pazopanib and cediranib

Cervical cancer ranks as the fourth leading cause of death from cancer in women. Historically, women with metastatic or recurrent cervical cancer have had limited treatment options. New anti-angiogenesis therapies, such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) targeting agents, offer an alternative strategy to conventional chemotherapy; they act by inhibiting the growth of new blood vessels, thereby restricting tumour growth by blocking the blood supply.. To assess the benefits and harms of VEGF targeting agents in the management of persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer.. We performed searches of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, online registers of clinical trials, and abstracts of scientific meetings up until 27 May 2020.. We examined randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the use of VEGF targeting agents alone or in combination with conventional chemotherapy or other VEGF targeting agents.. Three review authors independently screened the results of search strategies, extracted data, assessed risk of bias, and analysed data according to the standard methods expected by Cochrane. The certainty of evidence was assessed via the GRADE approach.. A total of 1634 records were identified. From these, we identified four studies with a total of 808 participants for inclusion. We also identified two studies that were awaiting classification and nine ongoing studies. Bevacizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy Treatment with bevacizumab plus chemotherapy may result in lower risk of death compared to chemotherapy alone (hazard ratio (HR) 0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62 to 0.95; 1 study, 452 participants; low-certainty evidence). However, there are probably more specific adverse events when compared to chemotherapy alone, including gastrointestinal perforations or fistulae (risk ratio (RR) 18.00, 95% CI 2.42 to 133.67; 1 study, 440 participants; moderate-certainty evidence); serious thromboembolic events (RR 4.5, 95% CI 1.55 to 13.08; 1 study, 440 participants; moderate-certainty evidence); and hypertension (RR 13.75, 95% CI 5.07 to 37.29; 1 study, 440 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). There may also be a higher incidence of serious haemorrhage (RR 5.00, 95% CI 1.11 to 22.56; 1 study, 440 participants; low-certainty evidence). In addition, the incidence of serious adverse events is probably higher (RR 1.44, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.79; 1 study, 439 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was USD 295,164 per quality-adjusted life-year (1 study, 452 participants; low-certainty evidence). Cediranib plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy Treatment with cediranib plus chemotherapy may or may not result in similar risk of death when compared to chemotherapy alone (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.65; 1 study, 69 participants; low-certainty evidence). We found very uncertain results for the incidences of specific adverse events, including gastrointestinal perforations or fistulae (RR 3.27, 95% CI 0.14 to 77.57; 1 study, 67 participants; very low-certainty evidence); serious haemorrhage (RR 5.45, 95% CI 0.27 to 109.49; 1 study, 67 participants; very low-certainty evidence); serious thromboembolic events (RR 3.41, 95% CI 0.14 to 80.59; 1 study, 60 participants; very low-certainty evidence); and serious hypertension (RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.02 to 8.62; 1 study, 67 participants; very low-certainty evidence). In addition, there may or may not be a similar incidence of serious adverse events compared to chemotherapy alone (RR 1.15, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.78; 1 study, 67 participants; low-certainty evidence). Apatinib plus chemotherapy or chemotherapy/brachytherapy versus chemot. We found low-certainty evidence in favour of the use of bevacizumab plus chemotherapy. However, bevacizumab probably increases specific adverse events (gastrointestinal perforations or fistulae, thromboembolic events, hypertension) and serious adverse events. We found low-certainty evidence that does not support the use of cediranib plus chemotherapy, apatinib plus chemotherapy, apatinib plus chemotherapy/brachytherapy, or pazopanib monotherapy. We found low-certainty evidence suggesting that pazopanib plus lapatinib worsens outcomes. The VEGF inhibitors apatinib and pazopanib may increase the probability of hypertension events.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Agents; Bevacizumab; Bias; Brachytherapy; Combined Modality Therapy; Confidence Intervals; Female; Gastric Fistula; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Hypertension; Indazoles; Intestinal Fistula; Intestinal Perforation; Lapatinib; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Progression-Free Survival; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Quality of Life; Quinazolines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sulfonamides; Thromboembolism; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A; Young Adult

