused by physical stalling. Loss of Xrcc1, a major downstream effector of PAR, also caused persistent PARP1 foci without affecting PARP1 exchange. Thus, we propose that the persistent PARP1 foci are formed by different PARP1 molecules that are continuously recruited to and exchanging at DNA lesions due to attenuated XRCC1-LIG3 recruitment and delayed DNA repair. Moreover, mutation analyses of the NAD+ interacting residues of PARP1 showed that PARP1 can be physically trapped at DNA damage sites, and identified H862 as a potential regulator for PARP1 exchange. PARP1-H862D, but not PARylation-deficient PARP1-E988K, formed stable PARP1 foci upon activation. Together, these findings uncovered the nature of persistent PARP1 foci and identified NAD+ interacting residues involved in the PARP1 exchange.

Topics: Binding Sites; Catalytic Domain; Cell Line, Tumor; DNA Damage; DNA Repair; Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer; Green Fluorescent Proteins; Humans; Indazoles; Kinetics; Molecular Imaging; NAD; Piperidines; Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase-1; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerases; Recombinant Proteins; X-ray Repair Cross Complementing Protein 1

BACKGROUND Thrombocytopenia is a potentially treatment-limiting adverse event of particular interest with the PARP inhibitor niraparib. This adverse event may necessitate niraparib dose reduction or treatment discontinuation, resulting in suboptimal treatment outcomes. Here, we report on niraparib dose optimization in 2 patients with breast cancer and 4 patients with ovarian cancer through concurrent administration of the thrombopoietin receptor stimulating agent avatrombopag to mitigate thrombocytopenia, enabling niraparib reescalation and improved clinical response. CASE REPORT Three of 6 patients received niraparib 300 mg daily, the highest recommended dose, for a sustained period. Avatrombopag therapy enabled niraparib dose escalation that led to reductions in biomarkers associated with disease progression. Before initiation of avatrombopag, increases in CA-125 levels, a marker for ovarian cancer, were observed in association with niraparib dose interruption, and in 2 patients with ovarian cancer CA-125 levels fell in response to niraparib dose escalation enabled by concurrent avatrombopag therapy. Further, in 2 patients with metastatic breast cancer, intracranial response was observed in association with avatrombopag-enabled niraparib therapy. In 1 patient with metastatic breast cancer, niraparib induced an intracranial response, while previous use of talazoparib had not, confirming preclinical findings of superior blood-brain-barrier penetrance with niraparib. CONCLUSIONS Avatrombopag is currently approved for use in chronic immune thrombocytopenia and thrombocytopenia associated with chronic liver disease in patients undergoing a surgical procedure. A clinical trial of avatrombopag for chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia is ongoing. Preliminary results in these 6 patient cases demonstrate the need for a confirmatory trial of avatrombopag for optimizing the dose of niraparib.

Topics: Adenosine Diphosphate Ribose; Breast Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerases; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Thrombocytopenia

There are large randomized clinical trials-SOLO-1 (Olaparib Maintenance Monotherapy in Patients With BRCA Mutated Ovarian Cancer Following First Line Platinum Based Chemotherapy [December 2018]), PRIMA (A Study of Niraparib Maintenance Treatment in Patients With Advanced Ovarian Cancer Following Response on Front-Line Platinum-Based Chemotherapy [September 2019]), and PAOLA-1 (Platine, Avastin and Olaparib in 1st Line [December 2019])-reporting positive efficacy results for maintenance regimens for women with primary, advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. The findings resulted in approval by the US Food and Drug Administration of the treatments studied as of May 2020. However, there are pressing economic considerations given the many eligible patients and substantial associated costs.. To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of maintenance strategies for patients with (1) a BRCA variant, (2) homologous recombination deficiency without a BRCA variant, or (3) homologous recombination proficiency.. In this economic evaluation of the US health care sector using simulated patients with primary epithelial ovarian cancer, 3 decision trees were developed, one for each molecular signature. The maintenance strategies evaluated were olaparib (SOLO-1), olaparib-bevacizumab (PAOLA-1), bevacizumab (PAOLA-1), and niraparib (PRIMA). Base case 1 assessed olaparib, olaparib-bevacizumab, bevacizumab, and niraparib vs observation of a patient with a BRCA variant. Base case 2 assessed olaparib-bevacizumab, bevacizumab, and niraparib vs observation in a patient with homologous recombination deficiency without a BRCA variant. Base case 3 assessed olaparib-bevacizumab, bevacizumab, and niraparib vs observation in a patient with homologous recombination proficiency. The time horizon was 24 months. Costs were estimated from Medicare claims, wholesale acquisition prices, and published sources. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses with microsimulation were then conducted to account for uncertainty and assess model stability. One-way sensitivity analyses were also performed. The study was performed from January through June 2020.. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) in US dollars per progression-free life-year saved (PF-LYS).. Assuming a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000/PF-LYS, none of the drugs could be considered cost-effective compared with observation. In the case of a patient with a BRCA variant, olaparib was the most cost-effective (ICER, $186 777/PF-LYS). The third-party payer price per month of olaparib would need to be reduced from approximately $17 000 to $9000 to be considered cost-effective. Olaparib-bevacizumab was the most cost-effective in the case of a patient with homologous recombination deficiency without a BRCA variant (ICER, $629 347/PF-LYS), and bevacizumab was the most cost-effective in the case of patient with homologous recombination proficiency (ICER, $557 865/PF-LYS). Even at a price of $0 per month, niraparib could not be considered cost-effective as a maintenance strategy for patients with homologous recombination proficiency.. The findings of this study suggest that, at current costs, maintenance therapy for primary ovarian cancer is not cost-effective, regardless of molecular signature. For certain therapies, lowering the drug price alone may not make them cost-effective.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological; Bevacizumab; Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Computing Methodologies; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Female; Genes, BRCA1; Genes, BRCA2; Homologous Recombination; Humans; Indazoles; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Medicare; Neoplasm Staging; Ovarian Neoplasms; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Piperidines; United States

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), one of the most lethal malignancies worldwide, has limited efficient therapeutic options. Here, we first demonstrated that simultaneously targeting poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) and autophagy could evoke striking synergistic lethality in HCC cells. Specifically, we found that the PARP inhibitor Niraparib induced cytotoxicity accompanied by significant autophagy formation and autophagic flux in HCC cells. Further experiments showed that Niraparib induced suppression of the Akt/mTOR pathway and activation of the Erk1/2 cascade, two typical signaling pathways related to autophagy. In addition, the accumulation of reactive oxygen species was triggered, which was involved in Niraparib-induced autophagy. Blocking autophagy by chloroquine (CQ) in combination with Niraparib further enhanced cytotoxicity, induced apoptosis and inhibited colony formation in HCC cells. Synergistic inhibition was also observed in Huh7 xenografts in vivo. Mechanistically, we showed that autophagy inhibition abrogated Niraparib-induced cell-cycle arrest and checkpoint activation. Cotreatment with CQ and Niraparib promoted the formation of γ-H2AX foci while inhibiting the recruitment of the homologous recombination repair protein RAD51 to double-strand break sites. Thus, the present study developed a novel promising strategy for the management of HCC in the clinic and highlighted a potential approach to expand the application of PARP inhibitors.

Topics: Animals; Apoptosis; Autophagy; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Cell Proliferation; Chloroquine; Drug Synergism; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; Heterografts; Histones; Humans; Indazoles; Liver Neoplasms; Mice; Oncogene Protein v-akt; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerases; TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases

Ovarian cancer is the second the most common gynaecological malignancy in developed countries. 70% of patients relapse in the first 3 years following debulking surgery and first-line chemotherapy. Niraparib is a poly adenosine diphosphate ribose polymerase inhibitor which uses the concept of synthetic lethality in the presence of a mutation in the breast cancer susceptibility gene (

Topics: Aged; Brain Neoplasms; Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous; Disease-Free Survival; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Neoplasm Grading; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Bevacizumab; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Platinum

This study estimated time without symptoms or toxicity (TWiST) with niraparib compared with routine surveillance (RS) in the maintenance treatment of patients with recurrent ovarian cancer.. Mean progression-free survival (PFS) was estimated for niraparib and RS by fitting parametric survival distributions to Kaplan-Meier data for 553 patients with recurrent ovarian cancer who were enrolled in the phase III ENGOT-OV16/NOVA trial. Patients were categorized according to the presence or absence of a germline. In the g. Patients who were treated with niraparib compared with RS experienced increased mean TWiST. Thus, patients who were treated with niraparib in the ENGOT-OV16/NOVA trial experienced more time without symptoms or symptomatic toxicities compared with control.

Topics: BRCA1 Protein; BRCA2 Protein; Disease Progression; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Germ-Line Mutation; Humans; Indazoles; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Progression-Free Survival; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Time Factors

Although Csp

Topics: Allyl Compounds; Boronic Acids; Catalysis; Chemistry Techniques, Synthetic; Indazoles; Piperidines; Rhodium; Stereoisomerism

Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Progression-Free Survival; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Although poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, as anti-tumor drugs targeting the DNA damage response (DDR), have been used for the therapy of various tumors, few researches reported their effect on laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC). Here, we first discovered that the PARP-1/2 inhibitor Niraparib could simultaneously induce cell growth inhibition and autophagy in LSCC TU212 and TU686 cells. Niraparib decelerated cell cycle of LSCC by arresting G1 phase and preventing the cells from entering S phase. DNA lesions were also observed upon Niraparib treatment as evidenced by the accumulation of γH2AX and abatement of pRB expression. In addition, autophagy generation was confirmed by the observation of autophagosomes, LC3-positive autophagy-like vacuoles, and obvious conversion of LC3-I to LC3-II. Moreover, blocking autophagy enhanced Niraparib-induced growth inhibition and DNA lesions. Further studies suggested that autophagy suppression could obstruct the activation of checkpoint kinase 1 (Chk1) through elevating proteasomal activity and then impair the capacity of homologous recombination (HR), thereby improving the anti-LSCC efficiency of Niraparib. Collectively, these findings suggested that simultaneous targeting of Niraparib and autophagy might be a promising therapeutic schedule for LSCC in clinic.

Topics: Autophagic Cell Death; Cell Cycle; Cell Line, Tumor; DNA Damage; Humans; Indazoles; Laryngeal Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors

Topics: Bevacizumab; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Platinum

Topics: Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Precision Medicine

The interactions between 2-{4-[(3S)-piperidin-3-yl] phenyl}-2H-indazole-7-carboxamide (niraparib) and human serum albumin (HSA) were investigated through fluorescence and computational studies. Fluorescence experiments showed that the static quenching mechanism and the binding constant of the HSA-niraparib system at a single binding site was approximately 4 × 10

Topics: Humans; Indazoles; Molecular Docking Simulation; Piperidines; Protein Binding; Serum Albumin, Human; Spectrometry, Fluorescence; Static Electricity

Ovarian cancer is the second most common and the most lethal gynecological malignancy in the western world. Unfortunately, there are lack of methods for early screening and diagnosis of the disease. Because of this, most of the cases are diagnosed at an advanced stage and have poor prognosis. The standard treatment of ovarian cancer is maximal cytoreductive surgical debulking followed by platinum-based chemotherapy. There are new molecular agents available for maintenance therapy of ovarian cancer including anti-angiogenic therapies, poly adenosine diphosphate ribose polymerase inhibitors, inhibitors of growth factor signaling, or folate receptor inhibitors, as well as several immunotherapeutic approaches. Niraparib is a poly adenosine diphosphate ribose polymerase inhibitor that has shown to be clinically effective as maintenance therapy in patients with platinum sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer. Studies have shown the median duration of progression-free survival was significantly longer among those receiving niraparib than among those receiving placebo, regardless of presence or absence of BRCA gene mutations or homologous recombination deficiency status. Studies have shown that treatment-emergent Grade 3 or Grade 4 hematological events were observed in patients receiving niraparib including thrombocytopenia (33.8%), anemia (25.3%) and neutropenia (19.6%). Most of the hematological laboratory abnormalities occurred within the first three treatment cycles. After dose adjustment, the incidence of hematological abnormalities was infrequent beyond cycle 3. We are reporting two cases of Grade III/IV neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in patients treated with niraparib in our institution. Unfortunately, one of the patients succumbed to septic shock secondary to right lower lobe pneumonia while severely neutropenic. The second patient's blood counts improved after discontinuing the medication and with supportive transfusions during the hospitalization.

Topics: Aged, 80 and over; Female; Hematologic Diseases; Humans; Indazoles; Middle Aged; Mutation; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors

The aim was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of niraparib compared with routine surveillance (RS), olaparib and rucaparib for the maintenance treatment of patients with recurrent ovarian cancer (OC).. A decision-analytic model estimated the cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained for niraparib versus RS, olaparib, and rucaparib from a US payer perspective. The model considered recurrent OC patients with or without germline BRCA mutations (gBRCAmut and non-gBRCAmut), who were responsive to their last platinum-based chemotherapy regimen. Model health states were: progression-free disease, progressed disease and dead. Mean progression-free survival (PFS) was estimated using parametric survival distributions based on ENGOT-OV16/NOVA (niraparib phase III trial), ARIEL3 (rucaparib phase III trial) and Study 19 (olaparib phase II trial). Mean overall survival (OS) benefit was estimated as double the mean PFS benefit based on the relationship between PFS and OS observed in Study 19. Costs included: drug, chemotherapy, monitoring, adverse events, and terminal care. EQ-5D utilities were estimated from trial data.. Compared to RS, niraparib was associated with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of US$68,287/QALY and US$108,287/QALY for gBRCAmut and non-gBRCAmut, respectively. Compared to olaparib and rucaparib, niraparib decreased costs and increased QALYs, with a cost saving of US$8799 and US$22,236 versus olaparib and US$198,708 and US$73,561 versus rucaparib for gBRCAmut and non-gBRCAmut, respectively.. Niraparib was estimated to be less costly and more effective compared to olaparib and rucaparib, and the ICER fell within an acceptable range compared to RS. Therefore, niraparib may be considered a cost-effective maintenance treatment for patients with recurrent OC.

Topics: Cost-Benefit Analysis; Decision Support Techniques; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Indoles; Ovarian Neoplasms; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Progression-Free Survival; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Survival Rate; United States

This study aimed to evaluate the budget impact of niraparib and olaparib in patients with platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer from a US third party payer perspective.. A budget impact model was constructed to assess the additional per member per month (PMPM) costs associated with the introduction of niraparib and olaparib, two poly ADP-ribose polymerase ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors recently approved to be used in platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer patients with and without a gBRCA mutation. The model assessed both pharmacy costs and medical costs. Pharmacy costs included adjusted drug costs, coinsurance, and dispensing fees. Medical costs included costs associated with disease monitoring and management of adverse events from the treatment. Epidemiological data from the literature were used to estimate the target population size. The analysis used 1-year time frame, and patients were assumed on treatment until disease progression or death. All costs were computed in 2017 USD. One-way sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate the model robustness.. In a hypothetical plan of 1,000,000 members, 206 patients were estimated to be potential candidates for niraparib or olaparib maintenance treatment after applying all epidemiological parameters. At listed 30-day supply WAC prices of $14,750 for niraparib and $13,482 for olaparib, budget impacts of these two drugs were $0.169 PMPM and $0.156 PMPM, respectively, most of which were contributed by pharmacy costs. Sensitivity analyses suggested that assumptions around market share, platinum-sensitive rate after first treatment, and WAC prices affected results the most.. In this model, it was assumed that adopting niraparib and olaparib would not affect utilization of existing medications. Also, the estimated clinical parameters from clinical trials could differ from real-world data.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Budgets; Female; Health Expenditures; Humans; Indazoles; Models, Econometric; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ovarian Neoplasms; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Piperidines; Platinum; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Progression-Free Survival; Survival Analysis; United States

PARP inhibitors have been proven clinically efficacious in platinum-responsive ovarian cancer regardless of BRCA1/2 status and in breast cancers with germline BRCA1/2 mutation. However, resistance to PARP inhibitors may preexist or evolve during treatment in many cancer types and may be overcome by combining PARP inhibitors with other therapies, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors, which confer durable responses and are rapidly becoming the standard of care for multiple tumor types. This study investigated the therapeutic potential of combining niraparib, a highly selective PARP1/2 inhibitor, with anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitors in preclinical tumor models. Our results indicate that niraparib treatment increases the activity of the type I (alpha) and type II (gamma) interferon pathways and enhances the infiltration of CD8

Topics: Animals; Antibodies; Base Sequence; BRCA1 Protein; BRCA2 Protein; Breast Neoplasms; CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes; CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes; Cell Line, Tumor; Female; Gene Expression Profiling; Humans; Immunotherapy; Indazoles; Interferons; Mice; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Mutation; Neoplasm Transplantation; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor

FDA-approved treatments for platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (PSROC) include bevacizumab and PARP inhibitors (PARPi); clinical decisions regarding therapy must be made prior to initiating chemotherapy. Using the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) value frameworks, we assessed relative values of concurrent/maintenance biologic therapies in PSROC.. Value scores were calculated for key maintenance therapies based on randomized controlled trials: bevacizumab (OCEANS, GOG 213); olaparib (Study 19, SOLO2); niraparib (NOVA); rucaparib (ARIEL3). Personalized value scorecards were constructed for patients with germline/somatic-BRCA mutations, homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), and wild-type BRCA (wBRCA). ASCO value scores assess clinical benefit, toxicity, long-term survival, symptom palliation, treatment-free interval, and quality of life (QOL). ESMO value scores assess clinical benefit, toxicity, and QOL.. ASCO scores were highest for maintenance PARPi in germline/somatic-BRCA mutation cohorts: olaparib (SOLO2) = 47, (Study 19) = 62; niraparib = 50; rucaparib = 54. HRD cohorts had slightly lower scores: niraparib = 46; rucaparib = 37. wBRCA cohorts had the lowest scores: niraparib = 26; rucaparib = 26; and olaparib (Study 19) = 32, as did patients receiving bevacizumab (OCEANS) = 35, (GOG 213) = 26. ESMO scores demonstrated high-value for maintenance PARPi in germline/somatic-BRCA mutation cohorts and low-value for bevacizumab and PARPi in wBRCA cohorts.. The value of maintenance PARPi therapy depends heavily on BRCA status, with the highest value scores in germline/somatic-BRCA mutation cohorts. Personalized value scorecards provide a visual aid to assess the harm-benefit balance of maintenance PARPi for PSROC.

Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Female; Genes, BRCA1; Genes, BRCA2; Germ-Line Mutation; Humans; Indazoles; Indoles; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Organoplatinum Compounds; Ovarian Neoplasms; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Precision Medicine; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Topics: Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines

Topics: Cost-Benefit Analysis; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Indoles; Ovarian Neoplasms; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Piperidines; United States

Topics: Cost-Benefit Analysis; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Indoles; Ovarian Neoplasms; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Piperidines; United States

Topics: Cost-Benefit Analysis; Humans; Indazoles; Indoles; Ovarian Neoplasms; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Piperidines; United States

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) has one of the highest death to incidence ratios among all cancers. High grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) is the most common and deadliest EOC histotype due to the lack of therapeutic options following debulking surgery and platinum/taxane-based chemotherapies. For recurrent chemosensitive HGSOC, poly(ADP)-ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi; olaparib, rucaparib, or niraparib) represent an emerging treatment strategy. While PARPi are most effective in homologous recombination DNA repair-deficient (HRD) HGSOCs, recent studies have observed a significant benefit in non-HRD HGSOCs. However, all HGSOC patients are likely to acquire resistance. Therefore, there is an urgent clinical need to understand PARPi resistance and to introduce novel combinatorial therapies to manage PARPi resistance and extend HGSOC disease-free intervals. In a panel of HGSOC cell lines, we established matched olaparib sensitive and resistant cells. Transcriptome analysis of the matched olaparib-sensitive vs -resistant cells revealed activation of the Wnt signaling pathway and consequently increased TCF transcriptional activity in PARPi-resistant cells. Forced activation of canonical Wnt signaling in several PARPi-sensitive cells via WNT3A reduced olaparib and rucaparib sensitivity. PARPi resistant cells were sensitive to inhibition of Wnt signaling using the FDA-approved compound, pyrvinium pamoate, which has been shown to promote downregulation of β-catenin. In both an HGSOC cell line and a patient-derived xenograft model, we observed that combining pyrvinium pamoate with olaparib resulted in a significant decrease in tumor burden. This study demonstrates that Wnt signaling can mediate PARPi resistance in HGSOC and provides a clinical rationale for combining PARP and Wnt inhibitors.

Topics: Animals; Cell Line, Tumor; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Female; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; Heterografts; Humans; Indazoles; Indoles; Mice; Ovarian Neoplasms; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerases; Wnt Signaling Pathway

Niraparib is a highly selective inhibitor of PARP-1 and PARP-2 approved in the United States for maintenance treatment of adult patients with recurrent ovarian cancer in complete or partial response to platinum-based chemotherapy. In this open-label crossover study, we evaluated the effects of food on niraparib pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety.. Patients received a single 300-mg dose of niraparib either after a high-fat meal or under fasting conditions. After a 7-day PK assessment, all patients received a second 300-mg dose of niraparib under the opposite condition, followed by 7-day PK assessment. Blood samples for PK analyses were collected at baseline (on days 1 and 8) and up to 168 h post-dose. Bioequivalence between conditions was defined by the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from 0 to last measurable concentration (AUC. The high-fat meal/fasting ratios of geometric least-squares means for AUC. A high-fat meal did not impact the PK profile of niraparib, indicating that niraparib can be taken with or without food. Niraparib was safe and well-tolerated.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Area Under Curve; Dietary Fats; Drug Monitoring; Fasting; Female; Food-Drug Interactions; Humans; Indazoles; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Therapeutic Equivalency

The irreversible ERBB1/2/4 inhibitor neratinib has been shown to rapidly down-regulate the expression of ERBB1/2/4 as well as the levels of c-MET, PDGFRα and mutant RAS proteins via autophagic degradation. Neratinib interacted in an additive to synergistic fashion with the approved PARP1 inhibitor niraparib to kill ovarian cancer cells. Neratinib and niraparib caused the ATM-dependent activation of AMPK which in turn was required to cause mTOR inactivation, ULK-1 activation and ATG13 phosphorylation. The drug combination initially increased autophagosome levels followed later by autolysosome levels. Preventing autophagosome formation by expressing activated mTOR or knocking down of Beclin1, or knock down of the autolysosome protein cathepsin B, reduced drug combination lethality. The drug combination caused an endoplasmic reticulum stress response as judged by enhanced eIF2α phosphorylation that was responsible for reducing MCL-1 and BCL-XL levels and increasing ATG5 and Beclin1 expression. Knock down of BIM, but not of BAX or BAK, reduced cell killing. Expression of activated MEK1 prevented the drug combination increasing BIM expression and reduced cell killing. Downstream of the mitochondrion, drug lethality was partially reduced by knock down of AIF, but expression of dominant negative caspase 9 was not protective. Our data demonstrate that neratinib and niraparib interact to kill ovarian cancer cells through convergent DNA damage and endoplasmic reticulum stress signaling. Cell killing required the induction of autophagy and was cathepsin B and AIF -dependent, and effector caspase independent.

Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Quinolines

The FDA approved niraparib, a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor, on March 27, 2017, for maintenance treatment of patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer who are in response to platinum-based chemotherapy. Approval was based on data from the NOVA trial comparing niraparib with placebo in two independent cohorts, based on germline

Topics: Aged; BRCA1 Protein; BRCA2 Protein; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Approval; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Female; Germ-Line Mutation; Humans; Indazoles; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ovarian Neoplasms; Peritoneal Neoplasms; Piperidines; Platinum; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerases; Progression-Free Survival; Risk Assessment

Topics: Humans; Indazoles; Piperidines

Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; BRCA1 Protein; BRCA2 Protein; Breast Neoplasms; Capecitabine; Female; Furans; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; Humans; Indazoles; Indoles; Ketones; Mutation; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerases; Prognosis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Survival Analysis; Vinblastine; Vinorelbine

PARP inhibitors have transformed treatment for ovarian cancer, a cancer notable for homologous recombination (HR) deficiencies and aberrant DNA repair, especially in the high-grade serous subtype. PARP inhibitors are now approved for recurrent ovarian cancer as maintenance following response to platinum chemotherapy and

Topics: Female; Humans; Indazoles; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Platinum; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors

PARP1 inhibitors are approved therapeutic agents in ovarian carcinomas, and have clinical activity in some breast cancers. As a single agent, niraparib killed ovarian and mammary tumor cells via an ATM-AMPK-ULK1 pathway which resulted in mTOR inactivation and the formation of autophagosomes, temporally followed by autolysosome formation. In parallel, niraparib activated a CD95-FADD-caspase 8 pathway, and collectively these signals caused tumor cell death that was suppressed by knock down of Beclin1, ATG5, CD95, FADD or AIF; or by expression of c-FLIP-s, BCL-XL or dominant negative caspase 9. The HDAC inhibitors AR42 and sodium valproate enhanced niraparib lethality in a greater than additive fashion. HDAC inhibitors enhanced niraparib lethality by increasing activation of the ATM-AMPK-ULK1-autophagy and CD95-FADD-caspase 8 pathways. Knock down of eIF2α, ATM, AMPKα, ULK1, Beclin1 or ATG5 reduced tumor cell killing by the niraparib plus HDAC inhibitor combination. Blockade of either caspase 9 function or that of cathepsin B partially prevented cell death. As a single agent niraparib delayed tumor growth, but did not significantly alter the tumor control rate. Tumors previously exposed to niraparib had activated the ERK1/2 and AKT-mTOR pathways that correlated with increased plasma levels of IL-8, MIF, EGF, uPA and IL-12. Collectively our findings argue that the addition of HDAC inhibitors to niraparib enhances the anti-cancer activity of the PARP1 inhibitor niraparib.

