opicapone and entacapone

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Antiparkinson Agents; Catechol O-Methyltransferase Inhibitors; Catechols; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Nitriles; Oxadiazoles; Parkinson Disease

Motor fluctuations are frequently seen in Parkinson disease patients on chronic treatment with levodopa. Management of motor fluctuation includes the addition of catechol-O-methyl transferase (COMT) inhibitors. Opicapone is a recent and selective third-generation COMT inhibitor which achieves marked increase in the bioavailability of levodopa. We present a consensus of a group of Spanish neurologists with extensive experience in the clinical management of motor fluctuations. The clinical experience of this group of experts is in line with clinical trials and confirms that opicapone is an effective drug in the control of motor fluctuations, regardless of the daily levodopa dose, or the use of other antiparkinsonian drugs. However, in the opinion of these experts, the ideal patient with Parkinson's disease to initiate treatment with opicapone is the one with mild motor fluctuations, since the ratio between clinical efficacy and adverse effects is more favorable. In general, it is an easy-to-use drug both in those first treated with a COMT inhibitor or those already on entacapone. In any case, the secondary side effects are easily managed.. Optimización del manejo clínico de opicapona en la enfermedad de Parkinson. Recomendaciones de expertos españoles.. Las fluctuaciones motoras constituyen una importante complicación en los pacientes con enfermedad de Parkinson tratados con levodopa. Entre las opciones terapéuticas para el manejo de las fluctuaciones motoras se cuenta con los inhibidores de la catecol-O-metil-transferasa (COMT), incluyendo la opicapona. La opicapona muestra una elevada afinidad por la COMT y consigue un aumento marcado de la biodisponibilidad de la levodopa. Se presenta el consenso de un grupo de expertos españoles en la enfermedad de Parkinson con experiencia en el tratamiento clínico de fluctuaciones motoras y el empleo de opicapona. La experiencia de este grupo de expertos, en consonancia con los ensayos clínicos, confirma que la opicapona es un fármaco eficaz en el control de las fluctuaciones motoras de la enfermedad de Parkinson, con independencia de la dosis de levodopa recibida o de la utilización de otros fármacos antiparkinsonianos. No obstante, a juicio de estos expertos, el paciente ideal para iniciar el tratamiento con opicapona es el que presenta fluctuaciones motoras leves, ya que muestra una mejor relación entre eficacia clínica y efectos adversos. En general, la opicapona es un fármaco de fácil manejo, tanto en pacientes que requieren opicapona como primer inhibidor de la COMT como en los previamente tratados con entacapona, o en los que están en tratamiento concomitante con otros fármacos antiparkinsonianos. En cualquier caso, los efectos secundarios son fácilmente corregibles.

Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Catechol O-Methyltransferase Inhibitors; Catechols; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dopamine Agonists; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Substitution; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Levodopa; Nitriles; Oxadiazoles; Parkinson Disease; Patient Selection; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Administration, Oral; Antiparkinson Agents; Catechol O-Methyltransferase Inhibitors; Catechols; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced; Humans; Levodopa; Nitriles; Oxadiazoles; Parkinson Disease

Opicapone is a novel, once-daily, potent third-generation catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitor. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of opicapone as an adjunct to levodopa compared with placebo or entacapone in patients with Parkinson's disease and motor fluctuations.. We did a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled and active-controlled trial of opicapone as an adjunct to levodopa in patients with Parkinson's disease with end-of-dose motor fluctuations. Patients aged 30-83 years were enrolled at 106 specialist centres across 19 European countries and Russia and were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1:1) by a proprietary computer-generated sequence to oral treatment with opicapone (5 mg, 25 mg, or 50 mg once daily), placebo, or entacapone (200 mg with every levodopa intake) for 14-15 weeks. Patients and investigators (ie, outcome assessors) were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline to end of study treatment in absolute time in the off state, as assessed by daily paper patient diaries; the primary analysis followed a hierarchical procedure for each opicapone dose in which superiority compared with placebo in the full analysis set was first tested and then, if positive, non-inferiority to entacapone was tested in the per-protocol set with a margin of 30 min. This trial is registered with EudraCT, 2010-021860-13, and ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01568073.. Between March 31, 2011, and Nov 30, 2013, of 679 patients screened, 600 were randomly assigned. 590 patients were included in the full analysis set (120 in the placebo group, 120 in the entacapone group, 119 in the opicapone 5 mg group, 116 in the opicapone 25 mg group, and 115 in the opicapone 50 mg group) and 537 in the per-protocol set (112 in the placebo group, 104 in the entacapone group, 110 in the opicapone 5 mg group, 105 in the opicapone 25 mg group, and 106 in the opicapone 50 mg group). The mean change in time in the off state was -56·0 min (SE 13·4; 95% CI -82·3 to -29·7) for placebo, -96·3 min (13·4; -122·6 to -70·0) for entacapone, -91·3 min (13·5; -117·7 to -64·8) for opicapone 5 mg, -85·9 min (13·7; -112·8 to -59·1) for opicapone 25 mg, and -116·8 min (14·0; -144·2 to -89·4) for opicapone 50 mg. Treatment with opicapone 50 mg was superior to placebo (mean difference in change from baseline -60·8 min, 95% CI -97·2 to -24·4; p=0·0015) and non-inferior to entacapone (-26·2 min, -63·8 to 11·4; p=0·0051). Treatment with opicapone 5 mg (p=0·056) or 25 mg (p=0·080) was not significantly different from treatment with placebo. Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 60 (50%) of 121 patients in the placebo group, 69 (57%) of 122 in the entacapone group, 63 (52%) of 122 in the opicapone 5 mg group, 65 (55%) of 119 in the opicapone 25 mg group, and 62 (54%) of 115 in the opicapone 50 mg group. The most common adverse events were dyskinesia (in five patients in the placebo group, ten in the entacapone group, 17 in the opicapone 5 mg group, nine in the opicapone 25 mg group, and 18 in the opicapone 50 mg group), insomnia (in one, seven, two, seven, and seven patients, respectively), and constipation (in three, five, four, none, and seven patients, respectively). Serious adverse events were reported in six patients in the placebo group, eight in the entacapone group, four each in the opicapone 5 mg and opicapone 50 mg groups, and one in the opicapone 25 mg group.. The addition of opicapone 50 mg to levodopa treatment in patients with Parkinson's disease and end-of-dose motor fluctuations could enable a simplified drug regimen that allows physicians to individually tailor the existing levodopa daily regimen, by potentially reducing the total daily levodopa dose, increasing the dosing interval, and ultimately reducing the number of intakes, thereby maximising its benefit.. BIAL.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiparkinson Agents; Catechol O-Methyltransferase Inhibitors; Catechols; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced; Europe; Female; Humans; Levodopa; Male; Middle Aged; Nitriles; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Oxadiazoles; Parkinson Disease

