morphinans and naloxegol

Due to the increased use of opioids for pain and their abuse globally, the rate of restrictive side effects is elevating. Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) is probably the most widespread, underdiagnosed, and yet common adverse effect. Naloxegol, as an opioid antagonist, is associated with beneficial impacts in OIC. Indeed, blocking mu (μ)-opioid receptors in the gastrointestinal tract (GI) may lead to neutralization of the GI adverse events of opioids.. This review is based on a PubMed and Clinicaltrials.gov search for studies undertaken over the past 20 years (2000-2020) using the following keywords: Movantik®, Moventig®, Naloxegol, Opioids, Opioid-induced constipation and Opioid antagonists.. Similar to the management of functional constipation, non-pharmacological therapies are applied as the first step of the procedure. However, in most cases, laxative therpaies with or without stool softeners, which may not result in satisfactory relief are applied. In these instances, administration of prokinetic agents is recommended. Furthermore, studies have shown that the best second-line therapy option is a peripherally acting μ-opioid receptor antagonist (PAMORA), which antagonizes GI adverse events.

Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Humans; Laxatives; Morphinans; Narcotic Antagonists; Opioid-Induced Constipation; Pain; Polyethylene Glycols; Receptors, Opioid, mu

Topics: Aptamers, Nucleotide; Drug Carriers; Drug Development; Morphinans; Peptides; Polyethylene Glycols; Technology, Pharmaceutical

Pain remains a global health challenge. For decades, clinicians have been primarily relying on μ-opioid receptor (MOR) agonists and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for pain management. MOR agonists remain the most efficacious analgesics available; however, adverse effects related to MOR agonists use are severe which often lead to forced drug discontinuation and inadequate pain relief. The recent opioid overdose epidemic urges the development of safer analgesics. Combination therapy is a well-established clinical pharmacotherapeutic strategy for the treatment of various clinical disorders. The combination of MOR agonists with non-MOR agonists may increase the analgesic potency of MOR agonists, reduce the development of tolerance and dependence, reduce the diversion and abuse, overdose, and reduce other clinically significant side effects associated with prolonged opioid use such as constipation. Overall, the combination therapy approach could substantially improve the therapeutic profile of MOR agonists. This review summarizes some recent developments in this field. This article is part of the Special Issue entitled 'New Vistas in Opioid Pharmacology'.

Topics: Abuse-Deterrent Formulations; Analgesics, Non-Narcotic; Analgesics, Opioid; Drug Combinations; Drug Synergism; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug Tolerance; Humans; Imidazoline Receptors; Morphinans; Narcotic Antagonists; Opioid-Related Disorders; Pain Management; Polyethylene Glycols; Prescription Drug Diversion; Receptors, Opioid, mu

To summarize and evaluate the existing literature regarding medications to treat opioid-induced constipation (OIC) in patients with chronic noncancer pain (CNCP).. PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science were searched using the following terms: constipation, opioid, chronic, pain, noncancer, nonmalignant, methylnaltrexone, alvimopan, lubiprostone, naloxegol, and naldemedine.. The search was limited to randomized controlled trials reporting human outcomes. Data extracted included the following: study design, population, intervention, control, outcomes related to OIC and safety, and potential biases assessed using Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias Assessment Tool.. After assessment, 16 of the 190 studies were included: methylnaltrexone (n = 4), naloxegol (n = 3), naldemedine (n = 2), lubiprostone (n = 3), and alvimopan (n = 4). Lubiprostone was the only nonperipherally acting µ-opioid receptor antagonist included. Only 1 study (naloxegol) used "usual care" (nonstudy laxative) rather than placebo as a comparator. Placebo-controlled trials demonstrated benefit for methylnaltrexone, naloxegol, naldemedine, and lubiprostone, with conflicting evidence for alvimopan. No data suggest that one agent is better than another. Overall risk of bias across all studies was low to moderate.. With risk of bias determined to be low to moderate, published data to date suggest that methylnaltrexone, naloxegol, and naldemedine may be appropriate to treat OIC in patients with CNCP.

Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Chronic Pain; Constipation; Evidence-Based Practice; Humans; Laxatives; Lubiprostone; Morphinans; Naltrexone; Narcotic Antagonists; Piperidines; Polyethylene Glycols; Quaternary Ammonium Compounds; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) is a major side effect of opioid use. Centrally acting antagonists result in opioid withdrawal or worsening of pain and lead to use of peripherally acting mu-opioid receptor antagonists (PAMORAs). The required doses of the PAMORAs, methylnaltrexone and naloxegol, in the treatment of OIC are well established in chronic opioid users. OIC may occur after short duration of opioid treatment; the required doses of naloxone, naltrexone, and PAMORAs in opioid-naïve subjects (with no opioid use for at least 3 months) are unclear. The aim of this review was to evaluate the PAMORA dose required for opioid-naïve subjects to achieve similar beneficial effects on symptoms or valid surrogates to those observed in chronic opioid users.. A PubMed search of μ-opioid antagonists to counter μ-opioid effects included terms: naloxone, naltrexone, methylnaltrexone, alvimopan, and naloxegol, as well as OIC and colonic transit.. The approved dose of methylnaltrexone in chronic opioid users, 0.3 mg/kg subcutaneous (SQ), did not affect motility in opioid-naïve subjects. Trials investigating the required dose of alvimopan showed 0.5-1 mg dose was efficacious in treating OIC; a 10-fold higher dose (12 mg) of alvimopan is needed to block effects of codeine on small bowel and colonic transit in opioid-naïve subjects compared to chronic opioid users. Opioid-naïve users need 125 mg of naloxegol to reverse the effects of opioids on transit; this is in contrast to the 12.5 to 25 mg needed to treat OIC in chronic opioid users.. Opioid-naïve subjects require a higher dose of PAMORA than chronic opioid users to achieve μ-opioid antagonist effect.

Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Constipation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Gastrointestinal Agents; Humans; Morphinans; Narcotic Antagonists; Pain; Piperidines; Polyethylene Glycols; Receptors, Opioid, mu; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Cancer Pain; Constipation; Enema; Gastrointestinal Agents; Gastrostomy; Humans; Laxatives; Morphinans; Naltrexone; Piperidines; Polyethylene Glycols; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Quaternary Ammonium Compounds

Opioids have been used for centuries, mostly as a sedative and to treat pain. Currently, they are used on a global scale for the treatment of acute and chronic pain in diseases as osteoarthritis, fibromyalgia, and low back pain. Binding of opioids on opioid receptors can cause a range of different effects such as changes in stress response, analgesia, motor activity and autonomic functions. This review provide a synthetic summary of the most recent literature on the use of drugs acting on mu-receptors to treat two prevalent functional bowel disorders, presenting with opposite bowel habit. Eluxadoline and naloxegol, methylnaltrexone and naldemedine are recently FDA and/or EMA approved drugs demonstrated to be effective and safe for treatment respectively of irritable bowel syndrome subtype diarrhea and opioid induced constipation.

Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Animals; Antidiarrheals; Constipation; Defecation; Diarrhea; Gastrointestinal Motility; Gastrointestinal Tract; Humans; Imidazoles; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases; Laxatives; Morphinans; Naltrexone; Narcotic Antagonists; Phenylalanine; Polyethylene Glycols; Quaternary Ammonium Compounds; Receptors, Opioid, mu; Signal Transduction

More than 6 million people in Germany suffer from chronic pain which greatly impairs their wellbeing. Often the only therapeutic option is to use class 2 or 3 analgesic opioids in the WHO classification, as class 1 analgesics may be toxic or of limited efficacy. However, the high incidence of opioid side effects leads to high discontinuation rates. Thus, the success of opioid treatment is also highly dependent on the management of the safety and tolerability of the treatment. Most opioid side effects, such as nausea and sedation, predominantly occur in the initial phase of therapy. In contrast, opioid-induced constipation can last throughout opioid therapy. First-line treatment with laxatives does not solve the problem in all patients. Possible second-line therapies include opioid receptor antagonists, such as Naloxone, oral-administered Naloxegol, or subcutaneously given Methylnaltrexone. The discussion also covers the management of other common side effects of opioids, such as nausea, vomiting, sedation, pruritus, micturition disorder, and further symptoms.

Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Administration, Oral; Analgesics, Opioid; Chronic Pain; Constipation; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Germany; Humans; Morphinans; Naltrexone; Narcotic Antagonists; Polyethylene Glycols; Quaternary Ammonium Compounds; Treatment Outcome

Naloxegol is a peripherally acting μ-opioid receptor antagonist that was developed for the treatment of opioid-induced constipation. Modeling and simulation of naloxegol efficacy and tolerability informed selection of doses for phase III studies and provided comprehensive dosage recommendations for the naloxegol US package insert.

Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Animals; Constipation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Labeling; Humans; Models, Biological; Morphinans; Narcotic Antagonists; Polyethylene Glycols; Treatment Outcome

Naloxegol is a peripherally acting µ-opioid receptor antagonist approved for use as an orally administered tablet (therapeutic doses of 12.5 and 25 mg) for the treatment of opioid-induced constipation. Over a wide dose range (i.e. single supratherapeutic doses up to 1000 mg in healthy volunteers), the pharmacokinetic properties of naloxegol appear to be time- and dose-independent. Naloxegol is rapidly absorbed, with mean time to maximum plasma concentration of <2 h. Following once-daily administration, steady state is achieved within 2-3 days and minimal accumulation is observed. The primary route of naloxegol elimination is via hepatic metabolism, with renal excretion playing a minimal role. In clinical studies, six metabolites were found in feces, urine or plasma, none of which have been identified as unique or disproportionate human metabolites. The major plasma circulating species is naloxegol. There are small effects of mild and moderate renal impairment, age, race, and body mass index on the systemic exposure of naloxegol; however, gender has no effect on the pharmacokinetics of this agent. Naloxegol is a sensitive substrate of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and its exposure can be significantly altered by strong or moderate CYP3A modulators. Food increases the bioavailability of naloxegol, and the relative bioavailability of the tablet formulation was not limited by dissolution. Naloxegol in the dose range of 8-125 mg can antagonize morphine-induced peripheral effects without impacting the effect of morphine on the central nervous system, consistent with a peripheral mode of action.

