phosphorus-radioisotopes and 2-6-diaminotoluene

We used 32P-postlabelling to compare DNA binding between the potent hepatocarcinogen 2,6-dinitrotoluene and its noncarcinogenic analog 2,6-diaminotoluene. The two compounds were compared to determine whether differences in DNA binding could partly explain the differences in their carcinogenicity. Fischer-344 rats were administered 1.2 mmol/kg of a compound by single i.p. injection and examined for DNA adduct formation in the liver. Four adducts were detected following administration of 2,6-dinitrotoluene, with a total adduct yield of 13.5 adducted nucleotides per 10(7) nucleotides. Qualitatively identical adducts were also detected after treatment with the derivative 2-amino-6-nitrotoluene. Adduct yields from 2,6-dinitrotoluene were 30 times greater than from 2-amino-6-nitrotoluene. No adducts were observed following treatment with 2,6-diaminotoluene. 2,6-Dinitrotoluene and 2,6-diaminotoluene were also compared for qualitative differences in hepatotoxicity. 2,6-Dinitrotoluene produced extensive hemorrhagic necrosis in the liver, whereas no evidence of hepatocellular necrosis was detected following administration of the latter. The differences between the two compounds in both DNA binding and cytotoxicity were consistent with the differences in their carcinogenicity.

Topics: Animals; Carcinogens; Chromatography, Ion Exchange; Dinitrobenzenes; DNA; Liver; Male; Necrosis; Phenylenediamines; Phosphorus Radioisotopes; Rats; Rats, Inbred F344