In the recent years, a number of targeted therapies have been approved for first-line treatment of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. A systematic review was conducted to assess the clinical efficacy, safety and effect of all first-line treatments evaluated to date on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). A systematic search of Embase, Cochrane and MEDLINE databases was performed to identify randomized controlled trials (1980-2015) evaluating any targeted therapy/immunotherapy against placebo or any other targeted intervention/immunotherapy in treatment-naive patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Conference proceedings from major cancer congresses (2007-2015) were handsearched. Sixteen randomized controlled trials were identified, mostly phase III. Overall, targeted therapies were associated with either improved [sunitinib, bevacizumab+interferon α (IFNα) and temsirolimus] or comparable (sorafenib) progression-free survival (PFS) versus IFNα monotherapy. Sunitinib demonstrated comparable PFS and overall survival to pazopanib, comparable PFS to sorafenib and shorter PFS compared with bevacizumab+IFNα (although no conclusions were made with regard to superiority/inferiority). Compared with sorafenib, tivozanib demonstrated a significantly longer PFS, and both tivozanib and axitinib demonstrated higher response rates. Nintedanib demonstrated comparable PFS and overall survival to sunitinib in a phase II trial. Temsirolimus, sunitinib and sorafenib treatment led to better HRQoL versus IFNα; pazopanib was associated with better HRQoL versus sunitinib. No direct meta-analyses or indirect treatment comparison analysis were undertaken because of noncomparability of the trials. In general, targeted therapies demonstrated favourable clinical efficacy and improved HRQoL compared with IFNα monotherapy. The newer therapies, tivozanib and axitinib (but not nintedanib), appeared to exhibit greater clinical benefit (response rate) than older tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Imidazoles; Indazoles; Indoles; Interferon-alpha; Kidney Neoplasms; Neoplasm Metastasis; Niacinamide; Phenylurea Compounds; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Quality of Life; Quinazolines; Quinolines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sirolimus; Sorafenib; Sulfonamides; Sunitinib

Vascular endothelial growth factor signaling pathway plays a crucial role in angiogenesis and has become a promising target for cancer drug development. We aimed to quantify the overall efficacy and safety of angiogenesis inhibitors in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).. Electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing angiogenesis inhibitors with non-angiogenesis inhibitors for NSCLC patients. The extracted data on objective response rates (ORRs), disease control rates (DCRs), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were pooled. Common adverse events (AEs) were also studied.. A total of 33 RCTs involving 17,396 patients were included. Compared with non-angiogenesis inhibitors, angiogenesis inhibitors resulted in significant improvement in PFS (HR, 0.81; 95 % CI 0.76-0.85; p < 0.001), OS (HR, 0.95; 95 % CI 0.92-0.98; p = 0.004), ORR (RR, 1.54; 95 % CI 1.37-1.73; p < 0.001) and DCR (RR, 1.18; 95 % CI 1.10-1.27; p < 0.001). The AEs associated with angiogenesis inhibitors were generally predictable and manageable.. Angiogenesis inhibitors were superior to non-angiogenesis inhibitors in terms of ORR, DCR, PFS and OS in advanced NSCLC patients. Further studies are warranted to explore the predictive biomarkers to pick up those who may gain utmost benefit from anti-angiogenic therapy.

Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Agents; Bevacizumab; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Disease-Free Survival; Hemorrhage; Humans; Indazoles; Indoles; Lung Neoplasms; Niacinamide; Odds Ratio; Phenylurea Compounds; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Quinazolines; Ramucirumab; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor; Signal Transduction; Sorafenib; Sulfonamides; Sunitinib; Thrombocytopenia; Treatment Outcome; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

Several 'lines of therapy' that utilize cytotoxic agents and are driven by platinum-free intervals are the current standard of care for patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. For patients with platinum-resistant disease, single agent chemotherapy (pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, topotecan, gemcitabine or weekly paclitaxel) is the standard of care. For patients with platinum-sensitive disease, combination chemotherapy (carboplatin plus paclitaxel, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin or gemcitabine) is the standard of care. In addition, antiangiogenic therapy using bevacizumab is an established option. Future directions could include 'lines of therapy' with biologic agents driven by specific biologic targets. Data from antiangiogenic agents (trebananib, pazopanib and cediranib), antifolate drugs (farletuzumab and vintafolide), poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (olaparib and veliparib), mTOR inhibitors (everolimus and temsirolimus) and immune editing agents (nivolumab) have been summarized in this review.

Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzimidazoles; Carboplatin; Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Deoxycytidine; Doxorubicin; Everolimus; Female; Folic Acid; Gemcitabine; Humans; Indazoles; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial; Nivolumab; Ovarian Neoplasms; Paclitaxel; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Polyethylene Glycols; Pyrimidines; Quinazolines; Recombinant Fusion Proteins; Sirolimus; Sulfonamides; Topotecan; TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases; Vinca Alkaloids

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the second most common gynecologic malignancy and the leading cause of death from gynecologic cancer in the USA. EOC is an exquisitely chemo-sensitive disease with response rates of over 75% in the upfront setting. Despite this, due to high rates of recurrence and development of chemo-resistance, the overall survival of EOC remains about 25%. Thus, there is a great need for new therapeutic approaches to render more durable responses. Based on preclinical and early phase clinical studies, key targeted pathways include targets that drive angiogenesis and chemo-resistance. Receptor tyrosine kinases and non-receptor tyrosine kinases play important roles in these processes and several small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are in clinical development.. This review summarizes clinical rationale, mechanisms of action and clinical data for the TKIs under evaluation in the Phase III setting for EOC.. Despite reasonable preclinical activity, small molecule TKIs are unlikely to improve patient survival as single agent therapies in an unselected EOC population. Incorporation of tissue evaluation during ongoing clinical trials is required to identify molecularly defined groups that respond to single agents and direct rational combination strategies based on mechanisms of resistance to improve outcomes in EOC.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Benzodioxoles; Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Erlotinib Hydrochloride; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Indoles; Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial; Neovascularization, Pathologic; Ovarian Neoplasms; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Quinazolines; Sulfonamides

Functional blood vasculature is essential for tumor progression. The main signalization pathways that play a key role in the survival and growth of tumor vessels originate from the VEGF-, PDGF- and FGF tyrosine kinase receptors. In the past decade, significant results have been published on receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (RTKIs). In this paper, the mechanisms of action and the results so far available of experimental and clinical studies on multi-target antiangiogenic TKIs are discussed. On the one hand, notable achievements have been made recently and these drugs are already used in clinical practice in some patient populations. On the other hand, the optimal combination and dosage of these drugs, selection of the apropriate biomarker and better understanding of the conflicting role of PDGFR and FGFR signaling in angiogenesis remain future challenges.

Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Animals; Axitinib; Benzenesulfonates; Humans; Imidazoles; Indazoles; Indoles; Neoplasms; Neovascularization, Pathologic; Niacinamide; Oligonucleotides; Phenylurea Compounds; Phthalazines; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Quinazolines; Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Receptors, Fibroblast Growth Factor; Receptors, Platelet-Derived Growth Factor; Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor; Signal Transduction; Sorafenib; Sulfonamides; Sunitinib

Angiogenesis is essential for tumor growth and metastasis. The main regulators of the process are the signaling cascades of VEGF-, PDGF- and FGF receptors. Inhibition of these pathways holds potential therapeutic benefit not only for cancer patients, but also for the treatment of other diseases. This paper summarizes the experimental and clinical results of studies available so far on the multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor nintedanib (BIBF 1120). According to these studies, nintedanib effectively inhibits VEGFR-, PDGFR- and FGFR signalization and thus the proliferation and survival of cell types which highly express these receptors (i.e. endothelial and smooth muscle cells and pericytes). In vitro studies and in vivo xenograft experiments have provided promising results. In the clinical setting, BIBF 1120 seems to be effective and well tolerated in various tumor types, such as lung, prostate, colorectal and hepatocellular carcinoma, as well as in gynecological tumors. The main adverse events are gastrointestinal toxicities and the reversible elevation of liver enzyme levels. Nintedanib might also be combined with paclitaxel, carboplatin, pemetrexed and docetaxel. There are several ongoing clinical trials testing the efficacy of BIBF 1120.

Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Axitinib; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Clinical Trials as Topic; Colorectal Neoplasms; Digestive System; Enzyme Inhibitors; Female; Genital Neoplasms, Female; Humans; Imidazoles; Indazoles; Indoles; Liver Neoplasms; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Neoplasms; Niacinamide; Oligonucleotides; Phenylurea Compounds; Phthalazines; Piperidines; Prostatic Neoplasms; Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Quinazolines; Receptors, Fibroblast Growth Factor; Receptors, Platelet-Derived Growth Factor; Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor; Signal Transduction; Sorafenib; Sulfonamides; Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays

Despite advances in surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy, patients with cancer have a poor prognosis. Sustained aberrant tumor angiogenesis and metastasis is a major obstacle for effective cancer treatment. Just a few years ago, few would argue that one of the key success stories of the modern cancer medicine were the anti-angiogenic drugs targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling pathway approved by FDA. This initial success inspired many researchers to search for new anti-angiogenic targets and drugs with the hope that one day, anti-angiogenic therapy might really become the panacea for cancer patients. Unfortunately, the limited clinical benefits achieved with anti-angiogenic drugs conflicts with the widely accepted notion that angiogenesis is a key event in tumor progression. Emerging data indicate that unique characteristics of the tumor vasculature within the tumor microenvironment may hold the key for success of anti-angiogenic therapy. In particular, the molecular and cellular alterations that sustain aberrant tumor angiogenesis in the face of angiogenic inhibitors represents novel targets for rationally designing and improving current anti-angiogenic strategies.

Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Bevacizumab; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Humans; Indazoles; Indoles; Neoplasms; Neovascularization, Pathologic; Niacinamide; Oligonucleotides; Phenylurea Compounds; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Quinazolines; Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor; Recombinant Fusion Proteins; Sorafenib; Sulfonamides; Sunitinib; Tumor Microenvironment

Treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has undergone significant changes over the past 3 years after a long period of relative stagnation. A better understanding of the biology of the tumor led to the discovery of molecular targeted therapies resulting in significant improvement in outcome for this common malignancy.. A review of new drugs, both established and investigational, at present used in the treatment of RCC is provided in this article.. A comprehensive free-text search of all available published literature including but not limited to, Medline, Scopus, American Society of Clinical Oncology presentations, National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines and information available through other national and international scientific organizations was carried out during the preparation of this manuscript.. Targeted therapy in RCC is a prime example of successful translational research. Continuing clinical and preclinical research in drug development holds promise for further advances in this area.

Topics: Animals; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Agents; Axitinib; Benzenesulfonates; Bevacizumab; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Clinical Trials as Topic; Everolimus; Humans; Imidazoles; Indazoles; Indoles; Kidney Neoplasms; Niacinamide; Phenylurea Compounds; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Quinazolines; Sirolimus; Sorafenib; Sulfonamides; Sunitinib

Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Animals; Consciousness; Hemodynamics; Indazoles; Losartan; Male; Niacinamide; Phenylurea Compounds; Piperidines; Propranolol; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Quinazolines; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Regional Blood Flow; Sorafenib; Sulfonamides

We examine how changes in a surrogate marker of tumour vessel density correlate with response and resistance to anti-angiogenic therapy.. In metastatic renal cancer patients treated with anti-angiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors, arterial phase contrast-enhanced computed tomography was used to simultaneously measure changes in: (a) tumour size, and (b) tumour enhancement (a surrogate marker of tumour vessel density) within individual lesions.. No correlation between baseline tumour enhancement and lesion shrinkage was observed, but a reduction in tumour enhancement on treatment was strongly correlated with reduction in lesion size (r=0.654, P<0.0001). However, close examination of individual metastases revealed different types of response: (1) good vascular response with significant tumour shrinkage, (2) good vascular response with stabilisation of disease, (3) poor vascular response with stabilisation of disease and (4) poor vascular response with progression. Moreover, contrasting responses between different lesions within the same patient were observed. We also assessed rebound vascularisation in tumours that acquired resistance to treatment. The amplitude of rebound vascularisation was greater in lesions that had a better initial response to therapy (P=0.008).. Changes in a surrogate marker of tumour vessel density correlate with response and resistance to anti-angiogenic therapy. The data provide insight into the mechanisms that underlie response and resistance to this class of agent.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Biomarkers, Tumor; Blood Vessels; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Disease-Free Survival; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Indoles; Kidney Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Neovascularization, Pathologic; Phenylurea Compounds; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Quinazolines; Sulfonamides; Sunitinib