orlistat and cetilistat

Topics: Anti-Obesity Agents; Appetite; Appetite Depressants; Benzazepines; Benzoxazines; Bupropion; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Approval; Drug Combinations; Drug Discovery; Energy Metabolism; Enzyme Inhibitors; Fructose; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Humans; Hypothalamus; Lactones; Lipase; Liraglutide; Metabolic Syndrome; Naltrexone; Obesity; Orlistat; Phentermine; Topiramate

Currently, obesity presents one of the biggest health problems. Management strategies for weight reduction in obese individuals include changes in life style such as exercise and diet, behavioral therapy, and pharmacological treatment, and in certain cases surgical intervention. Diet and exercise are best for both prevention and treatment, but both require much discipline and are difficult to maintain. Drug treatment of obesity offer a possible adjunct, but it may only have modest results, limited by side effects; furthermore, the weight lowering effects last only as long as the drug is being taken and, unfortunately, as soon as the administration is stopped, the weight is regained. These strategies should be used in a combination for higher efficacy. Drugs used to induce weight loss have various effects: they increase satiety, reduce the absorption of nutrients or make metabolism faster; but their effect is usually moderate. In the past, several drugs were used in the pharmacological therapy of weight reduction including thyroid hormone, dinitrophenol, amphetamines and their analogues, e.g. fenfluramine, At present, only orlistat is available in the long term treatment (≥ 24 weeks) of obesity as sibutramine and rimonabant were withdrawn form the market. Several new anti-obesity drugs are being tested at present, and liraglutide, a GLP-1 analogue (incretin mimetic), is the most promising one.

Topics: Amides; Anti-Obesity Agents; Anticonvulsants; Antidepressive Agents; Basal Metabolism; Benzazepines; Benzoxazines; Body Mass Index; Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic; Ciliary Neurotrophic Factor; Clinical Trials as Topic; Combined Modality Therapy; Cyclobutanes; Dexfenfluramine; Fatty Acids; Female; Fenfluramine; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Human Growth Hormone; Humans; Intestinal Absorption; Lactones; Leptin; Life Style; Liraglutide; Male; Norepinephrine; Obesity; Obesity, Morbid; Orlistat; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Receptor, Melanocortin, Type 4; Rimonabant; Satiation; Serotonin; Sodium-Glucose Transport Proteins; Sucrose; Thyroid Hormones

The prevalence of obesity is rising worldwide, with the U.K. having the highest prevalence in Europe. Obesity is associated with significant morbidity and has substantial healthcare implications, with current projections estimating that by 2030 obesity will cost the NHS approximately pounds 2 billion each year. Lifestyle modification remains the cornerstone of anti-obesity treatment, but drugs can be introduced as adjuncts to assist and maintain weight loss. Some 1.45 million obesity-related prescriptions were dispensed in 2009, highlighting the high demand for obesity pharmacotherapy. At present, the lipase inhibitor orlistat (Xenical) is the only UK-approved long-term medical therapy for obesity. Double-blind clinical trials have shown that orlistat significantly increases weight loss compared to placebo, but the array of adverse side effects associated with orlistat limits its tolerability. The need for more effective and better-tolerated anti-obesity medications is clear and six therapies have reached phase-III trials.

Topics: Anti-Obesity Agents; Benzazepines; Benzoxazines; Bupropion; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Combinations; Fructose; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Humans; Lactones; Life Style; Liraglutide; Naltrexone; Obesity; Orlistat; Phentermine; Topiramate; Weight Loss

The objective of this multicenter, randomized, double-blind study was to determine the efficacy and safety of cetilistat and orlistat relative to placebo in obese patients with type 2 diabetes, on metformin. Following a 2-week run-in, patients were randomized to placebo, cetilistat (40, 80, or 120 mg three times daily), or orlistat 120 mg t.i.d., for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was absolute change in body weight from baseline. Secondary endpoints included other measures of obesity and glycemic control. Similar reductions in body weight were observed in patients receiving cetilistat 80 or 120 mg t.i.d. or 120 mg t.i.d. orlistat; these reductions were significant vs. placebo (3.85 kg, P = 0.01; 4.32 kg, P = 0.0002; 3.78 kg, P = 0.008). In the 40 mg t.i.d. and placebo groups, reductions were 2.94 kg, P = 0.958 and 2.86 kg, respectively. Statistically significant reductions in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) were noted. Cetilistat was well tolerated, and showed fewer discontinuations due to adverse events (AEs) than in the placebo and orlistat groups. Discontinuation in the orlistat group was significantly worse than in the 120 mg cetilistat and placebo groups and was entirely due to gastrointestinal (GI) AEs. Treatment with cetilistat 80 or 120 mg t.i.d., or with orlistat 120 mg t.i.d., significantly reduced body weight and improved glycemic control relative to placebo in obese diabetic patients. Cetilistat was well tolerated with the number of discontinuations due to AEs being similar to placebo.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Benzoxazines; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Intention to Treat Analysis; Lactones; Lipase; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Obesity; Orlistat; Patient Selection; Treatment Outcome; Weight Loss

To assess the efficacy, pharmacodynamics, safety and tolerability of a range of doses of cetilistat, a novel inhibitor of gastrointestinal lipases, in healthy volunteers.. Three Phase I, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group studies were conducted. Enrolled subjects in the three studies (n = 99) received a controlled calorie diet (total intake 2160 calories daily, 30% from fat). Twenty-four subjects were randomized to placebo and 66 were randomized to the following cetilistat doses: 50 mg three times daily [t.i.d. (n = 7)], 60 mg t.i.d. (n = 9), 100 mg t.i.d. (n = 7), 120 mg t.i.d. (n = 9), 150 mg t.i.d. (n = 16), 240 mg t.i.d. (n = 9) and 300 mg t.i.d. (n = 9). Nine subjects received the approved orlistat dose (120 mg t.i.d.). Treatment was for 5 days, with a 2-day run-in period and 1-day post-treatment follow-up. The primary outcome measure was daily faecal fat excretion. Secondary outcomes included plasma lipid levels, tolerability [gastrointestinal adverse events (AEs)] and safety.. Cetilistat increased faecal fat excretion relative to baseline at all doses. Cetilistat was well tolerated, with gastrointestinal AEs the most common (51%). Steatorrhoea (oily stool) was more frequent in the orlistat group (4.11 events per subject) than in any cetilistat dose group (0.14-1.81 events per subject). Most AEs (98%) were mild or moderate in intensity.. Cetilistat increased dietary fat excretion in healthy volunteers receiving a controlled calorie diet. Cetilistat was well tolerated at all doses examined and tolerability appeared to be improved relative to orlistat. Faecal fat excretion in the cetilistat groups was at least comparable to the orlistat 120 mg t.i.d. group.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anti-Obesity Agents; Benzoxazines; Dietary Fats; Double-Blind Method; Enzyme Inhibitors; Humans; Intestinal Absorption; Lactones; Lipase; Male; Middle Aged; Obesity; Orlistat; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult