peplomycin and fosfestrol

Between August, 1986 and August, 1992, 16 combination chemotherapies with etoposide (100 mg/body, day 1-5), ifosfamide (50 mg/kg, day 1, 3, 5), peplomycin (5 mg/body, day 1-5) were performed on 13 patients with endocrine therapy-relapsed advanced prostatic cancer. Seven trials were performed on 5 patients who received DESP (diethylstilbestrol diphosphate) (500 mg/body, day 1-5) with the chemotherapy. In 9 trials performed on 9 patients who did not receive DESP, there was no response case. In 7 trials with DESP, one trial had a partial response (PR) (14%) and 4 remained objectively stable (stable) (57%). As to adverse effects, myelosuppression was observed in all trials but there was no lethal toxicity. The one-year survival rate of these patients treated with the chemotherapy alone and combined DESP were both about 20%. Therefore we should find a more effective treatment for endocrine relapsed prostatic cancer.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Diethylstilbestrol; Drug Administration Schedule; Etoposide; Humans; Ifosfamide; Male; Middle Aged; Orchiectomy; Peplomycin; Prognosis; Prostatic Neoplasms; Survival Rate

The present study was designed to investigate the efficacy of various combinations of chemotherapeutic agents in the treatment of prostatic cancer in a group refractory to antiandrogenic therapy (Group 1) and in a previous untreated group (Group 2). Therapeutic combinations of Estracyt (E) + Peplomycin (P) + Doxorubicin (Do) and P + Do + 5 FU (F) in Group 1 and E + P, Honvan (Ds) + P and E in Group 2 were carried out. The main objectives of this study were estimations of the efficacy of E and P in relation to the refractory cases of Group 1 and the efficacy of the combination E + P, in Group 2. This is the first such prospective, randomized, controlled study to be carried out in Japan in relation to prostatic cancer. The results obtained in the present study indicated that chemotherapeutic regimens including E provide some enhanced efficacy, but that the efficacy with regard to refractory cases is poor (23.1-27.3%), as has been reported of studies conducted in the USA and Europe. With regard to previously untreated cases, the E + P regimen achieved a relatively higher response rate than the other treatments (72.7 vs 44.5 or 50.0%). In the comparison of survival times and survival curves, there were no statistically significant differences among the various treatment subgroups. A comparison of survival curves revealed the interesting finding that the PAP-related response showed a clear correlation to the survival curves of Group 2 patients.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bleomycin; Diethylstilbestrol; Doxorubicin; Estramustine; Fluorouracil; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Staging; Nitrogen Mustard Compounds; Peplomycin; Prospective Studies; Prostatic Neoplasms; Random Allocation