Topics: Animals; Autophagy; Biomarkers; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Survival; DNA Damage; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Synergism; Gene Knockdown Techniques; Humans; Indazoles; Mice; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Signal Transduction; Valproic Acid

Topics: Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Quality of Life

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) proteins are used by cells in several DNA repair processes. PARP inhibition can result in preferential death of cancer cells when another mechanism for repairing DNA is defective. Two PARP inhibitors, olaparib and rucaparib, have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of recurrent, BRCA-associated ovarian cancer. More recently, these two and a third PARP inhibitor, niraparib, were approved by the FDA as maintenance therapy following platinum-based chemotherapy for recurrent ovarian cancer. This has caused a paradigm shift in disease management and a challenge for clinicians, who must decide how best to use these agents in individualized treatment. The oral formulation is attractive to patients, but adverse effects such as nausea and fatigue can impact quality of life. As clinicians become comfortable selecting PARP inhibitors and managing associated toxicities, future steps will be to investigate how to safely administer them in combination with other therapies.

Topics: Anemia; Creatinine; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Interactions; Exanthema; Fatigue; Female; Genes, BRCA1; Genes, BRCA2; Heart Rate; Humans; Hypertension; Indazoles; Leukopenia; Mutation; Myelodysplastic Syndromes; Nasopharyngitis; Nausea; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Pneumonia; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Thrombocytopenia; Transaminases; Vomiting

: Targeting PARP1 for synthetic lethality is a new strategy for breast cancers harboring germline mutations in BRCA. However, these mutations are rare, and reactivation of BRCA-mediated pathways may result in eventual resistance to PARP1 inhibitor therapy. Alternative synthetic lethality approaches targeting more common sporadic breast cancers and preinvasive ductal carcinoma

Topics: Apoptosis; Breast Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating; Cell Cycle; Cell Line, Tumor; Chemoprevention; CRISPR-Cas Systems; DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded; DNA Repair; Female; Germ-Line Mutation; HeLa Cells; Humans; Indazoles; Neoplasm Invasiveness; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Piperidines; Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase-1; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Spheroids, Cellular; Synthetic Lethal Mutations; X-ray Repair Cross Complementing Protein 1

Poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitor-based cancer therapy selectively targets cells with deficient homologous recombination repair. Considering their long-term use in maintenance treatment, any potential mutagenic effect of PARP inhibitor treatment could accelerate the development of resistance or harm non-malignant somatic cells.. We tested the mutagenicity of long-term treatment with the PARP inhibitor niraparib using whole-genome sequencing of cultured cell clones and whole-exome sequencing of patient-derived breast cancer xenografts.. We observed no significant increase in the number and alteration in the spectrum of base substitutions, short insertions and deletions and genomic rearrangements upon niraparib treatment of human DLD-1 colon adenocarcinoma cells, wild-type and BRCA1 mutant chicken DT40 lymphoblastoma cells and BRCA1-defective SUM149PT breast carcinoma cells, except for a minor increase in specific deletion classes. We also did not detect any contribution of in vivo niraparib treatment to subclonal mutations arising in breast cancer-derived xenografts.. The results suggest that long-term inhibition of DNA repair with PARP inhibitors has no or only limited mutagenic effect. Mutagenesis due to prolonged use of PARP inhibitors in cancer treatment is therefore not expected to contribute to the genetic evolution of resistance, generate significant immunogenic neoepitopes or induce secondary malignancies.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Cell Line, Tumor; Female; Heterografts; Humans; Indazoles; Mutation; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors

The recent approval of olaparib and niraparib as maintenance therapy can significantly affect the management of ovarian cancer. Clinical benefits, however, come with trade-offs in adverse events and costs.. To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of new ovarian cancer poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitor therapies, olaparib and niraparib, as maintenance therapy for patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer.. A decision tree model was constructed to evaluate the costs and effectiveness of olaparib and niraparib compared with placebo from a U.S. health care sector perspective. Costs included drug costs and costs of disease monitoring and management of adverse events throughout the treatment course. Costs were estimated from RED BOOK, Medicare reimbursement rates, and the literature and reported in 2017 U.S. dollars. Clinical effectiveness was measured in progression-free survival (PFS) life-years based on clinical trial results (NCT00753545, NCT01874353, and NCT01847274). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was computed by dividing the incremental cost by the incremental effectiveness.. At base case, niraparib was the more effective treatment option with slightly higher PFS, followed by olaparib. The ICERs for niraparib and olaparib compared with common baseline placebo were $235K and $287K per PFS life-year, respectively, with olaparib extended-dominated by niraparib. Both drugs were associated with lower ICERs in patients with a gBRCA mutation than in patients without a gBRCA mutation. One-way sensitivity analysis suggested that drug prices and PFS could affect ICERs significantly, but the ICERs remained above $100K per PFS life-year within the plausible ranges of all parameters. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis suggested that niraparib was associated with higher net benefits compared with placebo only when willingness-to-pay (WTP) values were above $210K per PFS life-year thresholds.. PARP inhibitors niraparib and olaparib will extend PFS in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer patients but are also associated with high drug acquisition costs. The base case ICERs were around or above $250K per PFS life-year in this model. No formal cost-effectiveness WTP threshold for health technology assessment exists in the United States. At a reference WTP of $100K per PFS life-year, the PARP inhibitors may not be cost-effective options.. This study was unfunded. The authors have nothing to disclose.

Topics: Clinical Decision-Making; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Female; Health Care Costs; Humans; Indazoles; Models, Economic; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ovarian Neoplasms; Paclitaxel; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Progression-Free Survival; United States

Oral niraparib, a highly-selective, potent poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP)-1 and PARP-2 inhibitor, is approved in the USA for the maintenance treatment of adult patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer who are in a complete or partial response to platinum-based chemotherapy. It is also under regulatory review in the EU for use in maintenance treatment in patients with platinum-sensitive, recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer who are in response to platinum-based chemotherapy. In the multinational, phase 3 NOVA trial in adult patients with platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer, niraparib significantly prolonged median progression-free survival, irrespective of the presence or absence of a germline BRCA (gBRCA) mutation and irrespective of the presence or absence of homologous recombinant deficiency. Niraparib is also in development for use in other solid tumours, including breast and prostate cancer. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of niraparib leading to its first global approval for the maintenance treatment of adult patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer.

