monensin and 3-nitrooxypropanol

The investigative material 3-nitrooxypropanol (3-NOP) can reduce enteric methane emissions from beef cattle. North American beef cattle are often supplemented the drug monensin to improve feed digestibility. Residual and confounding effects of these additives on manure greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are unknown. This research tested whether manure carbon and nitrogen, and GHG and ammonia emissions, differed from cattle fed a typical finishing diet and 3-NOP [125-200 mg kg

Topics: Air Pollutants; Ammonia; Animal Feed; Animals; Canada; Carbon; Carbon Dioxide; Cattle; Climate; Diet; Greenhouse Gases; Manure; Methane; Monensin; Nitrogen; Nitrous Oxide; Propanols; Rain; Red Meat; Temperature

The study objective was to evaluate the combined effects of supplementing monensin (MON) and the methane (CH4) inhibitor 3-nitrooxypropanol (NOP) on enteric CH4 emissions, growth rate, and feed conversion efficiency of backgrounding and finishing beef cattle. Two hundred and forty crossbred steers were used in a 238-d feeding study and fed a backgrounding diet for the first 105 d (backgrounding phase), transition diets for 28 d, followed by a finishing diet for 105 d (finishing phase). Treatments were as follows: 1) control (no additive); 2) MON (monensin supplemented at 33 mg/kg DM; 3) NOP (3-nitrooxypropanol supplemented at 200 mg/kg DM for backgrounding or 125 mg/kg DM for finishing phase); and 4) MONOP (33 mg/kg DM MON supplemented with either 200 mg/kg DM or 125 mg/kg DM NOP). The experiment was a randomized complete block (weight: heavy and light) design with 2 (NOP) × 2 (MON) factorial arrangement of treatments using 24 pens (8 cattle/pen; 6 pens/treatment) at the main feedlot and 8 pens (6 cattle/pen; 2 pens/treatment) at the controlled environment building (CEB) feedlot. Five animals per treatment were moved to chambers for CH4 measurements during both phases. Data were analyzed using a Mixed procedure of SAS with pen as experimental unit (except CH4). Location (Main vs. CEB) had no significant effect and was thus omitted from the final model. Overall, there were few interactions between MON and NOP indicating that the effects of the 2 compounds were independent. When cattle were fed the backgrounding diet, pen DMI was decreased by 7%, whereas gain-to-feed ratio (G:F) was improved by 5% with NOP supplementation (P < 0.01). Similarly, MON improved G:F ratio by 4% (P < 0.01), but without affecting DMI. During the finishing phase, DMI tended (P = 0.06) to decrease by 5% with both MON (5%) and NOP (5%), whereas ADG tended (P = 0.08) to decrease by 3% with MON. Gain-to-feed ratio for finishing cattle was improved with NOP by 3% (P < 0.01); however, no effects were observed with MON. 3-Nitrooxypropanol decreased CH4 yield (g/kg DMI) by 42% and 37% with backgrounding and finishing diets (P ≤ 0.01), respectively, whereas MON did not lower CH4 yield. Overall, these results demonstrate efficacy of NOP in reducing enteric CH4 emissions and subsequently improving feed conversion efficiency in cattle fed high-forage and high-grain diets. Furthermore, effects of NOP did not depend on whether MON was included in the diet.

Topics: Animal Feed; Animals; Cattle; Diet; Dietary Supplements; Edible Grain; Male; Methane; Monensin; Propanols

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of 3-nitrooxypropanol (NOP), a known methane (CH) inhibitor; the ionophore monensin (MON); and their combination on in vitro CH production in a high-grain diet (85% barley grain, 10% barley silage, and 5% vitamin-mineral supplement; DM basis) using a rumen simulation technique (Rusitec). Sixteen fermentation vessels in 2 Rusitec apparatuses (blocks) were used in a completely randomized block design with 4 treatments: Control, NOP (200 µg/g DM), MON (200 µg/g DM), and the combination of 200 µg NOP/g DM and 200 µg MON/g DM (NOP + MON). Two fermenters within each apparatus were randomly assigned to a treatment. Treatments were mixed with 10 g of substrate and supplied on a daily basis. The study included an 8-d adaptation period without treatment supplementation and a 6-d period for addition of treatments. Dry matter disappearance, pH, and total VFA were not affected by treatment ( ≥ 0.34). Acetate proportion was decreased by 8.3% and 14.9% with NOP and NOP + MON ( < 0.01), respectively; however, propionate proportion was not affected by treatment ( = 0.44). The acetate to propionate ratio was lowered by 21.1% with the combination of NOP and MON ( = 0.02), whereas ammonia-N concentration was not affected by treatment ( = 0.50). Total gas production was unaffected ( = 0.50), but CH production decreased by 77.7% and 75.95% ( < 0.01) with NOP and NOP + MON addition, respectively. Concurrently, H gas production increased by 131.3% and 185.6% ( = 0.01) with NOP and NOP + MON treatments, respectively. The copy number of methanogens was decreased in both solid and liquid phases ( < 0.01) with NOP and NOP + MON treatments. Despite the combination of NOP + MON showing the greatest decrease in acetate molar proportion and acetate to propionate ratio, it did not further inhibit CH beyond the effect of NOP alone. The decrease in CH emissions with treatments that included NOP occurred along with a decrease in the copy number of methanogens associated with the solid and liquid phases, confirming the inhibitory effects of NOP on these microorganisms. In conclusion, the combined effects of NOP and MON on CH mitigation did not exceed the effect of NOP alone when using a high-grain diet in vitro.

Topics: Ammonia; Animals; Bioreactors; Cattle; Diet; Edible Grain; Fermentation; Hordeum; Methane; Monensin; Propanols; Propionates; Random Allocation; Rumen; Silage