Opicapone is a novel third generation catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitor. The purpose of this study was to compare the levodopa pharmacokinetic profile throughout a day driven by the COMT inhibition either following repeated doses of opicapone or concomitant administration with entacapone.. A randomized, double-blind, gender-balanced, parallel-group study was performed in 4 groups of 20 healthy subjects each. Four subjects in each group received placebo during the entire study. Sixteen subjects in one group received placebo once daily for 11 days and on day 12, 200 mg entacapone concomitantly with each levodopa/carbidopa dose (three times separated by a 5-h interval). Sixteen subjects in each of the remaining three groups received respectively 25, 50, and 75 mg opicapone once daily for 11 days and on day 12, placebo concomitantly with each levodopa/carbidopa dose.. Levodopa minimum plasma concentration (Cmin) for each levodopa/carbidopa dose and for the mean of all levodopa/carbidopa doses increased substantially with all active treatments (entacapone and opicapone) when compared to the control group (placebo), with values ranging from 1.7-fold (200 mg entacapone) to 3.3-fold (75 mg opicapone). No statistical difference was found for levodopa peak of systemic exposure (as assessed by maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax)) between all active treatments and placebo. A significant increase in the levodopa extent of systemic exposure (as assessed by concentration-time curve (AUC)) occurred with all opicapone treatments in relation to placebo. No statistical difference was found for levodopa AUC when entacapone was compared to placebo. When compared to entacapone, both 50 and 75 mg opicapone presented a significant increase for the levodopa AUC. All active treatments significantly inhibited both peak (as assessed by Emax) and extent (as assessed by effect-time curve (AUEC)) of the COMT activity in relation to placebo. When compared to entacapone, all opicapone treatments significantly decreased the extent (AUEC) of the COMT activity due to a long-lasting and sustained effect. The tolerability profile was favorable for all active treatments.. Opicapone, a novel third generation COMT inhibitor, when compared to entacapone, provides a superior response upon the bioavailability of levodopa associated to more pronounced, long-lasting, and sustained COMT inhibition. The tolerability profile was favorable. On the basis of the results presented in this study and along with the earlier pharmacology studies, it is anticipated that opicapone adjunct therapy at the dosages of 25 and 50 mg will provide an enhancement in levodopa availability that will translate into clinical benefit for Parkinson's disease patients.

Topics: Adult; Antiparkinson Agents; Area Under Curve; Catechol O-Methyltransferase; Catechol O-Methyltransferase Inhibitors; Catechols; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Interactions; Female; Humans; Levodopa; Male; Middle Aged; Nitriles; Oxadiazoles; Young Adult

To evaluate the long-term, real-life effects on non-motor symptoms (NMS) of opicapone compared to entacapone in levodopa-treated people with Parkinson's disease (PwP).. A retrospective data analysis, with pre- and post-opicapone initiation data of 17 PwP with motor fluctuations compared to a comparable group of 18 PwP introduced on entacapone. The primary outcome was changes in the NMS Scale (NMSS) total score after 1-year follow-up. Secondary outcomes included changes in the NMSS domains, and Parkinson's Disease Sleep Scale (PDSS) total and item scores after the same time span.. Groups were comparable for baseline demographics and Parkinson's-related features (p ≥ 0.314) as well as duration of follow-up (1.33 ± 0.66 years for PwP on opicapone and 1.23 ± 0.49 years for those on entacapone; p = 0.858). PwP who were introduced on opicapone showed no changes in NMSS and PDSS total scores after 1 year (p = 0.605 and p = 0.507, respectively), whereas PwP who were introduced on entacapone showed significant worsening of NMSS and PDSS total scores at follow-up (p = 0.005 and p = 0.001, respectively). In neither group changes in individual NMSS domains from baseline to follow-up were observed (p ≥ 0.288 for entacapone and p ≥ 0.816 for opicapone, respectively). In PwP on entacapone significant worsening was seen in the distressing dreams, hallucinations, and limb numbness items of the PDSS (p ≤ 0.05).. Introduction of opicapone in real-life PwP with motor fluctuations seems to stabilise NMS burden and aspects of sleep dysfunction, in contrast to entacapone where there was a worsening of NMS burden and PDSS scores over 1 year follow-up.

Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Catechol O-Methyltransferase; Catechol O-Methyltransferase Inhibitors; Humans; Levodopa; Nitriles; Parkinson Disease; Retrospective Studies

Motor fluctuations are a significant driver of healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) in people with Parkinson's disease (pwPD). A common management strategy is to include catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibition with either opicapone or entacapone in the levodopa regimen. However, to date, there has been a lack of head-to-head data comparing the two COMT inhibitors in real-world settings. The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in HCRU and effect on sleep medications when opicapone was initiated as first COMT inhibitor versus entacapone.. In this retrospective cohort study, we assessed HCRU outcomes in pwPD naïve to COMT inhibition via UK electronic healthcare records (Clinical Practice Research Datalink and Hospital Episodes Statistics databases, June 2016 to December 2019). HCRU outcomes were assessed before (baseline) and after COMT inhibitor prescription at 0-6 months, 7-12 months and 13-18 months. Opicapone-treated pwPD were algorithm-matched (1:4) to entacapone-treated pwPD.. By 6 months, treatment with opicapone resulted in 18.5% fewer neurology outpatient visits compared to entacapone treatment; this effect was maintained until the last follow-up (18 months). In the opicapone group, the mean levodopa equivalent daily dose decreased over the first year and then stabilized, whereas the entacapone-treated group showed an initial decrease in the first 6 months followed by a dose increase between 7 and 18 months. Neither COMT inhibitor had a significant impact on sleep medication use.. This head-to-head study is the first to demonstrate, using 'real-world' data, that initiating COMT inhibition with opicapone is likely to decrease the need for post-treatment HCRU versus initiation of COMT inhibition with entacapone.

Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Catechol O-Methyltransferase; Catechol O-Methyltransferase Inhibitors; Humans; Levodopa; Oxadiazoles; Parkinson Disease; Patient Acceptance of Health Care; Retrospective Studies

The catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitors entacapone and opicapone prolong the efficacy of conventional oral levodopa/dopa decarboxylase inhibitor formulations through an increase in levodopa plasma bioavailability. Catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitors influence the homocysteine metabolism associated with levodopa/dopa decarboxylase application. The objectives of this study were to compare the impact of additional single-day entacapone or opicapone intake on the pharmacokinetic plasma behaviour of levodopa, 3-O-methyldopa and total homocysteine in 15 Parkinson's disease patients, with concomitant scoring of motor symptoms, under standardized conditions. The patients received opicapone plus two doses of 100 mg levodopa/carbidopa and, one week later, two doses of levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone or vice versa. Levodopa, 3-O-methyldopa and total homocysteine were determined with reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. Levodopa bioavailability and its maximum concentration were higher with opicapone. The computed peak-to-trough difference was lower after the second levodopa administration with entacapone. The fluctuation index of levodopa did not differ between both conditions. 3-O-methyldopa decreased on both days. Homocysteine levels did not significantly vary between both conditions. A significant homocysteine decrease occurred with entacapone, but not with opicapone. Motor behaviour improved with entacapone, but not with opicapone. Opicapone baseline scores were significantly better, and thus the potential for the improvement in motor symptoms was lower compared with the entacapone condition. The higher levodopa bioavailability with opicapone suggests that it is more efficacious than entacapone for the amelioration of "off" phenomena in fluctuating patients when co-administered with a levodopa/dopa decarboxylase inhibitor regimen. Both compounds prevented an increase in homocysteine, which is a metabolic marker for an impaired capacity in the performance of methylation processes.

Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Aromatic Amino Acid Decarboxylase Inhibitors; Carbidopa; Catechol O-Methyltransferase; Catechol O-Methyltransferase Inhibitors; Catechols; Homocysteine; Humans; Levodopa; Nitriles; Oxadiazoles; Parkinson Disease

Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Catechol O-Methyltransferase; Catechol O-Methyltransferase Inhibitors; Catechols; Enzyme Inhibitors; Humans; Levodopa; Nitriles; Oxadiazoles; Parkinson Disease

To evaluate the effectiveness of opicapone as add-on to levodopa and the effects of switching from entacapone over 1 year of treatment in patients with fluctuating Parkinson disease.. After completion of a placebo- and entacapone-controlled double-blind study of opicapone (5, 25, or 50 mg), 495 patients continued to a 1-year extension phase in which patients were treated with opicapone. Patients began with once-daily opicapone 25 mg for 1 week, followed by individually tailored levodopa and/or opicapone dose adjustments. The primary efficacy variable was the change from baseline in absolute "off" time based on patient diaries. Other outcomes included proportion of responders, scale-based assessments, and standard safety assessments.. One year of treatment with opicapone reduced "off" time by a half-hour (33.8 minutes) vs the open-label baseline and >2 hours (126.9 minutes) vs the double-blind baseline. Whereas patients who were originally treated with opicapone 50 mg in the double-blind phase maintained their efficacy, switching treatments led to further decreases in "off" time (-64.9, -39.3, -27.5, and -23.0 minutes for switching from placebo, entacapone, and opicapone 5 and 25 mg, respectively). Dyskinesia was the most frequently reported adverse event (14.5%) and was managed by adjustment of dopaminergic therapy. No new safety concerns were observed with long-term opicapone administration.. Long-term use of opicapone provided sustained efficacy over 1 year. Switching from entacapone to opicapone led to enhanced efficacy under the conditions of the study.. This study provides Class III evidence that for patients with Parkinson disease and end-of-dose motor fluctuations, long-term use (52 weeks) of opicapone is well tolerated and reduces "off" time.

Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Catechols; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Levodopa; Male; Middle Aged; Nitriles; Oxadiazoles; Parkinson Disease; Treatment Outcome

Catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) is an important target in the levodopa treatment of Parkinson's disease; however, the inhibitors available have problems, and not all patients benefit from their efficacy. Opicapone was developed to overcome those limitations. In this study, opicapone's pharmacological properties were evaluated as well as its potential cytotoxic effects.. The pharmacodynamic effects of opicapone were explored by evaluating rat COMT activity and levodopa pharmacokinetics, in the periphery through microdialysis and in whole brain. The potential cytotoxicity risk of opicapone was explored in human hepatocytes by assessing cellular ATP content and mitochondrial membrane potential.. Opicapone inhibited rat peripheral COMT with ED50 values below 1.4 mg⋅kg(-1) up to 6 h post-administration. The effect was sustained over the first 8 h and by 24 h COMT had not returned to control values. A single administration of opicapone resulted in increased and sustained plasma levodopa levels with a concomitant reduction in 3-O-methyldopa from 2 h up to 24 h post-administration, while tolcapone produced significant effects only at 2 h post-administration. The effects of opicapone on brain catecholamines after levodopa administration were sustained up to 24 h post-administration. Opicapone was also the least potent compound in decreasing both the mitochondrial membrane potential and the ATP content in human primary hepatocytes after a 24 h incubation period.. Opicapone has a prolonged inhibitory effect on peripheral COMT, which extends the bioavailability of levodopa, without inducing toxicity. Thus, it exhibits some improved properties compared to the currently available COMT inhibitors.

Topics: Adenosine Triphosphate; Animals; Antiparkinson Agents; Benzophenones; Brain; Catechol O-Methyltransferase; Catechol O-Methyltransferase Inhibitors; Catechols; Cell Survival; Cells, Cultured; Hepatocytes; Humans; Levodopa; Male; Membrane Potential, Mitochondrial; Models, Biological; Nitriles; Nitrophenols; Oxadiazoles; Rats, Wistar; Tolcapone

Catechol O-methyltransferase (COMT) is the enzyme responsible for the O-methylation of endogenous neurotransmitters and of xenobiotic substances and hormones incorporating catecholic structures. COMT is a druggable biological target for the treatment of various central and peripheral nervous system disorders, including Parkinson's disease, depression, schizophrenia, and other dopamine deficiency-related diseases. The purpose of this perspective is fourfold: (i) to summarize the physiological role of COMT inhibitors in central and peripheral nervous system disorders; (ii) to provide the history and perspective of the medicinal chemistry behind the discovery and development of COMT inhibitors; (iii) to discuss how the physicochemical properties of recognized COMT inhibitors are understood to exert influence over their pharmacological properties; and (iv) to evaluate the clinical benefits of the most relevant COMT inhibitors.

Topics: Acetophenones; Animals; Catalysis; Catechol O-Methyltransferase; Catechol O-Methyltransferase Inhibitors; Catechols; Clinical Trials as Topic; Crystallography, X-Ray; Humans; Inhibitory Concentration 50; Levodopa; Male; Models, Molecular; Nitriles; Oxadiazoles; Parkinson Disease; Prodrugs; Rats