Topics: Adult; Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Double-Blind Method; Drug Approval; Fallopian Tube Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial; Ovarian Neoplasms; Peritoneal Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration

Riassunto. I PARP inibitori interferiscono con la riparazione del danno nella singola elica del DNA determinando una progressione del difetto nella doppia elica. In circa il 50% delle pazienti con carcinoma dell'ovaio sieroso di alto grado sono presenti difetti nei meccanismi di ricombinazione omologa, deputati alla riparazione del danno della doppia elica del DNA. L'incapacità di riparare il danno si traduce nella morte cellulare, un processo definito "letalità sintetica". Nella famiglia dei PARP inibitori il niraparib è stato il primo a essere approvato dalla FDA nel trattamento delle pazienti con carcinoma ovarico ricorrente indipendentemente dalla presenza o assenza di mutazioni BRCA. Questo risultato è stato raggiunto grazie ai dati emersi dal trial di fase III ENGOT-OV16/NOVA, favorevoli in termini di prolungamento della sopravvivenza libera da progressione e associati a un buon profilo di tossicità. Ulteriori trial clinici sono in corso per valutare ulteriori indicazioni all'impiego di niraparib nel trattamento del carcinoma ovarico.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Disease-Free Survival; DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded; DNA Repair; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors

Malignant pleural mesotheliomas (MPM) are most often surgically unresectable, and they respond poorly to current chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Between 23 and 64% of malignant pleural mesothelioma have somatic inactivating mutations in the BAP1 gene. BAP1 is a homologous recombination (HR) DNA repair component found in the BRCA1/BARD1 complex. Similar to BRCA1/2 deficient cancers, mutation in the BAP1 gene leads to a deficient HR pathway and increases the reliance on other DNA repair pathways. We hypothesized that BAP1-mutant MPM would require PARP1 for survival, similar to the BRCA1/2 mutant breast and ovarian cancers. Therefore, we used the clinical PARP1 inhibitors niraparib and olaparib to assess whether they could induce synthetic lethality in MPM. Surprisingly, we found that all MPM cell lines examined, regardless of BAP1 status, were addicted to PARP1-mediated DNA repair for survival. We found that niraparib and olaparib exposure markedly decreased clonal survival in multiple MPM cell lines, with and without BAP1 mutations. This clonal cell death may be due to the extensive replication fork collapse and genomic instability that PARP1 inhibition induces in MPM cells. The requirement of MPM cells for PARP1 suggests that they may generally arise from defects in HR DNA repair. More importantly, these data demonstrate that the PARP1 inhibitors could be effective in the treatment of MPM, for which little effective therapy exists.

Topics: Cell Line, Tumor; Clone Cells; DNA Repair; Humans; Indazoles; Lung Neoplasms; Mesothelioma; Mesothelioma, Malignant; Mutation; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Piperidines; Pleural Neoplasms; Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase-1; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Synthetic Lethal Mutations; Tumor Suppressor Proteins; Ubiquitin Thiolesterase

Topics: Female; Humans; Indazoles; Indoles; Ovarian Neoplasms; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Treatment Outcome

Niraparib (MK-4827) is a novel poly(ADP-Ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor currently investigated in phase III clinical trials to treat cancers. The development of a new drug includes the characterisation of absorption, metabolism and excretion (AME) of the compound. AME studies are a requirement of regulatory agencies and for this purpose bioanalytical assays are essential. This article describes the development and validation of a bioanalytical assay for niraparib and its carboxylic acid metabolite M1 in human plasma and urine using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Sample pre-treatment involved protein precipitation for plasma and dilution of urine samples using acetonitrile-methanol (50:50, v/v). Final extracts were injected onto a SunFire C18 column and gradient elution using 20mM ammonium acetate (mobile phase A) and formic acid:acetonitrile:methanol (0.1:50:50, v/v/v) (mobile phase B) was applied. Detection was performed on an API5500 tandem mass spectrometer operating in the positive electrospray ionisation mode applying multiple reaction monitoring (MRM). The assay was successfully validated in accordance with the Food and Drug Administration and latest European Medicines Agency guidelines on bioanalytical method validation and can therefore be applied in pharmacological clinical studies.

Topics: Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Humans; Indazoles; Limit of Detection; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Tandem Mass Spectrometry

Selective inhibitors could help unveil the mechanisms by which inhibition of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerases (PARPs) elicits clinical benefits in cancer therapy. We profiled 10 clinical PARP inhibitors and commonly used research tools for their inhibition of multiple PARP enzymes. We also determined crystal structures of these compounds bound to PARP1 or PARP2. Veliparib and niraparib are selective inhibitors of PARP1 and PARP2; olaparib, rucaparib, and talazoparib are more potent inhibitors of PARP1 but are less selective. PJ34 and UPF1069 are broad PARP inhibitors; PJ34 inserts a flexible moiety into hydrophobic subpockets in various ADP-ribosyltransferases. XAV939 is a promiscuous tankyrase inhibitor and a potent inhibitor of PARP1 in vitro and in cells, whereas IWR1 and AZ-6102 are tankyrase selective. Our biochemical and structural analysis of PARP inhibitor potencies establishes a molecular basis for either selectivity or promiscuity and provides a benchmark for experimental design in assessment of PARP inhibitor effects.

Topics: Animals; Benzimidazoles; Enzyme Inhibitors; HEK293 Cells; Humans; Indazoles; Models, Molecular; Phenanthrenes; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerases; Tankyrases

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Drug Industry; Humans; Indazoles; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have yielded encouraging responses in high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas (HGSOCs), but the optimal treatment setting remains unknown. We assessed the effect of niraparib on HGSOC patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models as well as the relationship between certain markers of homologous recombination (HR) status, including BRCA1/2 mutations and formation of RAD51 foci after DNA damage, and response of these PDXs to niraparib in vivo.. Massively parallel sequencing was performed on HGSOCs to identify mutations contributing to HR deficiency. HR pathway integrity was assessed using fluorescence microscopy-based RAD51 focus formation assays. Effects of niraparib (MK-4827) on treatment-naïve PDX tumor growth as monotherapy, in combination with carboplatin/paclitaxel, and as maintenance therapy were assessed by transabdominal ultrasound. Niraparib responses were correlated with changes in levels of poly(ADP-ribose), PARP1, and repair proteins by western blotting.. Five PDX models were evaluated in vivo. Tumor regressions were induced by single-agent niraparib in one of two PDX models with deleterious BRCA2 mutations and in a PDX with RAD51C promoter methylation. Diminished formation of RAD51 foci failed to predict response, but Artemis loss was associated with resistance. Niraparib generally failed to enhance responses to carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy, but maintenance niraparib therapy delayed progression in a BRCA2-deficient PDX.. Mutations in HR genes are neither necessary nor sufficient to predict response to niraparib. Assessment of repair status through multiple complementary assays is needed to guide PARP inhibitor therapy, design future clinical trials and identify ovarian cancer patients most likely to benefit from PARP inhibition.

Topics: DNA-Binding Proteins; Female; Genes, BRCA2; Homologous Recombination; Humans; Indazoles; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Promoter Regions, Genetic

Results from a phase III trial indicate that maintenance therapy with the PARP inhibitor niraparib is more effective than placebo in slowing the progression of recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer. Improved progression-free survival was seen regardless of the presence or absence of germline BRCA mutations, or of homologous recombination deficiency; however, patients who had these mutations or defective DNA repair did better.

Topics: BRCA1 Protein; BRCA2 Protein; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Disease Progression; Female; Germ-Line Mutation; Humans; Indazoles; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Ovarian Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Treatment Outcome

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerases (PARPs) are involved in DNA repair following damage by endogenous or exogenous processes. It has become clear over the past decade that inhibition of PARP in the context of defects in other DNA repair mechanisms provide a tumor specific way to kill cancer cells. We describe the rationale for this approach and the design and discovery of niraparib, a potent PARP-1/2 inhibitor with good cell based activity, selectivity for cancer over normal cells, and oral bioavailability. Niraparib was characterized in a number of preclinical models before moving to phase I clinical trials, where it showed excellent human pharmacokinetics suitable for once a day oral dosing, achieved its pharmacodynamic target for PARP inhibition, and had promising activity in cancer patients. It is currently being tested in phase 3 clinical trials as maintenance therapy in ovarian cancer and as a treatment for breast cancer.

Topics: Animals; BRCA1 Protein; BRCA2 Protein; Drug Discovery; Enzyme Inhibitors; Homologous Recombination; Humans; Indazoles; Models, Molecular; Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerases

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerases (PARP1, -2, and -3) play important roles in DNA damage repair. As such, a number of PARP inhibitors are undergoing clinical development as anticancer therapies, particularly in tumors with DNA repair deficits and in combination with DNA-damaging agents. Preclinical evidence indicates that PARP inhibitors potentiate the cytotoxicity of DNA alkylating agents. It has been proposed that a major mechanism underlying this activity is the allosteric trapping of PARP1 at DNA single-strand breaks during base excision repair; however, direct evidence of allostery has not been reported. Here the data reveal that veliparib, olaparib, niraparib, and talazoparib (BMN-673) potentiate the cytotoxicity of alkylating agents. Consistent with this, all four drugs possess PARP1 trapping activity. Using biochemical and cellular approaches, we directly probe the trapping mechanism for an allosteric component. These studies indicate that trapping is due to catalytic inhibition and not allostery. The potency of PARP inhibitors with respect to trapping and catalytic inhibition is linearly correlated in biochemical systems but is nonlinear in cells. High-content imaging of γH2Ax levels suggests that this is attributable to differential potentiation of DNA damage in cells. Trapping potency is inversely correlated with tolerability when PARP inhibitors are combined with temozolomide in mouse xenograft studies. As a result, PARP inhibitors with dramatically different trapping potencies elicit comparable in vivo efficacy at maximum tolerated doses. Finally, the impact of trapping on tolerability and efficacy is likely to be context specific.. Understanding the context-specific relationships of trapping and catalytic inhibition with both tolerability and efficacy will aid in determining the suitability of a PARP inhibitor for inclusion in a particular clinical regimen.

Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating; Benzimidazoles; Cell Line; Cell Line, Tumor; DNA Damage; DNA Repair; DNA-Binding Proteins; Drug Tolerance; Humans; Indazoles; Mice; Neoplasms, Experimental; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Piperidines; Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase-1; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerases

Pediatric high-grade astrocytomas (pHGA) and diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas (DIPG) are devastating malignancies for which no effective therapies exist. We investigated the therapeutic potential of PARP1 inhibition in preclinical models of pHGA and DIPG. PARP1 levels were characterized in pHGA and DIPG patient samples and tumor-derived cell lines. The effects of PARP inhibitors veliparib, olaparib, and niraparib as monotherapy or as radiosensitizers on cell viability, DNA damage, and PARP1 activity were evaluated in a panel of pHGA and DIPG cell lines. Survival benefit of niraparib was examined in an orthotopic xenograft model of pHGA. About 85% of pHGAs and 76% of DIPG tissue microarray samples expressed PARP1. Six of 8 primary cell lines highly expressed PARP1. Interestingly, across multiple cell lines, some PARP1 protein expression was required for response to PARP inhibition; however, there was no correlation between protein level or PARP1 activity and sensitivity to PARP inhibitors. Niraparib was the most effective at reducing cell viability and proliferation (MTT and Ki67). Niraparib induced DNA damage (γH2AX foci) and induced growth arrest. Pretreatment of pHGA cells with a sublethal dose of niraparib (1 μmol/L) before 2 Gy of ionizing radiation (IR) decreased the rate of DNA damage repair, colony growth, and relative cell number. Niraparib (50 mg/kg) inhibited PARP1 activity in vivo and extended survival of mice with orthotopic pHGA xenografts, when administered before IR (20 Gy, fractionated), relative to control mice (40 vs. 25 days). Our data provide in vitro and in vivo evidence that niraparib may be an effective radiosensitizer for pHGA and DIPG.

Topics: Animals; Astrocytoma; Benzimidazoles; Blotting, Western; Brain Stem Neoplasms; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Proliferation; Cells, Cultured; Child; Combined Modality Therapy; Glioma; Humans; Indazoles; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Linear Models; Mice, Inbred NOD; Mice, Knockout; Mice, SCID; Microscopy, Confocal; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Piperidines; Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase-1; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerases; Pons; Radiotherapy; Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays

The aim of this study was to assess niraparib (MK-4827), a novel poly(ADP-Ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor, for its ability to radiosensitize human tumor cells. Human tumor cells derived from lung, breast and prostate cancers were tested for radiosensitization by niraparib using clonogenic survival assays. Both p53 wild-type and p53-defective lines were included. The ability of niraparib to alter the repair of radiation-induced DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) was determined using detection of γ-H2AX foci and RAD51 foci. Clonogenic survival analyses indicated that micromolar concentrations of niraparib radiosensitized tumor cell lines derived from lung, breast, and prostate cancers independently of their p53 status but not cell lines derived from normal tissues. Niraparib also sensitized tumor cells to H2O2 and converted H2O2-induced single strand breaks (SSBs) into DSBs during DNA replication. These results indicate that human tumor cells are significantly radiosensitized by the potent and selective PARP-1 inhibitor, niraparib, in the in vitro setting. The mechanism of this effect appears to involve a conversion of sublethal SSBs into lethal DSBs during DNA replication due to the inhibition of base excision repair by the drug. Taken together, our findings strongly support the clinical evaluation of niraparib in combination with radiation.

Topics: Breast Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Cell Line; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Survival; DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded; DNA Breaks, Single-Stranded; DNA Repair; Female; Histones; Humans; Hydrogen Peroxide; Indazoles; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Microscopy, Fluorescence; Oxidants; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerases; Prostatic Neoplasms; Rad51 Recombinase; Radiation-Sensitizing Agents; Tumor Stem Cell Assay; Tumor Suppressor Protein p53

To assess poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor MK-4827 together with radiation for the treatment of neuroblastoma.. Clonogenic survival assays were used to assess MK-4827, radiation and combination thereof in four neuroblastoma cell lines. In vivo efficacy was tested in a murine xenograft model of metastatic neuroblastoma. In vivo targeted inhibition and biological effects included measurement of cleaved caspase-3, γ-H2AX, and Ki 67 by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and poly-ADP-ribose by Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay.. Treatment of neuroblastoma cell lines reduced clonogenicity and resulted in additive effects with radiation. In vivo treatment with MK-4827 and radiation prolonged survival (p<0.01) compared to single modalities. In vivo superiority of MK-4827 plus radiation was further documented by significant elevations of cleaved caspase-3 and γ-H2AX in tumors from the combination group compared to single modality cohorts.. Combination of MK-4827 and radiation might provide effective therapy for children with high-risk neuroblastoma.

Topics: Animals; Caspase 3; Cell Line, Tumor; Chemoradiotherapy; Enzyme Inhibitors; Female; Histones; Humans; Indazoles; Mice; Neoplasm Metastasis; Neuroblastoma; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Radiation-Sensitizing Agents

Topics: BRCA1 Protein; BRCA2 Protein; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Male; Mutation; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors

Excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1) is a DNA repair enzyme that is frequently defective in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although low ERCC1 expression correlates with platinum sensitivity, the clinical effectiveness of platinum therapy is limited, highlighting the need for alternative treatment strategies. To discover new mechanism-based therapeutic strategies for ERCC1-defective tumours, we performed high-throughput drug screens in an isogenic NSCLC model of ERCC1 deficiency and dissected the mechanism underlying ERCC1-selective effects by studying molecular biomarkers of tumour cell response. The high-throughput screens identified multiple clinical poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 and 2 (PARP1/2) inhibitors, such as olaparib (AZD-2281), niraparib (MK-4827) and BMN 673, as being selective for ERCC1 deficiency. We observed that ERCC1-deficient cells displayed a significant delay in double-strand break repair associated with a profound and prolonged G₂/M arrest following PARP1/2 inhibitor treatment. Importantly, we found that ERCC1 isoform 202, which has recently been shown to mediate platinum sensitivity, also modulated PARP1/2 sensitivity. A PARP1/2 inhibitor-synthetic lethal siRNA screen revealed that ERCC1 deficiency was epistatic with homologous recombination deficiency. However, ERCC1-deficient cells did not display a defect in RAD51 foci formation, suggesting that ERCC1 might be required to process PARP1/2 inhibitor-induced DNA lesions before DNA strand invasion. PARP1 silencing restored PARP1/2 inhibitor resistance in ERCC1-deficient cells but had no effect in ERCC1-proficient cells, supporting the hypothesis that PARP1 might be required for the ERCC1 selectivity of PARP1/2 inhibitors. This study suggests that PARP1/2 inhibitors as a monotherapy could represent a novel therapeutic strategy for NSCLC patients with ERCC1-deficient tumours.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Cell Line; Cell Line, Tumor; DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded; DNA Repair; DNA-Binding Proteins; Endonucleases; Enzyme Inhibitors; G2 Phase Cell Cycle Checkpoints; High-Throughput Screening Assays; Humans; Indazoles; Lung Neoplasms; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Piperidines; Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase-1; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerases; Protein Isoforms; Rad51 Recombinase; RNA Interference; RNA, Small Interfering

The poly-(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor, MK-4827, is a novel potent, orally bioavailable PARP-1 and PARP-2 inhibitor currently in phase I clinical trials for cancer treatment. No preclinical data currently exist on the combination of MK-4827 with radiotherapy. The current study examined combined treatment efficacy of MK-4827 and fractionated radiotherapy using a variety of human tumor xenografts of differing p53 status: Calu-6 (p53 null), A549 (p53 wild-type [wt]) and H-460 (p53 wt) lung cancers and triple negative MDA-MB-231 human breast carcinoma. To mimic clinical application of radiotherapy, fractionated radiation (2 Gy per fraction) schedules given once or twice daily for 1 to 2 weeks combined with MK-4827, 50 mg/kg once daily or 25 mg/kg twice daily, were used. MK-4827 was found to be highly and similarly effective in both radiation schedules but maximum radiation enhancement was observed when MK-4827 was given at a dose of 50 mg/kg once daily (EF = 2.2). MK-4827 radiosensitized all four tumors studied regardless of their p53 status. MK-4827 reduced PAR levels in tumors by 1 h after administration which persisted for up to 24 h. This long period of PARP inhibition potentially adds to the flexibility of design of future clinical trials. Thus, MK-4827 shows high potential to improve the efficacy of radiotherapy.

Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Breast Neoplasms; Chemoradiotherapy; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Lung Neoplasms; Mice; Mice, Nude; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerases; Tumor Burden; Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays

We disclose the development of a novel series of 2-phenyl-2H-indazole-7-carboxamides as poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase (PARP) 1 and 2 inhibitors. This series was optimized to improve enzyme and cellular activity, and the resulting PARP inhibitors display antiproliferation activities against BRCA-1 and BRCA-2 deficient cancer cells, with high selectivity over BRCA proficient cells. Extrahepatic oxidation by CYP450 1A1 and 1A2 was identified as a metabolic concern, and strategies to improve pharmacokinetic properties are reported. These efforts culminated in the identification of 2-{4-[(3S)-piperidin-3-yl]phenyl}-2H-indazole-7-carboxamide 56 (MK-4827), which displays good pharmacokinetic properties and is currently in phase I clinical trials. This compound displays excellent PARP 1 and 2 inhibition with IC(50) = 3.8 and 2.1 nM, respectively, and in a whole cell assay, it inhibited PARP activity with EC(50) = 4 nM and inhibited proliferation of cancer cells with mutant BRCA-1 and BRCA-2 with CC(50) in the 10-100 nM range. Compound 56 was well tolerated in vivo and demonstrated efficacy as a single agent in a xenograft model of BRCA-1 deficient cancer.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Amides; Animals; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Proliferation; Cell Transformation, Neoplastic; Drug Discovery; Drug Stability; Enzyme Inhibitors; Female; Genes, BRCA1; Genes, BRCA2; Humans; Indazoles; Inhibitory Concentration 50; Mutation; Neoplasms; Piperidines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Rats