nitrogenase and imidazole

The protonation of N2 bound to the active center of nitrogenase has been investigated using state-of-the-art density-functional theory calculations. Dinitrogen in the bridging mode is activated by forming two bonds to Fe sites, which results in a reduction of the energy for the first hydrogen transfer by 123 kJ/mol. The axial binding mode with open sulfur bridge is less reactive by 30 kJ/mol and the energetic ordering of the axial and bridged binding modes is reversed in favor of the bridging dinitrogen during the first protonation. Protonation of the central ligand is thermodynamically favorable but kinetically hindered. If the central ligand is protonated, the proton is transferred to dinitrogen following the second protonation. Protonation of dinitrogen at the Mo site does not lead to low-energy intermediates.

Topics: Binding Sites; Chemistry, Physical; Histidine; Hydrogen Bonding; Imidazoles; Kinetics; Ligands; Models, Chemical; Models, Molecular; Molecular Conformation; Molybdoferredoxin; Nitrogen; Nitrogenase; Protons; Thermodynamics

Nitrogenase catalyzes the biological reduction of N(2) to ammonia (nitrogen fixation) as well as the reduction of a number of alternative substrates, including acetylene (HC identical with CH) to ethylene (H2C=CH2). It is known that the metallocluster FeMo-cofactor located within the nitrogenase MoFe protein component provides the site of substrate reduction, but the exact site where substrates bind and are reduced on the FeMo-cofactor remains unknown. We have recently shown that the alpha-70 residue of the MoFe protein plays a significant role in defining substrate access to the active site; alpha-70 approaches one face of the FeMo-cofactor, and when valine is substituted by alanine at this position, the substituted nitrogenase is able to accommodate a reduction of the larger alkyne propargyl alcohol (HC identical with CCH(2)OH, propargyl-OH). During this reduction, a substrate-derived intermediate can be trapped on the FeMo-cofactor resulting in an S = 1/2 spin system with a novel electron paramagnetic resonance spectrum. In the present work, trapping of the propargyl-OH-derived or propargyl amine (HC identical with CCH(2)NH(2), propargyl-NH(2))-derived intermediates is shown to be dependent on pH and the presence of histidine at position alpha-195. It is concluded that these catalytic intermediates are stabilized and thereby trapped by H-bonding interactions between either the-OH group or the-NH(3)(+)group and the imidazole epsilon-NH of alpha-195(His). Thus, for the first time it is possible to establish the location of a bound substrate-derived intermediate on the FeMo-cofactor. Refinement of the binding mode and site was accomplished by the use of density functional and force field calculations pointing to an eta(2) coordination at Fe-6 of the FeMo-cofactor.

Topics: Acetylene; Alanine; Azotobacter; Azotobacter vinelandii; Binding Sites; Catalytic Domain; Electron Spin Resonance Spectroscopy; Histidine; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration; Imidazoles; Iron; Kinetics; Magnetics; Models, Chemical; Models, Molecular; Molybdoferredoxin; Nitrogenase; Protein Binding; Valine

Equilibrium titrations in N-methylformamide (NMF) of G-25 gel filtered (ox)-state FeMo cofactor [FeMoco(ox)] from Azotobacter vinelandii nitrogenase were carried out using sodium ethanethiolate and followed using UV/Vis absorption spectroscopy. For Fe-Moco(ox), a non-linear least squares (NLLSQ) fit to the data indicated a strong equilibrium thiolate-binding step with Keq = 1.3+/-0.2x10(6) M(-1). With 245 molar excess imidazole, cooperative binding of three ethanethiolates was observed. The best NLLSQ fit gave Keq=2.0+/-0.1x10(5) M(-2) and a Hill coefficient n=2.0+/-0.3. A Scatchard plot of these data was concave upward, indicating positive cooperativity. The fit to previously published data involving benzenethiol titration of the one-electron reduced (semi-reduced) cofactor, FeMoco(sr), as followed by EPR required a model that included both a sub-stoichiometric ratio of thiol to FeMoco(sr) and about five cooperative ligand binding sites. These constraints were met by modeling FeMoco(sr) as an aggregate, with fewer thiol binding sites than FeMoco(sr) units. The best fit model was that of FeMoco(sr) as a dodecamer with five cooperative benzenethiol binding sites, yielding a thiol binding constant of 3.32+/-0.09x10(4) M(-4.8) and a Hill coefficient n=4.8+/-0.6. The results of all the other published ligand titrations of FeMoco(sr) were similarly analyzed successfully in terms of equilibrium models that include both cooperative ligand binding and dimer-level aggregation. A possible structural model for FeMoco aggregation in NMF solution is proposed.

Topics: Cyanides; Formamides; Imidazoles; Ligands; Models, Chemical; Molybdoferredoxin; Nitrogenase; Phenols; Solvents; Spectrophotometry, Ultraviolet; Sulfhydryl Compounds; Titrimetry