phosphorus-radioisotopes and 2-6-dinitrotoluene

The hepatocarcinogen 2,6-dinitrotoluene (2,6-DNT) is an intermediate in the chemical synthesis of 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene and polyurethane products and can contaminate the waste stream emitted by these industries. In this study, the production of mutagenic urine metabolites and the formation of hepatic DNA adducts is examined in the B6C3F1 male mouse. Animals were administered 50 mg/kg 2,6-DNT by gavage for 3 consecutive days. No body or liver weight effects were observed in treated animals. Following sacrifice, the livers were excised and DNA isolated for examination of 2,6-DNT-derived DNA adducts. During 2,6-DNT treatment, urine was collected, concentrated, and tested for mutagenicity in the Salmonella reversion bioassay. Mutagenic urine metabolites (469+/-53 revertants/ml urine) were excreted from B6C3F1 mice treated with 2,6-DNT and were comparable to results obtained for CD-1 mice and Fischer 344 rats. Two distinct hepatic DNA adducts (0.8+/-0.1 and 0.6+/-0.1 RAL/10(8) nucleotides) were detected in B6C3F1 mice by (32)P-postlabeling and thin layer chromatography which differed from the four adducts observed in hepatic DNA from 2,6-DNT-treated Fischer 344 rats.

Topics: Animals; Carcinogens; Dinitrobenzenes; DNA; DNA Adducts; Liver; Male; Mice; Mice, Inbred Strains; Mutagens; Phosphorus Radioisotopes; Rats; Rats, Inbred F344

We used 32P-postlabelling to compare DNA binding between the potent hepatocarcinogen 2,6-dinitrotoluene and its noncarcinogenic analog 2,6-diaminotoluene. The two compounds were compared to determine whether differences in DNA binding could partly explain the differences in their carcinogenicity. Fischer-344 rats were administered 1.2 mmol/kg of a compound by single i.p. injection and examined for DNA adduct formation in the liver. Four adducts were detected following administration of 2,6-dinitrotoluene, with a total adduct yield of 13.5 adducted nucleotides per 10(7) nucleotides. Qualitatively identical adducts were also detected after treatment with the derivative 2-amino-6-nitrotoluene. Adduct yields from 2,6-dinitrotoluene were 30 times greater than from 2-amino-6-nitrotoluene. No adducts were observed following treatment with 2,6-diaminotoluene. 2,6-Dinitrotoluene and 2,6-diaminotoluene were also compared for qualitative differences in hepatotoxicity. 2,6-Dinitrotoluene produced extensive hemorrhagic necrosis in the liver, whereas no evidence of hepatocellular necrosis was detected following administration of the latter. The differences between the two compounds in both DNA binding and cytotoxicity were consistent with the differences in their carcinogenicity.

Topics: Animals; Carcinogens; Chromatography, Ion Exchange; Dinitrobenzenes; DNA; Liver; Male; Necrosis; Phenylenediamines; Phosphorus Radioisotopes; Rats; Rats, Inbred F344

Using 32P-postlabelling, we examined DNA binding by 2,4 and 2,6-dinitrotoluene (DNT) in Fischer-344 rats. DNA binding between the two compounds was compared to determine if differences in adduct formation and persistence could partly explain the known isomer-specific hepatocarcinogenicity of DNTs. The differences in cytotoxicity between the two isomers were also assessed. Both 2,4 and 2,6-DNT induced adduct formation in hepatic DNA. Three distinct adducts were detected following single i.p. administration of 2,4-DNT, while the 2,6-isomer produced four different adducts. Depending on the concentration administered, the two compounds differed in their relative yields. 2,6-DNT produced a greater total adduct yield relative to the 2,4-isomer at low concentrations. Following administration of high concentrations, however, 2,4-DNT predominated. The maximum adduct levels measured were 3.0 and 1.8 adducted nucleotides per 10(6) nucleotides for 2,4 and 2,6-DNT, respectively. Substantial amounts of adducts from both compounds were found to persist over time. After 2 weeks, the mean persistence for 2,4 and 2,6-DNT induced adducts were 42% and 46%, respectively. Qualitative examination for liver toxicity showed 2,6-DNT to be more cytotoxic, inducing extensive hemorrhagic centrilobular necrosis. Rats treated with 2,4-DNT did not show any observable signs of hepatocellular necrosis. Under the conditions of this study, the differences between 2,4 and 2,6-DNT in adduct formation and persistence do not appear to be sufficient to account for their differences in carcinogenicity. The toxicity of 2,6-DNT may be a determining factor in the potent carcinogenicity observed with this compound.

Topics: Animals; Autoradiography; Carcinogens; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Chromatography, Thin Layer; Dinitrobenzenes; DNA; Liver; Male; Phosphorus Radioisotopes; Rats; Rats, Inbred F344