morphinans and tifluadom

Pigeons were trained to discriminate a dose of either 0.01 mg/kg of bremazocine or 0.05 mg/kg of fentanyl from water using a two-key drug discrimination procedure. During tests of substitution, the selective kappa-opioid agonists bremazocine, U50, 488 and tifluadom substituted for the bremazocine stimulus, whereas the less selective kappa-opioid agonists ethylketocyclazocine, levallorphan, proxorphan and nalorphine substituted for the fentanyl stimulus. The full mu-opioid agonists fentanyl, morphine, I-methadone and levorphanol, as well as the partial agonists nalbuphine, butorphanol and buprenorphine, substituted for the fentanyl stimulus. Compounds with partial-opioid agonist effects, namely nalbuphine, butorphanol, buprenorphine, proxorphan, levallorphan and nalorphine, produced 50% fentanyl-appropriate responding at doses 25 to 369.2 times smaller than the doses required to decrease response rates to 50% of control values. In contrast, the full mu-opioid agonists fentanyl, morphine, I-methadone and levorphanol produced 50% fentanyl-appropriate responding at doses only 1.3 to 10.9 times smaller than those required to decrease response rates by 50%. During tests of antagonism, both naloxone and Mr2266 produced a dose-dependent attenuation of the stimulus effects of bremazocine and fentanyl, whereas beta-funaltrexamine antagonized the stimulus effects of fentanyl but not bremazocine. Although bremazocine has been reported to have mu-opioid antagonist effects, it failed to antagonize the stimulus effects of the training dose of fentanyl. The present investigation establishes further that pigeons can discriminate selective kappa-opioid agonists from mu-opioid agonists and that in pigeons the classification of numerous opioid compounds on the basis of their kappa-like or mu-like stimulus effects differ from those in rat and monkey. In addition, under the drug discrimination procedure the actions of compounds classified as partial-opioid agonists can be differentiated from those of full mu-opioid agonists on the basis of the ratio of the dose required to engender fentanyl-like stimulus effects to the dose required to reduce response rates.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Topics: 3,4-Dichloro-N-methyl-N-(2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)-cyclohexyl)-benzeneacetamide, (trans)-Isomer; Animals; Benzodiazepines; Benzomorphans; Columbidae; Cyclazocine; Discrimination Learning; Ethylketocyclazocine; Fentanyl; Morphinans; Naloxone; Narcotics; Pyrrolidines; Receptors, Opioid; Receptors, Opioid, kappa; Receptors, Opioid, mu

The effects of mu-agonists (morphine, fentanyl) and kappa-agonists (U-50,488, U-69,593, bremazocine, nalbuphine, tifluadom) on the electroconvulsive threshold were studied in mice. The threshold could be significantly elevated by all drugs tested in a dose range that was in the order of magnitude of the antinociceptive ED50. Mice tolerant to the antielectroshock effect of morphine still reacted to U-69,593. The antagonism of the anticonvulsant effect by the mu-antagonist naloxone and the kappa-antagonist MR 2266 was receptor-specific only with fentanyl and U-50,488. The other opioid agonists were either antagonized by both drugs (morphine, U-69,593, bremazocine, nalbuphine) or even by the opposite antagonist (tifluadom). A synergistic effect of mu- and kappa-stimulation is assumed for the mediation of the antielectroshock effect of opioid drugs, but drugs with high affinity and intrinsic activity at one receptor type (fentanyl, U-50,488) are obviously able to bring about their antielectroshock effect through the one respective opioid binding site.

Topics: 3,4-Dichloro-N-methyl-N-(2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)-cyclohexyl)-benzeneacetamide, (trans)-Isomer; Animals; Benzeneacetamides; Benzodiazepines; Benzomorphans; Electroshock; Fentanyl; Male; Mice; Morphinans; Morphine; Nalbuphine; Naloxone; Pyrrolidines; Receptors, Opioid; Receptors, Opioid, kappa; Receptors, Opioid, mu; Seizures

The influence of oral (p.o.) administration of kappa-(U-50488, tifluadom) and mu- (morphine, DAGO) opioid substances on gastric emptying of liquids and solids in a standard canned dog food meal was evaluated using a double-radiolabeled technique in dogs fitted with gastric cannulas. One hour after feeding, 28.6% +/- 3.6% (mean +/- SD) of the solid phase and 27.1% +/- 8.6% of the liquid phase of the meal had been emptied. Both U-50488 and tifluadom given orally (0.01-0.1 mg/kg) significantly increased (p less than 0.05) the 1-h emptying of the solid phase of the meal by 23.1%-49.6%. In contrast, both drugs significantly reduced emptying of liquids. These effects were not reproduced when similar doses were given intravenously. Oral administration of morphine or DAGO (0.01-0.1 mg/kg) did not affect gastric emptying, whereas an inhibited emptying of solids was observed for morphine at a higher dose (1 mg/kg p.o.). At a dose of 100 micrograms/kg i.v. both naloxone and MR 2266 (0.1 mg/kg) abolished the effects of orally administered U-50488 on gastric emptying of solids and liquids. It is concluded that kappa- but not mu-agonists act locally to alter gastric emptying of a standard meal in dogs, having opposite effects on solid and liquid phases. A selective local stimulation of kappa mucosal or submucosal receptors of the gastroduodenal area may explain such effects.

Topics: 3,4-Dichloro-N-methyl-N-(2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)-cyclohexyl)-benzeneacetamide, (trans)-Isomer; Administration, Oral; Animal Feed; Animals; Benzodiazepines; Benzomorphans; Dogs; Enkephalin, Ala(2)-MePhe(4)-Gly(5)-; Enkephalins; Female; Gastric Emptying; Injections, Intravenous; Morphinans; Morphine; Naloxone; Pyrrolidines

The kappa opioid agonists, Mr 2033 and U-50, 488, or the mu opioid agonist, morphine, were administered chronically to three separate groups of rhesus monkeys. Tolerance developed to the overt signs of intoxication produced by each compound. Monkeys receiving morphine were not cross-tolerant to Mr 2033 or to U-50, 488, and monkeys receiving U-50, 488 were not cross-tolerant to morphine. Monkeys given Mr 2033 chronically were, however, cross-tolerant to morphine. When administration of U-50,488 was interrupted, or the monkeys receiving this compound were given an opioid antagonist, withdrawal behaviors were displayed that were qualitatively different from deprivation or antagonist-induced morphine withdrawal. These signs were suppressed by kappa agonists but not by morphine. Deprivation-induced withdrawal from Mr 2033 resulted in signs similar to those shown by U-50,488-dependent monkeys and some signs were observed in withdrawn morphine-dependent monkeys. Several antagonists, including the mu-selective antagonist beta-funaltrexamine, precipitated signs of withdrawal normally associated with morphine dependence in Mr 2033-dependent monkeys. Withdrawal from Mr 2033 was suppressed by kappa agonists in a stereoselective manner, and by morphine. The asymmetrical cross-tolerance and cross-dependence between Mr 2033 and morphine, and the appearance of morphine-like signs during precipitated withdrawal, suggest that Mr 2033 is kappa receptor selective but not specific. Dependence to U-50,488, however, was qualitatively and pharmacologically distinct from morphine-dependence and is apparently a consequence of specific activity at kappa receptors.

Topics: 3,4-Dichloro-N-methyl-N-(2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)-cyclohexyl)-benzeneacetamide, (trans)-Isomer; Animals; Benzodiazepines; Benzomorphans; Cyclazocine; Drug Tolerance; Endorphins; Ethylketocyclazocine; Macaca mulatta; Morphinans; Morphine; Narcotic Antagonists; Pentobarbital; Pyrrolidines; Substance Withdrawal Syndrome; Substance-Related Disorders; Time Factors