piperidines has been researched along with amthamine* in 3 studies
3 other study(ies) available for piperidines and amthamine
Article | Year |
---|---|
Histamine increases sickle erythrocyte adherence to endothelium.
Complications of sickle cell anaemia include vascular occlusion triggered by the adherence of sickle erythrocytes to endothelium in the postcapillary venules. Adherence can be promoted by inflammatory mediators that induce endothelial cell adhesion molecule expression and arrest flowing erythrocytes. The present study characterised the effect of histamine stimulation on the kinetics of sickle cell adherence to large vessel and microvascular endothelium under physiological flow. Increased sickle cell adherence was observed within minutes of endothelial activation by histamine and reached a maximum value within 30 min. At steady state, sickle cell adherence to histamine-stimulated endothelium was 47 +/- 4 adherent cells/mm(2), 2.6-fold higher than sickle cell adherence to unstimulated endothelial cells. Histamine-induced sickle cell adherence occurred rapidly and transiently. Studies using histamine receptor agonists and antagonists suggest that histamine-induced sickle cell adhesion depends on simultaneous stimulation of the H(2) and H(4) histamine receptors and endothelial P-selectin expression. These data show that histamine release may promote sickle cell adherence and vaso-occlusion. In vivo histamine release should be studied to determine its role in sickle complications and whether blocking of specific histamine receptors may prevent clinical complications or adverse effects from histamine release stimulated by opiate analgesic treatment. Topics: Analysis of Variance; Anemia, Sickle Cell; Cell Adhesion; Cells, Cultured; Endothelial Cells; Endothelium, Vascular; Erythrocytes; Famotidine; Histamine; Histamine Agonists; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Histamine H2 Antagonists; Humans; Imidazoles; Methylhistamines; P-Selectin; Piperidines; Pyrilamine; Stimulation, Chemical; Thiazoles; Thiourea; Venules | 2006 |
Effects of histamine H2 receptor agonists and antagonists on the isolated guinea pig gallbladder.
Histamine H2 receptor-mediated responses were examined on cholecystokinin-octapeptide (CCK-8)-precontracted guinea pig gallbladder in vitro, testing histamine and a series of specific histamine H2 receptor agonists and antagonists. Among the antagonists tested, zolantidine and compound SKF 92857 were previously shown to antagonize H2 receptor-mediated responses in the heart, but not in the stomach. Histamine, in the presence of the H2 receptor antagonist mepyramine (10 microM), and the H2 receptor agonists dimaprit, impromidine and amthamine, inhibited CCK-8 (3 nM)-induced contractions in a concentration-dependent fashion, with the following rank orders of potency: impromidine > amthamine > histamine > dimaprit (pD2 values were 6.73 +/- 0.04, 5.44 +/- 0.07, 4.64 +/- 0.04 and 3.71 +/- 0.05, respectively). The maximal relaxation produced by dimaprit was significantly lower than that produced by histamine, as well as by impromidine and amthamine, which behaved as full agonists. All the H2 receptor antagonists examined were able to inhibit amthamine-induced relaxation. Famotidine (pA2 = 7.09 +/- 0.26), zolantidine (pA2 = 6.54 +/- 0.11), compound SKF 92857 (pA2 = 6.58 +/- 0.13) and aminopotentidine (pA2 = 6.86 +/- 0.06) competitively antagonised the amthamine-induced effect, while iodoaminopotentidine produced surmountable antagonism only at low concentrations (1 microM, pA2 = 6.83 +/- 0.21). Finally, the slowly-dissociable antagonist loxtidine caused a non-parallel displacement to the right of the concentration--response curve to amthamine (pKB = 7.55 +/- 0.24), with a significant depression of the maximal response to the agonist, even at the lowest effective concentration (0.3 microM). In conclusion, histamine H2 receptors in guinea pig gallbladder resemble those of the heart, as regards their sensitivity to zolantidine and compound SKF 92857, which, by contrast, were unable to antagonize histamine effects at gastric H2 receptors in different experimental models. Topics: Animals; Benzothiazoles; Dopamine Agents; Famotidine; Gallbladder; Guanidines; Guinea Pigs; Histamine; Histamine Agonists; Histamine H2 Antagonists; In Vitro Techniques; Male; Muscle Contraction; Muscle Relaxation; Phenoxypropanolamines; Piperidines; Pyridines; Receptors, Histamine H2; Sincalide; Thiazoles; Triazoles | 1999 |
Does histamine stimulate cyclic AMP formation in the avian pineal gland via a novel (non-H1, non-H2, non-H3) histamine receptor subtype.
The effects of histamine (HA) and selective HA H1-, H2 and H3-receptor agonists on cyclic AMP formation were investigated in intact chick and duck pineal glands HA potently stimulated the pineal cycle AMP formation. The effect of HA was mimicked fully by N alpha-methylated histamines, and partially by several histaminergic drugs: 2-thiazolylethylamine (H1) amthamine (H2) and R alpha-methyl-histamine (H3). Dimaprit, another selective H2-agonist showed marginal activity. Forskolin highly potentiated the action of HA, and only weakly affected the effects of 2-thiazolylethylamine and amthamine. In the chick pineal, the stimulatory effects of HA and the tested histaminergic drugs were not blocked by mepyramine and thioperamide (H1- and H3-blockers, respectively), but they were antagonized by H2-receptor selective compounds ranitidine and aminopotentidine, which, however, acted in a noncompetitive manner. Another H2-selective blocker zolantidine antagonized the HA effect only when used at very high (30-100 microM) concentrations. In the duck pineal, the stimulatory effect of HA on cyclic AMP production was unaffected by mepyramine (H1), thioperamide (H3), and ranitidine (H2), and only partially inhibited by the H2-blocker aminopotentidine. Electrophysiological experiments revealed that HA is capable of evoking inward currents in most of the tested cells acutely isolated from chick pineal gland. The present findings further indicate that the pharmacological profile of the avian pineal HA receptor, whose stimulation leads to activation of cyclic AMP production, is different from any known HA receptor type (H1, H2, H3), and suggest the existence of either an avian-specific HA receptor, or a novel HA receptor subtype. Electrophysiological data suggest that the pineal HA receptor may be somehow linked to activation of an ionic channel. Topics: Animals; Benzothiazoles; Chickens; Cyclic AMP; Ducks; Histamine; Histamine Agonists; Histamine H2 Antagonists; Ion Channels; Male; Methylation; Phenoxypropanolamines; Pineal Gland; Piperidines; Receptors, Histamine; Stimulation, Chemical; Thiazoles | 1995 |