pazopanib and nintedanib

In the recent years, a number of targeted therapies have been approved for first-line treatment of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. A systematic review was conducted to assess the clinical efficacy, safety and effect of all first-line treatments evaluated to date on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). A systematic search of Embase, Cochrane and MEDLINE databases was performed to identify randomized controlled trials (1980-2015) evaluating any targeted therapy/immunotherapy against placebo or any other targeted intervention/immunotherapy in treatment-naive patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Conference proceedings from major cancer congresses (2007-2015) were handsearched. Sixteen randomized controlled trials were identified, mostly phase III. Overall, targeted therapies were associated with either improved [sunitinib, bevacizumab+interferon α (IFNα) and temsirolimus] or comparable (sorafenib) progression-free survival (PFS) versus IFNα monotherapy. Sunitinib demonstrated comparable PFS and overall survival to pazopanib, comparable PFS to sorafenib and shorter PFS compared with bevacizumab+IFNα (although no conclusions were made with regard to superiority/inferiority). Compared with sorafenib, tivozanib demonstrated a significantly longer PFS, and both tivozanib and axitinib demonstrated higher response rates. Nintedanib demonstrated comparable PFS and overall survival to sunitinib in a phase II trial. Temsirolimus, sunitinib and sorafenib treatment led to better HRQoL versus IFNα; pazopanib was associated with better HRQoL versus sunitinib. No direct meta-analyses or indirect treatment comparison analysis were undertaken because of noncomparability of the trials. In general, targeted therapies demonstrated favourable clinical efficacy and improved HRQoL compared with IFNα monotherapy. The newer therapies, tivozanib and axitinib (but not nintedanib), appeared to exhibit greater clinical benefit (response rate) than older tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Imidazoles; Indazoles; Indoles; Interferon-alpha; Kidney Neoplasms; Neoplasm Metastasis; Niacinamide; Phenylurea Compounds; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Quality of Life; Quinazolines; Quinolines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sirolimus; Sorafenib; Sulfonamides; Sunitinib

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the second most common gynecologic malignancy and the leading cause of death from gynecologic cancer in the USA. EOC is an exquisitely chemo-sensitive disease with response rates of over 75% in the upfront setting. Despite this, due to high rates of recurrence and development of chemo-resistance, the overall survival of EOC remains about 25%. Thus, there is a great need for new therapeutic approaches to render more durable responses. Based on preclinical and early phase clinical studies, key targeted pathways include targets that drive angiogenesis and chemo-resistance. Receptor tyrosine kinases and non-receptor tyrosine kinases play important roles in these processes and several small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are in clinical development.. This review summarizes clinical rationale, mechanisms of action and clinical data for the TKIs under evaluation in the Phase III setting for EOC.. Despite reasonable preclinical activity, small molecule TKIs are unlikely to improve patient survival as single agent therapies in an unselected EOC population. Incorporation of tissue evaluation during ongoing clinical trials is required to identify molecularly defined groups that respond to single agents and direct rational combination strategies based on mechanisms of resistance to improve outcomes in EOC.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Benzodioxoles; Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Erlotinib Hydrochloride; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Indoles; Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial; Neovascularization, Pathologic; Ovarian Neoplasms; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Quinazolines; Sulfonamides

Functional blood vasculature is essential for tumor progression. The main signalization pathways that play a key role in the survival and growth of tumor vessels originate from the VEGF-, PDGF- and FGF tyrosine kinase receptors. In the past decade, significant results have been published on receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (RTKIs). In this paper, the mechanisms of action and the results so far available of experimental and clinical studies on multi-target antiangiogenic TKIs are discussed. On the one hand, notable achievements have been made recently and these drugs are already used in clinical practice in some patient populations. On the other hand, the optimal combination and dosage of these drugs, selection of the apropriate biomarker and better understanding of the conflicting role of PDGFR and FGFR signaling in angiogenesis remain future challenges.

Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Animals; Axitinib; Benzenesulfonates; Humans; Imidazoles; Indazoles; Indoles; Neoplasms; Neovascularization, Pathologic; Niacinamide; Oligonucleotides; Phenylurea Compounds; Phthalazines; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Quinazolines; Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Receptors, Fibroblast Growth Factor; Receptors, Platelet-Derived Growth Factor; Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor; Signal Transduction; Sorafenib; Sulfonamides; Sunitinib

Angiogenesis is essential for tumor growth and metastasis. The main regulators of the process are the signaling cascades of VEGF-, PDGF- and FGF receptors. Inhibition of these pathways holds potential therapeutic benefit not only for cancer patients, but also for the treatment of other diseases. This paper summarizes the experimental and clinical results of studies available so far on the multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor nintedanib (BIBF 1120). According to these studies, nintedanib effectively inhibits VEGFR-, PDGFR- and FGFR signalization and thus the proliferation and survival of cell types which highly express these receptors (i.e. endothelial and smooth muscle cells and pericytes). In vitro studies and in vivo xenograft experiments have provided promising results. In the clinical setting, BIBF 1120 seems to be effective and well tolerated in various tumor types, such as lung, prostate, colorectal and hepatocellular carcinoma, as well as in gynecological tumors. The main adverse events are gastrointestinal toxicities and the reversible elevation of liver enzyme levels. Nintedanib might also be combined with paclitaxel, carboplatin, pemetrexed and docetaxel. There are several ongoing clinical trials testing the efficacy of BIBF 1120.

Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Axitinib; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Clinical Trials as Topic; Colorectal Neoplasms; Digestive System; Enzyme Inhibitors; Female; Genital Neoplasms, Female; Humans; Imidazoles; Indazoles; Indoles; Liver Neoplasms; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Neoplasms; Niacinamide; Oligonucleotides; Phenylurea Compounds; Phthalazines; Piperidines; Prostatic Neoplasms; Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Quinazolines; Receptors, Fibroblast Growth Factor; Receptors, Platelet-Derived Growth Factor; Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor; Signal Transduction; Sorafenib; Sulfonamides; Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays

The magnitude of interindividual pharmacokinetic variability (IIV) of a drug and the factors responsible for this variability are intensively studied before-and sometimes after-registration as crucial information in anticipating and understanding variability in toxicity and efficacy. However, there has been much less attention paid to intraindividual variability, reflecting random or systematic changes in an individual's pharmacokinetics over time. We have chosen to focus on small-molecule kinase inhibitors (SMKIs).

Topics: Drug Monitoring; Enzyme Inhibitors; Food-Drug Interactions; Humans; Indazoles; Indoles; Metabolic Clearance Rate; Phosphotransferases; Pyrimidines; Sorafenib; Sulfonamides; Vemurafenib

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is a heterogeneous disease characterized by a tumor microenvironment (TME) that overexpresses vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) and fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR), which can lead to neovascularization, tumor growth and metastasis. Therapeutic strategies inhibiting these signaling pathways might lead to innovative HNSCC treatments. Five HNSCC cell lines were characterized based on VEGFR1-3 and FGFR1-4 expression by sqRT-PCR and treated with three different tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) (nintedanib, dovitinib and pazopanib), all of which are effective against VEGFR and FGFR family members. Crystal violet assays were performed to analyze the effect of the treatments on cell growth (viability). Additionally, VEGFR1-3 and FGFR1-4 expression data were retrieved from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), and statistical analyses were performed to investigate the receptor expression level in the different cell lines and the efficacy of the single-agent treatments. A correlation analysis was performed to quantify the degree of relationship between receptor expression and drug efficacy. With the exception of VEGFR2, the targeted receptors were expressed at different levels in all of the cell lines. The cell lines exhibited concentration-dependent responses with cell line-specific differences toward two of the three TKIs (nintedanib and dovitinib). Notably, all of the cell lines were resistant to pazopanib. TKIs have potential as therapeutic agents for HNSCC. Cell line-specific differences were observed in our in vitro experiments. The observed pazopanib resistance could be explained by receptor expression. Further investigation is required to determine TKI efficacy in HNSCC.

Topics: Benzimidazoles; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Proliferation; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Humans; Indazoles; Indoles; Male; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Quinolones; Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor; Signal Transduction; Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck; Sulfonamides