piperidines and baricitinib

Topics: Alopecia; Alopecia Areata; Humans; Piperidines

To update the EULAR points to consider (PtCs) on the use of immunomodulatory therapies in COVID-19.. According to the EULAR standardised operating procedures, a systematic literature review up to 14 July 2021 was conducted and followed by a consensus meeting of an international multidisciplinary task force. The new statements were consolidated by formal voting.. We updated 2 overarching principles and 12 PtC. Evidence was only available in moderate to severe and critical patients. Glucocorticoids alone or in combination with tocilizumab are beneficial in COVID-19 cases requiring oxygen therapy and in critical COVID-19. Use of Janus kinase inhibitors (baricitinib and tofacitinib) is promising in the same populations of severe and critical COVID-19. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies and convalescent plasma may find application in early phases of the disease and in selected subgroups of immunosuppressed patients. There was insufficient robust evidence for the efficacy of other immunomodulators with further work being needed in relation to biomarker-based stratification for IL-1 therapy CONCLUSIONS: Growing evidence supports incremental efficacy of glucocorticoids alone or combined with tocilizumab/Janus kinase inhibitors in moderate to severe and critical COVID-19. Ongoing studies may unmask the potential application of other therapeutic approaches. Involvement of rheumatologists, as systemic inflammatory diseases experts, should be encouraged in clinical trials of immunomodulatory therapy in COVID-19.

Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Azetidines; Consensus Development Conferences as Topic; COVID-19 Drug Treatment; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Immunomodulating Agents; Immunomodulation; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; SARS-CoV-2; Sulfonamides

Immune dysregulation is an important component of the pathophysiology of COVID-19. A large body of literature has reported the effect of immune-based therapies in patients with COVID-19, with some remarkable successes such as the use of steroids or anti-cytokine therapies. However, challenges in clinical decision-making arise from the complexity of the disease phenotypes and patient heterogeneity, as well as the variable quality of evidence from immunotherapy studies. This Review aims to support clinical decision-making by providing an overview of the evidence generated by major clinical trials of host-directed therapy. We discuss patient stratification and propose an algorithm to guide the use of immunotherapy strategies in the clinic. This will not only help guide treatment decisions, but may also help to design future trials that investigate immunotherapy in other severe infections.

Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antibodies, Neutralizing; Anticoagulants; Azetidines; Bradykinin; Bradykinin B2 Receptor Antagonists; Complement Inactivating Agents; COVID-19; COVID-19 Serotherapy; Dexamethasone; Drug Combinations; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Glucocorticoids; Heparin; Humans; Hydrocortisone; Imatinib Mesylate; Immunization, Passive; Immunologic Factors; Immunomodulation; Interferon beta-1a; Interferon beta-1b; Interferon-gamma; Interleukin 1 Receptor Antagonist Protein; Kallikrein-Kinin System; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; SARS-CoV-2; Sulfonamides

Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are novel treatment approaches for psoriasis. However, there is no direct comparison of JAK inhibitors in plaque psoriasis. In order to compare the efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitors in psoriasis, we conducted a network meta-analysis using eligible randomized clinical trials (RCTs). The efficacy of JAK inhibitors was evaluated using a 75% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI75) from baseline, and the proportion of patients achieving the Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) response. The incidence of treatment-related adverse events (AEs) was also assessed. A total of eight RCTs with tofacitinib, peficitinib, solcitinib, baricitinib, abrocitinib and deucravacitinib were included. A total of 3612 participants who were diagnosed with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis were analysed. Overall, JAK inhibitors showed superior PASI75 response over placebo at both 8 and 12 weeks. Among all included JAK inhibitors, tofacitinib 15 mg twice a day (BID) had the highest probability of achieving PASI75 at both 8 and 12 weeks (SUCRA = 0.938 and 0.937, separately), followed by tofacitinib 10 mg BID (SUCRA = 0.905 and 0.908, separately) and deucravacitinib 12 mg once daily (QD) (SUCRA = 0.874 and 0.837, separately). A similar finding was observed for PGA response. Safety assessment showed that all JAK inhibitors had non-inferior safety compared with placebo, except for deucravacitinib 6 mg BID and 12 mg QD. Tofacitinib 2 mg BID was the first-ranked drug for safety profile followed by deucravacitinib 3 mg QD, and tofacitinib 5 mg BID. When comprehensively evaluated the efficacy and safety, tofacitinib (2 mg, 5 mg, 10 mg, 15 mg BID) was superior to other included JAK inhibitors with satisfying PASI75 and PGA response, as well as relatively low incidence of AEs. Our study confirmed that JAK inhibitors had promising treatment efficacy for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Tofacitinib showed superior efficacy and safety over peficitinib, solcitinib, baricitinib, abrocitinib and deucravacitinib.

Topics: Adamantane; Azetidines; Heterocyclic Compounds; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Janus Kinases; Network Meta-Analysis; Niacinamide; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Psoriasis; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

The impact of new and emerging therapies on the microenvironment of primary cutaneous lymphomas (PCLs) has been recently raised in the literature. Concomitantly, novel treatments are already used or registered (dupilumab, upadacitinib) and others seem to be added to the armamentarium against atopic dermatitis. Our aim was to review the literature on interleukins 4, 13, 22, and 31, and JAK/STAT pathways in PCLs to elucidate the safety of using biologics (dupilumab, tralokinumab, fezakinumab, nemolizumab) and small molecule inhibitors (upadacitinib, baricitinib, abrocitinib, ruxolitinib, tofacitinib) in the treatment of atopic dermatitis. We summarized the current state of knowledge on this topic based on the search of the PubMed database and related references published before 21 October 2021. Our analysis suggests that some of the mentioned agents (dupilumab, ruxolitinib) and others may have a direct impact on the progression of cutaneous lymphomas. This issue requires further study and meticulous monitoring of patients receiving these drugs to ensure their safety, especially in light of the FDA warning on tofacitinib. In conclusion, in the case of the rapid progression of atopic dermatitis/eczema, especially in patients older than 40 years old, there is a necessity to perform a biopsy followed by a very careful pathological examination.

Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Azetidines; Dermatitis, Atopic; Humans; Interleukins; Janus Kinases; Lymphoma; Lymphoma, Primary Cutaneous Anaplastic Large Cell; Nitriles; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Signal Transduction; Skin Neoplasms; STAT Transcription Factors; Sulfonamides; Tumor Microenvironment

The relative efficacy and tolerability of tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, and filgotinib were assessed in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with inadequate responses to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs).. We performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis to combine direct and indirect evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to examine the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, and filgotinib in RA patients with inadequate responses to bDMARDs.. Four RCTs comprising 1399 patients met the inclusion criteria. Tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, and filgotinib achieved significant American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) responses versus placebo. The ranking probability based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) indicated that upadacitinib 15 mg had the highest probability of being the best treatment for achieving the ACR20 response rate, followed by filgotinib 200 mg, baricitinib 4 mg, filgotinib 100 mg, tofacitinib 5 mg, and placebo. The ranking in SUCRA based on the ACR50 response rate indicated that baricitinib 4 mg had the highest probability of achieving the ACR50 response rate, followed by filgotinib 200 mg, tofacitinib 5 mg, upadacitinib 15 mg, filgotinib 100 mg, and placebo. Tofacitinib 5 mg showed a significantly higher ACR70 response rate than filgotinib 100 mg and upadacitinib 15 mg. Tofacitinib 5 mg, filgotinib 200 mg, and placebo showed a significantly lower serious adverse event rate than upadacitinib 15 mg.. Tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, and filgotinib were effective treatment options for RA patients with an inadequate response to bDMARDs but with different efficacy and safety profiles.. ZIEL: Bei Patienten mit rheumatoider Arthritis (RA) und inadäquater Reaktion auf biologische krankheitsmodizifierende Antirheumatika (bDMARD) wurde die relative Wirksamkeit und Verträglichkeit von Tofacitinib, Baricitinib, Upadacitinib und Filgotinib ermittelt.. Eine Bayes-Netzwerk-Metaanalyse wurde durchgeführt, um direkte und indirekte Evidenz aus randomisierten kontrollierten Studien (RCT) zu kombinieren und so die Wirksamkeit und Sicherheit von Tofacitinib, Baricitinib, Upadacitinib und Filgotinib bei RA-Patienten mit inadäquatem Ansprechen auf bDMARD zu untersuchen.. Die Einschlusskriterien wurden von 4 RCT mit 1399 Patienten erfüllt. Unter Tofacitinib, Baricitinib, Upadacitinib und Filgotinib zeigte sich eine signifikant höhere ACR20-Ansprechrate (gemäß American College of Rheumatology) als unter Placebo. Wie die Rangfolgewahrscheinlichkeit, basierend auf der Oberfläche unter der kumulativen Rangfolgenkurve (SUCRA, „surface under the cumulative ranking curve“), ergab, stellte Upadacitinib 15 mg mit größter Wahrscheinlichkeit die beste Behandlung zur Erzielung der ACR20-Ansprechrate dar, es folgten Filgotinib 200 mg, Baricitinib 4 mg, Filgotinib 100 mg, Tofacitinib 5 mg und Placebo. Die auf der ACR50-Ansprechrate basierende SUCRA-Rangfolge zeigte, dass für Baricitinib 4 mg die höchste Wahrscheinlichkeit bestand, die ACR50-Ansprechrate zu erzielen, es folgten Filgotinib 200 mg, Tofacitinib 5 mg, Upadacitinib 15 mg, Filgotinib 100 mg und Placebo. Tofacitinib 5 mg wies eine signifikant höhere ACR70-Ansprechrate auf als Filgotinib 100 mg und Upadacitinib 15 mg. Für Tofacitinib 5 mg, Filgotinib 200 mg und Placebo zeigte sich eine signifikant niedrigere Rate schwerer unerwünschter Ereignisse als für Upadacitinib 15 mg.. Für RA-Patienten mit inadäquater Reaktion auf bDMARD erwiesen sich Tofacitinib, Baricitinib, Upadacitinib und Filgotinib als wirksame Therapieoptionen, jedoch mit unterschiedlichen Wirksamkeits- und Sicherheitsprofilen.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Biological Products; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; Humans; Methotrexate; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Triazoles

An assessment of the relative efficacy and tolerability of tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, and filgotinib compared to those of methotrexate (MTX) was performed in disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD)-naive patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis to combine direct and indirect evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) so as to examine the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, filgotinib, and MTX in DMARD-naïve RA patients. Four RCTs comprising 2185 patients met the inclusion criteria. The ranking probability based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) indicated that upadacitinib 15 mg had the highest probability of achieving the American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response rate, followed by baricitinib 4 mg, tofacitinib 5 mg, filgotinib 200 mg, and MTX. Tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, and filgotinib treatments achieved significantly higher ACR50 and ACR70 responses compared to MTX. Tofacitinib 5 mg had the highest probability of achieving the ACR50 and ACR70 response rates, followed by upadacitinib 15 mg, baricitinib 4 mg, filgotinib 200 mg, and MTX. The safety analysis based on serious adverse events, adverse events (AEs), and withdrawals due to AEs revealed no statistically significant differences between the respective intervention groups. In conclusion, tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, and filgotinib were effective treatment options for DMARD-naïve RA patients, suggesting a difference in efficacy and safety among the different JAK inhibitors.. Die relative Wirksamkeit und Verträglichkeit von Tofacitinib, Baricitinib, Upadacitinib und Filgotinib wurde im Vergleich zu Methotrexat (MTX) bei DMARD-naiven („disease-modifying antirheumatic drug“) Patienten mit rheumatoider Arthritis (RA) untersucht. Die Autoren führten eine Netzwerk-Metaanalyse nach Bayes durch, um direkte und indirekte Evidenz aus randomisierten kontrollierten Studien (RCT) zu kombinieren und so die Wirksamkeit und Sicherheit von Tofacitinib, Baricitinib, Upadacitinib, Filgotinib und MTX bei DMARD-naiven RA-Patienten zu ermitteln. Die Einschlusskriterien wurden von 4 RCT mit 2185 Patienten erfüllt. Die Ranking-Wahrscheinlichkeit auf Grundlage der Fläche unter der kumulativen Ranking-Kurve („surface under the cumulative ranking curve“, SUCRA) zeigte, dass unter Upadacitinib 15 mg die höchste Wahrscheinlichkeit zur Erzielung der Responserate gemäß American College of Rheumatology 20 % (ACR20) bestand, dann folgten Baricitinib 4 mg, Tofacitinib 5 mg, Filgotinib 200 mg und MTX. Die Behandlung mit Tofacitinib, Baricitinib, Upadacitinib und Filgotinib führten zu signifikant höheren ACR50- und ACR70-Therapieantworten als MTX. Tofacitinib 5 mg wies die höchste Wahrscheinlichkeit für die Erzielung der ACR50- und ACR70-Responseraten auf, es folgten Upadacitinib 15 mg, Baricitinib 4 mg, Filgotinib 200 mg und MTX. Die Sicherheitsanalyse basierte auf den Parametern schwere unerwünschte Ereignisse, unerwünschte Ereignisse („adverse events“, AE) und Therapieabbruch aufgrund von AE, aber es waren keine statistisch signifikanten Unterschiede zwischen den jeweiligen Interventionsgruppen festzustellen. Als Fazit ist festzuhalten, dass Tofacitinib, Baricitinib, Upadacitinib und Filgotinib wirksame Therapieoptionen bei DMARD-naiven RA-Patienten waren, dabei ergaben sich Hinweise auf Unterschiede zwischen der Wirksamkeit und Sicherheit zwischen den verschiedenen JAK-Inhibitoren.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Bayes Theorem; Drug Therapy, Combination; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; Humans; Methotrexate; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Triazoles

Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) have been approved for use in various immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. With five agents licensed, it was timely to summarise the current understanding of JAKi use based on a systematic literature review (SLR) on efficacy and safety.. Existing data were evaluated by a steering committee and subsequently reviewed by a 29 person expert committee leading to the formulation of a consensus statement that may assist the clinicians, patients and other stakeholders once the decision is made to commence a JAKi. The committee included patients, rheumatologists, a gastroenterologist, a haematologist, a dermatologist, an infectious disease specialist and a health professional. The SLR informed the Task Force on controlled and open clinical trials, registry data, phase 4 trials and meta-analyses. In addition, approval of new compounds by, and warnings from regulators that were issued after the end of the SLR search date were taken into consideration.. The Task Force agreed on and developed four general principles and a total of 26 points for consideration which were grouped into six areas addressing indications, treatment dose and comedication, contraindications, pretreatment screening and risks, laboratory and clinical follow-up examinations, and adverse events. Levels of evidence and strengths of recommendations were determined based on the SLR and levels of agreement were voted on for every point, reaching a range between 8.8 and 9.9 on a 10-point scale.. The consensus provides an assessment of evidence for efficacy and safety of an important therapeutic class with guidance on issues of practical management.

