oxyntomodulin and empagliflozin

Oral semaglutide is a tablet formulation of a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA), recently approved in the USA and other countries. This paper reviews data from clinical trials (PIONEER 1, 2, 3, and 7) comparing oral semaglutide (once-daily doses of 3, 7, or 14 mg) with either once-daily placebo, empagliflozin 25 mg, or sitagliptin 100 mg. After 26 weeks in PIONEER 1, patients randomized to 3, 7, or 14 mg doses of oral semaglutide monotherapy had statistically significant reductions in glycated hemoglobin (HbA

Topics: Administration, Oral; Benzhydryl Compounds; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Glucosides; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Primary Health Care; Sitagliptin Phosphate

No head-to-head trials have directly compared once-weekly (OW) semaglutide, a human glucagon-like peptide-1 analog, with empagliflozin, a sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor, in type 2 diabetes (T2D).. We indirectly compared the efficacy of OW semaglutide 1 mg vs once-daily (OD) empagliflozin 25 mg in patients with T2D inadequately controlled on metformin monotherapy, using individual patient data (IPD) and meta-regression methodology.. IPD for patients with T2D receiving metformin monotherapy and randomized to OW semaglutide 1 mg (SUSTAIN 2, 3, 8 trials), or to OD empagliflozin 25 mg (PIONEER 2 trial) were included. Meta-regression analyses were adjusted for potential prognostic factors and effect modifiers.. The primary efficacy outcomes were change from baseline to end-of-treatment (~1 year) in HbA1c (%-point) and body weight (kg). Responder outcomes and other clinically relevant efficacy measures were analyzed.. Baseline characteristics were similar between OW semaglutide (n = 995) and empagliflozin (n = 410). Our analyses showed that OW semaglutide significantly reduced mean HbA1c and body weight vs empagliflozin (estimated treatment difference: -0.61%-point [95% confidence interval (CI): -0.72; -0.49] and -1.65 kg [95% CI: -2.22; -1.08], respectively; both P < 0.0001). Complementary analyses supported the robustness of these results. A significantly greater proportion of patients on OW semaglutide vs empagliflozin also achieved HbA1c targets and weight-loss responses.. This indirect comparison suggests that OW semaglutide 1 mg provides superior reductions in HbA1c and body weight vs OD empagliflozin 25 mg in patients with T2D when added to metformin monotherapy.

Topics: Benzhydryl Compounds; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Glucosides; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists are highly potent antihyperglycemic drugs that impose low risk of hypoglycemia and also result in body weight reduction. Currently, all approved members of the class require administration by injection. Areas covered: This manuscript reviews oral semaglutide-an experimental GLP-1 receptor agonist in phase-3 clinical development. Available pharmacological and clinical data of the drug are reviewed, and important end-points described. Expert opinion: Oral peptide delivery has become possible with the discovery of absorption enhancers. The clinical development program of once-daily oral semaglutide has shown superiority in reducing glycosylated hemoglobin and body weight in comparison with placebo and active comparators (sitagliptin, liraglutide, and empagliflozin). Safety and tolerability of oral semaglutide is in line with injectable members of the class. Delayed gastric emptying, local increase in pH, and enhanced absorption do not seem to affect the exposure of a number of other oral drugs that have been tested (metformin, digoxin, oral contraceptive ethinylestradiol/levonorgestrel, lisinopril, warfarin, furosemide and rosuvastatin). Clinical questions for further investigation include the effectiveness and safety of oral semaglutide in cardiovascular indications.

Topics: Benzhydryl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Glucosides; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Liraglutide; Sitagliptin Phosphate

The results of large placebo-controlled clinical trials to evaluate cardiovascular risks associated with drugs for type 2 diabetes mellitus indicated different cardiovascular effects among these drugs, but the detailed design of each trial was not completely the same. The aim of this study was to perform time-matched evaluation of cardiovascular risks of drugs for type 2 diabetes.. We used the difference in restricted mean survival time (RMST) as a measure of cardiovascular risks. Regarding drugs for type 2 diabetes used currently, this study included all 10 clinical trials in patients with type 2 diabetes at high cardiovascular risk the results of which have been published as of 30 November 2018. Since the shortest study follow-up time was about 672 days in SUSTAIN-6, we chose 672 days as a common time point to estimate the RMSTs regarding each safety event.. The differences of RMSTs (drugs for type 2 diabetes minus placebo: point estimate and 95% confidence interval) for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were 8 days (1, 15) for semaglutide, 5 days (1, 9) for liraglutide, and 7 days (2, 13) for empagliflozin. Those for death from cardiovascular causes were 5 days (2, 8) for empagliflozin and 2 days (1, 4) for canagliflozin. Those for death from any cause were 4 days (1, 8) for empagliflozin.. Through the evaluation up to 672 days, semaglutide, liraglutide, and empagliflozin decreased the risk of MACE. Concerning the risk of each cardiovascular event, risk reduction was seen with empagliflozin and canagliflozin.

Topics: Benzhydryl Compounds; Canagliflozin; Cardiovascular Diseases; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Follow-Up Studies; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Glucosides; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Liraglutide; Risk Factors; Survival Rate

It is known that Cardiovascular (CV) disease is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Over the last years, one of the most discussed topics is the CV safety of anti-diabetic medications. Regarding CV safety of older antidiabetic agents the data are less clear and conclusions about their CV safety are mostly based on randomized controlled trials designed to assess their glucose lowering efficacy. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge about the CV safety of older and newer antidiabetic medications. According to the published literature metformin is the first line agent for the treatment of type 2 diabetes and seems to have cardio-protective effects. The choice of the second line agent when metformin monotherapy fails to achieve HbA1c targets is less clear. In the light of the findings of the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial and the recently published LEADER and SUSTAIN 6 trials, empagliflozin, liraglutide and semaglutide seem reasonable options as second line agents for patients with CV disease. Sulfonylureas on the other hand, with the exception of gliclazide, should be avoided in those patients, although CV safety trials are still lacking. In individuals without CV disease any of the other classes of anti-diabetic medication can be selected on a patient-centered approach. Saxagliptin, alogliptin, sitagliptin and lixisenatide have been evaluated in CV safety trials and have neutral effects on CV outcomes, while pioglitazone may have some CV benefits. Saxagliptin and alogliptin, however, should be avoided in patients with heart failure, while pioglitazone is contraindicated in this population.

Topics: Benzhydryl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Glucosides; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Liraglutide; Metformin; Pioglitazone; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2

The final goal in the management of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) is reduction in cardiovascular (CV) complications and total mortality. Various factors including hyperglycemia contribute to these complications and mortality directly and indirectly. In recent years, large-scale CV outcome trials with new antidiabetic medications, such as dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP1) receptor agonists, and sodium glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, have been completed. Most clinical trials with DPP4 inhibitors have shown no inferiority compared with placebo treatments in terms of CV safety. However, they did not show benefits in terms of adverse CV events or mortality. CV outcome trials with GLP1 receptor agonists showed inconsistent results: lixisenatide did not show benefits in preventing major adverse CV events. In contrast, liraglutide and semaglutide (longer acting GLP1 receptor agonists) proved to be superior in terms of alleviating CV morbidity and mortality. Two large-scale CV outcome trials with SGLT2 inhibitors showed significant results: empagliflozin proved to be superior in preventing CV and all-cause mortality, and canagliflozin proved to be superior in preventing CV mortality but not all-cause mortality. So far, controlling cardiometabolic risk factors such as hemodynamic changes and weight loss by SGLT2 inhibitors are suggested to be the main mechanisms for these results. However, the risk-benefit profile for these new drugs will need further elucidation, and more studies are warranted to reveal the possible mechanisms. It will also be important to confirm these results from other ongoing trials with SGLT2 inhibitors.

