pazopanib and lenvatinib

Angiogenesis is an important and interesting scientific subject in the area of malignant tumours. Current research importance and interest are directed in connection to blood microvessels in cancer cell proliferation, tumour growth, and metastasis. Tyrosine kinases have been intensely implicated as therapeutic targets that affect the angiogenic process in tumour growth. In the last decades, targeting angiogenesis has led to achievements in the therapy of different carcinomas by different mechanisms, such as the utilization of anti-angiogenic small molecule receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors. In the current review, we aim to track the advancements in the total synthesis of three receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (pazopanib, regorafenib and lenvatinib). This review surveys different synthetic routes for these three approved drugs (pazopanib, regorafenib and lenvatinib) which were previously published as patents (2014-2021). The purity of medicines is a very important factor during manufacturing so we have decided to review the purification process of these anticancer medicines as well. It should be noted that the different patents may have reported some procedures with different yields and purities for the synthesis of desired drug and their intermediates. In order to simplify the understanding of the contents of this review article, only the best results reported in each of these patents are reported for the synthesis of desired drug and their intermediates.

Topics: Humans; Indazoles; Neoplasms; Phenylurea Compounds; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Quinolines; Sulfonamides; Tyrosine

Low muscle mass has been associated with worse clinical outcomes in various cancers. This work investigated whether, during tyrosine kinases inhibitors (TKIs) therapy, low muscle mass was associated with treatment toxicity and survival outcomes. A systematic literature search was performed in Pubmed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases from inception to June 2020, based on fixed inclusion and exclusion criteria. Effect sizes were estimated with hazard ratios (HR) and odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) and heterogeneity was assessed by measuring inconsistency (I

Topics: Gefitinib; Humans; Imatinib Mesylate; Indazoles; Muscle, Skeletal; Neoplasms; Phenylurea Compounds; Prognosis; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Quinolines; Sorafenib; Sulfonamides; Sunitinib; Survival Analysis

Anti-angiogenic treatment is an important option that has changed the therapeutic landscape in various tumors, particularly in patients affected by renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Agents that block signaling pathways governing tumor angiogenesis have raised high expectations among clinicians. Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR-TKIs) comprise a heterogeneous class of drugs with distinct pharmacological profiles, including potency, selectivity, pharmacokinetics and drug-drug interactions. Among them, tivozanib is one of the last TKIs introduced in the clinical practice; this drug selectively targets VEGFRs, it is characterized by a favorable pharmacokinetics and safety profile and has been approved as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic RCC (mRCC). In this article, we describe the clinical pharmacology of selected VEGFR-TKIs used for the treatment of mRCC, highlighting the relevant differences; moreover we aim to define the main pharmacologic characteristics of these drug.

Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Anilides; Axitinib; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Drug Interactions; Humans; Indazoles; Kidney Neoplasms; Phenylurea Compounds; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Quinolines; Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor; Sorafenib; Sulfonamides; Sunitinib

HOW TO CHOOSE THE APPROPRIATE SECOND-LINE TREATMENT?: The treatment of advanced or metastatic renal cell cancer (RCC) has dramatically improved in the past ten years. In the second-line setting, for patients who progressed on prior antiangiogenic therapy (mainly the VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) sunitinib or pazopanib), axitinib and everolimus have been recommended. Since 2015, other drugs have proven their efficacy and are currently considered the standard of care: cabozantinib (TKI that targets VEGFR, MET and AXL) and nivolumab (first anti-PD-1 check point inhibitor). Lenvatinib has also demonstrated promising results in association with everolimus, but this combination is not available in France. The optimal treatment choice for a given patient is challenging for the clinician when facing multiple options. In this article, we review the efficacy, safety and quality of life results of the main pivotal clinical studies involving advanced or metastatic RCC in the second-line setting, to help clinicians in selecting the most appropriate treatment. Beyond that, it is important to define all the sequencing strategy for patients to successively receive all the drugs that have demonstrated an increase in overall survival.

Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Anilides; Antineoplastic Agents; Axitinib; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Clinical Trials as Topic; Everolimus; Humans; Immunotherapy; Indazoles; Kidney Neoplasms; Nivolumab; Phenylurea Compounds; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Quinolines; Sulfonamides; Sunitinib

Survival of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has improved since the advent of targeted therapy. Approved agents include the multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) sunitinib, sorafenib, axitinib, pazopanib, cabozantinib, and lenvatinib (approved in combination with everolimus), the anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody bevacizumab, the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors everolimus and temsirolimus, and the programmed death-1 (PD-1) targeted immune checkpoint inhibitor nivolumab. The identification of predictive and prognostic factors of survival is increasing, and both clinical predictive factors and pathology-related prognostic factors are being evaluated. Serum-based biomarkers and certain histologic subtypes of RCC, as well as clinical factors such as dose intensity and the development of some class effect adverse events, have been identified as predictors of survival. Expression levels of microRNAs, expression of chemokine receptor 4, hypermethylation of certain genes, VEGF polymorphisms, and elevation of plasma fibrinogen or d-dimer have been shown to be prognostic indicators of survival. In the future, prognosis and treatment of patients with mRCC might be based on genomic classification, especially of the 4 most commonly mutated genes in RCC (VHL, PBRM1, BAP1, and SETD2). Median overall survival has improved for patients treated with a first-line targeted agent compared with survival of patients treated with first-line interferon-α, and results of clinical trials have shown a survival benefit of sequential treatment with targeted agents. Prognosis of patients with mRCC will likely improve with optimization and individualization of current sequential treatment with targeted agents.

Topics: Anilides; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antineoplastic Agents; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; Biomarkers, Tumor; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; DNA-Binding Proteins; Everolimus; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; Histone-Lysine N-Methyltransferase; Humans; Imidazoles; Immunologic Factors; Indazoles; Indoles; Interferon-alpha; Kidney Neoplasms; MicroRNAs; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Mutation; Niacinamide; Nivolumab; Nuclear Proteins; Phenylurea Compounds; Precision Medicine; Prognosis; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Quinolines; Receptors, CCR4; Sirolimus; Sorafenib; Sulfonamides; Sunitinib; Transcription Factors; Tumor Suppressor Proteins; Ubiquitin Thiolesterase; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A; Von Hippel-Lindau Tumor Suppressor Protein

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Antibiotics, Antineoplastic; Antineoplastic Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Doxorubicin; Humans; Indazoles; Japan; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Neoplasm Staging; Niacinamide; Phenylurea Compounds; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Quinolines; Slovenia; Sorafenib; Sulfonamides; Thyroid Neoplasms; Treatment Outcome

Advanced thyroid cancer is not amenable to therapy with conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy. However, newer advances in the understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of different subtypes of thyroid cancer have provided new opportunities for the evaluation of molecularly targeted therapies. This has led to multiple clinical trials using various multi-kinase inhibitors and the subsequent US FDA approval of sorafenib for differentiated thyroid cancer and vandetanib and cabozantinib for medullary thyroid carcinoma. This review provides a summary of the current literature for the treatment of advanced thyroid carcinoma and future directions in this disease.

Topics: Anilides; Antineoplastic Agents; Axitinib; Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine; DNA Mutational Analysis; Drug Approval; Humans; Imidazoles; Indazoles; Indoles; MAP Kinase Signaling System; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Niacinamide; Oligonucleotides; Phenylurea Compounds; Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases; Piperidines; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-ret; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Quinazolines; Quinolines; Sorafenib; Sulfonamides; Sunitinib; Thyroid Neoplasms; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

The incidence of thyroid cancer continues to increase and this neoplasia remains the most common endocrine malignancy. No effective systemic treatment currently exists for iodine-refractory differentiated or medullary thyroid carcinoma, but recent advances in the pathogenesis of these diseases have revealed key targets that are now being evaluated in the clinical setting. RET (rearranged during transfection)/PTC (papillary thyroid carcinoma) gene rearrangements, B-Raf gene mutations, and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR-2) angiogenesis pathways are some of the known genetic alterations playing a crucial role in the development of thyroid cancer. Several novel agents have demonstrated promising responses. Of the treatments studied, multi-kinase inhibitors such as axitinib, sorafenib, motesanib, and XL-184 have shown to be the most effective by inducing clinical responses and stabilizing the disease process. Randomized clinical trials are currently evaluating these agents, results that may soon change the management of thyroid cancer.

Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Anilides; Antineoplastic Agents; Axitinib; Benzamides; Benzenesulfonates; Benzoquinones; Bibenzyls; Boronic Acids; Bortezomib; Depsipeptides; ErbB Receptors; Gefitinib; Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors; HSP90 Heat-Shock Proteins; Humans; Hydroxamic Acids; Imatinib Mesylate; Imidazoles; Indazoles; Indoles; Lactams, Macrocyclic; Lenalidomide; Niacinamide; Oligonucleotides; Phenylurea Compounds; Piperazines; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-kit; Pyrazines; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Quinazolines; Quinolines; Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor; Sorafenib; Sulfonamides; Sunitinib; Thalidomide; Thyroid Neoplasms; Valproic Acid; Vorinostat

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as sunitinib and pazopanib are the mainstay of treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in India. However, pembrolizumab and nivolumab have shown significant improvement in the median progression-free survival and overall survival among patients with mRCC. In this study, we aimed to determine the cost-effectiveness of the first-line treatment options for the patients with mRCC in India.. A Markov state-transition model was used to measure the lifetime costs and health outcomes associated with sunitinib, pazopanib, pembrolizumab/lenvatinib, and nivolumab/ipilimumab among patients with first-line mRCC. Incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained with a given treatment option was compared against the next best alternative and assessed for cost-effectiveness using a willingness to pay threshold of one-time per capita gross-domestic product of India. The parameter uncertainty was analyzed using the probabilistic sensitivity analysis.. We estimated the total lifetime cost per patient of ₹ 0.27 million ($3,706 US dollars [USD]), ₹ 0.35 million ($4,716 USD), ₹ 9.7 million ($131,858 USD), and ₹ 6.7 million ($90,481 USD) for the sunitinib, pazopanib, pembrolizumab/lenvatinib, and nivolumab/ipilimumab arms, respectively. Similarly, the mean QALYs lived per patient were 1.91, 1.86, 2.75, and 1.97, respectively. Sunitinib incurs an average cost of ₹ 143,269 ($1,939 USD) per QALY lived. Therefore, sunitinib at current reimbursement rates (₹ 10,000 per cycle) has a 94.6% probability of being cost-effective at a willingness to pay threshold of 1-time per capita gross-domestic product (₹ 168,300) in the Indian context.. Our findings support the current inclusion of sunitinib under India's publicly financed health insurance scheme.

Topics: Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Humans; Ipilimumab; Kidney Neoplasms; Nivolumab; Sunitinib

This study aimed to develop an in vitro three-dimensional (3D) cell culture model of oral carcinogenesis for the rapid, scalable testing of chemotherapeutic agents. Spheroids of normal (HOK) and dysplastic (DOK) human oral keratinocytes were cultured and treated with 4-nitroquinoline-1-oxide (4NQO). A 3D invasion assay using Matrigel was performed to validate the model. RNA was extracted and subjected to transcriptomic analysis to validate the model and assess carcinogen-induced changes. The VEGF inhibitors pazopanib and lenvatinib were tested in the model and were validated by a 3D invasion assay, which demonstrated that changes induced by the carcinogen in spheroids were consistent with a malignant phenotype. Further validation was obtained by bioinformatic analyses, which showed the enrichment of pathways associated with hallmarks of cancer and VEGF signalling. Overexpression of common genes associated with tobacco-induced oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), such as MMP1, MMP3, MMP9, YAP1, CYP1A1, and CYP1B1, was also observed. Pazopanib and lenvatinib inhibited the invasion of transformed spheroids. In summary, we successfully established a 3D spheroid model of oral carcinogenesis for biomarker discovery and drug testing. This model is a validated preclinical model for OSCC development and would be suitable for testing a range of chemotherapeutic agents.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Biomarkers, Tumor; Carcinogenesis; Carcinogens; Cell Culture Techniques, Three Dimensional; Drug Screening Assays, Antitumor; Humans; Mouth Neoplasms; Spheroids, Cellular; Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck; Tumor Cells, Cultured; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

Two separate antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immunotherapy (IO) combinations are FDA-approved as front-line treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Little is known about off-protocol and post-front-line experience with combination TKI-IO approaches.. We conducted a retrospective analysis of mRCC patients who received combination TKI-IO post-first-line therapy between November 2015 and January 2019 at MD Anderson Cancer Center and Duke Cancer Institute. Chart review detailed patient characteristics, treatments, toxicity, and survival. Independent radiologists, blinded to clinical data, assessed best radiographic response using RECIST v1.1.. We identified 48 mRCC patients for inclusion: median age 65 years, 75.0% clear cell histology, 68.8% IMDC intermediate risk, and median two prior systemic therapies. TKI-IO combinations included nivolumab-cabozantinib (N +C; 24 patients), nivolumab-pazopanib (N+P; 13), nivolumab-axitinib (6), nivolumab-lenvatinib (2), and nivolumab-ipilimumab-cabozantinib (3). The median progression-free survival was 11.6 months and the median overall survival was not reached. Response data were available in 45 patients: complete response (CR; n = 3, 6.7%), partial response (PR; 20, 44.4%), stable disease (SD; 19, 42.2%), and progressive disease (3, 6.7%). Overall response rate was 51% and disease control rate (CR+PR+SD) was 93%. Only one patient had a grade ≥3 adverse event.. To our knowledge, this is the first case series reporting off-label use of combination TKI-IO for mRCC. TKI-IO combinations, particularly N+P and N+C, are well tolerated and efficacious. Although further prospective research is essential, slow disease progression on IO or TKI monotherapy may be safely controlled with addition of either TKI or IO.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Anilides; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Female; Humans; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Indazoles; Ipilimumab; Kidney Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Nivolumab; Phenylurea Compounds; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor; Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Quinolines; Retrospective Studies; Sulfonamides; Survival Rate; Treatment Outcome

First-line treatment for metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma patients with intermediate and poor-risk features consists of a combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors (e.g., nivolumab + ipilimumab) or immunotherapy with an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) drug (e.g., axitinib). The subsequent line of therapy should be determined on the basis of previous treatments and approved drugs available, based on the results of randomized clinical trials. Unfortunately, no phase 3 trial has compared the safety and efficacy of drugs after immunotherapy; thus, drug choice is more empirical than evidence-based. As the tumor may still be anti-VEGFR drug-naïve, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for first line treatment (e.g., sunitinib or pazopanib) may be beneficial. Because this is a second-line treatment, patients could also receive axitinib, cabozantinib, or a combination of lenvatinib and everolimus. The treating physician should choose an appropriate treatment according to the patient's age, comorbidities, and tolerability of previous checkpoint inhibitors, among other considerations. Cases of patients with renal cell carcinoma refractory to checkpoint inhibitor treatment are growing, warranting a review of the activity and safety of target therapies after immunotherapy.

Topics: Anilides; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Biomarkers, Tumor; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Immunotherapy; Indazoles; Kidney Neoplasms; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Neoplasm Metastasis; Nivolumab; Patient Selection; Phenylurea Compounds; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Quinolines; Sulfonamides; Sunitinib