piperidines and fexofenadine

The year 2012 has seen relevant changes in Polish pharmaceutical legislation and drug reimbursement, among others limiting the reimbursement solely to indications stated in the Summaries of Product Characteristics (SPCs). A discrepancy with expert recommendations became apparent. The aim of this study was to analyze discordances between up-to-date expert recommendations, the SPCs in force, and the evidence for the effectiveness of recommended drugs in urticaria. Guidelines for the treatment of urticaria issued by Polish and international expert bodies were analyzed, along with the SPCs. A systematic review of clinical trials of recommended drugs was carried out. Of drugs recommended by the experts, 203 were authorized in Poland for urticaria treatment, including 167 oral preparations of second-generation antihistamines (SGAH, 8 active substances), 29 oral preparations of first-generation antihistamines (6 substances), 4 preparations of systemic glucocorticosteroids (2), 2 topical glucocorticosteroid preparations (2) and one combined preparation of human immunoglobulin with histamine. Among products both recommended by experts and licensed for the treatment of urticaria in Poland, high or moderate-level of evidence of effectiveness was available for 7 active substances (bilastine, cetirizine, desloratadine, fexofenadine, loratadine, levocetirizine, rupatadine). Nevertheless, 39% of SGAH available in Poland (66 preparations of cetirizine, emedastine, levocetirizine, loratadine or fexofenadine) were registered exclusively for "chronic idiopathic urticaria" - a diagnosis inconsistent with the current state of medical knowledge. We conclude that there exist considerable discrepancies between expert recommendations for the pharmacotherapy of urticaria, the licensed use of drugs as defined in Summaries of Product Characteristics and scientific evidence for their effectiveness.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Administration, Topical; Anti-Allergic Agents; Benzimidazoles; Cetirizine; Glucocorticoids; Histamine Antagonists; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating; Humans; Loratadine; Piperidines; Poland; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Terfenadine; Treatment Outcome; Urticaria

To compare the anti-inflammatory effects of fexofenadine with other H(1)-receptor antagonists in vitro.. Published literature.. Recent experimental studies on anti-inflammatory effects of H(1)-receptor antagonists. Databases searched: Medline, Medscape.. 1990-2003. Search terms: second-, third-generation antihistamines; sedating, nonsedating antihistamines; in vitro anti-inflammatory activity; cetirizine; ebastine; loratadine; fexofenadine; desloratadine.. Second- and third-generation H(1)-receptor antagonists may demonstrate significant in vitro anti-inflammatory activity at concentrations considered to be clinically relevant. In some instances, higher (supraclinical) concentrations are required to achieve comparable effects.. Experimental research suggests that second- and third-generation H(1)-receptor antagonists may achieve anti-inflammatory effects in a clinical context. Further studies are required to support this conclusion.

Topics: Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Butyrophenones; Cells, Cultured; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Loratadine; Piperidines; Terfenadine

The review summarizes recent progress in the study of the cardiac actions of second--generation antihistamines. Terfenadine and astemizole, two antihistamines of the second generation, are in vitro potent blockers of potassium channels (K+). It has been considered to be responsible for QT prolongation of the electrocardiogram and life--treating ventricular tachycardias called torsades de pointes. Loratadine and descarboethoxyloratadine, the major metabolite of loratadine were studied on a human cardiac K+ channel (hKv 1.5) cloned from human ventricle. Parent compound and its metabolite in high concentration blocked hKv1.5 channels. However, loratadine (10 mumol/L) failed to inhibit HERG potassium channel and HERG K+. Ebastine also inhibit potassium channels, cloned human Kv 1.5. Cetirizine was completely devoid of any inhibitory action on HERG K+ channels in concentration up to 30 mumd/L. On the other hand terfenadine and astemizole effectively blocked HERG K+ channels with nanomolar affinities (330 and 480 nmol/L, respectively), whereas loratadine was about 300-fold less potent. Fexofenadine--the major metabolite of terfenadine, does not block either HERG or Kv1.5. The quinea pig model (in vitro) revealed that only terfenadine, astemizole and ebastine produced significant QT interval prolongation and arrhythmogenic effects. The other nonsedating antihistamines including cetirizine, loratadine and the major metabolite of ebastine (carabastine), terfenadine (feksofenadine) and astemizole (norastemizole) were devoid of QT interval prolongation and other adverse ECG effects.

Topics: Animals; Area Under Curve; Astemizole; Butyrophenones; Electrocardiography; Heart; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Humans; Loratadine; Piperidines; Tachycardia; Terfenadine; Torsades de Pointes

Most of the modern non-sedating H1 receptor antagonists (antihistamines) penetrate the brain poorly, allowing the use of doses large enough to counteract allergic processes in peripheral tissues without important central effects. The antihistamines reviewed here are acrivastine, astemizole, cetirizine, ebastine, fexofenadine, loratadine, mizolastine, and terfenadine. However, these drugs are not entirely free from central effects, and there are at least quantitative differences between them. Although psychomotor and sleep studies in healthy subjects in the laboratory may predict that an antihistamine does not cause drowsiness, the safety margin can be narrow enough to cause a central sedating effect during actual treatment. This might result from a patient's individual sensitivity, disease-induced sedation, or drug dosages that are for various reasons relatively or absolutely larger (patient's weight, poor response, reduced drug clearance, interactions). Mild to even moderate sedation is not necessarily a major nuisance, particularly if stimulants need be added to the regimen (e.g. in perennial rhinitis). Furthermore, patients can adjust doses themselves if needed. Sedating antihistamines are not needed for long-term itching, because glucocorticoids are indicated and more effective. It is wise to restrict or avoid using antihistamines (astemizole, terfenadine) that can cause cardiac dysrhythmias, because even severe cardiotoxicity can occur in certain pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions. Histamine H1 receptor antagonists (antihistamines) are used in the treatment of allergic disorders. The therapeutic effects of most of the older antihistamines were associated with sedating effects on the central nervous system (CNS) and antimuscarinic effects causing dry mouth and blurred vision. Non-specific "quinidine-like" or local anaesthetic actions often led to cardiotoxicity in animals and man. Although such adverse effects varied from drug to drug, there was some degree of sedation with all old antihistamines. Non-sedating antihistamines have become available during the past 15 years. Some of them also have antiserotonin or other actions that oppose allergic inflammation, and they are not entirely free from sedative effects either. In small to moderate "clinical" concentrations they are competitive H1 receptor antagonists, although large concentrations of some of them exert non-competitive blockade. Daytime drowsiness and weakness are seldom really important,

Topics: Astemizole; Benzimidazoles; Butyrophenones; Central Nervous System; Cetirizine; Drug Interactions; Heart; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Humans; Hypnotics and Sedatives; Loratadine; Piperidines; Potassium Channel Blockers; Terfenadine; Triprolidine

Bilastine, a novel non-sedating second-generation H. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, phase III study (trial registration number JapicCTI-142600) evaluated the effect of a 2-week treatment period with bilastine (20 mg once daily), fexofenadine (60 mg twice daily), or a matched placebo (double dummy) in patients with PAR. All patients were instructed to record individual nasal and ocular symptoms in diaries daily. The primary endpoint was the mean change in total nasal symptom scores (TNSS) from baseline to Week 2 (Days 10-13).. A total of 765 patients were randomly allocated to receive bilastine, fexofenadine, or placebo (256, 254, and 255 patients, respectively). The mean change in TNSS from baseline at Week 2 was significantly decreased by bilastine (-0.98) compared to placebo (-0.63, P = 0.023). Bilastine and fexofenadine showed no significant difference in the primary endpoint. However, the mean change in TNSS from baseline on Day 1 was more significantly decreased by bilastine (-0.99) than by placebo (-0.28, P < 0.001) or fexofenadine (-0.62, P = 0.032). The active drugs also improved instantaneous TNSS 1 h after the first and before the second drug administration on Day 1 (P < 0.05). The study drugs were well tolerated.. After 2-week treatment period, bilastine 20 mg once daily was effective and tolerable in Japanese patients with PAR, and exhibited a rapid onset of action.

Topics: Adult; Asian People; Benzimidazoles; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal; Terfenadine

This double-blind cross-over study compared the potential of bilastine, cetirizine, and fexofenadine to relieve the symptoms of allergic rhinitis.. Seventy-five allergic volunteers were challenged with grass pollen in the Vienna Challenge Chamber (VCC) on two consecutive days of allergen provocation; 6 h on day 1 and 4 h day 2. Bilastine 20 mg, cetirizine 10 mg, fexofenadine 120 mg, or placebo were taken orally 2 h after the start of provocation on day 1 only. Total nasal symptom scores, the global symptom scores, nasal secretions, and eye symptoms were assessed on both day 1 and day 2.. Bilastine had a rapid onset of action, within 1 h, and a long duration of action, greater than 26 h. Cetirizine was similar. Fexofenadine was similar on day 1 but less effective on day 2, indicating a shorter duration of action. Bilastine, like cetirizine and fexofenadine, was safe and well tolerated in this study.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Allergens; Anti-Allergic Agents; Benzimidazoles; Cetirizine; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Eye Diseases; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating; Humans; Middle Aged; Nasal Mucosa; Nose Diseases; Ophthalmic Solutions; Piperidines; Placebos; Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal; Terfenadine

Although many antihistamines are now in clinical use, few studies directly compare their pharmacodynamic and sedative activities in humans in vivo. We designed a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study to compare the inhibitory effects of bepotastine, cetirizine, fexofenadine, and olopatadine on histamine-induced flare-and-wheal response. Systemic sedative effects and impaired psychomotor activities by these drugs were also evaluated. Bepotastine (10 mg twice a day), cetirizine (10 mg once a day), fexofenadine (60 mg twice a day), and olopatadine (5 mg twice a day) or placebo was given in a double-blind manner to seven healthy volunteers before histamine challenge by iontophoresis. At 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 h following the oral administration of these drugs, histamine iontophoresis-induced wheal-and-flare response was measured. Sedative effects by the drugs were also evaluated by a visual analogue scale for subjective sedation, and by word processor test for psychomotor activity. Each volunteer was tested with all of the drugs (including placebo), administered in a random order with a washout period of at least 1 week. Histamine iontophoresis induced marked wheal-and-flare response in all participants. Bepotastine, cetirizine, fexofenadine, and olopatadine yielded significant reduction of histamine-induced wheal-and-flare response compared to placebo (P < 0.01). Among the drugs, olopatadine and cetirizine suppressed most markedly and persistently histamine-induced wheal-and-flare response, while bepotastine and fexofenadine produced a significant, but less persistent suppression. Olopatadine, fexofenadine, and cetirizine showed a significant systemic sedative effect in this order with bepotastine showing the least sedative effect. Moreover, olopatadine affected psychomotor performance most markedly, which was followed by fexofenadine and cetirizine. These results indicate that bepotastine, cetirizine, fexofenadine, and olopatadine inhibit histamine-induced wheal-and-flare response of humans in vivo and induce a variable systemic sedative effect and impaired psychomotor activity. Although olopatadine and cetirizine showed the strongest and most persistent suppression of histamine-induced wheal-and-flare response, olopatadine showed a considerable sedative effect with impaired psychomotor performance.

Topics: Adult; Cetirizine; Cross-Over Studies; Dermatitis, Atopic; Dibenzoxepins; Double-Blind Method; Female; Histamine; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Humans; Iontophoresis; Male; Olopatadine Hydrochloride; Piperidines; Psychomotor Performance; Pyridines; Sleep Stages; Terfenadine

The aim of this double-blind, randomized, crossover, placebo-controlled clinical trial was to compare the inhibition of the histamine-induced skin reaction induced by ebastine 20 mg with respect to that induced by fexofenadine 120 mg or placebo.. Eighteen volunteers (10 males, 8 females) received the three treatments once daily for 5 days, with a mean 7-day washout period between treatments. Intradermal tests, using 0.05 ml from a solution containing 100 microg/ml of histamine, were performed at baseline and at 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 10 and 24 h after a single dose and repeated 5-day dose, and in addition after 34, 48, 58 and 72 h after repeated 5-day dose.. After 24 h of acute administration, ebastine 20 mg was significantly more effective than fexofenadine 120 mg in reducing the wheal and flare induced by histamine challenge (p<0.001). Although fexofenadine 120 mg had the shortest onset of action (1.5 vs. 3 h in ebastine 20 mg), the duration of its antihistamine effect was the shortest (24 vs. 58 h in ebastine 20 mg) and wheal reduction after 24 h was not significantly different from placebo. The overall effect after single and repeated 5-day dose, expressed as the AUC of reduction of wheal and flare area (%/h), showed the following order of magnitude: ebastine 20 mg>fexofenadine 120 mg>placebo. No significant differences in the incidence of adverse events were found between the three treatments.. The present results clearly show a superior and long-acting effect of ebastine 20 mg compared with fexofenadine 120 mg on the skin response to histamine 24 h after dosing.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Butyrophenones; Double-Blind Method; Female; Histamine Antagonists; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Skin; Terfenadine

The objective of this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, 5-way crossover study was to compare the pharmacodynamic effects of the H1 antihistamine ebastine (10 mg once daily, E10) with those of cetirizine (10 mg once daily, C10), loratadine (10 mg once daily, L10), fexofenadine (60 mg, twice daily, F60 x 2) and placebo (P) after 6 days of treatment in healthy volunteers. The pharmacodynamic variable was the mean percent reduction from baseline (pretreatment) of the wheal area induced by intradermal histamine 0.1% on the morning after 6 days' treatment. A secondary variable was the concentration of histamine required to produce a wheal of area 150 mm2. E10 reduced wheal size more than did P (p < 0.001) or F60 x 2 (p < 0.019). No significant differences were found among E10, C10 and L10. After E10, a significantly greater concentration of histamine was needed to induce a wheal of 150 mm2 than after P (p < 0.001), L10 (p < 0.001) or F60 x 2 (p < 0.001). No significant differences were found between E10 and C10. In conclusion, this study shows that, at the end of the conventional dosing interval, ebastine 10 mg and cetirizine 10 mg once daily in repeated doses suppressed the histamine wheal more effectively than did loratadine 10 mg once daily or fexofenadine 60 mg twice daily.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Butyrophenones; Cetirizine; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Female; Histamine; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Humans; Hypersensitivity, Immediate; Injections, Intradermal; Loratadine; Male; Piperidines; Skin Tests; Terfenadine

Levocetirizine is the active enantiomer of cetirizine, a potent drug with little metabolism widely used for allergic rhinitis and urticaria.. This study compares the potency, consistency, onset, and duration of action of levocetirizine with other popular antihistamines.. Levocetirizine 5 mg, ebastine 10 mg, fexofenadine 180 mg, loratadine 10 mg, mizolastine 10 mg, or placebo in single doses were given to 18 healthy male volunteers in a double-blind, crossover, randomized fashion. Wheal-and-flare responses to epicutaneous histamine dihydrochloride (100 mg/mL) challenge were measured at 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 24 hours after each dose.. The overall effect of each drug was evaluated by the area under the curve (0 to 24 hours). Levocetirizine was the most potent and consistently effective drug for inhibiting the histamine-induced wheal-and-flare surface areas. Ebastine, fexofenadine, and mizolastine ranked next and had almost identical effects for inhibiting the wheal. Loratadine was the least potent drug. Levocetirizine, fexofenadine, and mizolastine inhibited the wheal-and-flare response after 1 hour and reached their peak for inhibition after 4 hours. Ebastine and loratadine could be distinguished from placebo only after 4 hours. After treatment with levocetirizine, all 18 subjects had >95% inhibition of the wheal response at one timepoint. Fexofenadine, mizolastine, and ebastine were inhibitory in declining order. All treatments were considered safe and well tolerated.. Levocetirizine, the active enantiomer of cetirizine, is more potent and consistent than other popular H1 antihistamines for blocking the cutaneous response to histamine. These findings may predict the efficacy of this drug in treating allergic disorders.

Topics: Adult; Benzimidazoles; Butyrophenones; Cetirizine; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Histamine; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Humans; Loratadine; Male; Piperidines; Terfenadine; Treatment Outcome; Urticaria

New H1-antagonists have become available, but there has been no comparison of their potency for inhibiting histamine in the skin.. Cetirizine 10 mg, ebastine 10 mg, epinastine 20 mg, fexofenadine 60 mg, terfenadine 60 mg, loratadine 10 mg, or placebo was given to 14 healthy male volunteers in a double-blind, crossover randomized manner. Inhibition of the wheal and flare response to epicutaneous histamine phosphate (100 mg/ml) challenge was measured at 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 24 h after doses.. Epinastine inhibited the wheal and flare after 30 min. Cetirizine commenced acting at 1 h and was superior to other treatments. Ebastine was no better than placebo until 4 h, but was efficacious thereafter until 24 h. Terfenadine induced potent inhibition after 1 h and was superior to its metabolite fexofenadine. Loratadine was the least potent inhibitor. Inhibition of the flare response paralleled the patterns seen for wheals. The rank order for area under the curve (0-24 h) was cetirizine, epinastine, terfenadine, ebastine, fexofenadine, loratadine, and placebo.. The inhibition of histamine effects in the skin may be useful in predicting the clinical utility of newly introduced antihistamines in treating allergic disorders.

Topics: Adult; Butyrophenones; Cetirizine; Cross-Over Studies; Dibenzazepines; Double-Blind Method; Histamine; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Histamine Release; Humans; Hypersensitivity, Immediate; Imidazoles; Loratadine; Male; Piperidines; Skin Tests; Terfenadine; Urticaria

Alogliptin (ALG), an inhibitor of dipeptidylpeptidase-4, is used in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus, and has a high absorption rate (>60-71%), despite its low lipophilicity (logP=-1.4). Here, we aimed to clarify the mechanism of its intestinal absorption. ALG uptake into Caco-2 cells was time-, temperature-, and concentration-dependent, but was not saturated at concentrations up to 10 mmol/L. The uptake was significantly inhibited by the organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP) substrate fexofenadine and by the OATP inhibitor 4,4'-diisothiocyanostilbene-2,2'-disulfonic acid (DIDS), but was not inhibited by organic cation transporter (OCT)/organic cation/carnitine transporter (OCTN) or peptide transporter 1 (PEPT1) substrates. Grapefruit, orange, and apple juices and their constituents, which are known to strongly inhibit intestinal OATPs, significantly inhibited ALG uptake into Caco-2 cells. The pH dependence was bell-shaped, indicating the involvement of a pH-sensitive transporter. However, ALG uptake by HEK293 cells overexpressing OATP2B1, a key intestinal OATP transporter of amphiphilic drugs, was not different from that of mock cells. In a rat in vivo study, apple juice reduced systemic exposure to orally administered ALG without changing the terminal half-life. These observations suggest that intestinal absorption of ALG is carrier-mediated, and involves a fruit-juice-sensitive transporter other than OATP2B1.

Topics: 4,4'-Diisothiocyanostilbene-2,2'-Disulfonic Acid; Administration, Oral; Animals; Caco-2 Cells; Citrus paradisi; Citrus sinensis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Food-Drug Interactions; Fruit and Vegetable Juices; Half-Life; HEK293 Cells; Humans; Intestinal Absorption; Male; Malus; Organic Anion Transporters; Piperidines; Rats; Terfenadine; Uracil

Nasal obstruction is one of the most bothersome symptoms of allergic rhinitis (AR) affecting sleep-related quality of life in AR patients. Although several treatments were tested to control nasal obstruction, some patients with moderate to severe AR do not respond to current treatments, including the combined administration of different types of anti-allergic medicine. Thus, new options for AR treatment are needed. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of combined treatment with a novel inhibitor of hematopoietic prostaglandin D synthase (HPGDS), TAS-205, and different types of anti-allergic medicine on nasal obstruction in AR. Firstly, we demonstrated that TAS-205 selectively inhibited prostaglandin D

Topics: Acetates; Animals; Anti-Allergic Agents; Cell Line; Cyclopropanes; Disease Models, Animal; Drug Synergism; Drug Therapy, Combination; Enzyme Inhibitors; Guinea Pigs; Humans; Intramolecular Oxidoreductases; Lipocalins; Male; Morpholines; Nasal Mucosa; Nasal Obstruction; Ovalbumin; Piperidines; Prostaglandin D2; Pyrroles; Quality of Life; Quinolines; Rats; Rhinitis, Allergic; Sulfides; Terfenadine

Prediction of human pharmacokinetics is important in the preclinical stage. Values for total clearance of compounds from plasma should be one of the most important pharmacokinetic parameters for predictions. Although several physiological and empirical methods including single-species allometry for prediction of values for human clearance of compounds using humanized-liver mice have been reported, further improvement of prediction accuracies would be still expected. To optimize these approaches, we proposed methods for unbound intrinsic clearance in virtually 100% humanized-liver mouse by incorporating unbound plasma fractions of compounds in differently humanized-liver mice. Comparisons of prediction accuracies of values for human clearance of 15 model compounds were performed among our current physiological and previously reported models and single-species allometry using humanized-liver mice. Incorporation of the actual unbound plasma fractions of compounds and correction of residual mice hepatocyte in humanized-liver mice showed comparable prediction accuracy to that by single-species allometry. After exclusion of 3 compounds with large species differences in values of clearance and unbound plasma fractions between mice and humans out of 15 compounds, prediction accuracies were improved in the methods investigated. The previously and present reported physiological methods could show the good prediction accuracy of values for clearance of drugs from plasma.

Topics: Acetamides; Albuterol; Animals; Carbamates; Chromatography, Liquid; Diazepam; Diclofenac; Digitoxin; Humans; Itraconazole; Ketoprofen; Liver; Metabolic Clearance Rate; Mice; Mice, Transgenic; Naproxen; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Phenytoin; Piperidines; Pravastatin; Pyrimidines; Quinidine; Tandem Mass Spectrometry; Telmisartan; Terfenadine; Verapamil

Drug-target binding kinetics has recently attracted considerable interest in view of the potential predictive power for in vivo drug efficacy. The recently introduced antihistamine bilastine has a long duration of in vivo drug action, which outlasts pharmacological active bilastine concentrations in blood. To provide a molecular basis for the long duration of action, we explored the kinetics of bilastine binding to the human histamine H

Topics: Benzimidazoles; Diphenhydramine; HeLa Cells; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating; Humans; Piperidines; Receptors, Histamine H1; Terfenadine; Time Factors

Piperine (PIP) has been found to inhibit P-glycoprotein (P-gp) function in rats, suggesting that it may have the potential to modulate P-gp-mediated drug efflux in humans. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of PIP on the pharmacokinetics of fexofenadine (FEX), a P-gp substrate, in healthy volunteers.. An open-label, two-period, sequential study involving 12 healthy volunteers was conducted. A single oral dose of FEX 120 mg was given to volunteers during the control phase and after the treatment phase. A once-daily oral dose of PIP 20 mg was given to volunteers during the treatment phase (10 days). Blood samples were collected at predefined time intervals, and plasma samples containing FEX were analyzed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.. Treatment with PIP significantly increased maximum plasma concentration of FEX [406.9 (control) vs. 767 ng/mL (treatment)] and area under the plasma concentration-time curve [3403.7 (control) vs. 5724.7 ng.h/mL (treatment)] when compared to the control phase. In contrast, PIP treatment significantly decreased apparent oral clearance of FEX [35.4 (control) vs. 20.7 L/h (treatment)] as compared to the control. There was no significant change observed in the half life and renal clearance of FEX between the treatment phase and control phase.. The results suggest that altered pharmacokinetics and enhanced bioavailability of FEX might be attributed to PIP-mediated inhibition of P-gp drug efflux. Therefore, intake of PIP or dietary supplements containing PIP may potentially enhance the absorption or bioavailability of P-gp substrate drugs in addition to FEX.

Topics: Adult; Alkaloids; Area Under Curve; ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1; Benzodioxoles; Biological Availability; Half-Life; Healthy Volunteers; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating; Humans; Male; Piperidines; Polyunsaturated Alkamides; Terfenadine

The histamine-1 receptor (H1R) antagonist ketotifen increased the threshold of discomfort in hypersensitive IBS patients. The use of peripherally restricted and more selective H1R antagonists may further improve treatment possibilities. We examined the use of fexofenadine and ebastine to reverse post-stress visceral hypersensitivity in maternally separated rats.. The visceromotor response to colonic distension was assessed in adult maternally separated and nonhandled rats pre- and 24 hours post water avoidance. Subsequently rats were treated with vehicle alone or different dosages of fexofenadine (1.8 and 18 mg/kg) or ebastine (0.1 and 1.0 mg/kg) and re-evaluated. Colonic tissue was collected to assess relative RMCP-2 and occludin expression levels by Western blot and histamine-1 receptor by RT-qPCR. β-hexosaminidase release by RBL-2H3 cells was used to establish possible mast cell stabilizing properties of the antagonists.. Water avoidance only induced enhanced response to distension in maternally separated rats. This response was reversed by 1.8 and 18 mg/kg fexofenadine. Reversal was also obtained by 1.0 but not 0.1 mg/kg ebastine. RMCP-2 expression levels were comparable in these two ebastine treatment groups but occludin was significantly higher in 1.0 mg/kg treated rats. There were no differences in histamine-1 receptor expression between nonhandled and maternally separated rats. Fexofenadine but not ebastine showed mast cell stabilizing quality.. Our results indicate that the peripherally restricted 2(nd) generation H1-receptor antagonists fexofenadine and ebastine are capable of reversing post stress visceral hypersensitivity in rat. These data justify future IBS patient trials with these well tolerated compounds.

Topics: Animals; Blotting, Western; Butyrophenones; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Irritable Bowel Syndrome; Mast Cells; Maternal Deprivation; Occludin; Piperidines; Rats; Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction; Stress, Psychological; Terfenadine

These findings suggest that the down-regulation of interleukin (IL)-5 gene expression in collaboration with the suppression of histamine H(1) receptor (H1R) gene expression in the nasal mucosa provides the basis for better therapeutic effects of preseasonal prophylactic treatment with antihistamines in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis caused by Japanese cedar pollen.. The effects of prophylactic administration of antihistamines on the expression of IL-5 and IL-33 mRNA in the nasal mucosa of the patients with pollinosis were investigated.. Eight patients had already visited the hospital before the peak pollen period and started preseasonal prophylactic treatment with antihistamines. Seventeen patients who first visited the hospital during the peak pollen period were designated as the no treatment group. After local anesthesia, nasal mucosa was obtained by scraping the inferior concha with a small spatula during the peak pollen period.. During the peak pollen period, the expression of IL-5 mRNA, but not that of IL-33 mRNA, in the nasal mucosa of patients receiving preseasonal prophylactic treatment with antihistamines was significantly lower in comparison with that of patients without treatment. Moreover, there was a significant correlation between the expression of IL-5 mRNA and the nasal symptoms or the expression of H1R mRNA.

Topics: Butyrophenones; Cryptomeria; Female; Histamine Antagonists; Humans; Interleukin-33; Interleukin-5; Interleukins; Male; Middle Aged; Nasal Mucosa; Piperidines; Pollen; Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal; Terfenadine

Urticaria is mainly caused by mast cell-derived histamine through the histamine H(1) receptor. Antihistamines are occasionally used on demand upon a recurrence of urticaria; therefore, rapidly acting agents should be explored. The onset of action is assumed to depend on time to maximum concentration (T(max)), but the speed of action needs to be evaluated not only through blood concentration analysis but also by measuring in vivo effectiveness.. In this study, we chose two representative second-generation antihistamines (bepotastine and fexofenadine) with relatively short T(max) values and evaluated their effects on histamine-induced skin responses using both visual and laser Doppler imaging scales.. Suppression of histamine-induced flare and itch was observed 3 and 6 h after administration of both antihistamines. Attenuation of itch was seen 30 min after the administration of each drug and thereafter until 6 h. In addition, bepotastine suppressed flare formation after only 30 min following application.. These results suggest that antihistamines suppress histamine-induced itch and flare, followed by wheal formation, and that bepotastine suppresses skin symptoms sooner after administration than fexofenadine does, which is relatively consistent with the T(max) results.

Topics: Adult; Female; Histamine; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating; Humans; Male; Piperidines; Pruritus; Pyridines; Skin; Terfenadine; Urticaria

H1-antihistamines are probably the most frequently used drugs in allergic diseases, with widely established efficacy, tolerance, and safety. We report a patient with urticaria due to ingestion of ebastine and fexofenadine. Skin prick tests, patch tests, and basophil activation tests with the implicated drugs and antihistamines from other families were negative. The oral challenges with the implicated antihistamines and other antihistamines tested were positive, but the patient tolerated an oral challenge with cetirizine. We present a patient with urticaria induced by different antihistamines in whom the diagnosis was established by oral challenge. The mechanism of sensitization remains unclear.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Butyrophenones; Diagnosis, Differential; Drug Hypersensitivity; Female; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating; Humans; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Terfenadine; Urticaria

The present study aimed to investigate the effect of piperine, a major component of black pepper, on the oral exposure of fexofenadine in rats. Pharmacokinetic parameters of fexofenadine were determined in rats following an oral (10 mg/kg) or intravenous (5 mg/kg) administration of fexofenadine in the presence and absence of piperine (10 or 20 mg/kg, given orally). Compared to the control group given fexofenadine alone, the combined use of piperine increased the oral exposure (AUC) of fexofenadine by 180% to 190% while there was no significant change in C(max) and T(1/2) of fexofenadine in rats. The bioavailability of fexofenadine was increased by approximately 2-folds via the concomitant use of piperine. Furthermore, T(max) tends to be increased which might be attributed to the delayed gastric emptying in the presence of piperine. In contrast, piperine did not alter the intravenous pharmacokinetics of fexofenadine, implying that piperine may increase mainly the gastrointestinal absorption of fexofenadine rather than reducing hepatic extraction. In conclusion, piperine significantly enhanced the oral exposure of fexofenadine in rats likely by the inhibition of P-glycoprotein-mediated cellular efflux during the intestinal absorption, suggesting that the combined use of piperine or piperine-containing diet with fexofenadine may require close monitoring for potential drug-diet interactions.

Topics: Alkaloids; Animals; ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1; Benzodioxoles; Biological Availability; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Enzyme Inhibitors; Food-Drug Interactions; Gastric Emptying; Half-Life; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating; Intestinal Absorption; Male; Piper nigrum; Piperidines; Polyunsaturated Alkamides; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Terfenadine

H(1)-antihistamines are widely used in the treatment of various allergic diseases. Particularly, a cornerstone of the management of chronic idiopathic urticaria is treatment with H(1)-antihistamines. However, a few cases of H(1)-antihistamine-induced urticaria have been reported. A 34-year-old woman presented with a 4-month history of recurrent urticaria, which was prominently exacerbated by the administration of H(1)-antihistamines. The patient consented to a provocation test of fexofenadine among drugs including cetirizine and hydroxyzine, which were suspected of inducing severe symptoms in episodes. One hour after challenge with 12 mg fexofenadine (one-fifth of the therapeutic dose), a urticarial reaction rapidly developed on nearly the entire body with remarkably increased levels of plasma histamine (190 nmol/L) and plasma leukotriene B4 (150 pg/mL). In challenge tests with other antihistamines, generalized urticaria occurred 5 and 1 h after intake of 10 mg loratadine and 10 mg bepotastine, respectively, whereas challenges with chlorpheniramine, mequitazine and azelastine were all negative. Skin prick tests with H(1)-antihistamines used in the challenges were all negative, indicating that the urticarial reactions after challenges with the causative drugs might not be immunoglobulin E-mediated. Among the causative drugs in our case, cetirizine and hydroxyzine are the piperazine derivatives, whereas fexofenadine, bepotastine, ebastine and loratadine are the piperidine derivatives. The chemical structures of both derivatives are very similar. Therefore, in this case, H(1)-antihistamine-induced urticaria may have been due to cross-reactivity between metabolites of these drugs, but not to drugs before metabolization. Hypersensitivity to H(1)-antihistamines should be considered when urticarial lesions worsen after H(1)-antihistamine treatment.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Drug Eruptions; Female; Histamine; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Humans; Immunologic Tests; Leukotriene B4; Loratadine; Piperidines; Pyridines; Skin Tests; Terfenadine; Urticaria

Sedation is the most frequent side effect of H(1)-antihistamines, and, sometimes, it may be life-threatening for patients. Evaluation of the sedative properties of H(1)-antihistamines is important to improve the patients' quality of life (QOL). Therefore, we carried out a large-scale surveillance quantified through a questionnaire using visual analog scale (VAS) from 1,742 patients. The results showed that the degree of sleepiness caused by some nonsedative second-generation antihistamines, including fexofenadine, olopatadine and cetirizine, was disease dependent. In atopic dermatitis, an unexpectedly low VAS score of sleepiness was obtained for the first-generation antihistamine d-chlorpheniramine, which is similar to those obtained for bepotastine and epinastine. d-Chlorpheniramine also showed a high VAS score in efficacy. Meanwhile, fexofenadine showed a higher VAS score of sleepiness in atopic dermatitis than those obtained in the other allergic diseases including allergic rhinitis, urticaria and asthma. In asthma, a higher VAS score of sleepiness was found for olopatadine, ebastine and cetirizine, when compared with d-chlorpheniramine. On the other hand, bepotastine showed the lowest VAS score for sleepiness. Our findings suggest the existence of unknown factors influencing the sedative properties of H(1)-antihistamines. Therefore, appropriate H(1)-antihistamines may need to be selected, depending on allergic diseases, to improve patients' QOL.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Asthma; Butyrophenones; Cetirizine; Child; Chlorpheniramine; Dermatitis, Atopic; Dibenzazepines; Dibenzoxepins; Female; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating; Humans; Imidazoles; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Olopatadine Hydrochloride; Pain Measurement; Piperidines; Population Surveillance; Psychomotor Performance; Pyridines; Quality of Life; Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial; Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal; Sleep Stages; Surveys and Questionnaires; Terfenadine; Urticaria

The use of in vitro data for quantitative predictions of transporter-mediated elimination in vivo requires an accurate estimation of the transporter Michaelis-Menten parameters, V(max) and K(m), as a first step. Therefore, the experimental conditions of in vitro studies used to assess hepatic uptake transport were optimized regarding active transport processes, nonspecific binding, and passive diffusion (P(dif)). A mechanistic model was developed to analyze and accurately describe these active and passive processes. This two-compartmental model was parameterized to account for nonspecific binding, bidirectional passive diffusion, and active uptake processes based on the physiology of the cells. The model was used to estimate kinetic parameters of in vitro transport data from organic anion-transporting peptide model substrates (e.g., cholecystokinin octapeptide deltorphin II, fexofenadine, and pitavastatin). Data analysis by this mechanistic model significantly improved the accuracy and precision in all derived parameters [mean coefficient of variations (CVs) for V(max) and K(m) were 19 and 23%, respectively] compared with the conventional kinetic method of transport data analysis (mean CVs were 58 and 115%, respectively, using this method). Furthermore, permeability was found to be highly temperature-dependent in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) control cells and artificial membranes (parallel artificial membrane permeability assay). Whereas for some compounds (taurocholate, estrone-3-sulfate, and propranolol) the effect was moderate (1.5-6-fold higher permeability at 37 degrees C compared with that at 4 degrees C), for fexofenadine a 16-fold higher passive permeability was seen at 37 degrees C. Therefore, P(dif) was better predicted if it was evaluated under the same experimental conditions as V(max) and K(m), i.e., in a single incubation of CHO overexpressed cells or rat hepatocytes at 37 degrees C, instead of a parallel control evaluation at 4 degrees C.

Topics: Algorithms; Animals; Biological Transport, Active; CHO Cells; Computer Simulation; Cricetinae; Cricetulus; Diffusion; Estrone; Fatty Acids, Monounsaturated; Fluvastatin; Hepatocytes; Indoles; Kinetics; Male; Membranes, Artificial; Models, Biological; Naphthalenes; Oligopeptides; Organic Anion Transporters; Permeability; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Pharmacokinetics; Piperidines; Quinolines; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Sincalide; Temperature; Terfenadine

The antiallergic agent bepotastine besilate is a nonsedating, second-generation H1-antagonist with high oral absorption and negligible distribution into brain. To clarify the role of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) in the pharmacokinetics of bepotastine, intestinal absorption and brain penetration studies were performed. [(14)C]Bepotastine transport in P-gp-overexpressed LLC-PK1 cells indicated that bepotastine was a substrate of P-gp. The affinity of bepotastine to P-gp estimated by ATPase activity assay was low, with a K(m) value of 1.25 mM. After i.v. administration, the brain/plasma free concentration ratio in mdr1-knockout mice was 3 times higher than that in wild-type mice. The in situ intestinal absorption studies of [(14)C]bepotastine in rats showed a clear regional difference, showing highest permeability at the upper part of small intestine with a decreasing permeability in the descending part of small intestine. The apparent absorption rate constant (ka) of [(14)C]bepotastine in the small intestine was greatly increased by cyclosporin A and verapamil, especially in the distal portion, and the site-specific absorption of [(14)C]bepotastine disappeared. The concentration dependence of ka of [(14)C]bepotastine was observed with a higher ka at higher concentration (20 mM) compared with that at lower concentration (1 microM). In conclusion, bepotastine is a substrate for P-gp, and P-gp clearly limited the brain distribution of bepotastine, whereas the effect of P-gp on intestinal absorption of bepotastine was minimal, presumably because of high membrane permeability at the upper region of small intestine where P-gp is less expressed. Such intestinal absorption property of bepotastine is distinctly different from the low membrane-permeable P-gp substrate fexofenadine.

Topics: Adenosine Triphosphatases; Animals; Anti-Allergic Agents; ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1; Autoradiography; Biological Transport, Active; Brain; Chromatography, Liquid; Intestinal Absorption; Kinetics; LLC-PK1 Cells; Male; Mass Spectrometry; Mice; Mice, Knockout; Piperidines; Pyridines; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Stimulation, Chemical; Swine; Terfenadine; Verapamil

We set out to establish the in vivo histamine H(1) receptor antagonistic (antihistaminic) and antiallergic properties of bilastine.. In vivo antihistaminic activity experiments consisted of measurement of: inhibition of increase in capillary permeability and reduction in microvascular extravasation and bronchospasm in rats and guinea pigs induced by histamine and other inflammatory mediators; and protection against lethality induced by histamine and other inflammatory mediators in rats. In vivo antiallergic activity experiments consisted of measurement of passive and active cutaneous anaphylactic reactions as well as type III and type IV allergic reactions in sensitised rodents.. In the in vivo antihistaminic activity experiments, bilastine was shown to have a positive effect, similar to that of cetirizine and more potent than that of fexofenadine. The results of the in vivo antiallergic activity experiments showed that the properties of bilastine in this setting are similar to those observed for cetirizine and superior to fexofenadine in the model of passive cutaneous anaphylactic reaction. When active cutaneous anaphylactic reaction experiments were conducted, bilastine showed significant activity, less potent than that observed with cetirizine but superior to that of fexofenadine. Evaluation of the type III allergic reaction showed that of the antihistamines only bilastine was able to inhibit oedema in sensitised mice, although its effect in this respect was much less potent than that observed with dexamethasone. In terms of the type IV allergic reaction, neither bilastine, cetirizine nor fexofenadine significantly modified the effect caused by oxazolone.. The results of our in vivo preclinical studies corroborate those obtained from previously conducted in vitro experiments of bilastine, and provide evidence that bilastine possesses antihistaminic as well as antiallergic properties, with similar potency to cetirizine and superior potency to fexofenadine.

Topics: Animals; Benzimidazoles; Bradykinin; Bronchial Spasm; Capillary Permeability; Cetirizine; Dermatitis; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Guinea Pigs; Histamine; Histamine Antagonists; Hypersensitivity; Male; Mice; Molecular Structure; Oxazolone; Piperidines; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Receptors, Histamine H1; Serotonin; Structure-Activity Relationship; Terfenadine; Time Factors

The long QT syndrome is a rare disease. The prevalence is estimated at 1/5 000 to 1/20,000. Numerous drugs are contra-indicated because they can lengthen the QT interval. A case of pollen allergy in an adolescent with LQTS is described. The possibility to prescribe anti-H1 drugs is reviewed since cases of torsades de pointe and even deaths have been reported for terfenadine and astemizole. Diphenhydramine, orphenadrine and hydroxyzine are contra-indicated. No accidents and no effects on the QT interval have been published for ebastine, fexofenadine, desloratadine and levocetirizine. These anti-H1 drugs could be used with great care, without any association with drugs resulting in low serum potassium level. Azelastine eye drops have been authorized and a routine protection by inhaled corticosteroids during the pollinic period has been advised in this adolescent treated by betablockers.

Topics: Adolescent; Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Butyrophenones; Cetirizine; Conjunctivitis, Allergic; Cromolyn Sodium; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Heart; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Humans; Long QT Syndrome; Male; Piperazines; Piperidines; Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal; Terfenadine

The oxidation of tert-butyl-phenyl group of title compounds by some microorganisms was studied. We have optimized the conditions of culture to increase the formation of acid metabolites and to avoid the formation of side products. We showed that an oxidative activity is induced by soybean peptones in Streptomyces platensis. The biologically active compounds, fexofenadine and carebastine, are produced in good yield (86-95%) by Absidia corymbifera.

Topics: Absidia; Biotransformation; Butyrophenones; Cunninghamella; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Oxidation-Reduction; Piperidines; Streptomyces griseus; Terfenadine

To compare antihistaminic and antiallergic activity of antihistaminic drugs of the latest generation (ebastin, cetirisine, fexofenadine, loratadine) and antihistaminic drugs of the first generation (clemastin) in the same patients with pollenosis.. Skin prick-titration with 10-dilution histamine and specific allergen, provocative nasal titration with 2-dilution histamine and allergen before and after a single intake of H1-antagonists were made in 30 patients in stable clinical remission of pollenosis during maximal antihistamine activity of the above drugs.. Systemic administration of the known H1-antagonists suppresses histamine sensitivity of both skin and nasal mucosa in the same degree. Drugs with more potent antihistaminic activity (fexofenadin and cetirisin) inhibited allergen-induced reactions more effectively. The order of the tested drugs by suppression of allergen-provoked skin and nasal reactions (by lowering antiallergic activity) is the following: fexofenadin and cetirisin > ebastin and loratadin > clemastin.. The above drugs of the latest generation seem to posses antiallergic activity not only due to antihistaminic effect but also due to other mechanisms. Different suppressive action of H1-antagonists reflects also individual sensitivity to different drugs. The factor of individual sensitivity of the patients to a pharmacological action of the drug may be crucial in the selection of the most effective medicine for each patient. This is confirmed by the data of individual sensitivity of the patient to antihistaminic and antiallergic action of H1-antagonists. The illustrated method may be helpful for individual selection of H1-antagonists for treatment of patients with allergic diseases.

Topics: Adult; Anti-Allergic Agents; Butyrophenones; Cetirizine; Clemastine; Female; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Humans; Hypersensitivity; Loratadine; Male; Piperidines; Pollen; Terfenadine

Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Butyrophenones; Cells, Cultured; Cetirizine; Chymases; Eosinophils; Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor; Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor; Hematopoietic Cell Growth Factors; Histamine; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Humans; Hypersensitivity; Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1; Interleukin-3; Interleukin-8; Loratadine; Mast Cells; Piperidines; Potassium Channel Blockers; Potassium Channels; Prostaglandin D2; Pyridines; Recombinant Fusion Proteins; Recombinant Proteins; Serine Endopeptidases; Terfenadine; Time Factors; Tryptases