netilmicin and carumonam

netilmicin has been researched along with carumonam* in 2 studies

Other Studies

2 other study(ies) available for netilmicin and carumonam

ArticleYear
Immunization of mice with antibiotic-treated Escherichia coli results in enhanced protection against challenge with homologous and heterologous bacteria.
    The Journal of infectious diseases, 1991, Volume: 163, Issue:1

    The murine immune response to Escherichia coli exposed to subminimal inhibitory concentrations of four antibiotics was investigated. Groups of mice were injected for 8 weeks with formalin-killed bacteria and subsequently challenged with 10 x LD50 of viable E. coli. Mice receiving saline only (controls) died within 24 h. The mortality of mice immunized with ciprofloxacin-treated E. coli was significantly lower than that of mice immunized with E. coli untreated or treated with other antibiotics. Sera from mice immunized with ciprofloxacin-treated bacteria showed better bacteriostatic capacity and enhanced production of antibodies that bound to homologous and heterologous lipopolysaccharide isolated from several smooth and rough gram-negative strains. The better protection observed in mice immunized with ciprofloxacin-treated E. coli was probably due to an enhanced production of antibodies to epitopes on lipopolysaccharide that became better exposed and so more accessible after treatment with ciprofloxacin.

    Topics: Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Aztreonam; Blood Bactericidal Activity; Ceftriaxone; Ciprofloxacin; Complement System Proteins; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay; Epitopes; Escherichia coli; Escherichia coli Infections; Female; Immunization; Immunoglobulin G; Immunoglobulin M; Lipopolysaccharides; Mice; Mice, Inbred BALB C; Netilmicin; Opsonin Proteins; Phagocytosis

1991
Ro 17-2301: in vitro comparison with aztreonam, imipenem, ceftazidime, cefotaxime and netilmicin.
    Chemotherapy, 1985, Volume: 31, Issue:4

    The in vitro activity of the novel monobactam antibiotic, Ro 17-2301 has been compared with those of aztreonam, imipenem, ceftazidime, cefotaxime and netilmicin. A total of 438 clinical isolates of aerobic gram-negative rods were employed and an agar dilution method was used for measurement of MIC. Ro 17-2301 was highly active against a wide variety of Enterobacteriaceae species (MIC range less than or equal to 0.03-8, MIC50 less than or equal to 0.03, MIC90 0.06 mg/l). The activity of aztreonam parallelled that of Ro 17-2301 although the latter seemed to have more uniformly high activity against Klebsiella sp. The other agents showed generally high activity against Enterobacteriaceae except netilmicin against Providencia stuartii (MIC50 4, MIC90 greater than or equal to 16 mg/l). Activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. was more variable. Ro 17-2301 and aztreonam were moderately active (MIC50 2, MIC90 8 and 16 mg/l, respectively). Imipenem was the most active agent against Acinetobacter, whereas Ro 17-2301 was moderately active. In conclusion, Ro 17-2301 shows impressive activity against Enterobacteriaceae and moderate activity against Acinetobacter and P. aeruginosa. Ro 17-2301 may well prove to be a useful agent in the treatment of gram-negative infections.

    Topics: Acinetobacter; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Aztreonam; Ceftazidime; Enterobacteriaceae; Gentamicins; Imipenem; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Netilmicin; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Thienamycins

1985