Topics: Albuminuria; Atherosclerosis; Benzhydryl Compounds; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cardiovascular System; Glucagon; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Glucosides; Heart Failure; Hemodynamics; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Ketones; Lipids; Liraglutide; Metabolic Syndrome; Metformin; Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease; Osmosis; Risk Factors; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Treatment Outcome

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a diabetes guidance in 2008 mandating that all new antidiabetes drugs rule out excess cardiovascular (CV) risk, defined as an upper bound of the two-sided 95% CI for major adverse CV events (MACE) of less than 1.80 preapproval and 1.30 postapproval. Over 25 large, prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trials involving nearly 195,000 subjects thus far have been completed or are ongoing in accordance with this guidance. The results of seven trials have been presented so far-three with dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors, one with a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor, and three with glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA). While all seven trials showed noninferiority in the rate of MACE with the use of these agents compared with placebo, three of them revealed CV benefits. Treatment with empagliflozin (an SGLT2 inhibitor) and treatment with liraglutide (a GLP-1 RA) both significantly reduced the risk of MACE, mortality from CV causes, and mortality from any cause when compared with placebo. Treatment with semaglutide, another GLP-1 RA, showed a significantly lower rate of MACE but not mortality from CV or any cause compared with placebo. In all of the trials, the effects of treatment on outcomes were out of proportion to the small differences in glycemic control levels, suggesting that the effects observed were likely unrelated to differences in the glucose-lowering efficacy. Overall, the results of these trials yield a favorable benefit-risk balance for these therapies in mitigating CV risk in patients with type 2 diabetes. More research is needed to elucidate the underlying mechanisms and confirm whether the CV benefits are a class effect or whether the benefits persist in patients without established CV disease or are evident even in patients without diabetes.

Topics: Animals; Benzhydryl Compounds; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Glucosides; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Liraglutide; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome

Low-grade inflammation is associated with complications of type 2 diabetes. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and sodium-glucose transporter-2 inhibitors have shown cardioprotective effects that are independent of their glucose-lowering effects. Cardio-protection could be mediated by the anti-inflammatory effects of these medications, but there is currently limited evidence to support this hypothesis. We conducted a prospective clinical study in patients with type 2 diabetes requiring treatment intensification. Ten patients were assigned to receive empagliflozin 10 mg and 10 patients to receive s/c semaglutide (titrated to 1 mg once a week) in a non-randomised manner. All parameters were measured at baseline and after 3 months. Fasting plasma glucose and glycated haemoglobin improved significantly in both treatment groups, with no between-group differences. Body weight and body mass index reduced significantly more in the semaglutide group, whereas waist circumference decreased only in the empagliflozin group. There was a trend for high-sensitivity CRP reduction in both treatment groups that did not reach statistical significance. Interleukin-6 and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio did not change in either group. Ferritin and uric acid decreased significantly only in the empagliflozin group, and ceruloplasmin decreased significantly only in the semaglutide group. Though there were clinically meaningful improvements in diabetes control in both treatment arms, we could detect only minor changes in some inflammatory markers.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Prospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Adult; Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Glucosides; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Benzhydryl Compounds; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Denmark; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Glucosides; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents

Empagliflozin and oral semaglutide reduce the incidence of cardiovascular mortality (CVM) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, these therapies impose a significant financial burden on healthcare systems. Therefore, we compared the value for money of empagliflozin versus oral semaglutide to prevent CVM. We calculated the cost needed to treat to prevent 1 case of CVM using either drug by multiplying the annualized number needed to treat to prevent 1 event by the annual cost of the therapy. Efficacy estimates were extracted from published randomized controlled trials data. We performed a scenario analysis to mitigate the primary differences between the populations of randomized controlled trials. Drug costs were calculated as 75% of the United States National Average Drug Acquisition Cost listing. The annualized number needed to treat for empagliflozin in EMPA-REG-OUTCOME was 141 (95% confidence interval [CI] 104 to 230) and 141 (95% CI 96 to 879) for oral semaglutide in PIONEER 6. The annual treatment costs are $4,797 for empagliflozin versus $7,133 for oral semaglutide. Therefore, the corresponding costs needed to treat are $676,385 ($498,894-$1,101,039) and $1,005,855 (95% CI $684,837-$6,270,544) respectively. In conclusion, our findings suggest that empagliflozin provides better value for money than oral semaglutide to prevent CVM in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus at the current United States prices of the interventions.

