nalbuphine and propacetamol

The aim of this study was to compare the analgesic efficacy of three different postoperative treatments after supratentorial craniotomy. Sixty-four patients were allocated prospectively and randomly into three groups: paracetamol (the P group, n = 8), paracetamol and tramadol (the PT group, n = 29), and paracetamol and nalbuphine (the PN group, n = 27). General anesthesia was standardized with propofol and remifentanil using atracurium as the muscle relaxant. One hour before the end of surgery, all patients received 30 mg/kg propacetamol intravenously then 30 mg/kg every 6 hours. Patients in the PT group received 1.5 mg/kg tramadol 1 hour before the end of surgery. For patients in the PN group, 0.15 mg/kg nalbuphine was injected after discontinuation of remifentanil, because of its mu-antagonist effect. Postoperative pain was assessed in the fully awake patient after extubation (hour 0) and at 1, 2, 4, 8, and 24 hours using a visual analog scale (VAS). Additional tramadol (1.5 mg/kg) or 0.15 mg/kg nalbuphine was administered when the VAS score was > or = 30 mm. Analgesia was compared using the Mantha and Kaplan-Meier methods. Adverse effects of the drugs were also measured. The three groups were similar with respect to the total dose of remifentanil received (0.27 +/- 0.1 mircog/kg/min). In all patients, extubation was obtained within 6 +/- 3 minutes after remifentanil administration. Postoperative analgesia was ineffective in the P group; therefore, inclusions in this group were stopped after the eighth patient. Postoperative analgesia was effective in the two remaining groups because VAS scores were similar, except at hour 1, when nalbuphine was more effective (P = .001). Nevertheless, acquiring such a result demanded significantly more tramadol than nalbuphine (P < .05). More cases of nausea and vomiting were observed in the PT group but the difference was not significant (P < .06). In conclusion, pain after supratentorial neurosurgery must be taken into account, and paracetamol alone is insufficient in bringing relief to the patient. Addition of either tramadol or nalbuphine to paracetamol seems necessary to achieve adequate analgesia, with, nevertheless, a larger dose of tramadol to fulfill this objective.

Topics: Acetaminophen; Adult; Analgesics, Non-Narcotic; Analgesics, Opioid; Anesthesia, Intravenous; Anesthetics, Intravenous; Craniotomy; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glasgow Coma Scale; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Nalbuphine; Pain Measurement; Pain, Postoperative; Piperidines; Propofol; Remifentanil; Supratentorial Neoplasms; Tramadol

The impact of hypnotic drugs on postoperative analgesia has not been evaluated. We compared the influence of the maintenance of anaesthesia with either propofol or isoflurane on postoperative pain.. Forty ASA 1-2 women, undergoing cosmetic abdominoplasty were randomized to receive either 6-12 mg.kg-1.hr-1 propofol i.v. (P, n = 20) or MAC 1-1.5 isoflurane inhalation (Iso, n = 20). The lungs were ventilated with N2O 60% and O2 40%, and 1 microgram.kg-1 fentanyl i.v. provided intraoperative analgesia. Before surgical closure, 2 g propacetamol i.v. were administered. Postoperative analgesia was provided after hourly assessment of pain (VAS 0-100 mm), with 10 mg nalbuphine i.v. if VAS > or = 50 mm, during the eight hours after surgery. Sedation score (awake 0 to unrousable 4) was also recorded. Analgesia satisfaction score (nil 0 to excellent 4) obtained from the patient on discharge.. Sedation scores were similar in both groups except in the first postoperative hour, when it was higher in the Iso group. The VAS at rest (15.4 +/- 18.6 vs 29.7 +/- 19.8 mm, P = 0.0001) and nalbuphine requirements (0.13 +/- 0.35 vs 0.70 +/- 0.80 doses, P = 0.004) were lower in the Iso group during the first six hours, although emesis was more frequent than in P (60 vs 25%; P = 0.03). The incidence of analgesia satisfaction score (> or = 3) was similar between the two groups (P: 95; Iso: 75%).. These results suggested that isoflurane anaesthesia provides better analgesia than propofol anaesthesia in the first six hours after abdominoplasty.

Topics: Abdomen; Acetaminophen; Adult; Analgesia; Analgesics; Analgesics, Opioid; Anesthetics, Inhalation; Anesthetics, Intravenous; Female; Fentanyl; Humans; Injections, Intravenous; Intraoperative Care; Isoflurane; Nalbuphine; Pain Measurement; Pain, Postoperative; Patient Satisfaction; Propofol; Vomiting

This prospective randomized single-blind study compared the efficacy of a combination of propacetamol (2 g) and a low dose of nalbuphine hydrochloride (10 mg) with nalbuphine hydrochloride (20 mg) alone, in a population of 152 white female patients after gynaecologic or obstetrical surgery, for alleviation of postoperative pain in recovery room. The drugs were administered intravenously in case of pain. The population was divided into two groups: group 1 received 20 mg of nalbuphine hydrochloride and group 2 received 2 g of propacetamol combined with 10 mg of nalbuphine hydrochloride. The pain intensity was studied with the visual analogue scale and comparisons use no parametric tests (Mann and Whitney test, Kruskall and Wallis test) and Chi2 test. Groups were similar for age, surgical and anaesthesia procedures and initial pain level. The propacetamol-nalbuphine hydrochloride 10 mg association provided a significantly better analgesia than nalbuphine 20 mg during the first two postoperative hours (p < 0.05). In group 1, the analgesia score decrease was respectively 28 +/- 25 mm (range: 33-75 mm) after 1 h and 31 +/- 25 mm (range: 26-84 mm) after 2 h. In group 2, the decrease was more important: 37 +/- 21 mm (range: 5-84 mm) after 1 h and 42 +/- 23 mm (range: 20-84 mm) after 2 h. Side effects were minimal and similar in both groups (nausea, drowsiness). It is concluded that a propacetamol-nalbuphine hydrochloride 10 mg association provides better analgesia than single dose of 20 mg of nalbuphine. This association convenient analgesia with a decreased dose of nalbuphine.

Topics: Acetaminophen; Adult; Analgesics; Cesarean Section; Drug Combinations; Female; Genital Diseases, Female; Humans; Hysterectomy; Laparotomy; Middle Aged; Nalbuphine; Pain Measurement; Pain, Postoperative; Pregnancy

To assess the intensity of postoperative pain after laryngeal surgery for cancer and the efficacy of analgesic injections at fixed hours.. A prospective clinical study performed during the 3 days following laryngeal cancer surgery.. A university medical center.. Fifteen men (age range, 38-74 years) having just undergone a partial or total laryngectomy for epidermoid carcinoma.. The analgesic treatment consisted of intravenous administrations at fixed hours (propacetamol or nalbuphine hydrochloride), with the possibility of rescue doses on demand. Pain and anxiety were assessed by means of visual analog scales (graduated from 0-10) every 3 hours on postoperative day 1, then every 6 hours on postoperative days 2 and 3. Objective criteria, ie, heart and respiratory rates and mean blood pressure, were measured with the same schedule.. Postoperative pain and anxiety intensities and their variations were analyzed. Correlations between postoperative pain and other criteria were researched.. Postoperative pain had a high initial level (maximum median, 7), then decreased and reached a score of 3 at the 30th hour. Unpredictable individual peaks of pain were reported. Anxiety was never high (maximum median, 4). No individual correlation was found between pain and objective parameters.. After laryngeal surgery for cancer, pain can reach high levels, particularly in the first hours following recovery. Analgesic administrations at fixed hours are not effective enough. Postoperative analgesic treatment should aim to prevent the high initial pain and be individually adapted.

Topics: Acetaminophen; Adult; Aged; Analgesics, Opioid; Anxiety; Blood Pressure; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Heart Rate; Humans; Laryngeal Neoplasms; Laryngectomy; Male; Middle Aged; Nalbuphine; Pain Measurement; Pain, Postoperative; Prospective Studies; Respiration