Topics: Adamantane; Advisory Committees; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Psoriatic; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Cytokines; Drug Therapy, Combination; Europe; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; Humans; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Niacinamide; Piperidines; Psoriasis; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Rheumatology; Spondylarthropathies; Spondylitis, Ankylosing; Sulfonamides; Triazoles

JAK inhibitor therapies are effective treatment options for immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs), but their use has been limited by venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk warnings from licensing authorities. We undertook this study to evaluate the VTE risk of JAK inhibitors in patients with IMIDs.. Systematic searches of Medline and Embase databases from inception to September 30, 2020 were conducted. Phase II and phase III double-blind, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of JAK inhibitors at licensed doses were included in our analyses. RCTs with no placebo arm, long-term extension studies, post hoc analyses, and pooled analyses were excluded. Three researchers independently extracted data on exposure to JAK inhibitors or placebo and VTE events (e.g., pulmonary embolism [PE] and deep vein thrombosis [DVT]) and assessed study quality.. A total of 42 studies were included, from an initial search that yielded 619. There were 6,542 JAK inhibitor patient exposure years (PEYs) compared to 1,578 placebo PEYs. There were 15 VTE events in the JAK inhibitor group and 4 in the placebo group. The pooled incidence rate ratios (IRRs) of VTE, PE, and DVT in patients receiving JAK inhibitors were 0.68 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.36-1.29), 0.44 (95% CI 0.28-0.70), and 0.59 (95% CI 0.31-1.15), respectively.. This meta-analysis of RCT data defines the VTE risk with JAK inhibitors as a class in IMID patients. The pooled IRRs do not provide evidence that support the current warnings of VTE risk for JAK inhibitors. These findings will aid continued development of clinical guidelines for the use of JAK inhibitors in IMIDs.

Topics: Arthritis, Psoriatic; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; Humans; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Piperidines; Psoriasis; Pulmonary Embolism; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk; Spondylarthropathies; Spondylitis, Ankylosing; Sulfonamides; Triazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is chronic, pruritic, inflammatory skin disease that affects a significant portion of the population in industrialized nations. For nonresponders to conventional therapies, AD can significantly reduce sleep quality and quality of life. AD pathogenesis is multifactorial and involves multiple immune pathways, with recent evidence of T helper (Th)2, Th17 and Th22 axis attenuation in various AD endotypes and racial subtypes. Inhibition of the conserved Janus kinase (JAK) signalling pathway represents a promising therapeutic avenue to reduce the activation of multiple proinflammatory mediators involved in AD pathogenesis. JAK inhibitors exist in both oral and topical forms with variable specificity for the receptor tyrosine kinases JAK1, JAK2, JAK3 and tyrosine kinase 2. Oral formulations include abrocitinib, upadacitinib, baricitinib and gusacitinib, and are most appropriate for patients with moderate to severe AD. Emerging topical formulation in development include ruxolitinib and deglocitinib, which may be used in patients with localized AD and also adjunctively with systemic therapy in patients with more severe disease. With observed rapidity in itch relief and accompanying dramatic reduction in inflammatory lesion count, JAK inhibitors represent a promising new treatment to revolutionize the management of AD.

Topics: Acetonitriles; Administration, Oral; Administration, Topical; Adult; Azetidines; Child; Dermatitis, Atopic; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; Humans; Janus Kinase 1; Janus Kinase 2; Janus Kinase 3; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Nitriles; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyridazines; Pyrimidines; Quality of Life; Safety; Severity of Illness Index; STAT1 Transcription Factor; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; TYK2 Kinase

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a widely acquired, relapsing inflammatory skin disease. Biologics are now widely used in patients with moderate-to-severe AD.. This work aims to summarize both label and off-label biologics on AD treatment in phase II and phase III stages, and compile evidence on the efficacy of the most-studied biologics.. We conducted a comprehensive literature search through PubMed, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov to identify all documented biological therapies for AD. The criteria were further refined to focus on those treatments with the highest evidence level for AD with at least one randomized clinical trial supporting their use. Only studies or articles published in English were enrolled in this study.. Primary searches identified 525 relevant articles and 27 trials. Duplicated articles and papers without a full text were excluded. Only completed trials were enrolled. We included 28 randomized controlled trials, 4 unpublished trials, 2 observational studies, and 1 meta-analysis. Eight kinds of biologics, including IL-4/IL-13 inhibitors, JAK inhibitors, anti-IL-13 antibodies, anti-IL-22 antibodies, anti-IL-33 antibodies, thymic stromal lymphopoietin inhibitor (TSLP), OX40 antibodies, and H4R-antagonists were included in this work. Dupliumab, as the most widely used and investigated biologic, was reported in 1 meta-analysis and 4 trials exploring its long-term use and application in both adults and pediatric patients. Besides dupilumab, four other IL-4/IL-13 inhibitors recruited were all randomized, clinical trials at phase 2-3 stage. Six different kinds of JAK inhibitors were summarized with strong evidence revealing their significant therapeutic effects on AD. There were 3 trials for nemolizumab, an anti-IL-13 antibody, all of which were in the phase 2 clinical trial stage. Results showed nemolizumab could be another alternative therapy for moderate-to-severe AD with long-term efficiency and safety.. The biological therapies with the most robust evidence on efficacy and long-term safety for AD treatment include dupilumab, barcitinib, abrocitinib, and delgocitinib. Most of the biologics mentioned in this review were still at the exploratory stage. This review will help practitioners advise patients seeking suitable biological therapies and offer experimental study directions for treatment.

Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Azetidines; Biological Products; Carbamates; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dermatitis, Atopic; Dermatologic Agents; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; Humans; Nitriles; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Sulfonamides

One-third of patients with severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) do not achieve remission or low disease activity, or they have side effects from cDMARD and bDMARD. They will need a new treatment option such as the small molecule JAK inhibitors. In this systematic review, we evaluate the efficacy and safety data of the current jakinibs: tofacitinib, peficitinib, decernotinib, upadacitinib, baricitinib and filgotinib in patients in whom treatment with conventional or biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (cDMARD and/or bDMARD) failed.. We searched for randomized controlled trials comparing efficacy and safety of jakinibs for RA treatment using the Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, and clinicaltrials.gov databases with the terms: "rheumatoid arthritis" OR "arthritis rheumatoid" OR "RA" AND "inhibitor" OR "jak inhibitor" AND "clinical trial" OR "treatment" OR "therapy".. All jakinibs achieved good results in ACR 20, 50, 70 and with CRP-DAS28 for LDA and remission, upadacitinib showed better results compared to the others. In ESR-DAS28 for remission, tofacitinib achieved the best result. Regarding the safety of all jakinibs, peficitinib, baricitinib and filgotinib did not register deaths in their studies unlike tofacitinib that presented 11 deaths. Despite all benefits of jakinibs, the use in patients with severe liver and kidney disease should be avoided.. Jakinibs in monotherapy or in combination with methotrexate can be considered a viable alternative in the treatment of moderate-to-severe RA. Even after failures with combination of cDMARDS and bDMARDS, jakinibs demonstrated efficacy.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Drug Therapy, Combination; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; Humans; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Kidney Diseases; Methotrexate; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

Inhibitors of Janus kinases (JAKs) are being developed for treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases and other immune-mediated diseases. Tofacitinib is effective in treatment of ulcerative colitis, but there are safety concerns. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the safety profile of tofacitinib, upadacitinib, filgotinib, and baricitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel diseases, psoriasis, or ankylosing spondylitis.. We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from January 1, 1990, through July 1, 2019. We performed a manual review of conference databases from 2012 through 2018. The primary outcome was incidence rates of adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs. We also estimated incidence rates of serious infections, herpes zoster infection, non-melanoma skin cancer, other malignancies, major cardiovascular events, venous thromboembolism, and mortality. We performed a meta-analysis, which included controlled studies, to assess the relative risk of these events.. We identified 973 studies; of these, 82 were included in the final analysis, comprising 66,159 patients with immune-mediated diseases who were exposed to a JAK inhibitor. Two-thirds of the included studies were randomized controlled trials. The incidence rate of AEs was 42.65 per 100 person-years and of serious AEs was 9.88 per 100 person-years. Incidence rates of serious infections, herpes zoster infection, malignancy, and major cardiovascular events were 2.81 per 100 person-years, 2.67 per 100 person-years, 0.89 per 100 person-years, and 0.48 per 100 person-years, respectively. Mortality was not increased in patients treated with JAK inhibitors compared with patients given placebo or active comparator (relative risk 0.72; 95% confidence interval 0.40-1.28). The meta-analysis showed a significant increase in risk of herpes zoster infection among patients who received JAK inhibitors (relative risk 1.57; 95% confidence interval 1.04-2.37).. In a systematic review and meta-analysis, we found an increased risk of herpes zoster infection among patients with immune-mediated diseases treated with JAK inhibitors. All other AEs were not increased among patients treated with JAK inhibitors.

Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Herpes Zoster; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; Humans; Incidence; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Janus Kinases; Piperidines; Placebos; Psoriasis; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Spondylitis, Ankylosing; Sulfonamides; Survival Analysis; Treatment Outcome; Triazoles

In recent years, different studies regarding psoriatic arthritis (PsA) have shown the pathogenetic role of dysfunction of signaling pathways involving the phosphodiesterase-4 enzyme and transcription factors or enzymes belonging to the kinase (JAK)-signal family pathway. These also represent the target of several drugs known as targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (tsDMARDs).. The authors performed a systematic literature search using the PubMed database, as well as through retrieving data from randomized controlled trials, their. In PsA, the PDE4i, apremilast, and the JAKi, tofacitinib, are effective across multiple clinical domains and have an acceptable tolerability profile, thus expanding the treatment options available for PsA patients. Apremilast and tofacitinib show several advantages mainly represented by their oral administration, a fast onset of action, and a short half-life. Data on tsDMARDs in PsA are still limited, and randomized trials and real-life studies are advocated.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Psoriatic; Azetidines; Humans; Janus Kinases; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Phosphodiesterase 4 Inhibitors; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sulfonamides; Thalidomide; Treatment Outcome

Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are novel small molecules with a mechanism of action in multiple signaling pathways that allows their application in a broad spectrum of autoimmune and autoinflammatory diseases. As far as the field of dermatology is concerned, chronic plaque psoriasis is currently one of the most studied indications regarding the potential use of JAK inhibitors. The purpose of this review is to provide a summarized overview of the existing information on the efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitors in plaque psoriasis, with a focus on tofacitinib, ruxolitinib, baricitinib, peficitinib and filgotinib. Although the published data on the therapeutic benefit of these agents in the therapy of this chronic condition are promising, further prospective studies and real-life data are necessary in order to sufficiently evaluate their role as an adequate treatment option for psoriatic patients.

Topics: Adamantane; Azetidines; Humans; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Janus Kinases; Niacinamide; Nitriles; Piperidines; Prospective Studies; Psoriasis; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Sulfonamides; Triazoles

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a type of chronic inflammatory arthritis which is associated with psoriasis. The early recognition and treatment for PsA are of critical importance. Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, as a kind of orally small molecules, have emerged as an encouraging class of drug in PsA treatment. This review provides a discussion of the role and current status of JAK inhibitors in the control of PsA. There are three JAK inhibitors approved for use in autoimmune diseases, for example, tofacitinib, baricitinib, and upadacitinib, and only tofacitinib has been approved in PsA treatment. The clinical trials of upadacitinib and filgotinib in PsA patients are undergoing. The efficacy and safety of these agents were briefly discussed. Although there are still issues in terms of their efficacy and safety currently, JAK inhibitors are expected to benefit more PsA patients in future.

Topics: Animals; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Psoriatic; Azetidines; Humans; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Sulfonamides

Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are a class of targeted therapies for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with established clinical efficacy. However, little is known about their efficacy compared with each other. This network meta-analysis (NMA) estimated the comparative efficacy of JAK inhibitors currently approved for RA.. A targeted literature review was conducted for phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy of three approved JAK inhibitors (tofacitinib, baricitinib, and upadacitinib) as monotherapy or combination therapy among patients with moderate-to-severe RA who had inadequate response to conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARD-IR). Using Bayesian NMA, American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20/50/70 responses and clinical remission (defined as DAS28-CRP < 2.6) were evaluated separately at 12 and 24 weeks.. Eleven RCTs were identified and included in the NMA. All JAK inhibitors demonstrated significantly better efficacy than csDMARD. Among combination therapies, upadacitinib 15 mg had the highest 12-week ACR50 responses (median [95% credible interval]: 43.4% [33.4%, 54.5%]), followed by tofacitinib 5 mg (38.7% [28.6%, 49.8%]), baricitinib 2 mg (37.1% [25.0%, 50.6%]), and baricitinib 4 mg (36.7%, [27.2%, 47.0%]). Similar results were observed for ACR20/70 and at week 24. Upadacitinib 15 mg + csDMARD was also found to have the highest clinical remission rates at week 12 (29.8% [16.9%, 47.0%]), followed by tofacitinib 5 mg (24.3%, [12.7%, 40.2%]), baricitinib 4 mg (22.8%, [11.8%, 37.5%]), and baricitinib 2 mg (20.1%, [8.6%, 37.4%]). Similar results were seen at week 24. Among monotherapies, upadacitinib had a higher ACR50 response (38.5% [25.3%, 53.2%]) than tofacitinib (30.4% [18.3%, 45.5%]). The differences in efficacy measures were not statistically significant between the JAK inhibitors.. The NMA found that upadacitinib 15 mg once daily had numerically higher efficacy in terms of ACR response and clinical remission among approved JAK combination therapies and monotherapies for csDMARD-IR patients with RA.

Topics: Adult; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Bayes Theorem; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; Humans; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Methotrexate; Network Meta-Analysis; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Severity of Illness Index; Sulfonamides

The introduction of novel, small-molecule Janus kinase inhibitors namely tofacitinib, baricitinib and upadacitinib has provided an alternative treatment option for patients with rheumatoid arthritis outside of traditional drugs and expensive biologics. This review aimed to critically assess the drug-drug interaction potential of tofacitinib, baricitinib and upadacitinib and provide a balanced perspective for choosing the most appropriate Janus kinase inhibitor based on the needs of patients with rheumatoid arthritis including co-medications and renal/hepatic impairment status. Based on the critical assessment, all three approved Janus kinase inhibitors generally provide a favourable opportunity for co-prescription with a plethora of drugs. While cytochrome P450 3A4-related inhibition or induction altered the exposures (area under the curve) of tofacitinib and upadacitinib, it did not impact the exposure of baricitinib. Transporter drug-drug interaction studies revealed that the disposition of baricitinib was altered with certain transporter inhibitors as compared with either tofacitinib or upadacitinib. Adjustment of tofacitinib or baricitinib dosages but not that of upadacitinib is required with the progression of renal impairment from a mild to a severe condition. While the dosage of tofacitinib needs to be adjusted for patients with moderate hepatic impairment status, it is not the case for either baricitinib or upadacitinib. Assessment of the drug-drug interaction potential suggests that tofacitinib, baricitinib and upadacitinib generally show a favourable disposition with no perpetrator activity; however, as victim drugs, they show subtle pharmacokinetic differences that may be considered during polypharmacy. Moreover, careful choice of the three drugs could be made in patients with rheumatoid arthritis with varying degrees of renal/hepatic impairments.

Topics: Animals; Antirheumatic Agents; Azetidines; Drug Interactions; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; Humans; Janus Kinases; Pharmacokinetics; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Sulfonamides

To compare improvement in pain and physical function for patients treated with baricitinib, adalimumab, tocilizumab and tofacitinib monotherapy from randomised, methotrexate (MTX)-controlled trials in conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs)/biologic (bDMARD)-naïve RA patients using matching-adjusted indirect comparisons (MAICs).. Data were from Phase III trials on patients receiving monotherapy baricitinib, tocilizumab, adalimumab, tofacitinib or MTX. Pain was assessed using a visual analogue scale (0-100 mm) and physical function using the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI). An MAIC based on treatment-arm matching, an MAIC with study-level matching and Bucher's method without matching compared change in outcomes between therapies. Matching variables included age, gender, baseline disease activity and baseline value of outcome measure.. With all methods, greater improvements were observed in pain and HAQ-DI at 6 months for baricitinib compared with adalimumab and tocilizumab (. Results suggest greater pain reduction and improved physical function for baricitinib monotherapy compared with tocilizumab and adalimumab monotherapy. No statistically significant differences in pain reduction and improved physical function were observed between baricitinib and tofacitinib with the MAIC analyses.

Topics: Adalimumab; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Biological Products; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Disability Evaluation; Humans; Methotrexate; Network Meta-Analysis; Pain; Pain Measurement; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

Several clinical trials have attempted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, filgotinib and peficitinib as monotherapy in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but their relative efficacy and safety as monotherapy remain unclear due to the lack of data from head-to-head comparison trials. The relative efficacy and safety of tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, filgotinib and peficitinib as monotherapy for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were assessed.. We performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis to combine direct and indirect evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and examine the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, filgotinib and peficitinib as monotherapy relative to placebo in patients with RA.. Five RCTs comprising 1547 patients met the inclusion criteria. Compared with placebo, tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, filgotinib and peficitinib as monotherapy showed a significantly higher American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response rate. Peficitinib 150 mg monotherapy showed the highest ACR20 response rate (odds ratio, 17.24.39; 95% credible interval, 6.57-51.80). The ranking probability based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve indicated that peficitinib 150 mg had the highest probability of being the best treatment for achieving the ACR20 response rate, followed by peficitinib 100 mg, filgotinib 200 mg, filgotinib 100 mg, tofacitinib 5 mg, upadacitinib 15 mg, baricitinib 4 mg and placebo. However, the number of patients who experienced serious adverse events did not differ significantly between the JAK inhibitors, except for tofacitinib 5 mg, and placebo.. All five JAK inhibitors-tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, filgotinib and peficitinib-were efficacious monotherapy interventions for active RA, and differences were noted in their efficacy and safety in monotherapy.

Topics: Adamantane; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Bayes Theorem; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; Humans; Niacinamide; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sulfonamides; Triazoles

To assess the efficacy and safety profiles of different dosing regimens of tofacitinib, baricitinib, and upadacitinib, novel selective oral Janus activated kinase inhibitors, in rheumatoid arthritis (RA).. Randomized controlled trials of tofacitinib (5 and 10 mg twice daily) baricitinib (2 and 4 mg daily), and upadacitinib (15 and 30 mg daily) in RA were identified from MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases through December 11, 2019. Random-effects models were used to estimate pooled mean differences and relative risks (RRs). American College of Rheumatology 20%, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index, adverse events, risk for infection, venous thromboembolic events, and malignancy were calculated.. Twenty trials with an overall low risk of bias involving 8982 patients were identified. Tofacitinib, baricitinib, and upadacitinib improved RA control as determined by American College of Rheumatology 20% (RR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.87 to 2.20) and Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index scores (mean differences, -0.31; 95% CI, -0.34 to -0.28) compared with placebo. Adverse events were more frequent with upadacitinib, 30 mg, daily (RR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.30); upadacitinib, 15 mg, daily (RR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.27); and baricitinib, 4 mg, daily (RR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.24). The risk for infection was highest with tofacitinib, 10 mg, twice daily (RR, 2.75; 95% CI, 1.72 to 4.41), followed by upadacitinib, 15 mg, daily (RR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.60) and baricitinib, 4 mg, daily (RR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.12 to 1.45). Data for venous thromboembolic events were not available for tofacitinib or baricitinib, but there was no increase in risk with upadacitinib (15 mg daily: RR, 2.34; 95% CI, 0.34 to 15.92).. Tofacitinib, baricitinib, and upadacitinib significantly improve RA control. Head-to-head Janus activated kinase inhibitor clinical trials are needed to further inform decision making.

Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; Humans; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sulfonamides

The treatment of rheumatoid arthritis has changed dramatically over the last two decades since the development of biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs). Moreover, Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors became available in 2013. JAK inhibitors are low-molecular-weight compounds, which exert anti-rheumatic effects by suppressing the action of JAK, an intracellular tyrosine kinase. Of note, biologics bind to extracellular proteins and block their activity. The availability of JAK inhibitors that are as effective as bDMARDs, despite the completely different route of administration and mode of action, has enabled the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis to enter a new stage. JAK inhibitors are useful in a variety of cases, including patients who inadequately responded to treatment with methotrexate and/or bDMARDs. Oral administration is convenient for patients. Nevertheless, the drugs should be carefully prescribed as they are metabolized in the liver and kidneys. Attention should also be paid to adverse events, such as infections including herpes zoster. It is necessary to understand the characteristics of JAK inhibitors and use these agents judiciously.

Topics: Adamantane; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Benzofurans; Cardiovascular Diseases; Herpes Zoster; Humans; Janus Kinases; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Neutropenia; Niacinamide; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Sulfonamides; Venous Thromboembolism

To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis investigating the effect of tofacitinib and baricitinib on venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk. Search of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, LILACS, and Google Scholar databases to identify controlled observational and clinical trials reporting on adverse effects in patients treated with oral tofacitinib or baricitinib up to July 2020. The outcome measure was occurrence of VTE events. We analyzed 59 studies involving 14,335 patients treated with tofacitinib or baricitinib and 11,612 patients who received another active drug or placebo. The meta-analysis showed an odds ratio (OR) for VTE events of 0.29 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.10-0.84) overall for tofacitinib based on data from 10 clinical trials with 15 treatment arms; similar ORs were observed for the 10 mg/d dose (OR = 0.18; 95% CI = 0.02-1.60) and the 20 mg/d dose (OR = 0.19; 95% CI = 0.04-0.91). The ORs for VTE events for baricitinib were 3.39 (95% CI = 0.82-14.04) overall, 3.05 (95% CI = 0.12-75.43) for 2 mg, 3.64 (95% CI = 0.59-22.46) for 4 mg, and 3.0 (95% CI = 0.12-76.49) for 7 mg. The indirect meta-analysis comparing tofacitinib with baricitinib (10 clinical trials with 15 treatment arms) showed an OR for VTE events of 0.086 (95% CI = 0.02-0.51) for tofacitinib and a superior safety profile for VTE events. In the meta-regression analysis (19 clinical trials with 21 treatment arms), the effect was 0.02 (95% CI = -0.04 to 0.08) for tofacitinib and -0.01 (95% CI = -1.29 to 1.26 for baricitinib. Plotting of the data for tofacitinib showed that VTE risk increased with high doses. The effect, however, was less than 1 for the 10-mg and 20-mg doses, indicating a protective effect. This effect was not observed for baricitinib. Tofacitinib is not associated with an increased risk of VTE and has a superior safety profile to baricitinib in this respect. Tofacitinib may exert a protective effect against VTE.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Azetidines; Humans; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Risk Factors; Sulfonamides; Venous Thromboembolism

Janus kinases inhibitors (JAKI) are new orally administrable disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA), representing a treatment alternative equally effective as biological DMARD that is also classified equivalent in the guidelines. JAKI reversibly inhibit intracellular signal transduction from the cytokine receptor to the nucleus. Tofacitinib and baricitinib, two JAKI already approved for RA treatment, are taken once or twice a day, respectively, and two more are expected to receive approval next year. Tofacitinib is also approved for PsA. Generally, JAKI are initially used in combination with methotrexate (MTX) but are equally effective as monotherapeutic treatment if MTX is contraindicated. In terms of therapy safety, JAKI and bDMARD are generally comparable with one exception: JAKI are associated with an increased risk of herpes zoster infection. JAKI treatment requires laboratory blood tests, especially blood count, transaminases and creatinine. Due to hepatic metabolization, tofacitinib is associated with certain drug interactions. Altogether JAKI enhance treatment possibilities for diseases such as RA and PsA combining the same effectiveness and safety as bDMARD with the option of oral administration.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Psoriatic; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Methotrexate; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

Fatigue is a common and debilitating symptom in patients with RA. Since 2007, fatigue has been included as one of the core outcome measures in RA. Clinical trials of biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) and targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs) have included fatigue as a secondary endpoint. A Cochrane review in 2016 concluded that the bDMARDs have a moderate effect on improving fatigue in RA. More recent clinical trials of the new biologic agent sarilumab and the Janus kinase inhibitors tofacitinib and baricitinib showed similar benefits. It remains unclear whether the effect of bDMARDs and tsDMARDs on fatigue is mediated by direct effects or through a reduction in inflammation. As fatigue was a secondary endpoint, many analyses did not adjust for potential confounding factors, including pain, mood and anaemia, which is a significant limitation.

Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Biological Products; Fatigue; Humans; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Sulfonamides

The relative efficacy and safety of tofacitinib and baricitinib were assessed in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with an inadequate response to disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) or biologics.. We performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis to combine direct and indirect evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to examine the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib and baricitinib in combination with DMARDs in RA patients with an inadequate DMARD or biologic response.. Twelve RCTs including 5883 patients met the inclusion criteria. There were 15 pairwise comparisons including 10 direct comparisons of 6 interventions. Tofacitinib 10 mg + methotrexate (MTX) and baricitinib 4 mg + MTX were among the most effective treatments for active RA with an inadequate DMARD or biologic response, followed by baricitinib 2 mg + MTX, tofacitinib 5 mg + MTX, and adalimumab + MTX. The ranking probability based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) indicated that tofacitinib 10 mg + MTX had the highest probability of being the best treatment to achieve the ACR20 response rate (SUCRA = 0.865), followed by baricitinib 4 mg + MTX (SUCRA = 0.774), baricitinib 2 mg + MTX (SUCRA = 0.552), tofacitinib 5 mg + MTX (SUCRA = 0.512), adalimumab + MTX (SUCRA = 0.297), and placebo + MTX (SUCRA <0.001). No significant differences were observed in the incidence of serious adverse events after treatment with tofacitinib + MTX, baricitinib + MTX, adalimumab + MTX, or placebo + MTX.. In RA patients with an inadequate response to DMARDs or biologics, tofacitinib 10 mg + MTX and baricitinib 4 mg + MTX were the most efficacious interventions and were not associated with a significant risk of serious adverse events.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Bayes Theorem; Humans; Network Meta-Analysis; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sulfonamides

Cytokines are key drivers of inflammation in RA, and anti-cytokine therapy has improved the outcome of RA. Janus Kinases (JAK) are intracellular tyrosine kinases linked to intracellular domains of many cytokine receptors. There are four JAK isoforms: JAK1, JAK2, JAK3 and TYK2. Different cytokine receptor families utilize specific JAK isoforms for signal transduction. Phosphorylation of JAK when cytokine binds to its cognate receptor leads to phosphorylation of other intracellular molecules that eventually leads to gene transcription. Oral JAK inhibitors (JAKi) have been developed as anti-cytokine therapy in RA. Two JAKi, tofacitinib and baricitinib, have been approved recently for the treatment of RA, and many JAKi are currently in development. JAKi inhibit JAK isoforms with different selectivity. This review discusses the efficacy and safety of JAKi in RA, in particular the potential clinical significance of JAKi selectivity.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Humans; Inflammation; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Sulfonamides

The Janus kinase (JAK) pathway is implicated in the pathogenesis of many inflammatory and autoimmune diseases including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriasis, and inflammatory bowel disease. There are a lot of proinflammatory cytokines involved in such diseases using this pathway to transduce intracellular signals. In the last years, JAK inhibitors (jakinibs) have appeared with a great success, showing that these kinds of drugs have a great applicability in clinical practice. Tofacitinib and baricitinib, the first jakinibs approved for the treatment of RA, are being investigated also for treating other autoimmune systemic diseases. Likewise, other jakinibs are in several phases of development. This review analyses the safety and clinical efficacy of the jakinibs, starting with the classics and continuing with next-generation jakinibs.

Topics: Autoimmune Diseases; Azetidines; Humans; Immunologic Factors; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; STAT Transcription Factors; Sulfonamides

Janus kinase inhibition is promising in the treatment of RA, with already two oral drugs marketed. New compounds are under investigation that are more selective for Janus kinase 1 or Janus kinase 3. Phase II results for filgotinib, upadacitinib, peficitinib and decernotinib are reviewed showing almost consistently a fast dose-dependent clinical improvement similar to already approved drugs tofacitinib and baricitinib. I will reflect on the most frequently reported dose-dependent adverse events and laboratory changes. Some are similar for all drugs of this class, some are more specific for a certain drug, but all may influence future treatment effectiveness in daily practice. This implies the need for a critical evaluation of phase III trials, and eventually trials specifically powered for conclusions on the safety profile and registries once these drugs become marketed. These innovative drugs also need head-to-head trials versus biologics or in-class as well as specific strategy studies to determine their optimal future use.

Topics: Adamantane; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Heterocyclic Compounds, 2-Ring; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; Humans; Janus Kinase 1; Janus Kinase 3; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Niacinamide; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Triazoles; Valine

Tofacitinib and baricitinib are the first orally available, small-molecule inhibitors of Janus kinase (JAK) enzymes to be approved for the treatment of RA. Tofacitinib is a selective JAK1, 3 inhibitor with less activity against JAK2 and TYK2 and baricitinib is a selective, oral JAK1, 2 inhibitor with moderate activity against TYK2 and significantly less activity against JAK3. Both drugs have undergone extensive phase III clinical trials in RA and demonstrated rapid improvements in disease activity, function and patient-reported outcomes as well as disease modification. Tofacitinib 5 mg bd, was approved by the Federal Drug Administration in 2012 for the treatment of RA in patients who are intolerant or unresponsive to MTX. An extended release formulation for the treatment of RA was approved by Federal Drug Administration in 2016. In 2017 the European Medicines Agency approved tofacitinib 5 mg bd in combination with MTX and baricitinib 4 mg and 2 mg once daily for the treatment of moderate to severe active RA in adult patients who are intolerant or unresponsive to one or more conventional synthetic DMARDs.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Janus Kinase 1; Janus Kinase 2; Janus Kinase 3; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Methotrexate; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

The treatment of hair loss is a challenge for all dermatologists. New medications are needed due to lack of efficacy of many treatments or their side-effect profile. This article discusses the most recent literature updates on the use of retinoids in frontal fibrosing alopecia, platelet-rich plasma in androgenetic alopecia, and JAK inhibitors in alopecia areata.

Topics: 5-alpha Reductase Inhibitors; Alopecia; Alopecia Areata; Azetidines; Humans; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Nitriles; Piperidines; Platelet-Rich Plasma; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Retinoids; Sulfonamides

To evaluate the risk of serious infection (SI) and herpes zoster (HZ) in rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving JAK inhibitors.. We conducted a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of phase II and III randomized controlled trials of tofacitinib (5 mg bid), baricitinib (4 mg od) and upadacitinib (15 mg od). Patient-exposure years were calculated. A per-protocol analysis was applied, incorporating follow-up time from patients randomized to placebo who cross into the treatment arm. Pooled incidence rates per 100 person-years of SI and HZ were calculated. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) of drug vs placebo were compared using a meta-synthesis approach.. Twenty-one studies were included in the meta-analysis; 11 tofacitinib (5888 patients), six baricitinib (3520 patients) and four upadacitinib studies (1736 patients). For SI, the incidence rates were 1.97 (95% CI: 1.41, 2.68), 3.16 (95% CI: 2.07, 4.63) and 3.02 (95% CI: 0.98, 7.04), respectively. The IRRs comparing treatment arm to placebo were statistically non-significant: 1.22 (95% CI: 0.60, 2.45), 0.80 (95% CI: 0.46, 1.38) and 1.14 (95% CI: 0.24, 5.43), respectively. For HZ, the incidence rates were 2.51 (95% CI: 1.87, 3.30), 3.16 (95% CI: 2.07, 4.63) and 2.41 (95% CI: 0.66, 6.18), respectively. The IRR of HZ comparing baricitinib with placebo was 2.86 (95% CI: 1.26, 6.50). Non-significant IRRs were seen with tofacitinib and upadacitinib: 1.38 (95% CI: 0.66, 2.88) and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.19, 3.22), respectively. Indicator opportunistic infections excluding HZ were too rare to provide meaningful incidence rates.. The absolute SI rates were low. However across the JAK inhibitors, the incidence of HZ is higher than expected for the population (3.23 per 100 patient-years). While the risk was numerically greatest with baricitinib, indirect comparisons between the drugs did not demonstrate any significant difference in risk.. Prospero 2017 CRD4201707879.

Topics: Adult; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Female; Herpes Zoster; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; Humans; Incidence; Infections; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sulfonamides

In Germany, baricitinib and tofacitinib have been approved for the treatment of at least moderately active rheumatoid arthritis after the failure of conventional disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in 2017, and tofacitinib also for psoriatic arthritis and ulcerative colitis. Both baricitinib and tofacitinib can be taken orally and reversibly inhibit Janus kinases (JAK) and therefore the signaling of a large number of cytokines via the JAK/STAT pathway. JAK inhibitors have been shown to be at least as efficacious in rheumatoid arthritis as adalimumab and tofacitinib was also efficacious in psoriatic arthritis. Since they inhibit many cytokines, it is likely that in the future they will be applied for the treatment of further chronic inflammatory disorder such as connective tissue diseases and vasculitis. The adverse events of JAK inhibitors are comparable to those observed with biologicals, only herpes zoster is slightly more common. In the placebo-controlled trials, venous thromboembolic events (VTE) were more common in the baricitinib treated patients. The VTE rate does not appear to be elevated in baricitinib treated patients compared to RA cohorts however.In conclusion, JAK inhibitors are a powerful new treatment of RA and likely many other rheumatic diseases and fulfill an unmet need since they may be taken orally.. JAK-Inhibitoren wirken intrazellulär und hemmen im Gegensatz zu den Biologika viele Zytokine.. JAK-Inhibitoren werden oral eingenommen. Angesichts der Halbwertzeit von einigen Stunden sind sie gut steuerbar.. Die JAK-Inhibitoren Baricitinib und Tofacitinib sind zugelassen für die Therapie der mittelschweren bis schweren aktiven RA bei erwachsenen Patienten nach erfolgloser Therapie mit DMARDs. Tofacitinib ist auch bei Colitis ulcerosa und in der Kombination mit MTX auch bei der Psoriasis-Arthritis (PsA) zugelassen.. In der Kombination mit Methotrexat (MTX) ist Tofacitinib bei der rheumatoiden Arthritis (RA) so gut wirksam wie Adalimumab mit MTX, Baricitinib war in der Kombination mit MTX sogar bei einigen Endpunkten besser als Adalimumab mit MTX. Die JAK-Inhibitoren sind auch in der Monotherapie wirksam.. Das Nebenwirkungsprofil der JAK-Inhibitoren unterscheidet sich nicht wesentlich von dem von TNF- oder IL6-Rezeptor-Inhibitoren. Nur das Auftreten eines Herpes zoster ist während der JAK-Inhibition etwas häufiger.. JAK-Inhibitoren hemmen zahlreiche Zytokine, die auch bei verschiedenen anderen chronischen Krankheiten eine Rolle spielen. Daher ist mit Zulassungen für weitere Indikationen zu rechnen, z. B. Kollagenosen.

Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Germany; Humans; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Sulfonamides

Alopecia areata (AA) is a relatively common disease, but no satisfactory treatment has yet been developed. Recently, research progress has been made in the pathogenesis of AA, revealing that autoreactive cytotoxic T cells are important and that the Janus kinase (JAK) pathway is involved. Therefore, the potential of JAK inhibitors as therapeutic agents for AA is attracting attention. Several single-arm clinical trials and retrospective studies demonstrated that oral JAK inhibitors are effective and tolerable treatments for moderate to severe AA. Although JAK inhibitors are emerging as an innovative treatment for AA, further placebo-controlled clinical trials are required to confirm their efficacy and long-term safety.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Alopecia Areata; Azetidines; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Janus Kinases; Middle Aged; Nitriles; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Signal Transduction; Sulfonamides; T-Lymphocytes, Cytotoxic; Treatment Outcome

Two different Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors-baricitinib and tofacitinib-are effective and licensed in active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). There have been recent concerns about potential thromboembolic risks with these drugs. Concerns about baricitinib focus on clinical trial findings. Using all publically available data, we estimate thromboembolic risks are approximately five events per 1000 patient years with 4 mg baricitinib daily. Concerns about tofacitinib have been raised by analyses of the Federal Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERs). These show some evidence of increased risks of pulmonary thrombosis, though not pulmonary embolism or venous thrombosis. Observational studies suggest in the general population and non-RA controls there are one to four thromboembolic events per 1000 patient years. In RA, thromboembolic risks increase to three to seven per 1000 patient years. The impact of biologics and disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) on disease risk appears minimal, and the number of thromboembolic events is between four and eight per 1000 patient years. In the short term, full details of thromboembolic events in trials of JAK inhibitors need to be published. As the numbers of thromboembolic events will be small and patients enrolled in trials are not representative of all RA patients who may receive JAK inhibitors, this information is unlikely to provide definitive answers. Consequently, in the longer term, large observational studies are needed to accurately quantify thromboembolic risks attributable to JAK inhibitors and other drugs used to treat RA, and differentiate these from risks attributable to RA itself and its comorbidities.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Risk Factors; Sulfonamides; Thromboembolism

The Janus Kinases (JAKs) are a family of intracellular tyrosine kinases that provide transmission signals from cytokine, interferons, and many hormones receptors to the nucleus resulting in synthesis of many biologically active compounds and changing cell metabolism and function. That was theoretical background to synthetize the JAK inhibitors (Jakinibs). In recent years a substantial battery of evidence has been collected indicating the potential role of Jakinibs to interact with the specific elements of the immune system, therefore changing the inflammatory response. JAK kinase blockade offers a unique opportunity to block most of the key cytokines enabling the deep interaction into immune system functioning. Following discovery first Jakinibs were intensively studied in various forms of autoimmune diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis, and finally two Jakinibs tofacitinib and Baricitinib have been approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Some clinical data indicated that under special circumstances Jakinibs may be even superior to biologics in the treatment of RA; however this suggestion should be verified in large clinical and observational studies.

Topics: Animals; Azetidines; Humans; Janus Kinases; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Rheumatic Fever; Sulfonamides

A new class of oral synthetic drugs has been developed for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with the aim of blocking the Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK-STAT) system. Tofacitinib and baricitinib have been approved for the treatment RA patients who inadequately respond to methotrexate or anti-tumor necrosis factor drugs. The aim of this narrative review is to summarize the data concerning the drugs' basic mechanisms and clinical trial results in order to inform clinicians about the serious and non-serious adverse events associated with JAK inhibitors. Areas covered: The mechanisms, adverse events, and clinical trial data associated with the use of JAK inhibitors in RA patients were reviewed by searching the PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane Library databases for papers published between 1999 and April 2018 using combinations of words or terms. Articles not written in English were excluded. Expert commentary: Management of the adverse events of JAK inhibitors is challenging because of the lack of robust treatment data used and the heterogeneity of the events themselves. Treatment decisions are often made clinically on the basis of age and the burden of comorbidities, and require the multidisciplinary collaboration of rheumatologists and other specialists.

Topics: Animals; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Janus Kinase 1; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Sulfonamides

To perform a systematic literature review (SLR) informing the 2016 update of the recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA).. An SLR for the period between 2013 and 2016 was undertaken to assess the efficacy of glucocorticoids (GCs), conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) and targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs) (tofacitinib and baricitinib) in randomised clinical trials.. For GCs, four studies were included in the SLR. Patients without poor prognostic factors experienced benefit when GCs were added to methotrexate (MTX). Lower doses of GCs were similar to higher doses. For csDMARDs, two new studies comparing MTX monotherapy with combination csDMARD were included in the SLR. In the tREACH trial at the end of 12 months no difference between the groups in disease activity, functional ability and radiographic progression was seen, using principles of tight control (treat-to-target). In the CareRA trial, combination therapy with csDMARDs was not superior to MTX monotherapy and monotherapy was better tolerated.For tsDMARDs, tofacitinib and baricitinib were shown to be more effective than placebo (MTX) in different patient populations.. Addition of GCs to csDMARD therapy may be beneficial but the benefits should be balanced against the risk of toxicity. Under tight control conditions MTX monotherapy is not less effective than combination csDMARDs, but better tolerated. Tofacitinib and baricitinib are efficacious in patients with RA, including those with refractory disease.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Methotrexate; Piperidines; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sulfonamides

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic, progressive autoimmune disease that causes inflammation and destruction of the joints.

Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Humans; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Sulfonamides

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory joint disease. The introduction of a new class of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, which work by inhibiting the Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK/STAT) pathway, has led to new possibilities for achieving remission of RA. Tofacitinib and baricitinib are both JAK/STAT inhibitors, which have shown efficacy in line with anti-tumour necrosis factor treatment. The side effects seem manageable, and up to now only increased risk of herpes zoster has raised consideration. JAK/STAT inhibitors create new possibilities for reaching low disease activity or remission for patients with RA.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Herpes Zoster; Humans; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Sulfonamides

Due to the chronic nature of psoriasis, the population of elderly psoriasis patients is increasing. However, many elderly psoriatic patients are not adequately treated because management is challenging as a result of comorbidities, polypharmacy, and progressive impairment of organ systems. Physicians may hesitate to use systemic or biologic agents in elderly psoriasis patients because of an increased risk of adverse events in this patient population. Small molecule medications are emerging as promising options for elderly patients with psoriasis and other inflammatory conditions. Areas covered: Here we review the efficacy, safety and tolerability of small molecule inhibitors apremilast, tofacitinib, ruxolitinib, baricitinib, and peficitinib in the treatment of psoriasis, with focus on their use in the elderly population. Expert opinion: Although small molecule inhibitors demonstrate efficacy in elderly patients with psoriasis, they will require larger head-to-head studies and post-marketing registries to evaluate their effectiveness and safety in specific patient populations. Apremilast, ruxolitinib, and peficitinib are effective agents with favorable side effect profiles; however, physicians should exercise caution when prescribing tofacitinib or baricitinib in elderly populations due to adverse events. The high cost of these drugs in the U.S. is likely to limit their use.

Topics: Adamantane; Azetidines; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Niacinamide; Nitriles; Phosphodiesterase 4 Inhibitors; Piperidines; Psoriasis; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Severity of Illness Index; Small Molecule Libraries; Sulfonamides; Thalidomide

Janus kinase family (JAKs) has recently attracted the attention of many researchers, and several JAK inhibitor drugs have been developed targeting different members of the JAK family. Tofacitinib and ruxolitinib are US FDA approved drugs in this family for rheumatoid arthritis and myeloproliferative diseases, respectively. Dysregulation of JAK/STAT pathway is also involved in many skin diseases, specifically inflammatory disorders. The JAK/STAT signaling pathway and its involvement in skin diseases are overviewed in this study. We also review clinical studies of JAK inhibitors in field of dermatology, including psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, alopecia areata and vitiligo. Although the available evidence shows promising results, it is still too early to draw a firm conclusion about the place of these drugs in dermatological treatment.

Topics: Alopecia Areata; Azetidines; Dermatitis, Atopic; Humans; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Janus Kinases; Nitriles; Piperidines; Psoriasis; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Skin Diseases; Sulfonamides; Vitiligo

New molecularly targeted therapeutics are changing dermatologic therapy. Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK-STAT) is an intracellular signaling pathway upon which many different proinflammatory signaling pathways converge. Numerous inflammatory dermatoses are driven by soluble inflammatory mediators, which rely on JAK-STAT signaling, and inhibition of this pathway using JAK inhibitors might be a useful therapeutic strategy for these diseases. Growing evidence suggests that JAK inhibitors are efficacious in atopic dermatitis, alopecia areata, psoriasis, and vitiligo. Additional evidence suggests that JAK inhibition might be broadly useful in dermatology, with early reports of efficacy in several other conditions. JAK inhibitors can be administered orally or used topically and represent a promising new class of medications. The use of JAK inhibitors in dermatology is reviewed here.

Topics: Alopecia Areata; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Azetidines; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dermatitis, Atopic; Dermatologic Agents; Humans; Janus Kinases; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Nitriles; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Psoriasis; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Signal Transduction; Skin Diseases; Sulfonamides; Vitiligo

Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are emerging as a promising new treatment modality for many inflammatory conditions.. Our aim was to systematically review the available data on the use of JAK inhibitors in cutaneous diseases.. This is a systematic review of PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov.. One hundred thirty-four articles matched our search terms, of which 78 were original articles and 12 reports on adverse events. Eighteen clinical trials were found. JAK inhibitors have been extensively studied for psoriasis, showing beneficial results that were comparable to the effects achieved by etanercept. Favorable results were also observed for alopecia areata. Promising preliminary results were reported for vitiligo, dermatitis, graft versus host disease, cutaneous T cell lymphoma, and lupus erythematosus. The most common adverse events reported were infections, mostly nasopharyngitis and upper respiratory tract infections.. It was not possible to perform a meta-analysis of the results.. This systematic review shows that while JAK inhibitors hold promise for many skin disorders, there are still gaps regarding the correct dosing and safety profile of these medications for dermatologic indications. Additional trials are necessary to address these gaps.

Topics: Alopecia Areata; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Antineoplastic Agents; Azetidines; Dermatologic Agents; Drug Eruptions; Humans; Janus Kinases; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Nitriles; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Psoriasis; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Signal Transduction; Skin Diseases; Sulfonamides

Tofacitinib is the first Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor commercially approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. This compound and a number of other JAK inhibitors are currently being tested in phase II and III trials for the treatment of a variety of autoimmune inflammatory diseases. Whereas a characteristic safety profile is emerging for some JAK inhibitors, differences between individual agents might emerge on the basis of distinct potency against their molecular targets. Similarly to biological therapy, JAK inhibition can lead to serious and opportunistic infections, and viral infections seem to be particularly frequent. Although no malignancy signals have been identified to date, long-term follow-up and further research are needed to understand the risk of malignancy associated with these compounds. As is the case for biologic agents, vaccination is important to mitigate the risks of these emerging therapies.

Topics: Azetidines; Humans; Infections; Janus Kinases; Neoplasms; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Rheumatic Diseases; Signal Transduction; Sulfonamides

Several classes of new oral therapy are in use or in development for the treatment of psoriasis. Despite the high efficacy of biologics, new oral therapies remain important as patients generally prefer this mode of administration and they offer an alternative risk-benefit profile. In this review, we discuss the novel modes of action of these drugs, including modulation of cellular pathways involving diverse targets such as Janus kinase, phosphodiesterase 4, sphingosine 1-phosphate, A3 adenosine receptor and rho-associated kinase 2. We review the available evidence around licensed drugs (apremilast) and drugs that are advanced (tofacitinib) or early (ponesimod, baricitinib, peficitinib, INCB039110, CF101, KD025) in the development pipeline. The key limitations of these oral therapies are their modest efficacy profile (apremilast, ponesimod) and the limitations of their safety profile (tofacitinib, ponesimod), while the evidence for the early pipeline drugs are at phase II level only. Potential niches of current unmet needs include apremilast for patients with concomitant psoriatic arthritis, as combination treatments with biologic therapies, and/or for patients in whom multiple biologic therapies have failed due to immunogenicity and secondary inefficacy. The present knowledge gap regarding these novel drugs includes the need for longer clinical trials or observational studies to evaluate safety, and randomised phase III trials for the early pipeline drugs. We conclude that further research and data are necessary to conclusively establish the role of these agents in the current psoriasis treatment paradigm.

Topics: Adamantane; Adenosine; Adenosine A3 Receptor Antagonists; Administration, Oral; Arthritis, Psoriatic; Azetidines; Biological Factors; Biological Therapy; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Isonicotinic Acids; Janus Kinases; Niacinamide; Phosphodiesterase 4 Inhibitors; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Psoriasis; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Receptors, Lysosphingolipid; rho-Associated Kinases; Sulfonamides; Thalidomide; Thiazoles

Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has improved considerably following the advent of biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). However, these drugs require special storage and transportation. Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are oral synthetic DMARDs that inhibit the non-receptor tyrosine kinase family Janus kinase. Recently, many JAK inhibitors are being developed as new therapies for patients with RA.. In this article, we mainly review the efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitors currently under investigation. Tofacitinib has already been approved in 43 countries except in the EU. Results of three JAK inhibitors (baricitinib, decernotinib, and peficitinib) in phase III are consistent with that of tofacitinib. Tofacitinib and baricitinib were partially effective in patients who had an inadequate response to biological DMARDs. Expert commentary: JAK kinase inhibitors provide a new therapeutic approach for rheumatoid arthritis. Meanwhile, further studies are needed to determine their risk-benefit ratio and the most appropriate patients suitable for such therapy.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Clinical Trials as Topic; Heterocyclic Compounds, 2-Ring; Humans; Janus Kinase 1; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Valine

The combined use of synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (sDMARDs) such as methotrexate and biological DMARDs (bDMARDs) has revolutionized treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Remission is now realistic targets, achieved by a large proportion of RA patients. However, bDMARDs are limited to intravenous or subcutaneous uses and orally available small but strong products have been developed. Oral administration of tofacitinib targeting the Janus kinase (JAK) is significantly effective than placebo in active RA patients with sDMARD-naïve, inadequately responsive to sDMARDs or TNF-inhibitors. The efficacy was rapid and as strong as adalimumab, a TNF-inhibitor. The common adverse events were related to infection, hematologic and hepatic disorders and association of tofacitinib with carcinogenicity and infections remains debated.

Topics: Administration, Ophthalmic; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Discovery; Humans; Janus Kinases; Lymphocytes; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Signal Transduction; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by synovial inflammation and joint destruction. Considerable advance in the treatment of RA has been made following the advent of biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). However, these biologics require intravenous or subcutaneous injection and some patients fail to respond to biological DMARDs or lose their primary response. Various cytokines and cell surface molecules bind to receptors on the cell surface, resulting in the activation of various cell signaling pathways, including phosphorylation of kinase proteins. Among these kinases, the non-receptor tyrosine kinase family Janus kinase (JAK) plays a pivotal role in the pathological processes of RA. Several JAK inhibitors have been developed as new therapies for patients with RA. These are oral synthetic DMARDs that inhibit JAK1, 2, and 3. One JAK inhibitor, tofacitinib, has already been approved in many countries. Results of phase III clinical trials using a JAK1/2 inhibitor, baricitinib, have shown feasible efficacy and tolerable safety. Both drugs are effective in patients who showed inadequate response to biological DMARDs as well as synthetic DMARDs. In addition, clinical phase III trials using filgotinib and ABT-494, specific JAK1 inhibitors, are currently underway. JAK inhibitors are novel therapies for RA, but further studies are needed to determine their risk-benefit ratio and selection of the most appropriate patients for such therapy.

Topics: Animals; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; Humans; Janus Kinases; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Sulfonamides; Triazoles

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Humans; Pharmacovigilance; Piperidines

This multi-center, retrospective study aimed to clarify the factors affecting drug retention of the Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) including baricitinib (BAR) and tofacitinib (TOF) in patients with RA. Patients were as follows; females, 80.6%; age, 60.5 years; DAS28-ESR, 4.3; treated with either BAR (n = 166) or TOF (n = 185); bDMARDs- or JAKi-switched cases (76.6%). The reasons for drug discontinuation were classified into four major categories. The drug retention was evaluated at 24 months using the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariate Cox proportional hazards modelling adjusted by confounders. Discontinuation rates for the corresponding reasons were as follows; ineffectiveness (22.3%), toxic adverse events (13.3%), non-toxic reasons (7.2%) and remission (0.0%). Prior history of anti-interleukin-6 receptor antibody (aIL-6R) ineffectiveness significantly increased the risk of treatment discontinuation due to ineffectiveness (p = 0.020). Aging (≥ 75 years) (p = 0.028), usage of PSL ≥ 5 mg/day (p = 0.017) and female sex (p = 0.041) significantly increased the risk of treatment discontinuation due to toxic adverse events. Factors not associated with treatment discontinuation were: number of prior bDMARDs or JAKi, concomitant MTX usage, difference of JAKi, and prior use of TNF inhibitor, CTLA4-Ig or other JAKi.

Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Female; Humans; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Registries; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Sex Factors; Sulfonamides; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

To describe the use of baricitinib and tofacitinib by Swedish RA patients and to compare their effectiveness with that of biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs).. RA patients who initiated baricitinib (n = 1420), tofacitinib (n = 316), abatacept (n = 1050), IL-6 inhibitors (IL-6is; n = 849), rituximab (n = 1101) or TNF inhibitors (TNFis; n = 6036) between January 2017 and November 2019 were followed for a minimum of 1 year using data from several linked Swedish national registers. Proportions reaching a good EULAR 28-joint DAS (DAS28) response, HAQ Disability Index (HAQ-DI) improvement >0.2 units and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) remission were compared at 1 year, imputing discontinued treatments as 'non-response'. Additionally, we compared drug retention and changes in DAS28, HAQ-DI and CDAI from baseline to 3 months after treatment initiation.. On average, baricitinib, and particularly tofacitinib, were initiated as later lines of therapy and more frequently as monotherapy compared with rituximab and TNFi. Adjusted 1 year response proportions were consistently lower on TNFi compared with baricitinib, with differences of -4.3 percentage points (95% CI -8.7, 0.1) for good EULAR response, -9.9 (-14.4 to -5.4) for HAQ-DI improvement and -6.0 (-9.8 to -2.2) for CDAI remission. Comparisons with non-TNFi bDMARDs also favoured baricitinib, but not consistently. Treatment responses for tofacitinib were only marginally lower than those for baricitinib and generally similar to those of bDMARDs, with precision limited by low power. Comparisons of drug retention and changes in disease activity from baseline to 3 months supported the 1 year findings.. Baricitinib and tofacitinib showed at least equivalent effectiveness compared with bDMARDs after exploring several different effectiveness measures.

Topics: Abatacept; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Biological Products; Cohort Studies; Humans; Interleukin-6; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Rituximab; Sulfonamides; Sweden; Treatment Outcome; Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors

Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antirheumatic Agents; Azetidines; COVID-19 Drug Treatment; Humans; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; SARS-CoV-2; Sulfonamides

Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors baricitinib and tofacitinib are recommended by the US National Institutes of Health as immunomodulatory drugs for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) treatment. In addition, baricitinib has recently received Emergency Use Authorization from the US Food and Drug Administration, although the instruction provided dosing information only for adults. Geriatrics with organ dysfunction are one of the most vulnerable cohorts when combating the pandemic. The aim of the present work was to evaluate current dosing strategies of baricitinib and tofacitinib for potential COVID-19 treatment for White and Chinese geriatric patients with chronic renal impairment. An established physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling framework for age-dependent simulations was utilized. PBPK drug models adopted from literature were first verified. Several population models representing different age groups, ethnicities, and stages of renal impairment were used for prospective simulations. Notwithstanding the increase in systemic exposure of both drugs resulting from renal dysfunction was more pronounced for geriatrics than general White populations, our simulations confirmed their current dosage adjustments based on renal functions are broadly adequate. The exception being White older subjects with mild renal impairment where current recommendation of 4 mg baricitinib yielded a 2.31-fold increase in systemic exposure, and reduction to 2 mg could mitigate the potential risk to an acceptable 1.15-fold. Comparable relationships between systemic exposure and renal dysfunction were observed for both drugs in the Chinese population. In summary, PBPK modeling of both JAK inhibitors supports the rational and prudent dose adjustments of these COVID-19 therapeutics among adult patients of different age groups and renal functions.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Azetidines; COVID-19 Drug Treatment; Geriatrics; Humans; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Piperidines; Prospective Studies; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Sulfonamides; United States

As there are no clear on-target mechanisms that explain the increased risk for thrombosis and viral infection or reactivation associated with JAK inhibitors, the observed elevated risk may be a result of an off-target effect. Computational approaches combined with in vitro studies can be used to predict and validate the potential for an approved drug to interact with additional (often unwanted) targets and identify potential safety-related concerns. Potential off-targets of the JAK inhibitors baricitinib and tofacitinib were identified using two established machine learning approaches based on ligand similarity. The identified targets related to thrombosis or viral infection/reactivation were subsequently validated using in vitro assays. Inhibitory activity was identified for four drug-target pairs (PDE10A [baricitinib], TRPM6 [tofacitinib], PKN2 [baricitinib, tofacitinib]). Previously unknown off-target interactions of the two JAK inhibitors were identified. As the proposed pharmacological effects of these interactions include attenuation of pulmonary vascular remodeling, modulation of HCV response, and hypomagnesemia, the newly identified off-target interactions cannot explain an increased risk of thrombosis or viral infection/reactivation. While further evidence is required to explain both the elevated thrombosis and viral infection/reactivation risk, our results add to the evidence that these JAK inhibitors are promiscuous binders and highlight the potential for repurposing.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Azetidines; Humans; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Machine Learning; Phosphoric Diester Hydrolases; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Sulfonamides; Thrombosis; Virus Diseases

To evaluate real-world efficacy of approved JAK inhibitors (JAKi) tofacitinib and baricitinib in a large, single-centre cohort of RA patients across the treatment pathway, including those refractory to multiple biologic drugs.. All RA patients, treated with tofacitinib (from time of compassionate access scheme) or baricitinib since approval in 2017 had DAS28-CRP scores and components recorded at baseline, 3 and 6 months (with retrospective data for compassionate access scheme). Efficacy was evaluated in the total cohort, each treatment group, and subgroups of number of prior biologic classes failed.. One hundred and fifteen patients were treated with a JAKi (tofacitinib 54, baricitinib 69, 8 both); 76.4% female; mean (s.d.) age 57.3 (14.3) years. On average patients had received three previous bDMARDs; 11 (9.6%) were bDMARD naïve. Combined group baseline DAS28-CRP (s.d.) 5.62(1.14) improved by 1.49(1.44) and 1.67(1.61) at 3 and 6 months, respectively, comparable in individual JAKi groups; with 24% in at least low disease activity at 3 months. The biggest improvement was observed in the biologic-naïve group (mean DAS28-CRP improved from 5.16-2.14 after 6 months); while those with prior exposure to minimum three bDMARD classes had DAS28-CRP improvement of >1.2. Five out of 8 patients treated with both JAKi sequentially responded. Twelve patients previously unresponsive to IL-6 blockade responded to JAKi. No unexpected safety events were recorded. Two cases of venous thromboembolism were observed.. JAK inhibition is effective in a real-world population of RA patients, including in a subset of patients refractory to multiple previous bDMARDs.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Female; Humans; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Retrospective Studies; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Gene Regulatory Networks; Humans; Janus Kinases; Methotrexate; Models, Statistical; Piperidines; Prednisolone; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Rituximab; Signal Transduction; STAT Transcription Factors; Sulfonamides; Virus Diseases

The aim of this multicenter, retrospective study was to clarify the retention rates of sarilumab (SAR), baricitinib (BAR), and tofacitinib (TOF) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).. Patients treated with either SAR (n = 62), BAR (n = 166), or TOF (n = 185) (females, 80.9%; age, 61.0 years; disease duration, 11.1 years; rheumatoid factor positivity, 84.4%; Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using erythrocyte sedimentation rate, 4.3; concomitant prednisolone dose, 5.3 mg/day [47.0%] and methotrexate dose, 8.8 mg/week [58.4%]; biologics- or Janus kinase inhibitors-switched cases 78.4%) were included. The reasons for drug discontinuation were classified into 4 major categories (lack of effectiveness, toxic adverse events, non-toxic reasons, and remission) by each attending physician. The drug retention rate was estimated at 18 months using the Kaplan-Meier method and adjusted for potential confounders by Cox proportional hazards modeling.. The discontinuation rates of SAR, BAR, and TOF for the corresponding reasons were as follows, respectively: lack of effectiveness (15.7%, 15.6%, and 21.5%; P = 0.84), toxic adverse events (15.8%, 12.1%, and 12.3%; P = 0.35), non-toxic reasons (10.9%, 7.7%, and 6.8%; P = 0.35), and remission (0.0%, 2.8%, and 0.0%; P = 1.0). The overall retention rates excluding non-toxic reasons and remission were as follows: 68.8% for SAR, 72.5% for BAR, and 66.7% for TOF (P = 0.54).. After adjustment by potent confounders, SAR, BAR, and TOF showed similar discontinuation rates due to lack of effectiveness and toxic adverse events. Key Points • This is the first retrospective multicenter study that aimed to clarify the retention rates and reasons for discontinuation of SAR, BAR, and TOF in patients with RA.

Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Cohort Studies; Female; Humans; Methotrexate; Middle Aged; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Retrospective Studies; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKinibs) are efficacious in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with variable reported rates of adverse events, potentially related to differential JAK family member selectivity. Filgotinib was compared with baricitinib, tofacitinib and upadacitinib to elucidate the pharmacological basis underlying its clinical efficacy and safety.. In vitro JAKinib inhibition of signal transducer and activator of transcription phosphorylation (pSTAT) was measured by flow cytometry in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and whole blood from healthy donors and patients with RA following cytokine stimulation of distinct JAK/STAT pathways. The average daily pSTAT and time above 50% inhibition were calculated at clinical plasma drug exposures in immune cells. The translation of these measures was evaluated in ex vivo-stimulated assays in phase 1 healthy volunteers.. JAKinib potencies depended on cytokine stimulus, pSTAT readout and cell type. JAK1-dependent pathways (interferon (IFN)α/pSTAT5, interleukin (IL)-6/pSTAT1) were among the most potently inhibited by all JAKinibs in healthy and RA blood, with filgotinib exhibiting the greatest selectivity for JAK1 pathways. Filgotinib (200 mg once daily) had calculated average daily target inhibition for IFNα/pSTAT5 and IL-6/pSTAT1 that was equivalent to tofacitinib (5 mg two times per day), upadacitinib (15 mg once daily) and baricitinib (4 mg once daily), with the least average daily inhibition for the JAK2-dependent and JAK3-dependent pathways including IL-2, IL-15, IL-4 (JAK1/JAK3), IFNγ (JAK1/JAK2), granulocyte colony stimulating factor, IL-12, IL-23 (JAK2/tyrosine kinase 2) and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (JAK2/JAK2). Ex vivo pharmacodynamic data from phase 1 healthy volunteers clinically confirmed JAK1 selectivity of filgotinib.. Filgotinib inhibited JAK1-mediated signalling similarly to other JAKinibs, but with less inhibition of JAK2-dependent and JAK3-dependent pathways, providing a mechanistic rationale for its apparently differentiated efficacy:safety profile.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Cells, Cultured; Cytokines; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; Humans; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Janus Kinases; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Sulfonamides; Triazoles

The differences of efficacy between each Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors have not been clarified in the patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in clinical practice. Here, we compared the efficacy between tofacitinib (TOFA) and baricitinib (BARI) in clinical practice.. The efficacy of TOFA (n=156) in patients with RA was compared with BARI (n=138). Selection bias was reduced to a minimum using propensity score-based inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). The Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) trajectory for patients who started TOFA or BARI was analysed using growth mixture modelling (GMM).. No significant difference was observed in patient characteristics between the TOFA and BARI groups in after adjustment by propensity score-based IPTW. The BARI group had a significantly higher rate of CDAI remission at week 24 after the introduction of JAK inhibitors than the TOFA group. The treatment-resistant group defined by GMM, comprising patients who did not achieve low disease activity at week 24, was more likely to include those who had received many biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) before the introduction of JAK inhibitors and those who received TOFA. Among patients with RA who received TOFA, those who had received ≥4 bDMARDs before the introduction of TOFA were more likely to be classified into the treatment-resistant group.. BARI showed a similar safety profile and better clinical outcome when compared with TOFA after reduction to a minimum of selection bias. However, these were observed in a small population. Accordingly, further investigation is required in an accurately powered head-to-head trial.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Female; Humans; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Propensity Score; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Azetidines; COVID-19 Drug Treatment; Female; Humans; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Prospective Studies; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Russia; SARS-CoV-2; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

Main objective: Describe the effectiveness and safety of baricitinib and tofacitinib in patients diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis in our hospital.. Analyse whether there are  differences between the two drugs in routine clinical practice.. Two-year retrospective study of patients diagnosed with  rheumatoid arthritis treated in our hospital with baricitinib and tofacitinib  for at least 6 months. Databases: Electronic medical record and outpatient medication dispensing software. Variables collected:  Demographic variables, poor prognosis factors, previous treatment,  duration of treatment, concomitant treatment, DAS28, number of swollen  and painful joints, pain visual analogy scale, treatment discontinuation,  and adverse reactions. Effectiveness evaluation: Decreases in the DAS28  scale, the number of swollen and painful joints, and the pain Visual  Analogy Scale at 6 months and 12 months after starting treatment. Safety evaluation: Detection of adverse reactions.. Student t- test.. A total of 44 patients were evaluated. Of these, 20 (70%  women) received treatment with baricitinib and 24 (95.8% women)  received tofacitinib. Baricitinib reduced the DAS28 by 2.3 and 1.7 at 6  months and 12 months, respectively, and tofacitinib reduced the scale by 2 and 1.9 at 6 months and 12 months, respectively. Baricitinib reduced the  number of swollen and painful joints by 7 at both 6 months and 12  months, and tofacitinib reduced the number of swollen and painful joints  by 4 and 6 at 6 months and 12 months, respectively. Baricitinib reduced  the Visual Analogy Scale score by 7.8 and 6.8 at 6 months and 12 months, respectively, and tofacitinib reduced the score by 5 and 6 at 6 months and 12 months, respectively. Corticosteroid treatment was needed in 40% of patients treated with baricitinib and 62.5% of patients treated with  rofacitinib. Treatment was discontinued due to loss of effectiveness in 10% of patients receiving baricitinib and 25% of patients treated with  tofacitinib. Adverse reactions were experienced by 10% of patients treated with baricitinib and 12.5% of patients treated with tofacitinib. Adverse  reactions led to treatment discontinuation in only 1 patient in each group.  No statistically significant differences were observed between the two  drugs.. The results show that baricitinib and tofacitinib were  effective and safe in relation to all the variables analysed. Moreover, both drugs were similar in terms of effectiveness and safety for the  treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in real-world clinical practice.. Objetivo: Objetivo principal: describir la efectividad y seguridad de baricitinib y tofacitinib en pacientes diagnosticados de artritis  reumatoide en nuestro centro. Objetivo secundario: analizar si existen  diferencias entre ambos fármacos en práctica clínica real.Método: Estudio observacional retrospectivo de 2 años de duración que  incluyó pacientes diagnosticados de artritis reumatoide en tratamiento con  baricitinib o tofacitinib en nuestro centro durante al menos 6 meses. Bases de datos: historia clínica electrónica, aplicativo informático de dispensación a pacientes externos. Variables recogidas: demográficas, factores de mal  pronóstico, tratamiento previo, duración de tratamiento, tratamiento  concomitante, escala DAS28, número de articulaciones inflamadas y  dolorosas, escala visual analógica del dolor, suspensión del tratamiento y  reacciones adversas. Evaluación de la efectividad: disminución en la escala DAS28, articulaciones inflamadas y dolorosas y escala visual analógica del  dolor a los 6 y 12 meses de iniciado el tratamiento. Evaluación de la  seguridad: detección de reacciones adversas.Análisis estadístico: prueba t-student.Resultados: Se evaluaron 44 pacientes, 20 (70% mujeres) recibieron tratamiento con baricitinib, 24 (95,8% mujeres) con tofacitinib.  Baricitinib redujo la puntuación en la escala DAS28 en 2,3 y 1,7 a los 6 y  12 meses. Tofacitinib en 2 y 1,9 respectivamente. Baricitinib redujo el  número de articulaciones inflamadas y dolorosas en 7 a los 6 y 12 meses,  tofacitinib en 4 las inflamadas y 6 las dolorosas. Baricitinib redujo la  puntuación en la escala visual analógica del dolor en 7,8 y 6,8; tofacitinib  en 5 y 6 a los 6 y 12 meses. El 40% de los pacientes con baricitinib y el 62,5% con tofacitinib precisaron tratamiento con corticoides. El 10% de los pacientes con baricitinib y el 25% de los pacientes con tofacitinib suspendieron el tratamiento por ineficacia. El 10% de los pacientes de baricitinib y el 12,5% de tofacitinib experimentaron reacciones adversas. Sólo un paciente de cada grupo suspendió el tratamiento por reacciones adversas. No se observaron diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre ambos fármacos.Conclusiones: Según nuestros resultados, baricitinib y tofacitinib han demostrado ser efectivos y seguros en todas las variables analizadas. Además, ambos fármacos resultaron similares en efectividad y  seguridad en la práctica clínica habitual del tratamiento de la artritis  reumatoide.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Female; Humans; Male; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Retrospective Studies; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome (HGPS) is an ultra-rare multisystem premature aging disorder that leads to early death (mean age of 14.7 years) due to myocardial infarction or stroke. Most cases have a de novo point mutation at position G608G within exon 11 of the

Topics: Adolescent; Azetidines; Cells, Cultured; Child, Preschool; Enzyme Inhibitors; Farnesyltranstransferase; Female; Humans; Janus Kinase 1; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Male; Piperidines; Progeria; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; STAT1 Transcription Factor; Sulfonamides

To compare the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib and baricitinib in patients with RA in a real-world setting.. A total of 242 patients with RA who were treated with tofacitinib (n = 161) or baricitinib (n = 81) were enrolled. We evaluated efficacy and safety between tofacitinib and baricitinib using multivariable analyses to avoid confounding. Their clinical disease activity and AEs were evaluated for 24 weeks.. The mean (SD) DAS28-ESR change from baseline to 24 weeks was 1.57 (1.55) (tofacitinib) and 1.46 (1.36) (baricitinib). There was no significant difference in the clinical response between the two groups (adjusted mean difference, 0.04; 95% CI, -0.35 to 0.28). The efficacy was not significantly changed in the patients without concomitant MTX use in both groups, but the concomitant MTX use showed better clinical efficacy in the cases of baricitinib treatment. In both groups, the most common AE was herpes zoster infection, and the AE rates were similar between the two groups. However, the predictive factors contributing to clinical response as revealed by a multivariable logistic analysis differed. The concomitant oral steroid use was independently associated with the achievement of DAS-low disease activity in the tofacitinib group, whereas in the baricitinib group, the number of biological and/or targeted synthetic DMARDs previously used was associated.. Our findings indicate that tofacitinib and baricitinib had comparable continuing efficacies and safety profiles. However, there is a possibility that the influence of clinical characteristics on the treatment response differs. The comparison provides useful information to the optimal use of JAK inhibitors in real-world settings.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Humans; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

To present our preliminary experience with JAK inhibitors in treating patients affected by juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) and associated uveitis. Case series. Four consecutive patients with long-term history of juvenile idiopathic arthritis and severe associated uveitis were included in the study. Indication for treatment with JAK inhibitors was uncontrolled arthritis and/or uveitis despite different treatments with conventional and biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). While on treatment with JAK inhibitors, namely, baricitinib (three cases) and tofacitinib (one case), all our patients showed improvement of uveitis defined as a reduction of intraocular inflammation according to Standardized Uveitis Nomenclature criteria. However, we observed a different response to treatment between the uveitis and the articular disease, as the latter did not respond as favorably as the former. Overall, the treatment was well tolerated by all patients and no ocular discomfort, ocular side effects, or allergic reactions were registered. JAK inhibitors may provide a new valuable treatment option in the therapeutic armamentarium for patients affected with JIA-associated uveitis, particularly in those refractory cases that are not adequately responding to conventional or biologic DMARDs.Key Points• A subset of patients with JIA uveitis either remain unresponsive or experience loss of efficacy• JAK inhibitors may provide a new valuable treatment option in JIA patients with uveitis• The safety profile was good with no occurrence of systemic side effects.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Arthritis, Juvenile; Azetidines; Female; Humans; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Male; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Uveitis; Visual Acuity; Young Adult

The relative efficacy and tolerability of tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, and filgotinib compared to adalimumab were assessed in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with inadequate responses to methotrexate (MTX).. We performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis to combine direct and indirect evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to examine the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, filgotinib, and adalimumab in RA patients with inadequate responses to MTX.. Four RCTs comprising 5451 patients met the inclusion criteria. Baricitinib 4 mg + MTX and upadacitinib 15 mg + MTX showed a significantly higher American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response rate than adalimumab 40 mg + MTX. Ranking probability based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) indicated that baricitinib 4 mg + MTX had the highest probability of being the best treatment for achieving the ACR20 response rate, followed by upadacitinib 15 mg + MTX, tofacitinib 5 mg + MTX, filgotinib 200 mg + MTX, filgotinib 100 mg + MTX, adalimumab 40 mg + MTX, and placebo + MTX. Upadacitinib 15 mg + MTX and baricitinib 4 mg + MTX showed significantly higher ACR50 and ACR70 response rates than adalimumab 40 mg + MTX. For herpes zoster infection, the ranking probability based on SUCRA indicated that placebo + MTX was likely to be the safest treatment, followed by filgotinib 200 mg + MTX, filgotinib 100 mg + MTX, adalimumab 40 mg + MTX, tofacitinib 5 mg + MTX, upadacitinib 15 mg + MTX, and baricitinib 4 mg + MTX. No statistically significant differences were found between the intervention groups in terms of safety.. In RA patients with an inadequate response to MTX, baricitinib 4 mg + MTX and upadacitinib 15 mg + MTX showed the highest ACR response rates, suggesting a difference in efficacy among the different JAK inhibitors.. ZIEL DER ARBEIT: Bei Patienten mit rheumatoider Arthritis (RA) und inadäquatem Ansprechen auf Methotrexat (Mtx) wurde die relative Wirksamkeit und Verträglichkeit von Tofacitinib, Baricitinib, Upadacitinib und Filgotinib im Vergleich zu Adalimumab untersucht.. Die Autoren führten eine Bayes-Netzwerk-Metaanalyse durch, um direkte und indirekte Evidenz aus randomisierten kontrollierten Studien (RCT) zu kombinieren und so die Wirksamkeit und Sicherheit von Tofacitinib, Baricitinib, Upadacitinib, Filgotinib und Adalimumab bei RA-Patienten mit inadäquatem Ansprechen auf MTX zu untersuchen.. Die Einschlusskriterien wurden von 4 RCT mit 5451 Patienten erfüllt. Unter Baricitinib 4 mg + MTX und Upadacitinib 15 mg + MTX zeigte sich eine signifikant höhere ACR20-Ansprechrate (gemäß American College of Rheumatology) als unter Adalimumab 40 mg + MTX. Wie die Rangfolgewahrscheinlichkeit, basierend auf der Oberfläche unter der kumulativen Rangfolgenkurve (SUCRA, „surface under the cumulative ranking curve“), ergab, stellte Baricitinib 4 mg + MTX mit größter Wahrscheinlichkeit die beste Behandlung zur Erzielung der ACR20-Ansprechrate dar, es folgten Upadacitinib 15 mg + MTX, Tofacitinib 5 mg + MTX, Filgotinib 200 mg + MTX, Filgotinib 100 mg + MTX, Adalimumab 40 mg + MTX und Placebo + MTX. Upadacitinib 15 mg + MTX und Baricitinib 4 mg + MTX wiesen signifikant höhere ACR50- und ACR70-Ansprechraten auf als Adalimumab 40 mg + MTX. In Bezug auf eine Herpes-zoster-Infektion ergab die auf SUCRA basierende Rangfolgewahrscheinlichkeit, dass Placebo + MTX am ehesten die sicherste Therapie darstellte, dem folgten Filgotinib 200 mg + MTX, Filgotinib 100 mg + MTX, Adalimumab 40 mg + MTX, Tofacitinib 5 mg + MTX, Upadacitinib 15 mg + MTX und Baricitinib 4 mg + MTX. Es wurden keine statistisch signifikanten Unterschiede zwischen den Interventionsgruppen hinsichtlich der Sicherheit festgestellt.. Bei RA-Patienten mit inadäquatem Ansprechen auf MTX ergaben Baricitinib 4 mg + MTX und Upadacitinib 15 mg + MTX die höchsten ACR-Ansprechraten, was ein Hinweis auf einen Unterschied in der Wirksamkeit der verschiedenen JAK-Inhibitoren sein könnte.

Topics: Adalimumab; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Bayes Theorem; Drug Therapy, Combination; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; Humans; Methotrexate; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Triazoles

Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Betacoronavirus; Colitis, Ulcerative; Coronavirus Infections; COVID-19; Cytokines; Dermatitis, Atopic; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; Humans; Immunomodulation; Janus Kinases; Nitriles; Pandemics; Piperidines; Pneumonia, Viral; Primary Myelofibrosis; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; SARS-CoV-2; STAT Transcription Factors; Sulfonamides

Topics: Abatacept; Adult; Aged; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antirheumatic Agents; Azetidines; Betacoronavirus; Coronavirus Infections; COVID-19; Disease Susceptibility; Female; Hospitalization; Humans; Interleukin 1 Receptor Antagonist Protein; Italy; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Pandemics; Piperidines; Pneumonia, Viral; Proportional Hazards Models; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Rheumatic Diseases; Risk Factors; SARS-CoV-2; Severity of Illness Index; Sulfonamides; Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors; Ustekinumab

The Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors tofacitinib and baricitinib are new treatments for rheumatic diseases. Recent concerns regarding the risk of thrombosis have led to warnings by competent authorities. We therefore aimed to examine the thromboembolic safety signal for tofacitinib and baricitinib.. Individual case safety reports (ICSRs) for tofacitinib and baricitinib were retrieved from the World Health Organization global database VigiBase in April 2019. Primary outcomes were deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary thrombosis (PT) or pulmonary embolism (PE). Patient demographics were summarized and then stratified by outcome. Disproportionality analyses were conducted by estimating the reporting odds ratios (RORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) worldwide, and stratified by either Europe or the US.. In both the tofacitinib (n = 40,017) and baricitinib (n = 2138) ICSRs, patients with reported DVT or PT/PE were older and had higher reporting of prothrombotic medications or antithrombotic treatments, suggesting a pre-existing thromboembolic risk/event. In Europe, tofacitinib was associated with increased reporting for DVT (ROR 2.37, 95% CI 1.23-4.56) and PT/PE (ROR 2.38. 95% CI 1.45-3.89). For baricitinib, a threefold increased reporting odds was observed for DVT (ROR 3.47, 95% CI 2.18-5.52) and PT/PE (ROR 3.44, 95% CI 2.43-4.88) in Europe. In the US, tofacitinib was only associated with an elevated ROR of PT (ROR 2.05, 95% CI 1.45-2.90) and no baricitinib ICSRs were reported.. This study supports the current recommendation for cautious use of tofacitinib in patients with high thromboembolic risk. Moreover, with a similar patient profile and elevated reporting for baricitinib, a potential class effect of JAK inhibitors cannot be ruled out.

Topics: Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Humans; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Pharmacovigilance; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Sulfonamides; Thromboembolism; World Health Organization

Innate immune cells play a crucial role in the pathophysiology of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) via release of cytokines. Small-molecule inhibitors of Janus kinases (JAKi) are clinically efficacious in patients with RA. However, the isoform-specific action of each JAKi is difficult to assess, since JAKs form heterodimeric complexes with cytokine receptors. We assessed the effects of several JAKi on GM-CSF-primed human innate immune cells.. Treatment with JAKi (tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib) prevented GM-CSF-induced JAK2/STAT5 phosphorylation at higher concentrations (400 nM) in THP-1 cells. Whereas compared with baricitinib or upadacitinib, the inhibitory effects of tofacitinib on the GM-CSF-induced JAK2/STAT5 phosphorylation were weak at lower concentrations (≤ 100 nM). All JAKi inhibited GM-CSF-induced IL-1β production by human neutrophils. However, the inhibitory effects of baricitinib on IL-1β production were larger compared to those of tofacitinib or upadacitinib at lower concentrations (≤ 100 nM). Similarly, all JAKi inhibited GM-CSF-induced caspase-1(p20) production by human neutrophils.. We conclude that incubation with JAKi prevents GM-CSF-mediated JAK2/STAT5 activation in human innate immune cells. Although baricitinib and upadacitinib almost completely blocked GM-CSF-mediated JAK2/STAT5 signaling, the inhibitory effects of tofacitinib were weaker at lower concentrations suggesting that variation exists among these JAKi in the inhibition of JAK2 signaling pathways.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Cell Line; Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; Humans; Immunity, Innate; Janus Kinase 2; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Neutrophils; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Signal Transduction; STAT5 Transcription Factor; Sulfonamides; THP-1 Cells

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) fibroblast-like synoviocytes (RA-FLS) play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of RA. RA-FLS display passive pro-inflammatory responses and self-directed aggressive responses, such as pro-inflammatory mediator production, reduced apoptosis and formation of a thickened synovial lining. Evidence suggests a role for Janus kinase (JAK)-signal transducer and transcriptional activator (STAT) signaling in the passive response but the aggressive behavior of RA-FLS is poorly understood. The pharmacologic effects of the novel JAK inhibitor, peficitinib, on cytokine-induced intracellular signaling and self-directed aggressive behavior of RA-FLS (e.g., increased expression of apoptosis-resistant genes and sodium nitroprusside-induced apoptosis) were investigated and compared with approved JAK inhibitors. RA-FLS assembly to form a lining-like structure and pro-inflammatory mediator production was investigated in three-dimensional (3D)-micromass culture. Peficitinib inhibited STAT3 phosphorylation in RA-FLS following induction by interferon (IFN)-α2b, IFN-γ, interleukin (IL)-6, oncostatin M, and leukemia inhibitory factor in a concentration-related manner, and was comparable to approved JAK inhibitors, tofacitinib and baricitinib. Peficitinib and tofacitinib suppressed autocrine phosphorylation of STAT3 and expression of apoptosis-resistant genes, and promoted cell death. In 3D-micromass culture, peficitinib reduced multi-layered RA-FLS cells to a thin monolayer, an effect less pronounced with tofacitinib. Both compounds attenuated production of vascular endothelial growth factor-A, matrix metalloproteinases, IL-6 and tumor necrosis factor superfamily-11. This study confirmed the pathogenic role of uncontrolled JAK-STAT signaling in the aggressive and passive responses of RA-FLS that are critical for RA progression. The novel JAK inhibitor peficitinib suppressed the pro-inflammatory behavior of RA-FLS, accelerated cell death and abrogated thickening of the synovium.

Topics: Adamantane; Apoptosis; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Cells, Cultured; Cytokines; Humans; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Janus Kinases; Niacinamide; Phosphorylation; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Signal Transduction; STAT3 Transcription Factor; Sulfonamides; Synoviocytes

Topics: Azetidines; Humans; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Sulfonamides; Thromboembolism; World Health Organization

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic autoimmune disease in which synovial fibroblasts (SF) play a key role. Baricitinib and Tofacitinib both act intracellularly, blocking the ATP-binding side of JAK proteins and thereby the downstream signalling pathway via STAT-3. Therefore, we investigated the role of organic cation transporters (OCTs) in Baricitinib and Tofacitinib cellular transport.. OCT expression was analysed in SF isolated from RA and osteoarthritis (OA) patients, as well as peripheral blood mononuclear cells. The interaction of Baricitinib and Tofacitinib with OCTs was investigated using quenching experiments. The intracellular accumulation of both drugs was quantified using LC/MS. Target inhibition for both drugs was tested using Western blot for phosphorylated JAK1 and STAT3 upon stimulation with IL-6.. MATE-1 expression increased in OASF compared to RASF. The other OCTs were not differentially expressed. The transport of Baricitinib was not OCT dependent. Tofacitinib; however, was exported from RASF in a MATE-1 dependent way. Tofacitinib and Baricitinib showed comparable inhibition of downstream signalling pathways.. We observed different cellular uptake strategies for Baricitinib and Tofacitinib. Tofacitinib was exported out of healthy cells due to the increased expression of MATE1. This might make Tofacitinib the favourable drug.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical; Fibroblasts; HEK293 Cells; Humans; Janus Kinase 1; Organic Cation Transport Proteins; Phosphorylation; Piperidines; Primary Cell Culture; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; STAT3 Transcription Factor; Sulfonamides

Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors have emerged as an effective class of therapies for various inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA). JAK inhibitors function intracellularly by modulating the catalytic activity of JAKs and disrupting the receptor-mediated signaling of multiple cytokines and growth factors, including those with pro-inflammatory activity. Understanding the inhibition profiles of different JAK inhibitors, based on the associated cytokine receptors and downstream inflammatory pathways affected, is important to identify the potential mechanisms for observed differences in efficacy and safety. This study applied an integrated modeling approach, using in vitro whole blood cytokine inhibition potencies and plasma pharmacokinetics, to determine JAK-dependent cytokine receptor inhibition profiles, in the context of doses estimated to provide a similar clinical response in RA clinical trials. The calculated profiles of cytokine receptor inhibition for the JAK inhibitors tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, and filgotinib and its metabolite, were generally similar when clinically efficacious doses for RA were considered. Only minor numerical differences in percentage cytokine receptor inhibition were observed, suggesting limited differentiation of these inhibitors based on JAK pharmacology, with each showing a differential selectivity for JAK1 heterodimer inhibition. Nevertheless, only robust clinical testing involving head-to-head studies will ultimately determine whether there are clinically meaningful differences between these JAK inhibitors. Furthermore, ongoing and future research into inhibitors with alternative JAK selectivity remains of clinical importance. Thus, all JAK inhibitors should be characterized via thorough preclinical, metabolic and pharmacological evaluation, adequate long-term clinical data, and when available, real-world experience.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Cell Line; Cytokines; Enzyme Assays; Female; Healthy Volunteers; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; Humans; Inhibitory Concentration 50; Janus Kinase 1; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Male; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Receptors, Cytokine; Sulfonamides; Triazoles

Topics: Adamantane; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Cell Proliferation; Chemokine CCL2; Fibroblasts; Humans; Interleukin-6; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Niacinamide; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Sulfonamides; Synovial Membrane

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune disease characterized by persistent synovial inflammation. The major drivers of synovial inflammation are cytokines and chemokines. Among these molecules, TNF activates fibroblast-like synoviocytes (FLSs), which leads to the production of inflammatory mediators. Here, we show that TNF regulates the expression of the transcription factor interferon regulatory factor 1 (IRF1) in human FLSs as well as in a TNF transgenic arthritis mouse model. Transcriptomic analyses of IRF1-deficient, TNF-stimulated FLSs define the interferon (IFN) pathway as a major target of IRF1. IRF1 expression is associated with the expression of IFNβ, which leads to the activation of the JAK-STAT pathway. Blocking the JAK-STAT pathway with the Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKinib) baricitinib or tofacitinib reduces the expression of IFN-regulated genes (IRGs) in TNF-activated FLSs. Therefore, we conclude that TNF induces a distinct inflammatory cascade, in which IRGs are key elements, in FLSs. The IFN-signature might be a promising biomarker for the efficient and personalized use of new treatment strategies for RA, such as JAKinibs.

Topics: Animals; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Biomarkers; Female; Gene Expression; Humans; Inflammation; Interferon Regulatory Factor-1; Interferons; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Mice; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Mice, Transgenic; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Signal Transduction; Sulfonamides; Synovial Membrane; Synoviocytes; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

The in vitro pharmacology of baricitinib, upadacitinib, and tofacitinib was evaluated to understand differences among these JAK inhibitors (JAKis) at the cellular level.. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells from healthy donors were incubated with different JAKis, levels of phosphorylated signal transducer and activator of transcription (pSTAT) were measured following cytokine stimulation, and half maximum inhibitory concentration (IC. Different JAKis modulated distinct cytokine pathways to varying degrees, and no agent potently or continuously inhibited an individual cytokine signaling pathway throughout the dosing interval. Notably, baricitinib inhibited JAK1/3 signaling to a lesser extent than upadacitinib and tofacitinib, while upadacitinib, baricitinib, and tofacitinib inhibited the signaling of JAK2/2-dependent cytokines, including GM-CSF and IL-3, as well as the signaling of the JAK2/TYK2-dependent cytokine G-CSF.

Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Biomarkers; Cytokines; Flow Cytometry; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; Humans; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Leukocytes, Mononuclear; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Signal Transduction; Sulfonamides

Topics: Adenine; Agammaglobulinaemia Tyrosine Kinase; Allografts; Autografts; Azetidines; B-Lymphocytes; Cell Separation; Drug Approval; Fetal Blood; Graft vs Host Disease; Hodgkin Disease; Humans; Nitriles; Photopheresis; Piperidines; Problem Solving; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Stem Cell Transplantation; Sulfonamides; T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration

Neutrophils play a crucial role in the pathophysiology of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) via the release of reactive oxygen species (ROS), proteases and cytokines. Orally active Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors (JAKi), e.g. baricitinib and tofacitinib, have high clinical efficacy in RA but are linked with neutropenia and increased infections. Our aim was to determine the effect of JAK inhibition with baricitinib and tofacitinib on healthy control and RA neutrophil lifespan and function. RA (n = 7) and healthy control (n = 7) neutrophils were treated with baricitinib or tofacitinib for 30 min, prior to incubation in the absence or presence of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) or interferon (IFN)-γ. JAKi prevented GM-CSF- and IFN-γ-induced apoptosis delay in RA and healthy control neutrophils in a dose-dependent manner. Baricitinib decreased the rate of chemotaxis towards interleukin (IL)-8, but not f-Met-Leu-Phe (fMLP) in RA neutrophils. While healthy control neutrophils incubated with GM-CSF became primed to produce ROS in response to stimulation with fMLP and phorbol-12-myristate-12-acetate (PMA), RA neutrophils produced increased levels of ROS without the need for priming. JAKi prevented ROS release from primed healthy control neutrophils in response to fMLP, but had no effect on ROS production by RA neutrophils. Baricitinib reversed GM-CSF priming of ROS production in response to fMLP in healthy control, but not RA, neutrophils. We conclude that incubation with JAKi prevents chemotaxis of RA neutrophils towards IL-8, but does not prevent the production of ROS or increase the level of apoptosis. This may be due to the in-vivo exposure of RA neutrophils to priming agents other than those that activate JAK/signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) signalling.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azetidines; Case-Control Studies; Cell Movement; Cells, Cultured; Female; Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor; Humans; Interleukin-8; Janus Kinases; Male; Middle Aged; Neutrophils; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Purines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Reactive Oxygen Species; Respiratory Burst; Sulfonamides; Tetradecanoylphorbol Acetate; United Kingdom