piperidines and efegatran

piperidines has been researched along with efegatran* in 4 studies

Reviews

3 review(s) available for piperidines and efegatran

ArticleYear
Direct thrombin inhibitors in acute coronary syndromes: principal results of a meta-analysis based on individual patients' data.
    Lancet (London, England), 2002, Jan-26, Volume: 359, Issue:9303

    To obtain more reliable and precise estimates of the effect of direct thrombin inhibitors in the management of acute coronary syndromes, including patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, we undertook a meta-analysis based on individual patients' data from randomised trials comparing a direct thrombin inhibitor (hirudin, bivalirudin, argatroban, efegatran, or inogatran) with heparin.. We included trials that involved at least 200 patients. The primary efficacy outcome was death or myocardial infarction, and the primary safety outcome was major bleeding. Data from individual trials were combined by use of a modified Mantel-Haenszel method.. In 11 randomised trials, 35,970 patients were assigned up to 7 days' treatment with a direct thrombin inhibitor or heparin and followed up for at least 30 days. Compared with heparin, direct thrombin inhibitors were associated with a lower risk of death or myocardial infarction at the end of treatment (4.3% vs 5.1%; odds ratio 0.85 [95% CI 0.77-0.94]; p=0.001) and at 30 days (7.4% vs 8.2%; 0.91 [0.84-0.99]; p=0.02). This was due primarily to a reduction in myocardial infarctions (2.8% vs 3.5%; 0.80 [0.71-0.90]; p<0.001) with no apparent effect on deaths (1.9% vs 2.0%; 0.97 [0.83-1.13]; p=0.69). Subgroup analyses suggested a benefit of direct thrombin inhibitors on death or myocardial infarction in trials of both acute coronary syndromes and percutaneous coronary interventions. A reduction in death or myocardial infarction was seen with hirudin and bivalirudin but not with univalent agents. Compared with heparin, there was an increased risk of major bleeding with hirudin, but a reduction with bivalirudin. There was no excess in intracranial haemorrhage with direct thrombin inhibitors.. Direct thrombin inhibitors are superior to heparin for the prevention of death or myocardial infarction in patients with acute coronary syndromes. This information should prompt further clinical development of direct thrombin inhibitors for the management of arterial thrombosis.

    Topics: Angina, Unstable; Antithrombins; Arginine; Glycine; Heparin; Hirudin Therapy; Hirudins; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Oligopeptides; Peptide Fragments; Pipecolic Acids; Piperidines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recombinant Proteins; Sulfonamides; Survival Rate; Thrombin

2002
Thrombin inhibitor design.
    Current medicinal chemistry, 1998, Volume: 5, Issue:4

    Recently, iv formulated direct thrombin inhibitors have been shown to be safe and efficacious alternatives to heparin. These results have fueled the hopes for an orally active compound. Such a compound could be a significant advance over warfarin if it had predictable pharmacokinetics and a duration of action sufficient for once or twice a day dosing. In order to develop an orally active compound which meets these criteria, the deficiencies of the prototype inhibitor efegatran have had to be addressed. First, using a combination of structure based design and empirical structure optimization, more selective compounds have been identified by modifying the P1 group or by incorporating different peptidomimetic P2/P3 scaffolds. Secondly, this optimization has resulted in the development of potent and selective non-covalent inhibitors, thus bypassing the liabilities of the serine trap. Thirdly, oral bioavailability has been achieved while maintaining selectivity and efficacy through the incorporation of progressively less basic P1 groups. The duration of action of these compounds remains to be optimized. Other advances in thrombin inhibitor design have included the development of uncharged P1 groups and the discovery of two non-peptide templates.

    Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Arginine; Binding Sites; Dipeptides; Drug Design; Humans; Models, Molecular; Oligopeptides; Pipecolic Acids; Piperidines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Structure-Activity Relationship; Sulfonamides; Thrombin

1998
Modulating platelet function with selective thrombin inhibitors.
    Haemostasis, 1996, Volume: 26 Suppl 4

    In addition to its pivotal role in blood coagulation, thrombin is one of the most important agonists for platelet recruitment and aggregation. Thrombin inhibitors impede thrombin-induced platelet aggregation but have no effect on aggregation induced by other agonists. A review is presented of selective thrombin inhibitors now in clinical investigation, some of which are also orally active.

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Animals; Antithrombins; Arginine; Blood Platelets; Boron Compounds; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dogs; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical; Glycine; Hirudin Therapy; Hirudins; Humans; Naphthalenes; Oligopeptides; Peptide Fragments; Pipecolic Acids; Piperidines; Recombinant Proteins; Sulfonamides; Thrombin

1996

Other Studies

1 other study(ies) available for piperidines and efegatran

ArticleYear
The importance of enzyme inhibition kinetics for the effect of thrombin inhibitors in a rat model of arterial thrombosis.
    Thrombosis and haemostasis, 1997, Volume: 78, Issue:4

    The relation between the antithrombotic effect in vivo, and the inhibition constant (Ki) and the association rate constant (k(on)) in vitro was investigated for eight different thrombin inhibitors. The carotid arteries of anaesthetized rats were exposed to FeCl3 for 1 h, and the thrombus size was determined from the amount of incorporated 125I-fibrinogen. The thrombin inhibitors were given intravenously, and complete concentration- and/or dose-response curves were constructed. Despite a 50,000-fold difference between the Ki-values comparable plasma concentrations of hirudin and melagatran were needed (0.14 and 0.12 micromol l(-1), respectively) to obtain a 50% antithrombotic effect (IC50) in vivo. In contrast, there was a comparable in vitro (Ki-value) and in vivo (IC50) potency ratio for melagatran and inogatran, respectively. These results can be explained by the concentration of thrombin in the thrombus and improved inhibition by the low-molecular-weight compounds. For all eight thrombin inhibitors tested, there was an inverse relationship between k(on)-values in vitro and the slope of the dose response curves in vivo. Inhibitors with k(on)-values of < 1 x 10(7) M(-1) s(-1) gave steep dose response curves with a Hill coefficient > 1. The association time for inhibition of thrombin for slow-binding inhibitors will be too long to give effective antithrombotic effects at low plasma concentrations, but at increasing concentrations the association time will decrease, resulting in a steeper dose-response curve and thereby a more narrow therapeutic interval.

    Topics: Amino Acid Chloromethyl Ketones; Animals; Anticoagulants; Arginine; Azetidines; Benzylamines; Carotid Artery Thrombosis; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Fibrinolytic Agents; Glycine; Hemodynamics; Heparin; Hirudin Therapy; Hirudins; Kinetics; Male; Oligopeptides; Partial Thromboplastin Time; Peptide Fragments; Pipecolic Acids; Piperidines; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Recombinant Proteins; Sulfonamides; Thrombin; Thrombin Time

1997