n-(cyanomethyl)-4-(2-((4-(4-morpholinyl)phenyl)amino)-4-pyrimidinyl)benzamide and fedratinib

Ruxolitinib is the first FDA-approved JAK inhibitor for the treatment of myeloproliferative neoplasms and is an effective means of controlling symptom burden and improving splenomegaly. However, a majority of patients will develop disease progression with long-term use. Fedratinib, momelotinib, and pacritinib are three newer-generation JAK inhibitors being prospectively evaluated and we will discuss their roles in the treatment of myeloproliferative neoplasms.. Fedratinib has a role in both JAK-inhibitor naive intermediate-/high-risk myelofibrosis patients and in patients that have previously received ruxolitinib. It has recently received FDA approval for these indications as well. Momelotinib does not appear to have an advantage over ruxolitinib with regards to improving splenomegaly in intermediate-/high-risk JAK-inhibitor naive myelofibrosis. However, increased rates of transfusion independence have been noted with momelotinib. Pacritinib has been studied in myelofibrosis patients with significant baseline anemia and thrombocytopenia; these trials support the use of pacritinib in myelofibrosis patients with significant thrombocytopenia. While ruxolitinib is effective in reducing the symptom burden and splenomegaly of patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms, a majority of patients will ultimately progress on therapy. Newer-generation JAK inhibitors including fedratinib, momelotinib, and pacritinib are being prospectively evaluated to determine their appropriate roles in the management of myeloproliferative neoplasms. In addition, both combination therapies with JAK inhibitors and novel investigational therapies are being actively explored.

Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzamides; Biomarkers; Bridged-Ring Compounds; Clinical Trials as Topic; Disease Management; Disease Progression; Disease Susceptibility; Humans; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Myeloproliferative Disorders; Pyrimidines; Pyrrolidines; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

In 2005, the description of the JAK2V617F mutation for the first time provided a molecular key to enable more rapid diagnosis and target for novel therapeutics in the myeloproliferative neoplasms. In 2007, the first-in-class agent INC18424, ruxolitinib, JAKafi, or JAKAVI was first tested in patients with intermediate-risk 2 or high-risk myelofibrosis regardless of whether they possessed the JAK2V617F mutation. Patients treated with this agent had major reduction in splenomegaly as well as impressive reduction, and in some cases resolution, of symptoms. This study was followed by the two Controlled Myelofibrosis Study with Oral JAK Inhibitor Therapy (COMFORT) trials (the first-ever phase III trials in myelofibrosis), which confirmed results in these aspects were superior to either placebo or standard care, and updated results show a survival advantage with this therapy. This paper discusses these results and data from other JAK inhibitors while speculating on the future of these therapies. It also reflects on the fact that the true targets and agents' mode of action are uncertain. Unlike targeted therapy for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), these agents do not deliver molecular remission, and it is not clear whether their predominant benefit is mediated via JAK2, JAK1, or both. Nonetheless, the advent of the JAK inhibitor is a welcome advance and has made a dramatic improvement to the therapeutic landscape of these conditions.

Topics: Benzamides; Bridged-Ring Compounds; Humans; Janus Kinase 1; Janus Kinase 2; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Mutation; Myeloproliferative Disorders; Nitriles; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Pyrrolidines; Sulfonamides

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are diseases that carry the JAK2 (V617F) mutation in about 70% of the patients. The purpose of this review is to describe the recent advances in the therapy of MPNs with JAK2 inhibitors.. Many drugs are now under investigations targeting different pathways critical for MPN development, such as the JAK-STAT (JAK2 inhibitors: INCB018424 or ruxolitinib, TG101348 or SAR302503, CYT387, SB1518, CEP701 and LY2784544) and the PI3K/AKT/mTOR (everolimus) pathways, or act through remodeling of chromatin with a key role in epigenetics (givinostat, panobinostat and vorinostat). The most relevant effects were spleen size reduction and relief of constitutional symptoms.. Patients who might benefit from JAK2 inhibitors in clinical practice are mostly those with splenomegaly or with constitutional symptoms. We should alert patients with lower hemoglobin levels that these therapies might, although temporarily, favor the need for red blood cell transfusions.

