mobiflex and dexketoprofen-trometamol

Acute musculoskeletal injuries are one of the most common painful presentation when admission to the emergency department. The aim of the study is to compare the tenoxicam mesotherapy with intravenous dexketoprofen in pain control in patients with acute musculoskeletal injury.. This parallel randomized controlled trial was conducted with the patients admitted to the emergency department with musculoskeletal injury. Intravenous dexketoprofen was administered to the control group, and mesotherapy treatment was performed to the other group. Differences between 10th, 30th, 60th and 120th minutes VAS scores and on the admission VAS score, clinically meaningful change in pain intensity, and adverse effect of the procedures were compared among groups.. The differences in VAS scores and the presence of clinically meaningful change in pain intensity were statistically significantly higher in mesotherapy group than the systemic therapy group in all time periods. During one-week follow-up period, there was no reported adverse effect neither in mesotherapy group nor in the systemic therapy group.. The mesotherapy treatment may be superior than the systemic therapy for pain relief in musculoskeletal injury in short term follow-up in emergency department settings.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Emergency Service, Hospital; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Injections, Intravenous; Ketoprofen; Male; Mesotherapy; Middle Aged; Musculoskeletal Pain; Piroxicam; Prospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Tromethamine; Young Adult

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of 3 nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs-intravenous tenoxicam, lornoxicam, and dexketoprofen trometamol-for the treatment of patients with renal colic.. We conducted a prospective double-blind randomized trial of consecutive adult patients who presented to the emergency department with a chief complaint of acute flank pain and had a clinical diagnosis of suspected acute renal colic. Patients were randomly allocated to receive an intravenous bolus of tenoxicam, lornoxicam, or dexketoprofen trometamol in a blinded fashion. Primary outcome measure of the study was visual analog scale (VAS) score difference at 30 minutes. Secondary outcome measures were VAS scores at 5, 15, and 120 minutes as well as rescue analgesic need at 30 minutes and adverse events during the follow-up period.. A total of 445 patients were screened, and 123 patients were enrolled in the study. The mean age was 36 ± 10 years. The mean reduction in VAS pain scores at 30 minutes was 42 ± 26 mm for tenoxicam, 57 ± 23 mm for lornoxicam, and 52 ± 25 mm for dexketoprofen (P = .047). Lornoxicam demonstrated the fastest rate of VAS score reduction over the first 30 minutes. The mean reduction values in VAS pain scores at 5, 15, and 120 minutes were similar among the 3 groups. Rescue analgesics at 30 minutes were required by 16 patients (39%) receiving tenoxicam, 10 patients (24%) receiving lornoxicam, and 8 patients (19%) receiving dexketoprofen (P = .121). No serious adverse events were observed.. Intravenous tenoxicam, lornoxicam, and dexketoprofen are all effective in the treatment of renal colic, although lornoxicam appears to reduce VAS pain scores with the fastest rate in this comparison.

Topics: Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Double-Blind Method; Emergency Service, Hospital; Humans; Injections, Intravenous; Ketoprofen; Male; Pain Management; Pain Measurement; Piroxicam; Prospective Studies; Renal Colic; Treatment Outcome; Tromethamine