piperidines and 8-cyclopentyl-1-3-dimethylxanthine

We tested the novel hypothesis that endogenous adenosine (eADO) activates low-affinity A3 receptors in a model of neurogenic diarrhea in the guinea pig colon. Dimaprit activation of H2 receptors was used to trigger a cyclic coordinated response of contraction and Cl(-) secretion. Contraction-relaxation was monitored by sonomicrometry (via intracrystal distance) simultaneously with short-circuit current (I(sc), Cl(-) secretion). The short interplexus reflex coordinated response was attenuated or abolished by antagonists at H2 (cimetidine), 5-hydroxytryptamine 4 receptor (RS39604), neurokinin-1 receptor (GR82334), or nicotinic (mecamylamine) receptors. The A1 agonist 2-chloro-N(6)-cyclopentyladenosine (CCPA) abolished coordinated responses, and A1 antagonists could restore normal responses. A1-selective antagonists alone [8-cyclopentyltheophylline (CPT), 1,3-dipropyl-8-(2-amino-4-chlorophenyl)xanthine (PACPX), or 8-cyclopentyl-N(3)-[3-(4-(fluorosulfonyl)benzoyloxy)propyl]-xanthine (FSCPX)] caused a concentration-dependent augmentation of crypt cell secretion or contraction and acted at nanomolar concentrations. The A3 agonist N(6)-(3-iodobenzyl)-adenosine-5'-N-methyluronamide (IB-MECA) abolished coordinated responses and the A3 antagonist 3-ethyl-5-benzyl-2-methyl-4-phenylethynyl-6-phenyl-1,4-(+/-)-dihydropyridine-3,5-dicarboxylate (MRS1191) could restore and further augment responses. The IB-MECA effect was resistant to knockdown of adenosine A1 receptor with the irreversible antagonist FSCPX; the IC(50) for IB-MECA was 0.8 microM. MRS1191 alone could augment or unmask coordinated responses to dimaprit, and IB-MECA suppressed them. MRS1191 augmented distension-evoked reflex I(sc) responses. Adenosine deaminase mimicked actions of adenosine receptor antagonists. A3 receptor immunoreactivity was differentially expressed in enteric neurons of different parts of colon. After tetrodotoxin, IB-MECA caused circular muscle relaxation. The data support the novel concept that eADO acts at low-affinity A3 receptors in addition to high-affinity A1 receptors to suppress coordinated responses triggered by immune-histamine H2 receptor activation. The short interplexus circuit activated by histamine involves adenosine, acetylcholine, substance P, and serotonin. We postulate that A3 receptor modulation may occur in gut inflammatory diseases or allergic responses involving mast cell and histamine release.

Topics: Adenosine; Animals; Chlorides; Cimetidine; Colon; Dihydropyridines; Dimaprit; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Enteric Nervous System; Gastrointestinal Motility; Guinea Pigs; Histamine; Histamine Agonists; Histamine H2 Antagonists; In Vitro Techniques; Intestinal Secretions; Male; Mecamylamine; Muscle Contraction; Muscle Relaxation; Muscle, Smooth; Neural Inhibition; Neurogenic Bowel; Neurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonists; Nicotinic Antagonists; Piperidines; Propane; Receptor, Adenosine A1; Receptor, Adenosine A3; Receptors, Histamine H2; Receptors, Neurokinin-1; Reflex; Theophylline; Xanthines

Numerous recent studies have reported major functional interactions between cannabinoid and opioid systems. These interactions can be studied in the myenteric plexus-longitudinal muscle isolated preparations. We had previously shown that in the guinea-pig ileum (GPI), the opioid acute withdrawal response is under the inhibitory control of several systems; mu-opioid agonist exposure indirectly activates the kappa-opioid system; conversely, exposure to a kappa-opioid agonist indirectly activates the mu-system; the indirectly activated opioid system inhibits the withdrawal response. The adenosine A1 system is also indirectly activated by opioids and it inhibits the withdrawal response. We had also shown that indirect activation is prevented or antagonized by cholecystokinin (CCK-8). In GPI preparations briefly exposed to the mu-agonist, dermorphine (DERM) and then challenged with naloxone (NL), the cannabinoid CB1 antagonist, SR141716 (SR), increased the withdrawal responses to NL, but only did so in presence of a kappa-opioid and an adenosine A(1) antagonist. Under similar experimental conditions, SR also enhances the kappa-opioid withdrawal response. In opioid agonist/CCK-8/NL tests, SR antagonized the inhibition of the tissue response to CCK-8 induced by the mu- or kappa-opioid agonist and increased the kappa-withdrawal response, but not the mu-withdrawal response. However, the dose-response curve against dermorphine inhibition of the response to CCK-8 was bell-shaped and the highest SR concentration also significantly decreased the mu-withdrawal response. In preparations exposed to dermorphine or to the kappa-agonist, U-50,488H, the cannabinoid agonist WIN 55,212-2 increased the opioid-induced inhibition of the tissue response to CCK-8 and decreased the NL-induced responses. These results show that opioid exposure may also activate the cannabinoid CB1 system, which leads to an inhibition of the opioid acute withdrawal response. This phenomenon and the antagonistic effect of SR on the opioid-induced inhibition of the response to CCK-8 suggest that reciprocal interaction between opioid and cannabinoid systems are operating in the enteric nervous system.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adenosine A1 Receptor Antagonists; Analgesics, Opioid; Animals; Benzoxazines; Cholecystokinin; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Guinea Pigs; Ileum; In Vitro Techniques; Male; Morpholines; Muscle Contraction; Muscle, Smooth; Naloxone; Naphthalenes; Narcotic Antagonists; Neurons; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB1; Receptors, Opioid, kappa; Receptors, Opioid, mu; Rimonabant; Substance Withdrawal Syndrome; Theophylline