Topics: Animals; Benzamides; Clinical Trials as Topic; Disease Models, Animal; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical; Humans; Janus Kinase 2; Janus Kinases; Mice; Myeloproliferative Disorders; Nitriles; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Pyrrolidines; Sulfonamides

An activating mutation (V617F) in the pseudokinase domain of the Janus kinase (JAK)-2 tyrosine kinase has been described in 90% of patients with polycythemia vera (PV) and 50% of patients with essential thrombocythemia (ET) and primary myelofibrosis (MF). The discovery of JAK2V617F stirred the development of JAK2 inhibitors for treatment of patients with MF, ET and PV. Similar to other tyrosine kinase (TK) inhibitors in current use, JAK2 inhibitors target the adenosine triphosphate (ATP) binding site at the TK domain and not the pseudokinase domain, thus affecting both mutated and wild-type kinases. In fact, clinical trials of these compounds have demonstrated improvements in constitutional symptoms and splenomegaly in patients with both mutated and wild-type JAK2 MF. It is believed that these drugs may act not only through inhibition of neoplastic cell proliferation, but also by downregulating signaling through proinflammatory cytokine receptors. In this article, we review the current state of JAK2 inhibitors and discuss why these drugs could be a valuable addition to the treatment armamentarium for patients with and without the JAK2V617F mutation.

Topics: Animals; Benzamides; Cytokines; Humans; Imidazoles; Janus Kinase 2; Nitriles; Point Mutation; Primary Myelofibrosis; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrazoles; Pyridazines; Pyrimidines; Pyrrolidines; Sulfonamides

Discovery of the JAK2 V617F mutation in the myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) essential thrombocythemia (ET), polycythemia vera (PV), and primary myelofibrosis (PMF) has stimulated great interest in the underlying molecular mechanisms and treatment of these diseases. Along with acceleration of technologies, novel mutations in genes such as MPL, LNK, and CBL have been discovered that converge on the JAK-STAT pathway. Several additional novel mutations in genes involved in epigenetic regulation of the genome, including TET2, ASXL1, DNMT3A, and IDH1/2, have emerged, in addition to several mutations in cellular splicing machinery. While understanding of the pathogenetic mechanisms of these novel mutations in MPNs has improved, it is still lagging behind the pace of mutation discovery. Concurrent with molecular discoveries, especially with regard to JAK-STAT signaling, therapeutic development has accelerated in recent years. More than ten JAK kinase inhibitors have been advanced into clinical trials. Recently the first JAK2 inhibitor was approved for use in patients with PMF. Most JAK-targeting agents share similar characteristics with regard to clinical benefit, consisting of improvements in splenomegaly, constitutional symptoms, and cytopenias, for example. It remains to be determined if JAK2 inhibitors can considerably impact disease progression and bone marrow histologic features (e.g., fibrosis) or significantly impact the JAK2 allele burden. While JAK2 inhibitors appear to be promising in PV and ET, they need to be compared with standard therapies, such as hydroxyurea or interferon-based therapies. Future clinical development will focus on optimal combination partners and agents that target alternative mechanisms, deepen the response, and achieve molecular remissions.

Topics: Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing; Alleles; Benzamides; Bridged-Ring Compounds; Carbazoles; Chromatin; Dioxygenases; DNA (Cytosine-5-)-Methyltransferases; DNA Methyltransferase 3A; DNA-Binding Proteins; Enhancer of Zeste Homolog 2 Protein; Epigenesis, Genetic; Furans; Gene Expression Regulation; Humans; Ikaros Transcription Factor; Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins; Isocitrate Dehydrogenase; Janus Kinase 2; Mutation; Myeloproliferative Disorders; Nitriles; Polycomb Repressive Complex 2; Proteins; Proto-Oncogene Proteins; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-cbl; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Pyrrolidines; Receptors, Thrombopoietin; Repressor Proteins; Signal Transduction; Spliceosomes; Sulfonamides

The discovery of JAK2V617F and other JAK-STAT-activating mutations in BCR-ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) has led to the development of small-molecule ATP-mimetics that inhibit wild-type and mutant JAK. Here, we review the current experience with JAK inhibitors used for the treatment of myelofibrosis and polycythemia vera/essential thrombocythemia.. Consistent with the clonal complexity of MPN, JAK inhibitors have not thus far shown disease-modifying activity; treatment with these agents has however shown clinically meaningful benefits, particularly decreased splenomegaly and improvement in constitutional symptoms, in myelofibrosis patients. Although these benefits accrue with both JAK-2 (TG101348) and JAK-1/2 (INCB018424, CYT387) inhibitors, the mode of action (predominant anticlonal versus anticytokine activity) may be different between the two groups. It is possible that an optimal balance between JAK-1-inhibitory and JAK-2-inhibitory activities may broaden the therapeutic activity (i.e. anemia improvement), as has been preliminarily seen (CYT387).. Although JAK inhibitors have important benefits in myelofibrosis therapy, their role in polycythemia vera/essential thrombocythemia treatment is still being defined. The optimal dosing strategy and feasibility for combination with other therapeutic agents remains to be established. Another challenge is the identification of robust primary end-points that will support labeling claims for JAK inhibitors for the aforementioned indications.

Topics: Benzamides; Humans; Janus Kinase 2; Mutation; Myeloproliferative Disorders; Nitriles; Polycythemia Vera; Primary Myelofibrosis; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Pyrrolidines; Sulfonamides; Thrombocythemia, Essential

Janus kinase-signal transducers and activators of transcription (JAK-STAT) signaling is critical to multiple cellular processes, including survival, differentiation, and proliferation. JAK-STAT signaling dysregulation has been noted in inflammatory disorders, and aberrant JAK2 pathway activation has been implicated in myelofibrosis and polycythemia vera. Moreover, 4 therapeutic JAK2 inhibitors (ruxolitinib, fedratinib, momelotinib, and pacritinib) have either been approved or are in advanced clinical development for myelofibrosis. Although all inhibit JAK2, reports indicate that they also inhibit other kinases. Profiling based solely on in vitro potencies is insufficient to predict the observed clinical effects. To provide further translational insights into clinical outcomes, we compared phenotypic biomarker profiles of ruxolitinib, fedratinib, momelotinib, and pacritinib in the BioMAP® Diversity PLUS panel of 12 human primary cell systems designed to recapitulate key aspects of tissue and disease states. Biomarker activity profiles that represent mechanistic signatures for each agent were compared with each other and a database of reference benchmark profiles. At clinically relevant concentrations, these agents had distinct biomarker impacts indicating diverse mechanistic signatures, suggesting divergent clinical effects for each agent. They disparately modulated inflammatory cytokine production and immune function. At clinically relevant concentrations, ruxolitinib had the broadest scope of activities across all 12 cellular systems, whereas pacritinib was more specific for the BT system (modelling T cell-dependent B cell activation) and exhibited the strongest inhibition of sIL-17A, sIL-2, and sIL-6. All 4 agents were antiproliferative to B cells, but ruxolitinib and momelotinib were also antiproliferative to T cells. These differential activities likely reflect distinct secondary pharmacology for these agents known primarily as JAK2 inhibitors. The phenotypic analysis reported herein represents key data on distinct modes-of-action that may provide insights on clinical outcomes reported for these agents. Such translational findings may also inform the development of next-generation molecules with improved efficacy and safety.

Topics: Benzamides; Bridged-Ring Compounds; Cell Proliferation; Cells, Cultured; Cytokines; Healthy Volunteers; Humans; Inflammation Mediators; Janus Kinase 2; Nitriles; Primary Cell Culture; Primary Myelofibrosis; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Pyrrolidines; Signal Transduction; Sulfonamides; Toxicity Tests

The BCR-ABL-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) include essential thrombocythemia, polycythemia vera, and primary myelofibrosis. Historically, complex biochemical alterations defining these heterogeneously distinct malignancies have remained elusive and constrained available therapy options. The discovery of Janus kinase (JAK) mutations collectively present in BCR-ABL-negative MPNs has led to a resurgence of medical interest in JAK-STAT targeted treatment modalities, as well as provided a unique platform for inhibiting symptom-directing proinflammatory cytokines. INCB018424, CYT387, SB1518, and TG101348 are among the most propitious JAK2 inhibitors under investigation, providing substantial improvement in constitutional symptoms, transfusion-dependent cytopenias, and reduction in spleen size. Despite their attributes, evidence of complete or partial remission has yet to be observed with therapy. Many uncertainties surrounding the full clinical potential of JAK2 inhibitors persist. Treatment guidelines addressing optimal stages for drug implementation, ideal dosing parameters and criteria for medication continuation/withdrawal may effectively resolve these ongoing concerns and provide advancements in the morbidity and mortality of these multifaceted disease processes.

Topics: Animals; Benzamides; Bridged-Ring Compounds; Carbazoles; Furans; Humans; Janus Kinase 2; Myeloproliferative Disorders; Nitriles; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Pyrrolidines; Sulfonamides