Topics: Benzhydryl Compounds; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Glucosides; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; United States

Novel glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist oral semaglutide has demonstrated greater improvements in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and body weight versus oral medications empagliflozin and sitagliptin, and injectable GLP-1 analog liraglutide, in the PIONEER clinical trial program. Based on these data, the present analysis aimed to evaluate the long-term cost-effectiveness of oral semaglutide versus empagliflozin, sitagliptin and liraglutide in Spain.. Outcomes were projected over patients' lifetimes using the IQVIA CORE Diabetes Model (v9.0), discounted at 3.0% annually. Cohort characteristics and treatment effects were sourced from PIONEER 2 and 4 for the comparisons of oral semaglutide 14 mg versus empagliflozin 25 mg and liraglutide 1.8 mg, respectively, and PIONEER 3 for oral semaglutide 7 and 14 mg versus sitagliptin 100 mg. Costs were accounted from a healthcare payer perspective in 2020 euros (EUR). Patients were assumed to receive initial therapies until HbA1c exceeded 7.5% and then treatment-intensified to basal insulin.. Oral semaglutide 14 mg was associated with improvements in quality-adjusted life expectancy of 0.13, 0.19 and 0.06 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) versus empagliflozin 25 mg, sitagliptin 100 mg and liraglutide 1.8 mg, respectively, with direct costs EUR 168 higher versus empagliflozin and EUR 236 and 1415 lower versus sitagliptin and liraglutide, respectively. Oral semaglutide 14 mg was associated with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of EUR 1339 per QALY gained versus empagliflozin and was considered dominant (clinically superior and cost saving) versus sitagliptin and liraglutide. Additional analyses demonstrated that oral semaglutide 7 mg was associated with improvements of 0.11 QALYs and increased costs of EUR 226 versus sitagliptin and was therefore associated with an ICER of EUR 2011 per QALY gained.. Oral semaglutide 14 mg was dominant versus sitagliptin and liraglutide, and cost-effective versus empagliflozin, for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in Spain.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Benzhydryl Compounds; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Glucosides; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Liraglutide; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Spain

Topics: Administration, Oral; Benzhydryl Compounds; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Costs; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Glucosides; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Liraglutide; Sitagliptin Phosphate; United States

Topics: Benzhydryl Compounds; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Routes; Drug Administration Schedule; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Glucosides; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Models, Econometric; Models, Statistical; Network Meta-Analysis; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Spain

Oral semaglutide is the first orally administered glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist for the treatment of type 2 diabetes, and has been evaluated in the PIONEER clinical trial program. These trials assessed the proportions of patients achieving single and composite endpoints, encompassing glycemic control [defined in terms of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c)], weight loss, and hypoglycemia. The present study assessed the cost of control with oral semaglutide versus empagliflozin, sitagliptin, and liraglutide in the US.. Four endpoints were evaluated: (1) HbA1c ≤ 6.5%; (2) HbA1c < 7.0%; (3) ≥ 1.0%-point HbA1c reduction and weight loss ≥ 3.0%; and (4) HbA1c < 7.0% without hypoglycemia and without weight gain. The proportions of patients achieving each endpoint were sourced from the PIONEER 2, 3 and 4 trials. Treatment costs were accounted over an annual time-period in 2019 US dollars (USD), based on wholesale acquisition cost. Cost of control was calculated by dividing treatment costs by the proportion of patients achieving each target.. Oral semaglutide was consistently associated with the lowest cost of control for all four endpoints. For the targets of HbA1c ≤ 6.5% and HbA1c < 7.0%, oral semaglutide 14 mg was associated with lower cost of control than empagliflozin 25 mg, sitagliptin 100 mg and liraglutide 1.8 mg by USD 15,036, 14,697, and 6996, respectively, and USD 931, 346 and 4497, respectively. For the double composite endpoint, cost of control was lower with oral semaglutide 14 mg by USD 525, 32,277 and 13,011, respectively versus empagliflozin 25 mg, sitagliptin 100 mg and liraglutide 1.8 mg. For the triple composite endpoint, cost of control was lower with oral semaglutide 14 mg by USD 1255, 7510 and 5774, respectively.. Oral semaglutide was associated with lower cost of bringing patients with type 2 diabetes to four clinically-relevant treatment targets versus empagliflozin, sitagliptin, and liraglutide in the US.. Novo Nordisk A/S.

Topics: Benzhydryl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Glucosides; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Liraglutide; Middle Aged; Sitagliptin Phosphate; United States; Weight Loss

Patients with asthma with obesity experience severe symptoms, are unresponsive to conventional asthma treatment, and lack proper pharmacotherapy. Empagliflozin and dulaglutide, developed for diabetes, reduce weight, decrease insulin resistance, and exert additive effects. We evaluated the efficacy of empagliflozin, dulaglutide, and their combination on obesity-induced airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) and lung fibrosis using a murine model. We assigned C57BL/6J mice to five groups: control, high-fat diet (HFD), and HFD with empagliflozin, dulaglutide, or both. Mice received a 12-week HFD, empagliflozin (5 days/week, oral gavage), and dulaglutide (once weekly, intraperitoneally). Both drugs significantly attenuated HFD-induced weight increase, abnormal glucose metabolism, and abnormal serum levels of leptin and insulin, and co-treatment was more effective. Both drugs significantly alleviated HFD-induced AHR, increased macrophages in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), and co-treatment was more effective on AHR. HFD-induced lung fibrosis was decreased by both drugs alone and combined. HFD induced interleukin (IL)-17, transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1, and IL-1β mRNA and protein expression, which was significantly reduced by empagliflozin, dulaglutide, and their combination. Tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α and IL-6 showed similar patterns without significant differences. HFD-enhanced T helper (Th) 1 and Th17 cell differentiation was improved by both drugs. Empagliflozin and dulaglutide could be a promising therapy for obesity-induced asthma and showed additive effects in combination.

Topics: Animals; Benzhydryl Compounds; Cell Differentiation; Cytokines; Diet, High-Fat; Disease Models, Animal; Fibrosis; Gene Expression Regulation; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Glucosides; Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments; Mice; Obesity; Recombinant Fusion Proteins; Respiratory Hypersensitivity; RNA, Messenger; Th1 Cells; Th17 Cells

In recognition of the substantial prevalence of cardiovascular disease-related comorbidities among patients with diabetes and the potential for some agents to increase this risk, evaluation of cardiovascular outcomes is now a standard component of late-stage clinical trials involving antihyperglycemic agents. While most agents are evaluated in noninferiority trials to establish a lack of cardiovascular-related harm, a few agents have shown significant reductions in cardiovascular-related outcomes, including mortality.

Topics: Benzhydryl Compounds; Bromocriptine; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Glucosides; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Risk Reduction Behavior; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Thiazolidinediones

Hyperglycemia is the major risk factor for microvascular complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the principal cause of death, and lowering HbA

Topics: Animals; Benzhydryl Compounds; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Glucosides; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Liraglutide; Pioglitazone; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Thiazolidinediones; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Benzhydryl Compounds; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Glucosides; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Liraglutide; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors