piperidines and hexahydrodifenidol

piperidines has been researched along with hexahydrodifenidol* in 9 studies

Reviews

1 review(s) available for piperidines and hexahydrodifenidol

ArticleYear
Pharmacology of hexahydro-difenidol, hexahydro-sila-difenidol and related selective muscarinic antagonists.
    Trends in pharmacological sciences, 1989, Volume: Suppl

    A series of hexahydro-difenidol (HHD) and hexahydro-sila-difenidol (HHSiD) analogues modified in the amino group, the phenyl ring and in the alkylene chain were investigated for their binding and functional properties at muscarinic M1, M2 and M3 receptors. Novel muscarinic receptor antagonists were obtained which exhibited different receptor selectivity profiles from the parent compounds HHD and HHSiD (M1 congruent to M3 greater than M2), e.g. HHD and HHSiD methiodides, M1 greater than M2 congruent to M3; p-fluoro-HHSiD, M3 greater than M1 greater than M2; trans-hexbutenol, M1 greater than M3 greater than M2; and (s)-p-fluoro-hexbutinol, M3 greater than M2 congruent to M1. Stereoselectivity ratios [(R)/(S)] for the enantiomers of HHD, hexbutinol and p-fluoro-hexbutinol were highest at M1, intermediate at M3 and lowest at M2 receptors.

    Topics: Animals; Humans; Parasympatholytics; Piperidines

1989

Other Studies

8 other study(ies) available for piperidines and hexahydrodifenidol

ArticleYear
Characterization of postjunctional muscarinic receptors mediating contraction in rat anococcygeus muscle.
    Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 1997, Volume: 356, Issue:5

    The present study was designed to characterize the postjunctional muscarinic receptors mediating contraction in rat anococcygeus muscle by means of a series of muscarinic agonists and subtype-preferring key muscarinic antagonists. Cumulative addition of muscarinic agonists elicited concentration-dependent contractions with the following rank order of potency (pD2 values): (+)-muscarine (6.36) > or = oxotremorine M (6.21) > or = arecaidine propargyl ester (APE) (6.18) > carbachol (5.68) = (+/-)-methacholine (5.65) > 4-(4-chlorophenyl-carbamoyloxy)-2-butynyltrimethylammonium chloride (4-Cl-McN-A-343) (4.28) > 4-(3-chlorophenylcarbamoyloxy)-2-butynyltrimethylammonium chloride (McN-A-343) (3.89). (+)-Muscarine, oxotremorine M, carbachol and (+/-)-methacholine behaved as full agonists, whereas APE, 4-Cl-McN-A-343 and McN-A-343 displayed partial agonism. The contractile responses of the rat anococcygeus muscle to (+/-)-methacholine were competitively antagonized by pirenzepine (pA2 = 6.92), 11-[[4-[4-(diethylamino)butyl]-1-piperidinyl]acetyl] 5,11-dihydro-6H-pyrido(2,3-b) (1,4)-benzodiazepine-6-one (AQ-RA 741; pA2 = 6.75), himbacine (pA2 = 7.11), (+/-)-p-fluoro-hexahydro-sila-difenidol (p-F-HHSiD; pA2 = 7.68) and the (R)- and (S)-enantiomers of hexahydro-difenidol [(R)-HHD: pA2 = 8.52; (S)-HHD: pA2 = 6.06]. A comparison of the pA2 values derived from studies of contraction in rat anococcygeus muscle with literature binding (pKi values) and functional affinities (pA2 values) obtained at native M1-M4 receptors strongly suggests that the postjunctional muscarinic receptors mediating contraction in rat anococcygeus muscle are of the M3 subtype.

    Topics: Animals; Drug Interactions; Male; Muscarinic Agonists; Muscarinic Antagonists; Muscle Contraction; Muscle, Smooth; Piperidines; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Receptors, Muscarinic; Stereoisomerism

1997
Stereoselective interaction of procyclidine, hexahydro-difenidol, hexbutinol and oxyphencyclimine, and of related antagonists, with four muscarinic receptors.
    European journal of pharmacology, 1992, Sep-01, Volume: 227, Issue:1

    We investigated the binding properties of the (R)- and (S)-enantiomers of the muscarinic antagonists trihexyphenidyl, procyclidine, hexahydro-difenidol, p-fluoro-hexahydro-difenidol, hexbutinol, p-fluoro-hexbutinol, and their corresponding methiodides at muscarinic M1, M2, M3 and M4 receptor subtypes. In addition, binding properties of the (R)- and (S)-enantiomers of oxyphencyclimine were studied. The (R)- enantiomers (eutomers) of all the compounds had a greater affinity than the (S)-isomers for the four muscarinic receptor subtypes. The binding patterns of the (R)- and (S)-enantiomers were generally different. We did not observe any general correlation between the potency of the high-affinity enantiomer and the affinity ratio (eudismic ratio) of the two enantiomers. The results are discussed in terms of a 'four subsites' binding model.

    Topics: Alkynes; Animals; Corpus Striatum; Heart; Humans; In Vitro Techniques; Male; N-Methylscopolamine; Neuroblastoma; Pancreas; Parasympatholytics; Piperidines; Procyclidine; Pyrimidines; Rats; Rats, Inbred Strains; Receptors, Muscarinic; Scopolamine Derivatives; Stereoisomerism; Tritium

1992
Stereoselectivity of (R)- and (S)-hexahydro-difenidol binding to neuroblastoma M1, cardiac M2, pancreatic M3, and striatum M4 muscarinic receptors.
    Chirality, 1991, Volume: 3, Issue:2

    (R)-Hexahydro-difenidol has a higher affinity for M1 receptors in NB-OK 1 cells, pancreas M3 and striatum M4 receptors (pKi 7.9 to 8.3) than for cardiac M2 receptors (pKi 7.0). (S)-Hexahydro-difenidol, by contrast, is nonselective (pKi 5.8 to 6.1). Our goal in the present study was to evaluate the importance of the hydrophobic phenyl, and cyclohexyl rings of hexahydro-difenidol for the stereoselectivity and receptor selectivity of hexahydro-difenidol binding to the four muscarinic receptors. Our results indicated that replacement of the phenyl ring of hexahydro-difenidol by a cyclohexyl group (----dicyclidol) and of the cyclohexyl ring by a phenyl moiety (----difenidol) induced a large (4- to 80-fold) decrease in binding affinity for all muscarinic receptors. Difenidol had a significant preference for M1, M3, and M4 over M2 receptors; dicyclidol, by contrast, had a greater affinity for M1 and M4 than for M2 and M3 receptors. The binding free energy decrease due to replacement of the phenyl and the cyclohexyl groups of (R)-hexahydro-difenidol by, respectively, a cyclohexyl and a phenyl moiety was almost additive in the case of M4 (striatum) binding sites. In the case of the cardiac M2, pancreatic M3, or NB-OK 1 M1 receptors the respective binding free energies were not completely additive. These results suggest that the four (R)-hexahydro-difenidol "binding moieties" (phenyl, cyclohexyl, hydroxy, and protonated amino group) cannot simultaneously form optimal interactions with the M1, M2, and M3 muscarinic receptors.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

    Topics: Animals; Binding, Competitive; Corpus Striatum; Humans; Male; Myocardium; Neuroblastoma; Pancreas; Piperidines; Rats; Rats, Inbred Strains; Receptors, Muscarinic; Stereoisomerism

1991
Binding affinities of hexahydro-difenidol and hexahydro-sila-difenidol analogues at four muscarinic receptor subtypes: constitutional and stereochemical aspects.
    European journal of pharmacology, 1991, Feb-25, Volume: 206, Issue:2

    Hexahydro-sila-difenidol and eight analogues behaved as simple competitive inhibitors of [3H]N-methyl-scopolamine binding to homogenates from human neuroblastoma NB-OK 1 cells (M1 sites), rat heart (M2 sites), rat pancreas (M3 sites), and rat striatum 'B' sites (M4 sites). Pyrrolidino- and hexamethyleneimino analogues showed the same selectivity profile as the parent compound. Hexahydro-sila-difenidol methiodide and the methiodide of p-fluoro-hexahydro-sila-difenidol had a higher affinity but a lower selectivity than the tertiary amines. Compounds containing a p-methoxy, p-chloro or p-fluoro substituent in the phenyl ring of hexahydro-sila-difenidol showed a qualitatively similar selectivity profile as the parent compound (i.e., M1 = M3 = M4 greater than M2), but up to 16-fold lower affinities. o-Methoxy-hexahydro-sila-difenidol has a lower affinity than hexahydro-sila-difenidol at the four binding sites. Its selectivity profile (M4 greater than M1, M3 greater than M2) was different from hexahydro-sila-difenidol. Replacement of the central silicon atom of hexahydro-sila-difenidol, p-fluoro-hexahydro-sila-difenidol and their quaternary (N-methylated) analogues by a carbon atom did not change their binding affinities significantly. The four muscarinic receptors showed a higher affinity for the (R)- than for the (S)-enantiomers of hexahydro-difenidol, p-fluorohexahydro-difenidol and their methiodides. The stereoselectivity varied depending on the receptor subtype and drug considered.

    Topics: Animals; Binding, Competitive; Brain; Humans; In Vitro Techniques; Kinetics; Myocardium; Pancreas; Piperidines; Rats; Rats, Inbred Strains; Receptors, Muscarinic; Stereoisomerism; Structure-Activity Relationship; Tumor Cells, Cultured

1991
Stereoselective inhibition of muscarinic receptor subtypes by the enantiomers of hexahydro-difenidol and acetylenic analogues.
    British journal of pharmacology, 1990, Volume: 99, Issue:3

    1. The affinities of the (R)- and (S)-enantiomers of hexahydro-difenidol (1) and its acetylenic analogues hexbutinol (2), hexbutinol methiodide (3) and p-fluoro-hexbutinol (4) (stereochemical purity greater than 99.8%) for muscarinic receptors in rabbit vas deferens (M1), guinea-pig atria (M2) and guinea-pig ileum (M3) were measured by dose-ratio experiments. 2. The (R)-enantiomers consistently showed higher affinities than the (S)-isomers. The stereoselectivity ratios [(R)/(S)] were greatest with the enantiomers of 1 (vas deferens: 550; ileum: 191; atria: 17) and least with those of the p-Fluoro-analogue 4 (vas deferens: 34; ileum: 8.5; atria: 1.7). 3. The enantiomeric potency ratios for compounds 1-4 were highest in rabbit vas deferens, intermediate in guinea-pig ileum and much less in guinea-pig atria. Thus, these ratios may serve as a predictor of muscarinic receptor subtype identity. 4. (S)-p-Fluoro-hexbutinol [(S)-4] showed a novel receptor selectivity profile with preference for M3 receptors: M3 greater than M2 greater than or equal to M1. 5. These results do not conform to Pfeiffer's rule that activity differences between enantiomers are greater with more potent compounds.

    Topics: Alkynes; Animals; Chemical Phenomena; Chemistry; Guinea Pigs; Ileum; In Vitro Techniques; Male; Muscle, Smooth; Muscle, Smooth, Vascular; Myocardium; Piperidines; Rabbits; Receptors, Muscarinic; Stereoisomerism; Vas Deferens

1990
Methoctramine and hexahydrodifenidol antagonise two muscarinic responses on the rat superior cervical ganglion with opposite selectivity.
    Neuroscience letters, 1989, May-22, Volume: 100, Issue:1-3

    Two novel muscarinic antagonists, methoctramine and hexahydrodifenidol, have been assessed for their action against two muscarinic agonist-induced responses on the rat superior cervical ganglion in vitro. DC recordings were made between the desheathed ganglion and its internal carotid nerve using the grease-gap technique. Hexahydrodifenidol and methoctramine antagonised the muscarine-induced M1-mediated depolarisation of this preparation with estimated pA2 values of 7.5 and 6.5, respectively. In 0.3 microM pirenzepine and 0.1 mM CaCl2, 1 microM muscarine evoked a hyperpolarisation mediated by cardiac-like M2 receptors. Hexahydrodifenidol and methoctramine antagonised this response with pIC50 values (-log10IC50) of 5.7 and 7.4, respectively. The selectivity of methoctramine for cardiac-like M2 receptors over M1 receptors is therefore confirmed and extended to these two neuronal responses. The selectivity of hexahydrodifenidol was opposite to, and greater than, that seen with methoctramine.

    Topics: Animals; Diamines; Ganglia, Sympathetic; In Vitro Techniques; Male; Membrane Potentials; Muscarine; Piperidines; Rats; Rats, Inbred Strains; Receptors, Muscarinic

1989
Binding and functional properties of antimuscarinics of the hexocyclium/sila-hexocyclium and hexahydro-diphenidol/hexahydro-sila-diphenidol type to muscarinic receptor subtypes.
    British journal of pharmacology, 1989, Volume: 98, Issue:1

    1. In an attempt to assess the structural requirements for the muscarinic receptor selectivity of hexahydro-diphenidol (hexahydro-difenidol) and hexahydro-sila-diphenidol (hexahydro-sila-difenidol), a series of structurally related C/Si pairs were investigated, along with atropine, pirenzepine and methoctramine, for their binding affinities in NB-OK 1 cells as well as in rat heart and pancreas. 2. The action of these antagonists at muscarinic receptors mediating negative inotropic responses in guinea-pig atria and ileal contractions has also been assessed. 3. Antagonist binding data indicated that NB-OK 1 cells (M1 type) as well as rat heart (cardiac type) and pancreas (glandular/smooth muscle type) possess different muscarinic receptor subtypes. 4. A highly significant correlation was found between the binding affinities of the antagonists to muscarinic receptors in rat heart and pancreas, respectively, and the affinities to muscarinic receptors in guinea-pig atria and ileum. This implies that the muscarinic binding sites in rat heart and the receptors in guinea-pig atria are essentially similar, but different from those in pancreas and ileum. 5. The antimuscarinic potency of hexahydro-diphenidol and hexahydro-sila-diphenidol at the three subtypes was influenced differently by structural modifications (e.g. quaternization). Different selectivity profiles for the antagonists were obtained, which makes these compounds useful tools to investigate further muscarinic receptor heterogeneity. Indeed, the tertiary analogues hexahydro-diphenidol (HHD) and hexahydro-sila-diphenidol (HHSiD) had an M1 = glandular/smooth muscle greater than cardiac selectivity profile, whereas the quaternary analogues HHD methiodide and HHSiD methiodide were M1 preferring (M1 greater than glandular/smooth muscle, cardiac).

    Topics: Animals; Cells, Cultured; Guinea Pigs; Humans; Ileum; In Vitro Techniques; Male; Muscle, Smooth; Myocardium; Pancreas; Parasympatholytics; Piperazines; Piperidines; Rats; Rats, Inbred Strains; Receptors, Muscarinic; Stereoisomerism; Structure-Activity Relationship

1989
Hexahydrodifenidol does not distinguish among M1 receptors in rat cerebral cortex, hippocampus and superior cervical ganglion.
    European journal of pharmacology, 1989, Aug-29, Volume: 167, Issue:3

    We have determined the antagonist affinity of hexahydrodifenidol in a range of receptor assays in the rat:-radioreceptor binding and phosphatidyl-inositol turnover assays in cerebral cortex and hippocampus, and electrophysiological experiments on the superior cervical ganglion and hippocampus. We failed to detect any appreciable differences in the affinity of hexahydrodifenidol among any of these assays.

    Topics: Animals; Cerebral Cortex; Electrophysiology; Ganglia, Sympathetic; Hippocampus; In Vitro Techniques; Male; Piperidines; Pirenzepine; Rats; Rats, Inbred Strains; Receptors, Muscarinic

1989