Topics: Humans; Morphinans; Narcotic Antagonists; Polyethylene Glycols; Receptors, Opioid, mu

Opioid-related bowel dysfunction is a common and potentially severe adverse effect from treatment with opioid analgesics. Its development is not dose related, nor do patients develop tolerance. Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) can lead to fecal impaction, bowel obstruction, and bowel perforation as well as noncompliance with opioid analgesics and poor quality of life. Routine administration of laxatives is necessary to maintain bowel function, and, in refractory cases, other modalities must be pursued. Available options are limited but include peripherally acting μ-opioid receptor antagonists (PAMORAs), including methylnaltrexone. Naloxegol is a newly developed PAMORA that is available through the oral route. At the therapeutic dose of 25 mg daily, naloxegol is effective and safe, with a limited side effect profile and is associated with preservation of centrally mediated analgesia. In this article, we discuss the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, adverse effects, clinical trials, and cost considerations of naloxegol. Finally, we discuss its potential role as a novel key treatment for OIC in palliative medicine patients.

Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Constipation; Drug Interactions; Humans; Morphinans; Naltrexone; Narcotic Antagonists; Pain; Polyethylene Glycols; Quality of Life; Quaternary Ammonium Compounds; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Opioid-based management of noncancer pain has become much more prevalent over the last 2 decades and is responsible for a wide range of side-effects, particularly affecting the intestinal tract causing opioid-induced constipation (OIC). This review will consider results of recent clinical trials that have provided evidence of new pharmacological management options for the treatment of OIC.. Supportive use of conventional agents, such as stool softeners, osmotic laxatives, and stimulating laxatives in OIC has limited efficacy. The peripheral μ-opioid receptor antagonist (PAMORA) methylnaltrexone (MNTX) was first FDA approved for OIC in patients with advanced illness and later also for OIC in noncancer pain patients; clinical trial results indicated MNTX did not reverse opioid analgesia and did not trigger central opioid withdrawal. Another PAMORA, the orally available naloxegol, has also gained recent FDA approval for the treatment of OIC in adults with chronic, noncancer pain. Lubiprostone, a bicyclical fatty acid acting via activation of intestinal chloride channel-2 (ClC-2), was also approved for OIC treatment in patients with noncancer pain.. PAMORA MNTX and naloxegol and the intestinal chloride channel-2 (ClC-2) activator lubiprostone represent additional possible therapeutic options for the management of OIC in patients with chronic noncancer pain.

Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Chloride Channel Agonists; Chronic Pain; Constipation; Humans; Lubiprostone; Morphinans; Naltrexone; Narcotic Antagonists; Polyethylene Glycols; Quaternary Ammonium Compounds; Receptors, Opioid, mu

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Azabicyclo Compounds; Azepines; Benzazepines; Biphenyl Compounds; Ceftazidime; Drug Approval; Drug Combinations; Humans; Ivabradine; Morphinans; Polyethylene Glycols; Pyridines; Tetrazoles; Thiazoles; Triazoles; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration; Valsartan

Opioid analgesics are frequently prescribed and play an important role in chronic pain management. Opioid-induced bowel dysfunction, which includes constipation, hardened stool, incomplete evacuation, gas, and nausea and vomiting, is the most common adverse event associated with opioid use. Mu-opioid receptors are specifically responsible for opioid-induced bowel dysfunction, resulting in reduced peristaltic and secretory actions. Agents that reverse these actions in the bowel without reversing pain control in the central nervous system may be preferred over traditional laxatives. The efficacy and safety of these agents in chronic noncancer pain were assessed from publications identified through Ovid and PubMed database searches. Trials that evaluated the safety and efficacy of oral agents for opioid-induced constipation or opioid-induced bowel dysfunction, excluding laxatives, were reviewed. Lubiprostone and naloxegol are approved in the United States by the Food and Drug Administration for use in opioid-induced constipation. Axelopran (TD-1211) and sustained-release naloxone have undergone phase 2 and phase 1 studies, respectively, for the same indication. Naloxegol and axelopran are peripherally acting μ-opioid receptor antagonists. Naloxone essentially functions as a peripherally acting μ-opioid receptor antagonist when administered orally in a sustained-release formulation. Lubiprostone is a locally acting chloride channel (CIC-2) activator that increases secretions and peristalsis. All agents increase spontaneous bowel movements and reduce other bowel symptoms compared with placebo in patients with noncancer pain who are chronic opioid users. The most common adverse events were gastrointestinal in nature, and none of the drugs were associated with severe adverse or cardiovascular events. Investigations comparing these agents to regimens using standard laxative and combination therapy and trials in special populations and patients with active cancer are needed to further define their role in therapy.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Analgesics, Opioid; Chronic Pain; Constipation; Humans; Lubiprostone; Morphinans; Narcotic Antagonists; Polyethylene Glycols; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Receptors, Opioid, mu; Treatment Outcome

To describe the effectiveness of naloxegol for the treatment of opioid-induced constipation (OIC) in chronic non-cancer pain patients.. Citations in PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, ScienceDirect, and ProQuest were obtained. Reference lists from individual articles obtained were reviewed for additional sources.. All English-language publications available as poster presentations, abstracts, and peer-reviewed articles ranging from preclinical to phase III trials and published between 2007 and September 14, 2014, were reviewed and summarized.. Naloxegol was shown to be effective for increasing the average weekly number of spontaneous bowel movements (SBMs) in a single phase II trial enrolling 208 patients. Phase III trials (KODIAC-04/-05) enrolling a total of 1352 patients developed a new primary end point with a more strict responder criteria. This entailed a mean increase in SBMs, at least 3 SBMs per week, efficacy in 9 of 12 weeks, and efficacy in 3 of the final 4 weeks of the study period. Both groups receiving naloxegol 25 mg had significant improvement over the placebo group. The improvement was similar in patients who reported failure with laxatives in the past and regardless of daily opioid dose. A long-term trial (KODIAC-08) showed safety over 52 weeks.. OIC affects many individuals treated with opioids for chronic non-cancer pain. Previous over-the-counter or prescription treatment options were limited by a lack of adequate and well-controlled studies, multiple daily dosing, or need for injections. Cost issues may limit therapy with naloxegol to select patients.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Analgesics, Opioid; Chronic Pain; Constipation; Female; Humans; Laxatives; Male; Morphinans; Narcotic Antagonists; Polyethylene Glycols

With increasing chronic opioid use, opioid-induced constipation (OIC) is becoming a relevant clinical challenge. Presently, only few treatments have been demonstrated to be more effective than placebo in treating OIC but most of them have a restricted clinical application because of side effects. Naloxegol , an orally administered, peripherally acting, μ-opioid receptor antagonist (PAMORA), was developed for the treatment of OIC.. This review summarizes published information and presentations at meetings on the effects of naloxegol in OIC. Pharmacodynamic studies have demonstrated that naloxegol inhibits gastrointestinal opioid effects while preserving central analgesic actions. Phase II and Phase III studies in patients with non-cancer OIC have confirmed the efficacy of naloxegol to inhibit OIC, and the most consistent efficacy was seen with the 25 mg dose once daily. Adverse events were mainly gastrointestinal in origin and usually transient and mild. There were no signs of opioid withdrawal in the studies. Safety and tolerability were also shown in a long-term safety study. Regulatory authorities have recently approved the use of naloxegol in OIC.. Naloxegol is the first approved, orally available PAMORA. The drug has the potential to substantially improve management of OIC patients.

Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Animals; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Constipation; Humans; Morphinans; Polyethylene Glycols

Oral naloxegol (Movantik™, Moventig(®)), a peripherally acting μ-opioid receptor antagonist, inhibits opioid binding in μ-opioid receptors in the gastrointestinal tract. This article reviews the pharmacological properties of naloxegol and its clinical efficacy and tolerability in patients with opioid-induced constipation. It demonstrated clinical efficacy and was well tolerated in placebo-controlled trials in patients with non-cancer pain and opioid-induced constipation, including those with an inadequate response to laxatives, and was well tolerated in a long-term safety study. As a PEGylated naloxone derivative, naloxegol is associated with significant improvements in spontaneous bowel movements, while maintaining levels of opioid-related analgesia (a result of its reduced ability to cross the blood-brain barrier). Naloxegol is a useful option in the treatment of opioid-induced constipation.

Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Constipation; Humans; Morphinans; Narcotic Antagonists; Polyethylene Glycols; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Receptors, Opioid, mu

Treatment of opioid-induced constipation (OIC) is becoming a relevant clinical challenge as most of the treatments demonstrated to be more effective than placebo in treating OIC have safety issues limiting a broad clinical application. Naloxegol is the first orally administered, peripherally acting, µ opioid receptor antagonist approved by the FDA and EMA specifically for the treatment of noncancer patients with OIC. This review summarizes the results of the studies regarding the effects of naloxegol in OIC. Pharmacodynamic studies have demonstrated that naloxegol was able to inhibit gastrointestinal opioid effects while preserving central analgesic actions. Phase II and phase III studies in patients with noncancer OIC have confirmed the efficacy of naloxegol to inhibit OIC, and the most consistent efficacy was seen with the 25-mg dose once daily. Side effects were mainly gastrointestinal in origin (and usually transient and mild) and there were no signs of opioid withdrawal in the studies. Safety and tolerability were shown in a long-term safety study. Considering its efficacy, safety, route of administration and the limitations of most of the other available treatments, naloxegol has the potential to become the first-line treatment for noncancer patients with OIC.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Analgesics, Opioid; Constipation; Humans; Morphinans; Narcotic Antagonists; Polyethylene Glycols; Receptors, Opioid, mu

Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Animals; Clinical Trials as Topic; Constipation; Gastrointestinal Diseases; Humans; Morphinans; Narcotic Antagonists; Polyethylene Glycols

▼Naloxegol (Moventig-AstraZeneca) is a peripherally acting mu-opioid receptor antagonist licensed for the treatment of opioid-induced constipation in adults who have had an inadequate response to laxative treatment. It was launched in the United Kingdom in October 2015. Here, we review the evidence for naloxegol and consider its place in the management of opioid-induced constipation.

Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Constipation; Humans; Morphinans; Narcotic Antagonists; Polyethylene Glycols

With increasing chronic opioid use, opioid-induced constipation (OIC) is a rapidly increasing clinical challenge. Naloxegol, an orally administered, peripherally-acting, µ-opioid receptor antagonist, was developed for the treatment of OIC. This drug profile summarizes published information and presentations at meetings on the effects of naloxegol in OIC. In animal studies, naloxegol was able to inhibit gastrointestinal opioid effects while preserving central analgesic actions and human pharmacodynamic studies were in agreement with such mode of action. Phase II and Phase III studies in patients with non-cancer OIC confirmed the efficacy of naloxegol to inhibit OIC, and the most consistent efficacy was seen with the 25 mg dose once daily. There were no signs of opioid withdrawal in these studies. Side effects were mainly gastrointestinal in origin, and usually transient and mild. A long-term safety study showed no new adverse events. The US FDA and EMA are currently evaluating the use of naloxegol in OIC.

Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Animals; Constipation; Disease Models, Animal; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Humans; Morphinans; Narcotic Antagonists; Polyethylene Glycols

Opioid treatment often causes debilitating constipation. However, it is not well described how opioids affect colonic motility and whether opioid-induced constipation is due to either a decrease of powerful peristaltic contractions or "uncoordinated" peristalsis. The present study aims to investigate the effect of oxycodone on parameters of colonic motility and to determine whether motility is normalized by the opioid antagonist naloxegol.. In two randomized, double-blind crossover trials, oxycodone or placebo was administered to 25 healthy males (Trial A), while another 24 healthy males were administered oxycodone with naloxegol or placebo (Trial B). Colonic motility was assessed by tracking the progression of an electromagnetic capsule throughout the large intestine. Segmental colonic transit times and capsule movements were calculated using displacement distance and velocity.. In Trial A, colonic transit time increased during oxycodone treatment compared with placebo (39 vs 18 hours, P < .01). Displacement during long fast antegrade movements was shorter during oxycodone treatment than with placebo (10 vs 20 cm, P = .03). In Trial B, colonic transit time was faster during oxycodone + naloxegol than during oxycodone + placebo (40 vs 55 hours, P = .049), mainly caused by an increase of the percentwise fraction of distance covered by fast movements in the left colon (P = .001).. Oxycodone treatment impaired colonic motility, manifested as increased transit time, specifically decreased long fast antegrade movements, and addition of naloxegol improved motility dynamics. In humans, the increased transit time during opioid treatment is caused by a decrease in long fast movements rather than uncoordinated peristalsis.

Topics: Adult; Analgesics, Opioid; Capsule Endoscopy; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Female; Gastrointestinal Motility; Gastrointestinal Transit; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Monitoring, Ambulatory; Morphinans; Narcotic Antagonists; Oxycodone; Polyethylene Glycols; Young Adult

Topics: Administration, Oral; Analgesics, Opioid; Cancer Pain; Double-Blind Method; Family; Feasibility Studies; Hospice Care; Humans; Morphinans; Narcotic Antagonists; Neoplasms; Opioid-Induced Constipation; Palliative Care; Patient Selection; Polyethylene Glycols

To determine patient preference for treating opioid-induced constipation (OIC) using naloxegol or polyethylene glycol (PEG) 3350 in patients receiving opioids for noncancer pain.. This crossover study included two 2-week active treatment periods, each preceded by a 1-week washout period (NCT03060512). Individuals with baseline Bowel Function Index scores ≥30 were randomized to 1 of 2 treatment sequences (naloxegol/PEG 3350 or PEG 3350/naloxegol). Patient preference (primary end point) was measured at the end of the second treatment period.. Of 276 patients randomized, 246 completed both treatment periods and reported preference (per protocol). Similar proportions of patients reported overall preference for naloxegol (50.4%) or PEG 3350 (48.0%; P = 0.92); 1.6% reported no preference. Medication characteristics influencing preference were similar for both treatments, except convenience and working quickly, which were strong influences of preference for higher proportions of patients preferring naloxegol (69.9% and 39.0%, respectively) vs those preferring PEG 3350 (29.9% and 27.4%, respectively). Patients aged <50 years or receiving laxatives within the previous 2 weeks generally preferred naloxegol. Changes from baseline in overall Bowel Function Index and Patient Global Impression of Change scores were similar between treatments, but analyses according to treatment preference revealed clinical improvement aligned with reported preference. Safety profiles were generally consistent with known medication profiles.. Almost equal proportions of patients with OIC reported similar preference for daily naloxegol or PEG 3350 treatment, and their preference was generally supported by clinically relevant and measurable improvements in OIC symptoms.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Analgesics, Opioid; Constipation; Cross-Over Studies; Defecation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Electrolytes; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Laxatives; Male; Middle Aged; Morphinans; Patient Preference; Polyethylene Glycols; Prospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

To summarize results from pain and opioid use assessments with naloxegol in adults with opioid-induced constipation (OIC) and chronic noncancer pain.. Two phase 3 randomized, double-blind, 12-week studies evaluated the efficacy and safety of oral naloxegol (12.5 or 25 mg daily) in adults (18 to < 85 years) with confirmed OIC and chronic noncancer pain: KODIAC-04 (NCT01309841) and KODIAC-05 (NCT01323790). Pain level was assessed daily (11-point numeric rating scale [NRS]; 0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain). Changes from baseline in mean weekly pain scores and opioid dose (weeks 1 through 12) were analyzed using mixed-model repeated measures.. At baseline, mean daily NRS average pain scores ranged from 4.5 to 4.8 for all groups in KODIAC-04 (N = 652) and were 4.6 for each group in KODIAC-05 (N = 700). Respective mean ± SD changes from baseline average pain for placebo, naloxegol 12.5 mg, and naloxegol 25 mg were -0.2 ± 1.07, -0.3 ± 1.05 (P = 0.773 vs. placebo), and 0.2 ± 0.95 (P = 0.837 vs. placebo; KODIAC-04) and -0.1 ± 0.94, -0.1 ± 0.87 (P = 0.744), and 0.0 ± 1.18 (P = 0.572; KODIAC-05). At baseline, mean daily opioid doses ranged from 135.6 to 143.2 morphine equivalent units (MEUs)/day in KODIAC-04, and from 119.9 to 151.7 MEUs/day in KODIAC-05. Respective mean ± SD changes from baseline dose were -1.8 ± 30.19, -2.3 ± 20.52 (P = 0.724 vs. placebo), and 0.4 ± 13.01 (P = 0.188 vs. placebo; KODIAC-04) and -0.3 ± 17.14, -1.3 ± 17.11 (P = 0.669 vs. placebo), and 0.1 ± 8.54 (P = 0.863 vs. placebo; KODIAC-05). Changes in maintenance opioid dose were few; reasons for such changes were similar across treatment groups.. Centrally mediated opioid analgesia was maintained during treatment with naloxegol in patients with noncancer pain and OIC.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Analgesics, Opioid; Chronic Pain; Constipation; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morphinans; Narcotic Antagonists; Polyethylene Glycols

Nausea, vomiting, and constipation (OIC) are common adverse effects of acute or chronic opioid use. Naloxegol (25 mg) is an approved peripherally active mu-opiate opioid receptor antagonist.. To compare the effects on pan-gut transit of treatment with codeine, naloxegol, or combination in healthy volunteers.. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-center, parallel-group study in 72 healthy opioid-naïve adults, randomized to: codeine (30 mg q.i.d.), naloxegol (25 mg daily), codeine and naloxegol, or matching placebo. During 3 days of treatment, we measured gastric emptying (GE) T. Participants were 59.7% women, median BMI 25.0 kg/m. Short-term administration of naloxegol (25 mg) in healthy, opioid-naïve volunteers does not reverse the retardation of gastric, small bowel, or colonic transit induced by acute administration of codeine. Further studies with naloxegol at higher dose are warranted to assess the ability to reverse the retardation of transit caused by acute administration of codeine in opioid-naïve subjects.

Topics: Adult; Codeine; Double-Blind Method; Female; Gastric Emptying; Gastrointestinal Transit; Healthy Volunteers; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morphinans; Narcotic Antagonists; Narcotics; Polyethylene Glycols; Receptors, Opioid, mu; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Opioid treatment interferes with anal sphincter function and its regulation during defecation. This may result in straining, incomplete evacuation, and contribute to opioid-induced bowel dysfunction (OIBD). Employing an experimental model of oxycodone-induced OIBD, we hypothesized that co-administration of the peripherally acting μ-opioid antagonist naloxegol would improve anal sphincter function in comparison to placebo.. In a double-blind randomized crossover trial, 24 healthy males were assigned to a six-day treatment of oral oxycodone 15 mg twice daily in combination with either oral naloxegol 25 mg once daily or placebo. At baseline and at day 6, anal resting pressure and the recto-anal inhibitory reflex (RAIR) were evaluated using manometry and rectal balloon distension. Furthermore, the functional lumen imaging probe was used to measure distensibility of the anal canal. Gastrointestinal symptoms were assessed with the Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptom (PAC-SYM) questionnaire and the Bristol Stool Form Scale.. During oxycodone treatment, naloxegol improved RAIR-induced sphincter relaxation by 15% (-45.9 vs -38.8 mm Hg; P < 0.01). No differences in anal resting pressure and anal canal distensibility were found between treatments (all P > 0.5). Naloxegol improved PAC-SYM symptoms (mean score over days; 2.6 vs 4.5, P < 0.001) and improved stool consistency scores (mean score over days; 3.3 vs 2.9, P < 0.01).. In this experimental model of OIBD, naloxegol improved the RAIR and reduced gastrointestinal symptoms. Hence, in contrast to conventional laxatives, naloxegol may regulate opioid-induced anal sphincter dysfunction and facilitate the defecation process.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Anal Canal; Analgesics, Opioid; Constipation; Cross-Over Studies; Defecation; Denmark; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morphinans; Narcotic Antagonists; Oxycodone; Polyethylene Glycols; Pressure; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Naloxegol is approved for the treatment of opioid-induced constipation (OIC) in adults with chronic noncancer pain. Population exposure-response models were developed using data from a phase II study comprising 185 adults with OIC. The weekly probability of response defined as having ≥3/week spontaneous bowel movements (SBMs) and ≥1 SBM/week increase over baseline was characterized by a longitudinal mixed-effects logistic regression dose-response model, and the probability of time to discontinuation was modeled with a Weibull distribution function. The predicted probability of SBM in a given week increased with increasing naloxegol dose. The model predicted that 12.5, 25, and 37.5 mg doses would produce median response rates of 40%, 50%, and 60%, and dropout rates of 13.3%, 16.7%, and 23.3%, respectively. The large overlap of predicted difference of the response rate between placebo and the 25 or 37.5 mg doses suggested little utility of using a 37.5 mg dose in phase III studies.

Topics: Algorithms; Analgesics, Opioid; Chronic Pain; Constipation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Models, Statistical; Morphinans; Narcotic Antagonists; Polyethylene Glycols; Regression Analysis

Naloxegol is a peripherally acting μ-opioid receptor antagonist approved as an orally administered tablet for the treatment of opioid-induced constipation. Patients with swallowing difficulties may benefit from alternative approaches to the oral administration of the whole-tablet formulation of naloxegol. This open-label, randomized, 4-period, 4-treatment, crossover, single-dose study (NCT02446171) evaluated the pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristics of crushed naloxegol 25-mg tablets (suspended in water) administered orally or by nasogastric tube and a naloxegol solution compared with the commercially available 25-mg tablet formulation in healthy volunteers. The PK profiles for the crushed tablet, whether administered orally or by nasogastric tube, and the 25-mg oral solution were similar to that of the 25-mg tablet administered orally. Compared with naloxegol commercial tablets, the relative bioavailability of naloxegol using 3 alternative methods of administration was approximately 100%. For each pairwise treatment comparison of the 3 alternative methods with the approved whole tablet, the geometric least-squares mean ratio ranges were 94.37%-100.04%, 94.83%-100.44%, and 97.05%-102.05% for area under the curve (AUC), AUC

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Area Under Curve; Biological Availability; Cross-Over Studies; Female; Healthy Volunteers; Humans; Intubation, Gastrointestinal; Male; Middle Aged; Morphinans; Narcotic Antagonists; Polyethylene Glycols; Prospective Studies; Young Adult

Naloxegol is a PEGylated, oral, peripherally acting μ-opioid receptor antagonist approved in the United States for treatment of opioid-induced constipation in patients with noncancer pain. Naloxegol is metabolized by CYP3A, and its properties as a substrate for the P-glycoprotein (PGP) transporter limit its central nervous system (CNS) permeability. This double-blind, randomized, 2-part, crossover study in healthy volunteers evaluated the effect of quinidine (600 mg PO), a CYP3A/PGP transporter inhibitor, on the pharmacokinetics and CNS distribution of naloxegol (25 mg PO). In addition, the effects of quinidine on morphine (5 mg/70 kg IV)-induced miosis and exposure to naloxegol were assessed. Coadministration of quinidine and naloxegol increased naloxegol's AUC 1.4-fold and Cmax 2.5-fold but did not antagonize morphine-induced miosis, suggesting that PGP inhibition does not increase the CNS penetration of naloxegol. Naloxegol pharmacokinetics was unaltered by coadministration of morphine and either quinidine or placebo; conversely, pharmacokinetics of morphine and its metabolites (in the presence of quinidine) were unaltered by coadministration of naloxegol. Naloxegol was safe and well tolerated, alone or in combination with quinidine, morphine, or both. The observed increase in exposure to naloxegol in the presence of quinidine is primarily attributed to quinidine's properties as a weak CYP3A inhibitor.

Topics: Adult; Analgesics, Opioid; Area Under Curve; ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1; Central Nervous System; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Morphinans; Morphine; Pain; Polyethylene Glycols; Quinidine; Receptors, Opioid, mu

Naloxegol, a peripherally acting μ-opioid receptor antagonist, was recently approved in the United States for the treatment of opioid-induced constipation. This study evaluated the effects of CYP3A inhibition and induction on the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of naloxegol. Separate open-label, nonrandomized, fixed-sequence, 3-period, 3-treatment, crossover studies of naloxegol (25 mg by mouth [PO]) in the absence or presence of the inhibitors ketoconazole (400 mg PO) and diltiazem extended release (240 mg PO), or the inducer rifampin (600 mg PO) were conducted in healthy volunteers. Area under the curve (AUC∞ ) for naloxegol was increased with coadministration of either ketoconazole (12.9-fold) or diltiazem (3.4-fold) and decreased by 89% with coadministration of rifampin compared with AUC∞ for naloxegol alone. Naloxegol was generally safe and well tolerated when given alone or coadministered with the respective CYP3A modulators; 1 subject discontinued because of elevations in liver enzymes attributed to rifampin. The exposure of naloxegol was affected substantially by ketoconazole, diltiazem, and rifampin, suggesting that it is a sensitive in vivo substrate of CYP3A4.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Cross-Over Studies; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A Inducers; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A Inhibitors; Drug Interactions; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morphinans; Polyethylene Glycols; Young Adult

Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) is the most common side effect of opioid treatment. Treatment for OIC typically involves a laxative. However, some patients have an inadequate response to these (laxative inadequate responders, or LIR). This has led to the development of treatments such as naloxegol. This analysis estimates the impact of naloxegol on the health state utility of LIR patients, examines if this utility impact is driven by the change in OIC status, and estimates the utility impact of relief of OIC.. The analysis was conducted using data from two 12-week randomized controlled trials, KODIAC 4 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT01309841) and KODIAC 5 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT01323790), plus KODIAC 7 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT01395524), a 12-week extension to KODIAC 4. All were designed to assess the efficacy and safety of oral naloxegol (12.5 and 25 mg) compared to placebo. Health state utility data were collected through the EuroQol-five dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D-3L). Descriptive analysis was undertaken to estimate how EQ-5D utility scores and EQ-5D domain responses varied with treatment, OIC status, and over time. A repeated measure mixed-effects model was used to predict the change from baseline in health state utility score over time.. Compared with placebo, LIR patients treated with naloxegol 25 mg reported a 0.08 improvement in the EQ-5D overall score after 12 weeks of treatment. The analyses also suggest that change in OIC status is a key driver of the impact of OIC treatment on health state utility. When other factors are controlled, relieving OIC is associated with a 0.05 improvement in health state utility, although treatment with naloxegol is associated with an improvement in health state utility over and above the improvement in OIC status.. These analyses suggest that treatment with naloxegol improves patients' health state utility; driven predominantly by the relief of patients' constipation.. AstraZeneca.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Analgesics, Opioid; Constipation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morphinans; Narcotic Antagonists; Polyethylene Glycols; Quality of Life

To characterize the absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion of naloxegol, a PEGylated derivative of the µ-opioid antagonist naloxone, in healthy male subjects.. [14C]-Labeled naloxegol (27 mg, 3.43 MBq) was administered as an oral solution to 6 fasted subjects. Blood, fecal, and urine samples were collected predose and at various intervals postdose. Naloxegol and its metabolites were quantified or identified by liquid chromatography with radiometric or mass spectrometric detection. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated for each subject, and metabolite identification was performed by liquid chromatography with parallel radioactivity measurement and mass spectrometry.. Naloxegol was rapidly absorbed, with a maximum plasma concentration (geometric mean) of 51 ng/mL reached before 2 hours after dosing. A second peak in the observed naloxegol and [14C] plasma concentration-time profiles was observed at ~3 hours and was likely due to enterohepatic recycling of parent naloxegol. Distribution to red blood cells was negligible. Metabolism of [14C]-naloxegol was rapid and extensive and occurred via demethylation and oxidation, dealkylation, and shortening of the polyethylene glycol chain. Mean cumulative recovery of radioactivity was 84.2% of the total dose, with ~68.9% recovered within 96 hours of dosing. Fecal excretion was the predominant route of elimination, with mean recoveries of total radioactivity in feces and urine of 67.7% and 16.0%, respectively. Unchanged naloxegol accounted for ~1/4 of the radioactivity recovered in feces.. Naloxegol was rapidly absorbed and cleared via metabolism, with predominantly fecal excretion of parent and metabolites.

Topics: Aged; Carbon Radioisotopes; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morphinans; Narcotic Antagonists; Polyethylene Glycols; Tissue Distribution

This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, ascending-dose, crossover study evaluated single oral doses of naloxegol (NKTR-118; 8, 15, 30, 60, 125, 250, 500, and 1000 mg), a PEGylated derivative of naloxone, for safety and tolerability, antagonism of peripheral and central nervous system (CNS) effects of intravenous morphine, and pharmacokinetics. Healthy men were randomized 1:1 to naloxegol or naloxegol-matching placebo administered with morphine and lactulose in a 2-period crossover design. Periods were separated by a 5- to 7-day washout. Assessments included safety, tolerability, orocecal transit time (OCTT), pupillary miosis, and pharmacokinetics. The study was completed by 46 subjects. The most common adverse events were somnolence, dizziness, headache, and nausea. Greater reversal of morphine-induced delay in OCTT occurred with increasing naloxegol dose, demonstrating dose-ordered antagonism of morphine's peripheral gastrointestinal effects. Forty-four subjects showed no reversal of pupillary miosis; 2 showed potential partial reversal at 250 and 1000 mg, indicating negligible antagonism of morphine's CNS effects at doses ≤ 125 mg. Rapid absorption, linear pharmacokinetics up to 1000 mg, and low to moderate between-subject pharmacokinetic variability was observed. The pharmacokinetics of morphine or its glucuronide metabolites were unaltered by concurrent naloxegol administration. Naloxegol was generally safe and well tolerated at single doses up to 1000 mg.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Central Nervous System; Cross-Over Studies; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Gastrointestinal Transit; Healthy Volunteers; Humans; Linear Models; Male; Middle Aged; Miosis; Models, Biological; Morphinans; Morphine; Narcotic Antagonists; Netherlands; Peripheral Nervous System; Polyethylene Glycols; Receptors, Opioid, mu; Young Adult

Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) is the most common and often a treatment-limiting adverse event (AE) of opioid therapy for chronic pain. Naloxegol (previously NKTR-118), a PEGylated derivative of naloxone that has minimal penetration of the central nervous system, has received regulatory approval as an oral therapy for OIC. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple-dose, dose-escalation study was performed to assess safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of multiple doses of naloxegol in healthy volunteers. Four cohorts, each with 4 male and 4 female volunteers, were randomized 3:1 to a twice-daily naloxegol solution (25, 60, 125, and 250 mg) or matching placebo solution. Doses were given every 12 hours for 7 days, with a single final dose on the morning of day 8. All 32 subjects completed the study. The incidence of most AEs was similar in the naloxegol and placebo groups; no AE led to study discontinuation. Naloxegol was rapidly absorbed. Plasma naloxegol pharmacokinetics showed dose proportionality, negligible accumulation at steady state, and no sex differences. Naloxegol in doses up to 250 mg every 12 hours was generally safe and well tolerated in this healthy volunteer population.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Area Under Curve; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Gastrointestinal Absorption; Half-Life; Humans; Male; Metabolic Clearance Rate; Middle Aged; Models, Biological; Morphinans; Narcotic Antagonists; Netherlands; Polyethylene Glycols; Young Adult

Opioid-induced constipation is common and debilitating. We investigated the efficacy and safety of naloxegol, an oral, peripherally acting, μ-opioid receptor antagonist, for the treatment of opioid-induced constipation.. In two identical phase 3, double-blind studies (study 04, 652 participants; study 05, 700 participants), outpatients with noncancer pain and opioid-induced constipation were randomly assigned to receive a daily dose of 12.5 or 25 mg of naloxegol or placebo. The primary end point was the 12-week response rate (≥3 spontaneous bowel movements per week and an increase from baseline of ≥1 spontaneous bowel movements for ≥9 of 12 weeks and for ≥3 of the final 4 weeks) in the intention-to-treat population. The key secondary end points were the response rate in the subpopulation of patients with an inadequate response to laxatives before enrollment, time to first postdose spontaneous bowel movement, and mean number of days per week with one or more spontaneous bowel movements.. Response rates were significantly higher with 25 mg of naloxegol than with placebo (intention-to-treat population: study 04, 44.4% vs. 29.4%, P=0.001; study 05, 39.7% vs. 29.3%, P=0.02; patients with an inadequate response to laxatives: study 04, 48.7% vs. 28.8%, P=0.002; study 05, 46.8% vs. 31.4%, P=0.01); in study 04, response rates were also higher in the group treated with 12.5 mg of naloxegol (intention-to-treat population, 40.8% vs. 29.4%, P=0.02; patients with an inadequate response to laxatives, 42.6% vs. 28.8%, P=0.03). A shorter time to the first postdose spontaneous bowel movement and a higher mean number of days per week with one or more spontaneous bowel movements were observed with 25 mg of naloxegol versus placebo in both studies (P<0.001) and with 12.5 mg of naloxegol in study 04 (P<0.001). Pain scores and daily opioid dose were similar among the three groups. Adverse events (primarily gastrointestinal) occurred most frequently in the groups treated with 25 mg of naloxegol.. Treatment with naloxegol, as compared with placebo, resulted in a significantly higher rate of treatment response, without reducing opioid-mediated analgesia. (Funded by AstraZeneca; KODIAC-04 and KODIAC-05 ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT01309841 and NCT01323790, respectively.).

Topics: Adult; Analgesics, Opioid; Constipation; Defecation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morphinans; Narcotic Antagonists; Pain; Polyethylene Glycols; Receptors, Opioid, mu

Naloxegol is a peripherally acting µ-opioid receptor antagonist (PAMORA) in development for the treatment of opioid-induced constipation (OIC). The pharmacokinetics of a single oral 25-mg dose of naloxegol in plasma was assessed in patients with mild (Child-Pugh class A) or moderate (Child-Pugh class B) hepatic impairment and compared with healthy volunteers. Participants were matched for sex, age, and body mass index. Hepatically impaired patients exhibited a 17%-18% decrease in area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) despite similar maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax ). This was an unexpected finding given that naloxegol is primarily cleared by the hepatic route. Time to Cmax was shorter in patients with moderate impairment (0.6 hours) versus those with mild impairment (2.3 hours) or normal subjects (2.0 hours). Mean apparent terminal half-life (t½ ) was shorter in patients with mild (9.6 hours) and moderate (7.5 hours) hepatic impairment versus healthy subjects (11.3 hours). Reductions in enterohepatic recycling of naloxegol because of hepatic impairment may explain the observed decreases in AUC and t½ observed in these patients. Naloxegol was generally well tolerated, and mild or moderate hepatic impairment appeared to have minimal effect on its pharmacokinetics and safety.

Topics: Adult; Area Under Curve; Female; Humans; Liver Diseases; Male; Middle Aged; Morphinans; Narcotic Antagonists; Polyethylene Glycols

The impact of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics of a 25-mg oral dose of naloxegol was examined in patients with renal impairment classified as moderate, severe, or end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and compared with healthy subjects (n = 8/group). Geometric mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) was increased in patients with moderate (1.7-fold) or severe (2.2-fold) impairment, and maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax ) were elevated in patients with moderate (1.1-fold) or severe (1.8-fold) impairment. These findings were driven by higher exposures in two patients in each of the moderate and severe impairment groups; exposures in all other patients were similar to the control group. Overall exposures in ESRD patients were similar and Cmax was 29% lower versus normal subjects. Renal impairment minimally affected other plasma pharmacokinetic parameters. As renal clearance was a minor component of total clearance, exposure to naloxegol was unaffected by the degree of renal impairment, with no correlation between either AUC or Cmax and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Hemodialysis was an ineffective means to remove naloxegol. Naloxegol was generally well tolerated in all groups. Renal impairment could adversely affect clearance by hepatic and gut metabolism, resulting in the increased exposures observed in outliers of the moderate and severe renal impairment groups.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Area Under Curve; Female; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morphinans; Narcotic Antagonists; Polyethylene Glycols; Renal Dialysis; Renal Insufficiency

Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) is a common adverse effect of opioid therapy.. To evaluate the long-term safety and tolerability of naloxegol, an oral, peripherally acting μ-opioid receptor antagonist (PAMORA), in patients with noncancer pain and OIC.. A 52-week, multicenter, open-label, randomised, parallel-group phase 3 study was conducted in out-patients taking 30-1000 morphine-equivalent units per day for ≥4 weeks. Patients were randomised 2:1 to receive naloxegol 25 mg/day or usual-care (UC; investigator-chosen laxative regimen) treatment for OIC.. The safety set comprised 804 patients (naloxegol, n = 534; UC, n = 270). Mean exposure duration was 268 days with naloxegol and 297 days with UC. Frequency of adverse events (AEs) was 81.8% with naloxegol and 72.2% with UC. Treatment-emergent AEs occurring more frequently for naloxegol vs. UC were abdominal pain (17.8% vs. 3.3%), diarrhoea (12.9% vs. 5.9%), nausea (9.4% vs. 4.1%), headache (9.0% vs. 4.8%), flatulence (6.9% vs. 1.1%) and upper abdominal pain (5.1% vs. 1.1%). Most naloxegol-emergent gastrointestinal AEs occurred early, resolving during or after naloxegol discontinuation and were mild or moderate in severity; 11 patients discontinued due to diarrhoea and nine patients owing to abdominal pain. Pain scores and mean daily opioid doses remained stable throughout the study; no attributable opioid withdrawal AEs were observed. Two patients in each group had an adjudicated major adverse cardiovascular event unrelated to study drug; no AEs were reported nor adjudicated as bowel perforations.. In patients with noncancer pain and opioid-induced constipation, naloxegol 25 mg/day up to 52 weeks was generally safe and well tolerated.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Analgesics, Opioid; Constipation; Female; Humans; Laxatives; Male; Middle Aged; Morphinans; Morphine; Narcotic Antagonists; Pain; Polyethylene Glycols

Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) is a common adverse effect associated with opioid use. Naloxegol is a PEGylated derivative of naloxone in clinical development as a once-daily oral treatment of OIC.. A thorough QT/QTc study was conducted, according to International Conference on Harmonisation E14 guidelines, to characterize the effect of naloxegol on cardiac repolarization.. In this randomized, positive- and placebo-controlled crossover study, healthy men received a single dose of naloxegol 25 mg (therapeutic dose), naloxegol 150 mg (supratherapeutic dose), moxifloxacin 400 mg (positive control), or placebo in 1 of 4 sequences (Williams Latin square design). The washout time between treatment periods was at least 5 days. Digital 12-lead ECGs were recorded at baseline and at 10 time points over 24 hours after dosing in each treatment period. QT intervals were corrected for heart rate using the Fridericia formula (QTcF) and the Bazett formula (QTcB).. A total of 52 subjects were enrolled (mean age, 28 years), and 45 received all 4 treatments. The placebo-corrected, baseline-adjusted, mean increases in QTcF with naloxegol 25 and 150 mg were both <5 msec at each time point, and all upper limits of the 2-sided 90% CI were <10 msec. Similar findings were observed using QTcB; the upper limits of the 2-sided 90% CI were <10 msec at all time points after dosing with naloxegol 25 or 150 mg. With moxifloxacin 400 mg, mean QTcF was increased by a maximum of 11.1 msec (90% CI, 9.3-12.9 msec), supporting assay sensitivity.. Naloxegol at 25 and 150 mg was not associated with QT/QTc interval prolongation in these healthy men, and at the proposed therapeutic dose of 25 mg/d, naloxegol is not expected to have a clinically relevant effect on cardiac repolarization in patients with OIC. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01325415.

Topics: Adult; Aza Compounds; Constipation; Cross-Sectional Studies; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Electrocardiography; Fluoroquinolones; Healthy Volunteers; Heart; Heart Rate; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morphinans; Moxifloxacin; Naloxone; Narcotic Antagonists; Polyethylene Glycols; Quinolines; Young Adult

The use of alvimopan at the time of cystectomy has been associated with improved perioperative outcomes. Naloxegol is a less costly alternative that has been used in some centers. This study aims to compare the perioperative outcomes of patients undergoing cystectomy with urinary diversion who receive the mu-opioid antagonist alvimopan versus naloxegol.. This was a retrospective review that included all patients who underwent cystectomy with urinary diversion at our institution between 2007-2020. Comparisons were made between patients who received perioperative alvimopan, naloxegol and no mu-opioid antagonist (controls).. In 715 patients who underwent cystectomy, 335 received a perioperative mu-opioid antagonist, of whom 57 received naloxegol. Control patients, compared to naloxegol and alvimopan patients, experienced a significantly (p < 0.05) delayed return of bowel function (4.3 vs. 2.5 vs. 3.0 days) and longer hospital length of stay (7.9 vs. 7.5 vs. 6.5 days), respectively. The incidence of nasogastric tube use (14.2% vs. 12.5% vs. 6.5%) and postoperative ileus (21.6% vs. 21.1% vs. 13.3%) was also most common in the control group compared to the naloxegol and alvimopan cohorts, respectively. A multivariable analysis revealed that when comparing naloxegol and alvimopan, there was no difference in return of bowel function (OR 0.88, p = 0.17), incidence of postoperative ileus (OR 1.60, p = 0.44), or hospital readmission (OR 1.22, p = 0.63).. Naloxegol expedites the return of bowel function to the same degree as alvimopan in cystectomy patients. Given the lower cost of naloxegol, this agent may be a preferable alternative to alvimopan.

Topics: Cystectomy; Gastrointestinal Agents; Humans; Ileus; Length of Stay; Morphinans; Narcotic Antagonists; Piperidines; Polyethylene Glycols; Postoperative Complications; Urinary Diversion

The rapid emergence of COVID-19 pandemics has posed humans particularly vulnerable to the novel SARS-CoV-2 virus. Since

Topics: COVID-19 Drug Treatment; Humans; Molecular Dynamics Simulation; Morphinans; Polyethylene Glycols; Protein Binding; Ritonavir; SARS-CoV-2; Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus

The objective of this clinical case report is to highlight unusual adverse effects brought on by naloxegol therapy in a patient with underlying psychiatric illness. The patient is a 68-year-old female, with a psychiatric history of bipolar disorder, who presented for chronic pain management and opioid-induced constipation. After failing other therapies, she was trialed on naloxegol on three separate occasions. She experienced mood lability with symptoms including agitation, confusion, irritability, hysteria and unprompted crying spells on each occasion. Notably, the drug manufacturer does not describe mood lability, nor the profound psychiatric manifestations outlined in our case report, as side effects of Naloxegol. Clinicians may consider judicious prescription of naloxegol when treating opioid-induced constipation in patients with pre-existing psychiatric co-morbidities.. Lay abstract Our case report describes a patient with a history of pre-existing psychiatric illness and chronic pain treated with opioids who experienced unusual psychiatric side effects with naloxegol treatment. Naloxegol is used in patients who suffer from constipation from treatment with long-term opioids, often after not responding to the first-line treatment, which is stool-softeners and laxatives. Our patient, a 68-year-old female with bipolar disorder, tried naloxegol multiple times and each time experienced side effects that resolved after stopping the medication. Her symptoms included agitation, confusion, irritability, hysteria and unprompted crying spells. The drug manufacturer states that the most common side effects are gastrointestinal, such as diarrhea and nausea, but does not mention these types of psychiatric symptoms as possible side effects.

Topics: Aged; Analgesics, Opioid; Constipation; Female; Humans; Morphinans; Narcotic Antagonists; Opioid-Induced Constipation; Polyethylene Glycols

Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) can affect up to 63% of all patients with cancer. The objectives of this study were to assess quality of life as well as efficacy and safety of naloxegol, in patients with cancer with OIC.. An observational study was made of a cohort of patients with cancer and with OIC exhibiting an inadequate response to laxatives and treated with naloxegol. The sample consisted of adult outpatients with a Karnofsky performance status score ≥50. The Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life Questionnaire (PAC-QOL) and the Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms (PAC-SYM) were applied for 3 months.. A total of 126 patients (58.2% males) with a mean age of 61.3 years (range 34-89) were included. Clinically relevant improvements (>0.5 points) were recorded in the PAC-QOL and PAC-SYM questionnaires (p<0.0001) from 15 days of treatment. The number of days a week with complete spontaneous bowel movements increased significantly (p<0.0001) from 2.4 to 4.6 on day 15, 4.7 after 1 month and 5 after 3 months. Pain control significantly improved (p<0.0001) during follow-up. A total of 13.5% of the patients (17/126) presented some gastrointestinal adverse reaction, mostly of mild (62.5%) or moderate intensity (25%).. Clinically relevant improvements in OIC-related quality of life, number of bowel movements and constipation-related symptoms were recorded as early as after 15 days of treatment with naloxegol in patients with cancer and OIC, with a good safety profile.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Analgesics, Opioid; Cancer Pain; Cohort Studies; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morphinans; Narcotic Antagonists; Opioid-Induced Constipation; Pain Management; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Polyethylene Glycols; Quality of Life; Surveys and Questionnaires

Naloxegol is a new peripherally acting mu-opioid receptor antagonist to treat opioid-induced constipation with supposedly no effect on opioid analgesia. We present a patient with cancer-related pain who developed acute opioid withdrawal symptoms due to an interaction between the opioid antagonist naloxone and naloxegol. He was treated with oxycodone sustained release because of poor pain control. For opioid-related constipation, he had been receiving naloxegol. He complained about worsening pain and constipation and oxycodone was switched to oxycodone/naloxone. Shortly after intake, he experienced acute severe agitation, anxiety, sweating, tachycardia, disorientation and yawning without improvement after intravenous midazolam. Only after intravenous morphine administration, symptoms were controlled. He was switched back to the previous oxycodone dose without naloxone, with naloxegol being maintained. In the light of this case we suggest to avoid the use of naloxone and naloxegol in combination, or at least, to use it with extreme caution and monitorisation of tolerance.

Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Constipation; Humans; Male; Morphinans; Naloxone; Narcotic Antagonists; Oxycodone; Polyethylene Glycols; Substance Withdrawal Syndrome

Opioid-induced constipation is the most prevalent adverse effect of opioid drugs. Peripherally acting mu opioid receptor antagonists (PAMORAs), including naloxegol, are indicated for the treatment of opioid-induced constipation. The aim of this study was the in vitro and in vivo pharmacological characterization of naloxegol in comparison with naloxone. In vitro experiments were performed to measure calcium mobilization in cells coexpressing opioid receptors and chimeric G proteins and mu receptor interaction with G protein and β-arrestin 2 using bioluminescence resonance energy transfer. In vivo experiments were performed in mice to measure pain threshold using the tail withdrawal assay and colonic transit using the bead expulsion assay. In vitro, naloxegol behaved as a selective and competitive mu receptor antagonist similarly to naloxone, being 3-10-fold less potent. In vivo, naloxone was effective in blocking fentanyl actions when given subcutaneously (sc), but not per os (po). In contrast, naloxegol elicited very similar effects with sc or po administration counteracting in a dose dependent manner the constipating effects of fentanyl without interfering with the fentanyl mediated analgesia. Thus, a useful PAMORA action could be obtained with naloxegol both after po and sc administration.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Analgesics, Opioid; Animals; Behavior, Animal; Calcium; CHO Cells; Constipation; Cricetulus; Fentanyl; Injections, Subcutaneous; Male; Mice; Morphinans; Morphine; Naloxone; Narcotic Antagonists; Pain; Polyethylene Glycols; Receptors, Opioid, mu

Naloxegol, an oral once-daily peripherally acting mu-opioid receptor antagonist, is indicated for the treatment of opioid-induced constipation (OIC) with inadequate response to laxative(s), in cancer and non-cancer patients. This study mainly aimed to assess in real-life conditions the efficacy and safety of naloxegol in cancer pain patients and the evolution of their quality of life.. A non-interventional, 4-week follow-up study was conducted in 24 French oncology and pain centers between 2018 and 2019. Eligible patients were aged ≥ 18 years, treated with opioids for cancer pain, and started naloxegol for OIC with inadequate response to laxatives. The rate of the response to naloxegol (primary criterion) was assessed at W4. The evolution of quality of life was measured using the Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life (PAC-QOL).. A total of 124 patients were included (mean age, 62 ± 12 years; ECOG ≤ 2, 79%; primary cancer, lung 18%, breast 16%, prostate 11%, head and neck 9%, digestive 9%…; metastatic stage, 80%). At inclusion, the median opioid dosage was 60 mg of oral morphine or equivalent. At W4, the response rate was 73.4% (95% CI [63.7-83.2%]), and 62.9% (95% CI [51.5-74.2%]) of patients had a clinically relevant change in quality of life (decrease in PAC-QOL score ≥ 0.5 point). Adverse events related to naloxegol were reported in 8% of patients (7% with gastrointestinal events; one serious diarrhea).. This real-world study shows that naloxegol is effective and well tolerated in cancer pain patients with OIC and that their quality of life improves under treatment.

Topics: Aged; Analgesics, Opioid; Cancer Pain; Constipation; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morphinans; Neoplasms; Opioid-Induced Constipation; Polyethylene Glycols; Quality of Life

Topics: Adenocarcinoma of Lung; Aged; Analgesics, Opioid; Biopsy; Dilatation; Endoscopy, Digestive System; Esophageal Achalasia; Esophagogastric Junction; Female; Humans; Liver; Liver Neoplasms; Lung Neoplasms; Lymphatic Metastasis; Manometry; Morphinans; Narcotic Antagonists; Palliative Care; Polyethylene Glycols; Treatment Outcome

Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) is common and can significantly affect quality of life. Naloxegol and methylnaltrexone are peripherally acting µ-opioid receptor antagonists (PAMORAs) which are effective for the management of OIC. We report on a case in the palliative care setting where a patient with established OIC had an inadequate response to naloxegol but an effective and immediate response to methylnaltrexone at the dose recommended for her weight. This is the first reported case of two PAMORAs used concomitantly.

Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Female; Humans; Middle Aged; Morphinans; Naltrexone; Narcotic Antagonists; Opioid-Induced Constipation; Palliative Care; Polyethylene Glycols; Quality of Life; Quaternary Ammonium Compounds

Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Constipation; Humans; Morphinans; Patient Preference; Polyethylene Glycols; Prospective Studies

Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Humans; Laxatives; Lubricants; Morphinans; Naltrexone; Narcotic Antagonists; Opioid-Induced Constipation; Polyethylene Glycols

Many patients on chronic opioid therapy suffer from constipation, one of the most common side effect of opioids. Movantik™ (naloxegol) is an opioid antagonist that is recently introduced in the market to treat opioid-induced constipation and contains naloxegol as the active ingredient. Naloxegol is a pegylated (polyethylene glycol-modified) derivative of α-naloxol. Detection of naloxone in the patients urine after consumption of naloxegol was not reported by the manufacturer and may mislead the prescribing clinicians. This study was conducted to investigate the presence of naloxone in the urine of patients that consume movnatik in pain management clinics.. The presence of naloxone and naloxol in the urine of 45 patients that consumed naloxegol and 25 patients that consumed suboxone™ were investigated using a liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LCMS) method. The urinary concentration of naloxone, naloxol, and their glucuronide conjugates were evaluated in five volunteers that took one pill of naloxegol for one day and one volunteer who took the pill for three days.. Naloxone was detected in the urine of 45 individuals that were prescribed naloxegol. Urinary concentration of naloxone showed a distribution with a mean of 25 ± 18 ng/ml. Consumption of one pill of 25 mg naloxegol resulted in the detection of naloxol and naloxone in the urine of 5 volunteers 1 h after taking the pill. Evaluation of urine specimens from 25 patients that consumed suboxone™, resulted in the detection of naloxone (180 ± 187 ng/ml) and naloxol (6.3 ± 7.2 ng/ml).. This study demonstrated that consumption of naloxegol leads to appearance of naloxone in the urine of patients receiving opioid therapy in pain management clinics.

Topics: Adult; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morphinans; Naloxone; Pain; Polyethylene Glycols; Retrospective Studies; Substance Abuse Detection

Oncologic patients on opioid therapy due to pain may have several side effects, including respiratory depression (in about 1% of cases), pruritus (up to 10% of cases), nausea (in 25-32% of cases), sedation (in 20- 60% of cases); but the most far-reaching side effect (up to 95% of cases) that can occur is constipation. The socalled "opioid-induced constipation" (OIC) can develop at the start of opioid therapy and can last as long as continued use. The OIC is a real change in intestinal habits that occurs when opioid treatment is started; it is noted with a reduced frequency of episodes of defecation, with a development or worsening of the effort to defecation, with a feeling of incomplete emptying and a perception on the part of the patient to live in a stressful way the act of defecation. Also because of this, the OIC can induce to tolerate the dose of opioids routinely causing inadequate pain management. Continuous therapy with opioids lasting at least two weeks and resistance to the treatment of constipation with osmotic laxatives for more than three days in patients with terminal disease (Nota 90 AIFA) allow the prescription of naloxegol, a PEGylated derivative of the naloxone. Naloxegol belongs to the PAMORA family (peripheral mu-opioid receptor antagonists) which does not generally cross the blood-brain barrier and therefore does not interfere with the central nervous system-mediated analgesic efficacy. The reported clinical case tends to show how the use of the drug under examination (naloxegol) solves the problem of the OIC in a oncologic patient, improving her quality of life.

Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Cancer Pain; Constipation; Female; Humans; Middle Aged; Morphinans; Narcotic Antagonists; Polyethylene Glycols; Quality of Life

The paper describes a case report of a patient with a significant history of opioid-induced dysfunction of the sphincter of Oddi, who required morphine sulfate to manage oral mucositis pain, and who was successfully treated with concomitant oral naloxegol (Moventig: Kyowa Kirin, Galashiels, UK).

Topics: Administration, Oral; Analgesics, Opioid; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morphinans; Morphine; Mucositis; Narcotic Antagonists; Pain; Polyethylene Glycols; Spasm; Sphincter of Oddi Dysfunction; Tonsillar Neoplasms

Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Constipation; Humans; Morphinans; Patient Preference; Polyethylene Glycols; Prospective Studies

Topics: Humans; Morphinans; Naloxone; Narcotic Antagonists; Polyethylene Glycols; Substance Abuse Detection

Model-informed drug discovery and development offers the promise of more efficient clinical development, with increased productivity and reduced cost through scientific decision making and risk management. Go/no-go development decisions in the pharmaceutical industry are often driven by effect size estimates, with the goal of meeting commercially generated target profiles. Sufficient efficacy is critical for eventual success, but the decision to advance development phase is also dependent on adequate knowledge of appropriate dose and dose-response. Doses which are too high or low pose risk of clinical or commercial failure. This paper addresses this issue and continues the evolution of formal decision frameworks in drug development. Here, we consider the integration of both efficacy and dose-response estimation accuracy into the go/no-go decision process, using a model-based approach. Using prespecified target and lower reference values associated with both efficacy and dose accuracy, we build a decision framework to more completely characterize development risk. Given the limited knowledge of dose response in early development, our approach incorporates a set of dose-response models and uses model averaging. The approach and its operating characteristics are illustrated through simulation. Finally, we demonstrate the decision approach on a post hoc analysis of the phase 2 data for naloxegol (a drug approved for opioid-induced constipation).

Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Decision Making; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Development; Drug Discovery; Drug Industry; Humans; Morphinans; Narcotic Antagonists; Polyethylene Glycols

Naloxegol is a novel selective, peripherally acting μ-opioid receptor antagonist for treating opioid-induced constipation (OIC) in patients with chronic pain syndromes. We analyzed the cardiovascular (CV) safety of naloxegol based on data from its development program prior to approval by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2015.. Comprehensive CV safety analyses were performed in 4 clinical studies of naloxegol (12.5 and/or 25 mg) in patients with noncancer pain and OIC: two 12-week, double-blind, randomized studies; a 12-week, double-blind, extension study; and a 52-week, randomized, open-label study versus usual care. Evaluations of baseline CV risk were obtained from medical histories and clinical findings at the time of study initiation.. Across the 4 studies (N = 2135), 68% of patients had ≥1 CV risk factor and 41% had a history of CV disease, diabetes, or ≥2 other CV risk factors. There were no increases in blood pressure, heart rate, or the rate-pressure product with naloxegol versus placebo. The rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) per 100 patient-years of exposure were 1.13 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31-2.89) for placebo/usual care and 0.75 (95% CI, 0.24-1.75) for naloxegol. The relative risk of MACE for all doses of naloxegol versus placebo was 0.67 (95% CI, 0.14-3.36).. These data demonstrate that naloxegol has a CV safety profile comparable to placebo/usual care in patients with OIC. Although the observed number of events was low, the data show no CV signal in patients with OIC treated with naloxegol.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Analgesics, Opioid; Cardiovascular System; Chronic Pain; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Constipation; Defecation; Evidence-Based Medicine; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morphinans; Narcotic Antagonists; Polyethylene Glycols; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Receptors, Opioid, mu; Recovery of Function; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Signal Transduction; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) is a common gastrointestinal adverse effect of opioids, which can severely affect compliance and adherence to pain medication regimens and quality of life. Naloxegol has demonstrated efficacy against OIC in several studies involving patients with nonmalignant chronic pain. Here we report efficacy and tolerability of naloxegol in a 68-year-old patient with metastatic lung cancer and severe pain, treated with opioids, who presented with OIC resistant to traditional measures. Addition of naloxegol produced rapid improvement in his OIC symptoms and no apparent adverse effects while taking extended-release morphine 130 mg orally every 12 hours.

Topics: Aged; Analgesics, Opioid; Cancer Pain; Constipation; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Morphinans; Morphine; Narcotic Antagonists; Polyethylene Glycols; Quality of Life

Opioid-induced bowel dysfunction wich comprises several other gastrointestinal complaints; could be highly debilitating, thus significantly deteriorating patients' quality of life. In particular, opioid-induced constipation (OIC) is the most frequent symptom. Therefore patients with haematological malignances need special attention of these disabling symptoms, which should be prevented by a correct evaluation of diet, age, intestinal habits, history of prior bowel disorders as well as constipating effects of other concomitant medication. However the occurrence of OIC during treatment with opioids requires pharmacological interventions. If these measures are not sufficient to regulate intestinal functions, required to pharmacological interventions, can be used osmotic laxatives. New emerging approved agents such as naloxone pegylate (naloxegol) indicated for the treatment of opioid-induced constipation in adult patients who have had an inadequate response to osmotic laxatives for more than 3 days in patients on opioids for at least 2 weeks. Here we report the case of patient treated with this new molecule both to test its efficacy and to dispel any doubt about the possibility of worsening of pain control linked to the use of this new molecule.

Topics: Aged; Analgesics, Opioid; Cancer Pain; Constipation; Hematologic Neoplasms; Humans; Laxatives; Male; Morphinans; Narcotic Antagonists; Polyethylene Glycols; Quality of Life

Naloxegol is an oral peripherally acting μ-opioid receptor antagonist approved for the treatment of opioid-induced constipation. Sensitive, robust, bioanalytical methods were required to quantitate naloxegol in human biological matrices as part of the clinical development program.. Analytical plasma samples were prepared using Solid Phase Extraction (SPE) coupled with concentration. The method's linearity was established at 0.1-50 ng/ml with up to 100-fold dilution. Urine samples were analyzed directly postdilution; dialysate samples were extracted by supported liquid extraction. Sensitive liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) assays were developed and validated, and demonstrated acceptable precision, accuracy and selectivity for naloxegol in the appropriate matrices.. Methods for quantifying naloxegol in human biological matrices have been successfully validated.

Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Chromatography, Liquid; Constipation; Humans; Limit of Detection; Morphinans; Narcotic Antagonists; Polyethylene Glycols; Receptors, Opioid, mu; Solid Phase Extraction; Tandem Mass Spectrometry

Naloxegol is an opioid antagonist which has been developed for the treatment of patients with opioid induced constipation. In the nonclinical safety program naloxegol was shown to have a very benign toxicity profile. In the rat, but not the mouse, 2-year carcinogenicity study a change in tumour pattern with an increase in testicular Leydig cell tumours (LCT) was observed after dosing at high (supra-pharmacological) concentrations. To establish the basis of the increase in LCT and to assess its potential relevance to humans, studies to exclude and potentially identify mode-of-action (MoA) were performed. A genotoxic mechanism was ruled out following negative results in the Ames, mouse lymphoma, and micronucleus assays. An effect on androgen metabolism was excluded since the treatment of rats with naloxegol for 14days did not result in any induction of CYP protein levels. It was demonstrated that administration of centrally restricted opioid antagonists naloxegol or methylnaltrexone at high doses induced an increase in LH release with no clear increase in testosterone, in contrast to the centrally acting opioid antagonist naloxone, which showed marked increases in both LH and testosterone. LCT due to increased LH stimulation is common in rats but not documented in humans. Collectively, the lack of genotoxicity signal, the lack of androgen effect, the increase in LH secretion in rats, which is no considered to be relevant for LCT formation in humans, and high margins to clinical exposures, the observed increase in LCT in the rat is not expected to be clinically relevant.

Topics: Animals; Biomarkers; Blood-Brain Barrier; Capillary Permeability; Dogs; Female; Humans; Leydig Cell Tumor; Luteinizing Hormone; Male; Mice; Morphinans; Naltrexone; Narcotic Antagonists; Polyethylene Glycols; Quaternary Ammonium Compounds; Rabbits; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Risk Assessment; Species Specificity; Testicular Neoplasms; Testosterone; Time Factors; Toxicity Tests; Up-Regulation

Topics: Adult; Advance Care Planning; Aged; Antiemetics; Baclofen; Benzodiazepines; Constipation; Depressive Disorder, Major; Dyspnea; Female; Hiccup; Humans; Male; Methylphenidate; Middle Aged; Morphinans; Morphine; Nausea; Olanzapine; Palliative Medicine; Polyethylene Glycols; Prochlorperazine; Pruritus; Sertraline; Terminal Care; Walkers

Naloxegol is a peripherally acting mu-opioid receptor antagonist for opioid-induced constipation in adults with chronic noncancer pain. This drug's once-daily oral formulation can be used as monotherapy and helps to decrease the constipating effects of opioid therapy; however, it has been associated with abdominal pain.

Topics: Abdominal Pain; Adult; Analgesics, Opioid; Chronic Pain; Constipation; Female; Humans; Male; Morphinans; Narcotic Antagonists; Polyethylene Glycols; Receptors, Opioid, mu

Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) is the most common adverse effect reported in patients receiving opioids to manage pain. Initial treatment with laxatives provides inadequate response in some patients. Naloxegol is a peripherally acting µ-opioid receptor antagonist used to treat patients with inadequate response to laxative(s) (laxative inadequate responder [LIR]). A cost-effectiveness model was constructed from the UK payer perspective to compare oral naloxegol 25 mg with placebo in non-cancer LIR patients receiving opioids for chronic pain, and a scenario analysis of naloxegol 25 mg with rescue laxatives compared with placebo with rescue laxatives in the same patient population.. The model comprised a decision tree for the first 4 weeks of treatment, followed by a Markov model with a 4-week cycle length and the following states: 'OIC', 'non-OIC (on treatment)', 'non-OIC (untreated)' and 'death'. Two phase III trials with a follow-up period of 12 weeks provided data on treatment efficacy, transition probabilities, adverse event frequency and patient utility. Resource utilisation data were sourced from a UK-based burden of illness study and physician surveys. A UK National Health Service and Personal Social Service perspective was adopted; costs and health-related quality of life gains were discounted at a rate of 3.5 %. The model was run over a time horizon of 5 years, reflecting the average period of opioid use.. Naloxegol has an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £10,849 per quality-adjusted life-year gained versus placebo, and £11,179 when rescue laxatives are made available in both arms (2014 values). Model outcomes were only sensitive to variations in utility inputs. However, the probabilistic sensitivity analyses indicate that naloxegol has a 91 % probability of being cost effective at a £20,000 threshold when compared with placebo.. Naloxegol is likely a cost-effective treatment option for LIR patients with OIC. This assessment should be supported by further work on the utility of patients with OIC, including how utility varies with more granular measures of OIC.

Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Chronic Pain; Constipation; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Decision Trees; Humans; Laxatives; Markov Chains; Models, Economic; Morphinans; Narcotic Antagonists; Polyethylene Glycols; Quality of Life; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Receptors, Opioid, mu; United Kingdom

Naloxegol, a polyethylene glycol conjugated derivative of the opioid antagonist naloxone, is in clinical development for treatment of opioid-induced constipation (OIC). The aim of the study was to develop a population pharmacokinetic model describing the concentration vs. time profile of orally administered naloxegol, and determine the impact of pre-specified demographic and clinical factors and concomitant medication on population estimates of apparent clearance (CL/F) and apparent central compartment volume of distribution (Vc /F).. Analysis included 12,844 naloxegol plasma concentrations obtained from 1247 healthy subjects, patients with non-OIC and patients with OIC in 14 phase 1, 2b and 3 clinical studies. Pharmacokinetic analysis used the non-linear mixed effects modelling program. Goodness of fit plots and posterior predictive checks were conducted to confirm concordance with observed data.. The final model was a two compartment disposition model with dual absorptions, comprising one first order absorption (ka1 4.56 h(-1) ) and one more complex absorption with a transit compartment (ktr 2.78 h(-1) ). Mean (SE) parameter estimates for CL/F and Vc /F, the parameters assessed for covariate effects, were 115 (3.41) l h(-1) and 160 (27.4) l, respectively. Inter-individual variability was 48% and 51%, respectively. Phase of study, gender, race, concomitant strong or moderate CYP3A4 inhibitors, strong CYP3A4 inducers, P-glycoprotein inhibitors or inducers, naloxegol formulation, baseline creatinine clearance and baseline opioid dose had a significant effect on at least one pharmacokinetic parameter. Simulations indicated concomitant strong CYP3A4 inhibitors or inducers had relevant effects on naloxegol exposure.. Administration of strong CYP3A4 inhibitors or inducers had a clinically relevant influence on naloxegol pharmacokinetics.

Topics: Adult; Area Under Curve; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Models, Biological; Morphinans; Narcotic Antagonists; Polyethylene Glycols

Naloxegol, a peripherally acting μ-opioid receptor antagonist for the treatment of opioid-induced constipation, is a substrate for cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4/3A5 and the P-glycoprotein (P-gp) transporter. By integrating in silico, preclinical, and clinical pharmacokinetic (PK) findings, minimal and full physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models were developed to predict the drug-drug interaction (DDI) potential for naloxegol. The models reasonably predicted the observed changes in naloxegol exposure with ketoconazole (increase of 13.1-fold predicted vs. 12.9-fold observed), diltiazem (increase of 2.8-fold predicted vs. 3.4-fold observed), rifampin (reduction of 76% predicted vs. 89% observed), and quinidine (increase of 1.2-fold predicted vs. 1.4-fold observed). The moderate CYP3A4 inducer efavirenz was predicted to reduce naloxegol exposure by ∼50%, whereas weak CYP3A inhibitors were predicted to minimally affect exposure. In summary, the PBPK models reasonably estimated interactions with various CYP3A modulators and can be used to guide dosing in clinical practice when naloxegol is coadministered with such agents.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Computer Simulation; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A Inducers; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A Inhibitors; Drug Interactions; Forecasting; Humans; Models, Biological; Morphinans; Narcotic Antagonists; Polyethylene Glycols; Receptors, Opioid, mu

Naloxegol is a polyethylene glycol derivative of naloxone approved in the US as a once-daily oral treatment for opioid-induced constipation (OIC) in adults with chronic noncancer pain. Population exposure-response models were constructed based on data from two phase III studies comprising 1,331 adults with noncancer pain and OIC. In order to characterize the protocol-defined naloxegol responder rate, the number of daily spontaneous bowel movements (SBMs) was characterized by a longitudinal ordinal nonlinear mixed-effects logistic regression dose-response model, and the incidence of diary entry discontinuation was described by a time-to-event model. The mean number of SBMs per week increased with increasing naloxegol dose. The predicted placebo-adjusted responder rates (90% confidence interval) were 10.4% (4.6-13.4%) and 11.1% (4.8-14.4%) for naloxegol 12.5 and 25 mg/day, respectively. Model-predicted response to naloxegol was influenced by the baseline SBM frequency and characteristics of the opioid treatment.

Topics: Adult; Analgesics, Opioid; Chronic Pain; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Constipation; Defecation; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Medical Records; Middle Aged; Models, Statistical; Morphinans; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Narcotic Antagonists; Polyethylene Glycols; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Constipation; Humans; Morphinans; Naloxone; Naltrexone; Narcotic Antagonists; Polyethylene Glycols; Quaternary Ammonium Compounds

Numerous factors, such as changes in gastrointestinal physiology, reduced mobility, decreased liquid and nutritional intake, and certain comorbidities, predispose older adults to constipation. Use of opioid medications further compounds this problem. Unlike other side effects associated with opioid use, patients do not develop tolerance to constipation and other opioid-induced bowel dysfunctions. Although opioid-induced constipation has a prevalence rate of 80% in this population, it remains highly undertreated. Despite this problem, there have been limited therapeutic options available for older adults suffering from opioid-induced constipation. On September 16, 2014, a new oral agent, naloxegol, a peripherally acting muopioid receptor antagonist (PAMORA), approved by the Food and Drug Administration, provides new hope for patients. This paper explores clinical complications associated with opioid-induced constipation in older adults, analyzes the efficacy and safety of laxatives and PAMORAs, and defines the future role of naloxegol in this vulnerable population.

Topics: Aged; Analgesics, Opioid; Constipation; Drug Approval; Humans; Laxatives; Morphinans; Narcotic Antagonists; Polyethylene Glycols; Prevalence; Receptors, Opioid, mu; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration

Topics: Adult; Analgesics, Opioid; Chronic Pain; Constipation; Drug Approval; Humans; Morphinans; Naltrexone; Narcotic Antagonists; Polyethylene Glycols; Quaternary Ammonium Compounds; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration